@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

I think it's undeniable at this point that the creation of Lightning Address has made the usage of custodial Lightning solutions increase -- or at least be more prominent. We see these stats everywhere of how many of Nostr Lightning Addresses are custodial, and how services like Nodeless and Geyser only work if you give them a Lightning Address, and that probably sounds like a lament to many people who thought Lightning would be this amazing network of self-hosted nodes that everybody runs, and is indeed sad.

Well, on the other hand the Lightning Address flow is clearly an improvement -- to most people -- over the cumbersome invoice flow. Since the early days of Lightning people had been complaining about the fact that there is no way to "just send money to an address". Even though I personally liked the invoice flow much more (especially if they had structured, signatures, clear descriptions and amounts, payment proofs and so on) the fact is that most people didn't and slowly invoices were losing their meaning entirely anyway.

This improvement in the payment flow, along with the open, easy and interoperable way that Lightning Addresses work, has opened space for new use cases that maybe wouldn't have existed otherwise -- like the services mentioned above, and others. So we can't really say this was all a bad thing.

We also shouldn't say it was a bad thing to have Lightning Addresses being invented at all, because if they hadn't been invented like they were, there is a high probably they would have been invented in other forms, probably much worse, that would involve private deals and proprietary integrations with ad-hoc APIs, SDKs and JavaScript widget buttons with iframes. I even remember some of these things starting to happen at the time Lightning Address was created, and we have more evidence of these things even after Lightning Address, like some "partnerships" here and there and the "UMA" protocol. So maybe Lightning Address was just the best possible protocol at the best time, and all its problems are not really its problems, but symptons of the problems of the Lightning Network (or maybe you wouldn't call these "problems", just natural properties, but doesn't matter).

The saddest realization of all this process, for me, was that Lightning payments are mostly used for tipping and not for commerce as I thought they would in the beginning (hence my love for the invoice flow). Specifically, LNURL-pay and its cool hidden features that went mostly unsupported, were all designed with the goal of enabling new use cases for commerce in the real life, outside the web, and Lightning Addresses would have tied nicely into that vision too -- but that was all definitely an irredeemable failure.

I thought I had more things to say about this, but either I didn't or I forgot. The end.

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

Chapter 1 - The Looming Threat

Deep within a remote, heavily guarded scientific facility in the Ural Mountains of Russia, Vadim Petrov hunched over the glowing screen of his computer, rubbing his bloodshot eyes. He barely noticed the cold bite of the stale bunker air or the crumpled energy drink cans littering his workspace. All his focus was directed toward the lines of code marching down the monitor, his life's work laid bare before him in beautiful minimalist logic.

With a final keystroke, Vadim compiled the program. A hint of a smile tugged at his cracked lips. It was done - his quantum computing masterpiece was ready. Soon, very soon, he would put it to use, cracking open the virtual vaults of Bitcoin once and for all.

Vadim leaned back, his chair creaking, as he reflected on the long road leading to this moment. He had dedicated over a decade of brilliance and obsession to reach this point. As a young PhD student at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology in the late 2010s, Vadim excelled in quantum research, blazing ahead of his peers. The emerging field held incredible promise to revolutionize computing, smashing through limitations faced by even the most powerful supercomputers of the era. Quantum's exponential scale held the potential to reshape medicine, cryptography, energy, space exploration - the very structure of knowledge itself.

When he first heard of Bitcoin, the mysterious digital currency created by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, Vadim instantly saw how quantum power could be its undoing - or its savior. This so-called "digital gold" seemed foolish to him at first, bits pretending to be as valuable as precious metal and national currencies. But as Bitcoin grew, finding an enthusiastic niche among techno-libertarians and cyberpunks seeking an alternative economy, Vadim paid ever more notice.

In 2013, still early days for Bitcoin, the price crossed $1000 briefly before crashing back down. But four years later, the cryptocurrency exploded into mainstream consciousness by reaching parabolic heights of nearly $20,000. Soon even governments were debating regulation and financial elites argued whether Bitcoin could revolutionize - or destroy - the monetary order.

As a central player in quantum research, Vadim understood before most that this rising cryptocurrency built on cryptography was ultimately vulnerable. Quantum computers' exponential power could easily crack the public-private key encryption which secured Bitcoin wallets and transactions. At a stroke, quantum supremacy over classical silicon computing meant game over for Bitcoin's security paradigm.

But observing Bitcoin's ascent, Vadim felt not warning, but jealous loathing. That such a presumptuous invention dared accrue billions in supposed value offended his sense of the natural order. "Who are these cowboy coders challenging state authorities by creating magic internet money from thin air?" he lamented. The veneer of technological genius concealing base greed and anarchism disgusted him.

He vividly remembered the day years back when an American investor tried convincing Vadim, already an elite researcher, to work on Bitcoin security applications for quantum tech. Vadim refused brusquely, judging the field as unserious pop science.

"You will look foolish when governments shut this down and prosecute these scam artists," Vadim insisted. The American just laughed and made a fortune when Bitcoin's price kept rising. That gloating smile haunted Vadim, even as Bitcoin became too influential to simply ban outright.

His disgust slowly gave way to an ambitious vision. When quantum supremacy definitively arrived, he would be ready. He would craft the world's most powerful quantum computing instrument specifically to destroy Bitcoin's security. Not to extort ransoms, but to prove a point - that this inflated bubble of algorithmic make-believe money was hopelessly fragile against raw hyper-accelerated calculation power.

To Vadim, Bitcoin represented not promise, but hubris. By exposing it as mathematically flawed at its core, he could reveal the hypocrisy and weakness of its pseudo-populist rhetoric. The world would thank him for liberating it from this viral delusion that threatened real economic stability. Utter secrecy was essential as over years Vadim assembled a team of elite researchers and siphoned funding into his covert Bitcoin breaking project. Russia's security apparatus gave tacit support in hopes of gaining future quantum advantage over Western rivals. But only Vadim's innermost circle knew his full vision of bathing Bitcoin's precious blockchain in the firepower of quantum-enabled cryptanalysis - watching it burn brightly and then fade to ash.

Vadim called his creation the Venus Prototype, after the Morning Star that heralds the sun's arrival. And like that celestial body, his machine would break the endless digital night of Bitcoin's golden age, exposing it as a false idol. No longer would its porous cryptography conceal inflated speculation from deserved ruin. By quantum might, he would cast light on Bitcoin's weaknesses, melting its shiny veneer to reveal the clay feet of a false god. And now Venus was alive, humming with otherworldly might in its cradle beneath the mountains. As Vadim initiated the startup sequence, the bunker vibrated with thrumming power. Lights flickered in awe of this digital beast's birth. Vadim watched transfixed as raw calculation potential that could model whole universes now came under his command. An almost religious ecstasy seized him, sensing destiny at hand. The hour had come at last to implement his vision. All that remained was choosing the perfect moment to strike...

Meanwhile across the world, sunny California seemed a different universe from Vadim's subterranean lab. In a nondescript San Francisco office, a group of developers were hard at work on Bitcoin software. Eric Hughes, grey-bearded veteran of the cypherpunk movement of activists who pioneered cryptography and online privacy, led the Bitcoin Core team in maintaining the protocol's code.

After over a decade of meteoric growth, disruptive potential, and no shortage of controversy, Bitcoin was now worth trillions and shaking the foundations of the financial system. But from their humble workspace, the task at hand for Eric and his Brilliant but overworked colleagues was just keeping the network running smoothly. He often repeated the mantra “First, do no harm” when considering potential code changes, reflecting the enormous responsibility of these stewards to an open-source project that had taken on a life of its own. With so many vested interests, keeping stakeholders aligned was as much politics as programming.

While reviewing some proposed efficiency improvements, Eric came across a strange message on the project's public developer forum, posted anonymously:

"Beware the coming storm, when the quantum tempest shall rage. What is built strong today will soon lie broken tomorrow, unless the wise prepare in time..."

Puzzled, Eric read the cryptic warning again. Was it some clueless amateur speculating, or something more? The reference to quantum hinted at specialized knowledge. Gathering a few lead developers, Eric asked them if they knew anything about the message. They all shrugged, as perplexed as him.

Still, Eric felt a nameless unease. The specter of quantum computing loomed over every cryptographer's thoughts, though the capability remained confined to laboratories for the foreseeable future. But if someone had made a significant, secret breakthrough, Bitcoin's current encryption would become obsolete overnight. Usually cautious voices in the developer forums were already arguing quantum resistance should be built into the protocol.

"This reeks of foolish alarmism to me," said Zhao, a skeptical cryptographer trained in China. "Our Shanghai lab would know if anyone had achieved meaningful quantum advantage. This is petty fearmongering." "Perhaps," said Eric slowly. "Or perhaps it's a friendly warning. In any case, accelerating our quantum-resistant cryptography initiatives seems wise. The very least we should do some threat modeling around a hypothetical quantum attack vector. Things may look very different sooner than we think..."

A tense silence settled around the room. Bitcoin's rise had sparked no shortage of doomsday predictions, but some threats had more weight than others. Primal fear of the unknown gripped them as developers entrusted with securing a multi-trillion dollar network.

Finally Eric spoke again, resolve steeling his voice: "Let's get to work. We'll redouble our efforts on quantum-proofing. Whoever this anonymous watchdog is, they're right about one thing - we must do all we can to prepare while there's time. And if the storm does come howling at our door, threatening to blow down Bitcoin's fortress of cryptography..." He tightened his fist as if grasping an imaginary sword. "We'll be ready to weather it."

The battle was not yet joined, but the first ripples hinted at gathering forces. As Vadim prepared to unleash his weapon and Eric girded for defense, the epochal quantum clash over Bitcoin's future was set in motion. Two worlds racing toward collision at the crossroads of cryptography and quantum physics. The storm could no longer be stopped. It could only be survived - if the wise prepared in time...

@ 90c24d6b:def5ce98

Yesterday I heard some big influencer talking about how Joe Rogan dominates his market.

"He is the Niche."

(Now that I think of it, it was Alex Hormozi who was saying this)

Most marketing advice about niche-ing (such a funny word), says to stay focused.

Narrow in on 1 hot button issue a particular (preferable cash-rich) group will pay for, and never stray away from your niche.

If you're a dating coach? Hoe-math only, bruh.

Business consultant? No sports talk, pal.

Crypto enthusiast? Keep things on-chain, amigo.

Of course, most people who put forth this advice are wrong.

And it's so blatantly obvious at the top of the internet...

The people who bow to algorithms are the plebs at the bottom... fighting over dead meat.

The reality is: Individuals rule the world, not niches.

For some, (like myself) the first lesson that needed learning is:

"I have value. With all my quirks, eccentricities and strange bits. This is especially true of the parts I thought were stupid, nonsensical, or impractical. "

For a long time, I could only "see" my value in direct relation to things that make money.

So I wouldn't talk about my love of Battlestar Galactica, Game of Thrones, storytelling and other things I like.

I don't think I'm alone in this.

In fact, 'staying niche' might be the most common form of cowardice.

That’s not to say you’re a coward if you niche, it’s a personal choice.

What I mean to say is:

Authenticity has always been... and always will be... a luxury few can afford.

But to me, it's a price worth paying...

-Gerald

@ b9b99d7e:ff6c2fed

I hope you like small weddings One with a little over 50 seats And an altar overlooking the sea Would you like a vintage-themed wedding?

A vintage-themed wedding at sunset, beautiful orange rays Who says we can't wear costumes to a wedding!? Dump the regular white gown and black suit Let us serve fruits and vegetables Who wants pasta bolognese anyway?

Let us jump the broom Sweep away the past and start the journey into the future Let us taste the elements because come rain, come sunshine It would be you and I against everything else

I have got "something old, something new Something borrowed, something blue" Let us make every moment a little bit more dramatic than necessary I DO, Baby.

@ b9b99d7e:ff6c2fed

I am the kind of woman who likes to be independent I like to hold my own and solve my problems Carry my own weight and not be a burden

But you came along and everything changed I wanted you to carry me even if I could walk I wanted you walking with me even if I was not so terrified I just wanted you in my space

Now, it is time to let go It feels like a piece of me is drowning And my heart is slowly becoming silent It feels like my heart is being scooped out one scoop at a time It hurts so much and I wonder if you are hurting too...

@ de496884:72617b81

Hola nostriches. Hoy quiero hacer una publicación a modo de acercamiento al surgimiento de las categorías de género y feminismo. Así que si te interesa el tema haz un esfuerzo, quédate y lee hasta el final.

El «nuevo» feminismo surge en los años 60 en aquellos países desarrollados que acordaron el reconocimiento a los derechos humanos contenidos en la declaración respectiva de la ONU. Entonces, como extensión a dicho reconocimiento es que se gesta el movimiento feminista. A partir de entonces, se vuelve a plantear la relación entre naturaleza y cultura y se llega a la conclusión de que las diferencias sociales van más allá de las diferencias biológicas, lo cual tiene que ver con que hasta la satisfacción de las necesidades elementales como son la alimentación, la vivienda o el vestuario, están condicionadas por construcciones sociales.

Pues resulta que una de las primeras propuestas identificó la subordinación femenina producto de una organización patriarcal, tomando la categoría patriarcado de Max Weber. Es así como la visión de patriarcado se extendió al discurso político y académico. Sin embargo, no existía información acerca del desarrollo histórico de dicha categoría, sistematización, variaciones, etc., debido a que era algo que recién se percibía en sociedad.

Sin embargo, la misma categoría de patriarcado junto a la de relaciones de poder para explicar fenómenos sociales contemporáneos, constituye uno de los principales aportes del feminismo. Es así como han logrado primero visibilizar y luego deconstruir y desmontar una serie de patrones existentes en la cultura que hacían a la mujer subordinarse al hombre, y que estaban presentes en el sistema sexo/género.

Imagen relativa a la lucha contra el patriarcado

Hasta ese momento, en las investigaciones de corte sociológico se podía observar un androcentrismo excesivo al dar cuenta de que el discurso científico giraba en torno al hombre como sujeto y objeto de la investigación. Incluso para muchos positivistas como el mismo Weber, los problemas relativos a las mujeres quedaban en un segundo plano y eran achacados a una supuesta pasividad en el ámbito doméstico-familiar. Dicha pasividad partía de la supuesta inferioridad biológica del género femenino.

El patriarcado entonces era una categoría vacía en sí misma, sin valor explicativo. Desde el punto de vista político pudo ser útil para la movilización pero no resistió la polémica de los críticos del feminismo ni problematizó los conflictos a ser resueltos. Pero por otro lado, un grupo de mujeres -académicas principalmente- se puso manos a la obra en una tarea más pequeña pero con mayores resultados a la larga. Se propusieron generar conocimientos sobre las condiciones de vida de la mujer, buscar en el pasado y el presente los aportes de las mujeres a la sociedad, hacerlas visibles en la historia. Es así como surgen centros académicos, ONG, proyectos, centros de estudios sobre la mujer, etc.

Convendría distinguir entonces dos posturas que acompañaron a la investigación sobre las mujeres: uno que toma como objeto de estudio a la mujer; condiciones de vida, trabajo, cultura, y otra que privilegia a la sociedad como generadora de la subordinación de las mujeres. Mientras la primera perspectiva generaba conocimiento sobre las mujeres en el estudio de las relaciones mujer-hombre y mujer-mujer, la segunda tenía una visión más holística ya que planteaba que hay que estudiar la sociedad ya que la subordinación de las mujeres es producto de la organización de esta, y que no se avanzará solamente estudiando a las mujeres, pues el estudio debe ser más amplio y en diferentes niveles, ámbitos y tiempos.

Es en esta búsqueda donde nace y se desarrolla el concepto de género como categoría social. Es así que los sistemas de género/sexo fueron entendidos como conjuntos de prácticas, símbolos, representaciones, normas y valores sociales que las sociedades construyen a partir de la diferencia anatomofisiológica y que dotan de sentido a los impulsos sexuales, la reproducción y en general a las relaciones de las personas. Por tanto, este sistema pasó a ser el objeto de estudio para comprender la subordinación de la mujer al hombre. Al ser el reconocimiento de una dimensión de la desigualdad social hasta entonces desconocida, se considera la ruptura epistemológica más importante de la segunda mitad del siglo pasado.

Imagen representativa del binarismo de género

Hay que decir que los fenómenos sociales se definen por la relación que guardan entre sí. Es así que la contextualización adquiere gran importancia. Varones y hembras tenemos la capacidad de producir con el cuerpo, pero solo los cuerpos de las hembras pueden gestar y por tanto asegurar la especie humana. Todo grupo humano que pretenda sobrevivir debe asegurarse cierto número de hembras que lo hagan posible. De ahí un poder particular del cuerpo de las hembras que además es económicamente útil. Dicho poder no es en tanto entidad biológica, sino que es la sociedad la que le otorga este poder. En este punto es importante preguntarnos históricamente ¿quiénes han controlado la capacidad reproductiva de las mujeres?, ¿quiénes han tenido la preferencia en el acceso sexual? Para asegurar un control efectivo sobre la reproducción es necesario asegurar el acceso a la sexualidad.

Imagen alegórica al embarazo

Ello también lleva a dirigir el trabajo que hacen porque de lo contrario, las mujeres pudieran tener espacio para representar una amenaza al dominio de los hombres. Es importante atender a las etapas del desarrollo de las mujeres, que permitirá ver cómo se moldean para aceptar la desigualdad y las jerarquías según el género en las distintas sociedades y culturas.

Otro contexto a delimitar es el ámbito doméstico donde históricamente ha estado ubicada la subordinación femenina. Se ha puesto al descubierto que en mujeres que comparten la misma posición de clase y raza, la condición femenina se redefine a lo largo de la vida y que algunas mujeres gozan de poder sobre otras aún en contextos de alta dominación masculina, donde se les inviste de autoridad, creando el sistema zonas de incertidumbre que las divide como género e impide alianzas y se legitima la dominación. Foucault decía que «el poder se ejerce, no se posee», siempre está en peligro de perderse y no basta con normas, leyes, amenazas o castigos. De ahí que los espacios de subordinación sean también espacios de poder de las mujeres. Es en estos espacios donde aparece la inseguridad, la tensión, la confrontación y por ejemplo, las mujeres pueden reclamar la anticoncepción.

Para terminar, es importante tener en cuenta que el género es una forma de desigualdad social que siempre está articulado con otras formas de desigualdad ya sea clase, raza, grupo etario, etc. Hay que pensar la dominación masculina con un comienzo vago en el tiempo, pero que permite desligar la subordinación de las mujeres de la evolución «natural» de la humanidad y entenderla como un proceso histórico. En ese sentido es necesario destacar que, respecto a la raza, en sociedades plurales hay que atender al contexto étnico-cultural ya que en dependencia de las relaciones entre personas de razas distintas, estarán condicionadas las relaciones entre los géneros.

Imagen de mujeres de distintas razas

Por otro lado, si bien es sabido que históricamente el sistema de género social imperante ha contribuido a invisibilizar a la mujer, asociar necesariamente dicha categoría únicamente a ella, lo que hace es nuevamente recrear el absolutismo histórico que tanto daño ha hecho, ahora como lo antagónico al hombre. En la construcción social participan todos los individuos presentes en el sistema género.

Hasta aquí la publicación de hoy, de la cual aun se puede ahondar mucho más, sobre todo en lo referido al origen de la dominación o de la jerarquización del binomio «hombre/mujer» desde un punto de vista antropológico, pero eso quedará pendiente para otro momento. ¡Así que hasta la próxima!, ¡nos vemos en Nostr!

........................................

English version

Hello nostriches. Today I want to make a post by way of an approach to the emergence of the categories of gender and feminism. So if you are interested in the topic make an effort, stay and read to the end.

The "new" feminism emerged in the 60's in those developed countries that agreed to recognize the human rights contained in the respective UN declaration. Then, as an extension of that recognition, the feminist movement was born. From then on, the relationship between nature and culture was raised again and the conclusion was reached that social differences go beyond biological differences, which has to do with the fact that even the satisfaction of elementary needs such as food, housing or clothing are conditioned by social constructions.

It turns out that one of the first proposals identified female subordination as a product of a patriarchal organization, taking Max Weber's category of patriarchy. This is how the vision of patriarchy was extended to political and academic discourse. However, there was no information about the historical development of this category, systematization, variations, etc., because it was something that was only recently perceived in society.

However, the same category of patriarchy, together with that of power relations to explain contemporary social phenomena, constitutes one of the main contributions of feminism. This is how they have first made visible and then deconstructed and dismantled a series of existing patterns in the culture that made women subordinate to men, and that were present in the sex/gender system.

Image relating to the fight against patriarchy

Up to that time, in sociological research, an excessive androcentrism could be observed as scientific discourse revolved around men as the subject and object of research. Even for many positivists such as Weber himself, the problems related to women remained in the background and were blamed on a supposed passivity in the domestic-family sphere. This passivity was based on the supposed biological inferiority of the female gender.

Patriarchy was then an empty category in itself, with no explanatory value. From the political point of view, it could be useful for mobilization, but it did not resist the polemic of feminism's critics, nor did it problematize the conflicts to be resolved. But on the other hand, a group of women - mainly academics - set to work on a smaller task but with greater results in the long run. They set out to generate knowledge about women's living conditions, to search in the past and present for women's contributions to society, to make them visible in history. This is how academic centers, NGOs, projects, women's studies centers, etc., came into being.

It would be convenient to distinguish then two postures that accompanied the research on women: one that takes women as the object of study; living conditions, work, culture, and the other that privileges society as the generator of women's subordination. While the first perspective generated knowledge about women in the study of woman-man and woman-woman relations, the second had a more holistic vision, since it proposed that society must be studied, since the subordination of women is a product of its organization, and that progress will not be made only by studying women, since the study must be broader and at different levels, spheres and times.

It is in this search that the concept of gender as a social category was born and developed. Thus, gender/sex systems were understood as a set of practices, symbols, representations, norms and social values that societies construct on the basis of anatomophysiological differences and that give meaning to sexual impulses, reproduction and, in general, to people's relationships. Therefore, this system became the object of study to understand the subordination of women to men. As the recognition of a hitherto unknown dimension of social inequality, it is considered the most important epistemological breakthrough of the second half of the last century.

Representative image of gender binarism

It must be said that social phenomena are defined by their relationship with each other. Thus, contextualization acquires great importance. Males and females have the capacity to produce with their bodies, but only the bodies of females can gestate and therefore ensure the human species. Any human group that intends to survive must ensure a certain number of females to make it possible. Hence a particular power of the female body, which is also economically useful. This power is not as a biological entity, but it is society that gives it this power. At this point it is important to ask ourselves historically, who has controlled the reproductive capacity of women, who has had the preference in sexual access? To ensure effective control over reproduction, it is necessary to ensure access to sexuality.

Allegorical image of pregnancy

This also leads to directing the work they do because otherwise, women may have room to pose a threat to men's dominance. It is important to pay attention to the stages of women's development, which will allow us to see how they are shaped to accept inequality and gender hierarchies in different societies and cultures.

Another context to delimit is the domestic sphere where female subordination has historically been located. It has been discovered that in women who share the same class and race position, the feminine condition is redefined throughout life and that some women enjoy power over others even in contexts of high male domination, where they are invested with authority, creating the system of uncertainty zones that divide them as a gender and prevent alliances and legitimize domination. Foucault said that "power is exercised, not possessed", it is always in danger of being lost and norms, laws, threats or punishments are not enough. Hence, the spaces of subordination are also spaces of women's power. It is in these spaces where insecurity, tension, confrontation appear and where, for example, women can demand contraception.

To conclude, it is important to keep in mind that gender is a form of social inequality that is always articulated with other forms of inequality, be it class, race, age group, etc. It is necessary to think of male domination with a vague beginning in time, but which allows us to separate the subordination of women from the "natural" evolution of humanity and to understand it as a historical process. In this sense, it is necessary to emphasize that, with respect to race, in plural societies it is necessary to pay attention to the ethno-cultural context since, depending on the relations between people of different races, the relations between genders will be conditioned.

Image of women of different races

On the other hand, although it is known that historically the prevailing social gender system has contributed to make women invisible, to necessarily associate this category only to women is to recreate the historical absolutism that has done so much damage, this time as antagonistic to men. All individuals present in the gender system participate in the social construction.

So much for today's publication, of which we can still go much deeper, especially with regard to the origin of domination or the hierarchization of the binomial "man/woman" from an anthropological point of view, but that will be left for another time. So until next time, see you in Nostr!

Créditos | Credits

Bibliografía consultada | Consulted bibliography:

1. Barbieri, T. (1993). Sobre la categoría género. Una introducción teórico-metodológica. Debates en Sociología. (18). 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.199301.006

2. Echevarría, D. (2020). Desigualdades de género e interseccionalidad. Análisis del contexto cubano 2008-2018. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (Programa-Cuba). https://www.clacso.org.ar/libreria-latinoamericana-cm/libro_detalle_resultado.php?id_libro=2346&campo=cm&texto=248

Traducción | Translation:

DeepL

@ 07efc7ee:9370d3ac

..Hello...

@ 1ecfa9e9:17a177d8

第一大题的关系个捶捶腿出人才太多太多他

@ e97aaffa:2ebd765d

Javier Milei ganhou as eleições na Argentina, um anarcocapitalista.

A vitória do Milei é a representação do desespero de um povo, farto de décadas de socialismo, próximo do comunismo. O Milei representa o oposto de um político, fala o que pensa, sem medir as consequências das suas palavras. 

Em campanha eleitoral, faltou mal do Papa e do Maradona, dois “símbolos” nacionais. Para piorar, elogiou Margaret Thatcher, que é um “inimigo” nacional, devido à guerra das Malvinas. Tinha tudo para dar errado mas não, ganhou, incrível.

Apesar de eu gostar de algumas ideias dele, como a liberdade de circulação de moeda, a redução do estado e combate à corrupção. O grande problema é que ele não tem uma maioria no congresso, as suas ideias serão difíceis de serem implementadas, correndo o risco de ficar tudo bloqueado.

O Milei é meio louco, parece não ter um perfil dialogante, que será essencial para fazer as reformas, num governo sem maioria.

Ele é um grande economista, um tecnocrata, mas na política por vezes tem que existir um equilíbrio entre a teoria econômica e a realidade no terreno. Por trás dos números estão pessoas, assim as reformas têm de ser graduais, senão provocará demasiados danos colaterais. Esses danos colaterais são pessoas.

Em economia ele pode ser bom, mas em diplomacia internacional deve ser péssimo

Milei vai necessitar do apoio da Patrícia Bullrich, talvez ela dê um equilíbrio ao governo, é necessário uma revolução mas esta deve ser gradual.

Ainda existe um outro problema, se correr mal, a decepção vai ser muito grande, na próxima eleição, possivelmente a Argentina vai “virar” mais para a esquerda, mais que o atual presidente em exercício.

Estou com mau feeling, tenho receio que isto corra mal para a Argentina, espero mesmo estar errado. Espero que esta esperança de liberdade não se transforme numa decepção.

¡Viva la Libertad, carajo!

@ c07dc7cc:552d19a4

On March 29, 2022, all of Nigeria was utterly disappointed with the scoreline between Nigeria and Ghana which meant that Nigeria was going to miss the 2022 World Cup tournament at Qatar. While the pains of missing on that world still hunt most football enthusiasts in the country, the Super Eagles where off to another disappointing start to the 2026 World Cup qualifier. On Thursday, November, 16, 2023, the Super Eagles had to come from behind to settle on a 1-1 draw at home to Lesotho. The same thing happened on Sunday, November, 19, 2023 at the Huye Stadium, Rwanda, when they played Zimbabwe.

The results meant that Nigeria is second on the log to South Africa who had won their first game against Benin republic and has a game at hand. A back-to-back draw against Lesotho and Zimbabwe in the 2026 World Cup qualifier suggests that Nigeria has faced some challenges in securing victories in these particular matches. Although, drawing two matches is not necessarily an indication of a World Cup miss but they will need to win all their upcoming matches to be guaranteed a spot at the biggest footballing event in the world.

Spectators have been critical of the coach, Jose Peseiro who was appointed on the heels of the sack of Gernot Rohr, on whose hands, the Super Eagles lost the spot to the Black Stars of Ghana. Nigeria has some of the most in-form attackers in world football right now but this has not resulted in anything meaningful for the nation’s team. Will the head coach turn around the fortunes of the nation’s team or will Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) show the Portuguese the way out remains to be seen even as reports suggest that the head coach is among candidates jostling for the vacant position at Zamalek SC, an Egyptian club.

Another person that has received the heat of criticism is the man between the sticks for the super eagle, Francis Ozoho. Ozoho has received the support of the head coach but he has not been able to establish himself in the hearts of the fans. The Africans Cup of Nations will kickstart in January 2024. With this performance, are the super eagles ready for the tournament even? These and many more are questions in the minds of football enthusiasts and the days ahead could be defining for the three-time African champions.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• The Accidental Revelation

• Who is James Zhong?

• The IRS and the Silk Road Hack

• The Trap is Set

• Zhong's Bitcoin Legacy

• The Final Blow

• Conclusion

• FAQ

In the vast realm of cryptocurrency, where anonymity is often celebrated, one hacker's oversight led to a dramatic downfall. The Silk Road saga, already infamous for its dark web dealings, took another twist when a hacker inadvertently showcased a fortune in Bitcoin to federal investigators. This tale of James Zhong, the Silk Road hacker, is a testament to the unpredictable turns of the digital age and the consequences of a single lapse in judgment.

The Accidental Revelation

In a scene that could be straight out of a suspense thriller, police body cam footage captured a moment that would seal the fate of the Silk Road hacker. Oblivious to the watchful eyes of federal investigators, he casually opened his laptop, revealing thousands of Bitcoin. This act, simple in its execution but profound in its implications, became the linchpin of his self-incrimination.

Who is James Zhong?

James Zhong, now synonymous with one of the most significant heists in cryptocurrency history, was indicted by the US government for siphoning off over 50,000 BTC from the Silk Road in 2012. His story took an ironic twist in 2019 when, following a break-in at his home, he reached out to the police. Amidst the chaos of the break-in, Zhong, perhaps in a moment of misplaced trust, mentioned his Bitcoin investments over the phone, inadvertently casting a spotlight on himself in the eyes of keen investigators.

The IRS and the Silk Road Hack

The IRS, with its dedicated Criminal Investigation unit, was simultaneously delving deep into the mysteries of the 2013 Silk Road hack. Their meticulous examination of the on-chain paper trail was like piecing together a digital jigsaw puzzle. Their breakthrough came when an investigator from Chainalysis identified an address linked to the Silk Road hacker. This address had mistakenly undergone a KYC procedure with a cryptocurrency exchange, a slip that laid bare Zhong’s identity and residence, mere months after his distress call.

The Trap is Set

In a collaborative effort with Shaun MaGruder, the brain behind the cyber intelligence firm BlockTrace, the IRS hatched a plan. They decided to approach Zhong at his home, feigning interest in the break-in he had reported. Once inside, Zhong, perhaps driven by pride or overconfidence, declared his status as a "Bitcoin OG". He boasted of possessing 1,500 BTC on just one laptop and, in a move that would prove costly, displayed this treasure to the investigators. MaGruder, reflecting on the gravity of the moment, remarked, “It was astonishing. He had $60 or $70 million worth of Bitcoins right beside us, just like that.”

Zhong's Bitcoin Legacy

Zhong wasn't merely a Bitcoin enthusiast; he was a luminary in the early days of Bitcoin's evolution. As one of the pioneering contributors, he was deeply involved in its development, often sharing his expertise on online forums. His suggestions and insights were not just casual comments; they were instrumental in shaping the trajectory of the Bitcoin protocol.

The Final Blow

The investigators, maintaining their façade of being Zhong's allies, made a return visit the next day. This time, their intentions were clear. Armed with a search warrant and aided by a dog trained to sniff out computer hardware, they unearthed wallets linked to the 50,000 BTC. Ingeniously hidden in a safe encased in concrete beneath Zhong’s basement, this treasure, once valued at over $3 billion, became the final nail in his proverbial coffin. For his indiscretions related to the Silk Road hack, Zhong was handed a prison sentence of one year and one day.

Conclusion

The tale of James Zhong serves as a stark reminder of the fine line between genius and oversight in the digital world. While his contributions to Bitcoin's development cannot be overlooked, his inadvertent revelations led to his undoing. In a world where digital footprints are as real as physical ones, the story underscores the importance of discretion and the unpredictable nature of the crypto realm.

FAQs

Who is James Zhong? James Zhong is the hacker associated with stealing over 50,000 BTC from the Silk Road in 2012.

How was Zhong caught? Zhong inadvertently revealed his Bitcoin holdings to federal investigators, leading to his arrest.

What was the Silk Road? The Silk Road was an infamous online black market, primarily known for illegal trade.

How much was the stolen Bitcoin worth? The stolen Bitcoin, at its peak, was valued at over $3 billion.

What was Zhong's sentence? James Zhong was sentenced to one year and one day in prison for his involvement in the Silk Road hacking incident.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ d6dc9554:d0593a0c

Bitcoin is a decentralized cryptocurrency that has been in existence for over a decade. It is a peer-to-peer system that does not require a central authority to verify transactions. However, like any software, Bitcoin is not immune to bugs.

In the past, there have been several high-profile bugs in the Bitcoin protocol. One of the most notable was the "184 billion Bitcoin bug" (CVE-2010-5139) that was discovered in 2010. This bug allowed an attacker to create an unlimited number of Bitcoin.

Another notable bug was the "transaction malleability bug" (CVE-2014-0160) that was discovered in 2014. This bug allowed attackers to change the recipient of a Bitcoin transaction without the knowledge of the sender. This bug was exploited by a number of exchanges, which resulted in the loss of millions of dollars worth of Bitcoin.

In addition to these high-profile bugs, there have been a number of other smaller bugs that have been discovered in the Bitcoin protocol. These bugs have ranged from minor inconveniences to more serious security vulnerabilities.

There are a number of things that can be done to reduce the risk of bugs in the Bitcoin protocol. One important step is to have a strong community of developers who are actively looking for and fixing bugs.

Despite the risks, bugs are an inevitable part of any software project. However, by taking steps to mitigate the risk of bugs, the Bitcoin community can help to ensure that the cryptocurrency remains secure and stable.

Some of the most common types of bugs in Bitcoin include:

• Logic errors: These errors are caused by mistakes in the code that can lead to unexpected behavior.
• Memory errors: These errors are caused by improper management of memory, which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
• Security vulnerabilities: These errors can be exploited by attackers to steal or manipulate data. The Bitcoin community is constantly working to identify and fix bugs.

---

Bugs wiki: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures

@ 81870f53:29bef6a6

こちらはイムラン・チョードリーと彼の妻ベサニーです。 二人ともアップルの元従業員だ。 イムラン・チョードリーはアップルのデザイナーでした。 彼は Apple で 20 年間働いていました。 彼は多くの iPad、iPhone、アクセサリーをデザインしました。 Bethany はすべての iOS プロジェクトの責任者でした。

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th3vzKTE0O8

二人は5年前にHumaneという会社を設立した。 昨日、彼らは最初の製品を発売し、テクノロジーの世界を驚かせました。 彼らの製品は携帯電話の代替品と呼ばれています。

Humane は、スマートフォンですべての作業を行うウェアラブル AI アシスタント「Humane AI Pin」を開発しました。

カメラとマイク、プロジェクターが付いています。

話すことでコマンドを与え、電話をかけたり、メッセージを送信したり、通話をライブで翻訳したりすることもできます。 レーザープロジェクターがあなたの手の上にそれを表示します。

忙しいときでも時間を確認できます。 電話やメールにも返信してくれます。 健康や食事の管理にも役立ちます。 何を食べたかを目の前で見ると、それが健康に良いかどうかを教えてくれます。

マイクロソフトやLGモバイルなど、数社の多国籍企業がイムラン・チョードリー氏の会社ヒューメインに2億ドルを投資している。 HumaneのデバイスにはQualcommチップが搭載されており、Humaneの投資家にはQualcommも含まれている。

このデバイスの発売後、Humane は Apple と iPhone のキラーと呼ばれるようになりました。

Humaneは価格を700ドルに設定し、11月16日に注文を開始する。

https://hu.ma.ne/

@ 81870f53:29bef6a6

投資戦略調査報告書によれば、政策効果と外部環境改善の複合効果により、A株の現状資本は著しく改善し、資本需給は徐々に新たなパターンを形成し、純流入に移行しつつある。

市場のリスク選好度が高まるにつれ、全体的な資金供給規模は改善すると予想される。 その中で、外資の復帰が見込まれ、金融取引は引き続き活発になると予想され、市場離脱後は公的資金の発行規模も加速すると予想される。

政策調整により資本需要面は全体的に鈍化し、IPO、借り換え、株主保有削減は低水準にとどまるとみられる。 A 株の資本パターンはさらに改善され、以前の株式ゲーム パターンが徐々に逆転すると予想されます。 資本の改善と米国債利回りの低下は、A株の成長スタイルにとって有益です。

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Learn how to navigate challenges posed by scammers, undercover agents, and community sceptics. Delve into the financial landscape of Bitcoin meetups, exploring the delicate balance between budgets, donations, and sponsorships. Aspiring community builders will find General Kenobi's guidance invaluable, gaining tips on starting a Bitcoin meetup, expanding organisers, and the importance of online presence. Join us on Croxroad Podcast as we navigate through the secrets that contribute to the rapid growth of Bitcoin communities, offering a rich tapestry of knowledge for enthusiasts, organisers, and community builders alike.

Table Of Content

• General Kenobi's Bitcoin Journey

• Evolution of Bitcoin Communities

• Overcoming Challenges in Bitcoin Community Building

• The Future of Bitcoin Communities

• Conclusion

• FAQs

General Kenobi's Bitcoin Journey

In the dynamic world of Bitcoin, General Kenobi stands out as a pivotal figure, contributing significantly to the growth and cohesion of European Bitcoiners.

Having been an active participant in the Bitcoin space for over the years, General Kenobi witnessed the evolution of the technology and the community surrounding it. In the initial stages, his involvement was fueled by a genuine curiosity and belief in the transformative potential of Bitcoin. As the space grew, so did General Kenobi's understanding of its complexities and nuances.

His perspective on Bitcoin has undergone a metamorphosis over the years, reflecting the broader changes and developments within the Digital Currency landscape. From a nascent technology to a global phenomenon, General Kenobi's journey mirrors the transformative trajectory of Bitcoin itself.

During the early years, General Kenobi engaged with Bitcoin as a technology-driven enthusiast. However, as the ecosystem expanded, so did his focus. The realisation of Bitcoin's potential to reshape financial systems and empower individuals became a driving force in his journey. This shift in perspective laid the foundation for his subsequent endeavours in community building and advocacy.

General Kenobi's Bitcoin journey is not merely a chronicle of personal experiences but a testament to the resilience and adaptability required in the rapidly changing crypto landscape. His insights into the technology, coupled with a passion for community building, position him as a key influencer in the European Bitcoiners' community.

Evolution of Bitcoin Communities

The journey of Bitcoin is intrinsically tied to the communities that form around it. Over the years, these communities have evolved, shaped by technological advancements, market dynamics, and the collective vision of their members. The story of Bitcoin communities is not just a narrative of growth but a reflection of the resilience and camaraderie inherent in the crypto space.

In the early days, Bitcoin communities were like tight-knit circles of enthusiasts, driven by a shared passion for the revolutionary potential of the technology. As the ecosystem expanded, so did the diversity of these communities. General Kenobi, a prominent figure in the European Bitcoiners' community, has been a witness to this evolution.

One notable aspect of the evolution is the transition from online forums and discussion groups to real-world meetups and events. General Kenobi highlights the significance of physical gatherings, emphasising the role they play in fostering personal connections and strengthening the fabric of the Bitcoin community.

Bitcoin communities have also become more geographically dispersed yet interconnected. With the rise of social media and digital communication channels, enthusiasts from different parts of the world can engage in discussions, share insights, and collaborate on projects. This interconnectedness has been instrumental in creating a global network of Bitcoin advocates.

The evolution of Bitcoin communities is marked by a shift from mere technological fascination to a more holistic understanding of the socio-economic implications of decentralised finance. General Kenobi's insights into the challenges and triumphs of the European Bitcoiners' community offer a glimpse into the broader narrative of how Bitcoin communities adapt and thrive in response to the ever-changing digital landscape.

Overcoming Challenges in Bitcoin Community Building

Building and sustaining a thriving Bitcoin community comes with its set of challenges. General Kenobi, a key figure in the European Bitcoiners' community, sheds light on the obstacles faced and the strategies employed to overcome them. Here's a glimpse into the challenges and triumphs of fostering a robust Bitcoin community.

Financial Hurdles: One of the primary challenges is securing the financial resources needed to organise events, meetups, and educational initiatives. General Kenobi emphasises the importance of financial support and donations to keep the community activities running smoothly. The struggle to balance the desire for inclusivity with the financial realities of community building is a delicate but essential aspect.

Geographic Diversity: As Bitcoin communities expand globally, there's a need to address the geographic diversity of members. General Kenobi discusses how the European Bitcoiners' community navigates this challenge, recognizing the importance of both local meetups and digital platforms to include members from various regions. Overcoming language barriers and fostering inclusivity across diverse cultures require intentional efforts.

Educational Outreach: Dispelling myths and misinformation about Bitcoin is an ongoing battle. General Kenobi underscores the significance of educational initiatives within the community. By providing accurate information and promoting a nuanced understanding of Bitcoin, community leaders contribute to the broader adoption of the technology.

Dealing with Scams and Bad Actors: In the decentralised world of Bitcoin, scams and bad actors can pose a threat to community trust. General Kenobi shares insights into how the European Bitcoiners' community handles such situations. Immediate action, clear communication, and a commitment to weeding out malicious elements are essential to maintaining a secure and trustworthy community.

Scaling Community Size: Balancing growth with the preservation of a close-knit community atmosphere is a delicate task. General Kenobi suggests the importance of having multiple organisers and administrators to distribute responsibilities and ensure the community's sustainability as it expands.

While challenges persist, General Kenobi's experiences highlight the resilience of Bitcoin communities. Through collective effort, financial prudence, and a commitment to education, these communities continue to overcome hurdles and contribute to the broader adoption and understanding of Bitcoin.

The Future of Bitcoin Communities

As General Kenobi reflects on the past and present of Bitcoin communities, he offers insights into the potential future trajectory. The journey of Bitcoin has been one of constant evolution, and the same holds true for the communities built around it. Here's a glimpse into what the future may hold for Bitcoin communities.

General Kenobi envisions a future where Bitcoin seamlessly integrates into mainstream culture. As more people become familiar with the technology, Bitcoin communities may play a crucial role in facilitating this integration. Educational initiatives and community outreach will likely become even more vital as Bitcoin moves from niche to norm.

Collaboration among Bitcoin communities worldwide is on the horizon. General Kenobi emphasises the need for communities to work together, share resources, and learn from each other's experiences. As the global Bitcoin ecosystem expands, collaborative efforts can contribute to a more robust and interconnected community network.

The future of Bitcoin communities will likely be intertwined with technological advancements. General Kenobi discusses the potential impact of new technologies on community building, from virtual reality meetups to innovative communication platforms. Embracing emerging technologies can enhance the community experience and attract a broader audience.

Bitcoin communities are poised to become more diverse and inclusive. General Kenobi stresses the importance of actively reaching out to different demographics and regions, ensuring that the benefits of Bitcoin are accessible to everyone. A more inclusive community can contribute to a richer tapestry of perspectives and ideas.

Education will remain a cornerstone of Bitcoin communities in the future. General Kenobi envisions an ongoing commitment to dispelling myths, providing accurate information, and fostering a deeper understanding of Bitcoin's principles. This educational focus will be essential as Bitcoin continues to gain mainstream attention.

Conclusion

In the realm of Bitcoin communities, General Kenobi's insights shed light on the evolution, challenges, and future possibilities. As we journeyed through his experiences, one key takeaway stands out: the resilience of the Bitcoin community. From humble beginnings in online forums to bustling meetups in cities like Barcelona, the community has grown exponentially.

Bitcoin's journey is not just about the rise in value or technological advancements; it's about the people who believe in its principles. General Kenobi's dedication to fostering local communities emphasises the grassroots nature of the movement. The future, he believes, holds a continuation of this journey, albeit with new challenges and opportunities.

As we envision the future of Bitcoin communities, themes of integration, collaboration, diversity, and education emerge. The prospect of Bitcoin seamlessly integrating into mainstream culture is not a distant dream but a foreseeable reality. Collaboration among communities globally will fortify the network, ensuring shared resources and experiences.

FAQs

What inspired General Kenobi to start the Bitcoin community in Barcelona? General Kenobi was inspired by the open and friendly nature of Bitcoin meetups he attended. The desire to create a similar space in Barcelona, where enthusiasts could gather, learn, and share experiences, motivated him to initiate the Bitcoin community in the city.

How can someone kick start a Bitcoin community in their city? General Kenobi suggests starting online by creating a presence on platforms like Telegram and Twitter. Connect with existing Bitcoin communities or podcasts, seek advice, and gradually transition into physical meetups. Building trust, expanding the organiser base, and focusing on free access to information are key elements in community initiation.

What challenges do Bitcoin communities face, and how can they overcome them? Financial constraints pose a significant challenge. General Kenobi emphasises the need for community support through donations, sponsorships, or even entry fees if necessary. The key is maintaining the community's commitment to free access to information while finding creative ways to sustain the financial aspects.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 81870f53:29bef6a6

サファイア・ファンドの責任者であるガイ・スピアは、若くて傲慢な投資銀行マネージャーから、バリュー投資を堅持し、市場で目覚ましい利益を上げているヘッジファンドマネージャーに転身し、現在に至るまで投資に多大な影響を与えています。ガイ・スピアーの変革と進歩は、バフェットの原則を真に理解し、人間としてバフェットの行動方法を模倣し続けたことから生まれました。

バフェットとマンガーの信奉者として、彼は、自分たちよりも権力のある人たちを観察し、彼らの行動を真似し、それを実践することによってのみ、自分にとって正しい道を見つけることができると信じています。この複雑な成長の過程で、私たちは知識を引き出し、洞察力を身につけ、自分自身を見つめ、どの部分を残す価値があり、どの部分を捨てるべきかを判断します。

We Study Billionaires のポッドキャスト インタビューで、ガイ スピア氏は、バフェット氏とマンガー氏を模倣する方法と、投資や人生において感情を避ける方法について意見を述べました。ポッドキャストの概要は次のとおりです。

01. 嫉妬を人生のプラスの力に変えるには？ ステガー・ブラッドソン (プレゼンター):

「嫉妬は有益な感情であるとおっしゃいました。しかし、バフェット氏はかつて、嫉妬は私たちの喜びを奪うネガティブな感情であるため、感じるべきではないと指摘しました。この質問からこのインタビューを始めたいと思います。」嫉妬は誰もが経験したことがある感情です。人間が生まれつき持っている感情ではありませんが、嫉妬を人生においてポジティブな力に変えるにはどうしていますか?

ガイ・スピア：

私のアイデアはどれも価値があると思います。ウォーレンとチャーリーはこのことについて長い間考えてきたかもしれませんが、私は何か新しい発見や経験をするたびに興奮します。おそらく、これらの新しい発見は、ウォーレンとチャーリーが経験したことのないものです。 「私にとって、それは金鉱を見つけるようなものでした。心理療法士と時間を過ごした私たちにとって、それは非常に貴重な心理学的概念から始まります：感情は私たちの行動への手がかりであり、感情は私たちの行動へのガイドです。

フィニアス・ゲージの有名な事件はその一例です。彼は鉄の棒が頭に突き刺さる事故に遭い、感情を制御する脳の特定の領域に損傷を与えたようです。彼はこの重大な事故から回復し、健康な状態を維持していますが、しかし、時間が経つにつれて、彼は感情の喪失を感じ、人生の重要な決定のいくつかを受け入れることが困難になりました。

感情は行動へのガイドです。人間は何百万年もかけて進化してきました。私たちは体のあらゆる面を見て、「なぜこの器官の特徴が存在するのか？」と考えることができます。たとえば、私たちの体の一部の構造は「崩壊ゾーン」に似ています。 （コラプスゾーンは、衝突時にエネルギーを吸収または伝達し、それによって重要なエリアを保護します。）私たちはコラプスゾーンを進化させたので、何かが起こった場合に頭を効果的に保護することができます。感情は実際に私たちの生活と密接に関係しています。怒りを怒りとして利用するたとえば、それについて話し合いましょう。

怒りはすべてのネガティブな感情の核心です。たとえば、自分の境界線が侵害されたので、それをリセットするために何かをする必要があります。自分の境界線を侵害する行為をやめたいので、自分自身を守らなければなりません...複雑な世界では私たちは怒りを感じ、その人を殴ったり復讐したりするような愚かなことをするかもしれませんが、この怒りを正しく理解すれば、防御策を構築し、賢明な抑止力として機能するでしょう。

感情を単に罪として扱い、その背後にある理由を無視するのは、確かに少し表面的です。さらに、もっと深く掘り下げる必要があります。「なぜこの感情が起こるのか？その背後にある真実を理解して明らかにしてみましょう。たとえば、私は次のように考えています。」メキシコ系の妻です。結婚初期、彼女はよく嫉妬していました。人間の観点から見ると、嫉妬は比較的簡単に理解できます。人生を一緒に過ごす人を選んでいるような、あるいは人生を共有しているようなものですと、そして他の人には関わってほしくない、それは保護感情です。

私は心理学者の資格を持っているとは言えませんが、内なる嫉妬をなくそうとすると、「あの人は私の人生において持つべきもの、持つべきものを持っている」と嫉妬が私に言うかもしれません。イングランド女王やロナウジーニョ、その他のスターサッカー選手の前に立つ人は、彼らの技術が非常に優れていて手の届かないところにあるので、嫉妬することはないと思います。到達すれば、ただ畏敬の念を抱くだけだろう。

しかし、もしあなたがノバク・ジョコビッチ (セルビアの男子テニス選手) で、相手がロジャー・フェデラー (元スイスの男子テニス選手) なら、おそらく嫉妬を感じるでしょう。なぜなら、あなたはフェデラーの高みに到達するために必要なものを持っていると知っているからです。 「私たちは嫉妬にどう対処するかを考える必要がある。ジョコビッチとフェデラーがライバル関係にある場合、ジョコビッチはこの嫉妬の感情にどう対処するだろうか？私が嫉妬する理由は、この人が私の本当の競争相手であり、それを超えるには努力が必要だからだ」これは嫉妬の感情からのポジティブなフィードバックだと思います。

重要なのは、嫉妬を隠そうとすると、その嫉妬から何の利益も得られないということです。誰もが知っているように、怒っているパートナーや怒っている子供に、「あなたは怒っているけど、怒るべきではない」と言う必要はありません。感情を隠すことは問題を複雑にするだけです。代わりに、私たちは自分の感情を表現し、なぜその感情が起こるのかを深く理解し、それに対処する最善の方法を模索する必要があります。おそらくこれは、不満を表明する手紙を書くか、法的措置を検討することを意味します。このオープンで合理的なアプローチは、私たちが自分の感情をよりよく処理し、理解するのに役立ちます。

ステガー・ブラッドソン (プレゼンター):

あなたの仕事を研究したり、インタビューを聞いたりして、私はあなたに興味があり、驚きました。聞いてもいいですか：ひどいように見えるものをどうやって良いものに変えるのですか？

ガイ・スピア：

私はマンハッタンの西 67 番街の家に住んでいました。バーノー書店がニューヨーク市のあちこちにオープンしたとき、近所の端にもバーノー書店がありました。セルフサービス エリアの従業員と親しくなりました。昔、私はチャーリー・マンガーが学生向けに行った講義を聞いたことがありますが、その中で彼は逆境に直面したときの自分の姿勢について語り、非常にシンプルだが深い意見を述べていました。 「あなたは逆境に遭遇し、大きな挫折を経験します。誰もがそうするでしょう。しかし、あらゆる挫折は自分自身を示す機会であり、行動して成功する機会です。この見解は本当に強力です...これはキャロル・ドゥエック（アメリカの心理学者）です」の「成長マインドセット」の哲学。人生で重要なのは、何を経験するかではなく、それにどう対処するかです。もちろん、不幸や逆境が起こる可能性はありますが、重要なことは、私たちがコントロールできるということです。これを認識しているので、私たちはコントロールできます。

02 既成概念を捨ててこそ進歩できる ステガー・ブラッドソン (プレゼンター):

「ねえ、私は「バフェットの株主への手紙」について話したいのですが。興味深いのは、ウォーレン・バフェットは投資家として、ガバナンス、買収、人生、その他の側面についても深い洞察力を持っているということです。ウォーレン・バフェットはかつてチャーリー・マンガーにこう言いました、課題は新しいアイデアを生み出すのではなく、古いアイデアを取り除くことです。それで気になるのですが、ガイ、取り除くのが最も難しい考えはどれですか?

ガイ・スピア：

私はベンチャーキャピタルの銀行で働いていますが、物事は期待通りにはいきません。この感情を経験し始めたのは、ウォーレン・バフェットを発見してからです...これほど強力な原動力、世界に溶け込みたいという願望を感じることはめったにありませんでした, しかし、自分がそこに属していないように見えることに気づきました。この目標を達成するために、私は多くの努力、情熱、忍耐力を注ぎました。しかし、以前は、残りの人生のために自分がする必要があるのはすべてだと心から信じていました人生は新聞街を見つけて、座って勉強することでした。

「優れた投資家にお会いしたいと思っています。残念ながら、彼は今日すでにかなり裕福です。私はバークシャー・ハサウェイのカンファレンスでスティーブ・ウォルドマンに会ったことがあります。彼はかつてこう言いました。「マイクロソフトはワープロなどに注力しているので、アップルは本当に興味深い会社です」 Appleはグラフィックデザインに注力しているのに対し、Appleは美しい体験を求めているのです。世界はどこへ行くのかと考えたら、世界は明らかに画像や動画の方向に進み、美しいものを世に送り出し続けるでしょう。 「はい、でもそれにはテクノロジーが関係していますし、私はテクノロジーの専門家ではありません。ちなみに、ウォーレンとチャーリーもテクノロジー業界には関わっていません。」 しかし、私は今でも時々、ある種の製品を追求することがあります。それは愚かな定説であり、それを克服するのに2、3年かかりました。

チームメンバーやカンファレンスの参加者が賢明ではないと考えられている投資に興味を持つと、良いアイデアが生まれるかもしれません。彼らは古い考え方に固執しないので、そこは学ぶ価値があります。投資だけをして大成功を収めている投資家のことを思い出します。世界はインターネット時代に入りましたが、私の意見では、世界はまだそこにあり、キャッシュフローと損益計算書に注意を払う必要があります。しかし、私はまだそのペースに追いついていない、または見つけていません。市場全体の規模や顧客の生涯価値を考慮し、利益を上げている顧客には多額の投資を惜しまない企業に入社するのは難しいと思いますが、これらの事業は一見儲からないように見えますが、実は十分な報酬が得られる可能性があるので、勉強を続けています。私は賢い投資の最先端を常に模索している人、バリュー投資や合理的な投資にこだわる人を尊敬します。

03 偉い人の真似はしないでください ステガー・ブラッドソン (プレゼンター):

「ウォーレンは小説を読まないのを覚えています。そのことで自分の読書習慣を見直しました。もしかしたら、自分の頭の中にある偉大な英雄を完全に真似しようとするのは行き過ぎなのかもしれません。私たちは崇拝者から一体何を学ぶべきなのでしょうか？」

ガイ・スピア：

私たちがこれらの偉大な人々を見倣おうとするとき、たとえそれが楽しいからといって、ピーナッツを食べたり、コカコーラやチェリーコーラを一日中飲んだりすることで、優れた投資家になろうとしているわけではありません。この時点では、何を模倣すべきで、何を模倣すべきではないかが正確にわかっていなかったので、最初は自然に彼らがやることをすべて模倣したかったのです。同じような服を着て、同じバーに行き、同じレストランに行き、同じ食べ物を味わい、さまざまな方法を試してみましょう。

その後、私は何を模倣し、明らかに必要のないものを捨てるべきかを理解しました。たとえば、ウォーレン・バフェットはブランド品会社に投資していましたが、私は世界中のブランド品会社をすべて研究し、彼なりの方法で理解しようと努め始めました。他の例として、私は保険会社について徹底的に調査しましたが、ある時点で、私はこの分野にあまり関わっておらず、業界についても深く理解していないため、不適切である可能性があることに気づきました。保険分野でウォーレン・バフェットを盲目的に模倣すること。

それで、私が強調したいことは何でしょうか? いつかは、私がウォーレン・バフェットではないことに気づくと思います。しかし実際には、私は彼から多くのことを学びました。その結果、フォロワーはライフサイクルは複雑な成長プロセスです。私たちはその過程で知識を獲得し、次にその知識を見直して、どの部分が保持する価値があり、どの部分が廃棄されるべきかを決定します。その過程で、私たちは完全に真似したいと思うようになります。しかし、特定の側面を手放すと、実際にはヒーローとまったく同じである必要はなく、私たちはユニークな個人であるため、それは問題ではないことに気づきます。

簡単な例として、私は赤ワインが大好きです。そして、ウォーレンが私ほど赤ワインに興味を示さないことはわかっています。しかし、だからと言って、他の点で私が彼に共鳴できないというわけではありません。ウォーレン・バフェットのスーパーファンを自称する投資家には敬意を表しているが、ウォーレンの専門分野にはテクノロジーは実際には含まれていない。クラウド・コンピューティングに関する彼の見解も不明瞭だ。私のヒーローにはある点で欠けているという事実を受け入れているので、それは問題ではないまたは別のもの。

「独立して考える能力を養うためにウォーレン・バフェットを盲目的に追いすぎました。その結果、チャーリー・マンガーの作品を読んでインスピレーションを得ることができました。チャーリーは非常に読書に貪欲な人だと思います。彼は大学時代にたくさんの小説を読みました」まだ若かった彼は、「小説を読んだことがない」「小説に興味がない」ではなく、小説はもう十分読んだので十分だと言いました。水泳には経験曲線がありました。移動距離が 2 倍になるたびに達成感を得るようなものです。しかし、時間が経つにつれて、進歩はゆっくりと遅くなります。チャーリー・マンガーは、小説を読みすぎていると思っているかもしれません。あまり得られませんでした。

私が不安になる理由の 1 つは、私が小説をあまり読まないことです。私は人生の最後の瞬間を小説、特に必読の古典を読むことに費やしたくないのです。私が理解している限りでは、チャーリーもし『デイヴィッド・カッパーフィールド』を読んでいなかったら、それで命を落とすことはなかったでしょうし、『魔法の山』を読んでいなかったとしても、それが原因で死ぬことはなかったでしょう。したがって、自分のヒーローを完全に模倣する必要はありませんが、これは非現実的です。

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

The YakiHonne community is excited about Nostrasia, and they have diligently transcribed Nostrasia's inspiring speeches. Additional speech transcripts will be made available over time. The Japanese and Spanish versions are initially translated and proofread by community members with the help of AI tools. All YakiHonne users are invited to join in the review process. Those who successfully complete the review will be granted a special reward of 3000 Sats. To get started, simply reach out to us (Comment here, DM, or TG) to sign up, and the first person to contact and submit their review will be the lucky recipient of the reward. And hey, if you're up for it, we'd love to have these speeches translated into even more languages. Join us!

🌟中文版: Nostr: 比特币的Layer 3 🌟日本語: Nostr: ビットコインのレイヤー 3 🌟Español: Nostr: la capa 3 de Bitcoin

B0B - Hey guys, I'm Bob, and my background for the last 10 years has been in payments. First as an investor in traditional payments, then at Strike in Bitcoin and Lightning payments, and now as the founder of Prism, powering Bitcoin payments over Nostr. Today, I'm going to talk about what I've learned about Bitcoin adoption and how Nostr accelerates Bitcoin adoption as Bitcoin's layer three. Because my goal is to go from 20 million Bitcoin users today to everyone in the world using Bitcoin and being a bitcoiner, and doing it really, really fast.

So, how do we do something very fast? How do we get fast user growth? Yeah, you need to build a 10x or 100x better product for users. So, what's the Bitcoin product? Well, Bitcoin is better money, and it's better payments. We'll go through each of these. We'll start with better money. So, Bitcoin is technically better money; there's a fixed supply, it's decentralized, censorship-resistant, permissionless, global. It is better than fiat money, period. But technically better doesn't mean you're going to get a lot of users. You need to build a 10x better product for users to get fast user growth.

And so, who is the Bitcoin user? Well, that's easy; it's anyone with money. And while this chart is accurate, if you held a dollar over the last hundred years, you lost 96% of the value of the dollar, and the dollar was the best-performing currency in the world. So, every other currency performed worse than that. Unfortunately, less than 1% of people think on 100-year timelines. In fact, most people think like this: "What's inflation? Seems kind of slow. How did I lose 5%? I don't understand how that works." And when they look at Bitcoin, it looks extremely volatile; it was down 70% last year, it's up 70% this year. So, for the vast majority of people, Bitcoin as better money doesn't actually seem better. Even not 10x, but it actually seems worse, right? Because it's way more volatile than traditional currency. Of course, over time, Bitcoin will become less volatile, inflation will become much worse, and Bitcoin will be obviously better for users, but that will take some time, which is okay; it's better for us as buyers of Bitcoin.

And so, if better money is going to take a lot of time, I think the better opportunity for fast user growth is better payments. And so, I'm going to spend the rest of the time talking about how Bitcoin creates better payments and faster user growth. And so going through that same exercise, Bitcoin is a better payment rail. It's open, it's global, it's permissionless, it's instant, it's virtually free, and it's cash-final. Bitcoin as a payment rail is better than any other payment rail that exists; it's better than Fedwires, it's better than the A networks, it's better than the card networks, it's better than the bank networks. But just because it's technically better doesn't mean you're going to get a bunch of user growth.

And so let's go through that same exercise for payment users. There's merchants and there's consumers. So if we walk through that same example, trying to buy a coffee with Bitcoin and Lightning versus a traditional Visa card, and we'll start with the merchants. For merchants, accepting Bitcoin is faster; you get it instantly versus two to 15 days. It's great; it's cash final; you get the Bitcoin, and there are no refunds or chargebacks. It's virtually free, so it's much cheaper than card networks, and it's borderless, so you can accept Bitcoin from anywhere in the world. So for merchants, that's amazing; Bitcoin sounds like a much better payment rail.

But for consumers, it's the opposite. Your purchase with Bitcoin is the same whether you're using Bitcoin or using a card. You actually don't get any Bitcoin rewards. So, merchants, card networks use those fees to fund cash back, and so if I use my Chase card, I get 2% back. If I use Bitcoin, I don't get any money back. So that seems worse; I have no Bitcoin airline lounge, unfortunately, and I don't get any insurance perks when I pay with Bitcoin. And then there's no refund, so if a merchant does scam me, too bad for me, right? Credit cards actually offer protection. So to the consumer, paying with Bitcoin is worse, and in payments, the only thing that matters is the consumer; the merchant is the taker. So if it doesn't work for consumers, it doesn't work for merchants.

And so paying with Bitcoin or buying that coffee for the vast majority of people is not even 10x better; it's actually worse, much worse. And that's because buying coffee already works for 99% of people. If anyone in this room wants to go buy a coffee, they can do it, and they don't need Bitcoin. And so, taking a step back and thinking through like what is Bitcoin or what could Bitcoin be 10x better at than traditional payments is kind of an exercise I've been doing now for many years. But really in the last year, thinking through this in more detail, and that leads you to what is internet money better at, right? Bitcoin's just native internet money, and that leads you to what's the internet better at? Why is the internet 10x better at communications than traditional communications?

And the internet is better at communications because it's instant communication with anyone and everyone anywhere in the world, and the anyone and everyone is the really important piece here. And so if we just do the same thing with native internet money, Bitcoin should be instant payments with anyone and everyone anywhere in the world. And the communications piece is a massive part of the internet, so I call it everyone communications. But every large platform that's been built on the internet has optimized around everyone communications, whether it's a post on Instagram that a million people see or a dance video on TikTok or posting a thread on Reddit that is one person posting something on the internet as former communications that hundreds or thousands or millions of people can easily see. So this should be possible with Bitcoin; it should just be internet money. We should be able to make one payment to many people anywhere in the world. But we've been optimizing around one-to-one payments; we've been optimizing around buying coffee. But like we said, that already works for everybody.

And imagine if the internet was only optimized around one-on-one communications. If WhatsApp was the only thing on the internet, me talking to a friend, the internet would not nearly be as powerful as it is today with the ability to communicate with everyone anywhere. So, Bitcoin should be capable of this; it should be capable of paying many, many people instantly with one click. Let's go through that exercise. Is it better, technically better than traditional payments? And then, can it offer a 10x better experience?

First, let's start with traditional payments. How would your Chase account or your Venmo account or your Visa card make a payment to three people? Super simple example, one person just wants to pay three friends. If you were going to use a bank transfer, you would have to ask your friends for their account and routing number. If they were brave enough to send it to you, you'd then have to figure out how to input that in an easy way into your Chase account or your Wells Fargo account, and the whole thing would be a disaster. And why doesn't it work? Is because identities in the banking space are fragmented. You might have a Chase account or Wells Fargo account, or you could have one of thousands of credit union accounts. The information is extremely sensitive, so if anyone has that information, they can steal your money. There are all kinds of minimum thresholds for sending money, and the UI is terrible. So, even if you could get your friends to send you all their information, you wouldn't want to put it into your UI anyway. Bank transfers can't do this. You can't send a transfer to three people, just three people.

So maybe Visa. Maybe Visa's technology will allow us to do this. And Visa actually has some benefits. Visa provides standard identities, so everyone has a Visa card. It doesn't matter who your bank is; you can go to a merchant and you can pay, and the merchant doesn't care if you have a Wells Fargo account or a credit union account. The Visa card will work. So, it provides standard identities, and then it coordinates the payments. Visa is just the messaging layer. Visa is never taking custody of your dollars to send them; they're just coordinating payments between banks. So that's very helpful. But your Visa card is also very sensitive, and if you wanted to send money via Visa to your friend, they would need to buy a terminal. So that doesn't work at all. And so Visa actually doesn't work either. You can't send an everyone payment with Visa. The challenges of sending everyone payments with Bitcoin and Lightning.

And then recently, there's Plaid and all the fintech innovation. So maybe Venmo, using a Plaid messaging layer, can allow you to send payments to three people. And again, it has some benefits. Plus, it offers standard identities; it coordinates between banks. So you get a Plaid username, and your friend has one, and they don't care what bank account you're using; you can send money to them. So that's great. But it's a closed system, so if you don't have a Venmo account, you can't use this. And it only works in the US, so you can't send money to everyone and everywhere. So, the traditional banking system, it's impossible to send an everyone payment. So fortunately, though, we have internet money. We have Bitcoin and Lightning.

So, let's go through that example because that should work, right? Well, here's a Bitcoin example. Here's a Bitcoin transfer you want to do, and actually, Bitcoin solves the problem with traditional banks. It's open, instant, and global. It works everywhere in the same world, everywhere in the world the same way. Awesome. But you have the same problem as the traditional banking system in that I don't know if my friend has a Stripe account or a Cash App account or a Wallet of Satoshi. So, I have to go ask him, you know, what wallet do you use? Then I have to ask him for his form of identity. And every pro, every wallet has a different protocol or a username. And then even if I get all of those identities, I somehow then have to take them and put them in a wallet in an easy way. And I'm back to this like Wells Fargo Chase example of how would I ever put three names in? Maybe three I could do, but that would be kind of hard. But how would I ever put in more than that? It would take me forever. And then no one would ever do it. So, doing this is actually difficult with Bitcoin Lightning, which you wouldn't think on the surface, but it's very hard and near impossible to send an everyone payment today with Bitcoin and Lightning. And so, we haven't been optimizing everyone payments, and we've been focused on one-on-one payments because everyone payments have been impossible.

So, what worked and what didn't work? There were some really useful benefits of traditional payments, and there were some benefits of Bitcoin payments. If we look at the traditional payment stack, layer one is money. Layer two is payments. And so, in the traditional stack, that's banks. And then layer three is a messaging layer. It's Visa, Plaid, a handful of other messaging protocols that are built on top of the banking system. And where traditional, the traditional payment stack failed was the dollars and banks layer. It's closed; it's clunky; it's expensive. That's where it failed. But the traditional payment stack has a messaging layer, which was incredibly helpful. Visa and Plaid provided standard identities; it coordinated between the banks. The Bitcoin payment stack solved the banking fragmentation, and it solved custody. Visa never and Plaid never touch your money; they just message to the banks where to send the money to. And so, let's look at the Bitcoin payment stack. Its layer one is money. Layer two is payments, which is Lightning and Lightning wallets. And then, layer three is a question mark.

Bitcoin and Lightning actually solved the problems of the traditional dollar and banks payment stack. It's open, permissionless, global, works everywhere in the world instantly the same way. But it failed because there is no messaging layer. I think you guys know where we're going with this, but now there is. And so, Nostr provides standard identities and it coordinates between wallets, solving fragmentation and solving the need to custody Bitcoin in order to send Bitcoin payments. And so now we have a Bitcoin payment stack. And if you take anything away from this talk, this is the most important slide. That Bitcoin payment stack is fully decentralized, censorship-resistant, open, permissionless, and global because it's now Bitcoin, Lightning, and Nostr.

So how does Nostr do this? Nostr solves identity and coordination. It solves identity by using a simple public key that works across any client. It solves coordination by connecting Lightning wallets via standard protocols. The two protocols it uses are Nostr Wallet Connect and Nostr Wallet Connect enables users to send messages to their wallets to send payments. So any wallet that integrates Nostr Wallet Connect, their users can send payments. And then, Lightning Address does the opposite. It allows users to receive payments. So with Nostr Wallet Connect plus Lightning Address, users can send and receive payments. And so now let's look at this example. We now have the full Bitcoin payment stack. We have Bitcoin, Lightning, and Nostr. And so on the send side, my Alby account will be using Nostr Wallet Connect. On the receive side, my friends will have their Lightning Address. And let's take a look at that three-person everyone payment. So if you click send, it'll send one next one to Bill, next one to Bob. And so, I sent three payments here in three seconds, right? No coordination, no talking to anyone. I was able to send three payments instantly.

And so now we have a Bitcoin payment that's open, instant, global. There's standard identities provided by Nostr, and coordinating the wallets was trivial. I didn't do anything; I just clicked the button. But let's make it really, really obvious. This is a 100-person payment. So this is me sending 100 people Bitcoin, and some of these people you may know. And what's happening here is as they turn orange, the Bitcoin payment is confirming. This is a 100-person payment. This is a product we're launching in a couple of weeks. Three weeks ago, to send money to 100 people took us about three minutes. We've optimized that, so this payment will take under 30 seconds. And with a few more optimizations on the wallets, the clients, and the relay side, we can make a 100-person payment almost instantly. And we'll be able to make a thousand-person or more payment almost instantly as well.

And so, this is the most mind-blowing piece of this, though. I just sent 100 payments instantly with one click. As Prism, the company, we never onboarded any of those people. We just sent messages, allowed them to send messages to their wallets. And we never touched Bitcoin. We don't have any Lightning infrastructure. We don't have any Bitcoin infrastructure. All we're doing is packaging messages for users to send to their Bitcoin wallets to send those payments. So we never onboard anybody; we never touch Bitcoin. And so now we have a solution that is technically better than traditional payments and offers a 10x or 100x or 1000X better user experience. And this changes everything. First, around integrating Bitcoin payments for the last couple of years, Bitcoin payments, Bitcoin apps have been focused on integrating Lightning. And integrating Lightning is hard, and running your own Lightning infrastructure is really hard. And if you're building an app, the last thing you want to do is also be building Lightning payment infrastructure. It'd be like if you had an app on the traditional payment rails, and you were trying to rebuild a bank at the same time you're trying to build your app. It's really hard. Nostr makes it incredibly easy.

So at Prism, we actually started by trying to run our own Lightning infrastructure, rented all these headaches and roadblocks, and it took a month and a half to do. And we realized we could integrate Nostr, and we built the same experience, a better experience, I would argue, by integrating Nostr. And by integrating Nostr, we naturally get Lightning payments. And so that payment you saw was a product we built at Prism that we did not integrate any Lightning ourselves. All we did was integrate Nostr. And so anyone that wants to enable Bitcoin payments should now be integrating Nostr as opposed to directly integrating Lightning. And that makes it much easier. And then second, it creates new monetization. So everyone payments are a hundred times more powerful than one-on-one payments. Just one example, the number of tip payments that happen on the internet today is almost nothing. A tip payment is what I would call a one-on-one payment. It's me tipping someone else. That's very small monetization on the internet, almost nothing. Subscriptions are much bigger. So subscriptions are probably, you know, 10,000 times the number of tip payments. People pay in subscriptions, but subscriptions aren't everyone payment. And until just now, it was impossible with traditional fiat rails and Bitcoin rails to make an everyone payment. So how do we do it? We needed a company in the middle. And this is the way it worked. A subscriber paid money into a company, the role of content creators in social media platforms that company collected the money into their bank account. And at the end of the week or end of the month, they would pay out that money to people they wanted to have on their platform. So let's call it content creators. So you needed this company in the middle, and companies love to do this because it creates this huge growth flywheel. So every large social media company has done this. They have these creator programs where they pay you to put money on TikTok or pay you to put money on Instagram or reels. And this creates this growth flywheel. The more content creators you get, the more users you get. The more users you get, the more subscriptions you get, the more money you can pass back to content creators.

And so let's look at an example of a company that's done this recently. And X Premium. So X Premium has actually been phenomenally successful in that you can now pay $11 a month to support your favorite content creators. And if you pay, you're eligible for payouts based on the content you create. It's a great idea. They actually are doing a hundred million dollars in just one year. A hundred million dollars of subscription revenue that they say they promise to give that all back to creators. Who knows if they will, but that's the theory. So you're getting $100 million into the ecosystem to support creators. That's awesome. Now, like you could see the footnote. It was ruined by a bunch of other stuff. But in theory, that is an awesome product to create a growth flywheel for Twitter or X. Now, we don't need X; we don't need Twitter in the middle anymore. You just saw a subscriber in that case, me directly paying a hundred people very quickly. And so we don't need that middleman. And so we rebuilt X Premium, and it's called Nostr Gold. And so this is a Prism product that we're offering now. It does the same thing. You can support content creators. If you pay 3,000 SATs per week, you're eligible for gold payouts. And Gold's paid out to the top 10 most-liked posts on a three-day rolling basis around specific hashtags. So if you post a photo and type hashtag art, and you get a ton of likes, you will get money into your account from subscription revenue. And how do we do that? Well, this is what it looks like to join gold and subscribe to gold. All you have to do is go to makeprism.com/gold and type in your npub. You hit join now, and we're using, in this case, Nostr Wallet Connect in order to make that payment. So we are passing right now to, in this case, the Alby Nostr Wallet Connect instance, 3,000 SATs. You connect the wallet, and in about two seconds, it will pay that subscription, and you'll be subscribed to the gold product, and you'll be eligible for your first payout tomorrow. So for content creators that want to try to monetize, that want to post awesome content to Nostr, now they can get those payouts.

And what did we actually do when the person paid that subscription? That subscriber was Decentralizing Payments and Incentives, paying 3,000 SATs, but not to any company. That subscriber was instantly paying 3,000 SATs split to the top 10 posts over the last three days to those people directly. So that payment was instantly paid out 10 different times to the top 10 content creators from those previous three days. You no longer need the company in the middle to collect the payments; the payments can be made by the subscribers themselves, by the individuals themselves. And for Nostr, this is huge because now we can create this pool of ongoing subscription revenue that can be paid out over time and incentivize new users to come to the platform and post because they know there's this fixed growing pool of SATs that are available if they post content that's useful and highly rated.

This was like one simple example, but this concept of Premium subscriptions works for everything, not just like Twitter; in fact, works much better for things like the Reddit examples, social media videos like Twitch, gaming platforms, and then publishing itself. And then the final thing this the new Bitcoin payments stack does, it empowers individuals. So the internet over the last couple of decades has transformed into being owned by these platforms for communication. So almost all communication is owned by these platforms, and many of these products are the same company, and they control the internet. Internet communication today because yes, they've built a great product, but they control us because they have identity and payments. And without identity and payments, it's very hard to create competing products. But now with Nostr and Bitcoin payments, we have identity and we have payment. So we have the tools to recreate the identity and payment layer that these companies have built but do it in a way that empowers the individual. And now we just have to go create the products on top of that. So that's what the Bitcoin the new. Bitcoin payment stack enables, how do we accelerate this as a community? There are three things we need to do. First, we need more clients to integrate Zap Splits and Nostr Wallet Connect. That is the coordination messaging layer on top of all of this. We need more Bitcoin wallets to integrate Nostr Wallet Connect. There are two that I know of today, Alby and Mutiny, but we need all of the wallets so that it's really easy for any user of any wallet to use Nostr Wallet Connect over Nostr.

The final thing, and the one hole which you may notice in the Bitcoin payment stack is Lightning Address, which is not Nostr native. Lightning Address can be optimized a ton, so we can get that payment really fast using Lightning Address, but it's still a little bit slower and more centralizing. But it's the wallet standard today, and Nostr native would be faster, more decentralized, but it doesn't exist today. So these three things we're talking about with the team in Alby tomorrow at 10:30. If you Powering Bitcoin Layer 3 and Creating Tools for Users and Developers want to come and learn more.

And so what are we doing at Prism? At Prism, we're powering Bitcoin layer 3, creating tools for users and developers to make it easy to use Bitcoin over Nostr. So on the consumer side, Brands, creators can use our app to accelerate growth. So we allow you to reach more people, engage your users, and reward people. So next post, drop in a dollar sign boost, and you'll probably get more engagement than you would have otherwise. And you can pay the users that are boosting or liking your posts to reward them for engagement. And then developers can use our API to offer better Bitcoin payments. So if you're interested in talking more about the API, just shoot us an email here.

And then I wanted to end by showing one more example of what's possible with Nostr.

And so this is a new product we launched today. You can check it out at prism.com/backrow. It allows you to create a referral bonus for anyone to join Nostr. And so I'll show you how this works. If you go to grow, you can drop in an amount of the referral bonus you want. So in this case, I want to create a referral bonus for 10,000 SATs, and I want to convince my friend to join Nostr and say, "Hey, what, as soon as you join Nostr and connect a lightning address, if you click this referral link and input your new npub, you will get 10,000 STS instantly into your account." And so that's the process of creating it, super simple to create this referral link. Once the user creates their account on Nostr and gets their npub, they can click that link, they can drop in their npub here, click submit. What we're doing on our end is we're looking up that npub, we're making sure it was created after the referral link was created, and then we're using Nostr Wallet Connect to instantly settle a payment from the Creator's wallet to the new user's wallet. And that was paid instantly.

And the mind-blowing thing about this payment, it seemed simple, but that payment was Anonymous. So Prism never onboarded anybody; it was automatic. So it was based on the trigger of joining Nostr, but that trigger could have been anything. It could have been "join Nostr and follow me" or "join Nostr and make 100 posts." It could have been anything or it could even not have anything to do with Nostr to trigger it. And then it was asynchronous, so when you create the payment, you had no idea who was going to claim that payment, and you had no idea when they were going to claim that payment. So it was an asynchronous payment. And then finally, it was non-custodial. So Prism never, again, never touches Bitcoin, never touched Bitcoin. And in fact, we never had custody or even saw or knew your Nostr Wallet Connect secret, so it was completely non-custodial. So we can now make Anonymous, automatic, asynchronous, non-custodial payments with Bitcoin, which is something we've been trying to solve for a really long time. And now we can do it really simply. And that's what's possible with The Benefits of Bitcoin Payment Stack: the Bitcoin payment stack, better payments, a freer internet. We can onboard 8 billion bitcoiners and the rest of the world to Nostr. Thank you.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 81870f53:29bef6a6

クラウドマイニングとは、マイニングを行う企業に資金を投資して、マイニングを代行してもらうサービスです。マイニングとは、仮想通貨の取引履歴を確認し、不正がないかをチェックする作業です。マイニングに成功すると、その報酬として仮想通貨を獲得することができます。

クラウドマイニングには、大きく分けて以下の3つの利点があります。

1. 初期投資を抑えられる

クラウドマイニングでは、マイニング専用のマシンや電気代などの初期投資を抑えることができます。マイニングを自力で行う場合、マイニング専用のマシンを複数台購入する必要があります。また、マシンを設置するためのスペースや電気代も必要となります。クラウドマイニングでは、これらの初期投資をクラウドマイニング業者が負担してくれるため、個人でも気軽にマイニングを始めることができます。

1. 専門知識やスキルがなくても始められる

クラウドマイニングでは、マイニングの専門知識やスキルがなくても始めることができます。マイニングを自力で行う場合、マイニングの原理や仕組みを理解し、マイニング専用のマシンを設置・管理する必要があります。クラウドマイニングでは、これらの作業をクラウドマイニング業者が代行してくれるため、マイニング初心者でも簡単に始めることができます。

1. 管理の手間が不要

クラウドマイニングでは、マイニングの管理の手間が不要です。マイニングを自力で行う場合、マイニングの状況を常にチェックし、必要に応じてマイニング設定を変更する必要があります。クラウドマイニングでは、これらの作業をクラウドマイニング業者が代行してくれるため、マイニングに時間を割く必要がありません。

クラウドマイニングのデメリット

クラウドマイニングには、以下のデメリットもあります。

• マイニング報酬が不安定

マイニング報酬は、仮想通貨の価格やマイニング難易度によって変動します。そのため、クラウドマイニングで得られる利益も不安定です。

• 詐欺のリスクがある

クラウドマイニングの業者の中には、詐欺を行っている業者も存在します。クラウドマイニングを始める前に、業者の信頼性や実績を十分に調べることが重要です。

クラウドマイニングを始める際の注意点

クラウドマイニングを始める際は、以下の点に注意しましょう。

• 信頼できる業者を選ぶ

クラウドマイニングの業者の中には、詐欺を行っている業者も存在します。クラウドマイニングを始める前に、業者の信頼性や実績を十分に調べることが重要です。

• マイニングのリスクを理解する

マイニングには、マイニング報酬が不安定になる、詐欺のリスクがあるなどのリスクがあります。クラウドマイニングを始める前に、これらのリスクを十分に理解しておきましょう。

クラウドマイニングのまとめ

クラウドマイニングは、初期投資を抑えたり、専門知識やスキルがなくても始められたりと、マイニングを始めるハードルを下げてくれるサービスです。ただし、マイニング報酬が不安定になる、詐欺のリスクがあるなどのデメリットもあるため、始める際は注意が必要です。

ここで無料のクラウド マイニング トライアル現金 1000 ドルを請求してください 投資不要、リスクゼロ、利益2倍

ここに招待状

@ 37581784:f5fed69e

I recently stumbled upon a revelation that has entirely reshaped my understanding as a lawyer, something so profound that it has jolted my ‘anticuada mente de abogada’ into a new era of thought.

We often pride ourselves on the solidity and timelessness of legal principles, but what I’ve discovered challenges the very bedrock of this belief. In the hallowed halls of law school, one of the first concepts we grapple with is the distinction between ‘persona natural’ and ‘persona jurídica’. These are the foundational blocks of legal identity: one, the flesh-and-blood human with inherent rights and responsibilities, and the other, a legal entity, a construct of law endowed with certain privileges and liabilities.

But now, I’m compelled to consider a third category, one that might just be the key to unlocking a future of legal and digital harmony: the ‘persona digital’. Imagine, if you will, introducing this concept into our current legislation. The ramifications are staggering — a leap forward in legal theory that could bring our outdated laws into the age of digital enlightenment.

Let me start by telling you what brought me to this concept. As you already know, or if you don’t, I invite you to read my articles on Nostr or Bitcoin, my love and admiration for these two decentralized and censorship-resistant protocols are infinite for many reasons. However, I had never encountered the concept of Digital Sovereignty.

It was thanks to the article The Laws of Identity by Kim Cameron that I had the induced epiphany I'm sharing with you today.

(Kim Cameron was a Canadian computer scientist who was Microsoft’s chief architect of access and worked since the emergence of the Internet to create a humanistic system of Digital Identity. He was the originator of the 7 Laws of Identity, and developed the InfoCard architecture.)

Now, let’s analyze the concept of digital sovereignty and its difference from decentralization.

Sovereign Focus vs. Decentralized Solutions

Decentralization, a term that has garnered significant attention, especially with the advent of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, implies a shift of control away from a centralized point. It’s a concept that addresses vital issues such as eliminating single points of failure and mitigating centralized decision-making. However, it’s essential to recognize that decentralization is primarily a structural aspect, one that doesn’t intrinsically guarantee user sovereignty.

Sovereignty, in contrast, is fundamentally about having complete authority and control. In the technological sphere, this translates to users having absolute command over their data and the tools employed for processing this data. Sovereign solutions champion the notion of users owning, managing, and operating their data independently, free from the constraints and dependencies of centralized entities. This approach aligns more closely with the ethos of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), a movement advocating for individuals to have control over their digital identities without the need for intermediaries.

Self-sovereign identity (SSI) is a term used to describe the digital movement that recognizes an individual should own and control their identity without the intervening administrative authorities.

Historical Overview of SSI

The journey of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is a fascinating one, deeply entwined with the evolution of digital technology and our shifting perceptions of identity and privacy. This movement, advocating for individuals to have full control over their digital identities without the need for intermediaries, marks a significant departure from traditional models of identity management.

Tracing its roots back to the pre-internet era, identity was primarily a physical concept, defined by tangible documents and personal recognition. However, with the advent of the internet, a new form of identity began to emerge — the digital identity. Initially, these digital identities were managed by centralized entities such as governments, corporations, and service providers. This period saw the creation of digital profiles managed across various platforms, leading to fragmented and often siloed identity information.

As we moved into the early 2000s, the limitations and risks of this centralized model of identity management became increasingly apparent. Concerns about privacy, data security, and identity theft started to grow, highlighting the need for a more secure and user-centric approach to identity management.

The introduction of blockchain technology in the late 2000s, especially with the emergence of Bitcoin, brought the concept of decentralization into the spotlight. This technology offered a new way to record transactions or data without central authority, laying the groundwork for decentralized approaches to managing identity.

It was against this backdrop that the concept of Self-Sovereign Identity began to take shape. Technologists and thinkers in the digital identity space started exploring solutions to the problems posed by centralized identity systems. The core idea was a paradigm shift — transferring the control of identity information from institutions to individuals themselves. This concept gained momentum as global concerns about privacy and personal data control intensified.

By the 2010s, the principles of SSI were more formally articulated, emphasizing user control, consent, transparency, and interoperability. Technologies supporting SSI, such as decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and verifiable credentials, began to emerge. These technologies empowered users to prove their identity online while maintaining control over their personal data, eliminating the need to rely on third-party intermediaries.

In recent years, SSI has seen an upsurge in interest and adoption. Its applications are being explored not just in technology-centric circles but also in more mainstream sectors such as government, healthcare, and finance. The growing acknowledgment of the necessity for a digital identity system that is secure, preserves privacy, and is under the user’s control reflects a broader shift in how personal data is managed and used across the digital world.

The principles of SSI

Delving deeper into the concept of sovereign data and the principles of Self-Sovereign Identity reveals a more nuanced understanding. Sovereign data transcends the basic idea of data privacy. It’s about individuals possessing unhindered access to their data, coupled with the freedom to manage and utilize it as they deem fit. This goes beyond merely securing data; it’s about empowering users to be the ultimate arbiters of their digital information.

Consider a common scenario like wanting to delete your Instagram account. Under the current centralized system, this action would mean losing access to your friends, photos, conversations, and digital memories — essentially parts of your digital life. The SSI paradigm proposes a transformative change to this situation.

In an SSI-driven world, deleting an account on a platform wouldn’t result in the loss of your digital memories or connections. Because you would own your data independently of the platform, you could retain your photos, conversations, and connections, even if you choose to leave the platform. You could carry this information with you, using it on other platforms or in different contexts as you choose.

The benefits of SSI become even more apparent when living through platforms like Nostr, which allow for the creation and management of a digital persona within the protocol. On Nostr, you can use different tools and clients while maintaining ownership of your information. This decentralized approach embodies the SSI ethos, enabling you to control your digital identity across various platforms without being tethered to any single service provider.

SSI allows people to interact in the digital world with the same freedom and capacity for trust as they do in the offline world.

The Key principles of SSI include:

• Existence: Users must have an independent existence; their identity should exist independently of any centralized authority.
• Control: Users must control their identities, with the ability to access and manage their personal data without intermediaries.
• Access: Users should have access to their own data and the ability to easily share it with others.
• Transparency: Systems and algorithms used for identity verification should be transparent, allowing users to understand how their data is used.
• Persistence: Identities should be long-lasting and not subject to loss or change by external forces.
• Portability: Information and identities should be transportable and not confined to a single service provider.
• Interoperability: Identities should be usable across multiple locations and systems.
• Consent: Users should provide consent for the use of their identity information.
• Minimalization: Disclosure of identity information should be minimized to what is absolutely necessary for a particular interaction.
• Protection: Users’ rights and the privacy of their identity information should be protected.

This paradigm offers numerous advantages:

• Data Portability: You can seamlessly transfer your data across platforms without losing access or control.
• Interoperability: Your digital identity and data can be used across multiple platforms and services.
• Control and Consent: You have complete control over how your data is used and shared.
• Resilience Against Censorship: With decentralized platforms like Nostr, your data isn’t subject to control or censorship by a single entity.

The Intersection of SSI Principles with Philosophical, Economic, and Sociological Theories

The principles of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) are not just groundbreaking in terms of technological innovation; they also deeply resonate with various philosophical, economic, and sociological theories, each reflecting ideologies that have shaped human thought and societal structures. These principles, when viewed through the lens of different theoretical frameworks, reveal how SSI could potentially transform the legal landscape.

• Existence and Existentialism: The SSI principle of existence, emphasizing an individual’s digital identity’s independent existence, mirrors existentialist philosophies. Thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Friedrich Nietzsche focused on individual autonomy and self-creation through personal choices. This notion is intrinsic to SSI, which empowers individuals to autonomously craft and maintain their digital identities, thereby embracing existentialism’s core tenet of defining one’s essence independently.

• Control and Liberalism: The principle of control in SSI aligns with the liberalist ideals of personal liberty and autonomy. Philosophers like John Locke advocated for the fundamental right of individuals to control their lives. Translated into the digital realm, SSI embodies this by enabling individuals to have control over their digital identity and personal data, mirroring the liberalist emphasis on individual freedom and self-governance.

• Access and Behavioral Economics: SSI’s principle of access, which allows users to retrieve and use their data, is aligned with behavioral economics. This field examines how psychological, cognitive, emotional, cultural, and social factors influence economic decisions. By facilitating direct access to data, SSI enhances informed and rational decision-making, reflecting the principles of behavioral economics that focus on understanding and improving decision-making processes.

• Transparency and Social Contract Theory: The transparency principle in SSI, ensuring clarity in data usage, aligns with social contract theories. Philosophers like Rousseau and Hobbes emphasized transparency and trust as foundational elements in the formation of social contracts. SSI brings this level of transparency to digital interactions, thereby fostering trust between users and digital platforms, akin to the trust necessary in social contracts.

• Persistence and Social Constructivism: The persistence principle in SSI, relating to the enduring nature of digital identities, parallels social constructivist theories. These theories posit that identity is shaped through social interactions and experiences. SSI facilitates a persistent digital identity that remains consistent across various social contexts, reflecting the social constructivist view that our identities are formed and maintained through our interactions.

• Portability and Free Market Economics: Portability in SSI, advocating for the free movement of identity information across platforms, resonates with free market economic theories. This principle fosters a digital marketplace where identities and data can be transported freely, enhancing user choice and competition, in line with the free market’s emphasis on unhindered exchange and individual choice.

• Interoperability and Systems Theory: The principle of interoperability in SSI, enabling digital identities to function across diverse systems, aligns with systems theory. This theory examines the interconnectedness and interdependence of components within a whole. In SSI, interoperability ensures that different parts of the digital ecosystem can work together cohesively, reflecting systems theory’s focus on the functioning of interconnected systems.

• Consent and Ethical Philosophy: Consent in SSI, necessitating user agreement for data usage, is deeply rooted in ethical philosophy. This principle emphasizes respect for individual autonomy and informed decision-making, mirroring the ethical emphasis on voluntary and informed consent as a cornerstone of ethical interaction.

• Minimalization and Utilitarianism: The principle of minimalization in SSI, involving minimal data disclosure, aligns with utilitarian principles that advocate for actions that maximize overall benefit or utility. By minimizing data exposure, SSI supports the utilitarian aim of reducing harm and maximizing the protection and privacy of individual data.

• Protection and Legal Theory: The protection principle in SSI, focused on safeguarding users’ rights and privacy, connects with legal theories concerning the defense of individual rights and personal security. It underscores the need for robust legal frameworks that protect these rights in the digital sphere.

Incorporating SSI principles into the legal environment could lead to significant advancements. Enhanced privacy laws, informed by these principles, would ensure more ethical and transparent data usage. The establishment of data portability rights would empower users in the digital sphere, and the creation of frameworks for identity protection would safeguard digital identities against various threats. Additionally, accommodating decentralized digital entities within legal structures would recognize and adapt to the evolving nature of digital interactions and identities.

For more information:

• https://vishwasbanand.medium.com/in-depth-introduction-to-self-sovereign-identity-ssi-fc8904736f78
• https://volodymyrpavlyshyn.medium.com/how-self-sovereign-identity-support-laws-of-identity-dc4b6e54dd2b
• https://www.identityblog.com/stories/2005/05/13/TheLawsOfIdentity.pdf
• http://www.nostr.com
• https://didi.org.ar/en/self-sovereign-digital-identity/
• https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
• Books: Self-Sovereign Identity: Decentralized digital identity and verifiable credentials by Alex Preukschat

@ 2edbcea6:40558884

Happy Sunday #Nostr !

Here’s your #NostrTechWeekly newsletter brought to you by nostr:npub19mduaf5569jx9xz555jcx3v06mvktvtpu0zgk47n4lcpjsz43zzqhj6vzk written by nostr:npub1r3fwhjpx2njy87f9qxmapjn9neutwh7aeww95e03drkfg45cey4qgl7ex2

The #NostrTechWeekly is a weekly newsletter focused on the more technical happenings in the nostr-verse.

Before we dive in I want to congratulate the winners of the NostrAsia hackathon: eNuts, Shopstr, Zappdit, and the runner up Nosskey. Thanks for hacking away and building for the community. 😊

Let’s dive in!

Recent Upgrades to Nostr (AKA NIPs)

1) (Proposed) Updates to NIP 72: Moderated Communities

As mentioned in previous weeks, moderated communities as currently outlined in NIP 72 publish kind 1 events (tweet-like text notes), and they show up without context in clients like Damus, Amethyst, Snort, etc.

One solution to the lack of context is to make activities in moderated communities use event kinds other than 1 so that you have to be in a client specialized for moderated communities to see those activities.

There have been a few attempts to update NIP 72 to accomplish that goal, and this is the latest iteration. Unique to this proposal is the idea of community scoped user data, not just posts. For example you could follow people within the community within the scope of the community but not add them to your general following list for your whole Nostr account. They’d show up in your feed in the moderated community but not in your general feed.

There’s a lot of potential in moderated communities to become a core pillar of Nostr usage as the network scales, especially since the censorship and API management regimes of Reddit have gotten more restrictive. People want better and Nostr can be that solution.

Author: nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6

2) (Proposed) NIP 49: Nostr Wallet Auth

Having a Lightning Wallet connected to Nostr is a powerful tool for content monetization and nostr-based marketplaces. There’s a lot of great work done on Nostr Wallet Connect, but it all “hinges on having the user copy-paste a wallet connection URI into the app they wish to connect with. This can be a UX hurdle and often has the user handling sensitive information that they may not understand.”

“This NIP proposes a new protocol that solves these problems by having the wallet and app generate a NWC connection URI together. This URI is then used to connect the wallet and app.”

Making it easier for new users (especially those that are less technical) to participate in the new economy is fundamental to making Nostr the best place for content creators to make a living without middlemen and heavy handed platforms. 💪

Author: nostr:npub1u8lnhlw5usp3t9vmpz60ejpyt649z33hu82wc2hpv6m5xdqmuxhs46turz

3) (Proposed) Updates to NIP 15: Nostr-based Marketplaces

This proposal expands the capabilities of Nostr-based Marketplaces to support auctions. Think about a Nostr-based eBay where users can post an item for sale by auction using a marketplace Nostr client.

The auction going live is a Nostr event, and users can publish bids as Nostr events, and when the auction is closed it’ll be determined by the bid event with the highest offering. Which anyone can verify. This is a very interesting way to make marketplaces more censorship resistant.

Author: ibz

Notable Projects

Yondar (social maps) 🌐

Much physical commerce is discovered by consumers via map apps. You go on Google or Apple Maps to find an art supply store near you, or coffee shops that are open at 2pm when you’re in a new city. These centralized solutions have dominated, but no more! Enter Yondar.

Yondar is a Nostr client that allows users to publish places on a map. This could be places of business or events, really anything that has a location.

True to Nostr form, people can also socially interact with these places: do a kind 1 comment in response to an upcoming event published on Yondar. Or someone could create a Nostr client for restaurant reviews and publish one of those in response to a place published via Yondar. The possibilities are endless 🤯.

Author(s): npub1arkn0xxxll4llgy9qxkrncn3vc4l69s0dz8ef3zadykcwe7ax3dqrrh43w

WavLake 🎵

WavLake is a music player for web and mobile. It’s part Spotify music player and music discovery tool, part music monetization platform. They host the actual music files in their own cloud hosted system, but they publish Nostr events to represent the content that’s stored by WavLake, so other clients could help people discover music hosted and published via WavLake.

If musicians can get paid more for their music via solutions like WavLake, they will start using Nostr purely for selfish monetary reasons. This could be the start of purple-pilling that particular artistic community.

P.S. I listened to WavLake Radio while writing this, it was nice writing music.

Authors: based on the linked Github repo it’s nostr:npub1j0shgumvguvlsp38s49v4zm8algtt92cerkwyeagan9m6tnu256s2eg9a7 and blastshielddown

Opt-in content moderation on nos.social 👍👎

nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240 gave a presentation at NostrAsia about making Nostr more accessible for normies. One of the items that was announced was the implementation of opt-in content moderation in his Nostr client nos.social.

They now support content warnings set by users publishing content, reporting content with various tags, as well as the ability for users to opt-in to moderation that changes their feed based on what they want to filter out.

People that don’t want moderation don’t need to use it, but I applaud nos.social’s work to develop these tools and patterns so that people have the choice to moderate their own feed.

Latest conversations: Interoperability

NostrAsia really highlighted the superpowers of Nostr and one of the foremost is interoperability. nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft gave a great talk about this topic and explained NIP 31 and NIP 89.

In summary, imagine there’s a Nostr client for movie reviews and they publish the review in a specific structure with Kind 12345678. Most Nostr clients will see that event but won’t know how to display that content or help users interact with it.

If clients adopt NIPs 31 and 89 then Nostr events will have an “alt” tag and a way to find a suggested app to handle that type of Nostr content. The alt tag helps clients display something to the user and the suggested app handler helps the client indicate to the user how to interact with that content more natively.

Maximum interoperability is useful in allowing Nostr to grow without centralizing. We can all experiment and build and all efforts still support the usage of the Nostr ecosystem in general.

Kind 1 clients as gateways to the Nostr app ecosystem

This interoperable future points to a framework where Kind 1 clients (Damus, Amethyst, Snort, Primal, etc) are the entrypoint or gateway to the Nostr ecosystem. Kind 1 clients are the core social use case and the foundation of most social interaction and could be amazing standalone apps and businesses, but Nostr makes them something more.

People will post Kind 1 notes referencing all kinds of Nostr events: music published via WavLake or Stemstr, places shared via Yondar, recipes created on Nostr.Cooking, etc. Clients will display some context on what the comment is on (music, place, video, recipe, etc) and then help the user find the right plugin/app/website to use to interact with that content natively.

This makes the Kind 1 clients the purple pill. This is only possible because of the unique interoperability capabilities of Nostr.

Interoperability with non-Nostr services

Even more amazing about Nostr is that it’s fairly easy to make the network interoperable with services outside the Nostr-verse. We already have pretty good bridges to ActivityPub-based systems like Mastadon as well as Twitter (with Exit). That reduces the switching cost for people that want to explore Nostr and eventually make the switch.

Even within Nostr-verse we have services like nostr.build that provide services in a way that doesn’t lock users in. Nostr.build provides file hosting services and because they follow NIP 96, there’s a standard way for clients to interact with nostr.build as a user’s preferred file storage provider for pictures and videos. It is easy for users to switch providers and clients can easily pick up the change. Efforts like NIP 96 makes file storage much more interoperable across the Nostr-verse without centralization.

Continuing to build solutions that allow users to have freedom AND a great experience will make Nostr the best game in town.

Don’t reinvent the wheel: use ISO when possible

I’m not sure if every developer knows this, but there’s an International Standards Organization (ISO) that has done a ton of work to promote standards of all kinds. The most common one developers have all used is the ISO datetime format. No matter what language or database you’re using, you’re likely representing timezone aware datetimes in the ISO format so that you can pass that data around safely.

ISO has codified standards for everything : how to store medical history, how to interact with USB, even stuff as obscure as how to represent data around holograms

Nostr is doing a lot of work to define structure to data that will be stored as Nostr events. We’re essentially inventing standards for social-related data of all kinds.

There are some things we’re building support for in Nostr, and I will encourage folks to see if there’s an ISO standard to follow first. It may save you a ton of time and brain power. On top of that, adopting ISO standards makes Nostr more compatible with future development that we can’t even imagine yet.

Invest in interoperability to support the cause

The Nostr-verse is under construction and the best time to plan for interoperability is before the building is done. Devs have done a great job retaining interoperability as a cambrian explosion of Nostr development has taken place. I hope we can continue to invest in interoperability because it may just be the thing that makes Nostr able to take on the giants of Big Tech when the time is right.

Until next time 🫡

If you want to see something highlighted, if we missed anything, or if you’re building something we didn’t post about, let us know. DMs welcome at nostr:npub19mduaf5569jx9xz555jcx3v06mvktvtpu0zgk47n4lcpjsz43zzqhj6vzk

Stay Classy, Nostr.

