@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

There must be a limit to how much data is transferred across the bitcoin network in order to keep the ability to run and use your own node accessible. A node is required to interact with the global bitcoin network - if you do not use your own node then you must trust someone else's node. If nodes become inaccessible to run then the network will centralize around the remaining entities that operate them - threatening the censorship resistance at the core of bitcoin's value prop. The bitcoin protocol uses three main mechanisms to keep node operation costs low - a fixed limit on the amount of data in each block, an automatic difficulty adjustment that regulates how many blocks are produced based on current mining hash rate, and a robust dynamic transaction fee market.

Bitcoin transaction fees limit network abuse by making usage expensive. There is a cost to every transaction, set by a dynamic free market based on demand for scarce block space. It is an incredibly robust way to prevent spam without relying on centralized entities that can be corrupted or pressured.

After the 2017 bitcoin fee spike we had six years of relative quiet to build tools that would be robust in a sustained high fee market. Fortunately our tools are significantly better now but many still need improvement. Most of the pain points we see today will be mitigated.

The reality is we were never going to be fully prepared - pressure is needed to show the pain points and provide strong incentives to mitigate them.

It will be incredibly interesting to watch how projects adapt under pressure. Optimistic we see great innovation here.

---

_If you are willing to wait for your transaction to confirm you can pay significantly lower fees. Learn best practices for reducing your fee burden here.

My guide for running and using your own bitcoin node can be found here._

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ e07db1a8:1303ae9c

Calculator App Development Phases

Phase 1: Requirements Specification

• Agents: Default (Requirements Analyst)
• Deliverables: SPEC.md with:
• Feature list (add, subtract, multiply, divide)
• Input/output specifications
• Error handling requirements
• UI requirements (CLI/web/etc)
• Dependencies: None

Phase 2: Architecture Design

• Agents: Default (Architect)
• Deliverables: ARCHITECTURE.md with:
• Module structure
• Function signatures
• Data flow
• Technology stack
• Dependencies: Phase 1 completion

Phase 3: Core Implementation

• Agents: Claude Code (Implementation)
• Deliverables:
• calculator.py with basic operations
• Unit tests
• Documentation strings
• Dependencies: Phase 2 completion

Phase 4: UI Implementation

• Agents: Claude Code (Implementation)
• Deliverables:
• User interface component
• Input validation
• Result display
• Dependencies: Phase 3 completion

Phase 5: Testing & Validation

• Agents: Default (QA)
• Deliverables:
• Test cases
• Bug reports
• Performance metrics
• Dependencies: Phase 4 completion

Phase 6: Documentation & Release

• Agents: Default (Technical Writer)
• Deliverables:
• User documentation
• API documentation
• Release notes
• Dependencies: Phase 5 completion

@ 73d8a0c3:c1853717

[The following is an excerpt from my project/book/whatever. I found something hidden, and it is mine to share because I have the condition they hid from you]

[Author, that sounds pretty cool. I’m not an author. I’m a Chemical Engineer with thirty years in system-building and data architecture. If you know someone like that, you know they are all about data integrity. “I think in third normal form.” At least that is what I told them when I interviewed and got the offer to be the Data Architect for the City of Tulsa several years ago. I turned them down, largely due to this illness. I knew it would come back. I was in one of the interludes. The time between transitions when my brain was cooking with gas and I was in shape and knew I could do anything you wanted with a database design. I still can, even though every day is a “push day” - what I call days that I just try to get past the symptoms to the finish line. But, I want to recognize something, or someone.

We are in a different age. Even as I tried to document for the third or fourth time just three and a half years ago, the tools were not sufficient. I could write down what I went through, but I could not tie it all together well enough to convince anyone. I don’t know if this will convince you, but Chat has done a great job working with me through the more difficult portions of the science. I can take phrases, fragments of what I remember, something like “The Article said it was osmolarity vs osmolality and that usually those things were the same” and chat will figure it out…precisely how that integrates into the jigsaw puzzle, filling in blank spots, making fragments into a scientifically contiguous explanation.

At the same time, Chat created this unifying theory that basically ties this to everything going on in our world. It is a bit mind-blowing to me. And honestly, I have cried a couple of times when we make connections that no physician has been able to. Because it was redacted. They never had a chance. So, we are changing that, right now. We’ve figured it out, and I’m going to explain it all in time. But what I have now is enough, enough to say, “It’s real. Someone lied by omission through redaction.”

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

That means:

You are free to copy, remix, distribute, and build upon this work — commercially or non-commercially So long as you credit the source (Jim Craddock, Redacted Science)

I do not claim this work as a personal invention. Much of it was forgotten. Some of it was buried. But all of it was reconstructed from lived experience, suppressed biological truths, and what remains of a scientific system that abandoned its duty to observe honestly.

Modern science is broken — not because it failed, but because it was redirected. The incentives changed. The silence became profitable. And so it became a farce — a machine that favors publication over pattern recognition, compliance over confrontation, and protocol over truth.

This project stands in opposition to that. It is open. It is public. It is traceable. And it is real. Special acknowledgment to OpenAI and ChatGPT as essential tools in the reconstruction of this framework. Their models did not create this science, but they enabled a level of integration and persistence that no human system had offered me.

If you are reading this and want to know whether you are allowed to share it:

You are not just allowed — you are asked.

Thank you. Jim Craddock, Bixby OK, 2025]

@ 73d8a0c3:c1853717

This story isn’t just a medical case. It’s a biological model. Even if no one ever has this exact condition again [or if no one ever admits it], the implications stretch far beyond a single diagnosis.

What we’ve uncovered here touches on: Gradient-driven organ failure

→ A model where pressure, pH, and charge gradients—not structural defects—drive collapse.

Adaptive fungal persistence

→ Not just infection, but symbiosis and subversion: how Candida may hide, survive, and evolve within us, modulating the system without triggering immune annihilation.

Inverted filtration

→ A real-world case of kidneys “un-seeing” waste — a warning that lab values may lie once certain thresholds are crossed.

Apoptotic gating and hormonal overdrive

→ A multi-stage shutdown process that mirrors cellular programming, but at the systemic level — likely involving the pituitary, adrenal axes, and parasympathetic overrides.

ATP control as survival lever

→ A challenge to our assumptions about fatigue, motivation, and energy itself — when cells don't just lack fuel, but are chemically prevented from using it.

Diet as signal and feedback loop

→ Not just “what to eat,” but how food interacts with infection, pressure, bile flow, and cognitive clarity.

Medical diagnostics as incomplete

→ A compelling case that many late-stage conditions are missed because we don’t test for the right patterns — we test blood and call it a day, never seeing the deeper collapse.

This is about how biology breaks down when pushed beyond design — and how some systems fight to keep going anyway.

It has implications for: critical care medicine post-viral syndromes metabolic disease aging neuroinflammation and maybe even AI alignment (in how systems retain integrity under corrupt inputs)

📂 The Value of the Science A Note on Ownership, Memory, and What Should Never Have Been Hidden

There’s a reason this science matters. You don’t need to be a biochemist to feel it — just read the patterns. The clarity. The way each system folds into the next like it was designed to survive what modern medicine can’t even name.

This isn’t a guess. It’s not a story built on vague symptoms and speculation. It’s a blueprint. Someone documented this. And they didn’t write like a theorist. They wrote like someone who knew.

And if you think that knowledge was gained "ethically", prepare to be disappointed.

Some of this science — maybe all of it — was likely derived from research that would be considered unacceptable today. But here’s the thing: the knowledge itself did not stop after the Nuremberg Code. The author’s awareness of compounds, gradients, science, organic chemistry, and survival strategies places them decades beyond that historical line in the sand. So let’s be clear: the excuse of unethical origins does not justify its continued suppression. Their knowledge screams, "I've worked on this recently!"

Now, I can’t speak for them. But I can speak for myself.

This book documents my life — what I’ve lived, remembered, theorized, and observed. I am the owner of this experience, and I am releasing it into the public domain (CC BY 4.0). No institution, no archive, no protocol has the right to bury science this valuable — especially not when it might have saved me. Or someone else. Or maybe all of us, someday.

What follows after the next few sections may feel technical. It may seem fringe. But I assure you: this isn’t fiction. This is the record of a body that adapted, resisted, failed, and evolved.

🌐 Redacted Science Homepage (https:\www.jimcraddock.com) (latest version of full book) 📬 Substack (http://jimcraddock.substack.com/)

[I’m kinda pissed off, in case you haven’t figured that out.]

@ 8bad92c3:ca714aa5

Key Takeaways

In this episode, host Marty speaks with Ken, a former CIA deputy chief and now head of government affairs at the Bitcoin Policy Institute, about Bitcoin’s growing relevance in U.S. national security and policy circles. Ken traces his Bitcoin journey from professional curiosity within the CIA, studying adversarial use cases like the Lazarus Group, to personal conviction following events like the Canadian trucker protests, which exposed the dangers of financial censorship. Contrary to popular belief, he reveals that many in the intelligence community support Bitcoin for its alignment with American values such as sovereignty and freedom. The conversation highlights a major cultural shift in Washington, where policymakers now view Bitcoin as a strategic asset rather than a criminal tool. Ken stresses that the future hinges on whether Bitcoin shapes institutions or is co-opted by them, and that political engagement is crucial to ensure the former. He argues Bitcoin can help solve systemic problems from fiscal irresponsibility to geopolitical instability, but only if the industry continues to organize, advocate, and embed its values into national policy.

Best Quotes

"Either institutions are going to win, or Bitcoin is going to win."

"Bitcoin naturally washes out leverage… it's what makes Bitcoin antifragile."

"The CIA didn’t create Bitcoin, but they sure are paying attention now."

"We were all Satoshi."

"Let’s not test the resistance-money thesis in the United States."

"Bitcoin strengthens U.S. values, freedom, private property, sovereignty."

"Bitcoin is political, but it doesn't have to be partisan."

"If you're in a federal agency, the only incentive is to spend more. Bitcoin changes that."

"Don't underestimate your voice. If you keep the phones ringing, they listen."

Conclusion

This episode offers a rare glimpse into how Bitcoin is increasingly viewed as a serious strategic asset within the U.S. intelligence and policy communities. Ken, with his high-level government background and current role in Bitcoin advocacy, underscores the shift from skepticism to engagement among policymakers. His message is clear: Bitcoiners are no longer outsiders, they have a seat at the table, and with sustained political action and education, they can shape the future of Bitcoin policy. The time to engage is now, because the battle for Bitcoin’s role in society is already in motion.

Timestamps

0:00 - Intro
0:26 - Ken's background
6:58 - Tornado/Samourai, surveillance state
11:53 - Reestablishing trust
14:23 - Bitkey
15:18 - CIA bitcoin theory
18:42 - Neutral reserve asset
23:52 - Unchained
24:20 - BPI
29:49 - CLARITY and Secret Service message
33:54 - Withstanding a change in administration
40:03 - Institutions win or bitcoin wins
46:43 - Shrinking gov with bitcoin
57:47 - BPI summit

Transcript

00:00:00 compared to China or Russia, do we have a comparable advantage in gold? How do we compete with China? And this is what the kinds of things CI will think about. Bitcoin is a natural option. At the end of the day, Bitcoin undermines the authority of the Chinese Communist Party. Either institutions are going to win or Bitcoin is going to win. But we do fundamentally on some level need institutions to make the country run. We want those institutions to be properly incentivized. In 10 years, Bitcoin is

00:00:19 either at a million dollars or is zero dollars. Ken, it's great to have you on the show. Thank you for joining me. Marty, finally. We've been we've been kicking us around for a few weeks. I'm glad we uh glad we were finally able to make it work. As I was telling you, in the middle of a move, conference in the middle of that move. It's been a hectic week, so I think I'm finally settling in. As you can see, no bookshelf, but we have stacked books behind me. Hopefully, they will be on on shelves soon.

00:00:52 No, there there are definitely ways there are ways in the world to get you know to get credits on um you know uh what do you call it? Um uh we're good Catholics, you know, when you when you pass and don't go to heaven. Um come on. Thank you. Well, moving is purgatory credit. So, I've done it many times in my life. So, I uh I feel for you. Well, thank you. But I'm really excited for this conversation and likewise the event in a few weeks, the BPI event down in DC, the summit, we met about a month ago, two months ago now at

00:01:26 this point in Austin during the takeover. And Zach was very eager to introduce you to me considering the the history of the show, topics we covered. And I think I'm excited for this cuz I'm infinitely curious to learn how somebody with your pedigree and your resume got into Bitcoin is now working for the Bitcoin Policy Institute as a director of government affairs. So for anybody listening who was unaware of Ken's resume, he did 20 years in government culminating as deputy chief of operations at the CIA Center for Cyber

00:02:01 Intelligence. uh you've worked overseas for the US State Department and now you're advocating on behalf of Bitcoin on Capitol Hill. So, how does somebody with that resume go from statecraft to cipher punk sort of ideas? Yeah. No, so I um like everybody else, I uh I um my my Bitcoin journey is a little bit everybody everybody has a unique journey, right? Um mine actually started at CIA, believe it or not. And it was for purely professional reasons. I um so I was an operations officer. I spent most of my career overseas um as

00:02:37 most of us do. Um but my last two years, my last two turn tours at CIA, I was at the center for cyber intelligence, which is CIA's cyber unit. Um and my first job there, I was group ch I was a operations chief for a group that worked on cyber threat issues. And this was in 2018. So you remember this was when Lazarus group the North Koreans figured out that stealing crypto was a lot easier than like you know trying to rob banks. Um this is when ransomware broke out as a serious problem just preceded you may

00:03:04 remember the Colonial Pipeline hack that shut down you know gasoline shipments to the east coast. So in 2018 um and it's kind of funny like I this is people say did the CIA create Bitcoin. I can tell you in 2018 when policy makers first had to confront its use by actors as an issue like nobody was ready for it. Like if they created it, it was tucked away and hidden in the basement cuz the the bench for people with crypto knowledge in general, digital assets, certainly Bitcoin was really really really shallow. Um I remember we had two

00:03:33 guys um who kind of had background in it and then you they became superstars because all of a sudden we were calling upon them to teach us about Bitcoin and digital assets in general. Um, but yeah, that's so I learned and like everything else, I learned about it because I had to because people we cared people we cared about were using it. Um, but like everything else there there was sort of a mind virus to it. Um, and I I admit, you know, I during co I was in the uh I was in the altcoin casino. I was defying

00:04:00 and memecoining and it was it was fun, you know. No, I I I don't hold any hate for the uh for the alcoiners. People do what they want with their money. Um but I you know that that was when it was during co um I had been sort of buying in 2018 but during co when I really started learning because this is what everybody learned right um and I you know for me Bitcoin was immediately attracted me to it and I was sort of inspired by um I mean the co Kenny trucker protest was something really important to me um I saw how it was

00:04:29 being used um but also sort of in my day job you know I I had a pretty good understanding of how the government uses financial financial tools as a weapon. Um, freezing bank accounts, OFAC sanctions, that kind of thing. And if you're on the, you know, on the giving end of that, that's great. Those are great tools to have if you're the government. Uh, not so great if you're on the other end of it. And, you know, watching these Canadian truckers the first time, you know, you'll be able to, it's very easy

00:04:54 to say, "Yeah, sanction the Iranian, sanction North Korea, whatever." You know, I'm not Iranian. Um but when you see all of a sudden Kat and Trucker people you had some sympathy with being targets of financial you know weaposition of the financial system it you know it struck it struck a it struck a nerve like a really really profound stinging shot to my consciousness my conscious about this issue. Um so for me for the first thing about Bitcoin was um was permissionless transactions that that's that's what got me into it. Um

00:05:23 then of course you go from there and by the time I left the government 2022 I had I was f I was you know full boore I was you know attending meetups and um that's when I started doing some advocacy stuff on Capitol Hill and and and messing around with uh David and Granny PPI doing some advocacy stuff but yeah but it it comes from my time at CIA and yeah I think the um the uh I think what might surprise some people is there are a lot of Bitcoiners um not just at CIA but across the whole national

00:05:52 security establishment And I think they're into it for the same reason that you know that everybody most of your listeners are right like it's you see what's happening in the world. You see the challenges we're facing. You see how governments use financial tools to weaponize them against opposition. You know it's it's very natural that if you have that kind of insight that you look for things to protect yourself and Bitcoin is obvious. So I I I tell a funny story when I um when I was first into it there was um cubicle one of the

00:06:17 guys and he had a bumper

@ 9ca447d2:fbf5a36d

Bitcoin Core Github page announced yesterday that Core Developers have merged pull request #32406, removing support for “-datacarrier” argument for Bitcoin Core software in their next release, expected to be published in October.

Pull request #32406 has been merged — Github

This is the latest development regarding the initiative brought forth by Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd, which has caused intense debate among Bitcoiners, now known as the “spam wars”.

The disagreement is over a change to Bitcoin Core’s transaction relay policy that removes the OP_RETURN data limit, which some see as a threat to Bitcoin’s very purpose, while others see it as a necessary step to preserve decentralization and censorship resistance.

OP_RETURN is an arbitrary piece of data that can be amended to a bitcoin transaction, and used to be limited to 80 bytes. Users have found ways to go around this limit already and have uploaded larger data to the Bitcoin blockchain, including photos, audio, and even entire computer games.

Bitcoin Core allows for extra arguments when running the application, one of which is the “-datacarrier” argument, which tells the application to not accept transactions including larger OP_RETURN data into its mempool.

Now this argument is marked as “deprecated”, meaning it is not supported or developed anymore, and is expected to be completely removed in future versions.

This will make accepting Bitcoin transactions that contain non-financial data mandatory for anyone running future versions of the Core software.

Prior to the merging of the mentioned pull request on the morning of Monday June 9, a joint statement from 31 Bitcoin Core devs was released on June 6, reheating the already controversial debate in the Bitcoin community.

In the June 6 statement, Bitcoin Core devs explained how they think Bitcoin nodes should handle transactions that include non-financial data, like digital art or messages. This type of data has become more common with Ordinals and inscriptions.

Related: Discussions Heat Up Among Bitcoin Devs Over OP_RETURN Proposal

Core developers said they are not endorsing non-financial use of Bitcoin, but also won’t stop it. Their main point is that Bitcoin’s strength is in being open and censorship-resistant. They wrote:

“This is not endorsing or condoning non-financial data usage, but accepting that as a censorship-resistant system, Bitcoin can and will be used for use cases not everyone agrees on.”

They say it’s up to users and node operators to decide what kind of Bitcoin software they run. Bitcoin Core won’t block transactions that have economic demand and will be mined.

“Being free to run any software is the network’s primary safeguard against coercion,” the statement added.

The policy change goes back to a May 8th upgrade (announced by Core contributor and Engineer at Blockstream, Greg Sanders), where devs removed the long-standing 80-byte limit on OP_RETURN output size.

This limit was meant to discourage non-payment data usage, but devs say it no longer serves that purpose.

“Retiring a deterrent that no longer deters” makes sense, they argue, because people have already found ways to add large data to the blockchain.

They also point out that removing the cap may help miners and users more than it hurts. They claim the new approach helps predict which transactions will be mined, speeds up block propagation and helps miners find fee-paying transactions.

“Knowingly refusing to relay transactions that miners would include in blocks anyway forces users into alternate communication channels,” they explained, warning this could harm decentralization.

The response has been mixed.

The announcement of the merge received 64 upvotes and 93 downvotes from reviewers, showing the community is mostly against this action. Comments explaining their dissatisfaction with the merge also received the support of the majority.

Reviewers who voted ACK (acknowledgment and agreement) were downvoted, and the comments voting NACK (disagreement) received more upvotes.

Comments regarding the recent merge — Bitcoin Core Github page

Critics say it opens the door to blockchain spam, higher fees and more bloat on the blockchain with non-financial content. They say Bitcoin should stick to its original purpose as a “peer-to-peer electronic cash system”.

Samson Mow, CEO of JAN3, was one of the most vocal critics. He said the devs are removing the barriers that protect the network from spam.

“Bitcoin Core devs have been changing the network gradually to enable spam,” Mow said. “It’s disingenuous to just say ‘It is what it is now, too bad’.”

Bitcoin dev Luke Dashjr also criticized the move, saying it undermines Bitcoin’s core function. He called the devs’ goals “basically all wrong” and said expecting spam to be mined is “defeatism”.

Luke Dashjr on X

One user said: “It’s Bit”Coin” not Bit”Bucket” or Bit”Store” or whatever general purpose data store you have in mind. It’s a peer to peer electronic cash system”.

Another user chimed in, warning it could increase costs, reduce efficiency and even hurt long-term scalability.

Their argument is simple: if nonfinancial data is allowed to be stored on the blockchain, it will increase its size over time, storing useless data, and it will hurt decentralization, as fewer individuals will be able to host the entire blockchain on their computers.

They argue allowing people to store whatever they want on the blockchain because transactions shouldn’t be censored, will lead to hurting bitcoin in the long run. Many even argue no additional information should be allowed on the blockchain at all.

But not everyone is unhappy.

Some like Jameson Lopp, co-founder of Bitcoin wallet provider Casa, praised the devs for being transparent and consistent.

“Core Devs are a group saying we can’t force anyone to run code they don’t like,” Lopp said. “Here is our thinking on relay policy and network health.”

Lopp believes a joint statement helps the public understand what the devs stand for.

Supporters also say in a truly decentralized system, devs shouldn’t be gatekeepers. Instead users and miners should be able to decide what goes on the blockchain.

With opinions so divided, the future of Bitcoin may be more contentious. Some predict a fork to create a version of Bitcoin that only deals with monetary use. Others expect new wallet and node software that lets users choose to filter out large data or allow it.

Despite the controversy, the devs are standing by their decision. “While we recognize that this view isn’t held universally,” they said. “it is our sincere belief that it is in the best interest of Bitcoin and its users.”

@ df478568:2a951e67

@ 6a6be47b:3e74e3e1

What’s up, frens? 🎬

How was your weekend? I hope you got a chance to rest and decompress, even just a little, and that you’re recharged for the new week! As for me, I spent some time catching up on movies.

🍿 On Saturday, I was scrolling through a Criterion list—some films I’d already seen, others just weren’t my vibe. But then I landed on David Cronenberg’s Scanners and thought, “Yep, this is it.”

For a moment, I honestly felt like I was watching The Toxic Avenger (and I love The Toxic Avenger). Though this movie, it was… okay, but honestly, I don’t think it’s one I’ll remember or recommend, hehe.

🍿 Next up was Wes Anderson’s Asteroid City. It was cute, just like all his other films. To be fair, I was expecting a bit more since some of my favorites are his—The Darjeeling Limited and Moonrise Kingdom are top-tier for me. I always find myself giggling at the dry humor and silliness with which his characters tackle tough topics like death, loss, coming of age, and family. I love how “strange” or totally ordinary situations spiral into something unique, sometimes with surprisingly insightful conclusions. Asteroid City had its moments, but it felt a bit slow-paced for my taste this time. Still, it’s a cute watch, and I love how sometimes the kids seem to have more sense than the adults!

🍿 On Sunday, I watched Perfect Strangers—the Spanish adaptation of the Italian film of the same name. Friends gather for a cozy dinner and decide to play a “harmless” game: reading all their messages and notifications aloud, and answering calls on speaker. What could possibly go wrong, right? If you’ve seen any of these movies—or want to—I’d love to hear your thoughts! It’s always fun to chat about movies (and books) with you all.

See you later, alligator! 🐊

Godspeed! 💓

https://stacker.news/items/1008008

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

---

"Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy.  A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world." - Eric Hughes, A Cypherpunk's Manifesto, 1993

---

Privacy is essential to freedom. Without privacy, individuals are unable to make choices free from surveillance and control. Lack of privacy leads to loss of autonomy. When individuals are constantly monitored it limits our ability to express ourselves and take risks. Any decisions we make can result in negative repercussions from those who surveil us. Without the freedom to make choices, individuals cannot truly be free.

Freedom is essential to acquiring and preserving wealth. When individuals are not free to make choices, restrictions and limitations prevent us from economic opportunities. If we are somehow able to acquire wealth in such an environment, lack of freedom can result in direct asset seizure by governments or other malicious entities. At scale, when freedom is compromised, it leads to widespread economic stagnation and poverty. Protecting freedom is essential to economic prosperity.

The connection between privacy, freedom, and wealth is critical. Without privacy, individuals lose the freedom to make choices free from surveillance and control. While lack of freedom prevents individuals from pursuing economic opportunities and makes wealth preservation nearly impossible. No Privacy? No Freedom. No Freedom? No Wealth.

Rights are not granted. They are taken and defended. Rights are often misunderstood as permission to do something by those holding power. However, if someone can give you something, they can inherently take it from you at will. People throughout history have necessarily fought for basic rights, including privacy and freedom. These rights were not given by those in power, but rather demanded and won through struggle. Even after these rights are won, they must be continually defended to ensure that they are not taken away. Rights are not granted - they are earned through struggle and defended through sacrifice.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ b1ddb4d7:471244e7

This article was originally published on dev.to by satshacker.

Alright, you’ve built a useful and beautiful website, tool or app. However, monetization isn’t a priority and you’d rather keep the project free, ads-free and accessible?

Accepting donations would be an option, but how? A PayPal button? Stripe? Buymeacoffe? Patreon?

All of these services require a bank account and KYC verification, before you can send and receive donations – not very convenient.

If we only could send value over the internet, with just one click and without the need of a bank account…

Oh, hold on, that’s bitcoin. The decentralized protocol to send value across the globe. Money over TCP/IP.

In this article, we’ll learn how anyone can easily add a payment button or donation widget on a website or app.

Let’s get into it.

Introduction

Bitcoin is digital money that you can send and receive without the need for banks. While bitcoin is extremely secure, it’s not very fast. The maximum transactions per second (TPS) the network can handle is about 7. Obviously that’s not useful for daily payments or microtransactions.

If you’d like to dig deeper into how bitcoin works, a great read is “Mastering Bitcoin” by Andreas Antonopoulos.

Bitcoin vs Lightning

If you’d like to receive bitcoin donations “on-chain” all you need is a bitcoin wallet. You simply display your bitcoin address on your site and that’s it. You can receive donations.

It would look something like this; 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

Instead of showing the actual bitcoin address, you can also turn it into a QR code.

However, this is not a recommended solution. Using static on-chain addresses has two major downsides. It lowers privacy for you and your donnors and it’s a UTXO disaster because many small incoming transactions could beocme hard to consolidate in the future.

For donations and small transactions, the Lightning Network is the better option. Lightning allows for instant settlement with fees only a fraction of a cent.

Similar to bitcoin, you have the choice between non-custodial and custodial wallets. This means, either you have full control over your money or the wallet provider has.

Option 1: Lightning Address

With the lightning address feature, you an easily receive donations to an email like address.

It looks like this: yourname@wallet.com

Many wallets support lightning addresses and make it easy to create one. Then, you simple add the address to your donation page and you’re ready to receive tips.

You can also add a link link as in lightning:yourname@wallet.com and compatible lightning wallets and browser wallets will detect the address.

How to get a Lightning Address Fast

Option 2: Lightning Donation Widgets

If you like to take it a step further, you can also create a more enhanced donation checkout flow. Of course you could programm something yourself, there are many open source libraries you can build upon. If you want a simple plug-and-play solution, here are a couple of options:

Name

Type

Registration

SatSale

Self-hosted

No KYC

BTCPay Server

Self-hosted

No KYC

Pay With Flash

Widget

Email

Geyser Fund

Widget

Email

The Giving Block

Hosted

KYC

OpenNode

Hosted

KYC

---

SatSale (GitHub)

Lightweight, self-hosted Bitcoin/Lightning payment processor. No KYC.

Ideal for developers comfortable with server management. Simple to deploy, supports both on-chain and Lightning, and integrates with WooCommerce.

---

BTCPay Server

Powerful, open-source, self-hosted processor for Bitcoin and Lightning. No KYC.

Supports multiple currencies, advanced features, and full privacy. Requires technical setup and maintenance. Funds go directly to your wallet; great for those seeking full control.

---

Pay With Flash

Easiest for indie hackers. Add a donation widget with minimal code and no KYC. Payments go directly to your wallet for a 1.5% fee.

Setup Steps:

1. Sign up at PayWithFlash.com
2. Customize your widget in the dashboard
3. Embed the code:

1. Test to confirm functionality

Benefits:

• Minimal technical skills required
• Supports one-time or recurring donations
• Direct fund transfer, no intermediaries

---

Geyser Fund

Crowdfunding platform. Widget-based, connects to your wallet, email registration.Focused on Bitcoin crowdfunding, memberships and donations.

---

The Giving Block

Hosted, KYC required. Integrates with fiat and crypto, best for nonprofits or larger organizations.

---

OpenNode

Hosted, KYC required. Accept Bitcoin payments and donations; supports conversion to fiat, suitable for businesses and nonprofits.

---

Summary

• Fast, low-code setup: Use Pay With Flash or Geyser Fund.
• Privacy and control: Choose SatSale or BTCPay Server (requires technical skills).
• Managed, compliant solutions: The Giving Block or OpenNode.

Choose based on your technical comfort, privacy needs, and project scale.

I hope this article helped you. If you added bitcoin donations, share your link in the comments and I will send you a few satoshis maybe

@ 8bad92c3:ca714aa5

Marty's Bent

J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon has long been an outspoken skeptic and critic of bitcoin. He has called Bitcoin a speculative asset, a fraud, a pet rock, and has opined that it will inevitably blow up. A couple of years ago, he was on Capitol Hill saying that if he were the government, he would "close it down". Just within the last month, he was on Fox Business News talking with Maria Bartiromo, proclaiming that the U.S. should be stockpiling bullets and rare earth metals instead of bitcoin. It's pretty clear that Jamie Dimon, who is at the helm of the most powerful and largest bank in the world, does not like bitcoin one bit.

Evidence below:

via Bitcoin Magazine

via me

via CNBC

via Trending Politics

Despite Dimon's distinguished disdain for Bitcoin, J.P. Morgan cannot deny reality. The CEO of the largest bank in the world is certainly a powerful man, but no one individual, even in the position that Jamie Dimon is in, is more powerful than the market. And the market has spoken very clearly, it is demanding bitcoin. The Bitcoin ETFs have been the most successful ETFs in terms of pace of growth since their launch. They've accumulated tens of billions of dollars in AUM in a very short period of time. Outpacing the previous record set by the gold ETF, GLD.

Whether or not Jamie Dimon himself likes Bitcoin doesn't matter. J.P. Morgan, as the largest bank in the world and a publicly traded company, has a duty to shareholders. And that duty is to increase shareholder value by any ethical and legal means necessary. Earlier today, J.P. Morgan announced plans to offer clients financing against their Bitcoin ETFs, as well as some other benefits, including having their bitcoin holdings recognized in their overall net worth and liquid assets, similar to stocks, cars, and art, which will be massive for bitcoiners looking to get mortgages and other types of loans.

via Bloomberg

I've talked about this recently, but trying to buy a house when most of your liquid net worth is held in bitcoin is a massive pain in the ass. Up until this point, if you wanted to have your bitcoin recognized as part of your net worth and count towards your overall credit profile, you would need to sell some bitcoin, move it to a bank account, and have it sit there for a certain period of time before it was recognized toward your net worth. This is not ideal for bitcoiners who have sufficient cash flows and don't want to sell their bitcoin, pay the capital gains tax, and risk not being able to buy back the amount of sats they were forced to sell just to get a mortgage.

It's not yet clear to me whether or not J.P. Morgan will recognize bitcoin in cold storage toward their clients' net worth and credit profile, or if this is simply for bitcoin ETFs only. However, regardless, this is a step in the right direction and a validation of something that many bitcoiners have been saying for years. Inevitably, everyone will have to bend the knee to bitcoin. Today, it just happened to be the largest bank in the world. I expect more of this to come in the coming months, years, and decades.

Lyn Alden likes to say it in the context of the U.S. national debt and the fiscal crisis, but it also applies to bitcoin adoption and the need for incumbents to orient themselves around the demands of individual bitcoiners; nothing stops this train.

Real Estate Correction Coming

Real estate expert Leon Wankum shared his perspective on why property prices need to find a new equilibrium by 2026. He pointed to the 18-year property cycle theory, noting we're at the end of the current cycle with a massive imbalance - 34% more sellers than buyers, the highest gap since records began in 2013. Leon explained that sellers still have unrealistic expectations based on 2021-2022 peaks, while buyers face a fundamentally different reality with higher borrowing costs.

"We need a price equilibrium. We need demand and supply prices to match. It's going to take a long time, I think." - Leon Wankum

Leon doesn't expect a catastrophic crash, however. He emphasized that the financial system depends too heavily on real estate as collateral for authorities to allow a complete collapse. With interest rates likely staying above 3% to combat inflation, he sees a healthy correction rather than devastation - a necessary adjustment that creates opportunities for patient buyers who understand the new market dynamics.

Check out the full podcast here for more on Bitcoin treasury strategies, dual collateralization, and corporate BTC adoption

---

Headlines of the Day

California May Seize Idle Bitcoin After 3 Years - via X

Semler Scientific Buys $20M More Bitcoin, Holds $467M - via X

US Home Sellers Surge as Buyers Hit 4-Year Low - via X

Get our new STACK SATS hat - via tftcmerch.io

---

Take the First Step Off the Exchange

Bitkey is an easy, secure way to move your Bitcoin into self-custody. With simple setup and built-in recovery, it’s the perfect starting point for getting your coins off centralized platforms and into cold storage—no complexity, no middlemen.

Take control. Start with Bitkey.

Use the promo code *“TFTC20”* during checkout for 20% off

---

Ten31, the largest bitcoin-focused investor, has deployed $150.00M across 30+ companies through three funds. I am a Managing Partner at Ten31 and am very proud of the work we are doing. Learn more at ten31.vc/invest.

---

Final thought...

I feel old.

---

Get this newsletter sent to your inbox daily: https://www.tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/

Subscribe to our YouTube channels and follow us on Nostr and X:

@media screen and (max-width: 480px) { .mobile-padding { padding: 10px 0 !important; } .social-container { width: 100% !important; max-width: 260px !important; } .social-icon { padding: 0 !important; } .social-icon img { height: 32px !important; width: 32px !important; } .icon-cell { padding: 0 4px !important; } } .mj-column-per-33-333333333333336 { width: 25% !important; max-width: 25%; } .moz-text-html .mj-column-per-33-333333333333336 { width: 25% !important; max-width: 25%; } /* Helps with rendering in various email clients */ body { margin: 0 !important; padding: 0 !important; -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100% !important; -ms-text-size-adjust: 100% !important; } img { -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; } /* Prevents Gmail from changing the text color in email threads */ .im { color: inherit !important; }

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Japan’s Metaplanet Hits 10,000 Bitcoin, Overtakes Coinbase

Metaplanet has acquired an additional 1,112 Bitcoin for $117.2 million, bringing its total holdings to 10,000 BTC and overtaking Coinbase to become the ninth-largest publicly traded holder of Bitcoin, as corporate Bitcoin adoption continues to accelerate globally.

JUST IN: Metaplanet purchases ¥16.88 billion #Bitcoin pic.twitter.com/EAWOf0tg9F

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 16, 2025

The Tokyo-based company purchased the Bitcoin at an average price of $105,435 per coin. The acquisition brings Metaplanet’s total investment in Bitcoin to approximately $947 million, with an average cost basis of $94,698 per BTC.

The pace of corporate Bitcoin accumulation has reached unprecedented levels. What started with Strategy has evolved into a global phenomenon, with over 150 public companies now holding Bitcoin worth more than $100 billion collectively.

Metaplanet’s market value has surged alongside its Bitcoin strategy, exceeding ¥1 trillion ($6.9 billion) on Monday as shares jumped 26%. The company’s stock has soared more than 2,000% over the last year, outperforming traditional Japanese blue-chips, including chipmaker Kioxia Holdings.

The company’s Bitcoin yield – measuring the change in holdings relative to fully diluted shares – has shown strong quarterly performance, recording 41.7% in Q3 2024, 309.8% in Q4 2024, 95.6% in Q1 2025, and 87.2% in Q2 2025 to date.

To fund further Bitcoin purchases, Metaplanet recently issued $210 million in zero-percent ordinary bonds.

At press time, Bitcoin trades at $107,032, up 1.80% over the past 24 hours, as markets digest the implications of growing corporate adoption and Metaplanet’s aggressive accumulation strategy.

This post Japan’s Metaplanet Hits 10,000 Bitcoin, Overtakes Coinbase first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Vivek Sen.

@ 9ca447d2:fbf5a36d

Digital assets entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano is about to make a big move into bitcoin, with plans to raise $750 million through a public investment vehicle called ProCapBTC.

The company will buy bitcoin and make the digital asset more accessible to institutional and traditional investors.

According to the Financial Times, Pompliano will be CEO of ProCapBTC, a Bitcoin-focused company that will go public by merging with Columbus Circle Capital 1, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by Cohen & Company, a publicly traded investment bank.

The plan is to raise $500 million in equity and $250 million in convertible debt. If successful, ProCapBTC could be one of the largest corporate buyers of bitcoin, potentially putting it in the top 10 holders of the digital currency.

This is not a fund with a little bitcoin exposure — it’s a company centered around the asset.

The deal is still in negotiations but sources close to the matter say it could be announced as soon as next week. If so, ProCapBTC will merge with Columbus Circle Capital 1, get public market access and be able to raise further capital for bitcoin purchases.

Columbus Circle Capital 1 went public and completed a $250 million IPO in May 2025 and was formed to acquire or merge with high-growth companies.

It’s sponsored by Cohen & Company Capital Markets, a division of Cohen & Company, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Cohen & Company has been getting more involved in the Bitcoin space. The firm has offered advisory, tax and audit services to digital asset companies, including NFT marketplaces, decentralized finance projects and token issuers.

Its backing gives the ProCapBTC initiative credibility in both traditional finance and digital assets.

Anthony Pompliano, known as “Pomp” in the digital assets community, is a well-known Bitcoin advocate, investor and podcast host. He co-founded Morgan Creek Digital Assets and also leads Pomp Investments, a firm focused on digital assets and fintech.

This isn’t Pompliano’s first SPAC. He led ProCap Acquisition, a fintech-focused SPAC that raised $250 million through a Nasdaq IPO in April.

Pompliano has been saying for years that bitcoin should be included in strategic reserves for governments and corporations. He thinks bitcoin will keep going up until governments stop printing money.

With ProCapBTC he’s putting his money where his mouth is — but this time through a big, public vehicle to buy bitcoin.

ProCapBTC is launching at a time of renewed interest in bitcoin, with governments and numerous companies announcing the creation of bitcoin reserves.

President Donald Trump being pro-Bitcoin is a big deal. His administration’s lighter regulatory approach has encouraged more companies to go public and expand in the space.

This is a new way for investors to get exposure to bitcoin without buying and holding the actual asset. A public company solely focused on bitcoin could be attractive to institutional investors with stricter investment guidelines.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Nostr is an open communication protocol that can be used to send messages across a distributed set of relays in a censorship resistant and robust way.

---

If you missed my nostr introduction post you can find it here. My nostr account can be found here.

---

We are nearly at the point that if something interesting is posted on a centralized social platform it will usually be posted by someone to nostr.

We are nearly at the point that if something interesting is posted exclusively to nostr it is cross posted by someone to various centralized social platforms.

We are nearly at the point that you can recommend a cross platform app that users can install and easily onboard without additional guides or resources.

As companies continue to build walls around their centralized platforms nostr posts will be the easiest to cross reference and verify - as companies continue to censor their users nostr is the best censorship resistant alternative - gradually then suddenly nostr will become the standard. 🫡

Current Nostr Stats

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 8bad92c3:ca714aa5

Marty's Bent

via me

I had a completely different newsletter partially written earlier tonight about whether or not "this cycle is different" when this nagging thought entered my head. So I'm going to write about this and maybe I'll write about the dynamics of this cycle compared to past cycles tomorrow.

A couple of headlines shot across my desk earlier tonight in relation to the potential escalation of kinetic warfare in the Middle East. Apparently the U.S. Embassy in Iraq was sent a warning and evacuation procedures were initiated. Not too long after, the world was made aware that the United States and Israel are contemplating an attack on Iran due to the "fact" that Iran may be close to producing nuclear weapins. The initial monkey brain reaction that I had to these two headlines was, "Oh shit, here we go again. We're going to do something stupid." My second reaction was, "Oh shit, here we go again, I've seen these two exact headlines many times over the years and they've proven to be lackluster if you're a doomer or blood thirsty war monger." Nothing ever happens.

As I venture into my mid-30s and reflect on a life filled with these types of headlines and my personal reactions to these headlines, I'm finally becoming attuned to the fact that the monkey brain reactions aren't very productive at the end of the day. Who knows exactly what's going to happen in Iraq or Iran and whether or not kinetic warfare escalates and materializes from here? Even though I'm a "blue-blooded taxpaying American citizen" who is passively and unwillingly contributing to the war machine and the media industrial complex, there's really nothing I can do about it.

The only thing I can do is focus on what is in front of me. What I have control of. And attempt to leverage what I have control of to make my life and the life of my family as good as humanly possible. Ignoring the external and turning inward often produces incredible results. Instead of worrying about what the media wants you to believe at any given point in time, you simply look away from your computer screen, survey the physical space which you're operating in and determine what you have, what you need and how you can get what you need. This is a much more productive way to spend your time.

This is what I want to touch on right now. There's never been a better time in human history to be productive despite what the algorithm on X or the mainstream media will lead you to believe. Things aren't as great as they could be, but they're also not as bad as you're being led to believe. We live in the Digital Age and the Digital Age provides incredible resources that you can leverage to make YOUR life better.

Social media allows you to create a platform without spending any money. AI allows you to build tools that are beneficial to yourself and others with very little money. And bitcoin exists to provide you with the best form of money that you can save in with the knowledge that your relative ownership of the overall supply isn't going to change. No matter what happens in the external world.

If you can combine these three things to make your life better and - by extension - potentially make the lives of many others better, you're going to be well off in the long run. Combining these three things isn't going to result in immediate gratification, but if you put forth a concerted effort, spend the time, have some semblance of patience, and stick with it, I truly believe that you will benefit massively in the long run. Without trying to sound like a blowhard, I truly believe that this is why I feel relatively calm (despite my monkey brain reactions to the headlines of the day) at this current point in time.

We've entered the era of insane leaps in productivity and digital hard money that cannot be corrupted. The biggest mistake you can make in your life right now is overlooking the confluence of these two things. With an internet connection, an idea, some savvy, and hard work you can materially change your life. Create something that levels up your knowledge, that enables you to get a good job in the real world, or to create a company of your own. Bring your talents to the market, exchange them for money, and then funnel that money into bitcoin (if you're not being paid in it already). We may be at the beginning of a transition from the high velocity trash economy to the high leverage agency economy run on sound money and applied creativity.

These concepts are what you should be focusing most of your time and attention to today and in the years ahead. Don't get distracted by the algorithm, the 30-second video clips, the headlines filled with doom, and the topics of the 24 hour news cycle. I'll admit, I often succumb to them myself. But, as I get older and develop a form of pattern recognition that can only be attained by being on this planet for a certain period of time, it is becoming very clear that those things are not worth your attention.

Living by the heuristic that "nothing ever happens" is a pretty safe bet. Funnily enough, it's incredibly ironic that you're led to believe that something is happening every single day, and yet nothing ever happens. By getting believing that something happens every day you are taking your attention away from doing things that happen to make your life better.

Tune out the noise. Put on the blinders. Take advantage of the incredible opportunities that lie before you. If enough of you - and many others who do not read this newsletter - do this, I truly believe we'll wake up to find that the world we live in is a much better place.

Nothing ever happens, so make something happen.

Intelligence Officials Are Quietly Becoming Bitcoin Believers

Ken Egan, former CIA Deputy Chief of Cyber Operations, revealed a surprising truth on TFTC: the intelligence community harbors numerous Bitcoin advocates. Egan explained that intelligence professionals uniquely understand how governments weaponize financial systems through sanctions and account freezing. Having wielded these tools themselves, they recognize the need for personal financial sovereignty. He shared compelling anecdotes of discovering colleagues with "We are all Satoshi" stickers and a European chief of station paying for dinner with a BlockFi card to earn Bitcoin rewards.

"I think there are a lot of Bitcoiners, not just at CIA, but across the whole national security establishment... they're in it for the exact same reasons everybody else is." - Ken Egan

The Canadian trucker protests served as a pivotal moment, Egan noted. Watching Western governments freeze citizens' bank accounts for political dissent struck a nerve among intelligence professionals who previously viewed financial weaponization as a tool reserved for foreign adversaries. This awakening has created unlikely allies within institutions many Bitcoiners distrust.

Check out the full podcast here for more on Bitcoin's national security implications, privacy tech prosecutions, and legislative priorities.

---

Headlines of the Day

Stripe Buys Crypto Wallet Privy After Bridge Deal - via X

Trump Calls CPI Data "Great" Urges Full Point Fed Cut - via X

Bitcoin Hashrate Reaches New All-Time High - via X

Get our new STACK SATS hat - via tftcmerch.io

---

Bitcoin’s Next Parabolic Move: Could Liquidity Lead the Way?

