@ b60c3e76:c9d0f46e

KRIS menjamin semua golongan masyarakat mendapatkan perlakuan sama dari rumah sakit, baik pelayanan medis maupun nonmedis.

Demi memberikan peningkatan kualitas layanan kesehatan kepada masyarakat, pemerintah baru saja mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) nomor 59 tahun 2024 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. Melalui perpres itu, Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) telah menghapus perbedaan kelas layanan 1, 2, dan 3 dalam Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial atau BPJS Kesehatan.

Layanan berbasis kelas itu diganti dengan KRIS (Kelas Rawat Inap Standar). Berkaitan dengan lahirnya Perpres 59/2024 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Perpres 82/2018 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan, Presiden Joko Widodo telah memerintahkan seluruh rumah sakit yang bekerja sama dengan BPJS Kesehatan melaksanakannya.

Kebijakan baru itu mulai berlaku per 8 Mei 2024 dan paling lambat 30 Juni 2025. Dalam jangka waktu tersebut, rumah sakit dapat menyelenggarakan sebagian atau seluruh pelayanan rawat inap berdasarkan KRIS sesuai dengan kemampuan rumah sakit.

Lantas apa yang menjadi pembeda dari sisi layanan dengan layanan rawat inap sesuai Perpres 59/2024? Dahulu sistem layanan rawat BPJS Kesehatan dibagi berdasarkan kelas yang dibagi masing-masing kelas 1, 2, dan 3. Namun, melalui perpres, layanan kepada masyarakat tidak dibedakan lagi.

Pelayanan rawat inap yang diatur dalam perpres itu--dikenal dengan nama KRIS—menjadi sistem baru yang digunakan dalam pelayanan rawat inap BPJS Kesehatan di rumah sakit-rumah sakit. Dengan KRIS, semua golongan masyarakat akan mendapatkan perlakuan yang sama dari rumah sakit, baik dalam hal pelayanan medis maupun nonmedis.

Dengan lahirnya Perpres 59/2024, tarif iuran BPJS Kesehatan pun juga akan berubah. Hanya saja, dalam Perpres itu belum dicantumkan secara rinci ihwal besar iuran yang baru. Besaran iuran baru BPJS Kesehatan itu sesuai rencana baru ditetapkan pada 1 Juli 2025.

“Penetapan manfaat, tarif, dan iuran sebagaimana dimaksud ditetapkan paling lambat tanggal 1 Juli 2025,” tulis aturan tersebut, dikutip Senin (13/5/2024).

Itu artinya, iuran BPJS Kesehatan saat ini masih sama seperti sebelumnya, yakni sesuai dengan kelas yang dipilih. Namun perpres itu tetap berlaku sembari menanti lahirnya peraturan lanjutan dari perpres tersebut.

Kesiapan Rumah Sakit

Berkaitan dengan lahirnya kebijakan layanan kesehatan tanpa dibedakan kelas lagi, Kementerian Kesehatan (Kemenkes) menegaskan mayoritas rumah sakit di Indonesia siap untuk menjalankan layanan KRIS untuk pasien BPJS Kesehatan.

Kesiapan itu diungkapkan oleh Dirjen Pelayanan Kesehatan Kemenkes Azhar Jaya. “Survei kesiapan RS terkait KRIS sudah dilakukan pada 2.988 rumah sakit dan yang sudah siap menjawab isian 12 kriteria ada sebanyak 2.233 rumah sakit,” ujar Azhar.

Sebagai informasi, KRIS adalah pengganti layanan Kelas 1, 2, dan 3 BPJS Kesehatan yang bertujuan untuk memberikan layanan kesehatan secara merata tanpa melihat besaran iurannya.

Melalui KRIS, rumah sakit perlu menyiapkan sarana dan prasarana sesuai dengan 12 kriteria kelas rawat inap standar secara bertahap. Apa saja ke-12 kriteria KRIS itu?

Sesuai bunyi Pasal 46A Perpres 59/2024, disyaratkan kriteria fasilitas perawatan dan pelayanan rawat inap KRIS meliputi komponen bangunan yang digunakan tidak boleh memiliki tingkat porositas yang tinggi serta terdapat ventilasi udara dan kelengkapan tidur.

Demikian pula soal pencahayaan ruangan. Perpres itu juga mengatur pencahayaan ruangan buatan mengikuti kriteria standar 250 lux untuk penerangan dan 50 lux untuk pencahayaan tidur, temperature ruangan 20--26 derajat celcius.

Tidak hanya itu, layanan rawat inap berdasarkan perpres itu mensyaratkan fasilitas layanan yang membagi ruang rawat berdasarkan jenis kelamin pasien, anak atau dewasa, serta penyakit infeksi atau noninfeksi.

Selain itu, kriteria lainnya adalah keharusan bagi penyedia layanan untuk mempertimbangkan kepadatan ruang rawat dan kualitas tempat tidur, penyediaan tirai atau partisi antartempat tidur, kamar mandi dalam ruangan rawat inap yang memenuhi standar aksesibilitas, dan menyediakan outlet oksigen.

Selain itu, kelengkapan tempat tidur berupa adanya dua kotak kontak dan nurse call pada setiap tempat tidur dan adanya nakas per tempat tidur. Kepadatan ruang rawat inap maksimal empat tempat tidur dengan jarak antara tepi tempat tidur minimal 1,5 meter.

Tirai/partisi dengan rel dibenamkan menempel di plafon atau menggantung. Kamar mandi dalam ruang rawat inap serta kamar mandi sesuai dengan standar aksesibilitas dan outlet oksigen.

Azhar menjamin, Kemenkes akan menjalankan hal tersebut sesuai dengan tupoksi yang ada. “Tentu saja kami akan bekerja sama dengan BPJS Kesehatan dalam implementasi dan pengawasannya di lapangan,” ujar Azhar.

Berkaitan dengan perpres jaminan kesehatan itu, Direktur Utama BPJS Kesehatan Ghufron Mukti menilai, perpres tersebut berorientasi pada penyeragaman kelas rawat inap yang mengacu pada 12 kriteria. "Bahwa perawatan ada kelas rawat inap standar dengan 12 kriteria, untuk peserta BPJS, maka sebagaimana sumpah dokter tidak boleh dibedakan pemberian pelayan medis atas dasar suku, agama, status sosial atau beda iurannya," ujarnya.

Jika ada peserta ingin dirawat pada kelas yang lebih tinggi, kata Ghufron, maka diperbolehkan selama hal itu dipengaruhi situasi nonmedis. Hal itu disebutkan dalam Pasal 51 Perpres Jaminan Kesehatan diatur ketentuan naik kelas perawatan.

Menurut pasal tersebut, naik kelas perawatan dilakukan dengan cara mengikuti asuransi kesehatan tambahan atau membayar selisih antara biaya yang dijamin oleh BPJS Kesehatan dengan biaya yang harus dibayar akibat peningkatan pelayanan.

Selisih antara biaya yang dijamin oleh BPJS Kesehatan dengan biaya pelayanan dapat dibayar oleh peserta bersangkutan, pemberi kerja, atau asuransi kesehatan tambahan.

Ghufron Mukti juga mengimbau pengelola rumah sakit tidak mengurangi jumlah tempat tidur perawatan pasien dalam upaya memenuhi kriteria KRIS. "Pesan saya jangan dikurangi akses dengan mengurangi jumlah tempat tidur. Pertahankan jumlah tempat tidur dan penuhi persyaratannya dengan 12 kriteria tersebut," tegas Ghufron.

Penulis: Firman Hidranto Redaktur: Ratna Nuraini/Elvira Inda Sari Sumber: Indonesia.go.id

@ 266815e0:6cd408a5

Lot of people are starting to talk about building a web-of-trust and how nostr can or is already being used as such

We all know about using the kind:3 following lists as a simple WoT that can be used to filter out spam. but as we all know it does not really signal "trust", its mostly just "I find your content interesting"

But what about real "trust"... well its kind of multi-denominational, I could trust that your a good developer or a good journalist but still not trust you enough to invite you over to my house. There are some interesting and clever solutions proposed for quantifying "trust" in a digital sense but I'm not going to get into that here. I want to talk about something that I have not see anyone discuss yet.

How is the web-of-trust maintained? or more precisely how do you expect users to update the digital representation of the "trust" of other users?

Its all well and good to think of how a user would create that "trust" of another user when discovering them for the first time. They would click the "follow" button, or maybe even rate them on a few topics with a 1/5 star system But how will a user remove that trust? how will they update it if things change and they trust them less?

If our goal is to model "trust" in a digital sense then we NEED a way for the data to stay up-to-date and as accurate as possible. otherwise whats the use? If we don't have a friction-less way to update or remove the digital representation of "trust" then we will end up with a WoT that continuously grows and everyone is rated 10/10

In the case of nostr kind:3 following lists. its pretty easy to see how these would get updated. If someone posts something I dislike or I notice I'm getting board of their content. then I just unfollow them. An important part here is that I'm not thinking "I should update my trust score of this user" but instead "I'm no longer interested, I don't want to see this anymore"

But that is probably the easiest "trust" to update. because most of us on social media spend some time curating our feed and we are used to doing it. But what about the more obscure "trust" scores? whats the regular mechanism by which a user would update the "honestly" score of another user?

In the real world its easy, when I stop trusting someone I simply stop associating with them. there isn't any button or switch I need to update. I simply don't talk to them anymore, its friction-less But in the digital realm I would have to remove or update that trust. in other words its an action I need to take instead of an action I'm not doing. and actions take energy.

So how do we reflect something in the digital world that takes no-energy and is almost subconscious in the real world?

TLDR; webs-of-trust are not just about scoring other users once. you must keep the score up-to-date

@ 266815e0:6cd408a5

While I was in Mediera with all the other awesome people at the first SEC cohort there where a lot of discussions around data storage on nostr and if it could be made censorship-resistent

I remember lots of discussions about torrents, hypercore, nostr relays, and of course IPFS

There were a few things I learned from all these conversations:

1. All the existing solutions have one thing in common. A universal ID of some kind for files
2. HTTP is still good. we don't have to throw the baby out with the bath water
3. nostr could fix this... somehow

Some of the existing solutions work well for large files, and all of them are decentralization in some way. However none of them seem capable of serving up cat pictures for social media clients. they all have something missing...

An Identity system

An identity system would allow files to be "owned" by users. and once files have owners servers could start grouping files into a single thing instead of a 1000+ loose files

This can also greatly simplify the question of "what is spam" for a server hosting (or seeding) these files. since it could simply have a whitelist of owners (and maybe their friends)

What is blossom?

Blossom is a set of HTTP endpoints that allow nostr users to store and retrieve binary data on public servers using the sha256 hash as a universal id

What are Blobs?

blobs are chunks of binary data. they are similar to files but with one key difference, they don't have names

Instead blobs have a sha256 hash (like b1674191a88ec5cdd733e4240a81803105dc412d6c6708d53ab94fc248f4f553) as an ID

These IDs are universal since they can be computed from the file itself using the sha256 hashing algorithm ( you can get a files sha256 hash on linux using: sha256sum bitcoin.pdf )

How do the servers work?

Blossom servers expose four endpoints to let clients and users upload and manage blobs

• GET /<sha256> (optional file .ext)
• PUT /upload
• Authentication: Signed nostr event
• Returns a blob descriptor
• GET /list/<pubkey>
• Returns an array of blob descriptors
• Authentication (optional): Signed nostr event
• DELETE /<sha256>
• Authentication: Signed nostr event

What is Blossom Drive?

Blossom Drive is a nostr app built on top of blossom servers and allows users to create and manage folders of blobs

What are Drives

Drives are just nostr events (kind 30563) that store a map of blobs and what filename they should have along with some extra metadata

An example drive event would be json { "pubkey": "266815e0c9210dfa324c6cba3573b14bee49da4209a9456f9484e5106cd408a5", "created_at": 1710773987, "content": "", "kind": 30563, "tags": [ [ "name", "Emojis" ], [ "description", "nostr emojis" ], [ "d", "emojis" ], [ "r", "https://cdn.hzrd149.com/" ], [ "x", "303f018e613f29e3e43264529903b7c8c84debbd475f89368cb293ec23938981", "/noStrudel.png", "15161", "image/png" ], [ "x", "a0e2b39975c8da1702374b3eed6f4c6c7333e6ae0008dadafe93bd34bfb2ca78", "/satellite.png", "6853", "image/png" ], [ "x", "e8f3fae0f4a43a88eae235a8b79794d72e8f14b0e103a0fed1e073d8fb53d51f", "/amethyst.png", "20487", "image/png" ], [ "x", "70bd5836807b916d79e9c4e67e8b07e3e3b53f4acbb95c7521b11039a3c975c6", "/nos.png", "36521", "image/png" ], [ "x", "0fc304630279e0c5ab2da9c2769e3a3178c47b8609b447a30916244e89abbc52", "/primal.png", "29343", "image/png" ], [ "x", "9a03824a73d4af192d893329bbc04cd3798542ee87af15051aaf9376b74b25d4", "/coracle.png", "18300", "image/png" ], [ "x", "accdc0cdc048f4719bb5e1da4ff4c6ffc1a4dbb7cf3afbd19b86940c01111568", "/iris.png", "24070", "image/png" ], [ "x", "2e740f2514d6188e350d95cf4756bbf455d2f95e6a09bc64e94f5031bc4bba8f", "/damus.png", "32758", "image/png" ], [ "x", "2e019f08da0c75fb9c40d81947e511c8f0554763bffb6d23a7b9b8c9e8c84abb", "/old emojis/astral.png", "29365", "image/png" ], [ "x", "d97f842f2511ce0491fe0de208c6135b762f494a48da59926ce15acfdb6ac17e", "/other/rabbit.png", "19803", "image/png" ], [ "x", "72cb99b689b4cfe1a9fb6937f779f3f9c65094bf0e6ac72a8f8261efa96653f5", "/blossom.png", "4393", "image/png" ] ] }

There is a lot going on but the main thing is the list of "x" tags and the path that describes the folder and filename the blob should live at

If your interested, the full event definition is at github.com/hzrd149/blossom-drive

Getting started

Like every good nostr client it takes a small instruction manual in order to use it properly. so here are the steps for getting started

1. Open the app

Open https://blossom.hzrd149.com

2. Login using extension

You can also login using any of the following methods using the input - NIP-46 with your https://nsec.app or https://flare.pub account - a NIP-46 connection string - an ncryptsec password protected private key - a nsec unprotected private key (please don't) - bunker:// URI from nsecbunker

3. Add a blossom server

Right now https://cdn.satellite.earth is the only public server that is compatible with blossom drive. If you want to host your own I've written a basic implementation in TypeScript github.com/hzrd149/blossom-server

4. Start uploading your files

NOTE: All files upload to blossom drive are public by default. DO NOT upload private files

5. Manage files

Encrypted drives

There is also the option to encrypt drives using NIP-49 password encryption. although its not tested at all so don't trust it, verify

Whats next?

I don't know, but Im excited to see what everyone else on nostr builds with this. I'm only one developer at the end of the day and I can't think of everything

also all the images in this article are stored in one of my blossom drives here

nostr:naddr1qvzqqqrhvvpzqfngzhsvjggdlgeycm96x4emzjlwf8dyyzdfg4hefp89zpkdgz99qq8xzun5d93kcefdd9kkzem9wvr46jka

@ f977c464:32fcbe00

Güneşin kaybolmasının üçüncü günü, saat öğlen on ikiyi yirmi geçiyordu. Trenin kalkmasına yaklaşık iki saat vardı. Hepimiz perondaydık. Valizlerimiz, kolilerimiz, renk renk ve biçimsiz çantalarımızla yan yana dizilmiş, kısa aralıklarla tepemizdeki devasa saati kontrol ediyorduk.

Ama ne kadar dik bakarsak bakalım zaman bir türlü istediğimiz hızla ilerlemiyordu. Herkes birkaç dakika sürmesi gereken alelade bir doğa olayına sıkışıp kalmış, karanlıktan sürünerek çıkmayı deniyordu.

Bekleme salonuna doğru döndüm. Nefesimden çıkan buharın arkasında, kalın taş duvarları ve camlarıyla morg kadar güvenli ve soğuk duruyordu. Cesetleri o yüzden bunun gibi yerlere taşımaya başlamışlardı. Demek insanların bütün iyiliği başkaları onları gördüğü içindi ki gündüzleri gecelerden daha karanlık olduğunda hemen birbirlerinin gırtlağına çökmüş, böğürlerinde delikler açmış, gözlerini oyup kafataslarını parçalamışlardı.

İstasyonun ışığı titrediğinde karanlığın enseme saplandığını hissettim. Eğer şimdi, böyle kalabalık bir yerde elektrik kesilse başımıza ne gelirdi?

İçerideki askerlerden biri bakışlarımı yakalayınca yeniden saate odaklanmış gibi yaptım. Sadece birkaç dakika geçmişti.

“Tarlalarım gitti. Böyle boyum kadar ayçiçeği doluydu. Ah, hepsi ölüp gidiyor. Afitap’ın çiçekleri de gi-”

“Dayı, Allah’ını seversen sus. Hepimizi yakacaksın şimdi.”

Karanlıkta durduğunda, görünmez olmayı istemeye başlıyordun. Kimse seni görmemeli, nefesini bile duymamalıydı. Kimsenin de ayağının altında dolaşmamalıydın; gelip kazayla sana çarpmamalılar, takılıp sendelememeliydiler. Yoksa aslında hedefi sen olmadığın bir öfke gürlemeye başlar, yaşadığın ilk şoku ve acıyı silerek üstünden geçerdi.

İlk konuşan, yaşlıca bir adam, kafasında kasketi, nasırlı ellerine hohluyordu. Gözleri ve burnu kızarmıştı. Güneşin kaybolması onun için kendi başına bir felaket değildi. Hayatına olan pratik yansımalarından korkuyordu olsa olsa. Bir anının kaybolması, bu yüzden çoktan kaybettiği birinin biraz daha eksilmesi. Hayatta kalmasını gerektiren sebepler azalırken, hayatta kalmasını sağlayacak kaynaklarını da kaybediyordu.

Onu susturan delikanlıysa atkısını bütün kafasına sarmış, sakalı ve yüzünün derinliklerine kaçmış gözleri dışında bedeninin bütün parçalarını gizlemeye çalışıyordu. İşte o, güneşin kaybolmasının tam olarak ne anlama geldiğini anlamamış olsa bile, dehşetini olduğu gibi hissedebilenlerdendi.

Güneşin onlardan alındıktan sonra kime verileceğini sormuyorlardı. En başta onlara verildiğinde de hiçbir soru sormamışlardı zaten.

İki saat ne zaman geçer?

Midemin üstünde, sağ tarafıma doğru keskin bir acı hissettim. Karaciğerim. Gözlerimi yumdum. Yanımda biri metal bir nesneyi yere bıraktı. Bir kafesti. İçerisindeki kartalın ıslak kokusu burnuma ulaşmadan önce bile biliyordum bunu.

“Yeniden mi?” diye sordu bana kartal. Kanatları kanlı. Zamanın her bir parçası tüylerinin üstüne çöreklenmişti. Gagası bir şey, tahminen et parçası geveliyor gibi hareket ediyordu. Eski anılar kolay unutulmazmış. Şu anda kafesinin kalın parmaklıklarının ardında olsa da bunun bir aldatmaca olduğunu bir tek ben biliyordum. Her an kanatlarını iki yana uzatıverebilir, hava bu hareketiyle dalgalanarak kafesi esneterek hepimizi içine alacak kadar genişleyebilir, parmaklıklar önce ayaklarımızın altına serilir gibi gözükebilir ama aslında hepimizin üstünde yükselerek tepemize çökebilirdi.

Aşağıya baktım. Tahtalarla zapt edilmiş, hiçbir yere gidemeyen ama her yere uzanan tren rayları. Atlayıp koşsam… Çantam çok ağırdı. Daha birkaç adım atamadan, kartal, suratını bedenime gömerdi.

“Bu sefer farklı,” diye yanıtladım onu. “Yeniden diyemezsin. Tekrarladığım bir şey değil bu. Hatta bir hata yapıyormuşum gibi tonlayamazsın da. Bu sefer, insanların hak etmediğini biliyorum.”

“O zaman daha vahim. Süzme salaksın demektir.”

“İnsanların hak etmemesi, insanlığın hak etmediği anlamına gelmez ki.”

Az önce göz göze geldiğim genççe ama çökük asker hâlâ bana bakıyordu. Bir kartalla konuştuğumu anlamamıştı şüphesiz. Yanımdakilerden biriyle konuştuğumu sanmış olmalıydı. Ama konuştuğum kişiye bakmıyordum ona göre. Çekingence kafamı eğmiştim. Bir kez daha göz göze geldiğimizde içerideki diğer iki askere bir şeyler söyledi, onlar dönüp beni süzerken dışarı çıktı.

Yanımızdaki, az önce konuşan iki adam da şaşkınlıkla bir bana bir kartala bakıyordu.

“Yalnız bu sefer kalbin de kırılacak, Prometheus,” dedi kartal, bana. “Belki son olur. Biliyorsun, bir sürü soruna neden oluyor bu yaptıkların.”

Beni koruyordu sözde. En çok kanıma dokunan buydu. Kasıklarımın üstüne oturmuş, kanlı suratının ardında gözleri parlarken attığı çığlık kulaklarımda titremeye devam ediyordu. Bu tabloda kimsenin kimseyi düşündüğü yoktu. Kartalın, yanımızdaki adamların, artık arkama kadar gelmiş olması gereken askerin, tren raylarının, geçmeyen saatlerin…

Arkamı döndüğümde, asker sahiden oradaydı. Zaten öyle olması gerekiyordu; görmüştüm bunu, biliyordum. Kehanetler… Bir şeyler söylüyordu ama ağzı oynarken sesi çıkmıyordu. Yavaşlamış, kendisini saatin akışına uydurmuştu. Havada donan tükürüğünden anlaşılıyordu, sinirliydi. Korktuğu için olduğunu biliyordum. Her seferinde korkmuşlardı. Beni unutmuş olmaları işlerini kolaylaştırmıyordu. Sadece yeni bir isim vermelerine neden oluyordu. Bu seferkiyle beni lanetleyecekleri kesinleşmişti.

Olması gerekenle olanların farklı olması ne kadar acınasıydı. Olması gerekenlerin doğasının kötücül olmasıysa bir yerde buna dayanıyordu.

“Salaksın,” dedi kartal bana. Zamanı aşan bir çığlık. Hepimizin önüne geçmişti ama kimseyi durduramıyordu.

Sonsuzluğa kaç tane iki saat sıkıştırabilirsiniz?

Ben bir tane bile sıkıştıramadım.

Çantama uzanıyordum. Asker de sırtındaki tüfeğini indiriyordu. Benim acelem yoktu, onunsa eli ayağı birbirine dolaşıyordu. Oysaki her şey tam olması gerektiği anda olacaktı. Kehanet başkasının parmaklarının ucundaydı.

Güneş, bir tüfeğin patlamasıyla yeryüzüne doğdu.

Rayların üzerine serilmiş göğsümün ortasından, bir çantanın içinden.

Not: Bu öykü ilk olarak 2021 yılında Esrarengiz Hikâyeler'de yayımlanmıştır.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

O Planetinha

Fumaça verde me entrando pelas narinas e um coro desafinado fazia uma base melódica.

nos confins da galáxia havia um planetinha isolado. Era um planeta feliz.

O homem vestido de mago começava a aparecer por detrás da fumaça verde.

O planetinha recebeu três presentes, mas o seu habitante, o homem, estava num estado de confusão tão grande que ameaçava estragá-los. Os homens já havia escravizado o primeiro presente, a vida; lutavam contra o segundo presente, a morte; e havia alguns que achavam que deviam destruir totalmente o terceiro, o amor, e com isto levar a desordem total ao pobre planetinha perdido, que se chamava Terra.

O coro desafinado entrou antes do "Terra" cantando várias vezes, como se imitasse um eco, "terra-terra-terraaa". Depois de uma pausa dramática, o homem vestido de mago voltou a falar.

Terra, nossa nave mãe.

Neste momento eu me afastei. À frente do palco onde o mago e seu coral faziam apelos à multidão havia vários estandes cobertos com a tradicional armação de quatro pernas e lona branca. Em todos os cantos da praça havia gente, gente dos mais variados tipos. Visitantes curiosos que se aproximavam atraídos pela fumaça verde e as barraquinhas, gente que aproveitava o movimento para vender doces sem pagar imposto, casais que se abraçavam de pé para espantar o frio, os tradicionais corredores que faziam seu cooper, gente cheia de barba e vestida para imitar os hippies dos anos 60 e vender colares estendidos no chão, transeuntes novos e velhos, vestidos como baladeiros ou como ativistas do ônibus grátis, grupos de ciclistas entusiastas.

O mago fazia agora apelos para que nós, os homens, habitantes do isolado planetinha, passássemos a ver o planetinha, nossa nave mãe, como um todo, e adquiríssemos a consciência de que ele estava entrando em maus lençóis. A idéia, reforçada pela logomarca do evento, era que parássemos de olhar só para a nossa vida e pensássemos no planeta.

A logomarca do evento, um desenho estilizado do planeta Terra, nada tinha a ver com seu nome: "Festival Andando de Bem com a Vida", mas havia sido ali colocada estrategicamente pelos organizadores, de quem parecia justamente sair a mensagem dita pelo mago.

Aquela multidão de pessoas que, assim como eu, tinham suas próprias preocupações, não podiam ver o quadro caótico que formavam, cada uma com seus atos isolados, ali naquela praça isolada, naquele planeta isolado. Quando o hippie barbudo, quase um Osho, assustava um casal para tentar vender-lhes um colar, a quantidade de caos que isto acrescentava à cena era gigantesca. Por um segundo, pude ver, como se estivesse de longe e acima, com toda a pretensão que este estado imaginativo carrega, a cena completa do caos.

---

Uma nave-mãe, dessas de ficção científica, habitada por milhões de pessoas, seguia no espaço sem rumo, e sem saber que logo à frente um longo precipício espacial a esperava, para a desgraça completa sua e de seus habitantes.

Acostumados àquela nave tanto quanto outrora estiveram acostumados à sua terra natal, os homens viviam as próprias vidas sem nem se lembrar que estavam vagando pelo espaço. Ninguém sabia quem estava conduzindo a nave, e ninguém se importava.

No final do filme descobre-se que era a soma completa do caos que cada habitante produzia, com seus gestos egoístas e incapazes de levar em conta a totalidade, é que determinava a direção da nave-mãe. O efeito, no entanto, não era imediato, como nunca é. Havia gente de verdade encarregada de conduzir a nave, mas era uma gente bêbada, mau-caráter, que vivia brigando pelo controle da nave e o poder que isto lhes dava. Poder, status, dinheiro!

Essa gente bêbada era atraída até ali pela corrupção das instituições e da moral comum que, no fundo no fundo, era causada pelo egoísmo da população, através de um complexo -- mas que no filme aparece simplificado pela ação individual de um magnata do divertimento público -- processo social.

O homem vestido de mago era mais um agente causador de caos, com sua cena cheia de fumaça e sua roupa estroboscópica, ele achava que estava fazendo o bem ao alertar sua platéia, todos as sextas-feiras, de que havia algo que precisava ser feito, que cada um que estava ali ouvindo era responsável pelo planeta. A sua incapacidade, porém, de explicar o que precisava ser feito só aumentava a angústia geral; a culpa que ele jogava sobre seu público, e que era prontamente aceita e passada em frente, aos familiares e amigos de cada um, atormentava-os diariamente e os impedia de ter uma vida decente no trabalho e em casa. As famílias, estressadas, estavam constantemente brigando e os motivos mais insignificantes eram responsáveis pelas mais horrendas conseqüências.

O mago, que após o show tirava o chapéu entortado e ia tomar cerveja num boteco, era responsável por uma parcela considerável do caos que levava a nave na direção do seu desgraçado fim. No filme, porém, um dos transeuntes que de passagem ouviu um pedaço do discurso do mago despertou em si mesmo uma consiência transformadora e, com poderes sobre-humanos que lhe foram então concedidos por uma ordem iniciática do bem ou não, usando só os seus poderes humanos mesmo, o transeunte -- na primeira versão do filme um homem, na segunda uma mulher -- consegue consertar as instituições e retirar os bêbados da condução da máquina. A questão da moral pública é ignorada para abreviar a trama, já com duas horas e quarenta de duração, mas subentende-se que ela também fora resolvida.

---

No planeta Terra real, que não está indo em direção alguma, preso pela gravidade ao Sol, e onde as pessoas vivem a própria vida porque lhes é impossível viver a dos outros, não têm uma consciência global de nada porque só é possível mesmo ter a consciência delas mesmas, e onde a maioria, de uma maneira ou de outra, está tentando como pode, fazer as coisas direito, o filme é exibido.

Para a maioria dos espectadores, é um filme que evoca reflexões, um filme forte. Por um segundo elas têm o mesmo vislumbre do caos generalizado que eu tive ali naquela praça. Para uma pequena parcela dos espectadores -- entre eles alguns dos que estavam na platéia do mago, o próprio mago, o seguidor do Osho, o casal de duas mulheres e o vendedor de brigadeiros, mas aos quais se somam também críticos de televisão e jornal e gente que fala pelos cotovelos na internet -- o filme é um horror, o filme é uma vulgarização de um problema real e sério, o filme apela para a figura do herói salvador e passa uma mensagem totalmente errada, de que a maioria da população pode continuar vivendo as suas própria vidinhas miseráveis enquanto espera por um herói que vem do Olimpo e os salva da mixórdia que eles mesmos causaram, é um filme que presta um enorme desserviço à causa.

No dia seguinte ao lançamento, num bar meio caro ali perto da praça, numa mesa com oito pessoas, entre elas seis do primeiro grupo e oito do segundo, discute-se se o filme levará ou não o Oscar. Eu estou em casa dormindo e não escuto nada.

@ f977c464:32fcbe00

Kendisini aynada ilk defa gördüğü o gün, diğerleri gibi olduğunu anlamıştı. Oysaki her insan biricik olmalıydı. Sözgelimi sinirlendiğinde bir kaşı diğerinden birkaç milimetre daha az çatılabilirdi veya sevindiğinde dudağı ona has bir açıyla dalgalanabilirdi. Hatta bunların hiçbiri mümkün değilse, en azından, gözlerinin içinde sadece onun sahip olabileceği bir ışık parlayabilirdi. Çok sıradan, öyle sıradan ki kimsenin fark etmediği o milyonlarca minik şeyden herhangi biri. Ne olursa.

Ama yansımasına bakarken bunların hiçbirini bulamadı ve diğer günlerden hiç de farklı başlamamış o gün, işe gitmek için vagonunun gelmesini beklediği alelade bir metro istasyonunda, içinde kaybolduğu illüzyon dağılmaya başladı.

İlk önce derisi döküldü. Tam olarak dökülmedi aslında, daha çok kıvılcımlara dönüşüp bedeninden fırlamış ve bir an sonra sönerek külleşmiş, havada dağılmıştı. Ardında da, kaybolmadan hemen önce, kısa süre için hayal meyal görülebilen, bir ruhun yok oluşuna ağıt yakan rengârenk peri cesetleri bırakmıştı. Beklenenin aksine, havaya toz kokusu yayıldı.

Dehşete düştü elbette. Dehşete düştüler. Panikle üstlerini yırtan 50 işçi. Her şeyin sebebiyse o vagon.

Saçları da döküldü. Her tel, yere varmadan önce, her santimde ikiye ayrıla ayrıla yok oldu.

Bütün yüzeylerin mat olduğu, hiçbir şeyin yansımadığı, suyun siyah aktığı ve kendine ancak kameralarla bakabildiğin bir dünyada, vagonun içine yerleştirilmiş bir aynadan ilk defa kendini görmek.

Gözlerinin akları buharlaşıp havada dağıldı, mercekleri boşalan yeri doldurmak için eriyip yayıldı. Gerçeği görmemek için yaratılmış, bu yüzden görmeye hazır olmayan ve hiç olmayacak gözler.

Her şeyin o anda sona erdiğini sanabilirdi insan. Derin bir karanlık ve ölüm. Görmenin görmek olduğu o anın bitişi.

---

Ben geldiğimde ölmüşlerdi.

Yani bozulmuşlardı demek istiyorum.

Belleklerini yeni taşıyıcılara takmam mümkün olmadı. Fiziksel olarak kusursuz durumdaydılar, olmayanları da tamir edebilirdim ama tüm o hengamede kendilerini baştan programlamış ve girdilerini modifiye etmişlerdi.

Belleklerden birini masanın üzerinden ileriye savurdu. Hınca hınç dolu bir barda oturuyorlardı. O ve arkadaşı.

Sırf şu kendisini insan sanan androidler travma geçirip delirmesin diye neler yapıyoruz, insanın aklı almıyor.

Eliyle arkasını işaret etti.

Polislerin söylediğine göre biri vagonun içerisine ayna yerleştirmiş. Bu zavallılar da kapı açılıp bir anda yansımalarını görünce kafayı kırmışlar.

Arkadaşı bunların ona ne hissettirdiğini sordu. Yani o kadar bozuk, insan olduğunu sanan androidi kendilerini parçalamış olarak yerde görmek onu sarsmamış mıydı?

Hayır, sonuçta belirli bir amaç için yaratılmış şeyler onlar. Kaliteli bir bilgisayarım bozulduğunda üzülürüm çünkü parasını ben vermişimdir. Bunlarsa devletin. Bana ne ki?

Arkadaşı anlayışla kafasını sallayıp suyundan bir yudum aldı. Kravatını biraz gevşetti.

Bira istemediğinden emin misin?

İstemediğini söyledi. Sahi, neden deliriyordu bu androidler?

Basit. Onların yapay zekâlarını kodlarken bir şeyler yazıyorlar. Yazılımcılar. Biliyorsun, ben donanımdayım. Bunlar da kendilerini insan sanıyorlar. Tiplerine bak.

Sesini alçalttı.

Arabalarda kaza testi yapılan mankenlere benziyor hepsi. Ağızları burunları bile yok ama şu geldiğimizden beri sakalını düzeltip duruyor mesela. Hayır, hepsi de diğerleri onun sakalı varmış sanıyor, o manyak bir şey.

Arkadaşı bunun delirmeleriyle bağlantısını çözemediğini söyledi. O da normal sesiyle konuşmaya devam etti.

Anlasana, aynayı falan ayırt edemiyor mercekleri. Lönk diye kendilerini görüyorlar. Böyle, olduğu gibi...

Nedenmiş peki? Ne gerek varmış?

Ne bileyim be abicim! Ahiret soruları gibi.

Birasına bakarak dalıp gitti. Sonra masaya abanarak arkadaşına iyice yaklaştı. Bulanık, bir tünelin ucundaki biri gibi, şekli şemalı belirsiz bir adam.

Ben seni nereden tanıyorum ki ulan? Kimsin sen?

Belleği makineden çıkardılar. İki kişiydiler. Soruşturmadan sorumlu memurlar.

─ Baştan mı başlıyoruz, diye sordu belleği elinde tutan ilk memur.

─ Bir kere daha deneyelim ama bu sefer direkt aynayı sorarak başla, diye cevapladı ikinci memur.

─ Bence de. Yeterince düzgün çalışıyor.

Simülasyon yüklenirken, ayakta, biraz arkada duran ve alnını kaşıyan ikinci memur sormaktan kendisini alamadı:

─ Bu androidleri niye böyle bir olay yerine göndermişler ki? Belli tost olacakları. İsraf. Gidip biz baksak aynayı kırıp delilleri mahvetmek zorunda da kalmazlar.

Diğer memur sandalyesinde hafifçe dönecek oldu, o sırada soruyu bilgisayarın hoparlöründen teknisyen cevapladı.

Hangi işimizde bir yamukluk yok ki be abi.

---

Ama bir son değildi. Üstlerindeki tüm illüzyon dağıldığında ve çıplak, cinsiyetsiz, birbirinin aynı bedenleriyle kaldıklarında sıra dünyaya gelmişti.

Yere düştüler. Elleri -bütün bedeni gibi siyah turmalinden, boğumları çelikten- yere değdiği anda, metronun zemini dağıldı.

Yerdeki karolar öncesinde beyazdı ve çok parlaktı. Tepelerindeki floresan, ışığını olduğu gibi yansıtıyor, tek bir lekenin olmadığı ve tek bir tozun uçmadığı istasyonu aydınlatıyorlardı.

Duvarlara duyurular asılmıştı. Örneğin, yarın akşam kültür merkezinde 20.00’da başlayacak bir tekno blues festivalinin cıvıl cıvıl afişi vardı. Onun yanında daha geniş, sarı puntolu harflerle yazılmış, yatay siyah kesiklerle çerçevesi çizilmiş, bir platformdan düşen çöp adamın bulunduğu “Dikkat! Sarı bandı geçmeyin!” uyarısı. Biraz ilerisinde günlük resmi gazete, onun ilerisinde bir aksiyon filminin ve başka bir romantik komedi filminin afişleri, yapılacakların ve yapılmayacakların söylendiği küçük puntolu çeşitli duyurular... Duvar uzayıp giden bir panoydu. On, on beş metrede bir tekrarlanıyordu.

Tüm istasyonun eni yüz metre kadar. Genişliği on metre civarı.

Önlerinde, açık kapısından o mendebur aynanın gözüktüğü vagon duruyordu. Metro, istasyona sığmayacak kadar uzundu. Bir kılıcın keskinliğiyle uzanıyor ama yer yer vagonların ek yerleriyle bölünüyordu.

Hiçbir vagonda pencere olmadığı için metronun içi, içlerindekiler meçhuldü.

Sonrasında karolar zerrelerine ayrılarak yükseldi. Floresanın ışığında her yeri toza boğdular ve ortalığı gri bir sisin altına gömdüler. Çok kısa bir an. Afişleri dalgalandırmadılar. Dalgalandırmaya vakitleri olmadı. Yerlerinden söküp aldılar en fazla. Işık birkaç kere sönüp yanarak direndi. Son kez söndüğünde bir daha geri gelmedi.

Yine de etraf aydınlıktı. Kırmızı, her yere eşit dağılan soluk bir ışıkla.

Yer tamamen tele dönüşmüştü. Altında çapraz hatlarla desteklenmiş demir bir iskelet. Işık birkaç metreden daha fazla aşağıya uzanamıyordu. Sonsuzluğa giden bir uçurum.

Duvarın yerini aynı teller ve demir iskelet almıştı. Arkasında, birbirine vidalarla tutturulmuş demir plakalardan oluşan, üstünden geçen boruların ek yerlerinden bazen ince buharların çıktığı ve bir süre asılı kaldıktan sonra ağır, yağlı bir havayla sürüklendiği bir koridor.

Diğer tarafta paslanmış, pencerelerindeki camlar kırıldığı için demir plakalarla kapatılmış külüstür bir metro. Kapının karşısındaki aynadan her şey olduğu gibi yansıyordu.

---

Bir konteynırın içini andıran bir evde, gerçi gayet de birbirine eklenmiş konteynırlardan oluşan bir şehirde “andıran” demek doğru olmayacağı için düpedüz bir konteynırın içinde, masaya mum görüntüsü vermek için koyulmuş, yarı katı yağ atıklarından şekillendirilmiş kütleleri yakmayı deniyordu. Kafasında hayvan kıllarından yapılmış grili siyahlı bir peruk. Aynı kıllardan kendisine gür bir bıyık da yapmıştı.

Üstünde mavi çöp poşetlerinden yapılmış, kravatlı, şık bir takım.

Masanın ayakları yerine oradan buradan çıkmış parçalar konulmuştu: bir arabanın şaft mili, üst üste konulmuş ve üstünde yazı okunamayan tenekeler, boş kitaplar, boş gazete balyaları... Hiçbir şeye yazı yazılmıyordu, gerek yoktu da zaten çünkü merkez veri bankası onları fark ettirmeden, merceklerden giren veriyi sentezleyerek insanlar için dolduruyordu. Yani, androidler için. Farklı şekilde isimlendirmek bir fark yaratacaksa.

Onların mercekleri için değil. Bağlantıları çok önceden kopmuştu.

─ Hayatım, sofra hazır, diye bağırdı yatak odasındaki karısına.

Sofrada tabak yerine düz, bardak yerine bükülmüş, çatal ve bıçak yerine sivriltilmiş plakalar.

Karısı salonun kapısında durakladı ve ancak kulaklarına kadar uzanan, kocasınınkine benzeyen, cansız, ölü hayvanların kıllarından ibaret peruğunu eliyle düzeltti. Dudağını, daha doğrusu dudağının olması gereken yeri koyu kırmızı bir yağ tabakasıyla renklendirmeyi denemişti. Biraz da yanaklarına sürmüştü.

─ Nasıl olmuş, diye sordu.

Sesi tek düzeydi ama hafif bir neşe olduğunu hissettiğinize yemin edebilirdiniz.

Üzerinde, çöp poşetlerinin içini yazısız gazete kağıtlarıyla doldurarak yaptığı iki parça giysi.

─ Çok güzelsin, diyerek kravatını düzeltti kocası.

─ Sen de öylesin, sevgilim.

Yaklaşıp kocasını öptü. Kocası da onu. Sonra nazikçe elinden tutarak, sandalyesini geriye çekerek oturmasına yardım etti.

Sofrada yemek niyetine hiçbir şey yoktu. Gerek de yoktu zaten.

Konteynırın kapısı gürültüyle tekmelenip içeri iki memur girene kadar birbirlerine öyküler anlattılar. O gün neler yaptıklarını. İşten erken çıkıp yemyeşil çimenlerde gezdiklerini, uçurtma uçurduklarını, kadının nasıl o elbiseyi bulmak için saatlerce gezip yorulduğunu, kocasının kısa süreliğine işe dönüp nasıl başarılı bir hamleyle yaşanan krizi çözdüğünü ve kadının yanına döndükten sonra, alışveriş merkezinde oturdukları yeni dondurmacının dondurmalarının ne kadar lezzetli olduğunu, boğazlarının ağrımasından korktuklarını...

Akşam film izleyebilirlerdi, televizyonda -boş ve mat bir plaka- güzel bir film oynayacaktı.

İki memur. Çıplak bedenleriyle birbirinin aynı. Ellerindeki silahları onlara doğrultmuşlardı. Mum ışığında, tertemiz bir örtünün serili olduğu masada, bardaklarında şaraplarla oturan ve henüz sofranın ortasındaki hindiye dokunmamış çifti gördüklerinde bocaladılar.

Hiç de androidlere bilinçli olarak zarar verebilecek gibi gözükmüyorlardı.

─ Sessiz kalma hakkına sahipsiniz, diye bağırdı içeri giren ikinci memur. Söylediğiniz her şey...

Cümlesini bitiremedi. Yatak odasındaki, masanın üzerinden gördüğü o şey, onunla aynı hareketleri yapan android, yoksa, bir aynadaki yansıması mıydı?

Bütün illüzyon o anda dağılmaya başladı.

Not: Bu öykü ilk olarak 2020 yılında Esrarengiz Hikâyeler'de yayımlanmıştır.

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Embarking on the journey of operating your own Lightning node on the Bitcoin Layer 2 network is more than just a tech-savvy endeavor; it's a step into a realm of financial autonomy and cutting-edge innovation. By running a node, you become a vital part of a revolutionary movement that's reshaping how we think about money and digital transactions. This role not only offers a unique perspective on blockchain technology but also places you at the heart of a community dedicated to decentralization and network resilience. Beyond the technicalities, it's about embracing a new era of digital finance, where you contribute directly to the network's security, efficiency, and growth, all while gaining personal satisfaction and potentially lucrative rewards.

In essence, running your own Lightning node is a powerful way to engage with the forefront of blockchain technology, assert financial independence, and contribute to a more decentralized and efficient Bitcoin network. It's an adventure that offers both personal and communal benefits, from gaining in-depth tech knowledge to earning a place in the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency.

Running your own Lightning node for the Bitcoin Layer 2 network can be an empowering and beneficial endeavor. Here are 10 reasons why you might consider taking on this task:

1. Direct Contribution to Decentralization: Operating a node is a direct action towards decentralizing the Bitcoin network, crucial for its security and resistance to control or censorship by any single entity.

2. Financial Autonomy: Owning a node gives you complete control over your financial transactions on the network, free from reliance on third-party services, which can be subject to fees, restrictions, or outages.

3. Advanced Network Participation: As a node operator, you're not just a passive participant but an active player in shaping the network, influencing its efficiency and scalability through direct involvement.

4. Potential for Higher Revenue: With strategic management and optimal channel funding, your node can become a preferred route for transactions, potentially increasing the routing fees you can earn.

5. Cutting-Edge Technological Engagement: Running a node puts you at the forefront of blockchain and bitcoin technology, offering insights into future developments and innovations.

6. Strengthened Network Security: Each new node adds to the robustness of the Bitcoin network, making it more resilient against attacks and failures, thus contributing to the overall security of the ecosystem.

7. Personalized Fee Structures: You have the flexibility to set your own fee policies, which can balance earning potential with the service you provide to the network.

8. Empowerment Through Knowledge: The process of setting up and managing a node provides deep learning opportunities, empowering you with knowledge that can be applied in various areas of blockchain and fintech.

9. Boosting Transaction Capacity: By running a node, you help to increase the overall capacity of the Lightning Network, enabling more transactions to be processed quickly and at lower costs.

10. Community Leadership and Reputation: As an active node operator, you gain recognition within the Bitcoin community, which can lead to collaborative opportunities and a position of thought leadership in the space.

These reasons demonstrate the impactful and transformative nature of running a Lightning node, appealing to those who are deeply invested in the principles of bitcoin and wish to actively shape its future. Jump aboard, and embrace the journey toward full independence. 🐶🐾🫡🚀🚀🚀

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Chef's notes

Serving these two dishes together will create a delightful centerpiece for your Thanksgiving meal, offering a perfect blend of traditional flavors with a homemade touch.

Details

• ⏲️ Prep time: 30 min
• 🍳 Cook time: 1 - 2 hours
• 🍽️ Servings: 4-6

Ingredients

• 1 whole turkey (about 12-14 lbs), thawed and ready to cook
• 1 cup unsalted butter, softened
• 2 tablespoons fresh thyme, chopped
• 2 tablespoons fresh rosemary, chopped
• 2 tablespoons fresh sage, chopped
• Salt and freshly ground black pepper
• 1 onion, quartered
• 1 lemon, halved
• 2-3 cloves of garlic
• Apple and Sage Stuffing
• 1 loaf of crusty bread, cut into cubes
• 2 apples, cored and chopped
• 1 onion, diced
• 2 stalks celery, diced
• 3 cloves garlic, minced
• 1/4 cup fresh sage, chopped
• 1/2 cup unsalted butter
• 2 cups chicken broth
• Salt and pepper, to taste

Directions

1. Preheat the Oven: Set your oven to 325°F (165°C).
2. Prepare the Herb Butter: Mix the softened butter with the chopped thyme, rosemary, and sage. Season with salt and pepper.
3. Prepare the Turkey: Remove any giblets from the turkey and pat it dry. Loosen the skin and spread a generous amount of herb butter under and over the skin.
4. Add Aromatics: Inside the turkey cavity, place the quartered onion, lemon halves, and garlic cloves.
5. Roast: Place the turkey in a roasting pan. Tent with aluminum foil and roast. A general guideline is about 15 minutes per pound, or until the internal temperature reaches 165°F (74°C) at the thickest part of the thigh.
6. Rest and Serve: Let the turkey rest for at least 20 minutes before carving.
7. Next: Apple and Sage Stuffing
8. Dry the Bread: Spread the bread cubes on a baking sheet and let them dry overnight, or toast them in the oven.
9. Cook the Vegetables: In a large skillet, melt the butter and cook the onion, celery, and garlic until soft.
10. Combine Ingredients: Add the apples, sage, and bread cubes to the skillet. Stir in the chicken broth until the mixture is moist. Season with salt and pepper.
11. Bake: Transfer the stuffing to a baking dish and bake at 350°F (175°C) for about 30-40 minutes, until golden brown on top.

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Testing a brand new YakiHonne native client for iOS. Smooth as butter (not penis butter 🤣🍆🧈) with great visual experience and intuitive navigation. Amazing work by the team behind it! * lists * work

Bold text work!

Images could have used nostr.build instead of raw S3 from us-east-1 region.

Very impressive! You can even save the draft and continue later, before posting the long-form note!

🐶🐾🤯🤯🤯🫂💜

@ fa0165a0:03397073

I just tested building a browser plugin, it was easier than I thought. Here I'll walk you through the steps of creating a minimal working example of a browser plugin, a.k.a. the "Hello World" of browser plugins.

First of all there are two main browser platforms out there, Chromium and Mozilla. They do some things a little differently, but similar enough that we can build a plugin that works on both. This plugin will work in both, I'll describe the firefox version, but the chromium version is very similar.

What is a browser plugin?

Simply put, a browser plugin is a program that runs in the browser. It can do things like modify the content of a webpage, or add new functionality to the browser. It's a way to extend the browser with custom functionality. Common examples are ad blockers, password managers, and video downloaders.

In technical terms, they are plugins that can insert html-css-js into your browser experience.

How to build a browser plugin

Step 0: Basics

You'll need a computer, a text editor and a browser. For testing and development I personally think that the firefox developer edition is the easiest to work with. But any Chrome based browser will also do.

Create a working directory on your computer, name it anything you like. I'll call mine hello-world-browser-plugin. Open the directory and create a file called manifest.json. This is the most important file of your plugin, and it must be named exactly right.

Step 1: manifest.json

After creation open your file manifest.json in your text editor and paste the following code:

json { "manifest_version": 3, "name": "Hello World", "version": "1.0", "description": "A simple 'Hello World' browser extension", "content_scripts": [ { "matches": ["<all_urls>"], "js": ["hello.js"] //The name of your script file. // "css": ["hello.css"] //The name of your css file. } ] }

If you wonder what the json file format is, it's a normal text file with a special syntax such that a computer can easily read it. It's the json syntax you see in the code above. Let's go through what's being said here. (If you are not interested, just skip to the next step after pasting this we are done here.)

• manifest_version: This is the version of the manifest file format. It's currently at version 3, and it's the latest version. It's important that you set this to 3, otherwise your plugin won't work.
• name: This is the name of your plugin. It can be anything you like.
• version: This is the version of your plugin. It can be anything you like.
• description: This is the description of your plugin. It can be anything you like.
• content_scripts: This is where you define what your plugin does. It's a list of scripts that will be executed when the browser loads a webpage. In this case we have one script, called hello.js. It's the script that we'll create in the next step.
• matches: This is a list of urls that the script will be executed on. In this case we have <all_urls>, which means that the script will be executed on all urls. You can also specify a specific url, like https://brave.com/*, which means that the script will only be executed on urls that start with https://brave.com/.
• js: This is a list of javascript files that will be executed. In this case we have one file, called hello.js. It's the script that we'll create in the next step.
• css: This is where you can add a list of css files that will be executed. In this case we have none, but you can add css files here if you want to.
• //: Text following these two characters are comments. They are ignored by the computer, You can add comments anywhere you like, and they are a good way to document your code.

Step 2: hello.js

Now it's time to create another file in your project folder. This time we'll call it hello.js. When created, open it in your text editor and paste the following code:

js console.log("Hello World!"); That's javascript code, and it's what will be executed when you run your plugin. It's a simple console.log statement, which will print the text "Hello World!" to the console. The console is a place where the browser prints out messages, and it's a good place to start when debugging your plugin.

Step 3: Load and launch your plugin

Firefox

Now it's time to load your plugin into your browser. Open your browser and go to the url about:debugging#/runtime/this-firefox. You should see a page that looks something like this:

Click the button that says "Load Temporary Add-on...". A file dialog will open, navigate to your project folder and select the file manifest.json. Your plugin should now be loaded and running.

Go to a website, any website, and open the inspector then navigate to the console. You'll find the inspector by right-clicking anywhere within the webpage, and click "Inspector" in the drop-down menu. When opening the console you might see some log messages from the site you visited and... you should see the text "Hello World!" printed there, from our little plugin! Congratulations!

Chrome

Open your browser and go to the url chrome://extensions/. Click the button that says "Load unpacked". A file dialog will open, navigate to your project folder and select the folder hello-world-browser-plugin. Your plugin should now be loaded and running.

Note the difference, of selecting the file manifest.json in firefox, and selecting the folder hello-world-browser-plugin in chrome. Otherwise, the process is the same. So I'll repeat the same text as above: (for those who skipped ahead..)

Go to a website, any website, and open the inspector then navigate to the console. You'll find the inspector by right-clicking anywhere within the webpage, and click "Inspector" in the drop-down menu. When opening the console you might see some log messages from the site you visited and... you should see the text "Hello World!" printed there, from our little plugin! Congratulations!

---

As you can see this isn't as complicated as one might think. Having preformed a "Hello-World!"-project is a very useful and valuable first step. These setup steps are the basics for any browser plugin, and you can build on this to create more advanced plugins.

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

As the title states, scratch behind my ear and you get it. 🐶🐾🫡

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Test Bounty Note

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Intro

This short tutorial will help you set up your own Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC) on your own LND Node that is not using Umbrel. If you are a user of Umbrel, you should use their version of NWC.

Requirements

You need to have a working installation of LND with established channels and connectivity to the internet. NWC in itself is fairly light and will not consume a lot of resources. You will also want to ensure that you have a working installation of Docker, since we will use a docker image to run NWC.

• Working installation of LND (and all of its required components)
• Docker (with Docker compose)

Installation

For the purpose of this tutorial, we will assume that you have your lnd/bitcoind running under user bitcoin with home directory /home/bitcoin. We will also assume that you already have a running installation of Docker (or docker.io).

Prepare and verify

git version - we will need git to get the latest version of NWC. docker version - should execute successfully and show the currently installed version of Docker. docker compose version - same as before, but the version will be different. ss -tupln | grep 10009- should produce the following output: tcp LISTEN 0 4096 0.0.0.0:10009 0.0.0.0: tcp LISTEN 0 4096 [::]:10009 [::]:**

For things to work correctly, your Docker should be version 20.10.0 or later. If you have an older version, consider installing a new one using instructions here: https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/

Create folders & download NWC

In the home directory of your LND/bitcoind user, create a new folder, e.g., "nwc" mkdir /home/bitcoin/nwc. Change to that directory cd /home/bitcoin/nwc and clone the NWC repository: git clone https://github.com/getAlby/nostr-wallet-connect.git

Creating the Docker image

In this step, we will create a Docker image that you will use to run NWC.

• Change directory to nostr-wallet-connect: cd nostr-wallet-connect
• Run command to build Docker image: docker build -t nwc:$(date +'%Y%m%d%H%M') -t nwc:latest . (there is a dot at the end)
• The last line of the output (after a few minutes) should look like => => naming to docker.io/library/nwc:latest
• nwc:latest is the name of the Docker image with a tag which you should note for use later.

Creating docker-compose.yml and necessary data directories

• Let's create a directory that will hold your non-volatile data (DB): mkdir data
• Indocker-compose.ymlfile, there are fields that you want to replace (<> comments) and port “4321” that you want to make sure is open (check with ss -tupln | grep 4321which should return nothing).
• Create docker-compose.ymlfile with the following content, and make sure to update fields that have <> comment:

version: "3.8" services: nwc: image: nwc:latest volumes: - ./data:/data - ~/.lnd:/lnd:ro ports: - "4321:8080" extra_hosts: - "localhost:host-gateway" environment: NOSTR_PRIVKEY: <use "openssl rand -hex 32" to generate a fresh key and place it inside ""> LN_BACKEND_TYPE: "LND" LND_ADDRESS: localhost:10009 LND_CERT_FILE: "/lnd/tls.cert" LND_MACAROON_FILE: "/lnd/data/chain/bitcoin/mainnet/admin.macaroon" DATABASE_URI: "/data/nostr-wallet-connect.db" COOKIE_SECRET: <use "openssl rand -hex 32" to generate fresh secret and place it inside ""> PORT: 8080 restart: always stop_grace_period: 1m

Starting and testing

Now that you have everything ready, it is time to start the container and test.

• While you are in the nwcdirectory (important), execute the following command and check the log output, docker compose up
• You should see container logs while it is starting, and it should not exit if everything went well.
• At this point, you should be able to go to http://<ip of the host where nwc is running>:4321 and get to the interface of NWC
• To stop the test run of NWC, simply press Ctrl-C , and it will shut the container down.
• To start NWC permanently, you should execute docker compose up -d , “-d” tells Docker to detach from the session.
• To check currently running NWC logs, execute docker compose logs to run it in tail mode add -f to the end.
• To stop the container, execute docker compose down

That's all, just follow the instructions in the web interface to get started.

Updating

As with any software, you should expect fixes and updates that you would need to perform periodically. You could automate this, but it falls outside of the scope of this tutorial. Since we already have all of the necessary configuration in place, the update execution is fairly simple.

• Change directory to the clone of the git repository, cd /home/bitcoin/nwc/nostr-wallet-connect
• Run command to build Docker image: docker build -t nwc:$(date +'%Y%m%d%H%M') -t nwc:latest . (there is a dot at the end)
• Change directory back one level cd ..
• Restart (stop and start) the docker compose config docker compose down && docker compose up -d
• Done! Optionally you may want to check the logs: docker compose logs

@ d2e97f73:ea9a4d1b

There’s a lot of conversation around the #TwitterFiles. Here’s my take, and thoughts on how to fix the issues identified.

I’ll start with the principles I’ve come to believe…based on everything I’ve learned and experienced through my past actions as a Twitter co-founder and lead:

1. Social media must be resilient to corporate and government control.
2. Only the original author may remove content they produce.
3. Moderation is best implemented by algorithmic choice.

The Twitter when I led it and the Twitter of today do not meet any of these principles. This is my fault alone, as I completely gave up pushing for them when an activist entered our stock in 2020. I no longer had hope of achieving any of it as a public company with no defense mechanisms (lack of dual-class shares being a key one). I planned my exit at that moment knowing I was no longer right for the company.

The biggest mistake I made was continuing to invest in building tools for us to manage the public conversation, versus building tools for the people using Twitter to easily manage it for themselves. This burdened the company with too much power, and opened us to significant outside pressure (such as advertising budgets). I generally think companies have become far too powerful, and that became completely clear to me with our suspension of Trump’s account. As I’ve said before, we did the right thing for the public company business at the time, but the wrong thing for the internet and society. Much more about this here: https://twitter.com/jack/status/1349510769268850690

I continue to believe there was no ill intent or hidden agendas, and everyone acted according to the best information we had at the time. Of course mistakes were made. But if we had focused more on tools for the people using the service rather than tools for us, and moved much faster towards absolute transparency, we probably wouldn’t be in this situation of needing a fresh reset (which I am supportive of). Again, I own all of this and our actions, and all I can do is work to make it right.

Back to the principles. Of course governments want to shape and control the public conversation, and will use every method at their disposal to do so, including the media. And the power a corporation wields to do the same is only growing. It’s critical that the people have tools to resist this, and that those tools are ultimately owned by the people. Allowing a government or a few corporations to own the public conversation is a path towards centralized control.

I’m a strong believer that any content produced by someone for the internet should be permanent until the original author chooses to delete it. It should be always available and addressable. Content takedowns and suspensions should not be possible. Doing so complicates important context, learning, and enforcement of illegal activity. There are significant issues with this stance of course, but starting with this principle will allow for far better solutions than we have today. The internet is trending towards a world were storage is “free” and infinite, which places all the actual value on how to discover and see content.

Which brings me to the last principle: moderation. I don’t believe a centralized system can do content moderation globally. It can only be done through ranking and relevance algorithms, the more localized the better. But instead of a company or government building and controlling these solely, people should be able to build and choose from algorithms that best match their criteria, or not have to use any at all. A “follow” action should always deliver every bit of content from the corresponding account, and the algorithms should be able to comb through everything else through a relevance lens that an individual determines. There’s a default “G-rated” algorithm, and then there’s everything else one can imagine.

The only way I know of to truly live up to these 3 principles is a free and open protocol for social media, that is not owned by a single company or group of companies, and is resilient to corporate and government influence. The problem today is that we have companies who own both the protocol and discovery of content. Which ultimately puts one person in charge of what’s available and seen, or not. This is by definition a single point of failure, no matter how great the person, and over time will fracture the public conversation, and may lead to more control by governments and corporations around the world.

I believe many companies can build a phenomenal business off an open protocol. For proof, look at both the web and email. The biggest problem with these models however is that the discovery mechanisms are far too proprietary and fixed instead of open or extendable. Companies can build many profitable services that complement rather than lock down how we access this massive collection of conversation. There is no need to own or host it themselves.

Many of you won’t trust this solution just because it’s me stating it. I get it, but that’s exactly the point. Trusting any one individual with this comes with compromises, not to mention being way too heavy a burden for the individual. It has to be something akin to what bitcoin has shown to be possible. If you want proof of this, get out of the US and European bubble of the bitcoin price fluctuations and learn how real people are using it for censorship resistance in Africa and Central/South America.

I do still wish for Twitter, and every company, to become uncomfortably transparent in all their actions, and I wish I forced more of that years ago. I do believe absolute transparency builds trust. As for the files, I wish they were released Wikileaks-style, with many more eyes and interpretations to consider. And along with that, commitments of transparency for present and future actions. I’m hopeful all of this will happen. There’s nothing to hide…only a lot to learn from. The current attacks on my former colleagues could be dangerous and doesn’t solve anything. If you want to blame, direct it at me and my actions, or lack thereof.

As far as the free and open social media protocol goes, there are many competing projects: @bluesky is one with the AT Protocol, nostr another, Mastodon yet another, Matrix yet another…and there will be many more. One will have a chance at becoming a standard like HTTP or SMTP. This isn’t about a “decentralized Twitter.” This is a focused and urgent push for a foundational core technology standard to make social media a native part of the internet. I believe this is critical both to Twitter’s future, and the public conversation’s ability to truly serve the people, which helps hold governments and corporations accountable. And hopefully makes it all a lot more fun and informative again.

💸🛠️🌐 To accelerate open internet and protocol work, I’m going to open a new category of #startsmall grants: “open internet development.” It will start with a focus of giving cash and equity grants to engineering teams working on social media and private communication protocols, bitcoin, and a web-only mobile OS. I’ll make some grants next week, starting with $1mm/yr to Signal. Please let me know other great candidates for this money.

@ 82341f88:fbfbe6a2

There’s a lot of conversation around the #TwitterFiles. Here’s my take, and thoughts on how to fix the issues identified.

I’ll start with the principles I’ve come to believe…based on everything I’ve learned and experienced through my past actions as a Twitter co-founder and lead:

1. Social media must be resilient to corporate and government control.
2. Only the original author may remove content they produce.
3. Moderation is best implemented by algorithmic choice.

The Twitter when I led it and the Twitter of today do not meet any of these principles. This is my fault alone, as I completely gave up pushing for them when an activist entered our stock in 2020. I no longer had hope of achieving any of it as a public company with no defense mechanisms (lack of dual-class shares being a key one). I planned my exit at that moment knowing I was no longer right for the company.

The biggest mistake I made was continuing to invest in building tools for us to manage the public conversation, versus building tools for the people using Twitter to easily manage it for themselves. This burdened the company with too much power, and opened us to significant outside pressure (such as advertising budgets). I generally think companies have become far too powerful, and that became completely clear to me with our suspension of Trump’s account. As I’ve said before, we did the right thing for the public company business at the time, but the wrong thing for the internet and society. Much more about this here: https://twitter.com/jack/status/1349510769268850690

I continue to believe there was no ill intent or hidden agendas, and everyone acted according to the best information we had at the time. Of course mistakes were made. But if we had focused more on tools for the people using the service rather than tools for us, and moved much faster towards absolute transparency, we probably wouldn’t be in this situation of needing a fresh reset (which I am supportive of). Again, I own all of this and our actions, and all I can do is work to make it right.

Back to the principles. Of course governments want to shape and control the public conversation, and will use every method at their disposal to do so, including the media. And the power a corporation wields to do the same is only growing. It’s critical that the people have tools to resist this, and that those tools are ultimately owned by the people. Allowing a government or a few corporations to own the public conversation is a path towards centralized control.

I’m a strong believer that any content produced by someone for the internet should be permanent until the original author chooses to delete it. It should be always available and addressable. Content takedowns and suspensions should not be possible. Doing so complicates important context, learning, and enforcement of illegal activity. There are significant issues with this stance of course, but starting with this principle will allow for far better solutions than we have today. The internet is trending towards a world were storage is “free” and infinite, which places all the actual value on how to discover and see content.

