@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Packaging apps for MacOS is such a pain in the ass.

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

interesting, i didn’t know that

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Someone should build a relay with a plugin system. Then relay runners can just pull nips in like plugins and developers can focus on building plugins for the relay rather than entirely new relays that hardcode support some subset of nips. Thoughts? #grownostr

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

You keep your private notes locally and publish what you want to share. Idk what how a ledger is relevant here.

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

It’s still in alpha so please report bugs and let us know what kind of features you’d like to see.

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

It’s still very much in alpha so sync doesn’t work yet.

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

{"pubkey":"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245","content":" https:\/\/i.nostr.build\/BytyFxe1M6lEtWhB.jpg ","created_at":1726972254,"id":"c23127d89aa041d7e74dcd02019570a886dd3848e44bea61e32b35efb66bb770","kind":1,"sig":"9418144c68fd90c780b9f9c91cdc4f14a292d9c19873ccea7a2b7eb6bbb879c26dee4055fb89cc18ba401bed0c14d2a1a2d6d436deeadaa64b8d1e478292354e","tags":[["imeta","url https:\/\/i.nostr.build\/BytyFxe1M6lEtWhB.jpg","blurhash e6SY{qD*~q^+ae-;9EIUxut8-pt7E1Rjj[M|t7t7t7-;%LRjWDWVxu","dim 676x879"],["r","https:\/\/i.nostr.build\/BytyFxe1M6lEtWhB.jpg"]]}

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Relay Wizard now let's you choose between multiple relay implementations, including a nip29 relay that supports groups. If you have a relay you'd like to see implemented let me know. Try it out at relaywizard.com #grownostr #relays If you don't even know where to get started with setting up a server or hooking up a domain name you can also check out relayrunner.org https://video.nostr.build/610d5da76e5aca6874213adf8fd0ff3ad1c47efed2d23f199b18fe5c9c42649c.mp4

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Yup, I’m currently working on zaps and the editor: https://github.com/nodetec/notestack

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

I'm working on a new long form content site here if anyone is interested, It's a complete rewrite for blogstack that I started about a week ago so it's still missing some core features (like zaps, writing articles deletes etc..) any feedback would be appreciated. https://notestack.com/

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Publishing a blog from comet notes to nostr #grownostr #nostr https://video.nostr.build/fa596a1ff627728f866ab32873274bc48cac0c0eea6b7a712657ffa7190cfba6.mp4

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

I’m testing out running a public relay at wss://relay.notestack.com, any advice from other relay runners? #nostr #relay

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

The server costs about 6 bucks per month that’s running the relay and I’m also hosting like 3 websites from it currently, owning your own data is cheap.

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

Reading a note back from my personal relay, after spinning up a server and connecting a domain, this took like 20 seconds to get up and running with relay wizard. #relay https://video.nostr.build/f3a4405a1ffd2170711a5fc68cad05f0481181a835992a36e89a00f8c8b55511.mp4

@ 220522c2:61e18cb4

test post to my personal relay

@ c631e267:c2b78d3e

Die grauenvollste Aussicht ist die der Technokratie – \ einer kontrollierenden Herrschaft, \ die durch verstümmelte und verstümmelnde Geister ausgeübt wird. \ Ernst Jünger

«Davos ist nicht mehr sexy», das Weltwirtschaftsforum (WEF) mache Davos kaputt, diese Aussagen eines Einheimischen las ich kürzlich in der Handelszeitung. Während sich einige vor Ort enorm an der «teuersten Gewerbeausstellung der Welt» bereicherten, würden die negativen Begleiterscheinungen wie Wohnungsnot und Niedergang der lokalen Wirtschaft immer deutlicher.

Nächsten Montag beginnt in dem Schweizer Bergdorf erneut ein Jahrestreffen dieses elitären Clubs der Konzerne, bei dem man mit hochrangigen Politikern aus aller Welt und ausgewählten Vertretern der Systemmedien zusammenhocken wird. Wie bereits in den vergangenen vier Jahren wird die Präsidentin der EU-Kommission, Ursula von der Leyen, in Begleitung von Klaus Schwab ihre Grundsatzansprache halten.

Der deutsche WEF-Gründer hatte bei dieser Gelegenheit immer höchst lobende Worte für seine Landsmännin: 2021 erklärte er sich «stolz, dass Europa wieder unter Ihrer Führung steht» und 2022 fand er es bemerkenswert, was sie erreicht habe angesichts des «erstaunlichen Wandels», den die Welt in den vorangegangenen zwei Jahren erlebt habe; es gebe nun einen «neuen europäischen Geist».

Von der Leyens Handeln während der sogenannten Corona-«Pandemie» lobte Schwab damals bereits ebenso, wie es diese Woche das Karlspreis-Direktorium tat, als man der Beschuldigten im Fall Pfizergate die diesjährige internationale Auszeichnung «für Verdienste um die europäische Einigung» verlieh. Außerdem habe sie die EU nicht nur gegen den «Aggressor Russland», sondern auch gegen die «innere Bedrohung durch Rassisten und Demagogen» sowie gegen den Klimawandel verteidigt.

Jene Herausforderungen durch «Krisen epochalen Ausmaßes» werden indes aus dem Umfeld des WEF nicht nur herbeigeredet – wie man alljährlich zur Zeit des Davoser Treffens im Global Risks Report nachlesen kann, der zusammen mit dem Versicherungskonzern Zurich erstellt wird. Seit die Globalisten 2020/21 in der Praxis gesehen haben, wie gut eine konzertierte und konsequente Angst-Kampagne funktionieren kann, geht es Schlag auf Schlag. Sie setzen alles daran, Schwabs goldenes Zeitfenster des «Great Reset» zu nutzen.

Ziel dieses «großen Umbruchs» ist die totale Kontrolle der Technokraten über die Menschen unter dem Deckmantel einer globalen Gesundheitsfürsorge. Wie aber könnte man so etwas erreichen? Ein Mittel dazu ist die «kreative Zerstörung». Weitere unabdingbare Werkzeug sind die Einbindung, ja Gleichschaltung der Medien und der Justiz.

Ein «Great Mental Reset» sei die Voraussetzung dafür, dass ein Großteil der Menschen Einschränkungen und Manipulationen wie durch die Corona-Maßnahmen praktisch kritik- und widerstandslos hinnehme, sagt der Mediziner und Molekulargenetiker Michael Nehls. Er meint damit eine regelrechte Umprogrammierung des Gehirns, wodurch nach und nach unsere Individualität und unser soziales Bewusstsein eliminiert und durch unreflektierten Konformismus ersetzt werden.

Der aktuelle Zustand unserer Gesellschaften ist auch für den Schweizer Rechtsanwalt Philipp Kruse alarmierend. Durch den Umgang mit der «Pandemie» sieht er die Grundlagen von Recht und Vernunft erschüttert, die Rechtsstaatlichkeit stehe auf dem Prüfstand. Seiner dringenden Mahnung an alle Bürger, die Prinzipien von Recht und Freiheit zu verteidigen, kann ich mich nur anschließen.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

The past 26 August, Tor introduced officially a proof-of-work (PoW) defense for onion services designed to prioritize verified network traffic as a deterrent against denial of service (DoS) attacks.

~ > This feature at the moment, is deactivate by default, so you need to follow these steps to activate this on a MiniBolt node:

• Make sure you have the latest version of Tor installed, at the time of writing this post, which is v0.4.8.6. Check your current version by typing

tor --version

Example of expected output:

Tor version 0.4.8.6. This build of Tor is covered by the GNU General Public License (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html) Tor is running on Linux with Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL 3.0.9, Zlib 1.2.13, Liblzma 5.4.1, Libzstd N/A and Glibc 2.36 as libc. Tor compiled with GCC version 12.2.0

~ > If you have v0.4.8.X, you are OK, if not, type sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade and confirm to update.

• Basic PoW support can be checked by running this command:

tor --list-modules

Expected output:

relay: yes dirauth: yes dircache: yes pow: **yes**

~ > If you have pow: yes, you are OK

• Now go to the torrc file of your MiniBolt and add the parameter to enable PoW for each hidden service added

sudo nano /etc/tor/torrc

Example:

```

Hidden Service BTC RPC Explorer

HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/hidden_service_btcrpcexplorer/ HiddenServiceVersion 3 HiddenServicePoWDefensesEnabled 1 HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:3002 ```

~ > Bitcoin Core and LND use the Tor control port to automatically create the hidden service, requiring no action from the user. We have submitted a feature request in the official GitHub repositories to explore the need for the integration of Tor's PoW defense into the automatic creation process of the hidden service. You can follow them at the following links:

• Bitcoin Core: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/8002
• LND: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28499

---

More info:

• https://blog.torproject.org/introducing-proof-of-work-defense-for-onion-services/
• https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/onion-services/onion-support/-/wikis/Documentation/PoW-FAQ

---

Enjoy it MiniBolter! 💙

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

It turns out that Ubuntu Linux installations of Ubuntu 23.04, 22.04.3 LTS, and installs done since April 2023 that accepted the Snap version update haven't been following Ubuntu's own recommended security best practices for their security pocket configuration for packages.

A new Subiquity release was issued to fix this problem while those on affected Ubuntu systems already installed are recommended to manually edit their /etc/apt/sources.list file.

If you didn't install MiniBolt recently, you are affected by this bug, and we need to fix that manually if not we want to install all since cero. Anyway, if you installed Minibolt recently, we recommend you review that.

Follow these easy steps to review and fix this:

• Edit the sources-list file:

sudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list

• Search now for every line that includes '-security' (without quotes) (normally at the end of the file) and change the URL to --> http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

~ > For example, from http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu (or the extension corresponding to your country) to --> http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

~> Real case, Spain location, before fix:

``` deb http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted

deb http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security universe

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security universe

deb http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security multiverse

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security multiverse

```

After fix:

``` deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted

deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security universe

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security universe

deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security multiverse

deb-src http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security multiverse

```

Save and exit

Note: If you have already these lines changed, you are not affected by this bug, and is not necessary to do anything. Simply exit the editor by doing Ctrl-X

• Finally, type the next command to refresh the repository pointers:

sudo apt update

• And optionally take the opportunity to update the system by doing:

sudo apt full-upgrade

More context:

• https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#What_repositories_and_pockets_should_I_use_to_make_sure_my_systems_are_up_to_date.3F
• https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2033977
• https://www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-Security-Pocket-Issue

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

What's changed

• New method for Bitcoin Core signature check, click ~ >HERE< ~
• GitHub repo of Bitcoin Core release attestations (Guix), click ~ >HERE< ~

---

History:

~ > PR that caused the broken and obsolescence of the old signature verification process, click ~ >HERE< ~

~ > New GitHub folder of Bitcoin Core repo that stores the signatures, click ~ >HERE< ~

---

Thanks to nostr:npub1gzuushllat7pet0ccv9yuhygvc8ldeyhrgxuwg744dn5khnpk3gs3ea5ds for building the command that made magic possible 🧙‍♂️🧡

---

Enjoy it MiniBolter! 💙

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

Important notice to MiniBolt node runners:

~ > It turns out that the I2P devs have opened an issue on the Bitcoin Core GitHub repo commenting that because they gave the option to enable the notransit=true parameter in the official documentation:

[...] If you prefer not to relay any public I2P traffic and only allow I2P traffic from programs connecting through the SAM proxy, e.g. Bitcoin Core, you can set the no transit option to true [...] are having a heavy load on the I2P network since last December 19. Also comment that it is advisable to share as much bandwidth and transit tunnels as we can, to increase anonymity with coverage traffic, by contributing more to the I2p network than we consume.

So they ask that we deactivate that option that you use activated. With all this, he already updated the "Privacy" section by removing that setting.

The steps to delete this configuration once we have already configured it, are the following:

• With the "admin" user, stop i2pd:

sudo systemctl stop i2pd

• Comment line 93 with "#" at the beginning of it (notransit = true), save and exit

sudo nano /var/lib/i2pd/i2pd.conf --line numbers

• Start i2pd again:

sudo systemctl start i2pd

• And that's it, you could take a look at Bitcoin Core to see that it has detected i2pd running again after the reboot with:

tail --lines 500 -f /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log

~ > If you don't see that I2P is up in Bitcoin Core after the restart, sudo systemctl restart bitcoind and look again at the logs of the same.

---

More info in the rollback commit, see ~> HERE < ~

@ 6389be64:ef439d32

Black Locust can grow up to 170 ft tall

Grows 3-4 ft. per year

Native to North America

Cold hardy in zones 3 to 8

Firewood

• BLT wood, on a pound for pound basis is roughly half that of Anthracite Coal
• Since its growth is fast, firewood can be plentiful

Timber

• Rot resistant due to a naturally produced robinin in the wood
  • 100 year life span in full soil contact! (better than cedar performance)
  • Fence posts
  • Outdoor furniture
  • Outdoor decking
• Sustainable due to its fast growth and spread
  • Can be coppiced (cut to the ground)
  • Can be pollarded (cut above ground)
• Its dense wood makes durable tool handles, boxes (tool), and furniture
  • The wood is tougher than hickory, which is tougher than hard maple, which is tougher than oak.
  • A very low rate of expansion and contraction
  • Hardwood flooring
  • The highest tensile beam strength of any American tree
• The wood is beautiful

Legume

• Nitrogen fixer
  • Fixes the same amount of nitrogen per acre as is needed for 200-bushel/acre corn
  • Black walnuts inter-planted with locust as “nurse” trees were shown to rapidly increase their growth [[Clark, Paul M., and Robert D. Williams. (1978) Black walnut growth increased when interplanted with nitrogen-fixing shrubs and trees. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol. 88, pp. 88-91.]]

Bees

• The edible flower clusters are also a top food source for honey bees

Shade Provider

• Its light, airy overstory provides dappled shade
  • Planted on the west side of a garden it provides relief during the hottest part of the day
  • (nitrogen provider)
  • Planted on the west side of a house, its quick growth soon shades that side from the sun

Wind-break

• Fast growth plus it's feathery foliage reduces wind for animals, crops, and shelters

Fodder

• Over 20% crude protein
• 4.1 kcal/g of energy
• Baertsche, S.R, M.T. Yokoyama, and J.W. Hanover (1986) Short rotation, hardwood tree biomass as potential ruminant feed-chemical composition, nylon bag ruminal degradation and ensilement of selected species. J. Animal Sci. 63 2028-2043

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

Your MiniBolt is on a home local network, you want to expose it on the public Internet (clearnet) without exposing your public IP, without Firewall rules, without NAT port forwarding, without risk, easy and cheap?

---

Go to the bonus guide by clicking ~ >HERE <~

---

Enjoy it MiniBolter! 💙

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Ich begann, Social Media aufzubauen, \ um den Menschen eine Stimme zu geben. \ Mark Zuckerberg

Sind euch auch die Tränen gekommen, als ihr Mark Zuckerbergs Wendehals-Deklaration bezüglich der Meinungsfreiheit auf seinen Portalen gehört habt? Rührend, oder? Während er früher die offensichtliche Zensur leugnete und später die Regierung Biden dafür verantwortlich machte, will er nun angeblich «die Zensur auf unseren Plattformen drastisch reduzieren».

«Purer Opportunismus» ob des anstehenden Regierungswechsels wäre als Klassifizierung viel zu kurz gegriffen. Der jetzige Schachzug des Meta-Chefs ist genauso Teil einer kühl kalkulierten Business-Strategie, wie es die 180 Grad umgekehrte Praxis vorher war. Social Media sind ein höchst lukratives Geschäft. Hinzu kommt vielleicht noch ein bisschen verkorkstes Ego, weil derartig viel Einfluss und Geld sicher auch auf die Psyche schlagen. Verständlich.

«Es ist an der Zeit, zu unseren Wurzeln der freien Meinungsäußerung auf Facebook und Instagram zurückzukehren. Ich begann, Social Media aufzubauen, um den Menschen eine Stimme zu geben», sagte Zuckerberg.

Welche Wurzeln? Hat der Mann vergessen, dass er von der Überwachung, dem Ausspionieren und dem Ausverkauf sämtlicher Daten und digitaler Spuren sowie der Manipulation seiner «Kunden» lebt? Das ist knallharter Kommerz, nichts anderes. Um freie Meinungsäußerung geht es bei diesem Geschäft ganz sicher nicht, und das war auch noch nie so. Die Wurzeln von Facebook liegen in einem Projekt des US-Militärs mit dem Namen «LifeLog». Dessen Ziel war es, «ein digitales Protokoll vom Leben eines Menschen zu erstellen».

Der Richtungswechsel kommt allerdings nicht überraschend. Schon Anfang Dezember hatte Meta-Präsident Nick Clegg von «zu hoher Fehlerquote bei der Moderation» von Inhalten gesprochen. Bei der Gelegenheit erwähnte er auch, dass Mark sehr daran interessiert sei, eine aktive Rolle in den Debatten über eine amerikanische Führungsrolle im technologischen Bereich zu spielen.

Während Milliardärskollege und Big Tech-Konkurrent Elon Musk bereits seinen Posten in der kommenden Trump-Regierung in Aussicht hat, möchte Zuckerberg also nicht nur seine Haut retten – Trump hatte ihn einmal einen «Feind des Volkes» genannt und ihm lebenslange Haft angedroht –, sondern am liebsten auch mitspielen. KI-Berater ist wohl die gewünschte Funktion, wie man nach einem Treffen Trump-Zuckerberg hörte. An seine Verhaftung dachte vermutlich auch ein weiterer Multimilliardär mit eigener Social Media-Plattform, Pavel Durov, als er Zuckerberg jetzt kritisierte und gleichzeitig warnte.

Politik und Systemmedien drehen jedenfalls durch – was zu viel ist, ist zu viel. Etwas weniger Zensur und mehr Meinungsfreiheit würden die Freiheit der Bürger schwächen und seien potenziell vernichtend für die Menschenrechte. Zuckerberg setze mit dem neuen Kurs die Demokratie aufs Spiel, das sei eine «Einladung zum nächsten Völkermord», ernsthaft. Die Frage sei, ob sich die EU gegen Musk und Zuckerberg behaupten könne, Brüssel müsse jedenfalls hart durchgreifen.

Auch um die Faktenchecker macht man sich Sorgen. Für die deutsche Nachrichtenagentur dpa und die «Experten» von Correctiv, die (noch) Partner für Fact-Checking-Aktivitäten von Facebook sind, sei das ein «lukratives Geschäftsmodell». Aber möglicherweise werden die Inhalte ohne diese vermeintlichen Korrektoren ja sogar besser. Anders als Meta wollen jedoch Scholz, Faeser und die Tagesschau keine Fehler zugeben und zum Beispiel Correctiv-Falschaussagen einräumen.

Bei derlei dramatischen Befürchtungen wundert es nicht, dass der öffentliche Plausch auf X zwischen Elon Musk und AfD-Chefin Alice Weidel von 150 EU-Beamten überwacht wurde, falls es irgendwelche Rechtsverstöße geben sollte, die man ihnen ankreiden könnte. Auch der Deutsche Bundestag war wachsam. Gefunden haben dürften sie nichts. Das Ganze war eher eine Show, viel Wind wurde gemacht, aber letztlich gab es nichts als heiße Luft.

Das Anbiedern bei Donald Trump ist indes gerade in Mode. Die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) tut das auch, denn sie fürchtet um Spenden von über einer Milliarde Dollar. Eventuell könnte ja Elon Musk auch hier künftig aushelfen und der Organisation sowie deren größtem privaten Förderer, Bill Gates, etwas unter die Arme greifen. Nachdem Musks KI-Projekt xAI kürzlich von BlackRock & Co. sechs Milliarden eingestrichen hat, geht da vielleicht etwas.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

Build your nostr relay step by step on your MiniBolt node! (easily adaptable to other environment) No need to trust anyone else! Be sovereign!

~> Go to the bonus guide by clicking ~> HERE< ~

~> This guide includes a complete extra section to cover the different processes for using nostr as a user and relay operator.

---

PS: The MiniBolt project has its FREE relay, be free to connect by adding to your favorite client the next address: wss://relay.minibolt.info

~> Let a review on noStrudel or Coracle of your experience using it.

---

Remember, Nostr is freedom! Stay resilient! 💜 🛡️💪

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

What's changed

A bonus guide to get a quick overview of the system status with the most relevant data about the services on the main guide.

---

➕Additional extra sections (optional) to:

• Show on login
• Get the channel.db size of an old LND bbolt database backend
• Use MobaXterm compatibility version

🔧 GitHub PR related: https://github.com/minibolt-guide/minibolt/pull/97

Σ Dedicated GitHub repository: https://github.com/minibolt-guide/system_overview

---

🫂Acknowledgments

This is a fork of the minibolt_info repository, the main developer of this project is rmnscb, a member of the MiniBolt community, all the merits go to him. Thank you for your contribution 🧡🫂

---

-> CLICK HERE <- to go to the bonus guide

---

Enjoy it MiniBolter! 💙

@ 2f4550b0:95f20096

In the realm of leadership, whether in business, politics, or any organizational context, one of the most critical skills a leader can possess is the ability to make and keep promises. This skill not only builds trust and credibility, but also sets the tone for an organization's culture and operational ethos. A recent example of this leadership attribute can be observed in the actions of President Donald Trump on the first day of his second presidency, where he used executive orders to fulfill several campaign promises.

The Importance of Promises in Leadership

Leadership is fundamentally about influence, and one of the most effective ways to influence is through the power of your word. When leaders make promises, they are essentially laying down expectations for what stakeholders, customers, and employees can anticipate. These promises shape perceptions, motivate teams, and guide organizational strategy. However, the true test of leadership comes not in the making of these promises, but in their fulfillment.

Translating Promises into Action

On January 20, 2025, President Trump exemplified this principle by signing a flurry of executive orders that directly addressed several key campaign promises. These actions highlighted his approach to leadership. For instance, Trump signed executive actions on immigration, reversing many policies of his predecessor and reinstating his first-term policies like the "Remain in Mexico" initiative. This move was a direct fulfillment of his promise to tighten border control, demonstrating to his supporters and critics alike that his commitments were not merely rhetorical (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/guaranteeing-the-states-protection-against-invasion/).

The Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders, the fulfillment of promises builds a reputation for reliability and decisiveness, essential for maintaining trust and support. From a leadership perspective, Trump's example underscores the importance of clarity in communication and the readiness to act on stated objectives.

Lessons for Leaders

Here are some key takeaways for leaders across sectors:

• Transparency: Be clear about what you promise. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstanding and disillusionment.
• Accountability: Hold yourself accountable. Demonstrate accountability to your promises.
• Action: Follow through with action. Leaders must not only talk the talk but walk the walk.
• Consistency: Maintain consistency between what you say and what you do. This builds a reliable brand or leadership image, whether in politics or business.

In conclusion, the skill of making and keeping promises is central to effective leadership. Promises are not just words; they are commitments that, when fulfilled, can define a leader's legacy and influence.

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Was du bist hängt von drei Faktoren ab: \ Was du geerbt hast, \ was deine Umgebung aus dir machte \ und was du in freier Wahl \ aus deiner Umgebung und deinem Erbe gemacht hast. \ Aldous Huxley

Das brave Mitmachen und Mitlaufen in einem vorgegebenen, recht engen Rahmen ist gewiss nicht neu, hat aber gerade wieder mal Konjunktur. Dies kann man deutlich beobachten, eigentlich egal, in welchem gesellschaftlichen Bereich man sich umschaut. Individualität ist nur soweit angesagt, wie sie in ein bestimmtes Schema von «Diversität» passt, und Freiheit verkommt zur Worthülse – nicht erst durch ein gewisses Buch einer gewissen ehemaligen Regierungschefin.

Erklärungsansätze für solche Entwicklungen sind bekannt, und praktisch alle haben etwas mit Massenpsychologie zu tun. Der Herdentrieb, also der Trieb der Menschen, sich – zum Beispiel aus Unsicherheit oder Bequemlichkeit – lieber der Masse anzuschließen als selbstständig zu denken und zu handeln, ist einer der Erklärungsversuche. Andere drehen sich um Macht, Propaganda, Druck und Angst, also den gezielten Einsatz psychologischer Herrschaftsinstrumente.

Aber wollen die Menschen überhaupt Freiheit? Durch Gespräche im privaten Umfeld bin ich diesbezüglich in der letzten Zeit etwas skeptisch geworden. Um die Jahreswende philosophiert man ja gerne ein wenig über das Erlebte und über die Erwartungen für die Zukunft. Dabei hatte ich hin und wieder den Eindruck, die totalitären Anwandlungen unserer «Repräsentanten» kämen manchen Leuten gerade recht.

«Desinformation» ist so ein brisantes Thema. Davor müsse man die Menschen doch schützen, hörte ich. Jemand müsse doch zum Beispiel diese ganzen merkwürdigen Inhalte in den Social Media filtern – zur Ukraine, zum Klima, zu Gesundheitsthemen oder zur Migration. Viele wüssten ja gar nicht einzuschätzen, was richtig und was falsch ist, sie bräuchten eine Führung.

Freiheit bedingt Eigenverantwortung, ohne Zweifel. Eventuell ist es einigen tatsächlich zu anspruchsvoll, die Verantwortung für das eigene Tun und Lassen zu übernehmen. Oder die persönliche Freiheit wird nicht als ausreichend wertvolles Gut angesehen, um sich dafür anzustrengen. In dem Fall wäre die mangelnde Selbstbestimmung wohl das kleinere Übel. Allerdings fehlt dann gemäß Aldous Huxley ein Teil der Persönlichkeit. Letztlich ist natürlich alles eine Frage der Abwägung.

Sind viele Menschen möglicherweise schon so «eingenordet», dass freiheitliche Ambitionen gar nicht für eine ganze Gruppe, ein Kollektiv, verfolgt werden können? Solche Gedanken kamen mir auch, als ich mir kürzlich diverse Talks beim viertägigen Hacker-Kongress des Chaos Computer Clubs (38C3) anschaute. Ich war nicht nur überrascht, sondern reichlich erschreckt angesichts der in weiten Teilen mainstream-geformten Inhalte, mit denen ein dankbares Publikum beglückt wurde. Wo ich allgemein hellere Köpfe erwartet hatte, fand ich Konformismus und enthusiastisch untermauerte Narrative.

Gibt es vielleicht so etwas wie eine Herdenimmunität gegen Indoktrination? Ich denke, ja, zumindest eine gestärkte Widerstandsfähigkeit. Was wir brauchen, sind etwas gesunder Menschenverstand, offene Informationskanäle und der Mut, sich freier auch zwischen den Herden zu bewegen. Sie tun das bereits, aber sagen Sie es auch dieses Jahr ruhig weiter.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ 04c195f1:3329a1da

Dear Readers,

I’ve written about the AI Act before—you can read my full critique here—but now, parts of this bureaucratic monstrosity are about to become reality. Starting February 2, it will be illegal to use AI tools at work in the EU unless you can prove you have something called “AI competence.”

Let’s break this down.

What Does ‘AI Competence’ Mean?

No one knows. The EU has issued no practical guidance on how to define, evaluate, or measure this so-called competence. Yet, if you or your employees fail to meet this vague requirement, Brussels will be ready with the fines: up to €7 million or 1.5% of your company’s global revenue.

This is classic EU policymaking. Sweeping, unclear rules that businesses are left scrambling to interpret, while bureaucrats pat themselves on the back for ‘leading the way’ in AI regulation.

Who Does This Hurt Most?

Small and medium-sized businesses, naturally. These are the companies least equipped to deal with vague mandates or pay for the training programs that might, possibly, meet the requirements.

Meanwhile, big corporations will either move operations outside the EU or use their armies of lawyers to sidestep the rules entirely. The EU talks about fairness, but its policies always end up crushing the little guy while big players get a pass.

The Bigger Picture

AI is supposed to be the future. But while the US and China are racing ahead, the EU is busy tying businesses in regulatory knots. Is it any wonder that Europe is falling behind in innovation?

This isn’t just bad for business; it’s a direct assault on sovereignty and national economies. Instead of letting countries tailor AI policies to their needs, the EU insists on centralizing everything. The result? Fewer startups, fewer breakthroughs, and a Europe that’s increasingly irrelevant in global tech.

The Fight Ahead

February 2 is just the start. The full AI Act rolls out in stages, with more draconian measures to come. If we don’t push back now, this regulatory nightmare will only get worse.

National governments must reclaim control over AI policy before it’s too late. Europe’s future shouldn’t be dictated by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

What Do You Think?

How will these new rules impact Europe’s businesses and innovation? Reply to this read or shoot me a private message on Nostr.

Together, we can shine a light on the EU’s overreach and fight for a Europe that values sovereignty and innovation over red tape.

Stay informed, \ Dan Eriksson

@ e3168078:10f13b2c

ノス！
最近Umbrel上のn8nを使ってstacker newsの記事を要約するNostr botを作ってみました。
その際にFirecrawlというスクレイピングのSaaSを使っていたんですがセルフホストできるようなので試してみました。
Firecrawlは動的なページも読めたりマークダウンへの変換をしてくれますが無料プランだと1ヶ月500ページの制限があり、セルフホストすれば気兼ねなく使えます！
今回はUmbrel上のPortainerというアプリを使ってFirecrawlを動かせたのでその記録です。

手順

まずはUmbrelにPortainerアプリをインストールします。 Poratinerは今回初めて使ったんですが独自のDockerコンテナをUmbrelで動かす際に推奨されているアプリのようです。

アプリを開いてパスワードの初期設定などを済ませるとダッシュボードが表示されるかと思います。 ここでStackという機能を使ってFirecrawlのDocker composeを一括で取り込むことができます。

新しいStackを作成する画面で以下を入力します。

Repository URL: https://github.com/mendableai/firecrawl
Repository reference: refs/heads/main
Compose path: docker-compose.yaml (デフォルトがymlになっててハマりました…）

上記に加えてenv varを設定する必要があるんですがPortainerでは上記の画像下部にあるように "Load Variables from .env file" からenvファイルを選択できます。 Firecrawlのgithubにあるように apps/api/.env.example をダウンロードし以下の内容を更新しPortainerに取り込ませます。 USE_DB_AUTHENTICATION=false TEST_API_KEY=fc-test-key

あとはDeploy the stackを押して少し待つとfirecrawlのセットアップ完了です。

確認

動作テストにはUmbrelの設定からAdvanced Settings -> Terminal -> Umbrel OSを開き以下のコマンドを実行ししマークダウンが返って来れば成功です。 $ curl -X POST http://localhost:3002/v1/scrape -H 'Authorization: Bearer fc-test-key' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ "url": "https://example.com", "formats": ["markdown"] }' {"success":true,"data":{"markdown":"Example Domain\n==============\n\nThis domain is for use in illustrative examples in documents. You may use this domain in literature without prior coordination or asking for permission.\n\n[More information...](https://www.iana.org/domains/example)","metadata":{"title":"Example Domain","ogLocaleAlternate":[],"scrapeId":"7c196348-6561-4ebb-bb8a-9121a29c64b5","viewport":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1","sourceURL":"https://example.com","url":"https://example.com/","statusCode":200}}}

またn8n等のUmbrelの他のアプリ（コンテナ）から利用する場合はlocalhostがコンテナ自身になってしまうので別のIP等（172.17.0.1）を使う必要があるのでご注意ください。 （参考)

以上でUmbrel上でのFirecrawlセルフホストができるようになりn8nからも制限なく使えるようになりました。

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Heute möchte ich ein Gedicht mit euch teilen. Es handelt sich um eine Ballade des österreichischen Lyrikers Johann Gabriel Seidl aus dem 19. Jahrhundert. Mir sind diese Worte fest in Erinnerung, da meine Mutter sie perfekt rezitieren konnte, auch als die Kräfte schon langsam schwanden.

Dem originalen Titel «Die Uhr» habe ich für mich immer das Wort «innere» hinzugefügt. Denn der Zeitmesser – hier vermutliche eine Taschenuhr – symbolisiert zwar in dem Kontext das damalige Zeitempfinden und die Umbrüche durch die industrielle Revolution, sozusagen den Zeitgeist und das moderne Leben. Aber der Autor setzt sich philosophisch mit der Zeit auseinander und gibt seinem Werk auch eine klar spirituelle Dimension.

Das Ticken der Uhr und die Momente des Glücks und der Trauer stehen sinnbildlich für das unaufhaltsame Fortschreiten und die Vergänglichkeit des Lebens. Insofern könnte man bei der Uhr auch an eine Sonnenuhr denken. Der Rhythmus der Ereignisse passt uns vielleicht nicht immer in den Kram.

Was den Takt pocht, ist durchaus auch das Herz, unser «inneres Uhrwerk». Wenn dieses Meisterwerk einmal stillsteht, ist es unweigerlich um uns geschehen. Hoffentlich können wir dann dankbar sagen: «Ich habe mein Bestes gegeben.»

Ich trage, wo ich gehe, stets eine Uhr bei mir; \ Wieviel es geschlagen habe, genau seh ich an ihr. \ Es ist ein großer Meister, der künstlich ihr Werk gefügt, \ Wenngleich ihr Gang nicht immer dem törichten Wunsche genügt.

Ich wollte, sie wäre rascher gegangen an manchem Tag; \ Ich wollte, sie hätte manchmal verzögert den raschen Schlag. \ In meinen Leiden und Freuden, in Sturm und in der Ruh, \ Was immer geschah im Leben, sie pochte den Takt dazu.