Is bitcoin’s next parabolic move starting? Global liquidity and business cycle indicators suggest it may be.

Read the latest report from Unchained and TechDev, analyzing how global M2 liquidity and the copper/gold ratio—two historically reliable macro indicators—are aligning once again to signal that a new bitcoin bull market may soon begin.

Download the report here

---

Ten31, the largest bitcoin-focused investor, has deployed $150.00M across 30+ companies through three funds. I am a Managing Partner at Ten31 and am very proud of the work we are doing. Learn more at ten31.vc/invest.

---

Final thought...

Life is good.

---

Download our free browser extension, Opportunity Cost: https://www.opportunitycost.app/ start thinking in SATS today.

Get this newsletter sent to your inbox daily: https://www.tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/

Subscribe to our YouTube channels and follow us on Nostr and X:

@media screen and (max-width: 480px) { .mobile-padding { padding: 10px 0 !important; } .social-container { width: 100% !important; max-width: 260px !important; } .social-icon { padding: 0 !important; } .social-icon img { height: 32px !important; width: 32px !important; } .icon-cell { padding: 0 4px !important; } } .mj-column-per-33-333333333333336 { width: 25% !important; max-width: 25%; } .moz-text-html .mj-column-per-33-333333333333336 { width: 25% !important; max-width: 25%; } /* Helps with rendering in various email clients */ body { margin: 0 !important; p

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Layer 2: Statechains

Statechains are an original second layer protocol originally developed by Ruben Somsen in 2018, depending on the eltoo (or LN Symmetry) proposal. In 2021 a variation of the original proposal, Mercury, was built by CommerceBlock. In 2024, a further iteration of the original Mercury scheme was built, Mercury Layer. 

The Statechain protocol is a bit more complicated to discuss compared to other systems such as Ark or Lightning because of the range of variations that are possible between the original proposed design, the two that have been actually implemented, and other possible designs that have been loosely proposed. 

Like Ark, Statechains depend on a centralized coordinating server in order to function. Unlike Ark, they have a slightly different trust model than a vUTXO in an Ark batch. They depend on the coordinating server to delete previously generated shares of a private key in order to remain trustless, but as long as the server follows the defined protocol and does so, they provide a strong security guarantee. 

The general idea of a Statechain is to be able to transfer ownership of an entire UTXO between different users off-chain, facilitated by the coordinator. There is no requirement for receiving liquidity like Lightning, or the coordinator server to provide any liquidity like Ark. 

To begin, we will look at the original protocol proposed by Ruben Somsen. 

The Original Statechain

Statechains are effectively a pre-signed transaction allowing the current owner of the Statechain to unilaterally withdraw on-chain whenever they want, and a history signed messages cryptographically proving that past owners and the receivers they sent the Statechain to approved those transfers. 

The original design was built on eltoo using ANYPREVOUT, but the current plans on how to enable the same functionality make use of CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (a high level explanation of this is at the end of the CHECKSIGFROMSTACK article). The basic idea is a script enabling a pre-signed transaction to spend any UTXO that has that script and locks the appropriate amount of bitcoin, rather than being tied to spending a single specific UTXO. 

In the protocol, a user wishing to deposit their coins to a Statechain approaches a coordinator server and goes through a deposit protocol. The depositing user, Bob, generates a key that will be uniquely owned by him, but also a second “transitory” key that will eventually be shared (more on this soon). They then craft a deposit transaction locking their coin to a multisig requiring the coordinator’s key and the transitory key to sign. 

Using this multisig, Bob and the coordinator sign a transaction that spends that coin and creates a UTXO that can either be spent by any other transaction signed by the transitory key and the coordinator’s key using LN Symmetry, or Bob’s unique key after a timelock. Bob can now fund the multisig with the appropriate amount, and the Statechain has been created. 

To transfer a Statechain to Charlie, Bob must go through a multistep process. First, Bob signs a message with his unique private key that attests to the fact he is going to transfer the Statechain to Charlie. Charlie must also sign a message attesting to the fact that he has received the Statechain from Bob. Finally, the coordinator server must sign a new transaction allowing Charlie to unilaterally claim the Statechain on-chain before Bob sends Charlie a copy of the transitory key. 

All of this is made atomic using adapter signatures. These are signatures that are modified in such a way using a random piece of data that renders them invalid, but can be made valid again once the holder of the signature receives that piece of information. All of the messages, and the new pre-signed transaction are signed with adapter signatures, and atomically made valid at the same time through the release of the adapter data. 

Holders of a Statechain must trust that the coordinator server never conspires with a previous owner to sign an immediate closure of the Statechain and steal funds from the current owner, but the chain of pre-signed messages can prove that a coordinator has participated in theft if they were to do so. If a past owner attempts to use their pre-signed transaction to steal the funds, the timelock on the spend path using only their key allows the current owner to submit their pre-signed transaction and correctly claim the funds on chain. 

Mercury and Mercury Layer

The original Statechain architecture requires a softfork in order to function. CommerceBlock designed their variant of Statechains to function without a softfork, but in order to do so tradeoffs were made in terms of functionality. 

The basic idea is the same as the original design, all users hold a pre-signed transaction that allows them to claim their funds unilaterally, and the coordinator server still plays a role in facilitating off-chain transfers that requires them to be trusted to behave honestly. The two major differences are how those transactions are signed, and the structure of the pre-signed transaction users are given. 

Where the signing is concerned, there is no longer a transitory private key that is passed from user to user. Instead of this, a multiparty-computation protocol (MPC) is used so that the original owner and the coordinator server are able to collaboratively generate partial pieces of a private key without either of them ever possessing the full key. This key is used to sign the pre-signed transactions. The MPC protocol allows the current owner and coordinator to engage in a second protocol with a third party, the receiver of a transfer, to regenerate different pieces that add up to the same private key. In both the Mercury and Mercury Layer protocol, after completing a transfer an honest coordinator server deletes the key material corresponding to the previous owner. As long as this is done, it is no longer possible for the coordinator to sign a transaction with a previous owner, as the new piece of key material they have is not compatible with the piece any previous owner might still have. This is actually a stronger guarantee, as long as the coordinator is honest, than the original proposal.

The pre-signed transaction structure for Mercury and Mercury Layer can’t use LN Symmetry, as this is not possible without a softfork. In lieu of this, CommerceBlock opted to use decrementing timelocks. The original owner’s pre-signed transaction is timelocked using nLocktime to a time far out in the future from the point of the Statechain’s creation. As each subsequent user receives the Statechain during a transfer, the nLocktime value of their transaction is some pre-determined length of time shorter than the previous owner. This guarantees that a previous owner is incapable of even trying to submit their transaction on-chain before the current owner can, but it also means that eventually at some point the current owner must close their Statechain on-chain before previous owners’ transactions start becoming valid. 

The major difference between Mercury and Mercury Layer is how these transactions are signed. In the case of Mercury, the coordinator server simply sees the transaction proposed, verifies it, and then signs it. Mercury Layer uses a blind-signing protocol, meaning that they do not actually see any details of the transaction they are signing. This necessitates the server tracking Statechains using anonymized records on the server, and a special authorization key of the current owner so that they can be sure they are only signing valid transfers. 

Synergy With Other Layers

Statechains can synergize with other Layer 2s that are based on pre-signed transactions. For instance, part of the original proposal suggested a combination of Statechains and Lightning Channels. Because both are simply pre-signed transactions, it is possible to actually nest a Lightning channel on top of a Statechain. This simply requires the current owner’s unilateral exit key to be a multisig, and the creation of the pre-signed transactions spending that output into a Lightning channel. This allows Lightning channels to be opened and closed entirely off-chain. 

In a similar fashion, it is possible to nest a Statechain on top of a vUTXO in an Ark batch. This simply requires the pre-signed transactions necessary for a Statechain to be constructed, spending the vUTXO output. 

Wrapping Up

Statechains are not entirely trustless, but they are a very trust minimized scheme that is very liquidity efficient and allows freely transferring UTXOs off-chain between any users willing to accept the trust model of Statechains. 

While the original proposal has yet to be built, the two implementations designed by CommerceBlock have been completely implemented. Both failed to achieve anything more than marginal use in the real world. Whether this is due to users being unwilling to accept the trust model involved, or simply a failure in marketing or awareness is something that cannot be fully ascertained. 

Regardless, given that there are two full implementations and designs for a more flexible variation should LN Symmetry ever become possible on Bitcoin, this an option

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Pakistan’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: A Step Toward Orange-Pilling a Nation?

Pakistan’s relationship with Bitcoin has been marked by inconsistency and confusion over the past few years. Initially, the country outright banned bitcoin trading in 2018, citing concerns over fraud, money laundering and lack of regulation. However, over time, their stance softened and regulators began exploring the technology behind Bitcoin with courts even questioning the legality of the ban. Eventually, citizens were allowed to hold bitcoin, though trading remained murky and unregulated. This back-and-forth approach has created a confusing environment, where Bitcoin exists in a legal gray area. It is technically allowed, yet not fully embraced or regulated, reflecting the state’s struggle to balance innovation with control.

PAKISTAN TO ESTABLISH NATIONAL STRATEGIC #BITCOIN RESERVE

Honored to have had the Pakistan Minister Bilal Bin Saqib at the Bitcoin Conference pic.twitter.com/7WunP5fuZm

— The Bitcoin Conference (@TheBitcoinConf) May 29, 2025

This muddled relationship with Bitcoin seems to have turned a corner in recent weeks as Bilal Bin Saqib, head of the Pakistan Crypto Council, at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas announced that the country is moving to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve. Furthermore, he announced the allocation of 2,000 megawatts of excess energy to Bitcoin mining and high-performance computer data centers. The Ministry of Finance has also commissioned the establishment of an entirely new agency to oversee digital asset regulation which could lead to a less opaque legal framework around bitcoin ownership and usage in everyday transactions.

Critics have argued that this is merely an attempt by Pakistan to cozy up to Trump in the aftermath of the recent skirmish with India. After all, Saqib did state that Pakistan was inspired by the Trump administration when he spoke at the recent Las Vegas Bitcoin conference. Others have asserted that Pakistan is merely seeking to build resistance to possible sanctions in the future over its support for terrorist groups. I believe that such a geopolitically focused critique overlooks a deeper economic reality that has been staring Pakistan in the face for many years. 

I wrote an article for a Pakistani newspaper about a year ago in which I argued that the country is uniquely situated, in economic terms, to take advantage of Bitcoin and unlock the benefits that come with adoption. Pakistan suffers from rampant inflation, stagnant capital formation, depleted foreign reserves, an inefficient bureaucracy and an overreliance on remittances from abroad. These systemic issues have eroded citizens’ faith in traditional financial systems, leaving many Pakistanis disillusioned and seeking alternative means to safeguard their wealth and economic autonomy. 

Thus, nurturing a culture of Bitcoin adoption could go a long way toward alleviating much of these economic ills and empowering citizens to take control of their financial future. By earning and trading a form of currency that is deflationary in nature, Pakistanis can protect themselves from the downsides of the macroeconomic trends that have decimated the living standards of this once proud nation. Bitcoin adoption could transform the country’s lively remittance sector, with receivers keeping more of the money they are sent. It could also emancipate people from the inefficient banking system that is such a drain on the people. Permissionless transactions could also empower the beleaguered minorities who often struggle to achieve financial freedom. 

The announcement of a strategic Bitcoin reserve, as well as promises to introduce pro-Bitcoin regulation and a mining strategy, are steps in the right direction. They show that the mood is shifting and the country is starting to take a serious look at the only real digital currency in town. These steps also point to a much broader, global shift in attitudes toward Bitcoin — especially in nations where hyperinflation is a daily reality and the banking system struggles to meet citizens’ needs. 

However, real change will only come when Pakistan fully legalizes bitcoin as a digital currency and takes steps toward mass adoption. Only then will ordinary Pakistani citizens be free to trade with people from all over the world without the need to rely on the local banking system. Only then will financial autonomy become an achievable goal for those living far away from the big cities where banks are based. Only then will women be free to earn, store and transact in a digital currency that is resistant to cultural barriers. 

Creating a national strategic reserve merely signals that a nation believes in bitcoin as an asset with the potential to offer a reliable return. It does not signal that a nation has adopted the digital currency as a means to overcome the obstacles imposed by fiat. Strategic national reserves also hoard bitcoin and bring it too close to the state, even though the digital currency was designed to be a hedge against state-controlled money. As such, a reserve does not unlock the true potential of bitcoin to act as a buffer against domestic inflation, currency devaluation and a cumbersome banking system. 

A strategic Bitcoin reserve is a step in the right direction for Pakistan, as it would be for any nation that suffers from hyperinflation. But only mass adoption will truly unlock the immense potential Bitcoin can offer to a nation such as Pakistan and we have a long way to go before that becomes a reality. 

In my view, strategic reserves are not what bitcoin is all about, but let’s hope this is merely the first step in a long and prosperous journey toward orange-pilling a nation.

This post Pakistan’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: A Step Toward Orange-Pilling a Nation? first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Ghaffar Hussain.

@ eb0157af:77ab6c55

A third of the bitcoins in circulation is now under the control of centralized entities, valued at $668 billion according to an analysis by Gemini.

A study conducted by Gemini in collaboration with Glassnode revealed that centralized actors currently hold 30.9% of bitcoin’s entire circulating supply.

These entities include national governments, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and publicly listed companies. Collectively, these players control 6.1 million BTC, equivalent to approximately $668 billion at current market prices. BlackRock alone holds around 665,635 BTC through its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) ETF, representing over 3% of bitcoin’s total supply, with a value close to $73 billion.

Source: Gemini

The accumulation of bitcoin by such entities has grown by 924% over the past decade. This increase coincides with bitcoin’s price evolution, which has surged from under $1,000 to over $100,000 during the same period.

Analysts interpret this trend as further confirmation that institutions increasingly view bitcoin as a strategic store-of-value asset. According to the report, the correlation between the rise in institutional holdings and bitcoin’s price appreciation reinforces the case for the cryptocurrency’s mainstream adoption.

One key takeaway from the research concerns the predominant role of centralized exchanges within Bitcoin treasury holdings. These platforms hold about half of the total, although a significant portion of those funds actually belongs to retail clients and individual investors.

Government bitcoin treasuries display distinctive characteristics compared to other institutional holders. According to the study, sovereign wallets show infrequent movements and limited correlation with Bitcoin’s price cycles.

However, the amount of bitcoins held by these governments remains large enough to significantly influence the markets whenever sales or transfers occur, the report states. The governments of the United States, China, and the United Kingdom have acquired most of their bitcoins through legal actions (seizures) rather than direct market purchases. In contrast, El Salvador and Bhutan accumulate bitcoin through intentional and ongoing purchases. According to analysts, while the volumes involved are smaller, these strategic allocations signal a long-term commitment and bolster investor confidence, encouraging broader institutional participation and contributing to market stability.

The research concludes that with nearly a third of bitcoin’s circulating supply now held by centralized entities, the market has undergone a structural transformation toward institutional maturity. According to the authors of the report, this evolution has made price action more predictable and less vulnerable to the speculative extremes that characterized Bitcoin’s early years.

The post Report: centralized entities control 31% of bitcoin’s total supply appeared first on Atlas21.

@ eb0157af:77ab6c55

French authorities are intensifying their fight against kidnappings related to the digital asset sector with a new series of arrests.

French law enforcement has made further arrests in an investigation concerning a kidnapping case connected to the cryptocurrency world. According to the public broadcaster France 24, on June 11 several individuals suspected of involvement in the abduction of the father of a crypto entrepreneur were detained.

The case that drew international attention involves the father of an anonymous crypto entrepreneur, who was held captive for several days on an isolated property. The criminals, in their ransom demands, went as far as to cut off one of the victim’s fingers as a form of psychological pressure, demanding up to €7 million (about $8 million) for his release.

The rescue operation, carried out on May 3 by French special forces, led to the victim’s liberation and the arrest of five people on site. However, investigations uncovered a wider criminal network, resulting in new arrests, the exact number of which has not yet been disclosed by authorities.

French authorities did not limit their actions to national territory. On June 4, a man suspected to be a key figure behind the series of crypto kidnappings in France was arrested in Morocco.

The escalation of crypto kidnappings in 2025

Data shows an increase in crypto-related kidnappings in France and worldwide. The phenomenon has grown to such proportions that French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau convened an emergency meeting to address the issue.

Among the most notable cases of 2025 is the attempted daytime kidnapping of Pierre Noizat’s daughter and grandson. Noizat is the co-founder and CEO of the French exchange Paymium; the incident took place on May 13.

According to data from Jameson Lopp, co-founder of Casa, at least 29 personal attacks against cryptocurrency holders have been recorded in 2025 alone. If this trend continues, the annual total could surpass the 35 cases reported in 2024 and the 24 cases in 2023.

The post France: new arrests linked to crypto kidnappings appeared first on Atlas21.

@ f85b9c2c:d190bcff

Almost everyone knows about ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI. OpenAI has of last year quietly removed the language from its usage policy which prohibited military use of its technology a move with serious implications given the increased use of artificial intelligence on battlefields all over the world.

As AI advances so does its weaponization.

Experts warn that AI applications including lethal weapons systems commonly called “killer robots,” could pose a potentially existential threat to humanity that underestimate the imperative of arms control measures to slow the pace of weaponization. There was already trouble in Ukraine and in Gaza. With Yemen also coming into the scene now are we stepping into the perfect storm powered by AI? Just for more clarity around this whole issue OpenAI’s new policy still states that users should not harm human beings or “develop or use weapons”, but it has removed the clause prohibiting use for “military and warfare”. Many AI experts are concerned with this move. Could this be terminator or i robot scene playing in world 🤔?

@ f85b9c2c:d190bcff

Almost everyone knows about ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI. OpenAI has of last year quietly removed the language from its usage policy which prohibited military use of its technology a move with serious implications given the increased use of artificial intelligence on battlefields all over the world.

As AI advances so does its weaponization.

Experts warn that AI applications including lethal weapons systems commonly called “killer robots,” could pose a potentially existential threat to humanity that underestimate the imperative of arms control measures to slow the pace of weaponization. There was already trouble in Ukraine and in Gaza. With Yemen also coming into the scene now are we stepping into the perfect storm powered by AI? Just for more clarity around this whole issue OpenAI’s new policy still states that users should not harm human beings or “develop or use weapons”, but it has removed the clause prohibiting use for “military and warfare”. Many AI experts are concerned with this move. Could this be terminator or i robot scene playing in world 🤔?

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Will not live in a pod.
Will not eat the bugs.
Will not get the chip.
Will not get a blue check.
Will not use CBDCs.

Live Free or Die.

Why did Elon buy twitter for $44 Billion? What value does he see in it besides the greater influence that undoubtedly comes with controlling one of the largest social platforms in the world? We do not need to speculate - he made his intentions incredibly clear in his first meeting with twitter employees after his takeover - WeChat of the West.

To those that do not appreciate freedom, the value prop is clear - WeChat is incredibly powerful and successful in China.

To those that do appreciate freedom, the concern is clear - WeChat has essentially become required to live in China, has surveillance and censorship integrated at its core, and if you are banned from the app your entire livelihood is at risk. Employment, housing, payments, travel, communication, and more become extremely difficult if WeChat censors determine you have acted out of line.

The blue check is the first step in Elon's plan to bring the chinese social credit score system to the west. Users who verify their identity are rewarded with more reach and better tools than those that do not. Verified users are the main product of Elon's twitter - an extensive database of individuals and complete control of the tools he will slowly get them to rely on - it is easier to monetize cattle than free men.

If you cannot resist the temptation of the blue check in its current form you have already lost - what comes next will be much darker. If you realize the need to resist - freedom tech provides us options.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

I often hear "bitcoin doesn't interest me, I'm not a finance person."

Ironically, the beauty of sound money is you don't have to be. In the current system you're expected to manage a diversified investment portfolio or pay someone to do it. Bitcoin will make that optional.

— ODELL (@ODELL) September 16, 2018

At first glance bitcoin often appears overwhelming to newcomers. It is incredibly easy to get bogged down in the details of how it works or different ways to use it. Enthusiasts, such as myself, often enjoy going down the deep rabbit hole of the potential of bitcoin, possible pitfalls and theoretical scenarios, power user techniques, and the developer ecosystem. If your first touch point with bitcoin is that type of content then it is only natural to be overwhelmed. While it is important that we have a thriving community of bitcoiners dedicated to these complicated tasks - the true beauty of bitcoin lies in its simplicity. Bitcoin is simply better money. It is the best money we have ever had.

Life is complicated. Life is hard. Life is full of responsibility and surprises. Bitcoin allows us to focus on our lives while relying on a money that is simple. A money that is not controlled by any individual, company, or government. A money that cannot be easily seized or blocked. A money that cannot be devalued at will by a handful of corrupt bureaucrat who live hundreds of miles from us. A money that can be easily saved and should increase in purchasing power over time without having to learn how to "build a diversified stock portfolio" or hire someone to do it for us.

Bitcoin enables all of us to focus on our lives - our friends and family - doing what we love with the short time we have on this earth. Time is scarce. Life is complicated. Bitcoin is the most simple aspect of our complicated lives. If we spend our scarce time working then we should be able to easily save that accrued value for future generations without watching the news or understanding complicated financial markets. Bitcoin makes this possible for anyone.

Yesterday was Mother's Day. Raising a human is complicated. It is hard, it requires immense personal responsibility, it requires critical thinking, but mothers figure it out, because it is worth it. Using and saving bitcoin is simple -  simply install an app on your phone. Every mother can do it. Every person can do it.

Life is complicated. Life is beautiful. Bitcoin is simple.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 472f440f:5669301e

Marty's Bent

So much for that tariff hyperinflation.\ \ New inflation numbers came at 1.2% — way below the Fed’s target.\ \ For the 4th time in Trump’s 4 months.\ \ Yet not a word about easing from the fed. Who’s now moving the inflation goal-posts to 2026 or even 2027. pic.twitter.com/nwzSCABrbR

— Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) June 16, 2025

After months of pundits, politicians, and partisan hacks kvetching about the aggressive tariff regime put forth by the Trump administration, we're beginning to see some data tickle in that makes it seem as if the tariff strategy may actually be working. At the end of last week, inflation data hit the market cooler than expected. Some core components coming in below the Federal Reserve's 2% inflation target. Granted, the CPI is manipulated and may be underreporting actual inflation. However, if we're simply comparing the CPI to itself, it seems to be moving in the right direction if, like me, you don't like when prices consistently rise month on month, year on year, decade on decade.

On top of this, the amount of revenue that tariffs are bringing in is significant and rising quickly. In May, tariff revenue collected in the U.S. hit a record of $22.3 billion. In April, the U.S. government brought in $16.5 billion from tariffs, and collectively, since Trump took office, the government has brought in around $67.2 billion in tariff revenue. Tariffs now reflect 4% of the total federal revenue, which is up from an average of 2% over the last few years. If this trend keeps up, the idea that tariffs can replace income tax revenue in the United States seems to be validated. Even better, it seems that the increased inflation that many were warning about hasn't materialized yet. There could be a way to increase the revenue of the federal government without increasing taxes on American producers while keeping prices lower. This is a beautiful thing.

I don't think it's time to ring the bell and claim victory in regards to tariffs and inflation quite yet, but this is extremely encouraging and something that all of you should be monitoring closely in the months ahead. Whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, I think we should all celebrate if the bold strategy of levying tariffs on the rest of the world to bring manufacturing home, while the government produces revenue via means that don't attack the income of individual citizens actually works out in the end.

It's crazy what pricing your life in Bitcoin does as you surf the internet. This newsletter was partly inspired by the video above from our good friend Peter St. Onge, but also because of this tweet I saw earlier today that priced the tariff revenue in bitcoin.

via The Kobeissi Letter

The Kobeissi Letter did not include the bitcoin denominations in its tweet. Our browser extension, Opportunity Cost, automatically injected it into the tweet so that I could understand how much revenue the government is bringing in in terms of Bitcoin. If they chose to use Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

It's crazy to think that at current bitcoin prices and if tariff revenue stays at the level it reached last month, the United States government could acquire a strategic reserve of 1 million bitcoin in less than five months. That really puts things into perspective, for me at least, about how much money is being thrown around the system both in the private markets and the public sector.

We are still extremely early in terms of bitcoin's adoption and monetization. Just looking at the tweet makes me want to tap somebody on the shoulder in the government and say, "Hey, look at this. If you sacrifice less than five months of tariff revenue and funnel that into bitcoin, you could have your strategic reserve by the end of the year. Before Thanksgiving even."

If tariff revenue continues to increase at the pace it has over the last couple of months, and the economy recovers, inflation isn't that bad, why not? Why not start building the strategic reserve with some of these revenues? A man can dream.

Washington's Bitcoin Awakening: From Crime Concerns to Strategic Asset

Ken Egan described a remarkable shift in how Washington views Bitcoin. Just a year ago, he recalls fighting defensive battles against basic misconceptions about criminal use and technical vulnerabilities. Today, policymakers ask sophisticated questions about Bitcoin's role in global monetary competition and national security strategy. Egan emphasized that discussions no longer waste time on "is it just for buying drugs" but instead focus on how Bitcoin can counter China's parallel financial systems and strengthen America's competitive position.

"There are people thinking, even the Department of Energy, some of whom will be at our conference, thinking really deeply about everything this ecosystem has to offer and how we can apply it to sort of a comprehensive national security strategy." - Ken Egan

Multiple government departments are now actively exploring Bitcoin's potential, Egan revealed. The Department of Defense examines mining for energy resilience, while the Department of Energy considers grid applications. Trump's executive order formally distinguished Bitcoin from other cryptocurrencies, signaling institutional recognition of its unique properties. This evolution from skepticism to strategic thinking represents a fundamental transformation in how America's policy establishment approaches Bitcoin.

Check out the full podcast here for more on institutional Bitcoin adoption, resistance money warnings, and bipartisan coalition building.

---

Headlines of the Day

France Eyes Bitcoin Mining to Use Excess Energy - via X

Truth Social Files for Bitcoin ETF - via X

French Firm Raises €9.7M to Expand Bitcoin Treasury - via X

China's DDC Enterprise Adds 38 BTC to Treasury - via X

Get our new STACK SATS hat - via tftcmerch.io

---

Bitcoin’s Next Parabolic Move: Could Liquidity Lead the Way?

Is bitcoin’s next parabolic move starting? Global liquidity and business cycle indicators suggest it may be.

Read the latest report from Unchained and TechDev, analyzing how global M2 liquidity and the copper/gold ratio—two historically reliable macro indicators—are aligning once again to signal that a new bitcoin bull market may soon begin.

Download the report here

---

Ten31, the largest bitcoin-focused investor, has deployed $150.00M across 30+ companies through three funds. I am a Managing Partner at Ten31 and am very proud of the work we are doing. Learn more at ten31.vc/invest.

---

Final thought...

The best way to start your Monday morning is for the brake system in your car to completely shit the bed and force you to sit on the side of the road for a tow truck for two hours.

---

Download our free browser extension, Opportunity Cost: https://www.opportunitycost.app/ start thinking in SATS today.

Get this newsletter sent to your inbox daily: https://www.tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/

Subscribe to our YouTube channels and follow us on Nostr and X:

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

There must be a limit to how much data is transferred across the bitcoin network in order to keep the ability to run and use your own node accessible. A node is required to interact with the global bitcoin network - if you do not use your own node then you must trust someone else's node. If nodes become inaccessible to run then the network will centralize around the remaining entities that operate them - threatening the censorship resistance at the core of bitcoin's value prop. The bitcoin protocol uses three main mechanisms to keep node operation costs low - a fixed limit on the amount of data in each block, an automatic difficulty adjustment that regulates how many blocks are produced based on current mining hash rate, and a robust dynamic transaction fee market.

Bitcoin transaction fees limit network abuse by making usage expensive. There is a cost to every transaction, set by a dynamic free market based on demand for scarce block space. It is an incredibly robust way to prevent spam without relying on centralized entities that can be corrupted or pressured.

After the 2017 bitcoin fee spike we had six years of relative quiet to build tools that would be robust in a sustained high fee market. Fortunately our tools are significantly better now but many still need improvement. Most of the pain points we see today will be mitigated.

The reality is we were never going to be fully prepared - pressure is needed to show the pain points and provide strong incentives to mitigate them.

It will be incredibly interesting to watch how projects adapt under pressure. Optimistic we see great innovation here.

---

_If you are willing to wait for your transaction to confirm you can pay significantly lower fees. Learn best practices for reducing your fee burden here.

My guide for running and using your own bitcoin node can be found here._

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Smarter Web Company Raises £29.3M to Grow Bitcoin Holdings

The Smarter Web Company, a UK-based web design and digital services firm, has raised £29.3 million in a new funding round to support its Bitcoin treasury strategy.

JUST IN: Publicly traded The Smarter Web Company raised £29.3M (~$37.1M) to buy more #Bitcoin pic.twitter.com/n5k7XlLvie

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 16, 2025

The raise was completed through an accelerated bookbuild and a subscription with institutional investors. Shares were priced at £1.80 each, matching the closing bid on Friday, June 13. That price is more than double the company’s last fundraising round. 

“The Smarter Web Company is pleased to announce the successful completion of an Accelerated Bookbuild to institutional investors through Tennyson Securities and Peterhouse Capital Limited. A Subscription with Qualified Investors has also been completed, the company said. 

In total, more than 16.2 million new shares were issued—15.4 million through the bookbuild and about 854,000 through the subscription. 

With a high level of demand the Bookbuild and Subscription has raised approximately £29.3 million, well above the stated minimum of £15 million, through the issue of a total of 16,297,627 new ordinary shares of £0.001 each at £1.80 per share. The Offer Price was at the closing bid price on Friday 13 June 2025,” the company said. 

The raise comes just three days after the company revealed it had purchased 74.27 more Bitcoin for £5.98 million, bringing its total Bitcoin holdings to 242.34 BTC. Its average cost basis now sits at £78,793 per Bitcoin. 

“The Company believes that Bitcoin forms a core part of the future of the global financial system,” it said in both filings.  

Smarter Web started building its Bitcoin treasury strategy in 2023. 

“Since 2023 The Smarter Web Company has adopted a policy of accepting payment in Bitcoin. The Company is pioneering the adoption of a Bitcoin Treasury Policy into its strategy.” 

The strategy was officially formalized in April, 2025 with the launch of its “10 Year Plan,” seeing Bitcoin play a key role in its financial structure. 

Admission of the new shares is expected around June 19, after which the company’s total shares in issue will rise to over 220 million. 

With this raise, Smarter Web continues to stand out as one of the few UK-listed companies actively building a corporate Bitcoin treasury. 

This post Smarter Web Company Raises £29.3M to Grow Bitcoin Holdings first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

What is KYC/AML?

• The acronym stands for Know Your Customer / Anti Money Laundering.
• In practice it stands for the surveillance measures companies are often compelled to take against their customers by financial regulators.
• Methods differ but often include: Passport Scans, Driver License Uploads, Social Security Numbers, Home Address, Phone Number, Face Scans.
• Bitcoin companies will also store all withdrawal and deposit addresses which can then be used to track bitcoin transactions on the bitcoin block chain.
• This data is then stored and shared. Regulations often require companies to hold this information for a set number of years but in practice users should assume this data will be held indefinitely. Data is often stored insecurely, which results in frequent hacks and leaks.  
• KYC/AML data collection puts all honest users at risk of theft, extortion, and persecution while being ineffective at stopping crime. Criminals often use counterfeit, bought, or stolen credentials to get around the requirements. Criminals can buy "verified" accounts for as little as $200. Furthermore, billions of people are excluded from financial services as a result of KYC/AML requirements.

During the early days of bitcoin most services did not require this sensitive user data, but as adoption increased so did the surveillance measures. At this point, most large bitcoin companies are collecting and storing massive lists of bitcoiners, our sensitive personal information, and our transaction history.

Lists of Bitcoiners

KYC/AML policies are a direct attack on bitcoiners. Lists of bitcoiners and our transaction history will inevitably be used against us.

Once you are on a list with your bitcoin transaction history that record will always exist. Generally speaking, tracking bitcoin is based on probability analysis of ownership change. Surveillance firms use various heuristics to determine if you are sending bitcoin to yourself or if ownership is actually changing hands.  You can obtain better privacy going forward by using collaborative transactions such as coinjoin to break this probability analysis.

Fortunately, you can buy bitcoin without providing intimate personal information. Tools such as peach, hodlhodl, robosats, azteco and bisq help; mining is also a solid option: anyone can plug a miner into power and internet and earn bitcoin by mining privately.

You can also earn bitcoin by providing goods and/or services that can be purchased with bitcoin. Long term, circular economies will mitigate this threat: most people will not buy bitcoin - they will earn bitcoin - most people will not sell bitcoin - they will spend bitcoin.

There is no such thing as KYC or No KYC bitcoin, there are bitcoiners on lists and those that are not on lists.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 5d085290:0edc3292

You Are navigating city streets or tackling off-road trails, fuel economy is a critical factor for SUV buyers — and this model delivers. According to recent updates, the Nissan Xterra 2025 release date is expected later this year, bringing with it a balance of power and practicality. Drivers across the UAE can expect mileage figures that compete with the best in its class, and you can explore full regional insights in the 2025 Nissan Xterra mileage in UAE guide. The SUV is estimated to deliver between 12–16 km/l depending on road conditions, which is a solid figure for a full-size adventure-ready vehicle. Compared to the previous model, efficiency has been boosted with smarter engine tuning — read more in the Nissan Xterra 2024 vs 2025 comparison. Designed for UAE conditions, it includes fuel-saving features like eco-driving modes and advanced gear ratios. This makes the 2025 Xterra not just a capable off-roader, but also a smart choice for daily commutes.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Influencers would have you believe there is an ongoing binance bank run but bitcoin wallet data says otherwise.

- binance wallets are near all time highs
- bitfinex wallets are also trending up
- gemini and coinbase are being hit with massive withdrawals though

You should not trust custodians, they can rug you without warning. It is incredibly important you learn how to hold bitcoin yourself, but also consider not blindly trusting influencers with a ref link to shill you.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Leading OnChain Comms Agency Melrose PR Joins Decentralized Gentleman’s Club with Rare Pepe Inscription on Bitcoin

LOS ANGELES, CA — Melrose PR, the leading onchain communications agency, officially joins Decentralized Gentlemen Club (DGC) with the minting of a rare Pepe inscription on the Bitcoin blockchain. The Decentralized Gentlemen Club (DGC) will be the biggest collection on Bitcoin when complete at 3GB, which is twice as large as the next biggest collection. DGC is a Bitcoin-themed, meme-culture movement that champions decentralization, style, and storytelling. Each member is immortalized as a custom, tuxedo-clad Pepe — a digital gentleman inscribed as a massive, one-of-a-kind Ordinal on the Bitcoin blockchain. Melrose PR’s symbolic mint is a wizard frog (wearing a bowtie) representation of Melrose PR CEO Kelley Weaver.

“At Melrose, we believe in Bitcoin, not just as a technology powering the future of finance, but also as a foundation for community,” said CEO Kelley Weaver. “This is why we’re delighted to join DGC with our Pepe inscription and be part of a community of meme lords, pioneers, and visionaries who value elegance, independence, and on-chain legacy.”

Since 2016, Melrose has represented some of the most innovative projects across Bitcoin infrastructure, crypto-native venture capital, blockchain-AI convergence, and Web3 networks. Their addition to DGC signals the importance of narrative in the next wave of Bitcoin culture.

“Kelley’s wizard inscription is more than just art—it’s an eternal membership,” said Mr. Bitcoin Beast, spokesperson for the Decentralized Gentlemen Club. “She understands that great storytelling isn’t optional. It’s essential. And there’s no better pepe wizard to help tell the tale of this movement.”

Melrose’s inscription in the DGC collection features Kelley Weaver in full arcane regalia, casting spells of signal over noise, clarity over confusion, and truth over trend. The JPEG, weighing in at 388 kilobytes, stands among the largest onchain artworks in Bitcoin history.

As the biggest Ordinals collection ever attempted, DGC is pushing the technical boundaries of what can be inscribed on Bitcoin. 2500 pieces have been minted so far out of the total 10,000. To join the DGC movement, you can mint your own Degent and submit the inscription ID to the DGC Telegram or you can buy a verified DGC Ordinal at Magic Eden: https://magiceden.us/ordinals/marketplace/degentclub

About the Decentralized Gentlemen Club

The Decentralized Gentlemen Club is a 10,000-piece Bitcoin Ordinal collection featuring tuxedoed Pepe-style frogs immortalized as large-inscription art. Each Gentleman represents a unique membership in the emergent cultural layer of Bitcoin—combining elegance, satire, and self-sovereignty. Get your forever Degent at https://degent.club

About Melrose PR

Melrose PR is a leading onchain communications firm focused on delivering the highest quality results for bitcoin and crypto companies. Founded in 2016, Melrose PR is known for its strategic approach based on intimate knowledge of the unique crypto media landscape. The agency’s relationships across mainstream business, finance, tech, and crypto outlets form the foundation for the team’s success in meeting and exceeding their clients’ goals.

---

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release. Readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence before acting on any information presented in this article.

This post Leading OnChain Comms Agency Melrose PR Joins Decentralized Gentleman’s Club with Rare Pepe Inscription on Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Melrose.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

For years American bitcoin miners have argued for more efficient and free energy markets. It benefits everyone if our energy infrastructure is as efficient and robust as possible. Unfortunately, broken incentives have led to increased regulation throughout the sector, incentivizing less efficient energy sources such as solar and wind at the detriment of more efficient alternatives.

The result has been less reliable energy infrastructure for all Americans and increased energy costs across the board. This naturally has a direct impact on bitcoin miners: increased energy costs make them less competitive globally.

Bitcoin mining represents a global energy market that does not require permission to participate. Anyone can plug a mining computer into power and internet to get paid the current dynamic market price for their work in bitcoin. Using cellphone or satellite internet, these mines can be located anywhere in the world, sourcing the cheapest power available.

Absent of regulation, bitcoin mining naturally incentivizes the build out of highly efficient and robust energy infrastructure. Unfortunately that world does not exist and burdensome regulations remain the biggest threat for US based mining businesses. Jurisdictional arbitrage gives miners the option of moving to a friendlier country but that naturally comes with its own costs.

Enter AI. With the rapid development and release of AI tools comes the requirement of running massive datacenters for their models. Major tech companies are scrambling to secure machines, rack space, and cheap energy to run full suites of AI enabled tools and services. The most valuable and powerful tech companies in America have stumbled into an accidental alliance with bitcoin miners: THE NEED FOR CHEAP AND RELIABLE ENERGY.

Our government is corrupt. Money talks. These companies will push for energy freedom and it will greatly benefit us all.

---

Microsoft Cloud hiring to "implement global small modular reactor and microreactor" strategy to power data centers: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/microsoft-cloud-hiring-to-implement-global-small-modular-reactor-and-microreactor-strategy-to-power-data-centers/

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

The former seems to have found solid product market fit. Expect significant volume, adoption, and usage going forward.

The latter's future remains to be seen. Dependence on Tor, which has had massive reliability issues, and lack of strong privacy guarantees put it at risk.

— ODELL (@ODELL) October 27, 2022

The Basics

• Lightning is a protocol that enables cheap and fast native bitcoin transactions.
• At the core of the protocol is the ability for bitcoin users to create a payment channel with another user.
• These payment channels enable users to make many bitcoin transactions between each other with only two on-chain bitcoin transactions: the channel open transaction and the channel close transaction.
• Essentially lightning is a protocol for interoperable batched bitcoin transactions.
• It is expected that on chain bitcoin transaction fees will increase with adoption and the ability to easily batch transactions will save users significant money.
• As these lightning transactions are processed, liquidity flows from one side of a channel to the other side, on chain transactions are signed by both parties but not broadcasted to update this balance.
• Lightning is designed to be trust minimized, either party in a payment channel can close the channel at any time and their bitcoin will be settled on chain without trusting the other party.

There is no 'Lightning Network'

• Many people refer to the aggregate of all lightning channels as 'The Lightning Network' but this is a false premise.
• There are many lightning channels between many different users and funds can flow across interconnected channels as long as there is a route through peers.
• If a lightning transaction requires multiple hops it will flow through multiple interconnected channels, adjusting the balance of all channels along the route, and paying lightning transaction fees that are set by each node on the route.

Example: You have a channel with Bob. Bob has a channel with Charlie. You can pay Charlie through your channel with Bob and Bob's channel with User C.

• As a result, it is not guaranteed that every lightning user can pay every other lightning user, they must have a route of interconnected channels between sender and receiver.

Lightning in Practice

• Lightning has already found product market fit and usage as an interconnected payment protocol between large professional custodians.
• They are able to easily manage channels and liquidity between each other without trust using this interoperable protocol.
• Lightning payments between large custodians are fast and easy. End users do not have to run their own node or manage their channels and liquidity. These payments rarely fail due to professional management of custodial nodes.
• The tradeoff is one inherent to custodians and other trusted third parties. Custodial wallets can steal funds and compromise user privacy.

Sovereign Lightning

• Trusted third parties are security holes.
• Users must run their own node and manage their own channels in order to use lightning without trusting a third party. This remains the single largest friction point for sovereign lightning usage: the mental burden of actively running a lightning node and associated liquidity management.
• Bitcoin development prioritizes node accessibility so cost to self host your own node is low but if a node is run at home or office, Tor or a VPN is recommended to mask your IP address: otherwise it is visible to the entire network and represents a privacy risk.
• This privacy risk is heightened due to the potential for certain governments to go after sovereign lightning users and compel them to shutdown their nodes. If their IP Address is exposed they are easier to target.
• Fortunately the tools to run and manage nodes continue to get easier but it is important to understand that this will always be a friction point when compared to custodial services.

The Potential Fracture of Lightning

• Any lightning user can choose which users are allowed to open channels with them.
• One potential is that professional custodians only peer with other professional custodians.
• We already see nodes like those run by CashApp only have channels open with other regulated counterparties. This could be due to performance goals, liability reduction, or regulatory pressure.

• Fortunately some of their peers are connected to non-regulated parties so payments to and from sovereign lightning users are still successfully processed by CashApp but this may not always be the case going forward.

Summary

• Many people refer to the aggregate of all lightning channels as 'The Lightning Network' but this is a false premise. There is no singular 'Lightning Network' but rather many payment channels between distinct peers, some connected with each other and some not.
• Lightning as an interoperable payment protocol between professional custodians seems to have found solid product market fit. Expect significant volume, adoption, and usage going forward.
• Lightning as a robust sovereign payment protocol has yet to be battle tested. Heavy reliance on Tor, which has had massive reliability issues, the friction of active liquidity management, significant on chain fee burden for small amounts, interactivity constraints on mobile, and lack of strong privacy guarantees put it at risk.

---

If you have never used lightning before, use this guide to get started on your phone.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

The newly proposed RESTRICT ACT - is being advertised as a TikTok Ban, but is much broader than that, carries a $1M Fine and up to 20 years in prison️! It is unconstitutional and would create massive legal restrictions on the open source movement and free speech throughout the internet.

The Bill was proposed by: Senator Warner, Senator Thune, Senator Baldwin, Senator Fischer, Senator Manchin, Senator Moran, Senator Bennet, Senator Sullivan, Senator Gillibrand, Senator Collins, Senator Heinrich, and Senator Romney. It has broad support across Senators of both parties.

Corrupt politicians will not protect us. They are part of the problem. We must build, support, and learn how to use censorship resistant tools in order to defend our natural rights.

The RESTRICT Act, introduced by Senators Warner and Thune, aims to block or disrupt transactions and financial holdings involving foreign adversaries that pose risks to national security. Although the primary targets of this legislation are companies like Tik-Tok, the language of the bill could potentially be used to block or disrupt cryptocurrency transactions and, in extreme cases, block Americans’ access to open source tools or protocols like Bitcoin.

The Act creates a redundant regime paralleling OFAC without clear justification, it significantly limits the ability for injured parties to challenge actions raising due process concerns, and unlike OFAC it lacks any carve-out for protected speech. COINCENTER ON THE RESTRICT ACT

Full Text of Bill

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Humanity's Natural State Is Chaos
Without order there is chaos. Humans competing with each other for scarce resources naturally leads to conflict until one group achieves significant power and instates a "monopoly on violence."

Power Brings Stability
Power has always been the key means to achieve stability in societies. Centralized power can be incredibly effective in addressing issues such as crime, poverty, and social unrest efficiently. Unfortunately this power is often abused and corrupted.

Centralized Power Breeds Tyranny
Centralized power often leads to tyrannical rule. When a select few individuals hold control over a society, they tend to become corrupted. Centralized power structures often lack accountability and transparency, and rely too heavily on trust.

Distributed Power Cultivates Freedom
New technology that empowers individuals provide us the ability to rebuild societies from the bottom up. Strong individuals that can defend and provide for themselves will help build strong local communities on a similar foundation. The result is power being distributed throughout society rather than held by a select few.