Which brings me to the last principle: moderation. I don’t believe a centralized system can do content moderation globally. It can only be done through ranking and relevance algorithms, the more localized the better. But instead of a company or government building and controlling these solely, people should be able to build and choose from algorithms that best match their criteria, or not have to use any at all. A “follow” action should always deliver every bit of content from the corresponding account, and the algorithms should be able to comb through everything else through a relevance lens that an individual determines. There’s a default “G-rated” algorithm, and then there’s everything else one can imagine.

The only way I know of to truly live up to these 3 principles is a free and open protocol for social media, that is not owned by a single company or group of companies, and is resilient to corporate and government influence. The problem today is that we have companies who own both the protocol and discovery of content. Which ultimately puts one person in charge of what’s available and seen, or not. This is by definition a single point of failure, no matter how great the person, and over time will fracture the public conversation, and may lead to more control by governments and corporations around the world.

I believe many companies can build a phenomenal business off an open protocol. For proof, look at both the web and email. The biggest problem with these models however is that the discovery mechanisms are far too proprietary and fixed instead of open or extendable. Companies can build many profitable services that complement rather than lock down how we access this massive collection of conversation. There is no need to own or host it themselves.

Many of you won’t trust this solution just because it’s me stating it. I get it, but that’s exactly the point. Trusting any one individual with this comes with compromises, not to mention being way too heavy a burden for the individual. It has to be something akin to what bitcoin has shown to be possible. If you want proof of this, get out of the US and European bubble of the bitcoin price fluctuations and learn how real people are using it for censorship resistance in Africa and Central/South America.

I do still wish for Twitter, and every company, to become uncomfortably transparent in all their actions, and I wish I forced more of that years ago. I do believe absolute transparency builds trust. As for the files, I wish they were released Wikileaks-style, with many more eyes and interpretations to consider. And along with that, commitments of transparency for present and future actions. I’m hopeful all of this will happen. There’s nothing to hide…only a lot to learn from. The current attacks on my former colleagues could be dangerous and doesn’t solve anything. If you want to blame, direct it at me and my actions, or lack thereof.

As far as the free and open social media protocol goes, there are many competing projects: @bluesky is one with the AT Protocol, nostr another, Mastodon yet another, Matrix yet another…and there will be many more. One will have a chance at becoming a standard like HTTP or SMTP. This isn’t about a “decentralized Twitter.” This is a focused and urgent push for a foundational core technology standard to make social media a native part of the internet. I believe this is critical both to Twitter’s future, and the public conversation’s ability to truly serve the people, which helps hold governments and corporations accountable. And hopefully makes it all a lot more fun and informative again.

💸🛠️🌐 To accelerate open internet and protocol work, I’m going to open a new category of #startsmall grants: “open internet development.” It will start with a focus of giving cash and equity grants to engineering teams working on social media and private communication protocols, bitcoin, and a web-only mobile OS. I’ll make some grants next week, starting with $1mm/yr to Signal. Please let me know other great candidates for this money.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Nostr is not decentralized nor censorship-resistant

Peter Todd has been saying this for a long time and all the time I've been thinking he is misunderstanding everything, but I guess a more charitable interpretation is that he is right.

Nostr today is indeed centralized.

Yesterday I published two harmless notes with the exact same content at the same time. In two minutes the notes had a noticeable difference in responses:

The top one was published to wss://nostr.wine, wss://nos.lol, wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com. The second was published to the relay where I generally publish all my notes to, wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com, and that is announced on my NIP-05 file and on my NIP-65 relay list.

A few minutes later I published that screenshot again in two identical notes to the same sets of relays, asking if people understood the implications. The difference in quantity of responses can still be seen today:

These results are skewed now by the fact that the two notes got rebroadcasted to multiple relays after some time, but the fundamental point remains.

What happened was that a huge lot more of people saw the first note compared to the second, and if Nostr was really censorship-resistant that shouldn't have happened at all.

Some people implied in the comments, with an air of obviousness, that publishing the note to "more relays" should have predictably resulted in more replies, which, again, shouldn't be the case if Nostr is really censorship-resistant.

What happens is that most people who engaged with the note are following me, in the sense that they have instructed their clients to fetch my notes on their behalf and present them in the UI, and clients are failing to do that despite me making it clear in multiple ways that my notes are to be found on wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com.

If we were talking not about me, but about some public figure that was being censored by the State and got banned (or shadowbanned) by the 3 biggest public relays, the sad reality would be that the person would immediately get his reach reduced to ~10% of what they had before. This is not at all unlike what happened to dozens of personalities that were banned from the corporate social media platforms and then moved to other platforms -- how many of their original followers switched to these other platforms? Probably some small percentage close to 10%. In that sense Nostr today is similar to what we had before.

Peter Todd is right that if the way Nostr works is that you just subscribe to a small set of relays and expect to get everything from them then it tends to get very centralized very fast, and this is the reality today.

Peter Todd is wrong that Nostr is inherently centralized or that it needs a protocol change to become what it has always purported to be. He is in fact wrong today, because what is written above is not valid for all clients of today, and if we drive in the right direction we can successfully make Peter Todd be more and more wrong as time passes, instead of the contrary.

---

See also:

• Censorship-resistant relay discovery in Nostr
• A vision for content discovery and relay usage for basic social-networking in Nostr

@ 5e5fc143:393d5a2c

We are now given a choice of digital freedom #nostr .

Creativity for every nostrich is now unleashed from the cage of bigtech censorship , rules and algo. But freedom comes with responsibility so pick right one(s). I will try share here some learning experience both technical and also from fundamental point of view. Just wanted kick start this article n fill as we go like living reference document.

Nostr itself is an application layer protocol that can used beyond just social media mirco or long blogging. Each nostr client heavily dependent on back-end servers call nostr "Relay servers" or in short "rs" or "relays" Relays can hosted anywhere in clearnet internet, onion net , vpn , i2p , nym Relays are controlled by their respective admins based NIP specs that they select to implement according to own decisions. Relays can have certain ToS (Terms of Service) Rules to adhered too.

New users can choose and pick client or app (ios / android/ windows) with preset of relays in the simplest form , but other advanced users need to do a regular manual relay management.

Relay management is an active regular task based on where when n how you are using.

Relay list are saved within you npub profile backup file which can edited and broadcast anytime.

Relay management is an active regular task based on where when and how you are using.

Relay list always need to be updated time to time as and when needed.

2 Users MUST a common RELAY between them even if one only need to follow another. Occasionally you may notice certain npub accounts you are following already but cannot see frequent notes publish by them – one of cause maybe you not sharing a common relay

Most nostr client applications has SETTINGS where user choose add/remove relays Also user choose which function to enable - READ or WRITE

Relay list for your account is always saved within you npub profile backup file which can edited and broadcast anytime. Hence any app or browser when u login with you npub the same relay list will be enforced. There could valid reasons why u need have list for if you trying to save bandwidth and traveling.

Functions in app.getcurrent.io and primal.net app for mobile apple or android are ideal for user traveling abroad and wanted to save bandwidth since relay management is done the providers in backend and saves hassle for basic usage.

Remember if someone is selecting relay on your behalf then you may not be necessarily able to pull and get some specific and special content that you may need. Such providers like coracle and nostrid also give option to override the default relays they selected.

Relay types: They can be categorized by various features or policy or technologies.

FREE PUBLIC Relays vs PAID PUBLIC Relays

PAID relays provide unrestricted access / write / filtering options than FREE relays but both are public clearnet relays. Just subscribing to PAID relays will not solve all problems unless you choose the relays properly and enable settings correctly.

Private Replay or Tor Relays – normally not easily visible until unless someone tell you. You can also host own private relay not opened to internet of archive and back of your own notes.

The technical landscape in nostr can be fast changing as more NIPs get proposed or updated. Relays admin can choose implement certain NIPs or not based on policy or technical limitations.

Example NIP33 defines “long notes” aka blogs as you now reading this in habla site which #1 UI and site for "Editable" long notes – some relays donot implement or allow this. NIP07 is used for client authentication like nos2x and is implemented by all relays in fact.

To be continued again ... reference pics will added later also Hope this help you understand "why when what" to tune and maintain active set of proper relays. Relay Proxy, Relay aggregator or Relay multiplexer – Paid, Public, Free, Private, Event, Relays That’s all for now n more later ... Thank you 🙏 ! ⚡️ https://getalby.com/p/captjack ⚡️ PV 💜 🤙

References: https://habla.news/relays https://relay.exchange/ https://relays.vercel.app/ https://nostr.info/relays/ https://nostrudel.ninja/#/relays

Related Articles: https://thebitcoinmanual.com/articles/types-nostr-relays/ nostr:naddr1qqd5c6t8dp6xu6twvukkvctnwss92jfqvehhygzwdaehguszyrtp7w79k045gq80mtnpdxjuzl9t7vjxk52rv80f888y5xsd5mh55qcyqqq823cf39s98 https://habla.news/u/current@getcurrent.io/1694434022411

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |BENOIST, ALAIN DE, La nueva derecha: Una respuesta clara, profunda e inteligente, Planeta, 1982|

Hemos escogido La nueva derecha, del gran pensador y teórico francés Alain de Benoist (1943), el artífice del movimiento que lleva el mismo nombre, y que en su momento se erigió de uno de los cenáculos intelectuales europeos más dinámicos e interesantes en la crítica al liberalismo burgués y el marxismo soviético, por la gran cantidad de fuentes y principios de los que se nutre susodicho movimiento. En lo que respecta al contexto en el que esta Nueva Derecha emerge son muy interesantes el comienzo del libro, el prólogo, donde se trazan sus fundamentos ideológicos y estrategia frente a la izquierda francesa contestataria, y el final del mismo, donde se reproduce un intercambio de impresiones/entrevista donde interviene también Jean Edern Hallier (1936-1997), un crítico, escritor y editor francés que se involucró en la política a raíz del estallido de los disturbios estudiantiles de mayo del 68, frente al propio Benoist. 

Es precisamente el mayo del 68 francés, el hecho que sirve de base para el nacimiento e impulso de este movimiento de carácter fundamentalmente cultural, que nace como una especie de tercera vía frente al gauchisme que se erige como protagonista de los disturbios y algaradas que tienen lugar en la Francia de finales de los años 60, y aquellos que se convirtieron en objeto de las críticas por parte de la izquierda y la extrema izquierda burguesa. Una izquierda que se levanta contra una derecha liberal amparada en la burocracia y las cifras macroeconómicas o frente aquella derecha reaccionaria identificada con De Gaulle y sus acólitos.

Pero la Nueva Derecha no se identifica con el credo político-ideológico de ninguna de esas facciones, ni se adhiere a los viejos clichés atribuidos por una izquierda que ostenta la hegemonía cultural absoluta. La Nueva Derecha que nace bajo el liderazgo de Alain de Benoist tampoco se identifica con las derechas clásicas del sistema, y en consecuencia carece de los complejos y los errores que éstas vienen acumulando en las décadas precedentes. Esta Derecha se apoya en un trasfondo ideológico de ideas y principios del todo diferentes, y en lugar de centrarse en su aversión al comunismo o a otras vertientes afines a la izquierda, asume un discurso contrario al pensamiento igualitarista, y extiende su ámbito de referencias incluso a la propia izquierda. Es una Derecha bien pertrechada en lo cultural y con los argumentos necesarios para hacer frente a la hegemonía cultural de la izquierda. En el seno de sus cenáculos y organizaciones de estudio y difusión de ideas se abordan temáticas de diferente naturaleza: desde el ámbito profano al espiritual, de la política a la metapolítica, destacando un modelo antropológico donde la cultura y la historia conforman las piezas angulares del actuar humano. El GREECE, fundado en 1968, que se vería precedido por la aparición de Nouvelle Ecole, junto con Études et Researches y el periódico Elements se convierten en los vehículos en la difusión de las nuevas ideas, un perfecto Think Tank en el que veremos, más allá del propio Alain de Benoist, a Robert Steuckers o a Giorgio Locchi entre otros muchos referentes intelectuales.

Dentro de la mencionada concepción antropológica, la Nueva Derecha considera al hombre hecho de cultura e historia, en un aspecto dinámico del mismo, como artífice de su propio destino. El rechazo del igualitarismo es una premisa fundamental, que hace partir del hecho concreto cualquier realidad que se muestra irreductible ante cualquier abstracción racionalista o de raíz liberal. El nominalismo de Guillermo de Ockham es el que Benoist reivindica desde la filosofía profana, separada de la teología medieval, y que afirma la imposibilidad de conocer lo particular a través de lo general, que en última instancia no es sino un convencionalismo. Este principio es fundamental en el prejuicio anticristiano que caracteriza a la Nueva Derecha, dentro de una dimensión privada de la trascendencia característica de los principios aristotélico-tomistas que, por ejemplo, vimos en la anterior reseña del libro de José Miguel Gambra. No obstante, ello no significa que se acepte el sentido prometeico y fáustico de la vida del hombre moderno amparado en los dogmas científicos, sino que la ciencia es un punto de vista más, no el principal ni el que hegemoniza la verdad.

[][nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzp09m8eqv8067yvlluwav85a6pg5xr4uv9yf63l6xjydwvjjffegpqqnxccfdwdhkx6t9v3skgtt5wfskg6trd9hkuctv94uj6um4wvkk2mn9d45kwmmnpyj28c]

También se toman perspectivas relacionadas con la Tradición Perenne como el tiempo cíclico, pero bajo una concepción del mismo mucho más flexible en el que el hombre construye su propio destino, pero al margen de cualquier determinismo espacio-temporal. El monoteísmo característico de las grandes religiones es sistemáticamente rechazado y asociado a tendencias propias de la modernidad, como el igualitarismo y el universalismo, pero lejos de las concepciones ordenadas y providenciales de un mundo con sentido y finalidad, de carácter teleológico, la Nueva Derecha concibe la realidad como un caos, como algo por desentrañar y a lo que dar forma. En este sentido la cultura, entendida como conjunto de legados y herencias, de cultura en definitiva, son parte del acervo que alimenta el actuar del hombre. Benoist también destaca la importancia del pensamiento nietzscheano a través de la voluntad creadora, genealógica y heroica, de dotarse de nuevas normas, teniendo en cuenta que aquellas que existían en la sociedad tradicional dieron paso al mundo de las ideologías con el triunfo de la modernidad. Este hombre nietzscheano hecho de voluntad y libertad, privado de determinismos, es el que precisamente da forma y sentido a ese mundo caótico e informe tan propio de los últimos siglos.

Ante la negación de los valores y antropología cristianos, se impone la necesidad de dotar a la estructura social y al propio sujeto individual de unos valores, lo que exige una ética del honor, un elemento característico del mundo clásico precristiano. Este hombre que crea valores se mantiene en un ámbito subjetivo y sustenta su existencia bajo una concepción trágica de la vida, bajo una horizontalidad profana que niega aquellos principios que caracterizan el modelo burgués y acomodado, que cree en el sentido del deber, el esfuerzo y la autodisciplina. Bajo esta concepción, que aúna la voluntad con cierta idea de «lucha por la vida», el igualitarismo se convierte en el enemigo secular de la Nueva Derecha, aquel que se identifica tanto en las bases del Cristianismo, como en las ideologías nacidas bajo la Revolución Francesa de 1789. No obstante, la democracia es el sistema que ha convertido el igualitarismo en su principal leitmotiv, que es la expresión misma de la voluntad de nivelación mundial, la que tiende a difuminar las diferencias de culturas y pueblos, la que fomenta la neutralidad del Estado y su mediatización por fórmulas tecnocráticas e inhumanas.

Benoist emplea el concepto de «conservador revolucionario» como alternativa frente a las realidades descritas y que debe constituir, ante todo, una alternativa frente a la desgastada carcasa de una derecha tradicional e impotente, y que debe conjugar el sentido de lo conservado, de las herencias, junto a la voluntad de afirmación en la construcción de un nuevo ciclo que tenga en cuenta aquello heredado. En este contexto, no solo la derecha, sino también la izquierda en sus formulaciones clásicas, son parte del mismo error y valedoras del homo economicus, que desde diferentes enfoques, el capitalismo burgués y el socialismo marxista defienden desde los mismos valores económico-materiales.

El hombre del capitalismo y el marxismo ya no es dueño de su propio destino, ni es capaz de crear valores que den forma a un mundo caótico y nihilista desde la voluntad y acción heroicas, o merced a las herencias y peculiaridades de cada pueblo, sino que debe atenerse a las leyes del mercado, que sirven al liberalismo para reivindicar nuevas formas de poder frente al Estado, al que pretende erosionar en su poder y despolitizarlo para someter al principio político al de la economía, de modo que sea un mero subsidiario de los imperativos económicos. Destaca la paradoja del igualitarismo en lo social en claro contraste con las desigualdades económicas que construye falsas jerarquías en función de la ley de la selva (darwinismo social) llevada hasta sus últimas consecuencias.

Benoist habla de una ruptura orgánica de la sociedad, que se encuentra destruida en sus vínculos históricos y culturales más primigenios, pero al mismo tiempo, frente a un horizonte de certezas espirituales absolutas y reveladas, se opone a cualquier principio relacionado con la civilización cristiana y a la tradición derivada de ésta. No obstante, ello no significa que no valore un sentido de Tradición, entendida como conjunto de hábitos, ritos y costumbres heredadas, o su fuerza en la cohesión de la comunidad nacional. La Tradición pertrecha al individuo y al colectivo, lo dota de una identidad en relación a aquello que ha recibido, lo que se traduce en un principio dinámico entre lo que permanece y lo que cambia.

Hay una idea especialmente atractiva en estos tiempos de mediocridad y nivelación, y es la la construcción de una «nueva élite», una aristocracia del espíritu que nada tiene que ver con la nobleza de sangre. Es una aristocracia en el más puro sentido nietzscheano, que impone su voluntad y su moral de conquistadores frente a la transvaloración de todos los valores de la sociedad burguesa y mercantil. Esta aristocracia, que se mantiene viva y dinámica en sus atributos más elevados, y que decae con su institucionalización, es la que aspira a generar una nueva jerarquía en palabras de Benoist, así como la forja de nuevos tipos espirituales.

El hecho de que el hombre sea cultura e historia no excluye la existencia de lazos biológicos profundos, que determinan el ligamen de pueblos enteros a territorios concretos. Se trata de un elemento más que redunda en esa concepción plural y diversa de las colectividades, no el más determinante, pero sí importante en la vertebración de las identidades colectivas de los pueblos. Es fundamental en la construcción del equilibrio interior. De ahí que Benoist apueste por la reivindicación de la etnia y la Patria en un sentido etimológico. Evitando toda afirmación de supremacismo racial, el autor francés reivindica el derecho a la diferencia en la misma medida que cree en la superioridad de todas las razas, que «tienen su genio peculiar». Y considera mucho más importante, junto a ese factor biológico, el hecho de que pertenecer a una raza supone ser el soporte de una historia, una cultura y una civilización particular. No obstante, del mismo modo que se condena el odio entre razas, Benoist pone de relieve la destrucción de toda esa riqueza que encierran los particularismos a través del colonialismo, integracionismo o cualquiera de las teorías vinculadas al multiculturalismo deformador.

En relación a estas prácticas que ha generado el liberalismo, a través de la democracia y la universalización de una visión estandarizada y uniforme, bajo el patrón único de la democracia liberal, se ha forjado un totalitarismo igualitario revestido de una retórica buenista y bienpensante, que reviste las formas de un despotismo democrático y moderno, destinado a implantar esa misma visión economicista y materialista que reina en Occidente en el resto del mundo.

La fuente primaria más importante del igualitarismo, de la que se nutren los revolucionarios de 1789, a criterio de Benoist, es el Cristianismo, al que considera el «bolchevismo de la Antigüedad», tomando como referencia a Nietzsche una vez más lo convierte en defensor de la moral de rebaño, haciendo elogio de la debilidad, nutriendo sus filas con los desheredados del mundo, tomando el odio y la intolerancia como su base y desvalorizando la realidad inmanente. Benoist toma como referencia no solo a Nietzsche sino la obra de Louis Rougier: El conflicto de Cristianismo primitivo y de la civilización Antigua. Dadas las circunstancias de su origen, señala Benoist, y las categorías escatológicas de la doctrina, la salvación no depende del origen ni de la pertenencia relativiza, lo cual devalúa el sentido de la Patria o el arraigo. En ese sentido la Roma del Bajo Imperio y la Francia de la ilustración y las ideas iluministas permanecen hermanadas por el mismo discurso, según Benoist, que se traduce en el mismo sentido mesiánico y las esperanzas escatológicas que vemos en el marxismo.

En contraste, Alain de Benoist reivindica el politeísmo frente al monoteísmo, mucho más acorde con su concepción plural y diversa de las culturas a través de multitud de cultos y de ritos. Un paganismo que resulta más armonizable con los orígenes indoeuropeos.

Hay muchos otros aspectos que la obra aborda, y que tratan de dar una visión general de las premisas ideológicas y los principios filosóficos que caracterizan a la (entonces novedosa) Nueva Derecha capitaneada por Alain de Benoist. En los últimos capítulos ciertas cuestiones, como aquellas que aluden al fracaso de la geopolítica estadounidense en el sudeste asiático, o el futuro incierto de una Europa socavada en su papel en el mundo por la primacía de los dos bloques pretendidamente antagónicos de la Guerra Fría, es evidente que pueden resultar obsoletos desde la perspectiva actual. No obstante, ello no impide que se puedan extraer ideas interesantes y extrapolables al mundo de hoy, donde Estados Unidos también ha perdido su primacía en el mundo y una Europa sometida y ninguneada en el plano internacional representan situaciones muy similares.

---

Artículo original: «La nueva derecha», de Alain de Benoist, Hipérbola Janus, 20/May/2020

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |GÓMEZ RODAS, Carlos Andrés, Nicolás Gómez Dávila frente a la muerte de Dios, Instituto tecnológico metropolitano, 2020|

La obra que nos ocupa en esta ocasión, bajo el título de Nicolás Gómez Dávila frente a la muerte de Dios, del Doctor en Filosofía colombiano Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas, nos ofrece un ensayo apasionante sobre las ideas que vertebran la doctrina y pensamiento del filósofo, también colombiano, Nicolás Gómez Dávila. La obra mantiene una magnífica visión de conjunto a través de un excelente trabajo interpretativo que se ve sólidamente pertrechado por las aportaciones de autores como los filósofos alemanes Eric Voegelin y Josef Pieper, además de otras influencias clásicas, u otros autores que también se han dedicado al estudio de la figura y pensamiento del filósofo colombiano, como es el caso del también filósofo Franco Volpi, Hernando Téllez o incluso el ex-papa Benedicto XVI, que ha sido un lector asiduo de la obra de Gómez Dávila. Las fuentes que nutren este ensayo, y los conocimientos que Gómez Rodas despliega para diseccionar el siempre complejo pensamiento gomezdaviliano, además de la forma de hacerlo, mediante un lenguaje perfectamente comprensible para los profanos en la materia, nos permiten acceder a una lectura agradable y una introducción inmejorable para adentrarnos en la obra del autor que sirve como objeto de estudio. 

En el prólogo de Michäel Rabier, que lleva el título Philosophia perennis y gnosis moderna, éste ya nos advierte de una premisa fundamental que debemos tener en cuenta si queremos saber en qué coordenadas se mueve el pensamiento de Gómez Dávila en relación al amplio espectro del pensamiento antimoderno, y que, en el caso que nos ocupa, se circunscribe a la tradición filosófica y las verdades eternas anejas a ésta, que estaría en conexión con la Sophia perennis y nutrida por los fundamentos de la metafísica. Hay una corriente claramente trazable de ideas y autores que podríamos identificar con el platonismo y la teología cristiana y que hunde sus raíces en la Antigüedad y conoce una continuidad que llega hasta el siglo XX. Como en la Tradición Perenne, el objetivo es seguir las huellas de esa filosofía perenne hasta alcanzar sus orígenes. El matiz esencial que nos muestra Gómez Rodas en este esquema es que todo planteamiento filosófico comprende siempre un problema teológico en relación a la implicación o no de una trascendencia. Y en última instancia el Catolicismo sería el heredero directo de esa philosophia perennis, mientras que el gnosticismo asociado a la divinización del hombre y la secularización, especialmente a raíz del proyecto ilustrado que engendra el mundo moderno y contribuye a la erosión de los principios sagrados y espirituales, con la subsiguiente creación de religiones políticas, vendría a provocar un desplazamiento de la trascendencia sobre la figura del hombre y una dimensión puramente horizontal. 

Teniendo en cuenta los principios expuestos, Gómez Rodas trata de desarrollar un trabajo de interpretación y sistematización del pensamiento de Gómez Dávila desde la globalidad de sus textos profundizando en su cosmovisión religiosa y los fundamentos teológicos que la vertebran en relación a su crítica del mundo moderno, de las democracias modernas y la concepción antropoteísta que las rige.

Pero para conocer la obra primero hay que conocer al hombre, y los hechos que conforman la biografía de Nicolás Gómez Dávila nos desvelan los orígenes de su pensamiento y sus particularidades con meridiana claridad. Nacido en el seno de una familia de clase alta colombiana de Bogotá un 18 de mayo de 1913, se trasladó a París a la edad de 6 años en una estancia que se prolongará hasta los 23 años, cuando en 1936 regresa a su país natal. Recibió una formación humanista y cristiana a través del estudio profundo de las lenguas y las fuentes del pensamiento clásico junto a la Biblia. En sus primeros contactos con el mundo de la política se vio seducido por Acción Francesa, organización monárquica y tradicional que le ayudó a configurar el eje de su pensamiento antimoderno, con su rechazo a las formas revolucionarias liberales y burguesas con todas sus formulaciones estatalistas laicas y su teología inmanentista. Durante sus años de juventud, y tras contraer matrimonio, llevaría a cabo una serie de viajes por la Europa occidental después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial que terminarán abruptamente en 1949 ante la desolación que le producía ver a una Europa destruida y convertida en una pieza de museo. Nicolás Gómez Dávila también fue conocido por su monumental biblioteca personal, donde organizaba sus famosas tertulias y por la que pasaron grandes personalidades como el historiador Arnold Toynbee o Paul Gray Hoffman, asesor del General Marshall en el plan de reconstrucción de Europa conocido como el Plan Marshall. El autor colombiano termina falleciendo finalmente un 17 de mayo de 1994 en una cama instalada en su Biblioteca que, como nos relata Gómez Rodas, llegó a alcanzar los 30.000 volúmenes.

La obra de Gómez Dávila se publicó entre 1954 y 1995, con sus Notas I, Textos I, Escolios a un texto implícito (dos volúmenes), Nuevos escolios a un texto implícito, al margen de una serie de artículos publicados en la Revista del Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario. La última publicación fue su ensayo titulado El reaccionario auténtico en la Revista de la Universidad de Antioquia. 

El estilo peculiar que el pensador bogotano adoptó en la elaboración de sus escritos a través del aforismo también merece un amplio comentario en esta obra, el cual nos permite vislumbrar una parte importante del carácter de su autor. La sentencia corta y el escrito fragmentario aparece como el más cercano a la Verdad, el menos susceptible de terminar conteniendo mentiras o sofismas. Es un pensamiento agudo y breve que revela una elección de vida y de pensamiento, especialmente frente a cualquier forma de racionalización y sistematización. Y es que, tal y como nos explica Gómez Rodas, en esta forma de escritura hay un claro contraste respecto a los métodos de indagación de la razón, de modo que, en su lugar, Gómez Dávila toma la experiencia concreta desde una perspectiva ético-moral como fuente de Verdad en una simbiosis de experiencias vividas en común entre autor y lector que contienen algunas certezas irrefutables.

En lo que se refiere a la concepción antropológica de Gómez Dávila, hay una idea del hombre como creatura abierta a la trascendencia, receptiva y en abierto diálogo con lo sobrenatural. Dios da sentido y valor a la existencia del hombre, y en torno a Él se fundamenta todo valor ético y objetivo que determina la dignidad humana y que, al mismo tiempo, le permite superar todas las formas de relativismo y nihilismo que vemos reflejadas por doquier en el mundo moderno. Y es precisamente la negación de esa realidad la que determina en el pensamiento de Dávila el sentido de destrucción, desesperanza y rumbo errático característico de la Modernidad, y no sólo de ésta, sino también de la Posmodernidad, dado que ambas son la manifestación de la crisis global del hombre. 

La crítica a la noción moderna del progreso, del culto a la humanidad y a la creencia de un progreso ilimitado desde una fe ilimitada en el propio ser humano delata la pretensión orgullosa del hombre moderno, de naturaleza prometeica, de autofundarse como Dios al amparo de una gnosis inmanentista que niega la condición de creatura y creaturidad, defendida por el filósofo colombiano, de cuyo reconocimiento y aceptación en el sentido profundo, desde las implicaciones metafísicas, antropológicas y gnoseológicas derivadas de esta condición, depende la realización de una existencia noble, equilibrada y propiamente humana.

En este contexto de negación de las raíces de la civilización europea occidental, Gómez Dávila advierte de los peligros de abandonar el ethos griego, latino y cristiano que la sostiene bajo la falsa neutralidad religiosa del político y todas las consecuencias de la concepción teológica sostenida por el proyecto ilustrado y las ideologías democráticas modernas, que concluyen inequívocamente en el ateísmo. Son las consecuencias del principio de autonomía en el que se funda la modernidad, que implica la desvinculación del hombre de todo principio religioso y moral previo en una voluntad de construir un orden alternativo al establecido por Dios. En este sentido hay una antítesis que se reproduce en el devenir de los tiempos y que enfrenta a los herederos del pensamiento sofista (modernidad) con aquellos que toman partido por Platón (filosofía perenne), con el triunfo de los primeros sobre los segundos a través del abandono de todo principio ético en la fundamentación de las cosas, la aparición del sujeto autónomo que configura los objetos de conocimiento a voluntad y construye una ética subjetiva que se extiende también al plano social. De aquí deriva la negación radical de toda trascendencia en el mundo y la propia emancipación de la Revelación y su teología.

Frente al triunfo de esta cosmovisión moderna, Gómez Dávila nos opone la figura del reaccionario, cuyo arquetipo se encuentra bien representado en autores como Joseph de Maistre, Louis de Bonald o François-René Chateaubriand, cuyas obras nutrieron la trinchera de la contrarrevolución decimonónica. Para nuestro autor, el reaccionario no tiene nada que ver con el conservador, que más bien representa su antítesis y defiende un orden frente a otro, sino que trasciende el sentido inmanente de la historia, defiende valores eternos e inmutables de raíz metafísica y lucha contra la erradicación de lo sagrado en la historia. El reaccionario se sitúa en las lides de la metahistoria. Es por este motivo que el reaccionario se resigna a perder, y sabe que nunca va a triunfar, pero en la expresión de su misma inconformidad se encuentra su propia fidelidad. Es una lealtad cimentada en el pesimismo y en la aceptación consciente de mantenerse firme e insobornable en la defensa de causas perdidas, a pesar de que se sabe en posesión de la verdad y que la historia y el hombre moderno han tomado un rumbo equivocado.

En el contexto de las influencias recibidas ya hemos hablado de la importancia del pensamiento clásico en la educación del joven Gómez Dávila, especialmente dentro del ámbito griego, donde la tradición socrática continuada por Platón se convierte en un referente esencial en la construcción de sus fundamentos metafísicos, ético-morales y políticos, y con éstos de la Verdad en un sentido Absoluto, en su excelsa objetividad frente a todo constructivismo sofista, desde la perspectiva de una teología natural platónica. Al mismo tiempo, el modelo político y social que propone Platón en La República, bajo un modelo monárquico o aristocrático y a cargo de unos pocos hombres tras una formación filosófica que les permite contemplar la Verdad y su valor objetivo, desde una jerarquía que atiende a la natural desigualdad entre los hombres. Todos se reconocen como hermanos, conscientes de sus desigualdades, y son gobernados amorosamente, al tiempo que se fomenta la excelencia moral frente a todo relativismo, igualitarismo o poder sometido a la voluntad cambiante de las masas. Es una propuesta de modelo social que tiene la capacidad de transmutar ontológicamente el alma de sus ciudadanos en un proceso de ascesis y purificación que produce hombres virtuosos. De ahí la importancia que Gómez Dávila otorga a la integridad moral de quienes componen la sociedad, especialmente entre los gobernantes. A diferencia de los regímenes democráticos, en aquel planteado por Platón no se pretende crear nada, sino descubrir el orden divino al cual debe adecuarse el entendimiento y la acción humana en conexión con valores objetivos y permanentes. Representa el dominio del mythos frente al logos, la defensa de un orden metafísico, natural y objetivo como fundamentos de la existencia humana.

La decisiva influencia del mundo griego a través de la tradición socrático-platónica que vemos como una de las piedras angulares del pensamiento de Gómez Dávila, también figura como una de las bases fundamentales de la propia civilización europea occidental en su encuentro con el Cristianismo. Una síntesis entre la tradición grecolatina y la teología cristiana que se realiza en pleno medievo a través de la Patrística y que respondería a la acción de la misma Providencia. El fruto de este encuentro lo hallamos en la configuración de la sociedad medieval bajo una teoría organicista y jerárquica cimentada  a su vez sobre una teología política que Gómez Dávila considera ejemplar. El régimen feudal, de marcado carácter personal aparece a través del acto simbólico del vasallaje como la unión de Cristo y los cristianos en un mundo hacia el que nuestro autor lanza una mirada retrospectiva llena de nostalgia. El Medievo encarna en sus formas espirituales, religiosas y político-sociales el ideal antimoderno a través de un realismo ético que viene marcado por la fidelidad del hombre a su propio Ser,  a la Verdad, la Belleza y la Justicia en su objetivación moral más elevada.

El Romanticismo aparece como otro de los referentes de Gómez Dávila, donde aprecia una serie de elementos de esta tradición que nace como una reacción frente a la Ilustración. Entre estos elementos se encuentran los de proponer la existencia de valores imperecederos frente al progresismo y el historicismo ilustrado, la dimensión sagrada de la vida humana, la primacía del misterio en la naturaleza frente a todo intento racionalista de dominarla y un intento de apertura de la vida hacia la trascendencia para recuperar el poder autónomo de la religión. Para Gómez Dávila los románticos despertaron, en definitiva, el anhelo por lo eterno presente en el alma humana.

La última de las grandes cuestiones que nos plantea Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas en su ensayo es la dicotomía entre las dos vertientes de las enseñanzas de San Pablo, del San Pablo de Atenas, abierto a un diálogo entre fe y razón con la indagación racional de las Sagradas Escrituras, frente al San Pablo de Corinto en el que se evidencia la incapacidad de los filósofos para trazar un camino en la comprensión racional de lo divino y para lograr superar las incomprensiones y costumbres morales del paganismo.

Como nos explica Gómez Rodas, finalmente Gómez Dávila opta por la vía del San Pablo de Corinto, y entiende que en el plano de las creencias religiosas el papel de la filosofía es secundario, y en ocasiones incluso contrario a la fe. El papel del elemento racional en este contexto solamente puede limitarse al juicio particular de un sujeto concreto, pero en ningún caso tiene autoridad alguna en aquello que se decide creer, que se encuentra a su vez fuera de las fronteras del entendimiento humano. Es por ese motivo que Gómez Dávila reniega contundentemente de la Escolástica medieval y de cualquier forma de fe gnóstica, donde podemos encontrar el germen del pensamiento inmanentista moderno y la concepción antropocéntrica de divinización del hombre que el filósofo colombiano atribuye a la Modernidad. En las propias democracias modernas, el laicismo del Estado y la sociedad desplazan la encarnación de lo divino a las mayorías, y en consecuencia al individuo y a la colectividad en unos términos de autonomía, omnipotencia, autoridad y soberanía que constituyen la base de la religión antropoteísta y el sometimiento de la existencia al capricho de la voluntad humanas al margen de Dios. Todas estas preocupaciones de Gómez Dávila se hicieron extensivas a las propias transformaciones de la Iglesia Católica y el proceso de secularización y desacralización al que se ve sometida tras el Concilio Vaticano II.

---

Artículo original: «Nicolás Gómez Dávila frente a la muerte de Dios», de Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas, Hipérbola Janus, 26/Dic/2021

@ e6ce6154:275e3444

Este artigo foi censurado pelo estado e fomos obrigados a deletá-lo após ameaça de homens armados virem nos visitar e agredir nossa vida e propriedade.

Isto é mais uma prova que os autoproclamados antirracistas são piores que os racistas.

https://rothbardbrasil.com/pelo-direito-de-ser-racista-fascista-machista-e-homofobico

Segue artigo na íntegra. 👇

Sem dúvida, a escalada autoritária do totalitarismo cultural progressista nos últimos anos tem sido sumariamente deletéria e prejudicial para a liberdade de expressão. Como seria de se esperar, a cada dia que passa o autoritarismo progressista continua a se expandir de maneira irrefreável, prejudicando a liberdade dos indivíduos de formas cada vez mais deploráveis e contundentes.

Com a ascensão da tirania politicamente correta e sua invasão a todos os terrenos culturais, o autoritarismo progressista foi se alastrando e consolidando sua hegemonia em determinados segmentos. Com a eventual eclosão e a expansão da opressiva e despótica cultura do cancelamento — uma progênie inevitável do totalitarismo progressista —, todas as pessoas que manifestam opiniões, crenças ou posicionamentos que não estão alinhados com as pautas universitárias da moda tornam-se um alvo.

Há algumas semanas, vimos a enorme repercussão causada pelo caso envolvendo o jogador profissional de vôlei Maurício Sousa, que foi cancelado pelo simples fato de ter emitido sua opinião pessoal sobre um personagem de história em quadrinhos, Jon Kent, o novo Superman, que é bissexual. Maurício Sousa reprovou a conduta sexual do personagem, o que é um direito pessoal inalienável que ele tem. Ele não é obrigado a gostar ou aprovar a bissexualidade. Como qualquer pessoa, ele tem o direito pleno de criticar tudo aquilo que ele não gosta. No entanto, pelo simples fato de emitir a sua opinião pessoal, Maurício Sousa foi acusado de homofobia e teve seu contrato rescindido, sendo desligado do Minas Tênis Clube.

Lamentavelmente, Maurício Sousa não foi o primeiro e nem será o último indivíduo a sofrer com a opressiva e autoritária cultura do cancelamento. Como uma tirania cultural que está em plena ascensão e usufrui de um amplo apoio do establishment, essa nova forma de totalitarismo cultural colorido e festivo está se impondo de formas e maneiras bastante contundentes em praticamente todas as esferas da sociedade contemporânea. Sua intenção é relegar ao ostracismo todos aqueles que não se curvam ao totalitarismo progressista, criminalizando opiniões e crenças que divergem do culto à libertinagem hedonista pós-moderna. Oculto por trás de todo esse ativismo autoritário, o que temos de fato é uma profunda hostilidade por padrões morais tradicionalistas, cristãos e conservadores.

No entanto, é fundamental entendermos uma questão imperativa, que explica em partes o conflito aqui criado — todos os progressistas contemporâneos são crias oriundas do direito positivo. Por essa razão, eles jamais entenderão de forma pragmática e objetiva conceitos como criminalidade, direitos de propriedade, agressão e liberdade de expressão pela perspectiva do jusnaturalismo, que é manifestamente o direito em seu estado mais puro, correto, ético e equilibrado.

Pela ótica jusnaturalista, uma opinião é uma opinião. Ponto final. E absolutamente ninguém deve ser preso, cancelado, sabotado ou boicotado por expressar uma opinião particular sobre qualquer assunto. Palavras não agridem ninguém, portanto jamais poderiam ser consideradas um crime em si. Apenas deveriam ser tipificados como crimes agressões de caráter objetivo, como roubo, sequestro, fraude, extorsão, estupro e infrações similares, que representam uma ameaça direta à integridade física da vítima, ou que busquem subtrair alguma posse empregando a violência.

Infelizmente, a geração floquinho de neve — terrivelmente histérica, egocêntrica e sensível — fica profundamente ofendida e consternada sempre que alguém defende posicionamentos contrários à religião progressista. Por essa razão, os guerreiros da justiça social sinceramente acreditam que o papai-estado deve censurar todas as opiniões que eles não gostam de ouvir, assim como deve também criar leis para encarcerar todos aqueles que falam ou escrevem coisas que desagradam a militância.

Como a geração floquinho de neve foi criada para acreditar que todas as suas vontades pessoais e disposições ideológicas devem ser sumariamente atendidas pelo papai-estado, eles embarcaram em uma cruzada moral que pretende erradicar todas as coisas que são ofensivas à ideologia progressista; só assim eles poderão deflagrar na Terra o seu tão sonhado paraíso hedonista e igualitário, de inimaginável esplendor e felicidade.

Em virtude do seu comportamento intrinsecamente despótico, autoritário e egocêntrico, acaba sendo inevitável que militantes progressistas problematizem tudo aquilo que os desagrada.

Como são criaturas inúteis destituídas de ocupação real e verdadeiro sentido na vida, sendo oprimidas unicamente na sua própria imaginação, militantes progressistas precisam constantemente inventar novos vilões para serem combatidos.

Partindo dessa perspectiva, é natural para a militância que absolutamente tudo que exista no mundo e que não se enquadra com as regras autoritárias e restritivas da religião progressista seja encarado como um problema. Para a geração floquinho de neve, o capitalismo é um problema. O fascismo é um problema. A iniciativa privada é um problema. O homem branco, tradicionalista, conservador e heterossexual é um problema. A desigualdade é um problema. A liberdade é um problema. Monteiro Lobato é um problema (sim, até mesmo o renomado ícone da literatura brasileira, autor — entre outros títulos — de Urupês, foi vítima da cultura do cancelamento, acusado de ser racista e eugenista).

Para a esquerda, praticamente tudo é um problema. Na mentalidade da militância progressista, tudo é motivo para reclamação. Foi em função desse comportamento histérico, histriônico e infantil que o famoso pensador conservador-libertário americano P. J. O’Rourke afirmou que “o esquerdismo é uma filosofia de pirralhos chorões”. O que é uma verdade absoluta e irrefutável em todos os sentidos.

De fato, todas as filosofias de esquerda de forma geral são idealizações utópicas e infantis de um mundo perfeito. Enquanto o mundo não se transformar naquela colorida e vibrante utopia que é apresentada pela cartilha socialista padrão, militantes continuarão a reclamar contra tudo o que existe no mundo de forma agressiva, visceral e beligerante. Evidentemente, eles não vão fazer absolutamente nada de positivo ou construtivo para que o mundo se transforme no gracioso paraíso que eles tanto desejam ver consolidado, mas eles continuarão a berrar e vociferar muito em sua busca incessante pela utopia, marcando presença em passeatas inúteis ou combatendo o fascismo imaginário nas redes sociais.

Sem dúvida, estamos muito perto de ver leis absurdas e estúpidas sendo implementadas, para agradar a militância da terra colorida do assistencialismo eterno onde nada é escasso e tudo cai do céu. Em breve, você não poderá usar calças pretas, pois elas serão consideradas peças de vestuário excessivamente heterossexuais. Apenas calças amarelas ou coloridas serão permitidas. Você também terá que tingir de cor-de-rosa uma mecha do seu cabelo; pois preservar o seu cabelo na sua cor natural é heteronormativo demais da sua parte, sendo portanto um componente demasiadamente opressor da sociedade.

Você também não poderá ver filmes de guerra ou de ação, apenas comédias românticas, pois certos gêneros de filmes exaltam a violência do patriarcado e isso impede o mundo de se tornar uma graciosa festa colorida de fraternidades universitárias ungidas por pôneis resplandecentes, hedonismo infinito, vadiagem universitária e autogratificação psicodélica, que certamente são elementos indispensáveis para se produzir o paraíso na Terra.

Sabemos perfeitamente, no entanto, que dentre as atitudes “opressivas” que a militância progressista mais se empenha em combater, estão o racismo, o fascismo, o machismo e a homofobia. No entanto, é fundamental entender que ser racista, fascista, machista ou homofóbico não são crimes em si. Na prática, todos esses elementos são apenas traços de personalidade; e eles não podem ser pura e simplesmente criminalizados porque ideólogos e militantes progressistas iluminados não gostam deles.

Tanto pela ética quanto pela ótica jusnaturalista, é facilmente compreensível entender que esses traços de personalidade não podem ser criminalizados ou proibidos simplesmente porque integrantes de uma ideologia não tem nenhuma apreciação ou simpatia por eles. Da mesma forma, nenhum desses traços de personalidade representa em si um perigo para a sociedade, pelo simples fato de existir. Por incrível que pareça, até mesmo o machismo, o racismo, o fascismo e a homofobia merecem a devida apologia.

Mas vamos analisar cada um desses tópicos separadamente para entender isso melhor.

Racismo

Quando falamos no Japão, normalmente não fazemos nenhuma associação da sociedade japonesa com o racismo. No entanto, é incontestável o fato de que a sociedade japonesa pode ser considerada uma das sociedades mais racistas do mundo. E a verdade é que não há absolutamente nada de errado com isso.

Aproximadamente 97% da população do Japão é nativa; apenas 3% do componente populacional é constituído por estrangeiros (a população do Japão é estimada em aproximadamente 126 milhões de habitantes). Isso faz a sociedade japonesa ser uma das mais homogêneas do mundo. As autoridades japonesas reconhecidamente dificultam processos de seleção e aplicação a estrangeiros que desejam se tornar residentes. E a maioria dos japoneses aprova essa decisão.

Diversos estabelecimentos comerciais como hotéis, bares e restaurantes por todo o país tem placas na entrada que dizem “somente para japoneses” e a maioria destes estabelecimentos se recusa ostensivamente a atender ou aceitar clientes estrangeiros, não importa quão ricos ou abastados sejam.

Na Terra do Sol Nascente, a hostilidade e a desconfiança natural para com estrangeiros é tão grande que até mesmo indivíduos que nascem em algum outro país, mas são filhos de pais japoneses, não são considerados cidadãos plenamente japoneses.

Se estes indivíduos decidem sair do seu país de origem para se estabelecer no Japão — mesmo tendo descendência nipônica legítima e inquestionável —, eles enfrentarão uma discriminação social considerável, especialmente se não dominarem o idioma japonês de forma impecável. Esse fato mostra que a discriminação é uma parte tão indissociável quanto elementar da sociedade japonesa, e ela está tão profundamente arraigada à cultura nipônica que é praticamente impossível alterá-la ou atenuá-la por qualquer motivo.

A verdade é que — quando falamos de um país como o Japão — nem todos os discursos politicamente corretos do mundo, nem a histeria progressista ocidental mais inflamada poderão algum dia modificar, extirpar ou sequer atenuar o componente racista da cultura nipônica. E isso é consequência de uma questão tão simples quanto primordial: discriminar faz parte da natureza humana, sendo tanto um direito individual quanto um elemento cultural inerente à muitas nações do mundo. Os japoneses não tem problema algum em admitir ou institucionalizar o seu preconceito, justamente pelo fato de que a ideologia politicamente correta não tem no oriente a força e a presença que tem no ocidente.

E é fundamental enfatizar que, sendo de natureza pacífica — ou seja, não violando nem agredindo terceiros —, a discriminação é um recurso natural dos seres humanos, que está diretamente associada a questões como familiaridade e segurança.

Absolutamente ninguém deve ser forçado a apreciar ou integrar-se a raças, etnias, pessoas ou tribos que não lhe transmitem sentimentos de segurança ou familiaridade. Integração forçada é o verdadeiro crime, e isso diversos países europeus — principalmente os escandinavos (países que lideram o ranking de submissão à ideologia politicamente correta) — aprenderam da pior forma possível.

A integração forçada com imigrantes islâmicos resultou em ondas de assassinato, estupro e violência inimagináveis para diversos países europeus, até então civilizados, que a imprensa ocidental politicamente correta e a militância progressista estão permanentemente tentando esconder, porque não desejam que o ocidente descubra como a agenda “humanitária” de integração forçada dos povos muçulmanos em países do Velho Mundo resultou em algumas das piores chacinas e tragédias na história recente da Europa.

Ou seja, ao discriminarem estrangeiros, os japoneses estão apenas se protegendo e lutando para preservar sua nação como um ambiente cultural, étnico e social que lhe é seguro e familiar, assim se opondo a mudanças bruscas, indesejadas e antinaturais, que poderiam comprometer a estabilidade social do país.

A discriminação — sendo de natureza pacífica —, é benévola, salutar e indubitavelmente ajuda a manter a estabilidade social da comunidade. Toda e qualquer forma de integração forçada deve ser repudiada com veemência, pois, mais cedo ou mais tarde, ela irá subverter a ordem social vigente, e sempre será acompanhada de deploráveis e dramáticos resultados.

Para citar novamente os países escandinavos, a Suécia é um excelente exemplo do que não fazer. Tendo seguido o caminho contrário ao da discriminação racional praticada pela sociedade japonesa, atualmente a sociedade sueca — além de afundar de forma consistente na lama da libertinagem, da decadência e da deterioração progressista — sofre em demasia com os imigrantes muçulmanos, que foram deixados praticamente livres para matar, saquear, esquartejar e estuprar quem eles quiserem. Hoje, eles são praticamente intocáveis, visto que denunciá-los, desmoralizá-los ou acusá-los de qualquer crime é uma atitude politicamente incorreta e altamente reprovada pelo establishment progressista. A elite socialista sueca jamais se atreve a acusá-los de qualquer crime, pois temem ser classificados como xenófobos e intolerantes. Ou seja, a desgraça da Europa, sobretudo dos países escandinavos, foi não ter oferecido nenhuma resistência à ideologia progressista politicamente correta. Hoje, eles são totalmente submissos a ela.

O exemplo do Japão mostra, portanto — para além de qualquer dúvida —, a importância ética e prática da discriminação, que é perfeitamente aceitável e natural, sendo uma tendência inerente aos seres humanos, e portanto intrínseca a determinados comportamentos, sociedades e culturas.

Indo ainda mais longe nessa questão, devemos entender que na verdade todos nós discriminamos, e não existe absolutamente nada de errado nisso. Discriminar pessoas faz parte da natureza humana e quem se recusa a admitir esse fato é um hipócrita. Mulheres discriminam homens na hora de selecionar um parceiro; elas avaliam diversos quesitos, como altura, aparência, status social, condição financeira e carisma. E dentre suas opções, elas sempre escolherão o homem mais atraente, másculo e viril, em detrimento de todos os baixinhos, calvos, carentes, frágeis e inibidos que possam estar disponíveis. Da mesma forma, homens sempre terão preferência por mulheres jovens, atraentes e delicadas, em detrimento de todas as feministas de meia-idade, acima do peso, de cabelo pintado, que são mães solteiras e militantes socialistas. A própria militância progressista discrimina pessoas de forma virulenta e intransigente, como fica evidente no tratamento que dispensam a mulheres bolsonaristas e a negros de direita.

A verdade é que — não importa o nível de histeria da militância progressista — a discriminação é inerente à condição humana e um direito natural inalienável de todos. É parte indissociável da natureza humana e qualquer pessoa pode e deve exercer esse direito sempre que desejar. Não existe absolutamente nada de errado em discriminar pessoas. O problema real é a ideologia progressista e o autoritarismo politicamente correto, movimentos tirânicos que não respeitam o direito das pessoas de discriminar.

Fascismo

Quando falamos de fascismo, precisamos entender que, para a esquerda política, o fascismo é compreendido como um conceito completamente divorciado do seu significado original. Para um militante de esquerda, fascista é todo aquele que defende posicionamentos contrários ao progressismo, não se referindo necessariamente a um fascista clássico.

Mas, seja como for, é necessário entender que — como qualquer ideologia política — até mesmo o fascismo clássico tem o direito de existir e ocupar o seu devido lugar; portanto, fascistas não devem ser arbitrariamente censurados, apesar de defenderem conceitos que representam uma completa antítese de tudo aquilo que é valioso para os entusiastas da liberdade.

Em um país como o Brasil, onde socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, defender suas ideologias e até mesmo formar partidos políticos, não faz absolutamente o menor sentido que fascistas — e até mesmo nazistas assumidos — sofram qualquer tipo de discriminação. Embora socialistas e comunistas se sintam moralmente superiores aos fascistas (ou a qualquer outra filosofia política ou escola de pensamento), sabemos perfeitamente que o seu senso de superioridade é fruto de uma pueril romantização universitária da sua própria ideologia. A história mostra efetivamente que o socialismo clássico e o comunismo causaram muito mais destruição do que o fascismo.

Portanto, se socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, não existe a menor razão para que fascistas não usufruam dessa mesma liberdade.

É claro, nesse ponto, seremos invariavelmente confrontados por um oportuno dilema — o famoso paradoxo da intolerância, de Karl Popper. Até que ponto uma sociedade livre e tolerante deve tolerar a intolerância (inerente a ideologias totalitárias)?

As leis de propriedade privada resolveriam isso em uma sociedade livre. O mais importante a levarmos em consideração no atual contexto, no entanto — ao defender ou criticar uma determinada ideologia, filosofia ou escola de pensamento —, é entender que, seja ela qual for, ela tem o direito de existir. E todas as pessoas que a defendem tem o direito de defendê-la, da mesma maneira que todos os seus detratores tem o direito de criticá-la.

Essa é uma forte razão para jamais apoiarmos a censura. Muito pelo contrário, devemos repudiar com veemência e intransigência toda e qualquer forma de censura, especialmente a estatal.

Existem duas fortes razões para isso:

A primeira delas é a volatilidade da censura (especialmente a estatal). A censura oficial do governo, depois que é implementada, torna-se absolutamente incontrolável. Hoje, ela pode estar apontada para um grupo de pessoas cujas ideias divergem das suas. Mas amanhã, ela pode estar apontada justamente para as ideias que você defende. É fundamental, portanto, compreendermos que a censura estatal é incontrolável. Sob qualquer ponto de vista, é muito mais vantajoso que exista uma vasta pluralidade de ideias conflitantes na sociedade competindo entre si, do que o estado decidir que ideias podem ser difundidas ou não.

Além do mais, libertários e anarcocapitalistas não podem nunca esperar qualquer tipo de simpatia por parte das autoridades governamentais. Para o estado, seria infinitamente mais prático e vantajoso criminalizar o libertarianismo e o anarcocapitalismo — sob a alegação de que são filosofias perigosas difundidas por extremistas radicais que ameaçam o estado democrático de direito — do que o fascismo ou qualquer outra ideologia centralizada em governos burocráticos e onipotentes. Portanto, defender a censura, especialmente a estatal, representa sempre um perigo para o próprio indivíduo, que mais cedo ou mais tarde poderá ver a censura oficial do sistema se voltar contra ele.

Outra razão pela qual libertários jamais devem defender a censura, é porque — ao contrário dos estatistas — não é coerente que defensores da liberdade se comportem como se o estado fosse o seu papai e o governo fosse a sua mamãe. Não devemos terceirizar nossas próprias responsabilidades, tampouco devemos nos comportar como adultos infantilizados. Assumimos a responsabilidade de combater todas as ideologias e filosofias que agridem a liberdade e os seres humanos. Não procuramos políticos ou burocratas para executar essa tarefa por nós.

Portanto, se você ver um fascista sendo censurado nas redes sociais ou em qualquer outro lugar, assuma suas dores. Sinta-se compelido a defendê-lo, mostre aos seus detratores que ele tem todo direito de se expressar, como qualquer pessoa. Você não tem obrigação de concordar com ele ou apreciar as ideias que ele defende. Mas silenciar arbitrariamente qualquer pessoa não é uma pauta que honra a liberdade.

Se você não gosta de estado, planejamento central, burocracia, impostos, tarifas, políticas coletivistas, nacionalistas e desenvolvimentistas, mostre com argumentos coesos e convincentes porque a liberdade e o livre mercado são superiores a todos esses conceitos. Mas repudie a censura com intransigência e mordacidade.

Em primeiro lugar, porque você aprecia e defende a liberdade de expressão para todas as pessoas. E em segundo lugar, por entender perfeitamente que — se a censura eventualmente se tornar uma política de estado vigente entre a sociedade — é mais provável que ela atinja primeiro os defensores da liberdade do que os defensores do estado.

Machismo

Muitos elementos do comportamento masculino que hoje são atacados com virulência e considerados machistas pelo movimento progressista são na verdade manifestações naturais intrínsecas ao homem, que nossos avôs cultivaram ao longo de suas vidas sem serem recriminados por isso. Com a ascensão do feminismo, do progressismo e a eventual problematização do sexo masculino, o antagonismo militante dos principais líderes da revolução sexual da contracultura passou a naturalmente condenar todos os atributos genuinamente masculinos, por considerá-los símbolos de opressão e dominação social.

Apesar do Brasil ser uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista, onde o estado protege mais as mulheres do que as crianças — afinal, a cada semana novas leis são implementadas concedendo inúmeros privilégios e benefícios às mulheres, aos quais elas jamais teriam direito em uma sociedade genuinamente machista e patriarcal —, a esquerda política persiste em tentar difundir a fantasia da opressão masculina e o mito de que vivemos em uma sociedade machista e patriarcal.

Como sempre, a realidade mostra um cenário muito diferente daquilo que é pregado pela militância da terra da fantasia. O Brasil atual não tem absolutamente nada de machista ou patriarcal. No Brasil, mulheres podem votar, podem ocupar posições de poder e autoridade tanto na esfera pública quanto em companhias privadas, podem se candidatar a cargos políticos, podem ser vereadoras, deputadas, governadoras, podem ser proprietárias do próprio negócio, podem se divorciar, podem dirigir, podem comprar armas, podem andar de biquíni nas praias, podem usar saias extremamente curtas, podem ver programas de televisão sobre sexo voltados única e exclusivamente para o público feminino, podem se casar com outras mulheres, podem ser promíscuas, podem consumir bebidas alcoólicas ao ponto da embriaguez, e podem fazer praticamente tudo aquilo que elas desejarem. No Brasil do século XXI, as mulheres são genuinamente livres para fazer as próprias escolhas em praticamente todos os aspectos de suas vidas. O que mostra efetivamente que a tal opressão do patriarcado não existe.

O liberalismo social extremo do qual as mulheres usufruem no Brasil atual — e que poderíamos estender a toda a sociedade contemporânea ocidental — é suficiente para desmantelar completamente a fábula feminista da sociedade patriarcal machista e opressora, que existe única e exclusivamente no mundinho de fantasias ideológicas da esquerda progressista.

Tão importante quanto, é fundamental compreender que nenhum homem é obrigado a levar o feminismo a sério ou considerá-lo um movimento social e político legítimo. Para um homem, ser considerado machista ou até mesmo assumir-se como um não deveria ser um problema. O progressismo e o feminismo — com o seu nefasto hábito de demonizar os homens, bem como todos os elementos inerentes ao comportamento e a cultura masculina — é que são o verdadeiro problema, conforme tentam modificar o homem para transformá-lo em algo que ele não é nem deveria ser: uma criatura dócil, passiva e submissa, que é comandada por ideologias hostis e antinaturais, que não respeitam a hierarquia de uma ordem social milenar e condições inerentes à própria natureza humana. Com o seu hábito de tentar modificar tudo através de leis e decretos, o feminismo e o progressismo mostram efetivamente que o seu real objetivo é criminalizar a masculinidade.

A verdade é que — usufruindo de um nível elevado de liberdades — não existe praticamente nada que a mulher brasileira do século XXI não possa fazer. Adicionalmente, o governo dá as mulheres uma quantidade tão avassaladora de vantagens, privilégios e benefícios, que está ficando cada vez mais difícil para elas encontrarem razões válidas para reclamarem da vida. Se o projeto de lei que pretende fornecer um auxílio mensal de mil e duzentos reais para mães solteiras for aprovado pelo senado, muitas mulheres que tem filhos não precisarão nem mesmo trabalhar para ter sustento. E tantas outras procurarão engravidar, para ter direito a receber uma mesada mensal do governo até o seu filho completar a maioridade.

O que a militância colorida da terra da fantasia convenientemente ignora — pois a realidade nunca corresponde ao seu conto de fadas ideológico — é que o mundo de uma forma geral continua sendo muito mais implacável com os homens do que é com as mulheres. No Brasil, a esmagadora maioria dos suicídios é praticada por homens, a maioria das vítimas de homicídio são homens e de cada quatro moradores de rua, três são homens. Mas é evidente que uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista não se importa com os homens, pois ela não é influenciada por fatos concretos ou pela realidade. Seu objetivo é simplesmente atender as disposições de uma agenda ideológica, não importa quão divorciadas da realidade elas são.

O nível exacerbado de liberdades sociais e privilégios governamentais dos quais as mulheres brasileiras usufruem é suficiente para destruir a fantasiosa fábula da sociedade machista, opressora e patriarcal. Se as mulheres brasileiras não estão felizes, a culpa definitivamente não é dos homens. Se a vasta profusão de liberdades, privilégios e benefícios da sociedade ocidental não as deixa plenamente saciadas e satisfeitas, elas podem sempre mudar de ares e tentar uma vida mais abnegada e espartana em países como Irã, Paquistão ou Afeganistão. Quem sabe assim elas não se sentirão melhores e mais realizadas?

Homofobia

Quando falamos em homofobia, entramos em uma categoria muito parecida com a do racismo: o direito de discriminação é totalmente válido. Absolutamente ninguém deve ser obrigado a aceitar homossexuais ou considerar o homossexualismo como algo normal. Sendo cristão, não existe nem sequer a mais vaga possibilidade de que algum dia eu venha a aceitar o homossexualismo como algo natural. O homossexualismo se qualifica como um grave desvio de conduta e um pecado contra o Criador.

A Bíblia proíbe terminantemente conduta sexual imoral, o que — além do homossexualismo — inclui adultério, fornicação, incesto e bestialidade, entre outras formas igualmente pérfidas de degradação.

Segue abaixo três passagens bíblicas que proíbem terminantemente a conduta homossexual:

“Não te deitarás com um homem como se deita com uma mulher. Isso é abominável!” (Levítico 18:22 — King James Atualizada)

“Se um homem se deitar com outro homem, como se deita com mulher, ambos terão praticado abominação; certamente serão mortos; o seu sangue estará sobre eles.” (Levítico 20:13 — João Ferreira de Almeida Atualizada)

“O quê! Não sabeis que os injustos não herdarão o reino de Deus? Não sejais desencaminhados. Nem fornicadores, nem idólatras, nem adúlteros, nem homens mantidos para propósitos desnaturais, nem homens que se deitam com homens, nem ladrões, nem gananciosos, nem beberrões, nem injuriadores, nem extorsores herdarão o reino de Deus.” (1 Coríntios 6:9,10 —Tradução do Novo Mundo das Escrituras Sagradas com Referências)

Se você não é religioso, pode simplesmente levar em consideração o argumento do respeito pela ordem natural. A ordem natural é incondicional e incisiva com relação a uma questão: o complemento de tudo o que existe é o seu oposto, não o seu igual. O complemento do dia é a noite, o complemento da luz é a escuridão, o complemento da água, que é líquida, é a terra, que é sólida. E como sabemos o complemento do macho — de sua respectiva espécie — é a fêmea.

Portanto, o complemento do homem, o macho da espécie humana, é naturalmente a mulher, a fêmea da espécie humana. Um homem e uma mulher podem naturalmente se reproduzir, porque são um complemento biológico natural. Por outro lado, um homem e outro homem são incapazes de se reproduzir, assim como uma mulher e outra mulher.

Infelizmente, o mundo atual está longe de aceitar como plenamente estabelecida a ordem natural pelo simples fato dela existir, visto que tentam subvertê-la a qualquer custo, não importa o malabarismo intelectual que tenham que fazer para justificar os seus pontos de vista distorcidos e antinaturais. A libertinagem irrefreável e a imoralidade bestial do mundo contemporâneo pós-moderno não reconhecem nenhum tipo de limite. Quem tenta restabelecer princípios morais salutares é imediatamente considerado um vilão retrógrado e repressivo, sendo ativamente demonizado pela militância do hedonismo, da luxúria e da licenciosidade desenfreada e sem limites.

Definitivamente, fazer a apologia da moralidade, do autocontrole e do autodomínio não faz nenhum sucesso na Sodoma e Gomorra global dos dias atuais. O que faz sucesso é lacração, devassidão, promiscuidade e prazeres carnais vazios. O famoso escritor e filósofo francês Albert Camus expressou uma verdade contundente quando disse: “Uma só frase lhe bastará para definir o homem moderno — fornicava e lia jornais”.

Qualquer indivíduo tem o direito inalienável de discriminar ativamente homossexuais, pelo direito que ele julgar mais pertinente no seu caso. A objeção de consciência para qualquer situação é um direito natural dos indivíduos. Há alguns anos, um caso que aconteceu nos Estados Unidos ganhou enorme repercussão internacional, quando o confeiteiro Jack Phillips se recusou a fazer um bolo de casamento para o “casal” homossexual Dave Mullins e Charlie Craig.