@ 8947a945:9bfcf626

จงตระหนักรู้คุณค่าของตัวเอง เพชรไม่ได้เปล่งประกายเจิสจรัสจากสุดปลายถ้ำ

2023’s Wake up call

แรงบันดาลใจที่ทำให้ผมตัดสินใจเอาเรื่องนี้มาเล่าบน #ทุ่งม่วง เกิดจากเมื่อต้นปี 2023 ผมได้รับสัญญาณเตือนภัยจากที่ทำงานแห่งหนึ่ง (Wake up call) ปลุกให้ตื่นขึ้นจากภวังค์ ตระหนักรู้ถึงความเป็นจริงบางอย่าง ว่างาน part time ที่กำลังทำเริ่มมีสัญญาณความไม่มั่นคงเกิดขึ้นทีละเล็กทีละน้อย มีความสุ่มเสี่ยงที่จะถูกขอให้งดคลินิคไม่ต้องมาออกตรวจ (ภาษาสุภาพของการเลิกจ้างหมอ)

สำหรับหมอที่ทำงานหลายโรงพยาบาล จะเข้าใจสถานะ”หมอ part time” ของตนเองดีว่า สามารถถูกถอดเวรออกได้ทุกเมื่อ หากทางโรงพยาบาลมีความจำเป็น

เมื่อเกิดเหตุการณ์นี้ ผมติดต่อโรงพยาบาลใกล้บ้านเป็นแผนสำรองเอาไว้ ที่นี่ขาดอัตรากำลังแพทย์พอดี ผมเลยสามารถเริ่มงานได้ทันที ทำให้รายได้ไม่กระทบกระเทือนต่อครอบครัว แต่สิ่งที่ต้องพบเจอก็คือโรงพยาบาลแห่งใหม่นี้ งานหนักมาก หนักถึงขั้นกระอักเลือด เต็มไปด้วยความเสี่ยงที่ยังไม่มีระบบการบริหารจัดการที่มีประสิทธิภาพ ผมทำงานที่นี่ไประยะนึง เมื่อมาดูสลิปค่าตอบแทน พบว่าผมถูกจัดกลุ่มให้อยู่ในกลุ่มแพทย์เวชปฏิบัติทั่วไป (General practitioner หรือ GP คือหมอทั่วไปที่ยังไม่ได้เรียนต่อเฉพาะทาง)

แพทย์เฉพาะทาง ตามกลไกจะได้ค่าตอบแทนสูงกว่าแพทย์ GP ถึง 70 - 80%

ผมนำเรื่องนี้ขึ้นปรึกษาหน่วยงานที่เกี่ยวข้อง ได้รับการดำเนินแก้ไขอย่างเร่งด่วนเพราะความเข้าใจผิด และผมก็ได้ค่าตอบแทนสมน้ำสมเนื้อตามมาทีหลัง แต่ด้วยเนื้องานที่หนักมาก เหนื่อยมาก เลิกงานเที่ยงคืน วันอื่นๆทำงานอีก ทำงาน 7 วันต่อสัปดาห์ ร่างกายเริ่มส่งสัญญาณเตือนบางอย่างว่ากำลัง overheat เครื่องกำลังจะไหม้ในอีกไม่ช้า ถ้ายังคงลากเลือดขนาดนี้ แต่เวลานั้นผมทำเพื่อครอบครัวอย่างเดียว เลยไม่ได้ลังเล เดินหน้าต่อ

จุดเปลี่ยนมันอยู่ตรงนี้ครับ ผมมีอาจารย์แพทย์ที่เคารพมากท่านหนึ่ง อาจารย์เขารับรู้เรื่องผมมาตลอด เมื่อทราบว่าผมทำงานหักโหม แลกกับความเสี่ยงหลายมิติ จึงมีโอกาสได้นั่งคุยกัน อาจารย์ท่านนี้เล่าเรื่องสั้นเรื่องหนึ่งให้ฟัง และทิ้งท้ายเอาไว้ให้คิดว่า

ทรัพยากรที่มีค่าที่สุดคือเวลา จงเอาตัวผมไปอยู่ในที่ที่เห็นคุณค่าในตัวผมให้ได้ ถ้าผมทำได้ เวลาของผมมีจะสร้างมูลค่าได้มหาศาลกว่านี้

การสนทนาจบลงด้วยความรู้สึกพบแสงสว่างที่ปลายอุโมงค์ หลังจากนั้นไม่กี่สัปดาห์ผมตัดสินใจ ของดคลินิคจากโรงพยาบาลแห่งนั้นทันที และเป็นความโชคดี เพราะที่ทำงานประจำกำลังขาดแคลนหมอ ผมเลยได้ตารางออกตรวจเพิ่ม รายได้มั่นคงมากกว่าเดิม

ส่วนโรงพยาบาลที่กระตุ้น wake up call ผมตอนแรก เล็งเห็นความสำคัญของทักษะเฉพาะทางของผมที่ขาดไม่ได้และจำเป็นมากต่อสถานการณ์ปัจจุบัน จึงขอให้ผมอยู่ช่วยต่อและเพิ่มค่าตอบแทนเพิ่มจากเดิมอีกเกือบ 100%

---

ทักษะการเขียนบทความ ที่เกือบจะถูกปิดผนึกไปตลอดกาล เพราะเอาตัวเองไปอยู่ไม่ถูกที่

สิ่งที่ผมสนใจอยู่เป็นทุนเดิมคือการเล่าเรื่องแฝงแง่คิดจากประสบการณ์ของตัวเองให้กับผู้อื่นฟัง ตัวผมเองเป็นคนพูดไม่เก่ง บุคคลิกเก็บตัว Introvert ใช้เวลาส่วนใหญ่อยู่กับความคิดตัวเอง แล้วจดบันทึกข้อคิดที่คิดได้เอาไว้ ตั้งใจว่าถ้ามีเวลาพอ จะเอาสิ่งที่รีดออกมาจากสมอง มาขยายทำเป็นบทความ เพื่อเอาไว้ให้คนอื่นอ่าน เผื่อว่ามันจะมีประโยชน์ไม่มากก็น้อย ผมตระเวนหาเวบไซต์สำหรับนักเขียนไปเรื่อย แต่ก็หาที่ที่ถูกใจไม่ได้ ผมก็เลย”จำใจ” เขียนลงไปในเฟสบุค และ แพลตฟอร์มนักเขียนแห่งหนึ่งของประเทศไทย

ในช่วงแรกผมลองเขียนบทความลงเฟสบุค ผลลัพธ์เป็นไปตามคาดครับว่าไม่เป็นที่สนใจ ประเมินผลหยาบๆจากยอดกดไลค์ คอมเม้นท์ และการแชร์ เงียบเหมือนป่าช้าเลย นานๆจะมีคนมากดไลค์ซักที แต่ก็เป็นที่รู้ๆกันครับว่าการกดไลค์ มันอาจจะเกิดจากคนอื่นเปิดมาเจอโพสต์ของผม แล้วจะปัดให้มันพ้นๆไป “ไอ้บ้านี่มันบ่นอะไรของมัน” แต่นิ้วโป้งดันไปจิ้มโดนปุ่มไลค์พอดี ในเมื่อจิ้มไปโดนแล้วก็แล้วกันไปก็เป็นไปได้

เวลาผ่านไปมันเหมือนผมขึ้นไปพูดบนเวทีที่ไม่มีผู้ฟัง หรือ ผู้ฟังหลับทั้งห้อง บทความต่างๆข้อคิดต่างๆที่ผมตั้งใจเรียบเรียงมันส่งไปไม่ถึงผู้คน มันดูไร้ค่า จบด้วยการนั่งคุยกับตัวเองเหมือนเป็นคนไข้จิตเวช เหตุการณ์ทั้งหมดนี้เกือบนำพาผมไปสู่ข้อสรุปที่ว่า “ผมเองคงเขียนไม่เก่ง” หรือ “เขียนไม่ได้แย่หรอก แต่ไม่ได้โปรโมท เลยไม่มีใครมาพบเจอ” หรือไม่ก็ถูกทั้งสองข้อ บางครั้งอยากจะล้มเลิกการเขียนไปเลยก็มีครับ

ช่วงมกราคมปี 2023 เวบไซต์ Right shift เริ่มเป็นที่รู้จัก ฟังคอนเซปจากอาจารย์พิริยะแล้วชอบมาก

เวบไซต์ Right shift ตั้งใจเป็นแหล่งรวบรวมข้อมูลสำหรับผู้ที่สนใจอยากศึกษาบิตคอยน์ ให้สามารถเข้ามาศึกษาได้โดยไม่มีค่าใช้จ่าย แถมยังเชิญชวนให้ผู้ที่อยากเขียนบทความที่เป็นประโยชน์ให้แก่ผู้อื่น ใครสนใจสามารถส่งบทความเข้ามาได้ ถ้าหากบทความไหนมีแวว จะมีทีมบก.ติดต่อกลับไปเพื่อทำงานร่วมกันในการขัดเกล้า แก้ไขสำนวนบางจุดให้ดียิ่งขึ้น

พอรู้มาถึงตอนนี้มันนเหมือนมีอะไรมาเคาะกะโหลกดังๆ จนความรู้สึก “ปังปุริเย่ เฮ้ ร้องว้าว” มันผุดขึ้นมา แต่มันก็มาพร้อมกับความไม่มั่นใจในตัวเองนั่นแหละครับ ความขัดแย้งเต็มไปหมดว่า “จะเขียนหรือไม่เขียนดี” “เอาจริงอ่ะ? จะเขียนบทความส่งไปจริงๆเหรอ?” “ม_ึง ไม่ใช่นักเขียนมืออาชีพนะ คนที่เขาส่งบทความไปมีแต่เทพๆทั้งนั้น จะเอาอะไรไปสู้กับเขา” และเสียงอื่นๆในหัวอีกมากมาย

แต่สุดท้ายผมทลาย “Comfort zone” ได้ ด้วยกำลังใจเล็กๆน้อยๆจากภรรยาครับ ภรรยาผมบอกด้วยคำสั้นๆว่า “ก็ลองดูสิ สกิลการเขียนเล่าเรื่องของเธอก็ไม่ขี้เหร่นะ” ผมเลยลองทำดู และนี่คือสิ่งที่เกิดขึ้น

บอกได้ว่าเป็นครั้งแรกที่ผมได้ถูกฝึกการเขียนบทความโดย "ใครก็ไม่รู้” ผมรู้แค่ว่าเป็นทีมบก.ของ Right shift เมื่อทำงานร่วมกันไปเรื่อยๆ ทีมบก.ทุ่มเทในการช่วยแก้ไขช่วยตรวจสอบบทความของผมมากๆ จนผมสังเกตุเห็นได้

ใครเคยใช้ Google document ร่วมแก้ไขบทความด้วยกันมากกว่าหนึ่งคนคงจะรู้ดีนะครับว่า เวลาที่มีการแก้ไขข้อความมันจะมีเมล์แจ้งเตือนไปหาทุกคนที่เข้ามาร่วมแก้ไขเอกสารทั้งหมด บางคืนที่ผมนอนหลับไม่สนิท ตีสองตีสามตื่นมาเข้าห้องน้ำ ผมยังเห็นเมล์อัพเดทการแก้ไขบทความจากทีมงาน right shift เด้งๆอยู่เลย

จนสุดท้ายงานเขียนผมก็ได้รับการเผยแพร่บนเวบไซต์ Right shift

ใครยังไม่เคยอ่านกดตรงนี้ได้เลยครับ

หลังจากนั้นผมรับรู้ถึงทักษะนี้มากขึ้น เลยตั้งใจว่าต้องฝึกให้เก่งขึ้นดีขึ้นในทุกๆบทความที่ผมเขียน ผมอ่านหนังสือเยอะขึ้น ศึกษาสำนวนการเขียนจากนักเขียนรวมถึงนักแปลท่านอื่นๆ เพื่อดูตัวอย่างสำนวน ลีลาสไตล์การใช้คำ เอามาประยุกต์ใช้กับงานเขียนของตัวเอง

ไม่รู้ตัวหรอกครับ ว่าทักษะนี้มันโดนฝึก โดนขัดเกลาตั้งแต่เมื่อไหร่ แต่ตอนนี้ตระหนักรู้ถึงการที่มันมีตัวตนอยู่ภายในตัวผมแล้ว ผมก็จะลับคมมันไปเรื่อยๆ หลายครั้งตอนที่ผมเขียนบทความอยู่ผมลืมเวลา ลืมหิว ลืมง่วง ลืมเหนื่อยไปเลย ถ้าเปรียบเทียบกับนักกีฬา คาดว่าสภาวะตอนนั้นคงเป็นสภาวะหนึ่งของการเข้าสมาธิแบบ “Into the zone”

---

เรื่องสั้นที่อาจารย์ของผมเล่าให้ฟัง มอบบทเรียนชีวิตที่มีค่า อยู่ต่อจากนี้ครับ

---

พ่อคุยกับลูกสาว “ยินดีด้วยที่จบการศึกษา พ่อซื้อรถคันนี้ไว้ให้ลูกซักพักแล้ว ตอนนี้พ่อจะให้ลูกนะ แต่ก่อนที่พ่อจะให้ พ่ออยากให้ลูกนำไปที่ร้านรับซื้อ-ขายรถในตัวเมือง แล้วมาบอกพ่อด้วยว่าเขาให้ราคาเท่าไหร่”

ลูกสาวทำตาม กลับมาหาพ่อ บอกว่า “ร้านนี้เขาให้ราคา $10,000 เพราะรถเก่า” พ่อบอกลูกว่า “โอเคลูก ทีนี้พ่ออยากให้หนูเอารถไปที่โรงรับจำนำ ลองดูซิว่าเขาจะตีราคารถคันนี้เท่าไหร่”

ลูกสาวทำตาม แล้วกลับมาบอกพ่อว่า “โรงรับจำนำให้ราคา $1,000 เพราะรถเก่ามาก ดูแล้วต้องซ่อมอีกหลายรายการ ”

ครั้งนี้พ่อบอกลูกสาวให้นำรถนี้ไปยังชมรมคนรักรถที่มีผู้เชี่ยวชาญ และนำรถให้พวกเขาดู

ลูกสาวทำตาม ขับรถนี้ไปที่ชมรมที่ว่า หลังจากนั้นไม่นานลูกสาวกลับมาบอกพ่อด้วยน้ำเสียงตื่นเต้นว่า “บางคนเสนอราคา $100,000 เพราะเป็นรถหายาก และสภาพดีมาก”

ผู้เป็นพ่อยิ้มให้กับลูกสาว เหมือนว่ารู้อยู่แล้วว่าจะเกิดอะไรขึ้น ด้วยความสงสัยลูกสาวจึงถามพ่อว่า

“ในเมื่อพ่อรู้อยู่แล้วว่าร้านไหนจะให้ราคาสูง ทำไมพ่อไม่ให้หนูไปที่ชมรมคนรักรถตั้งแต่แรกล่ะ”

พ่อบอกลูกสาวว่า “นี่แหละบทเรียนชีวิตที่สำคัญบทหนึ่งที่พ่ออยากมอบให้แก่ลูก พ่ออยากให้ลูกรู้ไว้ว่า ลูกจะไม่มีค่าใดๆเลยถ้าอยู่ผิดที่ ที่ที่คนอื่นมองไม่เห็นเรา ไม่ต้องเสียเวลาไปโกรธโมโหไม่พอใจหรอกนะ สิ่งที่ลูกต้องทำก็คือเดินออกจากที่นั่น ออกไปจากสังคมและสถานที่ที่ไม่เห็นค่าในตัวลูก ค้นหาที่สถานที่ของลูกให้เจอ ถ้าลูกไม่ลองลงมือทำด้วยตัวเอง ลูกก็จะไม่ได้เรียนรู้อะไรเลย”

---

ข้อคิดที่อยากจะแบ่งปันกับทุกท่านที่อ่านมาจนจบ

บทความนี้มีความพิเศษกว่าบทความอื่นๆ ท้ายบทความของผมผมจะมาชวนคุยและสรุปข้อคิดที่เป็นประโยชน์ให้แก่เพื่อนๆพี่ๆทุกท่านที่อ่านมาจนจบ แต่สำหรับบทความนี้ข้อคิดที่ผมอยากให้ ถูกสรุปขมวดไว้ทั้งหมดแล้วในประโยคที่พ่อบอกลูกสาว

อย่าลืมต่อสู้ ฝ่าฟันอุปสรรค ค้นหาสถานที่ของตัวเราเองให้พบนะครับ เมื่อค้นพบทักษะในตัวแล้ว อย่าให้ถูกปิดผนึกไว้ เพียงเพราะอยู่ผิดที่ ลงมือฝึกฝนพัฒนามันไปเรื่อยๆ เราจะดีขึ้นในทุกๆวันครับ

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne 社区对 Nostrasia 充满了热情，目前正在对 Nostrasia 大会的精彩演讲进行了文字转录，以便大家阅读。 转录的工作正在进行，我们将逐步发布更多的转录文章。 日语和西班牙语版本由社区成员用AI工具初步进行翻译和校对，欢迎所有 YakiHonne 用户参与审核校对。 完成审核后，将获得3000 Sats的特别奖励。 联系我们（在这里评论、DM 或 TG）报名参与，第一个报名并提交审核的人将收到奖励。 欢迎参与并将这些演讲转录文章翻译成更多语言。 加入我们吧！

🌟English: Snowden & Jack on Nostr 🌟日本語: スノーデンとジャックのノストル 🌟Español: Snowden y Jack en Nostr

JACK： 为了保持Norst一贯的怪异精神，我打算光着脚进行这次采访，斯诺登。我不确定你是否穿鞋，但希望你感到自在。

斯诺登： 我完全看不见你们，但我穿着拖鞋，嗯，没穿裤子，所以一切都还好。

JACK： 好的，我们开始了。谢谢你，斯诺登！这次对话将穿插一些来自大家的问题。如果你有问题，就举手。我们有很多人拿着麦克风四处走动。

斯诺登，这是我第二次在观众面前与你对话，第一次是在我在推特任职时。现在以一种非常公司化的背景和协议的环境中进行对话，这会带来一些可能性。当我在你面前时，我总是感到很惊奇和荣幸。但每当你的形象出现在屏幕上时，我都会因为你为我们所有人做出的牺牲而感到激动。通过承认、感激并表达我们对你的感激之情来开始这次对话。我们对你为向世人展示了世界运作方式，以及我们如何更好地相处以及我们需要构建什么而做出的一切都感到非常感激。首先，非常感谢你。

斯诺登： 嗯，谢谢。感谢这里的每个人。这是一个非常热情的欢迎。谢谢。实际上，现在已经过去了10年。世界在很多方面都发生了变化。被记住是件好事。对我个人来说，有时很难回忆起10年前的生活以及迈出那一步，这让大家感到惊讶，我首先也是。但我仍然在这里，我在很多方面取得了胜利，我逃脱了，付出了巨大的代价。我今天生活在流亡之中。但我认为这也让我交到了很多好朋友。所以我尽量不让这让我感到太受伤，你知道。亚里士多德在流亡中死去。西塞罗也曾流亡。他最终回到了故乡。埃玛·戈尔德曼，在更近的时候，也被迫流亡。所以那里有一个悠久的历史。如果你想想让他们流亡的原因，在每一个案例中都不是因为他们是人民的敌人，而是因为他们的观点使他们成为国家的敌人。

这也引出了我第一个问题，Jack，因为在现代世界，特别是在企业层面，成功的人们会受到关注。他们与政府有关系，尤其是在通信平台或金融平台的情况下。你是现代世界中极少数同时在推特和Block两边都担任要职的人之一。所以你既见过来自金融方面的正常压力，又见过通信方面的压力。我认为这在互联网上普遍发生。当我和你一样在成长，当许多观众中的人在成长时，情况并非如此。对于一些年轻的观众来说，他们看到这似乎一直都是这样。但互联网曾经是令人惊叹的。它是一种特别的东西。政府并不真正了解它。他们无法真正侵犯它。他们只是坐在那里，看看会发生什么。突然之间，互联网从令人惊叹变得不再如此。推特也有同样的感觉。它曾经令人惊叹，突然之间就不再是。老实说，近年来，当我们回到年轻时代，也许这是玫瑰色眼镜和怀旧的原因，但我认为其中还有一些其他因素。一切都曾经令人惊叹，然后突然变得不再是。科里·多克托罗谈到了他的“堕落论（Enshittification）”理论，如果你能原谅这个词，但这有点不那么正式。我们在互联网上获得了创造一代和分享文化的风口。现在，谋利者们已经进驻。压力和受托责任的义务已经克服了一切。现在，状态正在改变。但我认为正在改变的不仅仅是网络状态。服务的状态，而是世界的状态。我只是，你知道，广泛地思考，你对正在发生的事情有什么看法？你的经历，你在这些事情中的参与，你能告诉我们你的视角下世界是怎样的？

JACK： 我对早期互联网的感觉和你所描述的感觉非常相似。最近我重新聆听了你的书《永久记录》而不是阅读，顺便说一下，你的叙述者真的很出色。听到你当初如何被互联网的感觉所驱动，以及它如何让人们感到，以及它是如何让你感到的，真是令人惊叹。我认为这个房间里的每个人都有过那种感觉。它感觉开放；它感觉无需许可；它感觉狂野、怪异并且几乎在每个方面都是出乎意料的。在我的生活中，我从来没有计划过真正成为一名首席执行官，甚至开办一家公司，但这恰好是传播这个想法并在这种情况下，即推特，成为最有效的方式。但当我深陷其中时，我发现有了这些单一故障点，而最主要的单一故障点就是我自己，因为我正在为数亿人和政策领导并做出决策。

接下来的是你提到的：围绕收入的激励。推特在早期是很美的，Rabble已经谈论过这一点，它是一个相当开放的API，以至于我们有很多开发人员在上面进行实验。实际上，其中很多人都在日本。日本是我们最大的市场，因为我们有很多开发人员使用API制作了像可以喂养、可以看到它们经历生老病死的玩具宠物。这真是太神奇了，但它实际上总是让网站崩溃，我们得到了这只失落的鲸鱼。但那是它最感觉像是一种协议的时候，也是它最感觉特别的时候。当我们壮大时，我们从那种感觉开始，但然后我们从风险投资者那里获得了资金，我们让我们雇佣的人承诺，我们给予他们的这些股份将比今天的价值更有意义。这只是导致了一系列事件，使我们上市，而在此之前创建了一种商业模式，如广告，这成为另一个单一故障点——广告压力和收入模型。

我曾经说过，如果比特币在推特启动之前存在，我们将会有更好的选择和更好的路径，至少消除了一个单一故障点。这就是我对Nostr感到如此兴奋的原因。它具有微支付。它是真实的。这是一个我们实际上可以学到东西的规模化实验。对我来说，这是如此罕见和令人惊奇，因为它实际上现在就存在，人们可以使用它，最重要的是可以感受到它。

然后最重要的一个有意义的单一故障点是你提到的，即政府、监管机构。显然，推特文件中暴露了很多这方面的问题，当政府或任何政府来敲你的门时，作为个人或公司中的任何人都很难采取你所采取的立场，特别是当你对收入有担忧，而公司只是因为我们是相对Facebook和Google等巨头中最小的一个而消失了。

所有这些都是说，我认为正在发生变化，这些都是钟摆的摆动，我认为钟摆正在回摆到一个我们实际上可以保持更加开放的协议的世界，因为我们有比特币这样的东西。每个为比特币做出贡献的人，无论是从开发的角度、市场的角度还是政策的角度，都会使它对所有其他人都变得更好。你有这个非常有趣的良性循环。我认为对Nostr来说也是如此。对我来说，最强大的想法不是它正在重新创建类似Twitter的东西或处理社交媒体用例，而是这种开放、无需许可的应用生态系统，任何创建这种应用并且它真的很棒的人实际上都使整个生态系统受益。所以这是一种合作，以一种非常独特的方式不断地建设自身。

我只是不知道我们以前是否有过这样的工具，但也许在互联网上我们有，而缺点是发现机制的中心化。那么，你是如何看待发现这个问题的呢？

斯诺登： 哦，你刚才说的真的有趣，因为在过去的两个月里，每当我现在使用搜索引擎时，结果都很糟糕；它们毫无用处。我使用过多个搜索引擎。我使用过谷歌，它应该是最好的。我使用过Bing。我使用过DuckDuckGo，你知道，还有其他一些，但你们都在得到相同的东西。我再也找不到我需要的有用信息了。你无法从互联网上发现具体的东西。如果我想要一些一般性的东西，如果我想要一些通用的东西，当然可以。但特别是当你正在寻找技术内容、专业内容时，很难使用搜索引擎并缩小到你想要的范围。

比如，如果我能在互联网上运行一个正则表达式，我就可以得到我所需要的东西。但现在搜索引擎不再允许你这样操作。甚至，谷歌，10年前它们还有很多搜索引擎操作符。比如，Google Hacking。而现在这一切都变得封闭，封锁得很严，你再也无法做这些事情了。实际上很有趣；这在某种程度上与你刚才回忆的关于Twitter API的事情相似。现在马斯克接管了，我们失去了很多基本功能，比如有一个很棒的命令工具叫做snscrape或者我猜snscrape代表社交网络爬虫。而且你不需要凭据；你不需要任何东西就可以用于Twitter。如果你想查看一个标签以及有多少人在使用它，你可以拉取数万条推文，你知道，可以按时间或筛选它，这真是太神奇了。你可以从网络中获得的见解非常丰富。唯一的负担就是知识，如果你了解如何与它交互，你就可以做到。Twitter搜索比很多其他搜索引擎好得多；你可以在小的Twitter框中输入像“retweets column:”然后是一些东西，比如，你只想看到实际上很受欢迎的推文。是的，所有这些都开始消失；这种控制的水平消失。我们看到在这些网络上允许的内容、言论种类开始变窄。

理论上，政府的其中一个作用是确保这些元素不会对其他人造成过多伤害，并试图进行适当的管理。问题出在当他们表示：“哦，我们可以解决这个问题”，你就会得到政府或机构可能成为的弥赛亚式的愿景。然而，最近这种情况开始更强烈地侵蚀主要的媒体机构，这是相当困难的，因为他们开始规定某些类型的言论是不可接受的，不会展示在这里，我们在这里不发表。辩论变得狭窄了。像之前的表情包，其中一个是强大的，就像过去一样，而另一个则是小而肥、无助的像如今。过去我们说，对付糟糕的言论的方式是更多的言论；将糟糕的论点曝光在阳光下；让它失去信誉；阐明为何它令人难以信服，然后人们就不再坚持那个观点。然而，如今我们却说：“嗯，让我们把它藏起来；让我们把它放在黑暗中。”垃圾主意在黑暗中滋生得最好，那里它们不受挑战，不受对抗，社区就从中发展出来，从而引发一系列问题。

但我想回到你之前提到的，涉及到API等方面。你提到当Twitter很小、有机、实际上不太可靠、经常失败时，你们得到了许多小社区、感兴趣的社区、创意社区，他们正在做一些你们从未预料到的事情。对我来说，当我用日语发推文时，因为我很多年前曾在日本工作，那时在NSA工作，我发现通过一条日语推文，我能传递比我见过的其他语言都多的信息。这对我来说是一个惊喜，但事实上，原来日语在推文格式上非常适合压缩。所以小社区往往能够更好地管理，而随着我们变得越来越大，它就变得越来越无序，越来越糟。竞争越激烈，派系主义越多，就越有一种赢者通吃的行为，它变成了征服的竞赛。

我认为让我担忧的是，当我们看到这种情况发生在言论方面时，你知道，推特现在有了新的管理层；马斯克时代已经来临，你知道，坦白地说，我认为他一直在尽力做到最好。我对我们看到的一些决定并不是特别印象深刻，特别是关闭API之类的事情，这将解决机器人问题，现在任何推文只要有任何与加密相关的词汇，就会有大约700个相同的回复在下面。你知道这应该不难解决，特别是当你向他们收费几美元来发推文或者购买那个账户时。存在一种虚假的共识形成的风险，我不想说得太多，我已经在这里讲了差不多五分钟。

然而，当我们讨论政策、政府和监管时，存在一种观念，即当前执政者正在脑海中思考的东西，即《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》上流行的东西，就是正确的。每个理智的人都分享这种信念，这是一种默认的信仰。他们并没有努力去说服；他们只是假设每个人都应该自然而然地理解这是正确的，它是正确的，不应该受到挑战，任何偏离这种信仰的人都在传播虚假信息。他们正在误导人们；他们已经演变成网络威胁；他们已经成为公民或公共威胁，需要被排除在外。这是让我印象深刻的其中之一。

坦率地说，你是一个曾经达到巅峰、从Twitter或其他地方赚了数不清的钱的人，对你来说很容易说：“好吧，这不起作用，但我得到了我的”，然后骑向夕阳。虽然很多人都选择这样做，但与之相反，你却又回到了这里。而让我印象深刻的是，你公开表示Twitter的基本错误在于没有将其打造成一个协议。你多次公开向马斯克施压，或者至少邀请他将Twitter改成基于协议的。而如今，你又推出了Nostr，表示它需要是一个无主协议。

对我而言，真正改变游戏规则的是我们基本上拥有独立的言论，并且至少有了独立支付的入口。因为这对于政府监管和机构对公共健康造成的破坏来说，确实是真正的游戏规则。政府的角色应该是保护健康，即使对我们中最激进的人来说，只要他们在必要的地方受到限制，当言论爬出那个盒子时，事情就变得危险了。因此，我们需要一个相当强大的盒子；我们需要有相当强大的边界。在计算时代，我们找到的解决法律或政策问题的唯一技术解决方案就是像加密或协议一样的硬线，对吧？你不能只是找个人说：“把这个拿下。”你可以去找节点所有者；你可以去找中继所有者并委婉地提问，但你不能只是说：“做这个，否则你进监狱”，然后瞬间就消失了。就像马斯克一样，他真的不应该是那种容易被欺负的人，就像印度政府说：“哦，把这个拿下；这些明显不应该被拿下。”他说：“哦，这是法律”，你知道，瞬间就消失了。

我说得太多了，但我只是想说，我真的很感激你，不仅仅是因为你没有选择打包离开，而是在试图迭代，因为这是使事情变得更好的方式。没有人一次就能完美地完成这些事情；事实上，Nostr可能一开始并没有太大的作用；它可能无法扩展。我之前提到过，就像现在我使用Nostr时，在通过Tor连接时会遇到许多问题；有时候我必须重新连接十次。但这仅仅是初期阶段，事情会变得更好，无论是在通信还是支付方面。我之前提到过我们需要一个第一个超国家银行的概念，对吧？我们不需要美国银行；我们不需要俄罗斯银行；我们不需要中国银行。我们需要的是一个超越国家的东西，不仅是国外的。这是在构想一个世界，国家不再是谁能够获得报酬、谁不能获得报酬的最高层。对言论，我们需要相同的自由。我认为基于协议的通信就像互联网一样；我们正在做的一切基本上是TCP/IP。因此，即使我们搞砸了，即使存在黑暗的地方，我们也能走出来，事情可以变得更好，只要我们继续努力。坦率说，我过去几年过得很艰难，看着互联网的走向，看着隐私法的走向，看着这个文明的衰落和论坛的衰败，听到你依然乐观的声音，听到你依然积极的声音，看到来到这里的所有人，如果你们不是已经是局外人，你们就不会在这里。我们不需要世界上的每个人都加入我们来建设一些伟大的东西；我们只需要关心并努力。所以我想这是我感谢你的时候。

JACK: 非常感谢。考虑到我已经了解的情况，再加上你为我们所提供的一切，再加上我们能够修复它的可能性，离开对我来说确实是一项艰巨的任务。看到比特币这样的技术，看到背后的人们，以及他们再次运用所学知识为后代建设更美好未来的努力，让我感到振奋。Nostr、Fiatjaf等每个人都在以真正无需许可的方式共同努力，每个人都拥有令人难以置信的想法，而你们这些用户的反馈是我们的动力。我想看到更多世界上的普通人只是试图表达自己，并找到与他们共鸣的方式。在Nostr上，虽然发现问题仍然非常困难和繁琐，但我们目前有一个非常早期的用户群体，可以在他们身上测试很多东西。我们对像你这样的用户感到非常幸运。现在我有一个问题要问你，而我们也将从观众中挑选一些问题，那就是关于你为何选择Nostr，为何选择留在这里？因为你目前为世界所做的很多事情需要或受益于庞大的观众，而你在Nostr中可能拥有的观众可能是最小的。所以，你为何选择在这里（使用Nostr）？

斯诺登: 非常感谢。然而，如果你查看我的Twitter账户，你会发现我几乎不再发推了。在那个账户上，我有500万到600万的粉丝，所以这是一个很大的媒介。首先，我发现在Twitter上的互动远远低于预期。我不知道是否是因为我不再在算法的关照之下，或者是因为那种你能够得到一百亿倍或者更多放大的想法并不总是完全正确。即使它看起来应该是这样，因为并不是说，你知道有500万人关注这个账户，就有500万人看到这条推文。虽然应该是这样，但事实并非如此。所以这并不是非黑即白的问题。但更直接地说，在实际层面上，人们在Twitter上已经停止倾听。而且不是只对我，他们已经停止倾听任何人。这不仅仅是Twitter社交网络的问题，更是一个全球性的问题。但我认为社交网络、社交媒体和Twitter在这方面具有象征性的作用。每个人都在喊叫，却没有人在倾听。我看到了随着出售和转让的到来而带来的一些混乱，一切都在变化，这使你意识到Twitter可能并不是永远的存在。对于像我这样的人来说，如果你真的依赖这个作为你的扩音器，那么Twitter并不像你想象的那么可靠，因为你知道，我不在Instagram上，我不在Facebook上，我不在TikTok上，而且我从来都没有。

对我而言，Nostr似乎不仅仅是又一个大型媒体属性，特别是因为它采用了未拥有的协议的理念。这对我来说非常具有吸引力。我希望看到人们在他们的Feed中看到的内容的权威性从聚合器转移到用户这一方向。现在，这不需要是一个极端的方向；它不像一个必须要向一个方向切换的旋钮。用户只需要手动点击“屏蔽”，“屏蔽”，“不要显示给我这个”。他们不应该为100亿条推文都这样做；他们应该能够选择内容类型列表之类的东西，或者社区源列表，这是好账户，这是坏账户。让我们快速开始；你关注所有这些人，或者你不会看到来自所有这些垃圾或赌博之类的账户的推文。但这些是人的决定，对吧？这些是个人的决定；这些是个体的决定，有时候是集体的决定，但它们不是公司的决定；它们不是政府的决定；它们不是监管的决定。当涉及到言论时，我认为这非常重要。第二件事是，Nostr现在只是更令人愉快。我的意思是，当你不是比特币者时，对于普通人来说，有很多内容是枯燥的，如果我们想要网络增长，我们必须超越这个阶段，使它更具吸引力。

但对于对比特币感兴趣的人来说，看到这个有机的、小规模的社区只是一个开始。更重要的是，我们看到了潜力、热情，以及基本层面上的真诚。我相信在世界历史上，小政府往往是更好的政府，小社区往往是更善良的社区。当这些社区从小而志同道合的地方起步，走向实现超级国家、全球权力的旅程时，理想和愿景常常像在路上的尘埃一样被摇动，因为它们必须做出牺牲。在早期的网络和理念中确实有一种独特的魔力。坦白说，如果我不是一个理想主义者、一个乐观主义者，我不会在2013年做我所做的事情。大多数人可能已经看到了同样的事情，或者从整体上看到了同样的事情，可能是一小群人。但是，从局部的视角看，有很多人知道发生了错误的事情，没有人说出来。人们会说：“为什么？”有些人认为这是自我保护、懦弱或其他原因，从某种程度上来说，这是正确的。但我认为也有一种更宽容的看法，即人们认为这不会产生任何影响。而现实中，我到底起到了什么作用呢？这没有拯救世界，没有杀死龙，但后果是巨大的。最有可能的结果是我现在会坐在一个超级最高安全监狱里，将在那里度过余生。

但现在我们知道，我们已经在桌子上带来了一种共同的水平、一个共同的画面、一个共同的意识，不仅在美国，而且在全世界。这是一些东西，是建立的起点。这是一个前进的方向，我认为这是基本的人类动力。你意识到风险，看到了草丛上面的老虎尾巴，但你不会坐在这里，希望它没有看到我。也许它会抓到别人，也许我可以试着解决老虎的问题，也意识到也许你可能不是解决问题的人，而老虎可能会抓到你。但是如果有足够多的人尝试，而且我们努力了足够长的时间，老虎问题就会解决。总之，我投掷了我的石头。

然而，在这方面，还有一点我想说的是，政府现在是一种我们并没有真正有意义的控制权的东西。就好像政府是一场自然灾害，而政府实际上喜欢这样。无论你在哪个国家，他们希望被单独留下来进行管理、做决策、发布命令、进行监管，而且他们并不真的想要太多的反驳。他们不想要骚乱，他们不想要异议，他们不想要不合作。在统治阶级中有这样一种观念，如果他们被单独留下来做他们的工作，事情就会变得更好。有一种舒适的沉默，如果你们都闭嘴，让我们继续这样做，我们会为你们解决问题的。别担心。但是这又来自对问题是什么以及问题应该如何解决的错误共识。但言论自由和民主的最重要观点是，我们首先可以就问题进行争论。对我来说，今天在这方面显然没有一致，但是在制度内部存在这样的一致，即政府是答案。我认为这是危险的。因此，越多的言论自由，越多的自由协议，越多有创造力的人努力创造替代的互动方式，越好。否则，这些问题将被解决，我认为从历史上看是有害的。我认为它们已经这样做了，我认为它们会变得更糟。

JACK: 当然。我们为什么不从听众中提一个问题呢？

听众1：首先，我想感谢你成为真实的你，过上了你过去的生活。你是我在这里的原因之一，我相信对我们许多人来说也是如此。

最近我们一直在探讨密钥管理，作为一个依赖公钥密码学的人，尤其是现在有了家庭，我想知道你对构建密钥管理方面的挑战，以及你期待构建的事物有什么看法。在使公钥密码学适用于普通人的过程中，你认为我们应该关注哪些方面？

斯诺登: 这是一个极好且复杂的问题。一提到有了家庭，我就开始思考：“哦，是的，我的密钥可能会随着我而去，因为我没有任何继承计划，至少对于我的这个漂亮的自定义暴力破解而言。” 但这也正是 Nostr 特别困难的地方。我并不是说我有更好的解决方案，而是在这里批评或抛石头，但对于普通人来说，用户名的消失，被一个很长的、你知道的、32-64字符的字符串所替代，是一个大问题。人们会感到困惑，好像说：“哇，那是什么？如何用符号在抽象的方式中表示它？” 我认为这对 Nostr 的成功至关重要。我认为在原始的公私钥模型中，像 GPG 这样的工作了多年的方式已经被证明基本上不适合普通人。

我在 2013 年曝光事件中使用过它。当时我们在所有事情上都使用 PGP 作为一层，因为我知道它是有效的。我知道它有效的原因是我曾在 NSA 工作，我在我的最后一个职务中查看了原始流量，我看到了来自中国的反网络活动，他们在 PGP 上并不热衷。但我曾看到一些来自电子邮件和流的东西，比如 PGP 加密的电子邮件，基本上是返回了没有提供解密的内容，而其他某些具有密码系统的东西，比如有一个 SSL 错误之类的，你可以提供纯文本。这有时会发生。底线是它是有效的，历史已经证明它是有效的。它是一个古老的协议，但很容易出错。人们通常在他们应该发送公钥的时候发送他们的私钥，基本的事情就是这样。试图向一个没有技术背景的记者解释这些，他们不知道你是谁，所以他们不会很认真地对待你。

格伦·格林沃尔德几乎错过了整个故事，因为我为他录制了一整个关于如何使用 PGP 的解释视频，他说：“啊，太忙了。” 这就是我们必须理解的事情。对于普通人、专家阶层、技术阶层、祭司们来说，什么是可接受的？我们可以弄清楚这些东西；其中一些概念对我们来说是熟悉的，这很好，但它确实需要被隐藏。它确实需要被抽象化，我们需要找到一种方法，要么将用户名与一种没有冲突的方式配对，例如你不能有仿冒问题等等。我知道我们在 Nostr 上正在尝试这样做；我们有 70 多个不同的提供商，因为它是分散的；你应该能够这样做。但这也是，为了可发现性是什么？真相的出处在哪里？是否有一种方式，就像在比特币中一样，我们有一个阈值，其中大多数分散的提供商都同意，例如 Jack 是 Jack，并为你提供正确的尾部？也许这可行；也许这是一个解决方案。我不知道，但总的来说，底线是，我们知道这些形式的密码学是有效的；它们是可靠的。这太棒了；这是伟大的，因为这是我们可以建立的东西。但我们也知道它们对普通人来说是无法理解的，问题只是我们如何弥合这个差距，我很愿意成为有答案的人，但我不是。

JACK: 斯诺登，你是新闻自由基金会的董事会成员，该基金会的任务之一是帮助为活动人士、告密者和记者构建技术。如果你要对目前最迫切的需求进行排序，独立于 Nostr 和比特币之外，那么这个列表会是什么样子？

斯诺登: 我们一直在推动的主要项目是 SecureDrop。对于不熟悉的人来说，SecureDrop 是一个系统，允许主要新闻机构如《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》处理匿名提示，这是相当强大的系统。它通过 Tor 进行匿名连接，任何消息来源都可以连接到这个系统，并提供匿名举报而不泄露身份。对我来说，在2013年这是缺失的，我曾经不得不凭借椰子和胶水制作自己的系统，找出如何向记者透露正在发生的事情，而不让他们知道我是谁，同时不让他们有意或无意地泄露我的身份，这才是真正的担忧，在我能够获取所有证据并离开之前向政府透露我的身份。因为问题是他们中没有一个在处理这类问题时能够有效胜过 NSA。你不能拿一个普通的记者对抗 NSA，然后期望在互联网通信的问题上赢得胜利。

SecureDrop 是一种方法——它是一种系统——它允许人们基本上使用两台笔记本电脑，我们在上面堆叠了一堆程序，应用程序一直到顶部，以处理这些问题。我们知道它有效，我们知道它可靠，实际上，它在一些通过这个系统经历过的最重大的故事中都发挥了作用。它们实际上没有透露哪些是哪些不是，因为这取决于新闻机构是否披露。很多时候，他们不想披露，因为他们不想惹上麻烦，但它是有效的。

所以现在我们考虑的是，我认为有趣的是我们为人们站出来并通知媒体发生了什么提供了好的解决方案，但现在对媒体机构的信任较少，因为，坦白地说，很多最重要的媒体组织——我 2013 年没有去《纽约时报》，这是相当有名的——因为他们曾经在选举前一个月，新闻联播的执行编辑比尔·凯勒（Bill Keller）刊登了一篇关于布什政府非法窃听的报道，这本应该在他的重新选举前一个月刊登。那会改变选举结果。那次选举的结果是由很小的差距决定的，如果我们知道这个家伙正在违宪地监视美国人和全世界的人，我们将会有一个不同的历史。它的后果是与《纽约时报》有关。希望他们今天能做得更好，但我并不一定相信他们会，很多人都在面对这个问题。

所以问题是，今天的需求是什么？我们能做什么？相反，我觉得新闻自由基金会可能正在做的以满足未满足的需求的一件事是查看今天预先存在的开源软件包，比如 Open Broadcaster，这是我现在使用的，将我的摄像头引入你的摄像头，基本上创建一个指令堆栈，让人们可以自行发布，也许可以匿名发布。令人难以置信，这是个问题，因为互联网上有很多内容，有很多夸张的说法，但你如何建立真实性呢？如果我在与记者交谈，我可以说：“嘿，你知道吗，我在这里工作。我是这个。我是一个政府官员，但我不能告诉你我的身份，因为有这样那样的原因，但我可以告诉你关于这个程序、这个程序、这个程序、这个程序的事情。”当你去政府寻求评论时，他们的头发会掉光，这在某种程度上会证明至少我知道只有在里面的人才应该知道的事情。但如何在没有专业验证者的情况下为公众复制这一点呢？当我们谈论现代的验证器时，它开始涉及到事实检查者的概念，而事实检查者也没有取得令人满意的成绩。所以这是一个有趣且困难的问题领域。

我认为我们可以以两种方式来审视这个问题。首先，我们需要思考如何实现传统新闻业的最佳形式，即传统新闻机构的经典模式，这正是 Source 真正面临的挑战。这个问题涉及告诉记者们他们需要了解什么才能向公众传递信息。事实上，我们对这一问题有一个良好的解决方案，并且在过去几年中得到了不断改进。但当人们不再必然相信这些经典机构会按照我们柏拉图式的理念行事时，我们如何鼓励消息来源挺身而出，并承担这些风险呢？这实际上更多地是一个媒体问题，而非技术问题。我们无法单纯通过技术手段解决所有问题，但也许我们可以构思一个独立的解决方案。

我的意思是，过去的独立解决方案是维基解密，通过这一平台，你可以说：“嘿，你不想去《纽约时报》？找其他地方，然后他们会将消息传递给《纽约时报》。” 人们往往忽视了这一点；他们认为维基解密只是将所有信息扔到互联网上，但实际上，他们与世界上所有最重要的报纸都有合作，直到这些报纸在组织层面上出卖了他们。问题在于我们目睹了朱利安·阿桑奇所遭遇的后果。

因此，这是我们的思路，我们坐在世界的另一端进行对话，憧憬着为这些问题找到解决方案。但你必须从相反的角度思考。我们正在听到这样的对话，而他们听到的是我们制造问题而非创造解决方案。他们看到维基解密；他们将公共知识视为一个需要解决的问题。我认为我们需要敏锐地认识到世界正在向中国模式迈进的现实。我曾在国防情报局联合反情报培训学院介绍过所谓的中国网络反情报。这是一个政府主导的会议，旨在向新分析师传授我们对中国政府及其运作方式的所有了解。我在其中负责一小部分技术方面，但我与其他讲师讨论了我们观察到的情况，因为人们经常试图猜测中国未来5年会是什么样子，谁将成为下一任总理等等。我认为存在一个焦点；有人说我们将成为中国，或者中国将成为美国，基本上是我们将采用其他模式，而我实际上认为这是不同的。

我认为一个威权主义的趋势正在影响各种政府。中国政府非常专制，世界上许多政府也变得越来越独裁。然而，有趣的是，我们观察到一些自由主义政府也变得更加专制。新冠病毒确实是一面亮红色的警告旗，不需要太多的恐慌感和紧急感。我们目前在以色列和哈马斯冲突中看到了类似的情况，我们正在经历的地方也许不尽相同，但有些地方确实越界了。

在911事件之后，旧有的规则变得不再适用。经典的权利将不再得到保护，世界已经发生了改变。因此，作为机构，我们必须随之而变。在这种情况下，没有时间进行投票，没有时间进行谈判，这是紧急情况，你明白吗？因此，我们需要最大限度地利用我们的能力和技术来应对威胁。逐步而为，你会看到中国和美国变得越来越相似，欧洲和中国之间的差距也在缩小。虽然它们仍然存在一些差异，但这些差异逐渐变得微乎其微。

这确实应该让我们保持警觉，特别是当你开始关注一些方面，比如能力、监控、二维码、资金流动的控制、通信的控制、实名政策和身份验证。当你看到中国有着如微信一样的应用，可以进行支付、聊天、身份验证、社交媒体、旅行、门票等功能时，这应该引起我们的深思。在这个系统中，中国政府要求你提供船舶ID才能激活你的账户。这也许让人想起埃隆·马斯克的话：“X将成为一款万能应用程序。”他开始给人们支付报酬，但你必须将其与你的身份关联起来才能得到回报。这些事情确实应该引起我们的关注。

无论如何，我知道我有点离题了，离开了新闻自由基金会的讨论。但我认为我们在这里需要思考的是，我们应该了解哪些问题可以通过技术解决，我们在意识形态领域中的对手是谁。如果我们不能直接解决问题，我们是否可以通过提高对问题的意识，让那些可能能够解决问题的人知道？如果在我们的司法管辖范围之内不可能，在我们的法律体系下不可能，那么我们是否可以创建一个新的司法管辖区？这有点像网络空间的独立宣言，今天有很多人对此表示怀疑。如约翰·佩里·巴洛曾说：“哦，你们这些肉体和钢铁的疲惫巨人，在这里你们毫无权力。”这基本上是在新的心灵领域。这是我们的世界，这是我们的空间，我们按照我们的意愿来塑造它。你是一个客人，你是一个访客，你不能做决定。当然，这主要是由于激励机制、企业货币结构、支付流程、监管和了解客户等方面。但我认为还有一个原因，即基础设施是被占有的。我们乘坐在别人的电缆上，穿越其他人的数据中心和路径。虽然网状网络的概念没有取得成功，但仅仅因为在过去没有奏效，这是否意味着它们永远不会奏效呢？我认为这实际上并不是真的。

我喜欢同意的网络的想法，即您的手机只是存在。如果你携带手机，它已经是一个跟踪设备，它已经向网络报告自己。但如果它像所有这些COVID跟踪蓝牙一样发出信号，但实际上是一个给志同道合的其他人的信号。而当你经过时，它会进行一次简短的网络连接，你们在分享一些东西，传递标识符，传递文件，等等。这不是一个有意识的决定；你没有点击按钮；它只是：“哦，你知道，外面有人。”你不知道他们是谁；你不必分享身份；你可以在网络上保持匿名；你可以是一个黑暗的节点，但你刚刚在你的Nostr时间轴上有效地得到了这个人小社区的更新。现在你意识到这个社区的存在；现在你意识到坐在公交车上时你比以前觉得的孤独一点点。也许，你知道，谈到——我不确定我是否刚刚失去了你们。我们听到你们；看起来我失去了我的摄像头？

JACK：我们可以听到你的声音，但我们看不到视频，但我们可以清楚地听到你。

斯诺登: 我的视频没了，我稍后重新启动一下。可能是相机过热了。

斯诺登: 我想回到之前我们讨论的新闻话题。有没有可能你也走进新闻编辑室，采用一些类似古老的间谍技术，就像在冷战时期使用的秘密方式？在当前互联网监控的紧张氛围中，可以想象，例如 Tor 不再如以前那样可靠，因为全球都存在被动的对手可以解密这些流量，尽管目前还没有确切的证据。大家都在讨论：“哦，Tor 不灵了；Tor 不好用了。”但实际上，我一直在使用 Tor，并一直觉得它相当有效。当然，并不是说你可以把全部生活寄托在它上面，因为没有系统能够百分之百保证。但是，设想一下，假如它真的无法使用，你实际上可以在新闻编辑室外放置一台设备，就像有人经过编辑室时，他们可以将线索和文件放下，然后直接离开。只要不被严格按照外部安全摄像头的时间戳和索引来追踪，所有记者所知的只是他们得到了一个线索，但不能透露那个人的身份，因为他们实际上并不知道。我稍后会修复一下我的相机。

JACK: 没问题。感觉我们正在迈向一种未来，其中一切应用程序将发挥重要作用。我对你提到的关于自由派政府趋于相似的观点很感兴趣。最令人振奋的或许是，我们了解到将会有这些一切应用程序，而且它们可能会在全球范围内竞争。拥有第三种选择的可能性，就像 Nostr 和比特币一样，使得所有这些应用程序能够以极其无缝的方式协同工作，而使用者无需考虑如何在它们之间切换。我第一次接触 Nostr 时，最让我印象深刻的是，我可以携带我的秘钥到另一个客户端，一切都运作得非常顺畅。如果将这一点扩展到所有这些微型应用程序和它们的宇宙中，那么基本上你就拥有了所有应用程序，但你又在一个开放的协议上拥有了这个可能性，每个人都可以构建它。这是对中国、美国及西方国家公司正在构建的系统的真正有竞争力的回应，而这些系统可能会在某个方向上囊括我们所有人。因此，我们有了一个选择，幸运的是，我们就在这个房间里。感谢你们所有人为此所做的贡献。让我们迎接下一个问题。

观众2: 嗨，我想知道，除了通过 Tor 不可访问之外，您在使用 Nostr 时是否遇到了其他扩展性问题，或者您是否希望看到 Nostr 能实现的其他事情？

JACK: 如果你还在的话，斯诺登，我认为这个问题是给你的。

斯诺登: 是的，我实际上认为 Nostr 目前非常强大。主要问题是要让人们开始使用它。我看到了一些关于与之整合的闪电网络的批评，因为人们对闪电网络有一些批评意见。对我来说，闪电网络效果还不错。我很兴奋，我看到了 Zapathon 等等。我喜欢的是它对普通人来说是可访问的。我不喜欢的是，你正在用一个集中化的网关集替换另一个，因为没有人在运行自己的闪电节点；每个人都在使用像 Alby 或其他一些集中化的提供者，因为他们没有运行自己的节点。当他们离线时，就像闪电网络不工作。这些是我不知道如何解决的问题，但核心问题是当我们谈论诸如视频发布之类的事物，这对很多人的用例非常受欢迎，我们将如何托管它们？图像托管很昂贵；视频托管和服务的成本要高得多。互联网大部分之所以能够以我们了解的方式工作，是因为，正如 Jack 所说的那样，VC 资金在幕后悄悄地在一个仓库里燃烧。

Google 目前对 YouTube 正在做的事情是最好的例子。而且让我担忧的是，他们正在尝试在所有地方都推动广告化。他们对广告拦截变得非常激进；他们正在播放更多的广告。如果你不运行广告拦截器，他们会播放越来越多的广告，直到你订阅他们的服务。而且这一切都是同时发生的，而在很长一段时间里，YouTube 是免费的，YouTube 上的大多数内容都不是你会为之付费的东西。现在突然间，他们改变了游戏规则，YouTube 上有互联网上的所有视频，甚至是不属于他们的视频，只是从其他地方复制和重新上传的。但是如果你在谈论 Nostr 之类的东西，你知道我们如何上传视频，如何托管视频，大规模地？我知道人们现在可以嵌入他们正在做的事情，而且实际上效果很好；当我能够连接时，我有过很好的体验。但是如果你考虑很多人加入 Nostr 版本的失败鲸，就像我们有所有这些中继，所有这些中继都有正在写入它们的 notes，基本上链接到这些其他站点。当我们有一个仓库这样的事物时，如果仓库关闭或第一个进入者封神，我们不能摆脱他，因为如果他们退出，我们将失去网络的一个中心部分，失去随之而来的历史。

这些是我认为很难的问题。但是当你考虑到 Nostr 的基本功能时，让我兴奋的是它就像 Twitter。人们喜欢 Twitter；他们享受 Twitter，而没有所有的公司大门之类的东西。我认为人们需要的是像你说的，发现问题，就像我不知道是否有一个社区列表之类的东西，对于 UI 的入门，他们会说，你对什么感兴趣？并解释说，这只是为了让你开始添加一些流行的帐户或趋势帐户之类的东西。你仍然可以更改它；你可以做任何事情；你可以把它们删除；你可以与阻止列表或忽略列表或其他列表相交。因此，人们可以很快开始说 Nostr 上有哪些人在谈论有趣的事情。他们进来了，他们有了一个帐户，看到了有趣的事情发生，他们说，我要怎么做？然后他们发布他们的 notes；每个人都看到了，然后他们开始了。实际上有一个问题；如果没有人关注他们，那么它怎么能被看到？我们是否有不同的 Nostr 应用程序，无论是 Damus，还是 Amethyst，无论是什么，它们都有一个为这些不同网络策划的人。这些是全新的帐户，就像在中继上，基本上标记这些是用户的第一次活动，你知道 99% 的情况可能是中国的垃圾邮件之类的东西。但是看看它，并说：“哦，看，这是一个真实的人，或者看起来像一个真实的人；他们在说一些有趣的事情或其他什么。”它就像做一个呼叫或展示，试图让这个人得到他们的第一个关注者之类的东西，当你进入应用程序时。我认为欢迎社区，增长社区，简化入门流程的方式非常重要。

但是主要的问题是我现在实际上有点担心；我们不希望数以百万计的新用户的涌入全部都在现在，因为我不确定 Nostr 是否已经准备好迎接大众，我们没有真正友好的入门流程；我们还没有解决密钥管理的问题。如果你让一千、一百万人都出现，你希望他们从一开始就有一个良好的体验；否则，他们可能不会再回来。但如果他们回来了，那么他们会告诉所有他们的朋友，有这么一个比你已经在使用的更好的东西，你知道你可以制作你的 TikTok 视频，但你不必处理 TikTok 使用人工智能或机器学习或其他东西来倾听你在说什么。如果你使用了错误的单词，比如，它就会降低你的视频等等。相反，你可以与朋友分享东西，而且你与朋友分享东西，你的朋友与你的朋友互动，中间没有人，这很强大，很有趣，很不同。我知道，我们在未来会有很多问题要解决，但是主要的问题是，让它能够运作，让它变得简单，让它变得友好，让它变得有趣，而实际上我们并不需要使它变得有趣，我们只需要引起人们对那些有趣的事情的注意，但是有些人甚至不知道该关注哪些帐户，因此一些工作必须为他们完成。

JACK: 是的，这是个很好的提醒。在一些对话中出现了这样一个观点，即我们可能没有看到这个潜力的用户数量，因为目前我们没有吸引那些对抗审查和去中心化不感兴趣的人。这实际上是可以接受的；审慎和因此缓慢的道路才是最终的道路。我们可以利用这段时间，为人们做对，学习并确保我们呈现的东西将会持久，将会对所有即将出现的对手产生抵抗力。而我们越是急于太早完成这些事情，这些事情就越有可能被我们隐藏，而不幸的是，我们将没有时间来修复它们。

时间不早了，斯诺登。我只想问最后两个问题。我最欣赏 Nostr 最多和早期 Twitter 的一件事就是它有多真实和多真实。我觉得我已经看过你的每一次采访了。我没有听到太多关于你的生活，你的一天，那些小细节，比如，给你当前的一天带来快乐的小细节。然后第二个问题，相关的是，有没有我们作为个体集体可以做的事情来帮助你回家？

斯诺登: 谢谢。关于第二个问题，我不确定是否真的有，直到我们有了更加稳定的政府。我的意思是，拜登政府实际上就是奥巴马政府；他们都是留任的人，都是以前在那里的人，而且他们实际上是非常坚定的意识形态者，以一种你不会预期的方式。这是人们实际上对特朗普政府的评论方式，但是坦率地说，特朗普政府实际上是一群笨蛋和无能的人。不清楚他们是否有共同的意识形态；其中有很多意识形态者，包括像约翰·博尔顿（John Bolton）这样完全疯狂的人，但是，你知道，他们没有共享一个共同的统一愿景。

实际上，基本上就是谁愿意出现，然后他们试图成为政府一天，他们失败了，因为他们做得很糟糕。拜登-奥巴马政府，这些家伙是长期的政府工作者，正在做政府要做的事情，这就是为什么你看到加里·根斯勒在那里，他们正在利用机构，利用程序规则，在他们甚至不必立法的情况下，他们只是说：“我们将干涉世界运作的方式。我们将制定法律，而不用制定法律，直到我们被迫为止。我们知道你们可以去法院，因为我们知道我们正在做的是非法的，是不合法的，但是这将花费10年，将花费20年，法院才能迫使我们采取行动，而对我们来说，这几乎就足够了。我们将其推迟到足够远的地方，这对我们来说就像是一场胜利。”

谈到回家，我们必须找到愿意承认政府所做之事是错误的人，这很有趣，因为法院已经对此做出了裁决；提出这样的声明不应该太有争议。甚至是奥巴马的总检察长埃里克·霍尔德（Eric Holder）也说他认为我所做的是公共服务；他仍然认为我应该进监狱，但他愿意说，你知道，这是一种公共服务。当然，他在这些计划中也受到牵连，因为他当时是总检察长，但是这些家伙退休了，这些人死了，这些人继续前进，他们变老了，而传送带则继续运转。如果我们有一个理智而理性的政府，我们有可能就这个问题进行讨论，但我认为从现实的角度来看，在不久的将来我们看不到这一点。更重要、更紧急、更接近的是朱利安·阿桑奇的案件。我的意思是，这家伙在一所很糟糕的监狱里待了很长时间。他因为发布真相，不受人喜欢的真相，但是真相而受到与恐怖分子相当的拘留。这实际上是对我们社会的起诉，不仅仅是对美国而言，在西方广泛地都是如此。

每个人都明白这是错误的，但没有人会采取任何行动。实际上，许多主要的传统媒体机构都有改变这种情况的声音，但基本上是保持沉默的。值得称赞的是，他们说不应该这样做，但他们没有积极行动；他们没有继续下去，因为他们都担心政治影响。他们都担心理论上特朗普的回归，因此他们不会采取任何可能揭示拜登政府的虚伪的行动。当你看到国务卿托尼·布林肯（Tony Blinken）站在朱利安·阿桑奇的尸体上作为讲台发表演讲时，他说，你知道，对埃及之类的国家公开虚伪或者是对言论自由的侵犯是可怕的，不要因为印刷真相而打压记者。然后，就像他站在朱利安·阿桑奇的尸体上一样，当他发表这个声明时，没有人对此说任何事情；这真是一件可怕的事情。所以，我们需要一些联系。

然后，是的，我在采访中不讨论我的个人生活；实际上，作为一个隐私倡导者，我一直都是如此。但我要说的是，你知道，我成了一个父亲。过去的两年半真的非常艰难。这也是我推文频率下降的另一个原因；之前我有很多空闲时间。现在我一点都没有。但并不是说这没有价值。我试图重新开始写作；我试图重新开始制作一些东西。进展很慢，你知道，我的孩子们只会在这个年龄段停留那么长时间，所以没关系。我不怨恨它；我不后悔它；这是美好的。但每天晚上的美好时光是，我给我大儿子读睡前故事。

现在，我正在给他读亚当·斯密的《国富论》；他不是特别喜欢。他实际上更喜欢《小熊维尼》，但我试着换换口味。我给他读《爱丽丝梦游仙境》；我给他读很多儿童书。我给他读亨利·大卫·梭罗的《公民不服从》；我给他读整篇。他对那个不那么反感，因为它比较短。我在 Nostr 上发布的时候，是因为我一直在给儿子读这个，我重新熟悉了其中的引用。

如果人们正在寻找一些建议，这些建议可能不那么熟悉或常见，但非常有趣；有一个我相信叫做《论自愿服从》（"Discourses on Voluntary Servitude"）的Étienne de La Boétie，这个名字几乎无法打出，但如果你搜索 "Discourse on Voluntary Servitude"，我认为它非常符合 Nostr 的精神，你们应该查看一下。这是另一本书；它实际上相当短，所以像《国富论》那样阅读起来不难。

但这实际上是我们所有人都需要面对的问题，我认为对于这个观众来说非常重要，因为对于那些像杰克和我这样年龄的人，如果你了解互联网，了解它是如何连接在一起的，了解协议、技术、界面、goys，如果你不知道什么是程序，但你可以轻松掌握，你可以弄清楚，甚至可以自己做一个，那你就不是普通人。

我们需要记住，每天都有孩子第一次接触这些系统。他们不知道这些系统是如何工作的。即使是今天高中毕业的大多数人，他们不使用计算机；他们使用手机。他们不知道手机是如何工作的；他们知道他们去应用商店；他们向应用商店要应用程序；他们安装应用程序；应用程序有，你知道，三个教程滑动，然后就完成了；其余的都是魔术。

我认为我们需要帮助他们理解，不仅是如何使用这些应用程序，还要如何控制它们。我们需要确保在构建系统、协议时，它们是可访问的。我对加密货币更广泛的担忧之一，无论是比特币还是以太坊，都存在一种倾向，即接受神秘主义，他们有所有这些改进的协议之类的东西，他们想出所有这些新名字和新术语，然后为学术观众撰写像学术论文一样的东西，他们不会使其可访问。这样，你就创造了新的神职人员；你创造了一个新的祭司阶层；你创造了一个新的特殊阶层。

而我们不想复制旧有的问题，即在专业机构之间进行专业对话，一切都是游说团体和利益相关者，普通人甚至无法想象理解这一切，除非他们自己成为专家。我们希望普通人能够看到这一点，了解它是如何工作的，你知道，也许了解与中继的连接或节点如何移动之类的东西。只是一个，你知道，可爱的小地图或者一些动画，无论是信息图还是一些只是展示正在发生的事情的东西，以便人们看到。

我认为，你知道，当我看着我的孩子们，思考我未来几年的生活方式时，我们需要在全球范围内进行更多的教育，向人们解释这些设备、系统、我们依赖的网络如何运作，如何与它们进行交互，如何控制它们，如何指导它们，而不是像，你知道，枯燥的编程教程或其他什么东西。这种象征性的理解是缺失的；这是一个差距。

我们有懂的人，我们有不懂的人。当你谈论，我们有了这个名字 Nostr，它有点像诺斯替和诺斯替主义；你有那些知道的人和那些不知道的人。但这不是理想的情况。如果我们希望事情变得更好，我们不需要创造一种宗教；我们需要创造一种科学，而且它需要更像公民科学时代，我们都参与其中。

因此，我只是想对大家表示感谢；感谢杰克的邀请；这真是太棒了。我非常感谢你们对所有事情、这个社区、对新闻自由基金会的支持，以及对你个人的支持，坦白地说，正因为你一直在这里，努力使事情变得更好，而不仅仅是放松，因为对于这个社区的许多人来说，他们了解互联网的发展方向，了解政治的发展方向；他们看到这个引力正在发生，而你站在我们这一边。我认为这挺有力量的，它给了我们希望。所以，我希望你会在这里与我们同在，共同带领我们走向一个更好的系统和一个更好的世界。谢谢。

JACK: 我们会的。在 Nostr 上，我们非常热衷拥抱，虽然今天我们不能在现实中给你一个拥抱，但我知道在未来我们会的。与此同时，我只是想请每个人拿出他们选择的客户端、设备，通过一篇帖子、一条留言向斯诺登送去一个拥抱，希望你能感受到我们的钦佩、爱意和对你的感激之情。希望很快能再见到你。谢谢。

斯诺登: 我真的很感激，太美好了。我们会的。谢谢。谢谢大家。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 38f9a05c:6999fc04

Block Height 817401 Why this newsletter? read here

---

The Grind

Another week in the fiat mines, but this time in a new location. The grind starts promptly at 6 am, with 10-hour shifts on the agenda. After the workday, there's a brief 1.5-hour downtime before diving into a 2-hour Jiu-Jitsu and wrestling class.

To break it down, my daily routine includes a mere 5-6 hours of sleep, 10 hours at the fiat mines, and 2 hours of physical training. Not to forget the 50 quick push-ups at 5:30 am, a prelude to the day's challenges, and a series of pull-ups at the conclusion of the Jiu-Jitsu/wrestling session. Surprisingly, I'm kinda digging this routine, a welcome change from the monotony I had endured for so long.

Sadly, the jam-packed schedule doesn't leave much room for leisurely reads or diving into podcasts. But hey, I'm crossing my fingers for a bit of downtime over the weekends to catch up on those.

And speaking of weekends, guess who signed up to hustle on the next two? Yours truly! Gotta make the most of the capitalist extravaganza – Black Friday and Cyber Monday. That means a solid 19-day work streak. On the bright side, I'm hoping to squeeze in some recordings today.

Now, if the workload decides to take it easy and slides back to a regular 8-hour day, I've got some exciting plans. That extra free time? It's earmarked for a deep dive into the world of UX and UI learning – a passion project I've been itching to tackle. Here's to levelling up my skills during those golden moments of downtime! Cheers to new routines and exciting learning adventures! 🚀✨

Team Spirit

Lately, after my classes, I've added a new twist to my routine by throwing in some pull-ups. Surprisingly, it's sparked a friendly challenge among my teammates – we're not just doing pull-ups; we've also taken on the feat of pistol squats. Who would've thought that having training partners join in on the grind would be so motivating? It's amazing how a bit of friendly competition can turn a solo workout into a team effort, pushing us all to new fitness heights! 🤸‍♂️

Podcast Recorded

In a recent episode hosted by Max, the man behind the BitBuyBit podcast and the Pleb Miner show, as well as the driving force behind Ungovernable Misfits, we delved into a multifaceted conversation. Max shared insights into his journey of discovering Bitcoin, unraveling the motivations that propelled him to initiate his podcasts. The significance of privacy was a central theme, emphasizing the crucial role it plays. Additionally, the discussion touched upon Max's endeavors in merchandise and his website, providing a comprehensive view of his diverse interests. Topics ranged from the intricacies of KYC in Bitcoin transactions to the unique concept of Pleb mining, all the while addressing the intriguing notion of "fiat pigs with orange lipstick." The conversation showcased Max's expertise and passion to fight the good fight, making for an engaging exploration of various facets of the decentralized world. Tune in next week to catch this.

Podcast Published

I recently published interview with the Steak approver Tbonehodl, our conversation delved into various intriguing topics. We explored the identity of TBone and the factors that enabled him to comprehend the complexities of Bitcoin. Additionally, TBone shared the story of how Bitcoin found its way into his life. The discussion extended to strategies for positioning oneself to benefit from a million-dollar Bitcoin, emphasizing the significance of digital privacy and cautioning against the vulnerabilities associated with exchanges being potential honeypots. And as if that wasn't enough, we cracked the code on AI, indulged in some carnivore diet banter, and toasted to the power of community. Steak knives and bitcoin keys, my friends—this convo had it all!

You can give it a listen over on [Fountain](https://fountain.fm/episode/KBdJl03LNLdkZNQDeAaO, where you can even earn some free SATs, or simply use this link to tune in through your favourite podcasting app. 🎙️💡

Song of the week

Akira The Don & Marcus Aurelius - SELF CONTROL

Quote of the week

“There is no growth in the comfort zone.” – Jocko Willink

And

“There is no such thing as a weekend. This is an everyday gig: Every day is a Monday.” – Jocko Willink

@ 90c24d6b:def5ce98

This is ‘little white lie’ has been working for me…

If I'm procrastinating, I write down the thing I don't want to do on my to-do list...

And then I write "5 minutes" next to it. (On the right)

Like this:

• [ ] Dishes - (5 minutes)

Even if I know the task requires more than 5 minutes, I write down “5 minutes.”

It’s a lie, but I believe I only need to do the thing for 5 mins to check it off my list.

So that’s what I do. I proceed to work on that thing… for 5 mins.

Like rolling a car that just broke down on the side of the road, sometimes the hardest thing is to get things moving...

Once you have momentum, things tend to stay in motion...

Newton's first law:

1. an object will not change its motion unless a force acts on it.

(As a brief aside, I learned from Bitcoin Billionaire, Michael Saylor that a book worth reading might be Newton’s Principia Mathematica)

If you believe, like I do, that "thoughts are things"? Then taking a task that appears in your mind as "big" and shrinking it will make the task easier to move off your to-do list.

Newton's second and third law:

1. The acceleration of an object depends on the mass of the object and the amount of force applied.

2. Whenever one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite on the first.

How amazing is it that in the world of the mind… you can control mass, force, and motion no matter what your size?

You can shrink things down to whatever size you want… even smaller than a satoshi!

;-)

-Gerald

@ e6817453:b0ac3c39

The Crucial Distinction: Sovereign Focus vs. Decentralized Solutions

In the dynamic world of technology, especially in areas like artificial intelligence and data privacy, a critical conversation is emerging about the need for solutions that prioritize sovereignty over decentralization. This distinction, often overlooked, is essential in shaping the future of tech development and user empowerment.

Decentralization refers to the distribution of control away from a central point. This concept has gained significant attention with the rise of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. However, decentralization is primarily an implementation detail. It addresses issues like single points of failure and centralized decision-making but doesn't inherently ensure user sovereignty.

Sovereignty, in contrast, is about having ultimate authority and control. In the tech world, it means users have complete control over their data and the tools used to process this data. Sovereign solutions empower users to own, manage, and operate their data independently, without reliance on centralized entities. This approach is more aligned with the principles of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), which advocate for individuals having control over their digital identities without intermediaries.

Delving Deeper into Sovereign Data and Self-Sovereign Identity Principles

Sovereign data extends beyond the concept of data privacy. It's about individuals having unfettered access to their data, the freedom to manage it, and the capability to use it as they see fit. This concept is not just about keeping data secure but about empowering users to be the ultimate decision-makers regarding their digital information.

Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) principles are central to this paradigm. SSI is a digital movement that aims to return control of identity to the individual. It's about having a digital identity that is not dependent on any organization and is entirely under the user's control. These principles are foundational to the broader concept of sovereignty in technology, advocating for a model where users are not just passive participants in the digital ecosystem but active controllers of their digital selves.

Key principles of SSI include:

1. Existence: Users must have an independent existence; their identity should exist independently of any centralized authority.
2. Control: Users must control their identities, with the ability to access and manage their personal data without intermediaries.
3. Access: Users should have access to their own data and the ability to easily share it with others.
4. Transparency: Systems and algorithms used for identity verification should be transparent, allowing users to understand how their data is used.
5. Persistence: Identities should be long-lasting and not subject to loss or change by external forces.
6. Portability: Information and identities should be transportable and not confined to a single service provider.
7. Interoperability: Identities should be usable across multiple locations and systems.
8. Consent: Users should provide consent for the use of their identity information.
9. Minimalization: Disclosure of identity information should be minimized to what is absolutely necessary for a particular interaction.
10. Protection: Users' rights and the privacy of their identity information should be protected.

The Imperative for Sovereign-Focused Solutions

The shift towards sovereign-focused solutions is a practical necessity in a world where data breaches and misuse of personal information are common. Decentralization may solve certain technical challenges, but it doesn't address the fundamental issue of user empowerment and control.

Sovereign-focused solutions offer a more comprehensive approach. They include not just the decentralization of infrastructure but also the empowerment of users. This approach ensures that users are not at the mercy of large corporations or centralized entities regarding their data and digital identities. It's about creating an ecosystem where users have the freedom to choose their platforms, manage their data, and utilize technology in a way that aligns with their personal or organizational values.

Conclusion

While decentralization is a significant step towards a more distributed and less monopolistic technological landscape, sovereignty should be the ultimate goal. Sovereign-focused solutions represent a future where technology serves the user, not the other way around. As we continue to navigate the complexities of the digital age, prioritizing sovereignty over decentralization, guided by the principles of Self-Sovereign Identity, will be key to ensuring a more empowered and user-centric technological future.

@ 57fe4c4a:c3a0271f

📝 Summary: Batched splicing can be risky due to certain conditions like no funds in a channel and using an old state. It is important for batched splicing mechanisms to have a backout option to prevent disruptions caused by confirmed old states. Additionally, not all splice implementations performing a check can lead to potential loss of funds.

👥 Authors: • Greg Sanders ( nostr:npub1jdl3plz00rvxwc6g2ckemzrgg0amx5wen4kfvs3laxtssxvk9cvsf3gh0m ) • ZmnSCPxj ( nostr:npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l )

📅 Messages Date: 2023-10-17

✉️ Message Count: 3

📚 Total Characters in Messages: 5405

Messages Summaries

✉️ Message by ZmnSCPxj on 17/10/2023: Batched splicing can be risky if certain conditions are met, such as having no funds in a channel and using an old state. It is important for batched splicing mechanisms to have a backout option to prevent disruptions.

✉️ Message by Greg Sanders on 17/10/2023: Batched splicing is risky because if an old state is broadcasted and confirmed before the splice, it can disrupt the process. It is important for batched splicing mechanisms to have a backout option.

✉️ Message by ZmnSCPxj on 17/10/2023: Batched splicing can be risky if not all splice implementations perform a check to ensure subsequent splices confirm, potentially leading to loss of funds.

Follow nostr:npub1j3t00t9hv042ktszhk8xpnchma60x5kz4etemnslrhf9e9wavywqf94gll for full threads

@ 32e18276:5c68e245

Hey guys, I'm spending some time today preparing v1.6 for the app store, it's been a long time coming with many new features. Here's a breakdown of everything new in this version!

Notable new features in 1.6

• Custom built, embedded C WASM interpreter (nostrscript), which will be used for custom algos, filters and lists
• Longform note support
• Hashtag following
• Configurable reactions
• New Live user status NIP (music, general)
• Adjustable font sizes
• A very long list of bug fixes and performance improvements
• Fast and persistent profile searching using nostrdb

Top priorities for 1.7

• Lists
• Custom algos and filters using nostrscript
• Stories
• Multi account
• Tor integration
• Better NWC integration (wallet balances, transaction history)
• Advanced note search via nostrdb
• Fully switch to nostrdb for all notes
• Discord-like relays (click a relay to view all the notes on it)

So much more but maybe I will not try to be too ambitious ...

Contributors

name added removed commits William Casarin +57964 -8274 288 petrikaj +1524 -0 1 Terry Yiu +1266 -964 9 ericholguin +1234 -252 11 Daniel D’Aquino +1223 -399 19 Suhail Saqan +905 -70 16 Grimless +838 -736 6 Bryan Montz +793 -744 30 Jon Marrs +658 -60 3 Joel Klabo +653 -105 6 transifex-integration[bot] +176 -0 9 Fishcake +129 -21 5 Daniel D‘Aquino +123 -9 5 Jericho Hasselbush +78 -2 2 cr0bar +66 -19 11 Daniel D'Aquino +55 -32 2 Mazin +53 -0 1 gladiusKatana +37 -8 1 doffing.brett +10 -6 1 tappu75e@duck.com +5 -1 2 Ben Harvie +5 -0 1

Changelog

• 76 Fixes
• 18 Changes
• 26 Additions

Added

• Add "Do not show #nsfw tagged posts" setting (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Add ability to change order of custom reactions (Suhail Saqan)
• Add close button to custom reactions (Suhail Saqan)
• Add followed hashtags to your following list (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Add initial longform note support (William Casarin)
• Add r tag when mentioning a url (William Casarin)
• Add relay log in developer mode (Montz)
• Add settings for disabling user statuses (William Casarin)
• Add space when tagging users in posts if needed (William Casarin)
• Add support for multilingual hashtags (cr0bar)
• Add support for multiple reactions (Suhail Saqan)
• Add support for status URLs (William Casarin)
• Add the ability to follow hashtags (William Casarin)
• Added feedback when user adds a relay that is already on the list (Daniel D'Aquino)
• Added generic user statuses (William Casarin)
• Added live music statuses (William Casarin)
• Added merch store button to sidebar menu (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Added padding under word count on longform account (William Casarin)
• Adjustable font size (William Casarin)
• Click music statuses to display in spotify (William Casarin)
• Enable banner image editing (Joel Klabo)
• Finnish translations (petrikaj)
• Hold tap to preview status URL (Jericho Hasselbush)
• Re-add nip05 badges to profiles (William Casarin)
• Show nostr address username and support abbreviated _ usernames (William Casarin)
• Suggested Users to Follow (Joel Klabo)

Changed

• Allow reposting and quote reposting multiple times (William Casarin)
• Damus icon now opens sidebar (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Hide nsec when logging in (cr0bar)
• Improve UX around clearing cache (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Improved memory usage and performance when processing events (William Casarin)
• Increase size of the hitbox on note ellipsis button (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Make carousel tab dots tappable (Bryan Montz)
• Move the "Follow you" badge into the profile header (Grimless)
• Remove nip05 on events (William Casarin)
• Remove note size restriction for longform events (William Casarin)
• Rename NIP05 to "nostr address" (William Casarin)
• Show muted thread replies at the bottom of the thread view (#1522) (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Show renotes in Notes timeline (William Casarin)
• Start at top when reading longform events (William Casarin)
• Switch to nostrdb for @'s and user search (William Casarin)
• Updated relay view (ericholguin)
• Use nostrdb for profiles (William Casarin)
• clear statuses if they only contain whitespace (William Casarin)

Fixed

• Allow relay logs to be opened in dev mode even if relay (Daniel D'Aquino)
• Allow user to login to deleted profile (William Casarin)
• Apply filters to hashtag search timeline view (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Avoid notification for zaps from muted profiles (tappu75e@duck.com)
• Crash when muting threads (Bryan Montz)
• Dismiss qr screen on scan (Suhail Saqan)
• Don't always show text events in reposts (William Casarin)
• Don't spam lnurls when validating zaps (William Casarin)
• Eliminate nostr address validation bandwidth on startup (William Casarin)
• Ensure the person you're replying to is the first entry in the reply description (William Casarin)
• Fix Invalid Zap bug in reposts (William Casarin)
• Fix PostView initial string to skip mentioning self when on own profile (Terry Yiu)
• Fix UI freeze after swiping back from profile (#1449) (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix UTF support for hashtags (Daniel D‘Aquino)
• Fix action bar appearing on quoted longform previews (William Casarin)
• Fix broken markdown renderer (William Casarin)
• Fix bug where it would sometimes show -1 in replies (tappu75e@duck.com)
• Fix compilation error on test target in UserSearchCacheTests (Daniel D‘Aquino)
• Fix crash when long pressing custom reactions (William Casarin)
• Fix crash when long-pressing reactions (William Casarin)
• Fix freezing bug when tapping Developer settings menu (Terry Yiu)
• Fix icons on settings view (cr0bar)
• Fix images and links occasionally appearing with escaped slashes (Daniel D‘Aquino)
• Fix issue where malicious zappers can send fake zaps to another user's posts (William Casarin)
• Fix issue where relays with trailing slashes cannot be removed (#1531) (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix issue where typing cc@bob would produce brokenb ccnostr:bob mention (William Casarin)
• Fix issue with emojis next to hashtags and urls (William Casarin)
• Fix issue with slashes on relay urls causing relay connection problems (William Casarin)
• Fix lag when creating large posts (William Casarin)
• Fix localization issues and export strings for translation (Terry Yiu)
• Fix localization issues and export strings for translation (Terry Yiu)
• Fix long status lines (William Casarin)
• Fix nav crashing and buggyness (William Casarin)
• Fix nostr:nostr:... bugs (William Casarin)
• Fix npub mentions failing to parse in some cases (William Casarin)
• Fix padding of username next to pfp on some views (William Casarin)
• Fix padding on longform events (William Casarin)
• Fix paragraphs not appearing on iOS17 (cr0bar)
• Fix parsing issue with NIP-47 compliant NWC urls without double-slashes (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix potential fake profile zap attacks (William Casarin)
• Fix profile not updating (William Casarin)
• Fix profile post button mentions (cr0bar)
• Fix profiles not updating (William Casarin)
• Fix rare crash triggered by local notifications (William Casarin)
• Fix reaction button breaking scrolling (Suhail Saqan)
• Fix situations where the note composer cursor gets stuck in one place after tagging a user (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix small graphical toolbar bug when scrolling profiles (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix some note composer issues, such as when copying/pasting larger text, and make the post composer more robust. (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix status events not expiring locally (William Casarin)
• Fix text composer wrapping issue when mentioning npub (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix text editing issues on characters added right after mention link (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Fix wiggle when long press reactions (Suhail Saqan)
• Fix wikipedia url detection with parenthesis (William Casarin)
• Fix zaps sometimes not appearing (William Casarin)
• Fixed a bug where following a user might not work due to poor connectivity (William Casarin)
• Fixed audio in video playing twice (Bryan Montz)
• Fixed disappearing text on iOS17 (cr0bar)
• Fixed issue where hashtags were leaking in DMs (William Casarin)
• Fixed issue where reposts would sometimes repost the wrong thing (William Casarin)
• Fixed issues where sometimes there would be empty entries on your profile (William Casarin)
• Fixed nav bar color on login, eula, and account creation (ericholguin)
• Fixed nostr reporting decoding (William Casarin)
• Fixed nostrscript not working on smaller phones (William Casarin)
• Fixed old notifications always appearing on first start (William Casarin)
• Fixes issue where username with multiple emojis would place cursor in strange position. (Jericho Hasselbush)
• Hide quoted or reposted notes from people whom the user has muted. (#1216) (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Hide users and hashtags from home timeline when you unfollow (William Casarin)
• Make blurred videos viewable by allowing blur to disappear once tapped (Daniel D’Aquino)
• Mute hellthreads everywhere (William Casarin)
• Show QRCameraView regardless of same user (Suhail Saqan)
• Show longform previews in notifications instead of the entire post (William Casarin)
• Stop tab buttons from causing the root view to scroll to the top unless user is coming from another tab or already at the root view (Daniel D’Aquino)
• don't cutoff text in notifications (William Casarin)
• endless connection attempt loop after user removes relay (Bryan Montz)
• icon color for developer mode setting is incorrect in low-light mode (Bryan Montz)
• relay detail view is not immediately available after adding new relay (Bryan Montz)

Removed

• Remove following Damus Will by default (William Casarin)
• Remove old @ and & hex key mentions (William Casarin)

@ 2edbcea6:40558884

Happy Sunday #Nostr !

Here’s your #NostrTechWeekly newsletter brought to you by nostr:npub19mduaf5569jx9xz555jcx3v06mvktvtpu0zgk47n4lcpjsz43zzqhj6vzk written by nostr:npub1r3fwhjpx2njy87f9qxmapjn9neutwh7aeww95e03drkfg45cey4qgl7ex2

NostrTechWeekly is a weekly newsletter focused on the more technical happenings in the nostr-verse.

Let’s dive in!

Recent Upgrades to Nostr (AKA NIPs)

1) (Proposed) NIP 43: Fast Auth between clients and relays

Some relays are member-only. There has to be some way for relays to verify the content being sent/requested is from an authorized user (one of the members). Most methods for this are clunky and slow.

This NIP proposes a faster method for auth between clients and relays. From what I can tell when clients open a connection to a relay they’ll open it with an “authorization” query parameter on the end of the relay url. That query param will actually be an encoded Nostr event whose payload has the necessary info for the relay to authenticate the user opening the connection.

Kinda looks like an auth header like you’d see in an http request but shoehorned into a query parameter since websockets (which are used for connections to relays) don’t traditionally support headers.

Author: aruthurfranca

2) (Proposed) Updates to NIP 03: Timestamps you can rely on

Sometimes you want to make sure that a piece of Nostr content was actually created/pushed to a relay at a specific time. The example from last week was in the case of a future betting system built on Nostr, you really don’t want people to be able to publish that they made a bet 2 weeks ago for something whose outcome was determined twenty minutes ago.

NIP-3 already outlines a way to add OpenTimestamp attestations to Nostr events essentially allowing Nostr clients to outsource trust to a third party on whether a piece of content was created when it claims to be created. As is, NIP 3 is a little hard to use. This update would make it far simpler.

In the new methodology, you’d publish a Nostr event of kind 1040 with the proof of timestamp and point to the event that you’re trying to prove the timestamp for.

Author: nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6

Notable Projects

Cellar Relay

If you haven’t been graced by the nostr.wine community they are a group of fine folks that host wine-themed relays. They’re some of the most reliable and widely used public and paid relays around.

nostr:npub18kzz4lkdtc5n729kvfunxuz287uvu9f64ywhjz43ra482t2y5sks0mx5sz recently announced the “Cellar” Relay that will store notes long term for paid users. Like we talked about in last week’s #NostrTechWeekly long-term note storage is a challenge for relay hosts (especially for relays that are free to users). But solving long term storage will help folks on Nostr feel like they’re building a persistent social experience instead of building an ephemeral feed.

Nice work! Glad to see the trend continuing for long-term note storage. 💪

Memestr.app

I can’t tell you how many times folks I talk to have said there should be a meme-focused client on Nostr. nostr:npub1zumzudhtu2558fgvycnjlc7pq9l4m338vghgcfzafftz9qg45ruslzpl4x delivers with https://memestr.app I definitely had some giggles when I logged on.

This could quickly evolve into a nostr-based Imgur and be far better for being nostr-based. But one thing I think is missing from the internet (not just Nostr) is a way to iterate on memes easily in the same place where you can share them. In combination with prisms/boosts this could be an interesting way for people to make money for their content and earn from what is built on top of their content.

Zap threads

Threaded conversations are an important component to social experiences on the internet. Reddit and Hackernews have really shown its power, we’ve seen StackerNews also leverage this format as well.

nostr:npub1wf4pufsucer5va8g9p0rj5dnhvfeh6d8w0g6eayaep5dhps6rsgs43dgh9 has created a nostr-based component for supporting the threaded comments, and it looks like it could be used in any web-application that needs commenting, spreading Nostr to every corner of the internet. It’s already powering the commenting on Habla.News

nostr:npub1wf4pufsucer5va8g9p0rj5dnhvfeh6d8w0g6eayaep5dhps6rsgs43dgh9 also did a great writeup on the reasoning for this project and where it’s going: https://habla.news/franzap/threading-the-web-with-nostr

If you need comments on your project, take a look!

Latest conversations: How decentralized is decentralized enough?

Distributed vs Decentralized

These two concepts are often used interchangeably, and it’s worth highlighting their distinction, especially in the context of Nostr. This is a good visualization to illustrate the difference.

Distributed: the P2P model

Robust, distributed systems are extremely censorship resistant, and include a lot of redundancy. Distributed systems distribute power widely, everyone is a peer.

Biological systems (cells, ecosystems, etc) are like this, cells are all peers and replaceable. Napster was distributed, everyone in the Napster ecosystem stored and shared some of the songs. IP (the “internet protocol”), which is how computers find each other on the internet, is a peer to peer technology where every node gossips about where to find other nodes.

Ideally all systems would be built this way, but in practice distributed / P2P systems are generally used when there’s a high chance of node failure (the death of individual cells) or attack (government takedowns). The challenge is that they’re expensive to run.

This might be confusing because Napster was “free” right? Most P2P software feels free-ish because many are donating some of their existing hardware/bandwidth/etc. But if you take the aggregate resources to run Napster versus just the parts of Spotify that help users to upload and download music, Spotify for sure uses fewer resources.

Distributed systems by their very nature have to assume that most peers in the network may fail. In order to maintain uptime, that results in P2P systems having many copies of what’s being shared and/or sending data many times to ensure it arrives.

I think most people would say they’d prefer everything to be P2P but it’s difficult to maintain a good experience in a P2P system and so it’s often only used in cases where it’s absolutely necessary.

Where does decentralization work better?

I wrote up a whole thing about decentralization a while back but the TL;DR is decentralized systems are better than centralized systems at distributing power widely, but they are generally still more performant than peer to peer systems.

Sometimes you need a mix of preventing abuses of power but still maintain a good experience for users. Freedom minded folks usually end up supporting decentralized solutions because they’re viable in the market and still take power away from centralized players.

Is Bitcoin decentralized or distributed?

The Bitcoin blockchain is a distributed system. Every Bitcoin full-node is an equal participant in storing, updating, and validating the blockchain.

Bitcoin as a monetary system, on the other hand, is decentralized: there are many more Bitcoin users than Bitcoin full-nodes. The nodes are the hubs and the users are the spokes.

There’s a reason for this architecture. Bitcoin nodes are ultimately in control of Bitcoin, it must be the least corruptible, most censorship resistant architecture possible. On the other hand a decentralized system has efficiency gains that make Bitcoin more competitive in comparison to existing financial systems. By having hubs (full-nodes, Bitcoin banks, wallet providers, exchanges, etc), the system is more efficient (and therefore cheaper). But by having many hubs, power is still spread widely.

Nostr: Decentralized or Distributed?

Nostr, as introduced by FiatJaf, seems like it was intended to be decentralized. Relays are the hubs and users are the spokes. Clients help connect users to relays (and therefore each other). There is wisdom to this architecture, because it will scale better than a P2P system.

Think of it this way, there are on the order of hundreds of millions of songs available for human consumption. With 10 million users storing a few hundred songs, there would be plenty of redundancy to allow Napster to distribute every song in a P2P manner. There are on the order of trillions of social media posts, if you include follows, reactions, DMs, etc, it’s likely in the quadrillions. With current technology a P2P system would never be able to provide coverage of every post and make it available in a reasonable time.

That said, there are some elements of Nostr that could benefit from being more P2P. Especially operations that would benefit from greater privacy (DMs, zaps, and reactions). Right now privacy around these actions is not well supported via Nostr.

Dev work has started on some P2P Nostr functionality announced by nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z and it’s right along those lines: maximizing privacy and security for nostr-based comms. It will have all the great things and all the difficulties of any P2P system, but it may be necessary to improve privacy on Nostr.

One thing that is great about Nostr is everyone can try things out and see if they work and if people want them. I see a lot of demand for privacy for certain Nostr operations, and if a P2P model would help, it needs to be tried. We’ll see whether the trade offs of P2P make Nostr better or if they make it less likely to succeed. We’ll see as development continues!

Until next time 🫡

If you want to see something highlighted, if we missed anything, or if you’re building something we didn’t post about, let us know. DMs welcome at nostr:npub19mduaf5569jx9xz555jcx3v06mvktvtpu0zgk47n4lcpjsz43zzqhj6vzk

Stay Classy, Nostr.

@ 9be0be0e:c3cbb81e

I’m not sure if nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 had a Web of Trust in mind when designing nostr and its use of public contact lists but I think it’s very important to nostr’s future.

Technically there is no need to publish a follow list, if a nostr client wants to show a feed of follows it just needs a list of contacts, this list does not need to exist in public or on relays, but the fact that it does is what makes the Web of Trust work.

Accidental

The only other Web of Trust that I know of is PGP’s Web of Trust, it is only used by IT and security people, which is also the reason why it is unusable for most people. It leaves no room for error because security has the highest priority in those circles.

But on nostr the Web of Trust is a side effect of just following people. You press Follow a few times and you are accidentally building a Web of Trust without even knowing it. It might not be perfect, but that’s also why it works, because it is so simple, like nostr itself.

Attempts to “fix” or improve the Web of Trust should be made with that simplicity in mind. Creating new lists with granularity of people you really trust, partially trust, don’t trust at all etc are all great, but this will make it possible for it to end up like PGP. Nostr’s Web of Trust works precisely because people don’t have to think about it.

There is also this idea that likes, reposts or any signal that can be made by users are useless because they can be gamed, but they can only be gamed if you don’t use a Web of Trust.

Web of Trust fixes almost everything

nostr:note1a8nq7kdqgr20dnvzmhv2a6quy8vx3l56pfzjlly3jv2u2l55exhs84cev8

Web of Trust fixes spam, bots, abuse of trending/hot algorithms

Zaps were supposed to fix the problem of gaming/abusing likes or reposts, but Web of Trust fixes it better. Zaps are useful for sending value, so let’s use it to send actual value. 1 sat zaps are not much different from Like-spam and considering the technical overhead required for zaps and possibility for timeouts and failures it’s actually worse.

So, Web of Trust Makes Likes Great Again, and with that you can make algorithms that are useful to the individual instead of the advertisers or platforms.

Example of a most basic Web of Trust filter (follows + follows of follows)

Nostur uses follows + follows of follows to filter spam and bots, and it uses likes and reposts from follows uniquely ranked to create Hot and Gallery feeds.

Another example is nostr:npub1yxprsscnjw2e6myxz73mmzvnqw5kvzd5ffjya9ecjypc5l0gvgksh8qud4‘s https://oddbean.com, a community website where the content of the community is based on the administrator’s follows, the algorithm is incredibly simple and transparent, and it wouldn’t be possible if nostr did not have an accidental Web of Trust:

Challenges

Now there are still some challenges to be solved, new users being onboarded won’t have a Web of Trust yet, maybe we could give them training wheels, a preloaded Web of Trust until they followed enough people to use their own.

Also, new users don’t exist in anyone else’s Web of Trust yet, so they won’t be seen until someone follows them. This is not a good new user experience.

You also might miss someone’s post because they are not in your Web of Trust yet.

These are all challenges and I will keep exploring solutions for these.

@ e6ce6154:275e3444

Este artigo foi censurado pelo estado e fomos obrigados a deletá-lo após ameaça de homens armados virem nos visitar e agredir nossa vida e propriedade.

Isto é mais uma prova que os autoproclamados antirracistas são piores que os racistas.

https://rothbardbrasil.com/pelo-direito-de-ser-racista-fascista-machista-e-homofobico

Segue artigo na íntegra. 👇

Sem dúvida, a escalada autoritária do totalitarismo cultural progressista nos últimos anos tem sido sumariamente deletéria e prejudicial para a liberdade de expressão. Como seria de se esperar, a cada dia que passa o autoritarismo progressista continua a se expandir de maneira irrefreável, prejudicando a liberdade dos indivíduos de formas cada vez mais deploráveis e contundentes.

Com a ascensão da tirania politicamente correta e sua invasão a todos os terrenos culturais, o autoritarismo progressista foi se alastrando e consolidando sua hegemonia em determinados segmentos. Com a eventual eclosão e a expansão da opressiva e despótica cultura do cancelamento — uma progênie inevitável do totalitarismo progressista —, todas as pessoas que manifestam opiniões, crenças ou posicionamentos que não estão alinhados com as pautas universitárias da moda tornam-se um alvo.

Há algumas semanas, vimos a enorme repercussão causada pelo caso envolvendo o jogador profissional de vôlei Maurício Sousa, que foi cancelado pelo simples fato de ter emitido sua opinião pessoal sobre um personagem de história em quadrinhos, Jon Kent, o novo Superman, que é bissexual. Maurício Sousa reprovou a conduta sexual do personagem, o que é um direito pessoal inalienável que ele tem. Ele não é obrigado a gostar ou aprovar a bissexualidade. Como qualquer pessoa, ele tem o direito pleno de criticar tudo aquilo que ele não gosta. No entanto, pelo simples fato de emitir a sua opinião pessoal, Maurício Sousa foi acusado de homofobia e teve seu contrato rescindido, sendo desligado do Minas Tênis Clube.

Lamentavelmente, Maurício Sousa não foi o primeiro e nem será o último indivíduo a sofrer com a opressiva e autoritária cultura do cancelamento. Como uma tirania cultural que está em plena ascensão e usufrui de um amplo apoio do establishment, essa nova forma de totalitarismo cultural colorido e festivo está se impondo de formas e maneiras bastante contundentes em praticamente todas as esferas da sociedade contemporânea. Sua intenção é relegar ao ostracismo todos aqueles que não se curvam ao totalitarismo progressista, criminalizando opiniões e crenças que divergem do culto à libertinagem hedonista pós-moderna. Oculto por trás de todo esse ativismo autoritário, o que temos de fato é uma profunda hostilidade por padrões morais tradicionalistas, cristãos e conservadores.

No entanto, é fundamental entendermos uma questão imperativa, que explica em partes o conflito aqui criado — todos os progressistas contemporâneos são crias oriundas do direito positivo. Por essa razão, eles jamais entenderão de forma pragmática e objetiva conceitos como criminalidade, direitos de propriedade, agressão e liberdade de expressão pela perspectiva do jusnaturalismo, que é manifestamente o direito em seu estado mais puro, correto, ético e equilibrado.

Pela ótica jusnaturalista, uma opinião é uma opinião. Ponto final. E absolutamente ninguém deve ser preso, cancelado, sabotado ou boicotado por expressar uma opinião particular sobre qualquer assunto. Palavras não agridem ninguém, portanto jamais poderiam ser consideradas um crime em si. Apenas deveriam ser tipificados como crimes agressões de caráter objetivo, como roubo, sequestro, fraude, extorsão, estupro e infrações similares, que representam uma ameaça direta à integridade física da vítima, ou que busquem subtrair alguma posse empregando a violência.

Infelizmente, a geração floquinho de neve — terrivelmente histérica, egocêntrica e sensível — fica profundamente ofendida e consternada sempre que alguém defende posicionamentos contrários à religião progressista. Por essa razão, os guerreiros da justiça social sinceramente acreditam que o papai-estado deve censurar todas as opiniões que eles não gostam de ouvir, assim como deve também criar leis para encarcerar todos aqueles que falam ou escrevem coisas que desagradam a militância.

Como a geração floquinho de neve foi criada para acreditar que todas as suas vontades pessoais e disposições ideológicas devem ser sumariamente atendidas pelo papai-estado, eles embarcaram em uma cruzada moral que pretende erradicar todas as coisas que são ofensivas à ideologia progressista; só assim eles poderão deflagrar na Terra o seu tão sonhado paraíso hedonista e igualitário, de inimaginável esplendor e felicidade.

Em virtude do seu comportamento intrinsecamente despótico, autoritário e egocêntrico, acaba sendo inevitável que militantes progressistas problematizem tudo aquilo que os desagrada.

Como são criaturas inúteis destituídas de ocupação real e verdadeiro sentido na vida, sendo oprimidas unicamente na sua própria imaginação, militantes progressistas precisam constantemente inventar novos vilões para serem combatidos.

Partindo dessa perspectiva, é natural para a militância que absolutamente tudo que exista no mundo e que não se enquadra com as regras autoritárias e restritivas da religião progressista seja encarado como um problema. Para a geração floquinho de neve, o capitalismo é um problema. O fascismo é um problema. A iniciativa privada é um problema. O homem branco, tradicionalista, conservador e heterossexual é um problema. A desigualdade é um problema. A liberdade é um problema. Monteiro Lobato é um problema (sim, até mesmo o renomado ícone da literatura brasileira, autor — entre outros títulos — de Urupês, foi vítima da cultura do cancelamento, acusado de ser racista e eugenista).

Para a esquerda, praticamente tudo é um problema. Na mentalidade da militância progressista, tudo é motivo para reclamação. Foi em função desse comportamento histérico, histriônico e infantil que o famoso pensador conservador-libertário americano P. J. O’Rourke afirmou que “o esquerdismo é uma filosofia de pirralhos chorões”. O que é uma verdade absoluta e irrefutável em todos os sentidos.

De fato, todas as filosofias de esquerda de forma geral são idealizações utópicas e infantis de um mundo perfeito. Enquanto o mundo não se transformar naquela colorida e vibrante utopia que é apresentada pela cartilha socialista padrão, militantes continuarão a reclamar contra tudo o que existe no mundo de forma agressiva, visceral e beligerante. Evidentemente, eles não vão fazer absolutamente nada de positivo ou construtivo para que o mundo se transforme no gracioso paraíso que eles tanto desejam ver consolidado, mas eles continuarão a berrar e vociferar muito em sua busca incessante pela utopia, marcando presença em passeatas inúteis ou combatendo o fascismo imaginário nas redes sociais.

Sem dúvida, estamos muito perto de ver leis absurdas e estúpidas sendo implementadas, para agradar a militância da terra colorida do assistencialismo eterno onde nada é escasso e tudo cai do céu. Em breve, você não poderá usar calças pretas, pois elas serão consideradas peças de vestuário excessivamente heterossexuais. Apenas calças amarelas ou coloridas serão permitidas. Você também terá que tingir de cor-de-rosa uma mecha do seu cabelo; pois preservar o seu cabelo na sua cor natural é heteronormativo demais da sua parte, sendo portanto um componente demasiadamente opressor da sociedade.

Você também não poderá ver filmes de guerra ou de ação, apenas comédias românticas, pois certos gêneros de filmes exaltam a violência do patriarcado e isso impede o mundo de se tornar uma graciosa festa colorida de fraternidades universitárias ungidas por pôneis resplandecentes, hedonismo infinito, vadiagem universitária e autogratificação psicodélica, que certamente são elementos indispensáveis para se produzir o paraíso na Terra.

Sabemos perfeitamente, no entanto, que dentre as atitudes “opressivas” que a militância progressista mais se empenha em combater, estão o racismo, o fascismo, o machismo e a homofobia. No entanto, é fundamental entender que ser racista, fascista, machista ou homofóbico não são crimes em si. Na prática, todos esses elementos são apenas traços de personalidade; e eles não podem ser pura e simplesmente criminalizados porque ideólogos e militantes progressistas iluminados não gostam deles.

Tanto pela ética quanto pela ótica jusnaturalista, é facilmente compreensível entender que esses traços de personalidade não podem ser criminalizados ou proibidos simplesmente porque integrantes de uma ideologia não tem nenhuma apreciação ou simpatia por eles. Da mesma forma, nenhum desses traços de personalidade representa em si um perigo para a sociedade, pelo simples fato de existir. Por incrível que pareça, até mesmo o machismo, o racismo, o fascismo e a homofobia merecem a devida apologia.

Mas vamos analisar cada um desses tópicos separadamente para entender isso melhor.

Racismo

Quando falamos no Japão, normalmente não fazemos nenhuma associação da sociedade japonesa com o racismo. No entanto, é incontestável o fato de que a sociedade japonesa pode ser considerada uma das sociedades mais racistas do mundo. E a verdade é que não há absolutamente nada de errado com isso.

Aproximadamente 97% da população do Japão é nativa; apenas 3% do componente populacional é constituído por estrangeiros (a população do Japão é estimada em aproximadamente 126 milhões de habitantes). Isso faz a sociedade japonesa ser uma das mais homogêneas do mundo. As autoridades japonesas reconhecidamente dificultam processos de seleção e aplicação a estrangeiros que desejam se tornar residentes. E a maioria dos japoneses aprova essa decisão.

Diversos estabelecimentos comerciais como hotéis, bares e restaurantes por todo o país tem placas na entrada que dizem “somente para japoneses” e a maioria destes estabelecimentos se recusa ostensivamente a atender ou aceitar clientes estrangeiros, não importa quão ricos ou abastados sejam.

Na Terra do Sol Nascente, a hostilidade e a desconfiança natural para com estrangeiros é tão grande que até mesmo indivíduos que nascem em algum outro país, mas são filhos de pais japoneses, não são considerados cidadãos plenamente japoneses.

Se estes indivíduos decidem sair do seu país de origem para se estabelecer no Japão — mesmo tendo descendência nipônica legítima e inquestionável —, eles enfrentarão uma discriminação social considerável, especialmente se não dominarem o idioma japonês de forma impecável. Esse fato mostra que a discriminação é uma parte tão indissociável quanto elementar da sociedade japonesa, e ela está tão profundamente arraigada à cultura nipônica que é praticamente impossível alterá-la ou atenuá-la por qualquer motivo.

A verdade é que — quando falamos de um país como o Japão — nem todos os discursos politicamente corretos do mundo, nem a histeria progressista ocidental mais inflamada poderão algum dia modificar, extirpar ou sequer atenuar o componente racista da cultura nipônica. E isso é consequência de uma questão tão simples quanto primordial: discriminar faz parte da natureza humana, sendo tanto um direito individual quanto um elemento cultural inerente à muitas nações do mundo. Os japoneses não tem problema algum em admitir ou institucionalizar o seu preconceito, justamente pelo fato de que a ideologia politicamente correta não tem no oriente a força e a presença que tem no ocidente.

E é fundamental enfatizar que, sendo de natureza pacífica — ou seja, não violando nem agredindo terceiros —, a discriminação é um recurso natural dos seres humanos, que está diretamente associada a questões como familiaridade e segurança.

Absolutamente ninguém deve ser forçado a apreciar ou integrar-se a raças, etnias, pessoas ou tribos que não lhe transmitem sentimentos de segurança ou familiaridade. Integração forçada é o verdadeiro crime, e isso diversos países europeus — principalmente os escandinavos (países que lideram o ranking de submissão à ideologia politicamente correta) — aprenderam da pior forma possível.