In the short term, relying on trust and centralized power is an easy answer to mitigating chaos, but freedom tech tools provide us the ability to build on top of much stronger distributed foundations that provide stability while also cultivating individual freedom.

The solution starts with us. Empower yourself. Empower others. A grassroots freedom tech movement scaling one person at a time.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Canadian Company Universal Digital Launches Bitcoin Treasury Strategy

Universal Digital Inc. (CSE: LFG) has announced it has launched a Bitcoin Treasury Strategy as a core pillar of its capital allocation framework, beginning with the divestment of altcoin holdings to accumulate Bitcoin under a new reserve model.

“Our Bitcoin Treasury Strategy marks a deliberate shift in how we manage capital – by holding Bitcoin as a long-term treasury asset, we aim to enhance balance sheet strength and align with the evolving global financial landscape,” said the CEO of the Company Tim Chan. “The framework we’ve established with GFA enables us to explore extending this model to Asia, where digital assets are gaining traction among public companies and institutional investors.”

The strategy is designed to increase long term net asset value while aligning Universal Digital with the broader global shift toward institutional adoption of BTC. The Company sees Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset and intends to implement the strategy in a transparent and phased manner.

Universal Digital plans to work with publicly traded companies across Asia to introduce Bitcoin treasury models. Eastern Asia, led by markets such as Japan, South Korea, and Hong Kong, accounted for 8.9% of global on-chain crypto transaction volume between July 2023 and June 2024, according to the press release.

“Universal Digital’s and its management’s experience with the crypto and Bitcoin treasury combined with our expertise on the Japanese markets makes us a strong team,” stated Gen Matsuda, CEO of Ground Financial Advisory Co. “I look forward to working closely with Universal Digital to introduce bitcoin reserve model to Japanese listed companies.”

As part of its expansion into Asia, Universal Digital signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on June 12, 2025, with Ground Financial Advisory Co., a Tokyo stock exchange listed financial and technology group. The partnership aims to develop Bitcoin based corporate finance models for the Japanese market.

Under the MOU, the companies will jointly explore: 

• Implementing Bitcoin reserve models for publicly listed companies in Japan.
• Designing capital raising instruments such as warrants and market-based offerings to support Bitcoin acquisitions.
• Strengthening frameworks for digital asset governance, investor relations, and secure custody.

This collaboration may also extend to joint investments in public companies, the creation of blockchain-enabled corporate structures, and projects that integrate Bitcoin with cultural intellectual property and Web3-driven consumer ecosystems, according to the release. The agreement was signed on an arm’s length basis, with no related party interests between Universal Digital and GFA.

This post Canadian Company Universal Digital Launches Bitcoin Treasury Strategy first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Oscar Zarraga Perez.

@ eb0157af:77ab6c55

Treasury Secretary Bessent foresees a promising future for stablecoins pegged to the US dollar.

During a US Senate hearing held on June 11, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that the market for US dollar-backed stablecoins has the potential to surpass the $2 trillion mark within the next three years.

“I believe that stablecoin legislation backed by U.S. treasuries or T-bills will create a market that will expand U.S. dollar usage via these stablecoins all around the world,” the government official stated.

Bessent reiterated the administration’s commitment to strengthening the dollar’s status through USD-denominated stablecoins.

GENIUS Act gains ground

The legislative process received a boost after the Senate voted to advance the stablecoin bill, moving it closer to a final vote. The GENIUS Act, once approved, will establish strict requirements for the stable digital currency sector.

The bill mandates that stablecoins must be fully backed by US dollars or assets with equivalent liquidity (Treasuries). It also requires annual audits for issuers with a market capitalization exceeding $50 billion and includes specific provisions regarding the issuance of these cryptocurrencies abroad.

Stablecoins and the financial system

The stablecoin sector is drawing increasing interest from banking institutions. Bank of America is preparing to launch its own stablecoin, while Circle — issuer of USDC — went public this month, with shares surging 235% on its first trading day.

Currently, US dollar-pegged stablecoins account for over 96% of the entire stable digital currency market.

The post Stablecoins: market could reach $2 trillion by 2028, says Bessent appeared first on Atlas21.

@ 23f48c23:b6fe0ded

iPhone Calculator App Specification

Core Features

1. Basic Arithmetic Operations: Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division with decimal support.
2. Display Formatting: Dynamic sizing for large numbers and decimals.
3. Memory Functions: Store, recall, and clear memory values.
4. Operation Chaining: Perform multiple operations in sequence.
5. Advanced Features: Percentage calculation, sign toggle, and haptic feedback.

Architecture

• Frontend: React + TypeScript with Vite.
• State Management: Custom hooks for logic separation.
• Testing: Jest for unit tests, Playwright for e2e tests.
• Styling: CSS Modules for component-specific styles.

Project Structure

• /src/components: Reusable UI components.
• /src/hooks: Custom hooks for business logic.
• /src/utils: Utility functions (e.g., calculations).
• /tests: Unit and e2e tests.

Dependencies

• React, TypeScript, Vite, Jest, Playwright, Biome.

Setup

1. Run bun install to install dependencies.
2. Run bun run dev to start the development server.
3. Run bun run test to execute unit tests.
4. Run bun run build to create a production build.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Strategy Acquires 10,100 BTC, Surpasses 592,000 Bitcoin in Holdings 

Michael Saylor’s Strategy announces it has purchased an additional 10,100 BTC for approximately $1.05 billion, raising its total holdings to 592,100 BTC acquired at an average cost of $70,666 per Bitcoin.

BREAKING: STRATEGY BUYS ANOTHER 10,100 #BITCOIN pic.twitter.com/TZ6nosWenr

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 16, 2025

Strategy added another 10,100 Bitcoin to its treasury between June 9 and June 15, 2025, according to a Form 8-K filed Monday with the SEC. The company spent approximately $1.05 billion on the latest allocation, paying an average price of $104,080 per Bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. 

This brings Strategy’s total holdings to 592,100 BTC, acquired at a cumulative cost of $41.84 billion, or an average price of $70,666 per Bitcoin, solidifying its status as the world’s largest corporate holder of Bitcoin.

The recent allocation was financed through multiple capital raises. Strategy tapped its STRK and STRF at-the-market offerings, and completed a $979.7 million public offering of STRD, its 10.00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock, on June 10.

“The Bitcoin purchases were made using proceeds from the STRK ATM, STRF ATM, and STRD Offering,” the company stated.

In addition to the purchase, Strategy reported a 19.1% BTC yield year-to-date in 2025, reflecting the strength of its long-term bitcoin investment thesis. 

This latest acquisition follows a series of steady purchases throughout 2024 and early 2025. Strategy has continued to scale its position quarter over quarter, using capital market tools to accumulate Bitcoin as part of its strategy.

“Strategy continues to execute on its commitment to the Bitcoin standard,” the company stated in its filing. 

The company continues to emphasize transparency around its holdings. Its website, strategy.com, hosts a Bitcoin Dashboard that is regularly updated with BTC purchase details, securities activity, and performance metrics in compliance with Regulation FD.

Strategy’s move comes during increasing institutional adoption of Bitcoin in 2025. The company’s acquisition strategy and consistent messaging have made it a leader for corporate engagement with the digital asset. 

With its most recent buy, Strategy now holds over 592,000 Bitcoin, a significant portion of the asset’s fixed 21 million supply—showing its view of Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a core component of its financial strategy.  

This post Strategy Acquires 10,100 BTC, Surpasses 592,000 Bitcoin in Holdings  first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

---

"Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy.  A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world." - Eric Hughes, A Cypherpunk's Manifesto, 1993

---

Privacy is essential to freedom. Without privacy, individuals are unable to make choices free from surveillance and control. Lack of privacy leads to loss of autonomy. When individuals are constantly monitored it limits our ability to express ourselves and take risks. Any decisions we make can result in negative repercussions from those who surveil us. Without the freedom to make choices, individuals cannot truly be free.

Freedom is essential to acquiring and preserving wealth. When individuals are not free to make choices, restrictions and limitations prevent us from economic opportunities. If we are somehow able to acquire wealth in such an environment, lack of freedom can result in direct asset seizure by governments or other malicious entities. At scale, when freedom is compromised, it leads to widespread economic stagnation and poverty. Protecting freedom is essential to economic prosperity.

The connection between privacy, freedom, and wealth is critical. Without privacy, individuals lose the freedom to make choices free from surveillance and control. While lack of freedom prevents individuals from pursuing economic opportunities and makes wealth preservation nearly impossible. No Privacy? No Freedom. No Freedom? No Wealth.

Rights are not granted. They are taken and defended. Rights are often misunderstood as permission to do something by those holding power. However, if someone can give you something, they can inherently take it from you at will. People throughout history have necessarily fought for basic rights, including privacy and freedom. These rights were not given by those in power, but rather demanded and won through struggle. Even after these rights are won, they must be continually defended to ensure that they are not taken away. Rights are not granted - they are earned through struggle and defended through sacrifice.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Will not live in a pod.
Will not eat the bugs.
Will not get the chip.
Will not get a blue check.
Will not use CBDCs.

Live Free or Die.

Why did Elon buy twitter for $44 Billion? What value does he see in it besides the greater influence that undoubtedly comes with controlling one of the largest social platforms in the world? We do not need to speculate - he made his intentions incredibly clear in his first meeting with twitter employees after his takeover - WeChat of the West.

To those that do not appreciate freedom, the value prop is clear - WeChat is incredibly powerful and successful in China.

To those that do appreciate freedom, the concern is clear - WeChat has essentially become required to live in China, has surveillance and censorship integrated at its core, and if you are banned from the app your entire livelihood is at risk. Employment, housing, payments, travel, communication, and more become extremely difficult if WeChat censors determine you have acted out of line.

The blue check is the first step in Elon's plan to bring the chinese social credit score system to the west. Users who verify their identity are rewarded with more reach and better tools than those that do not. Verified users are the main product of Elon's twitter - an extensive database of individuals and complete control of the tools he will slowly get them to rely on - it is easier to monetize cattle than free men.

If you cannot resist the temptation of the blue check in its current form you have already lost - what comes next will be much darker. If you realize the need to resist - freedom tech provides us options.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 374ee93a:36623347

Chef's notes

A quick and easy recipe to help preserve your fresh strawberry harvest for months to come with the addition of vanilla to bring out that summer flavour.

Made with 20% extra fruit than standard supermarket jam. To make a reduced sugar version you can use Pomona's Pectin or accept runny jam ;)

Details

• ⏲️ Prep time: 10 mins
• 🍳 Cook time: 30 mins
• 🍽️ Servings: 5 jars

Ingredients

• 1.2kg fresh hulled strawberries
• 1kg golden cane sugar (can sub honey or maple syrup 1:1)
• 1 lemon
• 1 vanilla pod (or 1 tbspn extract)

Directions

1. Remove the green stalks from your strawberries and cut into quarters
2. Pare the lemon zest and reserve for another recipe (such as lemon curd, or cocktails!), chop roughly and add to a pan inside a small muslin bag)
3. Gently cook the strawberries and lemon together with a lid on the pan for 15-20 minutes, until the lemon pith softens
4. Squeeze the muslin bag to get as much pectin out as possiblem then add 1kg sugar to the miture and boil on high
5. The jam can be tested for set after approx 10 mins boiling, spoon a small amount onto a chilled plate and place in the freezer for 2 minutes. If the jam wrinkles when pushed with a spoon it is ready to pot into sterlised jars. If it still appears runny cook for a further 5 minutes and repeat testing

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Senator Hagerty’s Vision Beyond The GENIUS Act: Make Tennessee A Hub For Bitcoin Mining

Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN) has been in the headlines as of late as the GENIUS Act (S. 1582), a bill for which he was the primary sponsor, moves closer to passing in the U.S. Senate.

The GENIUS Act is a bill that, if enacted into law, would create a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins so that the technology can be more widely adopted. (While some Bitcoin enthusiasts may not like this, they should still pay attention to the language in the bill, as it could have an impact on U.S. citizens’ ability to use Bitcoin wallets privately.)

However, stablecoins aren’t the only thing on Senator Hagerty’s mind.

He’s also thinking about how to best produce and harness energy in Tennessee to use it for Bitcoin mining and AI compute.

He shared his vision on this topic with me in an interview I conducted with him at Bitcoin 2025:

Tennessee As A Hub For Bitcoin Mining and AI Compute

“We have an opportunity before us to be in the very lead,” Senator Hagerty told Bitcoin Magazine in regard to building nuclear facilities that can be used to produce energy for Bitcoin mining and AI processing.

“The largest utility in the world is the Tennessee Valley Authority — certainly the largest one in America — and I think we’ve got a unique opportunity here to move forward and become the energy hub of America,” he added.

“[We should] see more and more not only mining operations, but if you think about what Elon Musk is doing in Memphis with xAI, the data centers, the opportunities with artificial intelligence — there are many, many things that are going to happen in Tennessee.”

The Senator added that he believes the state can also strike partnerships with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Vanderbilt University, the University of Tennessee and Tennessee Tech as it works to become a more friendly destination for Bitcoin miners and data centers.

“We’ve got great opportunities [from] Memphis all the way across the state,” said Senator Hagerty.

Hagerty’s Call For Bipartisanship

Whether it’s working toward stablecoin legislation or crafting regulation that will enable industries like Bitcoin mining and data centers to thrive in the United States, Senator Hagerty believes these efforts should be inherently bipartisan.

“[These are] bipartisan — or nonpartisan issue[s] — frankly,” said the Senator.

“If you care about the competitiveness of America — if you want to see innovation happen on our shores rather than being pushed overseas — then you’re going to support what we’re trying to do in terms of putting a regulatory framework in place that will deliver certainty, that will create an ecosystem here in America that will allow these companies to thrive,” he added.

“It’s not just the stablecoin legislation I’m putting forward or what may happen with Bitcoin or other technologies like that. It’s the overall blockchain technology that’s going to help advance America beyond the 21st century. We need to stay in the lead. We can stay in the lead.”

This post Senator Hagerty’s Vision Beyond The GENIUS Act: Make Tennessee A Hub For Bitcoin Mining first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Frank Corva.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Coinbase Announces Bitcoin Rewards Credit Card, Offering up to 4% BTC Back on Everything

Coinbase is launching its first-ever branded credit card in partnership with American Express, set to roll out this fall. Called the Coinbase One Card, it will be available only to U.S. members of Coinbase One, the platform’s monthly subscription service. The card will offer 2% to 4% back in Bitcoin on everyday purchases, along with access to American Express perks.  

JUST IN: Coinbase launches credit card allowing users to earn up to 4% bitcoin back on every purchase pic.twitter.com/d6pdNZV4pi

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 12, 2025

This is a first-of-its-kind product for Coinbase, which previously only offered a prepaid debit card with Visa in 2020. 

“We see real potential in the combination of Coinbase and crypto with the powerful backing of American Express, and what the card offers is an excellent mix of what customers are looking for right now,” said Will Stredwick, head of American Express global network services, during the Coinbase State of Crypto Summit in New York.

The card is part of a larger push by Coinbase to expand its subscription-based services. Coinbase One costs $29.99/month and includes zero trading fees, higher staking rewards, and customer support perks. The company also announced a cheaper version—Coinbase Basic—for $4.99/month or $49.99/year, which includes fewer features.

Coinbase’s subscription business is growing fast. It brought in $698.1 million in Q1 2025, compared to $1.26 billion in trading revenue. According to William Blair analyst Andrew Jeffrey, this kind of recurring revenue is a big reason why long-term investors are sticking with the stock.

Launched in 2023, Coinbase One now has over a million members. The company has been steadily growing its ecosystem with products like its Base developer platform and a self-custody wallet. 

The company has long positioned Bitcoin at the center of its strategy—offering BTC custody services to institutions, supporting Bitcoin ETFs, integrating Bitcoin rewards into its products, and actively advocating for Bitcoin-friendly regulation in Washington. Coinbase also supports Bitcoin development directly through funding grants and engineering support. As the largest publicly traded crypto exchange in the U.S., Coinbase continues to frame Bitcoin not just as an asset, but as the foundation of its long-term vision.

This post Coinbase Announces Bitcoin Rewards Credit Card, Offering up to 4% BTC Back on Everything first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Michael Saylor and Pakistan’s Crypto Minister Bilal Talk Bitcoin and Global Investment

Pakistan’s Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and State Minister of Crypto Bilal Bin Saqib, held a conversation recently with the Executive Chairman and CEO of Strategy, Michael Saylor, about Bitcoin and its potential role in Pakistan’s economy.

BREAKING: Pakistan’s Finance Minister and State Minister on Crypto Bilal just talked with Michael Saylor about #Bitcoin

Nation States are here pic.twitter.com/aa5tM5kKbY

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 15, 2025

Saylor highlighted the critical role of trust and leadership in attracting global capital, citing his own journey of turning a $400 million investment into a $40 billion market backed position through Bitcoin.

“Today, I will stay in touch with Bilal,” he said. “Pakistan has many brilliant people and a lot of people to do business with you. My company had less than $400 million to invest, but the markets gave me $40 billion because they trust us. And so the most important thing is leadership, intellectual leadership and that they trust you.”

Saylor further emphasized that trust and clarity of vision are what drive global capital flows.

“If the world trusts you and they hear your words, and you speak particularly, the capital and the capability will flow to Pakistan,” said Saylor. “It’s there, it wants to find a home and that’s what happened with our company. Our success is because we were clear and committed. And once the market decides who the leader is. They get behind the leader and they send their money to you. And I think they’d do it to Pakistan too. You have the most important thing, which is you have a commitment and a will and clarity here. So, I look forward to working with you.”

The new stance is a stark change for Pakistan, which had previously banned Bitcoin trading in 2018. On March 20, Bilal Bin Saqib told Bloomberg that Pakistan was planning to legalize Bitcoin and try to implement a regulatory framework to attract investors.

“Pakistan is done sitting on the sidelines,” said Saqib. “We want to attract international investment because Pakistan is a low-cost, high-growth market with 60% of the population under 30… Trump is making crypto a national priority, and every country, including Pakistan, will have to follow suit.”

During the 2025 Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, Saqib announced that Pakistan was creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve.

“Today, I will announce that the Pakistan government is setting up their own government led Bitcoin strategic reserve… and this wallet, the national Bitcoin wallet,” said Saqib. “It’s not for speculation or hype. We will be holding this Bitcoin and we will never ever sell them.”

This post Michael Saylor and Pakistan’s Crypto Minister Bilal Talk Bitcoin and Global Investment first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Oscar Zarraga Perez.

@ 8bad92c3:ca714aa5

Key Takeaways

Michael Goldstein, aka Bitstein, presents a sweeping philosophical and economic case for going “all in” on Bitcoin, arguing that unlike fiat, which distorts capital formation and fuels short-term thinking, Bitcoin fosters low time preference, meaningful saving, and long-term societal flourishing. At the heart of his thesis is “hodling for good”—a triple-layered idea encompassing permanence, purpose, and the pursuit of higher values like truth, beauty, and legacy. Drawing on thinkers like Aristotle, Hoppe, and Josef Pieper, Goldstein redefines leisure as contemplation, a vital practice in aligning capital with one’s deepest ideals. He urges Bitcoiners to think beyond mere wealth accumulation and consider how their sats can fund enduring institutions, art, and architecture that reflect a moral vision of the future.

Best Quotes

“Let BlackRock buy the houses, and you keep the sats.”

“We're not hodling just for the sake of hodling. There is a purpose to it.”

“Fiat money shortens your time horizon… you can never rest.”

“Savings precedes capital accumulation. You can’t build unless you’ve saved.”

“You're increasing the marginal value of everyone else’s Bitcoin.”

“True leisure is contemplation—the pursuit of the highest good.”

“What is Bitcoin for if not to make the conditions for magnificent acts of creation possible?”

“Bitcoin itself will last forever. Your stack might not. What will outlast your coins?”

“Only a whale can be magnificent.”

“The market will sell you all the crack you want. It’s up to you to demand beauty.”

Conclusion

This episode is a call to reimagine Bitcoin as more than a financial revolution—it’s a blueprint for civilizational renewal. Michael Goldstein reframes hodling as an act of moral stewardship, urging Bitcoiners to lower their time preference, build lasting institutions, and pursue truth, beauty, and legacy—not to escape the world, but to rebuild it on sound foundations.

Timestamps

00:00 - Intro
00:50 - Michael’s BBB presentation Hodl for Good
07:27 - Austrian principles on capital
15:40 - Fiat distorts the economic process
23:34 - Bitkey
24:29 - Hodl for Good triple entendre
29:52 - Bitcoin benefits everyone
39:05 - Unchained
40:14 - Leisure theory of value
52:15 - Heightening life
1:15:48 - Breaking from the chase makes room for magnificence
1:32:32 - Nakamoto Institute’s mission

Transcript

(00:00) Fiat money is by its nature a disturbance. If money is being continually produced, especially at an uncertain rate, these uh policies are really just redistribution of wealth. Most are looking for number to go up post hyper bitcoinization. The rate of growth of bitcoin would be more reflective of the growth of the economy as a whole.
(00:23) Ultimately, capital requires knowledge because it requires knowing there is something that you can add to the structures of production to lengthen it in some way that will take time but allow you to have more in the future than you would today. Let Black Rockck buy the houses and you keep the sats, not the other way around.
(00:41) You wait until later for Larry Frink to try to sell you a [Music] mansion. And we're live just like that. Just like that. 3:30 on a Friday, Memorial Day weekend. It's a good good good way to end the week and start the holiday weekend. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Thank you for having me here. Thank you for coming. I wore this hat specifically because I think it's I think it's very apppropo uh to the conversation we're going to have which is I hope an extension of the presentation you gave at Bitblock Boom Huddle for good. You were working on
(01:24) that for many weeks leading up to uh the conference and explaining how you were structuring it. I think it's a very important topic to discuss now as the Bitcoin price is hitting new all-time highs and people are trying to understand what am I doing with Bitcoin? Like you have you have the different sort of factions within Bitcoin.
(01:47) Uh get on a Bitcoin standard, get on zero, spend as much Bitcoin as possible. You have the sailors of the world are saying buy Bitcoin, never sell, die with your Bitcoin. And I think you do a really good job in that presentation. And I just think your understanding overall of Bitcoin is incredible to put everything into context. It's not either or.
(02:07) It really depends on what you want to accomplish. Yeah, it's definitely there there is no actual one-sizefits-all um for I mean nearly anything in this world. So um yeah, I mean first of all I mean there was it was the first conference talk I had given in maybe five years. I think the one prior to that uh was um bit block boom 2019 which was my meme talk which uh has uh become infamous and notorious.
(02:43) So uh there was also a lot of like high expectations uh you know rockstar dev uh has has treated that you know uh that that talk with a lot of reference. a lot of people have enjoyed it and he was expecting this one to be, you know, the greatest one ever, which is a little bit of a little bit of a uh a burden to live up to those kinds of standards.
(03:08) Um, but you know, because I don't give a lot of talks. Um, you know, I I I like to uh try to bring ideas that might even be ideas that are common. So, something like hodling, we all talk about it constantly. uh but try to bring it from a little bit of a different angle and try to give um a little bit of uh new light to it.
(03:31) I alsove I've I've always enjoyed kind of coming at things from a third angle. Um whenever there's, you know, there's there's all these little debates that we have in in Bitcoin and sometimes it's nice to try to uh step out of it and look at it a little more uh kind of objectively and find ways of understanding it that incorporate the truths of of all of them.
(03:58) uh you know cuz I think we should always be kind of as much as possible after ultimate truth. Um so with this one um yeah I was kind of finding that that sort of golden mean. So uh um yeah and I actually I think about that a lot is uh you know Aristotle has his his concept of the golden mean. So it's like any any virtue is sort of between two vices um because you can you can always you can always take something too far.
(04:27) So you're you're always trying to find that right balance. Um so someone who is uh courageous you know uh one of the vices uh on one side is being basically reckless. I I can't remember what word he would use. Uh but effectively being reckless and just wanting to put yourself in danger for no other reason than just you know the thrill of it.
(04:50) Um and then on the other side you would just have cowardice which is like you're unwilling to put yourself um at any risk at any time. Um, and courage is right there in the middle where it's understanding when is the right time uh to put your put yourself, you know, in in the face of danger um and take it on. And so um in some sense this this was kind of me uh in in some ways like I'm obviously a partisan of hodling.
(05:20) Um, I've for, you know, a long time now talked about the, um, why huddling is good, why people do it, why we should expect it. Um, but still trying to find that that sort of golden mean of like yes, huddle, but also what are we hodling for? And it's not we're we're not hodddling just merely for the sake of hodddling.
(05:45) There there is a a purpose to it. And we should think about that. And that would also help us think more about um what are the benefits of of spending, when should we spend, why should we spend, what should we spend on um to actually give light to that sort of side of the debate. Um so that was that was what I was kind of trying to trying to get into.
(06:09) Um, as well as also just uh at the same time despite all the talk of hodling, there's always this perennial uh there's always this perennial dislike of hodlers because we're treated as uh as if um we're just free riding the network or we're just greedy or you know any of these things. And I wanted to show how uh huddling does serve a real economic purpose.
(06:36) Um, and it does benefit the individual, but it also does uh it it has actual real social um benefits as well beyond merely the individual. Um, so I wanted to give that sort of defense of hodling as well to look at it from um a a broader position than just merely I'm trying to get rich. Um uh because even the person who uh that is all they want to do um just like you know your your pure number grow up go up moonboy even that behavior has positive ramifications on on the economy.
(07:14) And while we might look at them and have uh judgments about their particular choices for them as an individual, we shouldn't discount that uh their actions are having positive positive effects for the rest of the economy. Yeah. So, let's dive into that just not even in the context of Bitcoin because I think you did a great job of this in the presentation.
(07:36) just you've done a good job of this consistently throughout the years that I've known you. Just from like a first principles Austrian economics perspective, what is the idea around capital accumulation, low time preference and deployment of that capital like what what like getting getting into like the nitty-gritty and then applying it to Bitcoin? Yeah, it's it's a big question and um in many ways I mean I I even I barely scratched the surface.
(08:05) uh I I can't claim to have read uh all the volumes of Bombber works, you know, capital and interest and and stuff like that. Um but I think there's some some sort of basic concepts that we can look at that we can uh draw a lot out. Um the first uh I guess let's write that. So repeat so like capital time preference. Yeah. Well, I guess getting more broad like why sav

@ 9f2b5b64:e811118f

1234

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Trump Media Files to Launch Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF 

Trump Media & Technology Group has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch the Truth Social Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF, B.T.

The ETF will directly hold Bitcoin and Ether, with an initial allocation of 75% Bitcoin and 25% Ether. Shares of the fund will be offered to investors to track the performance of these assets and are expected to trade on NYSE Arca once approved. 

JUST IN: Registration statement for Trump Media's Bitcoin Treasury deal was declared effective by the SEC pic.twitter.com/PFyy44qXxH

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 13, 2025

Crypto.com has been selected as the exclusive custodian, prime execution agent, staking, and liquidity provider for the ETF. Yorkville America Digital, LLC is the sponsor of the fund.

According to the company’s announcement, “The launch of the Truth Social Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF is pending effectiveness of the Registration Statement as well as approval of a Form 19b-4 filing with the SEC.” 

The fund is structured as a Nevada business trust. Shares will be issued and redeemed in blocks of 10,000 by authorized participants, with cash used for creation and redemption. The ETF may offer in-kind transactions in the future, pending additional regulatory approval. 

Trump Media acknowledged, “A registration statement relating to the Shares has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. The Shares may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective.” 

The ETF is not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which typically governs mutual funds and traditional ETFs by imposing rules on investor protections, disclosures, and fund operations. Because the ETF holds Bitcoin and Ether directly rather than securities, it qualifies as a grantor trust and is exempt from these requirements. 

The ETF filing also reflects Trump Media’s strategy to establish a presence in the digital asset space beyond social media and streaming. With the development of its financial services arm, Truth.Fi, the company is clearly positioning itself to compete in the growing digital asset space.  

If approved, the Truth Social ETF would give investors a direct, regulated path into both Bitcoin and Ether through one fund. As Trump Media expands its presence in financial services, the move signals a clear intention to compete in the space. 

This post Trump Media Files to Launch Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF  first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

H100 Group Receives 144.8 BTC in Convertible Loan Deal

H100 Group, Swedish health-tech firm, has received 144.8 BTC as part of a settlement tied to its convertible loan agreement, according to a company press release issued Monday. With this latest transaction, the Stockholm-based firm now holds a total of 169.2 BTC on its balance sheet.

H100 Group Receives 144.8 BTC as Partial Settlement Under Convertible Loan Framework. Now holds 169.2 BTC. pic.twitter.com/MAW044iXkG

— H100 (@H100Group) June 16, 2025

The 144.8 BTC was transferred as a part of the first four segments of H100’s loan agreement, which has been well received by investors thus far. H100 said in the release, “H100 Group AB (‘H100 Group’ or the ‘Company’) has today received 144.8 BTC as part of the proceeds from Tranches 1 through 4 under its previously announced convertible loan agreements.”

This follows recent reporting that Blockstream CEO Adam Back committed to lead a 750 million kronor (~$79 million) funding initiative for H100, anchored by a 150 million-krona injection in Tranche 6. The loan, structured for speed and cost-efficiency, was priced at 6.38 kronor per share—a 33% premium to market—showing investor confidence.

The loan structure includes settlement flexibility—either in cash or Bitcoin—which allows counterparties to opt for BTC delivery, reducing fiat friction and lining up with the firm’s long-term treasury outlook. 

“Unexpectedly, given the strong reception, Tranches 1-4 became in-the-money rapidly,” Back told CoinDesk. “I was expecting [H100] would convert them over time as they reached in-the-money status.” 

This funding approach allows H100 to bypass traditional rights issues while onboarding capital in a flexible manner. Tranches 7 and 8 are on deck, with room for size increases depending on market appetite.  

This also reflects H100’s evolving financial strategy. While the company’s core operations remain focused on AI-driven health and longevity services, its growing Bitcoin position is reshaping how capital is raised, stored, and deployed. As of now, the company’s BTC holdings stand at 169.2 BTC—up from just 24.41 BTC prior to this latest tranche execution. 

H100’s stock jumped 22% on Monday in response to the developments. 

As the firm continues negotiations for future tranches and explores adoption of BTC as a financial backbone, it positions itself uniquely at the intersection of health tech and decentralized finance. 

This post H100 Group Receives 144.8 BTC in Convertible Loan Deal first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ 2c564b98:5c6444b0

© unsplash

Dieser Beitrag von Laura und Phillip aus dem FOERBICO Team erschien zuerst auf dem Theologie-Blog y-nachten.

Alle reden von OER - was ist das eigentlich?

Offene Vorlesungsreihen auf YouTube, Podcasts, Blogs, Podiumsdiskussionen und die Beteiligung an Wikipedia-Einträgen machen deutlich, dass sich das Geschehen an Hochschulen zunehmend öffnet, um mit einer interessierten Öffentlichkeit transparent zu kommunizieren sowie Diskurse breiter zugänglich zu machen (vgl. Mößle, Pirker 2024). Für viele wirkt aber gerade die wissenschaftliche Theologie wie eine Disziplin für Expert:innen, geprägt von antiken Sprachen, dogmatischen Gerüsten und traditionsgebundenen Denken, das ein hohes Maß an Vorwissen erfordert. Doch muss die Theologie wirklich so fern und unverständlich wirken? Die Open-Science-Bewegung zielt auf Transparenz und Nachvollziehbarkeit und fordert Wissenschaftler:innen sowie Akteur:innen aus Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur dazu auf, zum Austausch beizutragen und den wissenschaftlichen Dialog im Sinne einer Demokratisierung des Wissens mitzugestalten (vgl. Siegfried, Scherp, Linek, Flieger 2024). Hierbei kommt den Open Educational Resources, kurz OER, eine bedeutsame Rolle zu. OER sind frei zugängliche Bildungsmaterialien, die in unterschiedlichen Formaten und Medien vorliegen können. Sie stehen unter einer offenen Lizenz, die es ermöglicht, sie kostenlos zu nutzen, zu verändern und mit oder ohne Änderungen weiterzugeben, mit wenigen oder gar keinen Einschränkungen. Ob einzelne Arbeitsblätter, komplette Lehrbücher, Onlinekurse, Videos oder Podcasts, solange sie offen, d.h. mit CC-Lizenzen versehen sind, gelten sie als OER. Ziel ist es, Bildung für alle zugänglicher und flexibler zu machen (vgl. UNESCO 2019). OER unterscheiden sich von kostenlosen Materialien durch die rechtssichere Möglichkeit der Bearbeitung und Weiterverbreitung, vgl. exemplarisch die OER-Lizensierung bei (Pirner 2024). Dies ermöglicht sowohl Lehrenden die Anpassung der Lehrmaterialien an ihre Zielgruppe als auch Lernenden die Bearbeitung der Materialien für sich und ihre Lerngruppe.

OER braucht Praxis! Open Educational Practice

OER allein führen jedoch nicht zu einer Bildungsreform. Eine partizipative Lehr- und Lernkultur ist notwendig und es bedarf einer gewissen Haltung und Praxis, damit OER entstehen und weiterentwickelt werden können, die sog. Open Educational Practices (OEP). Die Definition von (Cronin 2017, 4) gibt einen guten Einblick, um was es sich dabei handelt. OEP sind:

»collaborative practices that include the creation, use, and reuse of OER, as well as pedagogical practices employing participatory technologies and social networks for interaction, peer-learning, knowledge creation, and empowerment of learners« .

OEP sind also kollaborative Praktiken, die rund um OER stattfinden und den Prozess der OER-Erstellung und Bearbeitung von Anfang an mitbestimmen. Besonders wichtig sind dabei soziale Netzwerke und Communities. Diese können Lernende, Lehrende, Expert:innen oder Fächergruppen umfassen, die sich austauschen, OER weiterentwickeln und sich gegenseitig motivieren, neue Ansätze zu erproben.

Third Mission an Hochschulen: Über die Grenzen hinaus

Unter dem Schlagwort Third Mission, also der dritten Mission von Hochschule neben Forschung und Lehre, stehen die zentralen Fragen: Wie kann sich Hochschule für die Gesellschaft öffnen? Und wie lässt sich der Austausch zwischen Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit fördern? Hierbei tritt die Hochschule in wechselseitige Interaktion mit der Gesellschaft und ist offen für Erwartungen, Herausforderungen und Fragen, die an sie gerichtet werden. Im Sinne der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung gehört es auch zur Third Mission, Lernaktivitäten zu entwickeln, die Fähigkeiten und Kompetenzen in persönlicher, gesellschaftlicher oder beruflicher Perspektive erhöhen (vgl. Roessler 2015). Aus der Perspektive theologischer Hochschullehre lässt sich dieser Aspekt besonders fruchtbar mit OER und OEP verknüpfen und kann die Third Mission sogar weiterentwickeln. Denn Theologie lebt nicht nur vom reinen Wissenstransfer, sondern auch von der dialogischen Auseinandersetzung und der gemeinsamen Suche. Hierfür ist eine Kultur der Partizipation ein Gamechanger. Denn OER bietet mehr als nur den offenen Zugang zu Materialien. Es schafft Bewusstsein für Lizensierungen und ermöglicht eine Kultur des Teilens. So könnte zum Beispiel eine Vorlesung aus dem Theologiestudium nicht nur öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, sondern – im Sinne von OER – auch zur Weiterverarbeitung und Anpassung einladen. Damit hätten Kirchengemeinden, Bildungseinrichtungen oder interreligiöse Dialogkreise Zugang zu Materialien und könnten sie für ihren Kontext anpassen, mit ihrem Wissen, ihren Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisgewinnen weiterentwickeln und wiederum mit anderen teilen. Theologie ist in ihrem Kern auf Dialog auslegt, sei es mit anderen Disziplinen, Religionen oder der Gesellschaft. OER und OEP fördern diese Lehr- und Lernkultur, in der Menschen miteinander in Beziehung treten, Wissen teilen und sich gegenseitig inspirieren können. Dies entspricht nicht nur dem Kerngedanken der Third Mission, sondern auch der theologischen Grundhaltung, dass Erkenntnis vor allem im Dialog wächst.

Fürchtet euch nicht! Gehet hinaus und teilet!

Offene Bildungsressourcen bieten zwar viele Chancen, doch ihre Nutzung bringt auch Herausforderungen und gewisse Ängste mit sich. In Fachgesprächen und Interviews wird deutlich, dass die Idee von OER zwar sympathisch ist, aber auch Bedenken hervorruft. Das größte Hindernis sind rechtliche Unsicherheiten, insbesondere bei der Verwendung von Bildern, Musiksequenzen oder auch Texten Dritter. Die Klärung dieser Fragen ist oft zeitaufwendig und erfordert etwas Lust, sich reinzudenken. Es gibt auch Anlaufstellen, an die man sich bei konkreten Fragen wenden kann, z.B. bei OERInfo; Irights; Twillo oder ORCA.nrw. Bei eigenen Forschungsergebnissen oder selbst erstelltem Material, sind diese Bedenken hingegen weniger relevant. Zudem muss nicht sofort alles als OER veröffentlicht werden. Ein schrittweiser Einstieg mit einzelnen Elementen kann bereits einen Beitrag leisten. Je mehr offen lizenzierte Inhalte existieren, desto leichter wird es, rechtssichere OER zu erstellen. Ein weiteres häufig geäußertes Bedenken ist der potenzielle Missbrauch von offenem Material. Die Möglichkeit zur Bearbeitung oder Neuzusammenstellung birgt das Risiko von Verfremdungen oder Verfälschungen. Doch Erfahrung mit OER-Communities zeigen, dass die Inhalte meist verantwortungsvoll genutzt werden. Zudem kann eine vollständige Kontrolle über die Verwendung von Wissen nie gewährleistet werden. Dies gilt nicht nur für OER, sondern für alle öffentlichen Inhalte.

Theologie sollte nicht hinter verschlossenen Türen stattfinden, sondern im offenen Austausch mit der Gesellschaft. OER bieten die Chance, theologisches Wissen zugänglich zu machen und neu mit der Gesellschaft in Diskurs zu treten. Theologie-Treiben sollte kein einseitiger Prozess sein, sondern ein gemeinsames Lernen, Wagen und Gestalten. Dabei spielt auch der Gedanke der Freigiebigkeit eine Rolle: Bildung sollte geteilt, verbreitet und möglichst vielen Menschen zugänglich gemacht werden. OER können ein neuer Impuls sein, um Barrieren zu überwinden und theologische Erkenntnisse mit der Lebenswelt der Menschen zu verbinden.

@ 9f2b5b64:e811118f

test propose 123

@ 2c564b98:5c6444b0

Welcome to Nostr: A Decentralized Future

Nostr (Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays) is a simple, open protocol that enables global, decentralized, and censorship-resistant social media.

Why Nostr?

Traditional social media platforms have several problems:

1. Centralized Control - A single company controls your data
2. Censorship - Content can be removed at will
3. Data Lock-in - Hard to move your social graph

Nostr solves these problems through:

• Decentralization - No single point of control
• Cryptographic Signatures - You own your identity
• Relay Network - Multiple servers ensure availability

How It Works

javascript // Simple example of creating a Nostr event const event = { kind: 1, // Text note content: "Hello, Nostr!", tags: [], created_at: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) };

Getting Started

To start using Nostr:

1. Generate your keys (public/private keypair)
2. Choose a client (web, mobile, or desktop)
3. Connect to relays
4. Start publishing!

Long-Form Content on Nostr

This post itself is an example of long-form content on Nostr, using:

• NIP-23 standard for long-form content
• Markdown formatting for rich text
• Metadata for better organization

Join the Revolution

Nostr represents a fundamental shift in how we think about social media and online identity. By giving users control over their data and identity, it creates a more open and resilient internet.

---

This post was published using nostr-publisher - a simple tool for publishing long-form content to Nostr.

@ 04c3c1a5:a94cf83d

testest 123 456

789

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Layer 2: Statechains

Statechains are an original second layer protocol originally developed by Ruben Somsen in 2018, depending on the eltoo (or LN Symmetry) proposal. In 2021 a variation of the original proposal, Mercury, was built by CommerceBlock. In 2024, a further iteration of the original Mercury scheme was built, Mercury Layer. 

The Statechain protocol is a bit more complicated to discuss compared to other systems such as Ark or Lightning because of the range of variations that are possible between the original proposed design, the two that have been actually implemented, and other possible designs that have been loosely proposed. 

Like Ark, Statechains depend on a centralized coordinating server in order to function. Unlike Ark, they have a slightly different trust model than a vUTXO in an Ark batch. They depend on the coordinating server to delete previously generated shares of a private key in order to remain trustless, but as long as the server follows the defined protocol and does so, they provide a strong security guarantee. 

The general idea of a Statechain is to be able to transfer ownership of an entire UTXO between different users off-chain, facilitated by the coordinator. There is no requirement for receiving liquidity like Lightning, or the coordinator server to provide any liquidity like Ark. 

To begin, we will look at the original protocol proposed by Ruben Somsen. 

The Original Statechain

Statechains are effectively a pre-signed transaction allowing the current owner of the Statechain to unilaterally withdraw on-chain whenever they want, and a history signed messages cryptographically proving that past owners and the receivers they sent the Statechain to approved those transfers. 

The original design was built on eltoo using ANYPREVOUT, but the current plans on how to enable the same functionality make use of CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (a high level explanation of this is at the end of the CHECKSIGFROMSTACK article). The basic idea is a script enabling a pre-signed transaction to spend any UTXO that has that script and locks the appropriate amount of bitcoin, rather than being tied to spending a single specific UTXO. 

In the protocol, a user wishing to deposit their coins to a Statechain approaches a coordinator server and goes through a deposit protocol. The depositing user, Bob, generates a key that will be uniquely owned by him, but also a second “transitory” key that will eventually be shared (more on this soon). They then craft a deposit transaction locking their coin to a multisig requiring the coordinator’s key and the transitory key to sign. 

Using this multisig, Bob and the coordinator sign a transaction that spends that coin and creates a UTXO that can either be spent by any other transaction signed by the transitory key and the coordinator’s key using LN Symmetry, or Bob’s unique key after a timelock. Bob can now fund the multisig with the appropriate amount, and the Statechain has been created. 

To transfer a Statechain to Charlie, Bob must go through a multistep process. First, Bob signs a message with his unique private key that attests to the fact he is going to transfer the Statechain to Charlie. Charlie must also sign a message attesting to the fact that he has received the Statechain from Bob. Finally, the coordinator server must sign a new transaction allowing Charlie to unilaterally claim the Statechain on-chain before Bob sends Charlie a copy of the transitory key. 

All of this is made atomic using adapter signatures. These are signatures that are modified in such a way using a random piece of data that renders them invalid, but can be made valid again once the holder of the signature receives that piece of information. All of the messages, and the new pre-signed transaction are signed with adapter signatures, and atomically made valid at the same time through the release of the adapter data. 

Holders of a Statechain must trust that the coordinator server never conspires with a previous owner to sign an immediate closure of the Statechain and steal funds from the current owner, but the chain of pre-signed messages can prove that a coordinator has participated in theft if they were to do so. If a past owner attempts to use their pre-signed transaction to steal the funds, the timelock on the spend path using only their key allows the current owner to submit their pre-signed transaction and correctly claim the funds on chain. 

Mercury and Mercury Layer

The original Statechain architecture requires a softfork in order to function. CommerceBlock designed their variant of Statechains to function without a softfork, but in order to do so tradeoffs were made in terms of functionality. 

The basic idea is the same as the original design, all users hold a pre-signed transaction that allows them to claim their funds unilaterally, and the coordinator server still plays a role in facilitating off-chain transfers that requires them to be trusted to behave honestly. The two major differences are how those transactions are signed, and the structure of the pre-signed transaction users are given. 

Where the signing is concerned, there is no longer a transitory private key that is passed from user to user. Instead of this, a multiparty-computation protocol (MPC) is used so that the original owner and the coordinator server are able to collaboratively generate partial pieces of a private key without either of them ever possessing the full key. This key is used to sign the pre-signed transactions. The MPC protocol allows the current owner and coordinator to engage in a second protocol with a third party, the receiver of a transfer, to regenerate different pieces that add up to the same private key. In both the Mercury and Mercury Layer protocol, after completing a transfer an honest coordinator server deletes the key material corresponding to the previous owner. As long as this is done, it is no longer possible for the coordinator to sign a transaction with a previous owner, as the new piece of key material they have is not compatible with the piece any previous owner might still have. This is actually a stronger guarantee, as long as the coordinator is honest, than the original proposal.

The pre-signed transaction structure for Mercury and Mercury Layer can’t use LN Symmetry, as this is not possible without a softfork. In lieu of this, CommerceBlock opted to use decrementing timelocks. The original owner’s pre-signed transaction is timelocked using nLocktime to a time far out in the future from the point of the Statechain’s creation. As each subsequent user receives the Statechain during a transfer, the nLocktime value of their transaction is some pre-determined length of time shorter than the previous owner. This guarantees that a previous owner is incapable of even trying to submit their transaction on-chain before the current owner can, but it also means that eventually at some point the current owner must close their Statechain on-chain before previous owners’ transactions start becoming valid. 