Sie schlug am Sarge des Vaters, sie schlug an des Freundes Bahr, \ Sie schlug am Morgen der Liebe, sie schlug am Traualtar. \ Sie schlug an der Wiege des Kindes, sie schlägt, will's Gott, noch oft, \ Wenn bessere Tage kommen, wie meine Seele es hofft.

Und ward sie auch einmal träger, und drohte zu stocken ihr Lauf, \ So zog der Meister immer großmütig sie wieder auf. \ Doch stände sie einmal stille, dann wär's um sie geschehn, \ Kein andrer, als der sie fügte, bringt die Zerstörte zum Gehn.

Dann müßt ich zum Meister wandern, der wohnt am Ende wohl weit, \ Wohl draußen, jenseits der Erde, wohl dort in der Ewigkeit! \ Dann gäb ich sie ihm zurücke mit dankbar kindlichem Flehn: \ Sieh, Herr, ich hab nichts verdorben, sie blieb von selber stehn.

Johann Gabriel Seidl (1804-1875)

@ 3ac03011:41ecd1bb

You've got to hand it to Trump. For centuries, politicians have hidden their corruption behind polite words like 'lobbying' and 'campaign donations.' But what happens when one leader decides to skip the facade entirely?

Enter $TRUMP: the grandaddy of all shitcoins—so brazen, so unapologetically self-serving, it's almost poetic. Why bother with the elaborate charade of influence-peddling when you can just mint a digital token and say, "Buy this if you want something from me"?

Need a policy changed? Pump $TRUMP. Want a ban lifted? You know the drill. Forget the subtle dance of lobbying—just load your wallet and fund your favour directly. It's simple. Efficient. And honestly, kind of genius if you have no morals.

The game has been the same: politicians selling out the people while posing as their saviours. They make soaring speeches, they shake hands, they kiss babies—and then they hand over the real power to the highest bidder. But at least they had the decency to keep up the illusion of caring. Trump? He's stripped away the illusion entirely.

Sure, it's a scam. But it's the most honest scam we've ever seen. No pretense. No empty promises about "making America great again." Just cold, hard transparency: "I'm for sale and now there's a token to prove it."

And really, isn't this just the logical endpoint of politics? Lobbying has always been bribery in a nice suit. Campaign donations? Legal pay-to-play. Trump just cut through the pageantry and put it on a blockchain.

Some will call it dystopian. But isn't it refreshing to see the grift so out in the open? The man is cutting out the middleman and embracing the essence of what leadership has become. Forget the speeches. Forget the empty promises. With $TRUMP, you don't need to wonder who he's working for—the market decides.

So here's to $TRUMP: the most honest scam in modern history. Maybe it's time for every politician to mint their own token—at least then we'd know exactly what they stand for. The audacity alone deserves respect.

[Image by Eric Fischl]

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Falls du beim Lesen des Titels dieses Newsletters unwillkürlich an positive Neuigkeiten aus dem globalen polit-medialen Irrenhaus oder gar aus dem wirtschaftlichen Umfeld gedacht hast, darf ich dich beglückwünschen. Diese Assoziation ist sehr löblich, denn sie weist dich als unverbesserlichen Optimisten aus. Leider muss ich dich diesbezüglich aber enttäuschen. Es geht hier um ein anderes Thema, allerdings sehr wohl ein positives, wie ich finde.

Heute ist ein ganz besonderer Tag: die Wintersonnenwende. Genau gesagt hat heute morgen um 10:20 Uhr Mitteleuropäischer Zeit (MEZ) auf der Nordhalbkugel unseres Planeten der astronomische Winter begonnen. Was daran so außergewöhnlich ist? Der kürzeste Tag des Jahres war gestern, seit heute werden die Tage bereits wieder länger! Wir werden also jetzt jeden Tag ein wenig mehr Licht haben.

Für mich ist dieses Ereignis immer wieder etwas kurios: Es beginnt der Winter, aber die Tage werden länger. Das erscheint mir zunächst wie ein Widerspruch, denn meine spontanen Assoziationen zum Winter sind doch eher Kälte und Dunkelheit, relativ zumindest. Umso erfreulicher ist der emotionale Effekt, wenn dann langsam die Erkenntnis durchsickert: Ab jetzt wird es schon wieder heller!

Natürlich ist es kalt im Winter, mancherorts mehr als anderswo. Vielleicht jedoch nicht mehr lange, wenn man den Klimahysterikern glauben wollte. Mindestens letztes Jahr hat Väterchen Frost allerdings gleich zu Beginn seiner Saison – und passenderweise während des globalen Überhitzungsgipfels in Dubai – nochmal richtig mit der Faust auf den Tisch gehauen. Schnee- und Eischaos sind ja eigentlich in der Agenda bereits nicht mehr vorgesehen. Deswegen war man in Deutschland vermutlich in vorauseilendem Gehorsam schon nicht mehr darauf vorbereitet und wurde glatt lahmgelegt.

Aber ich schweife ab. Die Aussicht auf nach und nach mehr Licht und damit auch Wärme stimmt mich froh. Den Zusammenhang zwischen beidem merkt man in Andalusien sehr deutlich. Hier, wo die Häuser im Winter arg auskühlen, geht man zum Aufwärmen raus auf die Straße oder auf den Balkon. Die Sonne hat auch im Winter eine erfreuliche Kraft. Und da ist jede Minute Gold wert.

Außerdem ist mir vor Jahren so richtig klar geworden, warum mir das südliche Klima so sehr gefällt. Das liegt nämlich nicht nur an der Sonne als solcher, oder der Wärme – das liegt vor allem am Licht. Ohne Licht keine Farben, das ist der ebenso simple wie gewaltige Unterschied zwischen einem deprimierenden matschgraubraunen Winter und einem fröhlichen bunten. Ein großes Stück Lebensqualität.

Mir gefällt aber auch die Symbolik dieses Tages: Licht aus der Dunkelheit, ein Wendepunkt, ein Neuanfang, neue Möglichkeiten, Übergang zu neuer Aktivität. In der winterlichen Stille keimt bereits neue Lebendigkeit. Und zwar in einem Zyklus, das wird immer wieder so geschehen. Ich nehme das gern als ein Stück Motivation, es macht mir Hoffnung und gibt mir Energie.

Übrigens ist parallel am heutigen Tag auf der südlichen Halbkugel Sommeranfang. Genau im entgegengesetzten Rhythmus, sich ergänzend, wie Yin und Yang. Das alles liegt an der Schrägstellung der Erdachse, die ist nämlich um 23,4º zur Umlaufbahn um die Sonne geneigt. Wir erinnern uns, gell?

Insofern bleibt eindeutig festzuhalten, dass “schräg sein” ein willkommener, wichtiger und positiver Wert ist. Mit anderen Worten: auch ungewöhnlich, eigenartig, untypisch, wunderlich, kauzig, … ja sogar irre, spinnert oder gar “quer” ist in Ordnung. Das schließt das Denken mit ein.

In diesem Sinne wünsche ich euch allen urige Weihnachtstage!

---

Dieser Beitrag ist letztes Jahr in meiner Denkbar erschienen.

@ c8cf63be:86691cfe

Das SNAFU des Reichtums

Das SNAFU-Prinzip[1] sagt das Kommunikation nur unter gleichen möglich ist:

Adäquate Kommunikation fliesst nur zwischen Gleichen ungehindert. Kommunikation zwischen Nicht-Gleichen ist missverständlich und von Dominaz- und Unterwerfungsritualen gefärbt, die immer wieder zum Zusammenbruch der Kommunikation führen und zu einem Spiel ohne Ende. [2]

So ist z. B. das Peter Prinzip [3] eine einfache Folge des SNAFU-Prinzips. Bezieht es sich in erster Linie auf Hierarchie lässt es sich hervorragend ausweiten auf den ökonomischen Bereich. Auch hier gilt, dass Kommunikation nur unter Gleichen möglich ist, hier ist die Hierarchie das ökonomische Ungleichgewicht.
Kommunikation ist auch hier nur unter gleichen möglich, ungefähr gleich reich müssen sie sein. Ein zu großer Unterschied in den ökonomischen Verhältnissen verhindert den Aufbau einer menschlichen Beziehung. Hier ist das einfache Beispiel: Wäre ich Reich, würde ich mich Fragen, ob die Freunde da, nur kommen weil ich ihnen die Drinks ausgebe. Jeder, der nicht so viel Geld wie ich hat, will vielleicht nur mein Geld. So kann ein Bill Gates nur einen Jeff Besos als Freund haben oder treffender ein Elon Musk nur einen Mark Zuckerberg.
Auch umgekehrt funktioniert diese Selektion: Wenn ich ein richtig cooler Typ wäre, würde ich mich fragen, ob ich den Reichen eigentlich gut finde, oder nur mit ihm rumhänge, weil er die Drinks bezahlt und weil ich zu Recht unsicher darüber sein kann, kann ich mich nur entziehen. Diejenigen, die wirklich freundschaftlich sind, sind die die sich einer solchen Situation nicht aussetzen.
Und was bleibt dem Reichen? Nur die Gesellschaft der Reichen. Hier trifft der Reichtum auf eine totale Armut. Die Auswahl der Freunde ist sehr klein.
Hier ist tatsächlich der Reichtum das Problem, bzw. das ökonomische Ungleichgewicht und es gibt eine einfache Lösung, der Unterschied muss kleiner werden, denn je kleiner der Unterschied desto mehr Auswahl an Freunden gibt es. Wie in der “Aufgeklärten Ökonomie” dargestellt ist die Ungleichheit, eine gesellschaftliche Entscheidung und eine konkrete Steuerung möglich. Wir können also den Reichen helfen und mehr Freiheit und Freunde schenken.
Pathologisch wird dieses Phänomen, wenn sich der innere Antrieb um den Reichtum dreht. Was durch die momentane Verfasstheit der gesellschaftlichen Praktiken sogar unterstützt und gefördert wird und damit viele Menschen objektiv unglücklich macht. Dieses pathologische der Gesellschaft wirkt dann auf das Individuum zurück und macht es ebenfalls Krank. Wir haben einen ähnlichen Mechanismus in der Gewalt kennenlernen dürfen. Vgl. “Gewalt ist eine ansteckende Krankrankheit”

Wenn sie sich leer fühlen, Erfolg ihnen kein Glück schenkt, keine Befriedigung. Wenn sie mehr brauchen und mehr, dann leiden sie wahrscheinlich auch an einer Dysfunktion der Belohnungssysteme, an Habsucht.
Auch ihnen kann und muss geholfen werden, denn Gier ist heilbar. Und ihrer Gier betrifft nicht nur sie. Ihre liebsten Menschen in Ihrer Umgebung, Menschen mit denen sie niemals direkt in Berührung kommen, sie alle leiden unter ihrer Krankheit.
Auch für sie kann es ein erfülltes Leben geben, einen Weg zurück in die Gesellschaft, die Gesellschaft von Menschen. Machen sie Psychotherapie, nehmen sie Pharmaka, buchen sie eine Kur und entledigen sich ihres Wohlstandes.[4]

---

References:

[1] Wikipedia, SNAFU: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNAFU.

[2] Wilson, R.A., Der Neue Prometheus. Die Evolution unserer Intelligenz. - Volksausgabe/ Raubdruck. 1983. Seite 245-246

[3] Wikipedia, Peter Prinzip: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter-Prinzip.

[4] InvestmentWeek, Sucht im Luxus: Eine Nacht in der Klinik der Superreichen 2024: https://www.investmentweek.com/sucht-im-luxus-eine-nacht-in-der-klinik-der-superreichen/, „Viele Patienten hier leiden an Einsamkeit“ … “Viele Superreiche …wüssten nicht, ob sie wegen ihres Geldes oder ihrer Persönlichkeit gemocht werden” „Reich sein bedeutet oft, keinen echten Kontakt zu haben. Viele unserer Klienten haben keine echten Freunde.“

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Das Betriebsklima ist das einzige Klima, \ das du selbst bestimmen kannst. \ Anonym

Eine Strategie zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel hat das deutsche Bundeskabinett diese Woche beschlossen. Da «Wetterextreme wie die immer häufiger auftretenden Hitzewellen und Starkregenereignisse» oft desaströse Auswirkungen auf Mensch und Umwelt hätten, werde eine Anpassung an die Folgen des Klimawandels immer wichtiger. «Klimaanpassungsstrategie» nennt die Regierung das.

Für die «Vorsorge vor Klimafolgen» habe man nun erstmals klare Ziele und messbare Kennzahlen festgelegt. So sei der Erfolg überprüfbar, und das solle zu einer schnelleren Bewältigung der Folgen führen. Dass sich hinter dem Begriff Klimafolgen nicht Folgen des Klimas, sondern wohl «Folgen der globalen Erwärmung» verbergen, erklärt den Interessierten die Wikipedia. Dabei ist das mit der Erwärmung ja bekanntermaßen so eine Sache.

Die Zunahme schwerer Unwetterereignisse habe gezeigt, so das Ministerium, wie wichtig eine frühzeitige und effektive Warnung der Bevölkerung sei. Daher solle es eine deutliche Anhebung der Nutzerzahlen der sogenannten Nina-Warn-App geben.

Die ARD spurt wie gewohnt und setzt die Botschaft zielsicher um. Der Artikel beginnt folgendermaßen:

«Die Flut im Ahrtal war ein Schock für das ganze Land. Um künftig besser gegen Extremwetter gewappnet zu sein, hat die Bundesregierung eine neue Strategie zur Klimaanpassung beschlossen. Die Warn-App Nina spielt eine zentrale Rolle. Der Bund will die Menschen in Deutschland besser vor Extremwetter-Ereignissen warnen und dafür die Reichweite der Warn-App Nina deutlich erhöhen.»

Die Kommunen würden bei ihren «Klimaanpassungsmaßnahmen» vom Zentrum KlimaAnpassung unterstützt, schreibt das Umweltministerium. Mit dessen Aufbau wurden das Deutsche Institut für Urbanistik gGmbH, welches sich stark für Smart City-Projekte engagiert, und die Adelphi Consult GmbH beauftragt.

Adelphi beschreibt sich selbst als «Europas führender Think-and-Do-Tank und eine unabhängige Beratung für Klima, Umwelt und Entwicklung». Sie seien «global vernetzte Strateg*innen und weltverbessernde Berater*innen» und als «Vorreiter der sozial-ökologischen Transformation» sei man mit dem Deutschen Nachhaltigkeitspreis ausgezeichnet worden, welcher sich an den Zielen der Agenda 2030 orientiere.

Über die Warn-App mit dem niedlichen Namen Nina, die möglichst jeder auf seinem Smartphone installieren soll, informiert das Bundesamt für Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (BBK). Gewarnt wird nicht nur vor Extrem-Wetterereignissen, sondern zum Beispiel auch vor Waffengewalt und Angriffen, Strom- und anderen Versorgungsausfällen oder Krankheitserregern. Wenn man die Kategorie Gefahreninformation wählt, erhält man eine Dosis von ungefähr zwei Benachrichtigungen pro Woche.

Beim BBK erfahren wir auch einiges über die empfohlenen Systemeinstellungen für Nina. Der Benutzer möge zum Beispiel den Zugriff auf die Standortdaten «immer zulassen», und zwar mit aktivierter Funktion «genauen Standort verwenden». Die Datennutzung solle unbeschränkt sein, auch im Hintergrund. Außerdem sei die uneingeschränkte Akkunutzung zu aktivieren, der Energiesparmodus auszuschalten und das Stoppen der App-Aktivität bei Nichtnutzung zu unterbinden.

Dass man so dramatische Ereignisse wie damals im Ahrtal auch anders bewerten kann als Regierungen und Systemmedien, hat meine Kollegin Wiltrud Schwetje anhand der Tragödie im spanischen Valencia gezeigt. Das Stichwort «Agenda 2030» taucht dabei in einem Kontext auf, der wenig mit Nachhaltigkeitspreisen zu tun hat.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

In the annals of treasure hunting, tales of sunken galleons and buried chests have given way to a new narrative—one that unfolds in the digital realm. The U.S. Government, traditionally associated with the physical might of gold reserves in Fort Knox, has inadvertently entered the arena of cryptocurrency by amassing a staggering $5 billion in Bitcoin. This digital fortune, however, was not amassed through investment or mining efforts but rather through the seizure of assets from the darker corners of the internet. As we stand at the crossroads of finance and technology, this cache of Bitcoin opens up a Pandora's box of possibilities and challenges that could redefine the economic landscape of tomorrow.

Table Of Content

• A Digital Fort Knox

• The Origins of the Cache

• The Dilemma of Liquidation

• Potential Paths Forward

• The Impact on the Future of Currency

• Conclusion

• FAQs

A Digital Fort Knox

Imagine a vault, not of steel and stone, but of complex cryptographic algorithms, housing a vast sum of Bitcoin equivalent to the wealth of small nations. This digital Fort Knox does not require armed guards or thick walls but instead relies on the impenetrable nature of blockchain technology. The U.S. Government's acquisition of such a significant amount of Bitcoin is a testament to the changing nature of value and wealth in the 21st century. Each Bitcoin in this modern trove was once part of illicit transactions, flowing through the veins of the internet until it was intercepted by the vigilant efforts of federal agencies. The narrative of each coin is a digital ledger, chronicling a journey from the shadowy fringes of the web to the secure wallets of the government.

The Origins of the Cache

The backstory of the government's Bitcoin collection is not one of serendipity but of strategic cyber sleuthing and legal might. It is a modern saga of law enforcement adapting to the challenges posed by the digital age. Federal agencies, armed with court orders and cutting-edge technology, have traced the movement of these digital assets through the blockchain, unraveling complex webs of transactions that lead to the criminal enterprises operating in the darknet markets. Each seizure represents a battle won in the ongoing war against cybercrime, with the confiscated Bitcoin serving as both evidence of victory and the spoils of war.

The Dilemma of Liquidation

The government's Bitcoin cache presents a unique conundrum: to liquidate or not to liquidate? This decision is fraught with economic implications, akin to a game of high-stakes poker where the government's hand could influence the entire table. A sudden influx of $5 billion worth of Bitcoin into the market could trigger a tidal wave of volatility, potentially devaluing the currency and destabilizing the fragile ecosystem of digital assets. The government must navigate these waters with a blend of economic savvy and strategic foresight, ensuring that any decision made is in the best interest of not just the immediate financial landscape but also the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies.

Potential Paths Forward

The government stands at the helm, charting a course through uncharted waters with its Bitcoin bounty. The options are as varied as they are complex. Holding onto the Bitcoin could be seen as an endorsement of its value, a digital reserve akin to the gold of yesteryear. Alternatively, a measured approach to selling the Bitcoin could be employed, releasing it into the market in a controlled manner to mitigate any negative impacts. There's also the innovative possibility of integrating Bitcoin into the government's financial transactions, embracing the very currency that was once shunned by the establishment.

The Impact on the Future of Currency

The U.S. Government's handling of this Bitcoin cache is not merely a financial decision; it is a statement on the future of currency itself. As the line between digital and fiat currencies blurs, the actions taken with this Bitcoin hoard could send ripples across the global economy. It could influence how governments around the world perceive and interact with digital assets, potentially ushering in a new era where cryptocurrency becomes a staple of economic policy and international trade.

Conclusion

The U.S. Government's Bitcoin cache is more than a collection of digital assets; it is a symbol of a new era in governance and economic strategy. The decisions made regarding this treasure will likely resonate through the annals of financial history, setting precedents for how nations interact with the burgeoning realm of digital currencies. As we delve deeper into this narrative, we realize that this treasure is not hidden but in plain sight, waiting to unlock a future where digital assets are as commonplace and as valuable as the gold once stored in the vaults of old.

FAQs

How did the U.S. Government acquire $5 billion in Bitcoin? The U.S. Government seized this Bitcoin from various cybercriminal operations and darknet markets through legal and technological efforts by federal agencies.

What is the significance of the government holding such a large amount of Bitcoin? This significant holding of Bitcoin by the government underscores the changing landscape of value and wealth, highlighting the increasing relevance of digital currencies in today's economy.

What challenges does the government face with this Bitcoin cache? The government faces the challenge of deciding how to manage and potentially liquidate the Bitcoin without causing market disruption due to the currency's volatility.

What are the potential strategies for the U.S. Government's Bitcoin cache? Strategies include holding the Bitcoin as a reserve asset, selling it off gradually to minimize market impact, or using it for government transactions and policy-making.

How could the government's handling of the Bitcoin cache affect the future of currency? The government's approach to managing the Bitcoin cache could set a precedent for how digital assets are treated by national entities, potentially influencing the integration of cryptocurrencies into mainstream finance.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews.co

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• From the Backbench to the Forefront

• Milei's Bitcoin Connection

• The Coinx Controversy

• Argentina's Financial Quagmire

• Conclusion

• FAQ

Well, folks, it seems like the winds of change are blowing in Argentina! In a twist that no one saw coming, Javier Milei, the presidential candidate with a penchant for Bitcoin and libertarian economics, clinched the top spot in Argentina's primary. This victory sent shockwaves throughout the nation. Milei and his gang, the La Libertad Avanza (or "Liberty Advances"), managed to snag a whopping 30% of the votes. They beat the second-place contender, Juntos Por El Cambio, by just under 2%, which is quite the feat!

From the Backbench to the Forefront

La Libertad Avanza, founded just a couple of years ago in 2021, was once the little guy in the political arena. In their first legislative elections, they made waves, becoming the third most-voted coalition in Buenos Aires. But this recent victory? It's monumental! It's like David taking on Goliath and emerging victorious. Milei's rise has certainly turned heads and raised eyebrows in the political sphere, making everyone wonder what's next.

Milei's Bitcoin Connection

Javier Milei is not your run-of-the-mill political candidate. He's carved out a unique niche for himself in the world of politics, largely due to his vocal support for cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin. When you tune into talk shows and interviews, you'll often find Milei passionately discussing the potential of digital currencies. He doesn't just see them as another financial instrument; to him, they represent a return to a time when the power of money was firmly rooted in the hands of the people, free from excessive governmental control.

His views on Bitcoin go beyond mere admiration. Milei perceives it as a revolutionary tool, one that can challenge traditional financial systems. He often contrasts the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies with the centralized control of traditional fiat currencies. In his eyes, Bitcoin and its peers are not just alternatives but superior forms of money. He's even made bold claims, suggesting that in many ways, cryptocurrencies are safer investments than traditional precious metals like gold or silver. This is a significant statement, especially in a country like Argentina, where people have historically turned to gold as a hedge against economic instability.

However, as with any public figure with strong opinions, Milei's crypto enthusiasm has its fair share of critics. While he paints a rosy picture of a crypto-driven future, there are those who question his motives and the feasibility of his vision. The crypto world, as many know, is not without its pitfalls. From volatile market swings to regulatory challenges, the journey to mainstream acceptance is fraught with challenges. And Milei's connection to this world has put him under the microscope, with every statement and action being dissected and debated.

The Coinx Controversy

Rumor has it that Milei promoted a Ponzi scheme called Coinx, which allegedly swindled a cool $800,000 in Argentine pesos. Milei, of course, denies any wrongdoing. He even compared their business model to that of a bank. The only difference? They can offer higher interest rates because they're not tied down by the central bank. But not everyone's buying it. Manuel Ferrari, a big shot in the Bitcoin Argentina NGO, remains wary of Milei. This controversy adds another layer to the complex narrative surrounding Milei's rise.

Argentina's Financial Quagmire