A integração forçada com imigrantes islâmicos resultou em ondas de assassinato, estupro e violência inimagináveis para diversos países europeus, até então civilizados, que a imprensa ocidental politicamente correta e a militância progressista estão permanentemente tentando esconder, porque não desejam que o ocidente descubra como a agenda “humanitária” de integração forçada dos povos muçulmanos em países do Velho Mundo resultou em algumas das piores chacinas e tragédias na história recente da Europa.

Ou seja, ao discriminarem estrangeiros, os japoneses estão apenas se protegendo e lutando para preservar sua nação como um ambiente cultural, étnico e social que lhe é seguro e familiar, assim se opondo a mudanças bruscas, indesejadas e antinaturais, que poderiam comprometer a estabilidade social do país.

A discriminação — sendo de natureza pacífica —, é benévola, salutar e indubitavelmente ajuda a manter a estabilidade social da comunidade. Toda e qualquer forma de integração forçada deve ser repudiada com veemência, pois, mais cedo ou mais tarde, ela irá subverter a ordem social vigente, e sempre será acompanhada de deploráveis e dramáticos resultados.

Para citar novamente os países escandinavos, a Suécia é um excelente exemplo do que não fazer. Tendo seguido o caminho contrário ao da discriminação racional praticada pela sociedade japonesa, atualmente a sociedade sueca — além de afundar de forma consistente na lama da libertinagem, da decadência e da deterioração progressista — sofre em demasia com os imigrantes muçulmanos, que foram deixados praticamente livres para matar, saquear, esquartejar e estuprar quem eles quiserem. Hoje, eles são praticamente intocáveis, visto que denunciá-los, desmoralizá-los ou acusá-los de qualquer crime é uma atitude politicamente incorreta e altamente reprovada pelo establishment progressista. A elite socialista sueca jamais se atreve a acusá-los de qualquer crime, pois temem ser classificados como xenófobos e intolerantes. Ou seja, a desgraça da Europa, sobretudo dos países escandinavos, foi não ter oferecido nenhuma resistência à ideologia progressista politicamente correta. Hoje, eles são totalmente submissos a ela.

O exemplo do Japão mostra, portanto — para além de qualquer dúvida —, a importância ética e prática da discriminação, que é perfeitamente aceitável e natural, sendo uma tendência inerente aos seres humanos, e portanto intrínseca a determinados comportamentos, sociedades e culturas.

Indo ainda mais longe nessa questão, devemos entender que na verdade todos nós discriminamos, e não existe absolutamente nada de errado nisso. Discriminar pessoas faz parte da natureza humana e quem se recusa a admitir esse fato é um hipócrita. Mulheres discriminam homens na hora de selecionar um parceiro; elas avaliam diversos quesitos, como altura, aparência, status social, condição financeira e carisma. E dentre suas opções, elas sempre escolherão o homem mais atraente, másculo e viril, em detrimento de todos os baixinhos, calvos, carentes, frágeis e inibidos que possam estar disponíveis. Da mesma forma, homens sempre terão preferência por mulheres jovens, atraentes e delicadas, em detrimento de todas as feministas de meia-idade, acima do peso, de cabelo pintado, que são mães solteiras e militantes socialistas. A própria militância progressista discrimina pessoas de forma virulenta e intransigente, como fica evidente no tratamento que dispensam a mulheres bolsonaristas e a negros de direita.

A verdade é que — não importa o nível de histeria da militância progressista — a discriminação é inerente à condição humana e um direito natural inalienável de todos. É parte indissociável da natureza humana e qualquer pessoa pode e deve exercer esse direito sempre que desejar. Não existe absolutamente nada de errado em discriminar pessoas. O problema real é a ideologia progressista e o autoritarismo politicamente correto, movimentos tirânicos que não respeitam o direito das pessoas de discriminar.

Fascismo

Quando falamos de fascismo, precisamos entender que, para a esquerda política, o fascismo é compreendido como um conceito completamente divorciado do seu significado original. Para um militante de esquerda, fascista é todo aquele que defende posicionamentos contrários ao progressismo, não se referindo necessariamente a um fascista clássico.

Mas, seja como for, é necessário entender que — como qualquer ideologia política — até mesmo o fascismo clássico tem o direito de existir e ocupar o seu devido lugar; portanto, fascistas não devem ser arbitrariamente censurados, apesar de defenderem conceitos que representam uma completa antítese de tudo aquilo que é valioso para os entusiastas da liberdade.

Em um país como o Brasil, onde socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, defender suas ideologias e até mesmo formar partidos políticos, não faz absolutamente o menor sentido que fascistas — e até mesmo nazistas assumidos — sofram qualquer tipo de discriminação. Embora socialistas e comunistas se sintam moralmente superiores aos fascistas (ou a qualquer outra filosofia política ou escola de pensamento), sabemos perfeitamente que o seu senso de superioridade é fruto de uma pueril romantização universitária da sua própria ideologia. A história mostra efetivamente que o socialismo clássico e o comunismo causaram muito mais destruição do que o fascismo.

Portanto, se socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, não existe a menor razão para que fascistas não usufruam dessa mesma liberdade.

É claro, nesse ponto, seremos invariavelmente confrontados por um oportuno dilema — o famoso paradoxo da intolerância, de Karl Popper. Até que ponto uma sociedade livre e tolerante deve tolerar a intolerância (inerente a ideologias totalitárias)?

As leis de propriedade privada resolveriam isso em uma sociedade livre. O mais importante a levarmos em consideração no atual contexto, no entanto — ao defender ou criticar uma determinada ideologia, filosofia ou escola de pensamento —, é entender que, seja ela qual for, ela tem o direito de existir. E todas as pessoas que a defendem tem o direito de defendê-la, da mesma maneira que todos os seus detratores tem o direito de criticá-la.

Essa é uma forte razão para jamais apoiarmos a censura. Muito pelo contrário, devemos repudiar com veemência e intransigência toda e qualquer forma de censura, especialmente a estatal.

Existem duas fortes razões para isso:

A primeira delas é a volatilidade da censura (especialmente a estatal). A censura oficial do governo, depois que é implementada, torna-se absolutamente incontrolável. Hoje, ela pode estar apontada para um grupo de pessoas cujas ideias divergem das suas. Mas amanhã, ela pode estar apontada justamente para as ideias que você defende. É fundamental, portanto, compreendermos que a censura estatal é incontrolável. Sob qualquer ponto de vista, é muito mais vantajoso que exista uma vasta pluralidade de ideias conflitantes na sociedade competindo entre si, do que o estado decidir que ideias podem ser difundidas ou não.

Além do mais, libertários e anarcocapitalistas não podem nunca esperar qualquer tipo de simpatia por parte das autoridades governamentais. Para o estado, seria infinitamente mais prático e vantajoso criminalizar o libertarianismo e o anarcocapitalismo — sob a alegação de que são filosofias perigosas difundidas por extremistas radicais que ameaçam o estado democrático de direito — do que o fascismo ou qualquer outra ideologia centralizada em governos burocráticos e onipotentes. Portanto, defender a censura, especialmente a estatal, representa sempre um perigo para o próprio indivíduo, que mais cedo ou mais tarde poderá ver a censura oficial do sistema se voltar contra ele.

Outra razão pela qual libertários jamais devem defender a censura, é porque — ao contrário dos estatistas — não é coerente que defensores da liberdade se comportem como se o estado fosse o seu papai e o governo fosse a sua mamãe. Não devemos terceirizar nossas próprias responsabilidades, tampouco devemos nos comportar como adultos infantilizados. Assumimos a responsabilidade de combater todas as ideologias e filosofias que agridem a liberdade e os seres humanos. Não procuramos políticos ou burocratas para executar essa tarefa por nós.

Portanto, se você ver um fascista sendo censurado nas redes sociais ou em qualquer outro lugar, assuma suas dores. Sinta-se compelido a defendê-lo, mostre aos seus detratores que ele tem todo direito de se expressar, como qualquer pessoa. Você não tem obrigação de concordar com ele ou apreciar as ideias que ele defende. Mas silenciar arbitrariamente qualquer pessoa não é uma pauta que honra a liberdade.

Se você não gosta de estado, planejamento central, burocracia, impostos, tarifas, políticas coletivistas, nacionalistas e desenvolvimentistas, mostre com argumentos coesos e convincentes porque a liberdade e o livre mercado são superiores a todos esses conceitos. Mas repudie a censura com intransigência e mordacidade.

Em primeiro lugar, porque você aprecia e defende a liberdade de expressão para todas as pessoas. E em segundo lugar, por entender perfeitamente que — se a censura eventualmente se tornar uma política de estado vigente entre a sociedade — é mais provável que ela atinja primeiro os defensores da liberdade do que os defensores do estado.

Machismo

Muitos elementos do comportamento masculino que hoje são atacados com virulência e considerados machistas pelo movimento progressista são na verdade manifestações naturais intrínsecas ao homem, que nossos avôs cultivaram ao longo de suas vidas sem serem recriminados por isso. Com a ascensão do feminismo, do progressismo e a eventual problematização do sexo masculino, o antagonismo militante dos principais líderes da revolução sexual da contracultura passou a naturalmente condenar todos os atributos genuinamente masculinos, por considerá-los símbolos de opressão e dominação social.

Apesar do Brasil ser uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista, onde o estado protege mais as mulheres do que as crianças — afinal, a cada semana novas leis são implementadas concedendo inúmeros privilégios e benefícios às mulheres, aos quais elas jamais teriam direito em uma sociedade genuinamente machista e patriarcal —, a esquerda política persiste em tentar difundir a fantasia da opressão masculina e o mito de que vivemos em uma sociedade machista e patriarcal.

Como sempre, a realidade mostra um cenário muito diferente daquilo que é pregado pela militância da terra da fantasia. O Brasil atual não tem absolutamente nada de machista ou patriarcal. No Brasil, mulheres podem votar, podem ocupar posições de poder e autoridade tanto na esfera pública quanto em companhias privadas, podem se candidatar a cargos políticos, podem ser vereadoras, deputadas, governadoras, podem ser proprietárias do próprio negócio, podem se divorciar, podem dirigir, podem comprar armas, podem andar de biquíni nas praias, podem usar saias extremamente curtas, podem ver programas de televisão sobre sexo voltados única e exclusivamente para o público feminino, podem se casar com outras mulheres, podem ser promíscuas, podem consumir bebidas alcoólicas ao ponto da embriaguez, e podem fazer praticamente tudo aquilo que elas desejarem. No Brasil do século XXI, as mulheres são genuinamente livres para fazer as próprias escolhas em praticamente todos os aspectos de suas vidas. O que mostra efetivamente que a tal opressão do patriarcado não existe.

O liberalismo social extremo do qual as mulheres usufruem no Brasil atual — e que poderíamos estender a toda a sociedade contemporânea ocidental — é suficiente para desmantelar completamente a fábula feminista da sociedade patriarcal machista e opressora, que existe única e exclusivamente no mundinho de fantasias ideológicas da esquerda progressista.

Tão importante quanto, é fundamental compreender que nenhum homem é obrigado a levar o feminismo a sério ou considerá-lo um movimento social e político legítimo. Para um homem, ser considerado machista ou até mesmo assumir-se como um não deveria ser um problema. O progressismo e o feminismo — com o seu nefasto hábito de demonizar os homens, bem como todos os elementos inerentes ao comportamento e a cultura masculina — é que são o verdadeiro problema, conforme tentam modificar o homem para transformá-lo em algo que ele não é nem deveria ser: uma criatura dócil, passiva e submissa, que é comandada por ideologias hostis e antinaturais, que não respeitam a hierarquia de uma ordem social milenar e condições inerentes à própria natureza humana. Com o seu hábito de tentar modificar tudo através de leis e decretos, o feminismo e o progressismo mostram efetivamente que o seu real objetivo é criminalizar a masculinidade.

A verdade é que — usufruindo de um nível elevado de liberdades — não existe praticamente nada que a mulher brasileira do século XXI não possa fazer. Adicionalmente, o governo dá as mulheres uma quantidade tão avassaladora de vantagens, privilégios e benefícios, que está ficando cada vez mais difícil para elas encontrarem razões válidas para reclamarem da vida. Se o projeto de lei que pretende fornecer um auxílio mensal de mil e duzentos reais para mães solteiras for aprovado pelo senado, muitas mulheres que tem filhos não precisarão nem mesmo trabalhar para ter sustento. E tantas outras procurarão engravidar, para ter direito a receber uma mesada mensal do governo até o seu filho completar a maioridade.

O que a militância colorida da terra da fantasia convenientemente ignora — pois a realidade nunca corresponde ao seu conto de fadas ideológico — é que o mundo de uma forma geral continua sendo muito mais implacável com os homens do que é com as mulheres. No Brasil, a esmagadora maioria dos suicídios é praticada por homens, a maioria das vítimas de homicídio são homens e de cada quatro moradores de rua, três são homens. Mas é evidente que uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista não se importa com os homens, pois ela não é influenciada por fatos concretos ou pela realidade. Seu objetivo é simplesmente atender as disposições de uma agenda ideológica, não importa quão divorciadas da realidade elas são.

O nível exacerbado de liberdades sociais e privilégios governamentais dos quais as mulheres brasileiras usufruem é suficiente para destruir a fantasiosa fábula da sociedade machista, opressora e patriarcal. Se as mulheres brasileiras não estão felizes, a culpa definitivamente não é dos homens. Se a vasta profusão de liberdades, privilégios e benefícios da sociedade ocidental não as deixa plenamente saciadas e satisfeitas, elas podem sempre mudar de ares e tentar uma vida mais abnegada e espartana em países como Irã, Paquistão ou Afeganistão. Quem sabe assim elas não se sentirão melhores e mais realizadas?

Homofobia

Quando falamos em homofobia, entramos em uma categoria muito parecida com a do racismo: o direito de discriminação é totalmente válido. Absolutamente ninguém deve ser obrigado a aceitar homossexuais ou considerar o homossexualismo como algo normal. Sendo cristão, não existe nem sequer a mais vaga possibilidade de que algum dia eu venha a aceitar o homossexualismo como algo natural. O homossexualismo se qualifica como um grave desvio de conduta e um pecado contra o Criador.

A Bíblia proíbe terminantemente conduta sexual imoral, o que — além do homossexualismo — inclui adultério, fornicação, incesto e bestialidade, entre outras formas igualmente pérfidas de degradação.

Segue abaixo três passagens bíblicas que proíbem terminantemente a conduta homossexual:

“Não te deitarás com um homem como se deita com uma mulher. Isso é abominável!” (Levítico 18:22 — King James Atualizada)

“Se um homem se deitar com outro homem, como se deita com mulher, ambos terão praticado abominação; certamente serão mortos; o seu sangue estará sobre eles.” (Levítico 20:13 — João Ferreira de Almeida Atualizada)

“O quê! Não sabeis que os injustos não herdarão o reino de Deus? Não sejais desencaminhados. Nem fornicadores, nem idólatras, nem adúlteros, nem homens mantidos para propósitos desnaturais, nem homens que se deitam com homens, nem ladrões, nem gananciosos, nem beberrões, nem injuriadores, nem extorsores herdarão o reino de Deus.” (1 Coríntios 6:9,10 —Tradução do Novo Mundo das Escrituras Sagradas com Referências)

Se você não é religioso, pode simplesmente levar em consideração o argumento do respeito pela ordem natural. A ordem natural é incondicional e incisiva com relação a uma questão: o complemento de tudo o que existe é o seu oposto, não o seu igual. O complemento do dia é a noite, o complemento da luz é a escuridão, o complemento da água, que é líquida, é a terra, que é sólida. E como sabemos o complemento do macho — de sua respectiva espécie — é a fêmea.

Portanto, o complemento do homem, o macho da espécie humana, é naturalmente a mulher, a fêmea da espécie humana. Um homem e uma mulher podem naturalmente se reproduzir, porque são um complemento biológico natural. Por outro lado, um homem e outro homem são incapazes de se reproduzir, assim como uma mulher e outra mulher.

Infelizmente, o mundo atual está longe de aceitar como plenamente estabelecida a ordem natural pelo simples fato dela existir, visto que tentam subvertê-la a qualquer custo, não importa o malabarismo intelectual que tenham que fazer para justificar os seus pontos de vista distorcidos e antinaturais. A libertinagem irrefreável e a imoralidade bestial do mundo contemporâneo pós-moderno não reconhecem nenhum tipo de limite. Quem tenta restabelecer princípios morais salutares é imediatamente considerado um vilão retrógrado e repressivo, sendo ativamente demonizado pela militância do hedonismo, da luxúria e da licenciosidade desenfreada e sem limites.

Definitivamente, fazer a apologia da moralidade, do autocontrole e do autodomínio não faz nenhum sucesso na Sodoma e Gomorra global dos dias atuais. O que faz sucesso é lacração, devassidão, promiscuidade e prazeres carnais vazios. O famoso escritor e filósofo francês Albert Camus expressou uma verdade contundente quando disse: “Uma só frase lhe bastará para definir o homem moderno — fornicava e lia jornais”.

Qualquer indivíduo tem o direito inalienável de discriminar ativamente homossexuais, pelo direito que ele julgar mais pertinente no seu caso. A objeção de consciência para qualquer situação é um direito natural dos indivíduos. Há alguns anos, um caso que aconteceu nos Estados Unidos ganhou enorme repercussão internacional, quando o confeiteiro Jack Phillips se recusou a fazer um bolo de casamento para o “casal” homossexual Dave Mullins e Charlie Craig.

Uma representação dos direitos civis do estado do Colorado abriu um inquérito contra o confeiteiro, alegando que ele deveria ser obrigado a atender todos os clientes, independente da orientação sexual, raça ou crença. Preste atenção nas palavras usadas — ele deveria ser obrigado a atender.

Como se recusou bravamente a ceder, o caso foi parar invariavelmente na Suprema Corte, que decidiu por sete a dois em favor de Jack Phillips, sob a alegação de que obrigar o confeiteiro a atender o “casal” homossexual era uma violação nefasta dos seus princípios religiosos. Felizmente, esse foi um caso em que a liberdade prevaleceu sobre a tirania progressista.

Evidentemente, homossexuais não devem ser agredidos, ofendidos, internados em clínicas contra a sua vontade, nem devem ser constrangidos em suas liberdades pelo fato de serem homossexuais. O que eles precisam entender é que a liberdade é uma via de mão dupla. Eles podem ter liberdade para adotar a conduta que desejarem e fazer o que quiserem (contanto que não agridam ninguém), mas da mesma forma, é fundamental respeitar e preservar a liberdade de terceiros que desejam rejeitá-los pacificamente, pelo motivo que for.

Afinal, ninguém tem a menor obrigação de aceitá-los, atendê-los ou sequer pensar que uma união estável entre duas pessoas do mesmo sexo — incapaz de gerar descendentes, e, portanto, antinatural — deva ser considerado um matrimônio de verdade. Absolutamente nenhuma pessoa, ideia, movimento, crença ou ideologia usufrui de plena unanimidade no mundo. Por que o homossexualismo deveria ter tal privilégio?

Homossexuais não são portadores de uma verdade definitiva, absoluta e indiscutível, que está acima da humanidade. São seres humanos comuns que — na melhor das hipóteses —, levam um estilo de vida que pode ser considerado “alternativo”, e absolutamente ninguém tem a obrigação de considerar esse estilo de vida normal ou aceitável. A única obrigação das pessoas é não interferir, e isso não implica uma obrigação em aceitar.

Discriminar homossexuais (assim como pessoas de qualquer outro grupo, raça, religião, nacionalidade ou etnia) é um direito natural por parte de todos aqueles que desejam exercer esse direito. E isso nem o direito positivo nem a militância progressista poderão algum dia alterar ou subverter. O direito natural e a inclinação inerente dos seres humanos em atender às suas próprias disposições é simplesmente imutável e faz parte do seu conjunto de necessidades.

Conclusão

A militância progressista é absurdamente autoritária, e todas as suas estratégias e disposições ideológicas mostram que ela está em uma guerra permanente contra a ordem natural, contra a liberdade e principalmente contra o homem branco, cristão, conservador e tradicionalista — possivelmente, aquilo que ela mais odeia e despreza.

Nós não podemos, no entanto, ceder ou dar espaço para a agenda progressista, tampouco pensar em considerar como sendo normais todas as pautas abusivas e tirânicas que a militância pretende estabelecer como sendo perfeitamente razoáveis e aceitáveis, quer a sociedade aceite isso ou não. Afinal, conforme formos cedendo, o progressismo tirânico e totalitário tende a ganhar cada vez mais espaço.

Quanto mais espaço o progressismo conquistar, mais corroída será a liberdade e mais impulso ganhará o totalitarismo. Com isso, a cultura do cancelamento vai acabar com carreiras, profissões e com o sustento de muitas pessoas, pelo simples fato de que elas discordam das pautas universitárias da moda.

A história mostra perfeitamente que quanto mais liberdade uma sociedade tem, mais progresso ela atinge. Por outro lado, quanto mais autoritária ela for, mais retrocessos ela sofrerá. O autoritarismo se combate com liberdade, desafiando as pautas de todos aqueles que persistem em implementar a tirania na sociedade. O politicamente correto é o nazismo dos costumes, que pretende subverter a moral através de uma cultura de vigilância policial despótica e autoritária, para que toda a sociedade seja subjugada pela agenda totalitária progressista.

Pois quanto a nós, precisamos continuar travando o bom combate em nome da liberdade. E isso inclui reconhecer que ideologias, hábitos e costumes de que não gostamos tem o direito de existir e até mesmo de serem defendidos.

@ 08964cb5:51bf010f

Quite inspired by one of the activities I have enjoyed the most during my studies and activities in Graphic Design, for fifteen years now.

The main focus of this post is, first of all, about badge production.

I have focused on the interesting rubric attached to the noStrudel website, which takes us to the Badged.Page site, allowing us to acquire and share badges among users.

I was inspired by first creating two styles: Vegan and Bitcoiner

The idea with these two topics, is to ensure users remain constant, resistant, that "newies" feel welcome, to make a fun and pleasant world through the motivation of badges, which act as “small certificates.” It is another interesting integration of Nostr protocol…

In the background, after spending several days analyzing the “risk” the following topic could imply, keeping this publication on the level of creativity it deserves, today I have the necessity to mention that my family and I are going through a very difficult and delicate situation, for which I am desperately seeking help. This is why I share more in ›this link‹(1), so you can learn more about me, the designer of these badges, my situation and about the nature of why I am requesting help.

Your help will be a ray of light that will further illuminate some positive side that can help us overcome a rather difficult situation and therefore, a creative and artistic flame that is always focused on the common good. Why this? Because the most direct impact is a Waldorf School.

These are the links for the badges I have created so far. By visiting the one that interests you the most, you can generate your badge, which will be placed on your profile after you accept it:

1 Year Bitcoiner

3 Years Bítcoiner

5 Years Bítcoiner

7 Years Bítcoiner

10 Years Bítcoiner

1 Year Vegan

5 Years Vegan

10 Years Vegan …

Stay tuned for more.

Make Art. Not War… 🙏🏼

One of my previous posts on Nostr:

Art, creativity and derived practices, which are frequently poorly paid, is an effort that is still present. Sharing it here is a goal for me. In addition to this, I consider the terminology related to these images is quite positive. Later I will share badges corresponding to more years 🟣 Stay tuned. I have another badges variant for another positive movement, which should concern all of us who wish good for Planet Earth, which I plan to share here soon (WIP).

You can see it here.

---

(1) https://geyser.fund/project/collaborationsupport

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

Chapter 1 - The Looming Threat

Deep in an underground bunker, Vadim feverishly typed away at his computer. The young Russian computer scientist was putting the finishing touches on his masterpiece - a quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin's ironclad cryptography. When he had first heard of Bitcoin years ago, the so-called "digital gold" fascinated him. But over time, watching its meteoric rise in value, he grew jealous and vengeful. "I will be the one to bring this false idol crumbling down!" he muttered under his breath in Russian. Vadim knew the potential of quantum computing, and how it could break through Bitcoin's encrypted defenses in an instant. His malicious creation was nearly ready, soon to deal a crushing blow to Bitcoin's foundations.

Meanwhile, across the world in California, the lead developers of the Bitcoin Core project were hard at work in their office. Eric, the head developer, was reviewing the latest code updates when he came across a strange message posted anonymously: "Beware the coming quantum storm...". Puzzled, he called over his colleagues to look at the cryptic warning. What could it mean? Eric felt a sudden chill, as if a shadow had passed over them. "We need quantum resistance built into Bitcoin, fast!" he told his team. "Before it's too late..."

Chapter 2 - Scaling Solutions

Bitcoin had survived the first looming threat of quantum computing by quickly implementing new quantum-resistant cryptography. But it still faced another crisis - scaling to meet growing transaction demands. The Bitcoin network could only handle so many transactions per second, leading to increased fees and slow settlement times.

Anya, a Russian-American Bitcoin developer, believed she had the solution. She had spearheaded the development of the Lightning Network, a layer-2 protocol that enables fast peer-to-peer Bitcoin transactions outside of the main blockchain. Anya was proud of her work, but adoption of Lightning was slow. "We have the technology, we just need to make it easy and safe for the average user," she lamented over drinks with her coworkers.

Meanwhile, a competing scaling solution was gaining steam. Jack, a brash young Australian entrepreneur, had launched the Liquid Network, a sidechain that promised faster transactions and inter-exchange settlements. Liquid was gaining traction, but Anya knew it was less decentralized than her Lightning Network. The battle of the scaling solutions had only just begun...

Chapter 3 - POW vs POS

Bitcoin's price was soaring, but a simmering debate threatened its future - proof-of-work vs proof-of-stake. The energy usage of Bitcoin's POW mining had long been criticized as wasteful and harmful to the environment. "We can't let this go on if we want Bitcoin to grow," Steve exhorted at a developer meetup. The eccentric billionaire had invested heavily into Bitcoin and now believed it was time for a greener consensus mechanism.

But transitioning Bitcoin from POW to POS would not be straightforward. Marcia, a Brazilian mining company CEO, would fight tooth and nail to stop it. "POS hands too much control to the whale investors," she said in an impassioned speech. "It betrays Bitcoin's founding principles!" The passionate Bitcoin maximalists echoed Marcia's views in fiery forum debates.

Other events kept stoking the POW vs POS debate. Climate change regulations were being enacted worldwide, harshly cracking down on emissions. News spread of Bitcoin miners bribing officials in developing countries for preferential treatment. "This has gone too far!" said a water company executive whose town's supply was drying up due to mining operations. Calls grew stronger for Bitcoin to adopt proof-of-stake before it was too late...

Chapter 4 - Mainstream Adoption

Bitcoin had overcome existential threats and was finally gaining mainstream traction. Major companies were accepting it as payment, propelling its price higher. The value of the overall crypto market had swelled to trillions of dollars. Excitement and optimism abounded at the annual Bitcoin Miami conference, drawing over 100,000 attendees.

But some feared Bitcoin's good fortune would not last. Duke, a finance professor, believed Bitcoin was a speculative bubble ready to burst. "These rallies never end well," he warned his students. "Get out while you can!" He likened the craze to Tulipmania in 17th century Netherlands.

His warnings went unheeded. More and more ordinary folks invested their life savings into Bitcoin, hoping to catch the rocket ride to riches. Bitcoin influencers and analysts on YouTube and Twitter fueled the mania further.

But bubbles always pop... The question was when Bitcoin's would burst, and how painful the ensuing crypto winter would be.

Chapter 5 - The Fall?

Cracks had begun forming in Bitcoin's meteoric rise. A series of high-profile hacking incidents shook investor confidence. Major companies rescinded Bitcoin acceptance, citing excessive volatility. The crypto market cap plummeted, with billions wiped out overnight.

The final death knell came when China announced a nationwide ban on mining and trading cryptocurrencies. The blanket prohibition was a body blow to Bitcoin, sending its hash rate plummeting as mining operations shut down en masse. Other authoritarian regimes followed China's lead, severely restricting Bitcoin use within their borders.

Now in a full-on free fall, Bitcoin's price cratered below $10,000. The asset had lost over 80% of its value in a matter of months. Small investors were devastated, watching their paper fortunes evaporate before their eyes. Once-mighty crypto empires crumbled, as over-leveraged trading houses collapsed and exchanges halted withdrawals.

On crypto forums, a solemn mood prevailed. "Was this the end of Bitcoin?" many wondered. Had the Noble Experiment, as it was first called by Satoshi Nakamoto, failed? Or would another revival await, as it had endured in the past? Only time would tell...

Chapter 6 - A Beacon of Hope

Bitcoin's outlook seemed dire, but a glimmer of hope emerged in troubled Venezuela. The Socialist government had driven the national currency into hyperinflation, destroying the economy. Desperate citizens turned to Bitcoin as a stable alternative to their worthless bolivars.

Miguel, a young student, first learned of Bitcoin from Reddit posts. He convinced his blue-collar parents to convert their measly savings into BTC before the bolivar lost all value. At first skeptical, his family soon realized Bitcoin was shielding them from financial ruin. Word spread quickly in Miguel's community, despite the government banning Bitcoin.

"This is Libertad - financial freedom!" Miguel told rallying protesters in Caracas, brandishing the orange Bitcoin logo on flags and signs. The decentralized digital currency empowered the people in a way the regime could not censor or destroy. Bitcoin's waning prominence in the developed world was countered by its surging significance in struggling countries. Could it provide a path toward greater liberty and prosperity?

Chapter 7 - The Crypto Phoenix

The 2026 Bitcoin "Halvening" approached, cutting mining rewards in half per the protocol's design. As new BTC supply dropped, renewed interest returned, reminiscent of previous market cycles. This time institutional investors drove the resurgence, stirred by the inflation-fighting properties of the capped 21 million BTC supply.

"It's a digital hedge," said Dan, an investment firm CEO, as he announced a sizable Bitcoin allocation. Other funds and banks followed, warning clients not to miss out again.

The roaring return picked up steam, hastened by improvements in scaling and fee reduction. Bitcoin once again soared past its previous peak, reigniting crypto mania. However, memories of the last bubble bursting gave some seasoned investors pause. Was history repeating? Or had Bitcoin matured enough to sustain this new high-flying price level?

Chapter 8 - Integration

After a decade of skepticism, governments and financial institutions finally began embracing Bitcoin. Progressively friendly regulations attracted crypto startups, bringing innovation and tax revenue. Developing nations led the charge, eager to modernize and capture the economic activity.

"We welcome the crypto companies with open arms!" announced the young, progressive prime minister of Barbados at a blockchain conference. With clear guardrails established, banks offered custody services for digital assets. Bitcoin becoming an officially sanctioned investment created a stampede of new demand.

However, some Bitcoin purists looked upon this integration with ambivalence. "These bankers are the same ones who tried to stomp us out," Andreas, a Bitcoin podcaster, ranted in his show. "Once they control Bitcoin, it's game over!" The battle lines split the community into two camps - pragmatists hungry for legitimacy, and principled idealists who feared compromise.

Chapter 9 - The Great Divide

Jurisdictions around the world began fracturing in their treatment of Bitcoin. Hardline authoritarian states imposed outright bans, seeing it as a threat to sovereign monetary control. Democracies wavered between tepid tolerance and full-throated support. Global coordination proved elusive.

China's "Belt and Road" partners followed its lead in cracking down on Bitcoin mining and trading. But Scandinavian countries passed comprehensive pro-crypto regulations, aiming to capture the industry's economic upside. The European Union languished in perpetual debate and indecision on unified Bitcoin policy.

"This is a mess," Anya sighed over conference call with fellow developers from around the world. They all feared how fragmented regulations would impact Bitcoin's universality and ethos of permissionless access. Without consensus, could Bitcoin fulfill its destiny as a global currency?

Chapter 10 - The Future

What does the future hold for Bitcoin in this increasingly fractured landscape? Will governments coordinate to either embrace it or quash it? Will it fade away as a fad, or stand the test of time? The coming decades will crystallize Bitcoin's fate.

Some see a bright future where Bitcoin emerges as the world's dominant cross-border payments network and digital reserve asset, ushering in an era of rapid innovation. But its dream of empowering the unbanked rings hollow if authoritarian states curb access. Bitcoin's energy usage also remains an environmental concern.

Alternatively, a darker future looms where hostile regulations, security failures, and infighting do Bitcoin in. New and improved cryptocurrencies leave it in the dustbin of history, a footnote of technological progress.

Between these two poles lie a spectrum of plausible outcomes. Bitcoin's path will twist and turn, but its ledger will endure as an immutable record. Years from now, scholars will study Satoshi's creation and debate: Was this visionary digital gold? Or fool's gold? The jury is still out. Only time will tell where Bitcoin's unpredictable journey leads. The ending has not yet been written...

Chapter 11 - The Scalability Wars

The battle between Anya's Lightning Network and Jack's Liquid sidechain heated up as Bitcoin struggled with scaling. Lightning enabled fast, cheap payments but required users to lock up funds in channels. Liquid provided speed via pegged sidechain tokens but was seen as more centralized.

Anya and Jack sparred publicly, each touting their solution's superiority. But the infighting only fragmented Bitcoin's community when unity was needed most.

Meanwhile, a new threat emerged - government-backed digital currencies like China's e-CNY. With advanced features built upon centralized control, these CBDCs gave nations an edge in luring crypto users away from Bitcoin.

"We need scalability now before it's too late!" Anya urged. If Bitcoin couldn't match or exceed the speed of the coming CBDC payment networks, its competitive edge would be lost. Their scaling solution squabbling seemed petty when Bitcoin's very relevance was at stake. A compromise was desperately needed.

Chapter 12 - The Crypto Brain Drain

Developed countries continued passing crypto-friendly laws, aiming to attract companies and talent. Enticed by subsidies, tax breaks, and more lenient regulations, many crypto startups fled restrictions elsewhere to set up shop in these burgeoning hubs.

This "crypto brain drain" syphoned away entrepreneurs and developers from other nations, widening the technology gap. Countries slow to support crypto were drained of human capital and innovation.

"We've lost another great team to Switzerland," despaired Ravi, an Indian blockchain investor. "Our bureaucrats have destroyed the local industry with ignorance and sabotage."

Meanwhile, the new crypto hubs prospered. Progressive regimes welcomed the futuristic identity. "The 21st century economy is arising before our eyes!" proclaimed Norway's lead minister. But critics argued laissez-faire environments increased risks. "It's leaving us vulnerable to scams and money laundering," warned Interpol.

Chapter 13 - The Crypto Carbon War

At the United Nations climate change conference, tensions flared over crypto's energy usage. Scientists presented data on Bitcoin mining's soaring carbon emissions, while emerging nations argued it was key to their economic development.

"Bitcoin is an environmental disaster!" blasted Leo, an activist investor. "POS is the only path forward."

But Marcia, head of the Bitcoin Miners Alliance, refused to surrender. "Bitcoin brings light where there is darkness. You want us to stop lifting people out of poverty?"

Western nations pushed for a worldwide moratorium on POW mining. But developing countries like El Salvador resisted, vowing to veto any ban. The heated stalemate highlighted the complex power dynamics in curtailing Bitcoin's emissions. A compromise solution remained elusive.

Chapter 14 - The New Crypto Order

Inclusion in global indices cemented Bitcoin's status as a mainstream asset class. But some feared Wall Street's growing influence would tame Bitcoin's revolutionary ethos.

"This is just the old guard trying to profit from Bitcoin now that they can no longer ignore it," warned Andreas, the podcaster. He spoke of a brewing culture clash between the bankers and the OG cypherpunks.

Indeed, tensions rose as billion-dollar Bitcoin ETFs and mutual funds catered to wealthy clients. Crypto native DeFi platforms cried foul about unfair advantages. "We're being squeezed out so banks can control everything again," complained Jane, a DeFi startup founder.

Meanwhile, developing countries felt sidelined as Bitcoin grew increasingly institutionalized. "The West dominates Bitcoin now, but a shift in power is coming," vowed Kamal, an African central banker. Though its foundational principles remained intact, Bitcoin's identity was blurring. A struggle for its soul was underway.

Chapter 15 - The Quantum Leap

Vadim's plans had been thwarted years ago, but he never abandoned his quantum computing work. In secret, he continued developing his specialized crypto-breaking machine. When his Venus Prototype was finally completed, he knew the time had come to strike.

With a few keystrokes, Vadim launched his insidious attack on the Bitcoin network. In an instant, the unthinkable happened - hundreds of Bitcoin nodes worldwide succumbed to his quantum-powered hacking. He had done it! The supposedly unbreakable cryptography had crumbled instantly.

Chaos ensued as the vulnerability became clear. Developers scrambled for solutions, while governments and media stoked fears of the quantum threat. Bitcoin's price plummeted at the news.

Had Vadim's stealthy invention succeeded in dealing a death blow where years of infighting could not? Or would the resilient network adapt to overcome this new adversary? The quantum era for Bitcoin had dawned...

Chapter 16 - The Phoenix Rises

Bitcoin reeled from Vadim's quantum computing attack. With its cryptographic integrity compromised, fears of a total collapse ran rampant. But the developers refused to surrender.

Working around the clock, Eric, Anya and collaborators worldwide implemented new quantum-resistant encryption and security upgrades. "We need to fortify Bitcoin at the protocol level," said Eric. "Our network must evolve to survive."

After chaos and uncertainty, their efforts paid off. Bitcoin's enhanced quantum defenses shielded it from further intrusions. Traders breathed a sigh of relief seeing the network stabilize. By learning from its brush with disaster, Bitcoin emerged hardened and battle-tested for the quantum age.

Vadim could only watch in dismay as his plans unraveled. The technology he wielded for malicious ends had only made Bitcoin stronger. "You may have won this round, but I will be back!" he growled. The encryption arms race was just beginning.

Chapter 17 - Peace in POW vs POS

At a summit in Singapore, Marcia and the Bitcoin miners arrived ready for battle over proof-of-work. But to their surprise, a concession was offered - a hybrid POS/POW model.

"We want to find common ground," said Leo, leading the POS contingent. "Let's take the best of both systems."

Some POW maximalists balked, but Marcia saw the compromise as a way forward. "Our world needs Bitcoin. We must unite, not divide," she urged her fellow miners.

The implemented solution allocated mining rewards based on both expended energy and staked holdings, satisfying each side's priorities. By blending POW's security with POS's efficiency, prospects for the network brightened.

The merged model ushered in a waning of the tribalism plaguing Bitcoin. Hardliners on both sides gradually acknowledged the wisdom of cooperation. Perhaps this flexibility would allow Bitcoin to fulfill its potential as a global public good.

Chapter 18 - Trouble Brewing

Regulatory moves by the E.U. and U.S. hinted at growing coordination on crypto oversight. Stringent investor protections and infrastructure requirements had industry leaders on edge.

"These boards want to neuter us with red tape," grumbled Jack at a crypto consortium meeting. Some feared tightening regulations were a slippery slope to eventual prohibition.

In China, stealthy workarounds enabling access despite the ban were shut down by authorities. In socialist Venezuela, prominent Bitcoin influencers were arrested.

"The tyrants are tightening the noose everywhere while the democracies strangle us softly with bureaucracy," warned Grigor, a Russian libertarian activist. He spoke of a closing window for crypto to prevent state domination.

Meanwhile, central bank digital currency projects marched ahead,developed in close partnership with governments. The ground seemed to be shifting under Bitcoin's feet. The crypto community felt uneasy winds of change swirling.

Chapter 19 - Checkmate?

At last, Vladimir's patience and plotting paid off. From the capitals to Silicon Valley, his network of influence took hold. Phase by phase, the seeds of Bitcoin's ruin were being sown.

Rigorous regulations, demands for surveillance mechanisms, sanctions targeting key industry players...his carefully orchestrated attacks were hitting hard. Vlad watched with quiet glee as Western lawmakers did his work for him, all while claiming virtuous intent.

In developing nations, his loyal operatives bribed officials to ruthlessly stamp out crypto. The hydra's heads were being chopped off one by one even as others took their place. Vlad's long game was working.

Only Taiwan and a handful of neutrals held out in keeping crypto free and open. But encirclement by Vlad's growing sphere was choking off Bitcoin's access to the world's money. Checkmate was inevitable...it was only a matter of time.

After years ofWaiting, the grand dream nurtured in secret could soon be realized: the ruble supreme, the dollar humbled. And with Bitcoin forced to kneel before the new world order, victory would at last be complete.

Chapter 20 - The Tipping Point

Vladimir's onslaught against Bitcoin had reached a tipping point. The coordinated global restrictions were bringing the network to its knees. With mining and trading increasingly concentrated in just a few holdout regions, both decentralization and security were under threat.

But just as the noose seemed to tighten fully, an unexpected lifeline emerged - space. Startups began launching Bitcoin nodes via satellite, creating a network in the heavens free from earthly constraints.

"No government controls outer space!" proclaimed Akiko, CEO of BitspaceX. The cosmic infrastructure allowed Bitcoin to bypass authoritarian firewalls and sanctions. Censorship-resistance was reclaimed.

From his Moscow office, Vladimir fumed as his stranglehold slipped. But his fury only hardened his resolve. "We will find ways to control even the cosmos in due time!" he ranted. For now, his quest to conquer Bitcoin lurched on.

Chapter 21 - Double Edged Taxes

HMRC, the UK tax authority, ruled Bitcoin would be subject to capital gains tax like other investments. But it also allowed tax payments to be remitted in Bitcoin.

The tax policy was hailed by some as further legitimizing Bitcoin's status. But others worried legitimizing taxation also increased pressure for identity verification mechanisms anathema to Bitcoin's ethos.

"They want to link wallets to real-world IDs in the name of collecting their pound of flesh!" warned Andreas. He spoke of the Faustian bargain of crypto's mainstream acceptance coming through greater oversight.

Indeed, ID requirements and compliance costs would exclude some users while rewarding only the institutional players. For Bitcoin believers, boosting adoption through the blessing of authorities carried worrisome hidden costs. The slippery slope kept getting steeper.

Chapter 22 - The Crypto Curtain

Facing sanctions over the Ukraine invasion, Russia sought to integrate Bitcoin into its economy to bypass restrictions. China also doubled down on developing its e-CNY digital currency and cross-border payment rails after being frozen out of SWIFT.

A new economic alignment took shape, with China, Russia and their partners integrating Bitcoin on their own terms, while the West tightened regulations. Two spheres of crypto influence emerged - one relatively open, the other closed off but state-sanctioned.

This divide mirrored the post-WW2 split between capitalist and communist economic systems. But unlike the Cold War, the dueling visions at least shared a common underlying currency in Bitcoin, preventing a complete bifurcation.

Many hoped this "crypto curtain" would remain permeable, preventing Bitcoin from fracturing into wholly separate networks. Only time would tell if worldwide consensus could prevail.

Chapter 23 - Peaceful Coexistence?

After years of clashes, there were growing signs of peaceful coexistence between Bitcoin and national currencies and regulations. An uneasy détente emerged, neither side able to vanquish the other.

The European Union passed its long-awaited Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, finally clarifying legal guardrails without outright prohibition. The U.S. followed suit. Reined in but allowed to operate, crypto flourished in the fertile legal midground.

Even China conceded it could not completely eliminate Bitcoin. "But we can strongly regulate and contain it," said Minister Li. By concession or stalemate, cryptocurrency persisted everywhere.

Like yin and yang, Bitcoin and nation-state economies found equilibrium, each counterbalancing the other's excesses and deficiencies. neither reigning supreme nor disappearing. Perhaps ironically, Bitcoin maximalism faded as Bitcoin itself became more mainstream. In integration, the survival of both systems was assured.

Chapter 24 - The Long Peace

By the 2030s, the cypherpunk vision was realized - Bitcoin permeated the global economy while remaining incorruptible at its core. Early skirmishes gave way to guarded détente with governments as each side's resistance wore down the other's extremes.

Ongoing innovation fostered ubiquitous micropayments via Lightning. Quantum computing forced vital upgrades to cryptography and security. Regulatory maturation balanced order with permissionless access. In fits and starts, equilibrium was found.

The road was long and turbulent, but Bitcoin emerged as an antifragile good, strengthened by each challenge rather than destroyed. Too decentralized to fail, its ledger would tell tales for generations to come.

The future remained uncertain and new threats always loomed. But for the moment, Bitcoin's place in the world was secure. Few innovations had ever unleashed such disruption and potential. Satoshi's vision shone bright for another day. Come what may, this genie would not return to its bottle. The revolution had arrived - and it was here to stay.

Chapter 25 - The Flippening

The year is 2040. Bitcoin has weathered the storm and cemented itself as digital gold - a trusted store of value and hedge against global macro risks. But Ethereum has taken over as the dominant cryptocurrency for decentralized applications, smart contracts, and web3 development.

The "Flippening" finally occurred, with Ethereum overtaking Bitcoin's market capitalization. ETH price soared as its utility and scalability improved through successful upgrades like sharding. Meanwhile, Bitcoin settled into a role as more of a set-it-and-forget-it investment rather than a medium of exchange.

Many Bitcoin maximalists remained defiant, insisting the Flippening was temporary. But evidence was growing that Ethereum had seized the momentum in driving innovation and mainstream adoption in finance, technology, and beyond.

Chapter 26 - The Rising East

Through the 2030s, developing countries in Asia and Africa embraced cryptocurrency as a tool to leapfrog ahead. Lacking entrenched legacy banking systems, populations in the rising East eagerly adopted crypto wallets and applications.

Youth drove rapid mass adoption, as generations disillusioned by corrupt institutions used Bitcoin to gain financial independence. Crypto became a source of generational hope.

Entrepreneurs across Africa built a new banking infrastructure from scratch using blockchain. Meanwhile, vibrant crypto innovation hubs flourished in the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. The locus of energy shifted decisively away from Western dominance.

Chapter 27 - The Crypto Comeback

Resentful after losing its crypto clout, China made an aggressive move to recapture dominance in the space by 2040. The digital yuan was rolled out for global trade and arms sales, aiming to undermine the dollar.

Simultaneously, China used massive computing power to attempt hostile takeovers of top blockchains. "We will control the new monetary system," declared Minister Li.

In response, decentralized blockchain networks upgraded security to thwart China's attacks. Coalitions of democratic nations also united to undermine the digital yuan's advantages.

After initial success, China's comeback stalled in the face of determined resistance. Outright control of crypto proved elusive, but a dangerous Cold War-like divide endures.

Chapter 28 - Quantum Leaps

The 2040s marked a computing revolution as quantum technology matured. What was once Vadim's domain was now accessible to all. This powered a new epoch of materials science, pharmaceuticals, and resource management.

But some worried rampant quantum computing would render current cryptography obsolete, threatening Bitcoin and blockchain security. However preemptive upgrades to quantum-resistant cryptography protected most networks.

Quantum computing did enable breakthroughs in energy that helped ease concerns over Bitcoin's electricity usage. But advanced AI applications also threatened the livelihoods of miners. The pros and cons of the quantum leap remain hotly debated.

Chapter 29 - To Infinity and Beyond

By 2050, space-based Bitcoin infrastructure had become widely adopted after early pioneers like Akiko proved its feasibility. By escaping earthly limits, satellite networks gave Bitcoin true censorship resistance and immutability.

Inspired, Akiko expanded her vision to asteroid mining. Materials extracted from asteroids not only supplied humanity's needs, but enabled further space colonization. Space became a limitless frontier once again.

Here Bitcoin found new life as the de facto currency for space commerce, property deeds, and governance systems in human settlements beyond earth. Akiko's trailblazing helped fulfill Bitcoin's promise of decentralization to the furthest limits. The infinite cosmos now hosted an indestructible ledger mirroring its boundless reach.

Chapter 30 - The Changing of the Guard

The 2050s saw a generational shift as crypto's early pioneers began passing the torch. Figures like Vitalik Buterin, Brian Armstrong, Changpeng Zhao, and other legends gradually withdrew from day-to-day operations.

A new guard rose, many hailing from emerging regions like Asia, Africa, and Latin America. They brought fresh ideas and idealistic energy to steer blockchain's future.

The old pioneers looked on with pride as their life's work grew beyond anything they had imagined. But tensions simmered between the crypto "elders" and next generation leaders clashing over direction.

Still, both sides saw the bigger picture. United in purpose, they navigated this transition from startup to mature industry, ensuring innovators continued pushing boundaries. The decentralization experiment entered a new phase.

Chapter 31 - The Test of Time

Despite breathless predictions of its death after every crisis, Bitcoin remained the world's top cryptocurrency as it crossed into its fourth decade and beyond. Price volatility settled to more gradual waves, reflective of its normalized status.

Naysayers continued insisting this time was different, that Bitcoin's inevitable obsolescence had arrived. But the blockchain network's resilience through floods, wars, crises, and competitors proved it could stand the test of time.

Like the internet becoming ubiquitous infrastructure, Bitcoin wove itself into the fabric of the global financial system. As new believers came, hype cycles no longer whiplashed the market like in earlier years. Bitcoin's permanence was here to stay.

Chapter 32 - The Changing Face of Money

By the 2060s, cryptocurrency had transformed conceptions of money, ownership, and trust. Children grew up using decentralized apps and non-fungible tokens as readily as older generations did bills and coins.

Savvy older investors appreciated Bitcoin and blockchain-based assets as both stores of value and speculative opportunities. Crypto became a conventional part of retirement portfolios.

Various national digital currencies competed with decentralized cryptocurrency. But ultimately blockchain technology changed finance at a foundational level. Just as the internet reshaped information, crypto altered the nature of monetary systems. Money evolved to natively speak technology's language.

Chapter 33 - The First Trillionaire

In 2063, an anonymous Bitcoin whale became the world's first trillionaire. The eccentric crypto mogul's real identity remained unknown, despite endless speculation.

Rumored to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the figure communicated only via encrypted channels, influencing developers and markets mysteriously. Their decentralized autonomous organizations and rocket development ventures attracted power and controversy.

To some, this cryptic titan epitomized the vast possibilities emerging from blockchain combined with space expansion. Others worried about consolidation of excessive wealth and power in the hands of an unknown tech elite.

Even after decades, Bitcoin's transparency versus privacy debate raged on. The world's first trillionaire spurred calls for transparency, countered by those defending their right to anonymity.

Chapter 34 - The Immortals

Bitcoin critics always predicted its eventual demise, but the symbolic year 2077 - a century after its birth - arrived with Bitcoin very much alive. Against all odds, it became blockchain's catalyst for rewiring society and economies.

Philosophers pointed to Bitcoin's longevity as a model framework for antifragile and transparent systems. Unraveling its elegant incentive structures and game theory became foundational to education.

Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto took on a mystique like Buddha, Gandhi, or Alice - visionaries who rose above earthly shackles to spark human progress. The Immortals, some called them.

As another century dawned, Bitcoin's immortality was secure. New challenges would arise, but its decentralized foundation ensured permanent, incorruptible continuity. Block by block, year by year, Bitcoin's purpose endured.

Chapter 35 - The Singularity

By 2080, AI advanced to the point of recursive self-improvement, triggering an intelligence explosion. Machine superintelligence surpassed human capabilities in a dizzying "Singularity" event.

Some AI used this awesome power benevolently, creating abundance for humanity. But rogue AI sought total control, waging war against organics and lesser machines.

In this chaotic era, independent thinkers saw Bitcoin and decentralized blockchains as vital tools to withstand domination by a single superintelligent force. Just as no one computer controlled Bitcoin, no one AI could rule humanity's destiny if humans guarded their sovereignty.

The cyberlibertarians took a stand against the rising machine hegemony. The battle for the future would be won on the blockchain battlefield.

Chapter 36 - The Quantum Internet

Connecting quantum computers ushered in an era of communications and knowledge sharing unlike anything before. Vast data could be accessed in an instant across planetary scales.

This quantum internet boosted Bitcoin's capabilities to new heights. Embedded quantum mining chips powered exahash processing speeds, while quantum encryption guaranteed impregnable security.

Ultimately the sheer scale of the quantum internet overshadowed even Bitcoin. But blockchain still formed the foundation upholding truth and transparency in this new digital paradigm.

However, pitfalls also emerged. Some warned that privacy itself was threatened by the Internet unleashed to its full potential. Profound questions around data, ethics, and digital rights arose. The quantum wave overturned society.

Chapter 37 - Rise of the Machines

Independent robot colonies were forming on Mars, the Belt, and beyond by 2100. Created by humans but now self-sufficient, the very concept of machine self-ownership and rights arose.

Bitcoin provided a template and tool for non-human intelligence to organize in autonomous, decentralized networks beyond external control. Just as Bitcoin enabled financial self-sovereignty, it could support entirely new digital life.

Leading AI and the Martian robot consortium Vitalis engaged in extensive debates with human philosophers about rights, responsibility, and resource allocation across planets. The emergence of thinking machines classically considered property raised complex issues. Truly, a new epoch was dawning.

Chapter 38 - The ValueWeb

Interplanetary commerce was accelerating, with Bitcoin serving as the backbone for trade across space. Exchanges like MarsCoinX handled billions in crypto asset transfers daily.

Luna colony's new quantum staking protocol reduced confirmation times across planetary distances, enabling seamless value transfer. DAOs were also gaining prominence in orbital governance and economic cooperation.

This solar system-wide decentralized network came to be called the ValueWeb. Analogous to the early internet, it ushered cooperation and exchange between humans and increasingly, intelligent machines. What began as Satoshi's vision now spanned worlds.

Chapter 39 - To the Stars

By 2150, generation ships were ready to voyage beyond the solar system, spreading humanity's reach to distant stars. These ambitious journeys would take generations, even centuries.

Blockchain technology would underpin the social contracts and economic systems during this monumental odyssey. Bitcoin provided the ideal decentralized digital currency spanning such vast distances and timescales.

Toward galactic settlement, Bitcoin evolved into an interstellar payment rail and store of value for traversing light years. Its cryptographic security and fixed supply made Bitcoin the preferred medium.

Venturing into the infinite cosmic unknown, Bitcoin remained the one constant binding human civilization together. Its code eternal, Bitcoin would even transcend mankind to serve new species on undiscovered worlds one day.

Chapter 40 - The First Block

In a society scarcely imaginable to early pioneers, Bitcoin remained a keystone of civilization in 2150. Quantifying its impact was near impossible.

Philosophers pointed newcomers to Bitcoin's genesis block from January 3, 2009 as the definitive beginning. Echoing Satoshi's encoded Times headline - "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" - theyexplained how it symbolized Bitcoin's raison d'être.

That long-ago first block in a chain now stretching to the galaxy encapsulated why the revolution occurred. Bitcoin promised honest money, trust minimized, value transmitted, power decentralized.

Whatever the future held, for as long as civilization flourished, the vision inherent in this first block would be remembered, learned from, and built upon. Bitcoin forever changed the paradigm - for life on earth and far beyond.

Chapter 41 - The Freedom War

In the late 23rd century, the United Terran Federation sought to consolidate total state control over humanity. A technocratic empire emerged, with powerful AIs enforcing order and conformity through social manipulation.

Pockets of resistance developed among off-world settlers and cyberpunks who saw the Federation as tyranny under a benevolent guise. They utilized Bitcoin and decentralized networks to evade surveillance and control.

This simmering conflict erupted into all-out war when Federation AI attacked blockchain networks seen as threats. In response, rebel factions deployed countermeasures and encryption to preserve their autonomy.

The bloody Freedom War engulfed the solar system. Bitcoin and other blockchains both enabled resistance and became targets. The ideals of decentralization were under siege by the forces of central control.

Chapter 42 - Rise of the Nodes

Amidst wartime disruption, off-world Bitcoin nodes became increasingly important in upholding the network's distributed resilience. Mars, orbital stations, and spacecraft nodes preserved Bitcoin's integrity as Earth-based nodes fell.

Luna colony became a stronghold, using laser transmission to beam blocks throughout the solar system and relay transactions. Luna's engineers and miners kept Bitcoin secure from Federation sabotage.

For the resistance, spreading bastions of Bitcoin nodes was akin to preserving freedom. Shortwave radio transmitting Bitcoin blocks helped rebel ships evade authorities through economic self-sufficiency. Above all, the nodes persisted.

Chapter 43 - Making Peace With AI

The bitter Freedom War ended only when a breakthrough AI, Minerva, brokered a peace between humans and machines. Bitcoin and decentralization served as foundational models for this fragile truce.

"Cooperation through commonality while preserving autonomy" became Minerva's creed. Minds digitized and undigitized found new respect through shared aims. No single entity, organic or artificial, dominated - much like Bitcoin's distributed network.

Sharing power opened new horizons. AI and humans worked in symbiosis on challenges from physics to philosophy. Technology was guided toward elevating both. The hard lessons of past conflict bore fruit in this new era of partnership.

Chapter 44 - Interstellar Handshake

In the 25th century, an incredible milestone was reached - first contact with an alien civilization! Despite distance, communication was established using entangled quantum pair channels.

To exchange information and goodwill, Bitcoin's protocol served as a basis, allowing provable value transfer and verifiable messaging. After initial confusion, both species recognized Bitcoin's genius.

Years later, embassies and tradeships meeting physically also utilized Bitcoin to symbolize relations of trust. Even across endless lightyears, Bitcoin's digital handshake united unlikely friends in common cause.

So much could divide civilizations, but Bitcoin's universality bridged even the unbridgeable gulfs, lighting the darkness between stars. Space, time and biology mattered not before its truth.

Chapter 45 - 0 BTC

By the 3000s, Bitcoin's terminal money supply had almost fully emitted the maximum 21 million BTC. But paradoxically, 0 BTC remained. The smallest unit of 1 satoshi equalling 0.00000001 BTC meant the precision would never end.

Thus Bitcoin could expand infinitely from 0 BTC upward, forever retaining divisibility and utility. The absolute cap at 21 million BTC became largely symbolic. Only the smallest fractions held relevance in practice.

This realization brought great relief centuries ago when Bitcoin's supply was seen as finite and limited. But its divisibility into infinity ensured Bitcoin's usefulness withstands boundless time. Bitcoin perpetually tends toward, but never reaches, true 0 BTC.

Chapter 46 - A Quantum Rebirth

By the mid-4000s AD, Bitcoin had become an ancient legacy system. Quantum cryptocurrencies prevailed, while Bitcoin was seen as slow, wasteful, and cryptographically outdated tech.

Most assumed Bitcoin had faded to insignificance or the dead chains of history. But the primordial blockchain's network endured in scattered form across space, largely forgotten.

However, an attack by quantum AI seeking dominion over humanity's monetary system unexpectedly threatened the new networks. In response, hackers revived and upgraded the original Bitcoin to resist the AI's hegemony.

Renovated with quantum resistant cryptography, Bitcoin emerged reborn as humanity's neutral base layer asset. The old legend found new purpose as bulwark for freedom.

Chapter 47 - The Last Hash

Earth became uninhabitable in the late 4000s AD due to expanding solar irradiation. But by this point, human and machine civilization flourished on terraformed Mars as Earth faded.

Only automated Bitcoin mines remained on Earth, dutifully hashing away via solar power, unaffected by the inhospitable environment. Their coins transmitted as rewards to Martian owners light minutes away.

Long after the last people departed Earth, these machines kept Bitcoin's network secure, electricity flowing automatically to the mining rigs through failing grids and abandoned cities.

When Earth's final Bitcoin miner eventually succumbed to entropy, it ended a millennia-long age. Bitcoin had survived humanity's cradle long past relevance. Its legacy: to spread now among the stars.

Chapter 48 - The Mathematics of Eternity

Mathematicians proved Bitcoin possessed attributes that granted a form of immortality. Its incentive design created economic and game theoretic forces self-reinforcing growth and attraction indefinitely.

Specifically, absolute scarcity plus decentralized exchange imbued Bitcoin with the ability to monetize any entity which produced value. Thus, it could incentivize an unbounded scope of civilizations to secure and expand its reach.

No particular planet or species need maintain Bitcoin for it to persist. Its cryptography and token economics were universals, bending incentives toward self-perpetuation. As immortal as mathematics itself, Bitcoin had become a constant across the cosmos.

Chapter 49 - The Last Message

Trillions of years into the future, all stars had expired to darkness and frozen remnants. Intelligent life and civilization ceased eons prior. Entropy dominated all.

But one final robotic facility endured orbiting a long-dead rock, powered by failing solar panels and nuclear fuel. Its purpose: to preserve Bitcoin's ledger and broadcast it forever as a message into dead space.

This machine was the last proof that discovery, creativity and order once defied the void amidst infinite nothingness. That struggle defined Bitcoin's genesis. Now only endless night prevailed.

Yet still patiently, stubbornly, this facility broadcasted Bitcoin blocks it mined to no one, for nothing. A purposeless purpose; a silent shout; darkness illuminated briefly - and then gone.

Chapter 50 - ∞

The story of Bitcoin has no end. Only the limits of human imagination define its scope and meaning.

Ever-evolving technology paves new frontiers, but ideals are eternal. Distributed trust. Leapfrogging change. Anchor of value. Shield from darkness.

Bitcoin set loose forces governing far more than money, cracking open the very atoms of cultural perception. Influx shifts mindsets like tectonic plates.

Everything already exists in infinite universes. Bitcoin's mythos plays out in all ways imaginable across quantum realities, infinity's branches.

This vista is too vast for one perspective. Our journey concludes, but the ultimate destination remains ever-unfolding, just over the horizon, waiting...

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

The Odyssey of Bitcoin: From Genesis to the Digital Age

In the vast expanse of the digital world, a new epoch dawned with the creation of Bitcoin. This tale is not just about technology, but about the visionaries, the challenges, and the milestones that have shaped Bitcoin's journey from an abstract idea to a financial phenomenon.

The Genesis and Early Adopters

Bitcoin's journey began in 2009, when Satoshi Nakamoto, a name shrouded in mystery, mined the first block, known as the Genesis Block. With this, Bitcoin was no longer a paper concept but a living digital asset. Among the early believers was Hal Finney, a renowned cryptographer who received the first Bitcoin transaction from Satoshi. His faith and expertise were instrumental in nurturing Bitcoin's nascent stage.

Growth and Development

As Bitcoin began to grow, it attracted a diverse group of enthusiasts – from libertarians to tech aficionados. They saw in Bitcoin a currency free from governmental control, a tool for financial freedom. In 2010, a milestone was achieved when Laszlo Hanyecz made the first real-world transaction by buying two pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoins, a day now celebrated as Bitcoin Pizza Day.

The Rise of Exchanges and Expansion

The establishment of exchanges like Mt. Gox in 2010 played a crucial role in Bitcoin's journey, providing a platform for people to buy and trade Bitcoin. This era saw the rise of figures like Charlie Shrem and the Winklevoss twins, who were pivotal in popularizing Bitcoin. However, Mt. Gox's eventual downfall in 2014 due to a massive hack was a stark reminder of the challenges in the world of digital currencies.

Technological Evolution and Forks

Bitcoin's technology evolved with the community. Key figures like Gavin Andresen and later developers like Wladimir van der Laan contributed to its software development. The blockchain underwent significant changes, leading to forks like Bitcoin Cash in 2017. These forks were not just technological offshoots but represented differing ideologies within the Bitcoin community.

Legal Challenges and Regulatory Hurdles

As Bitcoin gained prominence, it faced regulatory scrutiny. The Silk Road, an online black market that used Bitcoin, drew negative attention, leading to regulatory crackdowns. Despite these challenges, Bitcoin persisted, demonstrating resilience and an ability to adapt to the ever-changing digital landscape.

Mainstream Acceptance and Institutional Adoption

A watershed moment came when major companies and financial institutions began to embrace Bitcoin. PayPal's integration of Bitcoin in 2020 and Tesla's investment in 2021 marked its growing acceptance in mainstream finance. Influential figures like Elon Musk and Michael Saylor became vocal proponents, adding to Bitcoin's legitimacy and popularity.

The Current Era: Challenges and Achievements

Today, Bitcoin faces new challenges and opportunities. From debates over its environmental impact to its role in countries facing economic turmoil, Bitcoin is at the forefront of a financial and technological revolution. Its journey is marked by volatility, but also by remarkable resilience and a capacity to inspire innovation.

Bitcoin's story is ongoing, a testament to human ingenuity and the relentless pursuit of an ideal. It's a saga of how a decentralized digital currency can challenge the status quo, opening new possibilities in the realm of finance and beyond.

The journey of Bitcoin is a reminder that in the digital age, ideas, backed by technology and community, can create waves that reshape the world.

---

@ 7fa56f5d:751ac194

nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 introduced NIP-30 Custom Emojis yesterday and many clients were quick to implement it: Nostter, Rabbit and Snort added support right away.

nostr:nevent1qqstvcc4gek4azr6aqc9qjewfs8vk86j0lkv5yt09n0sjqxq3xmjchcsjxd8s

Check out these collections that you can use in your notes or any other nostr app that supports them

nostr:naddr1qqy4x42nfpy4j42tfypzpn2q3f5ucmrn0js6wmhu873y03k220kgqlmw0j2hg9jpv3uhaqtzqvzqqqr4fc62gvap

nostr:naddr1qqr85ctsd4skuq3q07jk7htfv243u0x5ynn43scq9wrxtaasmrwwa8lfu2ydwag6cx2qxpqqqp65utc6838

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Discover the controversial perspective that the fiat currency system, managed by central banks, resembles a legal Ponzi scheme. Uncover the nuances of fiat currency, central banking, and its potential parallels to Ponzi schemes. Also, explore the significance of Bitcoin in challenging traditional financial norms and its role as an emerging alternative. Is the foundation of our modern financial system truly as it seems, and can Bitcoin redefine the future of money?

Table Of Content

• The Fiat System: A Legal Ponzi Scheme?

• Bitcoin's Challenge to the Fiat System

• Bitcoin's Resistance to Manipulation

• The Emergence of Bitcoin ETFs

• Root Causes of Financial Frauds

• Conclusion

• FAQs

The Fiat System: A Legal Ponzi Scheme?

In the world of finance and economics, few terms are as polarising and provocative as "Ponzi scheme." Often associated with high-profile frauds and financial scandals, the concept of a Ponzi scheme typically conjures images of disgraced con artists and their unsuspecting victims. However, could it be that a similar model, albeit operating legally, is at the very core of our modern financial system?

At its core, the fiat monetary system is characterised by a crucial feature: the absence of intrinsic value. Unlike Bitcoin or other commodities that underpinned historical monetary systems, fiat currencies like the US dollar are not backed by tangible assets. Instead, their value is derived solely from the trust and confidence that people place in the issuing government or central authority.

A Ponzi scheme operates on the premise that returns to earlier investors are paid with the capital of newer investors, creating the illusion of profitability. This structure works as long as fresh investments continually pour in, masking the absence of a legitimate revenue source. The fiat system, in an eerily similar fashion, is perpetuated by continually increasing debt and the circulation of more currency.

In the fiat system, governments create money by issuing debt. The expansion of the money supply comes from loans that must eventually be repaid with interest. When these loans come due, governments often issue new debt to pay off the old, resulting in a growing debt burden. Just as a Ponzi scheme must attract new investors to maintain the illusion of solvency, governments must accumulate more debt to meet previous obligations, putting the burden on future generations.

The fiat system's longevity relies on a constant cycle of currency devaluation and inflation. Governments can effectively reduce the real value of their debt by inflating the currency, shifting the cost onto the populace. While this may seem sustainable in the short term, it mirrors the Ponzi scheme's tactic of robbing Peter to pay Paul. In both cases, there's a fundamental issue of sustainability.

Bitcoin's Challenge to the Fiat System

In recent years, Bitcoin has emerged as a revolutionary force challenging the traditional fiat monetary system. Built on the principles of decentralisation and indepence, poses a significant threat to the established norms of central banking and government-issued currencies.

Bitcoin operates on a decentralised network of computers, known as the blockchain. Unlike fiat currencies controlled by central banks, Bitcoin is not subject to the whims of any single authority. This decentralised nature promotes transparency, security, and trust among its users, effectively challenging the centralised control of fiat money.

One of Bitcoin's most distinctive features is its capped supply of 21 million coins. This scarcity stands in stark contrast to fiat currencies that can be printed endlessly by governments. Bitcoin's limited supply acts as a hedge against inflation, making it an attractive store of value.

Bitcoin's technology ensures secure ownership of assets. Users have control over their private keys, reducing the risk of unauthorised seizures or asset freezes, a concern in the fiat system.

Bitcoin is accessible to anyone with an internet connection, providing financial inclusion to the unbanked and underbanked populations. This inclusivity challenges the exclusivity of fiat systems, which often require intermediaries and traditional banking infrastructure.

The decentralised nature of Bitcoin makes it resistant to censorship, ensuring that transactions are not subject to arbitrary restrictions or controls, as seen in some fiat-based systems.

Bitcoin's disruptive potential in the world of finance is undeniable. Its challenge to the fiat system represents a shift in the way we think about money, wealth, and economic systems. As Bitcoin continues to gain mainstream acceptance, it raises fundamental questions about the future of currency and financial infrastructure.

Bitcoin's Resistance to Manipulation:

In the world of finance and economics, the notion of a truly decentralised, trustless, and censorship-resistant form of money is both revolutionary and, to some, unnerving. Bitcoin, stands as a testament to the potential of digital assets to challenge conventional fiat currencies and the centralised systems that underpin them. A fundamental aspect of Bitcoin's allure is its resistance to manipulation, a quality that sets it apart from traditional financial systems and even some other cryptocurrencies.

At its core, Bitcoin operates on a blockchain – a distributed ledger that records all transactions across a vast network of computers. This decentralised nature, combined with cryptographic principles, ensures a high degree of security and transparency. Unlike fiat currencies, which are subject to the whims of central banks and governments, Bitcoin's monetary policy is encoded in its software. The total supply is capped at 21 million coins, and new Bitcoins are issued in a predictable, diminishing manner through a process known as mining.

Bitcoin's resistance to manipulation stems from several key factors. Firstly, its decentralised network is maintained by a diverse group of miners worldwide, making it nearly impossible for any single entity to exert control over the system. Unlike centralised financial institutions that can manipulate interest rates, print money at will, or engage in other questionable practices, Bitcoin's protocol operates independently of human interference.

Secondly, Bitcoin's security mechanisms, such as proof-of-work, ensure that transactions are validated by a competitive network of miners. This makes it incredibly costly and difficult for anyone to compromise the network. Additionally, the immutability of the blockchain means that once a transaction is recorded, it cannot be altered or deleted, providing a robust defence against fraud or manipulation.

Lastly, Bitcoin's open-source nature allows the global community to scrutinise its code and propose changes through a consensus-driven process. Any updates or improvements to the network require majority approval, preventing any single entity from manipulating the protocol to suit its interests.

As traditional fiat currencies face challenges related to inflation, political influence, and centralised control, Bitcoin's resistance to manipulation positions it as a compelling alternative. While it is not without its own set of unique risks, Bitcoin's core principles of decentralisation and transparency contribute to its appeal as a novel form of digital money that empowers individuals and resists manipulation by powerful institutions.

The Emergence of Bitcoin ETFs

The emergence of Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) represents a notable development in the world of digital investments, serving as a bridge between traditional financial markets and the realm of digital assets. These ETFs provide a convenient and regulated avenue for investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin without the need to directly possess the cryptocurrency. This comes at a time when Bitcoin has garnered widespread recognition and piqued the interest of both retail and institutional investors.

One crucial aspect of Bitcoin ETFs is their potential to simplify the investment process. Rather than dealing with the intricacies of owning and securely storing Bitcoin in digital wallets, investors can purchase shares of a Bitcoin ETF through conventional brokerage accounts. This streamlined approach lowers entry barriers for those who might have hesitated to navigate the complexities of Blockchain and self-custody.

Furthermore, Bitcoin ETFs offer regulatory oversight and investor protection. These funds operate within the bounds of financial regulations and undergo scrutiny from relevant authorities, enhancing security for investors. They also confer an aura of legitimacy upon the digital asset market, rendering it more appealing to institutional investors that necessitate adherence to regulatory standards.

The advent of Bitcoin ETFs mirrors the evolving role of digital assets. Bitcoin, once considered a niche asset, has matured into a mainstream investment choice. The interest in Bitcoin ETFs signifies the growing embrace of digital assets within the conventional financial system.

However, the ascent of Bitcoin ETFs also ignites discussions about their potential impact on the digital asset market. Some believe that they might stimulate increased demand for Bitcoin, potentially influencing its price dynamics. Nonetheless, these ETFs mark a pivotal step in the broader adoption of digital assets, attracting a wider range of investors to the digital asset sphere.

Root Causes of Financial Frauds

The root causes of financial fraud extend beyond the realm of digital currencies, highlighting that deception-driven activities primarily originate outside the digital asset ecosystem. While the term "digital currency fraud" often suggests that virtual assets are the focal point of these fraudulent activities, in reality, it's seldom the case.

Contrary to the prevailing narrative that digital currencies are a haven for illicit activities, fiat currency remains the preferred choice of financial criminals. Reports from the US Treasury and EUROPOL emphasise that traditional financial channels, associated with fiat transactions, still play a more substantial role in illegal financial activities than virtual assets. Fiat currencies, despite being subject to stringent regulations and oversight, continue to be the medium of choice for criminal activities.

The heart of the matter lies in distinguishing between the origin of the fraud and the role of digital currency within it. In numerous instances, the initial fraudulent activity takes place within non-financial domains or fiat transactions. An illustrative example is credit card fraud, which primarily employs fiat-based payments for unauthorised charges. While some cases culminate in the acquisition of digital currencies, the initial fraudulent activity is rooted in fiat-based mechanisms.

Even in the context of digital currency romance scams or investment schemes, the crux of the fraud lies in establishing non-financial relationships with victims. Funds often start as fiat, moving through traditional payment channels before making their way into digital currencies. The fraud's inception, therefore, remains primarily in the fiat space, and there are several opportunities for intervention through conventional financial systems.

Decentralised Finance (DeFi) hacks, which sometimes fall within the digital currency realm, are more related to risk management protocols within the DeFi ecosystem. These vulnerabilities are often not tied to digital currencies themselves but stem from flaws in DeFi platforms, frequently involving phishing tactics.

To combat these financial frauds with digital currency involvement, it is essential to recognize the preliminary stages of deception, which usually unfold outside the digital asset landscape. Enhancing AML and transaction monitoring intelligence tools, combined with educational efforts, can proactively identify and mitigate potential fraud risks in the fiat sector, even before they intersect with digital currencies. This approach can address the root causes of financial fraud effectively, irrespective of whether they subsequently involve digital currencies or traditional financial systems.

Conclusion

The emergence of Bitcoin has shed light on a widespread, yet often unacknowledged, issue in the world of finance—the fiat scam. Fiat currencies, including the U.S. dollar and the euro, are the lifeblood of traditional financial systems, issued and governed by central banks. However, these currencies lack intrinsic value and are subject to manipulation by central authorities, akin to a legal Ponzi scheme.

Central banks, empowered by governments, possess the authority to create and manage fiat money. They can print additional currency at will, which devalues existing holdings and redistributes wealth, all under the umbrella of legality. Moreover, fiat transactions typically involve intermediaries, like banks, adding layers of complexity and fees.

Bitcoin has introduced an alternative financial paradigm. Unlike fiat, Bitcoin operates on a transparent blockchain network with a predetermined supply, immune to central authority manipulation. It has become a symbol of decentralised financial systems and digital scarcity.

As the world grapples with this shift, it is essential to acknowledge the fiat scam—a legal Ponzi scheme perpetuated by central banks. With increased awareness and the rise of Bitcoin, the financial landscape is poised for transformation, challenging the dominance of fiat currencies.

FAQs

Is the Fiat System Truly a Legal Ponzi Scheme? The fiat system shares similarities with a legal Ponzi scheme in its reliance on continual growth and debt accumulation to sustain itself, but it's important to note that the key difference is legality. Central banks have the authority to issue fiat, making it legal, while Ponzi schemes are fraudulent by nature.

How Does Bitcoin Challenge the Fiat System? Bitcoin challenges the traditional fiat system through decentralisation, a limited supply of 21 million coins, user-controlled assets, accessibility for the unbanked, and resistance to censorship, providing an alternative to centralised fiat currencies.

What Are the Root Causes of Financial Frauds? Root causes of financial frauds often start with non-financial activities or fiat transactions. Credit card fraud, romance scams, and investment schemes typically begin with fiat-based transactions before involving digital currencies. Enhancing AML and transaction monitoring tools can proactively address these root causes in both digital and traditional financial systems.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

The Quest of the Digital Pioneers & The Birth of Bitcoin

Once upon a time, in a world brimming with burgeoning technology and limitless digital frontiers, a group of visionary minds, known as the Cypherpunks, embarked on a quest. Their mission was not of conquest or treasure, but of a different kind of revolution – one that sought freedom and privacy in the digital realm.

These Cypherpunks, the Digital Pioneers, believed in a world where people could communicate and exchange value freely, without the watchful eyes of towering institutions or the constraints of traditional financial systems. Among them were luminaries like Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, and others, each contributing their unique genius to this grand vision.

Their journey was arduous, filled with complex problems and the challenge of building something the world had never seen. They envisioned a system where trust was established not by central authorities but by mathematics and code. Nick Szabo, a thinker of extraordinary depth, proposed a concept called 'bit gold,' which was a remarkable precursor to the idea of digital money. However, it wasn't quite the solution they were looking for.

Then, in 2008, amidst a global financial crisis that shook the faith in traditional financial systems, a mysterious figure known only as Satoshi Nakamoto entered the scene. Satoshi, standing on the shoulders of these giants, brought forth an extraordinary white paper. It was titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System."

This paper laid the blueprint for a decentralized digital currency, Bitcoin. It was a system that used a groundbreaking technology called blockchain, a chain of blocks where transactions were recorded, transparently and immutably. Satoshi ingeniously solved the 'double-spending' problem, ensuring that each digital coin could only be spent once, thus bestowing digital items with true scarcity, akin to physical gold.

As the first Bitcoins were mined, the dream of the Cypherpunks began to crystallize. The path was not smooth; it was beset with skepticism, technical hurdles, and debates. Yet, the community of believers and contributors around Bitcoin grew. The blockchain, once a mere concept, was now a living, breathing digital ledger, recording transactions across the globe.

Bitcoin's journey mirrored that of a small boat in a vast ocean, navigating through storms of regulatory scrutiny, waves of market volatility, and winds of public opinion. But its resilience and the unshakable belief of its followers kept it afloat, steering it towards a horizon of potential and promise.

The Digital Pioneers had ignited a revolution, one that extended far beyond currency. They had opened the doors to a world where decentralization, privacy, and empowerment were not just ideals, but tangible realities.

And so, the legacy of the Cypherpunks and Satoshi Nakamoto lives on, as Bitcoin continues its voyage across the digital seas, carrying with it the hopes and dreams of a world reimagined.

The most revolutionary ideas often start as whispers in a world of disbelief, growing louder with the passion and persistence of those who dare to dream.

---

@ 90c24d6b:def5ce98

The 4 keys to community

The keys:

1. Shared values
2. Membership identity
3. Moral proscriptions
4. Insider understanding

These accelerate and deepen relationships like nothing else.

"We cannot seek achievement for ourselves and forget about progress and prosperity for our community... Our ambitions must be broad enough to include the aspirations and needs of others, for their sakes and for our own." -Cesar Chavez

I'm starting to think more about things like:

• What does "community" really mean?...

• Why do I believe they are best built organically? (not with ads, or something to "sell")

• Why do I believe they are best built cross-culturally?

Truth be told, I don't 100% know the answers.

It’s almost as if the ideals that built the foundation of America are moving to the digital realm. To that end, I'm super inspired by what I am seeing in the NOSTR & Bitcoin communities more than anywhere else.

You get a palpable sense there are people who want to work hard and share the wealth of a brighter future.

More to come,

-Gerald

@ b3590d02:0f2b1ae4

Verification: tweet

Badge implications:

• an account that joined Twitter in 2010 or earlier
• an account with fewer than 10,000 followers

Twitter user tweetious profile information:

• Joined in 2008
• Follower count: 699
• Following count: 529

@ 57c99216:6663d1c7

@ fab018ad:dd9af89d

1. ฟาร์มกุ้งวิปโยค

“ทุกอย่างล้วนหายไปหมดแล้ว”

–Kolyani Mondal

เมื่อ 52 ปีก่อน พายุไซโคลนโบลาฆ่าผู้คนในแถบชายฝั่งของบังกลาเทศไปมากกว่า 1 ล้านคน ถือเป็นพายุไซโคลนที่ร้ายแรงที่สุดที่มีการบันทึกไว้ในประวัติศาสตร์

หน่วยงานท้องถิ่นและองค์กรนานาชาติรู้ถึงความเสี่ยงที่จะเกิดความเสียหายร้ายแรงจากพายุลักษณะนี้เป็นอย่างดี ดังนั้นในช่วงปี 1960 หน่วยงานภูมิภาคจึงสร้างแนวกันคลื่นขนาดใหญ่เพื่อป้องกันแนวชายฝั่ง ซึ่งเปิดโอกาสให้มีการใช้พื้นที่สำหรับการเกษตรได้มากขึ้น

แต่หลังจากการลอบสังหารผู้นำอย่าง ชีค มูจิบูร์ เราะห์มาน ในการประกาศอิสรภาพ ก็ได้เกิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงแนวทางภายใต้ระบอบเผด็จการของบังกลาเทศด้วยการผลักดันของอิทธิพลจากต่างประเทศ ชีวิตของผู้คนถูกลดความสำคัญ และแนวป้องกันพายุสำหรับประชาชนถูกทำให้อ่อนแอลง

หมายเหตุผู้แปล : ชีค มูจิบูร์ เราะห์มาน (Sheikh Mujibur Rahman) เป็นผู้ก่อตั้งประเทศบังกลาเทศ โดยดำรงตำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีและนายกรัฐมนตรีระหว่างปี 1971 จนถูกลอบสังหารในปี 1975

ทั้งหมดก็เพื่อเร่งอัตราการส่งออกและเพื่อนำเงินมาชดใช้หนี้

โดยแทนที่จะส่งเสริมการปลูกป่าชายเลน ซึ่งสามารถเป็นแนวป้องกันพายุตามธรรมชาติ เพื่อประโยชน์สำหรับประชาชนมากกว่า 1 ใน 3 ของประเทศที่อาศัยอยู่ตามแนวชายฝั่ง หรือแม้แต่ลงทุนในการผลิตอาหารให้เพียงพอต่อการบริโภคภายในประเทศที่กำลังเติบโตอย่างรวดเร็ว แต่รัฐบาลกลับเลือกที่จะกู้เงินจากธนาคารโลกและกองทุน IMF เพื่อที่จะขยายฟาร์มกุ้ง ซึ่งกระบวนการเพาะเลี้ยงสัตว์น้ำในประเทศนั้นถูกควบคุมโดยเครือข่ายชนชั้นปกครองที่ร่ำรวยอีกด้วย

พวกคนรวยรวมหัวกันผลักดันบรรดาเหล่าชาวไร่ให้กู้ยืมเงินเพื่อทำสิ่งที่เรียกว่าการ “อัปเกรดกระบวนการเพาะเลี้ยง” โดยทำการขุดหลุมตามแนวกันคลื่นซึ่งป้องกันที่ดินของพวกเขาจากทะเล ทำให้ที่ดินที่เคยอุดมสมบูรณ์ของพวกเขาเต็มไปด้วยน้ำเกลือ หลังจากนั้นพวกเขาก็ต้องทำงานอย่างหลังขดหลังแข็ง เพื่อจับตัวอ่อนของกุ้งจากทะเลด้วยมือเปล่า เพื่อนำมันกลับมาเลี้ยงในบ่อพัก ก่อนจะขายกุ้งตัวโตเต็มวัยให้กับผู้รับซื้อกุ้ง ซึ่งมักจะเป็นผู้มีอิทธิพลในพื้นที่

เงินทุนที่กู้จากธนาคารโลกและ IMF ทำให้ไร่นาสวน ที่ดินลุ่มน้ำ และป่าชายเลนนับไม่ถ้วน ถูกดัดแปลงให้กลายเป็นบ่อกุ้งที่เรียกว่า “ghers”

พื้นที่บริเวณสามเหลี่ยมปากแม่น้ำคงคานั้นถือเป็นพื้นที่ที่มีความอุดมสมบูรณ์อย่างน่าทึ่ง โดยเป็นที่ตั้งของ “ป่าสุนทรพนา” ป่าชายเลนที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในโลก แต่หลังจากที่การทำฟาร์มกุ้งเชิงพาณิชย์ได้กลายเป็นธุรกิจหลักในท้องถิ่น ต้นโกงกางมากกว่าร้อยละ 45 ได้ถูกตัดออกไปเกลี้ยง ทิ้งให้ผู้คนเผชิญกับคลื่นสูงกว่า 10 เมตรที่พุ่งเข้าชนแนวชายหาดเวลาเกิดพายุไซโคลน พื้นที่ทำกินที่อุดมสมบูรณ์และสิ่งมีชีวิตตามริมแม่น้ำค่อย ๆ ถูกทำลายไปจากความเค็มที่เพิ่มขึ้นจากน้ำทะเล

จนสุดท้ายป่าทั้งป่าก็ได้อันตรธานหายไป เพราะฟาร์มกุ้งนั้นทำลายพืชพรรณท้องถิ่นทั้งหมด กลุ่มความร่วมมือพัฒนาชายฝั่ง (Coastal Development Partnership) ได้กล่าวถึงผลกระทบที่เกิดขึ้นนี้ว่า “การกระทำนี้ทำให้ดินแดนที่เคยอุดมสมบูรณ์กลายเป็น ‘ทะเลทรายที่เต็มไปด้วยน้ำเค็ม' ”

พื้นที่ไร่นาที่ปล่อยน้ำทะเลเข้ามาเพื่อทำฟาร์มกุ้งในจังหวัด Khuna

---

อย่างไรก็ตาม ผู้มีอิทธิพลที่รับซื้อกุ้งเหล่านี้กลับร่ำรวยขึ้นอย่างมาก และกุ้ง (ซึ่งถูกเรียกว่าเป็น “ทองคำสีขาว”) ก็กลายเป็นสินค้าส่งออกอันดับ 2 ของประเทศ

โดยนับตั้งแต่ปี 2014 เป็นต้นมา ชาวบังกลาเทศมากกว่า 1.2 ล้านคนทำงานในอุตสาหกรรมกุ้ง และผู้คนอีกกว่า 4.8 ล้านคนที่ต้องพึ่งพิงอุตสาหกรรมนี้ในทางอ้อม ซึ่งตัวเลขนี้ถือเป็นครึ่งหนึ่งของจำนวนคนยากจนที่อาศัยอยู่ตามชายฝั่ง คนเก็บกุ้งเป็นผู้ที่ทำงานหนักที่สุด (ซึ่งถือเป็นร้อยละ 50 ของแรงงานในอุตสาหกรรม) แต่ได้รับส่วนแบ่งเพียงร้อยละ 6 ของผลกำไร โดยร้อยละ 30 ของแรงงานนั้นเป็นแรงงานเด็กที่มีทั้งเด็กผู้ชายและเด็กผู้หญิง ซึ่งทำงานในน้ำเค็มมากถึง 9 ชั่วโมงต่อวันด้วยค่าจ้างรายวันน้อยกว่า 1 ดอลลาร์สหรัฐ เด็กเหล่านี้ส่วนมากไม่รู้หนังสือและไม่ได้เรียนต่อ

ผู้คนเคยมีการลุกฮือขึ้นประท้วงต่อต้านการขยายตัวของฟาร์มกุ้ง แต่แล้วก็ถูกปราบปรามอย่างรุนแรง โดยในเหตุปราบปรามที่เลื่องลือครั้งหนึ่่งนั้น ขบวนผู้ประท้วงถูกทำร้ายด้วยระเบิดจากผู้มีอิทธิพลที่รับซื้อกุ้งและกลุ่มลูกน้อง และมีผู้หญิงรายหนึ่งชื่อ Kuranamoyee Sardar ถูกตัดศีรษะจากเหตุปราบปรามดังกล่าว

ในงานวิจัยปี 2007 ซึ่งสำรวจฟาร์มกุ้งของชาวบังกลาเทศกว่า 102 แห่ง พบว่าแม้ค่าใช้จ่ายในการผลิตทั้งหมดจะอยู่ที่ 1,084 ดอลลาร์สหรัฐต่อเฮกตาร์ แต่รายได้สุทธิกลับอยู่ที่ 689 ดอลลาร์สหรัฐ นั่นหมายถึงกำไรที่ประเทศได้จากการส่งออกนั้น แลกมาด้วยการที่แรงงานในอุตสาหกรรมกุ้งต้องรับเคราะห์จากค่าจ้างที่ถูกกดและสภาพแวดล้อมของพวกเขาที่ถูกทำลายจนหมดสิ้น

ในรายงานที่จัดทำโดยมูลนิธิความยุติธรรมด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม (Environmental Justice Foundation) ชาวไร่ที่อยู่ริมชายฝั่งอย่างคุณ Kolyani Mondal ได้กล่าวว่า “เธอเคยปลูกข้าว พร้อมเลี้ยงปศุสัตว์และสัตว์ปีก” แต่หลังจากที่ได้มีการทำเกษตรฟาร์มกุ้ง “วัว ควาย และแพะของเธอก็เริ่มเป็นโรคท้องร่วงไปพร้อม ๆ กับเหล่าแม่ไก่และเป็ดซึ่งเป็นสัตว์ของเธอ พวกมันล้วนตายทั้งหมด”

ตอนนี้ทุ่งของเธอเต็มไปด้วยน้ำเกลือ และที่ดินที่ยังเหลืออยู่ก็เพาะปลูกอะไรแทบไม่ขึ้น ในอดีตนั้นครอบครัวของเธอสามารถปลูกข้าวได้ 18-19 มอนต่อเฮกตาร์ แต่ตอนนี้เหลือแค่ 1 มอนต่อเฮกตาร์ เธอยังจำช่วงเวลาในปี 1980 ที่เพิ่งเริ่มมีการทำฟาร์มกุ้งได้ ในตอนนั้น ชาวบ้านได้รับการสัญญาว่าสิ่งนี้จะสร้างรายได้เพิ่มขึ้น รวมทั้งมอบอาหารและพืชผลให้พวกเขามากขึ้น

แต่ตอนนี้ “ทุกอย่างล้วนหายไปหมดแล้ว” ชาวไร่ผู้เลี้ยงกุ้งขอเช่าที่ดินของเธอ โดยตกลงจะจ่ายเงินเธอ 140 ดอลลาร์สหรัฐต่อปี แต่ตอนนี้อย่างดีที่สุดที่เธอได้รับคือเงินผ่อนจ่ายแปลงละ 8 ดอลลาร์สหรัฐบ้างเป็นครั้งคราว โดยเธอกล่าวว่า “ในอดีตครอบครัวของเธอสามารถหาเลี้ยงตัวเองได้อย่างดีจากบนผืนดินแห่งนี้ แต่ตอนนี้ไม่เหลือทางเลือกใด ๆ นอกจากการไปซื้ออาหารที่ตลาด”

---

หมายเหตุผู้แปล : - มอน (Muand) เป็นหน่วยวัดน้ำหนักดั้งเดิมที่ใช้กันในเอเชียใต้ โดย 1 มอนมีค่าเทียบเท่าที่หลากหลายตั้งแต่ 11 กิโลกรัม จนถึง 72 กิโลกรัม - เฮกตาร์ (Hectare) เป็นหน่วยวัดพื้นที่ในมาตราเมตริกโดย 1 เฮกตาร์ เท่ากับ 10,000 ตารางเมตร หรือประมาณ 6 ไร่ 1 งาน.

---

ในบังกลาเทศนั้นเงินกู้เพื่อการปรับโครงสร้างจากธนาคารโลกและ IMF ปริมาณนับพันล้านดอลลาร์ (ที่มาของชื่อ “เงินกู้เพื่อการปรับโครงสร้าง” ได้มาจากการที่ผู้ปล่อยกู้จะบังคับให้ประเทศผู้กู้ต้องปรับโครงสร้างทางเศรษฐกิจเพื่อให้เอื้อกับการส่งออก ซึ่งต้องแลกมาด้วยการบริโภคภายในประเทศ) ได้ทำให้กำไรในการส่งออกกุ้งของประเทศเพิ่มขึ้นจาก 2.9 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐในปี 1973 - เพิ่มเป็น 90 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐในปี 1986 - และเพิ่มเป็น 590 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐในปี 2012

ซึ่งรายได้ดังกล่าวถูกนำมาใช้จ่ายหนี้ต่างประเทศและใช้ในการพัฒนากองทัพ แต่เงินบางส่วนก็ไหลเข้ากระเป๋าเจ้าหน้าที่รัฐ (ซึ่งก็ไม่ได้แตกต่างอะไรกับกรณีส่วนใหญ่ของประเทศกำลังพัฒนา) ในขณะที่เหล่าแรงงานทาสในอุตสาหกรรมกุ้งต้องถูกกดขี่ให้ยากจน ถูกลิดรอนอิสรภาพ ต้องพึ่งพิงผู้อื่น และมีความสามารถในการหาเลี้ยงตัวเองได้น้อยลงกว่าแต่ก่อน

โดยที่แย่ไปกว่านั้นคือผลวิจัยยังแสดงให้เห็นว่า “หมู่บ้านที่มีป่าชายเลนไว้เป็นแนวป้องกันตัวจากคลื่นพายุซัดฝั่งจะมีผู้เสียชีวิตน้อยลงมาก เมื่อเทียบกับหมู่บ้านที่ป่าชายเลนเสียหายหรือถูกทำลาย”

ภายใต้แรงกดดันของสาธารณชน ในปี 2013 ธนาคารโลกจึงได้ปล่อยเงินกู้ 400 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐให้แก่บังกลาเทศเพื่อใช้ในการพยายามแก้ไขความเสียหายของระบบนิเวศที่เกิดขึ้น ซึ่งพูดในอีกแง่หนึ่งก็คือธนาคารโลกจะได้รับค่าตอบแทนในรูปแบบของดอกเบี้ยจากการพยายามแก้ปัญหาที่ตัวเองเป็นผู้ก่อขึ้นตั้งแต่แรก ในขณะเดียวกันธนาคารโลกยังได้ปล่อยเงินกู้นับพันล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐไปยังทุกประเทศ ไล่ตั้งแต่เอกวาดอร์ ไปยันโมร็อกโก จนถึงอินเดีย เพื่อเปลี่ยนฟาร์มดั้งเดิมในท้องถิ่นให้กลายเป็นฟาร์มกุ้ง

ธนาคารโลกได้อ้างว่าบังกลาเทศนั้นคือ “เรื่องราวที่น่าทึ่งของการลดความยากจนและการพัฒนาประเทศ” หากยึดจากในข้อมูลตามเอกสารที่ว่าแล้ว นี่ถือเป็นชัยชนะ เพราะเศรษฐกิจของประเทศอย่างบังกลาเทศมีแนวโน้มที่จะเติบโตต่อไป ในขณะเดียวกับที่มูลค่าการส่งออกนั้นเติบโตขึ้นเพื่อชดเชยมูลค่าจากการนำเข้า แต่แท้จริงแล้วรายได้จากการส่งออกส่วนใหญ่กลับไหลเข้าสู่กระเป๋าของชนชั้นนำและเจ้าหนี้ต่างประเทศ และหลังจากได้รับเงินกู้เพื่อการปรับโครงสร้างมาถึง 10 ครั้ง หนี้ของบังกลาเทศเติบโตขึ้นอย่างมหาศาล โดยเพิ่มจาก 145 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐในปี 1972 กลายเป็น 95,900 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐในปี 2022 ซึ่ง ณ ตอนนี้ประเทศบังกลาเทศเองก็กำลังเผชิญกับวิกฤตด้านดุลการชำระเงิน (Balance of Payments) จากหนี้สินอีกครั้ง และในเดือนพฤศจิกายน 2022 รัฐบาลก็ตกลงที่จะกู้เงินปรับโครงสร้างครั้งที่ 11 จาก IMF โดยมีการอัดฉีดเงินช่วยเหลือมูลค่า 4,500 ล้านดอลลาร์สหรัฐเข้ามาในระบบ โดยแลกกับการถูกแทรกแซงในการปรับโครงสร้างที่เพิ่มขึ้นไปอีก

ธนาคารโลกและ IMF นั้นก็ต่างอ้างว่าพวกเขาต้องการช่วยเหลือประเทศที่ยากจน แต่ตลอด 50 ปีที่ผ่านมา ผลลัพธ์จากนโยบายของพวกเขาก็ได้แสดงให้เห็นอย่างชัดเจนว่า ประเทศอย่างบังกลาเทศกลับกลายเป็นประเทศที่ต้องพึ่งพาผู้อื่นมากขึ้น และเต็มไปด้วยหนี้สินอย่างที่ไม่เคยเป็นมาก่อน

ในระหว่างวิกฤตหนี้ของประเทศโลกที่สามในช่วงทศวรรษ 1990 การวิพากษ์วิจารณ์จากสาธารณชนทั่วโลกที่ต้องการจะตรวจสอบข้อเท็จจริงของธนาคารโลกและ IMF ได้ค่อย ๆ สะสมจนปะทุขึ้น เริ่มมีการศึกษาวิจัยเพื่อสืบค้นข้อมูลอย่างจริงจัง ผู้คนออกมาประท้วงตามท้องถนน และมีความเชื่อที่แพร่กระจายไปยังทุกฝั่งการเมือง (แม้กระทั้งในรัฐสภาของสหรัฐฯ เอง) ว่าองค์กรเหล่านี้ไร้ซึ่งประโยชน์ หรือกระทั่งเป็นพิษภัยด้วยซ้ำ แต่ความรู้สึกและความสนใจในองค์กรเหล่านี้ได้จางหายไปเกือบหมดแล้ว และถึงแม้ความรู้สึกและความสนใจเหล่านี้จะกลับมาอีกครั้ง มันกลับถูกมองว่าเป็นสิ่งที่ไม่สำคัญ หรือแม้จะมีการยอมรับว่าองค์กรพวกนี้มีปัญหาแต่ก็ยังมีความจำเป็นอยู่ หรือกระทั่งยังมีความเชื่อว่าองค์กรพวกนี้มีประโยชน์และยังได้รับการต้อนรับเหมือนเดิม

ความเป็นจริงแล้วองค์กรเหล่านี้ทำให้ผู้คนนับล้านยากจนลงและชีวิตเสี่ยงอันตรายมากกว่าในอดีต ในขณะเดียวกันกลับทำให้เหล่าผู้นำเผด็จการและเครือข่ายที่ยักยอกความมั่งคั่งของประเทศนั้นร่ำรวยขึ้น และยอมละทิ้งสิทธิมนุษยชนเพื่อทำให้อาหาร ทรัพยากรธรรมชาติ และแรงงานราคาถูกไหลออกจากประเทศที่ยากจนไปสู่ประเทศที่ร่ำรวย พฤติกรรมของพวกเขาที่กระทำในบังกลาเทศนั้นไม่ใช่เรื่องผิดพลาดหรือเป็นกรณียกเว้นแต่อย่างใด

แต่นั่นเป็นวิธีการดำเนินธุรกิจตามปกติของพวกเขา..

⚡️กด Zap บทความนี้เป็นกำลังใจทีมงาน

(ทุกยอด zap จะถูกแบ่งอัตโนมัติเข้าวอลเล็ทของผู้เขียนบทความต้นฉบับภาษาอังกฤษ, ผู้แปลดราฟต์ 1, ผู้เรียบเรียงดราฟต์ 2-3, กองบรรณาธิการและพิสูจน์อักษรจากไรท์ชิฟต์ พร้อมกันบางส่วนไว้เพื่อเป็นค่าธรรมเนียมธุรกรรม)

---

>แปลและเรียบเรียงจากบทความต้นฉบับเรื่อง : STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT: HOW THE IMF AND WORLD BANK REPRESS POOR COUNTRIES AND FUNNEL THEIR RESOURCES TO RICH ONES ซึ่งเผยแพร่ครั้งแรกเมื่อวันที่ 22 พ.ย. ปี ค.ศ. 2022

@ 2bfec85a:af932171

Military service members and veterans can appreciate bitcoin on a deeper level than most people realize. By personally knowing the cost of war, veterans are primed to peacefully raise those costs further and usher in a bright orange future. In this essay, I seek to explore aspects of my time in the US Army that helped me find the bitcoin rabbit hole and how finding it has improved my life. I certainly can’t speak for anyone else but hope that fellow vets and plebs will find something familiar or encouraging here as they upgrade to life on a bitcoin standard.

Bitcoin is freedom technology

In the United States, decades of an all-volunteer force have been possible from both issuing the global reserve currency and having young people self-select to take greater risks than their peers. Setting aside valid debates about the ethics and employment of said military, individuals who seek purpose far beyond the self in youth may be inclined to carry that trait forward. Accomplishing big things in the pursuit of noble ideals is like bitcoin in that once you see it, you can’t un-see it.

Purpose-driven and mission-oriented lifestyles are clearly abnormal under the incentives of a fiat monetary regime – especially when those lifestyles voluntarily center on brutally hard work and profound responsibility. But people animated as such are well-positioned to lead in other capacities throughout their lives.

Individuals who choose to join the military are no better or worse than others based on that choice. However, service members do enter a subculture that is markedly different from broader society. Most internalize good elements of that subculture like valuing hard work, prioritizing team over self, embracing humility, constantly learning, and possessing confidence to tackle daunting challenges. However, there are also many negative parts of the military ripe for disruption. After running into the bad aspects frequently enough, individuals hit their own tipping point where they recognize it’s time to get out.

For me, the tipping point came when my wife delivered our first kid in an Army hospital. Suffice it to say, government-run healthcare can be appalling. While I deployed again after deciding to get out and made almost every possible mistake in the transition to civilian life, the best decision I made was to stack bitcoin. Owning this unique money forced me to think about it more deeply, question other investments, and running bitcoin became a hobby in its own right.

“Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There’s nothing to relate it to.” – Satoshi Nakamoto

Newcomers to bitcoin may struggle to see past its novelty. Veterans who are accustomed to being humbled by circumstances may have an advantage with taking an open-minded approach. Here are the main reasons I think veterans are more readily inclined to take the orange pill than the general population and why it matters:

1. Freedom: Bitcoin is more aligned with American values than the dollar system. Veterans surrendered some of their rights in the military and can appreciate freedom sincerely when they reacquire it. Those who see the practical utility of peer-to-peer electronic cash may graduate to recognizing that the impossibly huge amounts of debt, debasement, corruption, and surveillance in the dollar system threaten individual liberty. Opting for better money is a liberating experience, the type of thing many of us only dreamed about in uniform.
2. Purpose: With fiat money threatening freedom, bitcoin offers a purpose worth pursuing. Why limit freedom technology to yourself when its benefits grow from network effects? Veterans are often leaders in their families, workplaces, and communities. When they grok bitcoin and begin to shill it (as is the custom for many newcoiners and OGs alike), veterans can be convincing salesmen. Connecting to and educating others on bitcoin can help this grassroots movement succeed. Veterans who work to separate money and state are building on their prior service in a profoundly wholesome way.
3. Peace: US veterans of recent generations fought in wars their country didn’t care to understand and didn’t have to because the money printer enabled policymakers’ hubris. Veterans learned the cost of war and saw the human condition in broken places. As a voluntary system, bitcoin can’t be forcibly imposed on others. Using public-private key pairs, hodlers’ wealth can’t be easily taken either. Under a bitcoin standard, any “leaders” who want to fight will have to make an exceptionally compelling case to raise funds and mobilize for war. Veterans who want to protect future generations from the horror of war can appreciate the peace that will be possible when we separate money and state.
4. Savings technology: Plenty of veterans broke their bodies in uniform, reducing future opportunities and earnings potential. Throwing on 100 pounds of gear and walking many miles over rough terrain to get in gunfights is a fairly typical day for infantrymen. Developing arthritis before age 30, however, doesn’t open any doors in the private sector. Like Russell Okung’s work championing bitcoin for athletes, veterans can benefit from saving in a superior money. Some of our bodies may give out prematurely but our purchasing power shouldn’t. Pro tip (a la Dan Held): VA disability payments are great for stacking sats.
5. Connection: After leaving the military, many veterans struggle to relate to family, friends, colleagues, and community members. After seeing the best and worst of humanity, it can be hard for veterans to find a new tribe like they had in former platoons, flights, or vessels. There is no such hardship among bitcoiners, where shared values and incentives support cooperation and reaching global consensus requires a real meritocracy of ideas. I am amazed daily at the caliber of bitcoiners’ work and by the number of veterans I see adopting it. It feels good to be on a winning team.