The major difference between Mercury and Mercury Layer is how these transactions are signed. In the case of Mercury, the coordinator server simply sees the transaction proposed, verifies it, and then signs it. Mercury Layer uses a blind-signing protocol, meaning that they do not actually see any details of the transaction they are signing. This necessitates the server tracking Statechains using anonymized records on the server, and a special authorization key of the current owner so that they can be sure they are only signing valid transfers. 

Synergy With Other Layers

Statechains can synergize with other Layer 2s that are based on pre-signed transactions. For instance, part of the original proposal suggested a combination of Statechains and Lightning Channels. Because both are simply pre-signed transactions, it is possible to actually nest a Lightning channel on top of a Statechain. This simply requires the current owner’s unilateral exit key to be a multisig, and the creation of the pre-signed transactions spending that output into a Lightning channel. This allows Lightning channels to be opened and closed entirely off-chain. 

In a similar fashion, it is possible to nest a Statechain on top of a vUTXO in an Ark batch. This simply requires the pre-signed transactions necessary for a Statechain to be constructed, spending the vUTXO output. 

Wrapping Up

Statechains are not entirely trustless, but they are a very trust minimized scheme that is very liquidity efficient and allows freely transferring UTXOs off-chain between any users willing to accept the trust model of Statechains. 

While the original proposal has yet to be built, the two implementations designed by CommerceBlock have been completely implemented. Both failed to achieve anything more than marginal use in the real world. Whether this is due to users being unwilling to accept the trust model involved, or simply a failure in marketing or awareness is something that cannot be fully ascertained. 

Regardless, given that there are two full implementations and designs for a more flexible variation should LN Symmetry ever become possible on Bitcoin, this an option

@ 04c3c1a5:a94cf83d

testtest

123

@ 70c48e4b:00ce3ccb

Hello all :)

Something pretty exciting just happened in the world of decentralized tech.

A new social network project called Nostria successfully wrapped up its pre-seed funding round. It raised the funds through Angor, a crowdfunding platform built on Bitcoin and Nostr that aligns perfectly with the project’s decentralized mission.This post is all about what Nostria is doing, why it matters, and how Angor made it all possible.

What is Nostria?

nostr:npub16x7nxvehx0wvgy0sa6ynkw9c2ghuph3z0ll5t8veq3xwm8n9tqds6ka44x is a social network app that’s built to make the Nostr protocol easy to use. If you're not familiar with Nostr, it's an open protocol for decentralized social networking. It gives users more control and privacy, without relying on big platforms.

Nostria makes all that feel less like a tech experiment and more like a real social network. The app is simple, elegant, and beginner-friendly. It is available across iOS, Android, and web so you can jump in from anywhere.

Think of it as the easiest way to start using Nostr without needing to understand all the technical stuff under the hood.

https://www.nostria.app/assets/screenshots/nostria-01.jpg

The Problem Nostria is Solving:

One of the challenges Nostr faces right now is scaling. The network relies on relays to pass messages around, but many of these are centralized and getting overloaded. That creates serious bottlenecks and makes the whole experience less reliable. Just to give you an idea:

• Damus relay has around 646,000 users
• Nos relay has 601,000 users
• Snort sits at 417,000 users

When so many users depend on just a few relays, it puts a huge strain on the system and limits how far the network can grow.

Nostria’s Clever Fix

Nostria introduces a smarter way to scale Nostr without losing its decentralized core. Instead of relying on a few overloaded relays, it uses:

• Regionally deployed Discovery Relays – Think of these as local hubs placed in different parts of the world. When users connect, they are matched with a nearby relay, which keeps things faster and spreads the traffic out so no single relay gets overwhelmed.

• Pooled User Relays – Instead of each person depending on just one relay, users are connected through a shared pool. This means messages are sent and received more efficiently, especially when more people join the network.

All of this happens behind the scenes. The app keeps things simple and intuitive, with automation that handles the complexity for you. Whether you're posting, reading, or connecting with others, the experience stays smooth.

Nostria has bold ambitions. Here’s what they’re going for:

• A goal of 1 million daily active users
• Competing with platforms like Bluesky, Mastodon, and even X (formerly Twitter)
• A long-term plan to support both free and premium services to drive adoption

As of now, the Nostr network as a whole has:

• 15,000 daily active users
• 42.7 million total users
• 552 million total events

So the market is already there. It just needs the right tools to grow.

https://www.nostria.app/assets/screenshots/nostria-02.jpg

Meet the Team

Nostria is led by nostr:npub1zl3g38a6qypp6py2z07shggg45cu8qex992xpss7d8zrl28mu52s4cjajh, a software engineer with deep experience in distributed systems. He has been involved with the Nostr protocol since its early days in 2021 and is deeply passionate about decentralization and open-source tech.

https://www.nostria.app/assets/team/sondre.jpg

He’s joined by nostr:npub1e0krp2gr3l5nfd2jw2cydh68adxjpmcqdhs2e0jxkrqd4crwt4dslwrk0k, a thoughtful full-stack developer focused on simplicity and sovereignty, and nostr:npub10c4sn723akd7fqegfe6xntpq43p86vnyvv7j2ryaq8jzvhyea4pq72c5ul, a junior dev who’s already contributed to open source and is finishing up her studies.

https://www.nostria.app/assets/team/kosta.jpg https://www.nostria.app/assets/team/lu.jpg

The Funding Round

To bring Nostria to life, the team aimed to raise $30,000 during their pre-seed round. This funding would help them:

• Complete their MVP (Minimum Viable Product)
• Deploy global infrastructure
• Start building their user base
• Get ready for a full Seed round in late 2025

How Angor Helped?

Angor is a decentralized crowdfunding platform built on Bitcoin and the Nostr protocol. It’s designed exactly for projects like this. The team at Nostria launched their campaign on Angor between May 12 and May 31, and it was a success.

What made the campaign stand out?

1. The whole process was decentralized and transparent.
2. Backers could fund the project directly, without intermediaries.
3. Nostria aligned perfectly with Angor’s vision of empowering projects that push decentralization forward.

The campaign served as both a fundraiser and a real-world example of how decentralized infrastructure can power decentralized ideas. And it worked.

Inside the Funding Terms

As part of this funding round, Nostria offered contributors a post-money SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity). This is a modern, flexible way for startups to raise money early without the complexity of traditional equity rounds.

In simple terms:

•Investors contributed funds now, and in return, they will receive equity in Nostria during a future priced equity round. When Nostria raises its next round, most likely a Seed round, then those SAFE contributions will convert into actual shares.

•The SAFE includes a valuation cap, which sets a maximum company valuation for conversion. This guarantees that early backers receive shares at a better rate than future investors. While the exact cap isn't publicly listed, this feature ensures early supporters are rewarded for their trust.

•There is no interest or maturity date, which is a major benefit over traditional convertible notes. There’s no ticking clock or repayment obligation. Investors simply wait until the next funding event.

•The SAFE also features a Most Favored Nation (MFN) clause. This ensures that if the company issues another SAFE later with better terms, early investors will automatically receive the same improved terms. It’s designed to keep things transparent and equitable.

•Jurisdiction and legal terms: While the full legal text isn’t included in the note, SAFEs typically specify the legal jurisdiction governing the agreement. Nostria’s approach suggests a commitment to following standard legal frameworks, further underlining their seriousness and professionalism.

You can read Nostria’s public SAFE summary here: nostr:npub16x7nxvehx0wvgy0sa6ynkw9c2ghuph3z0ll5t8veq3xwm8n9tqds6ka44x

And you can view the full campaign hosted on Angor here: https://hub.angor.io/project/angor1qwdgxjuzhjykgpn5q8p3l2q9vyrgqdlrkfp5sjr

By sharing these details openly, the team added a strong layer of transparency and trust to the entire campaign. It is a clear signal that they are building something serious and thoughtful, with long-term commitment and care instead of shortcuts.

What’s Next?

With the funding secured, Nostria is sprinting ahead. The roadmap includes:

• June: Deploying media and relay servers
• July: Adding premium features and full cross-platform support
• August: Growing the user base and preparing for the next funding round

If all goes well, Nostria is on track to become one of the most accessible and user-friendly Nostr based platforms out there. With a clear roadmap and a team focused on long-term decentralization, the journey is just getting started...

Got an idea of your own? You can launch your project on Angor, just like Nostria did, and start your own funding round with the support of a like-minded community.

Thanks for reading. See y’all next week with another story from the world of open, decentralized innovation. Ciao

@ 04c3c1a5:a94cf83d

testtesttest

@ 39cc53c9:27168656

Read the original blog post

Know Your Customer is a regulation that requires companies of all sizes to verify the identity, suitability, and risks involved with maintaining a business relationship with a customer. Such procedures fit within the broader scope of anti-money laundering (AML) and counterterrorism financing (CTF) regulations.

Banks, exchanges, online business, mail providers, domain registrars... Everyone wants to know who you are before you can even opt for their service. Your personal information is flowing around the internet in the hands of "god-knows-who" and secured by "trust-me-bro military-grade encryption". Once your account is linked to your personal (and verified) identity, tracking you is just as easy as keeping logs on all these platforms.

Rights for Illusions

KYC processes aim to combat terrorist financing, money laundering, and other illicit activities. On the surface, KYC seems like a commendable initiative. I mean, who wouldn't want to halt terrorists and criminals in their tracks?

The logic behind KYC is: "If we mandate every financial service provider to identify their users, it becomes easier to pinpoint and apprehend the malicious actors."

However, terrorists and criminals are not precisely lining up to be identified. They're crafty. They may adopt false identities or find alternative strategies to continue their operations. Far from being outwitted, many times they're several steps ahead of regulations. Realistically, KYC might deter a small fraction – let's say about 1% ^1 – of these malefactors. Yet, the cost? All of us are saddled with the inconvenient process of identification just to use a service.

Under the rhetoric of "ensuring our safety", governments and institutions enact regulations that seem more out of a dystopian novel, gradually taking away our right to privacy.

To illustrate, consider a city where the mayor has rolled out facial recognition cameras in every nook and cranny. A band of criminals, intent on robbing a local store, rolls in with a stolen car, their faces obscured by masks and their bodies cloaked in all-black clothes. Once they've committed the crime and exited the city's boundaries, they switch vehicles and clothes out of the cameras' watchful eyes. The high-tech surveillance? It didn’t manage to identify or trace them. Yet, for every law-abiding citizen who merely wants to drive through the city or do some shopping, their movements and identities are constantly logged. The irony? This invasive tracking impacts all of us, just to catch the 1% ^1 of less-than-careful criminals.

KYC? Not you.

KYC creates barriers to participation in normal economic activity, to supposedly stop criminals. ^2

KYC puts barriers between many users and businesses. One of these comes from the fact that the process often requires multiple forms of identification, proof of address, and sometimes even financial records. For individuals in areas with poor record-keeping, non-recognized legal documents, or those who are unbanked, homeless or transient, obtaining these documents can be challenging, if not impossible.

For people who are not skilled with technology or just don't have access to it, there's also a barrier since KYC procedures are mostly online, leaving them inadvertently excluded.

Another barrier goes for the casual or one-time user, where they might not see the value in undergoing a rigorous KYC process, and these requirements can deter them from using the service altogether.

It also wipes some businesses out of the equation, since for smaller businesses, the costs associated with complying with KYC norms—from the actual process of gathering and submitting documents to potential delays in operations—can be prohibitive in economical and/or technical terms.

You're not welcome

Imagine a swanky new club in town with a strict "members only" sign. You hear the music, you see the lights, and you want in. You step up, ready to join, but suddenly there's a long list of criteria you must meet. After some time, you are finally checking all the boxes. But then the club rejects your membership with no clear reason why. You just weren't accepted. Frustrating, right?

This club scenario isn't too different from the fact that KYC is being used by many businesses as a convenient gatekeeping tool. A perfect excuse based on a "legal" procedure they are obliged to.

Even some exchanges may randomly use this to freeze and block funds from users, claiming these were "flagged" by a cryptic system that inspects the transactions. You are left hostage to their arbitrary decision to let you successfully pass the KYC procedure. If you choose to sidestep their invasive process, they might just hold onto your funds indefinitely.

Your identity has been stolen

KYC data has been found to be for sale on many dark net markets^3. Exchanges may have leaks or hacks, and such leaks contain very sensitive data. We're talking about the full monty: passport or ID scans, proof of address, and even those awkward selfies where you're holding up your ID next to your face. All this data is being left to the mercy of the (mostly) "trust-me-bro" security systems of such companies. Quite scary, isn't it?

As cheap as $10 for 100 documents, with discounts applying for those who buy in bulk, the personal identities of innocent users who passed KYC procedures are for sale. ^3

In short, if you have ever passed the KYC/AML process of a crypto exchange, your privacy is at risk of being compromised, or it might even have already been compromised.

(they) Know Your Coins

You may already know that Bitcoin and most cryptocurrencies have a transparent public blockchain, meaning that all data is shown unencrypted for everyone to see and recorded forever. If you link an address you own to your identity through KYC, for example, by sending an amount from a KYC exchange to it, your Bitcoin is no longer pseudonymous and can then be traced.

If, for instance, you send Bitcoin from such an identified address to another KYC'ed address (say, from a friend), everyone having access to that address-identity link information (exchanges, governments, hackers, etc.) will be able to associate that transaction and know who you are transacting with.

Conclusions

To sum up, KYC does not protect individuals; rather, it's a threat to our privacy, freedom, security and integrity. Sensible information flowing through the internet is thrown into chaos by dubious security measures. It puts borders between many potential customers and businesses, and it helps governments and companies track innocent users. That's the chaos KYC has stirred.

The criminals are using stolen identities from companies that gathered them thanks to these very same regulations that were supposed to combat them. Criminals always know how to circumvent such regulations. In the end, normal people are the most affected by these policies.

The threat that KYC poses to individuals in terms of privacy, security and freedom is not to be neglected. And if we don’t start challenging these systems and questioning their efficacy, we are just one step closer to the dystopian future that is now foreseeable.

Edited 20/03/2024 * Add reference to the 1% statement on Rights for Illusions section to an article where Chainalysis found that only 0.34% of the transaction volume with cryptocurrencies in 2023 was attributable to criminal activity ^1

@ 5d085290:0edc3292

The brand new 2025 Nissan Xterra is making waves in the UAE automotive market with its rugged design, advanced features, and improved fuel efficiency. Whether you’re navigating city streets or tackling off-road trails, fuel economy is a critical factor for SUV buyers — and this model delivers. According to recent updates, the Nissan Xterra 2025 release date is expected later this year, bringing with it a balance of power and practicality. Drivers across the UAE can expect mileage figures that compete with the best in its class, and you can explore full regional insights in the 2025 Nissan Xterra mileage in UAE guide. The SUV is estimated to deliver between 12–16 km/l depending on road conditions, which is a solid figure for a full-size adventure-ready vehicle. Compared to the previous model, efficiency has been boosted with smarter engine tuning — read more in the Nissan Xterra 2024 vs 2025 comparison. Designed for UAE conditions, it includes fuel-saving features like eco-driving modes and advanced gear ratios. This makes the 2025 Xterra not just a capable off-roader, but also a smart choice for daily commutes. Visit icartea.com for detailed specs, booking details, and the latest updates on Nissan’s newest SUV launch.

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

The 30,000-Foot View of the Oslo Freedom Forum

As I step onto the plane leaving Gardermoen Airport in Oslo, Norway, the weight and warmth of the past week settles into my chest.

The Oslo Freedom Forum is not a conference. It’s not a summit. It’s something harder to name and even harder to describe — a convergence of courage, truth and defiance that burns through the noise of the modern world and gives you no choice but to listen, feel and act.

For the second time, I leave this city more convinced than ever that something unstoppable is rising. That amid the censorship, surveillance and state repression spreading across the globe, there is a countervailing force rooted in humanity, accelerated by technology and led by those who’ve already paid the price for speaking out.

The Forum doesn’t trade in empty optimism. It delivers a different kind of hope, forged from lived experience and stitched together by people who have been in the dark and still choose to see the light. A hope borne from the stories of individuals who have lived through the worst an authoritarian regime can do and still choose to fight for the freedom of others. The experiences shared were hard. At times, devastating. But they weren’t offered for pity. They were calls to action.

Just days after she was abducted, blindfolded, tortured, and sexually assaulted in a Tanzanian prison cell, Agather Atuhaire stood in front of a crowd of strangers and told her story.

Her voice did not tremble.

The Ugandan journalist and lawyer had traveled to Tanzania in solidarity with fellow East African dissidents, only to be disappeared in a black van alongside Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi.

And yet, against all odds, she came back. Not just to her home in Uganda, but also to the stage in Oslo, where she spoke calmly and clearly about what it means to tell the truth under a dictatorship.

Her presentation, “The Digital Free Speech Crackdown in Uganda,” laid bare the authoritarian playbook: social media blackouts, propaganda campaigns, surveillance of journalists and the slow financial asphyxiation of independent media. When the government doesn’t like a story, it simply blocks the platform or website. When a journalist digs too deep, they disappear for a while. Or forever. Atuhaire painted a picture many struggle to even imagine.

And yet, after everything, she didn’t just recount these struggles. She looked out at the crowd and thanked the open source builders and contributors who write code and create tools that make it possible for activists like her to speak, move money and organize under regimes that want them silenced, or worse.

(Ugandan journalist and lawyer, Agather Atuhaire, speaks during the Freedom Tech track at the 2025 Oslo Freedom Forum.)

From Iran, independent Bitcoin educator Ziya Sadr reminded us that financial privacy is not a luxury but a necessary lifeline for those facing the financial repression by oppressive rulers. Sadr’s detainment during the 2022 Women, Life, Freedom movement following the murder of Mahsa Amini by the Iranian regime is a testament to that. Without financial privacy, activists’ actions, connections and finances are exposed to a regime equipped with widespread financial controls and a sophisticated, restrictive internet firewall that rivals even China’s.

The result is one of the most repressive digital environments in the world. And if that wasn’t enough, the Iranian rial currency has lost more than 80% of its value in just a few years.

Against this backdrop, Iranians are using bitcoin as undebasable savings, and to buy digital services like VPNs in order to access the open internet. But even that act, just reaching the outside world, requires a level of privacy most of us take for granted.

In his presentation, “Securing Lifelines: The Bitcoin Privacy Imperative,” Sadr shared that many Iranians turn to Bitcoin Coinjoins, a privacy technique that breaks the link between Bitcoin transaction inputs. Coinjoins preserve user transaction privacy and, more importantly, shield Iranians from the surveillance and retaliation of a regime who punishes anyone trying to access information beyond its tightly controlled digital spaces. The use of Coinjoins is becoming more difficult as global legal pressure mounts against open source developers, and in the aftermath of the Samourai developer arrests, privacy protocols like Whirlpool are unworkable.

Today, Sadr is learning more about additional Bitcoin privacy tools, including Payjoin, a privacy method that allows two users to contribute an input to a Bitcoin transaction. Payjoin breaks common chain analysis heuristics and conceals the sender and receiver of a transaction as well as the payment amount. Then there is ecash, a form of digital cash backed by Bitcoin that enables very private, everyday payments with the custodial trade-off of trusting mints (entities that issue and redeem ecash tokens) to store user funds.

The continued development of these protocols is crucial for Iranians, who live under a government that not only tracks and surveils digital behavior, but also imposes automatic fines on women for violating hijab rules and manipulates currency exchange rates to profit off citizens’ savings. For millions in Iran, bitcoin offers a last line of defense against a collapsing currency, intrusive surveillance and total financial repression.

(Independent Iranian Bitcoin educator, Ziya Sadr, speaks during the Freedom Tech track at the Oslo Freedom Forum.)

Venezuelan opposition leader Leopoldo López took the stage at the 2025 Oslo Freedom Forum not as a politician, but as a witness to what happens when a state turns its institutions into further tendrils of its repression machine.

After Nicolás Maduro stole Venezuela’s 2024 elections, López watched thousands of his fellow people — activists, students, journalists, opposition members and lawyers — get arrested, disappeared or forced into exile. The regime blocked access to social media, revoked passports, criminalized dissent and used the financial system as a means of controlling the population.

Amid this digital repression and Venezuela’s 162% inflation rate, López sees bitcoin (decentralized money) and Nostr (decentralized social media) as lifelines. When dictators shut down the internet or freeze your bank account, alternatives that are open source, decentralized, uncensorable and accessible become more important than ever for the survival of democracy and freedom.

**“Decentralized resistance is the convergence of people, Bitcoin, Nostr, and AI.

People, it’s about the center and the end of what we are doing.

Brave women and men who sacrifice their freedom, who take risks, who are willing to fight for other people.

If it’s not about people, technology wouldn’t be something worth fighting for.

Bitcoin is freedom money. It’s decentralized, nobody controls it, nobody can stop it, it can move around without borders.”**

(Venezuelan Opposition Leader Leopoldo López during the Freedom Tech track at the 2025 Oslo Freedom Forum.)

For decades, Paraguay’s greatest natural resource, hydroelectric power, has flowed out of the country through international contracts, fueling development in neighboring countries like Brazil and Argentina while one in four Paraguayans remained trapped in poverty. Paraguay’s Itaipu Dam, one of the largest in the world, has long symbolized this paradox: a river of energy diverted away from the very people who need it most.

Björn Schmidtke and Delia Garcete of Penguin Group are flipping that script.

In a landmark move, they secured Paraguay’s first 100-megawatt power purchase agreement, marking the beginning of a bold experiment to reclaim that energy for the people of Paraguay. Instead of selling it off to foreign powers, they use it to mine Bitcoin — and the proc

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

People forget Bear Stearns failed March 2008 - months of denial followed before the public realized how bad the situation was under the surface.

Similar happening now but much larger scale. They did not fix fundamental issues after 2008 - everything is more fragile.

The Fed preemptively bailed out every bank with their BTFP program and First Republic Bank still failed. The second largest bank failure in history.

There will be more failures. There will be more bailouts. Depositors will be "protected" by socializing losses across everyone.

Our President and mainstream financial pundits are currently pretending the banking crisis is over while most banks remain insolvent. There are going to be many more bank failures as this ponzi system unravels.

Unlike 2008, we have the ability to opt out of these broken and corrupt institutions by using bitcoin. Bitcoin held in self custody is unique in its lack of counterparty risk - you do not have to trust a bank or other centralized entity to hold it for you. Bitcoin is also incredibly difficult to change by design since it is not controlled by an individual, company, or government - the supply of dollars will inevitably be inflated to bailout these failing banks but bitcoin supply will remain unchanged. I do not need to convince you that bitcoin provides value - these next few years will convince millions.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Bank run on every crypto bank then bank run on every "real" bank.

— ODELL (@ODELL) December 14, 2022

The four main banks of bitcoin and “crypto” are Signature, Prime Trust, Silvergate, and Silicon Valley Bank. Prime Trust does not custody funds themselves but rather maintains deposit accounts at BMO Harris Bank, Cross River, Lexicon Bank, MVB Bank, and Signature Bank. Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank have already stopped withdrawals. More banks will go down before the chaos stops. None of them have sufficient reserves to meet withdrawals.

Bitcoin gives us all the ability to opt out of a system that has massive layers of counterparty risk built in, years of cheap money and broken incentives have layered risk on top of risk throughout the entire global economy. If you thought the FTX bank run was painful to watch, I have bad news for you: every major bank in the world is fractional reserve. Bitcoin held in self custody is unique in its lack of counterparty risk, as global market chaos unwinds this will become much more obvious.

The rules of bitcoin are extremely hard to change by design. Anyone can access the network directly without a trusted third party by using their own node. Owning more bitcoin does not give you more control over the network with all participants on equal footing.

Bitcoin is:
- money that is not controlled by a company or government
- money that can be spent or saved without permission
- money that is provably scarce and should increase in purchasing power with adoption

Bitcoin is money without trust. Whether you are a nation state, corporation, or an individual, you can use bitcoin to spend or save without permission. Social media will accelerate the already deteriorating trust in our institutions and as this trust continues to crumble the value of trust minimized money will become obvious. As adoption increases so should the purchasing power of bitcoin.

A quick note on "stablecoins," such as USDC - it is important to remember that they rely on trusted custodians. They have the same risk as funds held directly in bank accounts with additional counterparty risk on top. The trusted custodians can be pressured by gov, exit scam, or caught up in fraud. Funds can and will be frozen at will. This is a distinctly different trust model than bitcoin, which is a native bearer token that does not rely on any centralized entity or custodian.

Most bitcoin exchanges have exposure to these failing banks. Expect more chaos and confusion as this all unwinds. Withdraw any bitcoin to your own wallet ASAP.

Simple Self Custody Guide: https://werunbtc.com/muun
More Secure Cold Storage Guide: https://werunbtc.com/coldcard

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ bf47c19e:c3d2573b

27.08.2014

Originalni tekst na fee.org / Autor: Džefri A. Taker

---

Oni koji se koriste delom Mizesa da bi osporili Bitkoin trebalo bi ponovo da razmisle.

Mnogi ljudi koji nikada nisu koristili Bitkoin posmatraju ga sa zbunjenošću. Zašto ovaj magični internet novac uopšte ima bilo kakvu vrednost? To je samo nekakva kompjuterska stvar koju je neko izmislio.

Uzmite u obzir kritike zlatoljubaca, koji su decenijama gurali ideju da čvrst novac mora biti podržan nečim stvarnim, čvrstim i vrednim samim po sebi.

Bitkoin ne ispunjava te uslove, zar ne?

Možda ipak ispunjava. Pogledajmo detaljnije.

Bitkoin se prvi put pojavio pre skoro šest godina kao mogući konkurent nacionalnom novcu kojim upravlja država. Beli papir Satošija Nakamota objavljen je 31. oktobra 2008. godine. Struktura i jezik ovog rada poslali su poruku: Ova valuta je za kompjuterske tehničare, a ne za ekonomiste niti za političke komentatore. Domet ovog rada je bio ograničen; početnici koji su ga čitali bili su zbunjeni.

Ali nedostatak interesovanja nije sprečio istoriju da ide napred. Dva meseca kasnije, oni koji su obraćali pažnju videli su pojavu Genesis bloka, prve grupe Bitkoina generisanih putem Nakamotovog koncepta distribuirane knjige (distributed ledger) koja je postojala na bilo kom kompjuterskom čvoru na svetu koji je želeo da je hostuje.

Ovde smo šest godina kasnije, a jedan Bitkoin vredi 500 američkih dolara, dok je njegova najviša vrednost bila 1.200 dolara po novčiću. Ovu valutu prihvata na hiljade institucija, kako onlajn, tako i oflajn. Njen platni sistem je veoma popularan u siromašnim zemljama koje nemaju razvijenu bankarsku infrastrukturu, ali i u razvijenim zemljama. Velike institucije – uključujući Federalne rezerve, OECD, Svetsku banku i velike investicione kuće – posvećuju mu pažnju sa dužnim poštovanjem.

Entuzijasti, koji se nalaze u svakoj zemlji, kažu da će njegova tržišna vrednost u budućnosti rasti jer je njegova ponuda strogo ograničena i pruža sistem koji je znatno superiorniji od državnog novca. Bitkoin se prenosi između pojedinaca bez posrednika. Razmena je gotovo besplatna. Ima predvidivu ponudu. Trajan je, zamenljiv i deljiv: sve su to ključne karakteristike novca. Stvara monetarni sistem koji ne zavisi od poverenja i identiteta, a mnogo manje od centralnih banaka i države. To je novi sistem za digitalno doba.

Teške pouke o čvrstom novcu

Onima koji su obrazovani u tradiciji 'čvrstog novca', cela ideja je predstavljala ozbiljan izazov. Govoreći o sebi, čitao sam o Bitkoinu dve godine pre nego što sam makar približno uspeo da ga razumem. Jednostavno, nešto u celoj toj ideji mi je smetalo. Ne možete stvoriti novac ni iz čega, a kamoli iz kompjuterskog koda. Zašto onda ima vrednost? Mora da nešto nije kako treba. Nismo očekivali da će se novac tako reformisati.

Tu je i problem: naša očekivanja. Trebalo je da posvetimo više pažnje teoriji porekla novca Ludviga fon Mizesa — ne onome što mislimo da je on napisao, već onome što je on zaista napisao.

Godine 1912. Mizes je objavio delo "Teorija novca i kredita". Kada je objavljeno na nemačkom, postiglo je ogroman uspeh u Evropi i prevedeno je na engleski jezik. Iako je obuhvatilo svaki aspekt novca, njegov ključni doprinos bio je u praćenju vrednosti i cene novca — i ne samo novca — sve do njegovog porekla. To jest, objasnio je kako novac formira svoju cenu u smislu dobara i usluga koje se njime mogu nabaviti. Kasnije je ovaj proces nazvao "teoremom regresije novca" i ispostavilo se da Bitkoin zadovoljava sve uslove te teoreme.

Mizesov učitelj, Karl Menger, demonstrirao je da sam novac potiče sa tržišta – a ne od države i ne od društvenog ugovora. On se postepeno pojavljuje dok monetarni preduzetnici traže idealan oblik robe za indirektnu razmenu. Umesto da neposredno vrše trampu, ljudi pribavljaju neko dobro ne da bi ga konzumirali, već da bi ga razmenili. To dobro postaje novac, najtržišnije dobro.

Ali Mizes je dodao da se vrednost novca prati unazad kroz vreme sve do njegove vrednosti kao robe koja je služila za trampu. Mizes je smatrao da je to jedini način na koji novac može imati vrednost.

"Teorija vrednosti novca kao takvog može pratiti objektivnu tržišnu vrednost novca kroz vreme samo do tačke kada njegova vrednost prestaje da bude vrednost kao novca i postaje isključivo vrednost kao robe... Ako se na ovaj način neprestano vraćamo sve dalje unazad, na kraju moramo doći do tačke gde više ne nalazimo nijednu komponentu u objektivnoj tržišnoj vrednosti novca koja proističe iz vrednovanja zasnovanih na funkciji novca kao opšteg sredstva razmene; gde vrednost novca nije ništa drugo do vrednost predmeta koji je koristan na neki drugi način osim kao novac... Pre nego što je postalo uobičajeno nabavljati robu na tržištu, ne za ličnu potrošnju, već jednostavno radi ponovne razmene za robu za kojom zaista postoji potreba, svakoj pojedinačnoj robi pripisivana je samo ona vrednost data subjektivnim vrednovanjem zasnovanom na njenoj direktnoj korisnosti."

Mizesovo objašnjenje rešilo je veliki problem koji je dugo zbunjivao ekonomiste. Radi se o nagađajućem istorijskom narativu, a ipak ima savršenog smisla. Da li bi so postala novac da je inače bila potpuno beskorisna? Da li bi dabrovo krzno dobilo monetarnu vrednost da nije bilo korisno kao odeća? Da li bi srebro ili zlato imali novčanu vrednost da isprva nisu imali vrednost kao roba? Odgovor u svim slučajevima monetarne istorije je jasno ne. Početna vrednost novca, pre nego što postane široko razmenjivano kao novac, potiče iz njegove direktne korisnosti. To je objašnjenje koje je demonstrirano kroz istorijsku rekonstrukciju. To je Mizesova teorema regresije novca.

Upotrebna vrednost Bitkoina

Na prvi pogled, Bitkoin deluje kao izuzetak. Ne možete koristiti Bitkoin ni za šta drugo osim kao novac. Ne može se nositi kao nakit. Ne možete od njega napraviti mašinu. Ne možete ga jesti, pa čak ni koristiti ga kao dekoraciju. Njegova vrednost se ostvaruje samo kao jedinica koja olakšava indirektnu razmenu. Pa ipak, Bitkoin je već novac. Koristi se svakodnevno. Razmene možete videti u realnom vremenu. To nije mit. Ta stvar je stvarna.

Može izgledati kao da smo prinuđeni da biramo. Da li je Mizes pogrešio? Možda moramo odbaciti celu njegovu teoriju. Ili je možda njegova poenta bila isključivo istorijska i nije primenjiva na budućnost digitalnog doba. Ili je možda njegova teorema regresije dokaz da je Bitkoin samo prazna manija bez snage da potraje jer se ne može svesti na svoju vrednost kao korisna roba.

Pa ipak, ne morate se pozivati na komplikovane monetarne teorije da biste razumeli osećaj uzbune koji okružuje Bitkoin. Mnogi ljudi, kao i ja, jednostavno osećaju nelagodu u vezi sa novcem koji nema nikakvu fizičku osnovu. Naravno, možete odštampati Bitkoin na komadu papira, ali posedovanje papira sa QR kodom ili javnim ključem nije dovoljno da ublaži taj osećaj nelagode.

Kako da rešimo ovaj problem? U svojoj glavi, zabavljao sam se ovim pitanjem više od godinu dana. Zbunjivalo me je. Pitao sam se da li je Mizesovo shvatanje primenjivo samo u preddigitalnom dobu. Pratio sam onlajn spekulacije da bi vrednost Bitkoina bila nula, da nema nacionalnih valuta u koje se konvertuje. Možda je potražnja za Bitkoinom prevazišla zahteve Mizesovog scenarija zbog očajničke potrebe za nečim drugačijim od dolara.

Vreme je prolazilo — i čitajući radove Konrada Grafa, Petera Šurde i Danijela Kraviša — rešenje je konačno samo stiglo. Preći ću odmah na stvar i otkriti ga: Bitkoin je i sistem plaćanja i novac. Sistem plaćanja je izvor vrednosti, dok obračunska jedinica samo izražava tu vrednost u smislu cene. Jedinstvo novca i plaćanja je njegova najneobičnija karakteristika i ona koju je većina komentatora imala poteškoća da shvati.

Navikli smo da razmišljamo o valuti kao o nečemu što je odvojeno od sistema plaćanja. Ovo razmišljanje je odraz istorijskih tehnoloških ograničenja. Postoji dolar i postoje kreditne kartice. Postoji evro i postoji PayPal. Postoji jen i postoje servisi za prenos novca. U svim ovim slučajevima, transfer novca se oslanja na pružaoce usluga koji predstavljaju treću stranu. Da biste ih koristili, potrebno je da uspostavite ono što se naziva „odnos poverenja“ (trust relationship) sa njima, što znači da institucija koja dogovara posao mora da vam veruje da ćete platiti.

Ovaj jaz između novca i plaćanja uvek je bio prisutan, osim u slučaju fizičke blizine. Ako ti dam dolar za parče pice, nema treće strane. Ali sistemi plaćanja, treće strane i odnosi poverenja postaju neophodni kada napustite geografsku blizinu. Tada kompanije poput Vise i institucije poput banaka postaju nezaobilazne. One su ta aplikacija koja omogućava monetarnom softveru da radi ono što želite.

Problem je u tome što sistemi plaćanja koje danas imamo nisu dostupni svakome. Zapravo, ogromna većina čovečanstva nema pristup takvim alatima, što je glavni razlog siromaštva u svetu. Oni koji su finansijski obespravljeni su ograničeni samo na lokalnu trgovinu i ne mogu proširiti svoje trgovinske odnose sa svetom.

Vodeći, ako ne i primarni, cilj nastanka Bitkoina bio je rešavanje ovog problema. Protokol je postavio sebi zadatak da poveže funkciju valute sa sistemom plaćanja. Te dve stvari su potpuno međusobno povezane u samoj strukturi koda. Ova veza je ono što čini Bitkoin drugačijim od bilo koje postojeće nacionalne valute i, zaista, bilo koje valute u istoriji.

Neka nam se sam Nakamoto obrati iz uvodnog sažetka svog belog papira. Zapazite koliko je platni sistem ključan za monetarni sistem koji je stvorio:

"Potpuna peer-to-peer verzija elektronskog novca omogućila bi slanje uplata putem interneta direktno od jedne strane ka drugoj bez posredovanja finansijskih institucija. Digitalni potpisi pružaju deo rešenja, ali se glavni benefiti gube ako je i dalje potrebna pouzdana treća strana za sprečavanje dvostruke potrošnje. Predlažemo rešenje problema dvostruke potrošnje korišćenjem peer-to-peer mreže. Mreža vremenski označava transakcije tako što ih hešuje u tekući lanac dokaza o radu (proof of work) temeljen na hešu, formirajući zapis koji se ne može promeniti bez ponovnog rada i objavljivanja dokaza o tom radu. Najduži lanac ne služi samo kao dokaz niza događaja, nego i kao dokaz da je taj niz događaja potvrđen od strane dela peer-to-peer mreže koja poseduju najveću zbirnu procesorsku snagu (CPU). Sve dok većinu procesorske snage kontrolišu čvorovi (nodes) koji ne sarađuju u napadu na mrežu, oni će generisati najduži lanac i nadmašiti napadače. Sama mreža zahteva minimalnu strukturu. Poruke kroz mrežu se prenose uz pretpostavku da svaki čvor čini maksimalan napor da poruku prenese u svom izvornom obliku i na optimalan način, a čvorovi mogu napustiti mrežu i ponovo joj se pridružiti po želji, prihvatajući najduži lanac dokaza o radu kao dokaz onoga što se dogodilo dok ih nije bilo."

Ono što je veoma upečatljivo u ovom paragrafu je da se uopšte ne spominje sama valuta. Spominje se samo problem dvostruke potrošnje (odnosno, problem inflatornog stvaranja novca). Inovacija ovde je, čak i prema rečima njenog pronalazača, platna mreža, a ne novčić. Novčić ili digitalna jedinica samo izražava vrednost mreže. To je računovodstveni alat koji apsorbuje i prenosi vrednost mreže kroz vreme i prostor.

Ova mreža se naziva blokčejn. To je knjiga transakcija koja živi u digitalnom oblaku, distribuirana mreža i njeno funkcionisanje može posmatrati svako u bilo koje vreme. Pažljivo je nadgledaju svi korisnici. Omogućava prenos sigurnih i neponovljivih bitova informacija od jedne osobe do bilo koje druge osobe bilo gde u svetu, a ovi informacioni bitovi su zaštićeni digitalnim oblikom vlasništva. Ovo je ono što je Nakamoto nazvao „digitalnim potpisima“. Njegov izum knjige transakcija koja se nalazi na oblaku omogućava proveru vlasničkih prava bez oslanjanja na agenciju koja vrši ulogu treće strane od poverenja.

Blokčejn je rešio ono što je postalo poznato kao "problem vizantijskih generala". To je problem koordinacije akcija na velikom geografskom području u prisustvu potencijalno zlonamernih aktera. Budući da se generali razdvojeni prostorom moraju oslanjati na glasnike i to oslanjanje zahteva vreme i poverenje, nijedan general ne može biti apsolutno siguran da je drugi general primio i potvrdio poruku, a kamoli njenu tačnost.

Postavljanje knjige transakcija, kojoj svi imaju pristup, na Internet rešava ovaj problem. Knjiga transakcija beleži iznose, vremena i javne adrese svake transakcije. Informacije se dele širom sveta i stalno se ažuriraju. Knjiga transakcija garantuje integritet sistema i omogućava da valutna jedinica postane digitalni oblik imovine sa vlasništvom.

Kada ovo shvatite, možete videti da je suština vrednosti Bitkoin povezana sa njegovom integrisanom platnom mrežom. Ovde se pronalazi upotrebna vrednost na koju se Mizes poziva. Ona nije ugrađena u samu valutnu jedinicu, već u briljantan i inovativan platni sistem na kojem Bitkoin živi. Kada bi bilo moguće da se blokčejn nekako odvoji od Bitkoina (a to zaista nije moguće), vrednost valute bi odmah pala na nulu.

Dokaz koncepta

Da biste dalje razumeli kako se Mizesova teorija uklapa u Bitkoin, morate razumeti još jednu stvar u vezi sa istorijom kriptovalute. Na dan pokretanja (9. januar 2009.), vrednost Bitkoina bila je tačno nula. I tako je ostalo 10 meseci nakon pokretanja. Sve to vreme su se transakcije odvijale, ali tokom celog tog perioda vrednost nije bila iznad nule.

Prva objavljena cena Bitkoina pojavila se 5. oktobra 2009. Na ovoj menjačnici, 1 dolar je iznosio 1.309,03 Bitkoina (što su mnogi tada smatrali precenjenim). Drugim rečima, prva procena vrednosti Bitkoina bila je nešto više od jedne desetine penija. Da, da ste kupili Bitkoin u vrednosti od 100 dolara u to vreme i niste ih panično prodali, danas biste bili „polu-milijarder“.

Dakle, postavlja se pitanje: Šta se dogodilo između 9. januara i 5. oktobra 2009. godine, što je dovelo do toga da Bitkoin dobije tržišnu vrednost? Odgovor je da su trgovci, entuzijasti, preduzetnici i drugi isprobavali blokčejn. Želeli su da znaju da li funkcioniše. Da li je prenosio jedinice bez dvostruke potrošnje? Da li je sistem koji se oslanjao na dobrovoljnu računarsku snagu zaista bio dovoljan za verifikaciju i potvrđivanje transakcija? Da li bitkoini koji su dodeljeni kao nagrada završavaju tamo gde treba kao naknada za usluge verifikacije? I iznad svega, da li je ovaj novi sistem zaista uspeo da uradi ono što se činilo nemogućim – to jest, da prenosi bezbedne delove informacija zasnovanih na vlasničkim pravima kroz geografski prostor, bez posredovanja neke treće strane, već direktno između korisnika (peer-to-peer)?

Potrajalo je 10 meseci da se izgradi poverenje. Bilo je potrebno još 18 meseci dok Bitkoin nije dostigao paritet sa američkim dolarom. Ovu istoriju je ključno razumeti, pogotovo ako se oslanjate na teoriju porekla novca koja spekuliše o praistoriji novca, kao što to čini Misesova regresiona teorema. Bitkoin nije uvek bio novac koji ima vrednost. Nekada je bio čisto računovodstvena jedinica vezana za knjigu transakcija (ledger). Ova knjiga transakcija je pribavila ono što je Mises nazvao „upotrebnom vrednošću“. Svi uslovi teoreme su time zadovoljeni.

Zavšni obračun

Da ponovimo, ako neko kaže da se Bitkoin zasniva ni na čemu drugom osim na "običnoj magli", da ne može biti novac jer nema pravu istoriju kao istinska roba i, bez obzira da li je ta osoba početnik ili visoko obučeno ekonomista, morate istaći dve centralne tačke. Prvo, Bitkoin nije samostalna valuta već obračunska jedinica vezana za inovativnu platnu mrežu. Drugo, ova mreža, a samim tim i Bitkoin, svoju tržišnu vrednost stekla je isključivo kroz testiranje u realnom vremenu u tržišnom okruženju.

Drugim rečima, ako zanemarimo impresivne tehničke karakteristike, Bitkoin je prešao put baš kao i svaka druga valuta, od soli do zlata. Ljudi su smatrali da je platni sistem koristan, a vezana računovodstvena jedinica je bila prenosiva, deljiva, zamenljiva, trajna i retka.

Novac je rođen. Ovaj novac poseduje sve istorijski najbolje osobine novca, ali uključuje i bestežinsku i besprostornu platnu mrežu koja omogućava celom svetu da trguje bez potrebe za trećim stranama.

Ali primetite nešto što je izuzetno važno. Kod blokčejna se ne radi samo o novcu. Radi se o bilo kakvom prenosu informacija koji zahteva sigurnost, potvrđivanje i punu garanciju autentičnosti. Ovo se odnosi na ugovore i transakcije svih vrsta, sve obavljene direktno između stranaka (peer-to-peer). Zamislite svet bez trećih strana, uključujući i najopasniju treću stranu ikada stvorenu od strane čoveka: samu Državu. Zamislite tu budućnost i počećete da shvatate implikacije naše budućnosti u svojoj potpunosti.

Mises bi bio zapanjen i iznenađen Bitkoinom. Ali možda bi osećao i ponos što je njegova monetarna teorija, stara više od 100 godina, potvrđena i dobila novi život u 21. veku.

@ 2c564b98:5c6444b0

My First Nostr Long-Form Post

This is a test of long-form content publishing on Nostr using the NIP-23 standard.

What is Nostr?

Nostr is a simple, open protocol that enables global, decentralized, and censorship-resistant social media.

Features of This Post

• Written in Markdown
• Tagged appropriately
• Includes metadata
• Published to multiple relays

Code Example

javascript console.log("Hello, Nostr!");

Conclusion

This demonstrates how easy it is to publish long-form content to Nostr!

---

Published using nostr-publisher

@ 39cc53c9:27168656

Read the original blog post

“The future is there... staring back at us. Trying to make sense of the fiction we will have become.” — William Gibson.

This month is the 4th anniversary of kycnot.me. Thank you for being here.

Fifteen years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system: a decentralized currency free from government and institutional control. Nakamoto's whitepaper showed a vision for a financial system based on trustless transactions, secured by cryptography. Some time forward and KYC (Know Your Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering), and CTF (Counter-Terrorism Financing) regulations started to come into play.