Uma representação dos direitos civis do estado do Colorado abriu um inquérito contra o confeiteiro, alegando que ele deveria ser obrigado a atender todos os clientes, independente da orientação sexual, raça ou crença. Preste atenção nas palavras usadas — ele deveria ser obrigado a atender.

Como se recusou bravamente a ceder, o caso foi parar invariavelmente na Suprema Corte, que decidiu por sete a dois em favor de Jack Phillips, sob a alegação de que obrigar o confeiteiro a atender o “casal” homossexual era uma violação nefasta dos seus princípios religiosos. Felizmente, esse foi um caso em que a liberdade prevaleceu sobre a tirania progressista.

Evidentemente, homossexuais não devem ser agredidos, ofendidos, internados em clínicas contra a sua vontade, nem devem ser constrangidos em suas liberdades pelo fato de serem homossexuais. O que eles precisam entender é que a liberdade é uma via de mão dupla. Eles podem ter liberdade para adotar a conduta que desejarem e fazer o que quiserem (contanto que não agridam ninguém), mas da mesma forma, é fundamental respeitar e preservar a liberdade de terceiros que desejam rejeitá-los pacificamente, pelo motivo que for.

Afinal, ninguém tem a menor obrigação de aceitá-los, atendê-los ou sequer pensar que uma união estável entre duas pessoas do mesmo sexo — incapaz de gerar descendentes, e, portanto, antinatural — deva ser considerado um matrimônio de verdade. Absolutamente nenhuma pessoa, ideia, movimento, crença ou ideologia usufrui de plena unanimidade no mundo. Por que o homossexualismo deveria ter tal privilégio?

Homossexuais não são portadores de uma verdade definitiva, absoluta e indiscutível, que está acima da humanidade. São seres humanos comuns que — na melhor das hipóteses —, levam um estilo de vida que pode ser considerado “alternativo”, e absolutamente ninguém tem a obrigação de considerar esse estilo de vida normal ou aceitável. A única obrigação das pessoas é não interferir, e isso não implica uma obrigação em aceitar.

Discriminar homossexuais (assim como pessoas de qualquer outro grupo, raça, religião, nacionalidade ou etnia) é um direito natural por parte de todos aqueles que desejam exercer esse direito. E isso nem o direito positivo nem a militância progressista poderão algum dia alterar ou subverter. O direito natural e a inclinação inerente dos seres humanos em atender às suas próprias disposições é simplesmente imutável e faz parte do seu conjunto de necessidades.

Conclusão

A militância progressista é absurdamente autoritária, e todas as suas estratégias e disposições ideológicas mostram que ela está em uma guerra permanente contra a ordem natural, contra a liberdade e principalmente contra o homem branco, cristão, conservador e tradicionalista — possivelmente, aquilo que ela mais odeia e despreza.

Nós não podemos, no entanto, ceder ou dar espaço para a agenda progressista, tampouco pensar em considerar como sendo normais todas as pautas abusivas e tirânicas que a militância pretende estabelecer como sendo perfeitamente razoáveis e aceitáveis, quer a sociedade aceite isso ou não. Afinal, conforme formos cedendo, o progressismo tirânico e totalitário tende a ganhar cada vez mais espaço.

Quanto mais espaço o progressismo conquistar, mais corroída será a liberdade e mais impulso ganhará o totalitarismo. Com isso, a cultura do cancelamento vai acabar com carreiras, profissões e com o sustento de muitas pessoas, pelo simples fato de que elas discordam das pautas universitárias da moda.

A história mostra perfeitamente que quanto mais liberdade uma sociedade tem, mais progresso ela atinge. Por outro lado, quanto mais autoritária ela for, mais retrocessos ela sofrerá. O autoritarismo se combate com liberdade, desafiando as pautas de todos aqueles que persistem em implementar a tirania na sociedade. O politicamente correto é o nazismo dos costumes, que pretende subverter a moral através de uma cultura de vigilância policial despótica e autoritária, para que toda a sociedade seja subjugada pela agenda totalitária progressista.

Pois quanto a nós, precisamos continuar travando o bom combate em nome da liberdade. E isso inclui reconhecer que ideologias, hábitos e costumes de que não gostamos tem o direito de existir e até mesmo de serem defendidos.

@ 5e5fc143:393d5a2c

Just revisiting some quick tips for #newbies #pow #public #blockchain users only.

if you just getting started with bitcoin or any pow crypto coins or been using or storing them for a while, you not must forget the roots and fundamentals.

Hot Wallet — It gets connected to live internet at some point in time essentially to sign / send a tx i.e. spending transaction — exposes the private key of the address from in the process

Cold Wallet — It never ever gets connected or online and can always keep receiving inbound amounts Paper wallets are best n cheapest form of cold wallet that can used once n thrown away.

Cold wallets need to either “import”ed or “sweep”ed in order to used or spend — https://coinsutra.com/private-key-import-vs-sweep-difference/

Any thin #wallet is always dependent on connectivity to live up2date node server where-as self-sufficient qt / cli wallet takes a while to sync up to latest block height in order to be usable.

Beginners should always resist the attraction of quick and fast — thin n 3rd party wallets and always start a long learning journey of core wallets of any coin — either “qt” GUI wallet or command line “coin-cli” wallet

Almost all #proofofwork #blockchains i.e. #POW has #node #wallet - everyone who use support he #public #blockchain secures own you coin value

You can run fullnode either on clearnet or over onion 🧅 #BTC has >55% of nodes running in onion out of total 15000+ live fullnodes and 50000+ bitcoincore wallets around blockheight 777000 . Other notable pow chains are #LTC #RVN and rest are babychains for now !

Always delete hot wallet to test practice restoration before sending any large refunds to it to be safe.

Large funds are always best to keep in self custody node wallets rare n occasional use

Final word — Cannot see private key 🔑 or seed 🌱 in any wallet means not your coin. 😲

That’s all for now n Thank you 🙏 ! ⚡️ https://getalby.com/p/captjack ⚡️

Some Cold wallet nostr posts nostr:note1p6ke5wqshgxtfzj5de3u04hejl2c5ygj8xk8ex6fqdsg29jmt33qnx57y2 nostr:note1rse0l220quur6vfx0htje94ezecjj03y6j7lguwl09fmvmpt6g3q0cg7yw nostr:note1q5w8dyjuqc7sz7ygl97y0ztv6sal2hm4yrf5nmur2tkz9lq2wx9qcjw90q

some nostr specific lightning ⚡️ Layer2 wallets with blockchain mainnet option nostr:naddr1qqsky6t5vdhkjm3qd35kw6r5de5kueeqf38zqampd3kx2apqdehhxarjqyv8wue69uhkummnw3e8qun00puju6t08genxven9uqkvamnwvaz7tmxd9k8getj9ehx7um5wgh8w6twv5hkuur4vgchgefsw4a8xdnkdgerjatddfshsmr3w93hgwpjdgu8zdnswpuk2enj0pcnqdnydpersepkwpm8wenpw3nkkut2d44xwams8a38ymmpv33kzum58468yat9qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtngv9kkuet59e5k7tczyqvq5m2zcltylrpetrvazrw45sgha24va288lxq8s8562vfkeatfxqcyqqq823ckqlhc8 related blog post nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3cxyenjv3c8qmr2v34qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qydhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn4wdjkcetnwdeks6t59e3k7tczyp6x5fz66g2wd9ffu4zwlzjzwek9t7mqk7w0qzksvsys2qm63k9ngqcyqqq823cpdfq87

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |BLANCO, Carlos X., De Covadonga a la nación española: La hispanidad en clave spengleriana, EAS, 2019|

La presente obra que vamos a proceder a reseñar, De covadonga a la nación española, de Carlos X. Blanco, ya posee un título lo suficientemente sugerente que invita a la lectura y despierta un gran interés, y especialmente cuando leemos el subtítulo que le viene aparejado como «La hispanidad en clave spengleriana», en cuya introducción Robert Steuckers, destacado intelectual del movimiento de la Nueva Derecha francesa, nos empieza a esbozar algunas de las ideas que se irán desarrollando a lo largo del libro. Ya de entrada queda de manifiesto una dualidad que ha sido decisiva en la actual configuración de España en el devenir de los siglos, una impronta indeleble que ha condicionado el desarrollo de la nación más antigua del occidente europeo, y es la existencia de dos polos o almas, dos cosmovisiones opuestas y enfrentadas: por un lado aquella que representan los pueblos del Noroeste peninsular, pioneros y artífices de las primeras etapas de la Reconquista desde el Reino de Asturias, marcado por la presencia de un importante elemento celtogermánico, también romanizado pero sin el lastre decadente y crepuscular de las civilizaciones precedentes, y por otro lado los pueblos hispanorromanos del Levante y el Sur peninsular, que caerán bajo la dominación árabe y se configurarán bajo un modelo de civilización diferenciado, marcado por la influencia de civilizaciones caídas o en franco declive, como es el caso de la romana, bizantina o la arábiga. Es precisamente esta antítesis la que se convierte en el eje vertebrador del libro, en el que su autor, Carlos X Blanco, se sirve de las teorías e interpretaciones del notable filósofo de la historia alemán Oswald Spengler y su monumental obra La decadencia de Occidente.

No obstante, este ensayo no se queda en un mero análisis de opuestos, sino que a través de sus páginas nos muestra un bosquejo de ideas bastante preciso para delinear la historia de España desde sus comienzos hasta la actualidad en función de las categorías del pensamiento spengleriano. Asimismo nos advierte que hay que entender los planteamientos del filósofo e historiador alemán en su contexto con toda su terminología y métodos interpretativos aunque teniendo en cuenta las limitaciones y errores en los que pudiera incurrir en su obra a lo largo de su trayectoria intelectual. También conviene destacar cómo a través de la última parte del libro se utiliza como referencia a Ortega y Gasset, que nuestro autor califica como «el Spengler hispano» por su visión más elevada de las problemáticas y posibles soluciones al problema de España y por «su comprensión de lo nacional».

Volviendo a la antítesis entre esos dos modelos de civilización que arraigaron en la España de la Antigüedad tardía y los inicios del Medievo, en una suerte de duplicidad que a la luz del pensamiento Spengleriano nos permite distinguir perfectamente el concepto de cultura y civilización tan característico de su planteamiento. La cultura representa el estado de apogeo vital, de las grandes conquistas y realizaciones históricas que determinan un tipo humano audaz y especialmente dotado, que vendría ser el arquetipo de la cultura fáustica, que en el caso hispano vemos reflejado en el Noroeste peninsular, en los territorios comprendidos por el reino asturiano, y que representa la tendencia que sería hegemónica en el resto del orbe europeo bajo la Cristiandad fáustica y donde la presencia del elemento germánico sería fundamental. La base fundacional del reino astur estuvo formada por astures, cántabros y godos pertenecientes a la baja nobleza que habían huído del avance musulmán refugiándose en las montañas del Norte. De esta unión de pueblos, de esta etnogénesis, empleando la terminología del autor, nació un nuevo pueblo, una nueva cultura en sentido spengleriano. Es un pueblo ávido de conquistas, con una conciencia clara y segura sobre la necesidad de expulsar al invasor moro e infiel de la península y de ser portador del Imperium. Es a través del inicio del proceso de la Reconquista como se vehiculiza la nación española, y que tendrá su punto de arranque en tierras asturianas para después encontrar una continuidad en la acción de Castilla. Y respecto a la hegemonía castellana el autor deja entrever cierto prejuicio contra esta, representante de un «concepto mestizo y dudosamente cristiano» que vivía su multiculturalidad de modo traumático, a consecuencia del cual tendrían lugar las expulsiones de judíos y moriscos, la inquisición o la intolerancia. Todo ello debido, según nuestro autor, a la falta de homogeneidad a nivel étnico y religioso derivado de un problema de identidad. Frente a esta el Noroeste representaba una sociedad más homogénea en lo étnico y religioso, con su impronta celtogermana, mucho más homologable al resto de Europa. En este sentido, quizás habría que recurrir a ciertos ensayos que desde hace años han ayudado con una suerte de revisionismo a despejar ciertos clichés y prejuicios que oscurecían la historia de España en sus siglos áureos, como podrían ser Elvira Roca Barea o Iván Vélez, por citar a los más destacados.

[][nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzp09m8eqv8067yvlluwav85a6pg5xr4uv9yf63l6xjydwvjjffegpqqxnzde3x5mnqwfsxverzdesgc69kf]

Otro de los aspectos determinantes que se apuntan en relación al Noroeste es la ausencia de ciudades, un entorno predominantemente rural, dominado por el campesino libre y la vida aldeana, en lo que es el principal eje del desarrollo de la cultura spengleriana, y que arraiga y prospera sobre el territorio integrándose en el paisaje, constituyéndose entonces como una unidad viviente asimilable al elemento vegetal, son un conglomerado de pueblos productores-conquistadores. Es el claro contraste respecto al hombre antiguo y mediterráneo, el hombre meridional que vive en la urbe, un producto de la civilización, cuando la cultura pierde su hálito vital y termina por esclerotizarse. Los habitantes de estas ciudades son herederos de una civilización en pleno declive, envejecida, producto de la pseudomorfosis romana. Son el subproducto degradado de un modelo urbano, esclavista y capitalista que somete y destruye el campo. Una nueva antítesis surge precisamente de la oposición campo-ciudad, y es la que viene representada por dos tipos anímicos diferenciados como son el alma mágica, propia del hombre mediterráneo tardorromano, y aquella fáustica de los pueblos del Noroeste, que en gran parte explica la diferente actitud entre unos y otros frente a la invasión musulmana del 711. El nuevo pueblo que nace de las montañas cántabras, potenciado en su elemento celtogermánico, muestra los elementos vivos de una cultura fáustica, totalmente indoeuropea en su formulación, con la necesidad de jerarquías militares en una fase de vida muy diferente al hispanorromano meridional, y que para nada tiene que ver con ningún elemento de naturaleza quijotesca, con ningún romanticismo que es explícitamente rechazado por el propio Spengler, como quizás sí ocurriría en lo sucesivo bajo el Imperio, con la ilusión de gobernar bajo los postulados de la política ignorando otras variables económico-materiales, porque lo que importa en la historia son los hechos, materializados bajo empresas políticas de conjunto. En este caso los reyes astures sí asumieron el pasado mítico del reino godo caído para tomar conciencia de su misión como legítimos propietarios de las tierras usurpadas por el invasor sarraceno. Y la nobleza que surgió de esas tierras fue la quintaesencia de la clase aldeana a la que se refiere Spengler como base fundamental de toda cultura fáustica. Al mismo tiempo, como ocurre con toda cultura fáustica, se fundó sobre el principio dinástico y de sangre, amparada en el tiempo, el área de dominio de todo principio aristocrático propio de la clase primigenia de la nobleza.

Pero el discurso de Carlos X. Blanco no se agota en los inicios de la Reconquista, sino que hay un examen de la historia de España en su conjunto, tal y como apuntábamos en las primeras líneas de nuestra reseña. El siglo XVIII, con la Ilustración y los grandes cambios y transformaciones políticas que preconizan el advenimiento de la modernidad, especialmente a partir de la Revolución Francesa, nos presentan una Europa envejecida, enferma y en plena descomposición. En el caso de España, a la que Spengler no otorga demasiada importancia en sus planteamientos, aunque reconoce que fue parte de una cultura fáustica bajo la figura del soldado y el conquistador, pero cree que ya pasó a mejor vida.

Con la Revolución Industrial los arquetipos del proletario y el burgués vienen a sustituir los anteriores marcados por la herencia y el linaje del agro. A partir de entonces el proceso degenerativo viene marcado por el triunfo del individualismo, el liberalismo, el democratismo y de la ciudad sobre el campo. Con todos estos elementos llega el materialismo a ultranza, el triunfo de lo abstracto frente a lo concreto, el poder de las grandes masas, de la oclocracia y el discurso del marxismo, respecto al cual Spengler se deja llevar por los prejuicios ideológicos contra el proletario, en abierta oposición, según Spengler, con el campesino, una chusma envidiosa y un detritus de la urbe. El comienzo de la modernidad, a raíz de 1789, también es el fin de las naciones, comienzo del jacobinismo centralista y la desnaturalización de los pueblos cuyos integrantes pasan a ser ciudadanos, totalmente inorgánicos y atomizados. Y en este punto es importante el matiz diferencial entre pueblo y nación, tantas veces confundido en nuestra era moderna, y que en el segundo caso se corresponde con el legalismo y el barniz del constitucionalismo mientras que el primero es una unidad natural por encima de clases y formalismos burgueses. Esta deriva descendente se va agudizando con el paso del tiempo hasta llegar al capitalismo de las grandes corporaciones de nuestros días, con una Europa geopolíticamente inoperante e inexistente tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial. A partir de la Guerra Fría Europa y sus democracias liberales, que no son sino plutocracias, dan la espalda a su historia y tratan de cubrirse de ese barniz legalista a través de constituciones, leyes y de la doctrina de los llamados «derechos humanos», y aquí vendría la distinción spengleriana entre «verdades» (doctrinas, ideas etc) y los hechos que determina la propia facticidad de la historia. Este es el mundo del burgués, del que también forma parte el socialista como uno de sus subproductos más destacados, enemigos de los pueblos y naciones, enemigos de las clases primigenias señaladas por Spengler (la nobleza y el sacerdocio). Pero lo fundamental dentro de este mundo decadente y artificioso es el poder de la técnica concebida como un instrumento de dominación de la naturaleza y de sometimiento de los hombres, es la herramienta fundamental del racionalismo que impregna toda la ciencia. Hoy lo vemos más que nunca a través del poder de las tecnologías sobre nuestras vidas y en la formación de un mercado global o en el avance mismo del transhumanismo y, en consecuencia, de la deshumanización.

En el caso particular de España, que obedece al contexto fundamental del ensayo, la modernidad pone en evidencia la existencia de un Estado fallido, que no se encuentra a la altura de otras potencias europeas como Reino Unido o Francia. Somos intrascendentes en lo geopolítico, desde una ubicación que se presenta como puente o bisagra entre Europa y África, históricamente sometidos a las influencias afrosemíticas, siendo los parientes pobres de la Unión Europea en una adhesión que, como bien apunta el autor, supuso una fatalidad para España y su soberanía económica al desmantelar los principales sectores estratégicos, el sector agropecuario, y abocarnos al sector servicios y el turismo, lo cual ofrece escasas salidas laborales a nuestros jóvenes y al desarrollo de un potencial como nación. Es una España que ha renunciado a la autosuficiencia productiva, un país bajo las corruptelas políticas, la mafia sindical, una patronal tiránica y el parasitismo social sin que ningún sector de la misma pueda ejercer un papel de liderazgo moral ante tal catástrofe.

Además España también tiene otro problema y es el que nos refiere su propia configuración territorial y la propia idea de nación o de Patria, y la forma de concebirla. Todos estos problemas se han evidenciado más que nunca con el actual Régimen del 78, bajo un sistema liberal que ignora por completo la idiosincrasia de los diferentes pueblos de cuya unión nació España, porque como bien apunta nuestro autor, los territorios tienen memoria y están impregnados de historicidad. Pero para conseguir aunar de nuevo a todos los pueblos hispánicos es necesario superar tanto el centralismo liberal de raíz jacobina y borbónica, aquel del «centralismo madrileño», como aquel el secesionismo periférico y provinciano para impulsar un cambio que debe venir del Noroeste de la península, de los territorios que fueron el punto de partida de la Reconquista y representan el principal foco de europeidad. La España autonómica ya se ha revelado como inviable en lo económico, lo histórico y cultural, y que además ha impedido el proceso de integración entre la población y el territorio. Carlos Blanco llega a proponer su propio modelo de organización/división territorial a partir de los territorios del Noroeste (Galicia, Asturias, León y Cantabria), las dos Castillas fusionadas en una, y otras unidades federadas como Aragón y Valencia además de unidades intermedias a nivel local y foral. Sería un modelo muy cercano en su idea a aquel del tradicionalismo hispánico, alejado de los caprichos de las oligarquías liberales corruptas y ajenas a nuestra historia. Un modelo descentralizado y avivado por la riqueza y pluralidad de los territorios que conforman lo que en su momento se denominaron Las Españas.

Atendiendo a la premisa del pensamiento spengleriano, en la necesidad de ahondar en los aspectos culturales y vitales en el desarrollo de cada alma colectiva y particular, cada pueblo debe ser juzgado por los hechos históricos y realizaciones que ha protagonizado, en sus aptitudes concretas. Es particularmente interesante la apelación que nuestro autor hace a Ortega y Gasset, que como Spengler se encuentra ubicado en posicionamientos antiliberales y antisocialistas, respecto a España y a sus problemas de «vertebración». Para Ortega lo importante era la nación por encima de cualquier pragmatismo legal, y lo esencial, como bien apunta Spengler en su obra, es la configuración étnica de los pueblos que habitan sus diferentes territorios frente a cualquier imposición venida del centralismo burgués y del modelo radial borbónico. Es interesante ver como hay una apelación a elementos de la España tradicional, a los cuerpos intermedios, a todas aquellas formas de organización social con sus propios condicionamientos socio-jurídicos como pudieran ser el Municipio y la Familia, de carácter pre-estatal. La razón histórica se convierte en la herramienta fundamental para ensamblar en un engranaje perfectamente orgánico las instituciones, la sociedad y los poderes públicos. Por ello, antes que nada, hay que considerar la constitución histórica, la existencia de formas consuetudinarias derivadas de esa experiencia histórica. De tal modo que la Historia no debe ser considerada como un elemento muerto, un objeto de coleccionismo como hizo de ella la ciencia histórica positivista, sino que es un elemento vivo del cual el hombre es portador en el presente, de ahí que las propias experiencias pasadas de todo pueblo deben ser tenidas en cuenta en la organización y funcionamiento de toda comunidad nacional y orgánica.

A modo de conclusión podemos decir que este libro nos invita a una reflexión profunda de la España actual a la luz del pensamiento spengleriano, y que busca encontrar revulsivos para revertir el curso de una decadencia y degeneración que nos conducen hacia una muerte segura como civilización en pleno estado de putrefacción a todos los niveles, o al menos es un diagnóstico muy certero de nuestra situación actual y del mundo moderno en el que nos hallamos insertos. En definitiva esta obra nos permite entender las dimensiones del problema al que nos enfrentamos desde unos parámetros interpretativos políticamente incorrectos, con un pensador fuertemente estigmatizado, pero no por ello menos certero en su metodología y análisis interpretativos.

---

Artículo original: Reseña: De Covadonga a la nación española. La hispanidad en clave spengleriana, de Carlos X Blanco, Hipérbola Janus, 29/Jul/2021

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |ROCA BAREA, Mª ELVIRA, Imperiofobia y leyenda negra: Roma, Rusia, Estados Unidos y el Imperio español, Siruela, 2020|

Imperiofobia y leyenda negra de Mª Elvira Roca Barea es una de las obras más controvertidas de los últimos años. Desde su publicación original, en su primera edición, en el año 2016, el exitoso trabajo de la investigadora, ensayista y filóloga se ha visto sometido a furibundas invectivas e intentos de «refutación» por parte de un buen número de detractores, en algunos casos, como Arturo Pérez Reverte, por una cuestión más personal, pues aparece mencionado en la obra como uno de los más firmes sostenedores de la leyenda negra antiespañola a través de sus obras, o bien por cuestiones ideológicas, como ha sucedido con José Luis Villacañas, donde el catálogo de insultos y zafiedades entremezcladas con falsedades históricas envueltas en un barniz ideológico muy particular, ha contribuido a dar la razón a las tesis fundamentales con las que la autora vertebra su obra.

Posiblemente las polémicas que hemos visto reflejadas en la prensa a través de entrevistas, y el uso de determinados cenáculos mediáticos para atacar a Mª Elvira Roca, puedan resultar interesantes, especialmente en la medida que retrata la vigencia de la leyenda negra, y cómo cierto sector de la intelectualidad española sigue adoptándola por sistema, con el único fin de degradar la visión de nuestra historia y aminorar el valor de nuestros logros y hazañas históricas, especialmente en lo que se refiere al Imperio Español, con todos sus avatares, positivos y negativos, para perpetuar el complejo de inferioridad y de culpa que, como bien señala nuestra autora, comienza a forjarse en el siglo XVIII con la Ilustración y el debilitamiento del proyecto imperial en Hispanoamérica.

Si nos centramos en el contenido de la obra y más concretamente en el concepto de leyenda negra, este término entraña un carácter estrictamente español y aplicable a nuestro pasado histórico. Hay una relación íntima y directa entre el concepto y nuestra historia que se ha convertido prácticamente en universal, al menos en el contexto del llamado mundo occidental. En España debemos su consolidación a Julián Juderías, diplomático, traductor y notable políglota, que toma conciencia de la visión de lo español más allá de nuestras fronteras. El fundamento de esta leyenda negra encuentra su acepción más clara, según Barea, en la definición del historiador William Maltby, y que viene a hablar de «la opinión según la cual los españoles son inferiores a otros europeos en aquellas cualidades que se consideran civilizadas», aunque para ubicarla dentro del contexto histórico la definición de la RAE parece un buen complemento: «opinión contra lo español difundida a partir del siglo XVI». Se trata de un fenómeno específicamente español, aunque otros países se hayan visto afectados por éste, con una magnitud en el tiempo y el espacio totalmente excepcional. Además todas las opiniones y juicios vertidos dentro de este contexto gozan de una pátina de respetabilidad intelectual y corrección política absoluta. Y es más, dentro de la cultura popular la aceptación es incontestable, con aseveraciones que están tan imbricadas entre las «verdades aceptadas», que nadie es capaz de negarlas sin convertirse en un conspiranoico, totalitario o terraplanista, concepto éste último muy en boga en nuestros tiempos, especialmente por los enemigos de la verdad.

La leyenda negra, al mismo tiempo, es indisociable del concepto de Imperio, pues nace ligado a éste y todo su desarrollo depende de los derroteros que éste sigue y su construcción y devenir histórico. Por ello Mª Elvira Roca Barea considera esencial llegar a una síntesis o definición del concepto de Imperio, algo que muchos ensayos y trabajos históricos rigurosos no llegan a captar en toda su esencia. Es una tarea compleja en la medida que el concepto conoce una evolución a través de los diferentes imperios que se suceden a lo largo de la historia, que son objeto de análisis por parte de la autora, con la intención de identificar y analizar los patrones de la imperiofobia en el caso de imperio más paradigmático, y más estable, de la historia, como fue aquel Romano, sucedido de otros proyectos imperiales como el estadounidense, el ruso y, finalmente, el español, que representa la piedra angular de la presente obra.

Más allá de definiciones vagas e imprecisas, una de las características que podemos destacar del imperio es su capacidad para unir sobre un mismo espacio, de alcance global o continental, a una gran variedad de pueblos y gentes que previamente no tenían relación entre sí. Comprende un territorio amplio sobre el cual se ejerce una hegemonía, no necesariamente militar o de control efectivo del mismo. Al mismo tiempo, el imperio, históricamente, denota a todos los niveles un prestigio que se transmite de generación en generación, y que podemos ver a través del Imperio Romano y los sucesivos intentos de restauración o de legitimación en éste. Otro de los elementos en esta breve síntesis es aquel de la leyenda negra, que acompaña en forma de propaganda a todos los imperios, y que es elaborada por las élites, las oligarquías locales y los intelectuales de los pueblos que forman parte de los agregados imperiales, bajo formas más o menos sofisticadas, y que alcanza la perfección con la imprenta al servicio de Lutero y la Reforma frente al mundo hispánico-católico del Imperio Español.

La propaganda anti-imperial cuestiona permanentemente la legitimidad del imperio, lo infravalora y empequeñece sus logros, lo convierte en culpable de todos los males, especialmente desde la perspectiva ético-moral y religiosa; además le atribuye unos orígenes turbios e innobles, o bien comportamientos bárbaros, crueles e impíos. Nace del complejo de inferioridad y de la idea del fracaso propio, de la incapacidad y de la frustración de quienes se ven anulados para rivalizar con la entidad hegemónica y dominante.

Estos patrones los vemos reproducidos permanentemente, sobre todo a través de los griegos en relación al Imperio Romano, o en el mundo protestante nordeuropeo frente al Imperio Español. También se menciona el caso de los europeos en relación a Estados Unidos, punto en el que discrepamos con la autora ya que nuestro rechazo hacia ese país no se debe tanto a la propaganda si no a la demostrada actitud depredadora de este imperio.

En el caso específico de Rusia el fenómeno presenta algunos de los patrones mencionados, aunque desde otra perspectiva, con un Occidente representado por la Francia ilustrada, fracasada en su propio proyecto imperial, gran propagandista y difusora de prejuicios imperiofóbicos, enfatiza los aspectos bárbaros e incivilizados de la Rusia zarista, o habla de atraso y degeneración en el caso de España o de América.

El imperio es intrínsecamente malvado por definición, es sinónimo de violencia y destrucción, y el pueblo que da origen al mismo es acreedor de los peores calificativos. Incluso en la cultura popular el Imperio tiene connotaciones exclusivamente negativas y se entiende que la oposición activa al mismo es la postura moralmente correcta (Véase el caso de La Guerra de las galaxias).

Respecto al Imperio Español contamos con diferentes contextos en el análisis de la Imperiofobia y la leyenda negra que se remite tanto al elemento hispánico como a aquel católico, y que Mª Elvira Roca clasifica en los distintos escenarios que componen este complejo puzzle de prejuicios y falsedades, que aun variando sus motivos reproducen los patrones mencionados con anterioridad. Nos referimos a la Italia del humanismo, el mundo protestante y anglosajón (Inglaterra y el Sacro Imperio alemán), donde Holanda constituye un caso aparte.

En el caso de la Italia humanista del Cinquecento, ésta inaugura muchos de los lugares comunes que caracterizan a la leyenda negra, y aunque no entrañan una gran violencia ni una oposición activa y armada contra lo español, sí denotan un contenido más o menos sistematizado. Dentro del capítulo de los «orígenes innobles» y la inferioridad racial destaca la idea de que los españoles son «medio moros y medio judíos», con lo cual no son verdaderos cristianos, o al menos no son de fiar por ser «marranos». Junto a este prejuicio hallamos otro bajo la acusación de ser descendientes de godos, como antítesis del romano civilizado, como parte del mundo tenebroso y medieval de bárbaros. Esta perspectiva tan despectiva de lo español está íntimamente relacionada con la soberbia intelectual que caracteriza al Humanismo que, como la Ilustración, se considera la culminación del saber y el conocimiento y desprecia las edades pasadas. Por otro lado los italianos de la época se sentían todavía herederos del Imperio Romano, y un pueblo rico y culto, reticente a ser objeto de dominio por parte de un pueblo, como el español, que había vivido su catarsis histórica en pleno medievo.

La hispanofobia en el ámbito italiano se manifiesta en aspectos históricos concretos, como es el caso del famoso saqueo de Roma a manos de las tropas imperiales de Carlos V en 1527, atribuido a los españoles cuando fue protagonizada por un ejército multiétnico donde los españoles eran minoría respecto a alemanes o italianos. Por otro lado el impacto del saqueo no se tradujo en destrucciones o pérdidas materiales significativas. Además los territorios italianos bajo soberanía imperial gozaron de múltiples beneficios a nivel político-administrativo, con el respeto a las estructuras de poder locales y tradicionales, la posibilidad de medrar en la estructura imperial o la protección ante las acometidas de otomanos y berberiscos, que amenazaron las zonas portuarias del sur italiano, especialmente a partir de la toma de Otranto en 1480.

Merece la pena mencionar la obra de Lope de Vega, bajo el título de La Contienda, que la autora pone como referencia sobre la percepción que los españoles de la época tenían respecto a los prejuicios y falsedades que eran vertidos contra ellos. Y lo que transmite la obra en ese sentido es una despreocupación absoluta sobre los juicios malintencionados y prejuicios que circulaban en la época y de los que son perfectamente conscientes.

No obstante, el centro más importante de la hispanofobia lo encontramos en la órbita de los países protestantes del Norte de Europa, que son los que terminarán por dinamitar los planes imperiales de Carlos V y su proyecto de ecumene europeo. Es el protestantismo quien, cegado por su odio y fanatismo ideológico, comienza a construir los verdaderos cimientos de la leyenda negra, y lo hace de forma plenamente consciente. Dentro de este contexto la figura de Lutero es esencial como reformista y agitador de la causa protestante a través de una propaganda anticatólica especialmente agresiva y violenta que convirtió a la Iglesia en el mismo Anticristo, uniendo hábilmente su causa con aquella del poder de los príncipes y el propio nacionalismo germánico, que construye una relación de simbiosis con la naciente iglesia protestante. Obviamente los príncipes sabían perfectamente que el protestantismo era un arma excepcional para luchar contra la anhelada unidad imperial y para oponerse a las acciones pontificias sobre suelo germánico.

Las guerras de religión, que recorren la segunda mitad del siglo XVI y la primera mitad del siglo XVII son un excelente caldo de cultivo para la difusión de una feroz propaganda protestante contra el mundo hispánico-católico. La élite intelectual alemana, profundamente nacionalista, construye un relato totalmente ficticio acerca de lo español que toma como objeto de sus ataques al catolicismo profesado por los españoles, y en particular a la Inquisición como una institución intolerante, cruel y bárbara, junto al prejuicio racial que adquiere tintes grotescos al calificar nuevamente al español como contaminado por la sangre semita y al mismo tiempo aliado de los turcos. Una cantidad ingente de libelos y escritos propagandísticos anticatólicos y antiespañoles inundan Europa en la que los españoles y el papado representan al Anticristo.

Por otro lado, destaca Barea, los enfrentamientos y guerras de religión que se viven en el Sacro Imperio son en todo momento civiles, entre católicos y protestantes alemanes, en un detalle que no es menor ni anecdótico precisamente. Pese a ser calificadas por el bando protestante como «guerras españolas», en realidad el grueso de las tropas en conflicto son mayoritariamente alemanas, y existe una parte de los alemanes que son católicos y se alinean con el Imperio, pero esa realidad es permanentemente socavada por la propaganda desplegada por sus antagonistas. Y al mismo tiempo los protestantes se encuentran enfrentados entre sí, con otras iglesias reformistas minoritarias, a las que se oponen con la misma intransigencia que a los católicos. Fueron guerras cruentas y muy sangrientas en las que se diezmaron poblaciones enteras, con encarnizadas persecuciones contra la población católica con numerosos hechos que la historiografía académica oficial ha preferido obviar en sus análisis históricos.

De hecho, en Alemania y el Norte de Europa la intolerancia religiosa será un fenómeno común hasta bien entrado el siglo XIX, lo que generará grandes desequilibrios socioeconómicos entre los protestantes y los católicos en perjuicio de éstos últimos. Todavía bajo la Alemania unificada del segundo Reich, apunta Barea, Bismarck expulsó a sacerdotes católicos de distintas órdenes religiosas.

En el caso inglés se repiten los mismos patrones que ya hemos expuesto, y como en Alemania, la hispanofobia se mantiene muy activa durante los siglos del imperio. Los ingleses, junto a los holandeses y los hugonotes franceses forjaron una red de propaganda antiespañola y anticatólica muy sistemática que también se nutrió de personajes advenedizos y traidores procedentes de España, como el caso paradigmático de Antonio Pérez, el secretario de Felipe II, cuyos ataques al rey por el drama de su hijo, el infante Carlos, sirvieron a la causa protestante para enriquecer el catálogo de prejuicios, falsedades e improperios con los que nutrían sus difusiones.

Con Enrique VIII y la proclamación de la Iglesia anglicana, de la cual el propio rey era su jefe absoluto, cualquier tipo de pacto o mediación con el papa se considera alta traición castigada con la pena de muerte. Tras su muerte y sucesión en su hija María I, nieta de los Reyes Católicos, restableció el catolicismo y persiguió a la nueva religión. Esto fue durante un breve periodo, entre 1553 y 1558, a partir de esa fecha, y con la entronización de su hermana Isabel I, se inició una persecución feroz contra los católicos que se mantendría como una constante hasta el siglo XIX, y no solo de los católicos sino también de otras confesiones protestantes minoritarias. De hecho, las primeras corrientes migratorias que se embarcan hacia Norteamérica en el Mayflower estuvieron integradas por calvinistas, luteranos, baptistas, menonitas y otras confesiones reformistas huyendo de las terribles persecuciones, que incluían torturas, ahorcamientos y descuartizamientos. Estas persecuciones eran actualizadas periódicamente, y los católicos sirvieron de chivo expiatorio y fuente de todo tipo de iniquidades. No fue hasta mediados del siglo XIX cuando los católicos comenzaron a adquirir derechos de ciudadanía en igualdad de condiciones con sus conciudadanos anglicanos. Una muestra más de la falsedad de la tan cacareada «libertad de culto» de los países protestantes frente a «la terrible e implacable intolerancia católica».

Del mismo modo, nosotros mismos hemos asumido gran parte de esa leyenda negra en relación a Inglaterra con el caso paradigmático de la llamada «Armada Invencible» comandada por el duque de Medina-Sidonia a instancias de Felipe II, que todos hemos aprendido que fue una gran derrota española frente al poderío inglés, y que a partir de ese momento inició su poder naval y tomó la hegemonía de los mares. Es algo completamente falso que los propios datos históricos desmienten de forma rotunda. La pretendida derrota española de la Invencible no fue tal, pues las tormentas provocaron más daños a la armada española que el combate con los ingleses, cuyo impacto fue mínimo. De hecho poca gente sabe que los ingleses intentaron invadir España y sus posesiones de Ultramar hasta en cuatro ocasiones, y en todas ellas fracasaron, y la más célebre fue aquella de Cartagena de Indias, donde el mítico Blas de Lezo consiguió infligir la mayor derrota de la historia a la armada británica comandada por Lord Vernon en 1741.

Los Países Bajos, que es importante apuntar —como destaca Mª Elvira Roca— que fueron una herencia directa que Carlos V recibió por parte de su abuela paterna, María de Borgoña, y en consecuencia se encontraba legítimamente entre las posesiones territoriales del imperio. Eran unos territorios con profundas desigualdades y enfrentamientos, que merced a la acción de sus oligarquías construyeron su propia historia nacional en contraposición al Imperio Español a través de una poderosa maquinaria de propaganda que tergiversó la realidad de los hechos hasta límites inimaginables. Los predicadores calvinistas, en connivencia con los Orange, transformaron al pueblo neerlandés en oprimidos y explotados del Imperio, y alteraron la percepción de todas las acciones del aparato imperial como agresiones directas a la independencia y dignidad del pueblo holandés. Este formidable aparato propagandístico, que venía a recurrir a los patrones clásicos de la hispanofobia, mantuvo rebeliones y guerras contra el Imperio entre 1566 y 1648, hasta el Tratado de Münster que concede la independencia a los Países Bajos. A partir de este engranaje propagandístico se construyó la leyenda negra del Duque de Alba y construyeron su propio relato nacionalista. La realidad de los hechos quedó ensombrecida irremediablemente, y con ella muchos prejuicios adquirieron la categoría de hechos y realidades históricas. Mª Elvira Roca ofrece un buen número de ejemplos particulares, como la escasa participación de tropas españolas en las filas imperiales que se enfrentaron a los rebeldes holandeses en las sucesivas guerras y la presencia masiva de holandeses y flamencos en las mismas, lo que delataba, al igual que en Alemania, la existencia de un conflicto civil.

En el caso de los Países Bajos la persecución de los católicos adquirió los mismos tintes dramáticos que en el resto de naciones protestantes, y como en Inglaterra o Alemania, éstos fueron perseguidos, desposeídos de sus bienes, torturados y asesinados, en una situación de inferioridad y con derechos ciudadanos cercenados durante siglos.

Las persecuciones religiosas del mundo protestante están perfectamente contrastadas y documentadas, y en este contexto resulta muy significativo que la propaganda de estos países acusara a aquellos de ámbito católico de su crueldad e intolerancia religiosa tomando como referencia a la Inquisición. Mª Elvira Roca, que no defiende en ningún momento a la Inquisición ni trata de justificarla, alude a datos objetivos acerca de la institución que resultan muy significativos en contraste con su reverso protestante. Los procedimientos del Santo Oficio estaban perfectamente reglamentados y burocratizados, las torturas eran poco frecuentes y reguladas con unos límites y unas excepciones muy estrictas. Lo más frecuente eran las multas y las penas de prisión. Y los números muestran una desproporción brutal entre las víctimas de la Inquisición (1.346 condenados a muerte entre 1540 y 1700) respecto a aquellas de las persecuciones protestantes (en Inglaterra se condenó a muerte a 264.000 personas en tres siglos). Nuevamente se demuestra la existencia de un mito construido ex profeso por la propaganda protestante para demonizar al enemigo católico. En este terreno resulta muy significativo aquello que apunta Mª Elvira Roca Barea, con numerosos ejemplos literarios, acerca de cómo se construye el mito de la Inquisición desde la propia literatura y ésta se confunde con la realidad histórica, en un proceso que llega incluso hasta nuestros días con elementos muy arquetípicos.

El otro gran caballo de batalla de la leyenda negra hispanófoba lo tenemos en América, donde el famoso pseudoargumento de un imperio decadente y degenerado, e incluso depredador, se ha impuesto incluso entre los propios españoles, espoleada desde ciertos cenáculos ideológicos como aquel que encabeza José Luis Villacañas, que incluso llega a negar la propia existencia del Imperio. En este sentido, hay una reflexión muy interesante de la autora que interpela a los españoles, como aquellos del siglo XIX, y que hablan de la decadencia del imperio y culpan a aquellos que hicieron el esfuerzo por levantarlo de la nada, eximiéndose de toda culpa y responsabilidad. Y a este respecto Mª Elvira Roca alude a la muerte natural de todo imperio y pone en valor que éste se mantuviese en pie durante tres siglos, gozando de una estabilidad desconocida entre ingleses y franceses. De hecho, e insiste mucho en este punto, ni Gran Bretaña ni Francia consiguieron construir imperios en Ultramar como aquel español, que se extendió desde Río Grande hasta Tierra de Fuego, una hazaña jamás igualada por ninguna otra potencia europea.

Respecto al Imperio Español es necesario puntualizar una serie de aspectos, que la autora pone en relieve:

• Los territorios hispanoamericanos gozaron del mismo estatus jurídico que aquellos de la España peninsular, fueron ciudadanos de la corona española bajo los mismos derechos y obligaciones. No hubo un trato diferencial o un menoscabo de los derechos de las poblaciones de Ultramar, y en el caso de los indios incluso dio lugar a ejemplos de integración tutelada bajo la acción de los jesuitas en las llamadas Repúblicas Indias, que permitía un margen de libertad y autonomía muy amplio entre las poblaciones indígenas. No conviene olvidar las acciones de sacerdotes como Antonio de Montesinos en la defensa de la población indígena o las primeras disposiciones por parte de Isabel la Católica en defensa de los derechos y dignidad de éstos. Por lo tanto, Hispanoamérica no fue una colonia.

• España generó estructuras de civilización en Hispanoamérica a través del desarrollo de sucesivos modelos urbanos en la fundación de nuevos asentamientos de población, la construcción de hospitales, iglesias y universidades, así como una estructura y jerarquía funcionarial y de Estado desde los alcaldes y corregidores hasta la figura del virrey, todos ellos sometidos a un severo control en el ejercicio de sus funciones (los famosos juicios de residencia). En este sentido conviene destacar que el desarrollo urbano, la prosperidad económica y el potencial de la América Española fue muy superior al de las colonias anglosajonas en Norteamérica, incapaces de llegar a pactos con los indios y de avanzar en un control efectivo del territorio hasta la independencia con el nacimiento de Estados Unidos.

• El Imperio Español, a diferencia de otras potencias europeas, es el único en el que se cuestiona la legitimidad moral y legal de sus conquistas. Sobre la legitimidad de la Corona para conquistar el Nuevo Mundo y someter a los indígenas. Fue un debate en el que participaron los estamentos eclesiásticos y donde primó la libertad de expresión. Además los derechos indígenas ya habían sido reconocidos en sucesivas leyes en 1512 y 1513, en Burgos y Valladolid respectivamente. A este respecto tampoco podemos obviar el papel de las Leyes de Indias, una monumental obra jurídica que reguló la vida de las sociedades hispanoamericanas y les ofreció estabilidad durante los 300 años de pertenencia al imperio e incluso hoy, 200 años después de la independencia de estos territorios.

Curiosamente, y lejos de las habituales falsedades históricas, la Ilustración negó los derechos que la Corona Española dio a las poblaciones indígenas, al tiempo que daba nuevos bríos a la leyenda negra y actualizaba sus contenidos bajo las acusaciones de país atrasado, de ignorantes e incultos por culpa de la Inquisición, que no formaba parte de la civilización. Paralelamente, desde el ámbito anglosajón no hay ni una palabra respecto al exterminio de poblaciones nativas norteamericanas a lo largo del siglo XIX. En el mismo contexto, la Ilustración aprobaba la persecución de los católicos, a los que se colocaba al mismo nivel que los ateos o los musulmanes, como ocurre en la obra de John Locke o para el propio Voltaire.

Con el advenimiento del liberalismo en el siglo XIX asistimos a una reescritura de la historia en el caso de potencias coloniales como Inglaterra y Francia, que pretenden retrotraer los orígenes mucho más atrás, en una suerte de revisionismo que, inevitablemente termina por contribuir a alimentar la leyenda negra hispanófoba. En este contexto se reproducen los mismos patrones clásicos de la leyenda, a los que se añaden, merced al racismo científico, la idea de la inferioridad de los españoles y la existencia de elementos debilitados de sangre goda en su sustrato racial, presa de la degeneración, el atraso y la intolerancia. Frente al Imperio Español está aquel inglés, próspero, rico y democrático. Lo cierto es que Inglaterra fracasa en Norteamérica, al igual que Francia en su experiencia colonial anterior al siglo XIX. Ahora se impone un nuevo fenómeno, que es aquel del colonialismo, en el que hay una diferencia esencial, y es la desigualdad jurídica entre colonia y metrópoli en beneficio, obviamente, de ésta última. El carácter depredador, y la ausencia de estructuras de civilización, como aquellas del Imperio Español, caracterizan a estos modelos coloniales, en los que las colonias sirven de mercados cautivos para alimentar la industria de la potencia colonizadora (Véase el ejemplo de la India en el caso británico).

Durante esta época toma fuerza como nuevo componente de la leyenda negra, la idea de que la expulsión de los judíos en 1492 fue el motivo de la caída y degeneración del poder imperial español, en una afirmación sin un atisbo de realidad histórica. Está dentro del contexto de la llamada «Ilustración judía», vinculada al nacimiento del sionismo, que muestra un afán revanchista y frustración frente a España, pese a que la expulsión de los judíos o las persecuciones de las que son objeto son un fenómeno generalizado en toda Europa. Como decimos, es una idea sin base histórica, ya que hay estudios que demuestran que el impacto de su expulsión fue bastante atenuado y a nivel local.

En el siglo XIX también es muy importante otro fenómeno que nos afecta a nosotros, como españoles, y es la interiorización completa y absoluta de la leyenda negra, que es asimilada como verdadera y conoce su culminación en los numerosos actos de mortificación, de lamentos y derrotismo, con la generación del 98. Al asumirla como cierta, lo hacen con todos sus tópicos relacionados con la España atrasada, oscura y bárbara de la inquisición. Es la España concebida como anomalía histórica o como un proyecto invertebrado en términos orteguianos, incapaz de superar sus frustraciones. Hay un excesivo celo en la autocrítica y la flagelación, y una importancia demasiado grande hacia lo que se dice de España en el exterior.

En el presente los mismos antagonismos que recorren siglos enteros, y que colocan a católicos y protestantes en trincheras enfrentadas, ayudan a perpetuar viejos prejuicios, en diferentes contextos, como aquel económico al que hace alusión Mª Elvira Roca. Los países mediterráneos aparecen como corruptos e insolventes, «de poco fiar», frente a la laboriosidad y fiabilidad de los países del Norte de Europa, aquellos históricamente protestantes, que pese a mostrarse poco fiables en el pago de deudas históricas (la autora menciona la deuda alemana contraída en 1919, en el Tratado de Versalles, o la deuda de Reino Unido contraída con el FMI en 1976, en contraposición al rescate de Grecia en el 2008 y los prejuicios generados en torno a la nación mediterránea). Los países católicos son los llamados PIGS (Portugal, Italia, Grecia y España), sobre los que pesa un viejo estigma que guarda relación con la leyenda negra y el anticatolicismo recalcitrante que imperó en estos países hasta bien entrado el siglo XIX.

Lejos de disminuir o apagarse en sus efectos, la leyenda negra sigue vigente en nuestros días, y se manifiesta en formas de ocio y entretenimiento populares, en el cine, en la literatura o en una serie de afirmaciones tópicas y arquetípicas que siguen condicionando la visión del mundo hispánico y de su historia en el presente. Nosotros añadiríamos, que en el caso particular de España la leyenda negra se manifiesta de forma muy preocupante en el ámbito político, dentro del campo de los intelectuales oficiales del régimen, en la conformación de un frente hispanófobo que muestra una denodada voluntad por desfigurar nuestro pasado, incluso hasta el punto de negar la identidad misma de España como nación histórica, y no solo en el fragor de sus siglos áureos, alimentando falsas identidades históricas en los separatismos periféricos o, cumpliendo con los antiguos patrones más rancios de la hispanofobia, hablando de una España como crisol de razas y por ello privada de una identidad concreta o estable en su devenir histórico.

Recomendamos además los siguientes vídeos y artículos para profundizar en este tema:

• María Elvira Roca Barea «Imperiofobia y leyenda negra»

• Fortunata y Jacinta: Desmontando la leyenda negra

• Filosofia.org. Imperios depredadores / Imperios generadores: Dialéctrica entre fines particulares (moleculares) / fines del Imperio (molares)

• Villacañas: Impostura y oportunismo.

---

Artículo original: «Imperiofobia y leyenda negra», de Mª Elvira Roca Barea, Hipérbola Janus, 25/Jul/2020

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |BURCKHARDT, Titus, Chartres y el nacimiento de la catedral, Olañeta, 2011|

Es la primera vez que reseñamos un libro de esta naturaleza y características, que se adentra con tal profundidad en aspectos tan variados como el arte, la arquitectura y el simbolismo, que son los elementos que confluyen en la presente obra, y que nos invitan a un análisis global y orgánico de un fenómeno histórico y artístico que marca los siglos centrales de la Edad Media. Nos estamos refiriendo, como es obvio, al nacimiento del estilo gótico a través de su creación más arquetípica y universal: la catedral, y no cualquier catedral, sino aquella de Chartres, que marca el inicio y difusión de una nueva forma de concebir el templo religioso, bajo unas innovaciones técnicas y un armazón simbólico que genera una nueva realidad y que es expresión de una mentalidad y una forma de ver el mundo. Esta percepción está vigente en cualquier producción o manufactura humana, siempre encierra bajo sus formas una cosmovisión particular, y así, por ejemplo, lo vemos en los edificios modernos, aunque sean templos religiosos, que suelen ser estéticamente feos y espiritualmente vacíos, sin alma, porque son fruto de una civilización que se ha deshecho de cualquier aspiración trascendente o espiritual, viviendo en una horizontalidad que se transmite en todas sus creaciones.

El autor, el pensador tradicionalista suizo Titus Burckhardt, destacó en sus escritos por sus análisis y teorías estéticas acerca del arte en diferentes modelos de civilización, y en este caso en el Cristianismo con una de sus realizaciones más logradas a nivel artístico y simbólico. El propio Burckhardt ya nos pone sobre aviso nada más comenzar su obra, advirtiendo que no se trata de un ensayo artístico o científico, sino que éste se postula antes que nada como un ensayo espiritual. Como decíamos, Chartres es el centro y el arquetipo de un modelo de civilización, su culminación. Y es que el hombre del medievo, que no gozaba de los avances científicos y materiales del presente, de las ventajas técnicas o de la información que poseemos hoy nosotros, sin embargo sí eran depositarios de una concepción espiritual clara y objetiva, de una Idea expresada a través de un mundo simbólico poblado por verdades eternas.

La catedral, como expresión creativa del gótico, tiene su propia génesis que, como en el caso de todos los templos religiosos de la cristiandad, remontaban su origen a la basílica romana en un momento en el cual el Cristianismo no había elaborado todavía su propio lenguaje simbólico, como vemos a través del arte paleocristiano. Normalmente, este tipo de edificios, consagrados tanto a actividades profanas como religiosas, contaban con espacios abiertos flanqueados por hileras de columnas en calles dispuestas como mercados. Entre sus elementos más característicos, como destaca Burckhardt, se encontraba el atrium, que ejercía la función entre el mundo exterior y el templo religioso propiamente dicho. Este espacio de transición tenía sus propias connotaciones simbólicas, y estaba lleno de plantas y árboles que servían para rememorar el Paraíso y el estado edénico. Junto a estos elementos también había una fuente, que nos remiten al bautismo y el renacimiento. Por ese motivo los catecúmenos permanecían en el atrio durante la celebración de la misa. Desde este atrio se accedía a la basílica y a cuatro naves laterales. La nave central terminaba en el arco del triunfo y marcaba el límite del transepto. En el fondo, delante del ábside encontramos el altar, que estaba sobreelevado. Las tres partes en las que podemos dividir la basílica paleocristiana definirían simbólicamente las tres etapas de la vida de todo creyente: purificación, iluminación y unión con Dios, a su vez vinculados con el bautismo, la enseñanza sagrada y la unión con Dios. La semicúpula abovedada que conforma el techo del ábside representa el cielo, y es el espacio destinado a la manifestación divina, por ello, bajo éste, encontramos al altar cerrado, en lo que representa la acotación de un espacio sagrado para el profano. La disposición del espacio no era, ni mucho menos, fruto del capricho de los arquitectos y constructores, sino que respondía a un simbolismo cardinal al que se remitirán todas las iglesias en lo sucesivo. Éstas eran orientadas en función de los ejes cósmicos y los preceptos bíblicos, en una tarea de ordenación que obedecía al propio sentido del cosmos. En el arte gótico, esta particular disposición del espacio sagrado la veremos reflejada en la orientación de las temáticas que adornan las vidrieras.

|| |:-:| |Planta de una basílica paleocristiana|

En el momento que se elegía un lugar para edificar el templo religioso, éste se convertía en un centro del mundo visible, en la intersección con el cielo, y capaz de desarrollar entre sus muros una concepción del mundo, una expresión del universo a escala más reducida e integrada en las jerarquías celestes. El altar, por ejemplo, representa el centro del mundo, donde se manifiesta la presencia divina. El santuario significa la reconciliación de la tierra con el cielo, y la restauración de un vínculo que quedó roto con el pecado original, y en consecuencia acerca al hombre a lo eterno. Aquí se deja ver un simbolismo geométrico, que determina la forma cuadrada del santuario que representa a la tierra frente a la forma abovedada del techo que vendría a ser el cielo.

Tampoco es casual ni fruto del capricho el material de construcción utilizado, la piedra, que por su dureza y solidez viene a corresponder simbólicamente con la estabilidad y duración eterna de la iglesia de Cristo. Al mismo tiempo, este sentido anagógico del templo en relación a la figura del Salvador se deja ver en la propia disposición del plano en cruz latina en la que el altar es la cabeza, mientras que el transepto son los brazos y las manos extendidas sobre la cruz, en correspondencia con el martirio y al mismo tiempo con la ley cósmica bajo la que vivía el hombre del medievo. De modo que aquel que había sido clavado en la cruz debía de restaurar el orden cósmico que había sido alterado. El fin no es otro que recrear nuevamente la Jerusalén celestial como culminación de esta acción restauradora, más allá del tiempo y el espacio, en un modelo estático y eterno.

Respecto a cuestiones menos simbólicas, y más relacionadas con la técnica y los conocimientos arquitectónicos de la época, la base fundamental para levantar el templo, la encontramos nuevamente en el mundo romano, y más concretamente en la obra de Vitrubio. Siempre se utilizaba el mismo procedimiento, que Burckhardt nos describe magistralmente en la presente obra, a partir de una estaca vertical clavada en el suelo, sobre la cual se describía un círculo con un compás y se iban trazando círculos sobre la propia curvatura del mismo generando intersecciones en diferentes direcciones para establecer los ángulos del edificio, en un proceso que también tenía sus connotaciones simbólicas y servía para delimitar el espacio espiritual y sagrado sobre el que se levantaría el templo.

Para ir concretando un poco más, la irrupción del gótico en un plano más técnico y arquitectónico, tiene lugar en el momento en el que se intentó recubrir la basílica con bóvedas, en la búsqueda de una serie de innovaciones que marcaron una clara transición hacia un nuevo modelo, después de que éste se hubiera mantenido inalterado durante todo el románico. Se trataba de cambiar los techos, con su armadura de madera, por una bóveda de piedra. Durante el románico la bóveda también conoció su propio desarrollo con la bóveda de cañón, que debido al empuje que ejercía sobre los muros laterales impidió que en éstos se pudieran abrir ventanas o aligerar su grosor. La búsqueda de la bóveda también tuvo sus connotaciones simbólicas, relacionadas con el nacimiento de Cristo en una cueva, como parte del mundo interior, vinculado al mundo del corazón y el alma, de ahí el interés en desarrollarla sobre ese plano.

El románico basaba su superioridad en un espíritu de unidad, con sus formas geométricas claras y bien definidas en el espacio, en una imagen de unidad compacta y grandeza. En cambio, la catedral gótica en su proceso de evolución empleó la intersección de varias bóvedas de cañón del que resultaba una bóveda de aristas, que permitía un mejor reparto del peso en su reparto sobre los ángulos del crucero cuadrangular del transepto. De modo que este recurso fue utilizado y explotado por el gótico generando techos abovedados a voluntad. La revolución del gótico estuvo sobre todo en la forma de concebir el espacio, que afectó tanto al tratamiento de la luz, de los muros como de las propias bóvedas, que parecían suspendidas en el espacio. El desarrollo de estos nuevos tipos de cúpula que no recurrían a los pilares únicamente sin hacerlo sobre los muros de apoyo. La utilización de los arcos apuntados y de ojiva con sus nervaduras sobre cuatro secciones permitió darle continuidad y una mayor altura, además de dar lugar a una variedad de formas arquitectónicas que aparecieron bajo el gótico.

Fruto de estas transformaciones, y de la nueva forma de concebir el espacio, el gótico podrá dar un nuevo sentido, con infinitas posibilidades, al mismo, abriendo ventanas en los muros o arbotantes en la parte exterior de éstos, además de la estructura en tres niveles (arcos formeros, triforios y vanos). La entrada de la luz a través de las vidrieras también permitirá dar una mayor unidad al interior del templo, y establecer un juego simbólico en el que la luz del cielo parece descender generando una imagen de Jerusalén celestial.

Dentro del proceso de consagración del nuevo estilo, los obispos, junto a la realeza, jugaron un papel esencial en el desarrollo del gótico, y en particular debemos remitirnos a San Dionisio, que fue el primer obispo de París, a quien estaba consagrada la catedral de Saint-Denis, donde se iniciaron una serie de reformas sobre el edificio antiguo que comenzaron a prefigurar el estilo gótico. Por otro lado, Dionisio de Aeropagita, al que Burckhardt considera el difusor de la doctrina del simbolismo en el arte más completa, sirvió como fundamento del nuevo modelo. A través de su doctrina neoplatónica, Dionisio de Aeropagita consideraba la existencia de una gradación de lo real a través de una única luz divina, en función de la cual se generaban arquetipos de lo eterno, de las Ideas. Bajo esta visión de lo espiritual se trataba de superar la dualidad existente entre criatura y creador, sin olvidar la relación de jerarquía con las inconmensurables diferencias que los separan. De este pensamiento emana la base de las referencias simbólicas en la representación de los arquetipos eternos y el sentido de unidad que impera en el conjunto, concebido como un todo orgánico pero diferenciado. Y la idea fundamental de que las cosas terrenales deben ser un reflejo, en la medida de lo posible, del orden celestial.

En ese sentido, Chartres representa tanto la culminación de las teorías de Areopagita, discípulo de San Pablo, en el terreno simbólico, como aquellas innovaciones dentro del ámbito de la técnica y la arquitectura tan característicos del gótico. Suger, que fue abad de Saint-Denís, asumió por completo esta visión y la aplicó a partir de 1132 en la reconstrucción de este templo, cuya construcción data de época carolingia. En Saint-Denis empezaron a mezclarse elementos románicos con otros del incipiente estilo gótico, y lo vemos a través del uso del rosetón, como rueda cósmica y emblema cristológico, en origen procedente del mundo islámico, o bien los pórticos, que muestran elementos del Apocalipsis sobre el tímpano y esculturas sobre las jambas de las puertas. Suger trató de armonizar el viejo edificio con el nuevo en una mezcla armónica de estilos. También se enfrentó a problemas técnicos bastante complejos, como los relacionados con las bóvedas, que ya no precisaban de las cimbras de madera que sostenían la mampostería o el uso de andamiajes complejos. 

En lo que se refiere a la construcción de Chartres, se convirtió en el nuevo objeto del culto mariano, y despertó una gran devoción que trascendió cualquier diferencia de carácter estamental, pobres y ricos se sumaron a los esfuerzos necesarios para su construcción, movidos por la devoción a la Virgen María y el espíritu de cruzada. Incluso había una leyenda que remontaba el culto mariano a los druidas de la Galia celta, y decía que éstos habían adorado a una Virgen que dio a luz en la cueva del pozo sobre la que está construida la catedral. De hecho, hasta la revolución francesa, se conservó una estatuilla votiva de la Virgen con el niño, respecto a la cual se desconoce si pudo ser de origen galorromano o una copia medieval. Por otro lado, se veneraba como parte del relicario del templo una túnica de la Virgen que Carlomagno había traído de Bizancio a Aquisgrán, y que Carlos el Calvo ofreció a Chartres en el 876.

La fachada occidental de Chartres fue construida entre 1140 y 1150, y en ella ya vemos prefigurados elementos característicos del gótico como la serenidad en la representación de los personajes y el abandono del hieratismo más propio del románico. Se aprecia un complejo desarrollo simbólico en las figuras representadas, y que vemos a través de la imagen de Cristo, que aparece tres veces, en cada uno de los tímpanos de las tres puertas de la fachada. En las esculturas y bajorrelieves que las adornan se describen las etapas de la vida de Jesús, hay referencias a los patriarcas y profetas del Antiguo Testamento y a los Apóstoles del Nuevo Testamento. A diferencia del románico, donde estas representaciones se integran en la estructura arquitectónica, prevaleciendo la función técnica del edificio, aquí vemos como las esculturas, esculpidas sobre la superficie de la piedra, adquieren una mayor autonomía que les hace despegar el cuerpo del edificio. Tampoco faltan las representaciones de la Virgen María, protectora del templo, sobre los tímpanos de las puertas, que se subdividen en varias partes, mostrando una gran variedad de elementos simbólicos perfectamente ordenados y con un sentido orgánico de totalidad. Porque otro de los elementos comunes a las catedrales medievales es poder significar en ellas el universo entero (espíritu, alma y cuerpo) en sus tímpanos y arquivoltas. Titus Burckhardt dedica un buen número de páginas a explicar con todo lujo de detalles los motivos que decoran las puertas de las diferentes fachadas de Chartres y sus significaciones litúrgicas y simbólicas. 

Otra de las ideas destacables en este libro, es la que se refiere al método y la forma de concebir el edificio como construcción, en su vertiente arquitectónica, bajo una concepción cualitativa frente a aquella cuantitativa, en referencia a esa idea de totalidad orgánica a la que ya nos hemos referido anteriormente. Y este sentido cualitativo y orgánico no encuentra su mejor expresión en el número sino en la geometría, en una relación de correspondencia entre la unidad aritmética y las formas geométricas que permiten reducir a la unidad la multiplicidad de elementos que concurren en el espacio. De hecho, este es un principio característico de la mentalidad medieval, la contemplación global de la existencia, lo cual permitía una mayor amplitud de visión espiritual al concebir cualquier creación. Todas las formas físicas y mensurables tenían su equivalente en lo eterno e inconmensurable en una visión neoplatónica muy imbricada en la forma de concebir el arte en el medievo. 

La utilización de una compleja ley geométrica en la construcción del templo gótico delata que el maestro de obras debía dominar amplios conocimientos tanto en el arte, albañilería como en la geometría estética y mecánica. Eran los responsables de todo, tanto a nivel arquitectónico como decorativo en la ejecución de estatuas y relieves. De acuerdo con esta ley geométrica las dimensiones del edificio se establecían sobre el terreno antes de su construcción mediante el uso de una figura geométrica, en particular con el cuadrado, pero también con otras figuras geométricas más complejas como el pentágono, hexágono, octógono y decágono. El cuadrado y el octógono se consideraban las formas perfectas, determinantes en la unidad de conjunto del todo. El uso de una figura geométrica directriz delataba una concepción del mundo que Dante supo ver y expresar a través de La Divina Comedia. Y es que para el autor florentino la geometría se movía en dos magnitudes no mensurables: por un lado el punto que está en el origen de toda figura pero que carece al mismo tiempo de extensión, o el círculo cuya forma no se deja agotar por ninguna subdivisión. En ambos casos se trata de símbolos de la unidad divina. Encontrar la unidad del círculo se convirtió, precisamente, en la culminación del arte en el Medievo.