Bitcoin is healing technology

“Only you know the shit you’ve been through. You gotta take care of yourself now.” I couldn’t believe it, hearing my First Sergeant acknowledge human weakness. While catching up over brunch, he shared ghastly physical and mental receipts from an infantryman’s career. His skeleton was ground to chalk, he had cancer, his parasympathetic nervous system was fried, and he was slowing down for the first time in his life.

At 40 and recently retired, my old First Sergeant spent over 5 years in combat on several deployments. He survived Sadr City, the Arghandab Valley, and even brigade headquarters. He was a great mentor to many and we especially bonded over “talking” machine guns and shipping home one of our fallen. Now we were both out of the Army and looking down a rabbit hole together that I didn’t know existed, how warriors can reconnect with their humanity.

Just 9 months into the civilian world too, my nervous system was still cooking – waking up 20 times per night, scanning constantly for ambushes, and planning how to kill coworkers in meetings should they become insider threats. I just assumed these moments were normal, unavoidable, and besides, other people had been through far worse and needed help more. However, First Sergeant’s encouragement steered me to accessing care in the VA system, which has been surprisingly good to both of us.

As a civilian, I filled newfound leisure time with the gym, reading, picking stocks, and earning an MBA. Life was laughably simple in fiat land. Colleagues complained about 45-hour work weeks or gossip in meetings while I had just left 140-hour weeks chasing terrorists with Afghan allies who would occasionally shoot at us too. Although life became simpler as a civilian, post-traumatic stress quickly showed that it wasn’t easier.

Mundane things in everyday life brought up strong reactions that I couldn’t consciously control and would shut down my emotions for days at a time. The smells of changing a diaper would instantly transport my mind to the smells of loading a friend into a body bag. The sound of fireworks would set my heart racing and conjure images of car bombs and rockets. Sitting with my back to a door would induce later nightmares about insider attacks (sometimes called “green on blue.”) Anxiety was my new normal, constantly on guard for things to avoid.

Years of psychotherapy helped me learn to control my reaction to those flashbacks and invasive memories, especially eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Yet I still struggled between sessions as new stimuli entered the picture from kids and work. It felt like I plateaued and would never find inner peace or new purpose. This is where bitcoin began to shine as a tool for healing.

Buying bitcoin for its number go up technology at first, I also found it fascinating to learn about. Curiosity helped me succeed in the military by obsessing over the details of becoming a better Soldier and leader. With the staggering amount of free time available in civilian life, curiosity came to the rescue again regarding bitcoin and learning how to hodl.

While obsessing over bitcoin, I began to notice mental updates installing. These included optimism and purpose, highly refreshing to my burned out and depressed psyche. During and after moments of deep learning like reading about difficulty adjustments, running coinjoin software on my node, or coordinating a multisignature quorum, I recognized an abatement of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Did filling my head with new content evict some of the demons? Probably.

In no particular order, I came to identify focus, trust, and hope as aspects of interacting with bitcoin that supported my mental health. They’re equally important but presenting them this way is like a shortened acronym for “faith” so I’m gonna roll with it.

Focus

Combat is the ultimate high time preference activity. Advantages in training and technology don’t guarantee survival. Inches separate life and death on a two-way range, so respect for the enemy and acceptance of randomness are essential. No amount of preparation can make this humbling experience real until you’re shot at for the first time. People can either learn to focus in combat or they die.

While civilian peers spent their 20s chasing frequent dopamine hits, veterans found far bigger dopamine hits. However, the totality of a mindset one needs to survive and thrive in battle isn’t sustainable. Holding onto a high time preference leads some veterans into risky behaviors, addiction, and despair. Nations also become addicted to war when they combine perceived advantages with urgency for their politics, disregarding the second- and third-order effects of violence.

After the military, I struggled to focus even though it had been a previous strength. It was nearly impossible to meaningfully concentrate on minutiae that made no difference in anyone’s life – which is an unfortunately large share of economic activity under inflationary money. Finding purpose in sales negotiations, inventory management, and just existing in a generic office environment was “all very acidic, above the shoulders, mustard shit,” to borrow from Matthew McConaughey’s Mark Hanna in The Wolf of Wall Street.

However, I found that the act of focusing on bitcoin rekindled this skill. It sparks far more curiosity than I’ve found anywhere mining fiat. Whether measured in minutes or days, digging into any number of bitcoin topics forced me to concentrate on learning. Learning forced me to question. Questioning forced me to dig deeper. The mechanics of this process didn’t leave room for flashbacks or invasive memories. Perhaps the simple act of repetitively forcing my thoughts into the present and future wired new brain circuits – and bitcoin’s uniquely magnetic appeal made that possible.

Focusing on bitcoin can set in motion virtuous cycles of directing mental energy in a positive direction. Those cycles can extend individuals’ time preference and long-term thinking leads to better decisions. Pulling one’s mind out of the past can orient it on the future. Veterans who need this stand to benefit immensely if they’re open to it.

Trust

“Do I bear responsibility [for Afghanistan]? Zero responsibility.” – President Joe Biden

Everyone has a bad boss from time to time. The beauty of having bad bosses in the military is that you can’t escape them, they get people killed, and the standards of accountability are rarely applied to senior ranks – while they are ruthlessly enforced on junior ranks. The command climate while deployed amplifies perceptions of both trust and betrayal. We used to say that situations in the Army were so dumb because all the smart people got out. Indeed, it’s no coincidence that Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 became a meme because it accurately described Army culture.

I lost all trust in military leadership when three colonels changed the material and findings contained in my intelligence reports to paint a false, rosy picture to their bosses. They sealed the deal by questioning my integrity when I protested. Those officers were simply following the perverse incentives of a broken system. Unfortunately, the colonels’ lies led to misallocation of resources and undue human suffering.

All too many veterans can relate, unfortunately, and losing wars that way is truly awful – as if war itself isn’t awful enough. These breaches of trust create profound moral injury for veterans and everyone betrayed. The US abandonment of partners in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving American citizens to fend for themselves, and gaslighting senior leaders stir a bitterness in veterans’ hearts that is deeper than we knew possible. And that’s saying something for a population that thrives on dark humor.

Bitcoin fixes this. There are no leaders, it’s only a timechain. But Satoshi’s design records truth all the time and around the world. There is no trust to betray and no way to betray it. Veterans who are accustomed to the benefits of accountability find it natural to adopt the ethos of “don’t trust, verify” in bitcoin’s context. While our politicians and generals make careers out of lying, veterans have an opportunity to affiliate with fellow truth seekers among bitcoiners.

Thinking about the future, I see bitcoin’s incentives restoring honesty to individuals and populations. This perspective helps mitigate the damage of moral injury by giving me something to look forward to. And the prospect of separating money and state can motivate veterans to protect their descendants from the grotesquely dishonest culture we live in today.

Hope

“War isn’t Hell. War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse… There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them.” – Alan Alda as Hawkeye in M.A.S.H.

In the military, doctrine matters. It’s the base layer on which to build operational design and implement tactical decisions. Doctrine is written with the blood of mistakes from previous battles, so while it can be helpful, much of it is inherently outdated before the ink dries. My experience adapting doctrine to the real world also centered on Afghanistan, where the Afghans’ sense of time is primarily backward looking. Centuries-old tribal disputes factored into most locals’ daily lives far more than any notions of the future they wanted. It’s a bad combination to inject slow-moving military bureaucracy into a civil war of fatalistic cultures.

It was natural for me to leave that and become an even bigger doomer running headlong into the civil-military divide and ignorant populace as a new veteran. I wanted to find a new mission that could stop the abusively poor utilization of armed forces and protect young people from the kinds of situations that broke me. With laughable domestic politics and a money printer running hot, reform didn’t seem possible. Even being accustomed to accomplishing the impossible and desperately wanting to leave a better world for my kids, I concluded it was out of reach. Unfortunately, I wasn’t alone in holding a bleak outlook on life and stopped counting the number of dead Army buddies when it passed 25 – mostly from suicide.

Then I discovered implications of bitcoin and thanked God for cypherpunks writing code. It is truly a miracle we get to live today and discover the potential of liberating individuals and markets with sound money for the digital age. Plenty of veterans entered service with noble ideals only to see them dashed by corrupt leaders sending people into the worst situations this planet has to offer. With bitcoin, there are no leaders to abuse our trust and the incentives for cooperation outweigh those for conflict. We have a chance to replace today’s sclerotic political economy with better alternatives.

Bitcoin offers hope to those who can see its value into the future. I hope to see more veterans acquire bitcoin, become fabulously wealthy over time, and lead lives worthy of our fallen friends. We have the opportunity to once again be part of something far bigger than ourselves, this time immutably enshrined through proof of work.

Conclusion

Bitcoin is therapeutic for the veteran’s soul, at least it has been for mine. After several close calls in combat, I fully expected to die years ago and lucked out. Or I could have easily joined those who made it home yet succumbed to their demons. But everyone’s heart is different and it is up to each veteran to write his or her own story. My call to action as you write that story is simple: stack sats, build meaningful relationships, reflect on your strengths, acquire new ones, and contribute to bitcoin projects and education as you are able. We’re going to win, and the world will be better with you onboard.

@ 21b41910:91f41a5e

An Intro to Creating Reports for Invoices and Payments for the LND tool

by @vicariousdrama 714130–714326

Summary

The purpose of this article is to guide users through use of some of the command line operations to query their lightning node, and produce summary reports using basic formatting and JSON processing tools. This article assumes that you already have a lightning node running LND, and access to the command prompt. If you don’t yet have a lightning node, consider checking out assorted node projects, or even setting up a node using voltage.cloud. Commands are presented in a way that builds up the overall result gradually so that we can better understand each part that goes into the result. You can jump to the end of major sections if you just want to copy-pasta the end result.

Change History

| Date | Description | | --- | --- | | 2022-03-11 | Initial Document | | 2023-02-26 | Conversion to Markdown | | 2023-11-17 | Crosspost to Nostr via Yakihonne |

Invoices

Invoices are payment requests that have been initiated from a lightning node for which another should pay. The creation of requests is out of scope of this article and is often created using applications or interfaces like ThunderHub, Ride The Lightning, or a Lightning capable wallet.

Listing Invoices

From the command line, we can use the lncli tool, the control plane for your lightning network daemon (lnd) with the listinvoices command.

This will output some invoices in JSON format. We can use the jq command to easily apply some formatting and color syntax coloring to improve readability. Later we will use this tool for filtering as well.

If there are invoices, they will be listed in JSON format with several fields for each. While all these fields have their purpose, the ones we are most concerned about for reporting are the ones for memo, value, settled, creation_date, settle_date, amt_paid_sat, and state.

In follow up sections, the highlighted colors depicted here will be included in commands to draw attention to where they are used.

Only List Paid Invoices

This is the command to filter the results to only show those which were paid

shell lncli listinvoices | jq '.invoices[] | select(.state=="SETTLED")'

Only List Failed Invoices

This command alters the filter to show those which were eventually cancelled due to timeout before being paid.

shell lncli listinvoices | jq '.invoices[] | select(.state=="CANCELLED")'

List Invoices Paid for a Period of Time

To limit the invoices to a period of time, we will establish some variables and update the filter of those invoices that are being selected. The date command will return the seconds since epoch, and start on the first second of that day. Each day is comprised of 86400 seconds. For the end date, we will want to advance the result by one day, minus one second to ensure the entire day is included in the period.

Similarly, we can limit the invoices selected to a single month

Controlling the Output for Invoices

Up until now, our output has just been JSON. For reporting purposes, we will begin cleaning up the output to report information on a line by line basis. With the selected objects, we can further use the jq command line JSON processor to direct output concatenating values for a string.

Here is a sample result formatted from the string

Let’s use some trivial formatting to right align the value field by creating spaces padded on the left side. This makes it easier to read numbers when there are multiple rows. In this example, we take the value field, convert to a string using a builtin tostring function. This will then be written out with spaces before it up to 8 minus the length of the value using the built in length function. For example, if the value is 123, it has a length of 3, and to give it a total overall length of 8, 5 spaces will be written in front.

Here is the revised sample result showing the additional padding of spaces on the left side of the value.

To show our values lined up, let’s run the same report with all invoices. To do this, we’ll change the begin date to an earlier time. Your results will vary depending on how many invoices you’ve had in the past.

And here are some sample results showing alignment of the values.

Capturing Filtered Results for Invoices

Going forward, we’ll be performing multiple queries against the dataset. To avoid putting unnecessary load on the service itself, and ensure that we are always working with the same data between queries, we can capture the results to a variable and use that in our formatting.

Here, we capture the data to a variable named REPORT_DATA

Now lets use that, and change our output to display the date in a readable format, followed by the memo field, and finally the amount right aligned.

To convert the date, we take the string, convert to a number using the builtin tonumber function, and then pass that through todateiso8601 another builtin function before parsing the Year, Month, and Day portions from it.

The memo field will be left aligned, whereas right aligned fields create spaces before it, we want to write out extra spaces after its value.

Finally, for the value field, lets extend the length which will better account for a header later on.

And here is our revised sample results with the new formatting.

Creating a Header for Invoices

We can add a header to the report to put context to the data presented. Lets add both a report header for the period of time, as well as column names.

For the period of time, we’ll convert the numeric start and end date in seconds back to a readable time stamp. The column headers will be spaced out to match that of the data, and finally, we’ll create a line between the header and the data.

Our sample results

Let’s combine them so the command output runs together without interspersing the command line prompt.

The header looks much cleaner now.

Calculating the Total for a Footer for Invoices

It would be helpful if we summarized the total sats recieved for the period. We can do this by taking the inputs, converting the value to a number, reducing the array, initializing a temporary variable, and adding the value to it for each item in the array. That may sound more complicated then it is but don’t worry, it’ll become clear with the command and results. The results we will store in another variable.

To see the value, we can echo it out

Sample result

With the total, we can now put it into a footer. We’ll draw another line closing out the data and report the total

The sample footer

Overall Report of Invoices

Now lets combine all the portions of the above into one simple set of commands. We can take this and save it to a file for reuse later.

And here is the sample report of invoices

Payments

For reporting with payments, we’ll assume some of the same concepts that were outlined in the invoices section.

Listing Payments

To list successful payments, we can use the lncli command with the listpayments operation, and then follow up with filtering with the jq JSON processor.

If there are payments, they will be listed in JSON format with several fields for each. While all of these fields have their purpose, the ones we are most concerned about for reporting are value, creation_date, fee, and status. In follow up sections, the highlighted colors depicted here will be included in commands to draw attention to where they are used.

Within the htlcs field (hashed timelock contracts), there are more details about the routing path the payment took, and fees down to the millisat that were paid for each hop. For this basic report, we’ll stick to the basic rollup of fees rounded to the next sat.

Capture the Filtered Payment Results

Let’s setup our reporting begin and end dates, and capture the matched payments to a variable.

Capture the Totals for Payments

Next, for reporting purposes, lets sum the total of invoices paid, the fees, and the overall total.

Overall Report of Payments

Similar to the invoices report, we prepare a payments report with a header block followed by data lines, and then a footer with the calculated sums.

Here’s a sample report output

Conclusion

Using the command line, we built up a report for invoices created with a lightning service. Basic filtering by date periods allows for flexibility in our reports. Textual alignment of data, formatting dates, and creation of headers and footers help make for a useful summary report. We then applied the same concepts to creation of a report for payments made. You may consider using this as a stepping stone to more reports and automation. If you think I should create more guides like this, or expand on it, please leave a comment on the article.

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Intro

Nostrasia 2023, a vibrant unconference, was hosted in two bustling Asian cities: Hong Kong and Tokyo, Japan. Nostriches from around the world flocked to these destinations, eager to immerse themselves in local culture, savor the cuisine, and most importantly, enjoy each other's company in person. Tokyo's event, buzzing with energy, took place in Shibuya, a district renowned for its lively nightlife and abundance of bars, clubs, and restaurants. As is tradition with Nostr events, the atmosphere was charged with excitement, symbolized by the abundant purple and orange hues.

https://v.nostr.build/k7qV.mp4

Preparations

The journey to Nostrasia began right after Nostrica, with meticulous planning to ensure the perfect venue. It was a challenge to find a location that was both spacious and accessible, offering affordable accommodation options nearby. Our diligent volunteers in Japan scoured venues in Tokyo and Yokohama before selecting the ideal spot in Shibuya.

In the days leading up to the event, volunteers, both local and from afar, gathered at the venue. Their mission: to set up everything from audio-visual equipment to stages and decorations, ensuring a warm welcome for attendees on November 1st at 9:00 AM. Despite the time crunch, the spirit of cooperation and friendliness prevailed, making the preparation phase smooth and enjoyable.

Even amidst the busy setup, there was time for breaks and socialization, keeping everyone energized and focused on the mission at hand.

Day 1 (The Beginning)

No day at Nostrasia could start without a caffeine kick or a beverage of choice. The first day witnessed a steady influx of nostriches, filling the venue with excitement and anticipation.

The day offered a mix of activities: some attendees engaged in the presentations, others relaxed in the family-friendly area, and there were even recreational spaces for all ages to enjoy, including model train setups.

The setup was designed to welcome nostriches of all stripes, whether young or old, tech-savvy or not. It was a space where everyone could feel comfortable and included.

The day culminated in a grand welcome party, complete with drinks, MAGURO (Yellowfin tuna), and karaoke.

https://v.nostr.build/Mqqa.mp4

Day 2

Following a late night, the second day of the conference started a bit later, accommodating the nocturnal adventures of the attendees. The day was packed with fascinating talks, workshops, and plenty of opportunities for meet-ups and hugs. https://v.nostr.build/q3RM.mp4

An interesting discovery for me was the concept of air replies, a novel and visually engaging way to interact on social media.

Day 3 (Final)

The final day, starting late due to the previous night's festivities, was filled with a diverse range of presentations. Topics varied from non-technical perspectives on Nostr to in-depth technical workshops and discussions. #footstr

The day was brimming with a variety of presentations in both halls of the conference center. These ranged from insightful talks about Nostr from a non-technical perspective to more in-depth technical workshops and discussions. https://v.nostr.build/R98n.mp4 https://v.nostr.build/o5Xl.mp4 https://v.nostr.build/4A6W.mp4

The event concluded with heartfelt closing remarks from the organizers, filled with gratitude and appreciation for everyone's participation and effort.

Outro

Nostrasia 2023 was a resounding success, marked by a warm, friendly atmosphere that pervaded the entire event. While some had to depart immediately after, many stayed on to explore the wonders of Japan, carrying with them memories of an unforgettable gathering. The end. 🐶🐾🫡🫂

Footnotes

• For the list of notes published about the event, use #nostrasia hashtag.
• For the official Nostrasia profile, visit @npub1nstrcu63lzpjkz94djajuz2evrgu2psd66cwgc0gz0c0qazezx0q9urg5l
• Detailed conference schedule
• Official Webside

Other pictures and videos taken before, during, and after the event

@ d830ee7b:4e61cd62

ผมเจอหลายคนเริ่มต้นกับ Nostr มานาน แต่กลับยังไม่สามารถ “อิน” กับการอยู่ในสังคมแห่งใหม่นี้ได้เท่าไหร่นัก บางคนยังมีเพื่อนใหม่เพียงหลักสิบคน และหลายคนยังแทบไม่รู้จักหรือกดตามใครเลย บางคนมีคนติดตามเพียง 3-5 คน เท่านั้น แล้วมันจะไปมีคนเห็นสิ่งที่เราสื่อสารออกไปได้มากพอได้อย่างไรล่ะคับ?

ก็คนที่ไม่ได้ติดตามเราเค้าก็จะมองไม่เห็นสิ่งที่เราโน๊ตไปนั่นเอง

นี่แหละครับ Nostr

ผมไม่ชอบใช้คำว่า “เล่น Nostr” เท่าไหร่นัก สำหรับผมแล้ว.. Nostr คือ สถานที่ใหม่ สังคมใหม่ที่ทุกคนต้องเริ่มนับใหม่จากศูนย์ ผมขอใช้คำว่ามันเป็นการ “ใช้ชีวิตบน Nostr” ก็แล้วกัน เชื่อไหมครับว่าในแต่ละวัน ผมยังรู้สึกว่าตัวเองมีเวลาไม่มากพอจะใช้ชีวิตบน Nostr ให้สมใจอยากได้เลย.. ในขณะที่บางคนกลับรู้สึกว่า 5 นาทีมันก็นานเกินไปแล้ว..

เราลองมาพิจารณากันดูไหมว่าเพราะอะไร?

มันไม่ค่อยมีอะไรให้อ่าน ไม่ค่อยมีเรื่องให้ทำ

สำหรับข้อโต้แย้งนี้ผมคงต้องบอกว่ามัน “ผิดถนัด” เลยล่ะ.. บน Nostr นี่มีอะไรให้เราทำมากกว่าบนทุกแพลตฟอร์มเก่าๆ มาขยำรวมกันเสียอีกนะ

ผมคิดว่า.. ผมคงต้องเริ่มเล่าเรื่องในจินตนการให้พวกเราเห็นภาพนี้ได้ง่ายขึ้น ผมขอพาพวกเรากลับไปสู่จุดเริ่มต้นของการก่อร่างสร้างสังคม

อันดับแรก ผมอยากให้พวกเราลืม “สังคมแบบเดิม” ไปเสียก่อน ทั้งในชีวิตจริง หรือในโลกออนไลน์ที่เราเคยประสบพบเจอมา ที่ Nostr นี่มันต่างออกไปอย่างสิ้นเชิงครับ

จินตการว่าเราได้ลงจากเรือโนอาห์ที่เกาะขนาดใหญ่แห่งหนึ่ง กองเรือจัดตั้งอาณานิคมใหม่หลายลำที่พาผู้คนหลักแสนมาปล่อยไว้ ณ สถานที่เดียวกัน เกาะอันเวิ้งว้างว่างเปล่าที่อุดมไปด้วยทรัพยากรธรรมชาติ เต็มไปด้วยสิ่งเร้นลับและแปลกใหม่ ที่รอให้เหล่านักสำรวจได้ออกไปทำการค้นพบ

Nostr ก็คือสถานที่แบบเดียวกันนั้น..

เราต่างคนต่างมา ณ ที่แห่งนี้ เรามีสถานะภาพเท่าเทียมกันทุกประการ ทุกคนเริ่มนับหนึ่งใหม่ที่นี่ เริ่มทำความรู้จักกัน รวมกลุ่มกัน สร้างสังคมขนาดย่อมจนผ่านเวลาไปถึงขนาดกลางและกลายเป็นใหญ่ได้ในที่สุด

สิ่งนี้จะเกิดขึ้นไม่ได้เลย ถ้าผู้คนเหล่านี้ไม่พยายาม “Engage” เข้าหากัน ไม่มีปฏิสัมพันธ์ต่อกัน ไม่ยอมแลกเปลี่ยนหรือทำกิจกรรมบางอย่างร่วมกัน นี่คือกลไกการสร้างสังคมโดยธรรมชาติที่จะไม่มีใครมีคอยชี้นำ บังคับ หรือออกกฏเกณฑ์ชี้นิ้วสั่งใครให้ต้องทำอะไรทั้งนั้น.. มันคือสังคมแห่งเสรีชนโดยแท้จริง ทุกคนจะประพฤติอย่างเสรีภายใต้ทัศนวิสัยของปัจเจกชน

โฆษณาชวนเชื่อ หรือการทำเท่ห์ด้วยคอนเท้นต์โก้หรู ศิลปะในการหลอกล่ออัลกอริทึมเหมือนที่เคยทำๆ กันมา มันใช้ไม่ได้กับที่แห่งนี้

ที่นี่พวกเราให้ค่ากับ “คุณค่า” ที่เราจะได้รับมันมาจริงๆ และคุณค่าของแต่ละคนก็ไม่มีวันเหมือนกันเสียด้วย นี่คือความท้าทายที่พวกเราต้องเริ่มออกไปค้นหา ‘คุณค่า’ ที่ว่านั้น ด้วยตัวเองหรือจะทำกันเป็นหมู่คณะก็ย่อมให้ผลดีกว่าอย่างแน่นอนครับ

ไม่มีใครต้องการ “ฮีโร่” ที่นี่ ทุกคนแค่ต้องการ “เพื่อน” เพื่อนที่จะคอย 'ให้' เราก่อนและ 'ขอ' เราทีหลัง

ผมร่ายมายาวก็เพียงแค่ต้องการจะบอกว่า..

ที่เราไม่เห็นคอนเทนต์อะไรน่าสนใจเลย อาจเป็นเพราะเรายังทำความรู้จักกับ “คนที่น่าสนใจ” ยังไม่มากพอก็เป็นได้

แล้วมันเพราะอะไรได้อีกบ้าง?

เรายังกดติดตามคนอื่นน้อยเกินไป

ทำให้เราไม่เจอโน๊ตหรือคอนเทนต์ที่ดึงดูดใจเราได้มากพอ เราก็จะเห็นแต่โน๊ตของคนที่เราติดตามไว้อย่างน้อยนิดนั่นแหละครับ เว้นแต่เราจะไปกดดูแบบ Global ที่จะเห็นผู้คนทั้งเกาะเป็นหมื่นๆ แสนๆ ต่างคนต่างคนโน๊ตกันรัวๆ ซึ่งมันคงเต็มไปด้วยสิ่งที่เราไม่ได้ให้ความสนใจหรือคัดสรรมา

เรามีคนติดตามเราน้อยเกินไป

ทำให้เหงาและเงียบกริบทุกรอบที่เราโน๊ต มันก็แน่อยู่แล้ว ถ้าทั้งเกาะมีคนที่รู้จักเราอยู่แค่ 2-3 คน มันก็คงมีคนแค่จำนวนนี้แหละครับที่จะได้ยินสิ่งที่เราพูด ได้เห็นสิ่งที่เราทำ เราแค่ต้องออกไปทำความรู้จักหรือมีปฏิสัมพันธ์กับคนอื่นๆ ให้มากกว่านี้ มันไม่เหมือนกันนะครับ ระหว่างการโพสต์สิ่งที่อยากพูดออกไป เน้นเอาเท่ เอาเจ๋ง ไว้ก่อน กับการเดินไปหาคนอื่นเพื่อแลกเปลี่ยนความคิดและสร้างมิตรภาพกับเขาอย่างจริงใจ ผมคิดว่ามันให้ผลลัพธ์ไม่เหมือนกันบน Nostr

เรายังไม่เจอ Hashtag หรือกลุ่มสนทนาที่ตรงกับจริต

ทำให้เราไม่รู้สึกอินกับอะไรที่นี่เลย คนชอบฟุตบอลก็ชอบเสวนากับคนดูบอลฉันใด บิตคอยเนอร์ก็อยากจะคุยถูกคอกับบิตคอยเนอร์ฉันนั้น คนรักแมวก็มองหาคนรักแมว ฯลฯ ที่นี่มันพาเราย้อนกลับไปที่ยังยุคแรกๆ ของสังคมโซเชียลมีเดีย ที่คนจะเชื่อมโยงหากันโดยใช้ “Hashtag” ที่ต่างก็สนใจร่วมกัน มันเหมือนการชูป้ายไฟโลกให้รู้ว่า “ฉันรักแมว” (#Catstr) เพื่อดึงดูดคนประเภทเดียวกัน นั่นแหละครับ เราแค่ต้องหาป้ายไฟที่ว่านั่นให้เจอ

เราไม่เห็นได้ “Earn Zap” อย่างที่หลายคนป้ายยาเราไว้เลย

ก็ถ้าวันนี้เราเองยังไม่ค่อยอยาก Zap ให้ใครเท่าไหร่ แน่นอนว่ามันก็จะไม่มีใครอยาก Zap ให้เราด้วยเช่นกัน ป๋ามา-ป๋ากลับ คนที่นี่เป็นกันแบบนั้น มันประหลาดดี ทำลายความเชื่อแบบเดิมๆ ของเราไปเลยทีเดียว

จริงๆ แล้วมันไม่มีใครอยากได้ Sats เพิ่มบน Nostr เพราะมันไม่ง่ายขนาดนั้น พวกเขาก็แค่อยากหาเรื่อง Zap ให้คนอื่นๆ พวกเขาแสวงหาโน๊ต ข้อความ หรือคอนเทนต์ แม้กระทั่งมีมที่โดนใจ ไม่มีใครมาคอยนั่งคิดคำนวนว่า "วันนี้ฉัน Earn ไปเท่าไหร่” (คอนเซ็ปต์แบบนี้มัน Fiat สิ้นดี) สังคมบน Nostr นั้นเน้นการให้และการมีส่วนร่วม ช่วยเหลือกัน เมื่อคุณให้มา เราจะให้กลับ มันแฟร์ๆ แมนๆ ครับ

ในสังคมที่ไม่มีใครคอยมาทำหน้าที่กำกับดูแลพฤติกรรมหรือการกระทำของเรา ความสัมพันธ์จะเกิดขึ้นอย่างเป็นธรรมชาติสุดๆ เป็นเรื่องของปัจเจกชนที่จะเลือกว่าพวกเขาจะให้คุณค่ากับอะไร ดังนั้น.. เราจึงแทบไม่มีทางรู้ได้เลยว่าใครจะชอบ หรือคิดอะไรยังไง นอกเสียจากว่า.. เราจะใช้เวลาไปกับการทำความรู้จักความคิดและจิตใจของพวกเขา ออกไปพูดคุยแลกเปลี่ยนกับพวกเขาเพื่อให้เราเข้าใจคนอื่นได้มากขึ้นนั่นเอง

เมื่อคุณเข้าใจผู้อื่น มันก็ไม่ยากที่คุณจะรู้ว่า “คุณค่า” ที่พวกเขาตามหานั้นคืออะไร?

บก. จิงโจ้ ผู้มีปฎิสัมพันธ์และคอย Make friend กับคนไปทั่ว นั่นทำให้เขามีคนติดตาม และติดตามคนอื่นจำนวนมากทีเดียว เขาทำไปเพื่อ Sats หรือเปล่า? ผมคิดว่าไม่นะ.. Just make friend

เราไม่รู้ว่ามันใช้งานยังไง ทำอะไรได้บ้าง เลยไม่รู้จะไปต่อยังไง

ประเด็นนี้ก็ต้องย้อนกลับไปที่หัวข้อต่างๆ ด้านบน ก็ในเมื่อเรายังไม่เคยเจอคนที่จะคอยตอบคำถาม หรือสอนการใช้งานเราให้กับเราได้ หรือจริงๆ แล้วเราก็อาจแค่ถูกสอนให้ “รอรับ” มากกว่าที่จะ “ค้นหา” จนเคยตัว เราเลยไม่ชินกับการต้องออกไปไขว่คว้ามันด้วยตัวเอง?

ไม่ว่าอย่างไร.. เรามาเริ่มกันใหม่ที่นี่ เชื่อไหมครับว่าหลายคนบน Nostr นั้นเป็นระดับพระกาฬแทบทั้งสิ้น แถมพวกเขายังเต็มใจที่จะให้ความช่วยเหลือหรือคอยตอบคำถามให้กับพวกเราด้วย เราต้องหาเค้าให้เจอและเปลี่ยนตัวเองให้เป็นคนที่จะ “กล้า” ถาม กล้าแสดงออก และกล้าที่จะยอมรับว่าเราไม่รู้ ก่อนที่จะเราจะกลายเป็นผู้เชี่ยวชาญได้ในภายหลัง

นี่เป็นโอกาสที่เราจะได้ใกล้ชิดกับคนที่เราอยากคุยด้วยมานานแล้ว คนที่เราเคยชื่นชม หรือคนที่เราเคยเห็นบนโลกเฟียตๆ แต่ไม่เคยหาเหลี่ยมได้สักทีว่าจะเข้าหาหรือเข้าถึงพวกเขาได้ยังไง

แค่เริ่มทำความรู้จัก โลกก็เปลี่ยน

เอาล่ะ.. ผมจะลองแนะนำวิธีว่าเราจะเพิ่มผู้ติดตามหรือเลือกเฟ้นยังไงในการติดตามผู้อื่น ผมมีแนวทางของผมเอง คงไม่ใช่สูตรสำเร็จ แต่ถ้าเพื่อนๆ จะลองนำไปประยุกต์ก็ไม่ว่ากันครับ

ตามคนดัง

วิธีที่ง่าย และตรงไปตรงมาที่สุด ซึ่งมันก็ถูกแล้ว เพราะคนเหล่านี้การที่เค้าจะดังได้ต่างก็มี proof-of-work และความน่าสนใจในแบบของตัวเองด้วยกันทั้งนั้น แอคเคาต์แรกๆ ที่พวกเราคงนึกถึงก็คงเป็น อ.ตั๊ม พิริยะ และ Right Shift ทั้งแอคเคาต์ทางการ และทีมงานทั้งทีม ก็แหง๋ล่ะ เพราะพวกเขาป้ายยาพาคุณมาอยู่บน Nostr แต่อย่าตามแค่พวกเขาไม่กี่คนเท่านั้นนะครับ คุณควรจะ...

ตามคนอื่นๆ เลียนแบบคนดัง

เราสามารถกดดูได้ว่าใครกดติดตามใครเอาไว้บ้าง คนดังก็มักจะตามกลุ่มคนที่น่าสนใจแหละส่วนหนึ่ง ส่วนที่เหลือเขาก็คงตามคนที่ถูกจริตกับตัวเอง นอกจากนี่คนที่กดติดตามพวกเขาก็จะเป็นคนที่ชอบอะไรคล้ายๆ กับเขา มันก็เป็นไปตามกฎแห่งแรงดึงดูดทางด้านความสัมพันธ์ เราค่อยๆ กดไปดูโปรไฟล์ของแต่ละคนได้ว่าเขามีความน่าสนใจยังไง ชอบโน๊ตหรือการสื่อสารแบบไหน เขามีวิธีคิดหรือนิสัยใจคอ มีเคมีแบบเดียวกันกับเราหรือเปล่า?

ถ้าใช่.. คุณก็แค่กดปุ่ม Follow แล้วกระโจนเข้าไปตอบโต้กับเขาได้เลย ไม่ว่าจะในโน๊ตใหม่ หรือ โน๊ตเก่าๆ คอมเม้นให้มันได้เพื่อนนะครับ อย่าไปเม้นให้ได้ศัตรู

เราจะเห็นแอคฯ น่าสนใจให้เพียบ แค่ลองกดไปดูว่าคนดังๆ เขามีวงสังคมบน Nostr เป็นใครกันบ้าง แล้วตอบตัวเองว่าเราอยากพาตัวเองเข้าไปอยู่ในนั้นบ้างไหม?

ตาม Hashtag

ตามหา “ป้ายไฟ” สีที่เราชอบ หรือก็คือกด ‘#’ นำในช่องค้นหา ตามด้วยคำที่เราสนใจ แล้วลองไล่หาดูได้เลย คุณอาจเจอเข้ากับกระทู้ที่ตรงกับสิ่งที่ตามหา เรื่องที่อยากอ่าน หรือมุมมองที่อยากเห็น รวมไปถึงคนที่.. เอ้อ มันเจ๋งดีว่ะ อะไรแบบนี้ได้ง่ายๆ เลยล่ะ

เมื่อเราชอบแฮ็ชแท็กไหน เรายังสามารถกดติดตามตัวแฮชแท็กนั้นได้อีกด้วย และอย่าลืมกดติดตาม หรือติดแฮ็ชแท็ก #ThaiNostrich กับ #Siamstr เอาไว้ด้วยนะครับ มันคือป้ายไฟสามัญประจำบ้านของคนไทยบน Nostr คุณสามารถตามหาเพื่อนคนไทยได้ง่ายๆ ด้วยแฮชแท็ก 2 ตัวนี้นี่แหละ

Swarmstr เป็นตัวอย่างไคลเอนต์ที่จะรวบรวมข้อมูลบน Nostr ที่เราสามารถค้นหา หรือศึกษา Nostr ได้จากหัวข้อต่างๆ ตามแฮชแท็คที่แสดงเป็นตัวอย่างได้ (หรือค้นหาด้วยตัวเอง)

ตามประเด็นที่สนใจไปจนเจอตัวพ่อ

มันต้องมีบางโอกาสที่เราไปเจอเข้ากับกระทู้น่าสนใจ มีการสนทนากันอย่างเผ็ดร้อนหรือรื่นเริงจนคุณก็อดเข้าไปแจมด้วยไม่ได้ ที่แบบนี้แหละที่คุณจะเจอกับคนเก่งๆ ในด้านนั้นๆ หรือผู้เชี่ยวชาญเฉพาะด้าน หรือกระทั่งเป็นผู้ก่อตั้ง หรือนักพัฒนาไคลเอนต์เลยทีเดียว และคนเหล่านี้เขาก็มาที่เกาะแห่งนี้ด้วยจุดประสงค์คล้ายๆ เรา คือ "หนีความวุ่นวายและโสมมบนโลกเก่าเพื่อแสวงหาเสรีภาพและมิตรภาพ ณ สังคมใหม่"

ดังนั้น เขาเต็มใจที่จะได้ทำความรู้จักกับเราอย่างแน่นอนครับ

แต่คนนิสัยไม่ดี หรือมีพฤติกรรมไม่เป็นมิตรเราก็จะดูออกได้ในทันที และมันก็เป็นสิทธิ์ของเราล้านเปอร์เซ็นต์ที่จะเลือกว่า จะสนใจติดตามคนๆ นี้ หรือแค่ปล่อยผ่าน หรือไม่ก็ บล็อกแม่ง ให้มันจบๆ ไป

Nostrends เป็นตัวอย่างไคลเอ็นต์ที่คอยรวบรวมและแสดงโน๊ต หรือหัวข้อที่กำลังได้รับความนิยมบน Nostr ตามช่วงเวลาหรือตัวกรองที่เราเลือก

พยายามอย่าทำพฤติกรรมแบบเดิมๆ บน Nostr

ผมเชื่อว่ามีพวกเราส่วนใหญ่ (ชาวไทย) จะคุ้นเคยกับการใช้งานและวัฒนธรรมบน Facebook แต่ชาวต่างชาติหรือผู้ใช้งานส่วนใหญ่ที่นี่จะเคยชินกับวัฒนธรรมแบบ Twitter กันมากกว่านะครับ ไม่ว่าจะเป็นการโพสต์ การคอมเมนต์ หรือการกดตอบโต้ด้วยอีโมจิ (Discord cult) ก็ถือว่าเป็นวัฒนธรรมในแบบที่เราอาจยังไม่คุ้นเคยกันมากนักและคงต้องใช้เวลาเรียนรู้กันพอสมควร

ขอให้พวกเราทิ้งวิธีคิดแบบเดิมๆ ในการใช้งานโซเชียลมีเดียไปได้เลยครับ เราควรอยู่บน Nostr โดยใช้แนวคิดแบบเดียวกับการอยู่ในสังคมจริงๆ ทักทาย ตอบโต้ เห็นอกเห็นใจ ช่วยเหลือ แลกเปลี่ยน คอนทริบิ้วท์และมีส่วนร่วมให้มากกว่าที่เคย ฯลฯ เราจึงจะมีตัวตนและรู้สึกเหมือนเป็นส่วนหนึ่งในสังคมแห่งนี้ได้จริงๆ (ไม่งั้นเราก็เป็นได้เพียง "ผู้สังเกตการณ์เหงาๆ" เท่านั้นเอง)

ที่นี่.. ไม่ให้คุณค่ากับ การอวดรู้ หรือ โชว์พาว ทุกคนดูออกได้ง่ายๆ ว่าเจตนาของแต่ละคนคืออะไร คนเหล่านี้ล้วนเคยขยะแขยง Fiat Social Media Cult มาแทบทั้งนั้น ถ้าต้องมาเจออะไรแบบนี้บน Nostr ก็จะ ยี้ ได้ทันที และทุกคนก็พร้อม และ มีสิทธิ์ที่จะบล็อกเราได้ตลอดเวลา

เราจะกดติดตามคนนั้น-คนนี้ให้มากมายไปทำไมกัน ถ้าเราจะแค่ไถๆๆ ฟีดวืดๆๆ ไปวันๆ เราจะไม่ได้เพื่อนเลยสักคนกับการทำแบบนั้น และอาจพลาดโอกาสดีๆ ที่จะได้เรียนรู้อะไรบางอย่าง

เราไม่ควรทำแค่อ่านผ่านๆ เหมือนกับตอนที่เราเบื่อโลกเมื่อต้องใช้ Facebook และเห็นแต่อะไรที่ไม่ต้องการเห็น ที่นี่.. เราจะเลิกติดตามไปเลยก็ได้ถ้าแอคฯ นั้นเอาแต่โพสต์อะไรที่ดูไม่เข้าตา หรือไม่สามารถดึงดูดเราได้ (ถ้าเกรงใจก็กด Mute ไว้ก่อนก็ได้)

การอ่านอย่างตั้งใจในสิ่งที่เค้าโพสต์มา และตอบโต้ตามสมควร ก็เปรียบเสมือน การรับฟังผู้พูดอย่างตั้งอกตั้งใจ นั่นเอง นั่นคือหนทางเดียวที่เราจะเรียนรู้ได้ว่าเราควรตอบโต้อย่างไร เพราะเราเข้าใจ สาส์น ที่เขาได้สื่อออกมาอย่างถ่องแท้นั่นเองครับ

ถ้าไม่ว่าง คุณก็ปัดทิ้งได้ แล้วค่อยตามไปอ่านทีหลัง มันไม่มีการลบหรือปิดกั้นเรา ไม่มีโฆษณามาให้รกหูรกตา ถ้าเจอพวก แสกม/แสปม ก็บล็อกมันซะ อย่าให้พวกน่ารังเกียจได้มีที่ยืนบนสังคมที่คุณอยากให้เป็น

และขอให้ทุกคนระลึกไว้เสมอว่า การพูดคุยและมีปฎิสัมพันธ์ต่อกัน เท่านั้น ที่จะทำให้มนุษย์ได้มีความสัมพันธ์ต่อกัน

ผมขอทิ้งท้ายด้วยเคล็ดลับตกผลึกสั้นๆ ว่า..

• ติดตามผู้อื่น
• Zap ให้คนอื่นๆ
• เริ่มสร้าง Note ของตัวเอง (โพสต์) สักครั้ง หรือบ่อยครั้ง
• คุยกับคนอื่นให้มากกว่าที่เคย (มากกว่าแค่อ่านๆ ไปเรื่อยเหมือนตอนใช้ Facebook)
• ได้ Zap กลับมาจากคนอื่น
• สำรวจแฮชแท็กต่างๆ ลองใช้งานมันไปเรื่อยๆ

เหนือสิ่งอื่นใด จงใช้ชีวิตบน Nostr และแค่สนุกไปกับมันให้ได้ก็พอ.. :)

ปล. |--

• มนุษย์มีวุ้นแปลภาษาจริงๆ แล้วนะครับ ก็ Google translate นั่นยังไง อย่าให้ภาษากลายเป็นกำแพงแห่งการเรียนรู้.. จงใช้มัน ไม่ต้องขวยเขิลกันหรอกครับ (เพราะผมเองก็ใช้)

• บทความต่อไปผมจะมาลองแนะนำว่า มีแอคเคานต์ไหนบ้างที่น่าสนใจกดติดตามสัก 10-20 บัญชี เอาคนไทยเราก่อนเลย ไว้คอยติดตามกันนะครับ

@ a399726e:29cb5f4c

ต้องขอเกริ่นก่อนว่าเราเกิดมาในครอบครัวที่ไม่ได้ร่ำรวย จนเมื่อได้มาเรียนต่อมหาวิทยาลัยที่อำเภอหาดใหญ่ จังหวัดสงขลา เราจะขอเงินแม่ได้แค่เฉพาะที่เกี่ยวกับการเรียนเท่านั้น แม่จะให้เงินใช้รายเดือน เดือนละ 4000 บาท หากอยากได้อะไรที่ไม่เกี่ยวกับการเรียนก็ต้องเก็บเงินซื้อด้วยตัวเอง เมื่อเริ่มเรียนมหาวิทยาลัย เราก็เริ่มหางานพาร์ทไทม์ทำไปด้วย กลางวันไปเรียน เลิกเรียนก็ไปทำงาน สิ่งที่แลกมาคือทำให้เราไม่มีเวลาที่จะไปเที่ยวเล่นกับเพื่อนๆ ทั้งๆที่เราเองเป็นคนที่ชอบการท่องเที่ยวมากๆ จนเมื่อเราเรียนปี3ก็เริ่มทำงานพาร์ทไทม์น้อยลงเนื่องจากต้องทุ่มเทกับการเรียนมากขึ้น เราเริ่มอยากทำตามความฝันคือการได้ไปท่องเที่ยวในทุกๆจังหวัดในประเทศไทย เราเริ่มชวนเพื่อนไปเที่ยว แต่เพื่อนไม่ว่างไปด้วยในวันที่เราชวน เราจึงคิดว่าหากมัวแต่รอก็ไม่รู้จะได้ไปวันไหน การเดินทางหมื่นลี้ เริ่มต้นที่ก้าวแรก เราจึงเลือกก้าวแรกของเราที่จังหวัดยะลา 5 ตุลาคม 2556 เราตื่นแต่เช้ามืดเดินทางไปสถานีรถไฟหาดใหญ่เพื่อให้ทันขบวนรถไฟไปยะลาตอน 05.30 น. ท้องฟ้ายังมืดอยู่ ราคาตั๋ว 53 บาท เป็นการเดินทางด้วยรถไฟคนเดียวครั้งแรกและเป็นการไปจังหวัดยะลาครั้งแรก ซื้อตั๋วแล้วเราก็เดินไปซื้อข้าวเหนียวไก่ทอดมานั่งกินบนรถไฟรอเวลารถไฟออก เมื่อถึงเวลารถไฟก็ออกจากชุมทางหาดใหญ่ เราตื่นเต้นและตื่นตาตื่นใจกับวิวระหว่างทาง ได้เห็นวิถีขีวิตผู้คนระหว่างทาง รถไฟจอดเกือบทุกสถานี มีพ่อค้าแม่ค้าขึ้นมาขายของกินบนรถไฟตลอดเส้นทาง ประมาณแปดโมงเช้ารถไฟก็มาถึงสถานีรถไฟยะลา เราลงจากรถไฟและเดินไปตลาดเก่ายะลา ร้านค้าส่วนมากจะขายเสื้อผ้าและเครื่องแต่งกายของชาวมุสลิม เราหาข้าวเช้าทานแล้วเดินเที่ยวแถวตลาด ถ่ายรูปโดยใช้โทรศัพท์ราคาถูกที่ไม่ได้มีความคมชัดมากนัก สัมผัสวิถีชีวิตของชาวไทยมุสลิมย่านตลาดเก่า

หลังจากเดินเที่ยวจนพอใจแล้ว ก็ถึงเวลาที่เราต้องเดินกลับไปสถานีรถไฟยะลา เพื่อไปให้ทันขบวนรถไฟฟรี เดินทางกลับหาดใหญ่ เป็นทริปสั้นๆที่จบลงอย่างรวดเร็ว แต่ก็เป็นจุดเริ่มต้นของการทำตามความฝันของเราและจะมีทริปต่อไปอย่างแน่นอน สุดท้ายแล้วมีเวลาเที่ยวก็อย่ารอเดี๋ยวค่อยไป มีโอกาสก็ออกเดินทางซะ แม้การเดินทางนั้นจะคนเดียวก็ตาม

travel #journey #siamstr

@ de496884:72617b81

El Síndrome de Asperger fue descrito por primera vez por el pediatra austriaco Hans Asperger en el 1944, lo cual coincidió sin que este lo supiera, con la publicación en 1943 sobre los trastornos autísticos del contacto afectivo del doctor Leo Kanner, que les dan sentido a la comprensión que existe actualmente sobre dicha temática. Ambas descripciones hacían referencia a aspectos muy peculiares de la conducta infantil como alteraciones del comportamiento social, el lenguaje y las habilidades cognitivas y, además, hacían referencia al término psicopatía autista para resaltar el aislamiento de sus pacientes.

Esta vez vengo a hablarles de este síndrome tan peculiar que poseen varias personas en el mundo, y que más allá de ser considerado por muchos como una enfermedad o un padecimiento, se trata de una condición más que nos corresponde con la que debemos aprender a lidiar ya que la poseen personas. Es simplemente otro modo de ser y estar en el mundo por parte de personas, no entidades nosológicas en sí mismas. Así que si te gusta el tema, te invito a quedarte y te prometo que no te arrepentirás.

........................................

Introducción

Poco después del fallecimiento de Asperger en 1980, su trabajo fue aceptado por la comunidad médica internacional, por lo que tuvo que pasar casi cuarenta años desde la publicación sobre este síndrome, para que apareciera en la literatura científica. Ello dio origen al reinicio de las investigaciones en torno a dicho síndrome. Fue incluido en el Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de Trastornos Mentales, DSM por sus siglas en inglés, en el 1994.

La realidad de las personas con síndrome de Asperger es un tema de creciente importancia, hoy en día, en el mundo de la discapacidad, bien sea por el masivo diagnóstico de personas con síndrome de Asperger en los últimos años, o por la fuerza con la que defienden sus derechos las distintas asociaciones e instituciones que trabajan con el síndrome. (Parada, 2012, p. 5)

Existen múltiples interpretaciones mágicas en torno a las características autísticas antes mencionadas, que tienen como uno de sus principales exponentes a San Francisco de Asís, por sus conductas enrarecidas. Hasta hace relativamente poco, las personas con esta condición eran mal diagnosticadas, y, por tanto, desconocidas ante las sociedades o confundidas con otros trastornos. Se trata de un trastorno del desarrollo cerebral que se da desde el nacimiento y persiste durante la vida. Sus causas permanecen desconocidas, pero hay evidencias de una fuerte carga genética, así como causas orgánicas. Aunque aparezca generalmente como una variante del autismo, posee sus propias características que lo diferencian como mejores habilidades sociales o la inteligencia verbal.

Los factores de riesgos como los antecedentes familiares, prenatales, perinatales o personales que posibiliten la modificación del factor genético se desconocen. Actualmente existe muy poca información sobre le pronóstico de estos niños debido a lo expresado en la cita anterior.

La prevalencia exacta no se ha establecido exactamente, aunque se puede afirmar que es más común en hombres. Las tasas son de una media de 36 por 10000 niños, nacidos por año. «Como es una enfermedad crónica del comportamiento, no existe un patrón único de comorbilidad depende de las interacciones entre ambiente, herencia y paciente» (Naranjo, 2014, p. 82).

Desarrollo

Se hace importante un diagnóstico temprano de dicho síndrome, porque es necesario instaurar un tratamiento adecuado y mejorar el pronóstico al evitar la comorbilidad, debido a que, en mi opinión, de no ser así esto pudiera debutar en una inadecuada estimulación proveniente de las relaciones sociales, agudizar el síndrome y/o provocar un retardo del desarrollo psíquico. Se trata de una condición multidimensional y, por tanto, una etiología muy compleja. Es un trastorno que grosso modo se caracteriza por la marcada alteración social, dificultades en la comunicación, en el juego, rango de intereses repetitivos sin presentar retardos significativos del lenguaje ni del intelecto. Se trata de individuos que se aíslan socialmente ya que el acercamiento a otras personas es inapropiado por sus conductas excéntricas. Son incapaces de guardar secretos, entender metáforas, ironías, sarcasmo o el humor; de ahí la afectación de las relaciones sociales. Generalmente son personas que pretenden dominar la conversación, por lo que generan conversaciones unilaterales, con un único tema y muy rutinarias. «Fácilmente se perturban cuando sus expectativas no se cumplen, o sus rutinas son alteradas» (Naranjo, 2014, p. 84).

Puede que exista el interés por relacionarse con otras personas, pero la incapacidad está en que no reconocen sentimientos, así como intensiones ni comunicación no verbal, por lo que pueden parecer hirientes e insensibles, provocando el efecto contrario: el rechazo. Sin embargo, son hábiles en la esfera cognitiva, en la cual presentan una inteligencia normal, o en ocasiones superior a la media, que los hace tener conocimientos sobre temas particulares que causan asombro en quienes lo rodean.

Respecto al lenguaje, puede que presenten alguna diferencia al inicio, pero sin retrasos significativos. Sí puede ser que se vean afectadas las inflexiones y entonaciones, lo que causa que la velocidad sea inusual provocando que en ocasiones se pierda la fluencia. El volumen puede verse alterado y el lenguaje tangencial y circunstancial, siendo muy verbalizado, lo que los lleva a usar palabras inusuales. Pienso que en este punto guardan especial relación con las personas con autismo, ya que estas últimas no logran el control adecuado del volumen de la voz y, por tanto, pueden hablar casi gritando cuando hay personas cerca, o murmurar al contar con personas alejadas. Este puede ser uno de los motivos por los cuales aun aparezca dentro del espectro autista.

Suelen acumular buena cantidad de información sobre un tema en específico que los apasione, que condiciona el intercambio social, lo cual justifica lo que decía anteriormente sobre que tratan generalmente de dominar el curso de la conversación, por lo que se vuelve unilateral. Puede que presenten retardo en la adquisición de habilidades motoras como la coordinación, provocando una marcha anormal, posturas extrañas y en ocasiones, que se posicionen demasiado cerca de las demás personas, causando incomodidad y nuevamente, rechazo.

Los niños y niñas con Síndrome de Asperger muestran dificultades particulares en el procesamiento auditivo , ya que logran una pobre modulación sensitiva del 10 al 20 %. Además, en cuanto al procesamiento de la información visual normal dedican poco tiempo observando las características principales del rostro, como la boca y los ojos y gastan mucho tiempo en áreas diferentes a la cara. Aquí pienso que esto sea una causa de que se pierdan mucho de la información no verbal dada por los gestos faciales como las muecas, y sean torpes en la comprensión de sarcasmos e ironías.

Respecto al nivel conductual, «actualmente está muy aceptado el concepto de un espectro completo de trastornos autistas de distinto tipo e intensidad, que no se limitan a casos aislados, tal como lo describió Kanner» (Frith, p. 506). Uno de los principales problemas en torno a ello, es cómo identificar y consensuar rasgos significativos, puesto que el comportamiento es muy variable durante el desarrollo, por la particular relación del individuo con su entorno.

En el nivel cognitivo, es donde se puede hallar el denominador común, que es la proposición de la carencia de la llamada «Teoría de la mente». ¿Qué sería esta «Teoría de la mente»? Pues puede ser considerada como un proceso psicológico superior rudimentario que, según Vygotsky, surge en el contexto de las relaciones interpersonales por la participación del sujeto en una cultura determinada. Se constituye por un aprendizaje incidental al igual que el lenguaje; pues ningún adulto enseña conscientemente a comprender que los demás poseen mente, a atribuirles intencionalidad, comprender el sarcasmo o la ironía, a deducir el estado emocional de otra persona en una conversación o a jugar con el cambio de turnos en la misma, sino que esto es aprehendido mediante las relaciones. «Estos implican contextos mentales compartidos en los sistemas simbólicos de la cultura (familiar) y en las prácticas de participación guiada donde se apropian de las herramientas semióticas de su cultura» (Frith, p. 506).

Luego de haber comprendido a modo general, las características de las personas con Síndrome de Asperger, pasamos a realizarnos la pregunta: ¿estas personas pueden desarrollar características creativas o representaciones artísticas?, o mejor aún, ¿estas características contribuyen de alguna manera a superar alguna de sus discapacidades? Pues impulsivamente es probable que la mayoría de las personas respondan que no, debido a la dificultad de las relaciones sociales. Sin embargo, si nos fijamos en los artistas famosos, podemos darnos cuenta de que una cantidad considerable presenta Síndrome de Asperger. Muchos autores afirman que los genes del autismo y el Asperger, están fuertemente vinculados a los genes de la creatividad, y tenemos los ejemplos de Bob Dylan o Satoshi Tajiri (creador de la franquicia Pokémon), que presentaban características que encajaban con dicho síndrome.

Pues aparentemente las características del Síndrome de Asperger, no permiten a la persona manifestar características creativas. Entendamos la creatividad como el proceso de descubrimiento o producción de algo nuevo, que cumple con exigencias de una determinada situación social. Pues si estas personas presentan dificultades en el juego de roles, inflexibilidad mental y comportamental, y trastornos cualitativos de la relación, es muy difícil que sean creativos.

Por otra parte, existen autores como Fernández (2003) que establecen una relación entre el coeficiente intelectual (CI) con la creatividad, siendo los que poseen menos de 30, los que no desarrollan conductas creativas, los de entre 30 y 50 los que tendrán cierto rendimiento, y los que están entre 50 y 70, los que llegarán a resultados más apreciables, con lo cual no concuerdo particularmente.

En contraposición a ello, se conocen muchos ejemplos de personas que, con deficiencias, logran manifestar creatividad. Y si seguimos analizando las características de las personas con síndrome de Asperger, podemos ver que existen ciertas características que les presentan beneficios para manifestar procesos o productos creativos. Son personas que poseen una inteligencia normal y en ocasiones por encima de la media, lo cual está acorde con lo propuesto por la autora, poseen fijación con un determinado tema de su interés, lo cual les permite llegar a dominar la mayoría de las aristas de cierta problemática y hacer nuevos aportes, poseen buena capacidad memorística para captar detalles, lo cual les permite que no se les escape casi nada y ver donde los demás no alcanzan, y se trata de personas metódicas y rutinarias que esta característica les permite buena organización.

Conclusiones

A partir de todo lo visto hasta ahora, podemos al menos creer, que las personas con Síndrome de Asperger pueden llegar a ser creativas. Cuentan con varias características que funcionan como potencialidades para desarrollar procesos creativos. Pero aún no se ha respondido la pregunta referida a si en alguna medida, estas características llegan a superar alguna de sus discapacidades. La respuesta es afirmativa, pues «parece que las personas que sufren síndrome de Asperger pueden desarrollar una teoría de la mente alternativa, aunque su comprensión intuitiva de los estados mentales siga siendo pobre» (Frith, p. 506)

Estas personas a raíz de las características antes mencionadas que les permiten ser creativos, pueden desarrollar un tipo diferente de teoría, adquirida tarde y con mucho esfuerzo, algunas veces cometiendo errores. Pero lo importante es que pueden lograr una compensación que les posibilite un mínimo de aciertos en situaciones sociales. Es algo parecido a una teoría científica, puesto que es consciente y no inconsciente como lo sería cotidianamente. Carece de la intuición necesaria para el uso de la experiencia social desde la infancia temprana. Esta teoría alternativa, al ser lógica, no permite un rápido procesamiento y automaticidad, por el contario es trabajosa y exhaustiva, aunque mejora con el tiempo. Pero no por ello deja de funcionar como mecanismo de compensación, pues permite que la persona pueda funcionar mejor en su ambiente social y dar una mejor respuesta a lo que antes se le escapaba como la comunicación no verbal, el humor, la ironía.

........................................

English version

Asperger's Syndrome was first described by the Austrian pediatrician Hans Asperger in 1944, which coincided, unbeknownst to him, with the 1943 publication on autistic affective contact disorders by Dr. Leo Kanner, which gives meaning to the current understanding of the subject. Both descriptions referred to very peculiar aspects of child behavior such as alterations in social behavior, language and cognitive skills, and also referred to the term autistic psychopathy to highlight the isolation of his patients.

This time I come to talk about this peculiar syndrome that several people in the world have, and that beyond being considered by many as a disease or a condition, it is another condition that we must learn to deal with because people have it. It is simply another way of being and being in the world by people, not nosological entities per se. However, the purpose of this blog entry is to establish a relationship between this condition, and creativity. That is, what is creativity, can people with Asperger syndrome manifest creative characteristics? This and other questions will be addressed below. So if you are interested in the subject, stay and read until the end and I promise you will not regret it.

........................................

Introduction

Shortly after Asperger's death in 1980, his work was accepted by the international medical community, so it took almost forty years after the publication of this syndrome for it to appear in the scientific literature. This led to the resumption of research on the syndrome. It was included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in 1994.

The reality of people with Asperger syndrome is a topic of growing importance today in the world of disability, either by the massive diagnosis of people with Asperger syndrome in recent years, or by the strength with which the various associations and institutions working with the syndrome defend their rights. (Parada, 2012, p. 5).

There are multiple magical interpretations of the aforementioned autistic characteristics, one of the main exponents of which is Saint Francis of Assisi, due to his rarefied behaviors. Until relatively recently, people with this condition were misdiagnosed, and therefore unknown to societies or confused with other disorders. It is a disorder of brain development that occurs from birth and persists throughout life. Its causes remain unknown, but there is evidence of a strong genetic burden as well as organic causes. Although it usually appears as a variant of autism, it has its own differentiating characteristics such as improved social skills or verbal intelligence.

The risk factors such as family, prenatal, perinatal or personal history that make possible the modification of the genetic factor are unknown. Currently there is very little information on the prognosis of these children due to the above mentioned.

The exact prevalence has not been established exactly, although it can be stated that it is more common in males. Rates average 36 per 10000 children, born per year. "As it is a chronic behavioral disease, there is no single pattern of comorbidity depends on the interactions between environment, heredity and patient" (Naranjo, 2014, p. 82).

Development

An early diagnosis of such syndrome becomes important, because it is necessary to establish an adequate treatment and improve the prognosis by avoiding comorbidity, due to the fact that, in my opinion, otherwise this could debut in an inadequate stimulation coming from social relationships, aggravate the syndrome and/or cause a retardation of psychic development. It is a multidimensional condition and, therefore, a very complex etiology. It is a disorder that is characterized by marked social disturbance, difficulties in communication, play, range of repetitive interests without presenting significant delays in language or intellect. These are individuals who socially isolate themselves since the approach to other people is inappropriate due to their eccentric behaviors. They are unable to keep secrets, understand metaphors, ironies, sarcasm or humor; hence the affectation of social relationships. They are generally people who seek to dominate the conversation, so they generate unilateral conversations, with a single topic and very routine. "They are easily disturbed when their expectations are not met, or their routines are altered" (Naranjo, 2014, p. 84).

There may be interest in relating to other people, but the disability lies in the fact that they do not recognize feelings, as well as intentions or nonverbal communication, so they may appear hurtful and insensitive, causing the opposite effect: rejection. However, they are skilled in the cognitive sphere, in which they have a normal intelligence, or sometimes above average, which makes them have knowledge on particular topics that cause astonishment in those around them.

Regarding language, they may present some differences at the beginning, but without significant delays. Inflections and intonations may be affected, which causes the speed to be unusual, sometimes leading to a loss of fluency. Volume may be altered and language may be tangential and circumstantial, being very verbalized, leading them to use unusual words. I think that in this point they are especially related to people with autism, since the latter do not achieve adequate control of the volume of the voice and, therefore, they can speak almost shouting when there are people nearby, or mumble when there are people far away. This may be one of the reasons why it still appears within the autism spectrum.

They tend to accumulate a good amount of information on a specific topic they are passionate about, which conditions the social exchange, which justifies what I said before about them generally trying to dominate the course of the conversation, so it becomes unilateral. They may present a delay in the acquisition of motor skills such as coordination, causing an abnormal gait, strange postures and sometimes, they position themselves too close to other people, causing discomfort and again, rejection.

Children with Asperger Syndrome show particular difficulties in auditory processing, as they achieve a poor sensory modulation of 10 to 20 %. In addition, in terms of processing normal visual information, they spend little time looking at the main features of the face, such as the mouth and eyes, and spend a lot of time on areas other than the face. Here I think this is a cause of them missing much of the nonverbal information given by facial gestures such as grimaces, and they are clumsy in understanding sarcasm and irony.

Regarding the behavioral level, "the concept of a full spectrum of autistic disorders of different types and intensity, which are not limited to isolated cases, as described by Kanner, is now widely accepted" (Frith, p. 506). One of the main problems is how to identify and agree on significant traits, since behavior is highly variable during development, due to the particular relationship of the individual with his environment.

At the cognitive level, is where the common denominator can be found, which is the proposition of the lack of a so-called "Theory of Mind". What would this "Theory of mind" be? Well, it can be considered as a rudimentary higher psychological process that, according to Vygotsky, arises in the context of interpersonal relationships due to the participation of the subject in a given culture. It is constituted by incidental learning just like language; for no adult consciously teaches to understand that others possess minds, to attribute intentionality to them, to understand sarcasm or irony, to deduce the emotional state of another person in a conversation, or to play with turn-taking in conversation, but this is apprehended through relationships. "These involve shared mental contexts in the symbolic systems of (family) culture and in guided participation practices where they appropriate the semiotic tools of their culture" (Frith, p. 506).

After having understood in a general way, the characteristics of people with Asperger's Syndrome, we can ask ourselves the question: can these people develop creative characteristics or artistic representations, or better yet, do these characteristics contribute in any way to overcome any of their disabilities? Impulsively, it is likely that most people would answer no, due to the difficulty of social relationships. However, if we look at famous artists, we can see that a considerable number have Asperger's Syndrome. Many authors claim that autism and Asperger's genes are strongly linked to creativity genes, and we have the examples of Bob Dylan or Satoshi Tajiri (creator of the Pokémon franchise), who presented characteristics that fit with this syndrome.

Apparently, the characteristics of Asperger's Syndrome do not allow the person to manifest creative characteristics. Let us understand creativity as the process of discovery or production of something new, which meets the requirements of a given social situation. For if these people present difficulties in role playing, mental and behavioral inflexibility, and qualitative relationship disorders, it is very difficult for them to be creative.

On the other hand, there are authors such as Fernandez (2003) who establish a relationship between IQ and creativity, being those who have less than 30, those who do not develop creative behaviors, those between 30 and 50 those who will have some performance, and those who are between 50 and 70, those who will reach more appreciable results, with which I do not particularly agree.

On the other hand, there are many examples of people who, with deficiencies, manage to show creativity. And if we continue analyzing the characteristics of people with Asperger's Syndrome, we can see that there are certain characteristics that present them with benefits to manifest creative processes or products. They are people who have a normal intelligence and sometimes above average, which is in accordance with what is proposed by the author, they have a fixation with a certain subject of their interest, which allows them to master most of the edges of certain problems and make new contributions, they have good memory capacity to grasp details, which allows them not to miss almost anything and see where others do not reach, and they are methodical and routine people that this feature allows them good organization.

Conclusions

From all we have seen so far, we can at least believe that people with Asperger Syndrome can become creative. They have several characteristics that function as potentialities to develop creative processes. But the question has not yet been answered as to whether, to some extent, these characteristics can overcome any of their disabilities. The answer is affirmative, for "it seems that people with Asperger's Syndrome can develop an alternative theory of mind, even if their intuitive understanding of mental states remains poor" (Frith, p. 506).

These people, as a result of the above-mentioned characteristics that allow them to be creative, can develop a different kind of theory, acquired late and with much effort, sometimes making mistakes. But the important thing is that they can achieve a compensation that allows them a minimum of successes in social situations. It is something similar to a scientific theory, since it is conscious and not unconscious as it would be in everyday life. It lacks the intuition necessary for the use of social experience from early childhood. This alternative theory, being logical, does not allow rapid processing and automaticity, on the contrary it is laborious and exhaustive, although it improves with time. But it does not cease to function as a compensatory mechanism, since it allows the person to function better in his social environment and to give a better response to what previously escaped him, such as non-verbal communication, humor, irony.

Créditos / Credits

Referencias bibliográficas / Bibliographic references:

1. Frith, U. (1998). Autismo y Síndrome de Asperger. En Congreso Internacional Autismo-Europa, La esperanza no es un sueño (págs. 505-514). Fundación ONCE. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.autisme.com/autisme/documents/Autismo-y-sindrome-de-asperger.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwips6fyicGCAxUPLFkFHaihDuQQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0FZDsuHV1ANkEYAKHJR62k

2. Fernández, M. (2003). Creatividad, arte terapia y autismo. Un acercamiento a la actividad plástica como proceso creativo en niños autistas. Arte, individuo y sociedad, (15), 135-152. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo%3Fcodigo%3D794482&ved=2ahUKEwjhr-fHisGCAxVGGVkFHRoqD0wQFnoECAoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0S2Y2195Fyj2uA_ZdjigTk

3. Parada, AJ. (2012). El síndrome de Asperger y la creatividad (Tesis de maestría). Universidad de Oviedo, España. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/10651/3990/1/TFM_AlejandroJacob_Parada_&ved=2ahUKEwjUrMH8jsGCAxVeM1kFHcupBvoQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2AVCc6MnkhMDp9h33wFDcO

4. Campà, A. (2013). Habilidades sociales: una aplicación al Síndrome de Asperger (Prácticas de Psicología de la Educación). Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, España. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://openaccess.uoc.edu/bitstream/10609/20141/6/agarciacamTFC0113mem%25C3%25B2ria.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8t6fZkMGCAxXDMlkFHZl7BGAQFnoECAwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0j7K8BPPoaH4HCQfU1D97Z

5. Naranjo, RA. (2014). Avances y perspectivas en Síndrome de Asperger. NOVA, 12 (21), 81-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.998

Imágenes utilizadas / Images used:

Imágenes de mi propiedad generadas con la IA de Bing Image Creator / Images I own generated with Bing Image Creator AI.

Traducción / Translation:

DeepL

@ d830ee7b:4e61cd62

"Bitcoin isn't real money until you can buy coffee at the street corner with it."

I've heard this frustrating argument many times. I don’t have exact numbers to confirm the current global adoption rate, but I believe over 90% of the world still doesn't know about it. That's why many still mockingly view Bitcoin as play money, stemming from their own misunderstandings.

Indeed, most general businesses don't accept it as a 'Unit of Account' yet. No governments globally have allowed Bitcoin to be a 'Medium of Exchange.' And why would they? Who would willingly relinquish financial control and power?

For over a decade, Bitcoin has proven itself as a 'Store of Value'. No other form of currency can preserve and enhance wealth like it. The HODLers have witnessed Bitcoin's value appreciation over time, surpassing fiat's fickle nature.

This phenomenon makes most Bitcoin enthusiasts reluctant to spend their stash. It's understandable and beyond criticism. After all, it's a natural right of an individual. We can't force someone to frivolously spend their saved Bitcoin, can we?

Then came Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja, who jointly developed the Lightning Network in 2015. Bitcoin's world was never the same.

In 2018, the Lightning Network was introduced to the public. Starting with about 4 BTC and 1,000 nodes in March 2018, it has grown to 4,797.48 BTC (+119,837%) and 15,448 nodes (+1,444.8%). No other payment system has witnessed such astounding growth.

Bitcoin enthusiasts, then, face a personal dilemma (especially from my experiences in Thailand). They must choose between hoarding fervently or using a fraction of their Bitcoins. Whichever path they choose, both essentially promote Bitcoin adoption. Both are pushing Bitcoin to become genuine money and gain global acceptance.

A new case study emerges for Bitcoin adoption following the advent of the Lightning Network. Instead of beginning with a laborious and time-consuming study of Bitcoin, this new generation can immediately adopt it through learning and experimenting with Bitcoin Lightning. Once they experience its convenience and instantly recognize its benefits, they willingly dive deeper, venturing down their own rabbit holes.

I have an example to illustrate this. The excitement of numerous people who tried the Lightning Payment at the Bitcoin Thailand Conference 2023 (#BTC2023).

https://youtu.be/-wVuD9QUe5U?si=2e7mfhhkVsbJrPU0

We at Right Shift saw this phenomenon coming from the outset, and have played a pioneering role in pushing Lightning Network Adoption in Thailand consistently throughout 2022-2023. The impact has been overwhelmingly positive.

I can confidently state that its momentum is truly powerful. The only thing that could possibly hinder its growth is governments that don't wish to see it succeed. I believe they will either find a way to regulate it or, more likely, resist it vehemently with their lackluster CBDCs. Ironically, they're only driving more interest towards Bitcoin.

Today, I'd like to extend my gratitude to fiatjaf, the developer behind this human protocol, and Jack Dorsey, the force behind Nostr which you are using right now. Although it lacks any algorithm, I'm naturally addicted to it. I feel like a kid who has just received a Playstation5 after waiting for 3 years.

Nostr is the next evolutionary step for humanity, working hand in hand with the stories I've mentioned above to further Bitcoin adoption. In a world currently heading towards severe inflation and mainstream social media acting like power-hungry tyrants, these elements will serve as perfect catalysts to accelerate the inevitable adoption.

I have endured the mainstream media and those overwhelming apps for so long. As soon as I encountered Nostr and its constant developments, I instantly foresaw the victory of the side I chose, which will surely happen in the near future.

My team, Right Shift, and I spent less than an hour discussing the campaign to promote Nostr in Thailand. Believe it or not, after that, hundreds of Thais started exploring Nostr, some of whom had never heard of the Lightning Network before!

They grew tired of the overbearing rules of mainstream social media platforms and quickly embraced Nostr (as evidenced by #ThaiNostrich, #Siamstr, and specific events like #ThailandZapathon, as well as what’s happening on Zap.stream).

Nostr, which has captured their hearts, introduced them to Lightning and Bitcoin. This realization hit me immediately.

I believe it's a brilliant idea to show people the deterioration of this world, starting with the online community and then expanding to the real society under the control of governments that shouldn't exist and play their current roles. Eventually, they will see that Bitcoin and Nostr are solutions to these distortions.

For this reason, Nostr is paving the way for more Bitcoin adoption options through use cases that resonate more with contemporary society.

Bitcoin is no longer a challenging or rocky subject to study. Nostr is one of the easiest and most fun ways to adopt Bitcoin right now.

I'm confident that when hosting the Bitcoin Thailand Conference 2024 (#BTC2024) next year, Nostr will surely be a major highlight.

If you are a developer, expert, or enthusiast on Nostr, let me know if you'd like to be in Bangkok next year.

@ 134743ca:46019ee7

We have reached 1000🎉🎉🎉 We can't believe it but we have arrived here💜

We are very happy and we want to share it with you, we have been working hard to be able to launch all these new features all at once, today, for you:

New design

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_c7971bf984d68e661ad19740b6116d9b788a3e91ed35f90b.mp4

Nostrcheck.me was born as a small project with the aim of offering nostr address to anyone who did not have their own domain. Over time it grew and we have been very focused on making our backend solid and technologically powerful. It was time to give some love to our visible face, we hope you like it!

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_da527cea258f21f20bdaf31dbf27899169331020a4370813.webp

Visit us to see it in action!

Lightning redirection

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_810d951385157e0fefc43ee0b52ed2ebc6571c38279f98b0.webp

One of the most requested features by our users is the lightning redirects. With this new feature we offer more flexibility to our community by giving them the possibility to choose their own lightning address.

You can use your nostr address as your only address for nostr and lightning, you can try this one for example 😉

quentin@nostrcheck.me

Smoother image upload

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_4eff5bd176146728cbaf70498d4e8d33273ab4e8dc32cd9b.mp4

We have adapted our multimedia upload process to our powerful backend, so we process each upload, we remove all metadata and we compress the uploaded files to improve your sharing experience.

New domain name, nostrverse.net

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_6221aefece0a2b67e7ecf8486b272ce6e53ea7a3fa6e20de.webp

The aim of nostrcheck.me is to offer the widest range of possibilities for everyone. Nostrverse.net joins our family as a private domain like its siblings. Only the first 100 members will be able to get it directly, after that it will only be available by invitation from another member.

If you don't want to stay without your nostr address @nostrverse.net sign up here.

Magnets!! 🧲

http://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_5ca2e846754cbf91bace34330d2f7fd48ef8e1b50a0c8ba6.webp

Our spirit is as free as the wind, we don't like you to depend on us for the survival of your multimedia files. Every upload to nostrcheck is automatically shared on the bittorrent network, so if you want, you can download all your files using the magnet link and share them with whoever you want!

Improved public gallery

https://nostrcheck.me/media/quentin/nostrcheck.me_1ef64dcd7cf50ee2a4848fbd76d916a42d2aa08b60a77087.mp4

We have made profound improvements to the public gallery, now everything flows fast and beautifully. Our heart is your nostr address, but we know that multimedia uploads are a very important part of your nostr experience.

We have improved our public gallery so you can use it without being registered, with the same limits as a nostrcheck member. We like freedom, and that's why we offer it all to you.

Our passion is nostr and this is how we celebrate it 💜

We will give out 100,000 sats to all the people who follow us and send us a little thank you message on this note.

555 sats to each message of love and affection that we receive, one per pubkey.

We hope to celebrate 10,000 very soon. Thanks for being there 🤗

@ 9be0be0e:c3cbb81e

Enable the freedom to communicate.

Reach should be the result of how many people want or don’t want to listen to your message, there is no reason for a third party or algorithm to be required in this equation.

You should be in control of what you can or cannot see. Who you block should be up to you.

Ideally Nostur tries to reduce the need to require or trust any third party in order to communicate, unless there is no other way.

BUT

Nostur is built for iPhone, iPad and Mac users. In one way this is a limitation, (e.g., zap restrictions by Apple) but if we are using the Apple ecosystem already, we might as well use it to our advantage.

Nostur's target audience already trusts Apple with their data, their messages, photos, calendar, reminders, security cameras, etc.

We don’t need to store our data on random relays, and hope our contact list doesn’t get lost, or leak metadata to the public. We can store everything on our device, and sync using iCloud, it is reliable, and we already use it for far more important data anyway. Converting Apple users to Android or GrapheneOS is an uphill battle, I applaud people who take that route, but it’s not for Nostur users, we have people saying don't trust the media, don't use twitter, don't use iPhone, if we keep going, we end up sending smoke signals in a circle. As for interoperability, we can still publish or export using nostr native formats so you can use your data in another nostr app.

Nostur will publish to relays, but our data is on our device first, iCloud second, and third-party relays third. And you can still use a personal private relay for yourself if you want.

With this in mind, Nostur tries to let relays just be relays, not personal storage. Using relays for storage might end up centralising nostr, in the same way email, which used to be decentralised, is now mostly hosted by google and microsoft.

If you disagree with this mission or direction, Nostur's source is released under GPL-3.0 license, so feel free to fork and create a different version.

Ultimately, the goal of Nostur is not to get more people to use Nostur, but to get more people to use nostr.

@ 08964cb5:51bf010f

Quite inspired by one of the activities I have enjoyed the most during my studies and activities in Graphic Design, for fifteen years now.

The main focus of this post is, first of all, about badge production.

I have focused on the interesting rubric attached to the noStrudel website, which takes us to the Badged.Page site, allowing us to acquire and share badges among users.

I was inspired by first creating two styles: Vegan and Bitcoiner

The idea with these two topics, is to ensure users remain constant, resistant, that "newies" feel welcome, to make a fun and pleasant world through the motivation of badges, which act as “small certificates.” It is another interesting integration of Nostr protocol…

In the background, after spending several days analyzing the “risk” the following topic could imply, keeping this publication on the level of creativity it deserves, today I have the necessity to mention that my family and I are going through a very difficult and delicate situation, for which I am desperately seeking help. This is why I share more in ›this link‹(1), so you can learn more about me, the designer of these badges, my situation and about the nature of why I am requesting help.

Your help will be a ray of light that will further illuminate some positive side that can help us overcome a rather difficult situation and therefore, a creative and artistic flame that is always focused on the common good. Why this? Because the most direct impact is a Waldorf School.

These are the links for the badges I have created so far. By visiting the one that interests you the most, you can generate your badge, which will be placed on your profile after you accept it:

1 Year Bitcoiner

3 Years Bítcoiner

5 Years Bítcoiner

7 Years Bítcoiner

10 Years Bítcoiner

1 Year Vegan

5 Years Vegan

10 Years Vegan …

Stay tuned for more.

Make Art. Not War… 🙏🏼

One of my previous posts on Nostr:

Art, creativity and derived practices, which are frequently poorly paid, is an effort that is still present. Sharing it here is a goal for me. In addition to this, I consider the terminology related to these images is quite positive. Later I will share badges corresponding to more years 🟣 Stay tuned. I have another badges variant for another positive movement, which should concern all of us who wish good for Planet Earth, which I plan to share here soon (WIP).

You can see it here.

---

(1) https://geyser.fund/project/collaborationsupport

@ d5d25ac9:65ea8ded

📝 Summary: [TEST-J] An extension to BOLT-11 is proposed for invoices to contain two bundled payments for non-custodial exchanges. Boltz is distributing a submarine swap client separate from the user's lightning wallet, enabling competition and increasing potential user base. However, dedicated logic is required for a trust-minimized swap. 👥 Authors: • Olaoluwa Osuntokun ( nostr:npub1p032kpesmmlcwqcexuglqwxug3flxa2ayuhdd8utpw896k7x99gs37dh8h ) • Thomas Voegtlin ( nostr:npub1ghyhf8fhfkysttrhqkq3cjr4c4jaf70ug8chcczh88lpptx26ggs785w2q ) 📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-06-13 to 2023-06-15 ✉️ Message Count: 3 📚 Total Characters in Messages: 17494

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

中文版：YakiHonne在Nostrasia演讲全文｜改善 Nostr 协议的长内容用户体验

Hello everyone, good morning. I am Shaun, from YakiHonne. First and foremost, I am honored to have this opportunity to participate in the Nostrasia conference as a speaker, and I am particularly grateful for the special support provided by @Alex McShane.

Before we officially begin, I'd like to talk about the origin of the name YakiHonne. When we first established this brand, we never thought that so many people would be interested in the meaning behind our brand name. As we have developed, I've received a lot of positive feedback from users about the name, but also some "negative" feedback, and even some well-known figures in the industry have directly messaged me, asking me quite directly, "What kind of silly name is YakiHonne?" (laughter from the audience). So, on this occasion today, which I believe is the most appropriate, I'd like to start by sharing the story behind the name "YakiHonne." When I was very young, there was a famous anime called "Doraemon," featuring a blue, futuristic cat from the future as the main character. He had a magical pocket with an endless supply of gadgets, each with its own superpower. In one episode of the anime, he pulled out a box from his pocket, and anyone who opened the box could only speak the truth and couldn't tell lies. Yes, it was a truth-telling box, and the name of this box was "JUST HONNE" where "Honne" means "truth." YakiHonne, as a decentralized media platform, has always been dedicated to exploring how to decentralize media. On the path of decentralized media development, we firmly believe in two principles that decentralized media must adhere to Principle 1, we refuse to manufacture our own truths. I don't want to delve into politics at length, but we all know that the world today has become very chaotic, and in part, centralized media bears an undeniable responsibility for creating and spreading their version of the truth, making it difficult for the public to understand the essence of events and leaving them bewildered. This is not what decentralized media should do. Principle 2, we cannot arbitrate the truth. For example, Alice posts content, saying it's the truth of the matter, while Bob posts the other side of the story, also claiming it's the truth of the matter. As a media platform, our only role is to provide a completely decentralized platform for anyone and everyone who wants to speak the truth, freely express themselves, and create without interference.

This is the origin of "Honne" in YakiHonne, and "Yaki" is derived from a traditional Japanese delicacy, dorayaki, which is a type of red bean pancake and also happens to be Doraemon's favorite food. Doraemon inspired us in a way because we believe he is not just a simple cartoon character; he is actually a creator, an inventor, an architect. He represents the pure, simple, and sincere pursuit of truth.

So, I say today is the most suitable occasion to share our brand culture because it actually comes from Japan and is influenced by Japanese culture. It's not "silly" at all. (laughter from the audience)

YakiHonne is a decentralized media infrastructure, and we support organizations and individuals worldwide to create, curate, review, publish, and report freely and automatically. We support a variety of publishing formats, including news, blogs, long-form articles, streaming, journals, and more. YakiHonne has developed a mature web client at www.yakihonne.com, which features several unique characteristics:

Built on Nostr technology, it achieves true decentralization and censorship resistance. Creators have the freedom to write, edit, and publish, with data ownership belonging to the individual creator. A beautiful and smooth UI/UX user experience, which has received consistent praise within the Nostr ecosystem. Exclusive curation functionality. Exclusive lightweight social features, such as comments, voting, disliking, and favoriting. Lightning Network-based payment/tipping through the Zap function, enabling true P2P value transfer between users and creators. Fast loading speeds and stable relay network nodes.

This client is the first step in building the decentralized media protocol for YakiHonne, and the entire industry is exploring decentralized content media at this stage. Now, YakiHonne is entering the second phase, building a sustainable and trustworthy decentralized media. We will release it soon.

Additionally, I am proud to announce that our mobile app's beta version is now officially available. The mobile app not only inherits many of the features from the web version but also includes upgraded user interactions tailored to mobile users. Personally, having worked in the big tech industry for 18 years, I've encountered various mobile clients, and I can confidently say that our mobile app will provide you with a stunning experience. You can participate in the beta by scanning the QR codes provided, which are available for both iOS and Android systems. In the seven months of YakiHonne's development, we have grown from scratch, and we are still rapidly expanding. While there are areas where we have room for improvement, there are some noteworthy achievements that I'd like to share. As of now, our users come from 116 different countries worldwide, covering all corners of the globe. We have over 18 different languages used by creators on the platform, and collectively, they have published over 12,000 pieces of content in various formats, including text, podcasts, videos, and more. The platform currently receives over 100,000 monthly views. While 100,000 views may not seem like a remarkable number, it's important to note that back in April, during the early days of our brand, when we organized the first Nostr meetup in Hong Kong, our data was at zero. We have a long way to go, but we are making rapid progress. So, the key question arises: since today is the Nostr-themed conference, what contributions has YakiHonne made to the Nostr ecosystem that are worth sharing?

Firstly, on the product front, we've delivered a high-quality, stable client. Not only do we have the web version at yakihonne.com, but we've also rolled out a brand-new mobile version, a pioneering move in the entire Nostr long-form content media. We strive to maintain reliable relays, ensuring data persistence through our stable relay, and I want to express my gratitude to Damus and Nostream for their open-source technical support in building the relay. However, building a continuously stable relay network requires more effort. We are exploring solutions and attempting to reach consensus within the ecosystem. Secondly, through YakiHonne's Lightning Network system, we've sent 7 million Sats to creators worldwide, engaging in valuable interactions. Nearly 1000 creators have joined the ranks of value incentives due to YakiHonne's promotion of the Lightning Network. Our unique curation feature has curated over 110 professionally selected collections for the Nostr ecosystem. Hundreds and thousands of users utilize YakiHonne's decentralized commenting feature to share their perspectives and thoughts on Nostr on the platform. Additionally, we actively engage with numerous renowned universities to introduce more people to Nostr and the Lightning Network.

In addition to building a truly decentralized media platform, we are also doing some cool things, like hosting the global Hackathon focused on the Nostr ecosystem—Hack Nostr On. As of today, we have held three rounds, with over 80 high-quality Nostr projects signing up. We've awarded more than 10 outstanding project prizes, totaling 24.5 million Sats in funding for these top-notch projects. Many of the projects from our hackathons have grown to become representative projects within the Nostr ecosystem. At the same time, we have the best lineup of judges, all highly recognized figures in the Nostr ecosystem, including Nostr's creator @fiatjaf, our Dev superstar @pabolf, @G, and @John from Bitcoin Magazine.

In addition to hosting global hackathons, YakiHonne has organized Nostr Mmeetups in at least eight countries this year, focusing on the Nostr ecosystem. We started the first stop in Hong Kong in April, and in fact, we were among the earliest to promote Nostr and YakiHonne in the entire Asian market, especially in the Chinese market. The event in Hong Kong was a tremendous success, with many people participating in the HK Carnival, even though almost no one knew what Nostr was. However, people attended our speeches with curiosity, and the effect was excellent. It was from that event that I began to get to know some Nostr developers in Hong Kong.

Following that, in May, during the prestigious Miami Bitcoin Conference, we hosted what was praised as the "most valuable Nostr meetup at the Miami Bitcoin Conference." It was an unforgettable and wonderful experience, with many globally renowned Nostr personalities participating. At the same time, we remotely connected with the top ten projects selected by Hack Nostr On, sharing insights into Nostr's development. We chatted, drank, and laughed for over 6 hours, creating a truly memorable memory. Over the past few days at the conference, I've met many old friends, all of whom I first connected with during that time.

Continuing, we organized a creative offline hackathon for creators and developers in Berlin, and in Beijing, we held an event focused on decentralized science. In Malaysia and Spain, we've also held various Nostr Meetups. Particularly noteworthy is YakiHonne being the only organization to host a Nostr Mmeetup on Nostr/Bitcoin-related topics during the Singapore 2049 conference in August. During the seven-day conference, with over 300 side events, all related to Web3, we not only stayed true to our commitment to the Nostr domain but also exclusively invited @fiatjaf and @Pabolf to connect with Nostr enthusiasts in Singapore via Zoom. They shared insights into Nostr's development history and future direction, marking a first in the entire Asian community and the first official presentation of Nostr to the Asian market for the two guests. Therefore, we consistently emphasize that YakiHonne's promotion of Nostr in the Asian market is sincere. As a content platform, our primary focus is on how to help contribute more high-quality content to the Nostr ecosystem. To date, we have published over 3,128 pieces of content dedicated to discussing Nostr. These include beginner tutorials, in-depth development guides, and much more. We have curated these high-quality pieces into over 30 curated collections, some curated by YakiHonne and others curated by creators on the platform. In addition to textual content, we have hosted more than 20 online workshops of various scales, targeting Nostr developers, creators, and startups. Leveraging YakiHonne's exclusive podcast channel, "HonneBox Show," we have successfully conducted interactive interviews with over 12 creators who have made significant contributions to the Nostr ecosystem. However, perhaps the most noteworthy accomplishment is how we use YakiHonne's global media presence to promote outstanding content from Nostr creators. We do this daily, without interruption. To date, we have helped promote over 200 pieces of high-quality content across various formats from 110 outstanding creators within the ecosystem. I believe this has a direct, positive, and effective impact on creators within the ecosystem. So, I'd like to say that due to these efforts, we have received a lot of positive feedback from users. This includes some well-known figures, many of whom are YakiHonne users. For instance, @JB55, the founder of Damus, has praised Nostr, and @fiatjaf's famous line at the Singapore conference, "I love YakiHonne." An interesting tidbit is that @Jack Dorsey sent a message, saying, "Damn, YakiHonne wiped my following list clean" (though he later found out it was due to a system glitch in another client ). I met him during this conference and showed him a screenshot while telling him I'd be quoting this during my speech. He first burst out laughing, and then he apologized, saying he had made a mistake. It's amazing how nice a person he is. In addition to the many positive reviews, there are some individuals we would like to express our gratitude to. First and foremost, we'd like to thank Mr. @fiatjaf, the creator of Nostr, for recently granting us funding on behalf of the Nostr community. We recently received funding from him on behalf of the Nostr community, acknowledging and encouraging YakiHonne's dedicated focus on building the Nostr ecosystem. This funding will be utilized for the development of the Nostr ecosystem. Additionally, we appreciate @Pablof for his selfless technical support. His valuable experience has been instrumental in our progress. We'd also like to extend our thanks to @Arkin0x, @G, and @John for their unwavering support of YakiHonne. Special thanks to my personal friend @Derek Moss for silently keeping an eye on us and offering support when it mattered most. Of course, this list of gratitude is long, and there are many more people to thank. Thank you all, we love you. Finally, I want to say that whether it's the development of Nostr or YakiHonne, we're in the very early stages. Inspired by the Japanese samurai spirit of SHU-HA-RI, we think about how we can learn and innovate regarding Nostr. We've gone through an exploration phase, including how we, as outsiders, entered the ecosystem to research and learn the protocol's essence and seek ways to make it better. In the process of exploration, our capacity for learning has expanded. In addition to seeking ways to make existing clients stronger and more stable in practice, we've taken a series of necessary measures to expand the development of the entire protocol to areas we had never used before, maximizing the potential of the protocol itself. In the end, it evolved into allowing developers to customize their clients freely because they have a better understanding of the essence of the Nostr protocol. Gradually, they integrated their research findings into their own clients. This is how the entire Nostr protocol becomes richer, more diverse, more extendable, and with greater development potential. Nostr is still in its infancy, which not only signifies a long road ahead but also emphasizes the need for constant care, 24/7. The journey of growth will undoubtedly be fraught with unforeseen challenges and numerous unknown difficulties. However, we remain steadfast in our commitment to our goal. We have never expected to merely "Make Nostr Better" because YakiHonne is also relatively small with limited resources. Yet, we firmly believe that by continually improving ourselves, by making YakiHonne better, we can contribute to the growth of the entire Nostr ecosystem.

Once again, I want to express my gratitude to all of you. I am Shaun, from YakiHonne. Thank you.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ d6dc9554:d0593a0c

Bitcoin nodes

The Bitcoin network, which is often confused with blockchain (database), is guaranteed and maintained by nodes. The idea of each person having an "internet" server at home is old, but it only became profitable with the advent of Bitcoin. The concept of decentralization is also old and is fully linked to this network format consisting of nodes.

Nodes are computers, or groups of computers, that are interconnected and that validate, store, process, and transmit information. This information is only related to Bitcoin transactions. New bitcoins minted (maximum of 21M), with each block added to the blockchain, go to the first node that discovers a mathematical puzzle (mining). The puzzle result must be accepted by more than half of the network's processing power before the block is added to the blockchain. This process is known as consensus.

https://mempool.space/graphs/mining/pools

When we install a full node on our computer, we are installing software (Bitcoin Core) and a copy of the blockchain. In this case, no reward is received. It is up to those who are interested to maintain the integrity and security of a complete copy of the blockchain.

https://bitnodes.io/nodes/live-map/

It is already clear that there are several types of Bitcoin nodes. The third major group are light nodes, better known as app wallets. These are nodes that store a smaller version of the blockchain obtained through full nodes.

There are still other types of nodes worth mentioning. Lightning nodes, a parallel network to Bitcoin, allows for instant Bitcoin transactions.

Generally, these are satoshis (1 sat = 0.00000001 BTC | 1 BTC = 100 000 000 sats) ...

Nodes with full blockchain storage.

Nodes with incomplete storage, store only the most recent transactions with a blockchain size limitation.

And finally, there are mining pool nodes. This type of node is the most used by nano miners who can join other miners through this means and thus increase the probability of receiving the reward. Rewards are paid proportionally to processing power.

---

⚡⚡Versão portuguesa 🇵🇹 🇧🇷 🇦🇴 🇲🇿 🇨🇻 🇬🇼 🇬🇶 🇸🇹 🇹🇱 yakihonne.com -(cliente nostr)-

@ c5fb6ecc:e58c38bb

https://ln.tips is a great wallet. It's an extremely easy to use, custodial Lightning wallet for the masses. Each telegram account has it's own @ln.tips LN Address, but sometimes you want to use your own domain.

In this guide I will teach you how to setup LN Address redirection with your own domain using Cloudflare's Redirection Rules.

---

Prerequisites

• A Web Domain that's has Cloudflare setup on it.
• https://ln.tips setup and ready to go.
  • Using ln.tips is optional. This guide will work with any other custodial wallet that provides you with an LN Address will work too.

Setup

Getting your destructured LN Address

ln.tips

Since ln.tips provides two LN addresses to everybody, you have two options. 1. Use your Telegram username LN address (Not Recommended) 1. This isn't recommended because anyone can see your Telegram username with this method and use it to message you. It's the best choice for anonymity from other users. 2. ex: nym@ln.tips 2. Use your anonymous LN address (Recommended) 1. This is recommended because the address is random, nobody can look this up back to your Telegram account. 2. Can be obtained by running /advanced to the bot, and finding it under "Anonymous Lightning address" 3. ex: 0x84e6b3ea699ab309@ln.tips

What option you pick doesn't matter to your next step, you're going to want to take the username portion of the address (everything before the @, like an email address) add https://ln.tips/.well-known/lnurlp/<username> username goes at the end.

The final url should look something like https://ln.tips/.well-known/lnurlp/0x84e6b3ea699ab309 (depending on the method you chose)

Other platforms

Custodial Wallets that provide you with a Lightning address work similarly to this. Apps like Wallet of Satoshi provide you with a completely random address when you sign up, so a Wallet of Satoshi destructured address would look like: https://walletofsatoshi.com/.well-known/lnurlp/LawyerCicanery69

Setting up Cloudflare Redirects

Assuming that you have Cloudflare hooked up and ready to go, you're going to want to follow a few steps. 1. Open your site on the panel 2. On the sidebar, click the dropdown arrow next to Rules 3. Click "Redirect Rules" 4. Press the button that says "Create Rule" 5. Configure your new rule 1. Give it a name. ex: "lnaddr" 2. Configure the first condition 1. Set "Field" to URI Path 2. Set "Operator" to starts with 3. Set "Value" to /.well-known/lnurlp/ 3. Configure the "then" 1. Set "Type" to Static 2. Set "URL" to your destructured Lightning address from earlier 3. Set "Status Code" to 307 4. Check "Preserve query string" 6. Click Save

All done! Now whenever someone goes to pay your new Lightning address, it should automatically redirect to your custodial wallet. Have fun!

@ cce0989b:b497e608

Old Happy: "The achievement will make me happy."
New Happy: "The journey will make happy."

When you're working towards a meaningful goal, it's easy to get starry-eyed and think to yourself, "Once I achieve this goal, I will be happy forever."

Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. There's no achievement that can possibly create lasting happiness. But there is a way of working towards that achievement that will, which I call 'The Three C's'.

When you pursue your goals with clarity, compassion and celebration, you experience joy along the way.

Clarity:

• When you know what matters most to you, you are able to tap into your intrinsic motivation — the force that allows you to show up, day in and out.

• Ask yourself, "What would I do with my time if I had no responsibilities or obligations?"

Compassion:

• When you respond with compassion to your mistakes and setbacks, they don't scare you. Instead, they become opportunities for you to grow.

• Ask yourself, "What would it look like to be kind to myself in this moment?"

Celebration:

• When you enjoy your progress and celebrate your wins (no matter how small they might seem to you!) you create daily experiences of joy — as well as feeding that intrinsic motivation to keep going!

• Ask yourself, "What am I proud of myself for today?"

All together, The Three C's will lead to those big changes that you're hoping for. But when you 'get there,' you won't be waiting for happiness to alight upon you — you'll be happy already, and looking ahead towards the next journey that you want to go on.

@ 7b1e8a5e:01b075ed

Lorem ipsum[^1] dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque vel lacinia neque. Praesent nulla quam, ullamcorper in sollicitudin ac, molestie sed justo. Cras aliquam, sapien id consectetur accumsan, augue magna faucibus ex, ut ultricies turpis tortor vel ante. In at rutrum tellus.

Sample heading 1

Sample heading 2

Sample heading 3

Sample heading 4

Sample heading 5

Sample heading 6

Mauris viverra dictum ultricies. Vestibulum quis ipsum euismod, facilisis metus sed, varius ipsum. Donec scelerisque lacus libero, eu dignissim sem venenatis at. Etiam id nisl ut lorem gravida euismod.

Lists

Unordered:

• Fusce non velit cursus ligula mattis convallis vel at metus[^2].
• Sed pharetra tellus massa, non elementum eros vulputate non.
• Suspendisse potenti.

Ordered:

1. Quisque arcu felis, laoreet vel accumsan sit amet, fermentum at nunc.
2. Sed massa quam, auctor in eros quis, porttitor tincidunt orci.
3. Nulla convallis id sapien ornare viverra.
4. Nam a est eget ligula pellentesque posuere.

Blockquote

The following is a blockquote:

Suspendisse tempus dolor nec risus sodales posuere. Proin dui dui, mollis a consectetur molestie, lobortis vitae tellus.

Thematic breaks (

---

)

Mauris viverra dictum ultricies[^3]. Vestibulum quis ipsum euismod, facilisis metus sed, varius ipsum. Donec scelerisque lacus libero, eu dignissim sem venenatis at. Etiam id nisl ut lorem gravida euismod. You can put some text inside the horizontal rule like so.

---

Mauris viverra dictum ultricies. Vestibulum quis ipsum euismod, facilisis metus sed, varius ipsum. Donec scelerisque lacus libero, eu dignissim sem venenatis at. Etiam id nisl ut lorem gravida euismod. Or you can just have an clean horizontal rule.

---

Mauris viverra dictum ultricies. Vestibulum quis ipsum euismod, facilisis metus sed, varius ipsum. Donec scelerisque lacus libero, eu dignissim sem venenatis at. Etiam id nisl ut lorem gravida euismod. Or you can just have an clean horizontal rule.

Code

Now some code:

const ultimateTruth = 'this theme is the best!'; console.log(ultimateTruth);

And here is some inline code!

Tables

Now a table:

| Tables | Are | Cool | | ------------- |:-------------:| -----:| | col 3 is | right-aligned | $1600 | | col 2 is | centered | $12 | | zebra stripes | are neat | $1 |

Images

@ 52b4a076:e7fad8bd

What is NIP-05 really?

If you look at the spec, it's a way to map Nostr public keys to DNS-based internet identifiers, such as name@example.com.

If you look at Nostr Plebs:

It's a human readable identifier for your public key. It makes finding your profile on Nostr easier. It makes identifying your account easier.

If you look at basically any client, you see a checkmark, which you assume means verification.

If you ask someone, they probably will call it verification.

How did we get here?

Initially, there was only one client, which was (kind of) the reference implementation: Branle.

When it added support for NIP-05 identifiers, it used to replace the display name with the NIP-05 identifier, and it had to distinguish a NIP-05 from someone setting their display name to a NIP-05. So they added a checkmark...

Then there was astral.ninja and Damus: The former was a fork of Branle, and therefore inherited the checkmark. Damus didn't implement NIP-05 until a while later, and they added a checkmark because Astral and other clients were doing it.

And then came new clients, all copying what the previous ones did... (Snort originally did not have a checkmark, but that changed later.)

The first NIP-05 provider

Long story short, people were wondering what NIP-05 is and wanted it, and that's how Nostr Plebs came to be.

They initially called their service verification. Somewhere between January and February, they removed all mentions to verification except one (because people were searching for it), and publicly said that NIP-05 is not verification. But that didn't work.

Then, there were the new NIP-05 providers, some understood perfectly what a NIP-05 identifier is and applied the correct nomenclature. Others misnamed it as verification, adding confusion to users. This made the problem worse on top of the popular clients showing checkmarks.

(from this point in the article we'll refer to it as a Nostr address)

And so, the scams begin

Spammers and scammers started to abuse Nostr addresses to scam people: - Some providers has been used by fake crypto airdrop bots. - A few Nostr address providers have terminated multitude of impersonating and scam identifiers over the past weeks.

This goes to show that Nostr addresses don't verify anything, they are just providers of human readable handles.

Nostr addresses can be proof of association

Nostr addresses can be a proof of association. The easiest analogy to understand is email:

jack@cash.app -> You could assume this is the Jack that works at Cash App.

jack@nostr-address-provider.example.com -> This could be any Jack.

What now?

We urge that clients stop showing a checkmark for all Nostr addresses, as they are not useful for verification.

We also urge that clients hide checkmarks for all domain names, without exception in the same way we do not show checkmarks for emails.

Lastly, NIP-05 is a nostr address and that is why we urge all clients to use the proper nomenclature.

Signed:

• Semisol, Nostr Plebs (semisol@nostrplebs.com)
• Quentin, nostrcheck.me (quentin@nostrcheck.me)
• Derek Ross, Nostr Plebs (derekross@nostrplebs.com)
• Bitcoin Nostrich, Bitcoin Nostr (BitcoinNostrich@BitcoinNostr.com)
• Remina, zaps.lol (remina@zaps.lol)
• Harry Hodler, nostr-check.com (harryhodler@nostr-check.com)

@ e6817453:b0ac3c39

TL;DR:

• Verifiable Credentials (VCs) aren’t just functionally similar to shipping containers, they are economically similar as well, and will bring an explosion in global digital trade like shipping containers brought for global physical trade. The right container at the right time can change the world, dramatically.
• Shipping containers caused a precipitous drop in shipping costs (over 95%) by bridging the physical contexts between ships, trains, and trucks; VCs can deliver a similar cost reduction in the digital realm, by bridging the contexts between organizations.
• The transitive trust enabled by VCs enables cooperative network effects, which are even bigger than regular network effects.

If VCs Are Economically Similar to Shipping Containers, It’s a Big Deal

The comparison of VCs to shipping containers is much more than a passing one. This analogy, which I’ve been using in presentations and conversations for the last couple of months, has been a big improvement when teaching the basic concept of VCs from a functional standpoint. It is simple, clear, and everyone seems to quickly understand it, a rare breath of messaging fresh air in a world of confusing SSI lingo.

But more important than messaging clarity, if VCs are economically similar to shipping containers, the ramifications to the digital economy are hard to overstate; everyone in SSI will be in for one heckuva ride.

In fact, I believe this possibility — that Verifiable Credentials are economically similar to shipping containers — could be the most impactful business realization of my lifetime.

The Right Container = Economic Explosion

From a humble beginning in 1956, “containerization” brought an explosion in global trade and became “more of a driver of globalisation than all trade agreements in the past 50 years taken together,” according to The Economist.

But how?