Argentina's economic waters are turbulent, to say the least. With a dizzying inflation rate of 135% this year, the peso's value is plummeting, causing widespread distress. Amidst this chaos, many are pinning their hopes on Javier Milei, a figure who has emerged with a pro-Bitcoin stance that's causing quite the stir. Drawing parallels with El Salvador's audacious move to adopt Bitcoin, there's a buzz about whether Argentina might follow suit. But is Milei the savior Argentina has been waiting for? While his support for cryptocurrencies offers a glimmer of hope to some, it also brings with it skepticism and apprehension. The world of crypto, though promising, is still uncharted territory, especially for an economy as volatile as Argentina's.

As debates rage on, it's evident that Argentina stands at a crucial financial juncture. Milei's advocacy for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies suggests a potential shift in the country's financial paradigm. But diving into the crypto realm isn't without its risks, and there's a looming question: Are we witnessing the dawn of a new financial era for Argentina, or is it just a leap from the frying pan into the fire? The nation watches with bated breath, waiting to see the path Milei might pave.

Conclusion

Only time will truly reveal the impact of Milei's influence on Argentina's financial future. It's a waiting game now, folks. But if there's one thing we can bank on, it's that with Milei stirring the pot, Argentina's economic and financial landscape is poised for some dramatic shifts. The rollercoaster has just begun, so everyone better buckle up and brace themselves. Keep your eyes peeled and ears to the ground, because the upcoming months promise a whirlwind of changes, debates, and transformations for Argentina. The nation stands at a pivotal juncture, and the world watches with bated breath.

FAQ

Who is Javier Milei? Javier Milei is a presidential candidate in Argentina known for his support of Bitcoin and libertarian economics.

What is La Libertad Avanza? La Libertad Avanza, translated as "Liberty Advances," is the political coalition led by Javier Milei.

How did Milei fare in the recent primaries? Milei clinched the top spot in Argentina's primary, securing over 30% of the votes.

What is the Coinx controversy? Coinx is an alleged Ponzi scheme that Milei is rumored to have promoted. However, Milei denies any wrongdoing.

What is Milei's stance on Bitcoin? Milei is a strong advocate for Bitcoin, viewing it as a return to private sector-controlled money and a safer alternative to traditional assets like gold or silver.

That's all for today

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

X: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Youtube: @croxroadnews

Store: https://croxroad.store

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

*DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research. *

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Die Ungerechtigkeit ist uns nur in dem Falle angenehm,\ dass wir Vorteile aus ihr ziehen;\ in jedem andern hegt man den Wunsch,\ dass der Unschuldige in Schutz genommen werde.\ Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Politiker beteuern jederzeit, nur das Beste für die Bevölkerung zu wollen – nicht von ihr. Auch die zahlreichen unsäglichen «Corona-Maßnahmen» waren angeblich zu unserem Schutz notwendig, vor allem wegen der «besonders vulnerablen Personen». Daher mussten alle möglichen Restriktionen zwangsweise und unter Umgehung der Parlamente verordnet werden.

Inzwischen hat sich immer deutlicher herausgestellt, dass viele jener «Schutzmaßnahmen» den gegenteiligen Effekt hatten, sie haben den Menschen und den Gesellschaften enorm geschadet. Nicht nur haben die experimentellen Geninjektionen – wie erwartet – massive Nebenwirkungen, sondern Maskentragen schadet der Psyche und der Entwicklung (nicht nur unserer Kinder) und «Lockdowns und Zensur haben Menschen getötet».

Eine der wichtigsten Waffen unserer «Beschützer» ist die Spaltung der Gesellschaft. Die tiefen Gräben, die Politiker, Lobbyisten und Leitmedien praktisch weltweit ausgehoben haben, funktionieren leider nahezu in Perfektion. Von ihren persönlichen Erfahrungen als Kritikerin der Maßnahmen berichtete kürzlich eine Schweizerin im Interview mit Transition News. Sie sei schwer enttäuscht und verspüre bis heute eine Hemmschwelle und ein seltsames Unwohlsein im Umgang mit «Geimpften».

Menschen, die aufrichtig andere schützen wollten, werden von einer eindeutig politischen Justiz verfolgt, verhaftet und angeklagt. Dazu zählen viele Ärzte, darunter Heinrich Habig, Bianca Witzschel und Walter Weber. Über den aktuell laufenden Prozess gegen Dr. Weber hat Transition News mehrfach berichtet (z.B. hier und hier). Auch der Selbstschutz durch Verweigerung der Zwangs-Covid-«Impfung» bewahrt nicht vor dem Knast, wie Bundeswehrsoldaten wie Alexander Bittner erfahren mussten.

Die eigentlich Kriminellen schützen sich derweil erfolgreich selber, nämlich vor der Verantwortung. Die «Impf»-Kampagne war «das größte Verbrechen gegen die Menschheit». Trotzdem stellt man sich in den USA gerade die Frage, ob der scheidende Präsident Joe Biden nach seinem Sohn Hunter möglicherweise auch Anthony Fauci begnadigen wird – in diesem Fall sogar präventiv. Gibt es überhaupt noch einen Rest Glaubwürdigkeit, den Biden verspielen könnte?

Der Gedanke, den ehemaligen wissenschaftlichen Chefberater des US-Präsidenten und Direktor des National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) vorsorglich mit einem Schutzschild zu versehen, dürfte mit der vergangenen Präsidentschaftswahl zu tun haben. Gleich mehrere Personalentscheidungen des designierten Präsidenten Donald Trump lassen Leute wie Fauci erneut in den Fokus rücken.

Das Buch «The Real Anthony Fauci» des nominierten US-Gesundheitsministers Robert F. Kennedy Jr. erschien 2021 und dreht sich um die Machenschaften der Pharma-Lobby in der öffentlichen Gesundheit. Das Vorwort zur rumänischen Ausgabe des Buches schrieb übrigens Călin Georgescu, der Überraschungssieger der ersten Wahlrunde der aktuellen Präsidentschaftswahlen in Rumänien. Vielleicht erklärt diese Verbindung einen Teil der Panik im Wertewesten.

In Rumänien selber gab es gerade einen Paukenschlag: Das bisherige Ergebnis wurde heute durch das Verfassungsgericht annuliert und die für Sonntag angesetzte Stichwahl kurzfristig abgesagt – wegen angeblicher «aggressiver russischer Einmischung». Thomas Oysmüller merkt dazu an, damit sei jetzt in der EU das Tabu gebrochen, Wahlen zu verbieten, bevor sie etwas ändern können.

Unsere Empörung angesichts der Historie von Maßnahmen, die die Falschen beschützen und für die meisten von Nachteil sind, müsste enorm sein. Die Frage ist, was wir damit machen. Wir sollten nach vorne schauen und unsere Energie clever einsetzen. Abgesehen von der Umgehung von jeglichem «Schutz vor Desinformation und Hassrede» (sprich: Zensur) wird es unsere wichtigste Aufgabe sein, Gräben zu überwinden.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ e8a4bb8b:05f739c6

Opinion about CoinUnited.io - Crypto Wallet (iphone)

⚠️ WARNING: CoinUnited.io is a SCAM ⚠️ Do NOT use CoinUnited.io for cryptocurrency trading or investments. Here's why: Hong Kong SFC Alert: Listed as a suspicious platform on July 25, 20241. Withdrawal Issues: Many users report being unable to withdraw funds12. Fake Trading Environment: Platform likely uses simulated trading, not real market transactions1. False Regulatory Claims: Makes unverified claims about regulatory compliance12. Ongoing Investigations: Currently under investigation by Hong Kong police5. User Complaints: Numerous reports of lost investments and blocked accounts26. Deceptive Practices: Uses high APRs and leverage to lure investors12. Protect yourself and others. Avoid CoinUnited.io at all costs. If you've invested, seek immediate assistance from financial authorities. Always verify the legitimacy of crypto platforms before investing. Stay safe and share this warning to prevent others from falling victim to this scam.

WalletScrutiny #nostrOpinion

Join the conversation!

@ 16d11430:61640947

Hark, yon travellers, and gather round, for I shall tell thee a tale most grievous and yet queer, of the Black Knights of Sydney and their wretched deeds. In the land where the sun doth ever blaze and the sand kisseth the seas at Manly and Bondi alike, there rose a brood of shadowy lords, clad not in chain nor plate, but in ill-gotten power and tongues oiled with guile. These knights, though mighty in posture, were naught but fraudsters, lording o’er their glass castles with tools of torment and tormentors loyal yet weary.

The Black Knights and Their Tools of Torture

In their domains of steel and enchantment, the Black Knights kept the lower folk—Outsiders and plebs alike—beneath their boots, using tools most cruel. Chief amongst these instruments was the Rack of Review, a devilish device to which all Outsiders were summoned come every quarter moon. Here, the Knights would scry their scrolls of "metrics" and "outputs," their eyes narrowing as they spoke vile proclamations:

"Thy deliverables are tardy, thy productivity meagre, and thy enthusiasm fit for the dunghill!"

Strapped metaphorically to the Rack, the poor sods would be stretched—not in limb but in labour, their hours extended without mercy, until naught but a husk remained.

The Gantt Wheel of Doom

Lo, there was also the Gantt Wheel, a terrible, spinning contraption upon which the timelines of the kingdom were writ. The Wheel turned ever faster as the Knights demanded projects be completed "on the morrow" or "ere the next new moon." The Outsiders, desperate to keep pace, toiled day and night, only to find their efforts scoffed at and their souls ground into dust beneath the Wheel’s ceaseless spin.

The Slack Shackles

But even in their rare moments of respite, the Outsiders were bound by the Slack Shackles, cursed chains that buzzed and hummed without end. Messages did flow through these infernal devices, demanding updates, meetings, and “quick chats” at all hours. Ne’er a dawn nor dusk passed without the Shackles tightening their grip, leaving their victims weary and witless.

The Documentation Dungeon

When a fresh Outsider entered the kingdom, they were hurled into the dreaded Documentation Dungeon, a chaotic cavern where ancient scrolls lay piled high, each more incomprehensible than the last. “Figure it out!” barked the Trusty Squires, those harried managers who served the Knights with reluctant fervour. And so the Outsiders wandered the Dungeon’s depths, driven mad by its riddles, while the Squires hurried off to tend to their younglings or steal a quiet moment of peace.

---

The Outsiders’ Plight

Amongst the many Outsiders was one of particular ambition, newly arrived from lands far beyond the kingdom. Full of ideas and burning with determination, this Outsider sought not merely survival, but to reshape the very kingdom itself. Yet their brilliance was met with scorn, their ideas brushed aside by the Squires, whose refrain was always the same:

"Aye, 'tis a good idea, but I’ve no time for thee."

The Black Knights, meanwhile, saw in the Outsider not potential, but peril. "This one dares to shine too brightly," they muttered. "We must see them humbled."

---

The Reckoning

It came to pass that the Outsider, weary of the endless grind, began to see the cracks in the Knights’ armour. They discovered that the Rack’s metrics were flawed, the Gantt Wheel’s spin could be slowed, and the Slack Shackles could be hacked. Sharing their findings with their fellow Outsiders, they sowed the seeds of rebellion.

The Trusty Squires, long burdened by their double lives as enforcers and reluctant parents, began to waver. "Perhaps," they whispered, "the Outsiders speak true." And so, one by one, the Squires laid down their scrolls and joined the cause.

When the day of reckoning came, the Outsiders and their allies turned the Knights’ tools against them. The Rack, once a symbol of shame, now displayed the Knights’ own failings for all to see. The Gantt Wheel ground to a halt, and the Slack Shackles shattered into silence.

The Knights, their power undone, fled to their glass castles, clutching at their dwindling authority. The Outsiders, meanwhile, seized the kingdom, dismantling the tools of oppression and forging a new order where all could thrive.

---

A New Order

And so it was that the land of Sydney was reborn, no longer ruled by the Black Knights, but by a council of equals. The Rack was transformed into a table of collaboration, the Gantt Wheel into a tool of fairness, and the Shackles into oaths of trust. The Documentation Dungeon was cleared and made into a grand library, where knowledge was shared freely.

As for the Black Knights, their names faded from memory, their castles left to crumble. And the Outsiders, once strangers in a strange land, became the stewards of a kingdom built not on fear, but on hope.

And lo, the folk of Sydney lived happily, though ever wary of the shadows where new knights might rise. For they had learned a hard truth: that tyranny doth thrive where ambition goes unguarded, and freedom must ever be defended, even on the golden shores of Manly.

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Konsum ist Therapie.
Wolfgang Joop

Umweltbewusstes Verhalten und verantwortungsvoller Konsum zeugen durchaus von einer wünschenswerten Einstellung. Ob man deswegen allerdings einen grünen statt eines schwarzen Freitags braucht, darf getrost bezweifelt werden – zumal es sich um manipulatorische Konzepte handelt. Wie in der politischen Landschaft sind auch hier die Etiketten irgendwas zwischen nichtssagend und trügerisch.

Heute ist also wieder mal «Black Friday», falls Sie es noch nicht mitbekommen haben sollten. Eigentlich haben wir ja eher schon eine ganze «Black Week», der dann oft auch noch ein «Cyber Monday» folgt. Die Werbebranche wird nicht müde, immer neue Anlässe zu erfinden oder zu importieren, um uns zum Konsumieren zu bewegen. Und sie ist damit sehr erfolgreich.

Warum fallen wir auf derartige Werbetricks herein und kaufen im Zweifelsfall Dinge oder Mengen, die wir sicher nicht brauchen? Pure Psychologie, würde ich sagen. Rabattschilder triggern etwas in uns, was den Verstand in Stand-by versetzt. Zusätzlich beeinflussen uns alle möglichen emotionalen Reize und animieren uns zum Schnäppchenkauf.

Gedankenlosigkeit und Maßlosigkeit können besonders bei der Ernährung zu ernsten Problemen führen. Erst kürzlich hat mir ein Bekannter nach einer USA-Reise erzählt, dass es dort offenbar nicht unüblich ist, schon zum ausgiebigen Frühstück in einem Restaurant wenigstens einen Liter Cola zu trinken. Gerne auch mehr, um das Gratis-Nachfüllen des Bechers auszunutzen.

Kritik am schwarzen Freitag und dem unnötigen Konsum kommt oft von Umweltschützern. Neben Ressourcenverschwendung, hohem Energieverbrauch und wachsenden Müllbergen durch eine zunehmende Wegwerfmentalität kommt dabei in der Regel auch die «Klimakrise» auf den Tisch.

Die EU-Kommission lancierte 2015 den Begriff «Green Friday» im Kontext der überarbeiteten Rechtsvorschriften zur Kennzeichnung der Energieeffizienz von Elektrogeräten. Sie nutzte die Gelegenheit kurz vor dem damaligen schwarzen Freitag und vor der UN-Klimakonferenz COP21, bei der das Pariser Abkommen unterzeichnet werden sollte.

Heute wird ein grüner Freitag oft im Zusammenhang mit der Forderung nach «nachhaltigem Konsum» benutzt. Derweil ist die Europäische Union schon weit in ihr Geschäftsmodell des «Green New Deal» verstrickt. In ihrer Propaganda zum Klimawandel verspricht sie tatsächlich «Unterstützung der Menschen und Regionen, die von immer häufigeren Extremwetter-Ereignissen betroffen sind». Was wohl die Menschen in der Region um Valencia dazu sagen?

Ganz im Sinne des Great Reset propagierten die Vereinten Nationen seit Ende 2020 eine «grüne Erholung von Covid-19, um den Klimawandel zu verlangsamen». Der UN-Umweltbericht sah in dem Jahr einen Schwerpunkt auf dem Verbraucherverhalten. Änderungen des Konsumverhaltens des Einzelnen könnten dazu beitragen, den Klimaschutz zu stärken, hieß es dort.

Der Begriff «Schwarzer Freitag» wurde in den USA nicht erstmals für Einkäufe nach Thanksgiving verwendet – wie oft angenommen –, sondern für eine Finanzkrise. Jedoch nicht für den Börsencrash von 1929, sondern bereits für den Zusammenbruch des US-Goldmarktes im September 1869. Seitdem mussten die Menschen weltweit so einige schwarze Tage erleben.

Kürzlich sind die britischen Aufsichtsbehörden weiter von ihrer Zurückhaltung nach dem letzten großen Finanzcrash von 2008 abgerückt. Sie haben Regeln für den Bankensektor gelockert, womit sie «verantwortungsvolle Risikobereitschaft» unterstützen wollen. Man würde sicher zu schwarz sehen, wenn man hier ein grünes Wunder befürchten würde.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ da0b9bc3:4e30a4a9

Hello Stackers!

Welcome on into the ~Music Corner of the Saloon!

A place where we Talk Music. Share Tracks. Zap Sats.

So stay a while and listen.

🚨Don't forget to check out the pinned items in the territory homepage! You can always find the latest weeklies there!🚨

🚨Subscribe to the territory to ensure you never miss a post! 🚨

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/858364

@ 16d11430:61640947

In the modern world, human existence often feels like a series of transactions. Our labor, emotions, and even our identities are bought, sold, and traded in systems that shape how we live and think. From the workplace to the digital economy, commodification—the transformation of people and their qualities into marketable goods—is a driving force. To explore this, we can draw a provocative yet insightful parallel between corporations, brothels, and the psychological toll of commodifying the self.

The Nature of Commodification

Commodification begins when something intrinsic, like human labor, creativity, or even intimacy, is turned into a product to be exchanged. This process is not inherently negative; it has enabled trade, specialization, and economies of scale. However, when commodification extends to the very essence of human life, it can distort how we view ourselves and others.

In corporations, employees are reduced to "human resources," evaluated for their productivity and cost-effectiveness.

In brothels, intimacy—a deeply personal and emotional act—is transformed into a service exchanged for money.

Both systems, while different in form and function, rely on similar transactional mechanics that highlight the tension between value creation and value extraction.

---

The Psychological Impact of Transactional Systems

When humans are commodified, a subtle but profound psychological shift occurs. The person begins to see themselves and others as products or tools, rather than as complex, multifaceted beings. This can lead to:

1. Alienation from the Self

In corporations, workers may feel disconnected from the fruits of their labor, performing tasks that serve abstract goals (like shareholder profits) rather than personal or communal fulfillment.

In brothels, commodifying intimacy can create a dissonance between personal emotions and professional detachment.

1. Reductionism in Identity

Both systems reduce individuals to specific roles: the "employee" or the "service provider." This narrow definition can strip away the richer dimensions of identity, leading to feelings of inadequacy or loss of purpose.

The language used—whether "key performance indicators" in corporations or "clients and services" in brothels—reinforces this reductionism.

1. Emotional Transactionalism

When human relationships are repeatedly framed in transactional terms, individuals may struggle to form connections based on trust and reciprocity. Instead, they might view all interactions as exchanges of value, weakening the bonds of empathy and community.

---

Corporations and Brothels: Ethical and Unethical Dimensions

To fully understand the parallels, it’s important to acknowledge the spectrum of ethical possibilities within these systems. Both corporations and brothels can operate in ways that empower or exploit, depending on their structure, governance, and priorities.

Exploitation: When Systems Extract Value

In corporations, employees may feel like cogs in a machine, with minimal control over their work or compensation. Performance metrics, layoffs, and rigid hierarchies often amplify feelings of disposability.

In brothels, particularly those in unregulated or exploitative settings, workers may experience coercion, unsafe conditions, and a lack of autonomy over their lives.

Empowerment: When Systems Create Value

Ethical corporations foster creativity, collaboration, and meaningful contributions, treating employees as partners in a shared mission rather than mere labor inputs.

Progressive brothels, when regulated and consensual, can provide safe spaces for individuals to exercise autonomy, set boundaries, and earn a livelihood on their terms.

The key distinction lies in the balance between value creation and extraction, agency and coercion, empowerment and exploitation.

---

The Bitcoin Perspective: A Model for Fair Systems

Bitcoin offers a lens through which to critique commodification and envision systems that respect human agency and dignity. Unlike traditional corporations or centralized institutions, Bitcoin operates as a decentralized, transparent network where value is exchanged without middlemen or coercion. Its principles of proof of work, immutability, and voluntary participation provide a counterpoint to the exploitative tendencies of fiat systems.

1. Transparency and Accountability

In Bitcoin, every transaction is recorded on a public ledger, ensuring that no entity can obscure or manipulate value flows.

Similarly, corporations and brothels could adopt transparent governance models, where stakeholders—whether workers, customers, or clients—can verify fairness and accountability.

1. Agency and Sovereignty

Bitcoin restores financial control to individuals, allowing them to participate in the economy on their terms.

Ethical corporations and brothels should likewise empower individuals with choices and the ability to set their terms of participation.

1. Value Without Exploitation

Bitcoin’s decentralized system eliminates the need for exploitative intermediaries. Applying this principle, organizations could prioritize equitable value exchange, ensuring that no one is reduced to a disposable asset.

---

Healing the Psychological Impact

To move beyond the psychological toll of commodification, societies must reimagine systems of work and exchange. This involves:

1. Redefining Value

Value should extend beyond monetary metrics to include well-being, relationships, and personal growth. Organizations must recognize that human worth cannot be quantified.

1. Restoring Meaning

Work and services, whether in corporations or brothels, should align with personal values and societal benefits. This creates a sense of purpose and connection.

1. Fostering Empathy

Recognizing the humanity of everyone involved in a system—whether coworkers, clients, or customers—helps rebuild trust and compassion.

---

Conclusion: A New Paradigm for Transactional Systems

The metaphor of corporations as brothels is not about judgment but about understanding how transactional systems shape our psychology and relationships. By examining these parallels, we can challenge the commodification of the self and advocate for systems that prioritize human dignity, agency, and fairness.

Bitcoin, as a decentralized, transparent alternative, offers a glimpse of what such systems could look like. It challenges us to move beyond extraction and exploitation, toward value exchange that respects the complexity of human life. In doing so, it invites us to create a world where transactions do not diminish us but empower us to live fully and authentically.

@ dbb19ae0:c3f22d5a

Warning: Use this at your own risk Backup your files before using them in the software Backup often, test your backup. Verify and dry test your files before doing a production run

I had to write this program because rmdir was claiming not to have enough authorization

context nostr:note1l0u4pw5xp73eultr9nf5tgmlsgnv9q05wdqha4t6grd4699v74zssshm40