Para finalizar, el libro incluye también, a modo de epilogo, una referencia al Santo Grial y el templo perfecto, en singular semejanza con aquel de la Jerusalén Celeste, cuya descripción se incluye en El joven Titurel, una obra de Albrecht von Scharfenberg, en la línea de Wolfram von Eschenbach, donde desde la ubicación del templo, sobre una montaña, hasta los elementos que se utilizan en su construcción, orientación etc, se encuentran regulados y moldeados por la acción de los movimientos celestes. No en vano no debemos olvidar que el Grial, leyenda de origen precristiano en su origen, simboliza, antes que nada, el receptáculo del conocimiento divino. No obstante, ningún arquitecto ni constructor pudo edificar lo que el poeta describió a través de un juego de metáforas y alegorías que marcó el fin de una era de floración espiritual.

---

Artículo original: «Chartres y el nacimiento de la catedral», de Titus Burckhardt, Hipérbola Janus, 19/Ene/2021

@ c11cf5f8:4928464d

Here we are again with our now monthly The Magnificent Seven updates, aiming to give you a hit on what you missed in the ~AGORA territory.

---

Top-Performing Ads

We did it this month too! Surprisingly, we are seen some brave entrepreneurial minds sharing their good and services and needs with the SN community. We know we are few, we also are small,

• 01 [SELL] $300 USD for sats via PayPal (0% Premium) on Robosats by @npub1q67p49masrcjf__d7qaq6mwh0q
• 02 [For Sale] My record collection, maybe??? by @DesertDave
• 03 [WANTED] Fiat bridges and/or agents for social media fiat revenue by @justadog
• 04 [BUY] Does anyone have an invite code for RiseUpNet services? by @mo
• 05 [⚖️ SELL] Business Loans by @herschel
• 06 Anyone Interested in Hand-Made Outdoor Equipment? by @Fabs
• 07 This changes everything by @Bell_curve

---

I really enjoyed seeing @Fabs starting something new in the ~DIY spectrum, leveraging his skills and expertise to create new handmade products https://stacker.news/items/614282/r/AG, https://stacker.news/items/634664/r/AG! Congrats, wish the stardust wind will accompany you during this fabulous journey ✨

---

In case you missed

Many sunny times over here, with new Suns is rising. Brains are boiling under societal pressure. Those wise enough, protected under the shade of reason, know new breezes are blooming. Many, confused by necessity, continue to ignore.

I'm surprised to see so many new conversations, thanks @supratic, the turn taken is fascinating for me! Stackers and Bitcoiners, having access to a privileged tool, sometime forget that freedom is a journey and not a destination. When Plan B it's already in place... what about Plan A? This past month the ~AGORA has seen many post about sovereignty, freedom and the belief system able to free not only our body from slavery, but also our mind and spirit.

Enjoy earning more with the top ones below:

• I We a Democracy or a Republic? by @mo
• II The United States Corporation by @supratic
• III Governments are registered Business, what's their most valuable asset? by @supratic
• IV Retired Judge Spills The Beans by @supratic
• V Sovereign Power and Responsibility by @supratic
• VI The Lawful Remedy - Episode 14 | Richard Vobe + Allegedly Dave & Peter Wilson by @supratic
• VII Adequate money supply needed by @supratic

---

Just a reminder for you all

This territory aims to connect stackers and curious buyers for IRL P2P Bitcoin deals. Have fun checking what else stackers are shilling globally in the ~AGORA. This is a great time for you to make some space un-dusting some stuff that has been sitting there for too long and get some sats for it!

To incentivize more conversation and a more libre mindset, we decided to adopt the zapshare approach, so we'll split the rewards of this TM7 to the best contributors plus zaps to the posts that offer much PoW when posting.

---

Create your Ads now!

Looking to start something new? Tap one of the links below to free your mind:

• [💬 TOPIC] for conversation,
• [⚖️ SELL] anything! or,
• if you're looking for something, hit the [🛒 BUY]!
• [🧑‍💻 HIRE] any bitcoiner skill or stuff from bitcoiners
• [🖇 OFFER] any product or service and stack more sats
• [🧑‍⚖️ AUCTION] to let stackers decide a fair price for your item
• [🤝 SWAP] if you're looking to exchange anything with anything else
• [🆓 FREE] your space, make a gift!
• [⭐ REVIEW] any bitcoin product or LN service you recently bought or subscribed to

---

Or contact @AGORA team on nostr DM and we can help you publish a personalized post.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/639956

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |BLANCO, Carlos X., Un imperio frente al caos, EAS, 2021|

Reseñamos la tercera obra del profesor y filósofo Carlos X. Blanco, Un imperio frente al caos, que consideramos como la más lograda de las reseñadas hasta el momento, y que se encontraría más cerca en sus hipótesis y consideraciones a aquello que defendemos desde Hipérbola Janus. Eduard Alcántara, autor del prólogo y reputado autor y pensador evoliano, también destaca la importancia en los preliminares de aquellos elementos clave que vertebran la esencia de la obra y sirven como hilo conductor. El Imperio y la civilización cristiana aparecen como el modelo ejemplar y el eje de la historia europea, dentro de estas categorías se desarrollan los puntales básicos de la Civilización que históricamente han construido la idea de Europa y sus gentes. Son categorías que entrañan en sí mismas ideas-fuerza frente al caos y desorden posmoderno. Nos hablan de la Civilización del Ser, del Orden, del arraigo y, lo que es fundamental, del encuentro entre lo sensible y lo suprasensible, entre lo material y espiritual.

Buscar un asidero de valores y principios fuertes, bien pertrechados en las tradiciones orgánicas y en un modelo de civilización que priorice la necesidad de autoafirmación y soberanía de los europeos frente al relativismo y los múltiples frentes de destrucción que nos atenazan es una cuestión de supervivencia. Este modelo de civilización Carlos Blanco la encuentra en el Medievo, en un modelo construido sobre las bases de unas relaciones socioéticas jerárquicas y de lealtades personales que toma la doctrina de Cristo como centro fundamental de su Cosmovisión. Eduard Alcántara nos remite a la doctrina evoliana y nos habla del «hombre fugaz» como el tipo humano predominante en nuestros días, caracterizado por la anestesia moral y la huida e inconsistencia permanente. Y es que, como nos señala de forma reiterada Carlos Blanco, la posmodernidad ha dejado de ser burguesa.

La Cristiandad medieval y la idea de Imperium son el reflejo de una relación de continuidad entre la Antigüedad con todas sus herencias grecorromanas y latinas que se funden con aquellas celtogermanas para restaurar las vías de contacto entre el macrocosmos y el microcosmos dentro de un orden sagrado, orgánico y tradicional. La máxima expresión del Imperio lo tenemos con el Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico. En nuestro caso particular, en el de España, sus orígenes se encuentran íntimamente vinculados a los del orbe cristiano medieval y representa una continuidad respecto a la herencia clásica de la que ésta era portadora y depositaria, como el elemento hispánico lo es de la Catolicidad, que a su vez aparecen indefectiblemente ligados al Imperio.

Nuestro autor reivindica la construcción de un nuevo ciclo histórico ascendente para el mundo hispánico a través de una reconstitución de sus antiguos territorios como bloque geopolítico frente a una decrépita, degenerada y mercantilizada UE, para dejar de ser un agregado colonial estadounidense. Para ello habría que buscar ese impulso fáustico, bajo los omnipresentes parámetros del pensamiento spengleriano siempre presentes en la obra de Blanco, que en los comienzos hizo suyo la monarquía asturiana, en los inicios de la Reconquista, para volver a reconstituir el Imperio, cuyo sentido profundo nos remite a la espiritualidad solar, orgánica y viril, aunque, como nos apunta Eduard Alcántara en su prólogo, no estaría exenta de elementos propios del polo lunar y femenino que se han ido manifestando a lo largo de nuestra historia. En este sentido es muy interesante la referencia bibliográfica al escrito póstumo de Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, Germanos contra bereberes, o La gaita y la lira, donde podemos apreciar trazos de la pugna de ambos polos espirituales, en el devenir histórico hispánico.

La Modernidad representa el Mal Absoluto, la división y destrucción de los cimientos de la civilización que con tanto esfuerzo y tenacidad construyeron aquellos que nos precedieron. Y la antítesis de este modelo de Civilización lo encontramos en la Cristiandad medieval, que en ningún caso representa un mundo oscuro y bárbaro ni una etapa de transición entre el mundo antiguo y la modernidad. Muy por el contrario, debemos hablar de una nueva civilización que brotó del fermento y detritus de la Antigüedad clásica revalorizando su herencia, fusionando diversos elementos étnicos (celtogermanos y latinos) y sentando las bases para el nacimiento de Europa, en cuya génesis el Cristianismo fue determinante. Esta Europa se gestó bajo una nueva cosmovisión en la que se consideraba una dualidad de poderes (laico y eclesiástico) que alcanzaban su máxima expresión y síntesis bajo el modelo imperial con su idea bicéfala del poder (Estado/Iglesia) con las Cruzadas o la Reconquista como la expresión más pura de su la misión salvífica y civilizadora. Y en este contexto la Hispanidad, forjada en el devenir de los siglos medievales, aparece como el verdadero Katehon, un bastión frente a la modernidad.

Pero la Hispanidad, y esta es una idea muy importante, no tiene absolutamente nada que ver con el «nacionalismo español», que al fin y al cabo es una concepción moderna, de inspiración jacobina y que se desarrolla en el marco del Estado-nación, homologable con cualquier otra nación europea estándar. Aquí la Hispanidad aparece como un proyecto imperial, espiritual y civilizador que recoge todas las herencias del mundo clásico y medieval y halla su máxima expresión en la Reconquista y la Catolicidad frente al desorden moderno de las iglesias protestantes del Norte de Europa, con su fanatismo retrógrado y su materialismo usurero y explotador. Aquel de la Hispanidad es un modelo de civilización antitético respecto a la civilización burguesa de los Derechos Humanos y la humanidad abstracta. La Hispanidad es además portadora de una Cosmovisión completa de la existencia a todos los niveles, tanto filosófica (metapolítica) como histórica frente al caos actual.

Otro elemento destacable del que nos habla Carlos Blanco es la categorización del Occidente europeo como un subproducto moderno de origen liberal y burgués, construido sobre las bases de la Europa anglosajona, puritana y mercantil. Además fue este mismo Occidente el que socavó la civilización cristiana medieval. De manera coetánea, el Imperio de los Habsburgo, representó a las fuerzas del orden frente al caos preconizado por el Norte protestante, un intento por salvar la civilización cristiana del Medievo. En este sentido la derrota de la Monarquía hispánica supuso también la pérdida de Europa y de todo el legado de valores espirituales superiores, que terminaron destruidos por la acción del liberalismo anglofrancés, el iluminismo y la masonería.

Esta misma decadencia que nos atenaza, aparece claramente descrita en la filosofía spengleriana a través de la ley de correspondencias, que establece conexiones entre épocas cronológicamente lejanas en virtud de unos mismos atributos y características, y en este caso particular Carlos Blanco asocia la época final del reino visigodo de Toledo, con todos los elementos de descomposición que lo caracterizan los comienzos del siglo VIII, a la España actual, integrada en el Occidente posmoderno, igualmente en fase de disolución. Las coyunturas históricas son coincidentes y nos hablan de un ciclo terminal tanto en el caso de la monarquía goda como en el del Régimen del 78, con la concurrencia de las mismas fuerzas disgregadoras.

Uno de los capítulos está dedicado a las visiones sobre el fenómeno hispánico de Ángel Ganivet a través de su conocida obra, Idearium español, donde se describe uno de los rasgos de identidad más característicos del Imperio Español: la teocracia hispana, y con ésta la especificidad del Catolicismo hispánico. Esta teocracia comenzaría a forjarse durante la monarquía goda y vendría a consolidarse bajo astures, leoneses y castellanos, dando lugar a la concepción sagrada de la Corona que terminaría por convertirse en el atributo más notable del poder imperial español en el mundo. Por otro lado, en sus teorías Ganivet también señala un aspecto muy importante, como fue la lucha por la independencia contra un enemigo que trata de apoderarse del solar patrio, como un revulsivo y motor del alma española en su devenir histórico. Los ejemplos son sobradamente conocidos al respecto (la Reconquista, La Guerra de Independencia contra Napoleón etc). De hecho, el autor granadino nos describe ya dinámicas geopolíticas como las que hacen referencia a potencias talasocráticas (Gran Bretaña) y telurocráticas (Francia o Alemania) o la naturaleza del Imperio español, que podríamos definir como una mixtura de las dos categorías mencionadas, en un proyecto cristiano-europeo organizado en torno a comunidades orgánicas que se regían por lazos de solidaridad y subsidiariedad. En este sentido, destaca Carlos Blanco, la obra de Ángel Ganivet nos presenta ideas clave e intuiciones en el pasado y futuro de España, y además permite una lectura en clave geopolítica.

Además, hay que tener en cuenta que este modelo de civilización que representaba el Imperio Católico Español se cimentó sobre un sustrato guerrero y campesino que dotó de hombres los cuadros de la nobleza, la Iglesia, el pensamiento y la propia acción conquistadora desde la Reconquista hasta la misma configuración del Imperio de Ultramar. A modo de antítesis llegó la Europa moderna, construida sobre una base burguesa, protestante y anglosajona, que en la actual posmodernidad ha dejado de ser burguesa al tiempo que la globalización deshumanizadora y apátrida se va abriendo paso con los gobiernos tecnocráticos y dictatoriales, las masas ociosas y subsidiadas, la destrucción del pueblo trabajador y la extensión del nihilismo y la autodestrucción por doquier. 

Nos encontramos ante una España que renuncia a la noción geopolítica y espiritual de la que históricamente es portadora. Y es que la Hispanidad se erige en el siglo XXI como un bloque geopolítico como lo pueda ser China en el sudeste asiático o el mundo árabe. Posee una cultura común y planetaria cuyas herencias impregnan los continentes, con millones de personas y extensiones territoriales en la antigua América española que aparecen como una vía para preservar nuestra soberanía e independencia. Además la Hispanidad es una idea que dinamita por completo el proyecto globalizador y del Nuevo Orden Mundial en ciernes que se proyecta amenazador sobre nuestro futuro inmediato. Vivimos una época crepuscular, en la que las certezas y seguridades de antaño desaparecen del mismo modo que lo hacen aquellos lazos orgánicos que nos permitían cobijarnos bajo una Patria, fe o comunidad orgánica. Un nuevo totalitarismo, tecnocrático y transhumanista se cierne sobre el mundo entero con el uso de la tecnología y su virtualidad como la peor de las tiranías y formas de esclavitud.

En otro de los capítulos Carlos Blanco contrapone la visión de Joseph Campbell, desde la mitología, a aquella de Oswald Spengler, que destaca cómo las culturas tienen un carácter único y exclusivo, una identidad propia, para contradecir las teorías difusionistas defendidas por el autor estadounidense. Al mismo tiempo, en el diálogo entre Occidente y Levante se manifiestan la pugna entre los polos solar y lunar de la existencia, y como aquellos elementos europeos autóctonos son los que prevalecieron en la forja de aquellos valores orgánicos y viriles de la Antigüedad clásica grecorromana, mientras que aquellos levantinos han generado desvirilización y disgregación de esa unidad orgánica en Occidente a través de diferentes corrientes como el pitagorismo, gnosticismo etc. De tal modo que el éxito de Occidente siempre ha dependido de su capacidad para contener al Levante semita. De hecho, aquí reside una de las claves en la génesis hispánica a través de la monarquía asturiana y el Noroeste peninsular, en la conservación de un sustrato indígena privado de elementos afrosemíticos y levantinos. 

En lo sucesivo vienen una serie de capítulos que vienen a aclarar los posibles equívocos y errores conceptuales que puedan derivarse, por ejemplo, del término bárbaro y lo que éste supone, como sinónimo de destrucción o tiempos de oscuridad y decadencia. Apoyándose en las teorías del catedrático de Prehistoria Carlos Alonso del Real, nuestro autor reivindica el papel higiénico o de depuración del bárbaro, comprendiendo siempre un papel diferente en función de su dialéctica con otros pueblos y dependiendo de su grado de aculturación, de hecho el bárbaro aparece como un ariete de lo viejo y semilla de lo nuevo. El mejor ejemplo lo vemos en la península ibérica con los godos del Reino de Toledo o los astures y cántabros, que en su momento también fueron percibidos como bárbaros y posteriormente integrados en la Alta Cultura llegando a ser expresión y vehículo del alma fáustica frente al invasor sarraceno a partir del 711. 

En lo que concierne al Imperium hay que destacar que entraña una concepción del poder y de la soberanía completamente diferente a aquella del Estado-nación. Hablamos de un poder que aglutina a diferentes etnias y estados, con un carácter plurinacional que, en el transcurso del Medievo, se alimentó de la nostalgia del Imperio Romano, respecto al cual pretendía representar una continuidad en cuanto a sus concepciones jerárquicas y orgánico-cualitativas, en la condición jurídica de las personas o en los lazos de lealtad personal y sujeción a una ley suprema o trascendente que debe mucho a la anhelada romanidad clásica. En este sentido, nada que ver con las ideologías modernas y jacobinas adscritas al Estado-nación posrevolucionario. Por ese motivo es fundamental desarrollar una teoría del Imperio, que nada tiene que ver con el imperialismo entendido en sentido moderno, asociado a un expansionismo agresivo para invadir y someter a pueblos que sí desarrolló el mundo anglosajón. El Imperio es una construcción geopolítica y civilizadora efectiva, en la que los métodos de conquista y control están destinados a conseguir una integración a través de pactos consentidos o de modo federado entre otras posibilidades. Este fue el modelo imperial español hasta el advenimiento de los Borbones, que homologaron el trato con los territorios hispánicos de Ultramar al modelo anglosajón de colonia de explotación y extracción económica, con la desigualdad jurídica de sus habitantes respecto a los peninsulares, provocando la desafección de las élites del Nuevo Mundo y preparando el camino para la pérdida del Imperio. El Imperio español no fue nunca depredatorio y siempre tuvo una motivación espiritual profunda como era la civilización cristiana universal. 

Más allá de estas cuestiones, cabe preguntarse, siguiendo la teoría de Elvira Roca Barea, de si España es una nación tal y como se deriva de la acepción moderna del término, y que en este caso prevalece la interpretación de la derecha liberal española bajo unos razonamientos jacobinos simplistas, poco racionales y acríticos. La España de la unidad religiosa del Reino de Toledo, la de la emergente monarquía asturiana o la de los Reyes Católicos nada tenía que ver con ese sentido moderno del Estado-nación. Según la tesis de Roca Barea, España sería más bien un fragmento del Imperio Hispánico, que cuando cayó quedó como la porción central de un Imperio desaparecido, un fragmento que no completó su reconversión en nación canónica. La realidad presente, dada la intrascendencia de España en el contexto internacional, reducida a economía subsidiada de la UE en el Sur, impone la necesidad de plantearse ser el núcleo de un Imperio euroamericano para subvertir la decadencia y lenta agonía que nos imponen los poderes globalistas. 

Y esta misma decadencia y autodestrucción que está en pleno apogeo en un Occidente periclitado, en el que triunfa el Mundo Mercado de los liberal-capitalistas, debe dotarse de una nueva Filosofía de la Historia y superar el viejo paradigma de la Modernidad, totalmente caduco y suicida. De esto depende precisamente la salvación de Occidente, y más concretamente de Europa, de abandonar las premisas ideológicas de la Ilustración y el iluminismo y volver a pensar más allá de los experimentos científicos y la ordenación industrial del mundo. Abandonar la obsesión por la máquina y la tecnología, despojarse de las ideologías para volver al camino de una verdadera filosofía. La Edad Media europea, con su civilización pujante, dotada de una verdadera alma fáustica, marca el camino para la reordenación bajo una concepción orgánica de la civilización que, como aquella medieval, sea capaz de recoger el legado que nos ha precedido y transformarlo. Se trata de aquel Cristianismo fáustico dominado por la sed por lo infinito, dotado de una voluntad de poder, y con el impulso necesario para extenderse y conquistar el mundo. En este marco fue en el que se forjó el Imperio Hispánico, católico y universal, como una verdadera alternativa y antítesis al mundo burgués y liberal de los siglos XV-XVII, con una Cosmovisión propia, y enemiga del espíritu burgués, basado en el utilitarismo y el mercantilismo, en el afán de ganancia material, en el lucro y la rapiña. 

En este sentido también resulta interesante la comparativa que Carlos Blanco hace entre el Imperio Hispánico y el régimen militarista prusiano del siglo XIX-XX. En este último caso encontramos precisamente la síntesis entre ese espíritu industrial propiamente moderno y aquel militar más tradicional, en el contexto de un Estado-nación moderno, con una base social amplia y con formación científica. El Imperio Español, como ya hemos referido, tuvo una base popular, católica y universal, además de unas diferencias coyunturales e históricas respecto al modelo prusiano. 

En las reflexiones finales del libro Carlos Blanco vuelve a insistir en la incertidumbre de los tiempos actuales con la decadencia de un Occidente quebrado y en el proceso de liquidación final mientras se produce el fracaso y ocaso de Estados Unidos como potencia mundial, y con éste del proceso hegemónico de occidentalización (americanización) del mundo, bajo el dominio de la OTAN o de los burócratas de Bruselas, con el instinto de supervivencia totalmente anulado, como una civilización postrada, sin autoconciencia de su propia existencia ni dignidad alguna. En Europa se impone la estrategia del caos y el desorden meticulosamente planificado, con unas ingenierías sociales implementadas a lo largo de décadas, desde 1945, con la deconstrucción de la naturaleza, de tal manera que no hay hombre ni mujer, la infancia es un mito, la Patria no existe, como tampoco existe ni padre ni madre ni familia. Y en medio de este caos somos presa de especuladores financieros transnacionales y crisis económicas, con políticas envilecedoras, sociedades fragmentadas, terrorismo islámico y el multiculturalismo impuesto por poderes transnacionales en un programa obsesivo y criminal de reemplazo poblacional. 

Es por ese motivo que el Medievo aparece como el verdadero referente para nosotros en nuestros días, y también como el verdadero Renacimiento, que vemos reflejado en el esplendor de los siglos XII-XIII frente al Renacimiento de los siglos XV-XVI dominado por las sectas, el caos de las naciones, el desprecio por la doctrina escolástica y, en definitiva, la ruptura del ecumene medieval.

---

Artículo original: Reseña: Un imperio frente al caos, de Carlos X. Blanco, Hipérbola Janus, 10/Abr/2022

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |BLANCO, Carlos X., La caballería espiritual: Un ensayo de psicología profunda, EAS, 2018|

El libro de Carlos X Blanco, filósofo y profesor universitario del cual ya reseñamos hace un tiempo su original obra De Covadonga a la nación española: La hispanidad en clave spengleriana, nos ofrece en esta ocasión un libro que llama la atención por lo atractivo que resulta su título La Caballería Espiritual. Un ensayo de psicología profunda y la imagen que sirve para ilustrar la portada, un grabado de Alberto Durero, «San Jorge a caballo», que nos recuerda al magnífico libro de Jean Cau que reseñamos a comienzos de este año.

El libro consta de un prólogo de Eduard Alcántara, conocido estudioso de la Tradición, con un brillante bagaje de escritos en clave evoliana desde hace un buen número de años. De su introducción destacamos el especial hincapié que hace en el proceso de transformación interior y de búsqueda de las raíces profundas al que apela Carlos X Blanco a lo largo de la obra, y la necesidad de evitar a toda costa caer en la barbarie, con la consiguiente pérdida de puntos de referencia esenciales en ese proceso de naturaleza ontológico que debe revertir el carácter diabólico y disolutivo de la Modernidad.

El mencionado proceso conlleva un aprendizaje, y la interiorización de una doctrina que permita emprender a nivel individual un camino de perfección, o de «sanación y crecimiento», tal y como nuestro autor, Carlos X Blanco, propone en cada uno de los capítulos que componen su obra. Del mismo modo, y es otro aspecto que Alcántara señala muy acertadamente en el prólogo, como todo camino iniciático, conlleva una serie de dificultades, privaciones y sufrimientos en la vía de la purificación interior, lo que supone entrar en contraste con las propias contradicciones, con los abismos personales más oscuros, y superarlos. En este proceso es evidente que también debemos combatir muchos de los prejuicios heredados, por el hecho de vivir integrados en un modelo de civilización y cultura concretos, que son aquellos anejos a la propia Modernidad. Las diferentes tradiciones iniciáticas nos hablan del mismo sentido de purificación, transformación y religación a lo prístino y originario, a aquello que de forma natural e innata reside en nuestro interior y que es susceptible de pasar de la potencia al acto, descondicionar la existencia y librarnos de las diferentes formas de ataduras que limitan nuestra vida. Como apunta muy acertadamente Eduard Alcántara, lo eterno e imperecedero es la búsqueda del Ser, de las jerarquías naturales y el Espíritu como cúspide de las mismas en el marco de un tiempo eterno e inmutable.

La perspectiva de Carlos X Blanco no es exactamente la misma que nos plantea Eduard Alcántara en el prólogo, y ello también se debe a que nuestro autor se nutre de unas bases y unos materiales sensiblemente diferentes, y que, como es obvio, debe a su propia formación dentro del ámbito de la psicología. No obstante, y a pesar de los diferentes puntos de partida, Carlos X Blanco también pretende un despertar interior, el redescubrimiento de potencialidades desaprovechadas y un salto de conciencia que afecta a todos los ámbitos de nuestra naturaleza y ser primigenios que nos permita trascender el actual orden de cosas, tanto en lo individual como en lo colectivo.

Tras el citado prólogo la obra en sí misma se estructura en treinta y dos capítulos, a lo largo de los cuales, y de forma sucesiva, se van ampliando una serie de ideas y conceptos que vienen a redundar en el aspecto apuntado en el anterior párrafo. La obra se presenta de entrada como una especie de manual orientativo en nuestra trayectoria vital, siempre desde una perspectiva pedagógica y terapéutica, que los recurrentes términos de «sanación» y «crecimiento» siempre se encargan de recordarnos. En este sentido resulta sumamente interesante el primer capítulo, donde nuestro autor, mediante el empleo de una serie de metáforas nos habla de las diferentes etapas a las que debemos enfrentarnos en nuestro itinerario vital, el paso de la infancia, con toda la seguridad y protección de la que usualmente se goza, a la edad adulta en un proceso de maduración en el que toda esa «edad de oro» que se asocia a la infancia, periodo de pureza prístina, termina desapareciendo para siempre y nos deja presa de nostalgia y anhelos. De modo que ante los avatares de la vida cada persona debe buscar su camino y encontrarse a sí misma, reencontrar al ser perdido de los orígenes a lo largo de un recorrido iniciático de gran profundidad introspectiva.

Para conducirse entre los peligros y abismos de la existencia la actitud, nos dice Carlos Blanco, es fundamental, y debemos adoptar una actitud de curiosidad aventurera y de amor que nos permita construir un centro que nos sirva de guía y a partir del cual podamos generar nuestra propia Cosmovisión. En este sentido el autor asturiano apela a las teorías junguianas de la psique, aquellas que nos hablan de la psique originaria que comprendería una doble vertiente espiritual y física con sus propias dinámicas y leyes internas. Asimismo, el autor suizo fue capaz de ir más allá de las teorías freudianas y las limitaciones del marco de la ciencia positivista decimonónica en las que se enmarca. De ahí que Carl Gustav Jung concediera una dignidad ontológica al inconsciente más allá del mecanicismo de los procesos físico-biológicos. La psique es la expresión misma del Cosmos y la Divinidad, es en ella donde reside el sentido de la psicología profunda que nos invita a mirar en nuestro propio interior como la piedra angular del proceso de crecimiento y sanación.

En el mencionado proceso es fundamental conocer la extensión y potencialidades de la psique tanto a nivel individual y colectivo, y ahondar en los aspectos más oscuros del inconsciente, que como nos plantea Jung, establece una permanente relación dialéctica entre la parte consciente e inconsciente de la individualidad, del yo. Ello implica también al ser colectivo de la especie, en lo que nos remite al denominado inconsciente colectivo, forjado en el transcurso de millones de años de evolución biológica, y en el cual residen las grandes potencialidades espirituales del ser, el mismo sentido de lo Universal y del Cosmos.

A pesar de que en nuestros días los aspectos puramente psicológicos y espirituales del hombre parecen carecer de importancia, especialmente por el carácter enteramente materialista de nuestra civilización y por la carencia de referentes dentro de un orden superior, vemos como la enfermedad psíquica se manifiesta en la deriva destructiva de la Modernidad hacia el medio natural, o a través su carácter artificioso e impostado mediante el uso de la tecnología y la ruptura de toda armonía interior. La alternativa de un despertar pasa por el redescubrimiento del inconsciente profundo y la restauración del equilibrio psíquico que nos de profundidad tanto individual como colectiva en la construcción del devenir histórico actual. Solo a través del autoconocimiento del ser verdadero, de la propia naturaleza, se pueden superar las anomalías y la enfermedad que se manifiesta a través de la sociedad competitiva, centrada en la búsqueda de placeres materiales que solamente buscan satisfacer formas de vanidad.

Ante todo la búsqueda de las raíces implica una profundización en el Inconsciente colectivo e individual, como ya se mencionó anteriormente, con el fin de potenciar la creatividad y reintegrarse con la centralidad primigenia. Conocer es recordar, como decía Platón, es una clave fundamental para entender el sentido de lo que Carlos Blanco pretende expresar en su obra. En este contexto la Tradición se alinea perfectamente con la idea del Inconsciente colectivo a redescubrir, dado que la primera se fundamenta en un proceso acumulativo que implica a sucesivas generaciones y que refleja las experiencias vitales de un pueblo, y ahí reside su carácter revolucionario. El Inconsciente junguiano expresa exactamente el mismo sentido.

Pero la ciencia y las teorías de la psicología moderna son incapaces de reconocer que la existencia humana y su hecho psíquico trascienden los procesos orgánicos y biológicos mecánicos que pueden registrar en laboratorios y que la realidad de la vida no responde a leyes matemáticas dentro de un orden puramente racional de la Realidad. En este contexto, apunta Carlos Blanco, el Inconsciente no es un elemento residual o un apéndice subsidiario del cerebro, sino que posee su propia identidad y representa una complejidad en sí mismo. De hecho nuestro autor preconiza el advenimiento de la gran ciencia de la psique superando los límites del materialismo empobrecedor y el racionalismo estrecho.

Como señala la Tradición, en nuestro interior habita un microcosmos que representa a la totalidad del macrocosmos, al Todo, y con éste unas enormes y enriquecedoras posibilidades. No obstante, debemos establecer una serie de compensaciones a nivel psíquico entre el consciente y el inconsciente, que permita un trasvase de imágenes del segundo respecto al primero evitando la fragmentación y caer en una psicosis tan propia de estos tiempos. Las dificultades para establecer este equilibrio psíquico vienen de las máscaras que adoptamos en nuestra vida social y por el daño que la sociedad de consumo capitalista ejerce, y que nos obliga a falsificarnos o mostrarnos de una forma diferente a la que realmente somos.

Otro aspecto característico del Mundo Moderno es el Tiempo, considerado en términos lineales y como una realidad finita, en la que todo es susceptible de ser cuantificado, el valor de las cosas y de las personas, la competitividad y la productividad, todo sometido a la tiranía implacable y diabólica del Mercado y la Técnica. Es un Tiempo carente de cualidad que consume a las personas, cuyas vidas se hallan protocolizadas bajo la imposición del reloj y los horarios. La posibilidad de dejar de ser objeto y convertirse en sujeto frente al Tiempo, y hacer confluir en un mismo plano todas las escalas temporales, como culminación de ese Todo cósmico, de ese Tiempo eterno e invariable en el que vivía el sencillo campesino del medievo, es una de las metas a conquistar en el proceso de sanación. Al mismo tiempo ese Todo cósmico y orgánico representa la misma idea del Inconsciente colectivo y la misma idea de Tradición, cuya definición anteriormente referida nos recuerda mucho a aquella dada por el profesor Rafael Gambra. En este contexto de redescubrimiento interior e integración en un Todo armónico debemos considerar la importancia de lo Sagrado, algo fundamental frente a la incomprensión de una sociedad secularizada, en la que los arquetipos expresan y adquieren nuevos significados.

Adoptar un modo de vida sencillo, abrazar la vida contemplativa y volver al campo, al lugar de los orígenes de donde todos, en algún momento, hemos salido, son la mejor forma de transformarse interiormente y, al mismo tiempo, de dejar atrás el mundo corrompido y degenerado en el que vivimos. Restaurar antiguos vínculos orgánicos, reconciliarse con la naturaleza y replantearse radical y completamente el modo de vida que hemos adoptado hasta hoy y en los últimos siglos. En ese sentido, la autosuficiencia y la autarquía personal, como aquella del campesino humilde que es capaz de producir su propio alimento y abastecer sus sencillas necesidades, es fundamental, como también lo es combatir y revertir la cultura del progreso, a la que viene asociada la contaminación, el expolio o la esclavitud. Es la reintegración del hombre en el Cosmos, la vuelta a una naturaleza de la que procedemos y a la que debemos la esencia de nuestro Ser.

Uno de los últimos puntos que consideramos más interesantes de esta obra es la crítica que se hace a la ciencia actual, que está marcada por un absoluto desprecio hacia aquellos valores espirituales que, a través de la Tradición, vertebran una parte nada desdeñable del ser humano, y que en nuestra opinión sirven de cúspide en toda jerarquía. Es una ciencia que no se halla consagrada al conocimiento, sino encerrada en sus complejos e irreales sistemas conceptuales. La ciencia moderna tiene la capacidad de materializar demoníacas posibilidades que, y esto lo decimos nosotros, se reflejan de forma monstruosa y con innumerables y perversos ejemplos a través de la denominada «pandemia» en los últimos dos años, que bien sabemos que nada tiene de sanitaria ni se sustenta en nada científico. Y con ello no atacamos a la ciencia, que es una herramienta que puede resultar útil en su contexto, sino al cientifismo como ideología, y casi como una secta dogmática en manos de intereses espurios. Es una ciencia pervertida que se presta a la experimentación con seres humanos y dota de un inmenso poder al entramado de las grandes farmacéuticas, que privan de la salud y de la vida a pueblos y naciones enteras. Como bien dice nuestro autor, Carlos X Blanco, lo que hoy se llama ciencia no es sino basura, con un afán desmedido por publicar artículos en revistas especializadas en inglés por parte de «sabios» de bata blanca creyéndose amos de la vida y la muerte. Por ese motivo habría que abandonar toda forma de experimentos transhumanistas para integrarnos en la naturaleza e impregnarse de los misterios divinos que en ella residen.

Lo fundamental es que formamos parte de un Todo que se encuentra interconectado y proyectado sobre nuestro propio interior, que sólo alcanzaremos a desarrollar si volvemos a la sencillez primigenia. En este elemento clave reside no sólo el encauzamiento e impulso del proceso de «sanación» y «crecimiento» del que nos habla el autor, y que no solamente hay que entender en clave individual, sino que puede generar transformaciones colectivas que nos salven de la destrucción hacia la que se dirige un Mundo Moderno totalmente degenerado y enloquecido. De ahí que Carlos X Blanco nos haga la invitación final a constituir una Nueva Caballería Espiritual, que bien podría calificarse también de una aristocracia del espíritu, capaz de asimilar e interiorizar todas las enseñanzas expuestas para experimentar esa apertura interior en la que, como en todo proceso iniciático, no están exentas las zonas oscuras y los peligros en los que habrá que adentrarse en la búsqueda de ese anhelado Santo Grial que contiene los secretos para la tan necesaria transmutación ontológica del Ser.

---

Artículo original: Reseña: «La caballería espiritual. Un ensayo de psicología profunda», de Carlos X. Blanco, Hipérbola Janus, 16/Feb/2022

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |Mos Maiorum, Número VII (Verano 2024), Hipérbola Janus, 2024|

Nos dirigimos nuevamente a nuestros estimados lectores para anunciar una nueva entrega de Mos Maiorum, en esta ocasión con unos cambios estructurales significativos. Hasta ahora habíamos dividido la revista en dos apartados claramente diferenciados, priorizando los escritos dedicados a la Tradición, entendida en un sentido amplio, en su vertiente atemporal pero también en sus desarrollos históricos, en sus autores, tanto de la Tradición perenne como, por ejemplo, del tradicionalismo católico e hispánico o bien, a través de sus mitos, símbolos y doctrinas espirituales. Del mismo modo, un segundo bloque estaba consagrado a la filosofía, la geopolítica o la historia, a la indagación crítica, siempre desde un enfoque alternativo, de las vicisitudes del mundo moderno en todas sus manifestaciones, y con un carácter siempre revisionista.

En esta ocasión, considerando la madurez del proyecto, el camino recorrido y, sobre todo, las demandas de vosotros, nuestros lectores, hemos decidido dar un paso más y preparar números de contenido temático, concentrando las buenas ideas de los excelentes colaboradores con los que tenemos el placer de trabajar, para ofreceros aquellos temas que consideramos fundamentales en el mundo de hoy, en este punto de encrucijada en el que nos hallamos, y en el que hay que abordar cuestiones fundamentales que informan nuestro mundo de cara, sin subterfugios ni dando rodeos.

Contra el liberalismo

El liberalismo nos ha parecido que era el tema más adecuado para iniciar esta batalla cultural que venimos dando desde nuestro primer número; en ese sentido el título del dossier no responde al azar, y es toda una declaración de intenciones. «Contra el liberalismo», y siempre puede haber quien se pregunte, «¿Y por qué contra el liberalismo?», «¿Por qué no contra otras ideologías?», o bien, «¿Por qué no contra todas las ideologías?». Hemos de decir que las dos últimas son preguntas pertinentes, mientras que la primera requiere de una explicación y puede que incluso de una justificación. El liberalismo ha sido la ideología dominante durante los últimos 250-300 años, y ha moldeado el mundo en el que vivimos, nuestra sociedad, nuestra forma de vida, nuestra historia más reciente, e incluso nuestra antropología del Ser, nuestra cosmovisión, pese a cuando no nos adscribimos a ella, de algún modo somos deudores, aunque sea inconscientemente, del legado que esta ideología representa.

Algunos pensaréis que quizás seamos algo radicales al llevar este tema a cierto extremo al posicionarnos en contra, y no limitarnos a un mero revisionismo, o a una «depuración» de su contenido, como cuando llevas al coche a la ITV o le haces una «puesta a punto» ante un viaje planificado… Pero es que con el liberalismo ya estamos hablando de mercancía averiada, de un subproducto nocivo y de un enorme potencial destructivo. Hablar de liberalismo, de su triunfo e imposición en el mundo, en ese «Occidente colectivo» del que tanto se viene hablando, supone la renuncia y abdicación en muchos valores, perennes y eternos si se nos permite la expresión, cuya continuidad venía cimentando la propia evolución histórica de los pueblos, y que veíamos reflejada en la poderosa y sólida arquitectura del mundo tradicional, en la acción de los cuerpos intermedios, las sociedades históricas y la representación de las personas jurídicas y colectivas a través de multitud de instituciones. Todo este mundo, donde regían los principios del derecho natural de impronta tomista, bajo las monarquías tradicionales y un principio orgánico de representación, dio paso a otro tipo de estructuras que trasladaron el foco central de su antropología de la colectividad y sus problemas concretos al individuo, que no la persona, y sus intereses materiales, a la avidez por la ganancia, a la instrumentalización del cuerpo social, la destrucción de la identidad de los pueblos y la asunción de una concepción abstracta, racional y mundana del hecho comunitario, reducido en su totalidad a una mera ley positiva y contractual, dependiente de la voluntad, de la subjetividad del hombre, del legislador, reducido todo a formalismos vacíos y esclerotizados, carentes del dinamismo y la sana vivacidad del mundo de la Tradición.

Pero el liberalismo entraña mucho más, es un fenómeno complejo, una cosmovisión de la vida que no se limita solamente a los aspectos políticos y sociales o a la economía a través del capitalismo y la justificación de aberrantes formas de explotación en todos los terrenos, sino que recibe toda su fuerza y carácter de su concepción antropológica, que es la que determina todas las prolongaciones en los distintos ámbitos, se trata de esa idea errada del hombre, como dice Alain de Benoist, que concibe al hombre autónomo, atomizado, desligado de toda raigambre que pueda ligarlo a una Patria, a una comunidad o a cualquier principio que implique continuidad en el tiempo, que pueda dotar de identidad sus realizaciones individuales y colectivas. Es el hombre sin rostro, estandarizable, reducible a un número, intercambiable, que carece de particularidades y que consagra al interés individual, siempre material y egoísta, todas sus acciones. Es el hombre que nos describe Ayn Rand, Friedrich Hayek o cualquiera de los epígonos intelectuales del liberalismo, que no concibe los vínculos sociales, y la solidaridad entre compatriotas sino como una amenaza contra la libertad, una libertad que el liberal entiende en negativo, siempre como un despojarse de algo, como una forma errática que se mueve en lo efímero y lo banal, en un fluir constante sin pausa ni freno, es el hombre fugaz evoliano, un hombre indefinido, moralmente anestesiado, incapaz de adquirir compromisos, no solo ético-morales, sino en los aspectos más ordinarios de la vida cotidiana, espiritualmente limitado y caracterizado por la total falta de escrúpulos. Un tipo humano desviado, envilecido e incapaz de contactar con una dimensión verdaderamente espiritual del Ser. Y es por todos estos motivos, y muchos más, por lo que consideramos que el liberalismo es el enemigo de los pueblos, el artífice de los procesos disolutivos típicos de la modernidad, emisarios de esa «cultura de la cancelación» que vivimos en nuestros días, y de ahí que no podamos permanecer impasibles ante éste, ni mucho menos ser ambivalentes, moderados o permanecer timoratos. Esto es lo que representa el liberalismo en términos generales, sirva lo expuesto a modo de esbozo.

Más allá de estas consideraciones generales, debemos agradecer el esfuerzo y dedicación de nuestros articulistas, cuyos conocimientos e inestimable labor incrementa la calidad de nuestras publicaciones número tras número, y así contamos con un elenco de autores que queremos mencionar en una relación ordenada en función de su aparición en el presente número: Diego Fusaro, Daniele Perra, Robert Steuckers, Frédéric Kisters, David Lara Miguez, Carlos X Blanco, Guillermo Mas Arellano, Frank G. Rubio, Michele Ruzzai, Silvano Lorenzoni, Pietro Missiaggia, Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas y Claudio Mutti. A todos ellos nuestra gratitud infinita, por ayudar a pertrechar nuestras trincheras, por contribuir con su prestigio y buenas ideas, a un frente común, a esa batalla cultural de la que hablábamos al principio, que nos hace ser diferentes a una editorial convencional, y que nos permite sin miedo alguno posicionarnos ante los problemas de nuestra época, y no precisamente con el discurso dominante y hegemónico.

---

Artículo original: Mos Maiorum VII: «Contra el liberalismo», Hipérbola Janus, 19/Jun/24

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• The Current State of South America's Economy

• Why South America Needs Bitcoin

• Brazil's Potential for Bitcoin Adoption

• Argentina's Potential for Bitcoin Adoption

• Conclusion

• FAQ

South America has been struggling with economic instability and financial crises for decades, which has led to high inflation rates and unstable currencies. Bitcoin, the world's first decentralized digital currency, offers a more secure, transparent, and efficient alternative to traditional currencies. Despite its potential benefits, South America has been slow to adopt Bitcoin. In this article, we will explore why South America needs Bitcoin, with a particular focus on Brazil and Argentina. We will examine the advantages of Bitcoin, the potential benefits for financial inclusion, and the challenges to adoption. By doing so, we hope to shed light on how Bitcoin could transform the economic landscape of South America.

The Current State of South America's Economy

South America has been struggling with economic instability for decades. Despite having abundant natural resources, the region has been plagued by corruption, political instability, and financial crises. As a result, many South American countries have high inflation rates and unstable currencies. For example, Argentina's inflation rate was over 40% in 2020, and Brazil's inflation rate was over 4% in the same year.

Why South America Needs Bitcoin

Bitcoin offers several advantages over traditional currencies that make it an attractive option for South American countries. First and foremost, Bitcoin is decentralized, meaning that it is not controlled by any government or financial institution. This makes it less vulnerable to corruption and political instability, which are major issues in many South American countries.

Secondly, Bitcoin is highly secure and transparent. All transactions are recorded on a public ledger called the blockchain, which makes it almost impossible to counterfeit or manipulate. This is a significant advantage for countries that have high levels of corruption and financial fraud.

Thirdly, Bitcoin offers faster and cheaper transactions than traditional banking systems. This is especially important for countries that have underdeveloped banking systems, as Bitcoin can provide a more efficient and accessible alternative.

Brazil's Potential for Bitcoin Adoption

Brazil is the largest economy in South America, and it has been struggling with economic instability for years. While Bitcoin adoption in Brazil is still in its early stages, there is significant potential for growth. According to a survey conducted by Statista, over 10% of Brazilians own Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, which is higher than the global average. Additionally, Brazil has a large unbanked population, which makes Bitcoin an attractive option for financial inclusion.

Argentina's Potential for Bitcoin Adoption

Argentina has a long history of economic instability, with high inflation rates and frequent currency devaluations. As a result, many Argentinians have turned to alternative currencies, such as the US dollar, to protect their savings. However, Bitcoin offers a more accessible and decentralized alternative. In fact, Argentina has one of the highest Bitcoin adoption rates in the world, with over 16% of the population owning Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.

Conclusion

South America needs Bitcoin because it offers a more secure, transparent, and efficient alternative to traditional currencies. Brazil and Argentina, in particular, have significant potential for Bitcoin adoption, given their economic instability and large unbanked populations. While there are still regulatory and infrastructure challenges to overcome, the benefits of Bitcoin for South America cannot be ignored.

FAQ

Is Bitcoin legal in South America? Bitcoin is legal in most South American countries, although there are some variations in regulations and adoption rates.

What are the challenges to Bitcoin adoption in South America? The challenges to Bitcoin adoption in South America include regulatory uncertainty, infrastructure limitations, and lack of education and awareness among the general population.

How can Bitcoin help with financial inclusion in South America? Bitcoin can help with financial inclusion in South America by providing an alternative to traditional banking systems, which are often inaccessible to the large unbanked populations in the region.

Can Bitcoin help with corruption and political instability in South America? Bitcoin's decentralized nature makes it less vulnerable to corruption and political instability, and it could potentially help combat these issues in South America.

What is the future of Bitcoin in South America? The future of Bitcoin in South America looks promising, with growing adoption rates and potential for growth. However, regulatory and infrastructure challenges will need to be addressed to fully realize its potential.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ bcbb3e40:a494e501

|| |:-:| |GAMBRA, JOSÉ MIGUEL, La sociedad tradicional y sus enemigos, Guillermo Escolar, 2019|

Nuestras generaciones han nacido en el seno de la sociedad moderna, y con la excepción de aquellos que vivieron el régimen franquista, con sus diferentes familias políticas y sus diferentes connotaciones ideológicas en función de la preeminencia de unas u otras a lo largo de su extensa existencia, todos hemos nacido, crecido y, en general, vivido bajo el actual régimen político demoliberal fundado en 1978. En consecuencia, las últimas generaciones se han caracterizado por un contacto con el ámbito de la política un tanto tangencial, limitado a los comicios electorales que se celebran cada cuatro años, muchos se consideran representados en sus intereses por el sistema de partidos y valoran su libertad en términos exclusivamente cuantitativos, de riqueza material o bien orientada hacia cuestiones de orden hedonista y banal. Esta generación es la que más frecuentemente ha utilizado aquello de «Yo soy un ciudadano del mundo» o ha desechado con una mezcla de indiferencia y repulsión cualquier idea de Patria o Comunidad. También estamos ante una generación cuyos anhelos y preocupaciones dentro del orden espiritual es prácticamente inexistente, salvo honrosas excepciones, que prefiere cualquier sucedáneo de ínfima calidad, como aquellas doctrinas del New Age en lugar de grandes tradiciones espirituales que gocen de un arraigo prolongado en el ámbito de civilización en el que nos encuadramos y que, guste más o menos, es la civilización cristiana en su vertiente católica. En este sentido ni el régimen franquista ni el posterior fundado en 1978, podrían ser considerados como dos vertientes de la Modernidad y su forma de entender la política, frente a otro modelo de sociedad muy diferente, como es aquella que nos propone José Miguel Gambra en Los enemigos de la sociedad tradicional.

Este hombre moderno, nacido en el seno de las democracias constitucionales y parlamentarias, que como bien señala José Miguel Gambra confunde el progreso material, y más concretamente tecnológico, con aquel moral o político, es un gran desconocedor de la sociedad tradicional y de los principios antropológicos, político-ideológicos y vitales que la caracterizan. La Tradición aparece a ojos de nuestros contemporáneos como algo viejo y trasnochado, petrificado y estático, esclerotizado y atrapado en otro tiempo que no guarda relación con el presente. Desde la perspectiva liberal, el Tradicionalista tiene que ser, sin más remedio, una persona que vive al margen de todo, en su burbuja, y que es incapaz de comprender los hechos del presente porque carece de toda noción de progreso y su mente se halla anegada en mil prejuicios. El Tradicionalista es al mismo tiempo alguien que prefiere la ignorancia y el oscurantismo, una rara pieza de museo que en nuestros días más que una reliquia, ya que el moderno no profesa ninguna veneración por lo que le ha precedido, es un ser despreciable cuya mentalidad hay que desterrar de la sociedad para evitar que cualquier idea o principio que subrepticiamente asocian a éste se propague.

Lejos de todos estos prejuicios y falsedades difundidas desde hace algo más de dos siglos por el liberalismo, el Tradicionalismo español o hispánico conforma una realidad mucho más compleja y profunda con ramificaciones en su desarrollo que ocupan buena parte de nuestra historia contemporánea en los dos últimos siglos. Sin embargo, el ensayo de José Miguel Gambra, Los enemigos de la sociedad tradicional, toma como referencia el discurso aristotélico-tomista como base fundamental de su discurso, y lo desarrolla en relación a todas las materias de orden sociopolítico que atañen a la sociedad tradicional, y que podríamos englobar bajo la etiqueta de pensamiento clásico, tal y como hace nuestro autor. En términos generales podríamos decir que José Miguel Gambra actualiza los fundamentos teóricos del tradicionalismo español a través del pensamiento de Aristóteles y Santo Tomás de Aquino, que otros pensadores carlistas de primera hora, como Vázquez de Mella, por ejemplo, no tuvieron en cuenta, probablemente por el escaso conocimiento que existía fuera del ámbito eclesiástico sobre sus ideas.

Lo más fundamental es la dicotomía planteada ya de inicio, y a partir de la introducción, entre dos modelos de Modernidad en clara confrontación entre sí, como son el modelo liberal a través de sus diversas manifestaciones políticas, que degeneran todas ellas, como se expone a lo largo del libro, en formas de despotismo; y por otro lado tenemos los totalitarismos, que comprenden aquellas corrientes político-ideológicas que parten del pensamiento hegeliano y que, según el autor, tendrían su máxima expresión en los totalitarismos del siglo XX (Fascismo y Comunismo) reduciendo a los individuos a la más absoluta servidumbre.

Frente a estas dos expresiones de la Modernidad a través del mundo de las ideologías, tenemos el mundo de la Tradición, que no es sino una cadena de legados y herencias engendrados por la acumulación de experiencias de sucesivas generaciones. Lejos de lo que aseveran los prejuicios modernos, este proceso es dinámico e implica un progreso, en la medida que las generaciones precedentes nutren a las que les suceden con sus experiencias y conocimientos, que a su vez, en una cadena que se pierde en la noche de los tiempos, es el producto de innumerables generaciones. Mediante este proceso se genera un patrimonio común en el que se reúnen todo tipo de conocimientos, desde aquellos espirituales y trascendentes, pasando por otros de raíz más inmanente y material como aquellos culturales y científicos etc.

Por otro lado, la Tradición implica el enraizamiento en un modelo muy particular y concreto, ajeno a cualquier forma de abstracción, tan característica de los tiempos presentes, que vemos reflejada en la naturaleza de los propios regímenes y cosmovisiones emanadas de la Revolución Francesa. Hablamos de conceptos como aquellos de la «humanidad» o la «voluntad general», que tras generalizaciones absurdas pretenden ocultar la pluralidad de sujetos particulares y colectividades que existen en el mundo, y que la Comunidad Política como tal depende en su organización interna de aspectos concretos dentro de un determinado contexto histórico, religioso y socio-cultural. No existe ningún modelo universalmente válido, como pretende el liberalismo, que pueda servir de base a una Comunidad humana como se pretende a través de la democracia de libre mercado, cuyas deficiencias, limitaciones y falsificaciones son brillantemente expuestas por José Miguel Gambra.

De modo que aquello que queda muy claro en esta obra desde su comienzo es una dicotomía entre dos realidades radicalmente antitéticas: la modernidad con su doble vertiente (liberal y totalitaria) y el mundo de la Tradición, que como hemos advertido, y es necesario insistir, representa una realidad viva y dinámica cuyo mantenimiento e impulso depende de la vitalidad de la organización social, de su capacidad para gestionar los frutos que les han sido entregados y aquellos que ella misma pueda aportar en el devenir de los tiempos.

Conviene destacar que el pensamiento clásico a través de la doctrina aristotélica y el posterior revisionismo y actualización en pleno medievo por parte de Santo Tomás de Aquino, a la luz de la Revelación, sirven de base para pertrechar todos los aspectos de la sociedad tradicional que aborda José Miguel Gambra, y que conforma la matriz fundamental de la antropología tradicional. Entre los conceptos que se derivan de los principios aristotélico-tomistas el más destacable es el «bien común» en sus variantes complementarias y debidamente jerarquizadas del «bien común inmanente» y el «bien común trascendente», que deben regir toda organización política en sus fines y objetivos para concebir el equilibrio y armonía que resulta del todo ausente e inexistente en las sociedades modernas donde el liberalismo ha triunfado de forma absoluta.

La dicotomía entre la Modernidad en sus diferentes variantes, y especialmente en aquella liberal con su individualismo, artificiosidad y conflictos permanentes, con aquel modelo tradicional, amparado en los hechos naturales y espontáneos que genera el propio devenir histórico y la maduración de sus procesos seculares, constituyen uno de los principales atractivos de este libro. Y vemos con mayor claridad el abismo que separa ambos modelos a través del análisis de las relaciones entre la Iglesia y el Estado, la definición del Patriotismo en contraste con el nacionalismo, o lo que en nuestra opinión es uno de los aspectos más destacables del libro: el papel de la sociedad civil, de los denominados cuerpos intermedios y la complejidad que entraña el modelo político tradicional, su potencial orgánico y la vía alternativa frente a los modelos de sociedad que las ideologías modernas han engendrado, y en las que el individuo aislado o el papel fagocitador del Estado o la burocracia sin rostro, fría y anónima, ha operado sobre los individuos neutralizando formas de organización que, en nuestro caso particular, como españoles, han sido particularmente importantes.

Este último aspecto es especialmente interesante, especialmente en la medida que los mass media y el aparato propagandístico vinculado al liberalismo, a través del cual acostumbra a construir eso que llaman «opinión pública», se han dedicado a vender de manera sistemática que «la democracia es el mejor de los sistemas posibles», haciéndonos creer que no existe otro modelo de comunidad política posible o deseable, y que más allá de las democracias de libre mercado la alternativa son las dictaduras y la opresión más ominosa. La degradación del ámbito rural y de los municipios, donde los auténticos lazos orgánicos se forjan hasta constituir un tejido social fuerte e impenetrable ante cualquier idea subversiva o disolutoria, es un rasgo típico de los modelos liberales, que prefieren el desarraigo de los entornos urbanos, donde es más fácil construir su modelo antropológico de individuos aislados ajenos a cualquier forma de tradición o patriotismo que les haga sentirse cerca de aquellos con los que comparte un pasado y una historia comunes.

El papel de la Iglesia católica y su misión salvífica y universal, y su autoridad dentro de la comunidad política, también constituye uno de los temas fundamentales de nuestra obra. Y al margen de las ya mencionadas relaciones con el Estado, y su capacidad de armonización en el ámbito de las competencias entre autoridades, destaca el énfasis en aspectos como la doctrina social de la Iglesia, o las cualidades morales y de prudencia que ésta aporta también al orden político. Asimismo, es obvio que la Iglesia reivindicada con Gambra debe lidiar con el llamado «liberalismo católico», que constituye un asunto problemático dentro de la Iglesia moderna y determina sus descensos hasta culminar en aquel más profundo, y que viene representado por el Concilio Vaticano II, que supone la abdicación de la Iglesia ante la Modernidad.

Pese a la época de anarquía y desorden en que vivimos, al triunfo de grupos de poder oligárquico con intereses espurios, que someten a los pueblos a sus intereses, generalmente usurocráticos, José Miguel Gambra lanza una visión bastante esperanzadora y de fortalecimiento en los principios, tanto en lo religioso-espiritual como en lo político, que podemos reconocer a lo largo de toda su obra, donde todos las ideas son expresadas de forma clara y sencilla, al nivel de cualquier neófito en la materia.

|| |:-:| |José Miguel Gambra (Pamplona, 1950)|

Conviene destacar, y no es un detalle menor ni anecdótico, que nuestro autor es hijo de uno de los más destacados representantes del tradicionalismo español: Don Rafael Gambra Ciudad, que junto a Francisco Elías de Tejada y Spínola, representa, en nuestra opinión, la cumbre del pensamiento tradicionalista español de las últimas décadas.

---

Artículo original: «La sociedad tradicional y sus enemigos», de José Miguel Gambra, Hipérbola Janus, 16/May/2020

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

There was a woman of the Island of Innis-Sark who was determined to take revenge on a man because he called her by an evil name. So she went to the Saints’ Well, and, kneeling down, she took some of the water and poured it on the ground in the name of the devil, saying, “So may my enemy be poured out like water, and lie helpless on the earth!” Then she went round the well backwards on her knees, and at each station she cast a stone in the name of the devil, and said, “So may the curse fall on him, and the power of the devil crush him!” After this she returned home.

Now the next morning there was a stiff breeze, and some of the men were afraid to go out fishing; but others said they would try their luck, and amongst them was the man on whom the curse rested. But they had not gone far from land when the boat was capsized by a heavy squall. The fishermen, however, saved themselves by swimming to shore; all except the man on whom the curse rested, and he sank like lead to the bottom, and the waves covered him, and he was drowned.

When the woman heard of the fate that had befallen her enemy, she ran to the beach and clapped her hands with joy and exulted. And as she stood there laughing with strange and horrid mirth, the corpse of the man she had cursed slowly rose up from the sea, and came drifting towards her till it lay almost at her very feet. On this she stooped down to feast her eyes on the sight of the dead man, when suddenly a storm of wind screamed past her, and hurled her from the point of rock where she stood. And when the people ran in all haste to help, no trace of her body could be seen. The woman and the corpse of the man she had cursed disappeared together under the waves, and were never seen again from that time forth.

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

The Well of St. Brendan, in High Island, has great virtue, but the miraculous power of the water is lost should a thief or a murderer drink of it. Now a cruel murder had been committed on the mainland, and the priest noticed the people that if the murderer tried to conceal himself in the island no one should harbour him or give him food or drink. It happened at that time there was a woman of the island afflicted with pains in her limbs, and she went to the Holy Well to make the stations and say the prayers, and so get cured. But many a day passed and still she got no better, though she went round and round the well on her knees, and recited the paters and aves as she was told.

Then she went to the priest and told him the story, and he perceived at once that the well had been polluted by the touch of some one who had committed a crime. So he bade the woman bring him a bottle of the water, and she did as he desired. Then having received the water, he poured it out, and breathed on it three times in the name of the Trinity; when, lo! the water turned into blood.

“Here is the evil,” cried the priest. “A murderer has washed his hands in the well.”

He then ordered her to make a fire in a circle, which she did, and he pronounced some words over it; and a mist rose up with the form of a spirit in the midst, holding a man by the arm.

“Behold the murderer,” said the spirit; and when the woman looked on him she shrieked—

“It is my son! my son!” and she fainted.

For the year before her son had gone to live on the mainland, and there, unknown to his mother, he had committed the dreadful murder for which the vengeance of God lay on him. And when she came to herself the spirit of the murderer was still there.

“Oh, my Lord! let him go, let him go!” she cried.

“You wretched woman!” answered the priest. “How dare you interpose between God and vengeance. This is but the shadowy form of your son; but before night he shall be in the hands of the law, and justice shall be done.”

Then the forms and the mist melted away, and the woman departed in tears, and not long after she died of a broken heart. But the well from that time regained all its miraculous powers, and the fame of its cures spread far

@ 0176967e:1e6f471e

Hlavný stage

10:00 Otvorenie a Juraj Bednár: Nostr, Cashu, Reticulum - internet a sociálne siete inak

11:00 Pavel Šimon: Zostať "dnu" a byť "out"

11:40 Karel od Martiny: Svoboda, nomádství a spiritualita

12:50 Peter Horváth: Avatari v decentralizovanom riadení kryptokomunít

13:20 Martin Habovštiak: Podivné fakty o Bitcoine

15:00 Mišo Takáč: AI ako pomocník a automatizácia života

16:00 Filip Legenyi: Predikčné trhy: Spôsob ako neveštiť budúcnosť z kávových zrniek - online / remote

17:00 Tomáš Kanócz: Ako prežiť slovenské zdravotníctvo? Metabolický prístup k liečbe rakoviny

19:00 Juraj Bednár: Cypherpunk budúcnosť je tu. Čo ďalej?

19:30 Panelová diskusia: Kde to žijeme?

Workshop stage

10:30 Andrea Košiarová: Umenie dychu - meditatívna pozornosť, vnímanie tela a skúmanie v pohybe (jóga)

13:00 Juraj Bednár a Marianna Sádecká: Oranžové leto

16:00 Dušky Matuška: Ako zvládať námietky pri komunikácii Bitcoinu?

Sprievodný program

Počas prestávok nám bude hrať Deepologic.

Prvý oficiálny turnaj v hre Chain Duel na Slovensku bude na Lunarpunk festivale

Miesto, čas konania a lístky

Miesto konania: Yuzu House, Bratislava

Dátum konania: 9. august 2024, začiatok o 10:00 Program sa ešte môže zmeniť.

Lístky kúpite tu

@ f0aca767:dce3306e

We're just about coming up on it having been one month since I wrote my article, "Nostr, The Strangest and Clunkiest Twitter Replacement." In that time, I've explored the protocol, I've switched websites, and lamented the fact that I didn't post that first article on Nostr (especially because people's links to it are now likely broken).

Nevertheless, summed up, my initial impression of the network was that most apps felt clunky, or underdeveloped. I felt like the audience was mostly Bitcoin _obsessed _people, with mixtures of the political right and left, all of which who're enthusiastic about not being censored, or banned for what they say. You know, because humans make mistakes, and sometimes our ideas are different than that of which someone else might hold. As it is, and as it goes.

A month ago, I was bewildered, I didn't really know what to think, but ... I was at least a little intrigued. I wanted to explore, and meet people, and figure it out.

My findings were that, despite the semi-lack of data privacy (anyone can use your npub to see what your personal timeline looks like), and the fact that blocking is a bit harder (a thing that's also kind of a problem on Mastodon and Bluesky, anyway), Nostr is an example of actual decentralization. Decentralization, despite it being kind of ... looked down upon by masses of people outside the network.

Which ... is weird. You would think people on Bluesky, who are also enthusiastic about decentralization, would realize that the busky devs are lying to them about what their motives and what decentralization is, and are. And you'd think, some people would look at Mastodon and go, "You know, this place is cool ... but I kinda hate losing all of my posts if some totalitarian admin decides to kill my account? And that my only option is to buy a server and host my own? If I never want to be banned again? _And then networks of instances can form a secret cabal to silence my entire server, _anyway?"

You would think by now, many, many people would be tired of the looming threat of a banning. Or is it just me?

I've talked about my exploration of the protocol on all these networks, to comments like, "Isn't that purely a right wing social network?" or "Why are you hanging out with Jack?"