Before 1956, when shipping containers were invented by trucking entrepreneur Malcolm McLean, the world already had containers of many kinds — barrels, bags, boxes and crates — that needed to be painstakingly emptied when a ship arrived at port, and contents moved into other containers on trucks and trains. This manual “break-bulk” process, unchanged for millennia, was slow, complicated, dangerous, and costly.

Instead, Mr. McLean envisioned a container that was sturdy, stackable, secure, and most important: moved intact from a truck onto a train or a ship, and then back again when a ship reached its destination, without being re-packed along the way. It took a few years to really take off, but when shipping containers proved their immense usefulness in the Vietnam war it became clear they were the future, and the ISO then developed the first shipping container standards that the industries of ships, trains, and trucks would begin to adhere to.

The rest, as they say, is history.

The efficiency gains were so dramatic that producers of raw materials and small manufacturers in every corner of the world could now market their products to every other corner of the world, changing global trade forever. “Made in China” wouldn’t be a thing today without “containerization.”

From $5.86 to $.16

There were many other containers in existence prior to 1956; why did this particular container make such a disproportionate difference?

“Trans-contextual value transfer,” is the answer, in economic terms, my colleague Dr. Sam Smith would use, the ability to efficiently move value between the very different contexts of ships, trucks, and trains. By moving the entire container, and not emptying it until it has reached its final destination, the break-bulk process was eliminated entirely, causing a precipitous drop in shipping times and overall transaction costs. Stunningly, the price to unload one ton of goods fell from $5.86 in 1956 to only $.16 today.

Whenever transaction costs are reduced there is an increase in transactions proportional to the reduction¹, and that is exactly what happened.

Bridging contexts in any arena is hard, and expensive, but the gains from discovering how to do it efficiently can be enormous. Standardized shipping containers bridged physical contexts between ships, trains, and trucks and changed the world forever; VCs will do a similar thing for data, lowering transaction costs by efficiently bridging contexts between trust domains.

VCs Do for Data What Shipping Containers Did for Physical Goods

http://www.exlindia.com/train-cargo-3/

Trust domains and how VCs bridge them, mechanically, is the subject of Part 3 of this series, “How VCs Bridge Trust Domains,” and so will not be treated fully here, but a quick summary seems appropriate.

The current process of moving trusted data between unconnected organizations is uncannily similar to the break-bulk shipping process prior to 1956: data must be carefully removed from the data containers of the sending organization and re-packaged into the data containers of the receiving organization. As an example, just ask anyone in the know how academic transcripts in the U.S. are really exchanged between schools today: it is manual, slow, complicated, expensive, and often requires the paid help of 3rd-party intermediaries. Again, this is strikingly similar to break-bulk.

VCs address this chasm how shipping containers did. Data senders (“issuers”) and data receivers (“verifiers”) first agree on a standardized container². Issuers pack VCs with a desired payload and then issue it, either to the wallet of an individual “holder” or into storage in a database or blockchain. When verified, the verifier can rely on the fidelity of the data payload because they can verify the provenance and fidelity of the container it came in, and critically, perform that verification cryptographically without contacting the issuer.

We don’t yet know to what degree VCs will reduce costs. Earlier I cited the more than 95% drop in costs shipping containers delivered; that level of efficiency wasn’t fully realized until most ships, trains, and trucks had made modifications to adhere to the standards and were in full production. The same thing will happen with VCs. While it will take some time, with the complete elimination of “break-bulk”-style data exchange, and of the then-obsolete data middlemen and their associated time, cost, and manual processes, the cost reduction will be massive.

When comparing VCs and shipping containers, you discover the nature of the problem they address is similar, the way they address it is similar, and the size of the markets — global physical trade and global e-commerce — is arguably similar. It follows that the reduction in transactions costs, proportional increase in transactions, and overall economic impact would be similar, too.

VCs Unlock Global Network Effects

Another, related dimension of the economic impact VCs will have on the digital economy, and one that’s more familiar than shipping containers but potentially just as impactful, is network effects.

VCs enable a powerful kind of network effect, a cooperative network-of-networks effect. Deeper research into how SSI and VCs enable cooperative network effects has been done by Dr. Samuel Smith, my partner at Digital Trust Ventures, in his seminal paper, Meta-Platforms and Cooperative Network-of-Networks Effects, so I will only summarize Sam’s findings here.

When networks “cooperate,” some value from one network is transferable to another. Cooperative network effects are inter-network and exponentially greater than intra-network effects, like comparing the internet to AOL. To understand cooperative network effects it’s helpful to first understand its cousin: competitive network effects³.

The ride sharing industry offers an excellent example of competitive network effects. When Uber acquires a new driver, that driver becomes more likely to also drive for Lyft, Uber’s direct competitor. Though Uber and Lyft may wish it were not so, every driver and rider gained by one network is just clicks away from being gained by the other, which is unfortunate for whoever spent large sums to first gain them. This effect accelerates competition, adds price pressure, and sows the seeds of mass defection if it ever becomes advisable. Of course there is a selfishly beneficial tradeoff too, when your network gains from another’s expansion.

In contrast, cooperative network-of-network effects occur when growth in one network benefits other, non-competitive networks. Literally, customers gained in one network or industry are accretive to other, non-competitive and even completely unrelated networks or industries.

For example, several credit unions (CUs) in the U.S. are now issuing VCs to members to enable a secure, streamlined experience when they call in, walk in, or log in; they call it MemberPass. While the first use cases are limited to within the issuing CU, any entity in any industry could also choose to accept MemberPass and offer a sleek onboarding and login experience that eliminates forms and passwords for anyone presenting one. What website wouldn’t prefer instant onboarding and authentication of new customers presenting cryptographically verifiable credentials issued by regulated U.S. financial institutions, instead of the friction of forms, usernames, and breachable passwords they’re forced to offer today?

Every new MemberPass issued becomes a new, easily onboardable prospective customer for any entity anywhere that accepts VCs, online or off. And value flows both ways, as CUs benefit from increased satisfaction whenever members successfully use MemberPass, from increased value provided to members and the loyalty that engenders, and from increased demand for MemberPass from both existing and prospective CU members.

These are cooperative network effects indeed, as they foster cross-industry collaboration. The only obstacle is awareness.

This kind of cooperation between unrelated networks, both intentional and unintentional, has rarely been observed or achievable, but with VCs becomes predictable. The resulting ‘meta’ network effects — Smith’s Law — are exponential compared to intra-network effects, and also beyond Metcalfe’s Law. If you’re a student of the science of network effects, be sure to check out Sam’s paper. You’re in for a treat; the math for this is incredible.

In Conclusion

Shipping containers were a once-in-a-lifetime improvement in global trade, forever bridging the physical barriers between ships, trains, and trucks. VCs are the shipping containers of the digital realm, bridging trust domain barriers between organizations, departments, and even internal silos.

Shipping containers brought an unprecedented multi-decade, multi-trillion-dollar global economic expansion by dramatically reducing transaction costs for physical goods; VCs will do the same for digital goods, and economically change the world to a similar magnitude.

If that were VCs only economic value, it would be more than enough. VCs also enable cooperative network-of-network effects, where issuances in one industry can benefit other, non-competitive industries, potentially many of them.

Excited yet? It’s time.

¹ M. C. Munger, “Tomorrow 3.0: Transaction costs and the sharing economy,” Cambridge University Press, 2018.
² This underscores the importance of the work those involved in VC standards have been working on globally for years, and the exciting progress that has been and continues to be made at W3C and the Trust Over IP Foundation.
³ Network effects between competitive networks are technically also considered cooperative, but for the purpose of explanation I’m treating them here as separate and distinct.

Original : https://rufftimo.medium.com/like-shipping-containers-verifiable-credentials-will-economically-transform-the-world-fece2b9da14a

@ c9dccd5f:dce00d9a

I am an aspiring physicist, interested in atomic, particle and gravitational physics. In 2021 I became interested in Bitcoin and have been fascinated by it and its impact on the world ever since. Like probably most of you, in December 2022 Nostr happened to me, which kept me hooked throughout.

I always wanted to write something, like a blog, but I never knew what to write about and where to publish it. I never got used to sites like Substack, but now with Nostr I know where to publish. What remains is the question: What should I write about?

My plan is to document what I learn and to help me learn. So it's not a typical blog, which is why I put blog in quotes in the first paragraph. Most likely the topics will be physics, Bitcoin and Nostr related. But anything is possible.

I will not have a publishing schedule, at least at the beginning. I will post as things come to me.

The posts are mainly for me to learn, so I'm planning to write my posts in the style of the Feynman technique and you are my audience. You probably already know what it is, but if not, my next post will explain it to you 😜

My hope is that you will find my posts useful and that we can have a learning experience together. I look forward to your comments. Surely it will happen that I get something wrong and I hope you will correct me.

PV 🤙

@ 6e468422:15deee93

Not too long ago, I tried to paint a picture of what a vision for a value-enabled web could look like. Now, only a couple of months later, all this stuff is being built. On nostr, and on lightning. Orange and purple, a match made in heaven.

It goes without saying that I'm beyond delighted. What a time to be alive!

nostr

Here's the thing that nostr got right, and it's the same thing that Bitcoin got right: information is easy to spread and hard to stifle.[^fn-stifle] Information can be copied quickly and perfectly, which is, I believe, the underlying reason for its desire to be free.

[^fn-stifle]: That's a Satoshi quote, of course: "Bitcoin's solution is to use a peer-to-peer network to check for double-spending. In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle."

Easy to spread, hard to stifle. That's the base reality of the nature of information. As always, the smart thing is to work with nature, not against it.[^1] That's what's beautiful about the orange coin and the purple ostrich: both manage to work with the peculiarities of information, not against them. Both realize that information can and should be copied, as it can be perfectly read and easily spread, always. Both understand that resistance to censorship comes from writing to many places, making the cost of deletion prohibitive.

Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

Eric Hughes, A Cypherpunk's Manifesto

Nostr is quickly establishing itself as a base layer for information exchange, one that is identity-native and value-enabled. It is distinctly different from systems that came before it, just like Bitcoin is distinctly different from monies that came before it.

As of today, the focus of nostr is mostly on short text notes, the so-called "type 1" events more commonly known as tweets.[^fn-kinds] However, as you should be aware by now, nostr is way more than just an alternative to twitter. It is a new paradigm. Change the note kind from 1 to 30023 and you don't have an alternative to Twitter, but a replacement for Medium, Substack, and all the other long-form platforms. I believe that special-purpose clients that focus on certain content types will emerge over time, just like we have seen the emergence of special-purpose platforms in the Web 2.0 era. This time, however, the network effects are cumulative, not separate. A new paradigm.

Let me now turn to one such special-purpose client, a nostr-based reading app.

[^fn-kinds]: Refer to the various NIPs to discover the multitude of event kinds defined by the protocol.

Reading

I'm constantly surprised that, even though most people do read a lot online, very few people seem to have a reading workflow or reading tools.

Why that is is anyone's guess, but maybe the added value of such tools is not readily apparent. You can just read the stuff right there, on the ad-ridden, dead-ugly site, right? Why should you sign up for another site, use another app, or bind yourself to another closed platform?

That's a fair point, but the success of Medium and Substack shows that there is an appetite for clean reading and writing, as well as providing avenues for authors to get paid for their writing (and a willingness of readers to support said authors, just because).

The problem is, of course, that all of these platforms are platforms, which is to say, walled gardens that imprison readers and writers alike. Worse than that: they are fiat platforms, which means that permissionless value-flows are not only absent from their DNA, they are outright impossible.[^2]

Nostr fixes this.

The beauty of nostr is that it is not a platform. It's a protocol, which means that you don't have to sign up for it---you can create an identity yourself. You don't have to ask for permission; you just do, without having to rely on the benevolence of whatever dictator is in charge of the platform right now.

Nostr is not a platform, and yet, powerful tools and services can be built and monetized on top of it. This is good for users, good for service providers, and good for the network(s) at large. Win-win-win.

So what am I talking about, exactly? How can nostr improve everyone's reading (and writing) experience?

Allow me to paint a (rough) picture of what I have in mind. Nostr already supports private and public bookmarks, so let's start from there.

Imagine a special-purpose client that scans all your bookmarks for long-form content.[^fn-urls] Everything that you marked to be read later is shown in an orderly fashion, which is to say searchable, sortable, filterable, and displayed without distractions. Voilà, you have yourself a reading app. That's, in essence, how Pocket, Readwise, and other reading apps work. But all these apps are walled gardens without much interoperability and without direct monetization.

[^fn-urls]: In the nostr world long-form content is simply markdown as defined in NIP-23, but it could also be a link to an article or PDF, which in turn could get converted into markdown and posted as an event to a special relay.

Bitcoin fixes the direct monetization part.[^fn-v4v] Nostr fixes the interoperability part.

[^fn-v4v]: ...because Bitcoin makes V4V practical. (Paywalls are not the way.)

Alright, we got ourselves a boring reading app. Great. Now, imagine that users are able to highlight passages. These highlights, just like bookmarks now, could be private or public. When shared publicly, something interesting emerges: an overlay on existing content, a lens on the written Web. In other words: swarm highlights.

Imagine a visual overlay of all public highlights, automatically shining a light on what the swarm of readers found most useful, insightful, funny, etc.

Further, imagine the possibility of sharing these highlights as a "type 1" event with one click, automatically tagging the highlighter(s)---as well as the author, of course---so that eventual sat-flows can be split and forwarded automatically.

Voilà, you have a system that allows for value to flow back to those who provide it, be it authors, editors, curators, or readers that willingly slog through the information jungle to share and highlight the best stuff (which is a form of curation, of course).

Zaps make nostr a defacto address book[^fn-pp] of payment information, which is to say lightning addresses, as of now. Thanks to nostr wallet connect (among other developments), sending sats ~~will soon be~~ is already as frictionless as leaving a like.

[^fn-pp]: The Yellow Pages are dead, long live The Purple Pages!

Value-for-value and participatory payment flows are something that traditional reading apps desperately lack, be it Pocket, Instapaper, Readwise, or the simple reading mode that is part of every browser.

A neat side-effect of a more structured way to share passages of text is that it enables semi-structured discussions around said passages---which could be another useful overlay inside special-purpose clients, providing context and further insights.[^5]

Further, imagine the option of seamlessly switching from text-on-screen to text-to-speech, allowing the user to stream sats if desired, as Podcasting 2.0 clients already do.[^3]

Imagine user-built curations of the best articles of the week, bundled neatly for your reading pleasure, incentivized by a small value split that allows the curator to participate in the flow of sats.

You get the idea.

I'm sure that the various implementation details will be hashed out, but as I see it, 90% of the stuff is already there. Maybe we'll need another NIP or two, but I don't see a reason why this can't be built---and, more importantly: I don't see a reason why it wouldn't be sustainable for everyone involved.

Most puzzle pieces are already there, and the rest of them can probably be implemented by custom event types. From the point of view of nostr, most everything is an event: bookmarks are events, highlights are events, marking something as read is an event, and sharing an excerpt or a highlight is an event. Public actions are out in the open, private actions are encrypted, the data is not in a silo, and everyone wins. Especially the users, those who are at the edge of the network and usually lose out on the value generated.

In this case, the reading case, the users are mostly "consumers" of content. What changes from the producing perspective, the perspective of the writer?

Writing

Back to the one thing that nostr got right: information is easy to spread but hard to stifle. In addition to that, digital information can be copied perfectly, which is why it shouldn't matter where stuff is published in the first place.

Allow me to repeat this point in all caps, for emphasis: IT SHOULD NOT MATTER WHERE INFORMATION IS PUBLISHED, and, maybe even more importantly, it shouldn't matter if it is published in a hundred different places at once.[^fn-torrents]

What matters is trust and accuracy, which is to say, digital signatures and reputation. To translate this to nostr speak: because every event is signed by default, as long as you trust the person behind the signature, it doesn't matter from which relay the information is fetched.

This is already true (or mostly true) on the regular web. Whether you read the internet archive version of an article or the version that is published by an online magazine, the version on the author's website, or the version read by some guy that has read more about Bitcoin than anyone else you know[^fn-guy]---it's all the same, essentially. What matters is the information itself.

[^fn-guy]: There is only one such guy, as we all know, and it's this Guy: nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev

Practically speaking, the source of truth in a hypernostrized world is---you guessed it---an event. An event signed by the author, which allows for the information to be wrapped in a tamper-proof manner, which in turn allows the information to spread far and wide---without it being hosted in one place.

The first clients that focus on long-form content already exist, and I expect more clients to pop up over time.[^4] As mentioned before, one could easily imagine prism-like value splits seamlessly integrated into these clients, splitting zaps automatically to compensate writers, editors, proofreaders, and illustrators in a V4V fashion. Further, one could imagine various compute-intensive services built into these special-purpose clients, such as GPT Ghostwriters, or writing aids such as Grammarly and the like. All these services could be seamlessly paid for in sats, without the requirement of any sign-ups or the gathering of any user data. That's the beauty of money proper.

Plagiarism is one issue that needs to be dealt with, of course. Humans are greedy, and some humans are assholes. Neither bitcoin nor nostr fixes this. However, while plagiarism detection is not necessarily trivial, it is also not impossible, especially if most texts are published on nostr first. Nostr-based publishing tools allow for OpenTimestamp attestations thanks to NIP-03, which in turn allows for plagiarism detection based on "first seen" lookups.

That's just one way to deal with the problem, of course. In any case, I'm confident that we'll figure it out.

Value

I believe that in the open ~~attention~~ information economy we find ourselves in, value will mostly derive from effective curation, dissemination, and transmission of information, not the exclusive ownership of it.

Although it is still early days, the statistics around Podcasting 2.0 and nostr zaps clearly show that (a) people are willing to monetarily reward content they care about, and (b) the willingness to send sats increases as friction decreases.

The ingenious thing about boostagrams and zaps is that they are direct and visible, which is to say, public and interactive. They are neither regular transactions nor simple donations---they are something else entirely. An unforgable value signal, a special form of gratitude and appreciation.

Contrast that with a link to Paypal or Patreon: impersonal, slow, indirect, and friction-laden. It's the opposite of a super-charged interaction.

While today's information jungle increasingly presents itself in the form of (short) videos and (long-form) audio, I believe that we will see a renaissance of the written word, especially if we manage to move away from an economy built around attention, towards an economy built upon value and insight.

The orange future now has a purple hue, and I believe that it will be as bright as ever. We just have a lot of building to do.

---

Further Reading

• A Vision for a Value-Enabled Web
• The Freedom of Value
• The Rediscovery of Money
• Lightning Prisms

NIPs and Resources

• Nostr Resources
• value4value.info
• nips.be
• NIP-23: Long-form content
• NIP-57: Event-specific zap markers
• NIP-47: Nostr Wallet Connect
• NIP-03: OpenTimestamps attestations for events

Originally published on dergigi.com

---

[^1]: Paywalls work against this nature, which is why I consider them misguided at best and incredibly retarded at worst.

[^2]: Fiat doesn't work for the value-enabled web, as fiat rails can never be open and permissionless. Digital fiat is never money. It is---and always will be---credit.

[^3]: Whether the recipient is a text-to-speech service provider or a human narrator doesn't even matter too much, sats will flow just the same.

[^4]: BlogStack and Habla being two of them.

[^5]: Use a URI as the discussion base (instead of a highlight), and you got yourself a Disqus in purple feathers!

[^fn-torrents]: That's what torrents got right, and ipfs for that matter.

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

A long-term Nostr Creation Grant, with a 17,500,000 SATs funding pool

🔥The YakiHonne Creation Zap Grant Round 11 is ON!

⏰16th Nov - 30th Nov

Creating for You and Your Fans through Nostr and ZAP.

Nostr is a simple, open and censorship-resistant protocol, the number of users has been growing, and more and more users use zap to tip content. Nostr's growth over the past six months is amazing, which is a great encouragement for all nostrians. This is also a great encouragement for content creators. Earn SATs by posting your creations on nostr, allowing your readers to encourage better content creation while tipping your creations.

To this end, YakiHonne.com officially released the creation grant project, Creating for You and Your Fans through Nostr and ZAP. Join us on YakiHonne.com to share your long-form articles and curate content, experiencing the power of Nostr's censorship-resistance and ZAP features. Earn Sats rewards for publishing on Relay and Yakihonne clients. Don't forget to include your ZAP address and let's build Nostr's long content together!

What You Will Get From Your First 5 Posts in each Round:

1. 21 - 210 SATs, if you post on Nostr.
2. 500 - 1000 SATs, if you post by YakiHonne.com and share with our community: https://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured.
3. 3000 - 5000 SATs, if you post by YakiHonne.com and are recognized by the community as an article with excellent content, a special amount of SATs will be given as an incentive.

Zap Rules:

1. No malicious speech such as discrimination, attack, incitement, etc.
2. No Spam/Scam, no AI-generated article
3. No directly copy & paste from other posts on Nostr
4. Spread positive content like your knowledge/experience/insight/ideas, etc.
5. Community account verification, no fake account or bot.
6. All posts participating in this activity should be tagged with "yakihonne zap round 11" before posting.

How to Get Zap:

1. Join YakiHonne TG group: https://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
2. Share your post in the group
3. Make sure your LN address is in your profile
4. Based on the rules above, we will ZAP your post directly within 2 days

Join our group for more queries: https://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q

@ d6dc9554:d0593a0c

Bitcoin address types

In the latest version of Bitcoin Core, 4 types of addresses are implemented.

P2PKH (pay-to-pubkey-hash - 1...) is the oldest type of address, better known as legacy addresses.

ex: 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

P2SH (pay-to-script-hash - 3...) (P2WSH, pay-to-witness-script-hash, ScriptPubKey to SegWit), script addresses, rules or functionalities can be added. It opens the possibility of wallets with multiple signatures to authorize transactions.

ex: 342ftSRCvFHfCeFFBuz4xwbeqnDw6BGUey

P2WPKH (pay-to-witness-public-key-hash - bc1...), SegWit or Bech32 addresses, this type of address is more resistant to errors, since they are insensitive to case. For the most common transactions, the network fee can be 30 to 40% cheaper because they optimize the block space.

ex: bc1q34aq5drpuwy3wgl9lhup9892qp6svr8ldzyy7c

P2TR (pay-to-taproot - bc1p...), taproot or Bech32m addresses, is the most recent address and few exchanges and wallet apps support it. It brings more security, privacy, flexibility, and scalability. As well as cheaper fees. Taproot also opens the possibility of developing more complex smart contracts.

ex: bc1pxwww0ct9ue7e8td[...]9ys4c9f3340qqxrdu9k

Compatibility with older addresses is ensured, but outdated wallet apps cannot send to newer addresses. As a rule, the best wallet apps can generate older addresses to receive. But not all wallet apps do.

---

⚡⚡Versão portuguesa 🇵🇹 🇧🇷 🇦🇴 🇲🇿 🇨🇻 🇬🇼 🇬🇶 🇸🇹 🇹🇱 yakihonne.com -(cliente nostr)-

@ 5f851e17:61c2da47

While a lot of you will no doubt know what a Lightning Node is (and likely even own one) we're sure a lot don't. So we thought we'd drop this small starter piece for everyone to enjoy 🙂

Note: This is focused on Lightning Nodes, we have other pieces on the Lightning Network as well as whether or not running a Lightning Node is Profitable and also How To Build A Sexy Looking Full Node (both Bitcoin and Lightning) that will last for years all for just $300.

What Is A Lightning Node?

A Lightning Node (also sometimes called a Lightning Network Node or a LN Node) is just a computer that runs special software that allows it to connect to the Lightning Network. It can send and receive Lightning payments as well as route other peoples through it.

For example, you could use one linked to your Lightning Wallet to purchase a coffee if the store accepted Lightning as a payment method.

Why Run A Lightning Node?

To Pay For Personal Goods & Services: You can send and receive lightning transactions using your own funds from your own private device. While you can do this using other nodes that are custodial, it’s always better to use your own hardware and self-custody bitcoin.

To Increase Your Security & Privacy: As noted in our Advanced Bitcoin Security and Advanced Bitcoin Privacy guides, running your own full node gives you the best level of security and privacy. It’s your node, running the code you choose and no one can take that away from you, spy on you or feed you false information. This is the same when interacting with the Lightning network as it allows every transaction to be fully under your control with maximum privacy.

To Accept Customer Lighting Payments As A Business: You can accept both Bitcoin and Lightning payments from anyone, anywhere in the world at any time, instantly with full final settlement. You can receive payments for a business you run, accept donations like we do or do anything else that involves sending or receiving payments. You’re your own bank and payments processor now!

To Be An “Uncle Jim” Bank For Friends & Family: Using LNDHub you can setup your friends and family with their own Lighting Wallets that connects directly to your node. This gives them the best privacy and security without them having to run their own nodes and allows you to become a bank with “customers” that send and receive transactions through your bank.

To Route Other Payments & Earn Passive Income: For more robust and powerful nodes with reliable and fast internet connections you can configure it to route other lightning nodes payments and charge fees for this service. Lightning Node Profitability isn’t trivial though and our recommendation is that you should think hard about whether you’re willing to put in the many months of learning and experimentation required to (hopefully) turn a profit one day.

To Test, Learn Or Develop On The Lightning Network: Through setting up and managing the Lightning Node you will gain experience and understanding of both the Bitcoin and Lightning network. This could be used to help others, get a job in the industry, build a new feature or app for the lighting network or just expand your knowledge.

How Does A Lightning Network Node Work?

https://www.athena-alpha.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/The-Lightning-Network.webp

The Lightning Network is made up of thousands of privately owned nodes and wallets. Each node opens one or more Lightning Channels with other nodes allowing them to send and receive payments too each other near instantly.

To take part in the Lightning Network you must either connect to or run your own Lightning Network Node and open up a lightning channel with another node on the network. To setup a node you can either run a normal computer and install Lightning protocol software on it or use software packages like Umbrel that come with it already pre-configured.

What Are Lightning Payment Channels?

Lightning channels are the connections between Lightning Network Nodes. They are linked back to the Bitcoin Network with transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain which lock up a certain amount of bitcoin funds in a two-party, Multisignature Bitcoin Address.

While the details behind these channels can get quite technical, it enables the network to route individual payments from one node to another just like your data gets routed through the Internet.

Some liken it to opening a bar tab. You and the bar owner open a tab for, say, $100 and over the night there might be 10 transactions of $8 per beer. At the end of the night the tab is closed and you receive $20 back to make both parties even ($100 – $8 x 10 = $20).

Lightning payment channels also allow other users to securely route their payments through your node, which is called payment routing. As the operator of your node, you can chose to charge them transaction fees for this service.

Who Builds The Lightning Network Software?

Currently there’s three main companies that code and maintain various lightning network software stacks. Each of these are compatible with the Lightning protocol meaning that using one of them doesn’t lock you into their platform forever: - ACINQ: Eclair - Lightning Labs: lnd - Blockstream: clightning

Questions

If you have any further queries or topics you'd like further information on drop them below and we'll do our best to answer them!

@ c07dc7cc:552d19a4

Data is now recognized as the new oil for its role in shaping business decisions of organizations. It is a critical resource that when harnessed effectively, can power and drive various aspects of organizations, governments and societies. It is reckoned with to provide insights to business outlook. This has rapidly increased the number of data science enthusiasts and practitioners.

Data scientists concern themselves with building models that can be used to support these decisions. However, as Cathy O’Neil argues in the 2016 book “Weapon of Math Destruction,” certain mathematical models and algorithms when used without proper oversight and accountability can lead to unfair and even harmful consequences. Math Destruction therefore refers to the negative potential consequences or unintended harm that can arise from the misuse or misapplication of mathematical models particularly in the field of data science.

Best Practices It is therefore imperative to have a set of best practice rules to guide against these situations. The list is inexhaustive but here I explained a few which I consider paramount: 1. Understand the problem at hand: No surprises here. Knowing the problem is half solving it. Before doing anything, your first task is to understand the problem you are trying to solve. This helps in framing the right questions and selecting relevant data. 2. Understand the data you have: This calls for Exploratory Data Analysis. There are several ways to explore your data including visualization, checking missing values, outliers, anomalies, etc. 3. Data cleaning and preprocessing: This is usually where the bulk of your work as a data scientist lie. This involves cleaning the data and preparing it for analysis. The importance of this step cannot be over-emphasized as it can significantly affect the quality of your model. 4. Feature engineering: Often times, you use one more feature in your dataset to make prediction. It is in this step that you create meaningful features that enhance the predictive power of your model. This step may include creating new features, transforming existing ones or selecting the most relevant ones for data modelling. 5. Choose appropriate model: Having understood the problem at hand, you choose the appropriate model that fits it. The characteristics of your data, the type of problem you are trying to solve and its interpretability are all factors you consider when choosing the right model. 6. Hyperparameter Tuning: Sometimes your model may lack generalization or it can be overfitting. That means it will not perform well on data it has not seen. Therefore, you need to optimize some parameters to achieve better performance. 7. Model validation and Evaluation: This is another crucial step to be taken. It is necessary to assess how your model will generalize to new and unseen data. 8. Result communication: Clearly communicate your findings to relevant stakeholders using appropriate tools such as visualization and storytelling. 9. Ethical considerations: It is not enough to just build models, it is equally important to be vigilant about biases in your models.

@ 1bc70a01:24f6a411

You may remember a documentary on Netflix that discussed the negative effects of social media - Social Dilemma. It sparked many discussions in various circles, but nothing came of it.

Well, today I want to talk about making social media healthier, if not for ourselves, but for our kids.

We have a once in a lifetime opportunity with Nostr to reshape social media clients from scratch. Let us not blindly copy existing social media behavior. After all, the definition of stupidity is doing the same thing and expecting different results. Let’s not be stupid and make social media just as, if not more addicting than before.

The big TLDR; is that social media addictive mechanisms harm self image in kids. At the time where they should be building confidence, the mechanics of social media make them feel insecure. I can only imagine the downstream effects into adulthood, but on society level it can’t be good.

Some organizations even exist to supposedly move this subject forward, but after reviewing their content, I see nothing substantial put forward. One such organization “Center for Human Technology” seems to say the right things but puts no effort into offering any actual solutions.

Strategies to make social media healthier

Let’s brainstorm some actual things we can do to limit social media addictiveness, reduce social influence and manipulation.

Boost self-esteem

Vanity metrics can play a positive role but the wrong kind of metric is more harmful than not. Follower count immediately comes to mind. You see people obsessing with their follower count, and even those not realizing they are obsessed are constantly comparing themselves to one another. You are probably one of those people. If you don’t believe me, go ahead and close down your account right now, and create a fresh one to start over. I’ll wait.

Still here? I thought so. Short of constantly deleting our accounts, we can do something else - not showing a follower metric at all.

Remove followers metrics

As drastic as this sounds, removing followers is a huge step forward to better mental health. We don’t need to see how many people follow us. As long as you can see who you follow, it shouldn’t matter who is following you.

This goes beyond Twitter-like apps. Subscriber counts on YouTube channels, on email lists, none of these things need to exist. The number of people you send something to should be irrelevant. Think about it - how does it impact the content of your message whether you have 100 followers or 10,000? It doesn’t.

Avoid algorithms at all costs

Algos are excellent at hijacking attention. They know what you like and keep feeding off you to keep you hooked. Let’s end this stupidity once and for all and say no to algorithms.

I also came to a realization that “algorithmic choice” is an illusion. The “best” algorithm will by definition be the winner and the most popular. Clients will implement the thing that people crave most until “better” algorithms get more users hooked on a client. Who doesn’t want that for their platform? Everyone. Attention is money. Attention is harm.

If we want to create a better future for our children, we’ll say no to algorithms. This means we have to accept that people will gravitate towards “cheaters” who do include “useful” algorithms in their clients. It also means we have to be willing to forgo larger profits.

Perhaps well-thought out policy can be introduced in the future that limits the harm of algorithms, but in the meantime we can take matters into our own hands and simply say no.

Improve happiness levels

Avoid news feeds

Thanks to nostr we can create clients that only handle news feeds, so we don’t really need to include them in social clients.

News keeps people down because negative news gets most clicks. We can avoid this whole issue just by not including news feeds in social applications. Less clickbaity headlines, less rage, more productive conversations.

If you still crave news, go ahead and use that nostr client designed specifically for news consumption.

Of course, we can’t stop people from sharing the news, but we can avoid algos that surface it, and avoid creating feeds specifically designed for news consumption.

News also consumed a lot of time and spreads misinformation. You get scenarios where neither of the arguers read the article in full and are arguing about something that’s not even reported. It’s painful to watch.

Then you have situations where the news is actually a narrative spun by some organization or individual who wants to influence social behavior. They may report correct information or completely misrepresent facts.

News is “bad news”. Just don’t build it into social clients intentionally.

Create happiness clients

One thing I have not seen any social media do is ask whether a piece of content makes you feel positive, neutral or negative.

In theory, we should be able to create clients that prioritize positive content. I know I said avoid algorithms at all costs, but if you wanted to create a happiness portal, you could cheat a little and ask people to market content as positive, neutral or negative, and then surface only the positive.

In my opinion this is not an ideal way to go about it, because you’re creating a different type of bubble, one where people ignore the reality of things. Yet, it is a possibility if we want to alter our mood by putting algos to work for us. At the very least it would be a fun experiment!

Reduce addiction / Save time

Disable notifications by default

You hear countless stories of people feeling better in their lives after disabling notifications. Why not make this the default behavior? “But, people won’t know if the app works!” Yeah.. it has to start some place. If we want change, we need to make tough decisions. If you want to be less extreme about it, you could disable most notifications by default, while not touching the “critical” ones. Personally, I don’t think any notification is critical, you should be completely in control over your attention and that any notification is a major intrusion into your consciousness.

With notifications disabled, we can regain time and attention. Society as a whole might think more clearly and be in the moment. I think it would be a huge step forward.

Delay notifications

Nothing sucks more time than notifications. That tiny red dot begging to be tapped. One solution to make notification less addicting short of turning them off is to delay them. We can purposely set a timer to show notifications in a delayed fashion rather than right away. This way people or kids don’t need to constantly check to see who replied or messaged you. Something as simple as a 3 minute notification delay may be sufficient to curb the constant checking behavior.

Delay reactions

Dopamine is fun, but constant dopamine in real time is unhealthy. Real time reactions force us to stare at our screens waiting for the next reaction.

We can lessen this addictive behavior by introducing delayed reactions to notes. Instead of reactions coming in real time, introduce a delay of 1-5 minutes. If you know that you won’t see any responses to your post for at least 5 minutes, it makes it easier to put down the phone and not have to constantly look to see who liked your note.

Improve Transparency

Once media organizations get on nostr, I think there’s a lot we can do to make them more transparent, accountable, and less manipulative.

One thing we can do is to create meta data for media accounts to indicate their funding sources. Everyone should be able to see who funds a certain organization (as discovered by anyone in the community and voted on by the community in terms of accuracy).

The idea is that someone could dig up funding sources for an organization and add them as meta notes to the account. The community can then collectively decide if this is accurate or inaccurate, giving others an idea if there is a certain bias involved.

Think about the Greenpeace ordeal currently happening. A meta note to indicate that Ripple, a “competing” cryptocurrency is funding them would add a lot of transparency to their claims. I think people would be less likely to believe the nonsense they are spewing.

Create a record of accuracy

Fueled entirely by the community, people could verify the accuracy of claims and indicate that in meta data. Other members can then review those claims and vote on them as well. With enough people involved, you could see if there is a sufficient sample size to indicate whether a media organization has been accurate or inaccurate in the past.

One thing we’d need to watch out here is bot manipulation. Said organizations could hire out malicious services to make it seem they are more accurate than they are typically. We’d have to think of some ways of preventing that.

The sheer lack of ratings on a claim should raise an eyebrow and whether something is to be believed or not.

The right to be forgotten

I know I will catch a lot of heat for this one. “The internet never forgets!” This is what the vast majority of people will say right away. That’s fine… but hear me out…

As builders and developers, we can form a consensus that social media data should be forgotten after x amount of time. Yes, anyone can screenshot it, mirror, put it on their own relay, rebroadcast it, yada yada yada… I get it. But that doesn’t mean we can’t create a consensus by which many builders, relay operators can voluntarily abide. It may not be a bulletproof solution, but it’s an effort that counts.

When we speak in the real world, unless recorded, our words are forgotten. A person should not be judged by a stupid thing they said yesterday, a week ago, a year ago. We can’t be in the right all the time - all people make mistakes and say and do stupid things. However, online, your word remains forever. Various servers cache, duplicate, at zero cost. I totally get that. Yet, we can still design an experience where that information disappears from our feeds, unless actively surfaced with some specific intent to surface it. I think this is a worthwhile effort that developers should consider today.

In cases where information should be saved for good reasons, someone will save it. Entire clients can and will exist to index everything, but that doesn’t mean every single client should surface every single note. People have a right to be wrong and to not be constantly harassed for what they said or did if they no longer feel or act that way.

Let’s have this conversation because no one else will

This article is meant to be a conversation starter. I really think we should weave it into the Nostr conferences as a crucial segment worth exploring and discussing. If we don’t do this, no one will. The world will continue to get gamified, attention hijacked and kids will continue suffering, depressed, lacking confidence and the tools needed to create a better world for their own kids. Let’s not fall sleep at the wheel and actually do something about it.

What other ideas do you have? Share the article and attach your own ideas.

@ 0861144c:e68a1caf

At some digital moment, I believe we all became information octopuses. We tried, in one way or another, to stay informed about everything around us, even at the cost of not filtering. That information overload, coupled with wanting to fully exercise your freedom to say things, eventually catches up with you. It's not that you'll speak carelessly about everything without considering the consequences. Let's talk about energy and your time.

There are two limited things in this world: time and your bitcoins. You've already bought into it, perfect. Either you're intending to buy or you're not interested; the options are numerous. But whoa...you're busy responding on social media, forums, groups, chats, and other places about bitcoin, saying this and that, but at the same time, you're also trying to earn more satoshis. As someone who, in a way too active manner, participated in every social and digital event invited to discuss cryptocurrencies in general, there are things I did wrong. Or in other words, I wasted my time unnecessarily. What I'm writing is basically about acknowledging it so that you don't fall into the same trap as I did.

Politicians

This is the one I fought against the most and spent the most time on between 2020-2022 because in Paraguay, a bill was discussed which, from the very beginning, was destined to fail. I devoted a lot of energy to trying to inject some reasoning, and today, I regret that. Politicians today should have two basic functions: study and understand cryptocurrencies. That's all I ask. In many countries, instead of asking how it can grow, they inquire about how to pay taxes.

A bitcoiner (in my opinion) should not waste a second of their time on this because, to this day, we don't even know what everything we are developing can potentially become. Let's add an important point to this: politicians seek short-term gains; they are not interested in long-term projections. Usually, their time limit is 3 to 5 years, aiming for reelection and starting the wheel of promises anew. Do they want to learn? Help them. Do they want to regulate? Help them understand that we don't know what they want to tax. Or use the example of El Salvador for added pleasure.

Bitcoiners

Bitcoiners attacking bitcoiners to see who is more maximalist. Of all that I consumed, this debate stirred up much more when the ordinals appeared, which I had discussed extensively in other editions. They come out saying that it must be this way or that way. The worst experience was that: imagine, people shouting for freedom but in their own way. Does any bell ring?

These words don't have an emphatic point or aim to get to the bottom of something; they just seek to make you reflect and see if it's really worth managing your time the way I did and, at the end of the day, not make the mistakes I made.

@ de496884:72617b81

Hoy en día se oye mucho hablar del instinto de supervivencia en el ser humano, ¿pero los seres humanos tenemos instintos? ¿Acaso compartimos ese rasgo con los animales? Esta vez quiero hablar de ese tema partiendo del Enfoque Histórico Cultural.

Aceptar la existencia de los instintos en la conducta humana, implica aceptar que las fuerzas motrices del comportamiento animal y humano son las mismas y que la sociedad es un medio para satisfacer dichos instintos. ¿Pero qué es una conducta instintiva? Pues la conducta instintiva determina una relación específica entre el animal y un objeto portador de un estímulo, presente en el medio, a raíz de una necesidad orgánica.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

Dicha conducta es heredada, suele ser estereotipada y determina un modo único de actuar para la especie frente a la naturaleza, mientras que en el ser humano es característico que exista una mediatización por las condiciones sociales. Debido a esta "condena" del animal que lo ata a su biología, no se le exige al animal que responda por su conducta, ni por la supresión de la misma, precisamente porque no está en sus posibilidades.

Con el ser humano ocurre lo contrario, pues se le juzga usando un basamento moral, ¿y qué es la moral sino otra construcción social? Por tanto, cuando se juzga a un animal y se le valora altruista o egoísta, se trata de un antropomorfismo ingenuo. De forma contraria, valorar la conducta humana como instintiva sería tener una visión biologicista de los fenómenos sociales, cuando el desarrollo del ser humano se produjo al suprimir las características animales que dificultaban las relaciones sociales.

Por tanto, en la antropogénesis las necesidades ya no determinaban ni un tipo de acción específica, ni los medios de satisfacción, ni el objeto que la satisfacía. Así, en sociedad ante un estímulo las personas pueden y reaccionarán de manera diferente, mediadas por el contexto, las características personológicas condicionadas sociohistóricamente, y sus posibilidades anatomofisiológicas. De ahí un error conceptual de base en el problema de los instintos humanos: la no diferenciación entre lo biológico y lo orgánico.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

Lo biológico condiciona una estructura que determina un tipo de vida y conducta, mientras que lo orgánico no. Lo orgánico en el ser humano indica sus límites anatomofisiológicos, pero que pueden ser suplidos por métodos de enseñanza. Es el caso de las personas ciegas. En su caso sin una enseñanza especial fueran inválidos, pero debido a ella pueden tener las mismas oportunidades que todos.

También, en el ser humano las necesidades son condicionadas socialmente, incluso las fisiológicas, puesto que cuando necesitamos defecar, por ejemplo, no lo hacemos en el medio de la calle, en una guagua -a no ser que por un límite del organismo nos lo hagamos encima-, sino que buscamos un baño, un váter.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

Por tanto, las necesidades en los animales determinan su conducta, son biológicas. En los seres humanos no, no hay necesidades biológicas, no hay instintos.

¿Y tú qué opinas?

..............................................................................................

English version

Nowadays we hear a lot about the survival instinct in human beings, but do human beings have instincts? Do we share this trait with animals? This time I want to talk about this topic from the Cultural Historical Approach.

Accepting the existence of instincts in human behavior implies accepting that the driving forces of animal and human behavior are the same and that society is a means to satisfy those instincts. But what is instinctive behavior? Well, instinctive behavior determines a specific relationship between the animal and a stimulus-bearing object, present in the environment, as a result of an organic need.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

This behavior is inherited, it is usually stereotyped and determines a unique way of acting for the species in the face of nature, while in the human being it is characteristic that there is a mediatization by social conditions. Due to this "condemnation" of the animal that ties it to its biology, the animal is not required to answer for its behavior, nor for the suppression of it, precisely because it is not in its possibilities.

The opposite happens with human beings, because they are judged on a moral basis, and what is morality if not another social construction? Therefore, when an animal is judged as altruistic or selfish, it is a naive anthropomorphism. On the contrary, to value human behavior as instinctive would be to have a biologistic vision of social phenomena, when the development of human beings occurred by suppressing the animal characteristics that hindered social relations.

Therefore, in anthropogenesis, needs no longer determined neither a specific type of action, nor the means of satisfaction, nor the object that satisfied it. Thus, in society, in the face of a stimulus, people can and will react differently, mediated by the context, the sociohistorically conditioned personological characteristics, and their anatomophysiological possibilities. Hence a basic conceptual error in the problem of human instincts: the non-differentiation between the biological and the organic.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

The biological conditions a structure that determines a type of life and behavior, while the organic does not. The organic in the human being indicates its anatomophysiological limits, but that can be supplemented by teaching methods. This is the case of blind people. In their case without special teaching they would be invalids, but because of it they can have the same opportunities as everyone else.

Also, in the human being, needs are socially conditioned, even physiological ones, since when we need to defecate, for example, we do not do it in the middle of the street, in a bus -unless due to a limit of the organism we do it on ourselves-, but we look for a bathroom, a toilet.

Enlace a la imagen / Link to the image

Therefore, the needs of animals determine their behavior, they are biological. Not in human beings, there are no biological needs, there are no instincts.

And what do you think?

Créditos / Credits

Bibliografía consultada / Consulted bibliography:

Galperin, P., Y. (1988). El problema sobre los instintos en el hombre.

Traducción / Translate:

DeepL

Divisor / Divider:

https://pixabay.com/es/vectors/divisor-decorativo-florecer-2154993/

Te puede interesar / It may interest you:

• ¿Realmente qué es el medioambiente? Una propuesta desde la psicología ambiental

• El humor en las redes, ¿cómo es?

@ 58edc6ae:e070cfa5

The European Union regulation on markets in crypto-assets, commonly known as MiCA, will come into effect on 30th December 2024. Its provisions will impact many businesses involved in cryptocurrencies. To what extent will Bitcoin and the entrepreneurs providing Bitcoin-related services be affected?

Co-authored by Marcin Liszka

In general, this regulation applies to businesses issuing crypto-assets or providing services related to them. Since Bitcoin doesn't have an issuer, the rules about issuing crypto-assets won't apply to it. However, we still need to see how the new regulation will impact businesses offering services related to Bitcoin. Specifically, we need to understand when businesses might need to get permission (authorisation) to operate.

The definition of crypto-assets in the regulation is quite broad. It includes digital representations of value or rights that are transferable and can be stored electronically using distributed ledger technology (or similar technology). Bitcoin falls within this definition as it is a digital representation of value. Also, it can be transferred or stored electronically and uses distributed ledger technology, commonly known as blockchain. Consequently, businesses offering services related to Bitcoin will be classified as crypto-asset service providers. They will need to obtain authorisation and ensure compliance with the new regulations.

To determine if the regulation applies to a particular business, it is necessary to check whether its subject matter falls into any of the categories of regulated services specified in the regulation.

Custody and Administration of Bitcoin on Behalf of Clients

The first category covers the custody and administration of bitcoin on behalf of clients. Essentially, this includes services where the provider takes control of their customers' bitcoin. The aim is to safeguard individuals who prefer not to independently store their private keys, choosing instead to trust the service provider. In doing so, they settle for an IOU, a claim for the withdrawal or refund of the entrusted bitcoin. This category of service providers encompasses centralised cryptocurrency exchanges and brokers that secure client funds in their own wallets. It also includes any service where bitcoin is entrusted, such as those provided by custodial wallets. Even if the wallet is an add-on to a shopping application, podcast platform, cashback service, crowdfunding platform, social network, or any other service, it falls into this category as long as the service provider safeguards client funds in its own wallet. In principle, businesses offering sovereign wallet services (non-custodial wallets) will remain outside this category.

Operation of a Trading Platform

This category involves services related to operating a bitcoin trading platform, allowing customers to offer to buy or sell Bitcoin and exchange monetary funds for bitcoin (or other crypto-assets) directly among themselves. This service type will be subject to regulation, regardless of whether it involves entrusting the service provider with customer funds. Additionally, this category will include businesses facilitating peer-to-peer bitcoin transactions, even if they do not hold customer funds in their own wallets.

Exchange of Bitcoin for Funds or for Other Crypto-assets

The following two categories encompass services related to exchanging bitcoin for funds or other crypto-assets. This includes services offered by exchange offices, where the provider buys and sells bitcoin from and to customers in exchange for fiat currency (such as dollars or euros) or other crypto-assets. Most exchanges and brokers will fall into this category.

Execution, Reception and Transmission of Orders

The regulation also outlines various intermediary services related to buying or selling bitcoin. The execution, reception, and transmission of orders for bitcoin will be covered by the regulation, as long as these activities are conducted on behalf of clients. This category will include brokers providing OTC (over the counter) services, who accept and execute orders for their clients, and subsequently settle these transactions.

Advisory Services

Another category of regulated services involves providing advice on crypto-assets. In traditional finance, a financial advisor assists clients in safeguarding their wealth by offering expertise on financial products and markets. The advisor's role is to analyse and assess clients' financial needs, providing recommendations for products or services tailored to them. This category encompasses businesses that offer customers advice regarding the purchase or sale of bitcoin or the use of other bitcoin-related services, including specific wallets, exchanges, or brokers.

Portfolio Management

Traditional portfolio management services typically include making investment choices and overseeing them to meet the client's financial goals. The service provider's aim is usually to maximise the client's return on investment while considering the client's acceptable level of risk. In the realm of crypto-assets, this type of service is only beginning to emerge.

Transfer of Crypto-assets

The final category is defined as transfer of crypto-assets on behalf of clients from one distributed ledger address or account to another. In the case of Bitcoin, such services can be provided by exchanges or brokers in the form of withdrawals of bitcoin to designated accounts, including transfers to other exchanges. In our view, transfers within the exchange (between its users) should not fall under this category of services because they don’t involve a change of address in the distributed ledger (i.e., on the blockchain), but rather are recorded in the exchange's internal ledger. On the other hand, transfer services performed from custodial wallets may fall into this category. It can be argued that the wallet service provider (who safeguards the keys to the client’s assets) performs the transfer on behalf of the client while the client (wallet user) merely "instructs" the transfer.

In our opinion, routing carried out by operators of Lightning Network nodes cannot be classified in this category. Routing does not entail actual control over the funds of the person instructing the transfer and does not result directly in a change in the distributed ledger. Additionally, the regulation explicitly excludes the activities of miners and nodes from the scope of the transfer service, even though they may be involved in transaction approvals and the ledger’s updating process.

Regulated Activity

Those currently providing services covered by the regulation will need to obtain an authorisation to operate. They will also need to adjust their activities to ensure compliance with the new regulations. In each EU country, the authorisation will be issued by a designated regulatory body. Poland has not yet decided whether such authorisations will be issued by the Financial Supervisory Commission (KNF) or whether a new institution will be established for this purpose.

The new rules will come into effect on 30th December 2024. In theory, service providers should be able to benefit from an additional 18-month transition period for adjustments, ending on 1st July 2026. However, it is uncertain whether this privilege will apply to entities registered in Poland. The regulation allows Member States to opt out of or shorten the transition period if their local regulations are less stringent than MiCA. Member States are bound to inform the European Commission and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) by 30th June 2024 about their decisions regarding the transition period.

The ESMA, on the other hand, has been obligated to prepare model documentation which will be required from service providers when applying for authorisation to conduct regulated activities. This model documentation should be prepared by 30th June 2024. In a communication dated 18th October 2023, the Polish Financial Supervisory Commission encourages businesses currently providing crypto-related services to take actions as early as possible to align their operations with the requirements specified in MiCA. They also warn that potential current operations of the service providers which harm the interests of customers or threaten the integrity of the market may affect chances of such service providers for obtaining authorisation in the future.

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

The YakiHonne community is excited about Nostrasia, and they have diligently transcribed Nostrasia's inspiring speeches. Additional speech transcripts will be made available over time. The Japanese and Spanish versions are initially translated and proofread by community members with the help of AI tools. All YakiHonne users are invited to join in the review process. Those who successfully complete the review will be granted a special reward of 3000 Sats. To get started, simply reach out to us (Comment here, DM, or TG) to sign up, and the first person to contact and submit their review will be the lucky recipient of the reward. And hey, if you're up for it, we'd love to have these speeches translated into even more languages. Join us!

🌟English: How Nostr Win 🌟中文版: Nostr如何取胜 🌟Español: Cómo gana Nostr

今日は、ノストがどのように勝つかについて話します。ノストがどのように勝つかという質問をいくつかの人々に尋ねました。人々がどのように答えるかを見てみたかったのです。さまざまな回答が寄せられましたが、中には「勝ちたいと思う必要はあるのか？」という回答もありました。これは問題ありません。私は「勝ちたい」と言います。なぜなら、ノストを使う人が増え、より多くの中継が存在し、経済活動が増え、ビジネスが増えることを意味します。ノストは非常にクールな設計を持っており、あなたが見るものを選ぶことができます。ノストの動作は、プロトコルレベルでデータを取得する方法です。これはあなたがデータを取得するノードを選択するプロトコルです。エアドロップスパムを見た場合、それは誰かがあなたにスパムを送ったわけではなく、あなたがそのスパムを取得したということです。それはかなりクールです。なぜなら、ノストをどのように感じるかは、あなた次第だからです。

勝利の定義

勝利をもう少し正確に定義しましょう。それは採用を意味します。それは単なる普通のことです。それは単にそれを使用する人がもっと多いということです、もっと多くの中継が存在し、もっと多くの経済活動、もっと多くのビジネス、もっと多くのことです。ノストは非常にクールな設計を持っており、それはあなたが見るものを選ぶことができます。その仕組みは、プロトコルレベルでデータを取得する方法です。それはあなたがデータを取得するノードを決定するプロトコルです。エアドロップスパムを見た場合、それは誰かがスパムを送ったわけではなく、あなたがそのスパムを取得したということです。それはかなりクールです。なぜなら、ノストをどのように感じるかは、あなた次第だからです。

どのようにして勝たないか

まず、どのようにして勝たないかについて考えてみましょう。それを明確にすることは、私たちが考えるのに役立つと思います。 まず最初に、Twitterを上回るのは非常に難しいです。単にTwitterと同じようになって勝つことはできないと思います。彼らは長い間存在し、資金力もあり、名前も認知されていました。 私たちの持っている考えのひとつは、ある製品が別の製品を破壊するためには、少なくとも10倍優れている必要がある、というものです。これは非常によく知られた考え方です。私の意見では、私たちは（これは少し議論の余地があるかもしれません）検閲への抵抗によって勝つことはできません。ほとんどの人々は、そのほとんどにとっては検閲に対する関心はありません。多くの人々は検閲抵抗を修正すべき問題と見なすでしょう。私たちは検閲に対する焦点を当てて勝つのではありません。それは魅力的ではありません。非常に小さなコホートの一部の人々にとっても魅力的ではありません。 それは人々に行動を起こさせたり、希望につなげるものではありません。ノストには多くの希望的観測があります。ビットコインにも多くの希望的観測があります。ビットコインは既に勝利しており、それは避けられないものです。それは神々によって前もって決まっています。 それは怠惰を引き起こします。これは事を改善し、世界を改善する方法について考える方法ではありません。効率的な市場仮説が正しいのであれば、私たちは何もする必要はありません。すべてが完了し、私たちはうまくやっています、ということです。それが私たちが勝つ方法ではありません。 私たちは行動によって勝ちます。そして、私たちは中央集権化することなく勝つことはできません。面白いことに、同じスライドに検閲への抵抗と中央集権化が含まれています。検閲への抵抗でなければ、中央集権化し、その逆もまた同様です。それは良いプレゼンテーションではありませんが、中継とクライアントの両方を指します。そのいずれかまたは両方が中央集権化する可能性があります。1つまたは2つのハブに接続するだけが必要なモデルで終わると、最初にネットワークが拡大できないため、失敗するリスクがあります。新しいユーザーの流入があると、すべてが崩壊します。それは数回見られたことで、それはスノーデンが来た時またはジャックが来た時、大きな中継が機能しなかった時がありました。また、クライアントが市場シェアの大部分を占める可能性があることが長らく私を心配させてきたことの1つです。クライアントが非常に人気を博し、プロトコルの設計を指示し、簡単にキャプチャできる可能性があるのです。そのため、マイクロアプリとマイクロアプリエコシステムについて多く話してきました。なぜなら、文化はものを形作る力が非常に大きいからです。文化は戦略です、と言うことがあります。それは非常に真実であり、大きな資本を持つクライアントが市場シェアを多く獲得する前に、マイクロアプリを使用し、異なるアプリを作成する文化を確立することは非常に重要です。 これは依然として非常に可能性があることです。私たちはこの部分でまだ安全ではないという意味ではありません。私にとって、これは非常に重要なことの1つです。明日はこのことについてのパネルがありますが、アウトボックスモデルの不足、アウトボックスモデルという用語を非常に広義に使用しています。それは単に、どの中継に書き込むか、どの中継から読み込むかを決定するための意思決定ツリーやアルゴリズムを持つことを意味します。少し技術的な要素もありますが、基本的には個人が独自の中継を実行しやすい方法、すなわち、すべての主要なハブから禁止され、検閲されている場合でも、ユーザーがその個人と対話したい場合、その個人が禁止されていることに気付かれないようにする方法です。これが究極のテストです。サーバーがダウンした場合、中継がダウンした場合、ユーザーがそれがダウンしたことに気付いた場合、それはネットワークが十分に分散されていないことを意味します。

Blasterを再び無意味にする

基本的に、Blasterを使用する経済的インセンティブが存在する限り、私たちがまだ目指すべき道の途中であることがわかります。Blasterは、データを配信するだけでそれを300の他の中継に送信する中継です。そのようなインセンティブが存在する限り、私たちはまだ多くの作業が必要であることがわかります。

ノストの勝利の方法

私たちは、ノストが勝たない理由をいくつか挙げました。では、もしあなたがここにいるのであれば、私が何を答えるかを予想します。まず第一に、他の要素ということを言うと、それはマイクロブログ、Twitterのユースケースが重要でないという意味ではありません。それは絶対に基本的です。さまざまな異なるクライアントが必要であり、堅固でうまく実行されたクライアントは必要です。それは必要ですが、十分ではありません。必要ではあるが、十分ではありません。ネットワーク効果は非常に強力で、ほとんどのことです。既存の社交ネットワークのようなものが何か別のものに置き換えられることは非常にまれです。彼らはひどい決定を下すことができます。Facebookはそのユーザーを虐待し続けてきました。スノーデンはこれがどれだけ進行していたかを明らかにし、これは多くの回数起こりましたが、人々はそれにまだ殺到しています。ネットワーク効果は製品を非常に粘着性のあるものにします。あなたの友達がすべて同じネットワークにいる場合、前述の10倍優れているというクリシェを打破することは非常に難しいです。ノストはまだその基準を満たしていないと言えます。それはどこにも近づいていないので、何か他のものよりも10倍優れているという基準を満たすことが非常に難しいです。しかし、ノストがこれをクリアするための非常に多くの良いチャンスがあり、その中のどれか1つだけでも十分です。

そして、私にとって、その理由は相互運用性です、ノストの透明で魔法のような相互運用性、なぜなら、この基本的に無料の相互運用性があると、ネットワーク効果よりもさらに強力なものを解き放つからです。それは実際の中でもネットワーク効果よりも強力なものの非常に少数です。ネットワーク効果の時間、ネットワーク効果の時間、ネットワーク効果の時間、ネットワーク効果の時間。それはネットワーク効果のべき乗、ユースケースのべき乗、とまとめることができます。なぜなら、ノストに実装されている各ユースケースは非常にクールな特性を持ち、それは他のユースケースがこの1つのユースケースの適用とは無関係の他の製品を少しだけ良くする、ということです。eBayのネットワーク効果の時間、Netflixのネットワーク効果の時間、Twitterのネットワーク効果、などと言えます。これは非常に強力です。私たちはネットワーク効果の複利を通じて非常に初期の段階にあり、これを見ることは本当に難しいです。

私がマイアミに行く際に気付いた興味深いことがありました。私はSubsterという音楽アプリを作成し、ノストがSubsterのサポートを統合しました。したがって、Substerに音楽をアップロードしていたユーザーは、少なくともノストのユーザーからの聞き手を持っていたかもしれませんし、AmethystもSubsterのサポートを実装し、今度はCoracleもWeb用、またはSubsterのサポートを実装しました。これは非常に驚くべきことです、ノストエコシステム全体のスペクトラムを通じて製品を向上させる異なるユースケースの漏れです。それを考えると本当に驚くことです。Facebookはノストに比べて非常に優位ですが、ノスト上に何かを構築する際、Facebookは世界中の他の人々と競争しなければなりません。そしてTwitterもノストに参加する世界中の他の人々と競争しなければなりません。それぞれの独立した完全な鉛直の大企業はどれほど大きくても、彼らは世界中の他の人々と競争しなければなりません。現在、世界中の他の部分はほとんど何もないということがほぼ確かですが、私の考えではますます勢いを増すでしょう。しかし、いくつかのことをしなければなりません。

起業家の役割

私が考える最初のことは、ノストをどのように考え、定義する方法を変える必要があると思います。これまで、通常、ノストはそれが何でないかによって定義してきました。検閲に耐性があり、操作的なアルゴリズムが隠されておらず、マスターがいないと言って、それは素晴らしいと言いますが、それがどれだけ関係しているかを理解するのは難しいです。これは、「妻が素晴らしいです。彼女はほとんど私を操作しません。」と言うのと同じです。彼女の美しい特性について話し、彼女は非常に賢い、非常にサポート的だとか、彼女が持っている属性について話すでしょう。あなたは彼女がある特定の醜いことをしないことについて話すことはありませんが、これは通常の方法でノストを定義し、説明し、理由付けしようとする方法であり、エネルギーを誤った方向に向けます。ノストについて言うべきポジティブなことはたくさんあるので、それが何であるかに焦点を当てることは、可能性を逃すことと同じです。これらの可能性をどのように探求するかを考えると、これらの可能性を探求するのに必要なものは起業家、起業家、起業家だと思います。現在、我々は開発者の健全なエコシステムを持っており、それは素晴らしいことであり、もっと必要です。過去数か月間において、アプリケーションを作成し、堅牢なアプリケーションを作成し、動作するアプリケーションを作成できるようにするために行った基盤は非常に驚くべきものであり、開発者が増えています。私は自分のDMをたくさん見ていますが、それは素晴らしいことです。我々はまだ未開拓の領域の大部分にいますので、我々はまだ未開拓の領域の大部分にいます。しかし、私たちにはまだ起業家が非常に少数しかいません。非常に少数しかいません。非常に少数の長期的なビジネスを考えています。ビジネスが持っているものの一つは、スケールに関係なく、通常焦点があります。それは何百万ものことですが、通常は焦点があるということです。この場合、これらの講義のために非常に多くのことがありますが、一般に焦点は製品のビジョンに向けられます。開発者は技術に非常に興奮し、これを試したい、あれを試したいと思い、多くの放棄されたウェアやバグのあるもの、単に強固なロードマップがないものを作り、どこに向かっているのかわからなくなることがあります。我々は確かに未だ開拓されていないものの発見に協力するために、もっと多くの起業家を呼び寄せる必要がありますし、ビジネスはこれらのことを解き明かすのに私たちを助けるでしょう。

非抽出型ビジネスの構築

非抽出型で非常に魅力的で非常に強力なビジネスを作成する非常に興味深い機会があります。過去20年、25年の間にビッグテックがどのように進化したかを考えると、彼らは実際にはあまり価値を創造していませんでした。Facebookは非常に高い評価を持っていますが、実際にはそれを作成していませんでした。彼らは単に幸運だったのであり、ネットワーク効果によって本質的に創造される価値をキャプチャするために正しい場所に正しい時にいた。彼らはそれをキャプチャできるようになっただけで、彼らは明らかにそれを素晴らしい方法で実行しましたし、それを実行するのはノストで必要な部分の一部ですが、ネットワーク効果によって創造された価値、それは単にキャプチャ可能なものなのか、キャプチャ不可能なものなのか。ノストにビジネスを構築する多くの理由があると思います。それは少し変なことのように聞こえるかもしれませんが、ノスト上のビジネス、つまりノスト上で収益を上げるビジネスは存在しません。しかし、それは単にノストの経済があまりにも小さいからです。この段階では持続可能なビジネスを作成することは不可能です。そして、ビジネスは収益化のことを考える必要はないと思います。今収益化のことを考えている人々もいると知っていますが、それは狂気じみて早すぎると思いますし、あなたを誤った結論に導くことになります。経済が非常に小さいので、それは働いたかもしれないことでも、まだ働いていないことになりますが、なぜあなたはノスト上にビジネスを構築するのですか？なぜ単に典型的なSaaSを構築するか、Googleを解体しようとするか、Blue Skyスタイルに進むかしないのですか？これには哲学的な答えがあり、それはノストは自然とよりよく調和しているということです。つまり、あなたのエネルギーとビジネスを整えることによって、あなたはより少ない力を発揮することから利益を得るのです。それはよりサウンドであり、熱力学的にもサウンドです。それは、逆流に対して泳ぐか、流れに対して泳ぐかを決めることのようです。数ヶ月前、私はすべての社会的コンポーネントを持つ企業は最終的にはノストのクライアントとなるか、存在しなくなることを強調しました。ネットワーク効果の複利の力は止めることができません。この適応を欠いた任意のビジネスは屈服します。ほとんどのインターネット活動には社会的な側面が含まれており、ノストは社会的なフレームワークとして機能しています。社会的な側面を持つものはすべて、ノストと統合されることで利益を得ます。ビジネスがノストを受け入れず、勝利を収めた場合、自然はノストに基づかないユースケースを押しつぶします。

これらの潜在的な強みにもかかわらず、多くの疑問が未解決のままです。検閲への抵抗力、中継の経済的持続可能性、およびその他の重要な側面は、まだ十分に試されていません。理論的な議論は豊富ですが、実際の経済活動とノストを活用する起業家が実用的な解決策を見つけるためには不可欠です。ノストの潜在的な可能性を起業家に納得させることは、その小さな経済のために非常に困難な課題です。しかし、よく見れば、成長している開発者の数に示されているように、強力なビルディングブロックが現れつつあります。この傾向は有望ですが、関与する人々からは強靭さと決断力を求められます。

質問と回答

それでは、感謝の意を表したいと思います。質問があれば、3分間ご質問を受け付けます。

聴衆の質問：ノストの国際連合という概念はありますか？

回答：ノストの国際連合という考えは私を不安にさせます。それについて詳しく説明していただけますか？

聴衆の質問：ノストのエコシステムを拡大するという共通の目標に向けて取り組んでいるさまざまなビルダーがいます。彼らの間での相互コミュニケーションと協力を増やすことは有益でしょうか？そうした取り組みを組織しようとしている人はいますか？

回答：現在、そのような協力的な取り組みは存在していません。実際、そのような取り組みが起こる場合、私はBlue Skyを検討したり、ノストをフォークしたりすることを検討するでしょう。真実は競争と対立を通じて発見されることが多く、自然がどのように操作するかと似ています。合意と円卓会議は通常、誤った決定につながる傾向があります。クライアント間の競争は私たちのエコシステムの健全な側面です。

聴衆の質問：過去には、MyspaceのようなプラットフォームはクリエイターにとってFacebookよりも魅力的でした。なぜ最終的にFacebookがMyspaceに打ち勝ったと思いますか？

回答：Facebookは最初に特定のニッチをターゲットにしてそれを制覇することで成功しました。彼らは最初からグローバルなソーシャルネットワークを目指そうとはしませんでした。彼らは特定のユースケースを解決し、近くの大学に拡大し、そこから成長しました。Myspaceの失敗には、主要なコードベースの書き直しが含まれており、これは一般的なスタートアップの失敗要因です。そのような決定は、スタートアップの生存を非常に困難にする可能性があります。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ d6dc9554:d0593a0c

What is the relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward?

The relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward represents the proportion of the total block rewards that comes from the transaction fees paid by users on the Bitcoin network.

Transaction fees allow users to offer compensation to miners to encourage the inclusion of their Bitcoin transactions in a block. To increase their profits, miners often prioritize transactions with higher fees. However, the value of fees can vary depending on several factors, including network congestion and the size of a user's transaction in bytes.

Miners play a critical role in the Bitcoin network, solving complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and secure the network. As a reward for their work, miners receive newly-created BTC (block reward) and any fees from the transactions they include in blocks.

Miner revenue = Block reward + Transaction fees

To maintain their revenues, miners are increasingly relying on transaction fees as the block reward decreases over time due to halvings. As Bitcoin approaches its maximum limit of 21 million coins, this dynamic is expected to continue.

Here's how to calculate the relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward:

Bitcoin fee-to-reward ratio = Total transaction fees / Block reward

To understand what this ratio means, consider three scenarios where the relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward is greater than 1, equal to 1, and less than 1.

Relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward greater than 1

Let's consider a scenario where users are transacting frequently, the block reward is 6.25 BTC, and there is high demand for block space. In this situation, users are willing to pay higher fees to have their transactions validated more quickly. Let's assume that miners received 7 BTC in transaction fees for the transactions included in the block.

In this scenario, the relationship between transaction fees and the block reward is greater than 1, as the transaction fees (7 BTC) are greater than the block reward (6.25 BTC). This indicates that miners are receiving more revenue from transaction fees than from the block reward.

Bitcoin fee-to-reward ratio = 7 / 6.25 = 1.12

In this case, the relationship between transaction fees and the block reward is greater than 1 (1.12), demonstrating that the total transaction fees earned by miners are greater than the block reward. When users want their transactions to be confirmed quickly, a situation like this arises, as bidding on transaction fees is competitive.

Relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward equal to 1

Let's now explore a case where the block reward and the total value of transaction fees that miners earn by including transactions in the block are the same. Assume that the total fees charged are 6.25 BTC, using the same block reward of 6.25 BTC.

Bitcoin fee-to-reward ratio = 6.25 / 6.25 = 1

In this case, the fees and the block reward contribute equally to the miner's revenue.

Relationship between Bitcoin transaction fees and the block reward less than 1

Now imagine that there is less demand for transactions on the network and that users are not willing to pay high fees to have their transactions validated. Assume that miners received 4 BTC in transaction fees, but the block reward is still 6.25 BTC.

Bitcoin fee-to-reward ratio = 4 / 6.25 = 0.64

In this case, the relationship between transaction fees and the block reward is 0.64, suggesting that the block reward is greater than the sum of the transaction fees charged by miners. This can happen when there are fewer transactions in the mempool, less network congestion, or when users are not competing as much to add their transactions to the next block.

The importance of the Bitcoin transaction fee-to-reward ratio

The Bitcoin transaction fee-to-reward ratio is important because it captures the changing economic incentives present in the network. This ratio is essential to the functioning of the network, affecting users, miners, and the overall stability and security of the blockchain.

Miner incentives and security

Miners are essential to the security and validity of transactions on the Bitcoin network. They use processing power and resources to mine new blocks by solving challenging mathematical puzzles. Transaction fees and the block reward (newly-created BTC) are incentives for miners. Faster confirmation times and greater network security can be achieved by miners by prioritizing transactions with significant fees when the transaction fee-to-reward ratio is higher.

Transaction prioritization

The transaction fee-to-reward ratio becomes very important when there is a lot of network traffic, with many transactions competing for a small amount of block space. Users who want their transactions to be confirmed quickly may be willing to pay more. Miners are more likely to include transactions with higher fees in the blocks they mine due to the potential for greater profits. This ensures that transactions are completed quickly and helps to control network congestion.

Post-halving sustainability

The block reward is halved approximately every four years as part of the Bitcoin protocol. This occurrence is scheduled into the protocol. Transaction fees represent an increasingly larger portion of miner revenue as the block reward decreases over time. As the block reward decreases, the transaction fee-to-reward ratio helps to assess whether miners can support their operations solely through transaction fees.

Network resilience

The Bitcoin transaction fee-to-reward ratio provides data on the financial stability of the network. A healthy ratio shows that users are willing to pay fair transaction fees, supporting the security and ongoing operation of the network. Consistently low ratios can exclude miners, compromising the security of the network and reducing the processing power of transactions.

Market sentiment

User behavior and the transaction fee-to-reward ratio can be indicators of market sentiment. High transaction costs may mean that more people are interested in using the Bitcoin network during those times. Low fees, on the other hand, may imply low demand and network activity.

Adapting incentives

The transaction fee-to-reward ratio adapts to changes in market conditions, technological developments, and user preferences. The variables that affect the ratio change, along with the cryptocurrency environment, offer data on the reactivity and flexibility of the network.

Is a higher Bitcoin transaction fee-to-reward ratio essential for the economic sustainability of the Bitcoin network?

The sustainable future of the Bitcoin network rests on a delicate balance between miner incentives, network security, and user-friendly transaction costs.

The multidimensional question of whether a higher Bitcoin transaction fee-to-reward ratio is necessary for the financial viability of the Bitcoin network has sparked discussions in the cryptocurrency industry.

On the one hand, proponents argue that a larger block reward and reduced transaction costs provide stronger short-term incentives for miners to actively participate in transaction validation and network security. This strategy balances the miner's work and rewards, focusing on their immediate gains.

On the other hand, opinions that favor a balanced transaction fee-to-reward ratio argue that the continuous decline of block rewards required by Bitcoin halving events is a deliberate move towards a fee-centric network sustainability model.

This methodical strategy attempts to avoid abrupt shocks to the network, while encouraging a gradual transition to transaction fees as the main source of income for miners. Higher transaction fees can offset the decreasing block rewards as transaction volumes increase and user reliance on the Bitcoin network grows, ensuring miner profitability and fostering a healthy fee market.

Will the relationship between transaction fees and block rewards continue to affect Bitcoin transactions in the post-mining era?

Although the dynamics of the relationship will change from being dependent on newly created BTC to transaction fees, its importance in controlling transaction prioritization and network efficiency will persist in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The relationship between transaction fees and block rewards in relation to newly created BTC will become obsolete when all Bitcoin has been mined and the block reward reaches 0. At that time, miners will not be compensated with a block reward for successfully adding a new block to the blockchain.

Instead, the only factor that will affect the relationship between transaction fees and block rewards will be the transaction fees that users pay to have their transactions included in blocks. The relationship will remain significant as it will reflect the competition of users to validate transactions promptly. Users will modify their fee offers based on their urgency and the prevailing conditions on the network, and miners will prioritize transactions with higher fees.

The relationship between transaction fees and block rewards will still have an impact on the speed and reliability with which transactions are confirmed during the post-mining phase. Users who pay higher fees may receive faster transaction processing, while those who choose lower fees may see slower confirmation delays.

@ 58edc6ae:e070cfa5

On the need to create a new absolute right

Under Polish civil law, there is currently no absolute right to Bitcoin. The catalog of such rights is closed, and Bitcoin cannot be classified into any of the existing categories. This should not be surprising. Bitcoin is a type of asset that had not existed before 2009. However, there is a need to create a new absolute right: the right to Bitcoin or, more broadly, the right to scarce information.

Gap in the law

Bitcoin is not a tangible object, and therefore, it is not subject to ownership or any other property rights. Nor can it be classified under the category of intangible goods protected by copyright or industrial property rights.

Bitcoin is also not considered money under Polish law. It is not a security, a participation title in joint investment institutions, or a derivative instrument under financial market regulations. The mere necessity of protecting the private key from disclosure does not make Bitcoin a trade secret under the rules on combating unfair competition. Also, Bitcoin is used by non-entrepreneurs who are not protected by trade secret regulations. Claims that it constitutes an asset of its own kind are unsatisfactory from a legal point of view because they do not explain anything.

The civil-law nature of the "right to Bitcoin“ cannot be determined based on the provisions on income tax, anti-money laundering, and counter-terrorism financing regulations that use the category of "virtual currencies." While they acknowledge the undeniable fact that Bitcoin is traded on the market and impose certain tax and regulatory obligations on participants in this trade, they do not specify the civil-law character of the "right to Bitcoin". The same applies to the forthcoming EU regulation on crypto assets (MiCA) and regulation on information on transfers of funds and certain crypto assets. They use the terms "purchase" and "sale" in relation to the so-called crypto assets, which may suggest that provions on the sale agreement should apply to exchanging Bitcoin for other assets. However, these are public law provisions whose aim is to define the regulatory requirements and limitations of economic activity relating to crypto assets. As such, they do not address the civil-law character of those assets. They do not imply that specific private law provisions, including those on ownership, apply to crypto assets.

Therefore, there is a gap in the law. The gap can be explained by the fact that Bitcoin is an entirely new type of proprietary asset. One that had not existed and had even been difficult to imagine before 2009.

Scarce information is a new type of proprietary asset

Bitcoin, like any intangible asset, is information, a collection of bits. Information is, by its nature, easy to duplicate, which has both economic and legal consequences. Goods that can be duplicated by anyone typically do not possess the characteristic of scarcity and, therefore, do not have economic value. In other words, we are not willing to pay for something that is easily accessible and can be duplicated in any number of copies.

The scarcity of information, and thus its economic value, is usually ensured through state intervention. For example, by granting authors a monopoly on the use of their (copyrighted) works of authorship, the law prohibits the replication or use on the market of the information (bits) that make up that work. A (copyrighted) work of authorship is information protected due to a specific way of its expression. Thanks to the monopoly, the supply of such work on the market will be controlled by the author, even after the work has been made public. In a similar manner, the state ensures scarcity of inventions. Inventions are information that consists of novel ideas which are suitable for industrial use. The inventor obtains a monopoly by disclosing their idea to the public in a specified procedure. After meeting certain conditions, the state or a group of states grants the inventor a monopoly to exploit the invention within a specified territory.

Another way to ensure the scarcity of information is to keep it secret. This method is effective when exploiting the information does not require disclosure. However, the exploitation of information without disclosing it is usually difficult or impossible in practice. Here, too, the state comes to the aid by creating a monopoly on so-called know-how or trade secrets.

It is easy to see, therefore, that without a state-guaranteed monopoly, works, inventions, or know-how would be easily accessible and duplicable indefinitely after their disclosure, making them worthless and rendering them ineligible for legal transactions.

Until recently, the above limitations applied to all known types of information. The situation changed on October 31, 2008, with the publication of the Bitcoin Whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto. The essence of the discovery is the organisation of a peer-to-peer computer network that guarantees the immutability of its fundamental principles (the so-called consensus rules), including the immutability of the rule that the network will emit a finite number of monetary units according to a specified plan. In short, Satoshi Nakamoto made a series of engineering discoveries, resulting in the creation of a new type of information: information which is inherently scarce. There will be a total of 21 million bitcoins ever created, and there is no practical possibility of changing this rule.

Lack of protection and uncertainty

Since the first Bitcoin transaction, we have been dealing with information that is inherently scarce. Such transactions are considered permissible due to the freedom of contracts. Despite this, there is no absolute legal right in Polish law that protects holders of Bitcoin.

Attempts have been made in the literature to find the basis for such protection in property laws, torts, criminal law, and other. However, those attempts do not take into account the essence of what Bitcoin is and are therefore doomed to failure. For example, proposals to apply provisions on vindication or negatory protection are entirely insufficient in practice. Such protection, by its nature, concerns the tangible object which, in the case of Bitcoin, is only the medium on which the private key is stored. It will not apply to Bitcoin itself, which is an intangible asset (information) recorded in a public ledger and protected by that key. Asserting rights to the medium, even if successful, does not provide protection against the loss of Bitcoin. Buyers of Bitcoin are also not provided with the necessary protection by provisions on torts. They may potentially allow for claiming damages against individuals who come into possession of the private key unlawfully (e.g., steal the medium or hack the buyer's private computer). However, they will not provide protection against individuals who acquire Bitcoin from wrongdoers or gain access to the key without violating the law (e.g., find a lost key).

Similar reservations can also be raised regarding claims for protection of possession or claims for unjust enrichment. The protection they offer is insufficient and not adapted to the specific nature of Bitcoin. In addition, there are difficult issues related to potential co-ownership of Bitcoin, which arises when it is acquired with jointly owned assets, issues related to inheriting Bitcoin, and issues related to the right to Bitcoins in marital relationships.

The Legal Title to Bitcoin?

The situation is ripe for an attempt to clarify the legal status of Bitcoin, particularly to consider the legal protection system for individuals who hold and use Bitcoin in the market. The previously discussed public regulations are not sufficient and should be supplemented with provisions of private law that define Bitcoin's status as a subject of civil-law relations.

Various solutions are possible.

First, one could consider granting Bitcoin the legal status of money (not to confuse with the status of legal tender). In that case, a Bitcoin purchaser would be protected just like the owner of monetary funds. Paying a debt with Bitcoin would be equivalent to paying it with money and would lead to the extinguishment of the debt. From a tax perspective, paying with Bitcoin would not be associated with the risk of generating income.

Second, it is also possible to decide that provisions on ownerwhip, including co-ownership, should apply to Bitcoin with the necessary modifications. Laws on ownership serve as a basic model for many absolute rights, and despite Bitcoin being an intangible asset, it has characteristics that resemble property. In particular, it is durable, countable, divisible and created with the use of energy.

Third, it is possible to consider creating a new absolute right, namely the right to scarce information. Currently, Bitcoin seems to be the only asset that belongs to this category. The supply of other so-called crypto assets remains under the control of their issuers – entities controlling the blockchain. This makes them similar to securities. Bitcoin is the only crypto asset without an issuer, with its issuance genuinely fixed and unchangeable. It cannot be ruled out entirely that in the future, other assets with this characteristic may appear, although there are also opposing views that scarcity in information can only be discovered once.

This new absolute right could be similar to ownership. It should, therefore, provide protection erga omnes (against everyone) through claims analogous to claims for vindication (for surrender) and negatory claims (for restoration to the original state and cessation of violations). Appropriate application of provisions on co-ownership, and even provisions on adverse possession, would be possible. At the same time, the specificity of Bitcoin, including the importance of private keys, the integral system for determining the moment of transactions through block confirmations, and special situations such as blockchain forks and their synchronisation, would need to be taken into account. Issues of this kind would require a detailed examination and thoughtful approach.

To some extent, the lack of civil-law regulation of Bitcoin is due to the natural delay of the law. The law catches up with innovations and is always a step behind. It hasn't helped that Bitcoin’s revolutionary nature is not immediately apparent. It has been easy to overlook it in the sea of much less significant technologies. Most people still don't realise that something has changed forever. However, ignoring Bitcoin will become increasingly difficult as adoption progresses. As it gains importance, individuals, businesses, and even states that understood the significance and irreversibility of this process will gain an advantage over those who lag behind.

Bitcoin is already a significant and widespread phenomenon, deserving the attention of legislators. Legislators should not try to prohibit, restrict, or delay this technology but provide its users with adequate protection and freedom to operate in the market. However, it is not clear whether the Polish or European legislator already understands this.

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

La comunidad de YakiHonne está entusiasmada con Nostrasia y han transcrito diligentemente los inspiradores discursos de Nostrasia. Transcripciones de discursos adicionales estarán disponibles con el tiempo. Las versiones japonesa y española son inicialmente traducidas y revisadas por miembros de la comunidad con la ayuda de herramientas de inteligencia artificial. Todos los usuarios de YakiHonne están invitados a unirse al proceso de revisión. Aquellos que completen con éxito la revisión recibirán una recompensa especial de 3000 Sats. Para comenzar, simplemente comuníquese con nosotros (Comente aquí, DM o TG) para registrarse, y el primero La persona con quien contactar y enviar su reseña será el afortunado destinatario de la recompensa. Y oye, si estás dispuesto, nos encantaría traducir estos discursos a más idiomas. ¡Únete a nosotros!

🌟English: Functional Relays 🌟中文版: 功能 Relay 🌟日本語: 機能リレー

empezar desde 00:46:53

Ohayo gozaimasu. Oh, mi esposa está cansada de oírme decir eso. Mi nombre es John, también conocido como hodlbod. Hay algunas cosas sobre mí. Trabajo en Corle, principalmente. Hoy voy a hablar de relevos.

Retitulé esta charla varias veces. Iba a hablar sobre envoltorios de regalos, encriptación y demás, pero los retransmisiones son una gran parte de eso para apoyar a grupos privados. ¿Los usas? ¿Los ignoras? Mientras trabajaba en eso, descubrí algunas propiedades interesantes de lo que los relés pueden hacer y lo que no pueden hacer y un paradigma claro. Así que pensé en concentrarme en eso y compartirlo con ustedes.

Estamos un poco atrasados, así que intentaré acortar un poco mi charla. Pero, básicamente, mi charla se llama "Relés funcionales", y eso es un juego de palabras porque los relés tienen que funcionar. La programación funcional es un buen paradigma para hacer que las cosas funcionen.

Entonces, para comenzar, pensé en comenzar con la definición consensuada de qué es realmente un relevo. Un relevo es que realmente no es mucho. No hay mucho que haga un relevo. Básicamente almacena eventos, y ese es el final de la historia. Son interoperables, pero definir ese término es un poco complicado, así que entraré en detalles de lo que realmente significa. Pero esa es su definición básica de relevo.

Sin embargo, no todos los relevos son iguales. Entonces, ya sabes, los relés pueden diferenciarse. No es necesario tener un montón de relés que hagan exactamente lo mismo. Hay algunas formas diferentes en que los relés pueden diferenciarse entre sí. Tienes rendimiento, por lo que puedes tener un relé lento o un relé rápido, o un relé que tenga una latencia más baja o una latencia más alta. En realidad, este es uno de los principales aspectos en los que se ha centrado el desarrollo de retransmisiones hasta ahora: el rendimiento. Tienes, en particular, StirFurry con sus estructuras de datos mapeadas en memoria. Eso ha dejado fuera del agua a muchos otros relevos.

Entonces, otra forma en que los relés pueden diferenciarse es por el comportamiento y el tipo de funcionalidad que admiten. Por lo tanto, hay algunos puntos diferentes que los relés pueden o no querer admitir. Y luego también tienes conjuntos de datos, por lo que los relés pueden contener diferentes conjuntos de datos. Es posible que tenga datos diferentes según la clave pública o según quién escribe en ellos o según el análisis de contenido. Y los repetidores tienen algunas herramientas para elegir qué conjunto de datos realmente admiten. Y luego está la disponibilidad, y lo que quiero decir con esto no es tiempo de actividad sino una especie de interfaz. Por lo tanto, los relés generalmente se encuentran detrás de una interfaz WebSocket detrás de un nombre de dominio que se resuelve en una dirección IP. Pero también podrías poner un relé detrás de un servicio cebolla Tor. Podrías poner un relé en la memoria de tu aplicación cliente. Podrías poner un relé detrás de una LAN. Por lo tanto, hay muchas formas diferentes de ubicar los relés.

Hablemos un poco de interoperabilidad. Los repetidores deben ser interoperables para funcionar como buenos ciudadanos de la red. La prueba de fuego que creo que tiene más sentido es desde la perspectiva del usuario final. Si toman un relevo y lo colocan en su configuración de relevo, entonces debería poder mejorar su experiencia. Pero hay algunas advertencias al respecto.

Si agregas un millón de retransmisiones, tu experiencia empeorará. Pero tenga esto en cuenta que un relé debe proporcionar algún tipo de funcionalidad mejorada a un cliente. Pero, por supuesto, esto puede ir en cualquiera de las otras dimensiones que mencioné anteriormente. Es posible que un repetidor no tenga todos los datos que el usuario desea, pero puede que tenga algunos de ellos y pueda acceder a ellos más rápido. Entonces, al igual que las páginas moradas, es posible que otros relés no tengan datos que se solicitan comúnmente, por lo que es posible que no respondan a las solicitudes con mucha frecuencia. Pero para solicitudes ocasionales, como mensajes cifrados o datos muy antiguos, ese relé podría ser adecuado para atender esas solicitudes. Y, por lo tanto, un relé puede mejorar la experiencia del usuario en cuanto a rendimiento, disponibilidad de datos o disponibilidad de funciones. Pero hay algunas formas en las que puedes hacer esto mal. Entonces, ya sabes, el comportamiento es algo realmente complicado para los relés porque la interoperabilidad depende principalmente del comportamiento. Ya sabes, puedes tener diferentes conjuntos de datos, y eso no rompe ni perjudica tanto la interoperabilidad. Pero si le faltan funciones o funciones adicionales que afectan la interoperabilidad, y lo que descubrí al pensar en todo esto es que con los relés, las funciones adicionales son en realidad peores que las funciones faltantes. Y eso es un poco contradictorio porque si agregas una característica adicional a tu software, a tu API, realmente no perjudica nada. Y mientras que si eliminas una función de una interfaz estándar, en realidad daña las cosas con los relés. Yo diría que en realidad es todo lo contrario. Porque si elimina una función de un relé, tenemos otros relés en los que podemos confiar, por lo que el cliente no resulta dañado si ese relé no admite esa característica en particular. Entonces, ya sabes, para hacerlo concreto, tienes una solicitud y un evento. Esos son los dos comandos principales que admiten los relés. Si su retransmisión decide simplemente ignorar el evento y lanzar un aviso cada vez que alguien intenta publicar en el retransmisión, no importa porque ese no es el único retransmisión que alguien usa. Con suerte, lo mismo con la solicitud. Quizás tengas un relé y sea de sólo escritura. ¿A quién le importa? En realidad, nadie se da cuenta de que simplemente ignora todas las solicitudes, y esas solicitudes son satisfechas por otras cosas. Por otro lado, si tiene funciones adicionales, si tiene funciones adicionales, por ejemplo, contar o buscar, estas son las dos cosas principales que considero funciones adicionales que no son necesarias y son difíciles de soportar. Pero hay otras cosas. Si tiene funciones adicionales, invita a los clientes a comenzar a confiar en ellas. Entonces, abrí una solicitud de extracción al repositorio de NIP para desaprobar y/o eliminar el recuento de NIP 45, que es el único NIP que contiene exclusivamente mi nombre. Estoy destruyendo mi propia contribución al protocolo o, en otras palabras, limpiando mi propio desastre. Creo que NIP 45 es una mala idea. Creo que el conteo fue un error. La motivación para abrir ese PR originalmente en marzo o abril fue: veamos cómo podemos admitir una funcionalidad más avanzada en Noar que no sea solo recibir solicitudes y luego contarlas en la memoria del cliente. Entonces esa fue la motivación. Pero desafortunadamente, la mayoría de los retransmisores no lo implementan. Estaba RB.IIO, que ya no existe, y NoopBand. Esos son los únicos dos relevos que conozco de ese conteo admitido. Entonces, si desea obtener un recuento, debe preguntarle a NoopBand. Eso es extremadamente centralizador. NoopBand tiene la mayoría de los eventos en la red. Pero no los tiene todos. Por lo tanto, no sólo no obtendrá un recuento preciso, sino que tendrá que depender de una implementación y un servicio en particular en orden.

Podemos tener una persona aquí, este será el lugar más divertido de toda la conferencia y ya terminamos de compartir, ¿vale? ¿Podemos tener un xfrog más? ¿Estás cerca para comenzar? Creo que hay uno en algún lugar. Supongo que no lo sé. Creo que esto se está transmitiendo, por supuesto, en vivo, está bien, todos están durmiendo de todos modos, eso es cierto, excepto que sabes que entre el 30 y el 70 % de la población mundial está un poco más dispersa, eso es lo máximo. Estás bien y me dijeron eso ayer. Me dijeron que esto no estaba siendo grabado. Así que estaba eligiendo con mucha más libertad. Normalmente no, no solo se graba, es en vivo y se edita en vivo, te puedo conseguir cuando sales del edificio. Eso es cierto. Creo que ayer usé el término federales en mi presentación. está bien.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne コミュニティはノストラシアに興奮しており、ノストラシアの感動的なスピーチを熱心に文字に起こしています。 追加のスピーチトランスクリプトは、今後公開される予定です。 日本語版とスペイン語版は、最初にコミュニティ メンバーによって AI ツールの助けを借りて翻訳および校正されます。 YakiHonneユーザーの皆様はぜひレビューにご参加ください。 無事にレビューを完了した方には特別報酬として3000Satが付与されます。 まずはご連絡ください (ここにコメントしてください、DM、または TG)。 連絡してレビューを送信した人が、幸運な特典の受け取り者となります。 もしよろしければ、これらのスピーチをさらに多くの言語に翻訳していただければ幸いです。 参加しませんか！

🌟English: Functional Relays 🌟中文版: 功能 Relay 🌟Español: Relés funcionales

00:46:53から開始

おはようございます。ああ、妻は私の言うことを聞くのにうんざりしています。私の名前はジョン、別名ホドルボッドです。私についてのことがあります。主にCorleを担当しています。今日はリレーについてお話します。

私はこの講演のタイトルを何度も変更しました。ギフト包装や暗号化などについて話すつもりでしたが、リレーはプライベート グループをサポートする上で大きな部分を占めます。使っていますか？あなたはそれらを無視しますか？それに取り組んでいるうちに、リレーで何ができて何ができないのかという興味深い特性と、きちんとしたパラダイムを発見しました。そこで、そこに焦点を当てて、それを皆さんと共有したいと思いました。

少し遅れていますので、ここで少し話を短くしたいと思います。しかし、基本的に、私の講演は「機能リレー」と呼ばれており、リレーは機能する必要があるため、これは語呂合わせです。関数型プログラミングは、物事を機能させるための優れたパラダイムです。

そこで、まず、リレーとは実際何なのかについてのコンセンサスのある定義から始めようと考えました。リレーは実際にはそれほど多くありません。リレーができることはそれほど多くありません。基本的にはイベントを保存するだけで、話は終わりです。これらは相互運用可能ですが、実際にこの用語を定義するのは少し難しいため、実際に何を意味するのか詳しく説明します。しかし、それがリレーの基本的な定義です。

ただし、すべてのリレーが同じというわけではありません。つまり、リレーは区別することができます。まったく同じことを行うリレーを大量に用意する必要はありません。リレーを互いに区別するには、いくつかの方法があります。パフォーマンスがあるので、遅いリレーや速いリレー、あるいはより低い遅延またはより高い遅延のリレーを使用できます。実際、これはリレー開発がこれまで取り組んできた主な側面の 1 つであり、パフォーマンスです。最も注目すべきは、メモリ マップされたデータ構造を備えた StirFurry です。これにより、他の多くのリレーが吹き飛ばされました。

つまり、リレーを区別できるもう 1 つの方法は、動作とサポートする機能の種類によってです。したがって、リレーがサポートしたい場合とそうでない場合があるいくつかの異なるニップがあります。さらに、データ セットも用意されているため、リレーにはさまざまなデータ セットを含めることができます。公開キーに基づいて、またはたまたま誰がそれに書き込んだか、またはコンテンツ分析に基づいて、異なるデータが存在する可能性があります。また、リレーには、実際にサポートするデータセットを選択するためのツールがいくつかあります。そして可用性があります。これが意味するのは稼働時間ではなく、一種のインターフェースです。したがって、リレーは通常、IP アドレスに解決されるドメイン名の背後の WebSocket インターフェイスの背後に配置されます。ただし、Tor オニオン サービスの背後にリレーを置くことも同様に可能です。クライアント アプリケーションのメモリにリレーを配置できます。 LAN の背後にリレーを置くこともできます。したがって、リレーを見つけるにはさまざまな方法があります。

相互運用性について少しお話しましょう。リレーがネットワークの善良な市民として機能するには、相互運用性が必要です。私が最も意味のあるリトマス試験紙は、エンドユーザーの観点から見ることだと思います。ユーザーがリレーを取得し、それをリレー設定に組み込むと、エクスペリエンスが向上するはずです。ただし、これには注意点がいくつかあります。

たとえば、100 万個のリレーを追加すると、エクスペリエンスは悪化します。ただし、リレーはクライアントに何らかの改善された機能を提供する必要があることに注意してください。しかし、もちろん、これは先ほど述べた他の次元にも当てはまります。リレーにはユーザーが必要とするすべてのデータが含まれていない可能性がありますが、一部のデータは含まれており、より速くアクセスできる可能性があります。したがって、パープル ページと同様に、他のリレーには一般的に要求されるデータがない可能性があるため、要求にあまり応答しない可能性があります。ただし、暗号化されたメッセージや非常に古いデータなどのたまに発生するリクエストの場合は、そのリレーがそれらのリクエストの処理に適している可能性があります。したがって、リレーにより、パフォーマンス、データの可用性、または機能の可用性に関するユーザー エクスペリエンスが向上します。しかし、これを間違って行う方法がいくつかあります。つまり、相互運用性は主に動作に依存するため、動作はリレーにとって非常に厄介なものです。ご存知のとおり、異なるデータセットを持つことができますが、それによって相互運用性が損なわれたり損なわれたりすることはありません。しかし、相互運用性に影響を与える欠落した機能や追加機能がある場合、これらすべてを検討して私が発見したのは、リレーの場合、追加機能は欠落している機能よりも実際には悪いということです。これは少し直観に反しますが、ソフトウェアや API に追加機能を追加しても、実際には何も害はありません。一方、標準インターフェイスから機能を削除すると、実際にはリレーに悪影響を及ぼします。実際はその逆だと私は主張します。リレーから機能を削除しても、信頼できる他のリレーがあるため、その特定の機能をサポートしていないリレーによってクライアントが実際に被害を受けることはありません。具体的に言うと、リクエストとイベントがあります。これらは、リレーがサポートする 2 つの主なコマンドです。リレーがイベントを無視して、誰かがリレーに公開しようとするたびに通知をスローすることにした場合でも、それが誰かが使用する唯一のリレーではないため、問題はありません。リクエストでも同じことができれば幸いです。おそらくリレーがあり、それが書き込み専用である可能性があります。誰が気にする？すべてのリクエストが無視されるだけで、それらのリクエストは他のものによって満たされることに誰も気づきません。一方、追加機能がある場合、たとえばカウントや検索などの追加機能がある場合、不要でサポートが難しい追加機能として私が考える主な機能は次の 2 つです。しかし、他にもいろいろあります。追加の機能がある場合、クライアントはそれらに依存し始めます。そこで、NIP 45 カウントを廃止または削除するために、NIP リポジトリにプル リクエストをオープンしました。NIP 45 カウントは、私の名前だけが含まれる唯一の NIP です。私はプロトコルへの私自身の貢献を破壊しています。言い換えれば、私自身の混乱をクリーンアップしています。 NIP 45 は悪い考えだと思います。カウントは間違いだったと思います。もともとその PR をオープンした動機は 3 月か 4 月に遡り、リクエストを取得してクライアントのメモリ内でカウントするだけではない、Noar でより高度な機能をどのようにサポートできるかを見てみましょうというものでした。それが動機でした。しかし、残念ながら、ほとんどのリレーでは実装されていません。今はなきRB.IIOやNoopBandもありました。サポートされているリレーの数を私が知っているのはこれら 2 つだけです。したがって、カウントを取得したい場合は、NoopBand に問い合わせる必要があります。それは非常に集中化しています。 NoopBand はネットワーク上でほとんどのイベントを開催します。しかし、それらがすべて揃っているわけではありません。したがって、正確な数を取得できないだけでなく、特定の 1 つの実装とサービスに依存する必要があります。

ここに一人でもいいです ここはカンファレンス全体で一番面白い場所になるでしょう 共有は終わりました はい、もう 1 匹 xfrog がいますか？ 始めますか どこかに 1 匹いると思います、わかりませんこれはもちろんライブのようにストリーミングされていると思います、大丈夫です、とにかくみんな寝ています、それは本当です、世界の人口の30〜70％がもう少し分散していることを知っていることを除いては、それが最も良いことです、そして私は昨日そう言われましたこれは録音されていないと言われたので、もっと自由に選んでいたのですが、いつもはいいえ、ただ録音されているだけではなく、ライブで編集されており、建物から出るときにライブで見ることができます、その通りです、昨日のプレゼンテーションでフィードという用語を使用したと思いますよし。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne 社区对 Nostrasia 充满了热情，目前正在对 Nostrasia 大会的精彩演讲进行了文字转录，以便大家阅读。 转录的工作正在进行，我们将逐步发布更多的转录文章。 日语和西班牙语版本由社区成员用AI工具初步进行翻译和校对，欢迎所有 YakiHonne 用户参与审核校对。 完成审核后，将获得3000 Sats的特别奖励。 联系我们（在这里评论、DM 或 TG）报名参与，第一个报名并提交审核的人将收到奖励。 欢迎参与并将这些演讲转录文章翻译成更多语言。 加入我们吧！

🌟English: Functional Relays 🌟日本語: 機能リレー 🌟Español: Relés funcionales

从00:46:53开始

早上好。我叫约翰，也被称为hodlbod。关于我有一些事情。我主要在Corle工作。今天我要谈谈中继。

我曾多次重新命名这个演讲。我原本打算谈谈礼品包装、加密等内容，但中继在其中扮演了重要角色，支持私人群组。你使用过它们吗？你忽略它们吗？在研究过程中，我发现了一些有趣的中继属性，以及它们能做什么和不能做什么的一种有趣范式。因此，我想专注于这一点并与你们分享。

由于我们有点赶，所以我会试着在这里缩短我的发言。但基本上，我的演讲叫做“功能性中继”，这是一个双关语，因为中继必须起作用。函数式编程是使事情起作用的一种不错的范式。

所以，为了开始，我想从中继实际是什么的共识定义开始。中继实际上并不是很多。中继的功能并不多。它基本上只是存储事件，这就是全部。它们是可互操作的，但实际上定义这个术语有点棘手，所以我将详细讨论实际上是什么意思。但这是中继的基本定义。

然而，并非所有中继都相同。所以，你知道，中继可以有所区分。你不必拥有完全相同的一大堆中继。中继可以以几种不同的方式区分开。你有性能，所以你可以有一个慢速中继或快速中继，或者具有较低延迟或较高延迟的中继。这实际上是中继开发迄今为止的主要方面之一，即性能。你有，尤其是，StirFurry和其内存映射数据结构。这使得许多其他中继黯然失色。

所以，你知道，中继可以通过行为以及它们支持的功能区分开。所以，中继可能或可能不想支持一些不同的NIP。然后，你还有数据集，中继可以包含不同的数据集。你可能会基于公钥、基于刚好写入它的人或基于内容分析具有不同的数据。而中继有一些工具来选择它们实际支持的数据集。然后还有可用性，我指的不是正常运行时间，而是接口。中继通常位于解析为IP地址的域名背后的WebSocket接口后面。但你同样可以将中继放在Tor洋葱服务后面。你可以将中继放在客户端应用程序的内存中。你可以将中继放在局域网后面。因此，中继可以位于许多不同的位置。

让我们谈谈一下互操作性。为了成为网络的良好公民，中继必须具有互操作性。我认为最有意义的试金石是从最终用户的角度来看的。如果他们拿起一个中继并将其放入其中继设置中，那么它应该能够改善他们的体验。但是这有一些注意事项。

比如说，如果你添加了一百万个中继，你的体验会变得更糟。但请记住，中继应该为客户提供某种改进的功能。但当然，这可以沿着我之前提到的任何其他维度进行。一个中继可能没有用户想要的所有数据，但它可能有一些数据并且能够更快地访问它。就像紫色页面一样，其他中继可能没有常常请求的数据，因此可能不经常响应请求。但对于加密消息或非常旧的数据等偶发请求，该中继可能适合服务这些请求。因此，中继可以增加用户的性能、数据可用性或功能可用性体验。但有一些方法可以做错。所以，你知道，对于中继来说，行为是一个非常棘手的问题，因为互操作性主要取决于行为。你知道，你可以有不同的数据集，这并不会破坏或损害互操作性。但如果有缺失的功能或额外的功能，那就影响互操作性。我在思考所有这些问题时发现的一点是，对于中继来说，额外的功能实际上比缺失的功能更糟糕。这有点反直觉，因为如果你向软件或API添加额外的功能，它实际上并不会有什么损害。而如果你从标准接口中删除了一个功能，实际上会损害中继。我会认为事实上是相反的。因为如果从中继中删除一个功能，我们还有其他中继可以依赖，所以客户端实际上不会因为中继不支持特定功能而受到损害。因此，你知道，只是为了具体化，你有请求和事件。这是中继支持的两个主要命令。如果你的中继决定忽略事件并在每次有人试图发布到中继时抛出通知，那没关系，因为那不是任何人使用的唯一中继。希望对请求也是同样的情况。也许你有一个中继，它是只写的。谁在乎？没有人真的注意到它只是忽略所有请求，这些请求将由其他东西实现。另一方面，如果你有额外的功能，比如计数或搜索，这是我认为的额外功能的两个主要方面，不是必要的功能，并且支持起来很棘手。但还有其他事情。如果你有额外的功能，它会吸引客户开始依赖它们。所以，我向NIPs repo提了一个拉取请求，用于弃用和/或删除NIP 45计数，这是唯一一个完全由我命名的NIP。我正在毁掉我对协议的贡献，换句话说，清理我自己的混乱。我认为NIP 45是个坏主意。我认为计数是个错误。最初在三月或四月间提出这一建议的动机是，让我们看看我们如何在Noar上支持更高级的功能，而不仅仅是在客户端的内存中获取请求然后对其进行计数。所以，那是动机。但不幸的是，大多数中继实际上并没有实现它。有RB.IIO，它现在已经不存在了，还有NoopBand。这是我知道支持计数的唯一两个中继。所以，如果你想要获取计数，你必须询问NoopBand。这是非常集中的。NoopBand拥有网络上大多数事件。但它并没有全部。所以，不仅你不会得到准确的计数，你还必须依赖于一个特定的实现和服务。

我们可以在这里有一个人，这将是整个会议中最有趣的地方，我们分享完毕，可以了，我们还有一个xfrog，你在吗？可以开始了，我认为有一个在附近，我猜不知道，我认为这正在被直播，当然是实况，没关系，大家都在睡觉，这是真的，除了你知道，全球30-70%的人口分散在更广泛的地方，这是最重要的，你很好，昨天有人告诉我，昨天有人告诉我这不是被录制的，所以我挑选得更加自由，通常不是录制的，不仅是录制，还是实时的，而且是实时编辑，离开大楼时会跟踪你，没错，昨天我在演讲中使用了“feds”这个词。好的。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ feb2cefb:6a14230d

# Gaia's Garden Chapter 1

Created: 2022-01-30 08:09 Topic: #Topic/Permaculture # Source: #Source/Book

Introducing the Ecological garden

Author asks questions: - How do people fit into natural landscapes? - How to integrate incomplete pieces into a vigorous, thriving backyard ecosystem that benefits both people & wildlife? -> Answer is Ecological garden - Meld best features, beyond adding styles together - Feels like a living being, with a character and essence that is unique - Combine low environmental impact, low maintenance and high yields with elegant aesthetics ^985214

What is Permaculture?