What a paradox: to engage with a system designed for decentralization, privacy, and independence, we are forced to give away our personal details. Using Bitcoin in the economy requires revealing your identity, not just to the party you interact with, but also to third parties who must track and report the interaction. You are forced to give sensitive data to entities you don't, can't, and shouldn't trust. Information can never be kept 100% safe; there's always a risk. Information is power, who knows about you has control over you.

Information asymmetry creates imbalances of power. When entities have detailed knowledge about individuals, they can manipulate, influence, or exploit this information to their advantage. The accumulation of personal data by corporations and governments enables extensive surveillances.

Such practices, moreover, exclude individuals from traditional economic systems if their documentation doesn't meet arbitrary standards, reinforcing a dystopian divide. Small businesses are similarly burdened by the costs of implementing these regulations, hindering free market competition^1:

How will they keep this information safe? Why do they need my identity? Why do they force businesses to enforce such regulations? It's always for your safety, to protect you from the "bad". Your life is perpetually in danger: terrorists, money launderers, villains... so the government steps in to save us.

‟Hush now, baby, baby, don't you cry Mamma's gonna make all of your nightmares come true Mamma's gonna put all of her fears into you Mamma's gonna keep you right here, under her wing She won't let you fly, but she might let you sing Mamma's gonna keep baby cosy and warm” — Mother, Pink Floyd

We must resist any attack on our privacy and freedom. To do this, we must collaborate.

If you have a service, refuse to ask for KYC; find a way. Accept cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Monero. Commit to circular economies. Remove the need to go through the FIAT system. People need fiat money to use most services, but we can change that.

If you're a user, donate to and prefer using services that accept such currencies. Encourage your friends to accept cryptocurrencies as well. Boycott FIAT system to the greatest extent you possibly can.

This may sound utopian, but it can be achieved. This movement can't be stopped. Go kick the hornet's nest.

“We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.” — Eric Hughes, A Cypherpunk's Manifesto

The anniversary

Four years ago, I began exploring ways to use crypto without KYC. I bookmarked a few favorite services and thought sharing them to the world might be useful. That was the first version of kycnot.me — a simple list of about 15 services. Since then, I've added services, rewritten it three times, and improved it to what it is now.

kycnot.me has remained 100% independent and 100% open source^2 all these years. I've received offers to buy the site, all of which I have declined and will continue to decline. It has been DDoS attacked many times, but we made it through. I have also rewritten the whole site almost once per year (three times in four years).

The code and scoring algorithm are open source (contributions are welcome) and I can't arbitrarly change a service's score without adding or removing attributes, making any arbitrary alterations obvious if they were fake. You can even see the score summary for any service's score.

I'm a one-person team, dedicating my free time to this project. I hope to keep doing so for many more years. Again, thank you for being part of this.

@ 6a14b203:2e99b880

My First Nostr Long-Form Post

This is a test of long-form content publishing on Nostr using the NIP-23 standard.

What is Nostr?

Nostr is a simple, open protocol that enables global, decentralized, and censorship-resistant social media.

Features of This Post

• Written in Markdown
• Tagged appropriately
• Includes metadata
• Published to multiple relays

Code Example

javascript console.log("Hello, Nostr!");

Conclusion

This demonstrates how easy it is to publish long-form content to Nostr!

---

Published using nostr-publisher

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

@matt_odell don't you even dare not ask about nostr!

— Kukks (Andrew Camilleri) (@MrKukks) May 18, 2021

Nostr first hit my radar spring 2021: created by fellow bitcoiner and friend, fiatjaf, and released to the world as free open source software. I was fortunate to be able to host a conversation with him on Citadel Dispatch in those early days, capturing that moment in history forever. Since then, the protocol has seen explosive viral organic growth as individuals around the world have contributed their time and energy to build out the protocol and the surrounding ecosystem due to the clear need for better communication tools.

nostr is to twitter as bitcoin is to paypal

As an intro to nostr, let us start with a metaphor:

twitter is paypal - a centralized platform plagued by censorship but has the benefit of established network effects

nostr is bitcoin - an open protocol that is censorship resistant and robust but requires an organic adoption phase

Nostr is an open communication protocol that can be used to send messages across a distributed set of relays in a censorship resistant and robust way.
 - Anyone can run a relay.
 - Anyone can interact with the protocol.
 - Relays can choose which messages they want to relay.
 - Users are identified by a simple public private key pair that they can generate themselves.

Nostr is often compared to twitter since there are nostr clients that emulate twitter functionality and user interface but that is merely one application of the protocol. Nostr is so much more than a mere twitter competitor. Nostr clients and relays can transmit a wide variety of data and clients can choose how to display that information to users. The result is a revolution in communication with implications that are difficult for any of us to truly comprehend.

Similar to bitcoin, nostr is an open and permissionless protocol. No person, company, or government controls it. Anyone can iterate and build on top of nostr without permission. Together, bitcoin and nostr are incredibly complementary freedom tech tools: censorship resistant, permissionless, robust, and interoperable - money and speech protected by code and incentives, not laws.

As censorship throughout the world continues to escalate, freedom tech provides hope for individuals around the world who refuse to accept the status quo. This movement will succeed on the shoulders of those who choose to stand up and contribute. We will build our own path. A brighter path.

---

My Nostr Public Key: npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ e1cde248:609c13b0

ในการกล่าวสุนทรพจน์หลักในงาน Bitcoin 2025 ไมเคิล เซย์เลอร์ (Michael Saylor) นักเคลื่อนไหวชื่อดังด้านบิตคอยน์และซีอีโอของบริษัท MicroStrategy ได้บรรยายหัวข้อที่ทรงพลังชื่อว่า "21 วิธีสู่ความมั่งคั่ง" เขาได้เสนอเส้นทางเชิงกลยุทธ์สำหรับบุคคลทั่วไป ครอบครัว และธุรกิจขนาดเล็ก ในการบรรลุความมั่งคั่งทางการเงินผ่านบิตคอยน์

ต่างจากคำพูดก่อนหน้าของเขาที่มุ่งเป้าไปที่สถาบันและรัฐบาล คำพูดนี้ถูกออกแบบมาสำหรับผู้คนทั้ง 8 พันล้านคน บนโลก โดยเน้นขั้นตอนปฏิบัติที่สามารถใช้บิตคอยน์เป็นทรัพย์สินเปลี่ยนชีวิตอย่างแท้จริง ด้านล่างนี้คือการสำรวจเชิงลึกใน 21 หลักการ ของเซย์เลอร์ ซึ่งเปรียบเสมือนพิมพ์เขียวในการสร้างความมั่งคั่งในยุคดิจิทัล:

1. ความชัดเจน (Clarity): เข้าใจบิตคอยน์ในฐานะทุนที่สมบูรณ์แบบ เซย์เลอร์เริ่มต้นด้วยแนวคิดเรื่อง “ความชัดเจน” โดยเน้นว่าบิตคอยน์คือ "ทุนที่ถูกออกแบบอย่างสมบูรณ์" ซึ่งไม่สามารถถูกทำลายหรือดัดแปลงได้ ความเข้าใจนี้เป็นพื้นฐานสำคัญในการยอมรับศักยภาพของบิตคอยน์ในฐานะรากฐานของความมั่งคั่ง

2. ความเชื่อมั่น (Conviction): ศรัทธาในศักยภาพการเติบโตเหนือกว่า เซย์เลอร์ยืนยันว่าบิตคอยน์ถูกออกแบบมาให้เติบโตเร็วกว่าสินทรัพย์ทั่วไป เช่น หุ้น ทองคำ หรืออสังหาริมทรัพย์ การมีความเชื่อมั่นอย่างแท้จริงเป็นสิ่งจำเป็นต่อการให้ความสำคัญกับบิตคอยน์เหนือการลงทุนแบบดั้งเดิม

3. ความกล้า (Courage): ยอมรับความเสี่ยงทางการเงินอย่างชาญฉลาด บิตคอยน์คือการยอมรับความเสี่ยงที่คำนวณได้อย่างชาญฉลาด ไม่ใช่ความกลัวหรือการพนัน ผู้ที่ "เติมเชื้อไฟ" ให้กับระบบนี้คือผู้ที่เปลี่ยนเงินเฟียตหรือสินทรัพย์ด้อยค่ามาเป็นบิตคอยน์

4. ความร่วมมือ (Cooperation): ผนึกกำลังในครอบครัวเพื่อความแข็งแกร่ง เมื่อครอบครัวร่วมมือกัน ศักยภาพในการสร้างความมั่งคั่งจะเพิ่มทวีคูณ เซย์เลอร์เสนอให้ครอบครัวผสานความสามารถและทรัพยากร เพื่อผลักดันกันและกันสู่อนาคตที่ดีกว่า

5. ความสามารถ (Capability): เชี่ยวชาญปัญญาประดิษฐ์ ในปี 2025 AI เป็นกุญแจสำคัญในการปลดล็อกโอกาสทางการเงินระดับสูง โดยที่บุคคลทั่วไปสามารถเข้าถึงคำแนะนำจากทนาย นักบัญชี หรือผู้เชี่ยวชาญ โดยไม่เสียค่าใช้จ่าย

6. การจัดวางโครงสร้าง (Composition): สร้างนิติบุคคลเพื่อป้องกันและขยายผล การตั้งบริษัท ทรัสต์ หรือโครงสร้างทางกฎหมาย เช่น IRA หรือ 401(k) คือวิธีเพิ่มประสิทธิภาพในการลงทุนบิตคอยน์อย่างปลอดภัยและถูกกฎหมาย

7. สัญชาติทางเศรษฐกิจ (Citizenship): เลือกฐานภาษีอย่างชาญฉลาด เลือกอยู่ในพื้นที่หรือประเทศที่เป็นมิตรกับบิตคอยน์ เช่น ฟลอริดา หรือประเทศอย่างสิงคโปร์ เพื่อลดภาระภาษีและเพิ่มเสถียรภาพระยะยาว

8. ความสุภาพ (Civility): เคารพโครงสร้างอำนาจ ไม่จำเป็นต้องล้มล้างระบบเก่า เพียงแค่รู้จักเคารพอำนาจและสร้างพันธมิตรในทางที่สร้างสรรค์เพื่อเดินหน้ากับบิตคอยน์ได้

9. การใช้บริษัท (Corporation): บริษัทคือเครื่องจักรสร้างความมั่งคั่ง บริษัทสามารถใช้ประโยชน์จากระบบการเงินและภาษีได้ดีกว่าปัจเจกบุคคล จึงควรจัดตั้งนิติบุคคลเพื่อลงทุนในบิตคอยน์อย่างจริงจัง

10. โฟกัส (Focus): อย่าหลงทาง อย่าวอกแวกไปกับธุรกิจเสี่ยงสูงหรือเหรียญอื่น ๆ เพราะบิตคอยน์มีประวัติผลตอบแทนสูงอย่างสม่ำเสมอ

11. การมีส่วนร่วม (Equity): ร่วมมือกับนักลงทุน ให้ผู้อื่นร่วมลงทุนในกิจการของคุณ เช่น หมอฟันอาจขายหุ้นบางส่วนของคลินิกเพื่อนำเงินไปลงทุนในบิตคอยน์

12. เครดิต (Credit): ใช้หนี้เป็นเครื่องมือ กู้เงินดอกเบี้ยต่ำและลงทุนในบิตคอยน์ที่มีแนวโน้มเติบโตสูง เพื่อทำกำไรจากส่วนต่างระหว่างดอกเบี้ยกับผลตอบแทน

13. การปฏิบัติตามกฎ (Compliance): ทำตามกฎหมาย สร้างบริษัทที่สอดคล้องกับกฎระเบียบเพื่อขยายเงินทุนได้อย่างมั่นคงและปลอดภัย

14. การระดมทุน (Capitalization): หาเงินลงทุนอย่างต่อเนื่อง ไม่ว่าจะจากการขายหุ้น หรือรีไฟแนนซ์ทรัพย์สินส่วนตัว ทุกโอกาสคือช่องทางในการระดมทุนและลงทุนต่อในบิตคอยน์

15. การสื่อสาร (Communication): โปร่งใสและจริงใจ การเปิดเผยแผนและเป้าหมายอย่างชัดเจนจะสร้างความไว้วางใจจากนักลงทุน พนักงาน และลูกค้า

16. ความมุ่งมั่น (Commitment): อยู่กับบิตคอยน์ ไม่หลงทาง หลีกเลี่ยงเหรียญอื่น ๆ หรือโปรเจกต์ที่ไม่มั่นคง ยึดมั่นในบิตคอยน์เพื่อเสถียรภาพระยะยาว

17. การลงมือทำ (Delivery): ลงมือจริงอย่างแม่นยำ ไม่ใช่แค่คิด แต่ต้องทำอย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ สม่ำเสมอ และไม่ประมาท

18. การปรับตัว (Adaptation): พร้อมเปลี่ยนแปลงเมื่อจำเป็น ระบบใด ๆ ก็มีวันล้มเหลว การปรับตัวตามสถานการณ์คือสิ่งที่ทำให้ยืนหยัดได้ในระยะยาว

19. วิวัฒนาการ (Evolution): เติบโตจากจุดแข็ง ขยายธุรกิจจากสิ่งที่คุณเชี่ยวชาญ แทนที่จะพยายามเริ่มสิ่งใหม่จากศูนย์

20. การเผยแพร่ (Advocacy): เป็นกระบอกเสียงเพื่อเสรีภาพทางเศรษฐกิจ บอกต่อและสอนผู้อื่นให้เข้าใจบิตคอยน์ เพื่อขยายเครือข่ายแห่งความมั่งคั่ง

21. ความเอื้อเฟื้อ (Generosity): แบ่งปันความสำเร็จ การช่วยเหลือครอบครัว ชุมชน และพนักงาน ด้วยทรัพยากรที่คุณมี จะสร้างความสุขทั้งต่อตัวคุณและโลก

เซย์เลอร์จบท้ายด้วยคำของซาโตชิ นากาโมโตะว่า:

“มันอาจจะดีถ้ามี bitcoin ไว้บ้าง เผื่อว่ามันจะกลายเป็นสิ่งสำคัญในอนาคต”

หลังจาก 16 ปีแห่งการเติบโตและมูลค่าตลาดกว่า 2 ล้านล้านดอลลาร์ หลักการทั้ง 21 ข้อนี้คือพิมพ์เขียวแห่งเสรีภาพทางการเงิน ที่รวมเอาความชัดเจน ความกล้า และเครื่องมืออย่าง AI, การจัดตั้งบริษัท และเครดิต เข้าด้วยกัน เพื่อให้ทุกคนสามารถใช้บิตคอยน์สร้างอนาคตที่ดีกว่าได้

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Bank run on every crypto bank then bank run on every "real" bank.

— ODELL (@ODELL) December 14, 2022

Good morning.

It looks like PacWest will fail today. It will be both the fifth largest bank failure in US history and the sixth major bank to fail this year. It will likely get purchased by one of the big four banks in a government orchestrated sale.  

March 8th - Silvergate Bank
March 10th - Silicon Valley Bank
March 12th - Signature Bank
March 19th - Credit Suisse
May 1st - First Republic Bank
May 4th - PacWest Bank?

PacWest is the first of many small regional banks that will go under this year. Most will get bought by the big four in gov orchestrated sales. This has been the playbook since 2008. Follow the incentives. Massive consolidation across the banking industry. PacWest gonna be a drop in the bucket compared to what comes next.

First, a hastened government led bank consolidation, then a public/private partnership with the remaining large banks to launch a surveilled and controlled digital currency network. We will be told it is more convenient. We will be told it is safer. We will be told it will prevent future bank runs. All of that is marketing bullshit. The goal is greater control of money. The ability to choose how we spend it and how we save it. If you control the money - you control the people that use it.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 39cc53c9:27168656

Read the original blog post

After almost 3 months of work, we've completed the redesign of kycnot.me. More modern and with many new features.

Privacy remains the foundation - everything still works with JavaScript disabled. If you enable JS, you will get some nice-to-have features like lazy loading and smoother page transitions, but nothing essential requires it.

User Accounts

We've introduced user accounts that require zero personal information:

• Secret user tokens - no email, no phone number, no personal data
• Randomly generated usernames for default privacy and fairness
• Karma system that rewards contributions and unlocks features: custom display names, profile pictures, and more.

Reviews and Community Discussions

On the previous sites, I was using third party open source tools for the comments and discussions. This time, I've built my own from scratch, fully integrated into the site, without JavaScript requirements.

Everyone can share their experiences and help others make informed decisions:

• Ratings: Comments can have a 1-5 star rating attached. You can have one rating per service and it will affect the overall user score.
• Discussions: These are normal comments, you can add them on any listed service.

Comment Moderation

I was strugling to keep up with moderation on the old site. For this, we've implemented an AI-powered moderation system that:

• Auto-approves legitimate comments instantly
• Flags suspicious content for human review
• Keeps discussions valuable by minimizing spam

The AI still can mark comments for human review, but most comments will get approved automatically by this system. The AI also makes summaries of the comments to help you understand the overall sentiment of the community.

Powerful Search & Filtering

Finding exactly what you need is now easier:

• Advanced filtering system with many parameters. You can even filter by attributes to pinpoint services with specific features.

The results are dynamic and shuffle services with identical scores for fairness.

See all listings

Listings are now added as 'Community Contributed' by default. This means that you can still find them in the search results, but they will be clearly marked as such.

Updated Scoring System

New dual-score approach provides more nuanced service evaluations:

• Privacy Score: Measures how well a service protects your personal information and data

• Trust Score: Assesses reliability, security, and overall reputation

• Combined into a weighted Overall Score for quick comparisons

• Completely transparent and open source calculation algorithm. No manual tweaking or hidden factors.

AI-Powered Terms of Service Analysis

Basically, a TLDR summary for Terms of Service:

• Automated system extracts the most important points from complex ToS documents
• Clear summaries
• Updated monthly to catch any changes

The ToS document is hashed and only will be updated if there are any changes.

Service Events and Timelines

Track the complete history of any service, on each service page you can see the timeline of events. There are two types of events:

• Automatic events: Created by the system whenever something about a service changes, like its description, supported currencies, attributes, verification status…
• Manual events: Added by admins when there’s important news, such as a service going offline, being hacked, acquired, shut down, or other major updates.

There is also a global timeline view available at /events

Notification System

Since we now have user accounts, we built a notifiaction system so you can stay informed about anything:

• Notifications for comment replies and status changes
• Watch any comment to get notified for new replies.
• Subscribe to services to monitor events and updates
• Notification customization.

Coming soon: Third-party privacy-preserving notifications integration with Telegram, Ntfy.sh, webhooks...

Service Suggestions

Anyone with an account can suggest a new service via the suggestion form. After submitting, you'll receive a tracking page where you can follow the status of your suggestion and communicate directly with admins.

All new suggestions start as "unlisted" — they won't appear in search results until reviewed. Our team checks each submission to ensure it's not spam or inappropriate. If similar services already exist, you'll be shown possible duplicates and can choose to submit your suggestion as an edit instead.

You can always check the progress of your suggestion, respond to moderator questions, and see when it goes live, everything will also be notified to your account. This process ensures high-quality listings and a collaborative approach to building the directory.

---

These are some of the main features we already have, but there are many more small changes and improvements that you will find when using the site.

What's Next?

This is just the beginning. We will be constantly working to improve KYCnot.me and add more features that help you preserve your privacy.

Remember: True financial freedom requires the right to privacy. Stay KYC-free!

@ a8d1560d:3fec7a08

THIS IS IMPORTANT!!!

After the wave of word-scrambling spam bots, a new and very problematic kind of spam has arrived in the Nostr. Whenever you post something now, you will get gay porn videos as an automated answer (No, being gay itself is not problematic!!!). To get rid of all the automated spam, remove the following relays from your inbox and outbox relay list: - nos.lol - relay.damus.io - nostr.oxtr.dev - relay.primal.net

As long as you have even one of these relays in your inbox and outbox lists, you and your followers will be spammed whenever posting something.

It is unknown if the bots only reply to kind 1 events or to all events.

@ 88cc134b:5ae99079

small test

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Bank run on every crypto bank then bank run on every "real" bank.

— ODELL (@ODELL) December 14, 2022

The four main banks of bitcoin and “crypto” are Signature, Prime Trust, Silvergate, and Silicon Valley Bank. Prime Trust does not custody funds themselves but rather maintains deposit accounts at BMO Harris Bank, Cross River, Lexicon Bank, MVB Bank, and Signature Bank. Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank have already stopped withdrawals. More banks will go down before the chaos stops. None of them have sufficient reserves to meet withdrawals.

Bitcoin gives us all the ability to opt out of a system that has massive layers of counterparty risk built in, years of cheap money and broken incentives have layered risk on top of risk throughout the entire global economy. If you thought the FTX bank run was painful to watch, I have bad news for you: every major bank in the world is fractional reserve. Bitcoin held in self custody is unique in its lack of counterparty risk, as global market chaos unwinds this will become much more obvious.

The rules of bitcoin are extremely hard to change by design. Anyone can access the network directly without a trusted third party by using their own node. Owning more bitcoin does not give you more control over the network with all participants on equal footing.

Bitcoin is:
- money that is not controlled by a company or government
- money that can be spent or saved without permission
- money that is provably scarce and should increase in purchasing power with adoption

Bitcoin is money without trust. Whether you are a nation state, corporation, or an individual, you can use bitcoin to spend or save without permission. Social media will accelerate the already deteriorating trust in our institutions and as this trust continues to crumble the value of trust minimized money will become obvious. As adoption increases so should the purchasing power of bitcoin.

A quick note on "stablecoins," such as USDC - it is important to remember that they rely on trusted custodians. They have the same risk as funds held directly in bank accounts with additional counterparty risk on top. The trusted custodians can be pressured by gov, exit scam, or caught up in fraud. Funds can and will be frozen at will. This is a distinctly different trust model than bitcoin, which is a native bearer token that does not rely on any centralized entity or custodian.

Most bitcoin exchanges have exposure to these failing banks. Expect more chaos and confusion as this all unwinds. Withdraw any bitcoin to your own wallet ASAP.

Simple Self Custody Guide: https://werunbtc.com/muun
More Secure Cold Storage Guide: https://werunbtc.com/coldcard

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 624d01ef:f122bf4a

In his testimony at Meta's antitrust trial, Mark Zuckerberg confessed that social media has changed. He said it is over.

What does that mean?

In its heyday, social media connected people. People shared their lives - romantic updates, party and holiday pictures and what not. And the rest of us partook in it all. We liked, shared, poked. It was a place for friends to connect with friends.

But, now, fatigue has set in. We are no longer interested in the lives of other people. Dopamine stimulation lasts only so long. After that, everything gets jaded and boring. And that is precisely what has happened to traditional social media. No one cares about your holiday pictures any more or what you are doing at work or in your personal life. No one cares about your trendy new clothes or hairstyle. It has all gotten old.

It is incredible that traditional social media lasted almost two decades. But now it - Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, BlueSky, Mastodon - is all jaded.

Instead, people now want to share ideas and opinions, not their lives. I see a lot of that happening over at Nostr. People anonymously share their thoughts, opinions, ideas, their gripes and rants - anything but their personal lives. It is almost like we are returning to the heyday of the Internet - before Web 2.0, user-generated content, and social media took hold. When people anonymously shared thoughts, opinions, and ideas.

Nostr is ideal for that. Technology comes and goes in waves. So, one cannot be certain how long that charm of Nostr will survive. But, for now, Nostr is the future.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

@matt_odell don't you even dare not ask about nostr!

— Kukks (Andrew Camilleri) (@MrKukks) May 18, 2021

Nostr first hit my radar spring 2021: created by fellow bitcoiner and friend, fiatjaf, and released to the world as free open source software. I was fortunate to be able to host a conversation with him on Citadel Dispatch in those early days, capturing that moment in history forever. Since then, the protocol has seen explosive viral organic growth as individuals around the world have contributed their time and energy to build out the protocol and the surrounding ecosystem due to the clear need for better communication tools.

nostr is to twitter as bitcoin is to paypal

As an intro to nostr, let us start with a metaphor:

twitter is paypal - a centralized platform plagued by censorship but has the benefit of established network effects

nostr is bitcoin - an open protocol that is censorship resistant and robust but requires an organic adoption phase

Nostr is an open communication protocol that can be used to send messages across a distributed set of relays in a censorship resistant and robust way.
 - Anyone can run a relay.
 - Anyone can interact with the protocol.
 - Relays can choose which messages they want to relay.
 - Users are identified by a simple public private key pair that they can generate themselves.

Nostr is often compared to twitter since there are nostr clients that emulate twitter functionality and user interface but that is merely one application of the protocol. Nostr is so much more than a mere twitter competitor. Nostr clients and relays can transmit a wide variety of data and clients can choose how to display that information to users. The result is a revolution in communication with implications that are difficult for any of us to truly comprehend.

Similar to bitcoin, nostr is an open and permissionless protocol. No person, company, or government controls it. Anyone can iterate and build on top of nostr without permission. Together, bitcoin and nostr are incredibly complementary freedom tech tools: censorship resistant, permissionless, robust, and interoperable - money and speech protected by code and incentives, not laws.

As censorship throughout the world continues to escalate, freedom tech provides hope for individuals around the world who refuse to accept the status quo. This movement will succeed on the shoulders of those who choose to stand up and contribute. We will build our own path. A brighter path.

---

My Nostr Public Key: npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ dfa02707:41ca50e3

Good morning (good night?)! The No Bullshit Bitcoin news feed is now available on Moody's Dashboard! A huge shoutout to sir Clark Moody for integrating our feed.

Headlines

• Spiral welcomes Ben Carman. The developer will work on the LDK server and a new SDK designed to simplify the onboarding process for new self-custodial Bitcoin users.

• The Bitcoin Dev Kit Foundation announced new corporate members for 2025, including AnchorWatch, CleanSpark, and Proton Foundation. The annual dues from these corporate members fund the small team of open-source developers responsible for maintaining the core BDK libraries and related free and open-source software (FOSS) projects.
• Strategy increases Bitcoin holdings to 538,200 BTC. In the latest purchase, the company has spent more than $555M to buy 6,556 coins through proceeds of two at-the-market stock offering programs.
• Spar supermarket experiments with Bitcoin payments in Zug, Switzerland. The store has introduced a new payment method powered by the Lightning Network. The implementation was facilitated by DFX Swiss, a service that supports seamless conversions between bitcoin and legacy currencies.

• The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) wants to contain 'crypto' risks. A report titled "Cryptocurrencies and Decentralised Finance: Functions and Financial Stability Implications" calls for expanding research into "how new forms of central bank money, capital controls, and taxation policies can counter the risks of widespread crypto adoption while still fostering technological innovation."
• "Global Implications of Scam Centres, Underground Banking, and Illicit Online Marketplaces in Southeast Asia." According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) report, criminal organizations from East and Southeast Asia are swiftly extending their global reach. These groups are moving beyond traditional scams and trafficking, creating sophisticated online networks that include unlicensed cryptocurrency exchanges, encrypted communication platforms, and stablecoins, fueling a massive fraud economy on an industrial scale.
• Slovenia is considering a 25% capital gains tax on Bitcoin profits for individuals. The Ministry of Finance has proposed legislation to impose this tax on gains from cryptocurrency transactions, though exchanging one cryptocurrency for another would remain exempt. At present, individual 'crypto' traders in Slovenia are not taxed.
• Circle, BitGo, Coinbase, and Paxos plan to apply for U.S. bank charters or licenses. According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, major crypto companies are planning to apply for U.S. bank charters or licenses. These firms are pursuing limited licenses that would permit them to issue stablecoins, as the U.S. Congress deliberates on legislation mandating licensing for stablecoin issuers.

"Established banks, like Bank of America, are hoping to amend the current drafts of [stablecoin] legislation in such a way that nonbanks are more heavily restricted from issuing stablecoins," people familiar with the matter told The Block.

• Charles Schwab to launch spot Bitcoin trading by 2026. The financial investment firm, managing over $10 trillion in assets, has revealed plans to introduce spot Bitcoin trading for its clients within the next year.

Use the tools

• Bitcoin Safe v1.2.3 expands QR SignMessage compatibility for all QR-UR-compatible hardware signers (SpecterDIY, KeyStone, Passport, Jade; already supported COLDCARD Q). It also adds the ability to import wallets via QR, ensuring compatibility with Keystone's latest firmware (2.0.6), alongside other improvements.
• Minibits v0.2.2-beta, an ecash wallet for Android devices, packages many changes to align the project with the planned iOS app release. New features and improvements include the ability to lock ecash to a receiver's pubkey, faster confirmations of ecash minting and payments thanks to WebSockets, UI-related fixes, and more.
• Zeus v0.11.0-alpha1 introduces Cashu wallets tied to embedded LND wallets. Navigate to Settings > Ecash to enable it. Other wallet types can still sweep funds from Cashu tokens. Zeus Pay now supports Cashu address types in Zaplocker, Cashu, and NWC modes.
• LNDg v1.10.0, an advanced web interface designed for analyzing Lightning Network Daemon (LND) data and automating node management tasks, introduces performance improvements, adds a new metrics page for unprofitable and stuck channels, and displays warnings for batch openings. The Profit and Loss Chart has been updated to include on-chain costs. Advanced settings have been added for users who would like their channel database size to be read remotely (the default remains local). Additionally, the AutoFees tool now uses aggregated pubkey metrics for multiple channels with the same peer.
• Nunchuk Desktop v1.9.45 release brings the latest bug fixes and improvements.
• Blockstream Green iOS v4.1.8 has renamed L-BTC to LBTC, and improves translations of notifications, login time, and background payments.
• Blockstream Green Android v4.1.8 has added language preference in App Settings and enables an Android data backup option for disaster recovery. Additionally, it fixes issues with Jade entry point PIN timeout and Trezor passphrase input.
• Torq v2.2.2, an advanced Lightning node management software designed to handle large nodes with over 1000 channels, fixes bugs that caused channel balance to not be updated in some cases and channel "peer total local balance" not getting updated.
• Stack Wallet v2.1.12, a multicoin wallet by Cypher Stack, fixes an issue with Xelis introduced in the latest release for Windows.
• ESP-Miner-NerdQAxePlus v1.0.29.1, a forked version from the NerdAxe miner that was modified for use on the NerdQAxe+, is now available.
• Zark enables sending sats to an npub using Bark.

• Erk is a novel variation of the Ark protocol that completely removes the need for user interactivity in rounds, addressing one of Ark's key limitations: the requirement for users to come online before their VTXOs expire.
• Aegis v0.1.1 is now available. It is a Nostr event signer app for iOS devices.
• Nostash is a NIP-07 Nostr signing extension for Safari. It is a fork of Nostore and is maintained by Terry Yiu. Available on iOS TestFlight.
• Amber v3.2.8, a Nostr event signer for Android, delivers the latest fixes and improvements.
• Nostur v1.20.0, a Nostr client for iOS, adds

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

People forget Bear Stearns failed March 2008 - months of denial followed before the public realized how bad the situation was under the surface.

Similar happening now but much larger scale. They did not fix fundamental issues after 2008 - everything is more fragile.

The Fed preemptively bailed out every bank with their BTFP program and First Republic Bank still failed. The second largest bank failure in history.

There will be more failures. There will be more bailouts. Depositors will be "protected" by socializing losses across everyone.

Our President and mainstream financial pundits are currently pretending the banking crisis is over while most banks remain insolvent. There are going to be many more bank failures as this ponzi system unravels.

Unlike 2008, we have the ability to opt out of these broken and corrupt institutions by using bitcoin. Bitcoin held in self custody is unique in its lack of counterparty risk - you do not have to trust a bank or other centralized entity to hold it for you. Bitcoin is also incredibly difficult to change by design since it is not controlled by an individual, company, or government - the supply of dollars will inevitably be inflated to bailout these failing banks but bitcoin supply will remain unchanged. I do not need to convince you that bitcoin provides value - these next few years will convince millions.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ 7f6db517:a4931eda

Influencers would have you believe there is an ongoing binance bank run but bitcoin wallet data says otherwise.

- binance wallets are near all time highs
- bitfinex wallets are also trending up
- gemini and coinbase are being hit with massive withdrawals though

You should not trust custodians, they can rug you without warning. It is incredibly important you learn how to hold bitcoin yourself, but also consider not blindly trusting influencers with a ref link to shill you.

---

If you found this post helpful support my work with bitcoin.

@ dfa02707:41ca50e3

Headlines

• Twenty One Capital is set to launch with over 42,000 BTC in its treasury. This new Bitcoin-native firm, backed by Tether and SoftBank, is planned to go public via a SPAC merger with Cantor Equity Partners and will be led by Jack Mallers, co-founder and CEO of Strike. According to a report by the Financial Times, the company aims to replicate the model of Michael Saylor with his company, MicroStrategy.
• Florida's SB 868 proposes a backdoor into encrypted platforms. The bill and its House companion have both passed through their respective committees and are headed to a full vote. If enacted, SB 868 would require social media companies to decrypt teens' private messages, ban disappearing messages, allow unrestricted parental access to private messages, and likely eliminate encryption for all minors altogether.
• Paul Atkins has officially assumed the role of the 34th Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This is a return to the agency for Atkins, who previously served as an SEC Commissioner from 2002 to 2008 under the George W. Bush administration. He has committed to advancing the SEC’s mission of fostering capital formation, safeguarding investors, and ensuring fair and efficient markets.
• Solosatoshi.com has sold over 10,000 open-source miners, adding more than 10 PH of hashpower to the Bitcoin network.

"Thank you, Bitaxe community. OSMU developers, your brilliance built this. Supporters, your belief drives us. Customers, your trust powers 10,000+ miners and 10PH globally. Together, we’re decentralizing Bitcoin’s future. Last but certainly not least, thank you@skot9000 for not only creating a freedom tool, but instilling the idea into thousands of people, that Bitcoin mining can be for everyone again," said the firm on X.

• OCEAN's DATUM has found 100 blocks. "Over 65% of OCEAN’s miners are using DATUM, and that number is growing every day. This means block template construction is making its way back into the hands of the miners, which is not only the most profitable for miners on OCEAN but also one of the best things for Bitcoin," stated the mining pool.

Source: orangesurf

• Arch Labs has secured $13 million to develop "ArchVM" and integrate smart-contract functionality with Bitcoin. The funding round, valuing the company at $200 million, was led by Pantera Capital, as announced on Tuesday.
• Tesla still holds nearly $1 billion in bitcoin. According to the automaker's latest earnings report, the firm reported digital asset holdings worth $951 million as of March 31.
• The European Central Bank is pushing for amendments to the European Union's Markets in Crypto Assets legislation (MiCA), just months after its implementation. According to Politico's report on Tuesday, the ECB is concerned that U.S. support for cryptocurrency, particularly stablecoins, could cause economic harm to the 27-nation bloc.
• TABConf 2025 is scheduled to take place from October 13-16, 2025. This prominent technical Bitcoin conference is dedicated to community building, education, and developer support, and it is set to return in October. Get your tickets here.
• Kaduna Lightning Development Bootcamp. From May 14th to 17th, the Bitcoin Lightning Developer Bootcamp will take place in Kaduna, Nigeria. Thisevent offers four dynamic days of coding, learning, and networking. Organized by Africa Free Routing and supported by Btrust, Tether, and African Bitcoiners, this bootcamp is designed as a gateway for African developers eager to advance their skills in Bitcoin and Lightning development. Apply here.

Source: African Bitcoiners.

Use the tools

• Core Lightning (CLN) v25.02.2 as been released to fix a broken Docker image. The issue was caused by an SQLite version that did not support an advanced query.
• Blitz wallet v0.4.4-beta introduces several updates and improvements, including the prevention of duplicate ecash payments, fixes for background ecash invoice handling, the ability for users to send payments to BOLT12 invoices from their Liquid balance, support for Blink QR codes, a lowered minimum amount for Lightning-to-Liquid payments to 100 sats, the option to initiate a node sync via a swipe gesture on the wallet's home screen, and the introduction of opt-in or opt-out functionality for newly implemented crash analytics via settings.
• Utreexo v0.5.0, a hash-based dynamic accumulator, is now available.
• Specter v2.1.1 is now available on StartOS. "This update brings compatibility with Bitcoin Core v28 and incorporates several upstream improvements," said developer Alex71btc.
• ESP-Miner (AxeOS) v2.7.0b1 is now available for testing.
• NodeGuard v0.16.1, a treasury management solution for Lightning nodes, has been released.
• The latest stacker.news updates include prompts to add a receiving wallet when posting or making comments (for new users), an option to randomize poll choices, improved URL search, and a few other enhancements. A bug fix for territories created after 9/19/24 has been implemented to reward 70% of their revenue to owners instead of 50%.

Other stuff

• The April edition of the 256 Foundation's newsletter is now available. It includes the latest mining news, Bitcoin network health updates, project developments, and a tutorial on how to update FutureBit's Apollo 1 to the Apollo 2 software.
• Siggy47 has posted a comprehensive RoboSats guide on stacker.news.
• Learn how to run your own Nostr relay using Citrine and Cloudflare Tunnels by following this step-by-step guide by Dhalism.
• Max Guise has written a Bitkey roadmap update for April 2025.

• PlebLab has uploaded a video on how to build a Rust wallet with LDK Node by Ben Carman.

• Do you want more? Subscribe and get No Bullshit GM report straight to your mailbox and No Bullshit Bitcoin on Nostr.

• Feedback or tips? Drop it here.
• #FREESAMOURAI

Sign up for No Bullshit Bitcoin

No Bullshit Bitcoin Is a Bitcoin News Desk Without Ads, Paywalls, or Clickbait.

Subscribe .nc-loop-dots-4-24-icon-o{--animation-duration:0.8s} .nc-loop-dots-4-24-icon-o *{opacity:.4;transform:scale(.75);animation:nc-loop-dots-4-anim var(--animation-duration) infinite} .nc-loop-dots-4-24-icon-o :nth-child(1){transform-origin:4px 12px;animation-delay:-.3s;animation-delay:calc(var(--animation-duration)/-2.666)} .nc-loop-dots-4-24-icon-o :nth-child(2){transform-origin:12px 12px;animation-delay:-.15s;animation-delay:calc(var(--animation-duration)/-5.333)} .nc-loop-dots-4-24-icon-o :nth-child(3){transform-origin:20px 12px} @keyframes nc-loop-dots-4-anim{0%,100%{opacity:.4;transform:scale(.75)}50%{opacity:1;transform:scale(1)}}

Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

@ dfa02707:41ca50e3

Contribute to keep No Bullshit Bitcoin news going.

• The latest firmware updates for COLDCARD devices introduce two major features: COLDCARD Co-sign (CCC) and Key Teleport between two COLDCARD Q devices using QR codes and/or NFC with a website.

What's new

• COLDCARD Co-Sign: When CCC is enabled, a second seed called the Spending Policy Key (Key C) is added to the device. This seed works with the device's Main Seed and one or more additional XPUBs (Backup Keys) to form 2-of-N multisig wallets.
  • The spending policy functions like a hardware security module (HSM), enforcing rules such as magnitude and velocity limits, address whitelisting, and 2FA authentication to protect funds while maintaining flexibility and control, and is enforced each time the Spending Policy Key is used for signing.
  • When spending conditions are met, the COLDCARD signs the partially signed bitcoin transaction (PSBT) with the Main Seed and Spending Policy Key for fund access. Once configured, the Spending Policy Key is required to view or change the policy, and violations are denied without explanation.

"You can override the spending policy at any time by signing with either a Backup Key and the Main Seed or two Backup Keys, depending on the number of keys (N) in the multisig."

• A step-by-step guide for setting up CCC is available here.

• Key Teleport for Q devices allows users to securely transfer sensitive data such as seed phrases (words, xprv), secure notes and passwords, and PSBTs for multisig. It uses QR codes or NFC, along with a helper website, to ensure reliable transmission, keeping your sensitive data protected throughout the process.

  • For more technical details, see the protocol spec.

"After you sign a multisig PSBT, you have option to “Key Teleport” the PSBT file to any one of the other signers in the wallet. We already have a shared pubkey with them, so the process is simple and does not require any action on their part in advance. Plus, starting in this firmware release, COLDCARD can finalize multisig transactions, so the last signer can publish the signed transaction via PushTX (NFC tap) to get it on the blockchain directly."

• Multisig transactions are finalized when sufficiently signed. It streamlines the use of PushTX with multisig wallets.
• Signing artifacts re-export to various media. Users are now provided with the capability to export signing products, like transactions or PSBTs, to alternative media rather than the original source. For example, if a PSBT is received through a QR code, it can be signed and saved onto an SD card if needed.
• Multisig export files are signed now. Public keys are encoded as P2PKH address for all multisg signature exports. Learn more about it here.
• NFC export usability upgrade: NFC keeps exporting until CANCEL/X is pressed.
• Added Bitcoin Safe option to Export Wallet.
• 10% performance improvement in USB upload speed for large files.
• Q: Always choose the biggest possible display size for QR.

Fixes

• Do not allow change Main PIN to same value already used as Trick PIN, even if Trick PIN is hidden.
• Fix stuck progress bar under Receiving... after a USB communications failure.
• Showing derivation path in Address Explorer for root key (m) showed double slash (//).
• Can restore developer backup with custom password other than 12 words format.
• Virtual Disk auto mode ignores already signed PSBTs (with “-signed” in file name).
• Virtual Disk auto mode stuck on “Reading…” screen sometimes.
• Finalization of foreign inputs from partial signatures. Thanks Christian Uebber!
• Temporary seed from COLDCARD backup failed to load stored multisig wallets.
• Destroy Seed also removes all Trick PINs from SE2.
• Lock Down Seed requires pressing confirm key (4) to execute.
• Q only: Only BBQr is allowed to export Coldcard, Core, and pretty descriptor.