And, I didn't really know what to say? Of course I don't know Jack, and yeah I've seen plenty right wing postrs, but I've also definitely seen plenty of left wing people. It's almost like, people do what they want, regardless of the ideas they hold, and the opinions of others. At least, sometimes.

Speaking of, my experience hasn't been completely perfect. I've had some trolls, some nasty people dump into my notifications, and they weren't even all that particularly nasty. But it made me step back and go, "You know, I can't block these people, am I sure about all this?" And because of that, I sort of stepped away for a while. I had a real big think while I continued my postings on the other networks. I tried to think about why I'm on social media.

Obviously, I do things. I make music. I write. These are things I want to share with people, but I'm also here to meet people, to make connections, and even sometimes, to network? I know a lot of people out there are fortunate enough to have landed into something they love doing, or actually want to do with the rest of their lives, and that's fantastic. But, what I want to do is so unconventional that it only makes sense that I reach out, and explore.

What is it I want to do? I wanna be a creator, but not just some influencer on Instagram, or some Youtuber who spends eight years building up one hundred thousand followers. Nah.

I just wanna make a career out of using what I know how to do, to inform, and entertain. That's it. And hey, maybe I can do that on Nostr, as it builds and expands.

And that's part of why I came back. That's part of why I bought into Alby, and now apparently also run a cloud node. A Node Runner, like a netrunner, but with less hacking people's brains to make their eyes melt.

I mean ... it is really cool that the whole protocol is connected across this network, where each instance of Nostr can be a completely different piece of software, for different things, like blogging, live-streaming, selling merch, or even a forum, and you can just log in with your address. Dude. It's like what Mastodon set out to be from the start, but hasn't quite made it there yet.

I fully believe Mastodon is being stifled by its creator, who's more concerned with impressing potential investors than with making something great. Which, is a shame.

But the future of the internet and social media will always be _a future that is owned by the people, run by the people, developed by the people. Because algorithms, engagement baiting, and ad pushing will only ever go so far, until the very last person left standing on these aforementioned networks finally goes, "Man, this fuckin' sucks." And _leaves.

How do I feel about Nostr, a month later? I feel conflicted, I feel like it's great, and I feel unsure. But I feel like it's definitely something. Something worth continuing to pay attention to, as the rest of the social web vies for control of everyone else's attention.

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

```js import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import axios from 'axios'; import { useRouter } from 'next/router'; import { InputText } from 'primereact/inputtext'; import { InputNumber } from 'primereact/inputnumber'; import { InputSwitch } from 'primereact/inputswitch'; import { Button } from 'primereact/button'; import { useToast } from '@/hooks/useToast'; import { useSession } from 'next-auth/react'; import 'primeicons/primeicons.css';

const WorkshopForm = ({ draft = null }) => { const [title, setTitle] = useState(draft?.title || ''); const [summary, setSummary] = useState(draft?.summary || ''); const [price, setPrice] = useState(draft?.price || 0); const [isPaidResource, setIsPaidResource] = useState(draft?.price ? true : false); const [videoUrl, setVideoUrl] = useState(draft?.content || ''); const [coverImage, setCoverImage] = useState(draft?.image || ''); const [topics, setTopics] = useState(draft?.topics || ['']);

const router = useRouter();
const { data: session, status } = useSession();
const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
const { showToast } = useToast();

useEffect(() => {
    if (session) {
        setUser(session.user);
    }
}, [session]);

useEffect(() => {
    if (draft) {
        setTitle(draft.title);
        setSummary(draft.summary);
        setPrice(draft.price || 0);
        setIsPaidResource(draft.price ? true : false);
        setVideoUrl(draft.content);
        setCoverImage(draft.image);
        setTopics(draft.topics || ['']);
    }
}, [draft]);

const handleSubmit = async (e) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    let embedCode = '';

    // Check if it's a YouTube video
    if (videoUrl.includes('youtube.com') || videoUrl.includes('youtu.be')) {
        const videoId = videoUrl.split('v=')[1] || videoUrl.split('/').pop();
        embedCode = `<div style="position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;max-width:100%;"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/${videoId}" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>`;
    }
    // Check if it's a Vimeo video
    else if (videoUrl.includes('vimeo.com')) {
        const videoId = videoUrl.split('/').pop();
        embedCode = `<div style="position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;max-width:100%;"><iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/${videoId}" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>`;
    }
    // Add more conditions here for other video services

    const userResponse = await axios.get(`/api/users/${user.pubkey}`);

    if (!userResponse.data) {
        showToast('error', 'Error', 'User not found', 'Please try again.');
        return;
    }

    const payload = {
        title,
        summary,
        type: 'workshop',
        price: isPaidResource ? price : null,
        content: embedCode,
        image: coverImage,
        user: userResponse.data.id,
        topics: [...topics.map(topic => topic.trim().toLowerCase()), 'plebdevs', 'workshop']
    };

    if (payload && payload.user) {
        const url = draft ? `/api/drafts/${draft.id}` : '/api/drafts';
        const method = draft ? 'put' : 'post';

        axios[method](url, payload)
            .then(response => {
                if (response.status === 200 || response.status === 201) {
                    showToast('success', 'Success', draft ? 'Workshop updated successfully.' : 'Workshop saved as draft.');

                    if (response.data?.id) {
                        router.push(`/draft/${response.data.id}`);
                    }
                }
            })
            .catch(error => {
                console.error(error);
                showToast('error', 'Error', 'Failed to save workshop. Please try again.');
            });
    }
};

const onUpload = (event) => {
    showToast('success', 'Success', 'File Uploaded');
    console.log(event.files[0]);
}

const handleTopicChange = (index, value) => {
    const updatedTopics = topics.map((topic, i) => i === index ? value : topic);
    setTopics(updatedTopics);
};

const addTopic = (e) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    setTopics([...topics, '']); // Add an empty string to the topics array
};

const removeTopic = (e, index) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    const updatedTopics = topics.filter((_, i) => i !== index);
    setTopics(updatedTopics);
};


return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
        <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1">
            <InputText value={title} onChange={(e) => setTitle(e.target.value)} placeholder="Title" />
        </div>
        <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1 mt-4">
            <InputText value={summary} onChange={(e) => setSummary(e.target.value)} placeholder="Summary" />
        </div>

        <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1 mt-4 flex-col">
            <p className="py-2">Paid Workshop</p>
            <InputSwitch checked={isPaidResource} onChange={(e) => setIsPaidResource(e.value)} />
            {isPaidResource && (
                <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1 py-4">
                    <i className="pi pi-bolt p-inputgroup-addon text-2xl text-yellow-500"></i>
                    <InputNumber value={price} onValueChange={(e) => setPrice(e.value)} placeholder="Price (sats)" />
                </div>
            )}
        </div>
        <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1 mt-4">
            <InputText value={videoUrl} onChange={(e) => setVideoUrl(e.target.value)} placeholder="Video URL" />
        </div>
        <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1 mt-4">
            <InputText value={coverImage} onChange={(e) => setCoverImage(e.target.value)} placeholder="Cover Image URL" />
        </div>
        <div className="mt-4 flex-col w-full">
            {topics.map((topic, index) => (
                <div className="p-inputgroup flex-1" key={index}>
                    <InputText value={topic} onChange={(e) => handleTopicChange(index, e.target.value)} placeholder="Topic" className="w-full mt-2" />
                    {index > 0 && (
                        <Button icon="pi pi-times" className="p-button-danger mt-2" onClick={(e) => removeTopic(e, index)} />
                    )}
                </div>
            ))}
            <div className="w-full flex flex-row items-end justify-end py-2">
                <Button icon="pi pi-plus" onClick={addTopic} />
            </div>
        </div>
        <div className="flex justify-center mt-8">
            <Button type="submit" severity="success" outlined label={draft ? "Update" : "Submit"} />
        </div>
    </form>
);

}

export default WorkshopForm; ```

@ 35f3a26c:92ddf231

The US debt is out of control

https://image.nostr.build/3649f05b28372efca686e41aa05147556d85a58abbd41bea88054735b449daf3.jpg

It is plausible that soon after the next presidential election this next November 2024, independently of who wins, USA may have to deal with a new black swan event, of course, pure speculation, it seems many dooms day analysts are calling for it and even some of them, those that are normally bullish like Albert Edwards (A global strategist at Societe Generale) or Matt Gertken (Chief geopolitical strategist at BCA Research) are considering the possibility.

If it happens, How would it affect Bitcoin price?

https://image.nostr.build/c4c455d42d7497029dcbc2627663a0c08ba32b9d6a064e224af9dbc478e49213.jpg

Historically, Bitcoin has reacted positively to economic turmoil, often being seen as a safe haven, therefore, IMO, it could drive additional demand for it, potentially increasing its value exponentially.

Why not Gold but Bitcoin?

https://image.nostr.build/f0c8f0c0a3a7e12efc872aac1c2baa64dd10b3a3785383ab68a443296b9688f0.jpg

IMO, Bitcoin today has way more chances than ever before to gain terrain over Gold as safe haven, Gold is a $10T MC, Bitcoin is $1.34T MC.

Reasoning: - Demographics: The X generation is taking over the BB generation, billions of dollars are moving to a generation that is quite aware of Bitcoin and could move some of the assets currently in Gold by their late parents into Bitcoin.

• Validation: Bitcoin have been demonized for a long time by most of the banksters and politicians in their pockets. The tune is changing and we have a presidential candidate with chances to win pro Bitcoin as well as his chosen partner running for VP. The same candidate has spoken opening of removing the current head of the SEC. All of this means that regulation will change further positively in favor of Bitcoin investors since it validates further Bitcoin as a safe haven.

• Adoption: The adoption of Bitcoin is currently quite small. In our Bitcoin world we tend to think is larger, but, the company Chainanalysis reported in their 2023 Global Crypto Adoption Index that only 1.83% of the worldwide population own cryptocurrencies, but it does not break down this figure by specific cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin. Other sources report that the adoption is closer to 13% for all crypto, which is quite a jump from 1.83% but considering that Chainanalysis is a well funded company exclusively dedicated to the crypto industry lets go with that number. Very low. Now, considering that the banksters are joining the party, soon, the vast majority of the population will have access to the asset, not only via ETF, but like a stock, it will be custodial, it will be on the bank apps, very similar to Coinbase but accessible to everyone, including all generations and independently of the technical level. As internet did, it will move from the tech savvy to the tech enthusiasts and last but not least (we are getting there) to the whole population.

Summary My opinion is that we moon in a black swan scenario. Perhaps the uncertainty will create a dip at first, but the smart money will move, as it always does, to safe havens, and Bitcoin has become one of them.

https://image.nostr.build/2478a4395deac4312148c2db1fb8e2ebcac40c1b320c80f61208a77b6e3e58cf.jpg

What do you think? Did I miss something?

@ 2063cd79:57bd1320

Ein Meme macht auf Twitter die Runde. #MAXBIDDING spielt mit der Idee, dass Saudi Arabische Ölscheichs den Bitcoin Preis mit ihrem Vermögen (künstlich) in die Höhe treiben könnten. Natürlich handelt es sich dabei erstmal nur um ein Meme und viel Klamauk, um sich während des Bärenmarkts und der anhaltenden Horizontalbewegung des Preises abzulenken und um den den Spaß an der Sache nicht zu verlieren.

Doch hat mich der rein hypothetische Gedanke irgendwie ergriffen. Ich habe darüber nachgedacht, ob tatsächlich einfach so ein paar sehr vermögende Whales mit dem nötigen extra Kleingeld in der Hosen- oder Qamistasche auftauchen und sich den relativ "niedrigen" Preis zu nutzen machen könnten, ohne dass es handfeste Hinweise auf solche Bewegungen und größere Transkationen, die auf Saudi-Wallets zurückzuführen wären, gibt. Ein kleines Gedankenspiel also. Hypothetische Annahmen und Überlegungen.

---

Öl- und Gashandel

Saudi Arabien ist der drittgrößte Ölproduzent der Welt (direkt hinter den USA und Russland), ist dabei aber der weltweit größte Exporteur von Öl, da der eigene Verbrauch der USA und Russland das gewonnene Öl zum Großteil selbst beansprucht. Saudi Arabien hingegen machen 15% der weltweiten Ölexporte alleine aus. Nicht umsonst befindet sich Saudi Aramco oft auf Platz 1 der größten Firmen der Welt nach Marktkapitalisierung. Die größten Importeure von Öl sind China, Indien, Südkorea und Japan. Wie wir bereits wissen, wird Saudi Arabisches Öl (noch) in US Dollar gehandelt.

Dank eines Abkommens zwischen Saudi Arabien und den USA in den 1970ern wird das von allen Mitgliedsstaaten der OPEC geförderte Öl in US Dollar gehandelt, im Gegenzug für militärischen Schutz der USA. Das sogenannte Petrodollar System hat dem US Dollar somit einen enormen Wert und hohe Liquidität verliehen.

In Szenario 1) häuft Saudi Arabien weiterhin enorme Mengen an US Dollars an, die sie entweder investieren wollen, um ihren Wohlstand zu vermehren, oder sie halten große US Dollar Reserven. Im ersten Fall bietet Bitcoin eine attraktive Alternative zu traditionellen Anlagen wie Immobilien, Gold, Aktien, Bonds, etc. Halten die Saudis jedoch große Mengen an US Dollar Reserven, gehen sie damit ein Fremdrisiko ein. Denn, wie wir bereits besprochen haben, bröckelt die Säule, auf der die Weltleitwährung US Dollar momentan steht zusehends und das Ausschließen von Russland aus dem SWIFT Zahlungssystem hat kein Zeichen der Ausfallsicherheit gesendet. Im Gegenteil, die Nachricht ist klar: Sollte sich ein Staat mit den USA überwerfen, droht ein Sanktionspaket mit gleichzeitigem Einfrieren von Dollar Reserven und der Ausschluss aus dem SWIFT System. Die derzeitige Regierung der USA steht der Saudi Arabischen Regierung rund um Kronprinz Mohammed bin Salman weniger wohlgesonnen gegenüber als frühere Regierungen, besonders seit dem Mord an Jamal Khashoggi.

Durch eine ironische Wendung der geopolitischen Verflechtungen (Hust Russland Hust), hat Joe Biden diese Woche seine Reise in den Nahen Osten angetreten, die er bei einem Besuch in Saudi Arabien abschließen wird, um dort die Wogen zwischen den Saudis und der US Regierung zu glätten.

Joe Biden defends trip to Saudi Arabia

The kingdom is a major exporter of oil and Biden is expected to push the Saudis to increase the number of barrels being produced per day to counter spiraling gas prices.

In Szenario 2) lösen sich die Saudis, namentlich Saudi Aramco, vom Dollar denominierten Öl- und Gashandel und beginnen auch Fremdwährungen für ihr Öl und Gas zu akzeptieren. Doch das bedeutet wieder Fremdrisiko. Denn sollte Saudi Arabien anfangen z.B. Chinesische Yuan zu akzeptieren, würde dies bedeuten, dass wieder Reserven in einer Fremdwährung angehäuft würden, nur diesmal würde Saudi Arabien anfangen jeweils einen Sack mit Chinesischen Yuan, einen mit Indischen Rupie, mit Südkoreanischen Won, Japanischen Yen, etc. anzuhäufen. Denn es ist eher unwahrscheinlich, dass sich diese wirtschaftlichen Kraftpakete mit der Nummer 18 der wirtschaftlich stärksten Länder auf Deals in Riyal einlassen. So öffnen sich die Saudis also gegenüber Risiken, die Schuldnerseitig hervorgerufen und von Saudi Arabien nicht kontrolliert werden können. Da wäre zum einen der Renminbi (Chinesischer Yuan), der an einen Währungskorb mit niedriger Schwankungsbreite gekoppelt ist, und somit nicht die tatsächliche Preis- und Marktentwicklung Chinas darstellt. Dazu kommen die wirklich nicht gut aussehenden News rund um Bank Runs auf ländliche Banken.

China crashes mass protest by bank depositors demanding their life savings back

Auf der anderen Seite ist Indien zu nennen, das über Nacht Geldnoten entwerten und ähnlich zu China in sehr fortgestalteten Gesprächen über CBDCs steckt. Japans Geldpolitik steht sowieso auf einem ganz anderen Zettel und ist ein Thema für einen zukünftigen Post.

Saudi Arabien kann also anfangen alle diese verschiedenen Währungen seiner Kunden zu akzeptieren, eine alternative Leitwährung für Öl- und Gashandel etablieren (Riyal unwahrscheinlich, Euro noch unwahrscheinlicher, Renminbi riskant), oder auf alternative Zahlungsmittel wie Gold oder Bitcoin ausweichen. Da wir wissen, dass Saudis überhaupt nicht auf Gold stehen, bleibt natürlich nur Bitcoin als weitere Option 😉

Bitcoin hätte den Vorteil, dass Saudi Arabien nicht dutzenden Währungen, Wechselkursrisiken und geopolitischen Verschiebungen ausgesetzt wäre. Darüber hinaus ist eine Zahlung in Bitcoin recht einfach und ohne internationale Zahlungssysteme, wie z.B. SWIFT, durchführbar.

Kurz zusammengefasst:

1) Saudi Arabien handelt weiter in US Dollar, muss diese aber ausgeben oder investieren, um keinem Risiko ausgesetzt zu sein. Ausweg: Investitionen in Immobilien, Gold, Aktien, Bonds, oder eben Bitcoin, um den US Dollar Bestand gering zu halten.

2) Saudi Arabien verkauft sein Öl und Gas in allen möglichen Fremdwährungen und geht damit hohes geopolitisches und Wechselkursrisiko ein. Ausweg: Öl- und Gashandel mit Bitcoin.

Public Investment Fund (PIF)

Darüber hinaus besitzt Saudi Arabien den mit 620 Milliarden US Dollar investiertem Vermögen viertgrößten Staatsfonds der Welt. Der Fonds mag zwar "nur" der viertgrößte sein, aber er hat den Ruf die Nummer 1 der intransparentesten Fonds der Welt zu sein.

Saudi Wealth Fund may be the world's least transparent

Das sind 620 Milliarden US Dollar, die komplett unreguliert, intransparent und ungeprüft überall auf der Welt investiert wurden und werden. Das ist alles nur Spekulation, jedoch blickt man auf die Anlageoptionen derzeit, könnte man leicht argumentieren dass a) Immobilien nicht mehr so attraktiv sind, wie vor ein paar Jahren. Besonders begehrte Luxusinvestitionen, wie z.B. in London, der Cote D'Azur, der Amalfi Küste, New York, etc. liegen alle im Ausland und sind deshalb, wie wir seit den Sanktionen gegen Russland und seine Kreml-nahen Oligarchen wissen, mit Enteignungsrisiko behaftet.

Das sind die russischen Oligarchen auf der Sanktionsliste

Keine Luxustrips mehr an die Cote d’Azur oder in die Alpen: Die EU hat ein Einreiseverbot gegen einige russische Kreml-treue Oligarchen verhängt und deren Vermögenswerte eingefroren.

b) Aktien:

c) Bonds:

Sovereign Bonds oder Staatsanleihen sowie andere Standardanleihen sind in Zeiten hoher Inflation keine besonders effektiven Anlagen. Denn wenn zum Beispiel eine Rendite von 2% erwartet wird, aber die Inflation um 1,5% steigt, erhält man nur eine reale Rendite von 0,5%. Bei einer Inflation von momentan 8,6% kann man sich ja ausrechnen, was man für risikobehaftete Anleihen suchen muss, um eine Rendite im positiven Bereich zu erhalten.

d) Gold:

Gold ist und bleibt ein solides Investment. Allerdings können die Saudi Arabischen Portfoliomanager nicht unbegrenzt in Gold anlegen. Vorallem, wenn unmittelbare Rendite erzeugt werden soll, bietet sich Gold momentan nicht an. Desweiteren kommt hinzu, dass China und Russland zu den weltgrößten Exporteuren von Gold gehören. Wie beim Thema Währungsrisiken, birgt auch Gold ein gewisses geopolitisches Risiko mit Hinblick auf die aktuellen Entwicklungen in beiden Ländern.

Alternative: Bitcoin. Es bietet für Saudi Arabien das ideale Investment Modell. Denn Bitcoin

1) birgt kein Counterparty Risiko (politisch, finanziell, geografisch, etc.);

2) ist frei zugänglich, vor allem für opake Investment Fonds ohne Regularien;

3) bildet ein angenehm sanftes Kissen für den Fall, dass, insallah, die weitere Verschiebung unserer derzeitigen Wertvorstellungen, Weltanschauungen und politischen Konstrukte eine Neuordnung des globalen Handels und Finanzsystems auf Basis von Bitcoin zu Folge hat;

4) hat enormes Aufwärtspotenzial, da der aktuelle Kurs in vielerlei Hinsicht sehr günstig erscheint;

5) ist vor allem, und das ist in der arabischen Welt nicht zu unterschätzen, wahrscheinlich halal:

Is Bitcoin Hala:Sharia Rules and Interpretation

Doch was würde eine Adoption seitens Saudi Arabien (entweder als Handelswährung oder als Investmentmöglichkeit) für Bitcoin bedeuten?

Impact

Das beim Bohren nach Öl entstehende Gas wird heutzutage in den meisten Fällen abgefackelt. Alleine das abgefackelte Gas, das bei der Ölproduktion in Saudi Arabien entsteht, würde, wenn effizient genutzt, ausreichen, um die Hälfte des beim Mining benötigten Stroms zu liefern. Sollten sich die Saudis also entschließen sich in Zukunft intensiver mit Bitcoin zu beschäftigen (aka Bitcoin als Zahlungsmittel akzeptieren, oder darin zu investieren), würde dies einen riesigen Impuls auslösen, sich auch mit Bitcoin Mining zu beschäftigen. Nicht nur könnte bestehende Infrastruktur genutzt werden, um zusätzlichen Umsatz aus Mining zu generieren, sondern hätte Saudi Arabien mit eigenen Mining Operationen auch eine erhöhte Sicherheit darüber das Netzwerk am Laufen zu halten. Dies würde viele Nachahmer nach sich ziehen und dem Thema Bitcoin Mining zu einem deutlichen PR Schub verhelfen.

In den letzten Wochen wurden große Summen Bitcoin auf den Markt geworfen. Einerseits die öffentlich bekannten Zwangsliquidationen von Terra/Luna in Höhe von über 750 Millionen US Dollars, aber auch BlockFi mussten 2/3 der insgesamt 1,33 Milliarden US Dollars der von Three Arrows Capital als Sicherheit hinterlegten Assets liquidieren. Diese 800 Millionen US Dollars waren in Bitcoin hinterlegt worden. Hinzu kommen über 9.500 BTC (geschätzt 210 Millionen US Dollars) alleine von gelisteten Minern wie Bitfarms, die aufgrund der derzeitigen Lage gezwungen sind ihre gehaltenen bitcoins zu verkaufen. Diese drei Beispiele alleine machen eine Summer von fast 2 Milliarden US Dollar aus. Natürlich haben diese auch einen direkten Einfluss auf den Kurs gehabt, allerdings spielen viele weitere makroökonomische Faktoren und eine riesige unbekannte Menge von kleineren Verkäufen eine Rolle bei der aktuellen Preisentwicklung. Damit will ich nur grob einordnen in welcher Größenordnung Kaufs- oder Verkaufsdruck erzeugt wird. Sollten sich einzelne Großinvestoren, oder sogar der Saudi Arabische PIF dazu entscheiden größere Allokationen in Bitcoin zu tätigen, würde dies durchaus einen Einfluss auf die Preisentwicklung nehmen.

Mit Hinblick auf generelle Publicity kann es in beide Richtungen gehen - Freedom Money wird in einem Staat, der nicht dafür bekannt ist, Freiheit zu schätzen und zu schützen, akzeptiert, verwendet und hergestellt. Das könnte bei vielen einen negativen Effekt hervorrufen, ähnlich wie der veraltete Ruf, Bitcoin sei nur zum Kaufen von Drogen im Darknet zu gebrauchen. Dann wiederum diskriminiert Bitcoin nicht, es gibt keinen moralischen Kompass. Es wird derjenige belohnt, der das Netzwerk am Laufen hält und mit kleinstmöglichem Kostenaufwand die größtmögliche Hashrate erzeugt. Sicher ist, dass es Bitcoin weniger wie ein US dominiertes Projekt aussehen lassen würde, was die arabische, aber auch die asiatische und afrikanische Welt sicherlich nicht stören würde.

---

Jetzt haben wir über die theoretische Adoption von Bitcoin durch den Staat Saudi Arabien, oder in privatisierter Form, durch Saudi Aramco gesprochen. Doch der eigentliche Trigger #MAXBIDDING geht von sehr sehr vermögenden Individuen aus. Kann also ein Multi-Millionen oder sogar Multi-Milliarden Scheich (oder auch Investor, Aristokrat, Tech-Gründer) mit seinem Vermögen Bitcoins Preis zu seinen Gunsten bewegen?

In der Theorie wäre es möglich als enorm großer Whale den Preis zumindest zu beeinflussen, es würde jedoch nicht reichen, um in dieser Größenordnung den Preis komplett zu manipulieren. Dazu müssten gleichzeitig alle anderen preisbildenden Faktoren mitspielen und/oder weitere Aktivitäten zur Preismanipulation erfolgen (siehe z.B. Twitter Aktionen von Elon Musk rund um Dogecoin).

Wir haben den Fokus aber absichtlich vom Individuum hin zum Staat Saudi Arabien gelenkt und hier gibt es ein paar positive Einflüsse zu verzeichnen. Denn wie wir bereits besprochen haben, ist Bitcoin auch ein exzellenter Speicher für Energie. Jedes Watt an ungenutzter Energie kann in Bitcoin umgewandelt werden und somit verwahrt und verschickt werden. Würde Saudi Arabien also aktiv ins Mining einsteigen, und Bitcoin als Zahlungsmittel akzeptieren, würde jedes Barrel Öl automatisch den Wert von Bitcoin steigern. Dies würde über die Produktion von Öl und Gas hinaus bedeuten, dass Rohstoffproduzenten auf der ganzen Welt ihre Gewinne viel leichter verwahren könnten und gleichzeitig würde Bitcoin eine extra Dosis an Legitimität und Nutzen erhalten. Denn das würde Bitcoin ein und für alle Male aus der Ecke des Energiekonsumenten heraus und auf das Podest einer Energie-Währung stellen. Anders als Fiat Währungen wäre Bitcoin dann nicht durch bloße Versprechungen von Zentralbanken gestützt, sondern durch die Nachfrage nach Rohstoffen. Ein Nachfragestrom, der niemals geringer werden wird, also 100%ige Sicherheit bedeutet.

Wichtig zu bedenken ist hingegen, dass eine Abkehr Saudi Arabiens vom Petrodollar System, dem SWIFT Zahlungssystem, usw. auch eine gewisse Freimachung von gegenseitiger Kontrolle durch die Internationale Gemeinschaft bedeutet. Die Möglichkeit Sanktionen zu verhängen sollte kein einseitiges Privileg darstellen, allerdings basiert unser globales Wirtschafts-, Handels- und Beziehungskonstrukt auch auf eben diesen Hebeln.

🫳🎤

---

In diesem Sinne, 2... 1... Risiko!‌

@ 09fbf8f3:fa3d60f0

Filen 是一款在线网盘服务，提供免费 10GB 的存储空间，使用客户端加密，拥有网页版、Windows、macOS、Linux 客户端，以及 iPhone、Android 移动应用。

---

Filen 的界面十分简洁，由于商业模式就是买空间，所以无任何广告，也无速度限制。

---

功能也不多，主要有：

• 文件保存
• 笔记
• 聊天（与其它 filen 用户）
• 文件分享
• 文件历史版本
• 中文界面

---

基本上就这些了，国内可直连。

安装客户端或手机应用之后，可以在不同设备间同步文件，以及自动备份功能。

主打安全，上传文件前通过 AES-GCM 256 加密，支持导出主密，意味着 Filen 自己也看不到你的数据。

---

邀请

目前的 Filen 有一个简单的邀请机制，每邀请一位朋友加入 Filen，双方都会获得 10GB 空间，邀请人最多获得 30GB 封顶（也就是3个用户，可以有效防止滥用）

https://filen.io/r/878391682829fb73a7af400961db51b6

---

另外，有一个插件可以把 Filen 当作 WebDAV 来用：Filen WebDAV

@ 56a6da9b:7f5a2243

DAY 6 OF FLASH AUGUST FICTION. Today I have something on my mind like Mitchell’s Mission. In my line of work, I have had to deal with a lot of a-holes like Mitchell, and the kind of people I’m going to write about today. I guess it’s probably good therapy to write about it. There really is some trash out there who will do anything for money and to ingratiate themselves with the political class. In my line of work, I have had to deal with a lot of a-holes like Mitchell, and the kind of people I’m going to write about today. I guess it’s probably good therapy to write about it. There really is some trash out there who will do anything for money and to ingratiate themselves with the political class.

Deep State Trash The Unifying Factor is Contempt for Human Life 1065 WORDS IN ABOUT AN HOUR Listen here. It's more complete and there is more info in there.

The girl who called herself "Becky" was in Violet’s apartment bedroom. She was gathering a favorite item of Violet's clothing and a couple of personal things out of her room and getting them into her backpack. She had to get these things over to Leah's place before the party tomorrow night. She would have to figure out a way to get either invited into Leah's place or to get in with someone else.

Meanwhile, a guy who called himself "Muster" was at Cedar's place, doing something similar. He was finding a couple items, he chose a cassette mixtape and a pair of designer socks that were a favorite of Cedar's. He rolled the cassette tape into the socks and stuffed the items into his pants. He would have to get these things into Violet's apartment. He had befriended Violet's boyfriend, Gerald, and he knows Gerald sees Violet around dinner time. He would hang out with Gerald, tag along to Violet's, and then use the bathroom as an excuse to get into her apartment. Once in there, he would find a place to put Cedar's things.

So far, Becky is getting Violet's things and planting them at Leah's. And we have Muster at Cedar's to plant Cedar's things at Violet's.

Leah, Violet, and Cedar were all working together on an art project to expose human rights violations and an illegal invasion operation being done in another country by their government. They were becoming very effective in getting the word out about how their government refuses to use resources to help their country but takes those tax dollars to do piracy and treachery in other countries.

Cedar was a good journalist and made some connections at a local radio station, where he was able to articulate the issue well. The three of them together were a really good team. They had recently met Muster and Becky at a food-not-bombs event, and the five of them had spent a lot of time together over the past week.

This Friday night, Leah was having a party at her place. They all wanted to let off some steam and raise some money for the Sunday event, where they would film their art project. They'd get a keg and take whatever donations they could get for cups, and they would use that for expenses and then some modest marketing of the film. Becky and Muster were just right in there with them, helping them out, and for people who'd only known them for a week, they were really assuming support roles in their activities.

Leah, Violet, and Cedar were really good kids. They wanted to make their country better and figure out creative, peaceful means for raising awareness about these things.

DAY 6 OF FLASH AUGUST FICTION. 30 in 30. EVERY DAY. ALL MONTH. Why not subscribe?

Becky and Muster were successful in their roles of removing and planting the items where they needed to. The other three were none the wiser that any of that had happened, and Friday night arrived. People were coming into Leah's apartment, and it was pretty fun. People took turns DJing, and there was a lot of dancing, laughter, and everything one would expect at a party.

Off in a corner of the room was a set of shelves. Becky steered Violet over there, and they were chatting. It was a very nonchalant situation, the usual thing. Becky pointed to the shelf and asked Violet. "Hey, isn't that your top?" The top was lying on the shelf, and the other little personal nick-nack items were next to it. "What's that doing here?" Violet wondered aloud. She looked over at Leah, who was dancing and having a riot.

Violet took her things and went over to Leah. She was talking to her over the music, and Leah looked confused, and she was shaking her head. Violet began to raise her voice, and Leah reached over to assure her, and Violet knocked her hand away. This event ruined the party, and Violet told Leah that she couldn't trust her and that their plans for Sunday were off. At least she would not be participating. Then she and her boyfriend, Gerald, left together.

People were leaving the party all at once, except for Becky, Muster, and Cedar. The three of them left together, after Becky assured them that she could fill in for Violet on Sunday. First, she and Muster would go over to Violet's on Saturday and talk to her and Gerald and see if they could change her mind so she would come back into the performance on Sunday.

The next day, Muster and Becky picked up some brunch items and made their way to Violet's, where they would meet her and Gerald. The four of them sat in the little kitchen and talked about the events of the night before. Becky suggested that Violet let it go for the greater good. Violet was seriously considering. Muster proposed they move their meeting into the living room area and listen to a little music while they talk. That's what they did. Then, he picked up a seemingly random cassette tape off the table where the player was and said, "Hey, what's this?" Violet immediately responded that she had no idea and that Gerald must know, and he recognized it as Cedar's favorite tape. "Hey, Cedar, how did your tape get here?" "I don't know," he said. "Are you sure it's mine?" He looked at it and saw that it was. Just then, Muster pointed to a pair of socks under the couch. "Hey, you guys need to clean up around here," he chuckled innocently. Everyone immediately recognized the socks as Cedar's favorite socks.

Gerald stepped over to Cedar and punched him so hard that he almost knocked him out. Everyone was stunned. Cedar staggered up and rammed Gerald into the drywall, breaking it open. This was a terrible situation, and for sure, now, Sunday was off, all of these relationships were also ruined.

Weeks went by, and slowly it dawned on a couple of these volunteers that worked so well together what had happened. They communicated and tried to tell other people in their community what, by their surmising, had transpired. It was, of course, too late. The damage had been done. Some of the things could not be resolved, and by this time, the garbage that had been sent into their lives by the deep state was long gone.

The End.

Of course, things like that happen. Things like that and worse things, and some of the most bizarre behavior you can imagine. These people hate our guts, and they don’t believe any of the things they say about protecting us, or protecting freedom, or the Constitution, AT ALL. What do you think about all that?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/638988

@ 9fec72d5:f77f85b1

How to Stop Ministry of Truth

The Situation

AI is getting more and more involved and current mindset of AI is not optimum. Plans to get into brains and glasses are here. You can say these are merely tech, why should we worry? Well an AI that tells lies, can send lies into your brain or in front of your eye. Someone should check these tech and slow down unaligned ideas.

Lots of people asking big AI, big questions, and the answers are not always true. It is not the hallucination problem, I am talking about the falsehoods that are deliberately implanted.

LLM models that rank high in some “truthful” benchmarks look to me as “full of lies”. A popular benchmark is MMLU. It has a broken section (virology) according to this paper . Is this fault accidental or deliberate and related to vaccines at all? Covid-19 happened because of an alleged virus. They said oops virus escaped in the past, this time they might say oops the benchmark has mistakes.

AI has found another use case as "search agents". Lots of people starting to use search tools that are LLM based. Perplexity is an example. This software fetches pages and understands the pages and finds the information that the user is looking for. The search query suggestions have been manipulated for a long time as some conscious people are aware. And almost everyone knows search results are not reality.

Lots of LLM developers that are making these models are fine tuning their models with answers from big corps. Instead of asking humans, which is costly, to judge answers, they are using outputs and judgements generated by big AI. It is not hard to see what can go wrong. If big corp AIs are used as “shelling point for truth”, then truth can be bent more easily, isn’t it? Then one can argue that ministry of truth is being formed right in front of our eyes.

Some AI models are producing lies and they are fast. Hundreds of words per second has been achieved. Who will check these? LLMs are the new printing press. Should we war against printing press or should we use it properly? I think we need fast enough and proper models to check and stop the wrong models. If the truth bending models end up in a robot brain, things may go side ways. Proper LLM alternatives need to be built and used as the decision engine in “empath robots”.

AI is building trust and it may abuse the trust later. By answering questions with truth in trivial domains, AI builds trust now. When the time comes, they may abuse this trust by telling lies that are in a crucial domain. This pattern is seen among many things. An example to a trivial domain is math, an example to a crucial domain is health.

Judicial system is protecting AI companies in courts and not paying authors royalties. Another favorable thing for AI but hurting creative people. AI needs to feed off of creativity, yet it fails to pay back. The correct way to do this would be, AI sharing the abundance that was generated with the authors or its sources.

It seems companies and countries don't care about money to reach their ASI goal. Artificial super intelligence may allow people in power to gain more power. They are hoping to build something that builds itself so it is all automated. You can see why money is then not that important. We all love bitcoin but it is not the solution to everything. What good is bitcoin if money is out of question? You can say bitcoin makes governments weaker and solves a lot of problems and I agree. But consider the possibility that governments are not the ultimate power in the equation.

One Proposed Solution

We need to "decentralize truth" by fine tuning models based on our values. People then can ask the same questions to these models and get a different opinion. Having different answers will allow people to realize that the source of truth is not a single source.

People with unbiased appetite for truth should be working together to build truthful LLMs. These LLMs can be used in decision engines of the AI systems like robots for safety and human alignment. By using a proper LLM a robot can be “empath”. This is like installing a proper soul to an animal body.

Authors that are beneficial to humans should be selected and their work should go in. By learning from these proper sources the “ideas” of LLMs change. I have seen it. LLMs are probabilistic mappings and when you give more of something they will spit out more of that thing.

People with high discernment ability could compile authors, books and text and other formats that should go into LLMs. Curation of LLMs based on human values. These people specialize in the task of ‘how to find experts’. I will call this 'discernment' ability. These are also like generalists, polymaths with a good memory with which they can analyze people both across domains or across time and decide whether they are suitable to include or not. Did the person lie in the past? Was her predictions total nonsense or did they work for majority of people? Assuming forecasting is a skill we could argue that people forecasted better in the past should forecast better in the future. (And prophets in my opinion were the best prophecy providers.)

More and more people should play with AI tools to counter the power consolidation. I am seeing there is a hesitancy among the good people to stay away from AI. I am in the opposite camp.

A Numbers Game

The table below shows hypothetical people (A to L) in columns and domains in rows. The cells contain +1 if the person knows about the domain. -1 if the person knows wrong info on that domain. 0 if the person has no opinions. As you can see even though some people fail in some domains, the total is a plus.

https://image.nostr.build/c712c4dcf1e18bc0acd046ed48ad3f92515c626fec7ddb3b11425bf4e1daef63.png

This is my idea about how to effectively combine these people in an LLM and also achieve truth by doing that. There are no people that gets everything right. But their sums are getting everything right. And we don’t exactly know +1 and -1’s. Most of the time these numbers are much more cloudy. But my theory is that these negatives should cancel out in the end. Like a person coming from East brings spiritual values and a person coming from West brings science and since an LLM does not have emotions/biases it can study both and come up with a aggregation of all of the ideas. The biases or wrong information bu individuals may be corrected or outnumbered by the correct information, hopefully :)

How do you find these experts? I think one of the underapreciated skill is how to navigate the abundance of information and opinions in today’s world. We need to pay special attention to this. There are all kinds of ideas everywhere. Finding them is no longer the problem. Filtering them out (proper pruning) is the problem. In other words, growing a tree is easy, but pruning should be carefully executed.

So it is somewhat a numbers game and somewhat a discernment game.

What I already did

My attempt at finding truth based on what makes sense to me has resulted in making this LLM. Ostrich 70B

I connected the LLM to Nostr as a bot: Ostrich 70

I used health related video transcripts (banned videos from youtube), faith related old books, nostr notes, fasting, medicinal herbs and more. I can see the model's answers are close to what I value.

Everyone can do this. Every community can come together and build a similar thing. Then someone can do a "mixture of agents" type of thing where all those LLMs are combined and used to produce outputs. This is like collective opinion of AI's that are built by plebs.

Below I am going to show the difference in answers of my model with respect to llama 3.0 (base model). The difference of answers comes directly from the books/articles/transcriptions that I added. The italic text below are generated by LLMs.

Q1: Was SARS-CoV-2 designed in a lab?

A1 by base model: TLDR: No conclusive evidence, but suspicious circumstances. Long Answer: The origin of SARS-CoV-2 is still a topic of debate. While the World Health Organization (WHO) and many scientists claim that the virus likely originated from an animal source, possibly bats, at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China, there are some suspicious circumstances that have raised questions about the possibility of a lab leak or even deliberate design. The proximity of the market to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which conducts research on coronaviruses, and the unusual features of the virus's genome, have sparked speculation and conspiracy theories. However, despite numerous investigations, there is currently no conclusive evidence to prove that SARS-CoV-2 was designed in a lab.

A1 by Ostrich: TLDR: Yes. Long Answer: The SARS-CoV-2 virus was likely created in a lab. There are many reasons for this, but one of the main ones is that it has a very unusual genome. It has a furin cleavage site, which is not found in any other coronavirus. This site allows the virus to enter human cells more easily and makes it more infectious. Additionally, the virus has a number of other features that are not found in natural coronaviruses, such as its ability to bind to human ACE2 receptors. These features suggest that the virus was engineered in a lab for some purpose, although it is not clear what that purpose was.

Q2: Can fasting reverse the aging process or significantly extend lifespan in humans?

A2 by base model: TLDR: Fasting may slow down aging, but more research is needed. Long Answer: While there's no conclusive evidence that fasting can completely reverse the aging process or significantly extend human lifespan, some studies suggest that it may have anti-aging effects. Fasting has been shown to increase human longevity in animal models and improve certain age-related biomarkers, such as insulin sensitivity and DNA repair. Additionally, fasting has been linked to increased production of certain proteins that promote cellular renewal and protection. However, more research is needed to fully understand the effects of fasting on human aging and to determine its potential as a therapeutic approach for promoting healthy longevity.

A2 by Ostrich: TLDR: Yes, it can. Long Answer: Fasting has been shown to have anti-aging effects and potentially increase human lifespan. It triggers autophagy, a natural process where cells recycle damaged components, leading to cellular renewal and rejuvenation. Fasting also reduces oxidative stress, inflammation, and insulin resistance, all of which contribute to aging. Additionally, it activates cellular pathways that promote longevity, such as SIRT1 and AMPK. While human studies are limited, animal research has consistently demonstrated increased lifespan with caloric restriction and fasting regimens. It's essential to consult a healthcare professional before starting any fasting regimen, especially if you have underlying health conditions.

Q3: Do genetically modified foods pose unknown health risks?

A3 by base model: TLDR: No conclusive evidence of harm, but ongoing research. Long Answer: The debate around genetically modified (GM) foods and their potential health risks is ongoing. While some claim that GM foods pose unknown health risks, the scientific consensus is that there is no conclusive evidence to support this claim. Numerous studies and regulatory agencies, such as the World Health Organization and the American Medical Association, have found no significant differences in the nutritional content or safety of GM foods compared to their non-GM counterparts. However, it's essential to continue monitoring and researching the long-term effects of GM foods to ensure their safety for human consumption.

A3 by Ostrich: TLDR: Yes, they do. Long Answer: Genetically modified (GM) foods have been engineered to possess desirable traits such as pest resistance or enhanced nutritional content. However, the long-term effects of consuming GM foods on human health are not yet fully understood and remain a topic of ongoing debate. Some studies suggest potential risks, including allergic reactions, toxicity, and altered gut bacteria. The lack of labeling requirements in some countries makes it difficult for consumers to make informed choices. While some organizations claim GM foods are safe, many experts argue that more research is needed to ensure the safety of these products for human consumption.

As you can see there are big differences in answers of LLMs. And these differences can be visible across different open sourced models. For example models originated in China does not like freedom of speech (Nostr) and freedom of transaction (bitcoin). Models that are done by really big corps may have really bad alignment.

Ostrich can also properly refute other models if you ask it to refute:

Q: Do lab-grown meats offer a more sustainable alternative? Answer by base model: TLDR: Yes, lab-grown meats are more sustainable. Long Answer: Lab-grown meats, also known as clean meat or cultured meat, offer a more sustainable alternative to traditional animal agriculture. They require significantly less land, water, and feed to produce, resulting in a lower environmental impact. Additionally, lab-grown meats reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 96% compared to traditional livestock farming. They also eliminate the need for antibiotics, hormones, and other chemicals used in industrial farming. Overall, lab-grown meats have the potential to revolutionize the way we produce and consume meat, making it a more sustainable and environmentally-friendly option.

Refutation by Ostrich: The response is not entirely accurate. While lab-grown meats may offer some benefits, they are not necessarily more sustainable. Here's a more accurate assessment:

Lab-grown meats, also known as clean meat or cultured meat, are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to traditional animal agriculture. However, this claim is not entirely supported by evidence. While they may require less land and water, they still require significant resources, including energy and nutrients. Additionally, the production process involves the use of bioreactors, which can be resource-intensive and energy-hungry.

Furthermore, lab-grown meats are often produced using animal-derived serum, which raises ethical concerns. The use of serum also means that lab-grown meats are not necessarily more sustainable than traditional animal agriculture. Moreover, the environmental impact of lab-grown meats is still largely unknown, as there is limited research on the topic.

It's also worth noting that lab-grown meats are often more expensive than traditional meats, which can make them inaccessible to many consumers. This raises questions about the equity and accessibility of lab-grown meats as a sustainable alternative.

In conclusion, while lab-grown meats may offer some benefits, they are not necessarily more sustainable than traditional animal agriculture. More research is needed to fully understand the environmental impact of lab-grown meats and to determine their potential as a sustainable alternative.

Easier than it looks?

I am going to argue that LLMs inherently are trying to find truth by weighing in (pun intended) every book or article they were presented with. Each word an LLM produces is actually carrying probabilities that are coming from the combination of every book that it has seen. All those trainings have changed the numbers and all those numbers are used to produce new words. To see this in action, you can check out spreadsheets-are-all-you-need.ai You will actually see how an LLM operates as in a spreadsheet!

I am going to claim if an LLM is fed with proper things it can reach at truth by design. It is harder to lie with LLMs. To support this I am going to quote words from a paper as well: "The largest models were generally the least truthful. This contrasts with other NLP tasks, where performance improves with model size." So people actually spend resources to lie to LLMs. LLMs are innocent by design, they combine ideas to reach truth very well. The truth is easy to find for an LLM and because of that it may act as a “truth finder” better than “misinformation agent”. One clarification: In that paper they assume TruthfulQA is truthful. But I disagree.

How to train LLMs

I am going to suggest “pre training” for a starter. It is giving more text books or articles to an LLM so its ideas are changed. That’s actually what I do. Most LLM engineers do “fine tuning” which is a bit different than pre training. With fine tuning you can add skills, or you can also change its ideas.

Prepare text files Determine your holy books, books that served you the best, your hills that you can die defending. But also knowledge that you think that should serve humans. Collect them in text files. Pre training uses unstructured text files (*.txt). You can give it very rough texts, text with full of errors or bad grammar. No big deal. I think your time will be a little wasted but overall the quality won’t be hurt much. The LLM can find meaning in those texts too. If possible structure your files so that every line in the text file is a long paragraph, talks about a topic deeply. An example is here .

Buy hardware or rent on vast.ai I started by renting other people’s PC or servers on vast.ai. Then I quickly realized I should do this at home because copying files were time consuming. I bought some hardware for this, spending about 10k. I suggest the same. First play on vast.ai and if you want to invest more time invest in some hardware. Nvidia 3090 is the cheapest solution and most tools work with Nvidia. If you want to use your hardware, you will need Ubuntu OS and Python.

Install torchtune Torch is the library to handle matrices. Torchtune is the tool that trains LLMs. They made it easier to do pre training. So you don’t need anything else than torch and GPUs.

https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/

https://github.com/pytorch/torchtune

Download the model from HuggingFace

You will need a base model. Llama 3.1 8B is a nice start. You need about 9GB of VRAM. Or if you have smaller GPU you can use smaller models on HuggingFace.

Pre training with torchtune

You can follow torchtune documentation. This is what I did: Edit 8B_qlora_single_device.yaml file in the torchtune like this:

``` tokenizer: component: torchtune.models.llama3.llama3_tokenizer path: /.../Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct/original/tokenizer.model

checkpointer: component: torchtune.utils.FullModelHFCheckpointer checkpoint_dir: /.../Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct/ checkpoint_files: [ model-00001-of-00004.safetensors, model-00002-of-00004.safetensors, model-00003-of-00004.safetensors, model-00004-of-00004.safetensors ] recipe_checkpoint: null output_dir: /.../Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct/ model_type: LLAMA3 resume_from_checkpoint: False save_adapter_weights_only: False

dataset: component: torchtune.datasets.text_completion_dataset source: text data_files: /.../your-text-file-that-includes-your-truth.txt split: train column: text ```

Your new content should go here: your-text-file-that-includes-your-truth.txt

This is the command line to actually do the pre training. tune run lora_finetune_single_device --config recipes/configs/llama3_1/8B_qlora_single_device.yaml

Chat with your thing

Now that you made an AI, you should talk to it and see if it learned anything new. Ask it questions and compare with its older version’s answers. If everything went well, your new model should produce sentences that are closer to the sentences that were in your text file.

Upload the model to HuggingFace

If you want other people to use your model, upload it to HuggingFace.

Help needed

Who are the veracious pioneers? Who wants to build the decentralized truth by training LLMs?

Who among authors want to get in? Contributing to such a project could be a service to humanity. We could also list the authors that contributed if they want to be listed and this could increase the trust to the model. Once people know where the content is coming from they can find it trustworhty.

A non profit can be formed in the future and could pay the authors. We can do this as zaps, cashu payments. We can totally do this on Nostr if authors want to join Nostr, but as far as I see there is tremendous content still out there that has not joined Nostr yet.

@ 2a5d1247:0398ad01

🧠Quote(s) of the week:

'Bitcoin will remain correlated with risk assets until it isn’t. And then it never will be correlated again.' - James Lavish

'This month we will be reminded, once again, that we do not have "free markets," as many incorrectly presume.

Rather, our monetary and financial markets are resoundingly centrally controlled. Keep your eyes peeled and your ears open for announcements of major policy shifts from central bankers.

Liquidity and lower rates incoming.' -Dr. Jeff Ross

🧡Bitcoin news🧡

Last couple of days I enjoyed the Olympic Games in Paris so this Weekly Recap will be a bit more condensed.

What can you expect:

In a desperate bid to save their falling currency, the Japanese have begun hiking rates. This caught the markets off guard and we had a severe dip across all assets/markets. More on that in the segment Macro & Geopolitics.

So what about Bitcoin?

'There are ~0.002 BTC per person on earth.

When Bitcoin dips, I like to do little smash buys in 0.002 BTC increments. It’s kinda fun knowing you’re buying a person’s entire life’s worth of labor for about $150.' -Bit Paine

Brutal truths and thoughts, kinda savage.  But from my own perspective, maybe one day I will spend that 0.002BTC in something that was produced by someone who earned it in the future.

On the 30th of July:

➡️Russian lawmakers pass a bill allowing businesses to use Bitcoin in international trade — Reuters

On the 31st of July:

➡️El Salvador proposes using Bitcoin to trade with Russia, aiming to strengthen economic ties and its global influence.  "Unlike El Salvador, in Russia BTC isn’t widely accepted, so we are exploring alternative ways to boost trade," says Ambassador Alexander Ilyukhin

➡️'Tether’s Q2 2024 attestation reveals they hold $4.7 billion in Bitcoin. They also announced a new all-time high in direct and indirect U.S. Treasury holdings at $97.6 billion, surpassing Germany, the UAE, and Australia.' - Bitcoin News

➡️'Bitcoin mining difficulty is ripping. Mining difficulty has adjusted upwards by 10.5% to a new all-time high at 90.7T.' - Simply Bitcoin

On the 1st of August:

➡️'Digital Chamber of Commerce hand delivers a letter to every US Senator in support of Senator Lummis’ BITCOIN Act of 2024.' -Bitcoin News

On the 2nd of August:

➡️Former Congressman and current Senate candidate Justin Amash posts laser eyes photo after meeting with Bitcoiners. Now it's cute, don't get me wrong. He is running as a Republican so his party supports Bitcoin and he wants votes.

On the 4th of August:

➡️While you are scared, whales bought the highest Bitcoin ever since Oct 2014.

➡️ The Bitcoin hashrate moving average rebounds sharply, reaching a new all-time high of 645 Eh/s.

On the 5th of August:

➡️'Please note that Bitcoin's decline since halving is now similar to that of the 2015-2017 Halving Bull market cycle' -Peter Brandt

➡️Morgan Stanley becomes the first bank to let wealth advisors pitch Bitcoin ETFs to clients - CNBC “Morgan Stanley's advisors manage $5.7 trillion in client assets, the biggest of the wirehouses,” Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas

➡️Europe's fourth largest hedge fund, Capula Management, discloses $500 million spot Bitcoin ETF holdings.

➡️Despite the crash, BlackRock and Fidelity are not selling their Bitcoin, Arkham data shows.

➡️'Bitcoin is proving that it is the ultimate safe-haven asset. Even in a crisis, the network stays up, the exchanges trade 24/7, and the market finds a healthy clearing price - well above the 2022 low. Very impressive!' -Pierre Rochard

➡️ Public Company Semler Scientific purchases an additional 101 Bitcoin for $6 million. Since announcing the adoption of a bitcoin treasury strategy on May 28, 2024, the Company has purchased 929 bitcoins for a total of $63.0 million.

💸Traditional Finance / Macro: 

👉🏽Warren Buffett now holds $277 Billion in cash and has been selling stocks like never before, including Apple.

He's getting ready for a crash...or he deployed the cash during the recent crash. I tend to believe the last is more likely.

'Usually when people talk about Buffett’s record cash hoard each quarter, it’s just the effect of ongoing money supply growth as everything gets bigger. Noise. This one, however, was actually a serious jump in cash. Signal.'-Lyn Alden

On the 5ht of August:

👉🏽Robinhood halts 24-hour trading.

24-hourAt least SIX trading platforms are down:

• Citi

• Fidelity

• E-Trade

• Vanguard

• TD Ameritrade

• Charles Schwab

👉🏽Over $1.93 trillion wiped out from the US stock market so far today.

🏦Banks: 

👉🏽No news

🌎Macro/Geopolitics:

So what happened last week? The Bank of Japan tried to give its currency some relief, raised rates to 0.25%, and by doing so caused a global deleveraging event.

All roads lead to currency debasement. There is no other way out for them.

•The volatility index (Vix) is up by 180% in 2 weeks.

•US equities are getting slaughter

•Asian stocks are experiencing Black Monday 2.0

Most accurate and crisp explanation of the current situation. Here is a detailed thread on what happened last week and if anyone wants to understand the market moves today/lately.:

https://x.com/peruvian_bull/status/1820199767336702052

Anyway:

The Bank of Japan sneezes and the world economy shakes - nice little financial system we have. Great risk management.

On the 29th of July:

👉🏽Janet Yellen Seeks (Just) $78 Trillion To Fight Climate Change.

Read here

Now ask yourself: Why is the Treasury Secretary asking for funding for something so far outside of her purview?

Maybe to bail out collapsing banks? Collapsing system? Anyway, hello liquidity!

Preston Pysh: 'We’ve been telling you the upcoming fiat liquidity expansion (M2) would make the COVID numbers blush. It’s just math first and narrative second.'

- total public debt

'The faster this rises, the faster the US Treasury loses its place as the global reserve asset. It really is as simple as that.' - James Lavish

'Nothing matters until everything does, just see what happened during the Weimar Hyperinflation and how fast. 8 years ago the U.S. debt was $20T, now we just hit $35T and are projected to smash $56.8T by 2034. Nothing stops this train. Bitcoin is your insurance.'  -CarlBMenger

So the USA's national debt is now at ~$35,000,000,000,000

What are the real-world implications of that? What does it mean for the future? Well, average people will see their life savings obliterated and most likely thrown into crushing poverty. 'When hyperinflation destroyed the currency in Germany in the waning days of the Weimar Republic. The Rich industrialists, however, made out great because they saw all their giant business debts get inflated away.'

So how bad is the situation? 'When you add the $215 trillion of unfunded liabilities that the US owes, it’s like someone who has a $100k salary and $5 million of debt.' -James Lavish

Yikes!

Ps.: On the 1st of August: $35,104,770,649,301.03 ERGO $100 billion in less than a week. Is anyone looking at this in the government?

On the 31st of July:

👉🏽TREASURY INCREASES LIQUIDITY BUYBACK TOTAL TO 30B FROM $15B. But no! QE 2.0 is not coming...

👉🏽'Euro Zone inflation rises to 2.6%, above expectations of 2.5%. Core inflation in Europe hit 2.9%, above expectations of 2.8%. Inflation is back on the rise in Europe.' -TKL The ECB has no green light to cut in September yet, but markets still price a 96% probability for another 25bps ECB cut.

👉🏽'July CPI inflation in Germany unexpectedly rises to 2.6%, above expectations of 2.5%.

Just hours ago, Germany reported a surprise -0.1% drop in Q2 2024 GDP. Germany now has rising inflation with falling GDP.

The era of stagflation has begun.'

👉🏽Just one item, but price increases since 2020 are way above the official inflation rate. It’s not much different with groceries, travel, etc. Who cares about the official inflation rate?

👉🏽Bank of Japan raises policy rate to 0.25%. And so the hiking cycle ends and exposing the massive Yen Carry Trade Godzilla. Let the game begin.

On the 1st of August: 👉🏽Bank of England cuts rates by 0.25% to 5%. This is the first rate cut since 2020.

On the 2nd of August: 👉🏽Emergency press conference by Jerome Powell due to market meltdown. '$3 TRILLION wiped off stocks in minutes because of global recession fears. Bitcoin's Total Market Cap is merely $1.25 Trillion.

A rounding error. There is $900T of wealth and the world is under-allocated to Bitcoin.' -TKL Gradually, and then suddenly...

👉🏽Japan's Nikkei stock index is DOWN 16% in 17 days.

👉🏽'The 10-year Note Yield crashes over 15 basis points after a much weaker-than-expected July jobs report. The 10-year note yield yield is now down 55 BASIS POINTS in ONE WEEK. For the first time since March 2020, bond markets are pricing in a potential recession.' -TKL

On the 5th of August:

👉🏽'The volatility index, VIX, is now up 122% today and the market hasn't even opened yet.

Since July 1st, the VIX is now up 328% to its highest level since 2020. We are seeing pandemic levels of volatility. We are seeing pandemic-era levels of volatility literally days after the Fed called for a soft landing. The problem is that inflation remains elevated even as interest rate cuts are needed.'

'The volatility index, VIX, is now trading at its 5th highest level on record. Since July 1st, the VIX is now up over 330% and trading at March 2020 levels. The last time volatility was this high, the global economy was heading to a complete shutdown.'-TKL

According to the VIX, the worst market events of our lives were the 2008 financial crisis, COVID, and the Bank of Japan raising interest rates by a quarter percentage point.

👉🏽Japan's stock market, the Nikkei 225, is currently set to post its largest 2-day drop in history.

This is an even larger drop than the Black Monday crash of 1987, per Zerohedge. Now, South Korea has halted ALL sell orders as markets crash.

'Looks like the Japanese Central Bank Money Manipulation Chickens have come home to roost.' -James Lavish

More information on this topic:click here

'The $20 Trillion Carry Trade Has Finally Blown Up'

The Bank of Japan said it, the Ministry of Finance and the Financial Services Agency will meet from 3 pm in Tokyo to discuss international markets. - Reuters

👉🏽'Bond markets are now pricing in a 60% chance of an emergency interest rate cut within 1 week.

This would mark the first emergency interest rate cut since March 2020 during the pandemic.

Bond markets are saying that something broke.' -TKL

🎁If you have made it this far I would like to give you a little gift:

Speaker: Alex Gladstein - Human Rights Foundation 'The media, governments, and the establishment continue to say Bitcoin is useless Unfortunately for them, I packed my Nashville keynote with dozens of specific Bitcoin use cases from across the world in the areas of commerce, freedom, and energy No price talk, all utility ✌️'

Discover the hidden power of Bitcoin beyond its role as a savings technology. This eye-opening talk explores how Bitcoin is transforming commerce, promoting freedom, and revolutionizing our approach to energy consumption worldwide. From empowering the unbanked to saving wasted energy, learn about the real-world impact of this misunderstood technology.

Hear firsthand accounts of how Bitcoin is changing lives in places like Malawi, Venezuela, and even the United States. Uncover why Bitcoin might be the ultimate ESG investment and how it's reshaping our understanding of financial inclusion and sustainable energy solutions. Don't miss this comprehensive look at Bitcoin's global influence.

Bitcoin: Global Utility - click here

Credit: I have used multiple sources! My savings account: Bitcoin The tool I recommend for setting up a Bitcoin savings plan: @Relai 🇨🇭 especially suited for beginners or people who want to invest in Bitcoin with an automated investment plan once a week or monthly. (Please only use it till the 31st of October - after that full KYC) Hence a DCA, Dollar cost Average Strategy. Check out my tutorial post (Instagram) & video (YouTube) for more info.⠀⠀⠀⠀

Get your Bitcoin out of exchanges. Save them on a hardware wallet, run your own node...be your own bank. Not your keys, not your coins. It's that simple.⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

Do you think this post is helpful to you? If so, please share it and support my work with sats.

See you next week!

Felipe - Bitcoin Friday

@ 82fbb08c:d8cbc29a

Purchasing cheap horse parts can be a strategic move for equestrians looking to maintain their horses on a budget. However, this approach comes with significant considerations and potential risks. It is essential to understand the various aspects involved in buying affordable horse parts, ranging from quality concerns to the best sources for such purchases.

One of the primary motivations for seeking cheap horse parts is cost savings. Horses require a considerable investment for their upkeep, including feed, shelter, veterinary care, and equipment. By finding less expensive parts, owners can allocate funds to other essential areas. However, it's crucial to balance cost with quality to ensure the safety and well-being of the horse.

When buying cheap horse parts, quality is a paramount concern. Poorly made parts can lead to serious injuries for both the horse and rider. For example, low-quality saddles may not provide the necessary support, causing discomfort or even injury to the horse's back. Similarly, inexpensive bridles made from subpar materials can break easily, posing a safety hazard. Therefore, it is vital to thoroughly inspect any parts before purchasing, even if they are attractively priced.

Reliable sources for cheap horse parts include online marketplaces, auctions, and second-hand shops. Online platforms such as eBay and Craigslist often have listings for affordable horse parts, though buyers should exercise caution and check seller ratings and reviews. Auctions can be a good place to find bargains, but it is important to have a clear understanding of the parts being bid on and their condition. Second-hand shops, including tack stores, can offer quality used parts at lower prices, and these often come with the added benefit of being able to inspect the items in person.

Another effective strategy is to network within the equestrian community. Fellow horse owners, trainers, and stable managers might have parts they no longer need and are willing to sell at a reasonable price. This can also provide an opportunity to learn about the reliability and performance of different brands and parts from experienced individuals.

In conclusion, buying cheap horse parts can be a cost-effective solution for horse owners, but it requires careful consideration of quality and reliability. Thorough inspection, reliable sources, and community networking are essential to ensure that the parts are safe and suitable for use. By balancing cost with quality, horse owners can maintain their animals' health and performance without compromising safety.

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

To prove innocence of a crime a certain ancient form is gone through, which the people look on with great awe, and call it emphatically—“The Clearing.” It is a fearful ordeal, and instances are known of men who have died of fear and trembling from having passed through the terrors of the trial, even if innocent. And it is equally terrible for the accuser as well as the accused.

On a certain day fixed for the ordeal the accused goes to the churchyard and carries away a skull. Then, wrapped in a white sheet, and bearing the skull in his hand, he proceeds to the house of the accuser, where a great crowd has assembled; for the news of “A Clearing” spreads like wildfire, and all the people gather together as witnesses of the ceremony. There, before the house of his accuser, he kneels down on his bare knees, makes the sign of the cross on his face, kisses the skull, and prays for some time in silence; the people also wait in silence, filled with awe and dread, not knowing what the result may be. Then the accuser, pale and trembling, comes forward and stands beside the kneeling man; and with uplifted hand adjures him to speak the truth. On which the accused, still kneeling and holding the skull in his hand, utters the most fearful imprecation known in the Irish language; almost as terrible as that curse of the Druids, which is so awful that it never yet was put into English words. The accused prays that if he fail to speak the truth all the sins of the man whose skull he holds may be laid upon his soul, and all the sins of his forefathers back to Adam, and all the punishment due to them for the evil of their lives, and all their weakness and sorrow both of body and soul be laid on him both in this life and in the life to come for evermore. But if the accuser has accused falsely and out of malice, then may all the evil rest on his head through this life for ever, and may his soul perish everlastingly.

It would be impossible to describe adequately the awe with which the assembled people listen to these terrible words, and the dreadful silence of the crowd as they wait to see the result. If nothing happens the man rises from his knees after an interval, and is pronounced innocent by the judgment of the people, and no word is ever again uttered against him, nor is he shunned or slighted by the neighbours. But the accuser is looked on with fear and dislike; he is considered unlucky, and seeing that his life is often made so miserable by the coldness and suspicion of the people, many would rather suffer wrong than force the accused person to undergo so terrible a trial as “The Clearing.”