```perl use strict; use warnings; use File::Path qw(remove_tree);

Specify the directory to be deleted

my $directory = 'c:\Users\mydirectory\mysubdirectory\';

Remove the directory

remove_tree($directory, {error => \my $err});

Check for errors

if (@$err) { foreach my $diag (@$err) { my ($file, $message) = %$diag; if ($file eq '') { print "General error: $message\n"; } else { print "Problem unlinking $file: $message\n"; } } } else { print "Directory successfully deleted.\n"; }

```

@ 16d11430:61640947

Corporate infidelity—the betrayal of principles, trust, or ethics for personal or organizational gain—breeds a toxic "cheat culture" that often promotes cheaters to the highest ranks. This phenomenon undermines meritocracy, rewards unethical behavior, and creates a cycle where deception becomes normalized. Here's an exploration of how this happens, supported by evidence and psychoanalysis of the relationship between cheaters and corporate leadership.

---

1. How Corporate Infidelity Breeds a Cheat Culture

Corporate infidelity sets a precedent that unethical behavior is acceptable if it delivers results. Over time, this shapes an organizational culture where:

1. Cheating Becomes a Norm: When employees see unethical practices rewarded or ignored, they learn that integrity is secondary to success.

2. Survival of the Craftiest: In such cultures, those who can manipulate systems, cut corners, or deceive stakeholders often rise faster than those adhering to principles.

3. Erosion of Accountability: A lack of accountability fosters a permissive environment, where leaders themselves engage in and benefit from unethical practices.

---

1. Evidence of Cheat Culture in Leadership

Several high-profile scandals illustrate how cheating has propelled individuals to leadership positions:

Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal

What Happened: Thousands of employees, pressured by unrealistic sales targets, created millions of unauthorized customer accounts.

Leadership's Role: Senior executives not only incentivized this behavior but ignored warnings from whistleblowers.

Outcome: The culture of cheating started at the top, as leaders prioritized growth over ethics, and they faced only minimal accountability initially.

Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes

What Happened: Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of Theranos, misrepresented the capabilities of her company’s blood-testing technology to investors and regulators.

Leadership Dynamics: Holmes created a culture where employees were pressured to meet impossible expectations, even if it meant falsifying results.

Outcome: Holmes’s rise was fueled by her charisma and ability to sell a dream, despite the underlying fraud.

Enron and Skilling’s Leadership

What Happened: Enron executives engaged in widespread accounting fraud to inflate profits and conceal debt.

Leadership’s Role: CEO Jeffrey Skilling cultivated a high-pressure environment that rewarded financial manipulation and punished transparency.

Outcome: Enron’s collapse highlighted how cheat culture at the top devastates entire organizations.

---

1. Psychoanalysis: The Relationship Between Cheaters and Corporate Leadership

The relationship between cheaters and corporate leadership is symbiotic, driven by psychological and organizational factors:

A. Psychological Traits of Cheaters in Leadership

1. Narcissism: Many corporate cheaters possess narcissistic traits, including an inflated sense of self-importance and a lack of empathy. They manipulate others to maintain their power and image.

Example: Elizabeth Holmes’s portrayal as a visionary leader allowed her to deflect scrutiny for years.

1. Risk-Taking Behavior: Cheaters often thrive in environments where calculated risk-taking is rewarded, pushing boundaries until ethical lines are crossed.

Example: Enron executives’ risky financial strategies were initially celebrated as innovative.

1. Machiavellianism: A tendency to prioritize personal gain over principles enables cheaters to navigate corporate politics and manipulate others.

Example: Executives at Volkswagen during the Dieselgate scandal prioritized market dominance over compliance.

---

B. Why Organizations Promote Cheaters

1. Results-Oriented Metrics: Companies often measure success by short-term outcomes (e.g., profits, growth) rather than long-term sustainability. Cheaters excel at delivering impressive metrics, even if through unethical means.

2. Fear and Obedience: Cheaters in leadership roles cultivate a culture of fear, discouraging dissent and ensuring compliance with their unethical practices.

3. Halo Effect: Charismatic cheaters, like Elizabeth Holmes or Jeffrey Skilling, use their charm and vision to distract from ethical shortcomings, earning trust from boards and investors.

4. Cultural Blind Spots: Organizations with weak ethical frameworks or poor governance fail to detect or address unethical behavior until it’s too late.

---

1. The Long-Term Impact of Cheat Culture

The systemic promotion of cheaters to leadership has far-reaching consequences:

1. Erosion of Trust: Employees, investors, and customers lose faith in organizations when scandals come to light.

2. Demoralization of Ethical Employees: High-performing, ethical employees are often overlooked or pushed out, leading to talent attrition.

3. Reinforced Cycle of Corruption: When cheaters rise to power, they perpetuate a culture that rewards unethical behavior, creating a self-sustaining system.

---

1. Breaking the Cycle: Preventing Cheat Culture

2. Transparent Governance: Implementing decentralized systems like blockchain can provide immutable records of decisions and transactions, reducing opportunities for manipulation.

3. Ethical Leadership Training: Developing leaders with strong ethical foundations ensures accountability at the top.

4. Whistleblower Protections: Encouraging employees to report unethical practices without fear of retaliation can help identify and address issues early.

5. Focus on Long-Term Metrics: Shifting from short-term profits to long-term value creation reduces pressure to cheat.

6. Adopting Bitcoin Principles: Bitcoin’s trustless, decentralized nature eliminates reliance on charismatic but untrustworthy individuals, promoting accountability.

---

Conclusion

Corporate infidelity fosters a cheat culture where unethical behavior is rewarded and cheaters rise to the top. This dynamic is fueled by psychological traits like narcissism and organizational flaws such as results-oriented metrics and weak governance. High-profile scandals, from Theranos to Enron, illustrate the dangers of such cultures. However, with transparent systems, ethical leadership, and decentralized accountability mechanisms like Bitcoin, organizations can break this cycle and rebuild trust, integrity, and fairness in corporate leadership.

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Und plötzlich weißt du:
Es ist Zeit, etwas Neues zu beginnen
und dem Zauber des Anfangs zu vertrauen.
Meister Eckhart

Schwarz, rot, gold leuchtet es im Kopf des Newsletters der deutschen Bundesregierung, der mir freitags ins Postfach flattert. Rot, gelb und grün werden daneben sicher noch lange vielzitierte Farben sein, auch wenn diese nie geleuchtet haben. Die Ampel hat sich gerade selber den Stecker gezogen – und hinterlässt einen wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Trümmerhaufen.

Mit einem bemerkenswerten Timing hat die deutsche Regierungskoalition am Tag des «Comebacks» von Donald Trump in den USA endlich ihr Scheitern besiegelt. Während der eine seinen Sieg bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen feierte, erwachten die anderen jäh aus ihrer Selbsthypnose rund um Harris-Hype und Trump-Panik – mit teils erschreckenden Auswüchsen. Seit Mittwoch werden die Geschicke Deutschlands nun von einer rot-grünen Minderheitsregierung «geleitet» und man steuert auf Neuwahlen zu.

Das Kindergarten-Gehabe um zwei konkurrierende Wirtschaftsgipfel letzte Woche war bereits bezeichnend. In einem Strategiepapier gestand Finanzminister Lindner außerdem den «Absturz Deutschlands» ein und offenbarte, dass die wirtschaftlichen Probleme teilweise von der Ampel-Politik «vorsätzlich herbeigeführt» worden seien.

Lindner und weitere FDP-Minister wurden also vom Bundeskanzler entlassen. Verkehrs- und Digitalminister Wissing trat flugs aus der FDP aus; deshalb darf er nicht nur im Amt bleiben, sondern hat zusätzlich noch das Justizministerium übernommen. Und mit Jörg Kukies habe Scholz «seinen Lieblingsbock zum Obergärtner», sprich: Finanzminister befördert, meint Norbert Häring.

Es gebe keine Vertrauensbasis für die weitere Zusammenarbeit mit der FDP, hatte der Kanzler erklärt, Lindner habe zu oft sein Vertrauen gebrochen. Am 15. Januar 2025 werde er daher im Bundestag die Vertrauensfrage stellen, was ggf. den Weg für vorgezogene Neuwahlen freimachen würde.

Apropos Vertrauen: Über die Hälfte der Bundesbürger glauben, dass sie ihre Meinung nicht frei sagen können. Das ging erst kürzlich aus dem diesjährigen «Freiheitsindex» hervor, einer Studie, die die Wechselwirkung zwischen Berichterstattung der Medien und subjektivem Freiheitsempfinden der Bürger misst. «Beim Vertrauen in Staat und Medien zerreißt es uns gerade», kommentierte dies der Leiter des Schweizer Unternehmens Media Tenor, das die Untersuchung zusammen mit dem Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach durchführt.

«Die absolute Mehrheit hat absolut die Nase voll», titelte die Bild angesichts des «Ampel-Showdowns». Die Mehrheit wolle Neuwahlen und die Grünen sollten zuerst gehen, lasen wir dort.

Dass «Insolvenzminister» Robert Habeck heute seine Kandidatur für das Kanzleramt verkündet hat, kann nur als Teil der politmedialen Realitätsverweigerung verstanden werden. Wer allerdings denke, schlimmer als in Zeiten der Ampel könne es nicht mehr werden, sei reichlich optimistisch, schrieb Uwe Froschauer bei Manova. Und er kenne Friedrich Merz schlecht, der sich schon jetzt rhetorisch auf seine Rolle als oberster Feldherr Deutschlands vorbereite.

Was also tun? Der Schweizer Verein «Losdemokratie» will eine Volksinitiative lancieren, um die Bestimmung von Parlamentsmitgliedern per Los einzuführen. Das Losverfahren sorge für mehr Demokratie, denn als Alternative zum Wahlverfahren garantiere es eine breitere Beteiligung und repräsentativere Parlamente. Ob das ein Weg ist, sei dahingestellt.

In jedem Fall wird es notwendig sein, unsere Bemühungen um Freiheit und Selbstbestimmung zu verstärken. Mehr Unabhängigkeit von staatlichen und zentralen Institutionen – also die Suche nach dezentralen Lösungsansätzen – gehört dabei sicher zu den Möglichkeiten. Das gilt sowohl für jede/n Einzelne/n als auch für Entitäten wie die alternativen Medien.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ 16d11430:61640947

Corporate infidelity—marked by ethical breaches, dishonesty, and the prioritization of profits over principles—has plagued modern society. From environmental scandals to financial fraud, these betrayals erode trust, destabilize economies, and perpetuate inequality. However, the emergence of Bitcoin and its underlying blockchain technology presents a transformative solution. With its emphasis on transparency, decentralization, and immutability, Bitcoin offers a path to ending corporate infidelity and its widespread societal effects.

---

The Roots of Corporate Infidelity

Corporate infidelity thrives in centralized systems that lack accountability and incentivize short-term gains. Whether it's manipulating emissions data, exploiting customer trust, or undermining environmental stewardship, these actions are enabled by opaque structures, fiat-based incentives, and unchecked power.

Key Factors Enabling Corporate Infidelity:

1. Opaque Financial Systems: Fiat-based systems rely on centralized control, allowing manipulation, fraud, and mismanagement to go unchecked.

2. Short-Termism: Quarterly earnings reports and profit-driven motives often override long-term ethical commitments.

3. Lack of Transparency: Traditional corporate governance operates behind closed doors, making it difficult to identify and address misconduct.

4. Centralized Power: Concentrated authority within organizations enables unethical behavior to persist unchecked.

---

How Bitcoin and Blockchain Combat Corporate Infidelity

Bitcoin, as a decentralized, transparent, and immutable financial system, addresses the structural weaknesses that enable corporate infidelity. Here’s how:

1. Immutable Transparency

Bitcoin’s blockchain is a public ledger where all transactions are permanently recorded and verifiable. This transparency makes it nearly impossible to manipulate financial data or hide unethical practices.

Impact on Corporate Governance: By integrating blockchain technology, companies can create verifiable records of financial transactions, supply chains, and decision-making processes, reducing opportunities for fraud and corruption.

1. Decentralized Accountability

Bitcoin operates without central authority, redistributing power to a global network of participants. This decentralization reduces the risks of concentrated decision-making that often lead to unethical behavior.

Impact on Corporations: Decentralized systems empower stakeholders—employees, customers, and investors—to hold corporations accountable. Transparent decision-making eliminates the "black box" of traditional corporate governance.

1. Alignment of Incentives

Bitcoin’s protocol incentivizes long-term participation and trust. Its deflationary nature discourages reckless monetary expansion, aligning with sustainable practices over speculative short-term gains.

Impact on Society: Corporations operating on Bitcoin-based systems are encouraged to prioritize stability and value creation, reducing the focus on quarterly profits at the expense of ethics.

1. Smart Contracts and Automation

Blockchain-enabled smart contracts enforce agreements automatically without intermediaries. These contracts can ensure compliance with ethical and operational standards, removing the possibility of infidelity.

Example Use Case: Companies can automate ethical practices, such as verifying supply chain sustainability or ensuring fair wages, through immutable smart contracts.

1. Trustless Systems

Bitcoin eliminates the need for trust in third parties by relying on cryptographic proof. This trustless design reduces opportunities for betrayal and infidelity within corporate structures.

Impact on Employees and Customers: With verifiable systems in place, stakeholders no longer need to rely on promises—they can verify outcomes independently.

---

Real-World Applications: Bitcoin in Action

1. Supply Chain Transparency

Blockchain-based systems allow for end-to-end tracking of goods, ensuring ethical sourcing and eliminating fraud. Companies like IBM are already leveraging blockchain for supply chain transparency.

1. Financial Integrity

Bitcoin eliminates the need for centralized banks and financial intermediaries, reducing risks of financial mismanagement. Companies can integrate Bitcoin payments to promote transparency in financial transactions.

1. Decentralized Audits

Blockchain-based auditing ensures that financial reports are accurate and tamper-proof, making it harder for corporations to engage in fraudulent activities.

---

Transforming Society Through Bitcoin

The societal benefits of Bitcoin extend beyond the corporate world. By addressing corporate infidelity, Bitcoin can help create a more equitable, sustainable, and trustworthy society:

1. Restoring Trust in Institutions

Bitcoin’s emphasis on transparency and accountability can rebuild public trust in corporations, governments, and financial systems.

1. Promoting Ethical Leadership

Leaders operating in Bitcoin-based systems are incentivized to act ethically, as their actions are subject to public scrutiny.

1. Reducing Inequality

By decentralizing power and removing intermediaries, Bitcoin empowers individuals and small businesses, reducing wealth concentration and systemic inequality.

1. Accelerating Justice

Immutable records on the blockchain can expedite legal and regulatory processes, ensuring swift accountability for unethical behavior.

---

Challenges and the Road Ahead

While Bitcoin offers a powerful tool for combating corporate infidelity, its adoption faces challenges, including regulatory resistance, technical literacy gaps, and cultural inertia. To fully realize its potential:

1. Education and Advocacy: Stakeholders must understand Bitcoin’s capabilities and embrace its principles.

2. Policy Integration: Governments and organizations need to develop frameworks that encourage blockchain adoption.

3. Cultural Shift: A commitment to transparency, accountability, and decentralization must become a societal norm.

---

Conclusion

Corporate infidelity has long undermined trust, stability, and equality in society. Bitcoin offers a revolutionary alternative, providing the means and methods to end unethical practices through transparency, decentralization, and accountability. By embracing Bitcoin’s principles, corporations and societies can foster a future built on trust, integrity, and sustainable value creation—a future where betrayal of principles is no longer an option.

@ 5579d5c0:db104ded

When it comes to metabolic health, most conversations revolve around nutrition (low-carb, keto, low-fat, calories in calories out etc.) and exercise.

While these are undeniably important, they only address part of the picture.

The real elephant in the room is often overlooked: circadian health.

This fundamental aspect of biology underpins metabolic function and is the key driver of dysfunction when disrupted.

---

Circadian Health: The Missing Piece

Your body operates on a 24-hour clock in line with the rising and setting of the sun.

This natural cycle, called the circadian rhythm, regulates critical functions like sleep, energy production, hormone release, and digestion.

Every cell in your body has its own internal clock, working together to coordinate metabolism and energy production.

Circadian rhythm disruption is the invisible force driving metabolic dysfunction.

Lack of morning sunlight and regular light exposure throughout the day, paired with excessive artificial light at night and blue light, throws the system into chaos.

Add misaligned eating habits, such as eating late at night, and you have the perfect recipe for metabolic dysfunction.

But how does circadian rhythm disruption lead to metabolic dysfunction?

A good question.

The circadian clock governs the rhythmic release of hormones, and synchronises metabolic processes with daily light-dark cycles.

Let’s start with Leptin.

Leptin is a hormone produced by fat cells that signals to the brain how much energy your body has.

When Leptin levels are low, you feel hungry, and the body conserves energy.

When Leptin levels are high, you feel full, and the body is more likely to use fat for energy.

Leptin levels naturally follow a circadian rhythm, peaking at night to signal energy sufficiency and promote fat-burning during sleep.

When circadian rhythms are disrupted, the brain stops responding properly to Leptin signals, leading to Leptin resistance, which causes to increased hunger, fat storage, and reduced fat burning, even when Leptin levels are high.

If you’re overweight or have a waist-to-height ratio over 0.5, you are most likely Leptin resistant.

Next up, Insulin

Insulin is naturally released by the pancreas in response to rising blood sugar levels, typically after eating, to help cells absorb glucose (sugar) for energy or storage.

Insulin sensitivity is naturally highest in the morning and decreases in the evening.

Disruption of circadian rhythms in the pancreas impairs Insulin secretion, leading to higher blood glucose levels.

Simultaneously, circadian misalignment reduces the responsiveness of muscle, liver, and fat cells to Insulin, promoting hyperinsulinemia (higher levels of Insulin).

Over time, this dysregulation leads to Insulin resistance, setting the stage for metabolic dysfunction, namely Type 2 Diabetes.

Our stress hormone Cortisol is involved too.

Morning sunlight is critical for maintaining the body’s natural Cortisol rhythm, which kickstarts metabolic activity for the day.

Elevated night time Cortisol, a hallmark of circadian disruption, impairs Leptin signalling, raises blood glucose, while further desensitising cells to Insulin.

And finally, Melatonin, yes your sleep hormone.**

Melatonin levels should be higher at night and lower in the morning.

Cortisol suppresses the brains ability to release Melatonin, disrupting sleep and circadian alignment further.

Reduced Melatonin levels exacerbates Leptin resistance and promotes fat storage, particularly visceral fat.

So when we add all these up we have weight gain, raised blood sugar, visceral fat deposition, blunted fat burning and high Cortisol, a recipe for metabolic health disaster.

---

Fixing your circadian health

Where do you start?

• Morning sunlight: Exposing yourself to natural light within 30 minutes of waking helps synchronise your circadian clock. This simple habit improves Leptin sensitivity, Cortisol rhythms, and overall metabolic health.
• Sunlight exposure throughout the day: Take regular breaks to step outside for 5–10 minutes every 1–2 hours to anchor your circadian rhythm.
• Limit artificial light at night: Reducing exposure to screens and bright lights after sunset helps protect Melatonin production, supporting sleep and metabolic repair. Use dim, amber/red lighting and wear blue light-blocking glasses in the evening.
• Aligned eating window: Eating from sunrise to sunset, within a 10–12-hour window, no snacking, avoiding late-night meals to optimise insulin sensitivity and fat burning.

---

The bigger picture

Addressing metabolic health without considering light environment is like expecting flowers to bloom in the dark.

Nutrition and exercise matter, but without proper circadian alignment, the foundation of your metabolic health remains compromised.

By focusing on your light exposure, meal timing, and circadian rhythm, you will become more Leptin sensitive, Insulin regulation, and fat metabolism.

It’s not just about eating the right foods or doing the right workouts, it’s about living in sync with your body’s natural rhythm.

-Chris

If you are interested in working with me book a call here.

https://calendly.com/hello-chrispatrick

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Es ist besser, ein Licht zu entzünden, als auf die Dunkelheit zu schimpfen. Konfuzius

Die Bemühungen um Aufarbeitung der sogenannten Corona-Pandemie, um Aufklärung der Hintergründe, Benennung von Verantwortlichkeiten und das Ziehen von Konsequenzen sind durchaus nicht eingeschlafen. Das Interesse daran ist unter den gegebenen Umständen vielleicht nicht sonderlich groß, aber es ist vorhanden.

Der sächsische Landtag hat gestern die Einsetzung eines Untersuchungsausschusses zur Corona-Politik beschlossen. In einer Sondersitzung erhielt ein entsprechender Antrag der AfD-Fraktion die ausreichende Zustimmung, auch von einigen Abgeordneten des BSW.

In den Niederlanden wird Bill Gates vor Gericht erscheinen müssen. Sieben durch die Covid-«Impfstoffe» geschädigte Personen hatten Klage eingereicht. Sie werfen unter anderem Gates, Pfizer-Chef Bourla und dem niederländischen Staat vor, sie hätten gewusst, dass diese Präparate weder sicher noch wirksam sind.

Mit den mRNA-«Impfstoffen» von Pfizer/BioNTech befasst sich auch ein neues Buch. Darin werden die Erkenntnisse von Ärzten und Wissenschaftlern aus der Analyse interner Dokumente über die klinischen Studien der Covid-Injektion präsentiert. Es handelt sich um jene in den USA freigeklagten Papiere, die die Arzneimittelbehörde (Food and Drug Administration, FDA) 75 Jahre unter Verschluss halten wollte.