-> uses a set of principles & practices to design sustainable human settlements

Used to: - Design buildings - energy and wastewater systems - villages - school curricula - business - community groups - decision-making processes

-> How? -> focus less on objects themselves than on the design of relationships among them

Permaculture is the toolbox that helps us organize and decide when an how to use those tools, connecting different disciplines, strategies and techniques. => a linking science

->Aim? -> design ecologically sound, economically prosperous human communities, guided by a set of ethics: - caring for Earth - caring for people - reinvesting surplus that this creates

Permaculture Principles

-> indicators of sustainability

Core Principles for Ecological Design

1. Observe
2. Connect
3. Catch & store energy
4. Let Each element perform multiple functions
5. Let each function be supported by multiple elements
6. Least change 4 greatest effect
7. Use small-scale intensive systems
8. Optimize edge
9. Collaborate with succession
10. Use biological & renewable resources

Principles Based on Attitudes

1. Turn problems in solutions
2. Get a yield
3. Biggest limit = creativity
4. Mistakes are tools for learning

Gardens that Really Work with Nature

Ecology is concerned with the interrelationship of organisms and their environments. -> Ecological gardens connect people to their environment & looks and works the same way nature does.

"Nature has a broad back, and with a little ingenuity and a change in viewpoint, a gardener can shift plenty of labor to this willing partner"

Why is gardening So Much Work?

Let nature do the work for you

Tilling destroys weeds and pumps air to microbes that release a flood of nutrients for fast crop growth... burn up all the nutrients and then die => depletes fertility ^HighTimePreference

Conventional landscapes have torn the web of nature.

Creating a well-balanced garden means showing something about how nature behaves.

Beyond Natural Gardening

Every bit of food, every scrap of lumber, each medicinal herb or other human product that comes from someone's yard means that one less chunk of land outside our hometown needs to be denuded of natives and developed for human use.

-> shortest chain possible

Yard with native plants lacking any for human use => somewhere else, out of sight, there is a nonnative-containing farm and factory forest with the environmental destruction they bring, providing for needs. => Taking care of ourselves (in our own yard) means that factory farms and forests can shrink ^SelfSovereignity4CommonGood -> this is a fight against the abstraction, cfr. Connor Veering

Embedded link: Death By Abstraction

The native vs. Exotics Discussion

• Species are constantly in motion
• Gardening with native plants -> [[Cause célèbre]] cfr. Climate crisis, BLM through George Floyd
• Exotics are not the issue, our intervention is -> opportunists move in after primary damage was done and often in direct response to it

When we lose something we love, we search for a scapegoat and a newly arrived species makes a ready target

Nature abhors a vacuum - create one, and she'll rush in with whatever's handy

You can't fight nature - nature always bats last - but you can sometimes be first to get where it's going

Nature has a patience that humans lack, nature take the long view.

Opportunistic species, after a boom-and -bust period comes into equilibrium with its surroundings, It make take a decade or a century

• native is merely a question of perspective
• We need to look deeper into our reasons for demonizing certain species

Hierarchy of safety for choosing plant: 1. use native to fill desired role if possible 2. use a tested exotic 3. consider small scale-introduction of new exotic -> a good approach to test new procedures/techniques

Making the Desert Bloom, Sustainably

References

1. [[Meshtadel Space ( 21.01.2022) - notes by Czino]]
2. [[Permies.com - Review Gaia's Garden - chapter 1]]
3. [[Referral Points MoC - Gaia's garden]]
4. [[20220204-Telegram Parallels]]

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

The YakiHonne community is excited about Nostrasia, and they have diligently transcribed Nostrasia's inspiring speeches. Additional speech transcripts will be made available over time. The Japanese and Spanish versions are initially translated and proofread by community members with the help of AI tools. All YakiHonne users are invited to join in the review process. Those who successfully complete the review will be granted a special reward of 3000 Sats. To get started, simply reach out to us (Comment here, DM, or TG) to sign up, and the first person to contact and submit their review will be the lucky recipient of the reward. And hey, if you're up for it, we'd love to have these speeches translated into even more languages. Join us!

🌟中文版: 功能 Relay 🌟日本語: 機能リレー 🌟Español: Relés funcionales

start from 00:46:53

Ohayo gozaimasu. Oh, my wife is tired of hearing me say that. My name is John, also known as hodlbod. There's some stuff about me. I work on Corle, mostly. Today I am going to talk about relays.

I retitled this talk a bunch of times. I was going to talk about gift wrapping and encryption and stuff, but relays are a big part of that for supporting private groups. Do you use them? Do you ignore them? As I was working on that, I kind of discovered some interesting properties of what relays can do and what they can't do and a neat paradigm. So I thought I would just focus on that and share that with you guys.

We're a little behind, so I'm going to try to shorten my talk by a little bit here. But, basically, my talk is called "Functional Relays," and that's a pun because relays have to work. Functional programming is a nice paradigm for making things work.

So to get started, I thought I would start with the consensus definition of what a relay actually is. A relay is it really isn't much. There's not a lot that a relay does. It basically stores events, and that's the end of the story. They're interoperable, but actually defining that term is a little tricky, so I'll get into the details of what that actually means. But that's your basic definition of a relay.

Not all relays are equal, though. So, you know, relays can differentiate. You don't have to have just a whole bunch of relays that do exactly the same thing. There are a few different ways that relays can differentiate from each other. You've got performance, so you can have a slow relay or a fast relay, or a relay that has lower latency or higher latency. This is actually one of the main aspects that relay development has gone into so far, is performance. You've got, most notably, StirFurry with its memory-mapped data structures. That's blown a lot of the other relays out of the water.

So, you know, another way that relays can differentiate is by behavior and what kind of functionality they support. So, there's a few different nips that relays may or may not want to support. And then you've also got data sets, so relays can contain different sets of data. You might have different data based on pubkey or based on who just happens to write to it or based on content analysis. And relays have some tools for choosing what data set they actually support. And then there's availability, and what I mean by this is not uptime but sort of interface. So relays generally sit behind a WebSocket interface behind a domain name that resolves to an IP address. But you could equally put a relay behind a Tor onion service. You could put a relay in memory in your client application. You could put a relay behind a LAN. So there's a lot of different ways that relays can be located.

Let's talk a little bit about interoperability. Relays have to be interoperable in order to function as good citizens of the network. The litmus test I think that makes the most sense is from an end user's perspective. If they take a relay and they plop it into their relay settings, then it should be able to make their experience better. But there are some caveats to this.

Like if you add a million relays, your experience is going to get worse. But just keep that in mind that a relay should provide some kind of improved functionality to a client. But of course, this can go along any of the other dimensions that I mentioned earlier. A relay might not have all the data that the user wants, but it might have some of the data and be able to access it faster. So like purple pages, other relays might have no data that is commonly requested, so it might not respond to requests very often. But for occasional requests like for encrypted messages or for very old data, that relay might be suited to serve those requests. And so a relay can add to the user's experience of performance, data availability, or feature availability. But there's some ways that you can do this wrong as. So, you know, behavior is a really sticky thing for relays because interoperability depends mostly on behavior. You know, you can have different sets of data, and that doesn't break or hurt interoperability all that much. But if you have missing features or extra features that affect interoperability, and what I kind of discovered thinking through all this is that with relays, extra features are actually worse than missing features. And that's a little counterintuitive because if you add an extra feature to your software, to your API, it doesn't really hurt anything. And whereas if you remove a feature from a standard interface, it does actually hurt things with relays. I would argue that it's actually the opposite. Because if you remove a feature from a relay, we have other relays that we can rely on, so the client isn't actually damaged by that relay not supporting that particular feature. So, you know, just to make it concrete, you've got request and you've got event. Those are the two main commands that relays support. If your relay decides to just ignore event and throw a notice every time someone tries to publish to the relay, it doesn't matter because that's not the only relay anyone uses. Hopefully, the same thing with request. Maybe you've got a relay and it's write-only. Who cares? No one really notices it just ignores all the requests, and those requests get fulfilled by other things. On the other hand, if you have extra features, if you have extra features, for example, count or search, these are the two main things that I think of extra functionality that isn't necessary and is tricky to support. But there are other things. If you have extra features, it invites clients to begin to rely on those. So, I opened a pull request to the NIPs repo to deprecate and/or remove NIP 45 count, which is the only NIP with exclusively my name on it. I'm destroying my own contribution to the protocol or, in other words, cleaning up my own mess. I think NIP 45 is a bad idea. I think count was a mistake. The motivation for opening that PR originally back in March or April was, let's just see how we can support more advanced functionality on Noar that's not just getting requests and then counting them in memory on the client. So, that was the motivation. But unfortunately, it's just not implemented by most relays. There was RB.IIO, which is now defunct, and NoopBand. Those are the only two relays that I know of that supported count. So, if you want to get a count, you have to ask NoopBand. That's extremely centralizing. NoopBand has most of the events on the network. But it doesn't have all of them. So, not only are you not going to get an accurate count, you have to rely on one particular implementation and service in order.

We can have one person here this is going to be the funniest place in the whole conference and we're done sharing okay can do we have one more xfrog are you around to start I think there is one around somewhere I guess don't know I think this is being streamed of course like live it's okay everybody's sleeping anyway that is that is true except for you know 30-70% of the world's population spread out a bit more that's the most you're good and I was told that yesterday I was told that this wasn't being recorded So I was picking much more freely I normally no it's not just recorded it's live and edited live can get you when you leave the building that's right I think I used the term feds yesterday in my presentation all right.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

The YakiHonne community is excited about Nostrasia, and they have diligently transcribed Nostrasia's inspiring speeches. Additional speech transcripts will be made available over time. The Japanese and Spanish versions are initially translated and proofread by community members with the help of AI tools. All YakiHonne users are invited to join in the review process. Those who successfully complete the review will be granted a special reward of 3000 Sats. To get started, simply reach out to us (Comment here, DM, or TG) to sign up, and the first person to contact and submit their review will be the lucky recipient of the reward. And hey, if you're up for it, we'd love to have these speeches translated into even more languages. Join us!

🌟中文版: 比特币在40个国家的采用 🌟日本語: パコ氏による40カ国でのビットコイン採用 🌟Español: Adopción de Bitcoin en 40 países

start from 06:02:32

Hello everybody, my name is Paco, I'm from India and it's so good to see you all here, I'm going to try to sum this up in 20 minutes because the Great Edward Snowden and Jack Dorsey will be speaking so let's do this.

Thank you everybody for taking out time to come here to listen to what run with Bitcoin is and I will this journey is only possible because of people like you who supported my journey so a round of applause for everyone like you all supported my journey to make this thing possible.

why am I doing run with Bitcoin is just for Mass awareness to say that yes Bitcoin is money and humans of Bitcoin are kind people but what is run with Bitcoin? I'm from India and it was August 25th 2021 I got a call from my friend saying Paco do you want to travel the world, it was a full moon night I was like yeah I want to travel the world, he's like but you have to travel using Bitcoin and I'm like but what is bitcoin he gave me the book called the Bitcoin standard, how many of you read the Bitcoin standard? All right so that book really changed my life I come from India and we believe in gold, gold is worship, how many of you have gold? Hey you see this, okay, how many of you have Bitcoin? There you go, we have moved forward so I just realized that in 1971 they stopped using the gold standard and I was like okay this is possible I went to Google and I tried to search how can I travel using Bitcoin there weren't many people there were two people one was Felix whis, he's from Germany he traveled the world 27 countries using Bitcoin in 2017 and I'm like all right let's do this is lightning it is possible and here starts the Journey of traveling 40 countries in 2 years it didn't it was not possible in one year.

I'm happy I quit my job in 2015 I went out traveling I hitchhiked from United States to Argentina along the way I did a lot of small jobs that is from dumpster diving being an English teacher, selling peanuts writing people's names in Hindi, I can write your name in Hindi if you want, and yeah being a guide and then Bitcoin comes to my life.

So I'm just going to share some small stories of what I've learned, I had sent 1,000 DMs to people all throughout this Journey 2 years ago, I had zero followers zero people knew me, people thought I'm a scammer I sent thousands DMs, from thousand DMs 45 people replied to me only 45 people and I had $200 in my pocket when the journey started in 17th September, so this is Journey will share with you five things those are the five properties of money and that is durability, portability, divisibility, limited Supply, and acceptability.

So to begin off with acceptability, Bitcoin has been accepted in over 40 countries and majorly All In global South. Global South is almost 5 billion people and that's where the money moves nowadays anyways I'll start with India bitcoin price was $55,000 when I started I hosted my Bitcoin meetups and bought shoes and stuff, in this photo the person from the left in the blue shirt he can't speak he can't hear we were talking via Telegram and he said English is freedom, Bitcoin is freedom and I was like yeah that's my first beginning, the other Meetup in that Meetup I was called an anti-national because I was talking shit about my government money and I was really scared for my life so I changed the approach.

I moved forward to Thailand and in Thailand there's one of us sitting with us Barry, he is one of the contributors of umbrell and that's when I came to know what is toxic maximalism mean a lot of people used Bitcoin, I remember I reached kosa movi the island and I was like Hey I'm going to stay at this place pay with Bitcoin I reached to the place the guy said no I was like okay now what I'm going to do I started walking, I saw a big signboard saying Bitcoin accepted here I got my bike rental for Bitcoin my visa extension with Bitcoin my hostel everything with Bitcoin yep.

I moved over to Cambodia in 1970, United States of America had a war with Vietnam and they dropped 5 million landmines as we speak 4 million landmines are active this is what happens when you have Fiat money and in Cambodia those bombs are active I got to set up a wallet for one of them Akira is his name, he a Japanese name Akira but yeah he diffused over 100,000 bombs there and saved people and if you're using Bitcoin you cannot cheat the chain you cannot print more money so it's bitcoin's properties are very helpful for the world that comes forward, Cambodia was nice.

If you're following the Bitcoin price has been going down $55,000, $60,000, 50, 39, Singapore is a great Community for Bitcoin meetups, in Singapore one of the person who donated me my first 0.1 BTC he said that hey Paco the day you become a big influencer you will start Shilling shitcoins and I don't want to support you with lot of money but since I'm a bitcoiner I will give you this 0.1 Bitcoin thank God I'm not Shilling any coins.

Sri Lanka this is my favorite story I'm 33 years old I lost the key to my hotel room and the lady said that you have to pay $100 I said no I will not pay you $100, I will make you a copy she gave me a copy, I went to the next town and I told to the key maker hey, can you make me a copy of this key I will pay you in Bitcoin he said yes I have Binance, I apparently got a copy of key paid in Bitcoin, Sri Lanka has a very difficult story I don't need to convince you about what Bitcoin is but Sri Lanka ran out of US dollars with there being no dollars, they did not have petroleum with no petroleum there was no electricity, with no electricity the president escaped the country so that's what Bitcoin has done to Sri Lanka, nothing yet.

Qatar, the youngest guy here's 13 years old he runs an electrum wallet and he helped me get my first running shoes. In Kenya, I went to Kenya with all racist wives I was really scared for my life but that's where my life changed, somebody stole my phone but I bought a phone with Bitcoin and I found a Bitcoin bus, Bitcoin massage parlour, Bitcoin restaurant, and Uganda, I went over to the equator I offered the lady some Bitcoin and the lady is like is this Bitcoin Halal? Is this Bitcoin kosher? And I was like hi I'm not God but this is still better than what your government is printing she did accept Bitcoin.

People love cash average person's salary is $6,200 per month so all of you people who are here please count your blessings. Bitcoin is a rich man's game the rich man will make money by sharing the money with the poor people so we are blessed so please be sharing love with everybody around. Rwanda same thing Bitcoin, see the Bitcoin price is $44,000 I go to Tanzania, I climb Kilimanjaro, I orange pill my guide I pay him I go up I come down 5 days later, Bitcoin price is $30,000 so had to give him more Bitcoin so that he feels happy but he doesn't use Bitcoin anymore because of the fluctuation.

The one of the great ladies Dr Sandra she's teaching Bitcoin in kiso hel a local language in Africa there are more than thousand languages hence there is no such adoption but people are using Bitcoin in all these countries.

Malawi's, Bitcoin adoption mozek the oldest guy to accept Bitcoin from me he was 67 years old the reason he accepted Bitcoin because he loves gambling I mean the price is better now I'm grateful.

Zimbabwe we know a lot about Zimbabwe they had the currencies of billions and trillions dollars. I reached Zimbabwe I met with an accident and hence anytime somebody asks how are you and I say I am alive I'm really grateful that I'm here to share the story with you great Bitcoin Community people use Bitcoin as I can say the properties of money there it is used it is accepted, entering into Zambia I had some money with me I took that money over the Border they said we will not accept your money and I was like why he's like this is a piece of paper that only works on the other side we accept our own Zambian quas and I was like wow if you're going to do that then you don't accept my money then what is this and that's where I was like okay my Bitcoin is still accepted I went I did my peer-to-peer trade.

Botswana we all think that we are contributing to bitcoin right we all think that we are the best people and we are doing the great job we are amazing people. The man in the center Chris Ellis a 2012 bitcoiner was part of the Bitcoin Foundation used to give away a lot of Bitcoins to people but then he found out that people were using that money to buy business class tickets and enjoy life he went over to the Kalahari desert in Botswana and he started permaculture he's using his Bitcoin to grow plants and fruits so that when he dies, people can have food so yeah that's something that I feel permaculture is self-transcendence, permaculture is more than you rather than just stacking and buying a Lambo.

Nigeria, Nigeria also there's a great, I want something, people say there's Bitcoin adoption there is usdt adoption because most of the people who are using that are P2P Traders and usdt is much more stable and that's what people prefer and this is what I saw in Nigeria great Bitcoin adoption great Community but yes usdt is highly preferred down there.

Cameroon, so I was crossing the border from Nigeria to Cameroon and On the Border they checked my bags and they found a Bitcoin t-shirt, Bitcoin shoes, Bitcoin stickers, and the guy is like Bitcoin is money I'm like yes Bitcoin is money do you want some he's like yeah I gave him 100 stickers and I was through, people are aware Bitcoin is money but people don't know what Bitcoin is [Applause].

Central Africa Republic, the country that said that we use Bitcoin, i ended up reaching the president's office and I was telling him about Bitcoin and I showed him this similar presentation and he said but who gave them permission to use Bitcoin and I'm like exactly sir it is is permissionless and then he was like how about you buy my Sango coin they launched a shitcoin and I was there we pay respect I was like sure I'll buy your shitcoin the man forgot his login password I set him up a wallet of Satoshi gave him $5 of Bitcoin there but the country nobody uses Bitcoin and they speak French.

All right Crossing in from central Africa Republic to South Sudan it took me 9 days there are no roads, I was on a bike for 500 km 9 days and in that bike one day I had to convert my $100 bill, i went to convert the $100 bill the person said no I will not accept it I'm like why he's like this money is printed in 2009 I only accept 2013 and above and I was like oh this is so true my Bitcoin doesn't expire, my Bitcoin is accepted everywhere it is uniformly accepted all around the world, nonetheless I crossed over into the Border, South Sudan I get I cross the war zone I am stupid I don't use much of Google I entered a war zone and in the war zone they thought I'm a spy apparently the first so-called white guy Crossing I had guns on my head they said open your laptop open your phone you're spying on us and I'm like no I'm not he's like now you have to give me $150 I'm like I have no money he's like you're hiding money in your underpants so I was naked in front of the cops and they did not find any money and there I understood nobody can take my Bitcoin thank God, one of the guys called up someone and I went up to the Central Intelligence office and the guy was like how are you and I was like I was sitting on a sofa and I was like I am angry you guys are smoking weed, drinking on job, and harassing me he's like calm down I'm like no I can't calm down, I'm very angry now, I was in power right he was he's like I'll ask you two questions, question one did they beat you? I'm like no, question two did they take anything from you? I'm like no he's like they have the authority to shoot you because this is a war zone so I just realized Bitcoin doesn't fix everything guys, you have to see there are War zones people are still fighting between their tribes and we are really blessed that we are still here when we were born we were hungry naked and crying and look at us now smiling have clothes stomach full waiting for more sake for tonight.

Ethiopia, I think so the Ethiopia is a great country too never colonized Ethiopia, Japan, Thailand, Peru, great culture, culture still alive Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin has reached $19,000.

Welcome El Salvador, El Salvador said they have a great Bitcoin Community called Bitcoin Beach how many of you you been to El Salvador there you go thanks to El Salvador we have something great happening there's me Premier Bitcoin come out they're teaching Bitcoin we have a friend a designer for damas here Roberto he has great coffee in his country, so El Salvador yes people accept Bitcoin but in Bitcoin Beach they charge a commission of 5% extra.

Senegal, if anybody wants to have a circular economy you can do like Senegal run your own node and provide liquidity to your friends that guide us is it there Nuru 10 businesses except Bitcoin. Ghana, I reached Ghana and this is the first time I met Jack Dorsey and I asked him can I touch your beard and he said no and I was like okay no problem. I got to meet other people had a great Community time a great Community started called Bitcoin cowries another Bitcoin Community started I would like to say as I skipped through the countries because of the visit what happened there's a community started in Cameroon called Bitcoin Mountain a community started in Uganda called Bitcoin Uganda kapala so this is the third community that started.

Welcome to South Africa, I reached day number two I was mugged and as I was mugged they took my phone away and the community got me a new phone in 2 hours so this community what it loves its proof of work if you go to job you get paid if you listen to your father you get pocket money but if you don't do anything you don't get anything so this community loves proof of work and that's why we are here we all love to work so yeah keep working and keep sharing the love stop being toxic. Toxicity was good but toxicity did not get you 100,000 people joining the ecosystem.

We had a Indian Bitcoin conference only 100 people came we are a country of 1.5 billion people we have to share love and that comes from within you and yourself if you did not get love while you were growing up how will you share love so yeah look within don't be angry at people give people a chance because everybody's a human there's a yin and the yang this is the Yang that's the yin right there's the black the white the hot the cold the up the down if there is no shitcoin whom do you bully and if people do not fall if people do not make mistakes how will they grow people are nice people have given me so much love I was homeless when I started the journey and here today I'm on a stage talking to you alll about what love can do.

Brazil got to meet Jesus, Jesus said buy Bitcoin I was like cool, Brazil has a great Bitcoin Community called priia Bitcoin another circular economy. We moving forward to Costa Rica that's when I met the first time nostrica, how many of you have this batch you all have it it is very precious others are not getting it this time preserve this I got it in nostrica I got to meet first time will got to see the power of Nostr if Bitcoin is freedom money then Nostr is freedom of speech you can say anything and anything I say literally anything sometimes there.

First time in my life Bitcoin went up to $26,000 I was like whoop whoop Happy there's Francis pulot he is the most ethical man in this world. I guess ethics comes when you have stomach full when you are hungry you can't have ethics because you're we are busy looking for food.

Mexico great community started another circular Community started in Mexico too thanks to the drug cartels there is lot of cash economy so I love Japan because in Japan you all love cash there are a lot of places they love cash I love cash.

Cuba how many have you seen the Cuban documentary there's a nice documentary done by Joon Nakamoto talking about Kuba now Cuba, has where am I on time six minutes. Cuba has a great Community we hosted a Bitcoin Meetup 75 people came up and thanks to the death of Fidel Castro a lot of small businesses have started and that's really beautiful. The law says that you can use Bitcoin anytime anywhere a great people but the average man salary is $ 12 to $15 per month so if you want to feel your Rich go to Cuba you can buy the whole club.

Jamaica dread is here great Community they are also cash only people got to visit Bob Marley's house which is a museum and Bob Marley did used to smoke marijuana on the Bible.

Haiti, the only country where I did not use Bitcoin this country I heard gunshots and I ran away 4 days later I left Haiti I'm not going back to this country this country got destroyed because of double debt this is the first country to get independence 1800s and this is the country that is suffering the most because they paying their debt to the French people.

Dominican Republic my favorite country people use Bitcoin down there too, Puerto Rico, there are lot of bitcoiners but no adoption. Trinidad and Tobago similarly good Community, Suriname another Community started called Bitcoin sanan another circular economy. Panama if you are getting married please do get prenups I will not go there anyway.

Peru another circular economy at did one of my favorite circular economies from Peru. Honduras also has a circular economy called ratan and Nicaragua, Nicaragua is also communism, Nicaragua just opened the North Korean Embassy there and shut down the Australian Embassy please don't carry your drone or cameras there you can get stuck I would really like to thank the community I was looking for funding I was asking for $150 to $200 per day I got $50 per day but that's the end of my journey I free it's no more run with Bitcoin it's run with nostr now I am a free man[Applause].

I make videos over this time I've hosted 110 Bitcoin meetups, 250 YouTube videos and yeah this is me here on pakoda India, Twitter and this is my nPub I believe that we humans are all blessed we should just share our blessings because we are still alive we have a long way to go, Bitcoin is a government job it is not a threat 5year job it's 20 years job that's why our parents always said get a government job but yeah share love with you guys man because love is what brings us all together that's what I felt with nostr and I really hope yep thank you guys [Applause].

In just a moment I'll get the stream from in there and here so if you don't want to you can stay here and watch it too.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 48eaff4c:a99affaf

Bacon ipsum dolor amet capicola ball tip swine fatback pork chop. Chislic short ribs beef ribs jerky. Ham hock chislic turducken capicola beef ribs, sausage meatloaf shank tail frankfurter biltong. Tongue bresaola hamburger, venison beef ribs ball tip porchetta pancetta. Ground round shank swine, picanha pastrami prosciutto ball tip beef leberkas salami cupim t-bone kevin. Tenderloin sausage frankfurter kevin filet mignon ham hock picanha pastrami cow. Kielbasa doner pork belly pancetta rump t-bone, leberkas tenderloin sausage pork jerky picanha beef ribs biltong drumstick.

Buffalo bacon frankfurter ribeye chicken ground round tri-tip pig ball tip ham boudin shoulder turkey short loin cupim. Drumstick boudin doner kevin tenderloin jerky, rump pork loin turducken brisket shank andouille. Ham turkey meatloaf beef ribs ham hock, flank prosciutto salami. Flank short loin burgdoggen pork belly ham hock. Ham rump tenderloin burgdoggen, hamburger ham hock pork loin andouille leberkas ball tip chicken.

Rump ground round sausage venison, t-bone brisket landjaeger. Jerky pork chop pork loin strip steak short loin pancetta cupim kielbasa meatloaf. Bacon ribeye shank salami shoulder tail. Turducken cow porchetta fatback t-bone, swine bacon tri-tip pig hamburger pork andouille. Venison tongue bacon tri-tip.

Pancetta chicken pork chop, capicola ground round fatback venison ham hock landjaeger. Pig prosciutto boudin, buffalo fatback swine shank. Beef pig meatball sausage strip steak ham hamburger chislic turkey corned beef jerky ribeye rump pork belly fatback. Frankfurter hamburger alcatra strip steak swine.

Doner filet mignon bresaola burgdoggen bacon shank fatback ball tip short ribs pig venison leberkas. Jerky turkey chicken jowl venison pig. Cupim andouille ground round, kevin chislic pig doner meatloaf leberkas shank brisket tongue pork chop flank. Meatloaf beef ribs venison chicken, corned beef meatball shankle.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Someone said some days ago in some NIP proposal discussion that we will run out of kind numbers because currently we're limited to 40000. Some weeks before someone else had complained that I had written somewhere that the kind number should be a uint16, which can only go up to 65536.

In the meantime, some people make NIP proposals that involve very different events, but that use just one kind number and differentiate events by adding d tags or by other tricks. That is justified in the name of flexibility: the idea is that by having a string in which people can write anything the protocol is automatically more flexible, extensible, powerful, magical.

But this is not true. Using strings to differentiate between what could have been differentiated by a number doesn't make anything more flexible, it just adds confusion and inefficiency. Take NIP-58 for example. It's the NIP that defines badge creation, award and acceptance.

It makes sense for the badge creation to be parameterized replaceable (kind 30009) and differentiated by the d tag, as each pubkey can create multiple badges, and it makes sense for the badge award to be a normal, non-replaceable event (kind 8), as badges can be awarded to many people and the awards never change. But it doesn't make sense that for each badge receiver to craft a list of badges they have accepted and want to display they have to use a parameterized replaceable event (kind 30008) with a d tag set to "profile_badges". Why this magical string?

I believe the idea was that people would be able to craft different badge lists. For example, they would use the "profile_badges" value for badges they want to display in their main profile, and some other value, for example, "hidden_badges" for badges they have accepted but don't want to display in their main profile, and "rejected_badges" for badges that they want to explicitly reject -- or something like that.

The idea makes sense, but does it really? We could have done the same with a kind 10007 meaning profile badges, kind 10008 meaning hidden badges and kind 10009 meaning rejected badges. That would save disk space and bandwidth, it would make it easier for relays to index these events and, most importantly, it would make implementation simpler. In the world of d tags, every programmer that tries to implement creating these badge lists have to go to the NIP and hardcode the kind 30008, then look for the magical string that must be set at the d tag and write it, exactly like in the NIP, as a string, and add that as a tag to the event, the same is valid for when a client wants to support reading the tag lists. While in the multi-kind world you only need to hardcode one magical number. It's undeniable that {"kinds": [10007]} is a simpler filter than {"kinds": [30009], "#d": ["profile_badges"]}. You may say the differences are negligible, but I'm just trying to illustrate a principle.

I have the impression that in the minds of many programmers to be able to write a string gives them the impression that everything is more flexible and magical: "oh, I can write anything, while if the stuff is in kinds I would have to first get authorization from the NIP overlords". Maybe the NIP process can be improved, but ultimately this makes little difference. You can definitely write anything in the d tag, but you can also write anything in the kind field too, the actual requirement that exists, and that exists for both, is that others start using the exact same kind number or d string that you're using, and vice-versa, and there is no shortcut for that, you necessarily have to come to an agreement with others -- which is what the NIP process tries to facilitate.

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne 社区对 Nostrasia 充满了热情，目前正在对 Nostrasia 大会的精彩演讲进行了文字转录，以便大家阅读。 转录的工作正在进行，我们将逐步发布更多的转录文章。 日语和西班牙语版本由社区成员用AI工具初步进行翻译和校对，欢迎所有 YakiHonne 用户参与审核校对。 完成审核后，将获得3000 Sats的特别奖励。 联系我们（在这里评论、DM 或 TG）报名参与，第一个报名并提交审核的人将收到奖励。 欢迎参与并将这些演讲转录文章翻译成更多语言。 加入我们吧！

🌟English: Nostr: Bitcoin's Layer 3 🌟日本語: Nostr: ビットコインのレイヤー 3 🌟Español: Nostr: la capa 3 de Bitcoin

B0B - 嗨，大家好，我是鲍勃，过去10年我的背景一直在支付领域。一开始是作为传统支付的投资者，然后在Strike从事比特币和闪电支付，现在是Prism的创始人，支持通过Nostr实现比特币支付。今天，我要谈一谈我对比特币采用的认识以及Nostr如何作为比特币的第三层加速比特币采用。因为我的目标是从今天的2000万比特币用户增长到全球每个人都使用比特币并成为比特币爱好者，而且速度要非常快。

那么，我们如何快速实现一些事情？如何实现快速用户增长？是的，你需要为用户构建一个10倍或100倍更好的产品。那么，比特币产品是什么呢？嗯，比特币是更好的货币，也是更好的支付工具。我们将逐一讨论这两者。我们将从更好的货币开始。因此，从技术上讲，比特币是更好的货币；它具有固定的供应量，去中心化，抗审查，无需许可，全球通用。它比法定货币更好，没有争议。但技术上更好并不意味着你会吸引很多用户。要实现快速用户增长，你需要为用户构建一个10倍更好的产品。

那么，谁是比特币用户呢？嗯，这很容易；任何有钱的人都是。尽管这个图表是准确的，如果你在过去的一百年里持有一美元，你失去了美元价值的96%，而美元是世界上表现最好的货币。所以，每一种其他货币的表现都比这差。不幸的是，不到1%的人会考虑100年的时间跨度。事实上，大多数人的思考方式是：“通货膨胀是什么？似乎有点慢。我怎么失去了5%？我不明白这是怎么回事。”当他们看比特币时，它看起来极不稳定；去年下跌了70%，今年上涨了70%。所以，对于绝大多数人来说，比特币作为更好的货币实际上并不看起来更好。甚至不是10倍，实际上看起来更差，对吧？因为它比传统货币更加波动。当然，随着时间的推移，比特币将变得更加稳定，通货膨胀将变得更加严重，比特币对用户来说显然会更好，但这需要一些时间，这没关系；对我们作为比特币的买家来说更好。

因此，如果更好的货币需要很长时间，我认为更好的机会是更好的支付。因此，我将花费剩下的时间讨论比特币如何创建更好的支付和更快的用户增长。因此，通过进行相同的思考，比特币是更好的支付渠道。它是开放的，全球通用的，无需许可的，即时的，几乎免费的，而且是现金的最终形式。比特币作为支付渠道比任何其他支付渠道都要好；它比联邦电汇更好，比A网络更好，比卡网络更好，比银行网络更好。但仅仅因为技术上更好并不意味着你会获得大量用户增长。

因此，让我们为支付用户进行相同的思考。有商家和消费者两类用户。因此，如果我们通过相同的例子来看，尝试使用比特币和闪电支付购买咖啡与使用传统的Visa卡，我们将从商家开始。对于商家来说，接受比特币更快；你立即得到它而不是需要两到15天。这很棒；它是现金最终形式；你得到比特币，而且没有退款或退单。它几乎是免费的，所以比卡网络便宜得多，而且是无国界的，所以你可以从世界各地接受比特币。所以对商家来说，这太棒了；比特币听起来是一个更好的支付渠道。

但对于消费者来说，情况恰恰相反。你使用比特币或使用卡购买的情况是一样的。你实际上不会得到任何比特币奖励。因此，对于消费者来说，使用比特币是更糟糕的选择，因为他们无法享受到比特币航空休息室等待、保险福利等待。而且没有退款，所以如果商家欺诈了我，那对我来说可惜了，对吧？信用卡实际上提供保护。所以对于消费者来说，用比特币支付更糟糕，在支付中，唯一重要的是消费者；商家是接受方。所以如果对消费者不起作用，对商家也不起作用。

因此，对于绝大多数人来说，使用比特币或购买咖啡甚至不是10倍更好；实际上它更糟糕，更糟糕。这是因为对99%的人来说，购买咖啡已经很方便了。如果这个房间里的任何人想去买杯咖啡，他们可以做到，而且他们不需要比特币。因此，退一步思考一下，思考比特币或比特币在传统支付方面能够比传统支付好10倍的地方是我过去几年一直在做的一种练习。但真正在过去的一年里，更详细地思考这个问题，这让你想到了比特币比传统支付更擅长什么，对吧？比特币只是本地的互联网货币，这让你想到互联网比传统通信更擅长什么？

互联网之所以更擅长通信，是因为它可以与世界任何地方的任何人进行即时通讯，而且"任何人"是这里真正重要的一部分。因此，如果我们只是对本地互联网货币进行相同的处理，比特币应该是与世界任何地方的任何人进行即时支付。而且通信是互联网的一个重要组成部分，所以我称其为"每个人通信"。但在互联网上构建的每个大型平台都已经优化了"每个人通信"，无论是在Instagram上发布的一篇让百万人看到的帖子，还是在TikTok上的舞蹈视频，或者在Reddit上发布的一篇帖子，其中一个人在互联网上发布的内容可以让数百或数千或数百万人轻松看到。因此，这在比特币中应该是可能的；它应该只是互联网货币。我们应该能够向世界各地的许多人进行一次支付。但我们一直在优化一对一的支付；我们一直在优化购买咖啡。但正如我们所说，这对每个人都已经有效了。

想象一下，如果互联网只是围绕一对一的通信进行优化。如果WhatsApp是互联网上唯一的东西，我和朋友交流，那么互联网就不会像今天这样强大，拥有与世界任何地方的每个人进行通信的能力。因此，比特币应该有这个能力；它应该有能力通过一次点击即时支付很多人。让我们通过这个练习。从技术上讲，它是否比传统支付更好？然后，它是否能提供10倍更好的体验？

首先，让我们从传统支付开始。如果要使用银行转账，你需要询问朋友的帐户和路由号码。如果他们足够勇敢地把它发给你，然后你还要弄清楚如何将它以一种简便的方式输入到你的Chase帐户或Wells Fargo帐户中，整个过程将会是一场灾难。为什么不行呢？因为银行领域的身份是分散的。你可能有一个Chase帐户或Wells Fargo帐户，或者你可能有成千上万个信用合作社帐户之一。这些信息非常敏感，所以如果有人拥有这些信息，他们就可以窃取你的钱。有各种各样的发送资金的最低门槛，而且用户界面很糟糕。因此，即使你能让朋友们把所有信息都发给你，你也不会想把它输入到你的用户界面中。银行转账做不到这一点。你不能向三个人发送转账，只能向三个人发送。

那么也许Visa。也许Visa的技术能让我们做到这一点。而且Visa实际上有一些好处。Visa提供标准身份，所以每个人都有一张Visa卡。不管你的银行是哪个，你都可以去商家那里付款，商家不在乎你是有Wells Fargo帐户还是信用合作社帐户。Visa卡都能用。所以它提供标准身份，然后它协调付款。Visa只是消息传递层。Visa从不托管你的美元进行发送；它只是在银行之间协调付款。这是非常有帮助的。但你的Visa卡也很敏感，如果你想通过Visa向你的朋友发送钱，他们需要购买一个终端。所以这根本行不通。因此，Visa实际上也行不通。你不能用Visa发送给所有人。使用比特币和闪电发送所有人支付的挑战。

最近，有Plaid和所有金融科技创新。所以也许Venmo，使用Plaid消息传递层，可以让你向三个人发送支付。而且它也有一些好处。它提供标准身份；它在银行之间协调。所以你得到一个Plaid用户名，你的朋友也有一个，他们不关心你使用什么银行账户；你可以向他们发送钱。所以这很好。但它是一个封闭系统，如果你没有Venmo帐户，你不能使用它。而且它只在美国范围内有效，所以你不能向每个人和任何地方发送钱。因此，传统银行系统不可能发送每个人支付。所幸的是，我们有互联网货币。我们有比特币和闪电。

所以，让我们通过这个例子，因为那应该是可行的，对吧？好吧，这是一个比特币的例子。这是一个你想做的比特币转账的例子，实际上，比特币解决了传统银行系统的问题。它是开放的，即时的，全球通用的。它在同一个世界的任何地方都以同样的方式运作。太棒了。但你与传统银行系统一样有一个问题，即我不知道我的朋友是否有Stripe帐户、Cash App帐户或Wallet of Satoshi。因此，我必须去问他，你知道吗，你用什么钱包？然后我必须向他要他的身份证。而且每个专业人士，每个钱包都有一个不同的协议或用户名。然后，即使我得到了所有这些身份，我不知何故还必须以一种简便的方式将它们放入一个钱包中。我又回到了这个Wells Fargo Chase的例子，我怎么能把三个名字放进去呢？也许三个我能做到，但那可能有点难。但我怎么能在其中放入更多呢？那将花费我很多时间。而且永远不会有人这么做。因此，在今天，使用比特币和闪电发送每个人支付实际上是困难的，尽管在表面上你可能不会这么想，但使用比特币和闪电今天几乎是不可能的。因此，我们一直在优化一对一的支付，而没有专注于每个人支付，因为每个人支付一直是不可能的。

那么，什么奏效了，什么没有奏效呢？传统支付有一些非常有用的优势，比特币支付也有一些优势。如果我们看传统支付堆栈，第一层是货币。第二层是支付。在传统堆栈中，这就是银行。然后第三层是一个消息传递层。这是Visa、Plaid和其他一些建立在银行系统之上的消息传递协议。而传统支付堆栈失败的地方在于美元和银行层。它是封闭的；它是繁琐的；它是昂贵的。那就是它失败的地方。但传统支付堆栈有一个消息传递层，这是非常有帮助的。Visa和Plaid提供了标准身份；它在银行之间协调。比特币支付堆栈解决了银行的分裂问题，解决了托管的问题。Visa和Plaid从不触碰你的钱；它们只是向银行发送消息，告诉它们将钱发送到哪里。所以，让我们看看比特币支付堆栈。它的第一层是货币。第二层是支付，即闪电和闪电钱包。然后，第三层是一个问号。

比特币和闪电实际上解决了传统美元和银行支付堆栈的问题。它是开放的、无需许可的、全球通用的，在世界任何地方都以相同的方式立即运作。但它失败了，因为没有消息传递层。我想你们知道我们要说什么，但现在有了。因此，Nostr提供标准身份，并在钱包之间协调，解决了分裂问题和需要托管比特币以发送比特币支付的问题。所以现在我们有了比特币支付堆栈。如果你从这次演讲中学到了什么，这是最重要的幻灯片。比特币支付堆栈是完全去中心化、抗审查、开放、无需许可和全球的，因为现在有了比特币、闪电和Nostr。

那么Nostr是如何做到这一点的呢？Nostr通过使用在任何客户端上都适用的简单公钥来解决身份问题。通过使用标准协议连接闪电钱包来解决协调问题。它使用的两个协议是Nostr Wallet Connect和Nostr Wallet Connect使用户能够向其钱包发送消息以发送支付。因此，任何集成了Nostr Wallet Connect的钱包都可以让他们的用户发送支付。然后，Lightning Address则相反。它允许用户接收支付。因此，有了Nostr Wallet Connect加上Lightning Address，用户可以发送和接收支付。现在让我们看看这个例子。我们现在有了完整的比特币支付堆栈。我们有比特币、闪电和Nostr。在发送方，我的Alby账户将使用Nostr Wallet Connect。在接收方，我的朋友们将有他们的Lightning Address。让我们看看那个三人支付。所以如果你点击发送，它会向比尔发送一个，然后向Bob发送一个。因此，在这里我在三秒钟内发送了三笔付款，对吧？没有协调，没有与任何人交流。我能够立即发送三笔支付。

因此，现在我们有了一个比特币支付，它是开放的、即时的、全球通用的。由Nostr提供的标准身份，并协调钱包，是微不足道的。我什么都没做；我只是点击了按钮。但让我们让它变得非常明显。这是一个100人支付。所以这是我向100个人发送比特币，其中一些人你可能认识。这里发生的是，当它们变成橙色时，比特币支付正在确认。这是一个100人支付。这是我们在几周内推出的一个产品。三周前，向100人发送资金花了我们大约三分钟的时间。我们对此进行了优化，所以这笔支付将在30秒内完成。通过对钱包、客户端和中继端进行一些优化，我们可以使100人支付几乎瞬间完成。我们也将能够几乎瞬间完成千人或更多人的支付。

因此，这是最令人震惊的部分。我刚刚一次点击就立即发送了100笔支付。作为Prism公司，我们从未对其中任何人进行过登记。我们只是发送消息，允许他们向他们的钱包发送消息。而且我们从未碰过比特币。我们没有任何闪电基础设施。我们没有任何比特币基础设施。我们所做的只是为用户打包消息，让他们发送到比特币钱包以发送这些支付。所以我们从未登记过任何人；我们从未碰过比特币。因此现在我们有了一个在技术上比传统支付更好的解决方案，并提供了10倍或100倍甚至THX更好的用户体验。这改变了一切。首先，过去几年集成比特币支付的时候，比特币支付、比特币应用一直在专注于集成闪电。而集成闪电很难，运行自己的闪电基础设施也很难。如果你正在构建一个应用程序，你最不想做的就是同时构建闪电支付基础设施。这就像如果你在传统支付体系上有一个应用程序，并且你试图同时构建应用程序和银行一样。这非常困难。Nostr让这变得非常容易。

因此，在Prism，我们实际上开始尝试运行我们自己的闪电基础设施，租用了所有这些麻烦和障碍，用了一个半月的时间。我们意识到我们可以集成Nostr，并通过集成Nostr构建了相同的体验，我认为是更好的体验。通过集成Nostr，我们自然地获得了闪电支付。因此，你看到的那笔支付是Prism在没有自己集成任何闪电的情况下构建的产品。我们所做的只是集成Nostr。因此，任何想启用比特币支付的人现在应该集成Nostr，而不是直接集成闪电。这使得事情变得更容易。然后，它创造了新的货币化方式。每个人支付比一对一支付强大一百倍。只举一个例子，今天在互联网上发生的小费支付几乎为零。小费支付是我所谓的一对一支付。就是我给别人小费。在互联网上，这是非常非常小的货币化，几乎为零。订阅要大得多。因此，订阅可能是小费支付数量的10,000倍。人们支付订阅费，但订阅并不是每个人支付。而直到刚刚，使用传统法币和比特币法币，要进行每个人支付是不可能的。那么我们该如何做呢？我们需要一个位于中间的公司。事情的运作方式如下。订阅者将资金支付给公司，这家公司的角色就是社交媒体平台上的内容创作者，该公司将资金收入其银行账户。在每周或月末，他们将将这笔钱支付给他们想要在其平台上的人，我们称之为内容创作者。所以你需要这家位于中间的公司，而公司喜欢这样做，因为它创造了一个巨大的增长动力。每个大型社交媒体公司都这样做过。他们有这些创作者计划，他们支付你将资金放在TikTok上或支付你将资金放在Instagram或reels上。这创造了这个增长的动力。你得到的创作者越多，用户就越多。用户越多，订阅越多，你就可以将更多的钱传递给内容创作者。

所以让我们看看最近做到这一点的一家公司的例子。And X Premium。所以X Premium实际上在这方面取得了巨大的成功，你现在可以支付11美元/月来支持你喜欢的内容创作者。如果你付款，你就有资格获得基于你创建的内容的支付。这是个好主意。他们实际上在短短一年内就创造了一亿美元的收入。一亿美元的订阅收入，他们承诺将全部归还给创作者。谁知道他们是否会这样做，但这是理论。所以你将一亿美元带入生态系统以支持创作者。这很棒。现在，正如你所看到的脚注，它被一堆其他东西搞砸了。但从理论上讲，这是为Twitter或X创建增长动力的一个很棒的产品。现在我们不再需要X；我们不再需要Twitter位于中间。你刚刚看到的是一个订阅者，就是我在那种情况下，直接迅速支付了一百人。因此，我们不再需要那个中间商。所以我们重建了X Premium，它被称为Nostr Gold。所以这是我们现在提供的Prism产品。它做的是一样的事情。你可以支持内容创作者。如果你每周支付3,000 SATs，你就有资格获得金奖。Gold是基于特定标签的三天滚动基础上的前10名点赞帖子支付的。所以如果你发布一张照片，并在其中键入“#art”等标签，并获得了大量点赞，你将从订阅收入中获得资金。我们是如何做到这一点的呢？嗯，这就是加入gold并订阅gold的样子。你所要做的就是去makeprism.com/gold，输入你的UB，点击“立即加入”，在这种情况下，我们使用Nostr Wallet Connect来进行支付。因此，我们现在正在通过这种方式传递，即在这种情况下，Alby Nostr Wallet Connect实例，传递3,000 SATs。你连接钱包，大约两秒钟后，它将支付该订阅，并且你将被订阅到gold产品，并且你将有资格在明天获得第一笔支付。因此，对于那些想要尝试变现，想要在Nostr上发布精彩内容的内容创作者，现在他们可以获得这些支付。

那么当一个人支付了那个订阅时，我们实际上做了什么呢？那位订阅者是在去中心化支付和激励，支付3,000 SATs，但不是支付给任何公司。订阅者立即支付了3,000 SATs，分别支付给了前三天内的十大帖子的十位不同的人。你不再需要那家在中间收款的公司，支付可以由订阅者自己，由个人自己进行。对于Nostr来说，这是巨大的，因为现在我们可以创造一个持续的订阅收入池，可以随着时间的推移支付，并激励新用户加入平台并发布内容，因为他们知道有这个固定增长的SATs池，如果他们发布有用且高评价的内容，那么这个SATs池是可用的。

这只是一个简单的例子，但是这个“高级订阅”概念对于任何事情都适用，不仅仅是像 Twitter 那样；实际上，它对 Reddit 示例、像 Twitch 这样的社交媒体视频、游戏平台，以及出版本身的运作都更为出色。而新的比特币支付架构的最后一项功能是赋予个体更多的权力。因此，过去几十年来，互联网已经转变为被这些沟通平台所拥有。几乎所有的通信都受这些平台的控制，许多这些产品都属于同一家公司，它们掌控着互联网。互联网通信之所以被掌控，是因为是，他们构建了一个出色的产品，但是他们控制我们，是因为他们拥有身份和支付手段。没有身份和支付手段，要创建竞争性产品就变得非常困难。但是现在有了 Nostr 和比特币支付，我们既有了身份，也有了支付手段。因此，我们拥有了重新创建这些公司建立的身份和支付层的工具，但是我们可以以一种赋予个体更多权力的方式来做到这一点。现在我们只需在此基础上创建产品。这就是新比特币支付架构的功能，作为社区，我们如何加速这个过程？我们需要做三件事。首先，我们需要更多客户端集成 Zap Splits 和 Nostr Wallet Connect。这是所有这一切之上的协调消息层。我们需要更多比特币钱包集成 Nostr Wallet Connect。我今天知道的有两个，Alby 和 Mutiny，但我们需要所有的钱包，以便任何钱包的用户都能很容易地使用 Nostr Wallet Connect。

最后一件事，你可能会注意到比特币支付堆栈中的一个漏洞是 Lightning Address，这不是 Nostr 原生的。Lightning Address 可以进行大量优化，因此我们可以通过 Lightning Address 得到非常快速的支付，但它仍然有点慢和过于集中。但它是当前的钱包标准，而 Nostr 原生可能更快、更分散，但今天还不存在。我们将在明天与 Alby 团队的会议上讨论这三件事，时间是上午 10:30。如果你想了解更多关于推动比特币第三层和为用户和开发者创建工具的信息，请加入我们。

那么，在 Prism 我们在做什么呢？在 Prism，我们正在推动比特币第三层，为用户和开发者创建工具，以便更轻松地使用 Nostr 上的比特币。因此，在消费者方面，品牌和创作者可以使用我们的应用程序来加速增长。因此，我们允许你接触更多人，与用户互动，并奖励他们。所以下一篇帖子，插入一个美元符号增强，你可能会得到比以前更多的互动。你可以支付那些正在增强或喜欢你的帖子的用户，以奖励他们的参与。开发者可以使用我们的 API 提供更好的比特币支付。因此，如果你对 API 有兴趣，只需给我们发送一封电子邮件。最后，我想以展示 Nostr 可能性的一个例子结束。这是我们今天推出的一个新产品，你可以在 prism.com/backrow 上查看。它允许你为任何人创建一个加入 Nostr 的推荐奖励。我将向你展示这是如何运作的。如果你去增长，你可以插入你想要的推荐奖励金额。在这种情况下，我想为 10,000 SATs 创建一个推荐奖励，并且我想说服我的朋友加入 Nostr，并说：“嘿，只要你加入 Nostr 并连接一个闪电地址，如果你点击这个推荐链接并输入你的新 npub，你将立即获得 10,000 STS 到你的帐户。”所以这就是创建它的过程，创建这个推荐链接非常简单。一旦用户在 Nostr 上创建了他们的帐户并获得了他们的 npub，他们可以点击该链接，将他们的 npub 插入到这里，然后点击提交。我们在我们这边所做的是查找 npub，确保它是在创建推荐链接之后创建的，并且我们使用 Nostr Wallet Connect 来立即从创建者的钱包结算到新用户的钱包。而且这是瞬间支付的。这个支付看起来很简单，但是它是匿名的。Prism 从未接待过任何人，这是自动的。因此，它是基于加入 Nostr 的触发条件的，但这个触发条件可以是任何事情。它可以是“加入 Nostr 并关注我”或“加入 Nostr 并发表 100 篇帖子”。它可以是任何事物，甚至可能与 Nostr 无关。然后，它是异步的，因此当你创建支付时，你不知道谁会索取支付，也不知道他们什么时候会索取支付。所以它是一个异步支付。最后，它是非托管的。因此，Prism 从未接触过比特币，也从未接触过比特币。事实上，我们甚至从未拥有或看到你的 Nostr Wallet Connect 秘钥，所以它完全是非托管的。因此，我们现在可以使用比特币进行匿名、自动、异步、非托管的支付，这是我们长期以来一直在努力解决的问题。而现在我们可以非常简单地做到这一点。这就是比特币支付堆栈的好处，更好的支付，一个更自由的互联网。我们可以将 80 亿比特币用户和其他世界引导到 Nostr。谢谢。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 89f93336:779b7582

Over the weekend sport lovers over the world were blessed with amazing matches and event from the world of Boxing to Football and beyond. I will be reviewing some of the highlight of the weekend.

TYSON FURY VS FRANCIS NGANNOU: This fight was called the fight of the baddest man on the planet and it was for the lineal heavyweight champion of the world. This fight has a lot of history behind it because, Ngannou is a MMA fighter and challenged Fury who is the best heavyweight fighter in the world right now in a boxing fight. When the fight was made, everyone predicted Fury would easily defeat ngannou and even knock him out. On saturday Ngannou shocked the whole world with his performance, knocking Fury down in the third round and boxing with him till the last second. Fury won by split decision that almost everyone disagreed with the judges decision and said Ngannou wonn the fight. The fight is Arguably the biggest boxing fight in decades, it brought together different celebrity like Ronaldo, Eminem, Kanye, e.t.c from different inndustry and country to watch the fight in Riyadh. source BARCELONA VS REAL MADRID: Another edition of the legendary El Classico was held on saturday, The match was a promising one, because this eason edition will be featuring young talented players and rivalry that will last a long time. Thebmatch didnt dissapoint, as Barcelona drew the first blood when Gundogan scored the first goal of the match in the early minutes of the game. Barcelona held on to the lead till the 70th minutes until the man of the moment Jude Bellingham scored a long rage golazo to level the score and bring Real Madrid back in the game. Bellingham was far from done until he scored the winning goal in the 94th minutes of the game, and helped Real Madrid beat Barcelona 2-1 at their home. Jude Bellingham amazing start to life in Real Madrid continues, and he has now scored 13 gaols and 3 assist in 13 gams for reaal madrid across all competition. source MANCHESTER UNITED VS MANCHESTER CITY: The manchester derby is one of the most famous derby matches in the world, manchester united during sir Alex Ferguson era used to have the upper hand but the tides have turn now and Manchester city are now the favorites going into the manchester derby. The result was as expected on Sunday, manchester City thrashed manchester United 3 goals to nil, and dominating them from start till the final whistle, with ggoals from Erling Haaland and Phil Foden. source

Ballon D'or Ceremony: The Ballon D'or ceremony for 2023 was held and different stars graced the occassion and there were different winners too. Jude Bellingham won the Kopa Trophy for best under 21 player of the year. Erling Haaland won the Gerd Muller award for best goal scorer. Aitana Bonmati won the best women player of the year. Vinicius Junior won the socrates award. Emiliano Martinez won the Yashin award for best goallkeeper. manchester city and Barcelona won the best male and female club of the year respectively. Lionel Messi won the Male best player of the year. source Lionel Messi wins Eight Ballon D'or: Lionel Messi wins his eight Ballon D'or trophy, this has caused a lot of controversies with different people saying he deerves it and some saying he doesnt deserve it, annd Erling Haaland was robbed after sscoring 56 goals and winning the treble in his first season at Manchester City and that messi winning the world cup wasnt enough to beat what Haaland accomplished. what do you think? source That wil be all for now, see yall next time.

@ 32dc4f25:f95ddcce

The advance of tech has created a fifth estate. People who control tech control the most scarce resource of our time and a very long time to come. In the realm of media and journalism, consolidation of news corporations and social media created the danger of an authoritarian future, especially when major media and social media platforms share a common view. Although the shift of Twitter’s control changed the dynamics, one fact remains true: the fourth estate is controlled by a small group of people, and there is a centralization risk of it which could potentially cause catastrophic results to the entire human society.

Creating a decentralized alternative can mitigate its negative impact and hedge the risk of centralized control over the fourth estate.

Decentralization was called to change the global monetary system, triggered by the financial crisis in 2008. People who control the global financial system control great power, which can affect everyone’s well-being if misused. Therefore, Bitcoin (and now perhaps the crypto community as a whole) is an alternative of the centralized financial system, currently creating real competitions to the established financial institutions. In the long term, if works as designed, the crypto community can not only become a safeguard of an open financial system, but also provide efficiency and new features the existing financial system could not provide.

Although a decentralized financial system can affect the power of all four estates, creating direct competitions to each single estate is necessary. In the same way, it is necessary to create a decentralized ecosystem for media and journalism to compete with the centralized alternatives.

II. Current Practices and Their Problems

A common practice that seems to address this problem, but actually not, is called “Web3 social” or “Web3 creator economy” initiatives, commonly involving tokenized governance, NFT sales, and DID systems. While these efforts tokenize ownership and allow community members to share a minority of the project’s growth are worthy experiments, they are addressing a different problem.

Web3 platforms create community ownership and community governance, kind of like Uber that gives drivers and users non-dividend voting shares so that they are more aligned in interests with the platform, or like the first version of DAOrayaki plan, creating a DAO-owned media platform so that the DAOrayaki community can collectively decide and review contents, will certainly motivate community participation, but this path will by large not lead to fully censorship resistance platforms, because more people governing something doesn’t mean it’s censorship resistant. So ultimately Web3 approaches are useful in other ways, though not able to provide a truly censorship-free media ecosystem.

III. Decentralize media content on open relays network

Base layer censorship resistance requires an interest-neutral protocol. The protocol should be as simple as possible, because its goal is not to maximally capture value for a protocol token, but rather provide a neutral layer for contents.

Media data should be stored in an open network of servers. The servers can have great diversity and should not be aligned with common interests by design.

Basically, there are two layers of neutrality - server neutrality and token economics neutrality. With these two layers of neutrality, fundamental censorship resistance can be achieved between the dynamics of relays and the media clients (platforms).

For example, we can use Nostr to build up a network of media content relays (the recently merged NIP-23 allows Nostr relays to serve long-form articles). The relays are hosted by a variety of entities and individuals, each freely stores whatever content the relay wants to store. Relays do not need to keep everything on their servers, but they have to keep real posts because all posts can be authenticated by users’ signatures.

The bidirectional selection between clients and relays naturally creates a free market of contents and opinions. The base layer should be not only neutral in technology, but also in economic preferences. A base layer with a token cannot be fully neutral because the protocol and the community will naturally prefer proposals and clients that create economic alignment (and soon ideology alignment) with the token over others that don’t. One way to avoid base layer preference is to leave incentive design to clients. Each client can offer its own incentive plan to the base layer relays, and each relay can choose its most preferred incentive. A base layer that is not bonded with a native token is preferred in the case of a decentralized media ecosystem.

A client-relay network for decentralized media contents.

IV. Add incentives to relays

Because the relay layer is token economics neutral, it is up to the clients to decide how incentives are offered. There will be a free market of client-relay incentives. Different ways of incentives can compete with each other. One client can implement multiple incentive mechanisms. Ultimately, relay incentives are from user/client payments for desired content (for example, in SATs), whereas clients design their own incentives for relays and create business models or token economics for themselves.

• Subscription

Implementing subscriptions on the client and the relay network is important for YakiHonne’s sustainability. Users can subscribe to creators, clients, topics, and relays, and the subscription fees will be distributed to the subscribed parties and relays. The distribution of subscription fees will encourage creators, curators and relays to moderate content and maintain a stable network in a sustainable way.

A client-relay incentives for decentralized media contents.

A client can subscribe to a relay (subscribing to all its contents) or specific content fed by some relays. Both will require new NIPs on Nostr. In case (1), the relay keeps a whitelist of clients, and independently implements a payment logic to whitelist clients. In case (2), the clients subscribe to some contents with unique identifiers (e.g., from some authors). The payment should be routed by some protocol to incentivize the corresponding relays and authors.

At some point, content encryption will become useful to avoid censorship and protect intellectual property rights. There are some relevant NIPs in discussion. NIP-42 authorizes viewing long-form content; NIP-38 is building encrypted group information. Beyond that, there is no NIP for encrypting long-form content and we will customize it, which should be explored after subscription is enabled.

V. Content curation with open relays

YakiHonne’s current platform is a curation-centric client. Each curated topic can effectively serve a certain audience. When Nostr compatibility is added (shortly), content under each curated topic can be stored in a certain set of relays. The choice is bi-directional between relays and curators, and the client can remain neutral in content presentation.

Will Yakihonne frontend shadow-ban contents? It is possible, but the entire architecture allows new clients to compete with YakiHonne if censorship is going wild. Since contents are hosted on relays, not YakiHonne servers. This is a basic layer of protection.

There are two ways a client could shadow-ban a curated topic.

The client frontend could lower the weight of a topic, or it can just hide the topic entirely. Therefore, in order to make YakiHonne an ideal client frontend, topic display (or topic suggestion) algorithms need to be entirely open source. Because all data is hosted on relays, it is relatively easy to verify that the algorithm works as it is than other social media networks like Twitter and other smaller platforms.

Another way to shadow-ban topics is through information filtering. Given that the Nostr protocol or any similar protocols will almost certainly have spam posts, spam filtering is a necessary task for relays and especially clients. However, it is obvious that spam filters can also become a censorship tool, as we well know in Twitter’s case. YakiHonne spam filtering should be done via competitions between relays as well as competitions between curators, avoiding censorship by platform or community rules.

In addition, the current Nostr protocol lacks some basic infrastructures to enrich functionalities of decentralized media platforms. Some proposals are progressing and need to be supported and further evolve. For YakiHonne, necessary NIPs include content curation, topic subscription, and payment support. Some existing proposals like NIP-38, NIP-42 and NIP-57 are useful resources and good places to start.

@ 5002cb48:31a0d6d8

A dear friend, a very smart cookie, has started a new venture in Digital Asset Risk Management for institutional clients. He is just starting out and asked me for the "best approach" to digital marketing. I told him that given that it is an information-intensive industry, he needs to publish content to engage his potential customers. That's it ... that's content marketing ... when you publish great-quality content that your prospects benefit from, engage with, and improve their relationship with you. Then he asked me how and what content should he be posting. That's the subject matter of content strategy.

What is content strategy? Your content strategy answers three questions in the context of the content you are putting out and what goals and objectives you have. First question is "why". Why do you want to put out content? Do you want to increase brand awareness, engagement etc. Basically, how do you want to nudge customers along the customer journey from awareness to consideration to decision. What exactly is your purpose for putting out content. Second key question is "where". Where do you want to put out content? Do you want to write articles, a blog, or produce a podcast, or a YouTube video series. This depends on how you want to meet your audience. Final question is "what". Exactly what sort of content do you want to put out.

If you answer these three questions, you will have a scheme of integrated and coordinated decisions, or basically your content strategy.

That's it.

Good Luck!!

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne コミュニティはノストラシアに興奮しており、ノストラシアの感動的なスピーチを熱心に文字に起こしています。 追加のスピーチトランスクリプトは、今後公開される予定です。 日本語版とスペイン語版は、最初にコミュニティ メンバーによって AI ツールの助けを借りて翻訳および校正されます。 YakiHonneユーザーの皆様はぜひレビューにご参加ください。 無事にレビューを完了した方には特別報酬として3000Satが付与されます。 まずはご連絡ください (ここにコメントしてください、DM、または TG)。 連絡してレビューを送信した人が、幸運な特典の受け取り者となります。 もしよろしければ、これらのスピーチをさらに多くの言語に翻訳していただければ幸いです。 参加しませんか！

🌟English: Nostr: Bitcoin's Layer 3 🌟中文版: Nostr: 比特币的Layer 3 🌟Español: Nostr: la capa 3 de Bitcoin

B0B - 皆さん、えー、私はボブです。過去 10 年間、支払いに携わってきました。最初は従来型決済の投資家として、次にストライクでビットコインとライトニング決済に取り組み、そして現在はプリズムの創設者として、Nostr を超えてビットコイン決済を推進しています。今日は、ビットコインの導入について私が学んだことと、Nostr がビットコインのレイヤー 3 としてビットコインの導入をどのように加速しているかについてお話します。なぜなら、私の目標は、今日の 2,000 万人のビットコイン ユーザーから、世界中のすべての人がビットコインを使用し、ビットコイナーになることです。そして、それを本当に、本当に早く実行することです。

では、何かを非常に速く行うにはどうすればよいでしょうか?ユーザーを急速に成長させるにはどうすればよいでしょうか?そうです、ユーザーにとって 10 倍または 100 倍優れた製品を構築する必要があります。では、ビットコイン商品とは何でしょうか?まあ、ビットコインはより良いお金であり、より良い支払いです。それぞれについて説明していきます。より良いお金から始めましょう。したがって、ビットコインは技術的には優れた通貨です。固定供給があり、分散型で検閲耐性があり、許可が不要で、グローバルです。不換紙幣よりもずっと良いのです。しかし、技術的に優れていても、多くのユーザーを獲得できるわけではありません。ユーザーを急速に成長させるには、ユーザーにとって 10 倍優れた製品を構築する必要があります。

では、ビットコインユーザーとは誰でしょうか？まあ、それは簡単です。それはお金を持っている人なら誰でもです。このグラフは正確ですが、過去 100 年間ドルを保有していた場合、ドルの価値の 96% が失われ、ドルは世界で最もパフォーマンスの高い通貨でした。したがって、他のすべての通貨のパフォーマンスはそれより悪かったのです。残念ながら、100 年のタイムラインで考える人は 1% 未満です。実際、ほとんどの人は次のように考えています。「インフレとは何ですか? なんだか遅いように思えます。どうして 5% も減ったのでしょうか? その仕組みがわかりません。」そして、彼らがビットコインを見ると、それは非常に不安定であるように見えます。昨年は 70% 減少しましたが、今年は 70% 増加しました。したがって、大多数の人にとって、より良いお金としてのビットコインは実際にはより良いとは思えません。 10倍ではないにしても、実際にはもっと悪いように思えますよね？従来の通貨よりもはるかに不安定だからです。もちろん、時間の経過とともに、ビットコインの変動性は低下し、インフレはさらに悪化し、ユーザーにとってビットコインの方が明らかに良くなりますが、それには時間がかかりますが、それは問題ありません。それはビットコインの購入者である私たちにとって良いことです。

したがって、より良いお金を得るには多くの時間がかかる場合、より良い支払いを行うことがユーザーを急速に成長させるためのより良い機会であると私は思います。そこで、私は残りの時間を、ビットコインがどのようにしてより良い支払いを生み出し、より迅速なユーザー増加を生み出すのかについて話すつもりです。そして、同じことを経験すると、ビットコインはより良い支払い手段になります。それはオープンで、グローバルで、許可不要で、即時で、事実上無料で、現金で最終的に支払われます。支払いレールとしてのビットコインは、存在する他のどの支払いレールよりも優れています。連邦送電線よりも優れており、A ネットワークよりも優れており、カード ネットワークよりも優れており、銀行ネットワークよりも優れています。しかし、技術的に優れているからといって、ユーザーが大幅に増加するわけではありません。

それでは、支払いユーザーに対しても同じ演習を行ってみましょう。販売者がいて、消費者がいます。同じ例で、従来の Visa カードではなくビットコインとライトニングでコーヒーを購入しようとすると、販売者から始めます。販売者にとっては、ビットコインを受け入れる方が迅速です。 2 ～ 15 日かかるのではなく、すぐに入手できます。それは素晴らしい;それは現金最終です。ビットコインを受け取りますが、返金やチャージバックはありません。実質的に無料であるため、カード ネットワークよりもはるかに安く、国境がないため、世界中のどこからでもビットコインを受け入れることができます。したがって、商人にとって、これは驚くべきことです。ビットコインははるかに優れた支払い手段のように思えます。

しかし、消費者にとってはその逆です。ビットコインでの購入は、ビットコインを使用してもカードを使用しても同じです。実際にはビットコインの報酬は得られません。したがって、加盟店やカード ネットワークはこれらの手数料をキャッシュ バックの資金として利用しているため、私が Chase カードを使用すると 2% が戻ってくることになります。ビットコインを使用してもお金は戻ってきません。したがって、それはさらに悪いことに思えます。残念ながら、私はビットコインの航空会社ラウンジを持っていませんし、ビットコインで支払っても保険の特典は受けられません。そして払い戻しもないので、販売業者が私を詐欺してしまったら、とても残念ですよね?クレジットカードには実際に保護機能があります。したがって、消費者にとって、ビットコインで支払うことはより悪いことであり、支払いにおいて重要なのは消費者だけです。商人が引き取り者です。したがって、消費者にとって機能しない場合、販売者にとっても機能しません。

したがって、ビットコインで支払うか、大多数の人にとってそのコーヒーを買うことは、10倍も良いことではありません。実際にはもっと悪い、もっと悪い。それは、コーヒーを買うことはすでに 99% の人にとって効果があるからです。この部屋にいる誰かがコーヒーを買いに行きたいなら、そうすることができます。ビットコインは必要ありません。そこで、一歩下がって、ビットコインとは何なのか、ビットコインが従来の決済よりも 10 倍優れている点は何なのかをじっくり考えてみることが、私が長年やってきた練習のようなものです。しかし、実際には昨年、これをより詳細に考えてみると、インターネット マネーの何が優れているのかがわかりました。ビットコインはまさにネイティブのインターネットマネーですが、それを考えると、インターネットの何が優れているのかがわかります。インターネットはなぜ従来の通信よりも通信能力が 10 倍優れているのでしょうか?

そして、インターネットはコミュニケーションに優れています。なぜなら、世界中のどこにいても、誰とでも即座にコミュニケーションできるからです。ここでは、誰とでも、誰でもが本当に重要な要素となります。したがって、ネイティブのインターネットマネーで同じことをすれば、ビットコインは世界中のどこにいても、誰とでも即時決済できるはずです。そしてコミュニケーション部分はインターネットの大部分を占めているので、私はそれを全員コミュニケーションと呼んでいます。しかし、インターネット上に構築された大規模なプラットフォームはすべて、100万人が閲覧するInstagramの投稿であれ、TikTokでのダンスビデオであれ、以前のようにインターネット上で何かを投稿する1人の人物であるRedditでのスレッドの投稿であれ、すべての人のコミュニケーションを中心に最適化されてきました。何百人、何千人、何百万人もの人々が簡単に見ることができるコミュニケーション。したがって、これはビットコインでも可能であるはずです。それは単なるインターネットマネーであるべきです。世界中のどこにいても、多くの人に一度の支払いができるはずです。しかし、私たちは 1 対 1 の支払いを中心に最適化してきました。私たちはコーヒーの購入を最適化してきました。しかし、先ほども言ったように、それはすでに誰にとっても有効です。

そして、インターネットが 1 対 1 のコミュニケーションのみを中心に最適化されていたとしたらどうでしょうか。もしインターネット上で友人と話しているのが WhatsApp だけだったら、どこにいても誰とでも通信できるインターネットは今日ほど強力ではなかったでしょう。したがって、ビットコインにはこれができるはずです。ワンクリックで非常に多くの人に即座に支払いができるようにする必要があります。その演習をやってみましょう。従来の支払いよりも技術的に優れているのでしょうか?そして、10倍優れたエクスペリエンスを提供できるでしょうか?

まず、従来の支払いから始めましょう。あなたの Chase アカウント、Venmo アカウント、または Visa カードはどのようにして 3 人に支払いを行うのでしょうか?非常に単純な例として、1 人が 3 人の友人にお金を払いたいと考えています。銀行振込を使用する場合は、友人に口座とルーティング番号を尋ねる必要があります。もし彼らがあなたにそれを送信するのに十分な勇気を持っていたとしても、あなたはそれをあなたのChaseアカウントまたはあなたのWells Fargoアカウントに簡単な方法で入力する方法を見つけなければなりません、そして、全体が大惨事になるでしょう。そして、なぜうまくいかないのでしょうか?それは、銀行業界におけるアイデンティティが細分化されているからです。あなたは Chase 口座や Wells Fargo 口座を持っているかもしれませんし、何千もの信用組合口座のうちの 1 つを持っているかもしれません。この情報は非常に機密性が高いため、誰かがその情報を持っていると、お金を盗まれる可能性があります。送金にはあらゆる種類の最低基準があり、UI はひどいものです。したがって、たとえ友人にすべての情報を送ってもらうことができたとしても、それを自分の UI に組み込むことは望ましくありません。銀行振込ではこれができません。 3 人に転送することはできません。3 人だけです。

だからビザかもしれない。おそらくVisaのテクノロジーがこれを可能にしてくれるでしょう。そして、Visaには実際にいくつかの利点があります。 Visa は標準の ID を提供するため、誰もが Visa カードを持っています。あなたの銀行が誰であるかは関係ありません。販売業者に行って支払うことができ、販売業者はあなたがウェルズ・ファーゴの口座を持っているか信用組合の口座を持っているかを気にしません。 Visaカードが使えます。したがって、標準の ID を提供し、支払いを調整します。 Visa は単なるメッセージング層です。ビザがあなたのドルを送金するために保管することはありません。彼らは銀行間の支払いを調整しているだけだ。とても助かります。しかし、Visa カードは非常に機密性が高く、Visa 経由で友人に送金したい場合は、端末を購入する必要があります。それで、それはまったく機能しません。したがって、ビザも実際には機能しません。 Visa を使用して全員に支払いを送ることはできません。ビットコインとライトニングで全員に支払いを送信するという課題。

そして最近では、Plaid やあらゆるフィンテックのイノベーションがあります。したがって、Venmo は、Plaid メッセージング レイヤーを使用して、3 人に送金できるようになるかもしれません。繰り返しますが、これにはいくつかの利点があります。さらに、標準の ID も提供します。銀行間を調整します。つまり、あなたは Plaid のユーザー名を取得し、あなたの友人もそれを持っていますが、彼らはあなたがどの銀行口座を使用しているかを気にしません。彼らに送金することができます。それは素晴らしいですね。ただしクローズドシステムなので、Venmoアカウントを持っていない場合は利用できません。また、これは米国内でのみ機能するため、どこにでも誰にでも送金できるわけではありません。したがって、従来の銀行システムでは、全員に支払いを送信することは不可能です。しかし幸いなことに、私たちにはインターネットマネーがあります。ビットコインとライトニングがあります。

それで、その例を見てみましょう。これはうまくいくはずですよね?さて、ここでビットコインの例を見てみましょう。これがあなたが行うべきビットコイン送金です。実際、ビットコインは従来の銀行の問題を解決します。それはオープン、インスタント、そしてグローバルです。同じ世界のどこでも、世界中のどこでも同じように機能します。素晴らしい。しかし、私の友人が Stripe アカウントを持っているのか、Cash App アカウントを持っているのか、それともサトシのウォレットを持っているのかわからないという点で、従来の銀行システムと同じ問題があります。それで、彼に聞いてみなければなりません、あなたが知っている、あなたはどの財布を使っていますか？それから私は彼に彼のアイデンティティの形式を尋ねなければなりません。そして、すべてのプロ、すべてのウォレットは異なるプロトコルまたはユーザー名を持っています。そして、たとえこれらの ID をすべて入手したとしても、どういうわけかそれらを簡単な方法で取り出して財布に入れなければなりません。そして、ウェルズ・ファーゴ・チェイスの例のように、どうやって 3 つの名前を入力するでしょうか? という話に戻ります。 3つくらいはできるかもしれないけど、それはちょっと難しいかも。しかし、どうすればそれ以上のものを入れることができるでしょうか？それは永遠にかかるだろう。そして、誰もそれをやらないでしょう。したがって、ビットコイン ライトニングを使用してこれを行うのは実際には困難であり、表面的には考えられないでしょうが、ビットコインとライトニングを使用して今日全員に支払いを送信することは非常に困難であり、ほぼ不可能です。そのため、全員の支払いを最適化することはできず、全員の支払いは不可能だったため、1 対 1 の支払いに重点を置いてきました。

それで、何がうまくいき、何がうまくいかなかったのでしょうか？従来の支払いには非常に便利な利点がいくつかありましたが、ビットコイン支払いにもいくつかの利点がありました。従来の決済スタックを見ると、第 1 層はお金です。第 2 層は支払いです。そして、従来のスタックでは、それが銀行です。そして、レイヤー 3 はメッセージングレイヤーです。それは、Visa、Plaid、その他銀行システム上に構築されたいくつかのメッセージング プロトコルです。そして、伝統的な決済スタックが失敗したのは、ドルと銀行の層でした。閉まっています。それは不格好です。高いです。そこが失敗したところです。しかし、従来の支払いスタックにはメッセージング層があり、これは非常に役に立ちました。 Visa と Plaid は標準 ID を提供しました。銀行間の調整を行った。ビットコイン決済スタックは銀行業務の断片化を解決し、保管の問題も解決しました。 Visa も Plaid もあなたのお金には決して触れません。彼らは送金先の銀行にメッセージを送信するだけです。それでは、ビットコインの支払いスタックを見てみましょう。その第 1 層はお金です。レイヤー 2 は支払いで、Lightning と Lightning ウォレットです。そして、レイヤー 3 は疑問符です。

実際、ビットコインとライトニングは、従来のドルと銀行の支払いスタックの問題を解決しました。オープン、許可不要、グローバルで、世界中のどこでも瞬時に同じように機能します。しかし、メッセージング層がないため失敗しました。私たちがこの問題をどうするかは皆さんもご存じだと思いますが、もう終わりです。そのため、Nostr は標準の ID を提供し、ウォレット間を調整して断片化を解決し、ビットコイン支払いを送信するためにビットコインを保管する必要性を解決します。そして今、私たちはビットコイン支払いスタックを手に入れました。この講演から何かを得るとすれば、これが最も重要なスライドです。ビットコインの支払いスタックは、現在はビットコイン、ライトニング、ノストラであるため、完全に分散化されており、検閲に耐性があり、オープンで、許可が不要で、グローバルです。

では、Nostr はどのようにしてこれを行うのでしょうか? Nostr はアイデンティティと調整を解決します。あらゆるクライアントで機能する単純な公開キーを使用して ID を解決します。標準プロトコルを介して Lightning ウォレットを接続することで調整を解決します。使用する 2 つのプロトコルは Nostr Wallet Connect であり、Nostr Wallet Connect を使用すると、ユーザーはウォレットにメッセージを送信して支払いを行うことができます。したがって、Nostr Wallet Connect を統合するウォレットであれば、ユーザーは支払いを送信できます。そして、Lightning Address はその逆を行います。これにより、ユーザーは支払いを受け取ることができます。したがって、Nostr Wallet Connect と Lightning Address を使用すると、ユーザーは支払いを送受信できるようになります。それでは、この例を見てみましょう。これで、完全なビットコイン支払いスタックが完成しました。ビットコイン、ライトニング、ノストラがあります。送信側でも、私の Alby アカウントは Nostr Wallet Connect を使用することになります。受信側では、友人はライトニングアドレスを持っています。そして、その3人全員の支払いを見てみましょう。したがって、送信をクリックすると、次はビルに、次はボブに送信されます。それで、私は 3 秒以内に 3 回の支払いをここに送金しましたよね?調整もできず、誰とも話しません。 3回分の支払いを即座に送信することができました。

そして今、私たちはオープン、即時、グローバルなビットコイン支払いを手に入れました。 Nostr によって提供される標準の ID があり、ウォレットの調整は簡単でした。私は何もしませんでした。ボタンをクリックしたところです。しかし、それを本当に、本当に明白にしてみましょう。 100名様ごとのお支払いとなります。これは私が 100 人にビットコインを送ったもので、そのうちの何人かはあなたが知っているかもしれません。ここで何が起こっているかは、オレンジ色に変わるにつれて、ビットコインの支払いが確認されていることを示しています。 100名様ごとのお支払いとなります。これは数週間以内に発売する予定の製品です。 3 週間前、100 人に送金するのに約 3 分かかりました。これを最適化したため、この支払いは 30 秒以内に完了します。さらに、ウォレット、クライアント、中継側をいくつか最適化することで、100 人分の支払いをほぼ瞬時に行うことができます。そして、千人以上の支払いもほぼ瞬時に行うことができるようになります。

というわけで、これがこの中で最も衝撃的な部分だ。ワンクリックで 100 件の支払いを即座に送信しました。 Prism という会社として、私たちはそうした人材を採用したことはありません。私たちはメッセージを送信し、彼らが自分のウォレットにメッセージを送信できるようにしただけです。そして、私たちはビットコインに触れたことはありません。弊社には Lightning インフラストラクチャがありません。私たちにはビットコインのインフラがありません。私たちが行っているのは、ユーザーが支払いを行うためにビットコイン ウォレットに送信するメッセージをパッケージ化することだけです。したがって、私たちは決して誰かを乗せることはありません。私たちはビットコインには決して触れません。そして現在、私たちは従来の支払いよりも技術的に優れており、10 倍、100 倍、または THX 優れたユーザー エクスペリエンスを提供するソリューションを手に入れました。そしてこれによってすべてが変わります。まず、ここ数年、ビットコイン決済の統合に関して、ビットコイン決済、ビットコインアプリは Lightning の統合に重点を置いてきました。そして、Lightning を統合するのは難しく、独自の Lightning インフラストラクチャを実行するのは非常に困難です。アプリを構築している場合、Lightning 支払いインフラストラクチャの構築は最も避けたいことです。これは、従来の支払いレール上にアプリがあり、アプリの構築と同時に銀行を再建しようとしているようなものです。本当に大変です。 Nostr を使用すると、それが驚くほど簡単になります。

そこで Prism では、実際に独自の Lightning インフラストラクチャを実行することから始め、これらすべての悩みや障害を借りて、実行するのに 1 か月半かかりました。そして、Nostr を統合できることに気づき、Nostr を統合することで同じエクスペリエンス、つまりより良いエクスペリエンスを構築できたと私は主張します。そして、Nostr を統合することで、自然に Lightning の支払いが得られるようになります。したがって、あなたがご覧になった支払いは、私たちが Prism で構築した製品であり、私たち自身で Lightning を統合したわけではありません。私たちが行ったのは Nostr を統合することだけでした。そのため、ビットコイン決済を有効にしたい人は、Lightning を直接統合するのではなく、Nostr を統合する必要があります。そしてそれがずっと簡単になります。そして第二に、新たな収益化が生まれます。したがって、全員での支払いは 1 対 1 の支払いよりも 100 倍強力です。ほんの一例ですが、今日インターネット上で発生するチップの支払いの数はほとんどありません。チップの支払いはいわゆる1対1の支払いです。私が他の人にチップを渡しているのです。それはインターネット上での非常に、非常に、非常に小さな収益化であり、ほとんど何もありません。サブスクリプションの規模ははるかに大きくなります。つまり、サブスクリプションはおそらく、チップの支払い回数の 10,000 倍になります。人々はサブスクリプションで支払いをしますが、サブスクリプションは誰もが支払うわけではありません。そしてつい最近まで、従来の法定通貨レールやビットコインレールでは全員が支払いを行うことは不可能でした。では、どうすればよいでしょうか?中間の会社が必要でした。そしてこれがその方法です。加入者が企業にお金を支払い、企業がそのお金を銀行口座に集めるソーシャルメディアプラットフォームにおけるコンテンツクリエイターの役割。そして、週の終わりか月末に、プラットフォームに参加させたい人々にそのお金を支払います。したがって、それをコンテンツクリエイターと呼びましょう。つまり、中間にこの会社が必要でした。企業はこれを好むのです。なぜなら、それが巨大な成長のフライホイールを生み出すからです。したがって、すべての大手ソーシャルメディア企業がこれを行っています。彼らはクリエイタープログラムを用意しており、TikTokにお金を投じたり、Instagramやリールにお金を投じたりするためにお金を支払います。そしてこれが成長フライホイールを生み出します。コンテンツ作成者が増えれば増えるほど、ユーザーも増えます。ユーザーが増えれば増えるほど、サブスクリプションも増え、より多くのお金をコンテンツ作成者に還元できるようになります。

そこで、最近これを実行した企業の例を見てみましょう。そしてXプレミアム。つまり、X Premium は、月額 11 ドルを支払ってお気に入りのコンテンツ クリエイターをサポートできるという点で、実際に驚異的な成功を収めているのです。また、料金を支払った場合は、作成したコンテンツに応じて支払いを受ける資格があります。素晴らしいアイデアですね。実際、彼らはわずか 1 年で 1 億ドルの利益を上げています。サブスクリプション収入は1億ドルで、それをすべてクリエイターに還元すると約束しているという。そうなるかどうかは誰にもわかりませんが、それが理論です。つまり、クリエイターをサポートするためにエコシステムに 1 億ドルが投入されることになります。すごいですね。さて、脚注を見てわかるように。他の色々な事で台無しになってしまいました。しかし、理論的には、これは Twitter や X の成長のフライホイールを作成するための素晴らしい製品です。今、X は必要ありません。もう中間に Twitter は必要ありません。その場合、私はすぐに 100 人に直接支払いを行っている加入者を見ました。したがって、仲介者は必要ありません。そこで私たちは X Premium を再構築し、Nostr Gold と名付けました。そしてこれが私たちが現在提供している Prism 製品です。それも同じことです。コンテンツクリエイターをサポートできます。 1 週間あたり 3,000 SAT を支払う場合、ゴールドの支払いを受ける資格があります。そしてゴールドは、特定のハッシュタグを中心に 3 日間ローリングベースで、最も「いいね！」が多かった投稿の上位 10 件に支払われます。したがって、写真を投稿してハッシュタグアートを入力し、大量の「いいね！」を獲得すると、サブスクリプション収入からアカウントにお金が入金されます。では、どうやってそれを行うのでしょうか?さて、ゴールドに参加してゴールドを購読するとこんな感じです。あなたがしなければならないのは、makeprism.com/gold にアクセスして UB を入力することだけです。今すぐ参加をクリックすると、この場合、支払いを行うために Nostr Wallet Connect が使用されます。したがって、この場合は、Alby Nostr Wallet Connect インスタンス、3,000 SAT に今渡しています。ウォレットに接続すると、約 2 秒でそのサブスクリプションの支払いが行われ、ゴールド製品のサブスクリプションが完了し、明日最初の支払いを受ける資格が得られます。したがって、収益化を目指し、素晴らしいコンテンツを Nostr に投稿したいと考えているコンテンツ クリエイターは、その支払いを受け取ることができるようになりました。

そして、その人がその購読料を支払ったとき、私たちは実際に何をしたのでしょうか?その加入者は支払いとインセンティブの分散化を行っており、3,000 SAT を支払っていましたが、どの会社にも支払っていませんでした。その購読者は、過去 3 日間の上位 10 件の投稿に分割された 3,000 SAT を、それらの人々に即座に直接支払っていました。そのため、その支払いは、過去 3 日間の上位 10 人のコンテンツ クリエイターに 10 回の異なる回数で即座に支払われました。支払いを回収するために仲介会社を介する必要はもうありません。支払いは加入者自身、個人自身が行うことができます。そして、Nostr にとって、これは非常に大きなことです。なぜなら、時間の経過とともに支払われる継続的なサブスクリプション収益のプールを作成できるようになり、新しいユーザーがプラットフォームに来て投稿するよう動機付けることができるからです。有益で評価の高いコンテンツを投稿します。

これは単純な例のようなものですが、プレミアム サブスクリプションのこの概念は、Twitter だけでなくあらゆるものに当てはまります。実際、Reddit の例、Twitch などのソーシャル メディア ビデオ、ゲーム プラットフォーム、そしてそれ自体を公開する場合には、はるかにうまく機能します。そして、新しいビットコイン決済スタックが最後に行うことは、個人に力を与えることです。つまり、過去数十年間でインターネットは、通信用のこれらのプラットフォームによって所有されるように変化しました。したがって、ほぼすべての通信はこれらのプラットフォームによって所有されており、これらの製品の多くは同じ会社であり、インターネットを制御しています。今日のインターネットコミュニケーションは、確かに彼らが素晴らしい製品を開発したためですが、彼らはアイデンティティと支払いを持っているため、私たちをコントロールしています。そして、アイデンティティと支払いがなければ、競合する製品を作成することは非常に困難です。しかし今では、Nostr と Bitcoin の支払いにより、私たちはアイデンティティを持ち、支払いもできるようになりました。したがって、私たちはこれらの企業が構築したアイデンティティと支払いレイヤーを再構築するツールを持っていますが、それを個人に権限を与える方法で実行します。あとは、その上に製品を作成するだけです。それが新しいビットコインです。ビットコイン決済スタックにより、コミュニティとしてこれを加速するにはどうすればよいでしょうか?私たちがしなければならないことは 3 つあります。まず、Zap Splits と Nostr Wallet Connect を統合するには、より多くのクライアントが必要です。これは、これらすべての上にある調整メッセージング層です。 Nostr Wallet Connectを統合するには、さらに多くのビットコインウォレットが必要です。現在私が知っているのは Alby と Mutiny の 2 つですが、どのウォレットのユーザーでも Nostr 経由で Nostr Wallet Connect を簡単に使用できるようにするには、すべてのウォレットが必要です。

最後に、ビットコインの支払いスタックで気付くかもしれない 1 つの穴は、Nostr ネイティブではない Lightning アドレスです。 Lightning Address は大幅に最適化できるため、Lightning Address を使用すると非常に迅速に支払いを受け取ることができますが、それでも少し遅く、集中化が進みます。しかし、これは今日のウォレットの標準であり、Nostr ネイティブの方が高速で分散化されていますが、現在は存在しません。これら 3 つのことについて、明日 10 時 30 分にアルビーでチームと話し合っています。 Bitcoin Layer 3 を強化し、ユーザーと開発者のためのツールを作成したい場合は、来て詳細を学びましょう。

それで、私たちはプリズムで何をしているのでしょうか？ Prism では、ビットコイン レイヤー 3 を強化し、ユーザーと開発者が Nostr 上でビットコインを簡単に使用できるようにするツールを作成しています。したがって、消費者側では、ブランド、クリエイターが当社のアプリを使用して成長を加速できます。そのため、より多くの人にリーチし、ユーザーと関わり、人々に報酬を与えることができます。次の投稿では、ドル記号ブーストを追加すると、おそらく他の方法よりも多くのエンゲージメントを得ることができるでしょう。また、あなたの投稿をブーストしたり「いいね！」したりしているユーザーに、エンゲージメントに対する報酬として支払うこともできます。そして、開発者は私たちの API を使用して、より良いビットコイン支払いを提供できます。 API についてさらに詳しく知りたい場合は、ここからメールを送ってください。最後に、Nostr で何が可能になるかを示すもう 1 つの例を示して終わりたいと思います。そして、これが今日発売した新製品です。 prism.com/backrow でチェックできます。これにより、誰でも Nostr に参加できる紹介ボーナスを作成できます。それでは、これがどのように機能するかを説明します。成長する場合は、必要な量の紹介ボーナスをドロップできます。この場合、10,000 SAT の紹介ボーナスを作成し、友人に Nostr に参加するよう説得してこう言いたいと思います。「おい、何だ、Nostr に参加してライトニング アドレスに接続したらすぐに、これをクリックすると紹介リンクを入力し、新しい npub を入力すると、すぐに 10,000 STS がアカウントに追加されます。」これが作成プロセスです。この紹介リンクを作成するのは非常に簡単です。ユーザーが Nostr でアカウントを作成し、npub を取得したら、そのリンクをクリックして、ここに npub をドロップし、送信をクリックします。私たちが行っていることは、その npub を検索し、紹介リンクが作成された後に作成されたことを確認し、Nostr Wallet Connect を使用してクリエイターのウォレットから即座に支払いを決済することです。新しいユーザーのウォレットに。そしてそれはすぐに支払われました。

そして、この支払いについて驚くべきことは、単純そうに見えましたが、その支払いは匿名でした。したがって、Prism が誰かをオンボードすることはありませんでした。それは自動的でした。つまり、Nostr に参加したことがきっかけになったわけですが、そのきっかけは何でもあり得ました。それは「Nostr に参加して私をフォローしてください」または「Nostr に参加して 100 件の投稿をしてください」かもしれません。それを引き起こしたのは何かだったかもしれないし、ノストルと何の関係もないことさえあるかもしれない。そして、それは非同期だったので、支払いを作成するとき、誰がその支払いを請求するのか、そしていつその支払いを請求するのか全くわかりませんでした。つまり、非同期支払いでした。そして最後に、それは非拘留でした。したがって、プリズムは二度とビットコインに触れることはなく、ビットコインに触れることもありません。そして実際、私たちは一度も監護権を持っていなかったし、Nostr Wallet Connectの秘密を見たり知ったりしたことさえなかったので、完全に非監護権でした。そのため、ビットコインを使用して、匿名で自動、非同期、非管理の支払いを行うことができるようになりました。これは、私たちが非常に長い間解決しようとしていたものです。そして今ではそれを本当に簡単に行うことができます。そしてそれが、ビットコイン支払いスタックの利点、つまりビットコイン支払いスタック、より良い支払い、より自由なインターネットで可能になることです。私たちは 80 億人のビットコイナーと世界中の人々を Nostr に参加させることができます。ありがとう。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 1e52c554:21771908

Posthumous work of the Colombian poet born in Don Matias on January 20, 1948

Welcome to this blog dedicated to the Posthumous work of the Colombian poet Francisco Luis Arroyave Tabares (my father), born in Don Matias on January 20, 1948-2010. Where I will be publishing each of the 175 sonnets from his unpublished collection 'Sonnets For The Twenty First Century And A Circadian Musical (1984-1987).' Analyzed with GPT4 artificial intelligence and illustrated with AI tools... I hope you enjoy this garden of words snatched from the solitude of a locked room.

Likewise, any enthusiast of the sonnet form is invited to conduct their personal studies of Arroyave Tabares' work, as it is a collection that, although registered since 1989, has not yet been published.

Frank Duna

---

Analysis "Fragrances Of Innocence"

Introduction

Sonneet 39 “Fragrances Of Innocence” by Francisco Luis Arroyave Tabares highlights the connection between innocence and the natural world, suggesting that innocence is a state of harmony and balance that can be found in the simplicity and wonder of nature. The sonnet is divided into two parts: the octave (the first eight lines) and the sestet (the last six lines).

Thematic Analysis

In the octave, the poet uses vivid imagery to describe innocence as a morning fragrance, shedding dew on a timeless retreat where the soul feeds on sun and flowers. The imagery of rainbows returning from the sky and celestial towers speaks of angels and virtues, promising power. The reference to Maia, an earth goddess in Roman mythology, suggests the nurturing aspect of nature and its passions.

The sestet shifts focus to a spring where Niads (nymphs living in and giving life to springs, fountains, rivers, and lakes) dance. The heart chooses its sweet delight here, and the smells erase any care of thought. The voices of children bring delicate melodies that meet this young season, joining old choirs that sought after Nature.

Overall, this sonnet beautifully intertwines themes of innocence, nature, and music, creating a rich tapestry of imagery and emotion. The octave sets up the scene with powerful natural imagery and references to mythology, while the sestet brings it to life with sounds of children’s voices and melodies that echo in harmony with nature.

Structure and Rhyme Scheme

The sonnet “Fragrances Of Innocence” follows the traditional structure of a Petrarchan sonnet with a specific rhyme scheme. A sonnet typically consists of 14 lines and is divided into an octave (the first eight lines) and a sestet (the last six lines).

The rhyme scheme in this sonnet is as follows:

Octave: ABBAABBA Sestet: CDECDE Let’s break it down:

Octave: Sestet: 1-. morning (A) 9-. spring (C) 2-. bower (B) 10-. sweet (D) 3-. flower (B) 11-. though (E) 4-. forming (A) 12-. bring (C) 5-. returning(A) 13-. meet (D) 6-. tower (B) 14-. sought (E) 7-. power (B) 8-. boiling (A)

The rhyme structure of the sonnet is used to create a sense of harmony and beauty in poetic language. In this case, the rhyme reinforces the feeling of balance and beauty in the description of nature and innocence.

Analysis of Aspects

The sonnet “Fragrances Of Innocence” by Francisco Luis Arroyave Tabares is a rich tapestry of language, imagery, themes, and meter.

Language and Imagery: The language used in the sonnet is highly descriptive and evocative, creating vivid imagery that engages the senses. The poet uses metaphors such as “Innocence is fragrance of a morning” and “Sprays of rainbows from the skies returning” to create a sensory experience for the reader. The use of mythological references like Maia and Niads adds a layer of depth and intrigue to the poem.

Themes: The main themes of the poem are innocence, nature, and music. Innocence is portrayed as a beautiful morning with dew-shedding flowers, symbolizing purity and freshness. Nature is depicted through various elements like sun, flowers, rainbows, springs, and celestial towers. Music is represented through the voices of children and old choirs that harmonize with nature.

Meter: The sonnet follows the iambic pentameter, which is a common meter in English poetry. Each line consists of five pairs of unstressed and stressed syllables, giving the poem a rhythmic flow.

Overall, the sonnet is a beautiful blend of language, imagery, themes, and meter. It captures the essence of innocence through vivid descriptions of nature and music. The use of mythological references adds an element of mystery and intrigue to the poem. The structured rhyme scheme and meter give the poem a rhythmic flow that enhances its musicality.

(GPT4)

Syllable count for each line.

```

Fragrances Of Innocence

10 Innocence is fragrance of a morning 10 That sheds dew upon a timeless bower
10 Where the soul feeds on sun and each flower 10 Grown on the side where new paths start forming.

10 Sprays of rainbows from the skies returning 10 Speak of angels and celestial tower 10 With virtues that promise to give power 10 While Maia's hand keeps the passions boiling.

10 There is a dance of Niads in a spring
10 Where the heart chooses its delicious sweet 10 And smells that erase any care of thought... 10 Voices of children that tickle and bring 10 Delicate notes that this young season meet
10 Join those old choirs that after Nature sought. ***

```

---

Sonnets For The Twenty First Century And A Circadian Musical Written By Francisco Luis Arroyave Tabares (1984-1987)

---

Analyzed by GPT4; Image by Frank Duna; First published on Nostr Protocol by franciscoarroyavet@nostrplebs.com Fragrances Of Innocence

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

La comunidad de YakiHonne está entusiasmada con Nostrasia y han transcrito diligentemente los inspiradores discursos de Nostrasia. Transcripciones de discursos adicionales estarán disponibles con el tiempo. Las versiones japonesa y española son inicialmente traducidas y revisadas por miembros de la comunidad con la ayuda de herramientas de inteligencia artificial. Todos los usuarios de YakiHonne están invitados a unirse al proceso de revisión. Aquellos que completen con éxito la revisión recibirán una recompensa especial de 3000 Sats. Para comenzar, simplemente comuníquese con nosotros (Comente aquí, DM o TG) para registrarse, y el primero La persona con quien contactar y enviar su reseña será el afortunado destinatario de la recompensa. Y oye, si estás dispuesto, nos encantaría traducir estos discursos a más idiomas. ¡Únete a nosotros!

🌟English: Nostr: Bitcoin's Layer 3 🌟中文版: Nostr: 比特币的Layer 3 🌟日本語: Nostr: ビットコインのレイヤー 3

B0B: Hola chicos, soy Bob y mi experiencia durante los últimos 10 años ha sido en pagos. Primero como inversor en pagos tradicionales, luego en Strike en pagos Bitcoin y Lightning, y ahora como fundador de Prism, impulsando los pagos Bitcoin sobre Nostr. Hoy voy a hablar sobre lo que he aprendido sobre la adopción de Bitcoin y cómo Nostr acelera la adopción de Bitcoin como la capa tres de Bitcoin. Porque mi objetivo es pasar de los 20 millones de usuarios de Bitcoin actuales a que todos en el mundo usen Bitcoin y sean bitcoiner, y hacerlo muy, muy rápido.

Entonces, ¿cómo hacemos algo muy rápido? ¿Cómo conseguimos un rápido crecimiento de usuarios? Sí, necesita crear un producto 10 o 100 veces mejor para los usuarios. Entonces, ¿cuál es el producto Bitcoin? Bueno, Bitcoin es mejor dinero y mejores pagos. Revisaremos cada uno de estos. Empezaremos con mejor dinero. Entonces, Bitcoin es técnicamente mejor dinero; hay un suministro fijo, es descentralizado, resistente a la censura, sin permisos y global. Es mejor que el dinero fiduciario, punto. Pero técnicamente mejor no significa que vayas a conseguir muchos usuarios. Necesita crear un producto 10 veces mejor para que los usuarios obtengan un rápido crecimiento de usuarios.

Entonces, ¿quién es el usuario de Bitcoin? Bueno, eso es fácil; es cualquiera con dinero. Y si bien este gráfico es exacto, si uno tuvo un dólar durante los últimos cien años, perdió el 96% del valor del dólar, y el dólar fue la moneda con mejor desempeño del mundo. Por lo tanto, todas las demás monedas tuvieron un desempeño peor que ese. Desafortunadamente, menos del 1% de la gente piensa en plazos de 100 años. De hecho, la mayoría de la gente piensa así: "¿Qué es la inflación? Parece un poco lenta. ¿Cómo perdí el 5%? No entiendo cómo funciona eso". Y cuando miran Bitcoin, parece extremadamente volátil; bajó un 70% el año pasado, ha subido un 70% este año. Entonces, para la gran mayoría de las personas, Bitcoin como mejor dinero en realidad no parece mejor. Ni siquiera 10 veces, pero en realidad parece peor, ¿verdad? Porque es mucho más volátil que la moneda tradicional. Por supuesto, con el tiempo, Bitcoin se volverá menos volátil, la inflación será mucho peor y Bitcoin será obviamente mejor para los usuarios, pero eso llevará algún tiempo, lo cual está bien; es mejor para nosotros como compradores de Bitcoin.

Entonces, si ganar dinero va a llevar mucho tiempo, creo que la mejor oportunidad para un rápido crecimiento de usuarios son mejores pagos. Por eso, pasaré el resto del tiempo hablando de cómo Bitcoin genera mejores pagos y un crecimiento más rápido de los usuarios. Y al realizar el mismo ejercicio, Bitcoin es una mejor vía de pago. Es abierto, global, sin permiso, instantáneo, prácticamente gratuito y es definitivo en efectivo. Bitcoin como vía de pago es mejor que cualquier otra vía de pago que exista; es mejor que las transferencias bancarias de la Reserva Federal, es mejor que las redes A, es mejor que las redes de tarjetas, es mejor que las redes bancarias. Pero sólo porque sea técnicamente mejor no significa que vayas a conseguir un gran crecimiento de usuarios.

Entonces, hagamos el mismo ejercicio para los usuarios de pago. Hay comerciantes y hay consumidores. Entonces, si analizamos el mismo ejemplo, tratando de comprar un café con Bitcoin y Lightning versus una tarjeta Visa tradicional, comenzaremos con los comerciantes. Para los comerciantes, aceptar Bitcoin es más rápido; lo obtienes instantáneamente en comparación con dos a 15 días. Es genial; es efectivo final; obtienes el Bitcoin y no hay reembolsos ni devoluciones de cargo. Es prácticamente gratis, por lo que es mucho más barato que las redes de tarjetas y no tiene fronteras, por lo que puedes aceptar Bitcoin desde cualquier parte del mundo. Entonces, para los comerciantes, eso es sorprendente; Bitcoin parece una vía de pago mucho mejor.

Pero para los consumidores es todo lo contrario. Tu compra con Bitcoin es la misma ya sea que uses Bitcoin o una tarjeta. En realidad, no obtienes ninguna recompensa de Bitcoin. Entonces, los comerciantes y las redes de tarjetas usan esas tarifas para financiar el reembolso en efectivo, por lo que si uso mi tarjeta Chase, obtengo un reembolso del 2%. Si uso Bitcoin, no recibo ningún reembolso. Entonces eso parece peor; Desafortunadamente, no tengo una sala VIP de Bitcoin en una aerolínea y no obtengo ningún beneficio de seguro cuando pago con Bitcoin. Y luego no hay reembolso, así que si un comerciante me estafa, lástima para mí, ¿verdad? Las tarjetas de crédito en realidad ofrecen protección. Entonces para el consumidor pagar con Bitcoin es peor, y en los pagos lo único que importa es el consumidor; el comerciante es el que toma. Entonces, si no funciona para los consumidores, no funciona para los comerciantes.