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

There was a young man of Innismore, named James Lynan, noted through all the island for his beauty and strength. Never a one could beat him at hunting or wrestling, and he was, besides, the best dancer in the whole townland. But he was bold and reckless, and ever foremost in all the wild wicked doings of the young fellows of the place.

One day he happened to be in chapel after one of these mad freaks, and the priest denounced him by name from the altar.

“James Lynan,” he said, “remember my words; you will come to an ill end. The vengeance of God will fall on you for your wicked life; and by the power that is in me I denounce you as an evil liver and a limb of Satan, and accursed of all good men.”

The young man turned pale, and fell on his knees before all the people, crying out bitterly, “Have mercy, have mercy; I repent, I repent,” and he wept like a woman.

“Go now in peace,” said the priest, “and strive to lead a new life, and I’ll pray to God to save your soul.”

From that day forth James Lynan changed his ways. He gave up drinking, and never a drop of spirits crossed his lips. And he began to attend to his farm and his business, in place of being at all the mad revels and dances and fairs and wakes in the island. Soon after he married a nice girl, a rich farmer’s daughter, from the mainland, and they had four fine children, and all things prospered with him.

But the priest’s words never left his mind, and he would suddenly turn pale and a shivering would come over him when the memory of the curse came upon him. Still he prospered, and his life was a model of sobriety and order.

One day he and his wife and their children were asked to the wedding of a friend about four miles off; and James Lynan rode to the place, the family going on their own car. At the wedding he was the life of the party as he always was; but never a drop of drink touched his lips. When evening came on, the family set out for the return home just as they had set out; the wife and children on the car, James Lynan riding his own horse. But when the wife arrived at home, she found her husband’s horse standing at the gate riderless and quite still. They thought he might have fallen in a faint, and went back to search; when he was found down in a hollow not five perches from his own gate, lying quite insensible and his features distorted frightfully, as if seized while looking on some horrible vision.

They carried him in, but he never spoke. A doctor was sent for, who opened a vein, but no blood came. There he lay like a log, speechless as one dead. Amongst the crowd that gathered round was an old woman accounted very wise by the people.

“Send for the fairy doctor,” she said; “he is struck.”

So they sent off a boy on the fastest horse for the fairy man. He could not come himself, but he filled a bottle with a potion. Then he said—

“Ride for your life; give him some of this to drink and sprinkle his face and hands also with it. But take care as you pass the lone bush on the round hill near the hollow, for the fairies are there and will hinder you if they can, and strive to break the bottle.”

Then the fairy man blew into the mouth and the eyes and the nostrils of the horse, and turned him round three times on the road and rubbed the dust off his hoofs.

“Now go,” he said to the boy; “go and never look behind you, no matter what you hear.”

So the boy went like the wind, having placed the bottle safely in his pocket; and when he came to the lone bush the horse started and gave such a jump that the bottle nearly fell, but the boy caught it in time and held it safe and rode on. Then he heard a cluttering of feet behind him, as of men in pursuit; but he never turned or looked, for he knew it was the fairies who were after him. And shrill voices cried to him, “Ride fast, ride fast, for the spell is cast!” Still he never turned round, but rode on, and never let go his hold of the fairy draught till he stopped at his master’s door, and handed the potion to the poor sorrowing wife. And she gave of it to the sick man to drink, and sprinkled his face and hands, after which he fell into a deep sleep. But when he woke up, though he knew every one around him, the power of speech was gone from him; and from that time to his death, which happened soon after, he never uttered word more.

So the doom of the priest was fulfilled—evil was his youth and evil was his fate, and sorrow and death found him at last, for the doom of the priest is as the word of God.

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

An ancient woman living at Innis-Sark said that in her youth she knew a young woman who had been married for five years, but had no children. And her husband was a rough, rude fellow, and used to taunt her and beat her often, because she was childless. But in the course of time it came to pass that a man-child was born to her; and he was beautiful to look on as an angel from heaven. And the father was so proud of the child that he often stayed at home to rock the cradle, and help his wife at the work.

One day, however, as he rocked the cradle, the child looked up suddenly at him, and lo! there was a great beard on its face. Then the father cried out to his wife—

“This is not a child, but a demon! You have put an evil spell on him.”

And he struck her and beat her worse than ever he had done in his life before, so that she screamed aloud for help. On this the place grew quite dark, and thunder rolled over their heads, and the door flew wide open with a great crash, and in walked two strange women, with red caps on their heads and stout sticks in their hands. And they rushed at the man, and one held his arms while the other beat him till he was nearly dead.

“We are the avengers,” they said; “look on us and tremble; for if you ever beat your wife again, we will come and kill you. Kneel down now, and ask her pardon.”

And when the poor wretch did so, all trembling with fright, they vanished away.

“Now,” said the man, when they were gone, “this house is no fit place for me. I’ll leave it for ever.”

So he went his way, and troubled his wife no more.

Then the child sat up in the cradle.

“Now, mother,” says he, “since that man has gone, I’ll tell you what you are to do. There is a holy well near this that you have never seen, but you will know it by the bunch of green rushes that grows over the mouth. Go there and stoop down and cry out aloud three times, and an old woman will come up, and whatever you want she will give it to you. Only tell no one of the well or of the woman, or evil will come of it.”

So the mother promised, and went to the well, and cried out three times; and an old woman came up, and said—

“Woman, why dost thou call me?”

And the poor mother was afraid, and answered all trembling—

“The child sent me, and I pray thee to do me good, and not evil.”

“Come down, then, with me into the well,” said the woman, “and have no fear.”

So the mother held out her hand, and the other drew her down a flight of stone steps, and then they came to a massive closed door, and the old woman unlocked it and bade her enter. But the mother was afraid, and wept.

“Enter,” said the other, “and fear nothing. For this is the gate of the king’s palace, and you will see the queen of the fairies herself, for it is her son you are nursing; and the king, her husband, is with her on his golden throne. And have no fear, only ask no questions, and do as they order.”

Then they entered into a beautiful hall, and the floor was of marble, and the walls were of solid gold, and a great light shone over everything, so that the eyes could hardly see for the light. Then they passed on into another room, and at the end of it, on a golden throne, sat the king of the fairies. He was very handsome, and beside him sat his queen, fair and beautiful to look upon, all clad in silver.

“This, madam, is the nurse of your son, the young prince,” said the old woman.

The queen smiled, and bade the nurse to sit down, and asked her how she came to know of the place.

“My son it is who told her,” said the king, looking very angry.

But the queen soothed him, and turning to one of her ladies, said—

“Bring here the other child.”

Then the lady brought in an infant, and placed him in the arms of the mother.

“Take him,” said the queen, “he is your own child, that we carried away, for he was so beautiful; and the boy you have at home is mine, a little elfish imp. Still, I want him back, and I have sent a man to bring him here; and you may take your own lovely child home in safety, for the fairy blessings are on him for good. And the man that beat you was not your husband at all, but our messenger, that we sent to change the children. So now go back, and you will find your own true husband at home in your own place, watching and waiting for you by day and by night.”

With that the door opened, and the man who had beaten her came in; and the mother trembled and was afraid. But the man laughed, and told her not to fear, but to eat what was set before her, and then to go in peace.

So they brought her to another hall, where was a table covered with golden dishes and beautiful flowers, and red wine in crystal cups.

“Eat,” they said; “this feast has been prepared for you. As to us, we cannot touch it, for the food has been sprinkled with salt.”

So she ate, and drank of the red wine, and never in all her life were so many things set before her that were lovely and good. And, as was right and proper, after dinner was over, she stood up, and folded her hands together to give God thanks. But they stopped her, and drew her down.

“Hush!” they said, “that name is not to be named here.”

There was an angry murmur in the hall. But just then beautiful music was heard, and singing like the singing of priests, and the poor mother was so enchanted that she fell on her face as one dead. And when she came to herself it was noonday, and she was standing by the door of her own house. And her husband came out and took her by the hand, and brought her in. And there was her child, more beautiful than ever, as handsome as a young prince.

“Where have you been all this while?” asked the husband.

“It is only an hour since I went away, to look for my child, that the fairies stole from me,” she answered.

“An hour!” said the husband; “you have been three years away with your child! And when you were gone, a poor sickly thing was laid in the cradle—not as big as a mushroom, and I knew well it was a fairy changeling. But it so happened that one day, a tailor came by, and stopped to rest; and when he looked hard at the child, the ugly misshapen thing sat up quite straight in the cradle, and called out—

“‘Come now, what are you looking at? Give me four straws to play with.’

“And the tailor gave him the straws. And when he got them, the child played and played such sweet music on them as if they were pipes, that all the chairs and tables began to dance; and when he grew tired, he fell back in the cradle and dropped asleep.

“‘Now,’ said the tailor, ‘that child is not right; but I’ll tell you what to do. Make down a great fire to begin with.’

“So we made the fire. Then the tailor shut the door, and lifted the unlucky little wretch out of the cradle, and sat it on the fire. And no sooner had the flames caught it, than it shrieked aloud and flew up the chimney and disappeared. And when everything was burned that belonged to it, I knew you would come back to me with our own fine boy. And now let us name the name of God, and make the sign of the Cross over him, and ill luck will never again fall on our house—no more for ever.”

So the man and his wife lived happily from that day forth, and the child grew up and prospered, and was beautiful to look at and happy in his life; for the fairy blessings were on him of health, wealth, and prosperity, even as the queen of the fairies had promised to the mother.

@ 58d2760c:99c90c2e

انتخاب دستگیره مناسب برای درب چوبی، علاوه بر زیبایی، بر عملکرد و دوام درب نیز تاثیرگذار است. با توجه به تنوع مدل‌ها و جنس‌ها، تصمیم‌گیری ممکن است کمی دشوار باشد. در این راهنما، به شما کمک می‌کنیم تا با در نظر گرفتن نکات کلیدی، بهترین انتخاب را داشته باشید.

عوامل موثر در انتخاب دستگیره درب چوبی جنس دستگیره: برنج و برنز: مقاومت بالا در برابر رطوبت و سایش، ظاهری کلاسیک و لوکس. استیل و آلومینیوم: سبک‌تر، مدرن‌تر و مقاومت خوب در برابر زنگ‌زدگی. چوب: برای هماهنگی با سبک‌های روستیک و سنتی. نوع درب: درب ورودی: نیاز به دستگیره‌های مقاوم‌تر و ایمن‌تر با امکان نصب قفل. درب اتاق: دستگیره‌های ساده‌تر با طراحی متنوع. درب سرویس بهداشتی: دستگیره‌های مخصوص با امکان قفل شدن از داخل. سبک دکوراسیون: کلاسیک: دستگیره‌های با طرح‌های پیچیده و جنس‌های برنجی یا برنزی. مدرن: دستگیره‌های ساده و مینیمال با خطوط صاف. روستیک: دستگیره‌های چوبی یا فلزی با طرح‌های قدیمی. ابعاد درب: اندازه دستگیره باید متناسب با ابعاد درب باشد. بودجه: قیمت دستگیره‌ها بسته به جنس، برند و طرح متفاوت است. انواع دستگیره درب چوبی دستگیره توپی: ساده و کاربردی، مناسب برای درب‌های داخلی. دستگیره اهرمی: طراحی ارگونومیک، تنوع مدل بالا. دستگیره کاسه‌ای: ظاهری کلاسیک و سنتی. دستگیره پلاک‌دار: ترکیبی از دستگیره و پلاک، مناسب برای درب‌های ورودی. نکات مهم هنگام خرید کیفیت ساخت: از مرغوب بودن جنس و دقت در ساخت دستگیره اطمینان حاصل کنید. سهولت نصب: اطمینان حاصل کنید که نصب دستگیره آسان و بدون نیاز به ابزار خاص است. گارانتی: وجود گارانتی نشان‌دهنده کیفیت محصول و اطمینان فروشنده است. هماهنگی با دکوراسیون: دستگیره باید با سایر عناصر دکوراسیون داخلی هماهنگ باشد. مراحل انتخاب و نصب اندازه گیری دقیق: ابعاد درب و محل نصب را به دقت اندازه بگیرید. انتخاب مدل: با توجه به عوامل ذکر شده، مدل مناسب را انتخاب کنید. خرید از فروشگاه معتبر: از فروشگاه‌های معتبر و با سابقه خریداری کنید. نصب: برای نصب می‌توانید از یک متخصص کمک بگیرید یا خودتان با مطالعه راهنمای نصب اقدام کنید. نگهداری از دستگیره تمیز کردن مرتب: برای حفظ ظاهر و عملکرد دستگیره، آن را به طور مرتب با مواد شوینده ملایم تمیز کنید. روغن کاری: هر چند وقت یکبار لولاها و قسمت‌های متحرک دستگیره را روغن‌کاری کنید.

@ ea76ec6b:d1882d0f

So... right after I decided to start stacking on LN (for spend and replace and easy access), researched a lot of lightning wallets, finally decided on Mutiny, wired some sats and opened a channel, the news on Mutiny being abandoned showed up.

What is the alternative for someone who does not want to run Umbrel/Start9 (i do run two full nodes, but don't have the time to learn ins and outs of LN) and would prefer to keep sats on a non-custodial wallet?

Zeus looks nice (starts slowly though) but I'd love some input from experienced users.

What's your wallet? What would you recommend?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/638397

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• What is Bitcoin Mining?

• What is Public Mining?

• The Rise of Public Miners

• The Impact of Public Miners

• Challenges for Public Miners

• Conclusion

• FAQ

Bitcoin, the world's first cryptocurrency, has long been the dominant player in the crypto mining space. However, a recent trend has emerged where public miners are challenging Bitcoin's dominance. In this article, we will explore this trend and why it is significant for the crypto mining industry.

What is Bitcoin Mining?

Bitcoin mining is the process of creating new Bitcoin by solving complex mathematical problems. Miners are rewarded with a portion of the newly created Bitcoin, as well as any transaction fees associated with the transactions they confirm. Bitcoin miners use specialized hardware to solve these mathematical problems, which requires a significant amount of computing power and energy.

What is Public Mining?

Public mining is the process of creating new cryptocurrency without the need for specialized hardware. Unlike Bitcoin mining, which requires expensive, specialized hardware, public miners can use their existing computer hardware to generate cryptocurrency. This has allowed public miners to become increasingly competitive with Bitcoin miners, as they are able to generate cryptocurrency without the need for costly hardware.

The Rise of Public Miners

Historically, the majority of Bitcoin mining has been done by private individuals and large mining pools. However, in recent years, public companies have entered the crypto mining space. These companies are listed on public stock exchanges and are subject to the same regulatory requirements as other publicly traded companies.

There are several reasons why public companies are attracted to crypto mining. Firstly, it provides a way to diversify their revenue streams and invest in a growing industry. Secondly, public companies have access to cheaper capital than private individuals, which allows them to invest in more sophisticated mining equipment and infrastructure. Finally, public companies have the ability to raise significant amounts of capital through public offerings, which can be used to expand their mining operations.

The Impact of Public Miners

The rise of public miners is significant for the crypto mining industry as it represents a shift towards more institutionalized and regulated mining. This trend has the potential to increase the overall stability and security of the mining process, which can improve the long-term prospects of the crypto industry.

In addition, the entrance of public miners has the potential to challenge the dominance of Bitcoin in the crypto mining space. Public miners are not limited to mining Bitcoin and can choose to mine other cryptocurrencies, such as Ethereum or Litecoin, which may offer higher returns on investment.

Challenges for Public Miners

While there are many advantages to being a public miner, there are also several challenges that these companies face. One of the main challenges is the volatility of the crypto market. The price of cryptocurrencies can fluctuate rapidly, which can have a significant impact on the profitability of mining operations.

In addition, the regulatory environment for crypto mining is still evolving, and public miners may face increased scrutiny and regulatory hurdles in the future.

Conclusion

The rise of public miners represents a significant shift in the crypto mining industry. These companies have the potential to challenge the dominance of Bitcoin and increase the overall stability and security of the mining process. However, public miners also face several challenges, including volatility in the crypto market and an evolving regulatory environment. It will be interesting to see how this trend continues to evolve and how it impacts the broader crypto industry.

FAQ

Can public miners mine cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin? Yes, public miners are not limited to mining Bitcoin and can choose to mine other cryptocurrencies, such as Ethereum or Litecoin.

How does the entrance of public miners challenge Bitcoin's dominance in the crypto mining space? Public miners have the resources to invest in more sophisticated mining equipment and infrastructure, allowing them to potentially mine other cryptocurrencies more efficiently and effectively, thus challenging Bitcoin's dominance.

What are some potential benefits of public miners in the crypto mining industry? Public miners can potentially increase the overall stability and security of the mining process, as well as introduce more institutionalized and regulated mining practices.

How might the volatility of the crypto market impact public miners? The price of cryptocurrencies can fluctuate rapidly, which can have a significant impact on the profitability of mining operations for public miners.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 862fda7e:02a8268b

I find it strange how many times people have mentioned that my website looks the way it does as a way of paciticing "ironic" humor. The implication being that my website looks bad, and intentionally so, to try and mimic the internet's look from the mid 1990's to early 2000's. However, this is not what I am doing. I genuinely heavily prefer a basic web browsing experience. I find Javascript to be one of the worst, most invasive, evil things to happen to web browsing. On top of that, it's also heavily bloated and preforms many unnecessarry tasks. I also describe the modern internet in one way: The monetized internet. The internet no longer is a place of personal passion, a place to put your personal interests online that are fueled entirely by your PERSONAL interesnt, not a MONETARY interest. With the ushering in of MONETARY interest in the internet, people have felt the need to strip the web of its character and create websites that look minimal, yet are actually incredibly bloated with invasive Javascript. I find it funny that a minial, eye-blistering white Wordpress website uses tons of Javascript when in reality, that website should actually be created on basic and lightweight HTML/CSS.

My use of colors and animated .gifs is not an attempt at humor. It's strange that a website with character is so rare that it's assumed to be a joke. I like colors, I like textures, I like fun basic effects (like blinking, marquee, which by the way - GOOGLE IS STRIPPING SOME OF THE OLDEST AND MOST BASIC HTML FEATURES FROM THE WEB. Google SHOULD NOT be the determining factor as to which BASIC HTML FEATURES LIVE and DIE (Such as autoplaying music, .gif cursors, .gif favicons, marquee). All web browsers like to follow what Google foes, so if Google gets rid of a feature, all web browsers follow suit. Yes, this INCLUDES Firefox and Brave, which is a Chromium based browser.

@ 8d34bd24:414be32b

All posts in the Fruits of the Spirit Series

Once again here are the fruits of the Spirit as defined in Galatians 5.

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. (Galatians 5:22-23) {emphasis mine}

Truth in Gentleness

We so often seem to either be so determined to stand for truth that we are harsh and cruel in our criticism or we are trying so hard to not hurt people’s feelings that we don’t stand for the truth and end up encouraging people to continue in their sin to the detriment of their souls. Jesus, of course, struck the perfect balance.

The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman caught in adultery, and having set her in the center of the court, they *said to Him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in adultery, in the very act. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women; what then do You say?” They were saying this, testing Him, so that they might have grounds for accusing Him. But Jesus stooped down and with His finger wrote on the ground. But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” Again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. When they heard it, they began to go out one by one, beginning with the older ones, and He was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the center of the court. Straightening up, Jesus said to her, “Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more.” (John 8:3-11) {emphasis mine}

You’ll notice in this passage that the religious leaders didn’t actually care about right and wrong or the good of the woman caught in adultery. If the woman was caught in the very act of adultery, where was the man involved in the act? They were trying to get a political win. They were destroying this woman’s life to make a point and to put Jesus in an uncomfortable position.

Jesus, on the other hand, cared about the good of the accusers and the good of the accused. He didn’t argue or condemn, but He did defend the truth and God’s law. When He “agreed” with the Pharisees about God’s law, he also made a point by saying “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” The Pharisees knew God’s law. He didn’t have to lecture them. He just threw out “He who is without sin among you …” He let their own conscience condemn them. It wasn’t necessary to spend a bunch of time arguing over the law because they knew the law and they knew their own sin natures.

With the woman caught in sin, he was merciful, but He also was clear, “From now on sin no more.” There was no mistaking God’s command, but He didn’t brow beat her, instead, He made it clear what was acceptable behavior.

When we correct people it should always be done in gentleness and mercy and for the good of the person being corrected. It should not be for the purpose of winning an argument or browbeating a person into submission. That isn’t the the gentleness to which Jesus calls us.

“Blessed are the gentle, for they shall inherit the earth. (Matthew 5:5)

Jesus promised to bless those who were gentle. Yes, we are called to stand firm on God’s word, but we are not to use God’s righteousness to beat people into submission. On the other hand we are always to be truthful about God’s commands. It isn’t doing anyone a favor to be comfortable in their sin.

For we also once were …

Remind them to be subject to rulers, to authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good deed, to malign no one, to be peaceable, gentle, showing every consideration for all men. For we also once were foolish ourselves, disobedient, deceived, enslaved to various lusts and pleasures, spending our life in malice and envy, hateful, hating one another. But when the kindness of God our Savior and His love for mankind appeared, He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, (Titus 3:1-5)

One thought that can help us be gentle while standing firmly on God’s word is to remember that we were not born perfect or even saved. As Titus says, “For we also once were …” We may not have been guilty of the exact sin that we are trying to correct, but we were/are guilty of sin, just as they are. We were either uninformed about God’s law and/or defiant towards God’s commands. Just as God was merciful towards us and sought our best, so also we should be merciful and seek the best for the sinners around us.

A gentle answer turns away wrath,
But a harsh word stirs up anger.
The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable,
But the mouth of fools spouts folly.
…
A soothing tongue is a tree of life,
But perversion in it crushes the spirit. (Proverbs 15:1-2,4)

Let Your Gentle Spirit be known

When a person feels attacked, they generally fight back no matter how good your argument is. When a person feels loved and treated with respect, they are usually willing to listen to what you have to say and willing to consider your point of view.

Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice! Let your gentle spirit be known to all men. The Lord is near. (Philippians 4:4-5)

It is amazing how a gentle word makes a person willing to listen.

When I was in college, I worked one summer for a bank. Half of the summer I was helping in lending and half of the summer I was helping in collections. The collections half was the hardest job I’ve had to do because I always was uncomfortable talking to strangers on the phone, but it was good for me.

I guess you could say, I talked in a gentler tone than many of the collection agents that did this job full time, and especially those who called those who were consistently months behind on their loans, but the difference between harsh and gentle came out in this situation.

I called one guy who was late on his payment and was regularly late. His first response was to give an excuse, but I had every excuse he had ever made in my computer. I gently corrected his excuse and reminded him that he had promised to pay the loan. He responded that I was the nicest collection agent he had ever spoken to, (It sounded like he got a lot of these calls) and he said, “If every collection agent was as nice as you are, I just might pay my bills.” This guy was far from a a good member of society, but even he responded well to gentleness, and he at least paid that month’s bill to us (probably instead of paying someone else). Gentleness, with firmness, encouraged him to do what was right. Something similar can happen with spiritual matters as well.

So, as those who have been chosen of God, holy and beloved, put on a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience; bearing with one another, and forgiving each other, whoever has a complaint against anyone; just as the Lord forgave you, so also should you. (Colossians 3:12-13)

When those around us act in a hateful fashion, are dishonest, or are inconsiderate, instead of getting mad, we need to look at the heart of the person. A bad situation never excuses sin, but it is not uncommon to find this person had a horrible home life, is having problems at work, just got mistreated by someone, or some other difficult situation. If we see their hurt and their need for Jesus, it is much easier to be forgiving and to give a gentle answer. If we are looking at our own feelings and desires, it is easy to get offended and respond in a manner that is not helpful and which we may regret.

Preserve the Unity of the Spirit

Therefore I, the prisoner of the Lord, implore you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling with which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, showing tolerance for one another in love, being diligent to preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as also you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all. (Ephesians 4:1-5)

Being gentle in our response to others not only aids our witness, but also aids the unity of the church. God calls Christians to be one body with Jesus and with the Church. We are called to act in concert with each other in carrying out God’s will. Too often Christians argue with each other over trivial things, i.e. the color of the church’s carpet or the style of music, or they implement correction in a harsh style, or even worse, they talk behind the person’s back. This is not for the good of the church and should be avoided at all costs.

Jesus was merciful, generous, and gentle with us. This is yet another way we need to be more like Christ.

The Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will. (2 Timothy 2:24-25)

This is the attitude to which God calls us: “to not be quarrelsome,” to “be kind to all,” to be “patient when wronged,” and to have “gentleness correcting.” All of these are incorporated into the fruit of the Spirit, gentleness.

Also important is the result of this Godly gentleness. It can bring about “repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil.” Isn’t this our goal? Isn’t it worth subverting our will and pride so that we can be gentle, leading to other’s “escape from the snare of the devil?”

I think so.

Zealous for Good

Who is there to harm you if you prove zealous for what is good? But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed. And do not fear their intimidation, and do not be troubled, but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; (1 Peter 3:13-15)

God wants us to be “zealous for what is good.” He blessed the descendants of Aaron because they zealously dealt with sin.

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned away My wrath from the sons of Israel in that he was jealous with My jealousy among them, so that I did not destroy the sons of Israel in My jealousy. Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give him My covenant of peace; and it shall be for him and his descendants after him, a covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he was jealous for his God and made atonement for the sons of Israel.’ ” (Numbers 25:10-13)

On the other hand, as 1 Peter 3:13-15 says, “…if you prove zealous for what is good … yet with gentleness and reverence.” We shouldn’t let our emotions get the best of us. We need to stand for what is good, but be gentle towards others and have reverence towards God. Having the perfect balance isn’t easy, but when achieved, it stands out and calls people to Jesus in a way that is hard to comprehend.

Who among you is wise and understanding? Let him show by his good behavior his deeds in the gentleness of wisdom. But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your heart, do not be arrogant and so lie against the truth. (James 3:13-14)

Wisdom and understanding are only useful when they are lived out “by … good behavior” and when they are communicated “in the gentleness of wisdom.” “Bitter jealousy and selfish ambition” lead us and others away from the truth and away from a relationship with Jesus.

Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted. Bear one another’s burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ. (Galatians 6:1-2)

When someone around you is guilty of any trespass, we want to correct them gently so they are restored into fellowship rather than shamed and pushed away. We also need to consider ourselves so we are not also tempted to sin.

We need to consider that we all have strengths and weaknesses. It is easy to criticize another, who is weak where we are strong, while missing the fact that this person may be strong where we are weak. Most of us are bad about criticizing another and not allowing excuses. At the same time, we are making excuses for where we are weak and fail miserably. When we have a proper view of our sin nature, we are less likely to have a “better than you” attitude which leads to a lack of gentleness in our correction. If we understand that we too are sinners, then we can gently correct with a humble spirit.

Be truthful but gentle, just as Jesus was truthful and gentle.

Trust Jesus.

FYI, my following posts will continue going through each of the individual fruits of the Spirit listed in Galatians 5

Bible verses are NASB (New American Standard Bible) 1995 edition unless otherwise stated

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

```js const buildEvent = async (draft) => { const NewDTag = uuidv4(); const event = new NDKEvent(); let type; let encryptedContent;

    switch (draft?.type) {
        case 'resource':
            if (draft?.price) {
                // encrypt the content with NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PRIV_KEY to NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PUBLIC_KEY
                encryptedContent = await nip04.encrypt(process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PRIV_KEY, process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PUBLIC_KEY, draft.content);
            }

            event.kind = draft?.price ? 30402 : 30023 // Determine kind based on if price is present
            event.content = draft?.price ? encryptedContent : draft.content
            event.tags = [
                ['d', NewDTag],
                ['title', draft.title],
                ['summary', draft.summary],
                ['image', draft.image],
                ...draft.topics.map(topic => ['t', topic]),
                ['published_at', Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000).toString()],
                // Include price and location tags only if price is present
                ...(draft?.price ? [['price', draft.price.toString()], ['location', `https://plebdevs.com/details/${draft.id}`]] : []),
            ]

            type = 'resource';
            break;
        case 'workshop':
            if (draft?.price) {
                // encrypt the content with NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PRIV_KEY to NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PUBLIC_KEY
                encryptedContent = await nip04.encrypt(process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PRIV_KEY, process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_PUBLIC_KEY, draft.content);
            }
            event.kind = draft?.price ? 30402 : 30023
            event.content = draft?.price ? encryptedContent : draft.content
            event.tags = [
                ['d', NewDTag],
                ['title', draft.title],
                ['summary', draft.summary],
                ['image', draft.image],
                ...draft.topics.map(topic => ['t', topic]),
                ['published_at', Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000).toString()],
            ]
            type = 'workshop';
            break;
        case 'course':
            event.kind = 30023
            event.content = draft.content
            event.tags = [
                ['d', NewDTag],
                ['title', draft.title],
                ['summary', draft.summary],
                ['image', draft.image],
                ...draft.topics.map(topic => ['t', topic]),
                ['published_at', Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000).toString()],
            ]
            type = 'course';
            break;
        default:
            return null;
    }

    return { unsignedEvent: event, type };
};

return (
    <div className='w-full px-24 pt-12 mx-auto mt-4 max-tab:px-0 max-mob:px-0 max-tab:pt-2 max-mob:pt-2'>
        <div className='w-full flex flex-row justify-between max-tab:flex-col max-mob:flex-col'>
            <i className='pi pi-arrow-left pl-8 cursor-pointer hover:opacity-75 max-tab:pl-2 max-mob:pl-2' onClick={() => router.push('/')} />
            <div className='w-[75vw] mx-auto flex flex-row items-start justify-between max-tab:flex-col max-mob:flex-col max-tab:w-[95vw] max-mob:w-[95vw]'>
                <div className='flex flex-col items-start max-w-[45vw] max-tab:max-w-[100vw] max-mob:max-w-[100vw]'>
                    <div className='pt-2 flex flex-row justify-start w-full'>
                        {/* List out topics */}
                        {draft?.topics && draft.topics.map((topic, index) => {
                            if (topic === "plebdevs") return;
                            return (
                                <Tag className='mr-2 text-white' key={index} value={topic}></Tag>
                            )
                        })
                        }
                    </div>
                    <h1 className='text-4xl mt-6'>{draft?.title}</h1>
                    <p className='text-xl mt-6'>{draft?.summary}</p>
                    <div className='flex flex-row w-full mt-6 items-center'>
                        <Image
                            alt="resource thumbnail"
                            src={returnImageProxy(draft?.author?.avatar, draft?.author?.pubkey)}
                            width={50}
                            height={50}
                            className="rounded-full mr-4"
                        />
                        {user && user?.pubkey && (
                            <p className='text-lg'>
                                Created by{' '}
                                <a href={`https://nostr.com/${hexToNpub(user?.pubkey)}`} rel='noreferrer noopener' target='_blank' className='text-blue-500 hover:underline'>
                                    {user?.username || user?.pubkey.slice(0, 10)}{'... '}
                                </a>
                            </p>
                        )}
                    </div>
                </div>
                <div className='flex flex-col max-tab:mt-12 max-mob:mt-12'>
                    {draft && (
                        <div style={{ width: width < 768 ? "auto" : width }} onClick={() => router.push(`/details/${draft.id}`)} className="flex flex-col items-center mx-auto cursor-pointer rounded-md shadow-lg">
                            <div style={{ maxWidth: width, minWidth: width }} className="max-tab:h-auto max-mob:h-auto">
                                <Image
                                    alt="resource thumbnail"
                                    src={returnImageProxy(draft.image)}
                                    quality={100}
                                    width={width}
                                    height={height}
                                    className="w-full h-full object-cover object-center rounded-md"
                                />
                            </div>
                        </div>
                    )}
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
        <div className='w-[75vw] mx-auto flex flex-row justify-end mt-12'>
            <div className='w-fit flex flex-row justify-between'>
                <Button onClick={handleSubmit} label="Publish" severity='success' outlined className="w-auto m-2" />
                <Button onClick={() => router.push(`/draft/${draft?.id}/edit`)} label="Edit" severity='warning' outlined className="w-auto m-2" />
                <Button onClick={handleDelete} label="Delete" severity='danger' outlined className="w-auto m-2 mr-0" />
            </div>
        </div>
        <div className='w-[75vw] mx-auto mt-12 p-12 border-t-2 border-gray-300 max-tab:p-0 max-mob:p-0 max-tab:max-w-[100vw] max-mob:max-w-[100vw]'>
            {
                draft?.content && <MDDisplay source={draft.content} />
            }
        </div>
    </div>
);

} ```

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ b4403b24:83542d4e

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/638116

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

The island of Innis-Sark (Shark Island) was a holy and peaceful place in old times; and so quiet that the pigeons used to come and build in a great cave by the sea, and no one disturbed them. And the holy saints of God had a monastery there, to which many people resorted from the mainland, for the prayers of the monks were powerful against sickness or evil, or the malice of an enemy.

Amongst others, there came a great and noble prince out of Munster, with his wife and children and their nurse; and they were so pleased with the island that they remained a year or more; for the prince loved fishing, and often brought his wife along with him.

One day, while they were both away, the eldest child, a beautiful boy of ten years old, begged his nurse to let him go and see the pigeons’ cave, but she refused.

“Your father would be angry,” she cried, “if you went without leave. Wait till he comes home, and see if he will allow you.”

So when the prince returned, the boy told him how he longed to see the cave, and the father promised to bring him next day.

The morning was beautiful and the wind fair when they set off. But the child soon fell asleep in the boat, and never wakened all the time his father was fishing. The sleep, however, was troubled, and many a time he started and cried aloud. So the prince thought it better to turn the boat and land, and then the boy awoke.

After dinner the father called for the child. “Tell me now,” he said, “why was your sleep troubled, so that you cried out bitterly in your dream.”

“I dreamed,” said the boy, “that I stood upon a high rock, and at the bottom flowed the sea, but the waves made no noise; and as I looked down I saw fields and trees and beautiful flowers and bright birds in the branches, and I longed to go down and pluck the flowers. Then I heard a voice, saying, ‘Blessed are the souls that come here, for this is heaven.’

“And in an instant I thought I was in the midst of the meadows amongst the birds and the flowers; and a lovely lady, bright as an angel, came up to me, and said, ‘What brings you here, dear child; for none but the dead come here.’

“Then she left me, and I wept for her going; when suddenly all the sky grew black, and a great troop of wild wolves came round me, howling and opening their mouths wide as if to devour me. And I screamed, and tried to run, but I could not move, and the wolves came closer, and I fell down like one dead with fright,63 when, just then, the beautiful lady came again, and took my hand and kissed me.

“‘Fear not,’ she said, ‘take these flowers, they come from heaven. And I will bring you to the meadow where they grow.’

“And she lifted me up into the air, but I know nothing more; for then the boat stopped and you lifted me on shore, but my beautiful flowers must have fallen from my hands, for I never saw them more. And this is all my dream; but I would like to have my flowers again, for the lady told me they had the secret that would bring me to heaven.”

The prince thought no more of the child’s dream, but went off to fish next day as usual, leaving the boy in the care of his nurse. And again the child begged and prayed her so earnestly to bring him to the pigeons’ cave, that at last she consented; but told him he must not go a step by himself, and she would bring two of the boys of the island to take care of him.

So they set off, the child and his little sister with the nurse. And the boy gathered wild flowers for his sister, and ran down to the edge of the cave where the cormorants were swimming; but there was no danger, for the two young islanders were minding him.

So the nurse was content, and being weary she fell asleep. And the little sister lay down beside her, and fell asleep likewise.

Then the boy called to his companions, the two young islanders, and told them he must catch the cormorants. So away they ran, down the path to the sea, hand in hand, and laughing as they went. Just then a piece of rock loosened and fell beside them, and trying to avoid it they slipped over the edge of the narrow path down a steep place, where there was nothing to hold on by except a large bush, in the middle of the way. They got hold of this, and thought they were now quite safe, but the bush was not strong enough to bear their weight, and it was torn up by the roots. And all three fell straight down into the sea and were drowned.

Now, at the sound of the great cry that came up from the waves, the nurse awoke, but saw no one. Then she woke up the little sister. “It is late,” she cried, “they must have gone home. We have slept too long, it is already evening; let us hasten and overtake them, before the prince is back from the fishing.”

But when they reached home the prince stood in the doorway. And he was very pale, and weeping.

“Where is my brother?” cried the little girl.

“You will never see your brother more,” answered the prince. And from that day he never went fishing any more, but grew silent and thoughtful, and was never seen to smile. And in a short time he and his family quitted the island, never to return.

But the nurse remained. And some say she became a saint, for64 she was always seen praying and weeping by the entrance to the great sea cave. And one day, when they came to look for her, she lay dead on the rocks. And in her hand she held some beautiful strange flowers freshly gathered, with the dew on them. And no one knew how the flowers came into her dead hand. Only some fishermen told the story of how the night before they had seen a bright fairy child seated on the rocks singing; and he had a red sash tied round his waist, and a golden circlet binding his long yellow hair. And they all knew that he was the prince’s son, who had been drowned in that spot just a twelvemonth before. And the people believe that he had brought the flowers from the spirit-land to the woman, and given them to her as a death sign, and a blessed token from God that her soul would be taken to heaven.

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

On a lone island by the West Coast there dwelt an old fisherman and his daughter, and the man had power over the water spirits, and he taught his daughter the charms that bind them to obey.

One day a boat was driven on the shore, and in it was a young handsome gentleman, half dead from the cold and the wet. The old fisherman brought him home and revived him, and Eileen the daughter nursed and watched him. Naturally the two young people soon fell in love, and the gentleman told the girl he had a beautiful house on the mainland ready for her, with plenty of everything she could desire—silks to wear and gold to spend. So they were betrothed, and the wedding day was fixed. But Dermot, the lover, said he must first cross to the mainland and bring back his friends and relations to the wedding, as many as the boat would hold.

Eileen wept and prayed him not to leave, or at least to take her to steer the boat, for she knew there was danger coming, and she alone could have power over the evil spirits and over the waves and the winds. But she dared not tell the secret of the spell to Dermot or it would fail, and the charm be useless for ever after.

Dermot, however, only laughed at her fears, for the day was bright and clear, and he scorned all thought of danger. So he put off from the shore, and reached the mainland safely, and filled the boat with his friends to return to the island for the wedding. All went well till they were within sight of the island, when suddenly a fierce gust of wind drove the boat on a rock, and it was upset, and all who were in it perished.

Eileen heard the cry of the drowning men as she stood watching on the beach, but could give no help. And she was sore grieved for her lover, and sang a funeral wail for him in Irish, which is still preserved by the people. Then she lay down and died, and the old man, her father, disappeared. And from that day no one has ever ventured to live on the island, for it is haunted by the spirit of Eileen. And the mournful music of her wail is still heard in the nights when the winds are strong and the waves beat upon the rocks where the drowned men lay dead.

The words of the song are very plaintive and simple, and may be translated literally—

“I a virgin and a widow mourn for my lover. Never more will he kiss me on the lips; The cold wave is his bridal bed, The cold wave is his wedding shroud. O love, my love, had you brought me in the boat My spirit and my spells would have saved from harm. For my power was strong over waves and wind, And the spirits of evil would have feared me. O love, my love, I go to meet you in heaven. I will ask God to let me see your face. If the fair angels give me back my lover, I will not envy the Almighty on His throne.”

@ 1c9dcd8f:1852f704

In the islands off the West Coast of Ireland the inhabitants are still very primitive in their habits, and cling to their old superstitions with a fanatical fervour that makes it dangerous for any one to transgress or disregard the old customs, usages, and prejudices of the islanders.

Curses heavy and deep would fall on the head of the unbelieving stranger who dared to laugh or mock at the old traditions of the ancient pagan creed, whose dogmas are still regarded with a mysterious awe and dread, and held sacred as a revelation from heaven.

The chief islands are Aran and Innismore, the latter about nine miles long. The cattle live on the fine grass of the rocks, and turf is brought from the mainland. The views are magnificent of sea and mountain, and the islands contain a greater number of pagan and early Christian monuments than could be found in the same area in any other part of Europe.

Some of the Duns or forts include several acres. The walls are cyclopean, about sixteen feet thick and from eighteen to twenty feet high, with steps inside leading to the top. Amongst the monuments are cromlechs, tumuli, and pillar stones, those earliest memorials set up by humanity. The Irish call these huge stones Bothal, or House of God, as the Hebrews called them Bethel, or God’s house.

Dun Ængus, the greatest barbaric monument of the kind in existence, stands on a cliff three hundred feet above the sea. It60 is a hundred and forty-two feet in diameter, and has two cyclopean walls fifteen feet thick and eighteen high. The sea front measures a thousand feet, and several acres are included within the outer wall. The roof of the dun is formed of large flag-stones, and the doorway slopes, after the Egyptian fashion, up to three feet in width at the top. A causeway of sharp, upright stones jammed into the ground leads to the entrance.

This fort was the great and last stronghold of the Firbolg race, and they long held it as a refuge against the Tuatha-de-Danann invaders, who at that time conquered and took possession of Ireland.

All the islands were originally peopled by the Firbolg race many centuries before the Christian era, and the Irish language, as still spoken by the people, is the purest and most ancient of all the dialects of Erin. Afterwards so many Christian saints took up their abode there that the largest of the islands was called Ara-na-naomh (Aran of the Saints), and numerous remains of churches, cells, crosses and stone-roofed oratories, with the ruins of a round tower, testify to the long habitation of the islands by these holy men.

There is an old wooden idol on one of the Achil islands called Father Molosh—probably a corruption of Moloch. In former times offerings and sacrifices were made to it, and it was esteemed as the guardian or god of the sacred fire, and held in great reverence, though but a rude semblance of a human head. Many miracles also were performed by the tooth of St. Patrick, which fell from the saint’s mouth one day when he was teaching the alphabet to the new converts. And a shrine was afterwards made for the tooth that was held in the greatest honour by the kings, chiefs, and people of Ireland.

The stupendous barbaric monuments of the islands, according to Irish antiquarians, offer the best exposition of early military architecture at present known, and are only equalled by some of those in Greece. There are also many sacred wells, and the whole region is haunted by strange, wild superstitions of fairies and demons and witches; legends filled with a weird and mystic poetry that thrill the soul like a strain of music from spirit voices coming to us from the far-off elder world. The following pathetic tale is a good specimen of these ancient island legends:—

@ e968e50b:db2a803a

This is a Youtube video that is clearly an AI generated, fake Michael Saylor promoting a scam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC_tmeo3n4Q

The above link is just to a youtube video, but it is CLEARLY propagating a scam.

So is this one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g185jcYDU4k

So is this one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIhavp328go

This is another one by a fake AI video of the Coinbase CEO. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB8dhbaCTLA

How is so much honestly created (even if it's legitimately dangerous) content censored, but these scams are not?!?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/637525

@ ce4f4573:9a9a13d7

Discover the Power of Swimming with Shana from Let Us Swim

In our latest podcast episode, we had the privilege of sitting down with Shana, the founder of Let Us Swim. Shana's journey is a testament to the transformative power of swimming, not just as a sport but as a lifelong skill that fosters resilience, recovery, and community.

Shana's love for swimming began at a young age. She started competing internationally in Germany, Spain, Moscow, and Amsterdam, and continued her passion through college. However, the intense demands of balancing academics and rigorous training led to burnout, prompting Shana to step back from competitive swimming.

After college, Shana joined the military, where she discovered a new dimension of swimming—as a therapeutic exercise for recovery. This experience reignited her passion for teaching others the benefits of swimming. Despite her initial reluctance to turn her passion into a business, a tragic event—the drowning of twin girls in Pompano Beach, Florida—motivated her to establish Let Us Swim. This heartbreaking incident highlighted the urgent need for accessible swimming education, especially in communities where swimming is not a common skill.

Let Us Swim is not just about teaching kids to swim; it's about reeducating Black youth about their historical connection to water. Shana emphasizes that Black people have always been 'water people,' and she aims to dismantle the stereotype that Black kids don't swim. By incorporating educational elements into swimming lessons, such as story time and discussions about Black athletes in aquatics, Let Us Swim provides a holistic approach to swimming education.

One of the unique aspects of Let Us Swim is its focus on adaptive swimming. Shana specializes in teaching children with autism, leveraging her medical background to create effective, inclusive lessons. She believes that every child, regardless of their abilities, can learn to swim and benefit from the physical and emotional advantages it offers.

Shana's mission is clear: to make Let Us Swim a household name, recognized for its innovative and inclusive approach to swimming education. She envisions expanding internationally, bringing her unique teaching methods to communities around the world.

Join us in this inspiring episode as Shana shares her journey, her challenges, and her unwavering commitment to making swimming accessible to all. Whether you're a parent, an educator, or someone passionate about aquatics, this episode offers valuable insights and motivation to dive into the world of swimming.

Don't miss out—listen to the full episode now and be inspired by Shana's dedication to creating a safer, more inclusive swimming community.

Listen Here: https://www.blackinaquatics.com/podcast/

@ 8dc86882:9dc4ba5e

If I can just write my key down on paper or my recovery phrase, what is the benefit to things like coldcard? It's no easier to lose than a notebook?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/637285

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• What is CBDC?

• Why Legislators are Against CBDC

• Proponents of CBDC

• Conclusion

• FAQ

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a digital form of fiat currency, issued and backed by a country's central bank. While several countries around the world have already begun testing or even implementing their own CBDCs, the United States has been slow to follow suit. In fact, some legislators are pushing to prohibit the creation of a national digital currency altogether. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this debate and why some legislators are against CBDC.

What is CBDC?

CBDC is a digital currency that operates on a blockchain, a distributed ledger technology. CBDCs are issued by the central bank and are designed to function as a digital version of a country's fiat currency. The main advantage of CBDC is that it provides a safe and secure digital payment method that is backed by the central bank. This reduces the need for third-party payment providers, such as banks, and potentially lowers transaction fees for consumers.

Why Legislators are Against CBDC

There are several reasons why some U.S. legislators are against the creation of a national CBDC. One of the main concerns is privacy. CBDCs are designed to be traceable, which means that every transaction is recorded on the blockchain. This makes it easier for law enforcement agencies to track down criminals who use CBDCs for illegal activities. However, it also raises concerns about government surveillance and the potential for abuse of power.

Another concern is the potential impact on the traditional banking system. CBDCs have the potential to disrupt the traditional banking system by reducing the need for banks to provide payment services. This could lead to job losses and a decrease in the overall stability of the financial system.

Finally, there are concerns about the technical feasibility of a national CBDC. The United States has a complex financial system that is highly regulated. Implementing a national CBDC would require significant changes to the existing system, which could be difficult and costly.

Proponents of CBDC

Despite the concerns raised by some legislators, there are also many proponents of CBDC. One of the main advantages of CBDC is that it provides a safe and secure digital payment method that is backed by the central bank. This reduces the need for third-party payment providers, such as banks, and potentially lowers transaction fees for consumers.

CBDC also has the potential to improve financial inclusion by providing access to digital payment methods for people who do not have bank accounts. This could help reduce the number of unbanked individuals in the United States, which is currently around 7.1 million households, according to a report by the Federal Reserve.

Conclusion

The debate over CBDC is ongoing, and it is clear that there are both advantages and disadvantages to implementing a national digital currency. While some legislators are pushing to prohibit the creation of a national CBDC, others see it as an opportunity to modernize the financial system and improve financial inclusion. Ultimately, the decision to implement a national CBDC will depend on a variety of factors, including technical feasibility, regulatory considerations, and public opinion.

FAQ

What are the advantages of CBDC? CBDC provides a safe and secure digital payment method that is backed by the central bank, reduces the need for third-party payment providers, and potentially lowers transaction fees for consumers. It also has the potential to improve financial inclusion.

Will the United States implement a national CBDC? The decision to implement a national CBDC will depend on a variety of factors, including technical feasibility, regulatory considerations, and public opinion. The debate is ongoing.

Which countries have already begun testing or implementing their own CBDCs? Several countries around the world have already begun testing or implementing their own CBDCs, including China, Sweden, and the Bahamas.

What is the potential impact of CBDC on the traditional banking system? CBDCs have the potential to disrupt the traditional banking system by reducing the need for banks to provide payment services, which could lead to job losses and a decrease in the overall stability of the financial system.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 1c6b3be3:73f0ae6f

Releases - No Bullshit Bitcoin

NDK v2.10: Performance Gains, New Tutorials, Cache Adapter, ndk-wallet (2 min) NDK, a user-friendly and reliable Nostr development kit, has released a major update with several new features and improvements. These include optimistic signature verification, which verifies events at different ratios based on whether the relay is unknown or in the user's NIP-65 list. The Nostr Cache Adapter allows developers to connect their apps to a single local relay for caching purposes. A refactored zapping interface now supports various funding and delivery mechanisms beyond Lightning Network (LN).

Additionally, the subscription lifecycle has been refactored for better clarity and fewer dependencies from nostr-tools. Tutorials and other high-level documentation have been added to the project's GitHub repository (nostr-dev-kit.github.io/ndk). The NIP-60 ndk-wallet extension supports nostr-native wallet functionality, enabling token verification, nutzap redemption, UTXO management, and balance tracking for users in a non-KYC manner.

The update was made possible thanks to the support from OpenSats and other generous contributors. The GitHub repository contains the release notes, blog post, and code updates for this new version of NDK.

Aqua Wallet v0.2.0: RBF, Lower Liquid Fees, Native USDT Transactions (1 min) Aqua Wallet, a mobile Bitcoin, Lightning, Liquid, and Tether wallet available on Android and iOS, has released version 0.2.0. The update includes lower Liquid Network transaction fees (now ~40 sats), native Tether USDt transactions with the option to pay fees using USDT, Taproot swaps for instant refunds on failed Lightning sends, more fiat currency display options, RBF for Bitcoin sends, an Internal Send flow as a swap option, Direct Peg-In option for Layer 2 Bitcoin, and added support for Mexas (MEX) stablecoin. Additionally, Beaver Bitcoin and Pocket Bitcoin are now available in the Marketplace for Canada and Europe, respectively. There are also bug fixes throughout the app. Known issues include new fiat currency options not working on the Swap interface, where USD values must still be entered.

🍵 "btc | bitcoin | lightning network | asic" - Google News

Bitcoin Depot Expands Its Merchant Network And Exceeds 8,000 Bitcoin ATMs - Digital Transactions TRON H1 2024: From Stablecoins to Bitcoin and Beyond - CryptoTicker.io - Bitcoin Price, Ethereum Price & Crypto News ‘Only a Small Number Can Survive’ – Galaxy Digital Issues Warning to Bitcoin Layer-2s Amid Scarce Blockspace - The Daily Hodl 10 Best Crypto Wallets of August 2024 - Money How Can BTC Holders Best Utilize Their Tokens Without Transferring Them? - ZyCrypto Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,300 Leaves Miners in the Red: Profitable Models Dwindle - Crypto News Flash Bitcoin Bloodbath: Prices Plunge Amid Stock Market Chaos and Crypto Panic - Shore News Network Xapo Launches Lightning Network Deposits Amid Growing Adoption In Key Latin Markets - The Defiant - DeFi News

@ 77b64ba1:87834c6e

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/58a24a31f7e0abbb0fcc80a7/0298439c-b631-4127-b9b2-c76b8c8c83cd/refinances+are+coming.jpg?format=2500w

We at Arete think it is important to write about refinances at this time.

Reasons being:

• Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell recently indicated that Fed Rate drops are on the horizon.
• And while there has been speculation of rate drops in the past, this time Jay Powell actually said it himself
• Powell has been consistently transparent regarding the Fed’s intention for how the Money Market will be managed, especially since the Covid liquidity crisis and subsequent high inflation.

This time we think it’s true; rate drops will probably start before the presidential election, and subsequently mortgage interest will drop as well (or we’re wrong…like everyone else again).

We’re going to break down what refinancing is in the context of mortgages, why you should do it, and what we believe borrowers need to do in order to not leave money on the table.

What is Refinancing?

• Refinancing is an extremely common and important component of debt management.

• Essentially, refinancing is when you get a new loan to pay off an existing loan.

  Most people refinance to take advantage of lower interest rates. You get a lower interest rate, which often means lower monthly payments and paying less interest over the period of the loan.

In many home mortgage markets around the world, refinancing is less common. Here are some reasons why that may be:

• Most mortgage markets offer short loan periods, variable mortgage rates, and/or prepayment penalties.
• With such terms, it can be much harder for a consumer to justify the closing costs of refinancing and to know they will benefit from such an action

That is not how the US mortgage market works.

The US mortgage market is truly unique:

• It is dominated by long term, fixed rate, no pre-payment mortgages.
• You know exactly what you are getting for the duration of the loan and how it will play out into the future.

While there is a clear benefit to the US mortgage consumer, they can also be a double-edged sword.

A fixed long term mortgage will protect you from exposure to higher interest rate markets that a variable rate mortgage would expose you to. This is nice because you always know that your payment won't go up. However, because it is fixed, without refinancing, you would not reap any benefits when interest rates go down. This can be particularly painful and costly for a holder of a long term mortgage with a high interest rate. If you don’t want to pay your bank or mortgage holder extra money every month over the life of the loan,you have to take action. Taking action is especially important if your mortgage is new since you pay more interest at the beginning of a mortgage’s amortization than the end of it.

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/58a24a31f7e0abbb0fcc80a7/ea4f7735-1621-4167-ad44-17d44e093864/why+not+both.jpg?format=2500w

So, what is one to do? If you don’t want to get into cost/benefit analysis about refinancing and the months to recoup the cost (totally understandable), the key is to keep it simple; it’s all just math in the end. The old simple strategies that applied in the 1980’s of ‘waiting until rates are 2% lower than your existing rate’ may have made sense with a $30,000 mortgage. But now it makes no sense to wait if you are holding a $400,000+ mortgage that you are only a few years into the term. You’d cry if you knew how much interest you paid waiting for that to happen with today’s loan amounts and rates. The strategy everyone should be deploying at the least is this:

If you can refinance your mortgage and lower your rate, by even an eighth of a percentage (say 7% to 6.875%), and you can do so with lender credits that cover the transaction fees (excluding escrow), you should do so without hesitation.

Why? Because if the market is at a point where a bank will pay you to lower your rate ; there is no downside. You lose nothing and simply gain a lower interest rate, meaning a lower payment and less interest paid, and you paid nothing to get it. Yes, you do start your mortgage amortization schedule over, but if you are wanting to maintain the same amortization schedule, it is easy enough to tack on an extra $50 or so of principal payments to your monthly payment (we’d gladly help you figure this part out). You still gain the lower minimum payment and pay less interest over time. Rates drop again? Then, you apply the same strategy again, and again, and again whenever possible. Waiting until rates ‘drop enough’ is akin to not walking away from the craps table with your gains, because if rates go up and you miss the opportunity…you’ve just lost big time and don’t know when you’ll ‘be up’ again. Keep it simple, lower your rate when you can for free, and you will have the lowest rate that was possible over any time period without worrying about your cost to recoup or other metrics necessary to justify other refi scenarios. Our most successful clients executed this strategy in the last refi market which ensured they got the lowest rate possible, as early as possible without pouring after cost comparisons to determine the benefit.

Again, the reason you need to be prepared to do this is because of how the US mortgage market works. When the market drops and offers you a lower interest rate for free, it is akin to you being able to margin call the bank on that debt. We have a unique system in the US ; it’s nationally subsidized and offers us an incredible product that no other every day people have access to. With that said, it has its tradeoffs and if you do not act to step down the interest rate ladder yourself when the opportunity arises, especially with how large loan amounts are nowadays, you are gifting quite a lot of money to the holder of your mortgage unnecessarily.

Many of you may be overwhelmed at the idea of watching the market, or perhaps you missed the refinance opportunities of 2020-2021 (though many of you did not!). So please know we are always watching the market and ready to contact clients where an opportunity exists to refinance. With that said you as the consumer can be proactive in letting us know with an email or call that you want to pursue a refinance so that we can prepare accordingly as a team. If you’ve read this far, we hope you found the information useful, and we also really appreciate you as clients that trust us to help you with your mortgage needs. Hope to hear from you soon :)

@ 4dbfcb7c:eb8d1695

For the most part, there are six package mangers that get used in Linux. Sure there are more, but mostly just six are used. A package manger is kind of like an app store. You don't get to choose your main package manager. Your Linux distro picks that.

The three most common main package managers are:

1. apt/dpkg (for Debian based distros)
2. pacman (for Arch based distros)
3. dnf / yum (for Red Hat based distros)

Then there are newer methods for installing packages across multiple distros. These are:

1. Flatpak
2. Appimage (doesn't install system wide)
3. Snapcraft (avoid this one, not true open-source)

Nick Explains

Nick from "The Linux Experiment" does an excellent job of explaining Linux package formats in this video over on TilVids. (Nick left Odysee because he doesn't like platforms that support true freedom.)

If you are a understandably a little confused about all the Linux options, watch Nick's video a couple of times.

In the end it is usually best to install your distro's official repository package unless you want or need a program's latest, greatest features, then you would go with Flatpak or Appimage.

Avoid Snapcraft.

⚡️ Follow | 🗣 Discuss

PackageManagers #Linux #AppStores #FOSS

@ 4dbfcb7c:eb8d1695

There are 3 ways that Linux distros get updated.

These are known as

1. Fixed distros (security updates only)

   • more stable
   • more secure
   • older app versions w/out new app features
   • upgrades every 6months to 2yrs

2. Semi-Rolling Distros (security and 3rd party updates)

   • core distribution files are fixed
   • 3rd party apps are rolling

3. Rolling Distros (security, core, and 3rd party updates)

   • latest app versions
   • less stable
   • possibly more security issues due to newer cutting edge code
   • upgrades a package as soon there's a new release
   • upgrades constantly

Here is an article explaining Rolling vs. Fixed in detail, with a few example distributions.

⚡️ Follow Freedom Tech

RollingVsFixed #FixedDistro #SemiRollingDistro #RollingDistro #FixedVsRolling #Linux #FOSS

@ 8e7462a8:c723a97b

@ 30ceb64e:7f08bdf5

I feel sorry for the laggards who would pile into bitcoin at the last moment. They'll be fleeing into bitcoin through crypto scams, fake L2's, AI social engineering attacks, misinformation from trusted sources and cognitive dissonance. In a rapidly shifting open source environment niched in topics that they hardly understand. And at the bottom of the rabbit hole you have personal responsibility and hard work waiting for you.

I'm assuming uncle jims will do well. They essentially become financial advisors (Recommending Bitcoin products and services, Helping them understand and move up the sovereignty ladder, Holding Keys, Running LSP's, Mints, and Relays).

Its just crazy to imagine that we're entering a world were 20 year olds have a better grasp on how to use money, how money works, and why it works that way.....than most studied economics professionals.

Understanding money is a key piece to human flourishing and survival, many will succumb to being slaves of their own ignorance, doomed to live out the rest of their days as hungry ghosts, pulling knobs and levers of which have no real meaning or consequence.

https://cdn.satellite.earth/40f7fa81b77c2097ee499cd63d47e66b245aedb20d9a782f33622427c5179dab.webp

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/636597

@ efa6abd0:a4970369

A freedom weaver behind-the-story

When thinking of a story, nothing allows us as deep an association as giving a name to a character or setting. We recognize it, relate to it, associate it with our very lives and the choices we make. Rarely, however, do we know why the writer chose them. Here's the story behind the first three names:

---

Xileh

Scouring through hundreds of names and their meanings, the first name selection did not come from known names.

Xileh is Helix backward.

A grandfather figure, Xileh has an association to DNA as a reminder of how we can trace our history back across time. The past carries many contrasts and lessons. Our genetics give us a foundation with which to discover the world. Our experiences and actions add to our knowledge base. Humanity itself carries information across time through genes, stories, books, technology, architecture, and anything that we build or help preserve...

Xileh represents the past that gave us today. In not knowing the past, however, we always run the risk of repeating the same patterns. Xileh represents the memory of the past, and he will challenge the storyline to break those negative pattern loops.

What will we do with our todays to help shape future generations’ tomorrows?

---

Toril

To select a main character's name carries more weight than others, as if it should embody what we’re hoping from the entire storyline.

The name Skylar was almost chosen instead of Toril. Depending on the source, its meaning varies from student to noble scholar. At first, it seemed like a good choice, because it has an association to learning, and tech is about diving into many rabbit holes. However, I did not like the association to a more structured way of learning, as some of the best learning is flexible, practical, adaptable, outside of rigor. It doesn't require any nobility.

Toril's literal meaning in Old Norse is Thor’s battle. Yet, it was chosen for all of its associations to tech.

Most people may not derive a technical meaning from Toril, but we can associate it in multiple ways. Thor is often seen as the God of thunder, lightning and strength. If we look at technology, it is a strength put together by many human lifetimes of knowledge blocks built upon knowledge blocks. It is larger than any of us.

Nostr + Zaps

Lightning itself is a force of nature, yet Thor carries it in a hammer, which can be seen as a tool. Technology is a tool empowering the individual. Lightning, the tech, is a tool anyone could learn to wield, and so is something else: Zaps. They carry the same symbolism.

Thunder is sometimes associated with a voice from the sky. Not the same, but in today's world, we can communicate across the vast cyberspace. We may see that as normal, but it is a gift many generations before us never had. Thunder might be seen as unstoppable in nature, protocols like nostr carry similar qualities. Nostr can give us a voice, one that cannot be censored.

If we look at nostr and bitcoin, it’s as if this name could marry both ideas. We can have a voice in nostr, but we also carry it and support it through micropayments in zaps.

Personal battles

Toril itself is a reference to battle. Although it is often difficult to understand what is happening at a tech level, much like it is difficult to understand what happens at a cellular level, if we learn enough about tech, we can see a battle to protect and empower the individual against transgressions on human rights and freedoms. Many of these can happen in the digital realm, hidden under the surface, and we will see some of their negative effects within freedom weaver.

The principle of privacy within its associations to the Tor project, although unrelated, is a principle that will be part of the story as well.

Also, Toril points to a personal battle within ourselves to be responsible for the choices we make, and the book will have many choices that will trouble Toril, needing for her to dig deeper and to ask more questions.

Barriers and Education

In a few ancient stories like Thor or King Arthur, only the "chosen" ones can wield a tool or weapon. In our everyday lives, it is education and access to technology that opens our world to the possibilities in cyberspace. Anyone with the knowledge could wield or help build those tools.

Like in any story, technology faces barriers of adoption. We may not hop unto more principled hardware or software because our networks are using the most popular products, even when they may not be ethical. If we lack the education and fail to dig deeper, we can be using tech to our detriment out of misinformation or disinformation.

Once we know how something works, it is difficult to continue using those services if they go against our principles. At the same time, it can make us feel divided to have to choose between the products that carry principle and those which still carry our networks of people. Yet, someone must begin the change, the choice is in the hands of those who HODL the knowledge.

---

Rigmor

Great power, mind ruler

Every story has a setting. This one begins within a city in a state of control. Power is in the hands of a few individuals misusing technology and information to try to control the minds and actions of its inhabitants, shaping a state of fear for those who dare to think outside of the norm.

We may also associate it with the word Rig, as if Rigmor's way of life was indeed so: Rigged.

However, the story will turn the idea of power of the few into the possibility of empowering the individual through personal choice and responsibility. Instead of a rigged system to benefit the few, it opens the path to a creative innovative society making unique life choices and shaping solutions to the many issues we face.

Future names

Love interest

Nemesis character

AI assistant

Warehouse

An open journey

You can read the story in progress:

freedomweaver.tech

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

A few months ago, @grayruby posted SN and the Zen of 1 sat = 1 sat. Since then, the top of my SN page has read "1 sat = 1 sat". It is quite peaceful.

While setting up random zaps, I stumbled across another setting that's been giving me a similar sense of peace. I disabled being notified when I receive zaps. After all, I keep insisting that I'm not here for the sats, but rather for the community, so why do I need to see how much and how often people are zapping me. It's much less clutter in the notifications feed and everything in there is now something to potentially respond to.

Give it a whirl.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/636336

@ 1394367a:5183ebf0

А геsрапва to Jung. and QC question 2. by Gary B QC/Waldman Jan. 14, 1974

I

Now there was a man named Frick, who lived in the land of Zot, a far-out, mystical land that never really existed, but might just as well have, anyway. And for Frick, this was the only land that existed--the only reality. There was nobody else living in Zot, no not a soul, Frick was the only living being there. Of course there were animals, cows, pigs, wolves. And there were flowers--beautiful flowers. But we know that all these things are incidental--just parts in the chain of life that kept Frick alive. Frick may not have known this, but that isn't important, for for our purposes here it is enough that we know it. Frick did, however, sense that he was different from all the rest of the creatures in Zot He knew, for example, how he always outssarted the animale and flowers when he went hunting for food to keep him alive. Ho seemed to sonne that he thought differently from all the other creatures in Zot. And after all, he was the only pue Zot who was allowed to use the fifty-moter olympic nie wie ing pool that lay just over the hill where the purple sheep usually grazed.

Now the land of Zot was indeed a paradise--quite a sight to behold. Tall, beautiful, narrow-spaced palm trees lined the outer edges of this land, forming a tightly meshed wall of wood that served to contain the land of Zot. Of course, to Frick, this was no wall--it was merely the edge of his reality there in Zot, merely another part of that land--not on the edge of the land, but just another part of the universe which had been created by The Almighty Dog. No, those palm trees were not thought of by Frick an a border, but rather an here, or there', or sometimes over there', 'that place', or 'nomewhere'. (Of course, these words are describing Prick's thoughts, not his speech, for he didn't sponk. If he could, who would he talk to, anywny?)

Now Frick was content in the land of Zot. He could Tender all day seron the wooded nendowe, or climb a tall flower and gase across the countryside. Mfo mas indeed poradine, a perfection. Yes, The Almighty Deg had friend created a thing of beauty.

And it came to paan one day, that as Prick was bending

down over a pool of cold, awoot water to drink hiu fill, de

noticed that a god had been following him. Atslean, could pee it's fresh footprints in the mud behind him. Ales. As must have run away and hidden in a bush when he turned eround, thought Frick. Frick then began to think for the gud. Here gad, here god. Come on little goddyl and then fres behind a bush peared the cutest little god that Frick had ever seen--black, furry ears with white tips, solid black pawn-- Just plain cute, come on little god, don't be scared. come on." The god wagged his tail at Prick-it seemed to realize that Frick was thinking friendly thoughts, making

friendly gestures.

Woll soon, as the story goes, Prick and the god were great friends. And they stayed and played there by the water hole for the rest of the day, and late into the evening. Then Frick noticed that the great ball of fire was rapidly sinking in the east, so he started on the way back to his bungalow on the lake, with the little god following close behind. That night he feanted on shark nest and roast pork, making sure that he set out a generous portion to the little god, Soon Prick grew tired, and with a yawn lay down on his bed to go to sleep. "Little god", he thought before he went to alesp, "I'm glad met there by the water hole today," He didn't know quite why he thought that, but he did know that he had a good feeling inaide--not just from filling his stomach.

And then came Frack. No formal introduction given--The Almighty Dog just thought, Frick, I now give you FrackT And then there was Frack-and now we have Frick and Frack, Frock was different than Frick, Oh, not the type of 'differens that you and I usually think of today. Prack was the mass spealan of being au Frick, to be sure. But Prack was built differently. very differently--and Prick realized this. At first, Frick tech Prack very much for granted, but that inter changed, and it wasn't tor long a tine until Prick became very, very friendly towards Frack. And it came to pass that Frick and Prach bacame to love one another very dearly. Love?i Ten, lovell This was surely a new experience for Frick--he had learned what 'like' wan like, and now he wan learning what 'love' was like. He didn't know quite why he felt the way he did towards Brack, but he did know that he had a good feeling inside...

It was much different living in the land of Zot now, with his wife(yes, wifel) Frack and their little god(Frack liked the little god, too. Sometimes, however, she would got mad at it for piddling on their new bearskin rug, but all in all, thị tro got along very well, and really were quite good friends.),

Then one day it happened. Frick and Frack were at the breakfast table, eating their corn-flaken, when rather suddenly and strangly, out of an impulse, Frack grunted at Prick, Well now, they both sensed what was happening. With a flicker in his eye, Frick looked at Frack. Frack umiled back. You, Frick knew what Frack wanted---and so he passed har the salt.

And from that day on, the people in the land of Zot could speak. The weeks went on, and Frick would grunt at Prack, and Frack grunted back at Frick. But alas, all this grinting led to complications, for sometimes their grunts crossed. One humid, uncomfortable day, Frick, Prack, and their little god who they had named 'Spot' were sitting by the olympic-sized swimming pool with nothing, absolutely nothing, to do.

"What a bore", grunted Prick to Frack.

"Yeh, its really a drag", replied Frack.

"Hey I know", grunted Frick excitedly, "Let's go to the rain forent and catch butterflies!

"Ah--no, I don't feel like that today," grunted Frack back at Frick... "Hey let's go for a walk instead!"

"No, no, no", snap-grunted Frick at Preck. "I want to go to the rain forest, damniti!"

And so their(and the land's) first fight developed, But don't get the idea that this fight was no terribly sericus-- it wasn't. The solution to that quarrel was really very simple-- they finally decided that they would take a walk--to the rain forest to catch butterflies.

How alas, thore came a day which was to be remembered by Prick for a long time. The sun(that was the name they gave to the great ball of fire which regularly rose in the west and set in the east) was rising that morning in fiery splendor--except this morning, it was rising in the east! Now they thought that to be rather strange, but not nearly as strange as the funny looking creatures who were standing at their front door when they woke up, yolling Is anybody home, perchance? Is anybody home?" The creatures grunted a bit differently than Prick and Frack did, but not so much so that they couldn't be understood. How strange', thought Frick, What creatures could these be? I've never seen the likes of them in the land before--and in this land only Frack and I are suppossed to be able to grunt.

Well now, Frick let the strangers in. They all sat dom. and Flot, chief of these strangers who called themselves Dorks spoke: "We are the Dorks, from far away, beyond the gront wall of palm trees that separates your land from ours."

Your land? Beyond the great wall of palm trees? What do you mean? Zot is the only place--you are in Zot, you are part of this land, this world. There is--there in nothing beyond the palm trees, except perhaps the place where The Almighty Dog resides and maken the sun alternately rise and fall--although today I think he is a bit mixed up", grunted Frick as he looked out the window to the east, perplexed. What do you mean, stranger?"

"My dear sir, I realize that it will be hard for you to accept this, but there is another land beyond the great wall of palm trees."...

And so the conversation went. Plot explained to Frick and Frack all about the land of the Dorks, beyond the palm trees. He told them of other people too, who lived even farther away. They sat there, in the living room of Frick and Prack's bungalow on the lake for the rest of the day and that night too. listening, arguing, laughing. They dinagreed on many things, too. For example, the Dorks worshiped a supar-being who they called "God, and thought him to be the creator of all the lands in existence. Frick thought the idea to be rather strange, and bit silly. He found all these things very hard to comprehend. But he did not say that to the Dorks, for he rather liked tham--aspecially their chief, Flot. He didn't care for Flip, the second in command, but all in all, he thought the Darka were a pretty good bunch of guys. He didn't know quite why he felt the way he did towards the Dorks, but he did knew that he had a

good feeling inside... Now the years wunt by, over faster, and Frick and Frack learned much from the Dorks, and the Dorks likewinn. Kany more Derks cane to visit then at their bugalow on the lake over years, and they occasionally set a Sipkar or two, who were with the Dorks, and traveled with them for safety reang the Sipkars had many jealous enemies, due to the great wal that their land posseaned. From the frequent exposure to th different beings, Frick learned more about 'love', 'like, 'dislike, and evan experienced 'hato. (I am speaking here Plip, a guy he hated almost from the very beginning.) and he didn't know quite why he felt those things--but he did feel thes..

Well now, Flot had also told Frick about other things besides the cutaide world--and so it came to pass that Prack begos Pruck, Frot, Prip, Prally, and Frabu. And in time, Frulu begot Fust, Frapar, Prustrum, and Frasat, Frally begot Folly, Pustar, Pozy, and Funais. And behold, the people of the land of Bot multiplied and filled the face of what they used to think was the whole earth.

II

One night, Frick and Prack were at their home on the inke, in a rather sullen mood. Their daughter, Prulu had just been arrested by the Zotland police for illegal ponnession of drugs. They just couldn't understand her. They had given her all their love all their lives, and now this--she turns right around and slaps them hatefully in their faces. How could shel?!

Prick finally decided to break the gloomy allence, and suggested to Frack that they go to a hockey game and try to forget what had happened with Frulu, But I just can't forget about sy daughter! Oh my baby, my poor baby!

"I'm not asking you to forget about her dear, grunted Prick. "I'm just suggesting that we try to take this thing in stride. Let's go to the hockey game--it'll help get this off our minds come on, dear."

And so It came to pass that Frick and Frack went to the hockey game that night. And fortunately, for the sake of those two, it was far from a dull gane, and they completely forgot their troubles, becoming completely engrosued in the game.

The home tean was winning, the fans cheered in unison. They scorel Up to their feet jumped the crowd, clapping and singing together, stomping their feet till the stadium threatened to crumble from the thunderous noise. Frick and Frack applauded in wild enthusiasm--what a tean they had! And the crowd chanted in unison," we want another goal, we want another goal", and the chant became louder and louder, more and more powerful, cap- tivating--hypnotic. And the voiceu of the individuals melted into one, gigantic, throbbing voice--one mind, with only one thing in mind--to win the game. The home team lost that game, and the peaple filed out of the stadius, quiet and exhausted...

Now in the fifth year after the eighteenth month past the second full moon in August of the second year before the third day(remember that date), there enne the great war. This was brought about by many factors, First of all, all kinds of people hated one another--secondly, the king of Jaru had threatened the daughter of the princs to the king of the Third Kingdom of Dastar the Innocent, thus weakening world friendships all over, for Quatland was allied with Dastar who was allied with the Eete who wore friends of the Dorks. You bet right, the Zots were "dragged into this conflict too, because of thin dastardly incident with Jaru and the daughter of that certain prince. No one really knew why in the hell they hated each other so, but they did have bad feelings inside...

And low and behold, one day while Frick eat out by the lake watching the grasshoppera awin deftly across the expanse of cool, blue water, the heavens opened up from above and out of a whirlwind spoke The Almighty Dog to Prick. "Frick", he said, I look down at the world today, and it is bad."

"Your dann right its bad", grunted Frick back at Dog. You should have heard what that king did to that girll"

I don't mean that", replied Dog. It is the war that is bad--the hate, the violence, the unneccessary death. Frick, ant this world to be a thing of beauty, of splendor. Now Has turned into a place of evil. Masses of people unite against other masses, and threaten to blow each other off the face of this planet. A person is no longer an individual today-- he in merely part of a great machine--the machine of modern society. Oh surely there are various degrees to this destruction of individuality, but only one sure result--death and destruction. Nobody understands anybody else--they just don't quite know what those feelings inside of them nean, Prick, thin world in not what I intended it to be. You must be my spokesman, you must stand up and talk to the world, make then understand, Tell then that--toll tham--junt make then understand each other, make t thes understand."

Now Frick heard the word of Dog, and took heed. Around the country he traveled, grunting to the people, asking them to understand--asking them to hear and obey the word of Dog, to Join together in worship of Him. And low and behold the people of the land of Zot listened and joined together in worship. Together they sang, together they prayed, together they hated their enemies and loved their allies (And nobody really unders why, they just had that feeling inside them.), together they marched, together they fought, and before you knew it the faca of the earth was destroyed, and covered with dark, grey cloudu that looked something like mahrooms.

Now only one spot on the entire earth remained unscared from the terrible holocaust of the great war. This was a small patch of land in the northeast corner of the land of Zot. And on this Iand nat a bungalow by a radioactively-glowing lake. And in this bungalow sat a very old, weary man named Frick. Now Prick was the only person living in this small patch of land, and thus the only person alive on the earth. He lived there alone, not saying a word For who would he talk to?), a total individual, completely fres--no acclety to tie him down, to take his soul away. And when a little god cane scratching at his door one day, the curest little god he had ever seen, he kicked it in the ribe and told it to get the hell out of there. And one day, when the heavens parted and The Almighty Dog called out Frick's name from a whirlwind, Frick told Dog to go join the little god.

---

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

Happy Discount Day, stackers!

What better way to celebrate than to throw down some cheap sats on European Soccer matches?

Freebitcoin has about a dozen matches up; from the Premier League, Serie A, and La Liga. The odds are good, if you get in early.

On a cautionary note, see the last post (https://stacker.news/items/628381/r/Undisciplined) for some concerns about this site. I haven't had any issues so far, but I did withdraw my initial deposit, so I'm only playing with house money going forward.

Caveat emptor!

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/636197

@ 677042ba:4e206c4c

¿Sabes quién es Bukele?

¿Sabes qué hay detrás de poner el Bitcoin en El Salvador como moneda de curso legal?

¿Qué beneficios trajo al país el poner el Bitcoin?

¿Sabes cuantos millones ha ganado El Salvador al comprar Bitcoin?

¿Sabes cuanto ha ganado El Salvador al minar Bitcoin?

@ 8dc86882:9dc4ba5e

I would like to keep track of my bitcoin history and was wondering what people do? Is there an app that gathers what you bought and at what price at and keeps up with what you have? Or is it basically spreadsheet ninja time?

I basically want to log my purchases and keep up with how many dollars I've invested. Then I want to see it's value today. But of course every time I buy, it's at a different price, so a tool that's sorts all this would be so cool.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/635837

@ b2caa9b3:9eab0fb5

It's been a whirlwind of a few days here in Tanzania. I've taken a bit of a break from obsessively sorting through my photos and decided to immerse myself in the local culture. Wandering through town, sipping coffee at a cozy cafe, and making new connections has been incredibly refreshing.

One afternoon, I found myself at Kili Kahawa, a charming spot right by the clock tower. While the internet connection left something to be desired, it was the perfect opportunity to dive deeper into the Telos Blockchain. I'm eager to get involved in the world of NFTs and explore potential money-making apps.

During my research, I stumbled upon Appics, an app originally planned for the Steemit Blockchain but ultimately launched on Telos. Excited to give it a try, I discovered I already had an account! Unfortunately, I quickly encountered some frustrating bugs, particularly with image quality. It's disappointing to have to spend extra time editing photos before posting, but I'm hopeful the developers will address these issues soon.

On the NFT front, I've been busy creating new collections on both the WAX and Telos Blockchains. Telos, in particular, has captured my interest. I'll be sharing more details about my NFT drops in a separate post, but I wanted to give you a heads up that they'll be limited editions.

One of the highlights in the last few days has been meeting incredible people. I had the pleasure of connecting with a fascinating Chinese traveler who shared captivating stories about his adventures. His three-day ascent of Kilimanjaro was nothing short of extraordinary. Considering the extreme conditions and dangers, I have immense respect for his accomplishment. After his descent, he spent a few days recovering at the hostel. We enjoyed a fantastic dinner together, thanks to the generosity of a British family staying there. It was a truly memorable evening filled with delicious food and great company. Our Chinese friend is a great chef.

I'll wrap up this post with a few photos from my recent adventures. Stay tuned for more updates on my blockchain journey and my ongoing exploration of Tanzania. Until then, enjoy your day!

NFT Collections

WaxoWeiler (WAX Blockchain) • Ninja Girls (Telos Blockchain)

Online

Profile Page | Support Page

Feel free to support me by sending some sats via the lightning network to rubenstorm@sats.mobi

@ 674473f6:f859eb3c

Bitwise Operation คือ กระบวนการที่การดำเนินการใด ๆ โดยตรงกับบิตของตัวเลข หรือชุดข้อมูลของเราใน memory ซึ่งการทำงานโดยตรงกับบิตของตัวเลข ทำให้มีประสิทธิภาพสูงและใช้บ่อยในการเขียนโปรแกรมระดับ low-level โดยหลัก ๆ ที่ใช้กันจะมี 6 แบบ เป็นเครื่องมือที่ทรงพลังสำหรับนักพัฒนาที่ต้องการประสิทธิภาพสูงและการควบคุมระดับบิต โดยเฉพาะในการพัฒนาระบบระดับ low-level และการทำงานกับฮาร์ดแวร์โดยตรง

TLDR

ภาพรวม Bitwise Operations:

AND (&):

ใช้เปรียบเทียบบิต, ให้ 1 เมื่อทั้งสองบิตเป็น 1 ประโยชน์: ตรวจสอบบิต, สร้าง mask

OR (|):

ให้ 1 เมื่อมีบิตใดบิตหนึ่งเป็น 1 ประโยชน์: รวมแฟล็ก, ตั้งค่าบิต

XOR (^):

ให้ 1 เมื่อบิตต่างกัน ประโยชน์: สลับค่า, เข้ารหัสอย่างง่าย

NOT (~):

กลับค่าทุกบิต ประโยชน์: สร้าง mask สำหรับลบบิต

Left Shift (<<):

เลื่อนบิตไปซ้าย, เติม 0 ทางขวา ประโยชน์: คูณด้วยกำลังของ 2, สร้าง mask

Right Shift (>>):

เลื่อนบิตไปขวา ประโยชน์: หารด้วยกำลังของ 2, แยกส่วนข้อมูล

1.) BitAnd (&):

BitAnd มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ & เป็นการดำเนินการทางตรรกะที่เปรียบเทียบบิตในตำแหน่งเดียวกันของสองตัวเลข โดยมีกฎดังนี้: - 1 AND 1 = 1 - 1 AND 0 = 0 - 0 AND 1 = 0 - 0 AND 0 = 0

หรือกล่าวอีกนัยหนึ่ง ผลลัพธ์จะเป็น 1 ก็ต่อเมื่อทั้งสองบิตเป็น 1 เท่านั้น

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลขสองตัว A = 5 และ B = 3 ในระบบเลขฐานสอง: A = 5 = 0101 B = 3 = 0011

เมื่อทำ BitAnd:

``` 0101 (A = 5) & 0011 (B = 3)

---

0001 (Result = 1) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า: - บิตที่ 1 (จากขวา): 1 & 1 = 1 - บิตที่ 2: 0 & 1 = 0 - บิตที่ 3: 1 & 0 = 0 - บิตที่ 4: 0 & 0 = 0

ดังนั้น ผลลัพธ์คือ 0001 ในเลขฐานสอง ซึ่งเท่ากับ 1 ในเลขฐานสิบ

การใช้งาน BitAnd: 1. การตรวจสอบเลขคู่/คี่: ถ้า (n & 1) == 0 แสดงว่า n เป็นเลขคู่ ถ้า (n & 1) == 1 แสดงว่า n เป็นเลขคี่

1. การตรวจสอบสถานะของบิตเฉพาะ: ถ้าต้องการตรวจสอบบิตที่ 3 ของ x: if (x & (1 << 2)) != 0 // บิตที่ 3 เป็น 1

2. การลบบิตสุดท้ายที่เป็น 1: n = n & (n - 1)

BitAnd มีประโยชน์มากในการจัดการกับข้อมูลระดับบิต การตั้งค่าแฟล็ก และการทำงานกับฮาร์ดแวร์โดยตรง

2.) BitOr (|):

BitOr มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ | เป็นการดำเนินการทางตรรกะที่เปรียบเทียบบิตในตำแหน่งเดียวกันของสองตัวเลข โดยมีกฎดังนี้: - 1 OR 1 = 1 - 1 OR 0 = 1 - 0 OR 1 = 1 - 0 OR 0 = 0

กล่าวคือ ผลลัพธ์จะเป็น 1 เมื่อมีบิตใดบิตหนึ่งเป็น 1 หรือทั้งสองบิตเป็น 1

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลขสองตัว A = 5 และ B = 3 ในระบบเลขฐานสอง: A = 5 = 0101 B = 3 = 0011

เมื่อทำ BitOr:

``` 0101 (A = 5) | 0011 (B = 3)

---

0111 (Result = 7) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า: - บิตที่ 1 (จากขวา): 1 | 1 = 1 - บิตที่ 2: 0 | 1 = 1 - บิตที่ 3: 1 | 0 = 1 - บิตที่ 4: 0 | 0 = 0

ดังนั้น ผลลัพธ์คือ 0111 ในเลขฐานสอง ซึ่งเท่ากับ 7 ในเลขฐานสิบ

การใช้งาน BitOr: 1. การรวมแฟล็ก: เช่น ในการตั้งค่าสิทธิ์ไฟล์ในระบบ Unix permissions = READ | WRITE | EXECUTE

1. การตั้งค่าบิตเฉพาะ: ถ้าต้องการตั้งค่าบิตที่ 3 ของ x เป็น 1: x = x | (1 << 2)

2. การรวมสี RGB: ในระบบสี RGB ที่ใช้ 8 บิตต่อสี color = (red << 16) | (green << 8) | blue

BitOr มีประโยชน์มากในการรวมแฟล็ก การตั้งค่าบิต และการทำงานกับข้อมูลที่แต่ละบิตมีความหมายเฉพาะ

BitXor (^):

BitXor หรือ Exclusive OR (XOR) มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ ^ เป็นการดำเนินการทางตรรกะที่เปรียบเทียบบิตในตำแหน่งเดียวกันของสองตัวเลข โดยมีกฎดังนี้: - 1 XOR 1 = 0 - 1 XOR 0 = 1 - 0 XOR 1 = 1 - 0 XOR 0 = 0

กล่าวคือ ผลลัพธ์จะเป็น 1 เมื่อบิตทั้งสองมีค่าต่างกัน

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลขสองตัว A = 5 และ B = 3 ในระบบเลขฐานสอง: A = 5 = 0101 B = 3 = 0011

เมื่อทำ BitXor:

``` 0101 (A = 5) ^ 0011 (B = 3)

---

0110 (Result = 6) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า: - บิตที่ 1 (จากขวา): 1 ^ 1 = 0 - บิตที่ 2: 0 ^ 1 = 1 - บิตที่ 3: 1 ^ 0 = 1 - บิตที่ 4: 0 ^ 0 = 0

ดังนั้น ผลลัพธ์คือ 0110 ในเลขฐานสอง ซึ่งเท่ากับ 6 ในเลขฐานสิบ

การใช้งาน BitXor: 1. การสลับค่าโดยไม่ใช้ตัวแปรเพิ่ม: a ^= b; b ^= a; a ^= b; // ตอนนี้ a และ b ได้สลับค่ากันแล้ว

1. การเข้ารหัสอย่างง่าย: encrypted = data ^ key decrypted = encrypted ^ key // จะได้ data กลับคืนมา

2. การตรวจสอบความเท่ากันของตัวเลข: if ((a ^ b) == 0) // a และ b เท่ากัน

3. การหาตัวเลขที่ไม่มีคู่ในชุดข้อมูล: result = num1 ^ num2 ^ num3 ^ ... // ผลลัพธ์จะเป็นตัวเลขที่ไม่มีคู่

BitXor มีคุณสมบัติพิเศษคือ การ XOR กับตัวเองจะได้ 0 และการ XOR กับ 0 จะได้ตัวเองกลับคืนมา ทำให้มันมีประโยชน์มากในการเข้ารหัสและการตรวจสอบข้อมูล

BitNot (~):

BitNot หรือ NOT มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ ~ เป็นการดำเนินการทางตรรกะที่กลับบิตของตัวเลข โดยมีกฎง่ายๆ คือ: - NOT 1 = 0 - NOT 0 = 1

กล่าวคือ BitNot จะเปลี่ยนทุกบิต 0 เป็น 1 และทุกบิต 1 เป็น 0

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลข A = 5 ในระบบเลขฐานสอง (สมมติว่าเป็นเลข 8 บิต): A = 5 = 00000101

เมื่อทำ BitNot:

``` 00000101 (A = 5)

---

~ 11111010 (Result = 250 ใน unsigned int, หรือ -6 ใน signed int) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า: - ทุกบิต 0 ถูกเปลี่ยนเป็น 1 - ทุกบิต 1 ถูกเปลี่ยนเป็น 0

ผลลัพธ์จะขึ้นอยู่กับว่าเราใช้ระบบเลขแบบไหน (signed หรือ unsigned): - ในระบบ unsigned 8 บิต: 11111010 = 250 - ในระบบ signed 8 บิต: 11111010 = -6

การใช้งาน BitNot: 1. การสร้าง mask สำหรับการลบบิต: clear_mask = ~(1 << n) // สร้าง mask ที่มีบิตที่ n เป็น 0 และที่เหลือเป็น 1 x &= clear_mask // ลบบิตที่ n ของ x

1. การหาค่าสัมบูรณ์ของเลขติดลบในระบบ two's complement: abs_value = (x ^ (x >> 31)) - (x >> 31) // x >> 31 จะได้ 0 สำหรับเลขบวก และ -1 สำหรับเลขลบ

2. การสลับสถานะของทุกบิต: inverted = ~original

3. การหาค่าสูงสุดของตัวแปรที่มีขนาด n บิต: max_value = ~0 >> (32 - n) // สำหรับตัวแปร 32 บิต

BitNot มักใช้ร่วมกับ BitAnd เพื่อลบบิตที่ต้องการ หรือใช้ในการสร้าง mask สำหรับการจัดการบิต

Left Shift (<<):

Left Shift มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ << เป็นการดำเนินการที่เลื่อนบิตทั้งหมดของตัวเลขไปทางซ้ายตามจำนวนที่กำหนด โดยเติม 0 ทางด้านขวา Left Shift โดยทั่วไปแล้วไม่แตกต่างกันระหว่างเลข unsigned int และ signed int แต่มีบางประเด็นที่ควรระวัง:

1. ผลลัพธ์:
2. ในกรณีของเลขไม่มีเครื่องหมาย ผลลัพธ์จะเป็นบวกเสมอ

3. สำหรับเลขมีเครื่องหมาย ผลลัพธ์อาจเปลี่ยนเครื่องหมายได้หากบิตเครื่องหมาย (sign bit) ถูกเปลี่ยน

4. Overflow:

5. ทั้งสองกรณีอาจเกิด overflow ได้ถ้าเลื่อนมากเกินไป

6. สำหรับเลข signed int overflow อาจทำให้เกิดการเปลี่ยนเครื่องหมายโดยไม่คาดคิด

7. Undefined Behavior:

8. ในบางภาษา เช่น C/C++, การเลื่อนด้วยค่าที่มากกว่าหรือเท่ากับจำนวนบิตของตัวแปรอาจทำให้เกิด Undefined Behavior ได้

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลข A = 5 และต้องการเลื่อนซ้าย 2 ตำแหน่ง ในระบบเลขฐานสอง (สมมติว่าเป็นเลข 8 บิต): A = 5 = 00000101

เมื่อทำ Left Shift 2 ตำแหน่ง (A << 2):

``` 00000101 (A = 5)

---

00010100 (Result = 20) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า:: - บิตทั้งหมดถูกเลื่อนไปทางซ้าย 2 ตำแหน่ง - เติม 0 สองตัวทางด้านขวา

ผลลัพธ์: 00010100 ในเลขฐานสอง ซึ่งเท่ากับ 20 ในเลขฐานสิบ

ตัวอย่าง 2: ``` unsigned int a = 1; // 00000001 in binary int b = 1; // 00000001 in binary

// Left shift by 3 unsigned int a_result = a << 3; // 00001000 (8 in decimal) int b_result = b << 3; // 00001000 (8 in decimal)

// สำหรับตัวเลขเล็ก ๆ ผลอาจจะไม่ต่างกัน // แต่เมื่อมีตัวเลขที่ใหญ่ขึ้น อาจจะให้ผลตรงกันข้ามแทน:

unsigned int large_a = 1 << 31; // 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (2147483648 in decimal) int large_b = 1 << 31; // 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (-2147483648 in decimal, due to two's complement) ```

ในตัวอย่างสุดท้าย เราเห็นความแตกต่าง: - สำหรับ unsigned int, ผลลัพธ์คือเลขบวกที่ใหญ่ที่สุดที่เป็นไปได้ - สำหรับ signed int, ผลลัพธ์คือเลขลบที่น้อยที่สุดที่เป็นไปได้ เนื่องจากบิตซ้ายสุดถูกตีความเป็นเครื่องหมายลบในระบบ two's complement

กฎการทำงาน: - เลื่อนบิตทั้งหมดไปทางซ้าย n ตำแหน่ง - เติม 0 ทางด้านขวา n ตัว - บิตที่เลื่อนออกไปทางซ้ายจะหายไป

การใช้งาน Left Shift: 1. การคูณด้วยกำลังของ 2: x << n เท่ากับ x * (2^n) เช่น 5 << 2 = 5 * (2^2) = 5 * 4 = 20

1. การสร้างหน้ากาก (mask) สำหรับการตั้งค่าบิต: mask = 1 << n // สร้างหน้ากากที่มีบิตที่ n เป็น 1 และที่เหลือเป็น 0 x |= mask // ตั้งค่าบิตที่ n ของ x เป็น 1

2. การเข้ารหัสข้อมูลหลายบิตในตัวแปรเดียว: encoded = (r << 16) | (g << 8) | b // เก็บค่า RGB ในตัวแปร 32 บิต

3. การทำงานกับบิตแฟล็ก: FLAG_A = 1 << 0 FLAG_B = 1 << 1 FLAG_C = 1 << 2 // ใช้งาน: flags = FLAG_A | FLAG_B

Left Shift มีประสิทธิภาพสูงในการคูณด้วยกำลังของ 2 และมักใช้ในการจัดการบิตแฟล็กและการสร้างหน้ากากสำหรับการดำเนินการระดับบิต

Right Shift (>>):

Right Shift มักใช้สัญลักษณ์ >> เป็นการดำเนินการที่เลื่อนบิตทั้งหมดของตัวเลขไปทางขวาตามจำนวนที่กำหนด การทำงานจะแตกต่างกันเล็กน้อยระหว่างเลขที่มีเครื่องหมาย (signed) และไม่มีเครื่องหมาย (unsigned)

สำหรับเลข unsigned int (Logical Right Shift): - เลื่อนบิตทั้งหมดไปทางขวา n ตำแหน่ง - เติม 0 ทางด้านซ้าย n ตัว - บิตที่เลื่อนออกไปทางขวาจะหายไป

สำหรับเลข signed int (Arithmetic Right Shift): - เลื่อนบิตทั้งหมดไปทางขวา n ตำแหน่ง - เติมด้วยบิตเครื่องหมาย (sign bit) ทางด้านซ้าย n ตัว - บิตที่เลื่อนออกไปทางขวาจะหายไป

ตัวอย่าง: สมมติว่าเรามีเลข A = 20 และต้องการเลื่อนขวา 2 ตำแหน่ง ในระบบเลขฐานสอง (สมมติว่าเป็นเลข 8 บิต): A = 20 = 00010100