Ebenfalls Wissenschaftler und Ärzte, aber auch andere Experten organisieren als Verbundnetzwerk Corona-Solution kostenfreie Online-Konferenzen. Ihr Ziel ist es, «wissenschaftlich, demokratisch und friedlich» über Impfstoffe und Behandlungsprotokolle gegen SARS-CoV-2 aufzuklären und die Diskriminierung von Ungeimpften zu stoppen. Gestern fand eine weitere Konferenz statt. Ihr Thema: «Corona und modRNA: Von Toten, Lebenden und Physik lernen».

Aufgrund des Digital Services Acts (DSA) der Europäischen Union sei das Risiko groß, dass ihre Arbeit als «Fake-News» bezeichnet würde, so das Netzwerk. Staatlich unerwünschte wissenschaftliche Aufklärung müsse sich passende Kanäle zur Veröffentlichung suchen. Ihre Live-Streams seien deshalb zum Beispiel nicht auf YouTube zu finden.

Der vielfältige Einsatz für Aufklärung und Aufarbeitung wird sich nicht stummschalten lassen. Nicht einmal der Zensurmeister der EU, Deutschland, wird so etwas erreichen. Die frisch aktivierten «Trusted Flagger» dürften allerdings künftige Siege beim «Denunzianten-Wettbewerb» im Kontext des DSA zusätzlich absichern.

Wo sind die Grenzen der Meinungsfreiheit? Sicher gibt es sie. Aber die ideologische Gleichstellung von illegalen mit unerwünschten Äußerungen verfolgt offensichtlich eher das Ziel, ein derart elementares demokratisches Grundrecht möglichst weitgehend auszuhebeln. Vorwürfe wie «Hassrede», «Delegitimierung des Staates» oder «Volksverhetzung» werden heute inflationär verwendet, um Systemkritik zu unterbinden. Gegen solche Bestrebungen gilt es, sich zu wehren.

---

Dieser Beitrag ist zuerst auf Transition News erschienen.

@ c631e267:c2b78d3e

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum dritten Geburtstag, liebe Denk Bar! Wieso zum dritten? Das war doch 2022 und jetzt sind wir im Jahr 2024, oder? Ja, das ist schon richtig, aber bei Geburtstagen erinnere ich mich immer auch an meinen Vater, und der behauptete oft, der erste sei ja schließlich der Tag der Geburt selber und den müsse man natürlich mitzählen. Wo er recht hat, hat er nunmal recht. Konsequenterweise wird also heute dieser Blog an seinem dritten Geburtstag zwei Jahre alt.

Das ist ein Grund zum Feiern, wie ich finde. Einerseits ganz einfach, weil es dafür gar nicht genug Gründe geben kann. «Das Leben sind zwei Tage», lautet ein gängiger Ausdruck hier in Andalusien. In der Tat könnte es so sein, auch wenn wir uns im Alltag oft genug von der Routine vereinnahmen lassen.

Seit dem Start der Denk Bar vor zwei Jahren ist unglaublich viel passiert. Ebenso wie die zweieinhalb Jahre davor, und all jenes war letztlich auch der Auslöser dafür, dass ich begann, öffentlich zu schreiben. Damals notierte ich:

«Seit einigen Jahren erscheint unser öffentliches Umfeld immer fragwürdiger, widersprüchlicher und manchmal schier unglaublich - jede Menge Anlass für eigene Recherchen und Gedanken, ganz einfach mit einer Portion gesundem Menschenverstand.»

Wir erleben den sogenannten «großen Umbruch», einen globalen Coup, den skrupellose Egoisten clever eingefädelt haben und seit ein paar Jahren knallhart – aber nett verpackt – durchziehen, um buchstäblich alles nach ihrem Gusto umzukrempeln. Die Gelegenheit ist ja angeblich günstig und muss genutzt werden.

Nie hätte ich mir träumen lassen, dass ich so etwas jemals miterleben müsste. Die Bosheit, mit der ganz offensichtlich gegen die eigene Bevölkerung gearbeitet wird, war früher für mich unvorstellbar. Mein (Rest-) Vertrauen in alle möglichen Bereiche wie Politik, Wissenschaft, Justiz, Medien oder Kirche ist praktisch komplett zerstört. Einen «inneren Totalschaden» hatte ich mal für unsere Gesellschaften diagnostiziert.

Was mich vielleicht am meisten erschreckt, ist zum einen das Niveau der Gleichschaltung, das weltweit erreicht werden konnte, und zum anderen die praktisch totale Spaltung der Gesellschaft. Haben wir das tatsächlich mit uns machen lassen?? Unfassbar! Aber das Werkzeug «Angst» ist sehr mächtig und funktioniert bis heute.

Zum Glück passieren auch positive Dinge und neue Perspektiven öffnen sich. Für viele Menschen waren und sind die Entwicklungen der letzten Jahre ein Augenöffner. Sie sehen «Querdenken» als das, was es ist: eine Tugend.

Auch die immer ernsteren Zensurbemühungen sind letztlich nur ein Zeichen der Schwäche, wo Argumente fehlen. Sie werden nicht verhindern, dass wir unsere Meinung äußern, unbequeme Fragen stellen und dass die Wahrheit peu à peu ans Licht kommt. Es gibt immer Mittel und Wege, auch für uns.

---

Danke, dass du diesen Weg mit mir weitergehst!

@ a95c6243:d345522c

Ein Lämmchen löschte an einem Bache seinen Durst. Fern von ihm, aber näher der Quelle, tat ein Wolf das gleiche. Kaum erblickte er das Lämmchen, so schrie er:

"Warum trübst du mir das Wasser, das ich trinken will?"

"Wie wäre das möglich", erwiderte schüchtern das Lämmchen, "ich stehe hier unten und du so weit oben; das Wasser fließt ja von dir zu mir; glaube mir, es kam mir nie in den Sinn, dir etwas Böses zu tun!"

"Ei, sieh doch! Du machst es gerade, wie dein Vater vor sechs Monaten; ich erinnere mich noch sehr wohl, daß auch du dabei warst, aber glücklich entkamst, als ich ihm für sein Schmähen das Fell abzog!"

"Ach, Herr!" flehte das zitternde Lämmchen, "ich bin ja erst vier Wochen alt und kannte meinen Vater gar nicht, so lange ist er schon tot; wie soll ich denn für ihn büßen."

"Du Unverschämter!" so endigt der Wolf mit erheuchelter Wut, indem er die Zähne fletschte. "Tot oder nicht tot, weiß ich doch, daß euer ganzes Geschlecht mich hasset, und dafür muß ich mich rächen."

Ohne weitere Umstände zu machen, zerriß er das Lämmchen und verschlang es.

Das Gewissen regt sich selbst bei dem größten Bösewichte; er sucht doch nach Vorwand, um dasselbe damit bei Begehung seiner Schlechtigkeiten zu beschwichtigen.

Quelle: https://eden.one/fabeln-aesop-das-lamm-und-der-wolf

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Nostr: a quick introduction, attempt #2

Nostr doesn't subscribe to any ideals of "free speech" as these belong to the realm of politics and assume a big powerful government that enforces a common ruleupon everybody else.

Nostr instead is much simpler, it simply says that servers are private property and establishes a generalized framework for people to connect to all these servers, creating a true free market in the process. In other words, Nostr is the public road that each market participant can use to build their own store or visit others and use their services.

(Of course a road is never truly public, in normal cases it's ran by the government, in this case it relies upon the previous existence of the internet with all its quirks and chaos plus a hand of government control, but none of that matters for this explanation).

More concretely speaking, Nostr is just a set of definitions of the formats of the data that can be passed between participants and their expected order, i.e. messages between clients (i.e. the program that runs on a user computer) and relays (i.e. the program that runs on a publicly accessible computer, a "server", generally with a domain-name associated) over a type of TCP connection (WebSocket) with cryptographic signatures. This is what is called a "protocol" in this context, and upon that simple base multiple kinds of sub-protocols can be added, like a protocol for "public-square style microblogging", "semi-closed group chat" or, I don't know, "recipe sharing and feedback".

@ 75656740:dbc8f92a

We spend too much time enthralled by even numbers. We can instantly tell if a number is even or odd and often have preferences in the matter. In grade school we memorize rules like

• An even plus an even is an even
• An odd plus an odd is an even
• An even plus an odd is and odd

And so forth to rules of multiplication. But this magical quality of numbers really just means evenly divisible by 2. What is so special about 2? Shouldn't we just as well care if a number is divisible by 3?

So I am introducing threeven numbers as all numbers divisible by 3.

0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, ...

are all threeven numbers. But what about numbers that aren't divisible by 3? Numbers that are not divisible 2 are called odd so I guess throdd?

There is, however, a slight problem. There seem to be more throdd numbers than threeven numbers.

1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, ...

To solve that we need to think about what an odd number is. If an even number is some number n times 2 or 2n then odd numbers are 2n + 1

This gives a nice way to think about threeven numbers as well. Every threeven is 3n and a throdd is 3n + 1 and we need to introduce throdder numbers as 3n + 2. There isn't any reason that there should only be two types of numbers. So instead of numbers that are divisible by 2 and numbers that aren't, we have numbers that are divisible by 3, numbers that are 1 greater than a multiple of three and numbers that are 2 greater than a multiple of three.

To recap

• Threeven = 3n
• Throdd = 3n + 1
• Throdder = 3n + 2

Now for handy rules of thumb.

• A threeven plus a threeven is a threeven
• A threeven plus a throdd is a throdd
• A threeven plus a throdder is a throdder
• A throdd plus a throdd is a throdder
• A throdd plus a throdder is a threeven
• A throdder plus a throdder is a throdd

And, for multiplication

• A threeven times a threeven is a threeven
• A threeven times a throdd is a threeven
• A threeven times a throdder is a threeven
• A throdd times a throdd is a throdd
• A throdd times a throdder is a throdder
• A throdder times a throdder is a throdd

This is just modular arithmetic and the same can be done for any integer n

m mod n = 0

Means m is an nven and there will be n - 1 varieties of nodd

Threeven, however, is the most fun to say and makes the point nicely, there is no need to carry it further.

Note: it appears that I am not the first to have discovered threeven numbers. And now you are stuck knowing about them as well.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Drivechain

Understanding Drivechain requires a shift from the paradigm most bitcoiners are used to. It is not about "trustlessness" or "mathematical certainty", but game theory and incentives. (Well, Bitcoin in general is also that, but people prefer to ignore it and focus on some illusion of trustlessness provided by mathematics.)

Here we will describe the basic mechanism (simple) and incentives (complex) of "hashrate escrow" and how it enables a 2-way peg between the mainchain (Bitcoin) and various sidechains.

The full concept of "Drivechain" also involves blind merged mining (i.e., the sidechains mine themselves by publishing their block hashes to the mainchain without the miners having to run the sidechain software), but this is much easier to understand and can be accomplished either by the BIP-301 mechanism or by the Spacechains mechanism.

How does hashrate escrow work from the point of view of Bitcoin?

A new address type is created. Anything that goes in that is locked and can only be spent if all miners agree on the Withdrawal Transaction (WT^) that will spend it for 6 months. There is one of these special addresses for each sidechain.

To gather miners' agreement bitcoind keeps track of the "score" of all transactions that could possibly spend from that address. On every block mined, for each sidechain, the miner can use a portion of their coinbase to either increase the score of one WT^ by 1 while decreasing the score of all others by 1; or they can decrease the score of all WT^s by 1; or they can do nothing.

Once a transaction has gotten a score high enough, it is published and funds are effectively transferred from the sidechain to the withdrawing users.

If a timeout of 6 months passes and the score doesn't meet the threshold, that WT^ is discarded.

What does the above procedure mean?

It means that people can transfer coins from the mainchain to a sidechain by depositing to the special address. Then they can withdraw from the sidechain by making a special withdraw transaction in the sidechain.

The special transaction somehow freezes funds in the sidechain while a transaction that aggregates all withdrawals into a single mainchain WT^, which is then submitted to the mainchain miners so they can start voting on it and finally after some months it is published.

Now the crucial part: the validity of the WT^ is not verified by the Bitcoin mainchain rules, i.e., if Bob has requested a withdraw from the sidechain to his mainchain address, but someone publishes a wrong WT^ that instead takes Bob's funds and sends them to Alice's main address there is no way the mainchain will know that. What determines the "validity" of the WT^ is the miner vote score and only that. It is the job of miners to vote correctly -- and for that they may want to run the sidechain node in SPV mode so they can attest for the existence of a reference to the WT^ transaction in the sidechain blockchain (which then ensures it is ok) or do these checks by some other means.

What? 6 months to get my money back?

Yes. But no, in practice anyone who wants their money back will be able to use an atomic swap, submarine swap or other similar service to transfer funds from the sidechain to the mainchain and vice-versa. The long delayed withdraw costs would be incurred by few liquidity providers that would gain some small profit from it.

Why bother with this at all?

Drivechains solve many different problems:

It enables experimentation and new use cases for Bitcoin

Issued assets, fully private transactions, stateful blockchain contracts, turing-completeness, decentralized games, some "DeFi" aspects, prediction markets, futarchy, decentralized and yet meaningful human-readable names, big blocks with a ton of normal transactions on them, a chain optimized only for Lighting-style networks to be built on top of it.

These are some ideas that may have merit to them, but were never actually tried because they couldn't be tried with real Bitcoin or inferfacing with real bitcoins. They were either relegated to the shitcoin territory or to custodial solutions like Liquid or RSK that may have failed to gain network effect because of that.

It solves conflicts and infighting

Some people want fully private transactions in a UTXO model, others want "accounts" they can tie to their name and build reputation on top; some people want simple multisig solutions, others want complex code that reads a ton of variables; some people want to put all the transactions on a global chain in batches every 10 minutes, others want off-chain instant transactions backed by funds previously locked in channels; some want to spend, others want to just hold; some want to use blockchain technology to solve all the problems in the world, others just want to solve money.

With Drivechain-based sidechains all these groups can be happy simultaneously and don't fight. Meanwhile they will all be using the same money and contributing to each other's ecosystem even unwillingly, it's also easy and free for them to change their group affiliation later, which reduces cognitive dissonance.

It solves "scaling"

Multiple chains like the ones described above would certainly do a lot to accomodate many more transactions that the current Bitcoin chain can. One could have special Lightning Network chains, but even just big block chains or big-block-mimblewimble chains or whatnot could probably do a good job. Or even something less cool like 200 independent chains just like Bitcoin is today, no extra features (and you can call it "sharding"), just that would already multiply the current total capacity by 200.

Use your imagination.

It solves the blockchain security budget issue

The calculation is simple: you imagine what security budget is reasonable for each block in a world without block subsidy and divide that for the amount of bytes you can fit in a single block: that is the price to be paid in satoshis per byte. In reasonable estimative, the price necessary for every Bitcoin transaction goes to very large amounts, such that not only any day-to-day transaction has insanely prohibitive costs, but also Lightning channel opens and closes are impracticable.

So without a solution like Drivechain you'll be left with only one alternative: pushing Bitcoin usage to trusted services like Liquid and RSK or custodial Lightning wallets. With Drivechain, though, there could be thousands of transactions happening in sidechains and being all aggregated into a sidechain block that would then pay a very large fee to be published (via blind merged mining) to the mainchain. Bitcoin security guaranteed.

It keeps Bitcoin decentralized

Once we have sidechains to accomodate the normal transactions, the mainchain functionality can be reduced to be only a "hub" for the sidechains' comings and goings, and then the maximum block size for the mainchain can be reduced to, say, 100kb, which would make running a full node very very easy.

Can miners steal?

Yes. If a group of coordinated miners are able to secure the majority of the hashpower and keep their coordination for 6 months, they can publish a WT^ that takes the money from the sidechains and pays to themselves.

Will miners steal?

No, because the incentives are such that they won't.

Although it may look at first that stealing is an obvious strategy for miners as it is free money, there are many costs involved:

1. The cost of ceasing blind-merged mining returns -- as stealing will kill a sidechain, all the fees from it that miners would be expected to earn for the next years are gone;
2. The cost of Bitcoin price going down: If a steal is successful that will mean Drivechains are not safe, therefore Bitcoin is less useful, and miner credibility will also be hurt, which are likely to cause the Bitcoin price to go down, which in turn may kill the miners' businesses and savings;
3. The cost of coordination -- assuming miners are just normal businesses, they just want to do their work and get paid, but stealing from a Drivechain will require coordination with other miners to conduct an immoral act in a way that has many pitfalls and is likely to be broken over the months;
4. The cost of miners leaving your mining pool: when we talked about "miners" above we were actually talking about mining pools operators, so they must also consider the risk of miners migrating from their mining pool to others as they begin the process of stealing;
5. The cost of community goodwill -- when participating in a steal operation, a miner will suffer a ton of backlash from the community. Even if the attempt fails at the end, the fact that it was attempted will contribute to growing concerns over exaggerated miners power over the Bitcoin ecosystem, which may end up causing the community to agree on a hard-fork to change the mining algorithm in the future, or to do something to increase participation of more entities in the mining process (such as development or cheapment of new ASICs), which have a chance of decreasing the profits of current miners.

Another point to take in consideration is that one may be inclined to think a newly-created sidechain or a sidechain with relatively low usage may be more easily stolen from, since the blind merged mining returns from it (point 1 above) are going to be small -- but the fact is also that a sidechain with small usage will also have less money to be stolen from, and since the other costs besides 1 are less elastic at the end it will not be worth stealing from these too.

All of the above consideration are valid only if miners are stealing from good sidechains. If there is a sidechain that is doing things wrong, scamming people, not being used at all, or is full of bugs, for example, that will be perceived as a bad sidechain, and then miners can and will safely steal from it and kill it, which will be perceived as a good thing by everybody.

What do we do if miners steal?

Paul Sztorc has suggested in the past that a user-activated soft-fork could prevent miners from stealing, i.e., most Bitcoin users and nodes issue a rule similar to this one to invalidate the inclusion of a faulty WT^ and thus cause any miner that includes it in a block to be relegated to their own Bitcoin fork that other nodes won't accept.

This suggestion has made people think Drivechain is a sidechain solution backed by user-actived soft-forks for safety, which is very far from the truth. Drivechains must not and will not rely on this kind of soft-fork, although they are possible, as the coordination costs are too high and no one should ever expect these things to happen.

If even with all the incentives against them (see above) miners do still steal from a good sidechain that will mean the failure of the Drivechain experiment. It will very likely also mean the failure of the Bitcoin experiment too, as it will be proven that miners can coordinate to act maliciously over a prolonged period of time regardless of economic and social incentives, meaning they are probably in it just for attacking Bitcoin, backed by nation-states or something else, and therefore no Bitcoin transaction in the mainchain is to be expected to be safe ever again.

Why use this and not a full-blown trustless and open sidechain technology?

Because it is impossible.

If you ever heard someone saying "just use a sidechain", "do this in a sidechain" or anything like that, be aware that these people are either talking about "federated" sidechains (i.e., funds are kept in custody by a group of entities) or they are talking about Drivechain, or they are disillusioned and think it is possible to do sidechains in any other manner.

No, I mean a trustless 2-way peg with correctness of the withdrawals verified by the Bitcoin protocol!

That is not possible unless Bitcoin verifies all transactions that happen in all the sidechains, which would be akin to drastically increasing the blocksize and expanding the Bitcoin rules in tons of ways, i.e., a terrible idea that no one wants.

What about the Blockstream sidechains whitepaper?

Yes, that was a way to do it. The Drivechain hashrate escrow is a conceptually simpler way to achieve the same thing with improved incentives, less junk in the chain, more safety.

Isn't the hashrate escrow a very complex soft-fork?

Yes, but it is much simpler than SegWit. And, unlike SegWit, it doesn't force anything on users, i.e., it isn't a mandatory blocksize increase.

Why should we expect miners to care enough to participate in the voting mechanism?

Because it's in their own self-interest to do it, and it costs very little. Today over half of the miners mine RSK. It's not blind merged mining, it's a very convoluted process that requires them to run a RSK full node. For the Drivechain sidechains, an SPV node would be enough, or maybe just getting data from a block explorer API, so much much simpler.

What if I still don't like Drivechain even after reading this?

That is the entire point! You don't have to like it or use it as long as you're fine with other people using it. The hashrate escrow special addresses will not impact you at all, validation cost is minimal, and you get the benefit of people who want to use Drivechain migrating to their own sidechains and freeing up space for you in the mainchain. See also the point above about infighting.

See also

• Podcast episode with Ruben Somsen and Aaron van Wirdum explaining Drivechain
• Alternatives to Drivechain
• Drivechain comparison with Ethereum

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Personagens de jogos e símbolos

A sensação de "ser" um personagem em um jogo ou uma brincadeira talvez seja o mais próximo que eu tenha conseguido chegar do entendimento de um símbolo religioso.

A hóstia consagrada é, segundo a religião, o corpo de Cristo, mas nossa mente moderna só consegue concebê-la como sendo uma representação do corpo de Cristo. Da mesma forma outras culturas e outras religiões têm símbolos parecidos, inclusive nos quais o próprio participante do ritual faz o papel de um deus ou de qualquer coisa parecida.