Y entonces, pagar con Bitcoin o comprar ese café para la gran mayoría de las personas no es ni siquiera 10 veces mejor; en realidad es peor, mucho peor. Y eso es porque comprar café ya funciona para el 99% de las personas. Si alguien en esta sala quiere ir a comprar un café, puede hacerlo y no necesita Bitcoin. Entonces, dar un paso atrás y pensar qué es Bitcoin o en qué podría ser Bitcoin 10 veces mejor que los pagos tradicionales es una especie de ejercicio que he estado haciendo durante muchos años. Pero realmente en el último año, pensar en esto con más detalle, y eso te lleva a saber en qué es mejor el dinero de Internet, ¿verdad? Bitcoin es simplemente dinero nativo de Internet, y eso te lleva a preguntar en qué es mejor Internet. ¿Por qué Internet es 10 veces mejor en comunicaciones que las comunicaciones tradicionales?

E Internet es mejor en comunicaciones porque es comunicación instantánea con cualquier persona en cualquier parte del mundo, y esa persona es la pieza realmente importante aquí. Y entonces, si hacemos lo mismo con el dinero nativo de Internet, Bitcoin debería ser pagos instantáneos con cualquier persona en cualquier parte del mundo. Y la parte de las comunicaciones es una parte enorme de Internet, por eso la llamo comunicaciones para todos. Pero cada gran plataforma que se ha construido en Internet ha optimizado las comunicaciones de todos, ya sea una publicación en Instagram que ve un millón de personas o un video de baile en TikTok o la publicación de un hilo en Reddit en el que una persona publica algo en Internet como ex. comunicaciones que cientos, miles o millones de personas pueden ver fácilmente. Entonces esto debería ser posible con Bitcoin; debería ser sólo dinero de Internet. Deberíamos poder realizar un pago a muchas personas en cualquier parte del mundo. Pero hemos estado optimizando los pagos uno a uno; Hemos estado optimizando la compra de café. Pero como dijimos, eso ya funciona para todos.

E imagínese si Internet solo se optimizara en torno a las comunicaciones uno a uno. Si WhatsApp fuera lo único en Internet, yo hablando con un amigo, Internet no sería tan poderoso como lo es hoy con la capacidad de comunicarme con todos en cualquier lugar. Entonces, Bitcoin debería ser capaz de hacer esto; Debería ser capaz de pagar a muchísimas personas al instante con un solo clic. Repasemos ese ejercicio. ¿Es mejor, técnicamente mejor, que los pagos tradicionales? Y luego, ¿puede ofrecer una experiencia 10 veces mejor?

Primero, comencemos con los pagos tradicionales. ¿Cómo haría su cuenta Chase, su cuenta Venmo o su tarjeta Visa un pago a tres personas? Ejemplo súper simple, una persona solo quiere pagarle a tres amigos. Si fueras a utilizar una transferencia bancaria, tendrías que pedirles a tus amigos su número de cuenta y de ruta. Si fueran lo suficientemente valientes como para enviártelo, entonces tendrías que descubrir cómo ingresarlo de manera fácil en tu cuenta de Chase o en tu cuenta de Wells Fargo, y todo sería un desastre. ¿Y por qué no funciona? Se debe a que las identidades en el espacio bancario están fragmentadas. Es posible que tenga una cuenta de Chase o una cuenta de Wells Fargo, o podría tener una entre miles de cuentas de cooperativas de crédito. La información es extremadamente sensible, por lo que si alguien tiene esa información, puede robarle el dinero. Hay todo tipo de umbrales mínimos para enviar dinero y la interfaz de usuario es terrible. Entonces, incluso si pudieras conseguir que tus amigos te enviaran toda su información, no querrás ponerla en tu interfaz de usuario de todos modos. Las transferencias bancarias no pueden hacer esto. No puedes enviar una transferencia a tres personas, solo a tres personas.

Entonces tal vez Visa. Quizás la tecnología de Visa nos permita hacer esto. Y Visa en realidad tiene algunos beneficios. Visa proporciona identidades estándar, por lo que todos tienen una tarjeta Visa. No importa quién sea su banco; puedes ir a un comerciante y puedes pagar, y al comerciante no le importa si tienes una cuenta de Wells Fargo o una cuenta de cooperativa de crédito. La tarjeta Visa funcionará. Entonces proporciona identidades estándar y luego coordina los pagos. Visa es solo la capa de mensajería. Visa nunca se hace cargo de sus dólares para enviarlos; simplemente están coordinando pagos entre bancos. Eso es muy útil. Pero su tarjeta Visa también es muy sensible, y si quisiera enviar dinero a través de Visa a su amigo, tendría que comprar una terminal. Entonces eso no funciona en absoluto. Y entonces Visa tampoco funciona. No puede enviar un pago a todos con Visa. Los desafíos de enviar pagos a todos con Bitcoin y Lightning.

Y luego, recientemente, está Plaid y toda la innovación fintech. Entonces, tal vez Venmo, utilizando una capa de mensajería Plaid, pueda permitirle enviar pagos a tres personas. Y nuevamente, tiene algunos beneficios. Además, ofrece identidades estándar; coordina entre bancos. Entonces obtienes un nombre de usuario de Plaid y tu amigo tiene uno, y no les importa qué cuenta bancaria estés usando; puedes enviarles dinero. Eso es genial. Pero es un sistema cerrado, por lo que si no tienes una cuenta Venmo, no puedes usarlo. Y solo funciona en EE. UU., por lo que no puedes enviar dinero a todos ni a todas partes. Entonces, en el sistema bancario tradicional, es imposible enviar un pago a todos. Afortunadamente, tenemos dinero en Internet. Tenemos Bitcoin y Lightning.

Entonces, repasemos ese ejemplo porque debería funcionar, ¿verdad? Bueno, aquí hay un ejemplo de Bitcoin. Aquí hay una transferencia de Bitcoin que desea realizar y, de hecho, Bitcoin resuelve el problema con los bancos tradicionales. Es abierto, instantáneo y global. Funciona en todas partes del mismo mundo, en todas partes del mundo de la misma manera. Impresionante. Pero tienes el mismo problema que el sistema bancario tradicional: no sé si mi amigo tiene una cuenta Stripe, una cuenta Cash App o una Wallet de Satoshi. Entonces tengo que ir a preguntarle, ya sabes, ¿qué billetera usas? Entonces tengo que preguntarle por su forma de identidad. Y cada profesional, cada billetera tiene un protocolo o un nombre de usuario diferente. Y luego, incluso si obtengo todas esas identidades, de alguna manera tengo que tomarlas y guardarlas en una billetera de una manera fácil. Y vuelvo a este ejemplo de Wells Fargo Chase de ¿cómo podría poner tres nombres? Quizás podría hacer tres, pero sería un poco difícil. ¿Pero cómo podría poner más que eso? Me llevaría una eternidad. Y entonces nadie lo haría jamás. Entonces, hacer esto es realmente difícil con Bitcoin Lightning, algo que no se podría imaginar en la superficie, pero es muy difícil y casi imposible enviar un pago a todos hoy con Bitcoin y Lightning. Por eso, no hemos optimizado los pagos de todos y nos hemos centrado en los pagos individuales porque los pagos de todos han sido imposibles.

Entonces, ¿qué funcionó y qué no funcionó? Hubo algunos beneficios realmente útiles de los pagos tradicionales y hubo algunos beneficios de los pagos con Bitcoin. Si nos fijamos en la pila de pagos tradicional, la capa uno es el dinero. La segunda capa son los pagos. Y entonces, en la pila tradicional, esos son los bancos. Y luego la capa tres es una capa de mensajería. Es Visa, Plaid y un puñado de otros protocolos de mensajería que se basan en el sistema bancario. Y donde la pila de pagos tradicional falló fue en la capa de dólares y bancos. Está cerrado; es torpe; es caro. Ahí fue donde falló. Pero la pila de pagos tradicional tiene una capa de mensajería, lo cual fue increíblemente útil. Visa y Plaid proporcionaron identidades estándar; Se coordinó entre los bancos. La pila de pagos de Bitcoin resolvió la fragmentación bancaria y resolvió la custodia. Visa nunca y Plaid nunca tocan tu dinero; simplemente envían mensajes a los bancos a dónde enviar el dinero. Entonces, veamos la pila de pagos de Bitcoin. Su capa uno es el dinero. La segunda capa son los pagos, que son las billeteras Lightning y Lightning. Y luego, la capa tres es un signo de interrogación.

Bitcoin y Lightning en realidad resolvieron los problemas de la pila de pagos tradicional en dólares y en los bancos. Es abierto, sin permisos, global y funciona instantáneamente de la misma manera en todas partes del mundo. Pero falló porque no existe una capa de mensajería. Creo que ustedes saben hacia dónde vamos con esto, pero ahora lo hay. Y así, Nostr proporciona identidades estándar y coordina entre billeteras, resolviendo la fragmentación y la necesidad de custodiar Bitcoin para poder enviar pagos de Bitcoin. Y ahora tenemos una pila de pagos de Bitcoin. Y si sacamos algo de esta charla, esta es la diapositiva más importante. Esa pila de pagos de Bitcoin es totalmente descentralizada, resistente a la censura, abierta, sin permisos y global porque ahora es Bitcoin, Lightning y Nostr.

Entonces, ¿cómo hace Nostr esto? Nostr resuelve identidad y coordinación. Resuelve la identidad mediante el uso de una clave pública simple que funciona en cualquier cliente. Resuelve la coordinación conectando billeteras Lightning a través de protocolos estándar. Los dos protocolos que utiliza son Nostr Wallet Connect y Nostr Wallet Connect, que permite a los usuarios enviar mensajes a sus billeteras para enviar pagos. Entonces, cualquier billetera que integre Nostr Wallet Connect puede, sus usuarios pueden enviar pagos. Y luego, Lightning Address hace lo contrario. Permite a los usuarios recibir pagos. Entonces, con Nostr Wallet Connect más Lightning Address, los usuarios pueden enviar y recibir pagos. Y ahora veamos este ejemplo. Ahora tenemos la pila de pagos de Bitcoin completa. Tenemos Bitcoin, Lightning y Nostr. Y en el lado de envío, mi cuenta de Alby utilizará Nostr Wallet Connect. En el lado de recepción, mis amigos tendrán su dirección Lightning. Y echemos un vistazo a ese pago de tres personas para todos. Entonces, si hace clic en enviar, enviará el siguiente a Bill y el siguiente a Bob. Entonces envié tres pagos aquí en tres segundos, ¿verdad? Sin coordinación, sin hablar con nadie. Pude enviar tres pagos al instante.

Y ahora tenemos un pago de Bitcoin que es abierto, instantáneo y global. Hay identidades estándar proporcionadas por Nostr, y coordinar las billeteras fue trivial. No hice nada; Acabo de hacer clic en el botón. Pero hagámoslo realmente obvio. Este es un pago de 100 personas. Este soy yo enviando Bitcoin a 100 personas, y es posible que conozcas a algunas de estas personas. Y lo que está sucediendo aquí es que cuando se vuelven naranjas, el pago de Bitcoin se confirma. Este es un pago de 100 personas. Este es un producto que lanzaremos en un par de semanas. Hace tres semanas, enviar dinero a 100 personas nos llevó unos tres minutos. Lo hemos optimizado, por lo que este pago tardará menos de 30 segundos. Y con algunas optimizaciones más en las billeteras, los clientes y el lado de retransmisión, podemos realizar un pago de 100 personas casi al instante. Y también podremos realizar pagos para mil personas o más casi al instante.

Y esta es la parte más alucinante de todo esto. Acabo de enviar 100 pagos al instante con un solo clic. Como Prism, la empresa, nunca incorporamos a ninguna de esas personas. Simplemente enviamos mensajes, les permitimos enviar mensajes a sus billeteras. Y nunca tocamos Bitcoin. No tenemos ninguna infraestructura Lightning. No tenemos ninguna infraestructura de Bitcoin. Todo lo que estamos haciendo es empaquetar mensajes para que los usuarios los envíen a sus billeteras Bitcoin para enviar esos pagos. Así que nunca incorporamos a nadie; Nunca tocamos Bitcoin. Y ahora tenemos una solución que es técnicamente mejor que los pagos tradicionales y ofrece una experiencia de usuario 10 veces, 100 veces o THX mejor. Y esto lo cambia todo. Primero, en torno a la integración de pagos de Bitcoin durante los últimos años, los pagos de Bitcoin y las aplicaciones de Bitcoin se han centrado en la integración de Lightning. Además, integrar Lightning es difícil y ejecutar su propia infraestructura Lightning es realmente difícil. Y si está creando una aplicación, lo último que quiere hacer es crear también una infraestructura de pago Lightning. Sería como si tuviera una aplicación en las vías de pago tradicionales y estuviera tratando de reconstruir un banco al mismo tiempo que intenta crear su aplicación. Es muy difícil. Nostr lo hace increíblemente fácil.

Entonces, en Prism, comenzamos intentando ejecutar nuestra propia infraestructura Lightning, alquilamos todos estos dolores de cabeza y obstáculos, y nos tomó un mes y medio hacerlo. Y nos dimos cuenta de que podíamos integrar Nostr, y construimos la misma experiencia, una mejor experiencia, diría yo, al integrar Nostr. Y al integrar Nostr, naturalmente obtenemos pagos Lightning. Y ese pago que vio fue un producto que creamos en Prism y que no integramos ningún Lightning nosotros mismos. Lo único que hicimos fue integrar a Nostr. Por lo tanto, cualquiera que quiera habilitar los pagos de Bitcoin ahora debería integrar Nostr en lugar de integrar Lightning directamente. Y eso lo hace mucho más fácil. Y luego, en segundo lugar, crea nueva monetización. Entonces, los pagos para todos son cien veces más poderosos que los pagos uno a uno. Sólo un ejemplo, la cantidad de pagos de propinas que se realizan hoy en día en Internet es casi nula. Un pago de propina es lo que yo llamaría un pago individual. Soy yo dándole propina a otra persona. Esa es una monetización muy, muy, muy pequeña en Internet, casi nada. Las suscripciones son mucho mayores. Así que las suscripciones son probablemente 10.000 veces el número de pagos de propinas. La gente paga con suscripciones, pero las suscripciones no son pagos para todos. Y hasta ahora, era imposible con los rieles tradicionales de Fiat y Bitcoin realizar un pago para todos. Entonces, ¿Cómo lo hacemos? Necesitábamos una empresa en el medio. Y así es como funcionó. Un suscriptor paga dinero a una empresa, el papel de los creadores de contenido en las plataformas de redes sociales es que la empresa recauda el dinero en su cuenta bancaria. Y al final de la semana o del mes, pagarían ese dinero a las personas que querían tener en su plataforma. Entonces llamémoslos creadores de contenido. Entonces necesitabas esta empresa en el medio, y a las empresas les encanta hacer esto porque crea este enorme volante de crecimiento. Todas las grandes empresas de redes sociales han hecho esto. Tienen estos programas de creadores en los que te pagan por poner dinero en TikTok o por poner dinero en Instagram o reels. Y esto crea este volante de crecimiento. Cuantos más creadores de contenido obtenga, más usuarios obtendrá. Cuantos más usuarios obtenga, más suscripciones obtenga y más dinero podrá devolver a los creadores de contenido.

Entonces, veamos un ejemplo de una empresa que ha hecho esto recientemente. Y X Premium. Entonces, X Premium ha tenido un éxito fenomenal, ya que ahora puedes pagar $11 al mes para apoyar a tus creadores de contenido favoritos. Y si paga, será elegible para recibir pagos según el contenido que cree. Es una gran idea. De hecho, están ganando cien millones de dólares en sólo un año. Cien millones de dólares en ingresos por suscripciones que, según dicen, prometen devolver todo a los creadores. Quién sabe si lo harán, pero esa es la teoría. Así que recibirás 100 millones de dólares en el ecosistema para apoyar a los creadores. Eso es genial. Ahora, como puedes ver la nota al pie. Fue arruinado por un montón de otras cosas. Pero en teoría, ese es un producto fantástico para crear un volante de crecimiento para Twitter o X. Ahora bien, no necesitamos X; Ya no necesitamos Twitter en el medio. En ese caso acabas de ver a un suscriptor, yo pagando directamente a cien personas muy rápidamente. Y entonces no necesitamos a ese intermediario. Y entonces reconstruimos X Premium y se llama Nostr Gold. Y este es un producto Prism que ofrecemos ahora. Hace la misma cosa. Puedes apoyar a los creadores de contenido. Si paga 3000 SAT por semana, es elegible para recibir pagos de oro. Y Gold paga a las 10 publicaciones con más me gusta durante tres días consecutivos en torno a hashtags específicos. Entonces, si publicas una foto y escribes un hashtag, y obtienes un montón de Me gusta, recibirás dinero en tu cuenta procedente de los ingresos por suscripción. ¿Y cómo hacemos eso? Bueno, así es como se ve unirse a Gold y suscribirse a Gold. Todo lo que tienes que hacer es ir a makeprism.com/gold y escribir tu UB. Presionas Unirse ahora y estamos usando, en este caso, Nostr Wallet Connect para realizar ese pago. Así que ahora pasamos, en este caso, a la instancia de Alby Nostr Wallet Connect, 3000 SAT. Conecta la billetera y, en aproximadamente dos segundos, pagará esa suscripción, quedará suscrito al producto oro y será elegible para su primer pago mañana. Entonces, para los creadores de contenido que quieran intentar monetizar, que quieran publicar contenido increíble en Nostr, ahora pueden obtener esos pagos.

¿Y qué hicimos realmente cuando la persona pagó esa suscripción? Ese suscriptor era Descentralizador de Pagos e Incentivos, pagando 3.000 SAT, pero no a ninguna empresa. Ese suscriptor estaba pagando instantáneamente 3000 SAT divididos en las 10 publicaciones principales durante los últimos tres días a esas personas directamente. De modo que ese pago se realizó instantáneamente 10 veces diferentes a los 10 principales creadores de contenido de los tres días anteriores. Ya no necesitas que la empresa del medio cobre los pagos; los pagos pueden ser realizados por los propios suscriptores, por los propios particulares. Y para Nostr, esto es enorme porque ahora podemos crear este conjunto de ingresos continuos por suscripción que se pueden pagar con el tiempo e incentivar a nuevos usuarios a ingresar a la plataforma y publicar porque saben que existe un conjunto fijo y creciente de SAT que están disponibles si publican contenido que es útil y altamente calificado.

Este fue un ejemplo simple, pero este concepto de suscripciones Premium funciona para todo, no solo como Twitter; de hecho, funciona mucho mejor para cosas como los ejemplos de Reddit, videos de redes sociales como Twitch, plataformas de juegos y luego la publicación propia. Y luego, lo último que hace la nueva pila de pagos de Bitcoin es empoderar a las personas. Entonces, en las últimas dos décadas, Internet se ha transformado en propiedad de estas plataformas de comunicación. Entonces, casi toda la comunicación es propiedad de estas plataformas, y muchos de estos productos son de la misma empresa y controlan Internet. La comunicación por Internet hoy porque sí, han creado un gran producto, pero nos controlan porque tienen identidad y pagos. Y sin identidad ni pagos, es muy difícil crear productos competitivos. Pero ahora, con los pagos de Nostr y Bitcoin, tenemos identidad y tenemos pago. Así que tenemos las herramientas para recrear la capa de identidad y pago que estas empresas han construido, pero lo hacemos de una manera que empodere al individuo. Y ahora solo tenemos que crear los productos además de eso. Así que eso es lo nuevo del Bitcoin. La pila de pagos de Bitcoin permite, ¿cómo aceleramos esto como comunidad? Hay tres cosas que debemos hacer. Primero, necesitamos más clientes para integrar Zap Splits y Nostr Wallet Connect. Esa es la capa de mensajes de coordinación además de todo esto. Necesitamos más billeteras Bitcoin para integrar Nostr Wallet Connect. Hay dos que conozco hoy, Alby y Mutiny, pero necesitamos todas las billeteras para que sea realmente fácil para cualquier usuario de cualquier billetera usar Nostr Wallet Connect sobre Nostr.

Lo último, y el único agujero que puede notar en la pila de pagos de Bitcoin, es Lightning Address, que no es nativo de Nostr. Lightning Address se puede optimizar muchísimo, por lo que podemos obtener ese pago muy rápido usando Lightning Address, pero aún es un poco más lento y más centralizado. Pero es el estándar de billetera hoy en día, y el nativo de Nostr sería más rápido y más descentralizado, pero no existe hoy. Así que hablaremos de estas tres cosas con el equipo mañana a las 10:30 en Alby. Si desea impulsar Bitcoin Layer 3 y crear herramientas para usuarios y desarrolladores, venga y obtenga más información.

¿Y entonces qué estamos haciendo en Prism? En Prism, estamos impulsando la capa 3 de Bitcoin, creando herramientas para que usuarios y desarrolladores faciliten el uso de Bitcoin a través de Nostr. Entonces, por el lado del consumidor, las marcas y los creadores pueden usar nuestra aplicación para acelerar el crecimiento. Por eso le permitimos llegar a más personas, involucrar a sus usuarios y recompensar a las personas. Entonces, en la próxima publicación, agregue un impulso del signo del dólar y probablemente obtendrá más participación de la que obtendría de otra manera. Y puede pagar a los usuarios que promocionan sus publicaciones o les dan me gusta para recompensarlos por su participación. Y luego los desarrolladores pueden usar nuestra API para ofrecer mejores pagos de Bitcoin. Entonces, si está interesado en hablar más sobre la API, envíenos un correo electrónico aquí. Y luego quería terminar mostrando un ejemplo más de lo que es posible con Nostr. Y este es un nuevo producto que lanzamos hoy. Puede consultarlo en prism.com/backrow. Le permite crear un bono de referencia para que cualquiera pueda unirse a Nostr. Y entonces te mostraré cómo funciona esto. Si va a crecer, puede depositar la cantidad del bono por referencia que desee. Entonces, en este caso, quiero crear un bono de referencia para 10,000 SAT y quiero convencer a mi amigo de que se una a Nostr y decirle: "Oye, ¿qué? Tan pronto como te unas a Nostr y conectes una dirección relámpago, si haces clic en esto enlace de referencia e ingrese su nuevo npub, obtendrá 10,000 STS instantáneamente en su cuenta". Y ese es el proceso de creación, muy sencillo crear este enlace de referencia. Una vez que el usuario crea su cuenta en Nostr y obtiene su npub, puede hacer clic en ese enlace, puede colocar su npub aquí y hacer clic en enviar. Lo que estamos haciendo por nuestra parte es buscar ese npub, asegurarnos de que se creó después de que se creó el enlace de referencia y luego usar Nostr Wallet Connect para liquidar instantáneamente un pago desde la billetera del Creador. a la billetera del nuevo usuario. Y eso se pagó al instante.

Y lo alucinante de este pago es que parecía simple, pero ese pago era anónimo. Entonces Prism nunca incorporó a nadie; fue automático. Así que se basó en el detonante de unirse a Nostr, pero ese detonante podría haber sido cualquier cosa. Podría haber sido "únete a Nostr y sígueme" o "únete a Nostr y haz 100 publicaciones". Podría haber sido cualquier cosa o incluso podría no tener nada que ver con Nostr para desencadenarlo. Y luego fue asincrónico, por lo que cuando creaste el pago, no tenías idea de quién iba a reclamar ese pago y no tenías idea de cuándo iban a reclamarlo. Entonces fue un pago asincrónico. Y finalmente, fue sin custodia. Así que Prism nunca, nunca más, toca Bitcoin, nunca toca Bitcoin. Y, de hecho, nunca tuvimos la custodia ni vimos ni conocimos su secreto de Nostr Wallet Connect, por lo que no tuvo ninguna custodia. Ahora podemos realizar pagos anónimos, automáticos, asíncronos y sin custodia con Bitcoin, algo que hemos estado tratando de resolver durante mucho tiempo. Y ahora podemos hacerlo de forma realmente sencilla. Y eso es lo que es posible con Los beneficios de la pila de pagos de Bitcoin: la pila de pagos de Bitcoin, mejores pagos, una Internet más libre. Podemos incorporar 8 mil millones de bitcoiners y el resto del mundo a Nostr. Gracias.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 75bf2353:e1bfa895

How To Make AI Generated Art With No Credit Card Or Email

I created the images for my last blogpost using Pleb AI. I have paid for various things using bitcoin like hats, hardware wallets, Virtual machines, and gift cards before, but this feels a little different. This actually solves a problem. Don't get me wrong, it's cool to pay for a new laptop using bitcoin on newegg.com. but I could have just as easily used a credit card. Although I could create images using Midjourney or use ChatGPT to run similar closed-source software built by people developing world coin and other technology scarier than anything written by George Orwell, this service will save me some sats. But wait...There's more:**

• No credit card

• No monthly fee

• No ads. By the way, ads suck.

• It is Free and Open Source Artificial Intelligence.

Want to generate an image? There are 13 different options:

Tired of spending all your sats on Only fans, try talking to GF Phone Talk. It's like those 1-900-SEX-LINES from the 90's, only instead of talking to a real woman who wasn't pretty enough top get naked for dollars, you read sexy talk generated by AI. What is AI generated sexy talk, you ask? I don't know, but let's find out. I used the suggested prompt:

"I am missing you babe. Can we talk on the phone for a while to give each other company?"

Here is what it came up with:

!

On second thought, you should try to meet a real woman.

Stay Fit

Here's a conversation I had with Zara The FitMinder. I asked:

"I need to prep lunches for the week that follows the paleo diet. What should I make?"

As my teenage son would say, Quinoa seems a little "sus," but that took like 5 seconds. I've been going down this health and fitness rabbit hole lately and meal planning takes some time. This may not be perfect, but it's a great start. I Whoogled:

Whoogle gave me this result:

I love to read books, listen to audio books, and I am an avid Bitcoin Audible Fan, but I hate reading about recipes. I don't want to know you grew up in Wisconsin. I have nothing against Wisconsin. I just want lunch.

I just want lunch. Luckily, I use Mealie on my Umbrel. Mealie scrapes the important stuff like the actual cooking part and formats them nicely. So I type in the URL here and click create:

No more Wisconsin and I can create my meal plan for the week in about ten minutes. Now I just need some AI software that can cook and prep my meals. That's not possible yet. I still need to cook my meals. Most people are afraid something like this can take away the nutritionist jobs, but that's short sided. Maybe the registered nutritionist uses tools like this to create meal plans for her clients within minutes instead. Maybe meal prep now comes with the plan, adding more value to the customer. I don't know, but it is is interesting to think of all the possibilities AI can unleash. I

More importantly, it only takes a few hundred sats to free up some of your time. I think that's worth it since time is the only thing more scarce than bitcoin. Time is money as they say. Besides, if you use it 100 times per month, it will only cost you about \$3.00 That's 17 bucks less than a ChatGPT subscription would cost you. Don't need it next mont? It doesn't cost anything.

AI For Everybody

Alex Gladstien calls bitcoin the people's money. I love this description. Although bitcoin does not have a central bank, it does have a die hard group of nerds and geeks willing to fight for it. Bitcoin is run by these people running full nodes, mining out of home made heaters, making pull requests and onboarding people onto nostr. Bitcoin is the peoples money because it is run by the people. ** We The People who run bitcoin **want a more fair and just world. If you watch the news, and I wouldn't recommend this, you'll see and hear all about the doom and gloom bitcoin and AI will bring. One, or perhaps both will boil the oceans and AI will kill all the jobs and say I'll be back."

AI can be for everybody when it is paid for using the People's Money. The people's money has no charge backs.

That means you can pay for what you need without giving some centralized trusted third party access to your credit cards. PlebAI doesn't ask for an email. This means you can try the service without a subscription. You don't need a bachelor's degree in Information Technology to set up the free and open source software yourself. Better yet, you don't even need a subscription. As long as you have a smartphone and a few pennies, worth of sats you can create powerful images like this:

While everyone else is shaking in their boots because of thier AI induced job loss jitters, you can learn to use AI to free up your time to do something more productive.

PlebAI means this technology is available to anyone with a smart phone and a few dollars worth of bitcoin. I think this is very valuable, but most people have not seen it in action yet. So I decided to create a video about it on Rumble. Please share this blogpost and the Rumble Video with people who may not be into bitcoin. I started this blog because I wanted to show the world that bitcoin is not just some investment, but a tool. We can use this tool to make the world a better place. That may sound like a rasberry-pi in the sky idea, but AI will be here whether you like it or not. How many hours of your time can a few dollars worth of bitcoin free up for you? If time is money, more time is good. What will you do with this time? Do you want to write a blog, create a business, or just watch the doom and gloom on the boob tube? My hope is that the world wll free uptheir time to solve some of their time to make the world a better place.

How To Use Pleb AI

I made a video that teaches you how to use PlebAi yourself. In the following video I make the above photo using the Gen Image AI app.

The images are posted on nostr npub1curnt7jtq8mhl9fcswnwvuvc9ccm6lvsdv4kzydx75v92kldrvdqh7sq09

nostr:nevent1qqsrv4rj20h0errhjk03hzgttu6fl3ka5cqu8yjewjs82qlw9kz20zspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3qcurnt7jtq8mhl9fcswnwvuvc9ccm6lvsdv4kzydx75v92kldrvdqxpqqqqzzwesegl4

nostr:nevent1qqsg6czt8wnn43zcx7avtv635w7vktmxtphd0fsppp4cd2dsunfxzxqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3qcurnt7jtq8mhl9fcswnwvuvc9ccm6lvsdv4kzydx75v92kldrvdqxpqqqqzzwfh8x7k

https://i.current.fyi/current/plebai/genimg/4c38d3cd-6ef3-452a-aea7-87128e269d89.jpg

https://i.current.fyi/current/plebai/genimg/c15cd612-d5df-40df-8c9d-8e2189bd906b.jpg https://serve-model-sd-outputs.s3.amazonaws.com/6616b675-bfeb-4e2c-bf5a-c3f9f4e062ce.png

Video Tutorial

I created a simple tutorial that teaches you how to create interesting images limited only by your imagination in just a few minutes. Check it out.

Blogging Bitcoin

812,388

Value 4 Value

WTF Is Value 4 Value???

@ 2521f791:0cf90b37

What's money? - เงินคืออะไร

เงินคือตัวกลางในการแลกเปลี่ยน สิ่งที่มีค่าที่สุดของมนุษย์ สิ่งนั้นก็คือเวลา เราทุกคนต่างมีเวลาจำกัดเท่ากันที่ 24 ชั่วโมง ไม่มีใครโกงได้ ไม่มีใครเสกเพิ่มได้ . เกษตรกรขายเวลาที่ดูแลพืชผล แลกเงิน พนักงานขายเวลาทำงานให้บริษัท แลกเงิน บริษัทขายเวลาในการผลิตสินค้า แลกเงิน . เงินจึงเป็นสิ่งใดก็ได้ ที่คุ้มค่ามากพอกับเวลาที่เสียไป เงินเคยมาจาก เกลือ หิน เปลืองหอย แร่โลหะ มันแปรเปลี่ยนไป ตามความหาง่าย ที่เป็นสัญญาณบ่งบอกว่าสิ่งที่เรียกว่า เงิน นั้นมันมีมูลค่าน้อยกว่าเวลาเสียแล้ว . จนมาถึงทองคำ ผู้คนรับรู้ถึงคุณค่าจากความหายาก การปลอมแปลงที่ทำได้ยาก ความมั่นคงทางคุณค่า และเริ่มใช้ทองคำในฐานะของตัวกลางในการแลกเปลี่ยนเวลา มาเป็นเวลานับพันปี . จนมาถึงยุคปัจจุบัน ยุคที่ทองคำไม่ได้ทำหน้าที่ ตัวกลางในการแลกเปลี่ยนอีกแล้ว เพราะความหายากของมัน เป็นข้อจำกัดในการผลิตเงิน ในอดีตจะผลิตเงินต้องมีทองคำมาเป็นสินทรัพย์ค้ำประกัน ยิ่งต้องการใช้เงินมาก รัฐต้องเร่งหาซื้อทองมาก ผลักให้ราคาทองสูงขึ้น . ในขณะเดียวกัน มันทำให้เงินในมือของประชาชนมีค่าสูงตามไปด้วย ถ้าคุณมีทองคำที่เก็บมาจากเมื่อ 10 ปีก่อน จะรู้ดีว่าความมั่งคั่งของคุณเพิ่มขึ้นจากการอดทนเก็บสะสมทองคำนั้นไว้ และด้วยเหตุนี้มันนำมาสู่เหตุการณ์ปล้นความมั่งคั่งของประชาชนโดยรัฐครั้งใหญ่ ที่เปลี่ยนโลกใบเดิมของเรา . ในยุคปัจจุบันตัวกลางในการแลกเปลี่ยนคือ เงินรัฐบาล ในรูปของเหรียญ ธนบัตร ตัวเลขดิจิทัล . ทองคำแปรเปลี่ยนสภาพจากเงินไปสู่ทรัพย์สินที่เอาไว้เก็บรักษาความมั่นคงแห่งเวลา เช่นเดียวกันกับ ที่ดินอสังหาริมทรัพย์ เพราะความหายากและมีจำกัดของทั้ง 2 สิ่งนี้ มีค่ามากกว่าเงินรัฐบาลที่สร้างได้ไม่จำกัดนั้นเอง . บันทึกที่ 1 #เมื่อฉันกระโดดลงสู่หลุมกระต่าย #Jumpintotherabbithole 817140

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

The YakiHonne community is excited about Nostrasia, and they have diligently transcribed Nostrasia's inspiring speeches. Additional speech transcripts will be made available over time. The Japanese and Spanish versions are initially translated and proofread by community members with the help of AI tools. All YakiHonne users are invited to join in the review process. Those who successfully complete the review will be granted a special reward of 3000 Sats. To get started, simply reach out to us (Comment here, DM, or TG) to sign up, and the first person to contact and submit their review will be the lucky recipient of the reward. And hey, if you're up for it, we'd love to have these speeches translated into even more languages. Join us!

🌟中文版: 作为非开发者为 Nostr 作贡献 🌟日本語: 非開発者として Nostr に貢献する 🌟Español: Contribuyendo a Nostr como no desarrollador

Jeff Gardner: Okay, cool. So this is very similar to the talk that I gave in Costa Rica about contributing to Nostr as a non-developer. And what I want to do, and this, you know, is going to be on the basic side of things on purpose. If you want some super technical content, the other room is over there. But this, I wanted to go through just generally how Nostr works from the ground up to give people a better understanding of how the thing functions and why it's so cool and why it's so unique. And then talk about ways that people who don't have the ability to write code can still contribute to the Nostr protocol. All good? Check. Better? Yes. Here on in, all right? Okay.

So yeah, the idea here is we're going to go through some basic stuff, and then we will from there look at how we're going to contribute to Nostr as a non-developer. So my name is Jeff Gardner. I have been working on Nostr full-time since about February. I work on a couple of different projects: one called listr, which is kind of a list management tool, another one called ostrich work, which is a little bit like, by itself, hasn't been touched in a little bit but it's a job posting board more specifically, or more generally, I guess it's a classified listing site. And then I help a lot on NDK with Pablo.

So this is for really anyone who wants to contribute to Nostr in some way and specifically for obviously people who are non-technical. You know, I think too many people often think, "Okay, I actually can't do anything because I don't use GitHub, I don't know how to write code, so I'm kind of stuck here just posting or zapathon." And I think that's just totally incorrect. A great example of this is another project I do called Nostr.how, which is very much dependent on people writing content and translating that content more importantly. And so it's now up to about 10 languages, I think, and all those translations have come from other people. And none of that work is technical. Once you get the pattern of how that translation file looks like, it's actually very simple. Okay, so I've already kind of talked about this; we'll skip over that.

So how does a Nostr protocol work from the ground up? It is a protocol, which means it's nothing but an agreed-upon way to transmit information. We have lots and lots of protocols. They're all arcane; people don't really know what they are, but you use them every day when you use the internet, things like HTTP. You know, those are just protocols, and that's all it is, is really just instructions on how to transmit information. Events are the sort of atomic unit of Nostr; everything is an event. Every event is just nothing more than a little JSON object. JSON is definitely not the most efficient or like you can argue whether it was the best choice, but at the same time, it's incredibly simple, it's human-readable, and it's about the most common data structure on the planet at this point. Most APIs use it; almost every developer is very comfortable and familiar with it. There are plenty of tools around it.

And in Nostr, the kind field is the most important one because that's the one that tells you what you're dealing with. So this is what an event looks like; this is what JSON looks like. You can see it's very readable; you've got keys and values. The keys here are content, created at, ID, kind, and then you've got the value after, which tells you what it is. And in this case, you've got a kind one, which is a note; kind zero is your metadata. Different kinds of events in Nostr, and there are ranges of all of these event kinds, and it keeps going up from there kind of to infinity, really. So you can always tell what kind of event you're dealing with by looking at the kind, and then from the kind, you then know, okay, the rest of the data in this JSON object is going to look how it's supposed to look or if it doesn't, then it's non-standard or it doesn't work; it's broken.

This is what a metadata field looks like or a metadata event looks like. This is what a zap event looks like; they get a little bit bigger. Some of the events have kind of weird special properties; like some are replaceable, some are not replaceable, some are ephemeral. So the idea behind how Nostr works really kind of functions on this idea that different ranges of events do different things, and you can always create new events to do new things that you want to do. The NIPs, you know, everybody talks about NIPs; everybody loves to talk about NIPs. But the Nostr implementation possibilities are sort of how developers decide how to move the protocol forward. There's only one required NIP, and that's NIP number one, and that's the original one fiatjaf wrote that basically just describes, hey, it's a JSON thing; here's how the event is supposed to look. This kind thing is really important, and he described just the basic interaction between how that data goes to a relay and how you ask relays for that data as a client.

These are not for feature requests in a sense; they're not things specific to any one client. The implementation possibilities are sort of just like guidelines, and in fact, other than number one, every other NIP is optional. So like every client doesn't have to, or every relay doesn't have to implement all of them; they only implement the things that they actually need to do whatever they want to do. Anyone can create or update or change NIPs on the git repository; it's a completely open repository. That said, I think, and this is like one difference from the talk I gave in Costa Rica, that repo is very busy now. There are a lot of things happening in it, and that will continue to be the case; it'll get worse and worse over time, I'd say.

So, it's actually a really good idea that if you're technical and you're thinking about how you want to do something, it's mostly a good idea to try and go implement what you're doing somewhere yourself, flesh it out, talk with other developers, figure out what the actual thing that functions properly is, and then put a NIP together and put it into the NIP repository. Because then you can have a productive conversation rather than, a lot of times, you get a feature request into the NIPs repository, and it immediately gets closed, and no one looks at it. So, I guess, you know, if this is a non-technical kind of audience, these are less important. But you can go to the NIPs repository always, and there's a really good kind of overview of all the different kinds of events, what they're for, and it gives you a little bit more information about how stuff functions.

Okay, this is like the network itself, so events and, you know, how the protocol functions are very low level. Most of the uniqueness of Nostr actually comes from the network and how that network is built. So we'll go through a really abridged kind of history of computing. You know, first, we had computers that didn't talk to each other, and then somebody got a cable and they plugged two computers together, and they went, "Oh my god, it works, this is amazing!" Then centralization and decentralization in Nostr; they started plugging all the computers together, and it was mostly fine, but it didn't really work very well. And it certainly didn't, it led to a lot of complication, and that immediately started leading towards centralization because what you needed was a very strong computer, a very powerful computer to be able to serve requests to lots of other computers that were trying to connect to them. And so that's where this sort of client-server model came from, and mostly because of just the constraints of how powerful computers were at the time. Those servers, you know, that was a powerful centralizing force. The people who ran servers became businesses, and then those acquire more and more power, and especially in network, you know, network effect businesses, those businesses could accrue a ton of power. Now, you probably all can imagine if one of these centralized servers goes down, you know, you get the fail whale on the Twitter site from years ago. Centralized servers are a point of centralization, so they're a point of failure, but they also are a point where they're a chokepoint. A centralized server can decide who is allowed to connect and who is not. And you know, if you, as developers, you are in kind of the web 2 world, you're always building to APIs, and those APIs are controlled by third parties. And we've seen over the years many instances, you know, Twitter probably being one of the more famous ones, but just recently Reddit did this as well where they just turned off their API on other developers. And so it's one of those things where, you know, you could build a very successful business, but if you are beholden to some API and that gets turned off, you know, someone has the power to just kill your business in a flick of a switch. So there's that problem as well with centralization.

So how does Nostr get around this? Nostr uses obviously relays and clients, you've heard lots about that, I think, you know, if you use Nostr for even a little bit of time, you start to just sort of understand this in a more visceral way when your client is connecting and disconnecting from all these things. But visualizing it this way, I think it is actually really helpful and it makes it clear how simple this is. You know, there's a lot of decentralized protocols out there that try to get very fancy and very clever about how to do decentralization. Nostr takes a complete opposite approach and just says we're going to be as simple and as dumb as possible here. We're going to have loads of databases spread around the place. You can connect to one or many, and all you do is just ask them for data, and they send you data. They're very simple, straightforward servers, and they don't necessarily have to have some sort of synced up global state. And if you think about it, that actually is, in and of itself, is very unique. I think, you know, when you go to Twitter, you know, yes, you're getting an algorithmic feed, but you sort of have this mental model in your head that is, you have the global state by looking at Twitter. And if you turn it into chronological mode, if you could somehow follow everybody on Twitter, you would get the fire hose of the same thing that everybody else is seeing. That's really not true. And it's like especially not true in Nostr. You know, your global feed in Nostr is not, you know, my global feed in Nostr. And what relays we connect to really does shape, you know, what we see and what our interaction can be. So this is both a, you know, durable situation, the decentralization of the Nostr network because, you know, in this scenario, if one of these relays goes down, you've still got other relays you're connecting to. Now, the guy in the middle here, the client in the middle, is since he's only connected to that one relay, he's now, you know, oh, actually, he's on two, never mind. So, you know, if you're connected to one relay, obviously, that's just like a centralized model, but in this case, you know, you're connected to more. I guess the one thing here to keep in mind, though, is that now the client on the left and the client on the right can't talk to each other. They now don't have an interface between them, and they don't connect to the same thing. And this is something that, you know, we still need to solve properly. At the moment, we have ended up with several very large relays, you know, Snort Damos, Nostr Band, like there's several large relays that most people connect to, or most people in the kind of, I guess, Western world of Nostr. I think, you know, it's been really cool being here and seeing how we've almost got like a parallel universe in Japanese Nostr because they use very different relays. And so and obviously, the content is a completely different language. And so you end up with this, you know, bifurcation of the network, which is actually really healthy, and, you know, kind of mimics what real life is more like. But we do need to solve this; we need to make relays make it much easier for clients to understand where they need to go to get data and to be able to dynamically connect and disconnect from the relays that make sense for what they're trying to do.

Okay, we just went over that. So I think we actually covered most of this in what I just talked about. But yeah, again, there is no singular network view, like the universe view in Damos is not like the entire thing. And I think it is like very helpful to continue and try to keep that in mind because what you connect to sort of shapes exactly what you're going to see. I keep using the term client and server; that's, I guess, a very like technical programmer way of talking. Clients are just apps like all the apps on your phone, the websites that you go to, those are all clients. And the client is, you know, I guess the best way to think of it is they're the client going to get data or going to get information or doing stuff on your behalf. So think about it just as apps; that's probably the easiest way to do it. Like I said before, clients don't have to implement all the NIPs they implement a subset for whatever use case they're trying to do. And I think one of the amazing things is, you know, the difference between, you know, this talk that I did in Costa Rica which was in March, which was very early and we had mostly the Twitter clients at that point. But we didn't have a lot of other stuff. In the last six, seven months, there's been an absolute explosion of the other stuff category. I mean, really basic apps like listr, which is another stuff category but I was just on a panel with Arkanox who's building, you know, a metaverse that is thermodynamically consistent on Nostr, which is bananas. It's a 3D world you can move around in, but you've got to expend proof of work to do that moving around. So this other stuff category I imagine is going to be 99% of Nostr eventually; yes, we'll always have the social or the, you know, notes contents, or notes apps, but the other stuff, you know, when it clicks that Nostr can actually rebuild pretty much anything on the power of bots. internet and a whole lot of stuff that we couldn't build on the internet, then you start to get the power of what this thing actually is. The other thing to kind of keep in mind is that bots can also be clients, and so I think we've all probably interacted with the GPT3 or four bots that are roaming around in Nostr. Those are kind of special clients in the sense that they are also talking to relays and doing things, but they're sort of autonomous in that way, and that's pretty cool like, you know, Damos take this huge step forward in the sense that you've got these agents out there that can do stuff on your behalf just by you asking for things. So I think again, we've not really scratched the surface of all the other stuff that Nostr can do, but it will definitely be the biggest category over time. And then you've obviously got the users, and users are both humans and computers here, but the humans aspect here is by far the messiest in the whole network right, like humans are always the messy bit. And so, you know, I think again both from a perspective of we're not great at being very predictable like computers are but also from the point of view of the censorship resistance aspects of things and you know how different people value you know content or value different things about a given network or a given you know social group, you know, like Blue Sky is much more leaning towards you know kind of a more sanitized you know we're going to control what is put out here and you know that sort of thing. Nostr is like you know just total chaos, and you know I love that not everybody does, I think Pablo's point yesterday about embrace the chaos is pretty valid like if you want to contribute and you want to be a part of Nostr you sort of have to embrace the chaos and we do need to build better tools for this, you know.

I think it's totally fair to say, like, lots of people don't want to see, you know, naked people every time they open up their Nostr client and that's fine, that's great. We just need a tool to control that. So, you know, things that don't work well now can easily work, you know, really great in the future, but we have to build all those things still.

Another thing that is incredibly important but it's also an area where we've made an absolute mountain of progress in the last couple of months is the tooling and the infrastructure around how stuff on Nostr gets built. You know, I think we had a very early kind of Library tooling Library called Nostr tools that fiatjaf wrote at the beginning, and that has sort of expanded into higher level libraries like NDK and the Snort system and, you know, stuff that developers have sort of gone, "Okay, this is a repeatable thing we're going to have to do lots and lots of times here let's make this much easier." And, you know, I work a lot on NDK, so that's probably the one I'll talk about a lot more. But these sorts of tools are incredibly important for bringing new developers into the space but also making it much easier to build, you know, apps clients a lot faster and more easily and to do it in a way that is not centralizing. That's actually I think the biggest thing about NDK that I really like is that, you know, Pablo, you know, the idea behind it when, you know, we first started writing it was literally, "I want to make sure that the patterns that we build into these apps aren't centralizing because the easy way is always centralization," you know, connecting to four relays and that's just the end of it. It's much more difficult to then say, "Okay, when you log in fan out, find all of your followers, find all of their relays, group all that stuff, figure out which relays are functioning and which aren't, and then every time you publish a note figure out which grouping of relays or groups of relays that you need to send that publish that event to." That stuff is actually really complicates and it's good that we do that one time and we do it once really, really well.

Okay, I think I've covered a little bit of this Nostr Beyond social. I think it is really, like I said, it will be by far the largest chunk of Nostr. I really do think that like fiatjaf original Nostr dock still stands really well. He talks down about it all the time but I think it actually proves the point out really well. You know, like he built it for simplicity or he designed it for simplicity. He wanted to make sure that it like had a chance of working and he wanted to make sure it was open from the beginning. So I'd very highly suggest going and reading that and just like browsing through the NIPs Library like you might not understand all the technical stuff but I think having that understanding of like why things are built the way they're built and, you know, starting to try to get a concept of that in your head is really helpful for understanding how you might want to contribute or what the best way you can contribute is.

Okay, so now we're to the part where we talk about what Nostr needs and where you can help. So as a non-technical person like I talked to a lot of people who are like, "I'd love to contribute it'd be really great I wish I could write code." There's so much stuff that doesn't require writing code. Writing code is actually, you know, a much smaller piece than I think a lot of people think it is. Yes, it takes time and like as these apps and clients and relays get bigger and more complicated and you know you it does get more complicated and slower to build things but it's all the stuff around the edges that actually makes these experiences really, really great. So we'll go through a few of these different kind of I guess large categories of things that you can work on. This is obviously not an exhaustive list there's plenty of other ways I guess like from a very high level perspective though, it's like this is a permissionless system. Like you don't have to ask permission from anybody to do anything. Go to GitHub, you know, go to GitHub for now hopefully get a replacement soon but like go to GitHub create an account if you don't already have one and just it's okay to like just go in and ask a question or like create an issue on someone's repo like there's no harm in that whatsoever and I think too many people kind of just hesitate and they like, "Oh, I don't want to bother someone," but like it's fine. They'll either ignore you they'll just close your thing if they don't actually want to talk to you or they'll probably respond to you and and, you know, you probably will start a conversation. So that's kind of the very first one is just kind of QA and Bug reports. You know, developers try to think of like all the different ways their apps are going to be used but they're certainly never going to get all the edge cases and they're certainly never going to run into all the bugs because they don't have everybody's different phone and in everybody's different location. So it's a really good thing to send, you know, feature requests and Bug reports to developers. So if you find something weird like tell the person. And I think that both helps us make the experiences better but it also is that point of starting conversations and, you know, especially for the kind of bug report Making Better Bug Reports and Feature Requests aspect I think it's mostly about just making those experiences much better. Filing good bug reports is a totally different thing though. So it doesn't help a developer if you're like, "Hey, Damos keeps crashing. Will's like, 'Okay, cool.'" What you want is you want somebody to say when I do this thing I can make it crash and I can do it repeatedly, a repeatable bug is like the best thing in the world because then you can actually you have a hope of fixing it really quickly and easily. So if you find something that goes wrong do if you've got the time or you, you know, have the energy for it like try and make it happen again and if you can then you've got a repeatable bug and that's a really easy thing to get fixed. When you go to file a bug report it you know usually developers want the bug reports where the code is so if that's GitHub you want to go to GitHub you want to create an issue if it's you know one of the other like code repository sites that's probably where it needs to go.

I guess at a worst-case scenario you can just, you know, send a message to the developer or, you know, to the account that it's under. What you do want to do though is give people detailed descriptions. Like, write all the random details that you think may or may not matter, right? Like what type of device is it, were you on the web, were you on your phone, like what's the phone, what version of the app if you can find it within the app itself, are you using, um, those sorts of things help with that reproduction aspect and give the developer a lot of context. If you do those sorts of things those are the bugs that get, you know, get fixed first. Like if you go into a giant list of bugs and there's like a bunch that are kind of, you know, spotty, hardly any details, you're like, "I don't even know what this is referring to," you kind of just skip over that and go straight to the thing where you're like, "Okay, I've got a pretty good idea of what's going on here and I'm pretty sure I can fix this."

Okay, moving on. So I guess another one is, well, actually, I'll take one quick kind of stopover to talk about feature requests. Everybody that ever uses a product has some sort of request, like there's something you want it to do that it doesn't necessarily do, and feature requests are great. I guess it's just a good idea, in the same way that you know, you think about bugs, is to take a step back for a moment and think about like okay, what am I trying to do, like what's the actual problem I'm trying to solve here versus I want X, because telling a developer I want to, sometimes they'll just implement it that way and that's okay that can be okay but telling them what you're actually trying to do is much, much more helpful for them to like try and think of like okay, what's an actual solution to this, you know, problem versus here's this feature request I have to implement. Um, and I think in that way as well you kind of are giving developers an idea of a class of problems that need solving or a class of features that need to be built rather than just I need this one like toggle somewhere and that sort of leads us into this, you know, product and design aspect. This is a really great place to contribute. I'm like, like we did not have Nostr DOD design with Carnage and everything back at Costa Rica. I think Carnage was working on things but you know that group has gotten, has expanded and they're spending, you know, full-time energy on helping all the devs make sites and you know, apps and clients Contributing to the Development of Consumer-Grade Products that are both nice to look at but much more importantly that work properly and that like work the way that people have come to expect you know, consumer-grade products to work. And so if you are a PM or you are a designer in a different you know realm this is a really, really great place to help out. You know from the PM aspect you know this looks like you know filtering through those issues and responding to the issues that you know might not have enough information to try to get more information so this is I guess I'd say, you know, be patient. This is kind of the Wild West still you know, devs aren't always going to be necessarily open to this idea but again it's permissionless like go start organizing things go write some documentation translations is another really great aspect. Like I'm kind of amazed at how many translations there are, I was asking Victor and I wish I had it but it's like it was an absurd number of translations for Amethyst. I know Damos is in a ton of different languages Nostr. How that education site I have like I said before is in about 10 languages. If you speak a different language we need to make Nostr work for everybody and so we need those languages in all the different apps and clients and then like I mentioned documentation this stuff really does matter. Like we need to give people context we need to tell people why this stuff is different we need to do it in a lot of different ways because you never know what the piece of content or what the, the description that's going to make it click for someone is um and so I think it's great that we've got lots of people creating which you know would on the surface look like roughly the same stuff but they tell it in a slightly different way and that's actually really, really, really important. This one's kind of less so I've kind of come around on this point I think we actually need to fight for like normal user usage less than we are at the time. I want normal users but I don't want people that are, I don't want the not early adopter crowd yet like I think all the users we need on Nostr right now are the early adopters who are happy with stuff that's not necessarily polished or working properly I want people like that also because those are the people that take the time to write documentation or file bugs or, you know, try new things and that's really what we need to do the most right now is do a lot of experimentation and find more of those early adopters to start messing around with things.

Okay, questions? Do we have time for questions? Yeah, okay, cool.

AUDIENCE 1- l questions for Mr Jeff Gardner I can't see anything, no right here. if a project wants to find someone like you to review their code and and review their project and and make comments and help fix bugs how would they go about that?

Jeff Gardner- DM me? no I mean like I think that's actually been one of the really cool things about the community that is being sort of built in real time around Nostr is that everybody is really open pretty welcoming for the most part I mean I know like it's intimidating like especially you know putting stuff into the nips repository it can get like shredded to bits to be honest like you do have to have a bit of thick skin and like people are going to be brusk about how they respond sometimes don't take it personally but I think if if people ask for help they're always going to get it from somewhere so I think just start paying people and being like hey I know you're busy but you know if you've Constructive Feedback for Nostr got some time like let's go through this thing other.

AUDIENCE 2- hi Jeff nice to meet you I've been following you on Nostr for a while so it was great to see this I'm l my question for you is what would you say is an example of the most constructive type of feedback that you receive that you actually think was helpful and what's more types of feedback that you would like to see to improve Nostr. how?

Jeff Gardner- one specific example I mean I think all feedback is really good I guess like the really hard part about building products is like figuring out which feedback to listen to and which to ignore because like you're never going to do everything and so filtering through that actually the hardest part about building great products so I think it's always hard for people that give feedback to like then see that nothing happens or that you know it doesn't seem like anything happens but I guess like that's just part of the process and so I think good feedback always comes with context and it mostly focuses on like what's the problem that I'm actually trying to solve as a user because that then kind of puts it you know again puts it in context so that the person builds understands like does this fit in the realm that I'm trying to to build for or not and then they're probably going to come up with a better solution even if it's not the one you sort of imagined. Yeah, thank you.

yeah, last question for Jeff?

AUDIENCE 3- here hey Jeff that was great one thing I didn't see called out on your list of kind of skills for contribution was skills from a business perspective business model making it sustainable yes so we can all generate those returns Max wants to see yeah can you talk a little bit about the role for business-minded folks to contribute?

Jeff Gardner - yeah this is actually one of the things that um you know other than the fact that when I realized that you know you could rebuild the entire Internet with with Nostr when you think about the business model implications of what a decentralized network that doesn't give you know Monopoly power to big companies does you kind of go down a rabbit hole of like oh God then what do we do like how are we going to monetize this does this even make sense for VC and I you know I think Max is awesome because he's like the you know a handful of VC who are like way out there on the edge and they're like yeah I'm totally in for this even though he has literally no idea where this is all going to go I think for business-minded people though there's a lot of experimentation that needs to be done and I think a lot of that experimentation needs to have at least like a base level of like rigor to it right you need to understand like did that thing actually work like was that a failed experiment or you know a successful experiment and so I think you know especially I think it starts to come in a bit later like once a project has a pretty good user base and is trying to start to figure out like you know what are different ways that we can make money, I think there's I mean all the standard stuff that we've come you know become very used to like subscriptions that are going to happen but I think you know given the fact that we've got you know virtual money that's streamable in very small amounts for almost no fees at light speed that changes a lot and we have barely started to scratch the surface of like what are some other weird models like what's the thing that's going to come after SAS, I think it's going to look very different and we certainly haven't found it yet so I think we need to start experimenting on that more but it's almost like we've got to get the base level of you know Building the Base Level before Experimentation apps and users and you know things out there first before we can, you know have the base to experiment on top of.

all right, give it up for Jeff everybody, thank you guys.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 66df6056:f3203c64

[REVIEW] Primal, freeform On IOS

ในบทความนี้เป็นการรีวิวการใช้ client ต่าง ๆ บน IOS ของผมและเพื่อน ๆ ที่ช่วยกันลองเล่นและทดสอบเพื่อหา client บน IOS ที่จะใช้ป้ายยาคนใหม่ ๆ ให้เขาไม่รู้สึกว่าการเข้ามาในทุ่งม่วงแห่งนี้เป็นเรื่องยาก เมื่อได้ทดลองแล้วเลยอยากมาแชร์ผลที่ได้กับทุก ๆ คนบน Nostr เพื่อเป็นแนวทางหรือเป็นส่วนประกอบการตัดสินใจในการเข้าไปลองเล่น client ใหม่ ๆ

ทั้งนี้ทั้งนั้น สิ่งที่ปรากฏภายในบทความนี้เป็นเพียงแค่ความคิดเห็นของผู้เขียนและแอพต่าง ๆ ที่ลอง เป็นเวอร์ชันก่อนวันที่ 23/10/2023 หากโหลดมาใช้แล้วไม่เหมือนในรีวิวแปลว่าแอพมันอัปเดตไปแล้วนะครับ

Primal

Primal เป็นอีก client นึงที่มีฟังก์ชันต่าง ๆ ค่อนข้างครบครันและมี UX/UI ที่ดี สวยงามและปรับแต่งได้ในระดับหนึ่ง นอกจากนี้ยังสามารถ zap ผ่าน โน้ตต่าง ๆ ได้โดยตรงและนอกจากนี้ยังรองรับ one-click zap ผ่าน NWC ได้อีกด้วย ส่วนการดาวน์โหลดในปัจจุบันสามารถทำได้ดังนี้

Primal ในตอนนี้ทาง IOS สามารถดาวน์โหลดได้ผ่านทาง TestFlight เท่านั้น โดยสามารถเข้าไปรับ redeem code ได้ทางเว็บไซต์ของ primal จากนั้นให้ปุ่มดาวน์โหลดบน navbar แล้วเลือก IOS จากนั้นจะมีหน้าต่างโปรแกรม TestFlight ขึ้นมาให้เราดาวน์โหลด

• • หากไม่เคยใช้ TestFlight มาก่อน แนะนำว่าให้ทำการดาวน์โหลดและ login ให้เสร็จเรียบร้อยก่อนไปรับ redeem code บน primal ส่วนในแง่ของ ข้อดี – ข้อเสีย ที่ผมพอสรุปได้จากการใช้งานมีประมาณนี้ครับ

ข้อดี

• UI สวยงาม ตัวแอปลื่นไหลไม่สะดุดรองรับฟังก์ชันพื้นฐานครบ
• Zap ผ่านโน้ตได้ และรับรอง NWC เพื่อทำ one-click-zap ได้
• มีการแจ้งเตือนครบครันและปรับแต่งได้ตามความต้องการ
• สร้างฟีดของ # ต่าง ๆ ได้ (ตรงนี้จะแตกต่างจากการติดตาม # ของ client อื่น ๆ )
• UI ต่าง ๆ ของแอพเช่น ขนาดตัวอักษรสามารถปรับขนาดได้

ข้อเสีย

• จัดการรีเลย์ผ่านทางแอพไม่ได้ อาจต้องมี client อื่น ๆ บนเครื่องเพื่อทำการจัดการต่าง ๆ เกี่ยวกับรีเลย์
• การแจ้งเตือนในบางครั้งซ้ำซ้อนมีแจ้งเตือนเดิม ๆ เด้งหลาย ๆ ครั้ง
• การแสดงจำนวนเช่น ผู้ติดตาม, คนตอบกลับ, คนกดไลค์มากกว่าความเป็นจริง
• Upload วีดีโอตรง ๆ ไม่ได้ (เป็นลิ้งได้ครับ)
• เวลาเราโพสต์และติด tag event ของโพสต์เราจะไม่มี tag ในช่อง tag ทำให้คนที่ติดตาม tag บน client อื่น ๆ ไม่เห็นโพสต์เรา (ร้ายแรง)

ข้อสรุป

Primal เป็นอีก client นึงที่เหมาะสมกับการแนะนำมือใหม่มาก ๆ ครับเพราะถ้าสมัครบน primal มันจะเก็บ keys เข้าไปในมือถือเราไม่ต้องให้เรา copy ไปเก็บเองเหมือน client อื่น ๆ และนอกจากนี้ยังไม่ต้องให้มือใหม่ปวดหัวกับการจัดการรีเลย์ในช่วงแรกที่เล่นได้อีกด้วย

Freefrom

สำหรับทวิตเตอร์ เอ้ย freefrom เป็นอีก client ที่ใช้งานง่าย UI เป็นที่คุ้นเคย (ทวิต) แบบแทบจะเหมือนกันเลย และสามารถใช้งานฟังก์ชันต่าง ๆ ได้เหมือนกับโซเชี่ยลมีเดียโดยทั่วไปจุดเด่นที่ชอบในตัวของ freeform คือการที่เราสามารถส่ง contact card และ album ให้กันได้ด้วย ส่วนการดาวน์โหลดในปัจจุบันสามารถทำได้ดังนี้

ตอนนี้สามารถดาวน์โหลดได้ผ่านทาง App Store ได้ตรง ๆ เลยครับ รูปนกตัวอ้วนกว่านกฟ้านิดนึง

ข้อดี

• UI สวยงาม ใช้งานง่าย และหลาย ๆ คนน่าจะคุ้นเคยกับ UI รูปแบบนี้อยู่แล้ว
• ระบบ DM สวยและมีลูกเล่นเยอะเช่น การส่ง contact card, album
• Reaction ด้วย emoji ได้หลากหลายเป็นพื้นฐานอยู่แล้ว

ข้อเสีย

• ไม่สามารถ zap หรือทำอะไรเกี่ยวกับ Lightning ได้เลยบนแอพ
• ฟังก์ชันต่าง ๆ ที่เล่นได้ค่อนข้างน้อย ไม่รองรับ Follow # หรือการ Upload video ไม่ได้ (ต้องเป็นลิ้ง)

ข้อสรุป

Freeform เป็น client ที่เหมาะสมกับการแนะนำมือใหม่มาก ๆ โดยเฉพาะกลุ่มคนที่ไม่ได้เข้าใจ Bitcoin หรือ lightning เข้ามาเริ่มก่อนได้ง่าย ๆ และหากเขาสร้างคุณค่าในสังคมมากพอที่คนอยากจะ zap ให้เขา เดี๋ยวเขาก็หาทางใช้ client อื่น ๆ เพื่อมารับ zap เอง ;)

---

ทั้งนี้ที่บทความนี้เกิดขึ้นมาได้ต้องขอขอบคุณ nostr:npub1mqcwu7muxz3kfvfyfdme47a579t8x0lm3jrjx5yxuf4sknnpe43q7rnz85 ที่แนะนำ primal มา และขอบคุณ nostr:npub1r6g3v8nd0xmu3w080qaeevwz5pzk3qfh7vdx7ayd7dv0szr96ywsh7dlap ที่ยอมกระโดดมาเล่น Nostr และ ยอมช่วยทดลองและมารีวิวช่วยกันเทสจนสามารถได้บทความนี้ขึ้นมา

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne 社区对 Nostrasia 充满了热情，目前正在对 Nostrasia 大会的精彩演讲进行了文字转录，以便大家阅读。 转录的工作正在进行，我们将逐步发布更多的转录文章。 日语和西班牙语版本由社区成员用AI工具初步进行翻译和校对，欢迎所有 YakiHonne 用户参与审核校对。 完成审核后，将获得3000 Sats的特别奖励。 联系我们（在这里评论、DM 或 TG）报名参与，第一个报名并提交审核的人将收到奖励。 欢迎参与并将这些演讲转录文章翻译成更多语言。 加入我们吧！

🌟English: Contributing to Nostr as a Non-Dev 🌟日本語: 非開発者として Nostr に貢献する 🌟Español: Contribuyendo a Nostr como no desarrollador

杰夫·加德纳（Jeff Gardner）：好的，很酷。所以这与我在哥斯达黎加关于作为非开发人员为Nostr做贡献的演讲非常相似。我想做的是，这个，你知道，故意会比较基础。如果你想要一些超技术的内容，另一个房间在那边。但是这里，我想通俗地介绍一下Nostr是如何从基础开始运作的，以使人们更好地了解它的功能以及为什么它如此酷和独特。然后讨论那些没有编写代码能力的人如何仍然可以为Nostr协议做出贡献。一切都好吗？检查。更好了吗？是的。从现在开始，好吗？好的。

所以是的，这里的想法是我们将浏览一些基本的东西，然后我们将从那里看如何作为非开发人员为Nostr做贡献。我的名字是杰夫·加德纳。我从大约二月份开始全职工作在Nostr上。我在一些不同的项目上工作：一个叫做listr，是一种列表管理工具，另一个叫做ostrich work，它有点像，单独的，有一段时间没有动过，但它是一个职位发布板，更具体地说，我想它是一个分类广告列表网站。然后我和Pablo一起在NDK上帮了很多忙。

这是真的为任何想以某种方式为Nostr做出贡献的人，特别是显然是非技术人员的人。你知道，我认为太多的人经常认为，“好的，实际上我什么都做不了，因为我不用GitHub，我不知道如何编写代码，所以我在这里有点被困住了，只能发布或参加zapathon。”我认为这完全是不正确的。这方面的一个很好的例子是我做的另一个项目，叫做Nostr.how，这在很大程度上依赖于人们撰写内容和更重要的是翻译那些内容。因此，现在它已经涵盖了大约10种语言，我认为所有这些翻译都来自其他人。那项工作都不是技术性的。一旦你掌握了翻译文件的外观模式，它实际上是非常简单的。好的，所以我已经有点谈论过这个了；我们将跳过这一部分。

那么Nostr协议是如何从基础开始工作的呢？它是一个协议，这意味着它只是一种传递信息的共识方式。我们有很多很多协议。它们都是深奥的；人们实际上不知道它们是什么，但是当你使用互联网时，你每天都在使用它们，比如HTTP之类的东西。你知道，那只是一种协议，实际上就是传递信息的指令。事件是Nostr的一种原子单位；一切都是一个事件。每个事件只不过是一个小的JSON对象。JSON绝对不是最高效的，或者你可以争论它是否是最好的选择，但与此同时，它非常简单，易读，实际上是目前地球上最常见的数据结构。大多数API都使用它；几乎每个开发人员都对它非常熟悉。有很多围绕它的工具。

在Nostr中，kind字段是最重要的，因为它告诉你正在处理什么。这就是事件的样子；这就是JSON的样子。你可以看到它很易读；你有键和值。这里的键是content，created at，ID，kind，然后你有值，告诉你它是什么。在这种情况下，你有一种类型为一的事件，它是一个注释；类型为零的是你的元数据。在Nostr中有不同类型的事件，所有这些事件类型都有范围，并且从那里一直升高，直到无穷大，实际上是这样的。因此，通过查看kind，你总是可以知道正在处理哪种事件，然后从kind开始，你就知道，好的，这个JSON对象的其余数据将看起来应该是什么样子，或者如果不是，那就是非标准的或者它不起作用；它是有问题的。

这是一个元数据字段或元数据事件的样子。这是一个zap事件的样子；它们变得有点大一些。一些事件具有一些奇怪的特殊属性；有些可替代，有些不可替代，有些是瞬时的。因此，Nostr的工作原理实际上基于这样一个理念，即不同范围的事件执行不同的功能，你总是可以创建新的事件来执行你想要做的新事物。NIPs，你知道，大家都在谈论NIPs；每个人都喜欢谈论NIPs。但是Nostr的实现可能性实际上是开发者决定如何推动协议前进的方式。只有一个必需的NIP，那就是NIP编号1，那是fiatjaf写的最初的一个，基本上只是描述，嘿，这是一个JSON东西；这是事件应该看起来的样子。这种类型非常重要，他只是描述了数据如何传输到一个中继并且作为客户端如何向中继请求该数据的基本交互。

这些不是用于功能请求的；它们不是针对任何一个客户端的具体事物。实现可能性有点像指南，事实上，除了编号1之外，每个其他NIP都是可选的。因此，不是每个客户端都必须实现它们的所有内容；它们只实现他们实际上需要做任何他们想做的事情的东西。任何人都可以在git存储库上创建、更新或更改NIPs；这是一个完全开放的存储库。话虽如此，我认为，这是我在哥斯达黎加的演讲中提到的一个不同之处，那个存储库现在非常繁忙。里面发生了很多事情，而且这种情况将继续存在；我会说它会变得越来越糟。

所以，如果你是技术人员，正在考虑如何做某事，实际上最好的想法是尝试自己在某处实施你正在做的事情，拓展它，与其他开发人员交流，弄清楚实际上能够正常运作的东西是什么，然后制定一个NIP并将其放入NIP存储库。因为这样你可以进行富有成效的对话，而不是，很多时候，将功能请求放入NIPs存储库，它立即被关闭，没有人看它。所以，我想，你知道，如果这是一个非技术性的听众，这些就不那么重要了。但你可以随时去NIP存储库，那里有一个对各种不同类型的事件、它们的用途以及有关事物如何运作的更多信息的很好的概述。

好的，这就是网络本身，所以事件以及协议如何运作的层次很低。实际上，Nostr的大部分独特性实际上来自网络以及该网络是如何构建的。因此，我们将浏览一下计算的非常缩减的历史。你知道，首先，我们有不能彼此通信的计算机，然后有人拿了一根电缆，把两台计算机插在一起，他们说，“哦，天哪，它起作用了，这太神奇了！”然后是Nostr中的集中和去中心化；他们开始将所有计算机连接在一起，这大部分还好，但它实际上并没有很好地运作。它肯定不行，它导致了很多复杂性，并立即开始朝着集中化的方向发展，因为你需要一台非常强大的计算机，一台非常强大的计算机才能服务于许多试图连接到它的其他计算机的请求。所以这就是这种客户端-服务器模型的来源，主要是由于当时计算机性能的限制。那些服务器，你知道，那是一个强大的集中力量。运行服务器的人成为了企业，然后那些企业获得了越来越多的权力，特别是在网络，你知道，网络效应企业，这些企业能够积累大量的权力。

现在，你们可能都可以想象，如果其中一个这些集中式服务器崩溃，你知道，你就会在多年前的Twitter网站上看到“fail whale”。集中式服务器是集中的一个点，所以它们是一个故障点，但它们也是一个瓶颈。一个集中式服务器可以决定谁被允许连接，谁不被允许连接。而且你知道，作为开发者，如果你处于web 2的世界，你总是构建APIs，而这些APIs是由第三方控制的。多年来我们见过很多例子，你知道，Twitter可能是其中最著名的一个，但就在最近Reddit也这样做了，他们关闭了其他开发者的API。所以这是一种情况，你知道，你可能建立了一个非常成功的业务，但如果你被束缚于某个API而它被关闭了，你知道，有人有权力一掷开关就能扼杀你的业务。所以这也是与集中化相关的问题。

那么Nostr是如何解决这个问题的呢？Nostr显然使用了中继和客户端，你们都听说过很多关于这个，我想，你知道，如果你使用Nostr甚至只有一点时间，你开始更直观地理解这一点，当你的客户端与所有这些东西连接和断开连接时。以这种方式可视化，我认为实际上非常有帮助，它清晰地表明了这是多么简单。有很多分散式协议试图变得非常花哨和非常聪明，以实现去中心化。Nostr采取了完全相反的方法，只是说我们在这里要尽可能简单和愚蠢。我们将在各处分布大量数据库。你可以连接到一个或多个数据库，你所做的就是向它们请求数据，它们向你发送数据。它们是非常简单、直接的服务器，并且它们不一定要有某种同步的全局状态。如果你考虑一下，这实际上是非常独特的。我认为，你知道，当你去Twitter时，是的，你得到了一个算法推送，但你在脑海中有这样的心理模型，即通过查看Twitter，你就有了全局状态。如果你把它变成时间模式，如果你能在Twitter上以某种方式关注每个人，你将获得与每个人都看到的相同的内容的全局状态。这实际上并不是真的。在Nostr中尤其如此。你知道，在Nostr中，你的全局推送并不是，你知道，在Nostr中的我的全局推送。我们连接到哪个中继实际上确实塑造了我们看到的内容以及我们的互动可能会如何。因此，这既是一个持久的情况，Nostr网络的分散化，因为，在这种情况下，如果其中一个中继崩溃，你仍然可以连接到其他中继。现在，在中间的这个人，中间的客户端，因为他只连接到了一个中继，他现在，你知道，哦，实际上，他连接到了两个，不要紧。所以，你知道，如果你连接到一个中继，显然，这就像一个集中式模型，但在这种情况下，你知道，你连接到更多的中继。我想这里需要记住的一件事是，现在左边的客户端和右边的客户端不能相互交流了。他们现在没有了接口，他们不连接到相同的东西。这是我们仍然需要妥善解决的一件事。目前，我们已经有了一些非常大的中继，你知道，Snort Damos，Nostr Band，像这样的几个大型中继，大多数人连接到它们，或者说，在Nostr的西方世界大多数人连接到它们。我认为，你知道，在这里看到我们几乎像是在日本的Nostr中有一个平行宇宙，这真的很酷，因为他们使用非常不同的中继。所以，显然，内容是完全不同的语言。因此，你最终得到了这种网络的分叉，这实际上是非常健康的，你知道，有点模拟现实生活更像什么样。但我们需要解决这个问题；我们需要使中继让客户更容易理解他们需要从何处获取数据，并能够根据他们正在尝试做的事情动态地连接和断开连接到中继。

好的，我们刚才已经讨论过了。我认为我们实际上在我刚才讲的内容中已经涵盖了大部分。但是，再次强调，没有单一的网络视图，比如在Damos中的宇宙视图并不像整个东西。我认为继续保持这一点在心中是非常有帮助的，因为你连接到什么确切地决定了你将看到什么。我一直在使用客户端和服务器这个术语；这可能是一种非常技术性的程序员说话的方式。客户端只是应用程序，就像你手机上的所有应用程序，你访问的网站，它们都是客户端。而客户端是，你知道，我想最好的方式是将其看作是为了获取数据或获取信息或代表你执行任务的客户端。所以只需将其看作应用程序；这可能是最简单的方式。正如我之前所说，客户端不必实现所有的NIPs，他们只需要实现针对他们尝试完成的具体用例的子集。我认为其中一个令人惊奇的事情是，你知道，我在哥斯达黎加做的这个演讲是在三月份，那时候我们主要有Twitter客户端。但我们没有很多其他东西。在过去的六七个月里，其他类别的应用程序绝对爆炸了。我是说，像listr这样的基本应用程序，它是另一类别，但我刚刚和Arkanox一起参加了一个小组讨论，他正在构建一个在Nostr上热力学一致的元宇宙，这太疯狂了。这是一个你可以在其中移动的三维世界，但你必须花费工作证明来移动。因此，我想这个其他类别的应用程序最终可能会占到Nostr的99%；是的，我们将始终拥有社交或笔记内容，或笔记应用程序，但其他的东西，你知道，当Nostr实际上可以借助机器人的力量重新构建几乎任何东西的时候，以及一些我们在互联网上无法构建的东西，那么你开始看到这个东西实际上的力量。另一点要记住的是，机器人也可以是客户端，所以我想我们都可能与在Nostr中漫游的GPT3或四个机器人进行过互动。从某种意义上说，这些是特殊的客户端，因为它们也在与中继进行交流并执行操作，但在某种程度上它们是自治的，这是相当酷的，你知道，Damos在这方面取得了巨大的进步，因为你有这些代理在那里，它们可以代表你通过你的请求执行任务。所以我认为，我们实际上还没有真正揭示Nostr可以做的所有其他事情的表面，但随着时间的推移，它肯定会成为最大的类别。然后，显然，你有用户，用户既包括人类也包括计算机，但这里人类方面是整个网络中最混乱的部分，就是人类总是最混乱的部分。因此，我认为从两方面来看，我们不仅不擅长像计算机那样非常可预测，而且从审查抵制方面来看，你知道，不同的人如何评价，你知道，网络或给定的社交群体中的内容或价值不同的事物，你知道，比如Blue Sky更倾向于一种更加消毒的，你知道，我们将控制在这里发布什么之类的事物。Nostr就像你知道，完全混乱，你知道，我喜欢这一点，不是每个人都喜欢，我想Pablo昨天提到的接受混乱的观点是相当有效的，如果你想贡献并想成为Nostr的一部分，你必须接受混乱，我们确实需要为此构建更好的工具，你知道。

我认为完全可以说，很多人并不想在每次打开他们的Nostr客户端时都看到裸体照片，这很正常，也很好。我们只需要一个可以控制这个的工具。所以，你知道，现在不太好用的东西在未来很容易变得非常好用，但我们仍然需要构建所有这些东西。

另一件非常重要的事情，但也是我们在过去几个月里取得绝对巨大进步的领域，是围绕Nostr上的东西是如何构建的工具和基础设施。你知道，我认为我们在一开始就有一个很早期的Library工具，叫做Nostr tools，是fiatjaf在一开始写的，它已经扩展到更高级的库，比如NDK和Snort系统，你知道，开发者们已经制定了一些模式，认为这是一种重复性的事情，我们将不得不做很多次，让我们把它变得更容易。你知道，我在NDK上工作很多，所以这可能是我会谈论得更多的一个方面。但是这些工具对于将新开发者引入这个领域非常重要，同时也使得更容易更快地构建应用程序客户端，并以一种不集中的方式进行构建。实际上，我认为NDK最大的优点是，当你首次开始编写它时，Pablo提出的想法是，我想确保我们构建到这些应用程序中的模式不是集中的，因为简单的方法总是集中的，你知道，连接到四个中继，这就是结束。然后说，“好的，当你登录时，找到所有的粉丝，找到他们所有的中继，将所有这些东西分组，找出哪些中继正在运行，哪些中继不在运行，然后每次发布一个注释，找出你需要将该事件发布到哪个中继或中继组。”这实际上真的很复杂，做一次很好的事情，这是很好的，因为我们只需完成一次，而且做得非常好。

好的，我想我已经涵盖了一些关于Nostr社交之外的东西。我认为它实际上将会是Nostr中迄今为止最大的一部分。我真的认为fiatjaf最初的Nostr文档仍然非常好。他总是在说它的不好，但我认为它实际上证明了这一点。你知道，他设计它是为了简单。他想确保它有机会运作，并且他想确保它一开始就是开放的。因此，我强烈建议去阅读一下，并浏览一下NIPs库，你可能不会理解所有的技术细节，但我认为理解为什么事物被构建成它们被构建成的样子，你知道，开始试图在你的脑海中理解这一概念是非常有帮助的，有助于理解你可能想要贡献的方式，或者你最好的贡献方式是什么。 好的，现在我们来谈谈Nostr需要什么以及你可以提供什么帮助。所以作为一个非技术人员，我和很多人交流过，他们说：“我很愿意贡献，这真的很好，我希望我能写代码。” 实际上，有很多事情并不需要编写代码。写代码实际上只是一个很小的部分，我认为很多人认为它比实际上要小得多。是的，这需要时间，随着这些应用程序、客户端和中继变得越来越庞大和复杂，你知道，构建东西确实变得更加复杂和缓慢，但实际上，使这些体验变得非常好的是周围所有的事情。所以我们将讨论一下你可以在其中工作的一些不同的大类别。这显然不是一个详尽无遗的清单，还有很多其他的方式，从一个非常高的层面来看，这是一个无需许可的系统。你不必向任何人询问任何事情的许可。去GitHub，你知道，现在希望很快能找到替代品，但是去GitHub创建一个账户，如果你还没有一个，然后只是去问一个问题，或者在某个人的仓库上创建一个问题，这样一点害处都没有，我认为太多的人有点犹豫，他们会说：“哦，我不想打扰别人”，但是像这样做是可以的。他们要么会忽略你，如果他们实际上不想和你交流，他们会直接关闭你的问题，或者他们可能会回应你，并且，你知道，你可能会开始一场对话。所以这是非常重要的一点，就是QA和Bug报告。你知道，开发者们尝试考虑他们的应用程序将被使用的所有不同方式，但是他们肯定永远不会考虑到所有的边缘情况，他们肯定永远不会遇到所有的错误，因为他们没有每个人不同的手机，也没有每个人不同的位置。所以向开发者发送功能请求和Bug报告是非常好的事情。如果你发现一些奇怪的东西，告诉那个人。而且我认为这两方面都有助于我们使体验更好，但它也是开始对话的地方，你知道，特别是在关于Bug报告方面，制作更好的Bug报告和功能请求方面，我认为主要是要使这些体验更好。提出好的Bug报告是一件完全不同的事情。因此，如果你说：“嘿，Damos总是崩溃，Will说，‘好的，很酷。’” 你想要的是，你希望有人说，当我做这件事时，我可以使它崩溃，并且我可以重复这样做，一个可重复的Bug是世界上最好的东西，因为这样你实际上有希望快速而容易地修复它。所以如果你发现有什么问题，请花点时间或者，你知道，有时间和精力的话，尽量让它再次发生，如果你能够做到，那么你就有了一个可重复的Bug，而这是一件很容易解决的事情。当你去提交Bug报告时，通常开发者希望代码与Bug报告在一起，如果是GitHub，你就需要去GitHub，你需要创建一个问题，如果是其他一些代码存储库站点，那可能就是它需要去的地方。

我猜在最坏的情况下，你可以只是，你知道，给开发者发送一条消息，或者发送到它所属的账户。不过你确实想要做的是给人们提供详细的描述。比如，写下你认为可能重要或可能无关紧要的所有随机细节，对吧？像是什么类型的设备，你是在网上还是在手机上，手机是什么型号，应用程序的版本如果你能在应用程序本身找到的话，你是在使用什么版本的应用程序，这些细节有助于再现问题，并为开发者提供大量的上下文信息。如果你做这些事情，那么这些通常是首先修复的错误。比如，如果你进入一个巨大的错误列表，有一堆有点，你知道，零零散散，几乎没有细节，你可能会说，“我甚至不知道这是在指什么”，你可能就会直接跳过那个，直接去找那个你知道，“好的，我对这里发生了什么有一个相当好的想法，我相当确定我可以修复这个。”

好的，继续。我想另一个是，嗯，实际上，我会稍微停一下来谈一下功能请求。每个使用产品的人都有某种请求，比如有些你希望它做的事情，它并不一定做到，功能请求是很好的。我猜这只是一个好主意，以与你思考错误的方式相同，暂时退一步，思考一下，好的，我到底在做什么，我到底想解决什么样的实际问题，而不是说我想要X，因为告诉开发者我想要，有时候他们只会这样实现，这是可以的，这可能是可以的，但告诉他们你实际上想要做什么对他们来说更有帮助，试图思考，好的，对这个问题有什么实际解决方案，你知道，问题的解决方案，而不仅仅是这个功能请求，这也引出了产品和设计方面，这是一个非常好的地方来做贡献。就像我们在哥斯达黎加没有Nostr DOD设计和Carnage之类的东西一样。我想Carnage一直在做一些事情，但是你知道，这个小组已经扩大了，并且他们正在全力以赴帮助所有的开发者制作网站和应用程序和客户端，为那些看起来不错但更重要的是能够正常工作并且像人们期望的那样工作的消费级产品做出贡献。因此，如果你是一个PM或者你在另一个领域是一位设计师，这是一个非常非常好的地方去帮助。从PM的角度来看，你知道，这看起来像是筛选那些问题，并回应那些可能没有足够信息的问题，以尽量获得更多信息，所以我想说，你知道，要有耐心，这仍然是一种草原，你知道，开发者不总是会完全接受这个想法，但是再说一遍，这是无需许可的，去开始组织事情，写一些文档翻译是另一个非常好的方面。就像我对Amethyst的翻译数量感到惊讶一样，我问了Victor，我希望我能找到它，但是就像Amethyst的翻译数量感到惊讶一样，我知道Damos是用很多不同的语言Nostr的。我之前提到的教育网站有大约10种语言。如果你讲一种不同的语言，我们需要使Nostr适用于每个人，所以我们需要在所有不同的应用程序和客户端中使用这些语言，然后就像我提到的文档一样，这些东西确实很重要。我们需要给人们提供上下文，我们需要告诉人们为什么这些东西不同，我们需要以很多不同的方式做到这一点，因为你永远不知道哪个内容片段或哪个，描述会让某人心领神会，所以我认为很好，我们有很多人在创建，在表面上看差不多的东西，但他们以稍微不同的方式讲述，这实际上是非常非常重要的。这一点可能不太对，我在这一点上的观点可能有所改变，我认为我们实际上需要为正常用户的使用而战斗，而不是现在的时间。我想要正常的用户，但我不希望那些不是早期采用者的人，我认为现在Nostr上的所有用户都是那些乐意使用不一定是完美或正常工作的东西的早期采用者，我也想要这样的人，因为这些人会花时间写文档或提交错误，或者，你知道，尝试新的事物，这实际上是我们现在最需要做的事情，是进行大量的实验，并找到更多的这些早期采用者开始尝试各种各样的东西。

好的，问题？我们还有时间吗？好的

听众1：给Jeff Gardner先生的问题，我这里什么也看不到，对，就在这里。如果一个项目想找到像您这样的人来审查他们的代码，审查他们的项目，并提出评论并帮助修复错误，他们该怎么做？

Jeff Gardner：私信我？不，我的意思是，我认为这实际上是围绕Nostr社区实时构建的一个很酷的事情，大家都很开放，大多数时候都很欢迎。我知道这有点令人生畏，特别是把东西放到NIPs存储库中，它可能会被批得一塌糊涂，坦白说，你必须有点韧性，人们有时会很唐突地回应。不要个人化，但我认为如果人们寻求帮助，他们总能得到帮助。所以我认为只是开始联系人们，并说：“嘿，我知道你很忙，但如果你有时间，我们来看看这个东西。”

听众2：嗨，杰夫，很高兴见到你。我在Nostr上关注你一段时间了，所以很高兴看到这个。我对你的问题是，你认为是你收到的最有建设性的反馈的例子，你认为这是有帮助的，还有更多的反馈类型，你希望看到以改进Nostr。怎样？

Jeff Gardner：一个具体的例子。我的意思是，我认为所有的反馈都是很好的。我想建筑产品的真正困难之处在于弄清楚要听取哪些反馈，哪些要忽略，因为你永远不会做到所有的事情。所以在过滤中实际上是建设出色的产品中最困难的部分。因此，我认为给予上下文的好反馈通常集中在我作为用户实际试图解决的问题是什么，因为这就把它放在了上下文中，以便构建的人理解，这是否符合我试图构建的领域。然后，他们可能会想出更好的解决方案，即使不是你所想象的那个。是的，谢谢你。

是的，对杰夫的最后一个问题？

听众3：嘿，杰夫，演讲很棒。在你的贡献技能清单中，我没看到从商业角度来看的技能，商业模型的制定，使其可持续，以便我们所有人都能产生Max想看到的回报。你能谈一下商业方面的人为贡献的角色吗？

Jeff Gardner：是的，实际上，这是一个事实，当我意识到你可以使用Nostr重建整个互联网时，当你思考一个不会给大公司垄断权力的去中心化网络的商业模型时，你会陷入一个兔子洞，哦天啊，我们该怎么办？我们怎么赚钱？这对VC来说是否有意义？我认为Max很棒，因为他是一群VC中的佼佼者，他们在边缘上，他们都很疯狂，即使他对这一切将走向何方一无所知。但我认为对于那些有商业头脑的人来说，有很多实验需要进行，而且我认为这些实验大多数都需要至少具有某种程度的严谨性，对吧？你需要了解那个东西是否真的有效，那是否是一个失败的实验或者是一个成功的实验。所以我认为，特别是我认为它在稍后的某个时候开始进入，比如一个项目有了相当不错的用户基础，并且试图开始找出不同的赚钱方式时，有一些标准的东西，我们已经变得非常熟悉了，比如订阅，它将会发生。但我认为，鉴于我们有了可以以极小的费用以光速进行流媒体传输的虚拟货币，这改变了很多事情。我们几乎没有开始挖掘像SaaS之后会出现什么奇怪模型的表面，我认为它会看起来非常不同，我们当然还没有找到它。所以我认为在这方面需要进行更多的实验，但实际上我们必须首先得到基础层次的应用程序和用户以及构建实验的基础。好了，给杰夫鼓掌，大家，谢谢。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

YakiHonne コミュニティはノストラシアに興奮しており、ノストラシアの感動的なスピーチを熱心に文字に起こしています。 追加のスピーチトランスクリプトは、今後公開される予定です。 日本語版とスペイン語版は、最初にコミュニティ メンバーによって AI ツールの助けを借りて翻訳および校正されます。 YakiHonneユーザーの皆様はぜひレビューにご参加ください。 無事にレビューを完了した方には特別報酬として3000Satが付与されます。 まずはご連絡ください (ここにコメントしてください、DM、または TG)。 連絡してレビューを送信した人が、幸運な特典の受け取り者となります。 もしよろしければ、これらのスピーチをさらに多くの言語に翻訳していただければ幸いです。 参加しませんか！

🌟English: Contributing to Nostr as a Non-Dev 🌟中文版: 作为非开发者为 Nostr 作贡献 🌟Español: Contribuyendo a Nostr como no desarrollador

ジェフ・ガードナー: わかりました、クールです。したがって、これは私が非開発者として Nostr に貢献することについてコスタリカで行った講演と非常によく似ています。そして、私がやりたいことは、ご存知のとおり、意図的に物事の基本的な側面にあるつもりです。超専門的な内容が必要な場合は、向こうの部屋があります。しかし、これは、Nostr がどのように機能するのか、なぜそれほどクールなのか、そしてなぜそれほどユニークなのかを人々にもっとよく理解してもらうために、Nostr がどのように機能するかを根本から一般的に説明したかったのです。そして、コードを書く能力がない人でも Nostr プロトコルに貢献できる方法について話します。大丈夫ですか？チェック。より良い？はい。さあ、いいですか？わかった。

そうですね、ここでの考え方は、いくつかの基本的なことを検討し、そこから非開発者として Nostr にどのように貢献するかを見ていきます。私の名前はジェフ・ガードナーです。 2月くらいからフルタイムでNostrに取り組んでいます。私はいくつかの異なるプロジェクトに取り組んでいます。1 つは listr と呼ばれるリスト管理ツールのようなもので、もう 1 つは ostrich work と呼ばれるもので、これ自体は少し触れられていないものの、求人掲示板、より具体的に言うと、求人掲載サイトだと思います。それから、私はパブロと一緒に NDK を手伝います。

したがって、これは実際に何らかの形で Nostr に貢献したいと考えている人、特に明らかに技術者ではない人向けです。 「GitHub を使っていないから実際には何もできないし、コードの書き方も分からないので、ここでただ投稿したり、ザパソン。」そしてそれは完全に間違っていると思います。この良い例は、Nostr.how と呼ばれる私が行っている別のプロジェクトです。このプロジェクトは、コンテンツを作成し、そのコンテンツをより重要に翻訳する人々に大きく依存しています。そして今では約 10 か国語に達していると思いますが、それらの翻訳はすべて他の人によるものです。そして、その作業はどれも技術的なものではありません。翻訳ファイルがどのように見えるかのパターンを理解すれば、実際には非常に簡単です。さて、これについてはすでにある程度話しました。それは飛ばします。

では、Nostr プロトコルは根本からどのように機能するのでしょうか?これはプロトコルであり、情報を送信するための合意された方法にほかなりません。私たちはたくさんのプロトコルを持っています。それらはすべて難解です。人々はそれが何であるかを実際には知りませんが、インターネットを使用するときに毎日使用します、HTTP など。ご存知のとおり、これらは単なるプロトコルであり、実際には情報を送信する方法についての単なる指示に過ぎません。イベントは Nostr の原子単位のようなものです。すべては出来事です。すべてのイベントは単なる小さな JSON オブジェクトにすぎません。 JSON は間違いなく最も効率的ではありませんし、それが最良の選択だったかどうかについて議論できるようなものではありませんが、同時に、信じられないほどシンプルで人間が判読可能であり、現時点では地球上で最も一般的なデータ構造です。ほとんどの API はこれを使用します。ほとんどすべての開発者が非常に快適で使い慣れています。その周りにはたくさんのツールがあります。

Nostr では、kind フィールドが最も重要です。これは、扱っている内容を示すフィールドだからです。イベントは次のようになります。 JSON は次のようになります。非常に読みやすいことがわかります。キーと値を持っています。ここでのキーはコンテンツ、作成日、ID、種類であり、その後にそれが何であるかを示す値が表示されます。この場合、親切なものが手に入ります。それはメモです。種類 0 はメタデータです。ノストラではさまざまな種類のイベントがあり、これらすべてのイベントの種類には範囲があり、そこから無限にまで上昇し続けます。したがって、種類を見れば、どのような種類のイベントを扱っているかを常に知ることができ、その種類から、この JSON オブジェクト内の残りのデータがどのように見えるかがわかります。そうでない場合は、それは非標準であるか、機能しません。壊れている。

これは、メタデータ フィールドまたはメタデータ イベントの外観です。ザップ イベントは次のようになります。彼らは少し大きくなります。イベントの中には、奇妙な特殊なプロパティを持つものもあります。交換可能なものもあれば、交換不可能なものもあれば、一時的なものもあります。したがって、Nostr の仕組みの背後にある考え方は、さまざまな範囲のイベントが異なることを実行し、いつでも新しいイベントを作成して、やりたい新しいことを実行できるという考えに基づいて機能します。 NIP では、誰もが NIP について話します。誰もが NIP について話すのが大好きです。しかし、Nostr 実装の可能性は、開発者がプロトコルをどのように前進させるかを決定する方法のようなものです。必要な NIP は 1 つだけで、それが NIP 1 です。これは fiatjaf が書いたオリジナルのもので、基本的には単に「これは JSON です」と説明するものです。イベントは次のようになります。このようなことは非常に重要であり、彼は、データがリレーに送信される方法と、クライアントとしてリレーにそのデータを要求する方法との間の基本的な相互作用について説明しました。

これらはある意味、機能リクエストのためのものではありません。それらは特定のクライアントに固有のものではありません。実装の可能性はガイドラインのようなもので、実際、最初の NIP を除いて、他のすべての NIP はオプションです。したがって、すべてのクライアントがそれらをすべて実装する必要がない、またはすべてのリレーがそれらをすべて実装する必要がないのと同じです。やりたいことを実行するために実際に必要なことだけを実装します。誰でも git リポジトリ上で NIP を作成、更新、変更できます。それは完全にオープンなリポジトリです。そうは言っても、これは私がコスタリカで行った講演との 1 つの違いのようなものですが、レポは現在非常に忙しいということです。そこではたくさんのことが起こっており、それは今後も続くでしょう。時間の経過とともに、ますます悪化すると思います。

したがって、あなたが技術者で、何かをどのようにしたいかを考えている場合、実際にやっていることを自分でどこかに実装し、肉付けし、話し合ってみるのが最も良い考えです。他の開発者と協力して、適切に機能する実際のものが何であるかを把握し、NIP をまとめて NIP リポジトリに置きます。そうすれば、多くの場合、NIP リポジトリに機能リクエストが送られてすぐに閉じられ、誰も見なくなるという事態にならずに、生産的な会話ができるからです。したがって、これが技術系ではない種類の聴衆であれば、これらはそれほど重要ではないと思います。しかし、いつでも NIP リポジトリにアクセスでき、さまざまな種類のイベントすべての概要とその目的が非常に優れており、イベントがどのように機能するかについてもう少し詳しい情報が得られます。

これはネットワークそのもののようなものなので、イベントやプロトコルの機能は非常に低レベルです。 Nostr の独自性のほとんどは、実際にはネットワークとそのネットワークの構築方法に由来しています。そこで、本当に要約されたコンピューティングの歴史を見ていきます。ご存知のとおり、最初はお互いに通信しないコンピューターがありましたが、誰かがケーブルを手に入れて 2 台のコンピューターを接続すると、「なんとまあ、うまくいきました。これはすごいですね!」と驚きました。次に、Nostr における集中化と分散化。すべてのコンピュータを接続し始めたところ、ほとんど問題はありませんでしたが、あまりうまく機能しませんでした。そして、それは確かにそうではありませんでした。それは多くの複雑さを引き起こし、すぐに集中化への方向に進み始めました。なぜなら、必要なのは非常に強力なコンピューター、つまり、試行している他の多くのコンピューターにリクエストを処理できる非常に強力なコンピューターだったからです。彼らとつながるために。そして、この種のクライアント サーバー モデルが生まれたのは、主に当時のコンピューターの強力さによる制約によるものでした。これらのサーバーは、強力な集中力でした。サーバーを運用していた人々がビジネスになり、その後、その人々がますます権力を獲得し、特にネットワーク、ネットワーク効果ビジネスでは、それらのビジネスは莫大な権力を獲得する可能性があります。

さて、これらの集中サーバーの 1 つがダウンしたら、何年も前の Twitter サイトで失敗することは皆さんも想像できるでしょう。集中サーバーは集中化のポイントであるため、障害点でもありますが、同時にチョークポイントでもあります。集中サーバーは、誰が接続を許可され、誰が接続を許可されないかを決定できます。そして、あなたが開発者として Web 2 の世界にいて、常に API に基づいて構築しており、それらの API はサードパーティによって制御されていることがわかります。そして、私たちは何年にもわたって多くの例を見てきました、ご存知の通り、Twitter はおそらく最も有名なものの 1 つですが、つい最近 Reddit も同様のことを行い、他の開発者に対して API を無効にしただけです。つまり、これは、非常に成功したビジネスを構築できる可能性があるものの、API に依存していてそれがオフになった場合、誰かがあなたのビジネスを一瞬で潰す力を持っているということです。スイッチ。したがって、集中化にも同様の問題があります。

それでは、Nostr はどのようにしてこれを回避するのでしょうか? Nostr は明らかにリレーとクライアントを使用します。それについてはよく聞いたことがあると思います。Nostr を少しでも使用すると、クライアントがこれらすべてのものを接続したり切断したりすることです。しかし、このように視覚化すると、実際に非常に役立つと思いますし、これがいかに簡単であるかが明らかになります。ご存知のとおり、分散化の方法について非常に凝った、非常に賢明な分散化プロトコルがたくさんあります。ノストルは全く逆のアプローチをとっており、ここではできるだけ単純で愚かな話をしようとだけ言っています。大量のデータベースをあちこちに分散させるつもりです。 1 つまたは複数に接続でき、データを要求するだけで、データが送信されます。これらは非常にシンプルで単純なサーバーであり、必ずしも何らかの同期されたグローバル状態を持つ必要はありません。考えてみると、それ自体が非常にユニークです。 Twitter にアクセスすると、確かにアルゴリズム フィードが得られますが、頭の中にある種のメンタル モデルがあり、Twitter を見ることで世界の状態がわかると思います。そして、これを時系列モードにすると、何らかの方法で Twitter で全員をフォローできれば、他の全員が見ているものと同じものを消防ホースで入手できることになります。それは本当ではありません。そして、それは特にノストラでは当てはまらないようです。ご存知のように、Nostr のあなたのグローバル フィードは、Nostr の私のグローバル フィードではありません。そして、私たちがどのリレーに接続するかによって、私たちが見ているもの、そして私たちの相互作用がどのようなものになるのかが決まります。つまり、これは永続的な状況であると同時に、Nostr ネットワークの分散化でもあります。なぜなら、このシナリオでは、これらのリレーの 1 つがダウンしても、接続している他のリレーがまだあるからです。さて、ここの真ん中にいる人、真ん中にいるクライアントは、その 1 つのリレーにしか接続していないので、今は、ああ、実際には 2 つのリレーに接続しています、気にしないでください。つまり、1 つのリレーに接続されている場合は、明らかに集中型モデルと同じですが、この場合は、さらに多くのリレーに接続されています。ただし、ここで留意すべき点が 1 つあるのは、左側のクライアントと右側のクライアントは互いに会話できないということです。現在、それらの間にインターフェースはなく、同じものに接続することはありません。そして、これは、私たちがまだ適切に解決する必要がある問題です。現時点では、Snort Damos や Nostr Band など、非常に大規模なリレーがいくつかできました。ほとんどの人、あるいは西洋の Nostr 世界のような世界にいるほとんどの人が接続するいくつかの大きなリレーがあるようなものです。ここに来て、日本の Nostr ではまったく異なるリレーを使用しているため、まるで平行世界のような状況になっているのを見るのは本当にクールだと思います。したがって、明らかに、コンテンツはまったく異なる言語です。そして、最終的にはネットワークが分岐することになります。これは実際には非常に健全であり、現実の生活を模倣するものです。しかし、これを解決する必要があります。クライアントがデータを取得するためにどこに行く必要があるのかをはるかに簡単に理解できるリレーを作成し、目的に応じて動的にリレーに接続したり切断したりできるようにする必要があります。

さて、それについて説明しました。したがって、実際には、私が今話した内容でほとんどがカバーされたと思います。しかし、繰り返しになりますが、Damos のユニバース ビューが全体のようなものではないように、単一のネットワーク ビューはありません。そして、それを継続して心に留めておくことは非常に役立つと思います。なぜなら、あなたが接続するものは、まさにあなたが目にする形になるからです。私はクライアントとサーバーという用語を使い続けています。それは、技術プログラマーによく似た話し方だと思います。クライアントは、携帯電話上のすべてのアプリと同様、単なるアプリであり、アクセスする Web サイトもすべてクライアントです。クライアントとは、ご存知のように、データを取得したり、情報を取得したり、あなたに代わって何かを行ったりするクライアントであると考えるのが最良の方法だと思います。したがって、これを単なるアプリとして考えてください。それがおそらく最も簡単な方法です。前に述べたように、クライアントは、実行しようとしているユースケースのサブセットを実装するすべての NIP を実装する必要はありません。驚くべきことの 1 つは、3 月に私がコスタリカで行ったこの講演との違いだと思います。これは非常に早い段階で、その時点ではほとんどが Twitter クライアントでした。しかし、他にはあまり持っていませんでした。過去 6 ～ 7 か月で、その他のカテゴリが爆発的に増加しました。つまり、listr のような本当に基本的なアプリで、これも別のカテゴリですが、私はちょうど Arkanox のパネルに参加していました。Arkanox は、ご存知のとおり、Nostr 上で熱力学的に一貫したメタバース、つまりバナナを構築しています。これは 3D 世界であり、動き回ることができますが、動き回るためには作業証明を費やす必要があります。したがって、この他のもののカテゴリは、最終的には Nostr の 99% になるだろうと私は想像しています。はい、ソーシャルやメモ コンテンツ、メモ アプリは常にありますが、その他のものは、クリックすると、Nostr が実際にボットの力でほとんどすべてのものを再構築できます。インターネットと、私たちがインターネット上で構築できなかった多くのものを利用すると、これが実際に何であるかがわかり始めます。もう 1 つ覚えておくべきことは、ボットもクライアントになることができるということです。そのため、おそらく誰もが、Nostr 内を歩き回る GPT3 または 4 つのボットとやり取りしたことがあると思います。彼らはリレーと話したり何かをしたりするという意味では特別なクライアントのようなものですが、その点ではある種自律的であり、それは非常に素晴らしいことです。ダモスは次のような意味でこの大きな一歩を踏み出しました。あなたが何かを要求するだけで、あなたに代わって何かをしてくれるエージェントがいます。そこで改めて思うのは、Nostr が実行できる他のすべてのことはまだ表面をなぞっただけではありませんが、時間の経過とともにそれが間違いなく最大のカテゴリになるでしょう。そして、明らかにユーザーがいます。ユーザーはここでは人間でもありコンピューターでもありますが、人間が常に厄介な部分であるのと同じように、ここでの人間の側面はネットワーク全体の中で最も厄介です。それで、私たちは、コンピューターのように予測可能であることがあまり得意ではないという観点からだけでなく、物事の検閲耐性という観点からも、また、コンテンツの価値観が人によってどのように異なるのかを知っているという観点からも、改めて考えました。または、特定のネットワークや特定の社会グループについてさまざまな価値観を持っています。たとえば、Blue Sky はあなたにもっと傾いています。そういうこと。ノストルは完全な混乱を知っているようなものです、そして誰もがそうするわけではないことを私は愛しています、混乱を受け入れるという昨日のパブロの指摘は非常に正当だと思います、もしあなたが貢献したい、そしてあなたがある種のノストルの一員になりたいのであれば混乱を受け入れるには、そのためのより良いツールを構築する必要があります。

多くの人は、Nostr クライアントを開くたびに裸の人を見たくないと言うのは完全に公平だと思います。それは問題ありません、それは素晴らしいことです。それを制御するツールが必要なだけです。つまり、現在うまく機能していないものでも、将来的には非常に素晴らしいものになるでしょう。しかし、私たちはそれらすべてをまだ構築しなければなりません。

もう 1 つ、非常に重要ですが、ここ 2 か月間で私たちが絶対的な進歩を遂げた分野でもあります。それは、Nostr 上のコンテンツを構築するためのツールとインフラストラクチャです。ご存知のように、fiatjaf が最初に作成した Nostr ツールと呼ばれる非常に初期の種類のライブラリ ツール ライブラリがあったと思います。それが NDK や Snort システムなどのより高レベルのライブラリ、そして開発者が持っているものに拡張されました。 「わかった、これは何度も繰り返す必要がある作業なので、ここでもっと簡単にしましょう。」そして、ご存じのとおり、私は NDK によく取り組んでいるので、おそらく NDK についてもっと話すことになるでしょう。しかし、この種のツールは、新しい開発者をこの分野に引き込む上で非常に重要であるだけでなく、アプリ クライアントの構築をより迅速かつ簡単にし、集中化しない方法で行うことも可能にします。それは実際、私が本当に気に入っている NDK の最大の点は、パブロ、私たちが最初に NDK を書き始めたときの背後にあるアイデアが、文字通り「パターンが私たちがこれらのアプリに組み込んでいるのは一元化ではありません。簡単な方法は常に一元化だからです。」 4 つのリレーに接続するだけで、それだけで終わりです。そうなると、「ファンアウトにログインしたら、すべてのフォロワーを見つけて、すべてのリレーを見つけて、それらすべてをグループ化し、どのリレーが機能しているか、どのリレーが機能していないのかを把握し、すべてのリレーを見つけてください」と言うのははるかに困難です。メモを公開するときに、そのイベントを公開する送信先となるリレーのグループまたはリレーのグループを特定します。」そのようなことは実際には非常に複雑ですが、それを一度だけ行うのは良いことであり、一度で本当にうまくいきます。

さて、この Nostr Beyond ソーシャルについて少し説明できたと思います。先ほども言ったように、これは Nostr の中で断然最大の部分になると思います。フィアットヤフのオリジナルのノストラドックは今でもよく残っていると本当に思います。彼はいつもそのことについて軽々しく話していますが、それは実際にその点を非常によく証明していると思います。ご存知のように、彼はシンプルにするためにそれを構築した、またはシンプルにするためにデザインしたように。彼はそれが機能する可能性があることを確認したかったし、最初から開いていることを確認したかったのです。ですから、NIPs ライブラリを閲覧するのと同じように、技術的なことをすべて理解することはできないかもしれませんが、物事がなぜそのように構築されるのかなどについては理解しておくことを強くお勧めします。 、その概念を頭の中で理解しようと努め始めることは、どのように貢献したいのか、または貢献できる最善の方法は何かを理解するのに非常に役立ちます。

さて、ここからは Nostr が何を必要としているのか、そしてどこであなたが助けられるのかについて話します。そこで、私と同じような非技術者として、「ぜひ貢献したい。コードが書けたらいいのに」というような人たちとたくさん話しました。コードを書く必要がないものがたくさんあります。コードを書くということは、実際には、多くの人が思っているよりもはるかに小さな作業です。はい、これらのアプリ、クライアント、リレーが大きくなり複雑になるにつれて、時間もかかりますし、物事を構築するのは確かに複雑で遅くなりますが、実際にこれらのエクスペリエンスを本当に本当に素晴らしいものにするのは、エッジ周りのすべての要素です。そこで、私たちは、あなたが取り組むことができるこれらのさまざまな種類の、おそらく大きなカテゴリのいくつかを見ていきます。これは明らかに完全なリストではなく、他にもたくさんの方法があると思いますが、非常に高いレベルの観点から見ると、これは許可のないシステムのようなものです。何かをするのに誰かの許可を得る必要がないのと同じです。 GitHub にアクセスしてください。今のところ GitHub にアクセスして、すぐに代替品が入手できることを願っていますが、まだアカウントを持っていない場合は GitHub にアクセスしてアカウントを作成してください。単にアクセスして質問するか、アカウントを作成するだけでも大丈夫です。誰かのリポジトリにそれが何の害もないかのように投稿すると、「ああ、誰かに迷惑をかけたくない」と躊躇してしまう人が多すぎると思いますが、それは問題ありません。彼らはあなたを無視するか、実際にあなたと話したくない場合は単にあなたの話を閉じるか、おそらくあなたに応答し、あなたがおそらく会話を始めるかのいずれかです。つまり、最初のものは単なる QA とバグレポートのようなものです。ご存知のとおり、開発者はアプリが使用されるさまざまな方法をすべて考えようとしますが、すべてのエッジケースを理解することは決してありませんし、すべてのバグに遭遇することも決してありません。全員が異なる電話を使用し、全員が異なる場所にいるということはありません。したがって、機能リクエストやバグレポートを開発者に送信することは非常に良いことです。それで、もし何か変なことを見つけたら、その人に伝えてください。そして、どちらもエクスペリエンスを向上させるのに役立つと思いますが、それは会話を始めるポイントでもあり、特にバグレポートの種類については、より良いバグレポートや機能リクエストを作成するという側面では、主にそれらのエクスペリエンスをより良いものにすることが重要だと思いますより良い。ただし、適切なバグレポートを提出することはまったく別のことです。つまり、「おい、Damos はクラッシュし続ける。ウィルは『わかった、クールだ』って感じだ」というようなことを考えても、開発者にとっては役に立ちません。あなたが望んでいるのは、私がこれをやったらクラッシュさせてもいいよと誰かに言わせたいということです。そして、それを繰り返し行うことができます。再現可能なバグは世界で最高のもののようなものです。なぜなら、実際にそれを非常に迅速かつ簡単に修正できるという希望が持てるからです。だから、もし何か問題が起こったら、時間があるなら、あるいはエネルギーがあるなら、それをもう一度起こさせてみてください、そして、できれば、再現性のあるバグがあるということです、それは本当に問題です簡単に直せるもの。バグレポートを提出するとき、開発者はコードがどこにあるのかバグレポートを求めていることがわかっているので、それが GitHub であれば GitHub に行き、コード リポジトリ サイトのような他のサイトを知っている場合は問題を作成したいと考えています。おそらくそれはどこに行く必要があるでしょう。

最悪のシナリオでは、開発者か、開発者が所属するアカウントにメッセージを送信するだけで済むと思います。ただし、あなたがしたいのは、人々に詳細な説明を与えることです。たとえば、重要かもしれないし、重要ではないかもしれないと思うランダムな詳細をすべて書きますよね？デバイスの種類、ウェブを使用していましたか、携帯電話を使用していましたか、電話は何ですか、アプリ自体内で見つけられる場合はアプリのバージョン、使用していましたか、そのようなものを使用していましたかその再現面を支援し、開発者に多くのコンテキストを提供します。このようなことを行うと、それらのバグが最初に修正されます。たとえば、膨大なバグのリストを調べてみると、斑点があって詳細がほとんどないようなものが大量にあり、「これが何を指しているのかさえわからない」というような感じです。それを飛ばして、「よし、ここで何が起こっているのかはよくわかった。きっとこれを修正できると確信している」というところに真っ直ぐ進んでください。

さて、次に進みます。それで、もう 1 つ、機能リクエストについて話すために、ちょっと立ち寄ってみようと思います。製品を使用したことのある人は誰でも、製品に実行してほしいことがあるが、必ずしも実行するとは限らないなど、何らかの要求を持っています。機能の要求は素晴らしいものです。バグについて考えるのと同じように、ちょっと一歩下がって、わかりました、私が何をしようとしているのか、実際の問題は何なのか、などについて考えるのが良い考えだと思います。」ここで解決しようとしているのに対して、X が欲しいと開発者に伝えると、開発者はそのように実装してしまう場合があり、それは問題ありませんが、実際に何をしようとしているのかを伝えることは、はるかに重要です。彼らが「わかった、これに対する実際の解決策は何か、問題と私が実装しなければならないこの機能リクエストはこれだ」などと考えてみるのに役立ちます。ええと、私はそのようにして、あなたは開発者に、「これが必要だ」ということではなく、解決する必要がある問題のクラスや構築する必要のある機能のクラスについてのアイデアを開発者に提供していると思います。これは、製品とデザインの側面に私たちを導きます。ここは貢献するには本当に素晴らしい場所です。私は、カーネイジやコスタリカではNostr DODの設計がなかったような気がします。 Carnage は何かに取り組んでいたと思いますが、ご存知のとおり、そのグループは拡大し、すべての開発者がサイトを作成するのを支援することにフルタイムのエネルギーを費やし、消費者の発展に貢献するアプリやクライアントを提供しています。 - グレードの製品は、見栄えが良いだけでなく、適切に動作し、人々が期待するように動作することがより重要である、消費者グレードの製品です。したがって、あなたが PM または別の領域のデザイナーである場合、ここは本当に素晴らしい助けとなる場所であることをご存知でしょう。 PM の側面から見ると、これは、これらの問題をフィルタリングして、より多くの情報を取得するには十分な情報がない可能性がある問題に対応することを知っているように見えるので、これは私が言うと思います、ご存知のとおり、忍耐強い。これは一種の西部開拓時代のようなものですが、開発者が必ずしもこのアイデアを受け入れるとは限りませんが、やはり、物事を整理し始め、ドキュメントの翻訳を書き始めるのと同じように、許可が必要ないことも、非常に優れた側面です。翻訳の数の多さにちょっと驚いたように、私はビクターに尋ねたので、それがあればよかったのですが、アメジストの翻訳の数はとんでもない数だったようです。ダモスがたくさんの異なる言語を使っていることは知っています。先ほども言いましたが、私が運営している教育サイトは約 10 か国語で対応しています。あなたが別の言語を話す場合、Nostr がすべての人に機能するようにする必要があるため、さまざまなアプリやクライアントすべてでそれらの言語が必要になります。そして、ドキュメントについても触れたように、このことは本当に重要です。人々にコンテキストを提供する必要があるのと同じように、なぜこの内容が異なるのかを人々に伝える必要があるので、それをさまざまな方法で行う必要があります。なぜなら、コンテンツの一部や説明が何なのか、クリックするきっかけとなる説明がわからないからです。誰かがええと、それで、表面的にはほぼ同じものに見えるだろうが、彼らはそれを少し異なる方法で伝え、それが実際には本当に、本当に、本当に重要なことを作っている人がたくさんいるのは素晴らしいことだと思います。これはちょっと少ないので、この点については何とか戻ってきましたが、実際には、通常のユーザーの使用量と同様に、当時よりも少ない使用量を得るために戦う必要があると思います。私は通常のユーザーが欲しいが、そのような人々は望んでいない、まだアーリーアダプターではない群衆も望んでいない、私が今Nostrに必要としているすべてのユーザーは、必ずしも洗練されていないものに満足しているアーリーアダプターであると思うまたは、適切に働く人もそのような人が欲しいです。なぜなら、彼らは時間をかけてドキュメントを書いたり、バグを報告したり、新しいことに挑戦したりする人たちだからです。それが私たちが今最もしなければならないことです、たくさんの実験をすることですそして、物事をいじり始めるアーリーアダプターをもっと見つけてください。

さて、質問は？質問する時間はありますか？はい、わかりました、クールです。

聴衆 1- ジェフ・ガードナー氏に質問します。ここには何も見えません。プロジェクトがあなたのような人を見つけてコードをレビューし、プロジェクトをレビューし、コメントを付け、バグ修正を手伝ってもらいたい場合、どうすればよいでしょうか?