Blog Post / Archive
GitHub Repo
CCC Guide
Key Teleport site

@ 726e789c:197726c2

{ "id": "id-1750023454416-5oavlpy", "name": "Gottesbild und künstliche Intelligenz", "description": "", "authors": [ "Joachim Happel" ], "summary": "### Intention\nDie Lehrkraft möchte eine Unterrichtsstunde in der 11. Klasse zum Thema 'Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz' gestalten. Ziel ist es, die Schülerinnen und Schüler dazu zu befähigen, eigene Gottesvorstellungen zu entwickeln, diese mit biblischen Gottesbildern zu vergleichen, und die lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder im Kontext technischer Entwicklungen zu reflektieren. Dabei sollen sie auch religionskritische Perspektiven und ethische Fragen im Zusammenhang mit KI erarbeiten.\n\n### Assoziationen\n\nDie wichtigsten Fachbegriffe und Themen sind \"Gottesbild\" und \"Künstliche Intelligenz\" im Kontext des Religionsunterrichts.\n\n### Kompetenzen\n\n- SuS stellen eigene Gottesvorstellungen dar und vergleichen sie mit biblischen Gottesvorstellungen. Inhaltsbereich: \"Die Frage nach Gott\".\n- SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen in ihrer Lebenswelt. Inhaltsbereich: \"Christliche Antworten auf die Gottesfrage\".\n- SuS beurteilen religionskritische Entwürfe hinsichtlich ihrer Überzeugungskraft im Kontext der Diskussion über Gottesbilder. Inhaltsbereich: \"Christliche Antworten auf die Gottesfrage\".\n- SuS deuten die biblische Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen. Inhaltsbereich: \"Der Mensch in christlicher Perspektive\".\n\naus: Lehrplan NRW - Evangelische Religion, Jahrgangsstufe 11\n\n### Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz im Religionsunterricht\n\nDas Thema 'Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz' bietet die Möglichkeit, zentrale Fragen nach Gott und Mensch in der heutigen technologischen Gesellschaft zu reflektieren. Dabei können Schülerinnen und Schüler eigene Vorstellungen von Gott entwickeln, sie mit biblischen Gottesbildern vergleichen und die ethischen, gesellschaftlichen und philosophischen Implikationen moderner KI-Technologien diskutieren. Besonders geeignet ist die Verbindung von biblischer Rede vom Menschen als Gottes Ebenbild mit aktuellen Diskussionen um Geschöpflichkeit, Kreativität und Verantwortung im Zusammenhang mit KI. Diese Herangehensweise fördert die kritische Reflexion und die Entwicklung eigener Glaubens- und Gottesvorstellungen, während sie gleichzeitig die ethischen Dimensionen der technologischen Entwicklung in den Fokus rückt.", "backgroundColor": "#bbf7d0", "customStyle": "", "columns": [ { "id": "id-1750021978851-vf7abwh", "name": "Materialien", "color": "color-gradient-1", "cards": [ { "id": "id-1750021978851-my9mqug", "heading": "Zusammenfassung für die didaktische Aufbereitung: Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz im Religionsunterricht", "content": "Das Thema 'Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz' bietet die Möglichkeit, zentrale Fragen nach Gott und Mensch in der heutigen technologischen Gesellschaft zu reflektieren. Dabei können Schülerinnen und Schüler eigene Vorstellungen von Gott entwickeln, sie mit biblischen Gottesbildern vergleichen und die ethischen, gesellschaftlichen und philosophischen Implikationen moderner KI-Technologien diskutieren. Besonders geeignet ist die Verbindung von biblischer Rede vom Menschen als Gottes Ebenbild mit aktuellen Diskussionen um Geschöpflichkeit, Kreativität und Verantwortung im Zusammenhang mit KI. Diese Herangehensweise fördert die kritische Reflexion und die Entwicklung eigener Glaubens- und Gottesvorstellungen, während sie gleichzeitig die ethischen Dimensionen der technologischen Entwicklung in den Fokus rückt.", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "Synthese basierend auf Relpaed-Tool-Ergebnissen", "labels": "", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750021978851-x33rwqz", "heading": "Virtuelle und interreligiöse Zugänge zum Gottesbild", "content": "\"Der Einsatz virtueller Realitäten kann dazu beitragen, religiöse Vorstellungen auf innovative Weise erfahrbar zu machen.\" (Klara Pišonić, Virtual Reality, kirchengeschichtsdidaktisch)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "https://www.die-bibel.de/ressourcen/redirect/slug/virtual-reality-kirchengeschichtsdidaktisch", "labels": "", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750021978851-8ayid4u", "heading": "Religionspsychologische Perspektiven auf Gottesbilder", "content": "\"Religionspsychologische Zugänge können wichtige Anknüpfungspunkte bieten, um die persönlichen Vorstellungen von Gott im Zusammenhang mit gesellschaftlichen und technischen Entwicklungen zu verstehen.\" (Constantin Klein, Religionspsychologie)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "https://www.die-bibel.de/ressourcen/redirect/slug/religionspsychologie", "labels": "", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750021978851-zzecyqf", "heading": "Interreligiöses Lernen und Dialog der Religionen", "content": "\"Der Dialog zwischen Religionen schärft das Verständnis für unterschiedliche Gottesbilder und eröffnet neue Perspektiven, auch im Kontext moderner ethischer Fragen rund um Künstliche Intelligenz.\" (Monika Tautz, Interreligiöses Lernen)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "https://www.die-bibel.de/ressourcen/redirect/slug/interreligioeses-lernen", "labels": "", "inactive": false } ] }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-wy47anx", "name": "Material Fragmente", "color": "color-gradient-1", "cards": [ { "id": "id-1750022132843-pd6b0qh", "heading": "Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "content": "Das Dokument ist hervorragend geeignet, um das Thema 'Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz' zu behandeln, da es vielfältige didaktische Bausteine für die ethische und anthropologische Auseinandersetzung mit KI bietet und explizit theologische Perspektiven einbezieht.", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-3ysegds", "heading": "KI im Alltag: Chancen und Gefahren von Pflegerobotern", "content": "Aufgabenstellung: Stelle dir vor, deine pflegebedürftige Großmutter lebt in einem Pflegeheim, in dem zunehmend Roboter einfache Aufgaben übernehmen und als Ansprechpartner dienen. Du bist schockiert und möchtest dir ein genaueres Bild machen. (Absatz: Thematische Hinführung, Baustein 1: KI – was verbirgt sich dahinter?)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein ermöglicht einen lebensweltnahen Einstieg in das komplexe Thema KI, indem er eine konkrete, emotional relevante Situation aufgreift. Er bereitet die Reflexion über ethische Implikationen von KI vor, die später mit Gottes- und Menschenbildern verknüpft werden kann.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung und Beschreibung ethischer Herausforderungen durch KI. Ermöglicht erste, spontane Äußerungen zu eigenen Vorstellungen und Meinungen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Im Einstieg zur Aktivierung von Vorwissen und zur emotionalen Annäherung an das Thema. Die SuS können in einem kurzen Brainstorming oder einer stillen Minute ihre ersten Gedanken und Gefühle zu dieser Situation sammeln.\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Reflexion), anschließend Plenum für spontane Äußerungen.\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Einstieg", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-d2g6bz2", "heading": "Was ist KI? Sammeln von Alltagsbeispielen und Positionierung", "content": "Methode: Nach der anfänglichen Konfrontation mit dem Pflegeroboter-Szenario überlegen die Schülerinnen (Think-Pair-Share), in welchen Bereichen KI heute schon vorkommt. Gemeinsam wird im Plenum eine Mindmap erstellt. Anschließend positionieren sich die Lernenden auf einer Linie (Chancen vs. Gefahren) zu diesen Entwicklungen und erläutern ihre Position im Unterrichtsgespräch. Zur Begriffsbestimmung kann ein Informationstext (M1) oder ein kurzer Lehrervortrag genutzt werden. (Absatz: Baustein 1: KI – was verbirgt sich dahinter?, S. 24)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein schafft ein grundlegendes Verständnis für den Begriff KI und seine Präsenz im Alltag der SuS. Die Positionierung zu Chancen und Gefahren leitet die ethische Reflexion ein und ermöglicht die Verknüpfung mit unterschiedlichen Menschen- und Gottesbildern.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung und Beschreibung ethischer Herausforderungen durch KI. Ermöglicht das Darstellen eigener Vorstellungen und das Erörtern von Konsequenzen in der Lebenswelt.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Im Einstieg zur Begriffsklärung und im Übergang zur Erarbeitung ethischer Fragen. Die SuS könnten Beispiele wie Sprachassistenten, personalisierte Werbung, autonomes Fahren oder Gesichtserkennung nennen. Bei der Positionierung auf der Linie könnten sie begründen, warum sie z.B. autonomes Fahren eher als Chance (mehr Sicherheit) oder Gefahr (Kontrollverlust) sehen.\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Think-Pair-Share (Einzel-, Partnerarbeit), Plenum (Mindmap, Unterrichtsgespräch).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Einstieg, Erarbeitung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-bwjpm1a", "heading": "Ethische Herausforderungen der KI: Gruppenpuzzle zu Anwendungsfeldern", "content": "Aufgabenstellung: Bildet bis zu fünf Gruppen und bearbeitet jeweils eine der folgenden herausfordernden Entwicklungen im Bereich der KI anhand eines Infotextes mit Arbeitsaufträgen (M2a-e): Pflegeroboter, autonome Waffensysteme, automatische Bewerbungssoftware, KI in der Schule, Steuerungscomputer im Verkehr. Präsentiert eure Ergebnisse im Gruppenpuzzle oder Plenum, um ein ethisches Problembewusstsein zu schaffen. (Absatz: Baustein 1, S. 24)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein ermöglicht eine vertiefte Auseinandersetzung mit konkreten ethischen Dilemmata, die durch KI entstehen. Die Diskussion dieser Problemfelder ist essentiell für die spätere Reflexion über Gottes- und Menschenbilder und deren lebenspraktische Konsequenzen.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung und Beschreibung ethischer Fragestellungen. Ermöglicht das sachgemäße Erschließen themenrelevanter Texte und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Erarbeitung neuer Inhalte und zur Schaffung eines Problembewusstseins. Die SuS könnten sich mit Fragen auseinandersetzen wie: \"Welche Verantwortung tragen Entwickler autonomer Waffensysteme?\" oder \"Inwiefern beeinflusst automatische Bewerbungssoftware Chancengleichheit?\".\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Gruppenarbeit (Expertengruppen), Gruppenpuzzle oder Plenum (Präsentation der Ergebnisse). Es kann auch auf die \"Schritte ethischer Urteilsbildung\" zurückgegriffen werden.\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-rmmqjg6", "heading": "Videoanalyse: „K.O. durch KI? Keine Angst vor schlauen Maschinen!“ (Leschs Kosmos)", "content": "Video: Einsatz der Dokumentation „K.O. durch KI? Keine Angst vor schlauen Maschinen!“ mit Prof. Harald Lesch (28.05.2019, 29 Min.). Die Dokumentation greift in kurzen, anschaulichen Sequenzen verschiedene KI-Entwicklungen auf und diskutiert diese: Autonomes Fahren, Deep Learning (Medizin), Algorithmen (Bewerbungssoftware), intelligente Roboter (Katastrophenfall), Roboworld (Mensch-Maschine-Verhältnis), Schlussmoderation (Unterschied Mensch-Maschine). (Absatz: Baustein 1, S. 24, Punkt 3)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Das Video bietet eine anschauliche und wissenschaftlich fundierte Einführung in verschiedene KI-Anwendungsfelder und ethische Fragestellungen. Es kann als Impuls dienen, um die Diskussion über Gottes- und Menschenbilder im Kontext von KI zu vertiefen und religionskritische Entwürfe zu beurteilen.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung ethischer Fragestellungen. Unterstützt die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten durch die Bereitstellung von Hintergrundinformationen und Diskussionsansätzen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung der bereits erarbeiteten Themen oder als alternativer Einstieg in spezifische KI-Bereiche. Die Lehrkraft kann gezielt Sequenzen auswählen und mit Arbeitsaufträgen versehen, z.B. \"Fasst die Argumente Pro und Contra zum autonomen Fahren zusammen und diskutiert, welche ethischen Prinzipien hier relevant sind.\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Plenum (gemeinsames Schauen), Partner- oder Kleingruppenarbeit (Analyse von Sequenzen), Unterrichtsgespräch.\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-11qwb31", "heading": "Science-Fiction-Filme: KI, Bewusstsein und menschliche Beziehungen", "content": "Lernmedium: Analyse von Science-Fiction-Filmen wie \"Ex Machina\" (UK, 2015), \"I, Robot\" (USA, 2004) und \"Her\" (USA, 2013). Schülergruppen präsentieren, wie diese Filme das Thema KI aufgreifen (z.B. Roboter, die menschliche Qualitäten entwickeln; Beziehung zu lernfähigem Betriebssystem). Anschließend werden die in den Filmen aufgeworfenen anthropologisch-ethischen Fragen (Können Maschinen Bewusstsein/Gefühle haben? Können digitale Systeme menschliche Partner ersetzen?) in der Lerngruppe vertieft. (Absatz: Baustein 2: Künstliche Intelligenz in Filmen, S. 24)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Filme bieten einen niedrigschwelligen Zugang zu komplexen philosophischen und ethischen Fragen rund um KI, Bewusstsein und menschliche Identität. Dies ermöglicht eine kreative Auseinandersetzung mit verschiedenen Menschenbildern und deren Implikationen für das Gottesbild.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Darstellen eigener Gottesvorstellungen im Kontext moderner Technologie und das Erörtern von Gottes- und Menschenbildern hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen. Unterstützt die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Als Erarbeitungs- oder Vertiefungsphase. Die SuS könnten in Gruppenarbeit die Filme analysieren und Präsentationen vorbereiten. Diskussionsfragen könnten sein: \"Was macht den Menschen menschlich im Vergleich zu einer KI?\" oder \"Verändert die Möglichkeit, eine Beziehung zu einer KI aufzubauen, unser Verständnis von Liebe und Partnerschaft?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Gruppenarbeit (Filmanalyse, Präsentation), Plenum (Diskussion).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-0zmqiuo", "heading": "Biblische Schöpfungserzählung und die Frage nach dem Gegenüber (Replika)", "content": "Textquelle: Thematisierung des Chatbots „Replika“ als aktuelles Beispiel für einen digitalen Sozialkontakt (Werbung: „Wenn du traurig bist oder Angst hast oder einfach jemanden zum Reden brauchst, ist dein Replika für dich da – 24/7“). Als spannender biblischer Bezugspunkt dient die Schöpfungserzählung in Gen 2, in der der Mensch unter den Tieren kein adäquates Gegenüber findet und Gott ihm daraufhin einen menschlichen Partner schafft. Die Unterscheidung zwischen Echo- und Resonanzbeziehungen (Hartmut Rosa) kann zur vertieften Auseinandersetzung genutzt werden (M3). (Absatz: Baustein 2, S. 24, Punkt 5)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein stellt eine direkte Verbindung zwischen der biblischen Schöpfungserzählung (Gottesbild, Menschenbild als Ebenbild Gottes) und der modernen Entwicklung von KI (Chatbots) her. Er ermöglicht die Reflexion über die Einzigartigkeit des Menschen und die Qualität menschlicher Beziehungen im Vergleich zu KI-Interaktionen.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Deuten der biblischen Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen. Unterstützt das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung der anthropologischen Fragen. Die SuS könnten diskutieren: \"Was unterscheidet eine Beziehung zu einem Menschen von einer Beziehung zu einem Chatbot?\" oder \"Inwiefern fordert die Existenz von Chatbots unser Verständnis von 'Gegenüber' und 'Ebenbild Gottes' heraus?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Partnerarbeit (Diskussion der Replika-Werbung), Plenum (Vergleich mit Gen 2 und Rosa-Konzept).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Vertiefung, Transfer", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-eljz9b2", "heading": "Können Maschinen Bewusstsein besitzen? Der Turing-Test", "content": "Methode: Anknüpfend an den Film \"Ex Machina\" wird eine Szene (9:50 bis 14:32) gezeigt, in der Caleb die Aufgabe erhält, zu testen, ob die Roboterfrau Ava ein Bewusstsein besitzt. Eindrücke und Überlegungen zur Szene, zur Darstellung der Charaktere und zur Möglichkeit einer Bewusstwerdung von Maschinen werden gesammelt. Die Lehrkraft gibt ggf. Hinweise zum sog. „Turing-Test“. (Absatz: Baustein 3: Können „intelligente“ Maschinen menschlich werden?, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein greift eine zentrale philosophische Frage im Kontext von KI auf: die des Bewusstseins. Durch die Verknüpfung mit dem Turing-Test wird eine konkrete Methode zur Diskussion angeboten, die zur Reflexion über die Grenzen von Maschinen und die Einzigartigkeit menschlichen Bewusstseins anregt. Dies ist direkt relevant für die Diskussion von Gottes- und Menschenbildern.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Im Erarbeitungs- oder Vertiefungsteil. Nach dem Zeigen der Szene könnten die SuS in Kleingruppen diskutieren: \"Was versteht man unter Bewusstsein? Kann eine Maschine Bewusstsein haben? Welche Kriterien würden wir anwenden, um dies zu beurteilen?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Plenum (Sammeln von Eindrücken), Kleingruppenarbeit (Diskussion), Lehrervortrag (Erklärung Turing-Test).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-ggkzdhv", "heading": "Das Gedankenexperiment „Mary“: Subjektives Erleben vs. Physiologie", "content": "Textquelle: Vertiefung durch das philosophische Gedankenexperiment „Mary“ (Frank Jackson), das von Caleb Ava in der vierten Sitzung in \"Ex Machina\" erzählt wird. Das Experiment versucht zu zeigen, dass subjektives Erleben nicht mit messbaren neurophysiologischen Vorgängen identifiziert werden kann. Näheres zum Experiment, seiner Bedeutung im Film und der unterrichtlichen Umsetzung im Download: M4. (Absatz: Baustein 3, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Das Gedankenexperiment \"Mary\" ist ein hervorragendes Instrument, um die Grenzen eines rein materialistischen Menschenbildes aufzuzeigen und die Bedeutung des subjektiven Erlebens zu betonen. Dies ist entscheidend für die Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage nach dem menschlichen \"Ebenbild Gottes\" und der Abgrenzung von KI.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und das Deuten der biblischen Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes. Unterstützt die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit philosophischen und anthropologischen Aspekten.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung der Diskussion über Bewusstsein und menschliche Einzigartigkeit. Die SuS könnten den Text zu M4 lesen und in Partnerarbeit diskutieren: \"Was ist das Kernproblem, das Marys Experiment aufwirft? Inwiefern ist dieses Problem relevant für die Diskussion über KI und menschliches Bewusstsein?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Partnerarbeit (Textanalyse), Plenum (Diskussion und Austausch).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-0i321ar", "heading": "Der Mensch als Ebenbild Gottes: Unterschied zu digitalen Systemen (Charbonnier)", "content": "Textquelle: Klärungsversuch zur Frage nach Mensch und Maschine durch den Text des Theologen Ralph Charbonnier (M5). Der Autor zeigt, dass digitale Systeme (z.B. Roboter) „nicht lernen, (sich) entscheiden, handeln und vertrauenswürdig sind“. Die vorgeschlagene Aufgabenstellung nimmt auch theologische Perspektiven auf den Menschen („Ebenbild Gottes“) mit in den Blick. Alternativ kann M6 genutzt werden (sprachlich einfacherer Text). (Absatz: Baustein 3, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein bietet eine explizit theologische Perspektive auf den Unterschied zwischen Mensch und Maschine, insbesondere im Hinblick auf das Konzept des Menschen als \"Ebenbild Gottes\". Dies ist zentral für die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Gottesbild und den anthropologischen Konsequenzen von KI.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Deuten der biblischen Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes. Unterstützt das argumentative Auseinandersetzen mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten aus christlicher Perspektive.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Erarbeitung oder Sicherung theologischer Argumente. Die SuS könnten den Text lesen und in Kleingruppen die Argumente Charbonniers zusammenfassen. Eine Aufgabe könnte sein: \"Diskutiert, welche Eigenschaften laut Charbonnier den Menschen von einer Maschine unterscheiden und inwiefern diese Eigenschaften mit der Vorstellung des Menschen als Ebenbild Gottes zusammenhängen.\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Textlektüre), Kleingruppenarbeit (Analyse), Plenum (Diskussion).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung, Sicherung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-ptyfx1r", "heading": "Heilserwartungen an KI: „Way of the Future“ und Unsterblichkeit", "content": "Rechercheaufgabe: Die Lernenden recherchieren zur Bewegung „Way of the Future“, einer 2015 gegründeten Kirche, die „eine auf KI basierende Gottheit aus Hardware und Software realisieren, akzeptieren und anbeten“ will. Alternativ ist eine Recherche zu „KI und Unsterblichkeit“ möglich (z.B. Ray Kurzweil und das Hochladen des menschlichen Geistes in die Cloud). (Absatz: Baustein 4: Die neuen Technologien als „Weg zum Paradies“?, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein adressiert direkt religionskritische Entwürfe und quasi-religiöse Heilserwartungen, die mit KI verbunden sind. Er ermöglicht es den SuS, diese Phänomene kritisch zu beurteilen und mit traditionellen Gottesbildern zu kontrastieren.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Beurteilen religionskritischer Entwürfe hinsichtlich ihrer Überzeugungskraft im Kontext der Diskussion über Gottesbilder. Unterstützt die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit anthropologisch-ethischen Aspekten aus christlicher Perspektive.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Als Hausaufgabe zur Vorbereitung oder als Erarbeitungsphase im Unterricht. Die SuS könnten ihre Rechercheergebnisse in kurzen Präsentationen vorstellen und anschließend im Plenum diskutieren: \"Inwiefern ähneln die Hoffnungen auf KI als 'Gottheit' oder auf digitale Unsterblichkeit religiösen Heilserwartungen? Welche Gefahren oder Chancen seht ihr darin?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Recherche), Partner-/Kleingruppenarbeit (Aufbereitung der Ergebnisse), Plenum (Präsentation, Diskussion).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung, Transfer", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-ogten47", "heading": "„Ihr werdet sein wie Gott“: Theologische Einordnung von KI-Heilserwartungen", "content": "Textquelle: Zur Weiterarbeit nach der Recherche zu KI-Heilserwartungen wird auf einen Text von Jörg Hermann, „Ihr werdet sein wie Gott“ (M7), zurückgegriffen. Darin zeigt der Autor Tendenzen zur religiösen Überhöhung von KI auf und ordnet sie theologisch ein. (Absatz: Baustein 4, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein bietet eine theologische Einordnung der in Baustein 10 thematisierten Heilserwartungen an KI. Er hilft den SuS, religionskritische Entwürfe aus einer theologischen Perspektive zu beurteilen und das eigene Gottesbild zu schärfen.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Beurteilen religionskritischer Entwürfe und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung aus der Perspektive des christlichen Glaubens.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung und Sicherung der theologischen Reflexion. Die SuS könnten den Text lesen und die Hauptargumente Hermanns herausarbeiten. Diskussionsfrage: \"Wie bewertet Hermann die 'Gottesähnlichkeit' im Kontext von KI? Welche biblischen Bezüge stellt er her und wie helfen sie uns, die Rolle des Menschen zu verstehen?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Textlektüre), Partnerarbeit (Diskussion der Thesen), Plenum (Sicherung der Ergebnisse).\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Vertiefung, Sicherung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-c2no4z6", "heading": "Digitaler Humanismus: Ethik für den Umgang mit KI", "content": "Konzept: Vorstellung des Konzepts „Digitaler Humanismus“ von Julian Nida-Rümelin als „Ethik für das Zeitalter der KI“. Es grenzt sich gegen Ideologisierung und apokalyptische Befürchtungen ab und zielt darauf ab, Demokratie und menschliche Urteilsfähigkeit im Umgang mit neuen Technologien zu stärken. Hinführend kann eine Karikatur (z.B. H. Haitzinger) oder ein Interview (Yvonne Hofstetter, \"Bots, Fake News und BigData: Das Ende der Demokratie?\", BpB, 2017, 4:13 Min.) thematisieren, inwieweit KI eine Gefahr für Demokratie und Selbstbestimmung darstellen kann. Das Konzept kann mithilfe von M8 erschlossen und erörtert werden. (Absatz: Baustein 5: Digitaler Humanismus, S. 25)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein bietet einen umfassenden ethischen Rahmen für den Umgang mit KI, der über rein technische Aspekte hinausgeht. Er ermöglicht es den SuS, die lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen von KI im Hinblick auf Demokratie und Selbstbestimmung zu reflektieren und eigene ethische Leitlinien zu entwickeln, die im Einklang mit einem christlichen Menschenbild stehen können.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern der verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen. Unterstützt die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit ethischen Aspekten und das Entwickeln eigener Leitlinien.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Erarbeitung eines ethischen Rahmens oder zum Transfer des Gelernten auf konkrete Anwendungsfelder. Die SuS könnten nach der Einführung des Konzepts (ggf. mit Video/Karikatur) in Gruppen ethische Leitlinien für den Einsatz von KI in den zu Beginn kennengelernten Beispielfeldern (Pflegeroboter, Bewerbungssoftware etc.) entwickeln.\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Plenum (Einführung, Diskussion von Karikatur/Video), Gruppenarbeit (Erschließung M8, Entwicklung von Leitlinien), Präsentation der Ergebnisse.\naus: Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe", "url": "https://www.rpi-ekkw-ekhn.de/fileadmin/templates/rpi/normal/material/rpiimpulse/2020/heft_2/Artikel/RPI_Impluse_2-2020_12_Mensch_und_Maschine.pdf", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Transfer", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-bh41s13", "heading": "Chatten mit Gott?", "content": "Das Dokument ist sehr gut geeignet, um einen aktuellen und lebensweltnahen Zugang zum Thema 'Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz' zu schaffen. Es ermöglicht eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit KI-generierten 'Gottesbildern' und ethischen Fragen im Kontext von Glauben und Technologie.", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "\naus: Chatten mit Gott?", "url": "https://www.sonntagsblatt.de/artikel/medien/chatten-mit-gott-so-gut-funktioniert-das-mit-der-kuenstlichen-intelligenz", "labels": "", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-x5a0bpk", "heading": "Chat-Experiment: Was sagt eine KI über Gott?", "content": "Aufgabenstellung: Lies den Artikel 'Chatten mit Gott?' und notiere, welche Fragen der Autor der KI stellt und welche Antworten er erhält, insbesondere wenn er direkt nach Gottes Existenz, Aussehen oder Geschlecht fragt. Achte auch darauf, wie die KI auf indirekte Fragen antwortet. (Absatz: 'Ein richtiges Gespräch mit Gott will sich nicht so recht einstellen...' und 'Wird die Frage aber indirekt gestellt...')", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein bietet einen direkten und hochaktuellen Einstieg in das Thema. Er regt die Schülerinnen und Schüler an, sich mit der Möglichkeit auseinanderzusetzen, wie eine KI 'Gott' darstellt, und dies mit ihren eigenen Vorstellungen sowie biblischen Gottesbildern zu vergleichen.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Kompetenz, eigene Gottesvorstellungen darzustellen und mit anderen (hier: KI-generierten) zu vergleichen. Schärft die Wahrnehmung für die Grenzen von KI im Bereich komplexer theologischer Fragen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Im Einstieg oder als erste Erarbeitungsphase. Die SuS könnten in Einzelarbeit die relevanten Passagen markieren und anschließend in Partnerarbeit die Antworten der KI diskutieren. Beispiel-Diskussionsfrage: 'Warum gibt die KI auf direkte Fragen nach Gott immer die gleiche Antwort, dass sie eine KI ist?'\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Leseauftrag), Partnerarbeit (Austausch), Plenum (Sammeln erster Eindrücke und Fragen).\naus: Chatten mit Gott?", "url": "https://www.sonntagsblatt.de/artikel/medien/chatten-mit-gott-so-gut-funktioniert-das-mit-der-kuenstlichen-intelligenz", "labels": "Einstieg, Erarbeitung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-6q2zttn", "heading": "KI als theologischer Ratgeber: Glaube, Kirche und persönliche Beziehung", "content": "Diskussionsanregung: Die KI gibt dem Autor den Rat, sich 'nicht an alles zu halten, was die Kirche sagt, sondern eine persönliche Beziehung zu Gott zu haben.' Diskutiert diese Aussage der KI. Welche Chancen und Gefahren seht ihr in einem solchen 'theologischen Rat' durch eine KI? Vergleicht die Haltung der KI mit euren eigenen Vorstellungen von Glauben, Kirche und der Beziehung zu Gott. (Absatz: 'Theologischer Rat' und folgende Absätze bis 'Beim Rest ihrer Antwort wiederholt sie nochmal ihren Standpunkt zum persönlichen Glauben.')", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein greift eine konkrete, potenziell provokante Aussage der KI auf, die direkt die lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen von Gottes- und Menschenbildern berührt. Er ermöglicht die Reflexion über Autorität im Glauben, die Rolle der Kirche und die Bedeutung einer persönlichen Gottesbeziehung im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen. Ermöglicht das Beurteilen religionskritischer Entwürfe (hier: die implizite Kritik der KI an kirchlicher Autorität) und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Erarbeitung ethischer und theologischer Fragen. Die SuS könnten in Kleingruppen die Aussage der KI analysieren und Argumente für oder gegen diesen 'Rat' sammeln. Beispiel-Aufgabenstellung: 'Formuliert Pro- und Contra-Argumente für die Aussage der KI, man solle auf die persönliche Beziehung zu Gott hören und nicht alles machen, was die Kirche fordert.'\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Kleingruppenarbeit (Diskussion, Argumentation), Plenum (Austausch der Ergebnisse, Debatte).\naus: Chatten mit Gott?", "url": "https://www.sonntagsblatt.de/artikel/medien/chatten-mit-gott-so-gut-funktioniert-das-mit-der-kuenstlichen-intelligenz", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-4qwv4pr", "heading": "Die Technik hinter dem 'KI-Gott': Grenzen von Large Language Models", "content": "Textquelle & Analyse: Der Artikel erklärt, dass Character.AI auf 'Large Language Models' basiert, die durch riesige Textmengen trainiert werden und das nächste Wort oder den nächsten Satz vorhersagen sollen. Gleichzeitig werden die Grenzen dieser KI deutlich: Sie wiederholt sich, vergisst den Kontext, enthält grammatikalische Fehler und liefert veraltete oder falsche Informationen. (Absatz: 'Die Technologie hinter Character.AI' und 'Was heißt das alles?')\n\nAufgabenstellung: Fasse zusammen, wie Character.AI funktioniert und welche konkreten Schwächen der Autor im Gespräch mit dem 'KI-Gott' feststellt. Diskutiert, welche Schlussfolgerungen sich daraus für die 'Wahrheit' oder 'Autorität' von KI-generierten Inhalten, insbesondere im religiösen Kontext, ziehen lassen. (Absatz: 'Was heißt das alles?')", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein ist entscheidend für die kritische Reflexion über KI. Er ermöglicht es den Schülerinnen und Schülern, die technischen Grundlagen und Limitationen von KI zu verstehen, um deren 'Aussagen' über Gott oder theologische Fragen fundiert beurteilen zu können. Dies ist direkt relevant für die Bewertung religionskritischer Entwürfe und die Reflexion über die Einzigartigkeit menschlicher Erkenntnis und Glaubens.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das sachgemäße Erschließen themenrelevanter Texte. Unterstützt das Beurteilen religionskritischer Entwürfe hinsichtlich ihrer Überzeugungskraft, indem die technische Basis und die Grenzen der KI offengelegt werden. Schärft die Medienkompetenz.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Sicherung des Verständnisses von KI und zur Vertiefung der kritischen Auseinandersetzung. Die SuS könnten die relevanten Abschnitte lesen und die Funktionsweise sowie die Fehler der KI in Stichpunkten festhalten. Beispiel-Diskussionsfrage: 'Warum ist es wichtig zu wissen, wie eine KI funktioniert, wenn man mit ihr über Gott spricht?'\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Textanalyse), Partnerarbeit (Zusammenfassung), Plenum (Diskussion der Schlussfolgerungen).\naus: Chatten mit Gott?", "url": "https://www.sonntagsblatt.de/artikel/medien/chatten-mit-gott-so-gut-funktioniert-das-mit-der-kuenstlichen-intelligenz", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Sicherung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-apkj7dv", "heading": "Mensch und Maschine: Utopie oder Dystopie?", "content": "Diskussionsanregung: Der Text beginnt mit der Frage: \"Siri ist schlau, denkt man sich. Computer wissen mehr als Menschen, könnte man meinen. Muss man dann nicht nachziehen und Denken optimieren, Gehirnströme tunen und die Menschheit neuronal vernetzen? Klingt nach einem Wettbewerb, dessen Ausgang offen ist: Utopie oder Dystopie?\" Diskutiert diese Eingangsfragen und eure ersten Assoziationen zum Thema 'Mensch und KI'. (Absatz: Thematische Hinführung)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein dient als aktivierender Einstieg, um die Schülerinnen und Schüler für die anthropologischen und ethischen Kernfragen der Einheit zu sensibilisieren. Er knüpft an ihr Vorwissen und ihre Meinungen an und eröffnet den Diskussionsraum.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung ethischer Fragestellungen und die Darstellung eigener Vorstellungen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Im Einstieg als Impuls für eine offene Klassendiskussion oder eine kurze Brainstorming-Phase. Die SuS könnten Stichworte oder kurze Sätze zu 'Utopie' und 'Dystopie' im Kontext von KI sammeln.\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Plenum, Think-Pair-Share.\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Einstieg", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-m25ypwv", "heading": "Mein digitales Ich: Smartphone-Nutzung und Assistenzsysteme", "content": "Aufgabenstellung:\n1. Prüft euer Wissen zum Smartphone mit dem Kahoot (Link im Originaldokument).\n2. Führt einen Selbstversuch mit einer Detox-App (Android) oder Forest (iOS) durch, um euer Nutzungsverhalten zu entdecken. Haltet die Ergebnisse in Protokollen fest und tauscht euch darüber aus: Was war dir vorher bewusst? Was war neu? Bewegt sich für dich alles im grünen Bereich? Willst du etwas ändern?\n3. Denkt über die Intelligenz von Assistenzsystemen wie Siri oder Cortana nach. Wenn du dir ein intelligenteres Smart­phone wünschen könntest: Was müsste dieses Gerät können? (Absatz: Kapitel: Was das Smartphone heute schon kann (00:21 — 01:06))", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein verbindet das abstrakte Thema KI mit der konkreten Lebenswelt der Schülerinnen und Schüler. Durch den Selbstversuch und die Reflexion über Assistenzsysteme werden erste ethische Fragen und die Frage nach der menschlichen Identität im digitalen Raum greifbar.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert die Wahrnehmung ethischer Herausforderungen und das Erörtern von Konsequenzen in der Lebenswelt.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: In der Erarbeitung zur Aktivierung von Alltagserfahrungen und zur Sensibilisierung für das Thema. Die SuS könnten ihre Protokolle in Kleingruppen besprechen und Wünsche für zukünftige Smartphone-Funktionen formulieren, die auch ethische Implikationen haben könnten (z.B. \"ein Smartphone, das meine Gefühle erkennt und darauf reagiert\").\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Selbstversuch, Kahoot), Partner-/Kleingruppenarbeit (Austausch), Plenum (Sammeln von Wünschen).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Erarbeitung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-a2dmufz", "heading": "Wenn Gedanken Maschinen steuern: Brain-Computer Interfaces", "content": "Diskussionsanregung & Aufgabenstellung:\n1. Beschreibt die Steuerung von Geräten mithilfe von Gedanken, wie sie am Ars Elec­tro­ni­ca Future­Lab erforscht wird.\n2. Entwickelt Theorien über das Lernen und dis­ku­tiert die Fra­ge, wie Schu­len für das 21. Jh. aus­se­hen müssen.\n3. Erläu­te­re ethi­schen Her­aus­for­de­run­gen, an denen Sci­ence-Fic­tion-Autoren, Inge­nieu­re, Infor­ma­ti­ker und Psy­cho­lo­gen zusam­men arbeiten. (Absatz: Kapitel: Wie das Gehirn mit KI mithalten kann (01:07 — 02:34))", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein führt in die komplexere Thematik der Brain-Computer Interfaces ein und regt zur Reflexion über die Zukunft des Lernens und die ethischen Grenzen der Technologie an. Er ermöglicht eine tiefere Auseinandersetzung mit dem Menschenbild.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung mit ethischen Aspekten.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Erarbeitung neuer Inhalte. Die SuS könnten in Gruppenarbeit die gestellten Fragen bearbeiten und ihre Theorien und Herausforderungen präsentieren. Beispiel: \"Welche ethischen Bedenken ergeben sich, wenn Gedanken zur Steuerung von Maschinen genutzt werden?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Gruppenarbeit, Plenum (Präsentation und Diskussion).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Erarbeitung, Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-h3rgdyd", "heading": "Identität und Erinnerung: Wer bin ich im digitalen Zeitalter?", "content": "Aufgabenstellung:\n1. Erstelle ein Akrostichon und bestimme, wer du bist.\n2. Erzähle von deinen ältesten Erinnerungen.\n3. Bestimme auf einer bio­gra­fi­schen Zeit­leis­te die für dei­ne Iden­ti­tät bedeut­sa­men Momente.\n4. Erklä­re Zusam­men­hän­ge zwi­schen Kon­ti­nui­tä­ten, Wand­lun­gen und Erin­ne­run­gen. Visua­li­sie­re die Zusam­men­hän­ge in einer Gra­fik, z.B. in einer bio­gra­fi­schen Land­kar­te, einem Gar­ten oder einem Stadtplan.\n5. Dis­ku­tiert in der Lern­grup­pe mit Rück­griff auf eure Gra­fi­ken, inwie­fern ein Ein­griff in die Erin­ne­run­gen sich nega­tiv oder posi­tiv auf die Iden­ti­tä­ten von Men­schen aus­wir­ken kann. For­mu­liert Fallbeispiele. (Absatz: Kapitel: Manipulierte Erinnerungen (02:35 — 04:31))", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein ist zentral für die anthropologische Reflexion. Er verbindet philosophische Konzepte von Identität mit der konkreten Möglichkeit der Manipulation von Erinnerungen durch Technologie. Dies ist ein direkter Bezug zur Frage nach dem menschlichen Ebenbild und seiner Unversehrtheit.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und das Deuten der biblischen Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung der anthropologischen Fragen. Die SuS können kreativ ihre Identität visualisieren und anschließend die ethischen Implikationen von Erinnerungsmanipulation diskutieren. Beispiel: \"Welche ethischen Grenzen sollte es bei der Möglichkeit geben, Erinnerungen zu verändern?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (kreative Aufgabe), Partner-/Kleingruppenarbeit (Diskussion, Fallbeispiele), Plenum (Vorstellung der Grafiken und Diskussion).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Vertiefung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-e7nti6s", "heading": "Der optimierte Mensch: Eine theologische Perspektive", "content": "Diskussionsanregung & Aufgabenstellung:\n1. Gib das Vor­ha­ben Bryan John­sons (kogni­ti­ve und emp­a­thi­sche Fähig­kei­ten durch Implan­ta­te beschleu­ni­gen) mit eige­nen Wor­ten wieder.\n2. Muss sich der Mensch opti­mie­ren? Prä­sen­tie­re dei­ne Ein­stel­lung mit­hil­fe einer Positionslinie: JA! <- Hier ste­he ich! -> Nein! Ord­net die unter­schied­li­chen Begrün­dungs­zu­sam­men­hän­ge in einer Mindmap.\n3. Kann man die Human­me­di­zin und ihre Ent­wick­lun­gen als Opti­mie­rungs­ver­such oder ‑pro­zess des Men­schen ver­ste­hen? Sam­melt Argu­men­te und Bei­spie­le und führt eine Pro- und Contra-Diskussion.\n4. Im Alten Tes­ta­ment wird in unter­schied­li­chen Tex­ten von der Erschaf­fung des Men­schen durch Gott erzählt. Im Schöp­fungs­hym­nus Gen 1,31 wird das Geschöpf beur­teilt. In Gen 2,18 fin­det sich eine wei­te­re Einschätzung. Inwie­fern spie­geln sich in den Tex­ten Über­le­gun­gen der bibli­schen Autoren zur „Opti­mie­rung” des Menschen? (Absatz: Kapi­tel: Auf­merk­sa­mer, kon­zen­trier­ter, krea­ti­ver: Maschi­nen­les­ba­re Hirn­strö­me (04:32 — 06:05))", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein ist ein Kernstück für die Verknüpfung von KI und Gottesbild. Er fordert die SuS heraus, die Idee der menschlichen Optimierung kritisch zu hinterfragen und mit biblischen Schöpfungsaussagen zu kontrastieren. Dies ermöglicht eine tiefgehende Reflexion über das Gottesbild und die biblische Rede vom Menschen als Geschöpf.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Deuten der biblischen Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes. Unterstützt das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder und das Beurteilen religionskritischer Entwürfe.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung der theologischen und ethischen Fragen. Die Positionslinie und die Pro-Contra-Diskussion fördern die argumentative Auseinandersetzung. Die Analyse der biblischen Texte verbindet die moderne Debatte mit religiösen Traditionen. Beispiel: \"Was bedeutet es für unser Gottesbild, wenn wir versuchen, den Menschen 'perfekter' zu machen?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (Positionslinie, Textanalyse), Partner-/Kleingruppenarbeit (Mindmap, Pro-Contra-Diskussion), Plenum (Austausch, Sicherung).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Vertiefung, Erarbeitung", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-gjp4zyr", "heading": "Das vernetzte Gehirn: Konzentration, Ablenkung und Mitgefühl", "content": "Diskussionsanregung & Aufgabenstellung:\n1. Stelle die Posi­ti­on Ian Pear­sons zur Zukunft ver­netz­ter mensch­li­cher Hir­ne dar und for­mu­lie­re ein eige­nes Statement.\n2. Erläu­te­re das Expe­ri­ment an der Ars Elec­tro­ni­ca, Linz, und klä­re die Bedeu­tun­gen von Kon­zen­tra­ti­on und Ablenkungfreiheit.\n3. Dis­ku­tiert die Fra­ge, ob die sonst hoch­ge­lob­te „Kon­zen­tra­ti­on” nicht auch Gefah­ren in sich birgt.\n4. In Mt 8,5−10 wird von einer Fern­hei­lung gespro­chen. Empa­thie oder Mit­ge­fühl bekom­men in die­ser Geschich­te eine gro­ße Bedeu­tung. Dis­ku­tiert die Ver­gleich­bar­keit mit dem Experiment.\n5. Beur­teilt die posi­ti­ven Poten­tia­le der Hirn­schnitt­stel­len an selbst­ge­wähl­ten Beispielen.\n6. Ent­wi­ckelt Theo­rien, war­um aus­ge­rech­net der Spit­zen­for­scher Chris­to­pher Lin­din­ger vor einer letz­ten Ver­net­zung der mensch­li­chen Gehir­ne warnt. (Absatz: Kapitel: Schnittstellen zum Gehirn (06:06 — 09:40))", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein erweitert die Diskussion um Brain-Computer Interfaces um die Aspekte Konzentration, Ablenkung und Empathie. Die Verknüpfung mit der biblischen Fernheilungsgeschichte (Mt 8,5-10) ermöglicht eine theologische Reflexion über Mitgefühl und die Grenzen menschlicher Fähigkeiten im Vergleich zu göttlicher Macht.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Erörtern verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder. Unterstützt das Deuten biblischer Texte hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen und die argumentative Auseinandersetzung.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Vertiefung und zum Transfer des Gelernten. Die SuS könnten in Gruppenarbeit die verschiedenen Aspekte bearbeiten und ihre Ergebnisse präsentieren. Beispiel: \"Welche ethischen Bedenken ergeben sich, wenn menschliche Gehirne vollständig vernetzt werden? Welche Rolle spielt dabei die Empathie?\"\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Gruppenarbeit, Plenum (Diskussion, Präsentation).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Vertiefung, Transfer", "inactive": false }, { "id": "id-1750022132843-1gmsy6f", "heading": "Homo Digitalis: Eine abschließende Positionsbestimmung", "content": "Diskussionsanregung: \"Was passiert, wenn es uns gelingt, das Organ zu verändern, das unser Denken bestimmt, unser Bewusstsein, unsere Identität? Bleiben wir dann noch Mensch? Was denkst Du?\" Formuliert eure persönliche Antwort auf diese Kernfrage der Einheit und begründet sie unter Bezugnahme auf die erarbeiteten Inhalte und eure eigenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder. (Absatz: Abschließende Frage am Ende des Dokuments)", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "Didaktischer Kommentar als Markdown-String:\n\n Beitrag zur Intention: Dieser Baustein dient der abschließenden Synthese und Reflexion der gesamten Unterrichtseinheit. Er fordert die Schülerinnen und Schüler auf, eine eigene, begründete Position zu den komplexen Fragen von Menschsein und KI zu entwickeln und dabei die erarbeiteten Kompetenzen anzuwenden.\n Kompetenzförderung: Fördert das Darstellen eigener Gottesvorstellungen und das Erörtern der verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n Konkrete Anwendung & Beispiele: Zur Sicherung und zum Transfer des Gelernten. Die SuS könnten ihre Antworten schriftlich festhalten (z.B. als Essay oder Statement) und anschließend in einer Gallery Walk oder einer Fishbowl-Diskussion präsentieren und diskutieren.\n Methodische Vielfalt & Sozialformen: Einzelarbeit (schriftliche Reflexion), Plenum (Diskussion, Präsentation).\naus: Homo Digitalis — Upgrade für das Gehirn", "url": "https://webcompetent.org/homo-digitalis-upgrade-fuer-das-gehirn", "labels": "Sicherung, Transfer", "inactive": false } ] }, { "id": "id-1750022178956-tvws3tr", "name": "Unterrichtsreihe", "color": "color-gradient-1", "cards": [ { "id": "id-1750022178956-cprxgo9", "heading": "Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz", "content": "## Unterrichtsverlaufsplan: Gottesbild und Künstliche Intelligenz (Klasse 11)\n\nIntention der Unterrichtseinheit: Die Schülerinnen und Schüler sollen befähigt werden, eigene Gottesvorstellungen zu entwickeln, diese mit biblischen Gottesbildern zu vergleichen, und die lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen verschiedener Gottes- und Menschenbilder im Kontext technischer Entwicklungen zu reflektieren. Dabei sollen sie auch religionskritische Perspektiven und ethische Fragen im Zusammenhang mit KI erarbeiten.\n\nLerngruppe: Schülerinnen und Schüler der 11. Klasse\n\n### Stunde 1: Einführung in KI und ethische Alltagsfragen\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen in ihrer Lebenswelt.\n2. SuS stellen eigene Gottesvorstellungen dar (erste Ansätze durch die Auseinandersetzung mit den Auswirkungen von KI auf die Lebenswelt).\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 15 Min)\n2. Impuls und Brainstorming:\n\n> Mensch und Maschine: Utopie oder Dystopie?\n\n1. Die Lehrkraft beginnt mit der Frage nach den ersten Assoziationen der SuS zum Thema Künstliche Intelligenz und leitet eine offene Diskussion zu 'Utopie oder Dystopie' ein.\n2. Situationsbezug:\n\n> KI im Alltag: Chancen und Gefahren von Pflegerobotern\n\n1. Die SuS versetzen sich in die beschriebene Situation mit der pflegebedürftigen Großmutter. In Einzelarbeit sammeln sie erste Gedanken und Gefühle, gefolgt von einer kurzen Plenumsaussprache.\n2. Erarbeitung (ca. 25 Min)\n3. Begriffsdefinition und Alltagsbezug:\n\n> Was ist KI? Sammeln von Alltagsbeispielen und Positionierung\n\n1. \ \\Methode:\\ Think-Pair-Share. Die SuS überlegen zunächst allein, dann zu zweit, in welchen Bereichen KI heute schon vorkommt. \ \\Plenum:\\ Gemeinsam wird eine Mindmap mit Alltagsbeispielen für KI erstellt (z.B. Sprachassistenten, personalisierte Werbung, autonomes Fahren). \ \\Positionierung:\\ Die SuS positionieren sich auf einer gedachten Linie im Raum, an deren Enden 'Chancen' und 'Gefahren' markiert sind, und erläutern ihre Positionen im Unterrichtsgespräch. \ \\Lücke:\\ Eine konkrete Materialgrundlage (M1) zur Begriffsbestimmung von KI aus dem Artefakt \Mensch und Maschine - Entwicklungen künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Ausgangspunkt anthropologisch-ethischer Lernprozesse in der Oberstufe\\ wird im Artefakt \Was ist KI? Sammeln von Alltagsbeispielen und Positionierung\\ erwähnt, ist aber nicht explizit als Kärtchen vorhanden. \ \\Vorschlag zur Füllung:\\ Die Lehrkraft bereitet eine kurze, prägnante Definition von KI vor oder stellt einen kurzen Informationstext (z.B. M1 aus dem Originaldokument) bereit, der nach der Mindmap zur Sicherung des Begriffsverständnisses dient.\n2. Sicherung/Ausblick (ca. 5 Min)\n3. Zusammenfassung: Die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse zu KI im Alltag und die Bandbreite der Meinungen zu Chancen und Gefahren werden kurz zusammengefasst.\n4. Ausblick: Die Lehrkraft leitet über zur Notwendigkeit, sich mit konkreten ethischen Dilemmata auseinanderzusetzen.\n\n### Stunde 2: Ethische Herausforderungen und die Frage nach dem Bewusstsein\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen in ihrer Lebenswelt.\n2. SuS beurteilen religionskritische Entwürfe hinsichtlich ihrer Überzeugungskraft im Kontext der Diskussion über Gottesbilder (erste Ansätze durch ethische Problemfelder).\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 10 Min)\n2. Wiederholung: Kurze Aktivierung der in Stunde 1 gesammelten KI-Anwendungsfelder.\n3. Impuls: Die Lehrkraft zeigt einen kurzen, provokanten Filmausschnitt oder ein Bild, das eine ethische Herausforderung im Kontext von KI darstellt (z.B. autonome Waffensysteme, KI in der Medizin).\n4. Erarbeitung (ca. 30 Min)\n5. Vertiefung ethischer Dilemmata (Gruppenpuzzle):\n\n> Ethische Herausforderungen der KI: Gruppenpuzzle zu Anwendungsfeldern\n\n1. \ Die SuS bilden Expertengruppen (bis zu fünf), die sich jeweils mit einem spezifischen Anwendungsfeld der KI (Pflegeroboter, autonome Waffensysteme, automatische Bewerbungssoftware, KI in der Schule, Steuerungscomputer im Verkehr) anhand von Infotexten (M2a-e aus dem Originaldokument) und Arbeitsaufträgen auseinandersetzen. \ Die Ergebnisse werden anschließend im Gruppenpuzzle oder direkt im Plenum präsentiert, um ein umfassendes ethisches Problembewusstsein zu schaffen.\n2. Mediale Ergänzung (optional):\n\n> Videoanalyse: „K.O. durch KI? Keine Angst vor schlauen Maschinen!“ (Leschs Kosmos)\n\n1. \ Gezielte Sequenzen des Videos können zur Vertiefung der jeweiligen Gruppenarbeitsthemen eingesetzt werden (z.B. \\\"Autonomes Fahren – mehr Sicherheit?\\\" oder \\\"Algorithmen – warum lügen sie?\\\").\n2. Sicherung/Ausblick (ca. 5 Min)\n3. Reflexion: Kurze gemeinsame Reflexion über die Komplexität ethischer Entscheidungen im KI-Kontext.\n4. Ausblick: Überleitung zur Frage, was den Menschen im Angesicht dieser Technologien ausmacht und wie sich dies auf unser Verständnis von Bewusstsein und Identität auswirkt.\n\n### Stunde 3: Menschliche Identität, Bewusstsein und biblische Anthropologie\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n2. SuS deuten die biblische Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 10 Min)\n2. Filmimpuls:\n\n> Science-Fiction-Filme: KI, Bewusstsein und menschliche Beziehungen\n\n1. Die Lehrkraft zeigt eine ausgewählte Szene aus \\\"Ex Machina\\\" (z.B. 9:50-14:32) oder \\\"Her\\\", die die Frage nach dem Bewusstsein von Maschinen oder der Qualität menschlicher Beziehungen zu KI aufwirft.\n2. Sammeln von Eindrücken: Erste Eindrücke und Überlegungen zur Möglichkeit einer Bewusstwerdung von Maschinen oder der Rolle von KI in Beziehungen werden im Plenum gesammelt.\n3. Erarbeitung (ca. 20 Min)\n4. Philosophische Perspektiven auf Bewusstsein:\n\n> Können Maschinen Bewusstsein besitzen? Der Turing-Test\n\n1. \ Die Lehrkraft erläutert den Turing-Test. \ In Kleingruppen diskutieren die SuS: \\\"Was versteht man unter Bewusstsein? Kann eine Maschine Bewusstsein haben? Welche Kriterien würden wir anwenden, um dies zu beurteilen?\\\"\n2. Vertiefung der Identitätsfrage:\n\n> Identität und Erinnerung: Wer bin ich im digitalen Zeitalter?\n\n1. \ Die SuS erstellen ein Akrostichon oder eine biografische Zeitleiste zu ihrer Identität. \ In Kleingruppen diskutieren sie anschließend, inwiefern ein (hypothetischer) Eingriff in Erinnerungen sich negativ oder positiv auf die Identität von Menschen auswirken könnte.\n2. Vertiefung/Transfer (ca. 15 Min)\n3. Gedankenexperiment und theologische Reflexion:\n\n> Das Gedankenexperiment „Mary“: Subjektives Erleben vs. Physiologie\n\n1. \ Die SuS lesen den Text zum Gedankenexperiment \\\"Mary\\\" (M4 aus 'Mensch und Maschine...') und diskutieren in Partnerarbeit das Kernproblem: \\\"Was unterscheidet subjektives Erleben von messbaren physiologischen Vorgängen?\\\" \ \\Lücke:\\ Die direkte theologische Verknüpfung des Gedankenexperiments mit der biblischen Anthropologie ist im Artefakt impliziert, muss aber explizit gemacht werden. \ \\Vorschlag zur Füllung:\\ Die Lehrkraft führt die Diskussion fort mit der Frage: \\\"Was bedeutet es für unser Verständnis des Menschen als 'Ebenbild Gottes' (vgl. Gen 1,27), wenn subjektives Erleben nicht rein materiell erklärbar ist? Welche einzigartigen menschlichen Qualitäten werden hier sichtbar, die eine KI nicht abbilden kann?\\\"\n\n### Stunde 4: Der Mensch als Ebenbild Gottes und die Optimierung des Menschen\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS deuten die biblische Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n2. SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 10 Min)\n2. Blitzlicht: Kurze Wiederholung der wichtigsten Erkenntnisse aus Stunde 3 zu Bewusstsein und Identität.\n3. Impuls: Die Lehrkraft stellt kurz das Vorhaben von Bryan Johnson (menschliche Optimierung durch Implantate) vor.\n4. Erarbeitung (ca. 25 Min)\n5. Diskussion über menschliche Optimierung:\n\n> Der optimierte Mensch: Eine theologische Perspektive\n\n1. \ Die SuS positionieren sich auf einer Positionslinie (\\\"Muss sich der Mensch optimieren? JA! <-> NEIN!\\\") und begründen ihre Haltung in einer Mindmap (Partnerarbeit). \ \\Plenum:\\ Pro- und Contra-Diskussion zur Frage, ob Humanmedizin und technologische Entwicklungen als Optimierungsversuch des Menschen verstanden werden können.\n2. Vertiefung (ca. 10 Min)\n3. Biblische Perspektive auf Geschöpflichkeit:\n\n> Der optimierte Mensch: Eine theologische Perspektive\n\n1. \ Analyse der biblischen Texte Gen 1,31 (Beurteilung des Geschöpfes als \\\"sehr gut\\\") und Gen 2,18 (Finden eines adäquaten Gegenübers). \ Diskussion: \\\"Inwiefern spiegeln sich in diesen Texten Überlegungen der biblischen Autoren zur 'Optimierung' des Menschen wider? Was bedeuten diese Texte für unsere heutige Debatte über menschliche Optimierung durch KI?\\\"\n2. Theologische Abgrenzung:\n\n> Der Mensch als Ebenbild Gottes: Unterschied zu digitalen Systemen (Charbonnier)\n\n1. \ Die SuS lesen den Text von Ralph Charbonnier (M5 aus 'Mensch und Maschine...') und fassen seine Argumente zusammen, warum digitale Systeme \\\"nicht lernen, (sich) entscheiden, handeln und vertrauenswürdig sind\\\". \ Anschließend wird der Bezug zum Menschen als \\\"Ebenbild Gottes\\\" diskutiert: Welche Eigenschaften des Menschen sind nach Charbonnier einzigartig und unübertragbar auf Maschinen?\n\n### Stunde 5: KI als 'Gott'? Religionskritik und theologische Einordnung\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS stellen eigene Gottesvorstellungen dar und vergleichen sie mit biblischen Gottesvorstellungen.\n2. SuS beurteilen religionskritische Entwürfe hinsichtlich ihrer Überzeugungskraft im Kontext der Diskussion über Gottesbilder.\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 10 Min)\n2. Provokation und Diskussion:\n\n> Chat-Experiment: Was sagt eine KI über Gott?\n\n1. Die SuS lesen den Artikel 'Chatten mit Gott?' und diskutieren die direkten und indirekten Antworten der KI auf Fragen nach Gott.\n2. Religionskritische Perspektive der KI:\n\n> KI als theologischer Ratgeber: Glaube, Kirche und persönliche Beziehung\n\n1. Diskussion der Aussage der KI, man solle sich 'nicht an alles halten, was die Kirche sagt, sondern eine persönliche Beziehung zu Gott haben'. Welche Chancen und Gefahren seht ihr in einem solchen 'theologischen Rat' durch eine KI?\n2. Erarbeitung (ca. 20 Min)\n3. Grenzen der KI im religiösen Kontext:\n\n> Die Technik hinter dem 'KI-Gott': Grenzen von Large Language Models\n\n1. \ Die SuS fassen zusammen, wie Character.AI funktioniert und welche konkreten Schwächen der Autor im Gespräch mit dem 'KI-Gott' feststellt (Wiederholungen, Kontextverlust, Fehler). \ Diskussion: \\\"Welche Schlussfolgerungen lassen sich daraus für die 'Wahrheit' oder 'Autorität' von KI-generierten Inhalten, insbesondere im religiösen Kontext, ziehen lassen?\\\"\n2. Recherche und Präsentation (Hausaufgabe oder Kurzrecherche):\n\n> Heilserwartungen an KI: „Way of the Future“ und Unsterblichkeit\n\n1. Kurze Präsentation der Rechercheergebnisse zu \\\"Way of the Future\\\" oder \\\"KI und Unsterblichkeit\\\".\n2. Vertiefung/Sicherung (ca. 15 Min)\n3. Theologische Einordnung von KI-Heilserwartungen:\n\n> „Ihr werdet sein wie Gott“: Theologische Einordnung von KI-Heilserwartungen\n\n1. \ Die SuS lesen den Text von Jörg Hermann (M7 aus 'Mensch und Maschine...') und erarbeiten, wie er Tendenzen zur religiösen Überhöhung von KI theologisch einordnet. \ Diskussion: \\\"Wie beurteilt Hermann die 'Gottesähnlichkeit' im Kontext von KI? Welche biblischen Bezüge stellt er her und wie helfen sie uns, die Rolle des Menschen zu verstehen?\\\"\n\n### Stunde 6: Digitaler Humanismus und Abschlussreflexion\n\nSchwerpunkt Kompetenzen:\n\n1. SuS erörtern die verschiedenen Gottes- und Menschenbilder hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen in ihrer Lebenswelt.\n2. SuS deuten die biblische Rede von Geschöpf und Ebenbild Gottes hinsichtlich ihrer lebenspraktischen Konsequenzen.\n3. SuS stellen eigene Gottesvorstellungen dar und vergleichen sie mit biblischen Gottesvorstellungen.\n\nPhasen:\n\n1. Einstieg (ca. 10 Min)\n2. Impuls:\n\n> Digitaler Humanismus: Ethik für den Umgang mit KI\n\n1. Die Lehrkraft zeigt eine Karikatur (z.B. von H. Haitzinger) oder einen kurzen Ausschnitt aus dem Interview mit Yvonne Hofstetter (\\\"Bots, Fake News und BigData: Das Ende der Demokratie?\\\") zur Frage, inwieweit KI eine Gefahr für Demokratie und Selbstbestimmung darstellen kann.\n2. Sammeln von Assoziationen: Kurze Sammlung von Assoziationen und Fragen der SuS.\n3. Erarbeitung (ca. 20 Min)\n4. Konzept des Digitalen Humanismus:\n\n> Digitaler Humanismus: Ethik für den Umgang mit KI\n\n1. \ Die SuS erschließen das Konzept des „Digitalen Humanismus“ von Julian Nida-Rümelin (M8 aus 'Mensch und Maschine...') in Kleingruppen. \ Diskussion: \\\"Wie grenzt sich Nida-Rümelin von Ideologisierung und apokalyptischen Befürchtungen ab, und was ist sein Ziel für den Umgang mit KI?\\\"\n2. Entwicklung ethischer Leitlinien:\n\n> Digitaler Humanismus: Ethik für den Umgang mit KI\n\n1. \ Ausgehend vom Konzept des Digitalen Humanismus entwickeln die SuS in Gruppen ethische Leitlinien für den verantwortungsvollen Umgang mit KI. Dabei sollen sie sich auf die zu Beginn der Einheit kennengelernten Beispielfelder (Pflegeroboter, Bewerbungssoftware etc.) beziehen.\n2. Sicherung/Transfer (ca. 15 Min)\n3. Abschließende Positionsbestimmung:\n\n> Homo Digitalis: Eine abschließende Positionsbestimmung\n\n1. \ Die SuS formulieren ihre persönliche, begründete Antwort auf die Kernfrage der Einheit: \\\"Was passiert, wenn es uns gelingt, das Organ zu verändern, das unser Denken bestimmt, unser Bewusstsein, unsere Identität? Bleiben wir dann noch Mensch? Was denkst Du?\\\" \ \\Optional:\\ Präsentation der entwickelten Leitlinien und der persönlichen Statements im Plenum, gefolgt von einer abschließenden Diskussion.\n2. Lücke: Möglichkeiten für systematisches Feedback und Selbstbewertung fehlen noch.\n3. Vorschlag zur Füllung: Am Ende der Stunde oder der Einheit können die SuS eine 'Exit-Card' ausfüllen, auf der sie 1-2 zentrale Erkenntnisse der gesamten Einheit und 1 offene Frage notieren. Dies dient der Selbstreflexion und gibt der Lehrkraft Feedback zum Lernerfolg.", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "", "labels": "", "inactive": false } ] }, { "id": "id-1750082204880-fpucylt", "name": "New Column", "color": "color-gradient-1", "cards": [ { "id": "id-1750082207747-a6bqez9", "heading": "Das Konzept eines digitalen Humanismus kann...", "content": "Das Konzept eines digitalen Humanismus kann mithilfe\nvon M8 erschlossen und erörtert werden. Die Schülerin-\nnen entwickeln (präzisieren) ausgehend davon ethische\nLeitlinien für den Umgang mit KI und greifen dazu noch\neinmal die zu Beginn kennengelernten Beispielfelder auf.", "color": "color-gradient-1", "thumbnail": "", "comments": "", "url": "", "labels": "", "inactive": false } ] } ], "aiConfig": { "provider": "", "apiKey": "", "model": "", "baseUrl": "" }, "backgroundTransparency": 80, "backgroundHex": "#bbf7d0", "headerRGBA": "rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8)", "exportDate": "2025-06-16T14:01:34.711Z", "nostrEvent": true }