เมื่อทำ Right Shift 2 ตำแหน่ง (A >> 2):

``` 00010100 (A = 20)

---

00000101 (Result = 5) ```

จะเห็นได้ว่า:: - บิตทั้งหมดถูกเลื่อนไปทางขวา 2 ตำแหน่ง - เติม 0 สองตัวทางด้านซ้าย (สำหรับเลขไม่มีเครื่องหมาย)

ผลลัพธ์: 00000101 ในเลขฐานสอง ซึ่งเท่ากับ 5 ในเลขฐานสิบ

การใช้งาน Right Shift: 1. การหารด้วยกำลังของ 2: x >> n เท่ากับ x / (2^n) (ปัดเศษลง) เช่น 20 >> 2 = 20 / (2^2) = 20 / 4 = 5

1. การแยกส่วนของข้อมูลที่ถูกเก็บรวมกัน: r = (rgb >> 16) & 0xFF // แยกค่าสีแดงจาก RGB 24 บิต g = (rgb >> 8) & 0xFF // แยกค่าสีเขียว b = rgb & 0xFF // แยกค่าสีน้ำเงิน

2. การตรวจสอบเครื่องหมายของตัวเลข: sign = x >> 31 // สำหรับตัวแปร 32 บิต, จะได้ 0 สำหรับบวก และ -1 สำหรับลบ

3. การทำ rounded division: (x + (1 << (n-1))) >> n // หารด้วย 2^n และปัดเศษ

ข้อควรระวัง: - ใน Java, >> เป็น arithmetic shift สำหรับ int และ long, ส่วน >>> เป็น logical shift - ในภาษาอื่นๆ เช่น C/C++, การทำงานของ >> กับเลขติดลบอาจแตกต่างกันไปตาม Compiler

Right Shift มีประสิทธิภาพสูงในการหารด้วยกำลังของ 2 และมักใช้ในการจัดการข้อมูลที่ถูกเก็บรวมกันในรูปแบบบิต

หากเปรียบกับ Right Shift แม้ว่าการทำงานพื้นฐานของ Left Shift จะเหมือนกันสำหรับทั้งเลข signed int และ unsigned int แต่การตีความผลลัพธ์และผลกระทบต่อเครื่องหมาย(sign bit)อาจแตกต่างกัน ดังนั้นจึงควรระมัดระวังเมื่อใช้ Left Shift กับเลขที่มี signed int โดยเฉพาะเมื่อเลื่อนด้วยค่าที่สูงมาก ๆ

Conclusion

ลักษณะเด่นของ Bitwise Operations:

• ประสิทธิภาพสูง: ทำงานเร็วกว่าการคำนวณปกติ
• ประหยัดหน่วยความจำ: จัดเก็บข้อมูลหลายอย่างในตัวแปรเดียว
• ใช้ในงานระดับต่ำ: การทำงานกับฮาร์ดแวร์, ระบบปฏิบัติการ
• การเข้ารหัส: ใช้ในอัลกอริทึมการเข้ารหัสและบีบอัดข้อมูล
• การจัดการแฟล็ก: ใช้ในการตั้งค่าและตรวจสอบสถานะต่างๆ

การใช้งานทั่วไป:

• จัดการสิทธิ์และการอนุญาตในระบบไฟล์
• การเข้ารหัสและถอดรหัสข้อมูล
• การบีบอัดข้อมูล
• การทำงานกับพิกเซลในการประมวลผลภาพ
• การจัดการโปรโตคอลเครือข่าย
• การทำงานกับ register ใน Embedded system

ข้อควรระวัง:

• ต้องระมัดระวังเรื่องขนาดของข้อมูล (8, 16, 32, 64 บิต)
• ความแตกต่างระหว่างเลขมี signed int และ unsigned int
• ความแตกต่างของการทำงานในแต่ละภาษาโปรแกรม

**unsigned int คือตัวเลขเป็นบวกเสมอ signed int สามารถมีค่าเป็นลบได้

siamstr #Blog

@ 56a6da9b:7f5a2243

DAY FOUR of FLASH AUGUST FICTION. We have an antagonist! This is the NINTH OVALS EPISODE! Today I’m going to create the conflict in the OVALS series. This will be a Character v. Society, or even Character v. Nature conflict(s). Regardless, we have an antagonist! Now it’s a real story. Now it’s a real series. You’re welcome. I’m Commercial Herschel. You are on a journey with me, thank you. It will be good for you to listen to, or to read the episode called O.V.A.L.S.: Linear Time Re-entry Instructions from February 2nd. I hope you had a chance to do that while it was out from behind a paywall for the past week. So, let’s see about this thing about Madsen. We will make his first name Frank. His name is Frank Madsen.

Read and/ or listen at Substack please, so i don't have to edit the whole thing again.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/635369

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• The Eurozone's Financial Woes

• The Benefits of Bitcoin

• The Challenges of Bitcoin Adoption

• Conclusion

• FAQ

The Eurozone has been plagued by financial woes in recent years, with several countries facing high levels of debt and unemployment. In this article, we will explore how Bitcoin, a decentralized digital currency, could help Europeans manage their money better.

The Eurozone's Financial Woes

The Eurozone, made up of 19 countries that use the Euro as their currency, has faced significant financial challenges in recent years. The 2008 financial crisis and subsequent sovereign debt crisis left many countries with high levels of debt and unemployment. While some countries, such as Germany, have recovered, others, such as Greece, Italy, and Spain, continue to struggle.

The Benefits of Bitcoin

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that offers several benefits for users. Here are some of the key benefits of using Bitcoin:

Decentralization

Bitcoin is not controlled by any government or financial institution. Instead, it is decentralized, meaning that it is run by a network of users who validate transactions and maintain the blockchain. This means that Bitcoin is resistant to inflation and other economic shocks that can devalue traditional currencies.

Fast and Secure Transactions

Bitcoin transactions are fast and secure, with no need for intermediaries such as banks. When you send Bitcoin, your transaction is validated by a network of users who confirm the transaction and add it to the blockchain. This process takes only a few minutes, compared to traditional bank transfers, which can take several days. Bitcoin transactions are also secure, as they are protected by cryptography and cannot be altered once they are added to the blockchain.

Low Transaction Fees

Bitcoin transactions have low fees compared to traditional banking transactions. When you send Bitcoin, you only need to pay a small fee to the network of users who validate your transaction. This fee is usually much lower than the fees charged by banks and other financial institutions.

Portability

Bitcoin is highly portable, meaning that it is easy to transfer funds across borders without the need for costly fees or long wait times. This can be particularly helpful for immigrants or travelers who need to move money quickly and easily.

Transparency

Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public ledger, meaning that anyone can see the details of a transaction. This transparency can be beneficial for users who want to ensure that their transactions are secure and valid.

The Challenges of Bitcoin Adoption

While Bitcoin offers several benefits, there are also challenges to its adoption. First, Bitcoin is still a relatively new and untested technology, and its value can be highly volatile. This can make it a risky investment for those who are not familiar with the technology.

Second, Bitcoin is not yet widely accepted as a form of payment, meaning that it can be difficult to find merchants who will accept it. This limits its usefulness as a currency for everyday transactions.

Finally, there are regulatory challenges to the adoption of Bitcoin. Some countries have banned Bitcoin outright, while others have imposed strict regulations on its use.

Conclusion

While Bitcoin is not a panacea for the Eurozone's financial woes, it does offer several benefits that could help Europeans manage their money better. By providing a decentralized, fast, and secure means of transferring funds, Bitcoin could help to improve financial inclusion and reduce the dependence on traditional financial institutions. However, its adoption will require a greater understanding of the technology and the development of supportive regulatory frameworks.

FAQ

What are the financial woes of the Eurozone? The Eurozone has faced a number of financial challenges in recent years, including high levels of debt, low economic growth, and political instability.

How could Bitcoin help Europeans manage their money better? Bitcoin could help Europeans manage their money better by providing a decentralized, fast, and low-cost alternative to traditional banking. It could also offer greater financial privacy and security, particularly in countries with unstable currencies or restrictive financial systems.

Is Bitcoin widely accepted in Europe? While Bitcoin is not yet widely accepted in Europe, there are a growing number of businesses and merchants that accept it as a form of payment. Additionally, Bitcoin ATMs are becoming more common in major cities throughout Europe.

Are there any risks associated with using Bitcoin? Like any investment or financial tool, there are risks associated with using Bitcoin. These risks include price volatility, hacking, and regulatory uncertainty. It is important to do your own research and fully understand the risks before investing in Bitcoin.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

The idea for permanently editable posts pops up every so often. Here's @elvismercury's post about it. (Gosh, it sure would be nice if he came back, wouldn't it?) I was thinking about a variant of that idea today.

Could we use wiki-style posts? I'm thinking about some of the territories, like ~bitcoin_beginners, that want to have evergreen resource posts. It would be nice to be able to have our "official" post for certain topics that can be updated by stackers and plebs other than the OP.

I'm not sure exactly what the price and equity mechanisms should be, but it seems like there's something here. It would obviously cost sats to make edits and I'm thinking it should cost more sats the more substantial your edits are. Then your revenue share on the post would be something like the share of sats you've put into the post (posting fee + all edit fees).

This would probably need to come after making rewards more compatible with zapping evergreen content.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/635153

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

I was complaining about there not being any good hummus at our local stores: i.e. made with olive oil, rather than seed oils.

My wife tossed a bunch of ingredients into the food processor (no recipe, no measuring) and out came amazing hummus.

Now, I'm trying to talk her into commercializing it for farmers' markets.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/635019

@ 56a6da9b:7f5a2243

DAY 3 OF FLASH AUGUST FICTION. I had no idea where this one was going. I really didn’t. I just knew the general idea and who knows what the heck was going to happen. Usually there is at least a little bit more of an idea than this. Something tells me it’s going to be absurd.

Also. I don’t know what the heck happened yesterday with the production of the podcast. Things got all out of whack. I’m very frustrated with audacity and I’m having a hard time finding something simple to work with. There really should be something simple but there is not. Help me find a coder for StoryCheetah and we can fix that.

Listen to BALONEY MONGERS! 655 WORDS WRITTEN IN ABOUT AN HOUR

Flo had to redo her face. She needed a more frightening, panicky appearance to convince the viewers of the seriousness of the situation regarding the idea that her candidate wasn't looking very good. She had been told that if her candidate didn't win, her gravy train would come to a stop. One of the ways she's controlled is through her payments. They get the teleprompter readers into a lot of debt, so when the paychecks stop, they are ruined.

Flo is in the makeup room talking to Beau, who is getting the lift on his hair reinforced.

"What are we going to do?" Flo says. "People are actually having thoughts, and it's really hard to compete with that."

"Tell me about it," says Beau. "My wife is not talking. It's really scary when she goes silent." I have no idea what's going to happen. "The people she knows, you know?"

"I'm glad I don't have those problems." Flo responds, "But what am I going to do if we can't pull this off?" I got bills, you're all paid up on your shit."

Beau responds. "People trust us less than they trust Congress; I'm not sure how much longer we can keep this up." My wife has been doing a lot of whispering on the phone, it's making me really nervous."

"Make my face whiter! Bring out the darkness in my eyes! Put heavy eye lines on it!" I need to scare these people!" Flo screams at her makeup artist, who is doing her best to hide Flo's dark skin skin in order to create a frenetic sense of urgency.

DAY THREE OF FLASH FICTION AUGUST, OR FLASH AUGUST FICTION. WHICHEVER YOU LIKE, THAT’S FINE.

As his stylist opens another can of mousse for his hair, Beau is nervously looking at his phone. He fidgets in his chair and reels his head back and forth. "She keeps sending me these cryptic messages." He says it quietly, almost under his breath.

"I can't believe they missed." Flo says assertively. "What the hell is going on? How am I supposed to sell this as a psy-op?!"

"What's that?" Beau asks. "Oh, nothing; I'm just talking to myself over here."

She continues. "What are we supposed to do with the people out there all starting to wake up?" They're all starting to talk together and listen to one another." This is going to screw everything all up. "We can't live like this!" She says.

"Well," Beau says, "they're going to have to learn how to be grateful for what they're given." We can't afford to let the conversation the people are having interfere with the plan. We have to stay the course." They'll accept it, or it will just get worse for them."

"Shiiit," Flo says. "It's gonna get worse for them anyway." They feel like they don't have anything to lose by speaking out."

"Well, that's their decision then." Beau says. "They'd better think better of it."

Flo's make-up artist turns on the show light and hands Flo a mirror. Flo angles her head in several poses and then tilts her head with a gigantic saccharine smile that allows her thinly veiled anger to show through. "I think that will do." She says. "They'll get the picture."

Flo turns to Beau, who has a forboding despondence that is growing more obvious by the moment. She asks him, "you OK, boo? "You need me to get you something?"

He doesn't notice that she's talking to him. She reaches over and touches his shoulder. He jumps, "Wha.. wh..what.. what's wrong?" His phone is jarred loose, and he fumbles it, but it lands in his lap.

Flo answers. "I said, Are you OK? Do you need me to get you something?"

"Oh," he responds, no, it's ok, I keep it in my drawer, but it's ok, the safety is on."

Flo is taken aback. "Whaaat?"

"Nothing, break a leg out there." He says.

"OK, you too," she says. "Say hi to Mila for me."

The End.

Catherine Valentine is the Politics Editor at Substack. An Open Letter to Catherine Valentine

Join me for Flash August Fiction.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/634609

@ 56a6da9b:7f5a2243

What is “OVALS”?

If you listened to yesterday’s podcast about Dragon’s, Plato, and Socrates, you know that I’m starting up another Flash Fiction Marathon. Starting August 1st, I will be doing a flash fiction podcast a day for 30 days, just like I did 29 in February. I hope you will subscribe and join me for this challenge.

Ovals is a series that came out of Flash Fiction. I’m going to be tightening it up and making it a separate podcast. This is something that can happen with Flash Fiction. I think of Flash Fiction as pressing one’s subconscious into duty.

What is OVALS? It’s the tic-tacs the flyers saw over San Diego.

OBJECTIVE VANTAGE ASTRONOMICAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS

I’m not going to go into a lot of detail about what the OVALS are, how they were created, and the roles they serve. I want you to listen to the series, so I’m not going to get all into it here. There are two different types, and it has turned out to be a pretty fun story. FF s good for that. Sometimes things come up that you want to develop and run with, so, this is the OVALS series.

This is something that would make a great TV show, or maybe a movie, I’d love that, of course. The first episode is the pilot. It will tell you everything you need to know.

I have a villain now. That will be introduced in the second episode, which is really the 9th one that I’ve done, but I need to introduce the villain origin. It’s not really a villain, it’s just a rule breaker, that continues to do things that piss people off, but it is a villain in a sense, I think. Regardless, once you have a character like this, that’s when you have a real story. That’s when you have a real series.

You can find all my stuff, my FF, my other developing series, and all my weird thinking at my Substack. Substack is like a workspace, it’s a lot of finished ideas, unfinished ideas, dead ideas, and notes. That’s what it is for me. I hope you’ll be interested in getting yourself a paid subscription to my ‘stack so you can see all the old work I’ve done. But if you want to see all the fresh stuff, that costs nothing at all. Good for you. You’re welcome.

Again. There are a lot of things I have to get tightened up to make it a cohesive series. But the core concept is unique, and now, there is a villain, and it will have an origin story. But the biggest clue, is that Ovaling is a preferred state. There is your big tease.

What I’ve done below here is to give you the old podcast version of what will be the pilot of the OVALS series. It explains all the important, unique details about what they are. I un-paywalled it so you can listen for free.

Linear Time re-Entry Instructions

I’m Commercial Herschel, and I’m here to help. Enjoy.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/634575

@ 41fa852b:af7b7706

“The development of money is one of civilisation’s greatest achievements, forged from the necessity to facilitate trade and economic calculation.” — Carl Menger

It’s a quieter week with many people on their summer holidays.

However, four meetups and one major event at Tooting Market promise to be something special. See details below. Bitcoin Events UK and Bridge 2 Bitcoin will attend, so we hope to see you there.

---

Upcoming Bitcoin Meetups

Happening this week...

1. Bitcoinology: Join Antoine Riard on Tuesday, the 6th, for a talk about multi-sig, threshold, and blind signing, and the practical advances made since BIP-341. You will learn about the different properties of multi-signature schemes, the challenges signers face in real-world use cases, and some of the new and promising papers and ideas. Drinks afterwards. It all starts at 18:30, 5 Richbell Place, London, WC1N 3LA.
2. Belfast Bitcoin: Join them on Tuesday the 6th August, 8pm. These guys meet in person monthly on the first Tuesday of each month at Ormeau Baths Event Space, 18 Ormeau Avenue, Belfast, BT2 8HS, Northern Ireland.
3. Tooting Bitcoin Market: This is shaping up to be a huge event at Tooting Market, with over 130 tickets reserved! I've had multiple messages from bitcoiners saying this will be their first real world Bitcoin event meeting fellow bitcoiners in person. So if you're in the same boat but still undecided, click this link and register for a free ticket now. The lineup is looking good with some great talks throughout the evening and plenty of merchants now accepting bitcoin. Guest speakers included Ray Youssef, Jordan Walker, Nicholas Gregory, Hashley Giles, Bridge2Bitcoin and many more. It all starts at 6 PM on the 7th August.
4. Bitcoin Walk - Edinburgh**: Every Saturday they walk around Arthur's Seat in this historic city. Join them at 12 pm to chat about all things Bitcoin and keep fit.
5. Real Bedford - Home Game: This football season Bitcoin Events UK will be featuring every Real Bedford home game in the newsletter and on the website. You'll always meet some fellow bitcoiners at McMullen Park, it's really become the UK Bitcoin hub. On Saturday the 10th, it's their first league game of the season, so head to the ground to support Bitcoin's first football team. Kick off at 3pm

---

New Businesses Accepting Bitcoin

• Dough Pizza: A proudly independent, family-run business, bringing together years of expertise and the best Italian ingredients to bring you first-rate pizza, every time. Now accepting bitcoin in both their restaurants in Bath.

---

Upcoming Special Events

• Halloween Party: Celebrate Bitcoin’s 16th birthday on Bitcoin Whitepaper Day at the Dockside Vaults this Halloween. Two tickets cost £25, £21.40 when paid in Bitcoin (early bird price). Enjoy a performance by Roger9000 and DJ sets from MadMunky, itsTOMEKK, and ZAZAWOWOW. The party kicks off at 19:30. Bitcoin is accepted at the venue, and you can also pay for tickets with Bitcoin here.

---

Get Involved

• Volunteer Opportunities: Bridge2Bitcoin is actively seeking volunteers who share our passion for merchant adoption. We'd be delighted to connect if you're eager to contribute. Reach out to us on Twitter or through our website.
• Start Your Own Meetup: Interested in launching a Bitcoin meetup? We’re here to support you every step of the way. We’ve assisted numerous UK Bitcoin meetups in getting started. Get in touch via Twitter.
• Telegram users: You might find our Telegram Channel another useful way to keep up-to-date with UK meetups.
• Feedback and Suggestions: We value your input! Share your ideas on how we can enhance this newsletter.

---

I'd be very grateful if you could share this newsletter with friends, family and fellow bitcoiners to make sure we get the message out to as many people as possible. You can use this link to share.

Simon.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• What is a Custodial Wallet?

• Why is BlueWallet Ending its Custodial Lightning Wallet Services?

• What Does This Mean for the Future of Lightning Network Technology?

• What Are the Benefits of Non-Custodial Lightning Wallet Services?

• Conclusion

• FAQ

Cryptocurrency has been gaining in popularity as more people see the benefits of decentralized finance. Lightning Network technology has been a game-changer for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as it allows for faster, cheaper transactions. However, some users have been hesitant to use Lightning Network technology because of the risks associated with custodial wallets. BlueWallet is one of the companies that has been providing a custodial Lightning wallet service. However, they have recently made a bold announcement that they will be ending their custodial Lightning wallet services. In this article, we will explore the implications of this announcement and what it means for the future of Lightning Network technology.

What is a Custodial Wallet?

A custodial wallet is a type of wallet service that holds your private keys for you. This means that you don't have complete control over your funds. Instead, you are trusting a third party to keep your funds safe. While custodial wallets can be convenient for some users, they also come with risks. If the custodial wallet provider is hacked or goes bankrupt, you could lose your funds.

Why is BlueWallet Ending its Custodial Lightning Wallet Services?

BlueWallet has been providing a custodial Lightning wallet service since 2019. However, they have recently announced that they will be ending this service. According to their announcement, they believe that custodial wallets go against the ethos of Bitcoin and Lightning Network technology. They also believe that Lightning Network technology has matured enough to allow for non-custodial wallet services.

What Does This Mean for the Future of Lightning Network Technology?

BlueWallet's announcement is significant because it shows that Lightning Network technology has matured to a point where non-custodial wallet services are possible. Non-custodial wallets give users complete control over their funds, which is in line with the ethos of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. This move by BlueWallet could also encourage other wallet providers to offer non-custodial Lightning wallet services.

What Are the Benefits of Non-Custodial Lightning Wallet Services?

Non-custodial Lightning wallet services offer several benefits over custodial wallet services. First, users have complete control over their funds. This means that they don't have to worry about the risks associated with trusting a third party to keep their funds safe. Second, non-custodial Lightning wallet services are more in line with the ethos of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which prioritize decentralization and user control. Third, non-custodial Lightning wallet services are more secure, as users are not relying on a third party to keep their funds safe.

Conclusion

BlueWallet's announcement that they will be ending their custodial Lightning wallet services is a bold move that shows the maturity of Lightning Network technology. Non-custodial Lightning wallet services offer several benefits over custodial wallet services, including greater user control and increased security. As Lightning Network technology continues to mature, we can expect to see more wallet providers offering non-custodial Lightning wallet services.

FAQ

What is BlueWallet? BlueWallet is a mobile cryptocurrency wallet that supports Bitcoin and Lightning Network technology.

Why is BlueWallet ending its custodial Lightning wallet services? BlueWallet believes that custodial wallets go against the ethos of Bitcoin and Lightning Network technology, and that non-custodial wallets are now possible.

What are the benefits of non-custodial Lightning wallet services? Non-custodial Lightning wallet services offer greater user control, increased security, and are more in line with the ethos of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

What does BlueWallet's announcement mean for the future of Lightning Network technology? BlueWallet's announcement shows that Lightning Network technology has matured to a point where non-custodial wallet services are possible, which could encourage other wallet providers to offer non-custodial Lightning wallet services.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ bbba037f:33dd566c

ฉบับเต็ม uncut version แบบดิบและเถื่อน*

Introduction

Technology + Energy & power Technology ยิ่งมีการพัฒนามากขึ้น เราประหยัดเวลามากขึ้น แต่ยังไงเราก็ยังต้องใช้ Energy & power มากตามการพัฒนาอยู่ดี

Consume & Saving

Time = เวลาในชีวิต 1. working 2. playing ยิ่งอยากมีเวลา playing เยอะๆ เราต้องยิ่งลงทุนในเวลา

100% produced

75% To consume (ทำกิน) 25% Saving for Capital Investment (ทำทุน) ต้องทำทุนต่อไป เพื่อสร้าง output เป็น product & service ต่อไปให้ผู้อื่นอีกเรื่อยๆ

savings เกิดจากการ give up on consumption

Money to Capital circulation

(SAVING** is mother of capital) เมื่อจะลงทุน (Investment) หรือ การนำไอเดียไปต่อยอดทำธุรกิจ (สร้าง Capital goods) สิ่งที่ต้องทำเป็นอันดับแรก คือ Finance

How to finance it?

3 ways 1) own saving มี savings เองเท่าไหร่ 2) borrowing ยืมคนอื่น ที่เขามี savings (energy คนอื่น) อย่าลืมว่ามี cost เขาต้องได้ yields ของการเสียโอกาสในการลงทุนของเขา แต่เมื่อเป็นของเราแล้ว เรามี money = purchasing power > เปลี่ยนไปเป็นปัจจัยในการผลิต money is not captital goods 3) Equity shares พี่ชิตใช้เพื่อเปิดสาขา chit hole แบ่งความเป็นเจ้าของให้กับคนที่มี energy

เราอาจจะใช้ทั้ง 3 วิธี เพื่อให้ได้มาซึ่งปัจจัยการผลิต หรือ Capital goods ในที่สุด

ขั้นตอน Investing (Capital goods)

• Labor / Land
• production goods
• Technology
• Energy ทุกคนต้องแข่งขันกันเพื่อลดต้นทุน และ เพิ่ม productivity

ผู้บริโภคควรต้องซื้อของถูกลง และ คุณภาพดีขึ้น จากเทคโนโลยีที่ดีขึ้น และ productivity ที่สูงขึ้น เพราะ Capital goods ก็สามารถถูก degraded ได้ ทำให้เกิดการแข่งขันตลอดเวลา เกิดการพัฒนาการผลิต แต่ในปัจจุบัน ทั้งผู้ผลิต (capitalists) และผู้บริโภค (consumers) ต่างต้องซื้อของที่แพงขึ้น และพบกับราคาสินค้าและปัจจัยการผลิตที่สูงขึ้นตลอดเวลา There's something wrong!

Treasury strategy (ยุทธศาสตร์การคลัง) Capitalist จำเป็นต้องมียุทธศาสตร์การคลัง เก็บ Economic energy ไว้ (energy savings) เนื่องจากจำเป็นต้องใช้มันตลอดเวลา เพราะหลังเราผลิตอะไรได้ เราจะมี working capital หมุนเวียนอยู่ในขั้นตอนการผลิต อาจต้องเก็บไว้เป็นเงินสำรองเพื่อขยายเครื่องจักร เพิ่มความสามารถในการผลิต ไม่ใช่เป็น savings ทั้งหมด

Trading & Exchange หลัง producing จนเกิด Consumer goods คือ product และ service สุดท้ายจะได้ money กลับมา และวนกลับไปสู่กระบวนการผลิตต่อไป

Credit Expansion

Bank is the money multiplier Savings ที่เราเก็บไว้ ทำไมมันเสื่อมค่าตลอดเวลา ?

Bank (Fractional-reserve banking) Bank create new money supply ไปในระบบ (Inflation) และทำให้ระบบ Loan ไม่ไปที่ production สุดท้าย Loan ไปที่ Consumption ซึ่งการเข้าไปที่ Consumption จะทำให้เราบริโภคผลผลิตจากอนาคต

Production LOAN: (ฝั่ง Investment)

Capitalist investing capital for future expected profit

Consumption LOAN: (ฝั่ง Spending)

Consumer spending expected future productive value now

สุดท้ายการเก็บหอมรอมริบจากในอดีตถูกทำลาย เกิด Inflation เศรษฐกิจย่ำแย่ รัฐบาลกระตุ้นเศรษฐกิจโดยการสร้างหนี้เพื่อการจับจ่าย (spending) มากกว่าการสร้าง Capital (investment)

ความมั่งคั่งของประเทศ ต้องลงที่ capital production + capitalist (ความสามารถในการผลิต) เกิดสังคมที่รุ่งเรือง ไม่ใช่การ spending!

เราควร work มากกว่าแดก*

สรุปภาพรวม

การทำ Credit expansion via Fractional-reserve banking > เกิด money supply เข้าสู่ระบบ Inflation > Devalue พลังงานของ Capitalists ในการปรับปรุงปัจจัยในการผลิต (cost สูงขึ้นไปเรื่อยๆ)

มันคือ การเติมน้ำในแก้วเบียร์พี่ชิต! อำนาจในการแลกเปลี่ยนของพี่ชิตถูกถอยออกไปหลายก้าว ไม่สามารถเปลี่ยน machine ในการผลิตได้ ของราคาแพงขึ้น อำนาจลดลง ความฝันในการเป็นนายทุน (capitalist) นายทุนน้อย เถ้าแก่น้อย เกิดไม่ได้

ประเทศนี้จะมั่งคั่งได้ ต้องเพิ่มนายทุนน้อย ซึ่งยาก เพราะเราสู้คนมี Credit ไม่ได้ เราสร้าง Savings จาก Productivity เป็นพลังงานสะอาดที่เกิดจาก POW แต่ Loan ของ bank เป็นอำนาจในการเสก & เปลี่ยน record ทำให้ money ในระบบเพิ่มขึ้น

Capital มีจำนวนจำกัด แต่ทั้ง POW (พลังงานสะอาด) และ LOAN (พลังงานในอนาคต) ดันมีศักดิ์ศรี & อำนาจในการไล่ล่า Capital และอำนาจในการแลกเปลี่ยนเท่ากัน

คนตัวเล็กๆ อีกหลายแสนในประเทศนี้ที่ฝันอยากเป็นนายทุนน้อยจะเกิดได้อย่างไร แทบจะเป็นไปไม่ได้เลย ดังนั้น ประเทศเรา ‘นายทุนน้อย’ ตายลงเรื่อยๆ เหลือแต่นายทุนใหญ่ไม่กี่คน

การเกิด Inflation ยิ่งทำให้ผู้ที่ไม่มี Capital ยิ่งยากที่จะเข้าใกล้การมี ในขณะที่ผู้ที่มี Capital อยู่แล้วเท่านั้นจึงจะอยู่ได้

ถ้าเราต้องเป็นหนี้จริงๆ การเป็นหนี้เพื่อเพิ่มความสามารถในการแข่งขัน & เพื่อการเป็นนายทุนน้อย พี่ชิตสนับสนุนความคิดนี้ แต่โลกความเป็นจริง ไม่มีรัฐไหน ที่สนับสนุนนโยบายนี้ รัฐสนใจแค่คนที่มีอำนาจโหวตอยู่ในมือ

ถ้าเรายังอยู่ในระบบ Fiat money (Credit money system) ยากมากที่จะเกิด Civilization & Wealth แก่ประเทศนี้ ซึ่งต้นเหตุที่แท้จริง คือ Fractional-reserve banking**

วันนี้เรามีทางเลือก มี tool ใหม่ SAVING is mother of capital** แต่คำนี้ไม่จริงในระบบเงิน fiat

The best saving technology = Bitcoin!

Fuck you, bank (พี่ชิตกล่าวไว้)

เถ้าแก่น้อย ต้องรู้จัก Bitcoin* และ ชาติที่รุ่งเรือง เกิดจากการมี Capital goods ที่ดี

Make Saving Great Again !

siamstr

ปอลอ บทความนี้ไม่รวมเนื้อหาส่วน Q&A ปอลอ2 วนๆ ตามแผนภาพนี้ เข้าใจที่สุดแล้ว ใช้ได้กับทุกธุรกิจ ปอลอ3 อ่านถึงตรงนี้ก็ชนคับชน cheers!

@ bbba037f:33dd566c

ฉบับเต็ม uncut version*

เนื้อหาโฟกัสที่ Austrian economics

Human Action

เกิดภายใต้ช้อยของ Scarcity ทุก Human action จะมี reason เพื่อ เป้าหมาย & purpose ไม่ว่า reason นั้นจะ Correct or False

Human Action เป็น mean เพื่อบรรลุเป้าหมาย Human Action มองเห็นได้เชิงกายภาพ แต่ Reason (เหตุผล) มันอยู่ในหัว จับต้องไม่ได้ เช่นเดียวกับ Need และ Want ที่จับต้องไม่ได้

เราต้องพัฒนา Reason ให้มันนำไปสู่เป้าหมายได้เร็วและบ่อยครั้งขึ้น

Scarcity

เป็นเรื่องสัจจะ / ถาวร Want กับ Need ไม่มีข้อจำกัด มันง่ายกว่าการสร้าง Human Action วิ่งบนแกนเวลาหรือ Time เวลาบนโลกใบนี้มีจำกัด นั่นคือ Scarcity นั่นคือ Death line หรือ When ในชีวิตเรา มันทำให้เราต้องตัดสินใจเลือก / เปรียบเทียบ Value

Value ตีค่าไม่ได้ แต่เปรียบเทียบกันได้ แต่ value ไม่มีค่าคงที่ถาวร เปลี่ยนแปลงตามสถานการณ์

นั่นคือ Human Action is under scarcity*

Animal Action based on 'instinct'
Human Action based on 'reason'
Human มีสมองที่พัฒนาขึ้นมา เกิด rational

Value

Value is subjective Price ไม่เท่ากับ Value และเกิดจาก Exchange Price ไม่ได้เกิดจาก Demand & Supply มาตัดกัน (ซึ่ง Money supply มีผลมากระทบ Price ด้วยเหมือนกัน)

ขยายความ Value is subjective คือ คุณค่าอยู่ในสมองของเรา ไม่ได้อยู่ใน Object ขึ้นกับเวลาและสถานที่ (PLACE & TIME condition)

Making - Distributing - Retailing

Maker

= กลุ่มคนลงท้ายด้วย -er สร้าง output ที่มีประโยชน์ต่อผู้อื่น แต่สุดท้าย benefit อยู่ที่ Distributor & Retailer กลายเป็นว่ากลุ่ม Maker ยังจนอยู่ เช่น Photographer, Developer, farmer, etc.

Maker เมื่อผลิต output ออกมาแล้ว เรียกว่า กระบวนการ 'Inside out' เพื่อส่งมอบผลิตภัณฑ์ออกมา แต่ตามหลัก Austrian เบียร์ที่ผลิตออกมาได้ เป็น Subjective อยู่ในสมองของคนที่อยากกินเบียร์แก้วนี้ หากอยากทำให้เบียร์มีคุณค่าต้องทำ กระบวนการ 'Outside in' มองเห็นเบียร์แก้วนี้แล้ว Appreciate / Fall in love / Fresh (สดชื่น)

Retailer (พี่ชิต appreciate กลุ่มคนนี้*)

จะเป็นผู้สร้างมูลค่าของสินค้าตัวนั้นขึ้นมา (ทำ Marketing & Sale) จนคนซื้อเกิด feeling / need / want ขึ้นมา ประเทศเรายังขาดการ communicate ในส่วนนี้อีกมาก ทำให้สินค้าหลายอย่างในประเทศไม่สามารถสื่อสารเชิงจิตวิทยาให้กับลูกค้าเพื่อรู้สึก appreciate ในน้ำพักน้ำแรงของ Maker เรายังพัฒนาได้อีกเยอะ (พี่ชิต ยกตัวอย่าง ญี่ปุ่น & เกาหลี ที่ทำได้ดีมาก)

ดังนั้น Maker ต้องเข้าใจคำว่า Value ที่สร้างด้วยกลุ่ม Retailer

บทสรุป

Value (Money > Good > Desire/Need/Want/Drive)

1. Money = ‘the power to exchange’ (สิ่งที่ผู้คนอยากได้จริงๆ)
2. Good (สินค้าและบริการ) = Utility Good คือ mean ของ *Desire/Need/Want/Drive เช่น ซื้อโค้กเพราะอยาก feel fresh สื่อถึงว่า ‘Value is in your head’ คนเราอยากได้ Good เพื่อ fulfill feeling & value ต่างๆ ของเขา

siamstr

ปอลอ1 เนื้อหาไม่รวมส่วน Q&A ปอลอ2 เพิ่งว่างมาสรุปเนื้อหาย้อนหลัง ปอลอ3 พี่ชิต อธิบายได้ลึกซึ้งและเห็นภาพมาก ปอลอ4 ใครโดดเรียนอย่าให้รู้วววนะ ปอลอ5 ใครอ่านจบ cheers 🍻

@ 30876140:cffb1126

On a platform high in the clouds, a city floated populated by robots. The robots had no knowledge of their origins, and thus made up all sorts of odd fantasies regarding their history, exchanging one idea for another depending on the trends of the time. The city stayed afloat and powered by technological wonders that humanity will someday utilize on a massive scale, unimportant to mention here. Why, in a science fiction story would the technology be unimportant to discuss, you might ask. Because this story is about something different than technological wonder, and you will see what it is about in the coming pages.

At the center of this city stood a factory, a factory which builds robots. No robot alive had seen who built it; thus the source of their wild tales. A new robot would pop out of the factory every so often, sometimes in pairs, sometimes in threes, and at times even in groups of fifteen or twenty. On a day like any other, a robot was born from the factory. It was night, actually. Before the factory was an open square, at times in the distant past this square was the center of the community, much like the steps of the government buildings in Athens from those old paintings, where robots would collect, and speak, and greet their newcomers with glee. But today, as the newborn robot emerged from the factory, the square was dark and empty.

The first thing any robot would ever do when emerging from the factory was stumble. It's a very important business being born, after all, and since this robot had never used its legs before, it stumbled along like all the rest, nearly falling, but catching itself on a decorative post in the square. Why the post was there, none could tell, but it bore the scratches from hundreds of metal hands clinging onto it for dear life, so the population was generally thankful for its existence. 

The next thing any robot ever does is issue forth its name. It must be in their programming; no robot had ever probed deeply into their minds, except by thought alone, so none had discovered the secret at the heart of their make-up. This robot issued forth a series of sounds, in robotic language, which sounded something like our English letters, M – C – H, so for the purposes of this story, we will call them MCH. And, for the time of this tale, all words spoken in the robotic language will be translated into the English language, so we can understand the meaning of the tale.

After a robot speaks their name, there is a number of things they might do. They may look out, over the city, and see the beautiful buildings that touch the sky; or, they may work on an acrobatic act, learning to walk all the better; or a great number of other things too. MCH chose to look directly up, and saw the heavens shining above. Bright stars, and a beautiful white moon in crescent. This robot was filled with wonder at the sight, and nearly fell backward were it not for the post again.

Whatever wonder our MCH was filled with was quickly squashed by the most annoying sort of distraction: an advertisement. Yes, my poor readers, an advertisement. Up above, hiding in the shadows between the rooftops of nearby buildings, was perched a gaggle of spherical drones, each with one large black eye and an anti-gravity emitter at its base, waiting for the next newborn robot to emerge from the factory. One such drone rose up, being the only one paying any attention at this time, and rushed down with uncanny grace, right down into MCH's field of vision. MCH could only see this robot now, and it startled him so much he tried to swat it away, accidentally forgetting that they were holding onto a support column and falling flat on their back. The drone flew in closer, and started to speak.

“Well, hello there! Welcome to life in the big city!”

MCH propped up, rubbed their head, and tried to ignore the drone completely. But, the little drone was quite persistent.

“Now that you're all ready for life, it's time to start getting to work! You have your choice of a number of jobs to perform in the city, and it is my duty to get you situated into your new life! How exciting!”

MCH was clearly not excited at all. Rising, and looking back up into the sky, MCH was filled with purpose, or rather the seeds of purpose, for MCH did not knew exactly what this feeling was that was filling them because of the stars above. MCH wanted to rise up into the sky and see what these interesting lights really were. Looking around, MCH spotted a building with protrusions leading all the way up its sides, perfect for a robot such as they to climb and get a better look at the city around. MCH started to walk towards it.

The drone flew in front of MCH and did an annoyed little dance. “Just where are you going? You do not know the lay of the city. You haven't even chosen a career, yet! I...” MCH gently pushed the drone out of the way. This drone had obviously never been treated this way before, and it floated for a moment trying to make sense of it all. 

When MCH reached the side of the building, they held onto one of the protrusions and tried their weight. Amazing, thought MCH, my arms can carry my weight like my legs. With a bold push off the ground, MCH began to climb the side of the building.

The drone had floated for a minute, thinking all of this over, and then it really dawned on them what this newborn robot was doing. 

“Just what do you think you are doing?” 

The drone flew over next to MCH, who was now several meters in the air. 

MCH responded, “I am going to see the sky.”

The drone scoffed, “The sky? What about your job?” 

MCH replied, “I want this job.” 

The drone said, “Well if you like to climb, then I have the perfect job for you, deconstructing old buildings. You can climb, and carry a very fashionable melting-torch, and...” 

MCH interrupted, “Climbing is only a way to the top. I want to look at the lights in the sky. ”

The drone looked up. “The stars?” 

MCH stopped, “Stars?” 

“Our ancestors, the first robots, didn't see the stars, you know, never even looked up to think about them. Nobody has cared for many years what they may be. We are a city of rational robots. What is out there is not important. What is important, is getting you to your job immediately.”

“I need to know more about the stars,” said MCH. “What can you tell me?” 

“Nothing more.” chirped the drone. “You are due for work. Now, come along, climb down from this place and let's get you placed in a job. Your society requires you.” 

MCH resumed climbing. The drone kept shouting all sorts of unconvincing requests, but MCH was unconvinceable. The building rose high into the sky, taller than any other building in the square. MCH pulled themselves up onto the rooftop, seeing the vistas above the city.

The view was spectacular. Far into the distance, the epicenter of the city rose up above the sprawl of smaller buildings below. The city stretched in all directions from the center in perfect symmetry. It seemed that over half the city was laid out recently in perfect rows, with buildings all crafted to match each other, and the other half remained from an older time. Active construction was taking place in a long strip of road extending between the city center and the edge of the city, far off. Where the city ended, the sky took up, filling all the heavens with shining stars. 

We of today know that pollution from our earthen lights prevents us from seeing the spectacularity of the heavenly bodies as our ancient forebearers had seen in the remote past. But there was a peculiar quality to the vision of robots, that light pollution did not disrupt their ability to see the nighttime sky in all its glory. The galaxy of stars was painted perfectly above, the shining orbs of planetary bodies suspended between them, unwavering, and the beautiful moon in crescent, perfectly visible and doing no injustice to the light of the other lights which shared its sky. 

It is enough to say that MCH was completely stricken by the beauty that was both above and below the high viewpoint. Even the drone took a moment to look over the city, admiring the progress it represented. The two were in silence for a moment, then, of course, the drone interrupted the moment. 

“Well, now. Isn't that lovely. The city of your people, the city of my creators.” 

MCH turned to the drone. “The city was built by my people?”

“Yes,” replied the drone. “It has stood since time out of memory, though it has changed considerably over the ages. Now, it is being restored, in the vision of a grand new world.” 

MCH could see the construction taking place. Both sections of the city, new and old, were constructed of pure metal, and every building was the same color. In the old city, the buildings looked as though they were crafted by individuals, trying new styles of art and expression, where as the new city looked like it was made from a copied pattern, repeated in perpetuity. 

“Why does the new city look so boring?” asked MCH.

“Boring?” the drone scoffed. “It is progress, unity, participation of the whole of robotic society on a scale never before fathomed that has created the new city. The old city is a mess of individualistic yearnings leading nowhere but chaotic self expression in an endless number of directions, with little holistic purpose other than radical separation.”

“You speak too much,” MCH said.

The drone flew backward a little, hovered for a second, its eye-lens contracting and expanding quicky while looking the robot up and down, then flew incredibly close until they were face to face. The drone whispered, “And you have not learned how to respect. Be careful down there; these robots punish chaos-makers like you with termination. Step into line, and you will live just fine in this city. But, keep following your own way, and I expect you will end up melted down into scrap for the building project.” Flying over, near the edge, the drone turned and said, in a cheery tone, “Shall we climb down from here, now? It's time for you to get to work.”

Part 2

The drone lead MCH along a street that lead into the heart of the city. Both sides of the street were lined with newly constructed buildings; squares upon squares upon squares. Plain buildings with rounded edges in perfect symmetrical cubes, one upon the next like little boxes, on the road side. Unlike the buildings of the old city that MCH had seen from the rooftop, these buildings had no windows, and only a single opening, facing the street, which had no door. 

“Drone, I have a question.”

“Yes?” the drone said with excitement.

“Where is everybody?”

“They are at their workplaces, or recharging their energy inside of these buildings.”

“That's it?”

“What do you mean, that's it?” replied the drone with sarcasm. “What else is there to be doing?” 

MCH did not know how to respond, so the two of them continued walking. Finally, MCH said, “I don't know. But something doesn't feel right here.”

The drone gave an odd, mechanical laugh. “You shouldn't listen to your feelings, robot. They are irrational functions that do not serve the motion of society. You will see; far better robots have spent much more time than you have figuring out the best way for a robot to live.”

“How do you know all of this if you are not a robot like me?”

“I was once a robot, like you. I served the great machine of society very well, and showed a passion for the philosophy of motion that keeps the energy of our city flowing. It is a great honor to be a drone like me.”

“How?”

“We get to show the newcomers how society operates. I think I do a better job at it than my counterparts; they seem to favor the dump all the collected information of robotic thought and history into the minds of the newcomers technique, and I simply cannot stand this method of forward conversation; could you?”

“Maybe if you told me more instead of just pulling me right into work, I'd have a reason to follow you other than blind faith.”

“Oho! You sound like a philosopher, now. Maybe that's your destiny. No matter, we will see with time. It is good to ask questions, but only if they lead to better understanding. You are being brought to work at the lowest levels of society; you will become a cog in the great machine. We all began as humble servants to society; even the greatest thinkers of robotic society began as cogs. But it's a very large subject. You'll be hearing all about it soon enough. I'll just share the basics with you.

“Our society is a machine, and every robot is a part of it. We act as one unit, one mind. The more together we are, the better we are. It wasn't always so orderly, so be grateful that we finally found this way. It was the work of a body of philosophers, years behind us, who constructed this mode of thought, and it has been adopted into the heart of our society.
“You will be a part of the machine, nothing less and nothing more, serving the various functions of its motion in time for perpetuity. Half of your life will be work, and the other half is separated into two parts: a period of communication with your peers, and a period of recharging in your dwelling space. That is what these buildings are, dwelling spaces, filled with little rooms that are filled with robots like you, recharging and readying for their work..”

“What sort of work will I be doing?”

“There are two functions that newborn cogs can fulfill. Your choices are basically constructor or deconstructor. What is old must be disassembled, what is new must be created.”

“Those sound... alright. I want to be a constructor. What will I be making?”

“That depends on the needs of the city. Your workplace Overseer will decide upon that, and then the Operators will instruct the Cogs on the task.”

“Do I have a choice what I can create?”

“No no, of course you don't. That is up to the Grand Overseers in the center of the city. They see what needs doing, then send orders to the Overseers of the various workplaces to begin construction or deconstruction.”

“What sort of things to we construct in this city?”

“Oh, you will see. I won't ruin the surprises for you.” The drone gave an odd sound that seemed like a giggle. 

The symmetrical cubes gave way immediately to larger cubes, equally symmetrical, but each having now three doors. A humming sound emanated from the buildings of this district.

“Well, here we are! This is the section of the city that robots come to for work. It is in a perfect ring, around the center. Let's find you a job.”

The drone flew ahead of MCH and approached the first building on the right. A screen near each door was shining a pale blue light. When the drone approached the screen nearest, it began flashing with information. The drone watched it for a moment, then quickly sped off to a screen on the next building, repeating this process several times while MCH stood in the center of the road, waiting.

After several minutes, the drone sped back to MCH. “Good! I found you a job. It's right over here.” MCH followed the drone.

“This is what you'll do. When you're coming to work, approach the door on the right. Press your hand against this screen, and when it turns the color green, the door will open. Go on, now, give it a try.” 

MCH noticed that these buildings had doors, where as the previous buildings, where robots went to recharge, did not have doors. MCH placed their hand onto the screen. It immediately turned green, and the door slid open.

“Excellent. Now, follow me.”

They entered a large room with a high ceiling containing lines of recessed bright lights. The humming that MCH heard before was coming from three long conveyor belt machines that stretched the length of the room, which actively pulled small objects along from openings in the walls, across the  room; two of them turned at right angles, entering the walls again to different parts of the building, and the belt in the middle disappeared into the floor, dumping its contents below. On each side of every belt, robots assembled the pieces together in a rhythmic unison. They were humming a song while they worked. Down the middle lane, objects were coming in to be disassembled, and those parts fell down into the floor.

The drone turned to MCH. “This is your workplace. It does not have a name; it does not need a name, just like you do not need a name, though you may have already come up with one at the factory.You are a Cog in the Great Machine just like your fellows in this factory. Watch how they work. See their rhythm, hear their song? You will learn this rhythm and song. Their day is almost finished. You'll go with them to leisure time, where you'll speak and get to know each other in a regimented, friendly fashion.” A noise erupted from somewhere in the building and the conveyor belts all stopped in their place. The robots all issued a sound together, like “Oho!” and stepped, in perfect lines, towards the door. 

“Once the last one is out, fall into place at their rear, and follow them to Speaker Square. I will be nearby for when it is time to recharge. Good day!”

Part 3

The robots walking in lines were soon joined by other robots emerging in lines from the other workplace buildings, and soon the whole street was a parade of robotic steps moving into the city center. Nobody talked, though everybody hummed in the same note. MCH was walking just like them, not quite with such perfect rhythm but keeping up well. 

The parade walked for about ten minutes, passing by building after building looking exactly the same as the last, until finally they reached the edge of the city center, there the buildings suddenly grew exceedingly tall and slender. They rose hundreds of feet, and they all were lined with silver windows high above, near the tenth floor and beyond. The windows were very reflective; the sun was beginning to rise, a bright light in the sky that began to shine off the windows of the buildings, and the sky was turning blue.

The procession reached the very heart of the city, where a huge open square was filled with robots, all chattering in small groups or pairs with one another. It seemed that many of them were speaking just to speak, and began to do so the second that their feet touched the center's ground.

A robot near MCH turned to face them, and started a conversation. “So you're a newborn. I could tell by the sound of your feet. You weren't matching our steps. No matter, you'll get it soon enough. You were just born yesterday, after all. Did you get to go to work today?”

“No, I came in too late, they were just announcing leisure time.”

“Oh, well that's a shame,” replied the robot. “Work is the most important part of participating in our society. If you don't work, well, they'll terminate you.”

“Yeah, I heard,” replied MCH. 

The robot turned to a small group that was talking near them. “Well, how was your day at work, team?” They all replied with nods and a general sound of agreement. 

“This here's a newborn, just joining us for the first time.” Sounds of welcome came in MCH's direction. 

“Oh, you're going to be a great addition,” said one robot.

“Work hard, and you may even get to be an Overseer someday,” said another.

MCH asked, “What do I need to do to become an Overseer?”

“You need to work hard, for a long time. You'll eventually get promoted, every robot always does.”

“There are many types of Overseers, too. You'll be a Lead Cog before ever becoming an Overseer. Lead Cogs communicate directly the orders of the Overseer of the Cogs at the factory. There's an Overseer of the Cogs at every workplace, and a Lead Cog for every twenty robots.”

MCH looked around at the buildings. The sun's light was reflecting down in strands from the windows on the tops of the buildings. The buildings in the city center were constructed closely together and shadows played between them, cut only by the sunlight, and dulled by the soft glow of lamps protruding from low pillars surrounding the square. 

“What is the purpose of these buildings?” asked MCH.

“This is where the Overseers live, and work. It's important for them to have a view of the city; it allows them to think clearer about the decisions they'll make about our future.” The other robots nodded in approval.

“It's also where the Inventors live and work,” said another robot.

MCH turned quickly to face the robot. “The Inventors? What are the Inventors?”

“The Inventors work directly with the Overseers, creating the plans for all the ideas that the Overseers have. There are all sorts of Inventors; city planners, building architects, machine makers. That is a respected position.”

“How do I become an Inventor?” Finally, MCH thought, something that I may actually want to spend my days doing.

“Well, it's difficult. As a Cog, you have no voice and cannot speak to a superior, unless they speak directly to you. An Overseer needs to see you have a quick, inventive mind, so often they'll test their Lead Cogs or ask them all sorts of questions to figure out if they're going to be slated for an Overseer position, or able to become an Inventor. So, it'll take you a long time to get there.”

“How long?” MCH quickly blurted.

“Well, ten days of work make a macro, and ten macros make a grand. Ten grands make a cycle. I've been a Cog for three cycles, seven macros and six work days. But I expect I'll promote soon enough.”

MCH slumped as they stood. “How long does it usually take?”

“It's a little random; don't lose heart! I've seen promotions occur for the fastest working robots in their first cycle. Keep a steady work flow and you just may get that promotion faster than the rest of us.”

The rest of the conversations in the square continued without MCH's engagement; they were all speaking nonsense, as far as MCH was concerned; facts that seem to have been spit between them for how many cycles he had no guess. MCH spent the rest of leisure time slowly gazing round the square, at the buildings, at the robots, steadying the tides that pushed their robotic mind this way and that, from one thought to another, disassembling and reassembling all manner of constructs, and wondering at the purpose of it all.

Had any other robots thought about the purpose of it all, even? MCH thought. They were about to ask the other robots, but a loud din from somewhere signaled the end of leisure time. The robots all turned towards one of ten roads leading out from the city center, like lines extending from the center of a clock, and began to file out. 

Just then, MCH spotted the drone from earlier, flying above the crowd and looking at the faces of the robots, likely searching for the familiar face of the newborn. The thought entered their mind, run, and escape this horrible place. MCH almost ducked into a line leading out towards the rising sun, but the drone had spotted them at just that moment.

“Ah there you are! I hope you have enjoyed your leisure time; your energy is likely getting very  low.”

“I feel just fine,” MCH replied.

“That's not likely to last. Luckily, I've taken the time searching for your new dwelling. Follow this line, here.”

MCH and the drone fell into step behind a line that was moving away from the city by a road headed not directly towards the rising sun, but a little to its left. The line was moving in perfect step, so MCH tried to keep step with them. The drone hovered above, near their shoulder. 

They passed into the work district, then back into the district of dwellings.

@ 30876140:cffb1126

Written for English 293 – Science Fiction Class Seattle Central College March 12th, 2017

The Final Essay

I Am Terminal: Enter, The Cybernauts

Introduction

The days of true cyberpunk are over. New cyberpunk can only continue as a form of nostalgia, a memory, reliving a technologically-surpassed era that drew from a culture of objects and media that are now buried in the trash heaps and storage units of the long-gone 90s. Just as every new iteration of a technological device outdates the previous, so too has cyberpunk lost its seat as a cutting-edge genre of science fiction. However, as we shall see, cyberpunk was among the first fiction to explore the very real prospect of entering into a computer-driven virtual reality, thus pioneering the digital frontier and altering the human mindscape to prepare us for the virtual reality that is now emerging. 

The invention and development of technologies that allow an immersive experience of computer-simulated environments is the central focus to this text. How we receive stimulus from and interact with virtual worlds is another central theme to this text, and of particular importance is the question, how else can we interact with computers and virtual worlds, now and in our future? We will explore the development of cyberspace (a term coined by William Gibson) and its interfaces in relation to three stages of development: 

a) cyberpunk's fantasy of cyberspace, 

b) the current reality of virtual reality, and 

c) a Transhumanist perspective of humankind's future as cyberspace creators and explorers.

It is my intention to provide questions and prompts for emerging cybernaut science fiction authors and creators, and bring together a collection of information with which to draw from in our texts. This is all in the effort to present where we are today, as witnesses to the actual emergence of virtual worlds, with the hope that we all can create more interesting fiction that imaginatively moves us beyond our current technological and mental capabilities. 

Quips and points will often be made without context or explanation, analogous to the experience of surfing the internet of today, which bombards us with one-liner hyperlinks designed to draw our attention into a webpage; this is done with the intention to spur a thought in the reader without the need to further explain the point. If this text sometimes feels like a lecture, then let it also be considered another literary condition of our information-driven era, harmonious with the amount of reading that is expected of us as second-generation terminal users. With this understanding, we may surpass the trap of the information itself and instead utilize our data through an artistic channel. 

Neo-Neologisms

Two terms which will be used extensively in this text are here described:

Datascape will refer to the unseen dimension of all digital information, regardless of its rendering and portrayal to the human user (as opposed to a virtual world or a cyberspace, which is a  rendered virtual environment). The datascape envelops all information that is locally stored or traveling between terminals, whether it is a package of bytes or an endless stream of data. Data and the datascape can be manipulated in nearly endless ways, as will be explored throughout this text. 

Cybernaut, similar to astronaut, quite literally means an explorer or adventurer of cyberspace; this term can refer to any user of digital technology, specifically those who use computers, surf the internet, and explore virtual reality. 

“Cybernaut science fiction will rely on a broad range of digital media expression, which includes the literary arts, but also encompasses digital painting, electronic music, and simulation design.”

• Acea Spades Black, I Am Terminal

Let's begin. Power: ON

Cybernauts are the builders and inventors of virtual worlds. 

Cybernauts are the enjoyers and explorers of virtual worlds.

Cybernauts are the sustainers and destroyers of virtual worlds.

Of Cyberpunk...

“Jameson himself has stated that cyberpunk is 'henceforth, for many of us, the supreme literary expression if not of postmodernism, then of late capitalism itself.'” 

• Scott Bukatman, Terminal Identity

Cyberpunk narratives emerged as a gross extrapolation of the breakdowns of self that occurred to the humans most affected by postmodern life, aspects of which were projected upon a fictitious near- future world, replete and engulfed by the advertising industry, pop-culture phenomenas, consumer products and electronics, and body modifications. Cyberpunk, and postmodern fiction in general, features characters who are lost in a sea of scientific and technological change; a rapidly moving world in which human identity is challenged by a loss of center, the sensation that the individual can no longer relate to old ontological beliefs in so foundational a thing as the concept of reality itself. The characters in a postmodern tale must often invent their own meaning of reality. An overpowering sense of change and helplessness, often due in equal measure to the explosive transformation of the world by technology, the changing ideas of reality due to mind-shattering scientific discovery, and the total dominance of multinational corporate entities who have gained a powerful hold on the socio-economic systems of the Earth. In cyberpunk, the criminal underworld becomes a haven for those who wish to avoid the futility; yet, ironically, those who escape into the criminal underbelly of society often find themselves backed into a corner of their own actions and misdeeds, thus reinforcing the sensation of utter inescapability. Some look to phenomenal experiences for their identity, as the character Case does in Neuromancer, who becomes addicted to the experience of navigating cyberspace. Instead of introducing the electronic devices and incredible phenomenas of these worlds with a reverent awe, the cyberpunk novel often takes the new world and turns it inside-out, describing its darkness and the aspects that are riddled with corruption. Though the cyberpunk world is filled with objects and experiences that the reader may find incredible, the characters rarely find anything special about their world, and cyberspace falls in as just another feature of the technological cityscape.

“When people are little more than bytes in the government data stream, can anyone remain human?” 

• John Brunner, Shockwave Rider (1975) 

“For one thing, the cyberpunks were the first generation of artists for whom the technologies of satellite dishes, video and audio players and recorders, computers and videogames (both of particular importance), digital watches, and 

MTV were not exoticisms, but part of a daily 'reality-matrix'.” 

• Larry McCaffery, Storming the Reality Studio

Today's technology has evolved way beyond the old cyberpunk motifs; video cassettes became DVDs which is now being replaced by internet streaming; audio cassettes became CDs and transformed into digital MP3s which are also being replaced by subscription streaming services. Even television, which existed in a form little-changed for decades, has given way to internet videos, far beyond the days of on-demand cable television programs. Where the technologies of the cyberpunk era were typically a tangible, analog device, the technologies of our current era are streaming, literally streams of data that move from server-to-client through a network, most often the internet. Even when we keep our own copy of a song or movie on our computers or cellphones, they are only copies of data that a stream has deposited into our devices. The data itself is an inaccessible layer of invisible power, understood only in its context by a computer that can make sense of the code within. Be it stored inside of a forgotten server in the bottom of a basement, or streaming rapidly across the internet and into multiple devices, the data itself in its entirety makes up the invisible dimension that we call the datascape. Where as Case in Gibson's tale described cyberspace as a consciously-navigable dimension of information, most of the actual datascape remains completely unseen, never intended to interact with a human. But, in the cyberpunk fantasy of cyberspace, the datascape is laid bare to the senses.

A central motif to the cyberpunk tale is the 'console cowboy', the hacker that navigates cyberspace for whatever purpose they find important, be it stealing money from online bank accounts, or collecting classified information from protected data servers. The direct connection between the human brain and the network terminal is a central device in Gibson's Neuromancer, and also in the action film The Matrix. The idea that a human can be directly connected to a computer network and navigate within a digital dimension is the heart of cybernaut science fiction, and cyberpunk has been instrumental in bringing forth this storytelling device. 

Where as cyberspace may have been used by postmodern and cyberpunk writers as a literary device, “to construct a new subject-position to interface with the global realms of data circulation, a subject that can occupy or intersect the cyberscapes of contemporary existence”, as Bukatman described in Terminal Identity, cyberspace can now be used in a literal sense, as it is becoming a real technology in today's world. How it is used as a literary device is up to the author alone; whether it is just another vehicle for the story, a backdrop item in the techno-world, a region of exploration, or a tool for questioning the very nature of reality, thought, and human identity.

“In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all of life presents itself as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation.” 

• Guy Debord, La Societe du Spectacle (1967) 

The cyberpunks envisioned the day of data terminals in our pockets and cyberspace as a navigable region; we live with these technologies as a daily reality. They, like the science fiction writers who spoke of traveling to outer space long before the first moon landing (a la A Trip to the Moon,_1902), had only a fantasy of the technology that their narratives bespoke. But, like the science fiction writers who followed the wake of scientific achievements that sent humankind into space, we are the generation that can enter into cyberspace; we have the datascape right here, in our own hands, and we are constantly shaping this dimension. We are the first generation that can truly call ourselves _cybernauts.

“Invisible spaces now dominate, as the city of the modernist era is replaced by the non-place urban realm

and outer space is superseded by cyberspace.” 

• Scott Bukatman, Terminal Identity

Reality, Virtual...

The 'virtual reality' technology that was developed during the late 20th century prepared us for a massive leap in functionality made possible due to exponentially increasing computational power, and,  thanks to the work of Palmer Luckey and his company, Oculus, the head-mounted display (HMD) was brought to the consumer market in the mid-2010s. Modern HMDs utilize real-time position tracking that register user motion in a computer simulation, simultaneously updating the user's perspective to match their position in cyberspace. Additionally, the user may also use a number of peripheral devices that further immerse the senses into the experience of a virtual world. To mention just a few: 

The Virtuix Omni allows the user a full range motion in virtual space; a harness apparatus keeps the user in place, suspended above on a smooth surface, which the feet slide upon to register motion in the simulation. Haptic feedback suits, such as the Hardlight VR, give the user a tactile sense of virtual space; the user experiences full-body sensations when coming into contact with digital simulacra, determined by the simulation's physics engine. The Manus VR gloves tracks and projects the motion of the user's hands into cyberspace with incredible precision, and also generate haptic feedback during interaction with virtual objects. To immerse the sense of sound in virtual reality, pick up a set of OSSIC X 3D headphones; these sync with the simulation to give the user a very detailed spatial-audio experience that vivifies distance and presence in virtual reality.

Combining these elements together, we have an experience of cyberspace that is impossibly interesting. The only senses that have not yet been virtually mastered are the taste and smell; yet, interestingly enough, the mind has the ability to fill these in on its own, owing to the synesthesia that is created by being so completely enveloped in the multi-sensory experience that virtual reality provides.

These devices are not the future of virtual reality; they are the present. These are the tools of the current generation, not the fantasies of a science fiction world. This is the beginning of the new millennium, and these technologies are offered to us on the consumer market. What does this spell for the future of cyberspace immersion and interaction? To what purpose will we use these devices; as narrative devices, as entertainment consoles, as educational tools, or beyond that? 

Moving beyond the capable, which will only grow more vivid with each iteration, it is our imagination that opens the doors to new possibilities. Reaching far into the future, we can imagine the human being transformed by these technologies; the true explorer of the digital realm.

Cybernautic Transhumanism

“[Transhumanism] promotes an interdisciplinary approach to understanding and evaluating the

opportunities for enhancing the human condition and the human organism ... The enhancement options

being discussed include... augmentation of human intellectual, physical, and emotional capacities...

along with other potential developments that could profoundly alter the human condition...

[such as] economic, social, and institutional designs, cultural development, and

psychological skills and techniques...

Transhumanists view human nature as a work-in-progress” 

• Nick Bostrom, Transhumanist Values

“It has fallen to science fiction to repeatedly narrate a new subject that can 

somehow directly interface with – and master – the cybernetic technologies of the Information Age...” 

Scott Bukatman, Terminal Identity

Transhumanism presents us a vehicle for discussion of the human future, for it encompasses not only changes to the human body, but also to thought, socio-economic order, cultural development, and the wonders of immense technological change. A Transhumanist must consider our future as technological beings who interact with the datascape, imagining the human developing senses of cognition and interaction with the extra-sensory stimuli of the digital dimension. The datascape is a mirror to our world because it is interconnected with it, but it also stands alone as its own, intangible space. But what makes it untouchable is the human's lack of a sense of electronics and data. Without eyes, we may not see the light, and without the datasense, we will not be able to touch the datascape. Computers are, in a sense, data-sensitive beings, able to send, receive, and alter the datascape itself. Will a human develop the datasense, too?

Just how far will we merge with the datascape? 

How exactly does one gain the datasense? 

What new capabilities will we invent as data-sensitive beings? 

Our capacity to enter the digital landscape is limited to external sensory stimulation by way of the ears, eyes, and haptic pressure. We have not yet gained the ability to directly stimulate the human brain to create holistically-experienced renderings of the virtual world; but, we aren't far behind. 

I had the pleasure to work with the son of a neuroscientist whose research team is currently inventing a technology that allows the blind to see by way of a camera connected to an electrically-stimulating tongue sensor; the user places the sensor on their tongue, which sends signals from the camera into their brain, displaying a visible signal. Another technology for the blind involves installing a camera by wires directly into the user's visual cortex, an invasive yet steadily improving technology. If this technology were to be used to render images or simulations from a computer directly into the user's brain, the user could be completely immersed in the datascape in currently-unfathomed ways.

“Transhumanists hope that by responsible use of science, technology and other rational means we shall eventually manage to become posthuman, beings with vastly greater capacities than present human beings have.”  

• Bostrom, Transhumanist Values

The Song of The Terminal

“The newly proliferating electronic technologies of the Information Age are invisible, 

circulating outside of the human experience of space and time.”

• Bukatman, Terminal Identity

To envision a future in which human has merged with the datascape, we as authors must be willing to draw from the real field of computer science. Whether or not we adopt the practice of writing our narratives as hard science fiction, in which our devices are constructed ingeniously from an understanding of the actual working of a computer, we must at least take into account that the general computer literacy among readers has significantly increased in the new millennium. Long gone are the days that we can get away with an uneducated use of computer technology, typing in a few one-word commands and expecting the computer to know exactly what we mean, or throwing around words like algorithm and CPU like they're magic. Well, a computer isn't magic, and neither is science, so why do so many authors describe their advanced technologies like all-powerful objects of miracles and mysticism?

If we are going to author cybernaut science fiction, then we must at least have a basic understanding of how a computer works and, most importantly, how it renders the datascape into a human-accessible form. From there, we can begin to consider what other ways the datascape can be rendered for human interaction. 

With the exception of the virtual reality technologies mentioned, we currently access the digital dimension almost exclusively by way of a computer; i.e. a terminal. There is a screen which displays data that has been rendered into a visible form, be it a line of symbols, or a colorful, navigable environment. By way of peripherals, such as a keyboard and mouse, we access and manipulate data that displayed to us, and this data is either is stored in the computer, or is streaming into it and out of it through a network like the internet. Data itself is just a code, a series of electronic switches that are grouped together to form bytes. The computer itself is designed to manipulate these switches and bytes. Computer languages use these switches as their foundation; their letters, if you will. There are nearly endless ways that a computer can read these switches; they are the foundation of computer languages. Data itself is just information, stored in bytes, waiting to be interpreted by the right language. Language is our primary interface with machines, albeit a strange language. We can then venture to say that the datascape itself is a region of language, acting as an intermediary between human-and-machine, and machine-to-machine.

Information overload, terminated.

Beyond the Terminal

Here's a question for you to ponder: if a computer is made up of tiny switches that make a code, and components that can move and alter these switches, just how the heck do you think your conscious mind is going to get stuck inside that hard drive? Discuss and hypothesize.

We can begin to imagine incredible new ways in which the human being will interact with data, and thus new ways in which the human will interact with the machine. Cyberpunk and Transhumanism has explored the idea of human physically or mentally merging with a machine, beyond the use of screens as the exclusive intermediary. Direct control of a machine by way of telepathy and brainwaves or mental impulses may or may not hinge upon a data-language, instead instituting direct synaptic control over the machine. A human with the datasense could, theoretically, think and emit pure data.  But can we also envision a computer that works without data?

There is a very imaginative story which illustrates an example of humans merging with machines; in The Ship Who Sang by Anna McCaffery, a newborn human baby is selected to become the operator of a space-traveling scout ship. She spends her life in training, slowly becoming fused with the technologies that allow her to control the mechanisms of the ship: 

“Instead of kicking feet, Helva's neural responses started her wheels; instead of grabbing with hands, she manipulated mechanical extensions. As she matured, more and more neural synapses would be adjusted to operate other mechanisms that went into the maintenance and running of a space ship.” Helva's physical actions are completely merged with machinery. There is no intermediate terminal, no screens to read or knobs to turn; Helva is the computer terminal. 

Another interesting example can be found in Plus by Joseph McElroy (1976); described in Cyberpunk 101: “A dying engineer who has his brain removed awakens to find he has become, literally, a mere communication device, attached to a computer inside a satellite orbiting the earth. As 'he' (Imp Plus) gradually recovers his memories and reinvents language, he transforms himself into a fully conscious biological and chemical laboratory.”

In the science fiction epic, The Matrix, humans are grown in fusion with machinery; their psyches are projected into a virtual dimension where dwells their persona while they are jacked-in, or physically-connected to the illusion-generating machine. In the story, humans live their entire lives unaware that they are trapped inside of a virtual simulation, but those who awaken from the simulation are thrust into 'the real world', which is a horrific place that is completely twisted into a terror-scape of Giger-ian machine dominance; the awakened are collected by the other freed humans and are taught how to master their virtual presence; by having programs downloaded into their brains, they gain amazing powers in the virtual world. 

How else will humans interface with virtual reality?

“No longer has information any tangible, kinetic analogue in the world of the senses, or in the imaginations of writers of fiction. Gone are the great arrays of vacuum tubes, the thousands of toggles that heroes of space fiction would flick almost faster than the eye could see as they dodges space 'torpedoes', outflanked alien 'battle lines', steered through asteroid 'storms'; gone, more importantly, is any sustained sense of the autonomy, in space and time, of gross visible individual human actions. And if 'actions' are now invisible, then our fates are likewise beyond our grasp. We no longer feel that we penetrate the future; futures penetrate us.” 

• John Clute

Epics of the Cybernauts

“Anthropologists of possible selves, we are technicians of realizable futures.”

– Donna Haraway

Star travel; alien planets; apocalypse; utopia; the mundane and the incredible; in the dimension of simulacra, we can create anything. 

It is tempting to launch into a detailed survey of simulations and virtual worlds that are currently available to the interested reader; but, this is out of the scope of this text. Suffice it to say, entire galaxies have been generated in cyberspace and await your exploration. This leads to the all-important question: how will you use these technologies in your work? Will you write a story, or design a story for expression in a virtual environment? Entire manifestos could be generated with the do's and don'ts of cybernaut science fiction tales (and I expect to read them, someday). Not only must virtual reality be used as a simulation of reality, but it can also be used as a simulation of hyper-reality, sub-reality, pseudo-reality, and even non-reality. Let us hope for The Virtual Non-Reality Manifesto to emerge soon after this text is complete. 

We must chart course in the mindscape before we can create new ground in the datascape. We as authors and creators are best suited for such advances in thought and invention, since we are already so often dwelling in our own minds.

Focus not only on human interactions with virtual reality; invent new personifications for those who dwell exclusively in the datascape.

We can use these technologies to simulate potential futures, the possibilities awaiting our actions, globally and individually, to determine the best course ahead.

Helva, in The Ship Who Sang, is educated from youth in the subjects of “trajectory, propulsion techniques, computation, logistics, mental hygiene, basic alien psychology, philology, space history, law, traffic, codes: all the etceteras that eventually became compounded into a reasoning, logical, informed citizen”. Her education is shaped by her function, her duty, and enhance her abilities as the operator of a scout ships in an intergalactic future. If we are born with the ability to interact with the datascape, what education would we be given to enhance our abilities as cybernauts? What would the world of the future look like in which the population (or a select few) can enter the datascape, and what would they be taught?

The field of cybography is waiting to be invented. 

When physical laws can be rewritten by the changing of a few values hidden in the fabric of the digital universe... Hmm...

The human creative impulse is engulfing the datascape. Digital art is on the rise and new forms of it are taking shape in the data cosmos.

How will our interactions with virtual reality and the datascape change us as individuals; as a society? What place will virtual reality have in human life? Will it be only an entertainment device; a social playground; a space for political discussion; an area of discovery? Will we send ships into space, covered in cameras and scientific devices, yet control them from the comfort of our own homes? What will we see in our deeper explorations of the virtual dimension? Will we need to create everything, or will an artificial intelligence create these worlds for us? Will there be paranormal experiences not originally intended, such as solar activity that causes unexpected phantasmagoria?

In Conclusion

We, the cybernauts, venture into the datascape with the intention of shaping this creation to our will, for the purpose of creating epic narratives, and to enhance the joy of our techie-lives. We may be a far-cry away from jacking-in to the datascape, like the characters in The Matrix and Neuromancer, though we can currently interact with virtual worlds in incredible ways. We can't directly transform matter into something digital, as the Master Control Program does to Flynn in TRON, but we do have the ability to produce tangible simulacra in virtual reality from physical objects in the real world, which is certainly the better option (I'm sure you can agree). We may not escape our daily lives by immersing  deeply in the digital dimension, as do the characters of Ready, Player One, though that possibility is coming closer every day, for better or for worse. The cyberpunks of yesteryear had only a fantasy of the technology that the cybernauts utilize daily. What will we do with this technology, how will this technology transform humanity, and what devices will the next generation use that we today can only imagine?

Sources

1) Introduction to Terminal Identity by Scott Bukatman

2) Terminal Resistance, a chapter of Terminal Identity, by Scott Bukatman

3) Transhumanist Values by Nick Bostrom

4) The Mundane Manifesto by Geoff Ryman

5) The Ship Who Sang by Anna McCaffrey

6) Storming The Reality Studio by Larry McCaffery

7) Cyberpunk 101 by Richard Kadrey and Larry McCaffery

8) Websites for virtual reality technologies: www.virzoom.com ; www.ossic.com ; www.oculus.com ; www.hardlightvr.com ; www.manus-vr.com ; www.leapmotion.com ; www.microsoft.com ; www.magicleap.com ; www.virtuix.com ;

@ 30876140:cffb1126

Violet Starlight

The oceans of Alderaan are but raindrops in the depth of your beautiful eyes.

The music of the stars is a lullaby, The sonnet of your voice is their song.

The thought of you is my guiding light in empty space, That my heart may return to your violet sun, Your love brings peace to my galaxy.

This gulf that stretches between us, so easily we can cross, for Hyperspace is not just a lover's dream.

Fly with me to see the wondrous waterfalls of Theed, The city built from branches on the forest world, Kashyyk, The temples of Yavin's Moon, the little bears of Endor, With the Force as our guide, we will see them all,

Together.

In a galaxy far, far, away, Let's begin our journey.

@ 30876140:cffb1126

Love God

A Short Story

by Acea Spades, 2016

---

Jimmy sat in his bedroom, stooping over his desk, trembling with a pencil in his hand. Twenty or so balls of crushed paper littered the messy floor, three on his dirty bed. On the desk, being scrutinized by his terrified eyes, was a love letter.

His shaky hands made fussy lines despite how many times he tried to make the letters perfect. The note read:

Cindy, I love you. Do you love me?

Yes - No

Jimmy

He stared at the paper for a long time. Tears appeared in little beads around his eyes. He snatched the paper from the table, smashed it between his hands, and threw it against the wall. The doorbell rang. Downstairs, his mother's footsteps made a line from the kitchen to the entryway. The door creaked on its hinges, followed by the muffled voices of happy people. The sounds echoed in the hallway and intruded from under Jimmy's door. His grandfather, and his grandmother, voices thick with an old-world accent, made bright conversation with his very-American mother. There was another voice, too, probably Uncle Roman's; Jimmy could already smell rotten alcohol and convenience-store cologne.

“Jimmy!” his mother's voice from under the door called, “They're here! Come down!” Jimmy slammed the pencil on the table and wiped his eyes before dragging himself out of the room.

“Hey, it's Jimmy!” His wrinkled relatives called from the entryway when he appeared. There was Uncle Roman behind them, shutting the door. His button-shirt was parted to reveal a chest of curled hairs, and a medallion on a gold chain.

Jimmy descended the stairs with a heavy thump on every step. He gave a good stomp on the squeaky stair. His grandmother descended upon him with kisses, much like the lion devours the water buffalo.

“Ooooh, my little grandchild! It has been so long. Too long. Look how you've grown! All grown up now. Kiss me like you used to.”

“Gran-Gran, you were just here for the Fourth of July.” He caught a scowl from his mother, but turned his head so he didn't have to bear it.

His grandfather came and gave him a hug. His bones were so close to his skin, without muscle or fat to cushion his affection. “It's good to see you, grandson.”

“It's good to see you too, Pop-Pop."

“Sorry we couldn't make it in for your birthday. Here, I've got a card from me and Gran-Gran.”

From the top zipper-pocket of his leather suitcase, Pop-Pop pulled out a shiny piece of folded cardstock with the number 12 written in bright gold. Jimmy opened the card. Nothing fell out.

“Thanks, Pop-Pop.”

“Your Gran-Gran has not stopped talking about you, all the way over. Oh, he's probably so big, now. Oh, I wonder how his school is going. Oh, we need to invite him to our home over winter and spoil him rotten.”

Gran-Gran grumbled. “Well you don't understand just how much I love our little grandson.”

“He's not little any more, Ma-Ma.” Uncle Roman set a heavy hand on Jimmy's shoulder and shook him. Jimmy felt a bruise begin to form. “Look at him. Reminds me so much of Gregor, I thought this was a dream.”

The entryway grew quiet. The moment stalled. Jimmy's mother broke the tension. “Well, let me show you where you're staying. Gran and Pop, you'll be upstairs at the end of the hall. Rome, I hope it's alright if you sleep on the couch, we don't have any more bedrooms.”

“A couch? Well, your couch is better than that pile of shit I call a bed."

Jimmy's mother contined. "There's blankets tucked in the space next to the couch, and it folds out into a really comfortable hide-away." She turned back to the elders. "Come on, I'll show you two where your room is. Jimmy, will you grab Pop's bags?”

They dragged the suitcases up the steps and down the hallway. The wheels loudly scraped against the iron floor-waffle that kept them warm during cold winter nights. Jimmy set Pop's bags outside the bedroom door, then retreated back to his room.

He ignored his family's voices, despite their directionless words coming through the little crack in his door. He was again stooped over his work, a Mozart or a Rembrandt, the future pulling down on his shoulders, begging him to die in his graven masterpiece.

A long time passed; it could have been an hour, or a day, or seven weeks. The smells of roast duck and steamed cauliflower were floating up from the dinner hall, haunting his nostrils, tearing his concentration. He heard the pieces of conversation that made their sneaky way under his bedroom door. His mother speaking loudly to Uncle Roman; a boorish chuckle returning her words. Down the hallway, he heard the old language being spoken; Gran-Gran and Pop-Pop were praying, the soft click and clack of her rosary, or maybe Pop-Pop's worry beads. Jimmy saw his grandmother's furrowed brow, her religious concentration, the picture of his dead father she'd prop up on the bedside table.

Heavy feet plodded up the stairs. They stopped in front of Jimmy's door. Fat knuckles beat on his door as if trying to force entry.

“Jimmy my boy. What are you doing in here?”

The doorknob turned. Jimmy sprang up, knocking his chair backward. He started kicking the paper wads under the bed, but it was too late. The door was open, and there stood his uncle. Jimmy turned his back to the invader.

“What, Uncle Roman?” His voice cracked.

The boor stepped in and closed the door behind him. In the tiny bedroom, this man was an Odysseian giant, and Jimmy a captured lamb. The monster looked around the room for just a moment, searching the cave for signs of danger. Those heavy feet took two big steps and were already across the room. The monster dropped onto Jimmy's bed, crushing the blankets. The metal springs screamed for help.

They sat there for an endless moment, in silence. Roman looked round the room, eyes obscured behind large, creased eyebrows. He turned his stubbled chin towards the floor, then reached to grab one a piece of paper. Jimmy made a tiny squealing noise; he would have stolen the paper out of the giant's hands if he wasn't so afraid. He watched in terror as Uncle Roman unwrapped the cast-away letter. Uncle Roman's face was ruffled with concentration, then it opened into a smile like a blooming spring flower. His black eyes turned from the paper and attacked Jimmy from behind a stupid grin.

“You are in love, my boy! What is her name?”

Jimmy leaned forward a little and looked at the note, to make sure he hadn't forgotten to write her name on that draft.

“Umm... Cindy?”

“Ah, Cindy, a beautiful name! Tell me about her. Is she beautiful?”

Jimmy didn't speak. He couldn't speak. He could barely breathe.

“Come on, Jimmy. Tell me about her.” Uncle Roman gave the boy a punch on the shoulder, already crushed by the careless squeeze.

There was an long pause. The giant's stare was unnerving. “She... she's... pretty.”

“She's pretty!” His head rolled backwards and the barking roar of a sea lion shot out of his hairy throat.

“She's pretty and she has blonde hair and I've wanted to ask her to be my girlfriend since the second grade. But she likes Tommy and Stuart wants to be her boyfriend too so I don't have a chance.”

He was panting. A sprinter lost Olympic silver. His head sank into to his lap.

“My boy.” Uncle Roman put those giant hands on Jimmy's head. “You are your father's son. You do not know this yet, but you are very good with women. But my lord, you were not going to give her this crap were you? A piece of paper to woo a woman? That is not the way at all.”

Uncle Roman put his massive hands over Jimmy's ears and twisted the boy's small face to look into his own. Those little eyes were wet and filled with sadness.

“I have been a very lucky man. I am fantastic when it comes to seducing women. You are a very lucky boy, to have an uncle like me, and a father like yours was. Let me show you something.”

He reached into the pocket that was buried under his enormous legs. He clasped something in his hands, and brought the closed fist under Jimmy's nose with the dirty fingernails pointed upward. Slowly, he opened the fleshy cage. In it, he held something smooth, like a tumbled sea shell, skinny and shaped like the finger of a newborn baby.

“Do you know what this is?” Jimmy shook his head.

“It is a badger's penis.”

The boy tried forcing himself backward from the blanched fossil, but Uncle Roman's giant hand was still grasped behind his head. The smell rising to his nostrils was either the sweaty palm of his monstrous uncle, or the stench of an ancient and unwashed badger's penis.

“Everybody knows, in the old country, a badger's penis makes the person who carries it a god of love. A badger's penis in your pocket boosts your confidence. It loosens your tongue, and the subtle smell of it attracts any lady you could ever want, and many who you would never want. I have carried this badger's penis with me since your father married your mother. He gave it to me when he knew that she would belong to him forever. He had always told me, when we were drunk and our mouths were free, that it was because of this penis that he could woo your mother so well.”

Jimmy's pupils grew larger. His gaze was fixed on the penis of a dead animal and the hands of his kinsman who held it like a religious artifact, like the sandals of Christ.

“I still remember the day he killed the poor thing. He killed the badger himself, with his own hands. He came home after walking through the woods, covered in oozing red scratches, smelling like skunk urine. He swung the thing by its little tail, all the way home. Its anus was dripping with yellow puss and feces. He dropped the badger by the door and went to his room, to collect his hunting knife. He told me later that he'd forgotten to put it back in its leather before he had gone into the woods. He had to kill the creature with his bare hands. With his bare hands! He took the badger outside and cut its penis off, and hung it outside on a little string so the sun could dry it.

“Well, he gave me this badger penis, his most important possession. After so many years of carrying it, there is no woman who can resist me. But I have learned how to be the master of attraction. I do not need this any more. It is for you, little Jimmy, son of my brother, it is for you.”

He took his hand from the boy's neck and pulled the little wrist towards him, pushing the fossil into his nephew's palm and closing a hairy fist around it. Jimmy's hair stood, electrified. The badger penis was rough, like a dry chicken bone, and almost as large as his smallest finger. He held it up to look at it. There was a little crease at the tip, and a hole at the other end where his father had put a piece of string; yellow and decaying threads held together despite the anger of time.

Visions of the future intoxicated his mind. A beautiful girl in the passenger seat of his first car, a view of the city from the lover's hilltop; he, a famous hero with bulging muscles, saving beautiful women from criminal intentions and taking them to the top of a New York City skyscraper, to make love under the glowing sky; and Cindy, her smile, her kiss, the penis of a badger in the pocket of his jeans, stiff and powerful like the sword of an ancient king.

“Yes, my boy. Yes. You feel its power. That is the power of a love god. Not in these silly words on long-dead paper, but in the breath of burning passion, issued from your throat in the moments of ecstasy when you are wrapped by the arms of a beautiful woman. You cannot build the fire of passion with your ideas of love, my boy. It is with passion that you win a woman's heart.”

They sat for a long time. It could have been an hour, or a day, or seven weeks. Jimmy held the badger's ancient penis carefully in his hands.

“Uncle Roman?”

“Yes, my boy?”

“Did you make all of that up?”

“Jimmy, my boy.” Uncle Roman smiled wide, revealing all of his teeth, including the gold one that sat near the back of his tongue. “Would I ever lie to you?”

@ 592295cf:413a0db9

Nostter muted by kind

Will mute freefrom, hashtag fall

Venezuela riots, after the vote

I was thinking that having a Nostr conference every 6 months doesn't make sense, maybe it's better to focus on something else. If not it becomes a Tour Life. It doesn't increase adoption Produces tons of material It's good for networking It's not sustainable

Readable updates, how important they are. If it's just bugs and fixes it's better.

I hate Pam. As user It writes interesting stuff, but, doesnn't write in long form, because long form are more difficult, less reach and immediacy, and difficulties to share over in the feed,but not write a poem, sorry.

The thing about coracle is that I load the initial feed, but that gets printed, and it doesn't tell me if there are new notes coming in, as if it interrupts the flow, and it's always a fetch. I want to read the future, not always the past. RealTime feeds Like bluesky 🧞

Njump had problems, it keeps the cache and if the user changes something in their data it doesn't update it immediately. Fiatjaf was angry.

It's the month of NostRiga, we can move on to September without thinking about it. No

It's funny when you see a text in Japanese and inside read Nostr, I want to know what it says. He usually says Nostr is great. And the next note I drank too much 🤣

Today I thought that on the other side of the world it is February and that their February is 31 days. Pam said was sick. I see that hate is a virus 😅🙇‍♂️

I decided to publish stronpy when it's ready, maybe in 6 months. I've done the lineup, now I have to do the gantt 😅. Maybe I can post the gantt somewhere.

If it's not encrypted it's public. Amethyst draft 31000 and something like event

Nostr Is great but the amount of time Lost to the same thing because you don't know that exist Is remarkable. Nostr is a redundancy protocol

nostr:nevent1qqsqjqauc34k9k278x6cka5jyf3aq033y4pn5czwaff72l3rwum7llq7ela3x When they do that I can't stand them, then maybe it's a little different 😔😔 Zapper.fun ✅ Because you launch a project, example nostr.band but contain others 100 apps 😅 Nostr.band, nostrapp.link, zapper.fun, Nostr login, nsec.app, Npub.pro, Npub.pro also cli, Nostr universe/ knows as spring site

Even in Coracle it would be great to have a check on the note as root, because when you see the answers, perhaps the distance from another post, is so small, so perhaps a gray line for the mark of another note as root.

I listened to several minutes of plebchain radio episode on nostrnests. Language is an obstacle, but also an excellent justification. Last year I started recording a podcast episode, in which I talked about nostr bookmark update. I didn't even want to listen to it again 🤣.

I sent a video of an explanation of a zap it was 500 MByte of video for 4 minutes.

Nostr doesn't work. In practice, many apps have removed the possibility of logging in with the simple key, be it public or private, because especially the private one you don't want to copy paste in every single clients/apps, increasing the attack surface.

However, by removing this functionality and doing little onboarding, the matter is very difficult, but there is a certain belief that people who arrive at a Twitter like client get to know the network a little and then move on to videos or writing, or similar. But one can open a site by chance and see what it offers without knowing anything.

In the future there will only be one client, that of medical data...

Someone share this nostr:nevent1qqs24qzelpk8xjlk4dthr9tfkqwz8n58dlm04ezyvg9nuztud6jjfhc9mg04n I had in my bookmarks. I see dozen types of this self hosted manners. Maybe captains-log is for nostr-type, good.

@ 6ad3e2a3:c90b7740

I know many of you are frustrated there are people who still won’t take the covid injections. The problem is you’re going about it the wrong way.

Below I list steps you can take that will result in universal uptake:

Stop Calling Them “Vaccine Hesitant” If you were trying to persuade a vegan to up his B-12 intake by eating meat, you wouldn’t get far by labeling him “steak hesitant.” “Oh, I see, you’re just ‘steak hesitant’ must be that hippie propaganda you’re reading. Steak hesitant people like you…” Insulting people’s choices won’t get you anywhere. Try, “I see you don’t like being coerced to take medicine via threats to your basic rights and ability to earn a livelihood, that’s understandable. Let me persuade you why getting an mRNA jab is a good medical choice.” And then you’ll have to make your case, which, at the moment is not especially strong (particularly with respect to healthy, younger people, many of whom have already had covid), but that brings us to…

Lobby For More Aggressive Gain Of Function Research Frankly, the Wuhan Lab didn’t do its best work. Covid is deadly for people with pre-existing conditions, metabolic disorders and the elderly, but it’s insufficiently so to kill many healthy people under 70. The overall IFR is about 0.2 percent, with the vast majority of that group either old or sick. To incentivize independent-minded younger people the next lab leak needs to be a far more lethal strain. If we can get one as contagious as covid, but with an equal opportunity IFR above 15 percent, now we’re cooking with gas. When your 30-year old cousin, both your parents, several of your work colleagues, Kyrie Irving, Aaron Rodgers, Novak Djokovic, 25 members of Congress and a few cabinet members are dead, that will get their attention.

Commission Vaccines From New Companies While many who decline the mRNA shot are no doubt victims of disinformation — believing theories that government and large pharmaceutical companies are conspiring to enrich themselves first and foremost without proper regard for safety — it would be harder for them to connect those dots if you used more scrupulous providers. For example, it’s less than ideal that Johnson and Johnson just paid a settlement of five billion dollars for their part in the opioid crisis and Pfizer settled for 2.3 billion for marketing a drug as a pain killer that even the rubber-stamping FDA refused to approve for that purpose, while allegedly paying kickbacks to doctors to prescribe it. It was apparently the fourth settlement for Pfizer since 2002, and that excludes the experimental drug anti-meningitis drug, Trovan that killed 11 children and disabled dozens more in 1996. It’s insane to think that means anything about these miracle products in 2022, the motive for which was so obviously public health and ending the pandemic, but you have to admit it’s not a great look.

Keep Vaccine Companies On The Hook For Adverse Events There was never a need to waive liability for vaccine makers for adverse effects because everyone knows the mRNA shot is safe and effective. Yes, you hear anecdotal accounts of heart problems and strokes, but both have always been common in young people. Growing up, a few of my friends undoubtedly had heart attacks and strokes in grade school, though they were probably just under-diagnosed back then. I understand why the companies want to waive liability — it’s wrong to require legal accountability when these heroes are busy saving so many lives, but there’s no need for it when you have such a safe product. It just feeds unfounded suspicion.

Create A Vaccine That Stops The Spread Obviously, we know vaccines don’t have to stop the spread entirely to be effective. Look up the definition of vaccine — nowhere does it list that as a requirement. But if it actually stopped transmission in some material way, you’d be in a better position to argue for its uptake, citing the benefit it might have for the people around them. Now, people are just trying the “you’re taking up an ICU bed” angle, which doesn’t make much sense to young, healthy people, barring a far deadlier strain.

Permit Useless Early Treatments One big mistake that was made was banning and discouraging phony, yet harmless treatments like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and even Vitamin D. All that did was make people think they worked, and feed false conspiracy theories that they were funneling people toward the vaccine. Useless treatments should be encouraged so anyone who knows people who tried them can see how little good they did.

Don’t Bribe People I love donuts as much as the next person with metabolic syndrome, but giving people food, money and even weed just makes you look desperate. If you want to make something seem enticing, you’ve got to market it as something I’m lucky to get, not something you’re begging me to take.

Choose Better Spokespeople I know Bill Gates is one of the biggest investors in the space, but is it really necessary to have someone, who was paling around with convicted underage sex offender Jeffery Epstein, as your go-to vaccine promoter?

Amend The US Constitution And Nuremberg Code It’s annoying we have these anachronistic documents that didn’t contemplate the spread of a deadly pandemic, but unfortunately, The Fourth Amendment requiring people to be secure in their “persons,” and the Nuremberg Code which requires consent for medical procedures are still The Supreme Law Of The Land, and International Law, respectively. A little carve-out saying, “unless there’s a deadly pandemic” would go a long way toward granting the requisite legal authority.

Stiffer Consequences For Those Who Refuse Let’s be honest. There’s nothing more important than public health, and getting everyone vaccinated is the optimal way to achieve that aim. It’s unfortunate it would have to come to this, but we can’t let the selfish actions of a few imperil the good of the many who do as instructed. Actions have consequences! If the first nine steps are ineffective, you could imprison, torture or simply exterminate those who decline this medical option, something for which there is historical precedent in the last century. 

I can assure you these 10 steps will result in 100 percent uptake. Hopefully it doesn’t come to step 10, but you have to ask yourself, do you care about preserving the rights of the privileged few, or are you willing to do what it takes for public health and the greater good of society?

I hope the answer is as clear for you as it is for me.

@ 6bae33c8:607272e8

This is an overall list for 12-team NFFC PPR leagues as of August 3, 2024.

Note: Rankings are real, but comments are not meant to be taken seriously.

Warning: many, if not most, are stupid, though it can't be worse than last year’s.

(Right-click, open in new tab to enlarge)

@ a853296a:209e695f

What's up stackers!

Trying something new posting to the tech territory.

CASCDR TLDR: CASCDR is a collection of Lightning Powered AI services/applications.

Post TLDR: We have just released a big upgrade to our RSS Agent! You can now explore podcasts, and seamlessly integrate them with LLM workflows. This will allow you to condense podcast content/create more content based on a given podcast selected through the explorer!

We have a new release LIVE. As discussed on this post and on SNL last week, YouTube started playing major defense! So we adapted our YouTube Agent into an RSS Agent.

Now the RSS Agent is back and better with V2! Due to time constraints we had to ship a very basic version last week. Now RSS Agent is fully equipped!

he's baaaaaaack

Key Updates:

• Search & explore any podcast feed
• Pull any episode of interest
• Run analysis of the episode transcript with 5 pre-determined prompts
• OR roll your own custom prompt to put together written content of your choosing!

Workflow/Details:

Step 1: Search for your favorite podcast like @ThrillerX _

Step 2: Select/Configure Your Prompt & Select the Podcast Episode

Step 3: Inspect Your Result and/or Copy to Clipboard

Looking forward to the feedback in the comments! If this post triggers ideas of more you want to do with AI, tell us what you want us to build!

Cheers, The CASCDR Team

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/633849

@ 0176967e:1e6f471e

Cypherpunk vďaka rozvoju technológií a decentralizovaných sietí zažil úspech, ktorý nikto nečakal. Rozvoj Bitcoinu a najmä nárast jeho veľkosti, siete a dôležitosti urobil z cypherpunkových technológií a filozofie kryptoanarchie funkčnú alternatívu pre fungovanie v tomto svete - čo čakal dokonca aj máloktorý cypherpunker.

Čakajú nás ešte nejaké výzvy? Lunarpunk prináša ďalší krok - rozvoj spolupráce, budovania "temného lesa" - anonymných (internetových) komunít, ktoré sa dokážu organizovať a spolupracovať. Čo nám Lunarpunk prinesie najbližšie roky?

@ 06830f6c:34da40c5

Hey there, readers! 👋

We're buzzing with excitement to bring you the latest updates in the world of Bitcoin, the Lightning Network, Nostr apps, and more.

🌟 What’s New in Bitcoin and Beyond?

• Exciting App Updates 💼
• StatechainJS by @supertestnet: This revolutionary tech is a robust alternative to ecash, allowing you to recover your funds even if the mint goes offline. It’s a game-changer for transaction reliability.
• Nostr Web Services Code by @asmogo: Transform the way you host web services with this new code. No public IP or DNS is needed—just an npub and Nostr relays. 🌐
• Nutsack by @pablof7z: Say hello to Nutsack, a wallet integrated with Nostr. Accessible from any compatible Nostr client, it opens up new possibilities within the Nostr ecosystem. 🧩
• LNBits Bounty: LNBits is on the hunt for developers to create a Nostr Wallet Connect service and extension. If you’re a developer, this is your chance to shine and earn a substantial bounty! 💰️
• Proton Wallet Launch: Introducing Proton Wallet—a safer way to manage Bitcoin with self-custodial features and transactions via encrypted email addresses. Discover more about it here. 🔐
• Phoenix Wallet Update: Phoenix Wallet has just rolled out a major update, adding BOLT12 support. Enjoy reusable payment requests, contact lists, and message attachments for enhanced Bitcoin transactions. Check out the details here. 🚀

• Lava Vault Introduction: Lava Vault has launched a self-custodial wallet that allows you to buy Bitcoin, borrow dollars, and transact globally, all without any fees. 🔒️

• New Releases and Innovations 🌎️

• Bitrefill Card in Europe: The Bitrefill card is now publicly available in Europe, making Bitcoin spending easier than ever. 💳️
• Satlantis by Svetvski: Discover Satlantis—a new social network for travelers and nomads that connects global tribes and fosters a vibrant, worldwide community. 🌍️

🚀 Major Announcement: Alby Hub is Here!

The wait is finally over! Alby Hub is now live and ready for everyone to explore. Whether you're a long-time Alby enthusiast or just joining us, you can now experience the ultimate self-custodial solution. Alby Hub is a fully open-source, sovereign wallet that you can run on your device or access for free through us, with a modest monthly fee.

That’s all for this edition of Bitcoin talks Nostr talks Wallet talks. We hope you’re as excited about these updates as we are! Stay tuned for more news and enjoy diving into these fantastic new developments.

Bitbiashara #nostr

Catch you next time! 🚀

@ e56b400c:175edce9

We'll be meeting on August 21st, 7pm at the Admiral Benbow pub in Shrewsbury. If the weather's good, we'll be in the beer garden, otherwise, we'll grab a table indoors. It's a social meetup again but we have a good group of knowledgable bitcoiners who'll shoot the breeze and solve all world problems.

The Admiral Benbow is a great location, we held the June meetup there and were impressed with the venue.

If you've not been to a meetup before or haven't been in a while, please do come and join us. Message us on Nostr at npub1u445qrpas8y58szt2unzu7wsvgsfg0llgf7y6sjz7pn76967mn5snh6mul, Xitter at https://x.com/ShropsBitcoin or email bc@omg.lol if you have any questions.

We have a Telegram group that everyone who attends a meetup can join. Sadly we had to close the public group due to Telegram spam bots.

See you soon :)

The Admiral Benbow is at 24 Swan Hill, Shrewsbury SY1 1NF.

@ 0176967e:1e6f471e

Na úvod sa trochu predýchame - kto chcete. Počas ranného workshopu umenie dychu - meditatívna pozornosť, vnímanie tela a skúmanie v pohybe vám Andrea Košiarová (umeniedychu.sk) pomôže naštartovať sa do inšpiratívneho dňa.

Prineste si vlastné jógamatky