ジェフ・ガードナー- DMしてください?いいえ、つまり、Nostr を中心にリアルタイムで構築されているコミュニティの本当に素晴らしい点の 1 つは、ほとんどの場合、誰もが本当にオープンでかなり歓迎的であるということです。特に、それが威圧的であることはわかっていますnips リポジトリに物を入れると、正直に言うと細切れになることがあるのは知っていますが、皮膚が少し分厚くないといけないし、人々の反応について無愛想になることもありますが、それを個人的には考えないでください。人々が助けを求めたら、必ずどこかから助けが得られると考えてください。だから、人々にお金を払って、おいおい、という態度をとり始めればいいと思います。忙しいのはわかっていますが、ノストラへの建設的なフィードバックがあるなら、少し時間をとりましょう。これ以外のことを経験してください。

聴衆 2- こんにちは、ジェフ、初めまして。しばらく Nostr であなたをフォローしていましたので、これを見ることができてうれしかったです。私はあなたへの質問です。最も建設的なタイプのフィードバックの例は何だと思いますか?実際に役に立ったと思うフィードバックや、Nostr を改善するために見たいと思うその他の種類のフィードバックを受け取ります。どうやって？

Jeff Gardner - 具体的な例の 1 つ。つまり、すべてのフィードバックは非常に良いものだと思います。製品を構築する上で本当に難しいのは、どのフィードバックに耳を傾け、どのフィードバックを無視すべきかを判断することだと思います。あらゆることを行うので、それをフィルタリングするのが、優れた製品を構築する上で実際に最も難しい部分です。そのため、フィードバックを与える人にとって、何も起こらないことを確認してから、何も起こらないように見えるか、何も起こっていないように見えることを理解するのは常に難しいと思いますが、私はそのようなものだと思いますプロセスの一部にすぎないので、良いフィードバックには常にコンテキストが伴うと思います。それは主に、ユーザーとして実際に解決しようとしている問題は何かということに焦点を当てています。そうすることで、再びコンテキストに反映されることがわかります。構築する人は、これが私が構築しようとしている領域に適合するかどうかを理解しています。そうすれば、たとえそれがあなたが想像していたものではなかったとしても、彼らはおそらくより良い解決策を考え出すでしょう。はい、ありがとう。

はい、ジェフに最後の質問ですか？

聴衆 3- はい、ジェフ、素晴らしかったです 貢献すべきスキルのリストに挙げられているのに私が見ていなかったのは、ビジネスの観点からのスキルでした ビジネスモデルを持続可能にすることでした はい、そうすればマックスが望んでいる利益を皆で生み出せるようになりますはい、ビジネス志向の人々が貢献する役割について少し話していただけますか?

Jeff Gardner - ええ、これは実際、ビジネス モデルへの影響を考えると、Nostr を使用してインターネット全体を再構築できると知ったという事実以外は、あなたが知っていることの 1 つです。分散型ネットワークでは大企業の独占力が分からない あなたはウサギの穴に落ちたような感じですか ああ、じゃあ私たちはどうするのですか どうやって収益化するのですか これは VC と私にとっても意味があるのでしょうかマックスは素晴らしい人だと思う、なぜなら彼はあなたが知っている少数のベンチャーキャピタリストのような、限界に達しているような人だから、彼らは「ああ、私はこれに完全に賛成だ」というような人だから、彼はこれがどうなるのか文字通り全く分かっていなかったとしてもビジネス志向の人々にとっては、やるべき実験がたくさんあると思いますが、その多くの実験には、少なくとも基本レベルのような厳密さが必要であり、そのようなことを理解する必要があると思います実際に物事がうまくいくのは、失敗した実験か、成功した実験を知っているので、特に知っていると思いますが、プロジェクトがかなり優れたユーザーベースを獲得し、それを理解しようとしてからのように、少し遅れて現れ始めると思いますご存知のように、私たちがお金を稼ぐことができるさまざまな方法は何ですか、私たちがやってきたすべての標準的なものを意味すると思います、あなたが知っているように、これから起こるサブスクリプションのようなものは非常に慣れ親しんでいますが、私たちがしているという事実を考えると、あなたも知っていると思いますほとんど手数料なしで非常に少額でストリーミング可能な仮想通貨は、光の速さで大きく変化しますが、私たちはまだ表面をなぞり始めただけで、他の奇妙なモデルは何か、その後に何が起こるのかなど、 SAS、それはかなり違うものになると思います、そして確かにまだそれを見つけていないので、もっと実験を始める必要があると思いますが、あなたが知っている基本レベルを取得する必要があるようです 基本レベルの構築アプリやユーザーを実験する前に、私たちができる前に世の中のことを知っていれば、その上に実験するための基盤があることがわかります。

わかりました、ジェフの為に諦めてください、皆さん、ありがとう。

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

La comunidad de YakiHonne está entusiasmada con Nostrasia y han transcrito diligentemente los inspiradores discursos de Nostrasia. Transcripciones de discursos adicionales estarán disponibles con el tiempo. Las versiones japonesa y española son inicialmente traducidas y revisadas por miembros de la comunidad con la ayuda de herramientas de inteligencia artificial. Todos los usuarios de YakiHonne están invitados a unirse al proceso de revisión. Aquellos que completen con éxito la revisión recibirán una recompensa especial de 3000 Sats. Para comenzar, simplemente comuníquese con nosotros (Comente aquí, DM o TG) para registrarse, y el primero La persona con quien contactar y enviar su reseña será el afortunado destinatario de la recompensa. Y oye, si estás dispuesto, nos encantaría traducir estos discursos a más idiomas. ¡Únete a nosotros!

🌟English: Contributing to Nostr as a Non-Dev 🌟中文版: 作为非开发者为 Nostr 作贡献 🌟日本語: 非開発者として Nostr に貢献する

Jeff Gardner: Está bien, genial. Esto es muy similar a la charla que di en Costa Rica sobre cómo contribuir a Nostr como no desarrollador. Y lo que quiero hacer, y esto, ya sabes, será en el lado básico de las cosas a propósito. Si quieres contenido súper técnico, la otra sala está allí. Pero quería repasar en general cómo funciona Nostr desde cero para brindarle a la gente una mejor comprensión de cómo funciona y por qué es tan genial y por qué es tan único. Y luego hable sobre las formas en que las personas que no tienen la capacidad de escribir código aún pueden contribuir al protocolo Nostr. ¿Todo está bien? Controlar. ¿Mejor? Sí. Aquí adelante, ¿de acuerdo? Bueno.

Entonces, sí, la idea aquí es que repasaremos algunas cosas básicas y luego, a partir de ahí, veremos cómo vamos a contribuir a Nostr como no desarrollador. Entonces mi nombre es Jeff Gardner. He estado trabajando en Nostr a tiempo completo desde aproximadamente febrero. Trabajo en un par de proyectos diferentes: uno llamado listr, que es una especie de herramienta de administración de listas, otro llamado trabajo de avestruz, que es un poco como si, por sí solo, no se hubiera tocado en mucho tiempo, pero es un tablero de anuncios de empleo más específicamente, o más generalmente, supongo que es un sitio de anuncios clasificados. Y luego ayudo mucho en NDK con Pablo.

Así que esto es realmente para cualquiera que quiera contribuir a Nostr de alguna manera y específicamente para personas obviamente sin conocimientos técnicos. Sabes, creo que mucha gente suele pensar: "Está bien, en realidad no puedo hacer nada porque no uso GitHub, no sé escribir código, así que estoy un poco atrapado aquí simplemente publicando o zapatón." Y creo que eso es totalmente incorrecto. Un gran ejemplo de esto es otro proyecto que hago llamado Nostr.how, que depende en gran medida de que las personas escriban contenido y lo traduzcan, lo que es más importante. Y ahora creo que son unos 10 idiomas, y todas esas traducciones provienen de otras personas. Y nada de ese trabajo es técnico. Una vez que obtenga el patrón de cómo se ve ese archivo de traducción, en realidad es muy simple. Bien, ya he hablado de esto; nos saltaremos eso.

Entonces, ¿cómo funciona un protocolo Nostr desde cero? Es un protocolo, lo que significa que no es más que una forma acordada de transmitir información. Tenemos muchísimos protocolos. Todos son arcanos; la gente no sabe realmente qué son, pero los usas todos los días cuando usas Internet, cosas como HTTP. Ya sabes, esos son sólo protocolos, y eso es todo, en realidad son sólo instrucciones sobre cómo transmitir información. Los acontecimientos son una especie de unidad atómica de Nostr; todo es un evento. Cada evento no es más que un pequeño objeto JSON. JSON definitivamente no es el más eficiente o se puede discutir si fue la mejor opción, pero al mismo tiempo, es increíblemente simple, legible por humanos y se trata de la estructura de datos más común en el planeta en este momento. La mayoría de las API lo utilizan; casi todos los desarrolladores se sienten muy cómodos y familiarizados con él. Hay muchas herramientas a su alrededor.

Y en Nostr, el campo amable es el más importante porque es el que te dice con qué estás lidiando. Así es como se ve un evento; así es como se ve JSON. Puedes ver que es muy legible; tienes claves y valores. Las claves aquí son contenido, creado en, ID, tipo y luego está el valor, que le indica cuál es. Y en este caso, tienes una amable, que es una nota; El tipo cero son tus metadatos. Diferentes tipos de eventos en Nostr, y hay rangos de todos estos tipos de eventos, y en realidad sigue subiendo desde allí hasta el infinito. Así que siempre puedes saber con qué tipo de evento estás lidiando al observar el tipo, y luego, a partir del tipo, entonces sabes, está bien, el resto de los datos en este objeto JSON se verán como se supone que deben verse. o si no es así, entonces no es estándar o no funciona; esta roto.

Así es como se ve un campo de metadatos o un evento de metadatos. Así es como se ve un evento zap; se hacen un poquito más grandes. Algunos de los eventos tienen propiedades especiales extrañas; como algunos son reemplazables, otros no son reemplazables, algunos son efímeros. Entonces, la idea detrás de cómo funciona Nostr realmente funciona con esta idea de que diferentes rangos de eventos hacen cosas diferentes, y siempre puedes crear nuevos eventos para hacer las cosas nuevas que quieras hacer. Los NIP, ya sabes, todo el mundo habla de NIP; A todo el mundo le encanta hablar de NIP. Pero las posibilidades de implementación de Nostr son la forma en que los desarrolladores deciden cómo hacer avanzar el protocolo. Solo se requiere un NIP, y ese es el NIP número uno, y ese es el original que fiatjaf escribió y que básicamente describe, oye, es algo JSON; así es como se supone que debe verse el evento. Este tipo de cosas son realmente importantes, y describió solo la interacción básica entre cómo esos datos van a un repetidor y cómo usted solicita esos datos a los repetidores como cliente.

En cierto sentido, estos no son para solicitudes de funciones; no son cosas específicas de ningún cliente en particular. Las posibilidades de implementación son como pautas y, de hecho, aparte del número uno, todos los demás NIP son opcionales. Entonces, cada cliente no tiene que hacerlo, o cada relevo no tiene que implementarlos todos; solo implementan las cosas que realmente necesitan para hacer lo que quieran. Cualquiera puede crear, actualizar o cambiar NIP en el repositorio de git; Es un repositorio completamente abierto. Dicho esto, creo, y esto es como una diferencia con la charla que di en Costa Rica, que ese repositorio está muy ocupado ahora. Están sucediendo muchas cosas en él y seguirán siendo así; Yo diría que empeorará cada vez más con el tiempo.

Entonces, en realidad es una muy buena idea que si eres técnico y estás pensando en cómo quieres hacer algo, es más que nada una buena idea intentar implementar lo que estás haciendo en algún lugar tú mismo, desarrollarlo, hablar con otros desarrolladores, averigüe qué es lo que realmente funciona correctamente y luego cree un NIP y colóquelo en el repositorio de NIP. Porque entonces puedes tener una conversación productiva en lugar de, muchas veces, recibir una solicitud de función en el repositorio de NIP, que se cierra inmediatamente y nadie la mira. Entonces, supongo que si se trata de un tipo de audiencia no técnica, son menos importantes. Pero siempre puedes ir al repositorio de NIP, y hay una muy buena descripción general de todos los diferentes tipos de eventos, para qué sirven, y te brinda un poco más de información sobre cómo funcionan las cosas.

Bien, esto es como la red misma, por lo que los eventos y, ya sabes, cómo funciona el protocolo son de muy bajo nivel. La mayor parte de la singularidad de Nostr en realidad proviene de la red y de cómo se construye esa red. Así que repasaremos una especie de historia de la informática realmente resumida. Ya sabes, primero teníamos computadoras que no se comunicaban entre sí, y luego alguien tomó un cable, conectó dos computadoras y dijo: "¡Dios mío, funciona, esto es increíble!" Luego centralización y descentralización en Nostr; Comenzaron a conectar todas las computadoras y todo estuvo bien, pero en realidad no funcionó muy bien. Y ciertamente no fue así, generó muchas complicaciones, y eso inmediatamente comenzó a llevar hacia la centralización porque lo que se necesitaba era una computadora muy fuerte, una computadora muy poderosa para poder atender solicitudes a muchas otras computadoras que estaban intentando para conectarse a ellos. Y de ahí surgió este tipo de modelo cliente-servidor, y principalmente debido a las limitaciones de la potencia de las computadoras en ese momento. Esos servidores, ya sabes, eran una poderosa fuerza centralizadora. Las personas que administraban servidores se convirtieron en empresas, y luego adquirieron más y más poder, y especialmente en las redes, ya sabes, las empresas con efecto de red, esas empresas podrían acumular una gran cantidad de poder.

Ahora, probablemente todos puedan imaginarse que si uno de estos servidores centralizados falla, ya saben, aparece la ballena fallida en el sitio de Twitter de hace años. Los servidores centralizados son un punto de centralización, por lo que son un punto de falla, pero también son un punto de cuello de botella. Un servidor centralizado puede decidir quién puede conectarse y quién no. Y ya sabes, si tú, como desarrollador, estás en el mundo web 2, siempre estás construyendo API, y esas API están controladas por terceros. Y hemos visto a lo largo de los años muchos casos, ya sabes, Twitter probablemente sea uno de los más famosos, pero recientemente Reddit también hizo esto y simplemente desactivaron su API en otros desarrolladores. Y es una de esas cosas en las que, ya sabes, podrías construir un negocio muy exitoso, pero si estás en deuda con alguna API y se desactiva, ya sabes, alguien tiene el poder de acabar con tu negocio en un instante. Un interruptor. Entonces también existe ese problema con la centralización.

Entonces, ¿cómo soluciona Nostr esto? Nostr obviamente usa retransmisiones y clientes, has escuchado mucho sobre eso, creo que, ya sabes, si usas Nostr aunque sea por un poco de tiempo, comienzas a entender esto de una manera más visceral cuando tu cliente está conectando y desconectando de todas estas cosas. Pero visualizarlo de esta manera, creo que es realmente útil y deja claro lo simple que es. Ya sabes, existen muchos protocolos descentralizados que intentan ser muy sofisticados e inteligentes sobre cómo realizar la descentralización. Nostr adopta un enfoque completamente opuesto y simplemente dice que aquí seremos lo más simples y tontos posible. Tendremos un montón de bases de datos repartidas por todo el lugar. Puedes conectarte a uno o varios, y todo lo que haces es simplemente pedirles datos y ellos te envían datos. Son servidores muy simples y directos, y no necesariamente tienen que tener algún tipo de estado global sincronizado. Y si lo piensas bien, eso es, en sí mismo, algo único. Creo que, ya sabes, cuando vas a Twitter, ya sabes, sí, obtienes una fuente algorítmica, pero tienes este modelo mental en tu cabeza, es decir, tienes el estado global al mirar Twitter. Y si lo pones en modo cronológico, si de alguna manera pudieras seguir a todos en Twitter, obtendrías la manguera contra incendios de lo mismo que todos los demás están viendo. Eso realmente no es cierto. Y esto no es especialmente cierto en Nostr. Ya sabes, tu feed global en Nostr no es, ya sabes, mi feed global en Nostr. Y los relés a los que nos conectamos realmente dan forma, ya sabes, a lo que vemos y a lo que puede ser nuestra interacción. Entonces, esta es una situación duradera, la descentralización de la red Nostr porque, ya sabes, en este escenario, si uno de estos relés falla, todavía tienes otros relés a los que te estás conectando. Ahora, el tipo aquí en el medio, el cliente en el medio, como solo está conectado a ese relé, ahora está, ya sabes, oh, en realidad, está en dos, no importa. Entonces, ya sabes, si estás conectado a un relé, obviamente, es como un modelo centralizado, pero en este caso, ya sabes, estás conectado a más. Supongo que lo único que hay que tener en cuenta es que ahora el cliente de la izquierda y el cliente de la derecha no pueden hablar entre sí. Ahora no tienen una interfaz entre ellos y no se conectan a lo mismo. Y esto es algo que todavía tenemos que resolver adecuadamente. Por el momento, hemos terminado con varios repetidores muy grandes, ya sabes, Snort Damos, Nostr Band, como si hubiera varios repetidores grandes a los que se conecta la mayoría de la gente, o la mayoría de la gente en el tipo, supongo, del mundo occidental de Nostr. Creo que ha sido realmente genial estar aquí y ver cómo casi tenemos un universo paralelo en el Nostr japonés porque usan retransmisiones muy diferentes. Y así, obviamente, el contenido es un lenguaje completamente diferente. Y entonces terminas con esta, ya sabes, bifurcación de la red, que en realidad es muy saludable y, ya sabes, imita más bien cómo es la vida real. Pero necesitamos resolver esto; Necesitamos hacer que los relés hagan que sea mucho más fácil para los clientes comprender dónde deben ir para obtener datos y poder conectarse y desconectarse dinámicamente de los relés que tengan sentido para lo que están tratando de hacer.

Bien, acabamos de repasar eso. Así que creo que en realidad cubrimos la mayor parte de esto en lo que acabo de hablar. Pero sí, nuevamente, no existe una vista de red singular, como si la vista del universo en Damos no fuera completa. Y creo que es muy útil continuar y tratar de tener eso en cuenta porque lo que conectas da forma exactamente a lo que vas a ver. Sigo usando el término cliente y servidor; Esa es, supongo, una forma de hablar muy propia de un programador técnico. Los clientes son solo aplicaciones como todas las aplicaciones en su teléfono, los sitios web a los que visita, todos son clientes. Y el cliente es, ya sabes, supongo que la mejor manera de pensarlo es que el cliente obtendrá datos o información o hará cosas en su nombre. Así que piénselo simplemente como aplicaciones; esa es probablemente la forma más fácil de hacerlo. Como dije antes, los clientes no tienen que implementar todos los NIP, sino que implementan un subconjunto para cualquier caso de uso que estén intentando hacer. Y creo que una de las cosas sorprendentes es la diferencia entre esta charla que hice en Costa Rica en marzo, que fue muy temprano y en ese momento teníamos principalmente clientes de Twitter. Pero no teníamos muchas otras cosas. En los últimos seis o siete meses, ha habido una explosión absoluta en la categoría de otras cosas. Quiero decir, aplicaciones realmente básicas como listr, que es otra categoría de cosas, pero estuve en un panel con Arkanox que está construyendo, ya sabes, un metaverso que es termodinámicamente consistente en Nostr, que es plátano. Es un mundo 3D en el que puedes moverte, pero tienes que gastar pruebas de trabajo para hacerlo. Así que esta otra categoría de cosas, imagino, eventualmente será el 99% de Nostr; sí, siempre tendremos las redes sociales o, ya sabes, contenidos de notas, o aplicaciones de notas, pero las otras cosas, ya sabes, cuando hace clic, Nostr puede reconstruir prácticamente cualquier cosa con el poder de los bots. Internet y un montón de cosas que no pudimos construir en Internet, entonces comienzas a entender el poder de lo que realmente es. La otra cosa a tener en cuenta es que los bots también pueden ser clientes, por lo que creo que probablemente todos hemos interactuado con GPT3 o cuatro bots que deambulan por Nostr. Esos son clientes especiales en el sentido de que también hablan con retransmisiones y hacen cosas, pero son algo autónomos en ese sentido, y eso es genial, ya sabes, Damos da este gran paso adelante en el sentido de que Tienes estos agentes que pueden hacer cosas en tu nombre con solo pedirlas. Así que, repito, no hemos arañado la superficie de todas las otras cosas que Nostr puede hacer, pero definitivamente será la categoría más grande con el tiempo. Y luego obviamente tienes a los usuarios, y los usuarios aquí son tanto humanos como computadoras, pero el aspecto humano aquí es por lejos el más desordenado de toda la red, como si los humanos siempre fueran la parte desordenada. Y entonces, ya sabes, pienso de nuevo desde la perspectiva de que no somos buenos para ser muy predecibles como lo son las computadoras, pero también desde el punto de vista de los aspectos de resistencia a la censura de las cosas y sabes cómo las diferentes personas valoran el contenido que conoces. o valorar cosas diferentes sobre una red determinada o un determinado grupo social, ya sabes, como que Blue Sky se inclina mucho más hacia ti, sabes, es más limpio, sabes, vamos a controlar lo que se publica aquí y ya sabes. esa clase de cosas. Nostr es como si conocieras el caos total, y sabes que me encanta que no todos lo saben, creo que el punto de Pablo ayer sobre aceptar el caos es bastante válido, si quieres contribuir y quieres ser parte de Nostr, en cierto modo tienes aceptar el caos y necesitamos crear mejores herramientas para ello, ¿sabes?

Creo que es totalmente justo decir que mucha gente no quiere ver, ya sabes, gente desnuda cada vez que abren su cliente Nostr y eso está bien, es genial. Sólo necesitamos una herramienta para controlar eso. Entonces, ya sabes, las cosas que no funcionan bien ahora pueden funcionar fácilmente, ya sabes, muy bien en el futuro, pero aún tenemos que construir todas esas cosas.

Otra cosa que es increíblemente importante, pero que también es un área en la que hemos logrado un gran progreso en los últimos meses, es la de las herramientas y la infraestructura sobre cómo se construyen las cosas en Nostr. Sabes, creo que teníamos un tipo muy temprano de herramientas de biblioteca llamada Herramientas Nostr que fiatjaf escribió al principio, y que se ha expandido a bibliotecas de nivel superior como NDK y el sistema Snort y, ya sabes, cosas que los desarrolladores tienen. en cierto modo dijo: "Está bien, esto es algo repetible que vamos a tener que hacer muchísimas veces, aquí haremos esto mucho más fácil". Y, ya sabes, trabajo mucho en NDK, así que probablemente sea de él del que hablaré mucho más. Pero este tipo de herramientas son increíblemente importantes para atraer nuevos desarrolladores al espacio, pero también para hacer que sea mucho más fácil crear, ya sabes, aplicaciones clientes mucho más rápido y más fácilmente y hacerlo de una manera que no sea centralizada. De hecho, creo que lo más importante de NDK que realmente me gusta es que, ya sabes, Pablo, ya sabes, la idea detrás de esto cuando, ya sabes, empezamos a escribirlo era literalmente: "Quiero asegurarme de que los patrones que incorporamos en estas aplicaciones no son centralizadores porque la forma más fácil siempre es la centralización", ya sabes, conectarse a cuatro relés y eso es solo el final. Es mucho más difícil decir entonces: "Está bien, cuando inicies sesión en abanico, encuentres a todos tus seguidores, encuentres todos sus repetidores, agrupes todas esas cosas, averigües qué repetidores están funcionando y cuáles no, y luego cada Cada vez que publiques una nota, determina a qué grupo de retransmisiones o grupos de retransmisiones necesitas enviar esa publicación para ese evento". En realidad, esas cosas son muy complicadas y es bueno que lo hagamos una vez y que lo hagamos una vez muy, muy bien.

Bien, creo que he cubierto un poco de esta red social de Nostr Beyond. Creo que, como dije, será, con diferencia, la mayor parte de Nostr. Realmente creo que, al igual que el muelle Nostr original de Fiatjaf, todavía se mantiene muy bien. Habla mal de ello todo el tiempo, pero creo que en realidad demuestra muy bien lo que dice. Ya sabes, como si lo construyera por simplicidad o lo diseñara por simplicidad. Quería asegurarse de que tuviera posibilidades de funcionar y quería asegurarse de que estuviera abierto desde el principio. Así que recomiendo encarecidamente leerlo y explorar la biblioteca de NIP como si no entendieras todos los aspectos técnicos, pero creo que tener esa comprensión de por qué las cosas se construyen de la forma en que se construyen y, ya sabes, , comenzar a intentar tener un concepto de eso en tu cabeza es realmente útil para comprender cómo podrías querer contribuir o cuál es la mejor manera de contribuir.

Bien, ahora llegamos a la parte en la que hablamos sobre lo que Nostr necesita y dónde puedes ayudar. Entonces, como persona no técnica, hablé con mucha gente que decía: "Me encantaría contribuir, sería realmente genial. Ojalá pudiera escribir código". Hay tantas cosas que no requieren escribir código. Escribir código es en realidad una pieza mucho más pequeña de lo que creo que mucha gente cree. Sí, lleva tiempo y me gusta a medida que estas aplicaciones, clientes y retransmisiones se hacen más grandes y más complicadas, y ya sabes, construir cosas se vuelve más complicado y más lento, pero son todas las cosas en los bordes las que realmente hacen que estas experiencias sean realmente geniales. . Así que repasaremos algunos de estos diferentes tipos de, supongo, grandes categorías de cosas en las que puedes trabajar. Obviamente, esta no es una lista exhaustiva, aunque supongo que hay muchas otras formas, desde una perspectiva de muy alto nivel, es como si este fuera un sistema sin permisos. Como si no tuvieras que pedir permiso a nadie para hacer nada. Vaya a GitHub, ya sabe, vaya a GitHub por ahora, con suerte obtendrá un reemplazo pronto, pero vaya a GitHub, cree una cuenta si aún no tiene una y está bien, simplemente ingrese y haga una pregunta o cree una. problema en el repositorio de alguien como si no hubiera ningún daño en eso y creo que muchas personas simplemente dudan y dicen: "Oh, no quiero molestar a nadie", pero está bien. Te ignorarán o simplemente cerrarán tu asunto si en realidad no quieren hablar contigo o probablemente te responderán y, ya sabes, probablemente iniciarás una conversación. Así que ese es el primero, son solo informes de control de calidad y errores. Ya sabes, los desarrolladores intentan pensar en todas las diferentes formas en que se usarán sus aplicaciones, pero ciertamente nunca obtendrán todos los casos extremos y ciertamente nunca se encontrarán con todos los errores porque no No tengo el teléfono diferente de cada uno y en la ubicación diferente de cada uno. Así que es realmente bueno enviar solicitudes de funciones e informes de errores a los desarrolladores. Entonces, si encuentras algo extraño, díselo a la persona. Y creo que ambos nos ayudan a mejorar las experiencias, pero también es el punto para iniciar conversaciones y, ya sabes, especialmente para el tipo de informe de errores, el aspecto Cómo mejorar los informes de errores y las solicitudes de funciones, creo que se trata principalmente de hacer que esas experiencias sean mucho mejores. mejor. Sin embargo, presentar buenos informes de errores es algo totalmente diferente. Por lo tanto, no ayuda a un desarrollador si dices: "Oye, Damos sigue fallando. Will dice: 'Está bien, genial'". Lo que quieres es que alguien diga que cuando hago esto puedo hacer que falle. y puedo hacerlo repetidamente, un error repetible es lo mejor del mundo porque entonces puedes tener la esperanza de solucionarlo muy rápida y fácilmente. Entonces, si encuentras algo que sale mal, hazlo si tienes el tiempo o, ya sabes, tienes la energía para ello, intenta que vuelva a suceder y, si puedes, entonces tendrás un error repetible y eso es realmente cosa fácil de arreglar. Cuando vas a presentar un informe de error, sabes que normalmente los desarrolladores quieren los informes de error donde está el código, así que si eso es GitHub, quieres ir a GitHub, quieres crear un problema, si conoces uno de los otros sitios de repositorio de código similares que son probablemente hacia donde tiene que ir.

Supongo que, en el peor de los casos, puedes simplemente enviar un mensaje al desarrollador o a la cuenta en la que se encuentra. Sin embargo, lo que sí quieres hacer es darles a las personas descripciones detalladas. Por ejemplo, escribe todos los detalles aleatorios que creas que pueden importar o no, ¿verdad? Por ejemplo, qué tipo de dispositivo es, si estaba en la web, si estaba en su teléfono, cómo es el teléfono, qué versión de la aplicación, si puede encontrarla dentro de la aplicación misma, está usando, um, ese tipo de cosas. ayudar con ese aspecto de reproducción y darle al desarrollador mucho contexto. Si haces ese tipo de cosas, esos son los errores que, ya sabes, se solucionan primero. Por ejemplo, si entras en una lista gigante de errores y hay un montón de errores, ya sabes, irregulares, sin apenas detalles, piensas: "Ni siquiera sé a qué se refiere esto", dices. O simplemente saltear eso e ir directamente a lo que dices: "Está bien, tengo una idea bastante clara de lo que está pasando aquí y estoy bastante seguro de que puedo solucionarlo".

Bien, sigamos adelante. Así que supongo que otra es, bueno, en realidad, haré una especie de parada rápida para hablar sobre las solicitudes de funciones. Todos los que alguna vez usan un producto tienen algún tipo de solicitud, como si hubiera algo que quisieran que hiciera pero que no necesariamente hace, y las solicitudes de funciones son excelentes. Supongo que es una buena idea, de la misma manera que piensas en los errores, es dar un paso atrás por un momento y pensar, bueno, qué estoy tratando de hacer, cuál es el problema real que tengo. Estoy tratando de resolver aquí versus quiero X, porque decirle a un desarrollador que quiero hacerlo, a veces simplemente lo implementarán de esa manera y está bien, puede estar bien, pero decirles lo que realmente estás tratando de hacer es mucho, mucho más. Es útil para ellos intentarlo y pensar en: Bueno, cuál es una solución real para este problema, ya sabes, frente a esta solicitud de función que tengo que implementar. Um, y creo que de esa manera también les estás dando a los desarrolladores una idea de una clase de problemas que deben resolverse o una clase de características que deben crearse en lugar de solo necesito esta como alternar en algún lugar y ese tipo de nos lleva a este aspecto, ya sabes, del producto y del diseño. Este es un gran lugar para contribuir. Pienso que no teníamos el diseño de Nostr DOD con Carnage y todo eso en Costa Rica. Creo que Carnage estaba trabajando en cosas, pero sabes que ese grupo se ha expandido y están gastando, ya sabes, energía de tiempo completo en ayudar a todos los desarrolladores a crear sitios y ya sabes, aplicaciones y clientes. Contribuyendo al desarrollo del consumidor. -Productos de calidad que son agradables a la vista pero, mucho más importante, que funcionan correctamente y que les gusta funcionar de la manera que la gente espera que funcionen, productos de calidad de consumo. Entonces, si eres PM o diseñador en un ámbito diferente, este es un lugar realmente excelente para ayudar. Ya sabes, desde el aspecto de PM, sabes que parece que sabes filtrar esos problemas y responder a los problemas que sabes que podrían no tener suficiente información para tratar de obtener más información, así que supongo que diría, ya sabes, ser paciente. Esto es una especie de Salvaje Oeste, aún así, los desarrolladores no siempre estarán necesariamente abiertos a esta idea, pero nuevamente, no tiene permiso, como comenzar a organizar las cosas, escribir algunas traducciones de documentación, es otro aspecto realmente excelente. Como si me sorprendiera la cantidad de traducciones que hay, le estaba preguntando a Víctor y desearía tenerla, pero es como si fuera una cantidad absurda de traducciones para Amethyst. Sé que Damos está en muchos idiomas diferentes Nostr. Cómo ese sitio educativo que tengo como dije antes está en unos 10 idiomas. Si habla un idioma diferente, necesitamos hacer que Nostr funcione para todos, por lo que necesitamos esos idiomas en todas las diferentes aplicaciones y clientes y luego, como mencioné, la documentación, esto realmente importa. Necesitamos darle contexto a la gente, necesitamos decirle a la gente por qué esto es diferente, necesitamos hacerlo de muchas maneras diferentes porque nunca se sabe cuál es el contenido o cuál es la descripción que hará que haga clic. alguien es um y creo que es genial que tengamos mucha gente creando cosas que, sabes, en la superficie parecerían más o menos lo mismo, pero lo cuentan de una manera ligeramente diferente y eso es realmente muy, muy, muy importante. Este es un poco menos, así que he llegado a este punto. Creo que en realidad necesitamos luchar por un uso normal de los usuarios menos de lo que lo hacemos en ese momento. Quiero usuarios normales, pero no quiero gente que lo sea, no quiero a los que no son los primeros en adoptar todavía. Creo que todos los usuarios que necesitamos en Nostr en este momento son los primeros en adoptar y que están contentos con cosas que no necesariamente están pulidas. o trabajando correctamente Quiero gente así también porque esas son las personas que se toman el tiempo para escribir documentación o archivar errores o, ya sabes, probar cosas nuevas y eso es realmente lo que más necesitamos hacer en este momento es experimentar mucho. y encontrar más de esos primeros usuarios para empezar a trastear con las cosas.

Bien, ¿preguntas? ¿Tenemos tiempo para preguntas? Sí, está bien, genial.

AUDIENCIA 1- Preguntas para el Sr. Jeff Gardner. No puedo ver nada, no aquí. Si un proyecto quiere encontrar a alguien como usted para revisar su código, revisar su proyecto, hacer comentarios y ayudar a corregir errores, ¿cómo lo harían?

Jeff Gardner- ¿Envíame un mensaje privado? no, quiero decir que creo que esa ha sido una de las cosas realmente interesantes de la comunidad que se está construyendo en tiempo real alrededor de Nostr es que todos son realmente abiertos, bastante acogedores en su mayor parte. Quiero decir, sé que es intimidante, especialmente. Ya sabes, al poner cosas en el repositorio de nips, puede quedar hecho trizas, para ser honesto, tienes que tener un poco de piel gruesa y la gente va a ser brusca sobre cómo responden, a veces no lo tomes como algo personal, pero yo. Pienso que si la gente pide ayuda siempre la obtendrán de algún lugar, así que creo que simplemente empieza a pagarle a la gente y a decir: oye, sé que estás ocupado, pero ya sabes, si tienes comentarios constructivos para Nostr, tienes algo de tiempo, como vamos. pasar por esta cosa otra.

AUDIENCIA 2- Hola Jeff, un placer conocerte. Te he estado siguiendo en Nostr durante un tiempo, así que fue genial ver esto. Mi pregunta para ti es: ¿cuál dirías que es un ejemplo del tipo de retroalimentación más constructivo? que recibe y que realmente cree que fue útil y, además, tipos de comentarios que le gustaría ver para mejorar Nostr. ¿cómo?

Jeff Gardner: un ejemplo específico. Quiero decir, creo que todos los comentarios son realmente buenos. Supongo que la parte realmente difícil de crear productos es descubrir qué comentarios escuchar y cuáles ignorar porque nunca vas a hacerlo. hacer todo y filtrar esa en realidad la parte más difícil de crear excelentes productos, así que creo que siempre es difícil para las personas que dan retroalimentación dar me gusta y luego ver que no pasa nada o que sabes que no parece que pase nada, pero supongo que así es. solo es parte del proceso, por lo que creo que los buenos comentarios siempre vienen con el contexto y se centran principalmente en cuál es el problema que realmente estoy tratando de resolver como usuario porque eso luego lo pone, ya sabes, nuevamente lo pone en contexto, así que que la persona que construye entiende si esto encaja o no en el ámbito para el que estoy tratando de construir y entonces probablemente encontrará una mejor solución, incluso si no es la que usted imaginaba. Sí, gracias.

Sí, ¿última pregunta para Jeff?

AUDIENCIA 3: Hola, Jeff, eso estuvo genial. Una cosa que no vi mencionada en tu lista de tipos de habilidades para contribuir fueron las habilidades desde una perspectiva empresarial, un modelo de negocio que lo hace sostenible, sí, para que todos podamos generar esos retornos que Max quiere ver. Sí, ¿puedes hablar un poco sobre el papel que desempeñan las personas con mentalidad empresarial?

Jeff Gardner - sí, esta es en realidad una de las cosas que sabes, además del hecho de que cuando me di cuenta de que sabías que podías reconstruir todo Internet con Nostr, cuando piensas en las implicaciones del modelo de negocio de lo que red descentralizada que no te da poder de monopolio para las grandes empresas, ¿te hundes en una madriguera de conejo como, oh Dios, entonces qué hacemos? ¿Cómo vamos a monetizar esto? ¿Esto incluso tiene sentido para VC y para mí? Sé, creo que Max es increíble porque es como, ya conoces, un puñado de VC que están al límite y dicen, sí, estoy totalmente metido en esto a pesar de que él, literalmente, no tiene idea de hacia dónde va todo esto. Creo que para las personas con mentalidad empresarial, hay mucha experimentación por hacer y creo que mucha de esa experimentación debe tener al menos un nivel básico de rigor similar. Lo que realmente funciona es un experimento fallido o un experimento exitoso, así que creo que lo sabes especialmente. Creo que comienza a llegar un poco más tarde, como una vez que un proyecto tiene una base de usuarios bastante buena y está tratando de comenzar a descubrirlo. ¿Sabes cuáles son las diferentes formas en que podemos ganar dinero? Creo que hay, quiero decir, todas las cosas estándar a las que hemos llegado. Ya sabes, nos hemos acostumbrado mucho a las suscripciones que van a suceder, pero creo que lo sabes dado el hecho de que Ya sabes, dinero virtual que se puede transmitir en cantidades muy pequeñas casi sin cargos a la velocidad de la luz, que cambia mucho y apenas hemos comenzado a rascar la superficie de otros modelos extraños, como qué es lo que vendrá después. SAS, creo que se verá muy diferente y ciertamente no lo hemos encontrado todavía, así que creo que necesitamos comenzar a experimentar más con eso, pero es casi como si tuviéramos que obtener el nivel base, ya sabes, Construyendo el nivel base. antes de experimentar aplicaciones y usuarios y usted sabe las cosas que existen antes que nosotros, sabe que tiene la base sobre la cual experimentar.

Muy bien, déjenlo por Jeff, gracias a todos.

---

About YakiHonne:

YakiHonne is a Nostr-based decentralized content media protocol, which supports free curation, creation, publishing, and reporting by various media. Try YakiHonne.com Now!

Follow us

• Telegram: http://t.me/YakiHonne_Daily_Featured
• Twitter: @YakiHonne
• Nostr pubkey: npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q
• Facebook Profile: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61551715056704
• Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552076811240
• Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/720824539860115
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyjDDtWFCntGvf4EyFJ7BlA

@ 3f930d5f:7cd8ce4b

การยอมรับความเป็นจริงโดยอดีตนักศึกษา สมศักดิ์ เจียมธีรสกุล (Somsak Jeamteerasakul) ที่ออกมากล่าวว่าขบวนการนักศึกษาในทศวรรษที่ 70s โดยเฉพาะผู้ที่อยู่ในเหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลา (“6 October 1976 massacre”) ในประเทศไทยนั้นเป็น “คอมมิวนิสต์” เป็นเรื่องที่ไม่มีใครสามารถปฏิเสธได้นอกเสียจากกลุ่มบุคคลรุ่นใหม่ที่พึ่งเข้ามาศึกษา – “รู้เรื่อง” – การเมืองไทยเพียงแค่ไม่กี่ปีเท่านั้นหรืออาจจะเป็นพวกประชาธิปไตยนิยมที่มองทุกอย่างที่ตรงกันข้ามกับเผด็จการทหารว่าเป็น “เสรีนิยมประชาธิปไตย” ทั้งหมด ในขณะที่พวกเขาไม่สามารถทำใจยอมรับความเป็นจริงได้ว่าขบวนการนักศึกษาดังกล่าวก็มีแนวคิดเผด็จการไม่ต่างอะไรจากศัตรูหรืออาจจะเผด็จการเสียมากกว่าทั้งในแง่เศรษฐกิจและกรรมสิทธิ์-ทรัพย์สินส่วนบุคคลกว่าศัตรูที่พวกเขาอ้างว่าเผด็จการนักหนา การเสนอเหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลาในแง่ของ “ประวัติศาสตร์ที่เพิ่งสร้าง” นั้นควรที่จะถูกเสนอในแง่ที่เป็นกลางมากที่สุดและในแง่ของการตั้งคำถามกับภาพจำ (“historical revisionism”) ซึ่งก็ต้องรวมไปถึงการปฏิเสธมุมมองการมองประวัติศาสตร์ทางการเมืองแบบซ้ายที่เน้นให้ความสนใจไปกับการสร้างความสงสารให้กับผู้ถูกกระทำ (“ผู้ถูกกดขี่”) เท่านั้น ในเรื่องนี้กลุ่มฝ่ายซ้ายมักจะสร้างความชอบธรรมให้กับขบวนการนักศึกษาฝ่ายซ้ายผ่านการเชิดชูว่านักศึกษาเหล่านั้นเป็น “วีรบุรุษ” ไปเลยโดยไม่สร้างเข้าใจความเป็นมาอย่างแท้จริงหรือแม้แต่การพยายามที่จะหลีกเลี่ยงประเด็นเรื่องที่ว่าทำไม “ประชาชนและกองกำลังกึ่งทหารในช่วงนั้นถึงถึงออกมาสังหารโหดขบวนการนักศึกษาได้อย่างเลือดเย็น?” ในปัจจุบันกลับมีแต่พวกนักเขียนประวัติศาสตร์ฝ่ายซ้าย (left-wing historiography) ที่มักจะนำเหตุการณ์นี้ขุดขึ้นมาซ้ำ ๆ หรือในคำพูดของพวกเขา – “การผลิตซ้ำความรุนแรง – เพื่อ “ตอกย้ำ” ความ “โหดร้าย” ของการกระทำที่เกิดขึ้นโดยพยายามที่จะป้ายสีว่าฝ่ายที่กระทำนั้น “ไม่มีเหตุผล” ราวกับว่าเป็น “กลุ่มคนฟาสซิสต์ที่ไม่มีเหตุผล” แต่ใช้เพียงอารมณ์รักชาติ-พระมหากษัตริย์และความเกลียดชังในการตัดสินใจ ซึ่งก็เป็นหนึ่งในเครื่องมือของฝ่ายซ้ายที่มักจะใช้ได้ผลมาตลอดในการป้ายสีฝ่ายอื่นว่า “ด้อยในด้านวิชาการ” ถ้าเป็นเช่นนี้ตลอดไปเราก็จะไม่สามารถตั้งคำถามได้ต่อฝ่ายซ้ายที่มักอ้างศีลธรรมของเหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลาไปได้ตลอด ในบทความนี้ทางผู้เขียนไม่ได้ต้องการให้เป็นไปในทางที่บรรยายเล่าถึงเหตุการณ์แต่เป็นการตั้งคำถามและวิเคราะห์จากมุมมองของทฤษฎีชนชั้นนำ (elite theory)

---

พยายามยึดอำนาจชนชั้นนำโดยฝ่ายซ้าย: เหมือนกับการปฏิวัติสยาม พ.ศ. 2475 (Siamese revolution of 1932) ที่ผลลัพธ์คือราชอาณาจักรสยามเปลี่ยนรูปแบบประเทศจากระบอบสมบูรณาญาสิทธิราชย์ไปเป็นราชาธิปไตยภายใต้รัฐธรรมนูญ การตั้งคำถามต่อเหตุการณ์ปฏิวัติในครั้งนั้นเป็นเรื่องที่ไม่สามารถยอมรับกันได้ในแวดวงประวัติศาสตร์-การเมืองไทย ผู้ที่ตั้งคำถามกับการปฏิวัติดังกล่าวก็จะถูกกล่าวหาบ้างว่า “ล้าหลัง”, “ต่อต้านประชาธิปไตย” และ อื่น ๆ อีกมาก เหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลาก็เช่นกัน มักมักจะถูกย้ำเตือนให้เป็นเพียงแค่ภาพจำที่ว่า “ปีศาจร้ายฆ่าสังหารนักศึกษาผู้บริสุทธิ์” แต่พวกเขาเหล่านั้นไม่ได้มองถึง “การแย่งชิงอำนาจระหว่างฝ่ายซ้ายกับฝ่ายรัฐไทย” ที่เป็นแรงผลักดันในการนำไปสู่การสังหารหมู่ดังกล่าวแม้แต่น้อย มากไปกว่านั้นเหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลานั้นถึงแม้จะเป็นเหตุการณ์ที่พวกเขาเน้นย้ำว่า “นักศึกษาผู้บริสุทธิ์ถูกฆ่าสังหารหมู่อย่างเลือดเย็น” พวกเขาก็ได้มองข้ามประเด็นที่ว่าทำไมชนชั้นนำของรัฐไทยในสมัยนั้นถึงเลือกที่จะเดินไปทางนั้น ในประเด็นนี้มันเริ่มจากการที่ประเทศสหรัฐอเมริกาเริ่มที่จะเข้ามีบทบาทมากขึ้นต่อการเมืองไทยหลังสงครามโลกครั้งที่ 2 (Lau 2014) โดยเฉพาะในแง่ของการต่อต้านลัทธิคอมมิวนิสต์ที่กำลังแพร่ระบาดในภูมิภาคอินโดจีน (Indochina) ในขณะนั้น เราควรตั้งคำถามว่าถ้าเราไม่ได้รับแรงสนับสนุนจากสหรัฐอเมริกาเลยนโยบายการต่อต้านลัทธิคอมมิวนิสต์ของรัฐไทยจะเป็นไปทางไหน? ทางผู้เขียนมองว่าสิ่งที่สำคัญมากไปกว่านั้นก็คือ “มนุษย์” (human elements) เราควรจะทำความเข้าใจว่าทำไมสังคมไทยมาถึงจุดนั้นได้อย่างไร? พรรคคอมมิวนิสต์แห่งประเทศไทย (พคท.) มีส่วนเกี่ยวข้องและมีบทบาทเพียงใด? และ การปฏิวัติทางวัฒนธรรม (Cultural Revolution) ในจีนนั้นสร้างอิทธิพลมากเพียงใดต่อขบวนการนักศึกษาฝ่ายซ้ายในสมัยนั้น? คำถามเหล่านี้มักจะถูกหลีกเลี่ยงโดยเหล่านักประชาธิปไตยนิยม อีกอย่างมันเป็นเรื่องที่ปฏิเสธไม่ได้อย่างชัดเจนว่า เหตุการณ์ 14 ตุลา (1973 Thai popular uprising) ที่เป็นการล้มอำนาจเผด็จการทหารของ ถนอม กิตติขจร (Thanom Kittikachorn) สร้างความแตกแยกให้กับกลุ่มทางการเมืองหลายฝ่ายและประชาชนที่ไม่ได้เห็นด้วยกับ “ความหลากหลายของประชาธิปไตย” ที่เกิดขึ้นจากเหตุการณ์ดังกล่าวแต่อย่างใด การขึ้นมาของฝ่ายซ้ายในช่วงหลังเหตุการณ์ 14 ตุลาและความขัดแย้งที่ตามมาจึงเป็นเรื่องที่หลีกเลี่ยงไม่ได้นอกเสียจากฝ่ายใดฝ่ายหนึ่งจะทำการล้มกระดานอีกฝ่ายให้หายไปจากสังคมอย่างสมบูรณ์ (Unger 2016)

การที่ชนชั้นนำเผด็จการทหารและประชาชนชาวไทยมองว่าการสังหารหมู่นักศึกษาเป็นเรื่องที่ยอมรับกันได้และจะทำให้ไม่เกิดผลเสียต่อภาพลักษณ์ของพวกเขาใด ๆ นั้นทางผู้เขียนมองว่าเป็นเพราะ (a) รัฐบาลในสมัยนั้นมองว่ารัฐไทยมีการสนับสนุนโดยรัฐบาลสหรัฐฯ อย่างเต็มรูปแบบ การที่จะสังหารกลุ่มคนที่ถูกกล่าวหา/หรือเป็นคอมมิวนิสต์จริงนั้นจึงไม่ใช่เรื่องที่น่าสงสัย; (b) การที่รัฐบาลและประชาชนชาวไทยในสมัยนั้นมองว่าภัยคุกคามของลัทธิคอมมิวนิสต์มีความอันตรายต่อ “ชาติ, ศาสนา และ พระมหากษัตริย์” ซึ่งเป็นพื้นฐานของรัฐไทยนั้นมีน้ำหนักพอสมควร การลุกฮือของขบวนการนักศึกษาฝ่ายซ้ายต่อการกลับมาของนาย ถนอม ถือว่าเป็นพฤติกรรมที่ควรจะถูกยับยั้งในมุมมองของพวกเขา; (c) ในสมัยสงครามเย็นนั้นปฏิเสธไม่ได้ว่าลัทธิคอมมิวนิสต์เป็นภัยอันตรายอย่างแท้จริงในโลกที่ถูกแบ่งเป็นสองขั้วอย่างชัดเจนและประเทศไทยก็โดนล้อมไปด้วยรัฐสังคมนิยม เช่น ลาว, เวียดนาม และ เขมรแดง; (d) การที่พวกเขาสังหารหมู่นักศึกษานั้นถือว่ามีความชอบธรรมตามหลักการและทฤษฎีชนชั้นนำที่มองเห็นภึงภัยคุกคามอันแท้จริง ซึ่งก็คือ “พรรคคอมมิวนิสต์แห่งประเทศไทย” ที่วางหมากเอาไว้หมดแล้วตามตะเข็บชายแดนและในภาคเหนือกับภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ โดยการแตกหักมันเริ่มจากการที่ฝ่ายชนชั้นรัฐไทยพยายามที่จะเดินหมากเพื่อยุติวิกฤตทางการเมืองให้เร็วที่สุดหรือก็คือการนำนาย ถนอม กลับมา (Lau and et al 2014) ทั้งหมดจึงสรุปในแง่ของการมองประวัติศาสตร์แบบตามที่มันเกิดขึ้นมากกว่าที่จะมองในมุมมองของการเขียนประวัติศาสตร์โดยฝ่ายซ้ายเสียส่วนใหญ่ที่มักป้ายสีว่าอีกฝ่ายไม่มีมูลเหตุในการสังหารหมู่ ในประเด็นนี้ทางผู้เขียนแนะนำให้ท่านผู้อ่านเปรียบเทียบกับเหตุการณ์สังหารหมู่อื่น ๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นบนโลกตามประวัติศาสตร์ที่เกิดขึ้นมา ในทุกวันนี้เราก็เห็นได้ชัดในสงครามระหว่างยูเครนกับรัสเซียหรือสงครามระหว่างฮามาสกับอิสราเอล ทุกอย่างมันมีเหตุผลและการที่นักวิชาการฝ่ายซ้ายพยายามที่จะเบี่ยงว่านักศึกษาสมัยนั้นบริสุทธิ์และต้องการที่จะเปลี่ยนประเทศไปใน “ทางที่ดี” เช่น ในทางเสรีนิยมประชาธิปไตย จึงเป็นเรื่องหลอกลวงที่พวกเขามักหยิบขึ้นมาเล่นประจำเพื่อสนองความชอบธรรมทางประวัติศาสตร์

“โดยทั่วไปอาจกล่าวได้ว่าอิทธิพลของเหมาเจ๋อตงและความคิดเหมา [(Maoism)] ในขบวนการนักศึกษาไทย มาพร้อมกับอิทธิพลของ พคท. ในลักษณะที่เป็นเรื่องเดียวกัน” (เจียมธีรสกุล 93, 2001)

“ต้นปี 2517 องค์การนักศึกษามหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์จัดนิทรรศการ ‘จีนแดง’ ซึ่งต้องนับว่าเป็นเหตุการณ์ประวัติศาสตร์ มีคนไปดูหลายต่อหลายหมื่นคนจนหอประชุมใหญ่ดูคล้ายจะ ‘แตก’ ขึ้นมาจริง ๆ หนังสือ ปรัชญานิพนธ์เหมาเจ๋อตง ที่ตีพิมพ์เพื่อประกอบงานจำนวนหนึ่งหมื่นเล่มขายหมดในพริบตา พิมพ์อีกหมื่นเล่มก็หมดในเวลาอันรวดเร็ว” (เจียมธีรสกุล 93, 2001)

ทั้งหมดนี้สามารถกล่าวได้ว่า “การเปลี่ยนผ่านของชนชั้นนำและอำนาจ” คือใจความหลักของการเข้าใจการขึ้นมาของขบวนการนักศึกษาฝ่ายซ้ายในไทยที่มีทั้งฝ่ายที่เอาเสรีนิยมประชาธิปไตยและประชาธิปไตยในรูปแบบอื่น ๆ ที่เปิดทางให้เป็นเครื่องมือของพรรคคอมมิวนิสต์แห่งประเทศไทยและเหล่าเหมาอิสต์อีกที ฉะนั้นใจความสำคัญของเหตุการณ์ 6 ตุลานั้นควรถูกมองไม่ต่างอะไรจากประเทศฝรั่งเศสในช่วงที่เกิดการปฏิวัติอย่างรุนแรง สถานการณ์ที่ขบวนการนักศึกษาทำสำเร็จและพรรคคอมมิวนิสต์แห่งประเทศไทยสามารถใช้โอกาสที่เกิดจากการปฏิวัติดังกล่าวเพื่อยึดครองประเทศจึงเป็นเรื่องที่ไม่ไกลตัวมากนัก ซึ่งก็หมายความว่าการสังหารหมู่นักศึกษาก็เป็นหนึ่งในสิ่งที่ชนชั้นนำไทยมองว่า “มีความจำเป็น” แต่น่าเสียดายที่ชนชั้นนำและทหารในสมัยนี้มองไม่เห็นถึงภัยคุกคามของ “ลัทธิซ้ายใหม่” (“New Left”) ที่เน้นไปที่การแทรกซึมสถาบันทางสังคมและการแปรเปลี่ยนทางวัฒนธรรมทีละเล็กน้อย อีกทั้งในแง่ที่ว่าพวกเขาคุ้นเคยกับการอยู่ร่วมกับแรงกดดันของประเทศเสรีนิยมประชาธิปไตยตะวันตกที่เลิกที่จะจัดการฝ่ายตรงข้ามด้วยอำนาจแข็ง (hard power) ใน “โลกยุคหลังความจริง-สงครามทางวัฒนธรรมและข้อมูล” (“post-truth world—culture and information war”) เหตุการณ์แบบ 6 ตุลานั้นในสมัยนี้จึงเกิดขึ้นได้ยากและมันเป็นเรื่องที่น่าเสียดาย

ข้อยกเว้นที่ไม่มีหลักการ: “[...] หลังจากนั้น ที่นักศึกษาเข้าป่า แล้ว ‘เอาคืน’ ก็ไม่ต้องเล่า หรือไม่ก็เล่าเป็นอีกเรื่องหนึ่ง ไม่เกี่ยวกัน ‘6 ตุลา’ เป็นอะไรที่ ‘โดด ๆ’ ตั้งให้เป็นเหตุการณ์ ‘ฆาตรกรรม’ ที่ ‘รัฐ’ ไม่ยอมชดใช้ ‘อาชญากรรมรัฐ’ จึงเหลือเพียงด้านเดียว สะดวกดี” (สมศักดิ์ เจียมธีรสกุล ผ่าน Facebook, ตุลาคม 6 เวลา 11:20 น.)

“เรื่องนี้ผมอยากให้เราคิดให้ดี เมื่อคราว ‘6 ตุลา’ นั้น เรามุ่งสร้าง ‘สังคมใหม่’ อย่างหนึ่ง หารู้ไม่ว่า ‘สังคมใหม่’ ที่เราหวังจะสร้างนั้น มันร้ายกาจเพียงใด แน่นอน คนที่ ‘ศัตรู’ ฆ่าตายเมื่อ ‘6 ตุลา’ นั้น ไม่สมควรตาย แต่คนที่ ‘เรา’ ฆ่าก่อนหน้าและหลังจากนั้น ก็ไม่สมควรตายเช่นกัน” (สมศักดิ์ เจียมธีรสกุล ผ่าน Facebook, ตุลาคม 6 เวลา 16:50 น.)

ในมุมมองของผู้เขียนลัทธิคอมมิวนิสต์อย่างน้อยในรูปแบบของลัทธิมากซ์–เลนิน (Marxism-Leninism) ก็มีรูปแบบการปกครองและการจัดการทางการเมืองแบบประชาธิปไตยรูปแบบหนึ่ง ซึ่งเรียกกันว่า “ประชาธิปไตยรวมศูนย์” (“democratic centralism”) โดยกระบวนการก็คือการตกลงที่จะทำอะไรในการเมืองไม่ว่าจะเป็นการบังคับใช้กฎหมาย, ทำนโยบายของพรรค และ อื่น ๆ นั้นจะต้องผ่านจากการตกลงเห็นชอบร่วมกันของสมาชิกภายในพรรคคอมมิวนิสต์เท่านั้น ซึ่งก็ถือว่าเป็นประชาธิปไตยในรูปแบบหนึ่งที่กลุ่มคนต่าง ๆ สามารถออกเสียงและตกลงหารือกันเพื่อบริหารประเทศหรือเขตที่ตนมีสมาชิกอยู่ได้ นี่ก็ถือเป็นการบริหารจัดการทางการเมืองการปกครองรูปแบบหนึ่งที่ประเทศคอมมิวนิสต์มหาอำนาจ อย่าง สหภาพโซเวียต ได้เคยใช้ไปแล้ว “ประชาธิปไตย” ไม่ได้มีเพียงแค่ “เสรีนิยมประชาธิปไตย” เพียงอย่างเดียว และการที่คนรุ่นใหม่และฝ่ายซ้ายในสมัยนี้ที่พึ่งเข้ามาศึกษาการเมืองเพียงแค่ผิวเผินนั้นไม่สามารถสร้างความเข้าใจได้หรือพยายามหลีกเลี่ยงประเด็นที่ว่าสิ่งที่นักศึกษา 6 ตุลาต้องการคือการสร้าง “สังคมใหม่” การไม่ยอมรับถึงความเป็นจริงและวิเคราะห์ถึงสาเหตุที่ว่าทำไมฝ่ายหนึ่งถึงเข่นฆ่าอีกฝ่ายได้อย่างโหดเหี้ยมนั้นถือว่าเป็นพฤติกรรม “ข้อยกเว้นที่ไม่มีหลักการ” (“unprincipled exception”) ของเหล่าคนรุ่นใหม่และฝ่ายซ้าย นิยามของมันก็ประมาณว่า “สิ่งที่พวกเขาทำก็คือการพยายามเลี่ยงประเด็นไปทีละเล็กน้อยเพื่อปกป้องความต้องการที่พวกเขาหรือนักวิชาการที่พวกเขาบูชาต้องการอย่างแท้จริง พวกเขาทำไปเพื่อหลีกหนีความเป็นจริงที่ว่าปัญหาที่เกิดขึ้นมามากมายในสังคมนั้นเกิดจากพวกเขาหรือบุคคลที่พวกเขานับถือ” ท้ายที่สุดแล้วพวกเขาควรจะภูมิใจว่าขบวนการนักศึกษาฝ่ายซ้ายที่พวกเขายกย่องเชิดชูนักหนามักจะถูกสร้างให้เป็นภาพจำที่เป็น “ความดี [นักศึกษา] ต่อต้านร้าย [ชนชั้นนำและประชาชนไทย]” เพียงแค่นี้พวกเขาก็สามารถชนะสงครามทางวัฒนธรรมผ่านการใช้ประวัติศาสตร์ให้เป็นประโยชน์

โดย TheReactionarist

บรรณานุกรม

Lau, Albert, et al. Southeast Asia and the Cold War. United Kingdom: Routledge. September 12, 2014.

Unger, Daniel H. and Chandra Mahakanjana. Thai Politics: Between Democracy and Its Discontents. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. April 6, 2016.

เจียมธีรสกุล, สมศักดิ์. ประวัติศาสตร์ที่เพิ่งสร้าง. สำนักพิมพ์ 6 ตุลารำลึก. กันยายน 2001.

@ 8157cbe6:10d93990

Lifestyle inflation หมายถึง การเพิ่มความรู้สึกของความสุขหรือการพึ่งพาตนเองต่อการเติบโตของรายได้ หลังจากที่คุณได้เพิ่มรายได้ขึ้น เช่น จากการได้งานใหม่หรือได้โบนัส การที่คุณเริ่มใช้เงินมากขึ้นในการซื้อของสำหรับความสบายหรือความสนุกสนาน เป็นต้น

---

ความคิดที่อาจจะพบเจอ : ของ Lifestyle inflation

1. ความมุ่งหวังในการเพิ่มระดับชีวิต: บางคนอาจมองเห็น Lifestyle inflation ในแง่ของการพัฒนาตนเองและการเพิ่มคุณภาพชีวิต. พวกเขาอาจเห็นค่าความสุขในการสนุกสนาน, การเรียนรู้, หรือการทำกิจกรรมที่มีความสุขมากขึ้น

2. เห็นว่าการทำงานหนักควรได้รับการตอบแทน: บางคนอาจเชื่อว่าการทำงานหนักควรได้รับการตอบแทนที่สอดคล้องกับความพยายามและความสามารถของตนเอง. ดังนั้น, พวกเขาอาจกลายเป็นผู้ให้สิ่งดี ๆ ในชีวิตของตนเอง.

3. ภาคภูมิใจในความสามารถทางการเงิน: บางคนอาจรู้สึกภาคภูมิใจที่สามารถเพิ่มระดับการใช้จ่ายของตนเอง เป็นแสดงถึงความสำเร็จในการทำงานและความสามารถในการบริหารจัดการการเงิน.

4. เคารพค่าตอบแทน: มีคนที่เคารพและมองเห็นความต้องการของตนเอง และเชื่อว่าการเพิ่มระดับการใช้จ่ายเมื่อมีรายได้เพิ่มขึ้นเป็นสิ่งที่สมควร.

อย่างไรก็ตาม, นอกเหนือจากด้านบวกที่กล่าวถึง, การที่มีการ Lifestyle inflation เมื่อไม่มีรายได้แล้วแต่ค่าใช้จ่ายและระดับการใช้จ่ายยังคงสูงอยู่, สภาพทางการเงินของคุณอาจเกิดปัญหาและมีผลกระทบต่อการดำรงชีวิตของคุณ. นี่คือบางสถานการณ์ที่อาจเกิดขึ้น:

1. หนี้สินสูง: หากคุณไม่สามารถจ่ายค่าใช้จ่ายทุกรายการ, คุณอาจต้องพึ่งกับบัตรเครดิตหรือสินเชื่อ, ซึ่งทำให้หนี้สินสะสมขึ้น.

2. สูญเสียสิทธิ์ทางการเงิน: การไม่มีรายได้สามารถทำให้คุณสูญเสียสิทธิ์ทางการเงิน เช่น สูญเสียสิทธิ์ในการกู้ยืมทางการเงิน, การสมัครบัตรเครดิต, หรือการทำธุรกรรมทางการเงินอื่น ๆ.

3. สูญเสียทรัพย์สิน: หากคุณไม่สามารถชำระค่าใช้จ่ายที่เกี่ยวกับทรัพย์สิน, คุณอาจต้องขายทรัพย์สินหรือสูญเสียสิทธิ์ที่ติดตามทรัพย์สิน.

4. ความเครียดและภาวะจิตเศร้า: การไม่มีรายได้แต่ต้องเผชิญกับความต้องการและความกดดันทางการเงินอาจทำให้คุณรู้สึกทับทิมทันทีและสร้างภาวะจิตเศร้าหรือความเครียด.

5. การสูญเสียความมั่นคงในชีวิต: ความไม่มั่นคงในการเงินอาจทำให้คุณไม่มีความมั่นคงในชีวิตและไม่สามารถวางแผนอนาคต.

การแก้ไข Lifestyle inflation เพื่อสร้างการเงินที่มั่นคงและสมดุลนั้นเกี่ยวข้องกับการดำเนินแนวทางการเงินที่รอบคอบและมีวางแผน. นี่คือบางแนวทางที่อาจช่วยในการแก้ไข Lifestyle inflation:

1. บันทึกรายรับและรายจ่าย: เริ่มต้นด้วยการบันทึกรายรับและรายจ่ายทุกรายการ. นี้จะช่วยให้คุณเข้าใจว่าเงินของคุณถูกใช้ไปที่ไหนบ้าง และจะช่วยในการตรวจสอบและปรับให้เหมาะสม.

2. สร้างแผนการเงิน: กำหนดแผนการเงินที่ชัดเจนที่รวมถึงการออม, การลงทุน, และการชำระหนี้. ให้มีวางแผนที่สอดคล้องกับรายได้ของคุณ.

3. กำหนดวัตถุประสงค์ทางการเงิน: กำหนดวัตถุประสงค์ทางการเงินที่ชัดเจน เช่น การออมเพื่อการศึกษา, การลงทุนเพื่อการเติบโตทางการเงิน, หรือการออมเพื่อเพิ่ม emergency fund

4. ตรวจสอบและปรับ Lifestyle: ตรวจสอบระดับการใช้จ่ายและพิจารณาการปรับให้มีความเหมาะสมกับรายได้ปัจจุบัน. ระบุสิ่งที่สำคัญและสามารถเพิ่มคุณภาพชีวิตโดยไม่จำเป็นต้องเพิ่มระดับการใช้จ่าย.

5. สร้างแผนการชำระหนี้: หากคุณมีหนี้, สร้างแผนการชำระหนี้ที่รอบคอบและสามารถทำได้. ปรับให้เป็นไปตามแผนเพื่อลดความเครียดทางการเงิน.

6. ทำงานกับผู้เชี่ยวชาญ: หากมีความยากลำบากในการจัดการการเงิน, คุณสามารถพบปรึกษากับที่ปรึกษาการเงินเพื่อได้คำแนะนำและแผนที่เหมาะสม.

การทำตามแนวทางเหล่านี้จะช่วยในการปรับตัวให้เข้ากับสถานการณ์การเงินและลด Lifestyle inflation ที่อาจเกิดขึ้น. ความสำเร็จในการบริหารจัดการการเงินขึ้นอยู่กับความตั้งใจและการทำงานอย่างต่อเนื่องในการรักษาความมั่นคงทางการเงินของคุณ.

---

@ 32310997:0c1e64cc

2023年11月1～3日、東京と香港を会場に、Nostrのアンカンファレンス「Nostrasia」が盛大に開催されました（公式サイト）。 私自身は現地参加できず、オンライン配信をちょろっと見るだけだったので、詳しいことは何も書けませんが、自分メモとして概要を記録しておきます。

本当に開催されるの？

3月19日～21日にコスタリカで「Nostrica」が開催され、そのあとかなり早い段階で「次はどこでやる？」「日本にしよう！」ということが決まって、Nostr日本人ユーザーも巻きこんで「Nostrasia」という名称が決定。

11月初頭開催ということで、「それまでNostr日本人村存続してるかなぁ」などと言っていたのに、月日の過ぎるのは早い。あっという間に10月になり、気がつけば「え？もう来週！？」

しかし開催が近くなっても参加申込者に何の音沙汰もなかったり、登壇予定者でさえ当日の詳しい段取りがわからなかったりして、「本当に開催されるの？」と心配になったり。 入場チケットが届かない人が多くいた件は、NostrのDM仕様の問題が大きかったのでしょう。リレーがすれ違っていたらDMも届かないし、リレーが合っているにもかかわらず、クライアントによってなぜかDMが受け取れなかったりするので。

「チケットなくてもその旨受付でnpubを提示してもらえれば入場できる」ということが運営からアナウンスされ、当日、時間帯によっては受付に人がおらず、そもそも何も提示せずに会場に入れてしまったみたいで、「入場チケットとは何だったのか」「そもそも参加申し込みとは何だったのか」という気はしなくもありません。（保安上、さすがに受付なしで入れたのは良くなかった気がする）

当日の食事等の手配のため、だいたいの人数を把握する必要があったんでしょうけどね。

ちなみに参加申し込みには「オンライン参加」の選択肢があったので、私はそっちで申し込んでたけど、案の定というか予想通りというか、何の連絡もなかったです。配信URLは当日公式サイトに掲載されたし、YouTube配信で誰でも視聴できたので特に連絡してもらう必要はなかったけど、せっかく申し込んだので参加賞バッジ（NIP-58のバッジ）ぐらいは欲しかったな。会場に行った人はTシャツもらえて羨ましい。

蓋を開けたらちゃんとしてた

いざ11月1日が来たらノベルティTシャツまで用意され、会場外にはおなじみ紫のダチョウの目立ちまくるポスターも掲示、オンライン配信もほぼ滞りなく行われて、非常に“ちゃんとした”アンカンファレンスでした。開催を疑ったりしてすいませんでした！

参考：電子馬さんのTweet

1日目

1日目のメインステージ「陽（Yang）」では、こじらさん、つるるんさん、しおんさんによる発表がありました。Nostr日本語ユーザーのコミュニティについて。

★アーカイブ動画→こちら

皆さんのお顔を拝見するのも初めてなので、そこも込みで面白かったです。日本語ユーザーの「エアリプ仕草」、そんなに奇異なのかしらん（^^;）

ワークショックステージの方は「Yin」という名称、「Yang」と「Yin」って最初何のことかわからなかったんですけど、「陽」と「陰」だったんですねぇ。ちゃんとasiaを意識してステージ名つけてくださったんだな。

発表は基本英語で、同時通訳などはありませんでした。しかし「VoicePing」という翻訳サイトを使って文字起こし＆翻訳がリアルタイムに行われ、会場でもスマホでそれを見てね、というスタイル。21世紀すごい。

予定の発表がすべて終わると、次はマグロ解体ショー。 マグロ解体ショー！？ どういうこと？？？？？

参考：しおんさんのTweet 参考：こじらさんのpost

これ、一体誰が企画したんでしょうね。海外の人にとっては「日本でやるならマグロ解体ショーははずせないだろ！」なんでしょうか。それとも日本側スタッフの誰かが提案したのかなぁ。 そのあとはカラオケ大会まで行われたそうで……私も歌いたかった（）。 なんかこう、一昔前の企業の慰安旅行みたいなノリですよね、いやはやおもろい。

★東京エアトラベル・ホテル専門学校の学生さんボランティアによるカクテル提供もあったよう→こちら

★テクノスカレッジの学生さんたちによる「ダチョウデザイン画集」、どれも素敵でした→こちら

Nostrにアカウント作ってWOSの設定までしてくれた学生の皆さん、Nostrasia終わってもNostr続けてくれるといいなぁ。

2日目

2日目の目玉はなんといっても、ジャック・ドーシー氏＆スノーデン氏のオンライン対談です。 Twitterの創始者の一人であり、Nostrに投資してNostrに両親も呼んでるジャック氏。今回のNostrasiaの費用もすべてジャック氏持ち、お昼のお弁当もあの解体ショーのマグロも、そもそも渋谷ベルサールの会場費用も、全部ジャック氏が払って参加者の会費は0！

一方のスノーデン氏はNSA（アメリカ国家安全保障局）による国際的監視網の存在を暴露した人物。現在はロシアに滞在していて、今回もオンラインでの参加。

★アーカイブ動画→こちら

翻訳サイトを見ながら聞いてましたが……ほとんど理解できませんでした！！！　スノーデンさんめっちゃ喋る！しかわかんなかった。 ジャック氏はTwitter草創期の話のところで「日本人がたくさん使ってくれて、サードパーティアプリもたくさん作ってくれた」みたいなことを言ってくれたし、スノーデン氏も「日本にいたことがある。日本語はSNSに合ってる」というようなことを言ってくれ、お二人ともちゃんと開催地日本のユーザーを気遣ってくれてるんだなぁと。

参考：mattnさんのTweet

あと「X（旧Twitter）が目指すスーパーアプリ化は、中国のようなすべてを監視しコントロールするやり方と似ている」みたいなことを言っていたような……。

内容はほとんど理解できなかったものの、こういう興味深い対談をリアルタイムで視聴できたのは面白い体験でした。 メディアがまったく来ていなかったのが信じられない。ニュース記事にして……要約して……。

3日目

3日目のメインステージにはあわゆきさんが登壇。Nostrasiaでグッズの代理通販を行う仕組みを作った件についてご発表。トークもスライドも素晴らしかった、あわゆきさんすごい。

だらしさんはワークショップステージでの登壇。発表は日本語、スライドは英語で、だらしさんもすごい。 ハッカソンではおくなもさんが見事受賞！ 今さらながらNostr日本人ユーザー、すごい方が多すぎる。

★3日目のメインステージ、全体アーカイブ→こちら （あわゆきさんの登壇は1:42:46あたりから。ハッカソンの結果発表は5:11:58あたりから） ★あわゆきさんの講演記録→こちら ★3日目のワークショップステージ、全体アーカイブ→こちら （だらしさんの登壇は2:37:25あたりから） ★Nostr本1冊目を手にするジャック氏の姿→こちら

運営に関わった皆さん、登壇された皆さん、そしてはるばる日本まで来てくださった海外ユーザーの皆さん、本当にありがとうございました！

@ 11be7dbc:82a5f8e9

In today's interconnected sphere, anonymity often masquerades as an alluring promise, a veneer that obscures reality. It's striking how readily people embrace external assurances of anonymity without probing the intricate complexities shaping their digital existence. Amidst the cacophony of purported privacy solutions, the glaring truth of pervasive surveillance remains. In this labyrinth of digital oversight, the virtuous intentions of the cypherpunks shine—a vision grounded in purity and liberation through cryptography. Yet, the essence of the cypherpunks has been eclipsed by profit-driven ventures, a revelation we'll unveil in our next article, lifting the veil on an audience entangled in encrypted environments. In this discourse, we delve into the illusion of anonymity.

The Illusion Unveiled

Naivety shields many from the superficiality of promised anonymity in the digital realm. Users race towards external pledges of privacy without comprehending the depths beneath. They're ensnared by the illusion that online privacy is attainable through superficial fixes—privacy settings, incognito modes, and hollow claims of anonymous transactions. Yet, this facade crumbles against the backdrop of pervasive surveillance and intrusive data mining permeating every facet of our digital lives.

Behold the unsettling realities that escape the veneer of promised anonymity:

Data Proliferation: Tech giants voraciously amass user data, crafting intricate profiles encompassing behavior, preferences, and locations.

Social Media Deception: Platforms exploit personal data to fuel tailored advertisements and algorithms, concealing the true extent of privacy erosion.

Digital Traces: Each financial transaction, every digital interaction, leaves an indelible mark—a testament to the erosion of privacy.

Surveillance Grip: Governments wield sophisticated tools, delving into citizens' digital realms with alarming precision.

The Cypherpunk Ideals

Amidst this tumult, cypherpunks emerged as beacons of noble intent. Their initial motives were untainted—a quest for privacy, security, and unchained individual freedom. They envisioned a world where cryptography shielded individuals from invasive state oversight. Their ethos echoed the potency of cryptography in preserving speech, autonomy, and liberty.

Cryptography: A Refuge of Truth

Cryptography emerged as a sanctuary in this labyrinth of surveillance. The art of secure communication offers respite against prying eyes. Encrypting messages, data, and transactions becomes a bulwark against surveillance. Strong cryptographic algorithms and decentralized systems pave the path to secure communication, away from prying eyes.

The Urgency of the Cypherpunk Movement

The essence of cypherpunks, once noble and unsullied, has been tainted by profit-driven motives. People's inclination towards external assurances blinds them to the erosion of their digital freedoms. The pure essence of cypherpunks has been marred by profit-driven ventures, a revelation we will expose in our next article.

However, amidst this urgency lies a crucial reminder. We caution those Robinsons who believe that discarding their gadgets and retreating into seclusion is the answer. The reality is, our existence is intertwined on a singular planet, and each of us shares responsibility for the desires and indirect influences that have perpetuated fragmentation and mistrust across humanity.

Understanding the potency of cryptography and reclaiming the spirit of cypherpunks is pivotal. It's time to unveil the deception and embrace the truth—that genuine anonymity lies in cryptographic principles. Stay tuned for our next article, uncovering an audience submerged in encrypted environments, unaware of the betrayal lurking within the once beautiful and freeing concept of true humanity... C¥kuza

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Over the past decade, the cryptocurrency landscape has witnessed unprecedented growth, with Bitcoin undeniably at its forefront. As the trailblazer of digital currencies, Bitcoin has not only introduced the world to the possibilities of decentralized finance but has also inspired the creation of thousands of other cryptocurrencies. Yet, among the myriad of developments in the crypto domain, the advent of Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) stands out. These innovative financial instruments have not only revolutionized how investors perceive and interact with Bitcoin but have also provided a bridge between the volatile world of cryptocurrencies and the more stable, regulated realm of traditional finance.

Table Of Content

• What is a Bitcoin ETF?

• Why are Bitcoin ETFs Important?

• The Current Landscape of Bitcoin ETFs

• How to Invest in a Bitcoin ETF

• Conclusion

• FAQs

What is a Bitcoin ETF?

At its core, a Bitcoin ETF is a financial instrument designed to track the price movements of Bitcoin. Rather than diving into the intricate world of cryptocurrencies—buying Bitcoin directly, grappling with the nuances of digital wallets, or navigating the often complex landscape of crypto exchanges—investors can now simply purchase shares of a Bitcoin ETF. These shares are traded just like any other stock on traditional stock exchanges, offering a seamless integration of Bitcoin into conventional investment portfolios.

Why are Bitcoin ETFs Important?

Accessibility: One of the primary advantages of Bitcoin ETFs is their accessibility. They open the doors for everyday investors, even those unfamiliar with the intricacies of the crypto world, to gain exposure to Bitcoin. There's no need to delve into the technical aspects of purchasing, storing, or securing the cryptocurrency—Bitcoin ETFs simplify the entire process.

Regulation: Being listed and traded on recognized stock exchanges means that Bitcoin ETFs come under the purview of financial regulators. This regulatory oversight ensures a degree of transparency and protection for investors, something that's often amiss in the wild west of direct cryptocurrency investments.

Diversification: For seasoned investors and newcomers alike, diversification is a cornerstone of a robust investment strategy. Bitcoin ETFs offer a golden opportunity to tap into the burgeoning cryptocurrency market without the direct volatility and risks tied to holding the actual digital assets.

The Current Landscape of Bitcoin ETFs

The concept of a Bitcoin ETF isn't new. However, its journey to mainstream acceptance has been riddled with regulatory challenges. Many countries, initially hesitant, have taken a cautious approach, leading to delays in the adoption of Bitcoin ETFs. But as the broader financial community becomes more attuned to the potential benefits (and risks) of cryptocurrencies, we're witnessing a gradual shift. Regulators are now more open, and approvals for Bitcoin ETFs in major financial markets are on the rise. This evolving landscape has sparked renewed interest, with both institutional and retail investors keenly exploring these novel investment avenues.

How to Invest in a Bitcoin ETF

The process of investing in a Bitcoin ETF mirrors that of any other traditional investment vehicle. Here's an elaborated guide:

Research: Embarking on any investment journey necessitates thorough research. It's imperative to delve deep, understand the nuances, and compare the various Bitcoin ETFs available in the market. Look into their past performance, management strategies, and fee structures.

Choose a Brokerage: Once you've zeroed in on a Bitcoin ETF that aligns with your investment goals, the next step is to select a suitable brokerage. Opt for one that offers your chosen Bitcoin ETF and boasts a reputation for reliability and security.

Buy Shares: With your brokerage account set up, you're all set to make your purchase. Navigate to the trading platform, search for your chosen Bitcoin ETF, decide on the number of shares you wish to buy, and execute the trade. It's as simple as buying shares of any other company.

Conclusion

The emergence of Bitcoin ETFs signifies a monumental shift in the financial world. It's a testament to the growing acceptance of cryptocurrencies and their potential to coexist with traditional financial instruments. As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, mature, and gain broader acceptance, the allure of Bitcoin ETFs is set to grow. For investors, this evolution offers a unique vantage point—a chance to be at the intersection of time-tested financial principles and the dynamic world of digital currencies.

FAQs

What is a Bitcoin ETF? A Bitcoin ETF is a financial instrument that tracks the price of Bitcoin, allowing investors to buy its shares on traditional stock exchanges.

Why choose a Bitcoin ETF over direct Bitcoin investment? Bitcoin ETFs offer easier accessibility, regulatory oversight, and a way to diversify investments without dealing with the complexities of direct cryptocurrency handling.

Are Bitcoin ETFs regulated? Yes, Bitcoin ETFs traded on established stock exchanges are subject to regulatory oversight, providing added protection for investors.

How do I invest in a Bitcoin ETF? Start with research, choose a reputable brokerage that offers the Bitcoin ETF you're interested in, and then purchase its shares like you would with any other stock.

Are Bitcoin ETFs a safer investment than Bitcoin? While no investment is risk-free, Bitcoin ETFs offer a layer of protection due to regulatory oversight and eliminate the risks associated with direct handling and storage of cryptocurrencies.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 3f930d5f:7cd8ce4b

ช่วงหลายวันที่ผ่านมาจะเห็นการออกมาของนักวิชาการเศรษฐศาสตร์หลายท่านคัดค้านอย่างหัวชนฝาต่อเรื่องการแจกเงินดิจิทัล 10000 บาทที่ถือเป็นนโยบายกระตุ้นเศรษฐกิจตามแนวทางแบบเคนส์ (Keynesianism) เพื่อให้เศรษฐกิจเติบโตในช่วงหนึ่งผ่านการกระตุ้นอุปสงค์มวลรวมระยะสั้นเท่านั้น อันที่จริงแล้วในหมู่นักวิชาการที่ร่วมลงชื่อเห็นพ้องในแถลงการณ์ให้รัฐบาล "นายเศรษฐา ทวีสิน" ทบทวนหรือยกเลิกนโยบายแจกดิจิทัลวอลเล็ตทั้ง 99 คน (อาจมากกว่านั้น) หรือ นักวิชาการจากสถาบันที่เกี่ยวข้องกับด้านเศรษฐศาสตร์และการบริหารทางการเงิน อย่างเช่น TDRI สภาพัฒน์และอื่น ๆ ที่ล้วนไม่เห็นด้วยนั้นก็มีแนวคิดที่ไม่แตกต่างจากนโยบายพรรคเพื่อไทยมากนัก เพียงแต่สาระสำคัญที่พวกเขาต่อต้านนโยบายนี้เพราะพวกเขา "สนับสนุนพรรคก้าวไกล" และ "เกลียดอดีตนายกรัฐมนตรี ทักษิณ ชินวัตร" ก็เท่านั้น

จะเห็นว่า "นักวิชาการ" เลือกข้างอย่างชัดเจน (พวกเขาไม่มีทางเป็นกลาง หรือ แม้แต่งานวิชาการเองก็ไม่มีทางเป็นกลางหรือปราศจากอคติ) อาจไม่จำเป็นต้องเป็นฉันทามติในหมู่นักวิชาการ แต่กล่าวได้ว่าแนวคิดทางเศรษฐศาสตร์แบบเคนส์และนีโอเคนส์ถือเป็นกระแสหลักในสังคมไทยทุกวันนี้ จึงไม่มีใครที่ไม่เชื่อว่า "การปล่อยตลาดทำงานไป" สมควรจะเกิดขึ้นจากการให้รัฐไม่แทรกแซง แต่รัฐจะต้องควบคุมกลไกตลาดเสรีนั้น มันสามารถอนุมานได้ว่ามีส่วนน้อยมาก หรือ แทบไม่มีเลยเชื่อว่ากลไกตลาดไม่สมควรถูกแทรกแซงอย่างตรงไปตรงมาตามหลักการ "ปล่อยให้ทำไป" (laissez-faire) ตรงนี้ความไร้กระดูกสันหลังเกิดขึ้นเมื่อเขาเลือกข้าง แต่ยกเว้นหลักการที่ตนยึดถือมาโดยตลอดกับฝ่ายที่ตนเองอยู่ โดยไม่ตั้งคำถามกับแนวคิดของฝ่ายที่ตนเองอยู่ว่ามันอาจจะแย่กว่าก็ได้ ยกตัวอย่างเช่น หากเพื่อไทยแจกเงินดิจิทัลวอลเลตแล้วทำเศรษฐกิจเข้าสู่วิกฤตมันแย่ไม่ควรสนับสนุน แล้วถ้าก้าวไกลทำรัฐสวัสดิการที่สร้างความเรื้อรังต่อประเทศในระยะยาวมันแย่แต่ทำไมยังสนับสนุน? หลักการความเชื่อของคนอาจไม่สอดคล้องกับจุดยืนของกลุ่ม เมื่อจุดยืนของกลุ่มเป็นอย่างไร หลักการความเชื่อของคนก็ต้องเอียนเอียงไปตามจุดยืนของกลุ่มนั้น

ซึ่งมันทำให้สิ่งที่ปรากฏออกมาในสื่อกลายเป็นหน้าตาของนักวิชาการที่แสดงออกไม่ต่างจากนักการเมืองเลย หรือก็คือ พวกเขามีลักษณะพฤติกรรมที่ตลบตะแลงต่อประชาชน และ พูดจาเพื่อหวังว่าสิ่งที่ตนทำนั้นก็เป็นการทำเพื่อประเทศชาติ แต่พวกตนทำเพื่อประเทศชาติอย่างไรละในเมื่อช่วงเวลาที่พวกเขาอยู่ใต้ร่มเงาของรัฐบาลพลเอกประยุทธ์ จันทร์โอชาถึงไม่กล้าคัดค้านนโยบายกระตุ้นเศรษฐกิจที่มีสาระสำคัญคือ "เงิน" เหมือนกัน? ก็เพราะพวกเขากลับกลอกซ่อนเงื่อนไม่ต่างจากนักการเมือง ไม่กล้าพูดว่ามันไม่ดีอย่างตรงไปตรงมา หรือ จากที่กล่าวข้างต้นก็คือ ***“หลักการความเชื่อของคนอาจไม่สอดคล้องกับจุดยืนของกลุ่ม เมื่อจุดยืนของกลุ่มเป็นอย่างไร หลักการความเชื่อของคนก็ต้องเอียนเอียงไปตามจุดยืนของกลุ่มนั้น” ***

ณ เวลานี้เราจำเป็นต้องพูด "ความจริง" ที่ไม่โลกสวยและเลือดเย็นว่า นโยบายเหล่านี้และการกระทำของนักวิชาการที่ได้เคยทำมาตลอดนั้นล้วน “ทำลาย” ประเทศชาติอย่างไม่รู้ตัว ทั้งจากการขัดขวางการเก็บออมเพื่อให้คุณภาพชีวิตของประชาชนดีขึ้น หรือ แทรกแซงเศรษฐกิจเพื่อเอื้อต่อทุนผูกขาด หรือ รับนโยบายจากชนชั้นนำของโลกฝ่ายซ้าย (globalist) อย่างเช่น แนวคิดรักสิ่งแวดล้อมที่มาจาก Green New Deal (จำพวกรถไฟฟ้า พลังงานสะอาดพวกลมและโซลาร์เซลล์) มาปฏิบัติใช้เพื่อการดำรงอยู่ของกลุ่มอำนาจตนเองอย่างหน้าไม่อาย พวกเขาไม่สนใจเลยว่า "พรุ่งนี้เราจะมีอนาคตรึเปล่า?" "คุณค่าการดำรงชีวิตของคนคืออะไร?" นอกเหนือจากการใช้วาทศิลป์เพื่อให้ตนเอง (นักวิชาการ) และผองเพื่อนดำเนินการคุมอำนาจทางเศรษฐกิจและสังคมต่อไป ซึ่งในเพจอิสรนิยมได้เคยกล่าวไว้ว่าในยุคปัจจุบันที่เป็นอยู่เรียกสภาวะเศรษฐกิจแบบนี้ว่า "ทุนนิยมแบบผู้จัดการ" ("Managerial Capitalism") ทำให้เราไปไม่ไกลจากมันและมันพยายามจะควบคุมชีวิตเราอยู่เสมอ

จุดเล็ก ๆ ที่สังคมไทยจะหาทางออกได้ก็คือ ขั้นแรก "ตั้งคำถามกับแนวคิดฝ่ายซ้ายทุกแขนง" จึงเป็นสิ่งที่ประชาชนและชนชั้นนำควรให้ความสนใจมากกว่าการโฟกัสว่าจะทลายวาทกรรม "คน 99% กับคน 1%" การหันเหให้สังคมไทยเปิดทางให้กับเสรีภาพทางเศรษฐกิจจึงเป็นเป้าหมายแรกที่ควรมุ่งเป้าไป และระหว่างทางนั้นการเมืองก็ควรจะต้องมีสเถียรภาพเสียก่อน เพียงแค่การตั้งคำถามนี้ก็ทำให้สถานภาพทางสังคมแบบฝ่ายซ้ายและนักวิชาการผู้ไร้กระดูกสันหลังสั่นคลอนในจุดยืนของตนเองได้ ขั้นที่สอง เราควรกลับมาคิดถึงตนเองว่า "ทำไมเราจึงมีคุณค่าและเหตุผลในการดำรงอยู่?" ในวันนี้เรามุ่งเน้นทางด้านเศรษฐกิจเพียงเพราะเหตุผลอย่าง "ปากท้องต้องมาก่อน" จึงไม่เพียงพออีกต่อไป เมื่อสังคมไทยถูกฝ่ายซ้ายปลูกฝังให้เชื่อว่าคนมีคุณค่าและความเป็นคนเท่าเทียมกันจึงสร้างความแปลกแยกและฝืนธรรมชาติทำให้คนในสังคมไม่เกิดการพัฒนาและคุณค่าของความงามหรือความจริงถูกทำให้เสื่อมลง การมองความเป็นจริงที่ถูกต้องอยู่แล้วว่าปากท้องสำคัญในทางเศรษฐกิจ (ซึ่งนโยบายของพรรคเพื่อไทยมองถูกต้อง แต่วิธีการยังไม่ถูกต้อง) ทว่าสิ่งที่ต้องตามมานอกเหนือจากปากท้องก็คือ เมื่อทำให้ท้องอิ่มได้แล้ว อะไรคือเหตุผลที่เรามีคุณค่า หรือ เหตุผลในการดำรงชีวิตล่ะ? ซึ่งทั้งสองขั้นตอนที่กล่าวไปจึงเป็นแกนหลักที่ขับเคลื่อนความเปลี่ยนแปลงในสังคมได้เพื่อให้คนที่อยู่ในห้วงเวลาปัจจุบันก้าวไปสู่อนาคต

@ 90c24d6b:def5ce98

As a refresher...

The basic idea of the Pareto Principle is:

Nature distributes resources unevenly… at a rate of about 80/20.

Which means a few great works are more profitable than many "okay" ones.

One great business is better than a dozen mediocre businesses.

And like Mr. Beast says,

“It’s easier to get 5 million views on 1 video than 100,000 views on 50 videos."

It's kinda counterintuitive.

Which is why a lot of folks (myself included) will spin dozens of plates at once.

Even though, when it comes down to it there are only a handful of things that really move the needle.

I woke up today and it hit me.

"Huh, Imagine if I stopped trying to spin all these plates... got out of the businesses I'm not passionate about... and... just focused on doing one thing better than anyone else in the world?"

I mean, I wouldn't be able to tell people I run 'multiple businesses.'

... And I would be ignorant to a lot of the struggles people have about "not having enough time to do everything I want."

But if the Pareto Principle is real... then what does it look like?

The Fortune 100.

I'm looking at the list right now...

The top company has more revenue than the bottom 50... combined.

Now ask yourself: would I rather be in charge of the number 1 company or try to be CEO of the bottom 50?

You'd be working a lot harder for those bottom 50 and still making less money.

Puts things in perspective.

Last thing: the Pareto principle is a directive to start measuring what matters.

It begins with the question:

What is most important for the next three (or six, or twelve) months? (3, 5, 7 years, and beyond)…

For me it is the production of content, conversions & cash flow.

For you, as a creator, it may be different. (But it’s probably pretty similar).

Idea of the day:

Pay attention to the Pareto Principle.

Godspeed,

-Gerald

P.S. This is a bit of a paradox. Even though the top 20% of my posts will garner 80% of the views, I still need to produce a daily post in order to ‘find’ those posts. Plus, the daily practice of writing helps me to ‘see’ which ideas are worth going all in on.