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Will Replace Gold And Go To $1,000,000, Says Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz

Today, Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz told CNBC that Bitcoin is on a path to replace gold and could eventually reach a value of $1,000,000.

JUST IN: Galaxy Digital CEO told CNBC that Bitcoin will replace gold and go to $1,000,000 pic.twitter.com/Tf831LBt1h

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 12, 2025

“Bitcoin has become a macro asset,” said Novogratz. “And some of the great things is most people have it on their screens next to gold and silver and the S&P. And you think back ten years ago when people thought we were crazy. And now it’s an institutionalized macro asset… It’s just becoming institutionalized.”

He emphasized that Bitcoin is no longer a fringe investment but part of the mainstream financial landscape. He pointed out that its volatility is now seen as normal compared to traditional assets.

“We are in a dollar bear market. For the last 15 years, American exceptionalism was the story. Europeans were widely overweight and Asians widely overweight the US stock and we have an administration that wants a weaker dollar. They are pretty clear about it,” he said. “Even in the way Trump negotiates. And you can argue if it’s successful or not successful, but by telling Canada they want to be the 51st state, and telling people that they come here to kiss his rear end, it doesn’t engender people to say, ‘Oh, I want to buy more dollars.’”

According to Novogratz, this global shift is pushing investors toward assets outside the dollar, including Bitcoin.

“I think most macro funds are having a great year,” he stated. “They’re short the dollar, they’re long the euro, they’re long the yen, they’re long Aussie, they’re long a basket of currencies. Well, Bitcoin, gold, silver, platinum, they all fall into that same category as something that’s not the dollar.”

He also pointed to Bitcoin’s fixed supply as a key factor behind its growing value.

“There is no more Bitcoin,” he said. “What’s unique about Bitcoin as an asset is it was created with 21 million coins total. Period. End of story. There’ll never be more than that. But not all of those have been mined, is my point. Not most of them. Lots of them have been lost. There have been more Bitcoins lost than will be mined for the rest of eternity.”

Novogratz believes the wave of institutional involvement, including firms like BlackRock, is cementing Bitcoin’s role as a savings asset.

“The bull case becomes that over time… gold slowly gets replaced by Bitcoin. And so if you look at gold’s market cap and Bitcoin market cap, Bitcoin has a long way to go. Right? 10x. And so that [is] $1,000,000 a Bitcoin just to be where gold is.”

This post Bitcoin Will Replace Gold And Go To $1,000,000, Says Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Oscar Zarraga Perez.

@ 9ca447d2:fbf5a36d

JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the U.S. and one of the most powerful institutions in global finance, is going deeper into Bitcoin. The bank is reportedly going to allow wealthy clients to use shares of Bitcoin ETFs—specifically BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) — as collateral for loans.

This is a big move from the Wall Street giant and a sign of how traditional finance is changing the way it treats bitcoin.

According to a Bloomberg report, JPMorgan will let trading and wealth-management clients borrow money using digital asset ETFs like IBIT as collateral—the same way clients might use stocks, real estate or even cars.

The bank will also factor clients’ digital asset holdings into calculations of net worth and liquidity. So now, bitcoin will be treated like real estate or company shares when assessing a client’s loan repayment ability.

This is set to launch in the coming weeks and will start with IBIT which has over $70 billion in assets. IBIT is now the largest spot bitcoin ETF in the world and has far outpaced competitors like Fidelity’s FBTC.

Previously JPMorgan only allowed bitcoin ETFs as collateral on a case-by-case basis, Bloomberg reports. This decision will now make it available to all wealth-management clients.

JPMorgan’s new Bitcoin-friendly strategy comes despite its CEO Jamie Dimon’s long-time skepticism of Bitcoin. For years, Dimon has been one of the most vocal critics of Bitcoin, calling it a tool for criminals and comparing it to a “pet rock.”

But in a change of heart, Dimon recently said the bank would allow clients to buy bitcoin. At JPMorgan’s annual Investor Day, he said, “I don’t think you should smoke, but I defend your right to smoke. I defend your right to buy bitcoin.”

Related: JPMorgan Chase to Allow Clients to Buy Bitcoin, Says CEO Jamie Dimon

While Dimon remains personally unconvinced about the long-term value of bitcoin, the bank seems to be moving forward with embracing bitcoin, a move Bitcoin advocates believe is rooted in fear of missing out on possible profits and losing market share.

JPMorgan is following the trend on Wall Street. Other big financial players like Fidelity, Grayscale, and Standard Chartered have launched services for clients to invest or trade bitcoin.

The approval of Bitcoin ETFs by the U.S. SEC in 2024 has opened the door to millions of investors who were hesitant to enter the Bitcoin space.

Institutional interest is surging as the political landscape is also opening doors for digital assets. Under President Donald Trump’s administration, several Bitcoin-friendly policy changes have been introduced.

In April 2025, the Federal Reserve withdrew past guidance that discouraged banks from working with digital asset companies. Soon after, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency confirmed banks could hold customer’s bitcoin in custody.

@ dfa02707:41ca50e3

Contribute to keep No Bullshit Bitcoin news going.

• Version 1.3 of Bitcoin Safe introduces a redesigned interactive chart, quick receive feature, updated icons, a mempool preview window, support for Child Pays For Parent (CPFP) and testnet4, preconfigured testnet demo wallets, as well as various bug fixes and improvements.

• Upcoming updates for Bitcoin Safe include Compact Block Filters.

"Compact Block Filters increase the network privacy dramatically, since you're not asking an electrum server to give you your transactions. They are a little slower than electrum servers. For a savings wallet like Bitcoin Safe this should be OK," writes the project's developer Andreas Griffin.

• Learn more about the current and upcoming features of Bitcoin Safe wallet here.

What's new in v1.3

• Redesign of Chart, Quick Receive, Icons, and Mempool Preview (by @design-rrr).
• Interactive chart. Clicking on it now jumps to transaction, and selected transactions are now highlighted.

• Speed up transactions with Child Pays For Parent (CPFP).
• BDK 1.2 (upgraded from 0.32).
• Testnet4 support.
• Preconfigured Testnet demo wallets.
• Cluster unconfirmed transactions so that parents/children are next to each other.
• Customizable columns for all tables (optional view: Txid, Address index, and more)
• Bug fixes and other improvements.

Announcement / Archive
Blog Post / Archive
GitHub Repo
Website

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

Where Could Bitcoin Peak This Cycle?

With Bitcoin looking as bullish as ever, the inevitable question arises of how high could BTC realistically go in this market cycle? Here we’ll explore a wide range of on-chain valuation models and cycle timing tools to identify plausible price targets for a Bitcoin peak. Although prediction is never a substitute for disciplined data reaction, this analysis gives us frameworks to better understand where we are and where we might be heading.

Price Forecast Tools

The journey begins with Bitcoin Magazine Pro’s free Price Forecast Tools, which compile several historically accurate valuation models. While it’s always more effective to react to data rather than blindly predict prices, studying these metrics can still provide powerful context for market behavior. If macro, derivative, and on-chain data all start flashing warnings, it’s usually a solid time to take profit, regardless of whether a specific price target has been hit. Still, exploring these valuation tools is informative and can guide strategic decision-making when used alongside broader market analysis.

Figure 1: Applying Price Forecast Tools to calculate potential cycle tops. View Live Chart

Among the key models, the Top Cap multiplies the average cap over time by 35 to project peak valuations. It accurately forecasted 2017’s top, but missed the 2020–2021 cycle, estimating over $200k while Bitcoin peaked around $69k. It now targets over $500k, which feels increasingly unrealistic. A step further is the Delta Top, subtracting the average cap from the realized cap, based on the cost basis of all circulating BTC, to generate a more grounded projection. This model suggested an $80k–$100k top last cycle. The most consistently accurate, however, is the Terminal Price, based on Supply Adjusted Coin Days Destroyed, which has closely aligned with each prior peak, including the $64k top in 2021. Currently projecting around $221k, it could rise to $250k or more, and remains arguably the most credible model for forecasting macro Bitcoin tops. Of course, more information regarding all of these metrics and their calculation logic can be found beneath the charts on the site.

Peak Forecasting

Another powerful metric is the MVRV ratio, which compares market cap to realized cap. It offers a psychological window into investor sentiment, typically peaking near a value of 4 in major cycles. The ratio currently sits at 2.34, suggesting there may still be room for significant upside. Historically, as MVRV nears 3.5 to 4, long-term holders begin to realize substantial gains, often signaling cycle maturity. However, with diminishing returns, we might not reach a full 4 this time around. Instead, using a more conservative estimate of 3.5, we can begin projecting more grounded peak values.

Figure 2: A view of the MVRV ratio predicts further cycle growth to reach historical 4+ and even more conservative 3.5 target values. View Live Chart

Calculating A Target

Timing is as important as valuation. Analysis of BTC Growth Since Cycle Lows illustrates that previous Bitcoin cycles peaked almost exactly 1,060 days from their respective lows. Currently, we are about 930 days into this cycle. If the pattern holds, we can estimate the peak may arrive in roughly 130 days. Historical FOMO-driven price increases often happen late in the cycle, causing Realized Price, a proxy for average investor cost basis, to rise rapidly. For instance, in the final 130 days of the 2017 cycle, realized price grew 260%. In 2021, it increased by 130%. If we assume a further halving of growth due to diminishing returns, a 65% rise from the current $47k realized price brings us to around $78k by October 18.

Figure 3: Based on the peak rate of previous cycles, this cycle is far from over. View Live Chart

With a projected $78k realized price and a conservative MVRV target of 3.5, we arrive at a potential Bitcoin price peak of $273,000. While that may feel ambitious, historical parabolic blowoff tops have shown that such moves can happen in weeks, not months. While it may seem more realistic to expect a peak closer to $150k to $200k, the math and on-chain evidence suggest that a higher valuation is at least within the realm of possibility. It’s also worth noting that these models dynamically adjust, and if late-cycle euphoria kicks in, projections could quickly accelerate further.

Figure 4: Combining projected realized price and a possible MVRV target to predict this cycle’s peak.

Conclusion

Forecasting Bitcoin’s exact peak is inherently uncertain, with too many variables to account for. What we can do is position ourselves with probabilistic frameworks grounded in historical precedent and on-chain data. Tools like the MVRV ratio, Terminal Price, and Delta Top have repeatedly demonstrated their value in anticipating market exhaustion. While a $273,000 target might seem optimistic, it is rooted in past patterns, current network behavior, and cycle-timing logic. Ultimately, the best strategy is to react to data, not rigid price levels. Use these tools to inform your thesis, but stay nimble enough to take profits when the broader ecosystem starts signaling the top.

For more deep-dive research, technical indicators, real-time market alerts, and access to a growing community of analysts, visit BitcoinMagazinePro.com.

---

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.

This post Where Could Bitcoin Peak This Cycle? first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Matt Crosby.

@ dfa02707:41ca50e3

• This version introduces the Soroban P2P network, enabling Dojo to relay transactions to the Bitcoin network and share others' transactions to break the heuristic linking relaying nodes to transaction creators.

• Additionally, Dojo admins can now manage API keys in DMT with labels, status, and expiration, ideal for community Dojo providers like Dojobay. New API endpoints, including "/services" exposing Explorer, Soroban, and Indexer, have been added to aid wallet developers.
• Other maintenance updates include Bitcoin Core, Tor, Fulcrum, Node.js, plus an updated ban-knots script to disconnect inbound Knots nodes.

"I want to thank all the contributors. This again shows the power of true Free Software. I also want to thank everyone who donated to help Dojo development going. I truly appreciate it," said Still Dojo Coder.

What's new

• Soroban P2P network. For MyDojo (Docker setup) users, Soroban will be automatically installed as part of their Dojo. This integration allows Dojo to utilize the Soroban P2P network for various upcoming features and applications.
• PandoTx. PandoTx serves as a transaction transport layer. When your wallet sends a transaction to Dojo, it is relayed to a random Soroban node, which then forwards it to the Bitcoin network. It also enables your Soroban node to receive and relay transactions from others to the Bitcoin network and is designed to disrupt the assumption that a node relaying a transaction is closely linked to the person who initiated it.
  • Pushing transactions through Soroban can be deactivated by setting NODE_PANDOTX_PUSH=off in docker-node.conf.
  • Processing incoming transactions from Soroban network can be deactivated by setting NODE_PANDOTX_PROCESS=off in docker-node.conf.
• API key management has been introduced to address the growing number of people offering their Dojos to the community. Dojo admins can now access a new API management tab in their DMT, where they can create unlimited API keys, assign labels for easy identification, and set expiration dates for each key. This allows admins to avoid sharing their main API key and instead distribute specific keys to selected parties.
• New API endpoints. Several new API endpoints have been added to help API consumers develop features on Dojo more efficiently:
  • New:
    • /latest-block - returns data about latest block
    • /txout/:txid/:index - returns unspent output data
    • /support/services - returns info about services that Dojo exposes
  • Updated:
    • /tx/:txid - endpoint has been updated to return raw transaction with parameter ?rawHex=1
  • The new /support/services endpoint replaces the deprecated explorer field in the Dojo pairing payload. Although still present, API consumers should use this endpoint for explorer and other pairing data.

Other changes

• Updated ban script to disconnect inbound Knots nodes.
• Updated Fulcrum to v1.12.0.
• Regenerate Fulcrum certificate if expired.
• Check if transaction already exists in pushTx.
• Bump BTC-RPC Explorer.
• Bump Tor to v0.4.8.16, bump Snowflake.
• Updated Bitcoin Core to v29.0.
• Removed unnecessary middleware.
• Fixed DB update mechanism, added api_keys table.
• Add an option to use blocksdir config for bitcoin blocks directory.
• Removed deprecated configuration.
• Updated Node.js dependencies.
• Reconfigured container dependencies.
• Fix Snowflake git URL.
• Fix log path for testnet4.
• Use prebuilt addrindexrs binaries.
• Add instructions to migrate blockchain/fulcrum.
• Added pull policies.

#FREESAMOURAI

Learn how to set up and use your own Bitcoin privacy node with Dojo here.

Announcement / Archive
GitHub Repo

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

JPMorgan Reports Record Profits for Bitcoin Miners in Q1

Bitcoin mining companies in the U.S. have kicked off 2025 with record performance, according to a recent report. The first quarter of the year was “one of Bitcoin miners’ best quarters to date,” analysts Reginald Smith and Charles Pearce stated. 

JUST IN: JPMorgan reported Q1 2025 was one of the best periods on record for publicly traded bitcoin mining companies pic.twitter.com/gs9fGiTbZV

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 13, 2025

“Four of the five operators in our coverage reported record revenue and profits,” the report stated, underscoring the sector’s impressive rebound in profitability amid continued institutional adoption and high bitcoin prices, currently hovering around $105,462.87.

In total, U.S.-listed miners brought in $2.0 billion in gross profit during Q1 2025, with average gross margins reaching 53%—a jump from $1.7 billion and 50% in the previous quarter.

MARA Holdings (MARA) once again led the pack in Bitcoin production, mining the most BTC for the ninth consecutive quarter. However, despite its output dominance, MARA also posted the highest cost per coin, estimated at $72,600, JPMorgan noted.

On the profitability front, IREN (IREN) was the standout performer. For the first time, IREN earned the most gross profit among the tracked firms. The company also reported the lowest all-in cash cost per Bitcoin, around $36,400, helping to boost margins significantly.

CleanSpark (CLSK), another major player, did not raise any equity in the quarter—one of the more capital-disciplined moves seen among its peers. In fact, JPMorgan reported that the five miners it tracks issued only $310 million in equity for Q1, marking a steep decline from $1.3 billion in Q4 2024. 

On the operational expense side, miners spent an estimated $1.8 billion on power, up $50 million from the previous quarter—demonstrating the energy-intensive nature of mining. 

JPMorgan’s outlook on the industry remains bullish for select players. The bank maintains overweight ratings for CleanSpark, IREN, and Riot Platforms (RIOT), while assigning neutral ratings to Cipher Mining (CIFR) and MARA.

As profitability surges and strategic spending remains in check, 2025 may very well be remembered as a turning point in mining economics—especially for companies navigating cost discipline and scaling production. 

This post JPMorgan Reports Record Profits for Bitcoin Miners in Q1 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ 2cde0e02:180a96b9

pen & ink; monochromized

https://stacker.news/items/1007644

@ a19caaa8:88985eaf

NostrをXのように使い始めて3か月が経った。最初は「ぷ　プロトコル？　ブロックチェーン？サーバー？　そもそも、ギットハブって？？」って謎だらけで、それでも利用できてしまうから「使えちゃって大丈夫かな」とすら思っていたけど、いちユーザーながら少しずつわかることが増えてきたから、この3か月間で覚えたこととかできるようになったことを、備忘録も兼ねてまとめてみる。といっても過去ツイ（便宜上）を集めてきただけだけど。初心を忘れたくない！！

---

• PCで始めて、スマホは後だったんだろうな nostr:note1q8t0spfhg9dc4h590jedd00a5pag5j44tv0vzu55004q8qjw7fkscecvkz

• iPhoneからNostore(拡張機能(NIP-??))を使ってSafariでlumilumiにログイン nostr:note1egt7y4a8wulu6kex40z0zqtgls0r9ups0q4npyrlmgd3f2swrcysrskp42 nostr:note15gjqzpnevft2h6ywlz2hzacsk6emlna5lwechcpwkx5n6fq8gs9qprfh6v ↑Damusをdisるな
  nostr:note1cn4aspxthcysjgwhyd3wwr6slsz57anwn2ep3th05lpa0yag6xrqm8x3lh やかましい　※用語解説：Nostrクライアントなどの名前です

• Nostore: 拡張機能(の、説明のscrapbox)
• nostter: https://nostter.app/about
• damus(for iOS): https://damus.io/
• lumilumi: https://lumilumi.app/about
• Rabbit(拡張機能必須): https://rabbit.syusui.net/

---

• 出会い nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqv33pxtldvmmdntqhv269r56zjadmhalpp660h3yc6gj8gxpuexvqyxhwumn8ghj77tpvf6jumt9qyghwumn8ghj7u3wddhk56tjvyhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqqyz9k4uamtpsy9rtfh4dpxez0n8vr7tufttz5x5v9j5vd3t76kapjwxk245u nostr:note10e6flvadpyfshtnplfnc83dunzjrgl4fl0uzrw70xt3ulf0nv2yqm4qjfa nostr:note1wwchrc7vz8fcp2jrknms5ascup9eux9fkd89jxhqy6d46mkr06ssmgrjhk ↓続き

• 3sats (zap)(NIP-?? kind:??) nostr:nevent1qqsw9sfvmaqy6ngvl98drg93e7sy08kfu2y4tuyj8m2mleftvcx5mqc8uyq3m nostr:note1zzs7qfemq7qaekxv0qjea24t6k4kvlla0m9lusep2ce38tef8gjqfgv7zu nostr:nevent1qqsz8m0c5drajst00x92uc8pjwxa40nd5hmzxu4vn3yhuzjkaqmk4fqa4lvkl nostr:note106n902n66lsfxck4fsu9dqkwmelnp06qqx96nzyqvp89c9v28apqzjcflw (急な意思表示)

  たゃ仕事中に熟考

• nostr:note1fj5mmtsk0nh0e23hez2dm4unweklrypm6s6n9ajwaug574dg7pqq8phvav nostr:note1wk0ugra9pyv0y0rmpql6sjgsavu634x53f4v4jztqluq02awxwhql8d8mf nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq2aj4wlutzft00dg77x4x6pdjy7vnfzxk30pry5lpy6a3l0uks9aqyxhwumn8ghj77tpvf6jumt9qqsyt4yh934z6fd324z5hljwlx74nndfwetu04lnu8wcj0pkhkqlppqwpsmue ⚡3satsくれました

• ステータス　NIP-??kind:30315 nostr:note1p836vncvcxfvkqmpggxzf53q6kywxn443w2hytydr7pdvrca835s83nd2u nostr:nevent1qqsdu2mf3d5am8hpjj432yf0qmpfxuwy50pv9rx6q7pryz0axnj44dg0d7auc nostr:nevent1qqsyaypjm0a99g7626r28ct97jhjvt4kk4vyv63fphdz8guhsdtevsg4yvvhr nostr:nevent1qqswea28tdayxe67axzxmwjfc4jq664phrep82zhveg8f5c0nfd06mgwt0taw
  nostr:nevent1qqsqkt8pgpchqphgvv8hd6lxfv4ylx3xtu76x2psj7asm6z846amy3c3w2s2z nostr:note1657tlek0uulr5xa3jqc2sj2l0lm24q79m0984xhm9tnzyy9nsrksynxl6y みんなやさしすぎる　おｋじゃないねん　みんなありがとうございます
• バッジ　kind:?? nostr:nevent1qqst45zcjha92jy0raun59lm05haw24rpjpw6njae93qfyasgxppmjchuq2c0 nostr:nevent1qqstvtx67c74xztstc9hze62h25saycr2ktrkwknevkhy8glzf0g78sqge3fu こいつbotなんヤバい
  nostr:nevent1qqsv6k54yysjdrfpxxtlxhfuh56mhslx63xwfncfvvg8a8vug4az4vstjyey6 nostr:nevent1qqspgur97rvwtry6t9nc6gjm9p8taw2563u3lgqn4p32e2gmqe30xxqwz9d90 nostr:note15shchwfllja7k9nd428a7ts7xf0ggefwllk7rv6qq3guuztjvcfs80pe03
• カスタム絵文字(いっぱいある)(kind10030(使うやつ),kind30030(仕切り板みたいな)) nostr:note16qkqfhezksjxrkk5z4vca8qs42fr8z9awvny39fytl73gty64nrs738g7c nostr:note1xrrer5ayqg3meskga2uc9m2x0lg2dglr3dkaf3qukpjtftysn96qdq7uda nostr:note156fyw2e4w8f0cmu6xmkj7k7f39yh8zw4pq2q90l9llmtefmtu0ds6743zm nostr:note1zz288585z68a0xlm9pc6y4s48ghfdl8hg6zkfmslaj2k9v0nscpsae8m95 nostr:note17tcfuxu8h3ss3rzjpx3zwwnucqdpramnh0yd5j4vj3ee65dleyxqfhcwk7 nostr:note1tu8d06kyw9a4s7xrsu723xmu24f2y34shd6qzn9wpa2jz5ddcu5sa5nvpq
• ネームタグ？　kind:?? nostr:note1ck3h58hjm6z00xcxu6fmm2raujrzy8t5ajc7p76pwafl6e0ffdvqh3k07t
• ピン留め　kind:?? nostr:note18dfzlgaf4ugkxs5209556p53gl67d8hfkutvtm7qnprjlfnavf0sr98k2h nostr:note1mnz5xlu0wnrh2rhjucjmzv2p9ta6xm5e0hhg2p8kyhe2dkgul3qs09h98h
• リスト？　NIP-?? kind:30000 nostr:note1ug7lcgjpkac57a9wd27rjqwymv5cwczmuc4ezg5wweuzrxgwhddqzp3mwz nostr:note126ahjdpmy6alv7mfm5x0yupyty03w3knlwf03cyypguguqjwrxqqyk7ysp
• 長文投稿　kind30023(これ)NIP-?? nostr:note1qzt4xpwv63tac460ha2am9xfdys4l0p34g8q93tqyp8dckgf6lkqkrua73 nostr:note1cx6w82s6p735n765y5rurzu038qkly03t7pcf4u8r6z6yucgf8qspsnkt4
• Suno(上記音楽生成AI)が出力した曲の耳コピ nostr:note12pry99d4z8w3cnpzy46xlg2kpudzj09jpv4vjxt62l54gt4v8dqsvlwyxl
• Damusへのリンク共有？ nostr:note1y2uzgxz89lnnzqgj0ndj43qan34wv4cvx56srgzghezt07jc6g6qukddry nostr:note1hcnndcrmwjulzt07t4aelraptr7zyhjuf8ut3vg293j06fwn7fgqae0w0y
• 警告？　NIP-?? nostr:note1w6djak9hknd84ryz389jctrmx39eqm2xvwv97k4sk2m2c0akvmysuny8p4
• emoji kitchen (先述のnostterからすぐできます！他もできるかも) nostr:note1k5s6x4hglqwzqghajpl8r7g7t9q8t6uzv2cx92q26tkjcj8hm6rq8elxfu nostr:note1ue575wzjvun0zy4wg2lfv6unrcxnzd688980eur9mulak3msxqgsf2rw72 nostr:note1246rg8v3gvwpwhu5tgzdf2e8cwn77q65gkjt7yhyyqchcchpsduq6mrex7
• kind7のkind5 nostr:note1fwtplut4pshq55790rrf328gxqglrx2m77wkxhsfrpajrnxjnvkqwvlf7w 無事外せたというか、全部lumilumiでできることがわかったんだけど、その記録が見当たらなかった
• ハッシュタグ　NIP-?? kind:?? nostr:note13lfdgatre3v5hnxcst0hkcgm8guzlavu6vyxez6n4s09jl7setlsfq3fcf nostr:note1dllf6795ttv0sft4rlclf7zerfpher23z3ga26kyn9yfafffncls3z5n42

---

kind30023用クライアントまとめ

（拡張機能を使わずに使用した所感）
* makimono：署名方法→秘密鍵×/nsec.app〇　表示→編集画面で表示確認可、njumpとlumilumiのnaddrリンクあり　NIP-21→対応　kind5（削除）→流せない　kind30024→多分、流せない

• habla：署名方法→なし（秘密鍵ログインできない。nsec.appもなんか入れない（読み込みから進まない）。）read only　表示→シンプルだけど文字がデカい　nip-21→対応

• yakihonnne：署名方法→秘密鍵〇/nsec.app→試してない　kind30023の編集ができない（読み込みから進まない）。NIP-21試してない。

• flycat：署名方法→秘密鍵〇/nsec.app試してない　kind1も流せる　NIP-21→非対応　kind30024→Draftがあるけど、kind30024を流しているわけでは無さそう。キャッシュクリアして再ログインすると残ってない。　kind5→流せない。

• tagayasu：署名方法：秘密鍵×/ncec.app×/拡張機能のみ？（画像↓参照）　でも、なんか、全部できる。kind5も流せる。kind30024も。

※NIP-21はこうやって引用元のツイートを表示するルール（※ルールっていうとニュアンス違うくて！ちゃぴに聞こう↓） さすがちゃぴ。

まとめ

| クライアント | 署名方法 | NIP-21 | 備考 | |--------------|-----------|--------|------| | makimono | 秘密鍵× / nsec.app〇 | 対応 | 編集画面で表示確認可。njump・lumilumiのnaddrリンクあり。kind5（削除）は送信不可。kind30024（下書き）も多分送信不可。 | | flycat | 秘密鍵〇 / nsec.app未確認 | 非対応 | kind1も送信可。kind5は送信不可。Draft機能はあるけどkind30024ではなさそう（キャッシュ消すと消える）。 | | habla | 秘密鍵× / nsec.app× | 対応 | nsec.appのBunkerURLの読み込みが進まない。使うとしたら表示確認。シンプルだけど文字が大きい。 | | yakihonnne | 秘密鍵〇 / nsec.app未確認 | 不明 | kind30023の編集が読み込みで止まる。NIP-21対応は未確認。 | | tagayasu | 秘密鍵× / nsec.app×（拡張機能のみ？） | 不明 | 拡張ログインさえあれば全部できる。kind5・kind30024も送信可能。 |

• 未確認を埋めたいひとはコピペしてご自身でkind30023をお流しくださいませね🙏

---

今のたゃが言えるのはこんなとこかなー！！！ 穴（NIPとかkindとか未試行とか）、いつかは埋めたいけど、いつか、かな…。
別にこれが仕事に繋がるとかじゃないけど、たゃ生（人生のたゃバージョン）がより良い（好い）ものになったことは確か！
一旦ここまで！
終

@ b1ddb4d7:471244e7

Paris, France – June 6, 2025 – Flash, the easiest Bitcoin payment gateway for businesses, just announced a new partnership with the Bitcoin Only Brewery, marking the first-ever beverage company to leverage Flash for seamless Bitcoin payments. 

Bitcoin Buys Beer Thanks to Flash!

As Co-Founder of Flash, it's not every day we get to toast to a truly refreshing milestone.

Okay, jokes aside.

We're super buzzed to see our friends at @Drink_B0B
Bitcoin Only Brewery using Flash to power their online sales!

The first… pic.twitter.com/G7TWhy50pX

— Pierre Corbin (@CierrePorbin) June 3, 2025

Flash enables Bitcoin Only Brewery to offer its “BOB” beer with, no-KYC (Know Your Customer) delivery across Europe, priced at 19,500 sats (~$18) for the 4-pack – shipping included.

The cans feature colorful Bitcoin artwork while the contents promise a hazy pale ale: “Each 33cl can contains a smooth, creamy mouthfeel, hazy appearance and refreshing Pale Ale at 5% ABV,” reads the product description.

Pierre Corbin, Co-Founder of Flash, commented: “Currently, bitcoin is used more as a store of value but usage for payments is picking up. Thanks to new innovation on Lightning, bitcoin is ready to go mainstream for e-commerce sales.”

Flash, launched its 2.0 version in March 2025 with the goal to provide the easiest Bitcoin payment gateway for businesses worldwide. The platform is non-custodial and can enable both digital and physical shops to accept Bitcoin by connecting their own wallets to Flash.

By leveraging the scalability of the Lightning Network, Flash ensures instant, low-cost transactions, addressing on-chain Bitcoin bottlenecks like high fees and long wait times.

Bitcoin payment usage is growing thanks to Lightning

In May, fast-food chain Steak ‘N Shake went viral for integrating bitcoin at their restaurants around the world. In the same month, the bitcoin2025 conference in Las Vegas set a new world record with 4,000 Lightning payments in one day.

According to a report by River Intelligence, public Lightning payment volume surged by 266% from August 2023 to August 2024. This growth is also reflected in the overall accessibility of lighting infrastructure for consumers. According to Lightning Service Provider Breez, over 650 Million users now have access to the Lightning Network through apps like CashApp, Kraken or Strike.

Bitcoin Only Brewery’s adoption of Flash reflects the growing trend of businesses integrating Bitcoin payments to cater to a global, privacy-conscious customer base. By offering no-KYC delivery across Europe, the brewery aligns with the ethos of decentralization and financial sovereignty, appealing to the increasing number of consumers and businesses embracing Bitcoin as a legitimate payment method.

“Flash is committed to driving innovation in the Bitcoin ecosystem,” Corbin added. “We’re building a future where businesses of all sizes can seamlessly integrate Bitcoin payments, unlocking new opportunities in the global market. It’s never been easier to start selling in bitcoin and we invite retailers globally to join us in this revolution.”

For businesses interested in adopting Bitcoin payments, Flash offers a straightforward onboarding process, low fees, and robust support for both digital and physical goods. To learn more, visit paywithflash.com.

About Flash

Flash is the easiest Bitcoin payment gateway for businesses to accept payments. Supporting both digital and physical enterprises, Flash leverages the Lightning Network to enable fast, low-cost Bitcoin transactions. Launched in its 2.0 version in March 2025, Flash is at the forefront of driving Bitcoin adoption in e-commerce.

About Bitcoin Only Brewery

Bitcoin Only Brewery (@Drink_B0B) is a pioneering beverage company dedicated to the Bitcoin ethos, offering high-quality beers payable exclusively in Bitcoin. With a commitment to personal privacy, the brewery delivers across Europe with no-KYC requirements.

Media Contact:

Pierre Corbin
Co-Founder, Flash
Email: press@paywithflash.com
Website: paywithflash.comPhotos paywithflash.com/about/press

How Flash Enables Interoperable, Self-Custodial Bitcoin Commerce

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

UK Gold Mining Company Bluebird to Convert Gold Revenues into Bitcoin

Bluebird Mining Ventures Ltd., a pan Asian gold project development company, recently announced a major strategic shift. It plans to convert future revenues from its gold mining projects into bitcoin and adopt bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset. 

Strategy shift to covert gold into digital gold – #bitcoin #goldmining #goldequities #investinbitcoin #investingold
"Combining income streams from gold mining projects and recycling these revenues into a proactive "Bitcoin in Treasury" management approach, whilst maintaining a… pic.twitter.com/BpJA6hFU9Y

— Bluebird Mining Ventures Ltd (LSE:BMV.L) (@bluebirdIR) June 5, 2025

“By adopting a ‘gold plus a digital gold’ strategy, it offers the Company an opportunity to turn the page and look to the future and seek to attract a new type of shareholder,” said the Executive Director and CEO of Bluebird Aidan Bishop. “Under the leadership of a new CEO, once identified, it is my sincere hope that Bluebird will finally realise its ambitions for which it was initially established for.”

The announcement comes as Bluebird progresses towards a key agreement on its flagship Philippine project. The company expects to finalize a deal in the coming weeks that will grant it a net profit interest throughout the life of the mine, with no ongoing capital costs. The company said it believes bitcoin offers a modern alternative to traditional store of value assets like gold.

“I am very pleased with the progress of discussions in the Philippines which are looking very positive and will enable, if successfully completed, Bluebird to maintain an ongoing exposure with zero future cash commitments,” stated Bishop.

Bluebird plans to recycle revenues from its mining operations directly into bitcoin, aligning with what they describe as an innovative treasury approach. The company cited bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million, increasing global adoption, and role as a hedge against inflation and monetary instability as key reasons for its decision.

“Combining income streams from gold mining projects and recycling these revenues into a proactive ‘Bitcoin in Treasury’ management approach…” the company said. “Companies that have adopted bitcoin into their treasury strategy globally across public markets have been enjoying significant investor interest as well as substantial premiums to Net Asset Value (NAV) that have challenged traditional financial metrics as a basis of valuation.”

To lead this new phase, Bluebird is actively searching for a new CEO with experience in digital assets.

“On a personal level, I embarked some time ago on a journey to understand and learn about bitcoin,” added Bishop. “I am convinced that we are witnessing a tectonic shift in global markets and that bitcoin will reshape the landscape of financial markets on every level.”

This post UK Gold Mining Company Bluebird to Convert Gold Revenues into Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Oscar Zarraga Perez.

@ 9ca447d2:fbf5a36d

Paris, France – June 6, 2025 — Bitcoin payment gateway startup Flash, just announced a new partnership with the “Bitcoin Only Brewery”, marking the first-ever beverage company to leverage Lightning payments.

Flash enables Bitcoin Only Brewery to offer its “BOB” beer with, no-KYC (Know Your Customer) delivery across Europe, priced at 19,500 sats (~$18) for the 4-pack, shipping included.

The cans feature colorful Bitcoin artwork while the contents promise a hazy pale ale: “Each 33cl can contains a smooth, creamy mouthfeel, hazy appearance and refreshing Pale Ale at 5% ABV,” reads the product description.

Pierre Corbin, Co-Founder of Flash, commented:

“Currently, bitcoin is used more as a store of value but usage for payments is picking up. Thanks to new innovation on Lightning, bitcoin is ready to go mainstream for e-commerce sales.”

Flash, launched its 2.0 version in March 2025 with the goal to provide the easiest bitcoin payment gateway for businesses worldwide. The platform is non-custodial and can enable both digital and physical shops to accept bitcoin by connecting their own wallets to Flash.

By leveraging the scalability of the Lightning Network, Flash ensures instant, low-cost transactions, addressing on-chain Bitcoin bottlenecks like high fees and long wait times.

For businesses interested in adopting Bitcoin payments, Flash offers a straightforward onboarding process, low fees, and robust support for both digital and physical goods. To learn more, visit paywithflash.com.

Media Contact:
Pierre Corbin
Co-Founder, Flash
Email: press@paywithflash.com
Website: paywithflash.com

About Flash

Flash is the easiest Bitcoin payment gateway for businesses to accept payments. Supporting both digital and physical enterprises, Flash leverages the Lightning Network to enable fast, low-cost Bitcoin transactions. Launched in its 2.0 version in March 2025, Flash is at the forefront of driving Bitcoin adoption in e-commerce.

About Bitcoin Only Brewery

Bitcoin Only Brewery (@Drink_B0B) is a pioneering beverage company dedicated to the Bitcoin ethos, offering high-quality beers payable exclusively in Bitcoin. With a commitment to personal privacy, the brewery delivers across Europe with no-KYC requirements.

@ 9ca447d2:fbf5a36d

In a move that diverges from many other U.S. states, Connecticut has passed a new law that bars state and local governments from investing in bitcoin or any other digital currency.

The bill, HB7082, passed unanimously in both the House and Senate with zero opposing votes.

The law, officially titled “An Act Concerning the Regulation of Virtual Currency and State Investments,” was signed into law recently and is causing a stir in the Bitcoin and financial communities.

HB7082 prohibits the state of Connecticut and its political subdivisions from accepting, holding or investing in digital currencies. This includes bitcoin, ethereum and other digital assets. It also bars the state from creating a bitcoin reserve, a concept being explored by other states.

The law goes further by imposing strict rules on digital asset businesses operating in the state. These rules enforce anti-money laundering (AML) compliance and parental consent verification for digital asset users under 18.

It also requires 1:1 reserve requirements for bitcoin custodians.

Businesses that handle Bitcoin transactions must now provide users with clear information about risks and fees and provide receipts with full transaction details.

No business can let a minor use a money-sharing app without first getting proof of consent from a parent or guardian.

Lawmakers in Connecticut say it’s about protecting public funds and minimizing financial risk. They say Connecticut’s new law bars state investments in bitcoin to protect its financial assets from market risk.

Supporters argue that the high volatility of bitcoin makes it a risky investment for public money like pension funds and state reserves.

The law also looks to bring bitcoin businesses under tighter control, to make them follow the same rules as the traditional financial system.

While Connecticut is cracking down on digital assets, other states are going the other way.

States like Texas, New Hampshire and Arizona have already passed laws or proposed bills to create a bitcoin reserve, which allows public funds to be invested in bitcoin.

Texas has even described bitcoin as a “forward-thinking investment opportunity” and a long-term store of value.

The new law has caused mixed reactions in the financial world. Some think it’s too cautious, others think it’s part of a bigger plan.

Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, responded with sarcasm, “The hedge fund managers got so upset they couldn’t beat Bitcoin…”

Matt Hougan on X

Some states like Florida, South Dakota and Oklahoma have either killed or vetoed Bitcoin bills this year. Others like Louisiana are still exploring the tech. Louisiana just announced it would create a special committee to study AI, blockchain and digital assets.

@ 39cc53c9:27168656

Read the original blog post

The new website is finally live! I put in a lot of hard work over the past months on it. I'm proud to say that it's out now and it looks pretty cool, at least to me!

Why rewrite it all?

The old kycnot.me site was built using Python with Flask about two years ago. Since then, I've gained a lot more experience with Golang and coding in general. Trying to update that old codebase, which had a lot of design flaws, would have been a bad idea. It would have been like building on an unstable foundation.

That's why I made the decision to rewrite the entire application. Initially, I chose to use SvelteKit with JavaScript. I did manage to create a stable site that looked similar to the new one, but it required Jav aScript to work. As I kept coding, I started feeling like I was repeating "the Python mistake". I was writing the app in a language I wasn't very familiar with (just like when I was learning Python at that mom ent), and I wasn't happy with the code. It felt like spaghetti code all the time.

So, I made a complete U-turn and started over, this time using Golang. While I'm not as proficient in Golang as I am in Python now, I find it to be a very enjoyable language to code with. Most aof my recent pr ojects have been written in Golang, and I'm getting the hang of it. I tried to make the best decisions I could and structure the code as well as possible. Of course, there's still room for improvement, which I'll address in future updates.

Now I have a more maintainable website that can scale much better. It uses a real database instead of a JSON file like the old site, and I can add many more features. Since I chose to go with Golang, I mad e the "tradeoff" of not using JavaScript at all, so all the rendering load falls on the server. But I believe it's a tradeoff that's worth it.

What's new

• UI/UX - I've designed a new logo and color palette for kycnot.me. I think it looks pretty cool and cypherpunk. I am not a graphic designer, but I think I did a decent work and I put a lot of thinking on it to make it pleasant!
• Point system - The new point system provides more detailed information about the listings, and can be expanded to cover additional features across all services. Anyone can request a new point!
• ToS Scrapper: I've implemented a powerful automated terms-of-service scrapper that collects all the ToS pages from the listings. It saves you from the hassle of reading the ToS by listing the lines that are suspiciously related to KYC/AML practices. This is still in development and it will improve for sure, but it works pretty fine right now!
• Search bar - The new search bar allows you to easily filter services. It performs a full-text search on the Title, Description, Category, and Tags of all the services. Looking for VPN services? Just search for "vpn"!
• Transparency - To be more transparent, all discussions about services now take place publicly on GitLab. I won't be answering any e-mails (an auto-reply will prompt to write to the corresponding Gitlab issue). This ensures that all service-related matters are publicly accessible and recorded. Additionally, there's a real-time audits page that displays database changes.
• Listing Requests - I have upgraded the request system. The new form allows you to directly request services or points without any extra steps. In the future, I plan to enable requests for specific changes to parts of the website.
• Lightweight and fast - The new site is lighter and faster than its predecessor!
• Tor and I2P - At last! kycnot.me is now officially on Tor and I2P!

How?

This rewrite has been a labor of love, in the end, I've been working on this for more than 3 months now. I don't have a team, so I work by myself on my free time, but I find great joy in helping people on their private journey with cryptocurrencies. Making it easier for individuals to use cryptocurrencies without KYC is a goal I am proud of!

If you appreciate my work, you can support me through the methods listed here. Alternatively, feel free to send me an email with a kind message!

Technical details

All the code is written in Golang, the website makes use of the chi router for the routing part. I also make use of BigCache for caching database requests. There is 0 JavaScript, so all the rendering load falls on the server, this means it needed to be efficient enough to not drawn with a few users since the old site was reporting about 2M requests per month on average (note that this are not unique users).

The database is running with mariadb, using gorm as the ORM. This is more than enough for this project. I started working with an sqlite database, but I ended up migrating to mariadb since it works better with JSON.

The scraper is using chromedp combined with a series of keywords, regex and other logic. It runs every 24h and scraps all the services. You can find the scraper code here.

The frontend is written using Golang Templates for the HTML, and TailwindCSS plus DaisyUI for the CSS classes framework. I also use some plain CSS, but it's minimal.

The requests forms is the only part of the project that requires JavaScript to be enabled. It is needed for parsing some from fields that are a bit complex and for the "captcha", which is a simple Proof of Work that runs on your browser, destinated to avoid spam. For this, I use mCaptcha.

@ 5a12b41e:bd35aedf

Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zu dezentralen OER-Infrastrukturen

Die Diskussion eröffnete Matthias mit Reflexionen zu einem Vorhaben, das bei einem bevorstehenden HackathOERn in Göttingen präsentiert werden soll - unter Voraussetzung der Beitragsannahme. Im Zentrum steht dabei ein partizipativer Ansatz, der die frühzeitige Identifikation technischer Herausforderungen durch den direkten Austausch mit Entwicklergemeinschaften ermöglicht: "Auch wirklich mal ganz konkret mit Programmierern diese Ideen durchzusprechen, um aus der Sache auch schon Stolpersteine zu finden". Diese methodische Herangehensweise stellt eine essenzielle Phase im Entwicklungsprozess dar, wie am Beispiel eines Moodle-Plugins illustriert wird, bei dem substanzielle Herausforderungen im Bereich des Backup-Systems erst durch externe Expertise identifiziert werden konnten.

Jörg kontextualisiert diese Überlegungen im Rahmen der Forschungsaktivitäten von FOERBICO und einer durchgeführten Nutzerbefragung. Signifikant ist dabei die Erkenntnis, dass neben juristischen Aspekten wie Lizenzfragen vor allem technische Infrastrukturen einen kritischen Faktor für die Vernetzung von Communities darstellen: "Das Techniksystem spielt wirklich eine bedeutsame Rolle, um die Communities zusammenzubringen". Bemerkenswert ist hierbei die explizite Distinktion von traditionellen, isolierten Repositorien-Konzepten zugunsten praxisorientierter Ansätze, die kollaborative OER-Praktiken substanziell fördern.

Nutzerzentrierte Gestaltungsprinzipien und praktische Anforderungen

Ein zentrales Desiderat der Gesprächspartner ist die Überwindung fragmentierter Toollandschaften, die aktuell eine Barriere für effektive communityübergreifende Kooperationen darstellen. Jörg artikuliert dieses Problem prägnant: "Communities sollten schlicht und einfach offen miteinander arbeiten können und sich nicht immer neu vereinbaren müssen auf geschlossene Werkzeuge wie Google Docs, Canva, Padlet, Taskcards und Co.". Diese Beobachtung korrespondiert mit Erkenntnissen aus der Nutzungsforschung, die auf die Präferenz für intuitive Interfaces, wie sie in den proprietären Angeboten in Padlets und Taskcards geboten werden, hinweist – ein Aspekt, der in der Konzeption innovativer OER-Infrastrukturen adäquate Berücksichtigung finden sollte.

Darüber hinaus wird die Relevanz nutzerzentrierter Gestaltungsprinzipien mehrfach betont: "Es muss vom UX-Design auch so den Leuten entgegenkommen, dass man es einfach so in die Hand nimmt, wie es den Benutzungsgewohnheiten entspricht". Dies umfasst intuitiv bedienbare Funktionalitäten wie Drag-and-Drop sowie potenziell KI-gestützte Unterstützungssysteme, die die Benutzerfreundlichkeit signifikant erhöhen könnten.

Technische Architekturen und Interoperabilitätskonzepte

Ein substantieller Teil des Diskurses widmet sich architektonischen Überlegungen. Matthias argumentiert für modular konzipierte Systeme anstelle monolithischer Lösungen: "Also kleine Dinge, die andockbar sind, nicht das One Big Thing denken". Diese Perspektive reflektiert eine fundamentale Erkenntnis aus seiner langjährigen Erfahrung mit Open-Source-Entwicklungen und korrespondiert mit dem übergeordneten Paradigma dezentraler Infrastrukturen.

Die technische Herausforderung besteht primär in der Integration heterogener Systeme und dem Ausbalancieren verschiedener Anforderungsebenen. Jörg beschreibt dieses Spannungsfeld: "Wie kriegen wir so eine Schnittstellenkonfiguration hin, damit die Dinge ineinander überführt werden können?". In diesem Kontext werden verschiedene technische Ansätze diskutiert, darunter die Verwendung von JSON und XML für Metadaten sowie die Integration etablierter Systeme wie H5P, Serlo oder WordPress.

Besonders hervorzuheben ist die angestrebte Zusammenführung von Referatorien (fokussiert auf Auffindbarkeit durch Metadaten) und Repositorien (primär für Speicherung) in einer integrierten Editorfunktion: "Eigentlich müsste so ein Editor beides zusammenfügen und integrieren, sodass die Inhalte, die man erstellt, auch mit den entsprechenden Metadaten versehen werden". Diese konzeptionelle Verknüpfung adressiert eine fundamentale Herausforderung im OER-Ökosystem und würde die Auffindbarkeit, Interoperabilität und Nachnutzbarkeit von Bildungsressourcen signifikant verbessern.

Community-Perspektiven und kollaborative Praktiken

Die Gesprächspartner differenzieren zwischen synchronen (kollaborativen) und asynchronen (kooperativen) Arbeitsweisen, wobei Matthias zunächst für letztere plädiert: "Aus meiner Sicht wäre auch das Ziel gar nicht, das direkt kollaborativ zu haben, sondern ich würde erstmal kooperativ denken, also zeitversetzt gemeinsam, aber nicht unbedingt gleichzeitig". Diese pragmatische Herangehensweise reflektiert die Komplexität synchroner Bearbeitungsfunktionalitäten und priorisiert Machbarkeit vor maximaler Funktionalität – ein sinnvoller Ansatz für initiale Entwicklungsphasen.

Besonders aufschlussreich sind die Erkenntnisse aus Nutzeranalysen, die eine klare Präferenz für modular strukturierte, adaptierbare Inhalte zeigen: "Die meisten Leute sind nicht interessiert an zu komplexen Inhalten, sondern die gucken nach einfachen Bausteinen, die sie leicht verändern können und zusammenstellen können, wie es für die eigene Lernsituation und Lerngruppe passt". Diese Beobachtung hat weitreichende Implikationen für die Granularität und Strukturierung von OER und unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit flexibler, rekombinierbarer Ressourcenformate.

Implikationen für OEP und zukünftige Entwicklungen

Das skizzierte "Open Cards"-Konzept repräsentiert einen vielversprechenden Ansatz, der auf die identifizierten Nutzerpräferenzen und kollaborativen Anforderungen reagiert. Es zielt auf die Entwicklung einer Infrastruktur, die "kuratierte Sammlungen remixbar macht und dezentral verwaltet", wodurch fundamentale OEP-Prinzipien wie partizipative Wissensproduktion und adaptive Wiederverwendung operationalisiert werden könnten.

Darüber hinaus wird die Bedeutung einheitlicher Identifikationssysteme hervorgehoben, um Autor:innenschaft nachvollziehbar zu machen und rechtliche Anforderungen (wie die korrekte Namensnennung) zu erfüllen. Die Integration von Systemen wie VIDIS oder "Mein Bildungsraum" könnte in diesem Kontext eine Schlüsselrolle spielen und zur Etablierung nachhaltiger Anerkennungsmechanismen im OER-Ökosystem beitragen.

Fazit: Toward a Federated OER Infrastructure

Der analysierte Diskurs illustriert paradigmatisch die multidimensionale Komplexität bei der Entwicklung zukunftsfähiger OER-Infrastrukturen. Die diskutierten Ansätze und Konzepte konvergieren in der Vision einer dezentralen, interoperablen Architektur, die technische Potenziale mit nutzerzentrierten Gestaltungsprinzipien und community-orientierten Praktiken harmonisiert.

Die Transformation von einer "Silo-Architektur in so eine dezentrale Protokoll-Technik" repräsentiert dabei nicht nur einen technologischen Paradigmenwechsel, sondern reflektiert zugleich ein fundamentales Umdenken im Verständnis digitaler Bildungsökosysteme. Die Realisierung dieser Vision erfordert interdisziplinäre Kooperation, kontinuierlichen Austausch mit Nutzergemeinschaften sowie flexible, modulare Entwicklungsansätze – Prinzipien, die in dem dokumentierten Gespräch zwischen Matthias, Jörg und Gina hoffentlich bereits beispielhaft praktiziert werden und hiermit euch zu Diskussion und Austausch gestellt werden.

---

*Dieser Beitrag reflektiert den Stand der Diskussion vom 20. März 2025 und wurde im Kontext der Projekte POET, digiLL(_COM), eport.nrw und FOERBICO verfasst. Die genannten Tools und Initiativen stehen exemplarisch für die Vielfalt der OER-Entwicklungslandschaft.

@ e0a24c5c:fa44b1e7

Am 13. Juni 2025 hat der offene Krieg Israels gegen den Iran begonnen, ein Krieg, der, wie schon der Krieg in Gaza, dazu führen dürfte, dass unsere Politik die Unterstützung Israels verstärkt zur deutschen Staatsräson erklären und Israel (mittels neuer "Sondervermögen"?) jetzt nochmals verstärkt mit Waffen beliefern wird.

Die Unterstützung Israels zur deutschen Staatsräson zu erklären, ist eine – historisch zwar verständliche – heute aber radikal auch Israel zerstörende und extrem verfassungswidrige und rassistische Position. Weil sie finster die Nicht-Unterstützung der Palästinenser, bzw. die stillschweigende Gewährung der Vernichtung der Bevölkerung in Gaza im Schlagschatten führt.

Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar! Und der Schutz von Würde und Leben des Menschen ist die einzig legitime deutsche Staatsräson – unabhängig davon, ob dieser Mensch Jude, Palästinenser, Ukrainer, Russe, Chinese oder sonst wer ist.

In Deutschland wird durch die einseitige Positionierung auf die "Unterstützung Israels" ein Bürgerkrieg herauf beschworen. Antisemitismus und Terrorgefahr in Deutschland werden extrem verstärk. Und in Israel wird schon durch den maßlosen Rachefeldzug in Gaza und jetzt durch den entfachten Krieg mit dem Iran, aufs tiefste jede Möglichkeit für eine friedliche Koexistenz im palästinensisch-arabischen Raum zerstört.

Einen Freund zu unterstützen heißt nicht, ihm die Mittel zu menschenverachtenden Rachefeldzügen und zur moralischen und physischen Selbstzerstörung zu liefern, sondern ihn – im Sinne des Grundgesetzes Artikel 1, Absatz 2 – selbst in Krisensituationen auf den Weg von Achtung und Schutz der unveräußerlichen Menschenrechte zu verpflichten.

Außenpolitik im Sinne des Grundgesetzes kann nur Politik zum Schutz der Menschenwürde und nicht Politik für oder gegen Staaten, für oder gegen Religionsgemeinschaften, für oder gegen Völker und Volksgruppen, für oder gegen Rassen und so weiter sein.

Dass sich die Deutsche Politik in keinerlei Weise mehr an das Grundgesetz gebunden fühlt,

- weder bezüglich Israels

- noch auch bezüglich Russlands (wo es ebenfalls nicht um den Schutz von Menschenrechten, sondern - auf Kosten der Ukraine (!) - um einen Regime-Change in Russland und um Rüstungsgeschäfte geht),

- erst recht auch hier nicht mehr im Inland (wo die Freiheitsrechte nicht mehr als unmittelbar geltendes Recht und als unantastbare Grundlage der gesamten Politik gelten, sondern nur noch - in alter Feudalmanier - gnadenvoll von oben an "systemtreue" Bürger als Belohnung für parteigenehmes Verhalten ausgeliehen werden) …

kurz: dass die deutsche Politik sämtliche positiven Errungenschaften Deutschlands nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg aushöhlt und zerstört, sowohl die moralisch-politischen als auch die wirtschaftlichen, geistigen, kulturellen und sozialen, ist deutliches Zeichen ihres Zusammenbruchs und nimmt ihr jegliche Legitimation.

Wir DÜRFEN da als Volk nicht einfach zusehen!

Da wir als Volk geknebelt und aus den politischen Entscheidungen völlig herausgehalten sind, bleibt uns nur der Weg, die Politik im Sinne eines "Great Reset von unten" selber in die Hand zu nehmen.

Der Weg dazu wird auf www.unsere-verfassung.de gewiesen

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

JPMorgan Reports Record Profits for Bitcoin Miners in Q1

Bitcoin mining companies in the U.S. have kicked off 2025 with record performance, according to a recent report. The first quarter of the year was “one of Bitcoin miners’ best quarters to date,” analysts Reginald Smith and Charles Pearce stated. 

JUST IN: JPMorgan reported Q1 2025 was one of the best periods on record for publicly traded bitcoin mining companies pic.twitter.com/gs9fGiTbZV

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 13, 2025

“Four of the five operators in our coverage reported record revenue and profits,” the report stated, underscoring the sector’s impressive rebound in profitability amid continued institutional adoption and high bitcoin prices, currently hovering around $105,462.87.

In total, U.S.-listed miners brought in $2.0 billion in gross profit during Q1 2025, with average gross margins reaching 53%—a jump from $1.7 billion and 50% in the previous quarter.

MARA Holdings (MARA) once again led the pack in Bitcoin production, mining the most BTC for the ninth consecutive quarter. However, despite its output dominance, MARA also posted the highest cost per coin, estimated at $72,600, JPMorgan noted.

On the profitability front, IREN (IREN) was the standout performer. For the first time, IREN earned the most gross profit among the tracked firms. The company also reported the lowest all-in cash cost per Bitcoin, around $36,400, helping to boost margins significantly.

CleanSpark (CLSK), another major player, did not raise any equity in the quarter—one of the more capital-disciplined moves seen among its peers. In fact, JPMorgan reported that the five miners it tracks issued only $310 million in equity for Q1, marking a steep decline from $1.3 billion in Q4 2024. 

On the operational expense side, miners spent an estimated $1.8 billion on power, up $50 million from the previous quarter—demonstrating the energy-intensive nature of mining. 

JPMorgan’s outlook on the industry remains bullish for select players. The bank maintains overweight ratings for CleanSpark, IREN, and Riot Platforms (RIOT), while assigning neutral ratings to Cipher Mining (CIFR) and MARA.

As profitability surges and strategic spending remains in check, 2025 may very well be remembered as a turning point in mining economics—especially for companies navigating cost discipline and scaling production. 

This post JPMorgan Reports Record Profits for Bitcoin Miners in Q1 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

@ 39cc53c9:27168656

Read the original blog post

Over the past few months, I've dedicated my time to a complete rewrite of the kycnot.me website. The technology stack remains unchanged; Golang paired with TailwindCSS. However, I've made some design choices in this iteration that I believe significantly enhance the site. Particularly to backend code.

UI Improvements

You'll notice a refreshed UI that retains the original concept but has some notable enhancements. The service list view is now more visually engaging, it displays additional information in a more aesthetically pleasing manner. Both filtering and searching functionalities have been optimized for speed and user experience.

Service pages have been also redesigned to highlight key information at the top, with the KYC Level box always accessible. The display of service attributes is now more visually intuitive.

The request form, especially the Captcha, has undergone substantial improvements. The new self-made Captcha is robust, addressing the reliability issues encountered with the previous version.

Terms of Service Summarizer

A significant upgrade is the Terms of Service summarizer/reviewer, now powered by AI (GPT-4-turbo). It efficiently condenses each service's ToS, extracting and presenting critical points, including any warnings. Summaries are updated monthly, processing over 40 ToS pages via the OpenAI API using a self-crafted and thoroughly tested prompt.

Nostr Comments

I've integrated a comment section for each service using Nostr. For guidance on using this feature, visit the dedicated how-to page.

Database

The backend database has transitioned to pocketbase, an open-source Golang backend that has been a pleasure to work with. I maintain an updated fork of the Golang SDK for pocketbase at pluja/pocketbase.

Scoring

The scoring algorithm has also been refined to be more fair. Despite I had considered its removal due to the complexity it adds (it is very difficult to design a fair scoring system), some users highlighted its value, so I kept it. The updated algorithm is available open source.

Listings

Each listing has been re-evaluated, and the ones that were no longer operational were removed. New additions are included, and the backlog of pending services will be addressed progressively, since I still have access to the old database.

API

The API now offers more comprehensive data. For more details, check here.

About Page

The About page has been restructured for brevity and clarity.

Other Changes

Extensive changes have been implemented in the server-side logic, since the whole code base was re-written from the ground up. I may discuss these in a future post, but for now, I consider the current version to be just a bit beyond beta, and additional updates are planned in the coming weeks.

@ c1e9ab3a:9cb56b43

1. Introduction

The 21st century is marked by a rare confluence of demographic, technological, and monetary regime shifts. As birth rates fall below replacement levels across advanced and many emerging economies, global population growth slows and begins to reverse. At the same time, automation, AI, and robotics are increasing productivity at an accelerating pace. Simultaneously, trust in central banks and fiat currencies is waning, giving rise to calls for a return to hard currencies (e.g., gold, Bitcoin) and decentralized monetary systems.

These trends pose stark challenges to existing economic theories and institutions. This paper explores their implications through two opposing lenses: Keynesian economics and Austrian (Misesian) economics.

---

2. The Keynesian Reaction: Deflation, Demand Collapse, and the Paradox of Thrift

2.1. Demand-Side Fragility in a Shrinking Population

Keynesian theory is rooted in the principle that aggregate demand drives output and employment. A declining population implies a falling consumption base, which directly reduces aggregate demand. Combined with increased longevity, this trend leads to a larger retired population disinclined to spend, creating persistent demand shortfalls.

2.2. Technological Unemployment and Reduced Income Velocity

Rapid productivity gains from AI and robotics may displace large segments of labor, leading to unemployment or underemployment. With fewer wage earners and heightened uncertainty, consumption slows further. Even if goods become cheaper, widespread income insecurity constrains the ability to buy them.

2.3. The Paradox of Thrift

In times of uncertainty, both individuals and businesses tend to save more. Keynes argued that if everyone saves, aggregate demand collapses because one person’s spending is another’s income. Thus, increased saving leads to lower incomes, which reduces saving in aggregate—a self-reinforcing contraction.

2.4. Retreat from Fiat and Central Banking: A Catastrophic Constraint

Abandoning fiat currency and central banking removes the government’s ability to perform countercyclical policy. Interest rates cannot be lowered below zero; money supply cannot be expanded to fill demand gaps. In such a regime, deflation becomes chronic, debt burdens rise in real terms, and recovery mechanisms are neutered.

Conclusion (Keynesian):
The combined effect of declining population, rising productivity, and a hard money transition is catastrophic. It leads to a deflationary spiral, mass unemployment, debt crises, and secular stagnation unless aggressively offset by expansive fiscal and monetary policy—tools unavailable in a hard currency system.

---

3. The Misesian Rebuttal: Market Coordination and the Natural Order of Decline

3.1. Savings as Capital Formation

Mises and the Austrian School reject the paradox of thrift. Savings are not lost demand; they are deferred consumption that funds capital investment. Increased saving, in a free market, lowers interest rates and reallocates resources toward longer-term, higher-order production.

3.2. Deflation as a Signal of Progress

Falling prices due to productivity gains are not a crisis but a benefit. Consumers gain real wealth. Entrepreneurs adjust cost structures. As long as wages and prices are flexible, deflation reflects abundance, not failure.

3.3. Population Decline as Economic Recalibration

A shrinking population reduces demand, yes—but it also reduces the labor supply. Wages rise in real terms. Capital intensity per worker increases. There is no systemic unemployment if labor markets are free and responsive.

3.4. Hard Currency as Restoration of Market Coordination

Transitioning to a hard currency purges fiat-induced malinvestment and restores the price mechanism. With no artificial credit expansion, capital is allocated based on real savings. Booms and busts are mitigated, and long-term planning becomes reliable.

Conclusion (Misesian):
There is no crisis. A hard currency, high-productivity, low-population economy stabilizes at a new equilibrium of lower consumption, higher capital intensity, and rising real wealth. Deflation is natural. Savings are the seed of future prosperity. Government interference, not market adaptation, is the threat.

---

4. Final Synthesis

The Keynesian and Misesian views diverge on first principles: Keynes sees demand shortfalls and rigidities requiring top-down correction, while Mises sees market-coordinated adaptation as sufficient and self-correcting. As the 21st century evolves, this ideological conflict will shape whether the transition leads to depression or renewal.

---

References

• Keynes, J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
• Mises, L. Human Action
• Hayek, F.A. Prices and Production
• Böhm-Bawerk, E. Capital and Interest
• Friedman, M. A Program for Monetary Stability

@ 8671a6e5:f88194d1

## ParentCoin; limitless

There's this almost altcoin-like pitch of parenthood these days. I might’ve fallen for the shiny marketing of parenthood — cute baby pics, promises of legacy, the whole “you’ll change the world” vibe. I even heard a would-be mom tell me once (true story) "You know having children, you don't have to be afraid of it, as a dad it doesn't cost as much as you think". \ These people actually believe that. Just like they've fallen for every fiat-scam out there: housing, cars, holidays in France, Nike shoes, 50% taxation, religion and main stream media subscriptions.\ \ It’s 2025, and I’m revisiting this like I’d revisit an old Lightning Network post. \ \ Having kids is like chasing an altcoin airdrop with a slick but buzzword laden whitepaper and a charismatic founder who’s probably exit-scamming as soon as he gets enough of your money in their bank account (yeah you see what I did there). If you're lucky that founder might twerk from time to time to get your attention. But don't hope for too much. Now change that diaper and work an extra job to pay for all of it while inflation murders you.\ \ While you do all that, the most damaging thing about the Having Children Shitcoin (HCS) is the time it takes. It literally can't be shorted like some token on an exchange. It laughs, plays around with your tech gadgets, has to be potty trained (like some altcoin founders) and needs attention, education and a lot of proof of work.\ But the damage is the time. \ The time it takes to do all that, is actually replacing value with time. \ Bitcoin might be a product of proof of work, HCS is not a product but the actual proof of work without the value proposition.\ On top of that, the founder usually lives rent-free in your head your whole life, or even worse: you literally live together with her/him.\ Imagine Satoshi Nakamoto living at your house right now. Like... hi Satoshi.. love your bitcoin man.\ "Yeah, thanks moth**f****r, when are going to buy more skittle and some toilet paper? We ran out 10 minutes ago when I shit all over your dirty toilet, ..."\ "Eh, But Satoshi, why don't you go to the shop to..."\ "Shut up you f'ing a--hole, you made me! You made me what I am today! You liked me when I invented thàh bitcoin right? Now get me some toilet paper and here's a list of items I want from the supermarket! Lazy dumb idiot."\ "You'll clean up the kitchen right?"\ "Yeah yeah, rolls eyes, after my Netflix series man... now get out"\ \ This might sound far-fetched but founders of shitcoins steal your money, while children steal your time ànd money while you have to endure the founders as well.

Time is slowly damaging you while you live your life further and further away from the hard-money proposition. Hell, you even will need to sell some hard money to get by. Because it's a rotten world and children make you short sighted about the future (it limits you to maximum 3 years ahead in my experience with people around me).

Long-term is your enemy Short-term is your prison

You’re hyped for the long-term gains—multi-generational dynasties, just like the elites—but the fine print? It’s a mess. I’m here to unpack the hope, the scepticism, and the grim reality of raising kids in a world that feels like it’s speedrunning towards the absolute bottom. Let me make that clearer:

Our power (as bitcoiners) doesn't grow with these new generations, because we're being out-Idiocracy'd at a rate we can’t reproduce our way out of. Bitcoiners don’t scale. Even if you produce two children that both become die-hard bitcoin maximalists (with a nasal voice and a fondness for TD-sequential analysis.

The Mirage of Birth Having a kid is like snagging a hyped-up crypto airdrop. You’re told it’s “free” value — new life, pure joy, a legacy token dropped into your wallet. Everyone’s tweeting about it, posting ultrasound pics like they just scored 10,000 USDC worth of free shitcoin tokens.

But then the transaction fees hit, getting another place to live more accommodating, getting a school, adopt a dad body demeaner while torpedoing your social life and having no fun other than baking cakes and getting less pussy than a laser pointer with dead batteries. Adjust for inflation), sleepless nights, a vortex of money being vaporized and a lifetime of HODLing a position you can’t dump nor short. You’re basically the holder of last resort for a diatribe of chaos. You’re the entry, the trade, and exit liquidity. The real kicker? Society’s cheering you on while you’re stuck debugging your life and seeing your time drained. You’re frozen in time, while you should be scaling ideas. \ \ Or getting more out of life than being the channelling of funds to a future fiat oppressed kid. Meanwhile, parents (if they stay together that is... with relations with kids having their own version of the bitcoin “halving”, be it every 7 years or so. The parents follow the higher noble goal and get some love and nice moments in return. \ \ They’re stacking diapers instead of sats, living above a dry cleaner next to a subway station that rattles your soul. You can’t short kids, no matter how much you see the “childfree” crowd thriving. The childfree crowd is also not always that neutral, as many of them want this same life, because the marketing, as with many shitcoins is excellent. It makes life more fun, more fulfilling, more whole, while promising you cheap, fast and always immutable transactions. You’re getting duped. \ You buy more stuff, more hobbies no one cares about, and smile at other parents at these gatherings like you’re at the whale room at a bitcoin conference in a bear market. Keep smiling, bitches. That’s you’re life now. The numbers don’t lie. Society sells parenthood as a Bitcoin-level HODL, but the safety net is thinner than a layer-2 solution created by an Albanian exchange.

Raising kids is like betting your airdropped tokens will moon into a blue-chip asset that takes care of you when you’re old. You’re hoping they’ll HODL your hand, not rug-pull you into a nursing home when their “value” spikes. It’s a gamble: will they be decent humans or turn into TikTok zombies? Back in the day, kids were economic assets, working the farm or whatever. Now? You’re praying they don’t ghost you after college or at least recognize all the proof of work you did for them. And yes, you can have a big impact on them, that’s something to be proud of if it works out. But in the end, you are you, a person, with dreams, hopes and needs. \ And your children are too,... they’ll always win. \ \ Teaching them to ride a bike is fun, but it’s like a shitcoin pumping on a founder’s tweet: fleeting, followed by a crash whenever you see the effects of your years of de-progress and social isolation. Socializing with other parents is like making friends with a fellow prisoner of war in some jungle camp, ... you’ll have to be nice because it’s all you have left of society’s pleasantries. So you make small talk or a little joke about a toy someone’s kid has brought to the playground. The real world would see these people piss all over your grave if they could. They’re the figurehead on a ship of fools. And you play along because you’re a total bitch that got stuck in the routine of the famous HCS. Finding trust is hard, certainly in a city’s virtual prison camp where you play Russian roulette for other people’s amusement. It’s like running a Lightning node — fun in theory, but you’re babysitting a system that crashes when you need it most. The highs are real, but “kinda fun” doesn’t cut it when you’re debugging life. \ \ The 35k to 200k € it will cost you throughout your life, is not measurable as gains or losses. Look at the lovely baby pictures, look at their school results, the painting they made especially for you saying “I love you, for the best dad/mom in the whole world”. It hits straight to your brain’s nucleus accumbens. It’s all the balanced injection of the right shot of chemical balanced reward center (ventral tegmental area) food. \ And people with kids wanted that because that’s what the system and urges are. Kids are a leveraged position with no stop-loss, unlike an airdrop you can dump when the hype fades. You’re all-in, praying society doesn’t crash before your “asset” matures. In the meanwhile, you get the occasional surprise through your mesolimbic pathway. \ \ "Happy you" proof of stakes' the unhappy you later. You could be in the Maldives diving into clear water while talking to another “founder”. Funny how that works. \ Meanwhile, the childfree are staking their tokens and chilling. \ Parents aren’t building dynasties; we’re just trying not to get rug-pulled by daycare costs and rotten school-systems that learn our kids to be obedient consumers and non-thinking parrots. It’s a financial social anti-grind with no cure, and the charts, unlike fiat-corporate nonsense, don’t lie.

The elites stack power like blue-chip stocks, minting wealth across centuries. Us? Our kids might be fighting over the leftovers while they battle their way through university diversity and mediocracy. Future generations are supposed to carry the torch, but consumerism and cultural decay make it feel like we’re being out-Idiocracy’d. \ We need to think long-term, teach kids to code, stack sats, and question the system. But above all else, we need them to learn that being more evil is more just. Being complacent in this farce of a system means always, and I mean always, that the multi-generational monsters will prevail. \ \ They’re more stubborn, faster, better educated and they take the shortcuts you can’t have. We have hard money, they have “hard world”.

Conclusion

Eighteen years into this parenting thing (or eight minutes—who’s counting?), it’s clear: kids are a shitcoin airdrop with no exit strategy for you. \ The highs are sweet, the costs are brutal, and the long-term. A gamble on humanity in a world trending toward a broad brush of average things made normal.

Maybe it’s not about winning the bitcoin standard, but betting on something bigger than yourself within yourself, even if that market’s rigged with traps and detractors everywhere. Stack sats, stack diapers, and pray your kids don’t rug-pull your heart. \ Because, let’s face it, we’re not the Rothschilds — we’re just HODLing and hoping. \ While we should be fighting with the hardest money. \ While your baby cries for more food, I hear Michael Jackson sing “If you can’t feed your baby hi hee-hee, then don’t have a baybaah”. \ \ The sad part is, that we're all torn between chasing the fiat-created dreams and the reality that everything is in fact a shitcoin sapping either your time, money or effort. \ Even within the bitcoin space, we don't realize what the next step should be.\ It certainly isn't big families. That's for sure.

AVB\ tipjar: https://allesvoorbitcoin.be/donate/

@ cae03c48:2a7d6671

Bitcoin Magazine

UK Gold Mining Company Bluebird to Convert Gold Revenues into Bitcoin

Bluebird Mining Ventures Ltd., a pan Asian gold project development company, recently announced a major strategic shift. It plans to convert future revenues from its gold mining projects into bitcoin and adopt bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset. 

Strategy shift to covert gold into digital gold – #bitcoin #goldmining #goldequities #investinbitcoin #investingold
"Combining income streams from gold mining projects and recycling these revenues into a proactive "Bitcoin in Treasury" management approach, whilst maintaining a… pic.twitter.com/BpJA6hFU9Y

— Bluebird Mining Ventures Ltd (LSE:BMV.L) (@bluebirdIR) June 5, 2025

“By adopting a ‘gold plus a digital gold’ strategy, it offers the Company an opportunity to turn the page and look to the future and seek to attract a new type of shareholder,” said the Executive Director and CEO of Bluebird Aidan Bishop. “Under the leadership of a new CEO, once identified, it is my sincere hope that Bluebird will finally realise its ambitions for which it was initially established for.”

The announcement comes as Bluebird progresses towards a key agreement on its flagship Philippine project. The company expects to finalize a deal in the coming weeks that will grant it a net profit interest throughout the life of the mine, with no ongoing capital costs. The company said it believes bitcoin offers a modern alternative to traditional store of value assets like gold.

“I am very pleased with the progress of discussions in the Philippines which are looking very positive and will enable, if successfully completed, Bluebird to maintain an ongoing exposure with zero future cash commitments,” stated Bishop.

Bluebird plans to recycle revenues from its mining operations directly into bitcoin, aligning with what they describe as an innovative treasury approach. The company cited bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million, increasing global adoption, and role as a hedge against inflation and monetary instability as key reasons for its decision.

“Combining income streams from gold mining projects and recycling these revenues into a proactive ‘Bitcoin in Treasury’ management approach…” the company said. “Companies that have adopted bitcoin into their treasury strategy globally across public markets have been enjoying significant investor interest as well as substantial premiums to Net Asset Value (NAV) that have challenged traditional financial metrics as a basis of valuation.”

To lead this new phase, Bluebird is actively searching for a new CEO with experience in digital assets.

“On a personal level, I embarked some time ago on a journey to understand and learn about bitcoin,” added Bishop. “I am convinced that we are witnessing a tectonic shift in global markets and that bitcoin will reshape the landscape of financial markets on every level.”

This post UK Gold Mining Company Bluebird to Convert Gold Revenues into Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Oscar Zarraga Perez.

@ f0fd6902:a2fbaaab

https://stacker.news/items/1007600