"Faz o papel" é de novo a interpretação da mente moderna. O sujeito ali é a coisa, mas ele ao mesmo tempo que é também sabe que não é, que continua sendo ele mesmo.

Nos jogos de videogame e brincadeiras infantis em que se encarna um personagem o jogador é o personagem. não se diz, entre os jogadores, que alguém está "encenando", mas que ele é e pronto. nem há outra denominação ou outro verbo. No máximo "encarnando", mas já aí já é vocabulário jornalístico feito para facilitar a compreensão de quem está de fora do jogo.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

A Causa

o Princípios de Economia Política de Menger é o único livro que enfatiza a CAUSA o tempo todo. os cientistas todos parecem não saber, ou se esquecer sempre, que as coisas têm causa, e que o conhecimento verdadeiro é o conhecimento da causa das coisas.

a causa é uma categoria metafísica muito superior a qualquer correlação ou resultado de teste de hipótese, ela não pode ser descoberta por nenhum artifício econométrico ou reduzida à simples antecedência temporal estatística. a causa dos fenômenos não pode ser provada cientificamente, mas pode ser conhecida.

o livro de Menger conta para o leitor as causas de vários fenômenos econômicos e as interliga de forma que o mundo caótico da economia parece adquirir uma ordem no momento em que você lê. é uma sensação mágica e indescritível.

quando eu te o recomendei, queria é te imbuir com o espírito da busca pela causa das coisas. depois de ler aquilo, você está apto a perceber continuidade causal nos fenômenos mais complexos da economia atual, enxergar as causas entre toda a ação governamental e as suas várias consequências na vida humana. eu faço isso todos os dias e é a melhor sensação do mundo quando o caos das notícias do caderno de Economia do jornal -- que para o próprio jornalista que as escreveu não têm nenhum sentido (tanto é que ele escreve tudo errado) -- se incluem num sistema ordenado de causas e consequências.

provavelmente eu sempre erro em alguns ou vários pontos, mas ainda assim é maravilhoso. ou então é mais maravilhoso ainda quando eu descubro o erro e reinsiro o acerto naquela racionalização bela da ordem do mundo econômico que é a ordem de Deus.

em scrap para T.P.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Veterano não é dono de bixete

"VETERANO NÃO É DONO DE BIXETE". A frase em letras garrafais chama a atenção dos transeuntes neófitos. Paira sobre um cartaz amarelo que lista várias reclamações contra os "trotes machistas", que, na opinião do responsável pelo cartaz, "não é brincadeira, é opressão".

Eis aí um bizarro exemplo de como são as coisas: primeiro todos os universitários aprovam a idéia do trote, apoiam sua realização e até mesmo desejam sofrer o trote -- com a condição de o poderem aplicar eles mesmos depois --, louvam as maravilhas do mundo universitário, onde a suprema sabedoria se esconde atrás de rituais iniciáticos fora do alcance da imaginação do homem comum e rude, do pobre e do filhinho-de-papai das faculdades privadas; em suma: fomentam os mais baixos, os mais animalescos instintos, a crueldade primordial, destroem em si mesmos e nos colegas quaisquer valores civilizatórios que tivessem sobrado ali, ficando todos indistingüíveis de macacos agressivos e tarados.

Depois vêm aí com um cartaz protestar contra os assédios -- que sem dúvida acontecem em larguíssima escala -- sofridos pelas calouras de 17 anos e que, sendo também novatas no mundo universitário, ainda conservam um pouco de discernimento e pudor.

A incompreensão do fenômeno, porém, é tão grande, que os trotes não são identificados como um problema mental, uma doença que deve ser tratada e eliminada, mas como um sintoma da opressão machista dos homens às mulheres, um produto desta civilização paternalista que, desde que Deus é chamado "o Pai" e não "a Mãe", corrompe a benéfica, pura e angélica natureza do homem primitivo e o torna esta tão torpe criatura.

Na opinião dos autores desse cartaz é preciso, pois, continuar a destruir o que resta da cultura ocidental, e então esperar que haja trotes menos opressores.

@ ed84ce10:cccf4c2a

Hackathon Summary

The HackSecret 4 hackathon brought together 130 developers to focus on developing decentralized confidential computing applications using the Secret Network. The event involved 48 projects, each utilizing Secret's Confidential Computing Layer and interfacing with blockchains such as Cosmos, EVM, and Solana. The hackathon was divided into two main tracks: Cross-Chain dApps and Native Secret dApps, both highlighting Secret's privacy features.

Structured support was provided through workshops on deploying dApps and confidential computing for environments such as EVM, IBC, and Solana. Developer resources supported participants in learning about Secret contracts, especially for newcomers. The prize pool totaled $12,000 USD, awarded in SCRT and SEI tokens. Some notable projects included confidential voting systems, sealed-bid auctions, and private voting mechanisms.

The hackathon emphasized technical innovation and practical problem-solving within the ecosystem of decentralized applications. Through active participation and creative submissions, the event contributed to expanding the Secret Network's ecosystem and promoted confidential computing advancements in Web3 technologies.

Hackathon Winners

7,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• Private Acknowledge Receipt: A blockchain system designed for confidential information sharing using NFTs with encrypted private data, ensuring secure data access and notifications on-chain.
• Great Walk NFT Experience: Connects hiking trails with NFTs that evolve as users progress, utilizing Secret Network for privacy and featuring a user-friendly frontend.

5,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• On-Chain 2FA: Integrates two-factor authentication via Google Authenticator for improved security in smart contracts and accounts on Secret Network.
• SecretHacks: A decentralized platform using vote encryption to ensure unbiased project evaluations for community funding and hackathons.

3,500 SCRT Prize Winners

• Straw Hat Builds: Supports developers moving from tutorial learning to real projects using blockchain and Rust, with an emphasis on practical application.
• KittyMix: A cat collecting game that encourages community-driven NFT remixing, leveraging Secret Network for hosting pixel-art NFTs with unique attributes.

2,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• Saffron - Escrow: Provides secure digital asset escrow services in the CosmWasm ecosystem, enhanced by Secret Network's privacy features for token and NFT trades.
• Secret Password Manager: A decentralized credential management system using Secret Network's confidential computing, offering a secure smart contract and web interface for credentials.

For a comprehensive overview of all projects, visit HackSecret 4 on DoraHacks.

About the Organizer

Secret Network

Secret Network is a blockchain platform that emphasizes data privacy and secure computation, distinguishing itself with privacy-preserving technologies. It enables encrypted smart contracts, offering enhanced data confidentiality compared to conventional blockchain systems. Initiatives include privacy-preserving DeFi applications and partnerships to expand privacy utilities within the blockchain ecosystem. The current mission of Secret Network is to advance privacy protections, build a more secure and decentralized web infrastructure, and empower developers and users with versatile privacy features.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

neuron.vim

I started using this neuron thing to create an update this same zettelkasten, but the existing vim plugin had too many problems, so I forked it and ended up changing almost everything.

Since the upstream repository was somewhat abandoned, most users and people who were trying to contribute upstream migrate to my fork too.

• https://github.com/fiatjaf/neuron.vim

@ fbf0e434:e1be6a39

Hackathon 回顾

HackSecret 4 Hackathon汇集了130位开发者，集中开发使用Secret Network的去中心化机密计算应用。活动涉及48个项目，每个项目都使用了Secret的机密计算层，并与诸如Cosmos、EVM和Solana等区块链进行交互。Hackathon分为两个主要赛道：跨链dApps和本地Secret dApps，两者都突出了Secret的隐私特性。

通过针对EVM、IBC和Solana等环境的dApps部署和机密计算的研讨会提供了结构化支持。开发者资源支持参与者学习Secret合约，特别是针对新手。奖池总额为12,000美元，以SCRT和SEI代币发放。一些值得注意的项目包括机密投票系统、密封投标拍卖和私人投票机制。

Hackathon强调了去中心化应用生态系统中的技术创新和实际问题解决能力。通过积极参与和创造性提交，活动为Secret Network生态系统扩展作出贡献，并促进了Web3技术中机密计算的进步。

Hackathon Winners

7,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• Private Acknowledge Receipt: 一个区块链系统，设计用于使用带有加密私密数据的NFT进行机密信息共享，确保在链上安全数据访问和通知。
• Great Walk NFT Experience: 将远足小径与随用户进展而演变的NFT连接起来，使用Secret Network实现隐私，并具有用户友好的前端界面。

5,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• On-Chain 2FA: 集成Google Authenticator的双因素认证，以提高Secret Network上智能合约和账户的安全性。
• SecretHacks: 一个去中心化平台，使用投票加密以确保社区资金和Hackathon项目评估时的不偏见。

3,500 SCRT Prize Winners

• Straw Hat Builds: 支持开发者从教程学习转向真实项目的开发，使用区块链和Rust，强调实际应用。
• KittyMix: 一个鼓励社区驱动型NFT重混的猫咪收集游戏，利用Secret Network托管具有独特属性的像素艺术NFT。

2,000 SCRT Prize Winners

• Saffron - Escrow: 提供CosmWasm生态系统中的安全数字资产托管服务，通过Secret Network的隐私特性增强代币和NFT交易。
• Secret Password Manager: 使用Secret Network的机密计算的去中心化凭证管理系统，提供安全的智能合约和凭证的网页界面。

欲了解所有项目的全面概述，请访问DoraHacks上的HackSecret 4。

关于组织者

Secret Network

Secret Network是一个专注于数据隐私和安全计算的区块链平台，以隐私保护技术为特点。它能够加密智能合约，提供比传统区块链系统更高的数据机密性。其举措包括隐私保护的DeFi应用，以及在区块链生态系统中扩展隐私功能的合作伙伴关系。Secret Network的当前使命是推进隐私保护，构建更安全和去中心化的网络基础设施，并通过多功能隐私功能赋能开发者和用户。

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

On "zk-rollups" applied to Bitcoin

ZK rollups make no sense in bitcoin because there is no "cheap calldata". all data is already ~~cheap~~ expensive calldata.

There could be an onchain zk verification that allows succinct signatures maybe, but never a rollup.

What happens is: you can have one UTXO that contains multiple balances on it and in each transaction you can recreate that UTXOs but alter its state using a zk to compress all internal transactions that took place.

The blockchain must be aware of all these new things, so it is in no way "L2".

And you must have an entity responsible for that UTXO and for conjuring the state changes and zk proofs.

But on bitcoin you also must keep the data necessary to rebuild the proofs somewhere else, I'm not sure how can the third party responsible for that UTXO ensure that happens.

I think such a construct is similar to a credit card corporation: one central party upon which everybody depends, zero interoperability with external entities, every vendor must have an account on each credit card company to be able to charge customers, therefore it is not clear that such a thing is more desirable than solutions that are truly open and interoperable like Lightning, which may have its defects but at least fosters a much better environment, bringing together different conflicting parties, custodians, anyone.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Splitpages

The simplest possible service: it splitted PDF pages in half.

Created specially to solve the problem of those scanned books that come with two pages side-by-side as if they were a single page and are much harder to read on Kindle because of that.

It required me to learn about Heroku Buildpacks though, and fork or contribute to a Heroku Buildpack that embedded a mupdf binary.

• https://github.com/fiatjaf/splitpages
• https://splitpages.herokuapp.com/

@ 04ed2b8f:75be6756

A warrior does not fear chaos—he thrives in it. Life is a battlefield, and disorder is the forge in which strength, strategy, and resilience are tempered. Whether in the pursuit of victory in business, relationships, or personal conquest, chaos is an inevitable adversary. But within every storm lies an opportunity—an opening to strike, to evolve, and to dominate where others falter. Only those who embrace the struggle with unwavering resolve can turn uncertainty into their greatest weapon.

Understanding Chaos

Chaos is not the enemy; it is the proving ground. It manifests as upheaval, setbacks, and unexpected challenges, forcing warriors to sharpen their minds and steel their resolve.
- Disruption Breeds Innovation: In the heat of battle, new tactics emerge. When the known paths are obliterated, new strategies take form.
- Mindset Is Your Strongest Weapon: Chaos can either crush you or forge you into something stronger. The choice lies within your perception.
- Growth Is Forged in Adversity: The greatest warriors are those who embrace discomfort, wielding it to forge endurance and ingenuity.

Seizing Opportunity Amidst Chaos

1. Adaptability Is Strength

2. The warrior who can shift tactics swiftly gains the upper hand. Flexibility and awareness allow for swift and decisive action where others hesitate.

3. Chaos Fuels Creativity

4. In the heat of turmoil, the boldest ideas are born. Warriors do not cling to old ways; they adapt, overcome, and conquer.

5. Endings Are Just New Battles

6. What seems like defeat is often a call to arms for greater conquests. Every setback is a chance to regroup and strike back with renewed vigor.

Harnessing Chaos for Victory

1. Remain Steady Amid the Storm: Fear clouds judgment; clarity is power. Observe, assess, and act with precision. Opportunities reveal themselves to those who master control over their emotions.
2. Strike First, Strike Hard: Do not merely react to chaos—command it. Take decisive actions that position you ahead of the pack.
3. Exploit Weaknesses: Where others see insurmountable problems, a warrior sees openings and opportunities to advance.

Lessons from the Battlefields of History

Legends are not born in times of peace but in the crucible of chaos. From generals who turned the tide of war in moments of despair to entrepreneurs who built empires from ruin, history is a testament to those who harnessed disorder and emerged victorious.

Conclusion: Chaos Is the Warrior's Ally

Chaos is not to be feared but embraced. It is the ultimate test of will and strategy. A true warrior sees beyond the disorder, crafting victory from the wreckage. In every crisis lies the seed of triumph; in every conflict, the chance to rise.

When chaos surrounds you, stand firm, sharpen your sword, and remember—opportunity belongs to those with the courage to seize it.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

tempreites

My first library to get stars on GitHub, was a very stupid templating library that used just HTML and HTML attributes ("DSL-free"). I was inspired by http://microjs.com/ at the time and ended up not using the library. Probably no one ever did.

• https://github.com/fiatjaf/tempreites

@ 16d11430:61640947

Part Two Of Series on Mastering the Musca

Building on the foundational physical conditioning required to catch a Musca domestica mid-flight, the second pillar of mastery lies in the cultivation of patience, refined visual tracking, and the perception of time. The process transcends physical agility, diving into cognitive and perceptual skills that are as much about mental discipline as they are about muscle memory.

The Science of Patience and Observation

Patience is the cornerstone of fly-catching excellence. Research in attentional control emphasizes that prolonged focus on erratic and unpredictable targets trains the brain's ability to maintain sustained attention. The ability to remain calm and observant under pressure—waiting for the opportune moment to act—relies on the prefrontal cortex, which governs impulse control and decision-making.

This form of patience, often described in meditative practices, lowers cortisol levels and enhances neuroplasticity, allowing individuals to adapt to the seemingly chaotic flight patterns of flies. Athletes in this discipline develop an intuitive understanding of when to strike, a skill honed through repetitive practice and exposure to unpredictable stimuli.

Visual Tracking: Decoding the Fly’s Erratic Patterns

Flies exhibit highly unpredictable movements, characterized by abrupt shifts in speed and direction. This erratic trajectory, driven by their compound eyes and rapid wing beats, challenges the human visual system. Successful fly-catching requires the athlete to excel in smooth-pursuit eye movements and saccades, which are rapid eye movements that recalibrate focus on moving targets.

Studies in visual-motor integration highlight that tracking small, fast-moving objects enhances neural efficiency in the occipital and parietal lobes. These regions process spatial information and coordinate motor responses. High-level performers develop an acute ability to anticipate trajectories by identifying subtle cues in the fly’s movement, such as wing positioning or changes in velocity.

Predictive Timing and the Illusion of "Slowing Down Time"

One of the most remarkable phenomena in fly-catching is the perception of slowed time during critical moments. This effect, documented in high-performance sports and combat scenarios, is attributed to the brain's increased processing of sensory input during periods of heightened arousal. By compressing time through rapid neural computations, the brain allows individuals to act with extraordinary precision.

Predictive timing, governed by the cerebellum, is essential for this process. The cerebellum calculates the fly’s likely trajectory, enabling the hand to intercept the target even as it changes direction. Repeated practice strengthens the cerebellar circuits, creating a feedback loop that enhances accuracy and reaction speed.

Refining the Craft Through Research

Prominent studies in neuroscience and sports science provide insights into training methods for aspiring fly-catching athletes:

1. Dynamic Visual Acuity Training: Exercises such as tracking moving dots on a screen can improve the ability to focus on fast-moving objects.

2. Anticipatory Drills: Practicing with simulated erratic targets, such as drones or programmable devices, hones the predictive capabilities of the brain.

3. Mindfulness and Reaction Time: Meditation and mindfulness training have been shown to reduce reaction times by calming the nervous system and improving attentional focus.

4. Eye-Hand Coordination Tools: Devices like stroboscopic glasses create controlled visual disruptions, forcing the brain to adapt to incomplete information.

The Path to Mastery

The art of fly-catching merges the physical, cognitive, and perceptual domains into a singular skill set. Through rigorous training, practitioners learn to read the chaotic dance of the fly, anticipate its movements, and act with surgical precision. The process demands patience, discipline, and a commitment to understanding the intricate connection between body and mind.

As Australia continues to explore this unique and challenging sport, its athletes embody a profound lesson: true mastery is not merely about speed or strength but the harmony of mind and body in the face of chaos.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

litepub

A Go library that abstracts all the burdensome ActivityPub things and provides just the right amount of helpers necessary to integrate an existing website into the "fediverse" (what an odious name). Made for the gravity integration.

• https://godoc.org/github.com/fiatjaf/litepub

See also

-

@ 30b99916:3cc6e3fe

Details

• 🍳 Cook time: 10 to 8 minutes at 350
• 🍽️ Servings: About 4 dozen cookies

Ingredients

• 2 sticks of butter
• 2 eggs
• 1 cup granulated sugar
• 1 cup brown sugar
• 1 cup peanut butter
• 1 t vanilla
• 2 cups flour
• 1/2 t salt
• 1 t soda
• 6 oz Semi-Sweet Chocolate chips (optional)

Directions

1. Blend butter, eggs, vanilla and sugars together thoroughly
2. Next blend in peanut butter thoroughly
3. Next blend in flour, salt, and soda thoroughly
4. Optional blend in chocolate chips
5. Add about table spoon of cookie dough per cookie on a cookie sheet. With a fork based in sugar place a cross hatch pattern on each cookie. Bake cookies for 10 to 8 minutes and place onto cooler rack.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

questo.email

This was a thing done in a brief period I liked the idea of "indiewebcamp", a stupid movement of people saying everybody should have their site and post their lives in it.

From the GitHub postmortem:

questo.email was a service that integrated email addresses into the indieweb ecosystem by providing email-to-note and email-to-webmention triggers, which could be used for people to comment through webmention using their email addresses, and be replied, and also for people to send messages from their sites directly to the email addresses of people they knew; Questo also worked as an IndieAuth provider that used people's email addresses and Mozilla Persona.

It was live from December 2014 through December 2015.

Here's how the home page looked:

• https://github.com/fiatjaf/questo.email

See also

• jekmentions, another thing related to "indieweb"

@ 16d11430:61640947

The Lightning Network (LN), a layer-2 protocol designed to scale Bitcoin transactions, is a powerful innovation that combines the reliability of Bitcoin's blockchain with the speed and affordability of off-chain payment channels. For node operators, the Lightning Network represents more than just a technical endeavor; it is a gateway to reimagining global finance and fostering economic empowerment. Here, we’ll delve into the motivations, responsibilities, and ambitions of Lightning Network node operators in today’s rapidly evolving ecosystem.

---

The Role of a Node Operator

At its core, a Lightning Network node operator is a steward of Bitcoin's second layer. By running a node, operators help facilitate instant, low-cost payments across the network. These nodes act as routing hubs, allowing users to send payments without directly opening a channel with one another.

But being a node operator is more than maintaining a server. It requires careful channel management, liquidity provisioning, and routing efficiency. A well-managed node contributes to the overall health and capacity of the Lightning Network, making it more reliable and accessible.

---

Ambitions Driving Node Operators

1. Decentralized Financial Sovereignty Many operators are motivated by the vision of a decentralized financial future. By running a node, they actively participate in building a trustless and permissionless payment network. This aligns with Bitcoin's ethos of financial sovereignty, where users can transact freely without intermediaries.

2. Earning Yield on Bitcoin Holdings Lightning Network node operators can earn routing fees by efficiently managing payment channels. While these fees are modest compared to traditional investments, they provide a way to earn yield on Bitcoin holdings without surrendering custody or relying on centralized services.

3. Enhancing Network Resilience A robust and well-distributed network is essential for Bitcoin's long-term success. Node operators aim to enhance the resilience of the Lightning Network by ensuring sufficient liquidity and efficient routing, especially in underserved regions.

4. Promoting Bitcoin Adoption Lightning Network enables microtransactions and instant payments, making Bitcoin more practical for everyday use. Node operators see themselves as enablers of this adoption, supporting merchants, applications, and users by providing reliable payment infrastructure.

5. Exploring Business Opportunities Beyond fees, the Lightning Network opens up new business models. From hosting custodial wallets to offering Lightning-as-a-Service (LaaS) for developers, node operators are at the forefront of experimenting with innovative monetization strategies.

---

Challenges in the Path of Ambition

Running a Lightning Network node is not without its hurdles. Operators face several challenges:

Liquidity Management: Balancing inbound and outbound liquidity is critical. Mismanagement can lead to failed transactions or idle capital.

Technical Expertise: Operating a node requires knowledge of Bitcoin, LN protocols, and server infrastructure, making it less accessible for non-technical users.

Competition: As the network grows, efficient routing and competitive fees become essential for attracting traffic.

Regulatory Uncertainty: In some jurisdictions, the role of node operators in financial systems remains ambiguous, potentially exposing them to legal scrutiny.

---

Current Implementations and Innovations

The Lightning Network ecosystem has evolved rapidly, offering tools and services to support node operators:

1. Node Management Tools: Platforms like ThunderHub, Ride the Lightning (RTL), and Amboss provide user-friendly interfaces for managing nodes and channels.

2. Liquidity Services: Services like Lightning Pool and Voltage help operators source liquidity, improving their routing capabilities.

3. Privacy Enhancements: Protocol upgrades like BOLT-12 aim to improve privacy for both users and operators, protecting transaction metadata.

4. Cross-Chain Applications: Some node operators are exploring integrations with other networks, enabling interoperability and expanding the use cases for LN payments.

---

A Vision for the Future

The ambitions of Lightning Network node operators reflect the broader vision of a decentralized, equitable, and efficient global financial system. As the network grows, operators will play a pivotal role in shaping its trajectory, driving innovation, and ensuring accessibility.

From powering micropayments for digital content to enabling financial inclusion in underserved regions, the Lightning Network's potential is vast. And at the heart of this potential lies the dedication of node operators—custodians of Bitcoin's scalability and champions of its ethos.

The road ahead is both challenging and inspiring. For node operators, it is an opportunity to pioneer a new financial paradigm, one channel at a time.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

idea: Rumple

a payments network based on trust channels

This is the description of a Lightning-like network that will work only with credit or trust-based channels and exist alongside the normal Lightning Network. I imagine some people will think this is undesirable and at the same time very easy to do (such that if it doesn't exist yet it must be because no one cares), but in fact it is a very desirable thing -- which I hope I can establish below -- and at the same time a very non-trivial problem to solve, as the history of Ryan Fugger's Ripple project and posterior copies of it show.

Read these first to get the full context:

1. Ryan Fugger's Ripple
2. Ripple and the problem of the decentralized commit
3. The Lightning Network solves the problem of the decentralized commit
4. Parallel Chains

Explanation about the name

Since we're copying the fundamental Ripple idea from Ryan Fugger and since the name "Ripple" is now associated with a scam coin called XRP, and since Ryan Fugger has changed the name of his old website "Ripplepay" to "Rumplepay", we will follow his lead here. If "Ripplepay" was the name of a centralized prototype to the open peer-to-peer network "Ripple", now that the centralized version is called "Rumplepay" the peer-to-peer version must be called "Rumple".

Now the idea

Basically we copy the Lightning Network, but without HTLCs or channels being opened and closed with funds committed to them on multisig Bitcoin transactions published to the blockchain. Instead we use pure trust relationships like the original Ripple concept.

And we use the blockchain commit method, but instead of spending an absurd amount of money to use the actual Bitcoin blockchain instead we use a parallel chain.

How exactly -- a protocol proposal attempt

It could work like this:

The parallel chain, or "Rumple Chain"

1. We define a parallel chain with a genesis block;
2. Following blocks must contain a. the ID of the previous block; b. a list of up to 32768 entries of arbitrary 32-byte values; c. an ID constituted by sha256(the previous block ID + the merkle root of all the entries)
3. To be mined, each parallel block must be included in the Bitcoin chain according as explained above.

Now that we have a structure for a simple "blockchain" that is completely useless, just blocks over blocks of meaningless values, we proceed to the next step of assigning meaning to these values.

The off-chain payments network, or "Rumple Network"

1. We create a network of nodes that can talk to each other via TCP messages (all details are the same as the Lightning Network, except where mentioned otherwise);
2. These nodes can create trust channels to each other. These channels are backed by nothing except the willingness of one peer to pay the other what is owed.
3. When Alice creates a trust channel with Bob (Alice trusts Bob), contrary to what happens in the Lightning Network, it's A that can immediately receive payments through that channel, and everything A receives will be an IOU from Bob to Alice. So Alice should never open a channel to Bob unless Alice trusts Bob. But also Alice can choose the amount of trust it has in Bob, she can, for example, open a very small channel with Bob, which means she will only lose a few satoshis if Bob decides to exit scam her. (in the original Ripple examples these channels were always depicted as friend relationships, and they can continue being that, but it's expected -- given the experience of the Lightning Network -- that the bulk of the channels will exist between users and wallet provider nodes that will act as hubs).
4. As Alice receive a payment through her channel with Bob, she becomes a creditor and Bob a debtor, i.e., the balance of the channel moves a little to her side. Now she can use these funds to make payments over that channel (or make a payment that combines funds from multiple channels using MPP).
5. If at any time Alice decides to close her channel with Bob, she can send all the funds she has standing there to somewhere else (for example, another channel she has with someone else, another wallet somewhere else, a shop that is selling some good or service, or a service that will aggregate all funds from all her channels and send a transaction to the Bitcoin chain on her behalf).
6. If at any time Bob leaves the network Alice is entitled by Bob's cryptographic signatures to knock on his door and demand payment, or go to a judge and ask him to force Bob to pay, or share the signatures and commitments online and hurt Bob's reputation with the rest of the network (but yes, none of these things is good enough and if Bob is a very dishonest person none of these things is likely to save Alice's funds).

The payment flow

1. Suppose there exists a route Alice->Bob->Carol and Alice wants to send a payment to Carol.
2. First Alice reads an invoice she received from Carol. The invoice (which can be pretty similar or maybe even the same as BOLT11) contains a payment hash h and information about how to reach Carol's node, optionally an amount. Let's say it's 100 satoshis.
3. Using the routing information she gathered, Alice builds an onion and sends it to Bob, at the same time she offers to Bob a "conditional IOU". That stands for a signed commitment that Alice will owe Bob an 100 satoshis if in the next 50 blocks of the Rumple Chain there appears a block containing the preimage p such that sha256(p) == h.
4. Bob peels the onion and discovers that he must forward that payment to Carol, so he forwards the peeled onion and offers a conditional IOU to Carol with the same h. Bob doesn't know Carol is the final recipient of the payment, it could potentially go on and on.
5. When Carol gets the conditional IOU from Bob, she makes a list of all the nodes who have announced themselves as miners (which is not something I have mentioned before, but nodes that are acting as miners will must announce themselves somehow) and are online and bidding for the next Rumple block. Each of these miners will have previously published a random 32-byte value v they they intend to include in their next block.
6. Carol sends payments through routes to all (or a big number) of these miners, but this time the conditional IOU contains two conditions (values that must appear in a block for the IOU to be valid): p such that sha256(p) == h (the same that featured in the invoice) and v (which must be unique and constant for each miner, something that is easily verifiable by Carol beforehand). Also, instead of these conditions being valid for the next 50 blocks they are valid only for the single next block.
7. Now Carol broadcasts p to the mempool and hopes one of the miners to which she sent conditional payments sees it and, allured by the possibility of cashing in Carol's payment, includes p in the next block. If that does not happen, Carol can try again in the next block.

Why bother with this at all?

1. The biggest advantage of Lightning is its openness

   It has been said multiple times that if trust is involved then we don't need Lightning, we can use Coinbase, or worse, Paypal. This is very wrong. Lightning is good specially because it serves as a bridge between Coinbase, Paypal, other custodial provider and someone running their own node. All these can transact freely across the network and pay each other without worrying about who is in which provider or setup.

   Rumple inherits that openness. In a Rumple Network anyone is free to open new trust channels and immediately route payments to anyone else.

   Also, since Rumple payments are also based on the reveal of a preimage it can do swaps with Lightning inside a payment route from day one (by which I mean one can pay from Rumple to Lightning and vice-versa).

2. Rumple fixes Lightning's fragility

   Lightning is too fragile.

   It's known that Lightning is vulnerable to multiple attacks -- like the flood-and-loot attack, for example, although not an attack that's easy to execute, it's still dangerous even if failed. Given the existence of these attacks, it's important to not ever open channels with random anonymous people. Some degree of trust must exist between peers.

   But one does not even have to consider attacks. The creation of HTLCs is a liability that every node has to do multiple times during its life. Every initiated, received or forwarded payment require adding one HTLC then removing it from the commitment transaction.

   Another issue that makes trust needed between peers is the fact that channels can be closed unilaterally. Although this is a feature, it is also a bug when considering high-fee environments. Imagine you pay $2 in fees to open a channel, your peer may close that unilaterally in the next second and then you have to pay another $15 to close the channel. The opener pays (this is also a feature that can double as a bug by itself). Even if it's not you opening the channel, a peer can open a channel with you, make a payment, then clone the channel, and now you're left with, say, an output of 800 satoshis, which is equal to zero if network fees are high.

   So you should only open channels with people you know and know aren't going to actively try to hack you and people who are not going to close channels and impose unnecessary costs on you. But even considering a fully trusted Lightning Network, even if -- to be extreme -- you only opened channels with yourself, these channels would still be fragile. If some HTLC gets stuck for any reason (peer offline or some weird small incompatibility between node softwares) and you're forced to close the channel because of that, there are the extra costs of sweeping these UTXO outputs plus the total costs of closing and reopening a channel that shouldn't have been closed in the first place. Even if HTLCs don't get stuck, a fee renegotiation event during a mempool spike may cause channels to force-close, become valueless or settle for very high closing fee.

   Some of these issues are mitigated by Eltoo, others by only having channels with people you trust. Others referenced above, plus the the griefing attack and in general the ability of anyone to spam the network for free with payments that can be pending forever or a lot of payments fail repeatedly makes it very fragile.

   Rumple solves most of these problems by not having to touch the blockchain at all. Fee negotiation makes no sense. Opening and closing channels is free. Flood-and-loot is a non-issue. The griefing attack can be still attempted as funds in trust channels must be reserved like on Lightning, but since there should be no theoretical limit to the number of prepared payments a channel can have, the griefing must rely on actual amounts being committed, which prevents large attacks from being performed easily.

3. Rumple fixes Lightning's unsolvable reputation issues

   In the Lightning Conference 2019, Rusty Russell promised there would be pre-payments on Lightning someday, since everybody was aware of potential spam issues and pre-payments would be the way to solve that. Fast-forward to November 2020 and these pre-payments have become an apparently unsolvable problem[^thread-402]: no one knows how to implement them reliably without destroying privacy completely or introducing worse problems.

   Replacing these payments with tables of reputation between peers is also an unsolved problem[^reputation-lightning], for the same reasons explained in the thread above.

4. Rumple solves the hot wallet problem

   Since you don't have to use Bitcoin keys or sign transactions with a Rumple node, only your channel trust is at risk at any time.

5. Rumple ends custodianship

   Since no one is storing other people's funds, a big hub or wallet provider can be used in multiple payment routes, but it cannot be immediately classified as a "custodian". At best, it will be a big debtor.

6. Rumple is fun

   Opening channels with strangers is boring. Opening channels with friends and people you trust even a little makes that relationship grow stronger and the trust be reinforced. (But of course, like it happens in the Lightning Network today, if Rumple is successful the bulk of trust will be from isolated users to big reliable hubs.)

Questions or potential issues

1. So many advantages, yes, but trusted? Custodial? That's easy and stupid!

   Well, an enormous part of the current Lightning Network (and also onchain Bitcoin wallets) already rests on trust, mainly trust between users and custodial wallet providers like ZEBEDEE, Alby, Wallet-of-Satoshi and others. Worse: on the current Lightning Network users not only trust, they also expose their entire transaction history to these providers[^hosted-channels].

   Besides that, as detailed in point 3 of the previous section, there are many unsolvable issues on the Lightning protocol that make each sovereign node dependent on some level of trust in its peers (and the network in general dependent on trusting that no one else will spam it to death).

   So, given the current state of the Lightning Network, to trust peers like Rumple requires is not a giant change -- but it is still a significant change: in Rumple you shouldn't open a large trust channel with someone just because it looks trustworthy, you must personally know that person and only put in what you're willing to lose. In known brands that have reputation to lose you can probably deposit more trust, same for long-term friends, and that's all. Still it is probably good enough, given the existence of MPP payments and the fact that the purpose of Rumple is to be a payments network for day-to-day purchases and not a way to buy real estate.

2. Why would anyone run a node in this parallel chain?

   I don't know. Ideally every server running a Rumple Network node will be running a Bitcoin node and a Rumple chain node. Besides using it to confirm and publish your own Rumple Network transactions it can be set to do BMM mining automatically and maybe earn some small fees comparable to running a Lightning routing node or a JoinMarket yield generator.

   Also it will probably be very lightweight, as pruning is completely free and no verification-since-the-genesis-block will take place.

3. What is the maturity of the debt that exists in the Rumple Network or its legal status?

   By default it is to be understood as being payable on demand for payments occurring inside the network (as credit can be used to forward or initiate payments by the creditor using that channel). But details of settlement outside the network or what happens if one of the peers disappears cannot be enforced or specified by the network.

   Perhaps some standard optional settlement methods (like a Bitcoin address) can be announced and negotiated upon channel creation inside the protocol, but nothing more than that.

[^thread-402]: Read at least the first 10 messages of the thread to see how naïve proposals like you and me could have thought about are brought up and then dismantled very carefully by the group of people most committed to getting Lightning to work properly. [^reputation-lightning]: See also the footnote at Ripple and the problem of the decentralized commit. [^hosted-channels]: Although that second part can be solved by hosted channels.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Boardthreads

This was a very badly done service for turning a Trello list into a helpdesk UI.

Surprisingly, it had more paying users than Websites For Trello, which I was working on simultaneously and dedicating much more time to it.

The Neo4j database I used for this was a very poor choice, it was probably the cause of all the bugs.

-https://github.com/fiatjaf/boardthreads

@ 6be5cc06:5259daf0

Bitcoin: Um sistema de dinheiro eletrônico direto entre pessoas.

Satoshi Nakamoto
satoshin@gmx.com
www.bitcoin.org

---

Resumo

O Bitcoin é uma forma de dinheiro digital que permite pagamentos diretos entre pessoas, sem a necessidade de um banco ou instituição financeira. Ele resolve um problema chamado gasto duplo, que ocorre quando alguém tenta gastar o mesmo dinheiro duas vezes. Para evitar isso, o Bitcoin usa uma rede descentralizada onde todos trabalham juntos para verificar e registrar as transações.

As transações são registradas em um livro público chamado blockchain, protegido por uma técnica chamada Prova de Trabalho. Essa técnica cria uma cadeia de registros que não pode ser alterada sem refazer todo o trabalho já feito. Essa cadeia é mantida pelos computadores que participam da rede, e a mais longa é considerada a verdadeira.

Enquanto a maior parte do poder computacional da rede for controlada por participantes honestos, o sistema continuará funcionando de forma segura. A rede é flexível, permitindo que qualquer pessoa entre ou saia a qualquer momento, sempre confiando na cadeia mais longa como prova do que aconteceu.

---

1. Introdução

Hoje, quase todos os pagamentos feitos pela internet dependem de bancos ou empresas como processadores de pagamento (cartões de crédito, por exemplo) para funcionar. Embora esse sistema seja útil, ele tem problemas importantes porque é baseado em confiança.

Primeiro, essas empresas podem reverter pagamentos, o que é útil em caso de erros, mas cria custos e incertezas. Isso faz com que pequenas transações, como pagar centavos por um serviço, se tornem inviáveis. Além disso, os comerciantes são obrigados a desconfiar dos clientes, pedindo informações extras e aceitando fraudes como algo inevitável.

Esses problemas não existem no dinheiro físico, como o papel-moeda, onde o pagamento é final e direto entre as partes. No entanto, não temos como enviar dinheiro físico pela internet sem depender de um intermediário confiável.

O que precisamos é de um sistema de pagamento eletrônico baseado em provas matemáticas, não em confiança. Esse sistema permitiria que qualquer pessoa enviasse dinheiro diretamente para outra, sem depender de bancos ou processadores de pagamento. Além disso, as transações seriam irreversíveis, protegendo vendedores contra fraudes, mas mantendo a possibilidade de soluções para disputas legítimas.

Neste documento, apresentamos o Bitcoin, que resolve o problema do gasto duplo usando uma rede descentralizada. Essa rede cria um registro público e protegido por cálculos matemáticos, que garante a ordem das transações. Enquanto a maior parte da rede for controlada por pessoas honestas, o sistema será seguro contra ataques.

---

2. Transações

Para entender como funciona o Bitcoin, é importante saber como as transações são realizadas. Imagine que você quer transferir uma "moeda digital" para outra pessoa. No sistema do Bitcoin, essa "moeda" é representada por uma sequência de registros que mostram quem é o atual dono. Para transferi-la, você adiciona um novo registro comprovando que agora ela pertence ao próximo dono. Esse registro é protegido por um tipo especial de assinatura digital.

O que é uma assinatura digital?

Uma assinatura digital é como uma senha secreta, mas muito mais segura. No Bitcoin, cada usuário tem duas chaves: uma "chave privada", que é secreta e serve para criar a assinatura, e uma "chave pública", que pode ser compartilhada com todos e é usada para verificar se a assinatura é válida. Quando você transfere uma moeda, usa sua chave privada para assinar a transação, provando que você é o dono. A próxima pessoa pode usar sua chave pública para confirmar isso.

Como funciona na prática?

Cada "moeda" no Bitcoin é, na verdade, uma cadeia de assinaturas digitais. Vamos imaginar o seguinte cenário:

1. A moeda está com o Dono 0 (você). Para transferi-la ao Dono 1, você assina digitalmente a transação com sua chave privada. Essa assinatura inclui o código da transação anterior (chamado de "hash") e a chave pública do Dono 1.
2. Quando o Dono 1 quiser transferir a moeda ao Dono 2, ele assinará a transação seguinte com sua própria chave privada, incluindo também o hash da transação anterior e a chave pública do Dono 2.
3. Esse processo continua, formando uma "cadeia" de transações. Qualquer pessoa pode verificar essa cadeia para confirmar quem é o atual dono da moeda.

Resolvendo o problema do gasto duplo

Um grande desafio com moedas digitais é o "gasto duplo", que é quando uma mesma moeda é usada em mais de uma transação. Para evitar isso, muitos sistemas antigos dependiam de uma entidade central confiável, como uma casa da moeda, que verificava todas as transações. No entanto, isso criava um ponto único de falha e centralizava o controle do dinheiro.

O Bitcoin resolve esse problema de forma inovadora: ele usa uma rede descentralizada onde todos os participantes (os "nós") têm acesso a um registro completo de todas as transações. Cada nó verifica se as transações são válidas e se a moeda não foi gasta duas vezes. Quando a maioria dos nós concorda com a validade de uma transação, ela é registrada permanentemente na blockchain.

Por que isso é importante?

Essa solução elimina a necessidade de confiar em uma única entidade para gerenciar o dinheiro, permitindo que qualquer pessoa no mundo use o Bitcoin sem precisar de permissão de terceiros. Além disso, ela garante que o sistema seja seguro e resistente a fraudes.

---

3. Servidor Timestamp

Para assegurar que as transações sejam realizadas de forma segura e transparente, o sistema Bitcoin utiliza algo chamado de "servidor de registro de tempo" (timestamp). Esse servidor funciona como um registro público que organiza as transações em uma ordem específica.

Ele faz isso agrupando várias transações em blocos e criando um código único chamado "hash". Esse hash é como uma impressão digital que representa todo o conteúdo do bloco. O hash de cada bloco é amplamente divulgado, como se fosse publicado em um jornal ou em um fórum público.

Esse processo garante que cada bloco de transações tenha um registro de quando foi criado e que ele existia naquele momento. Além disso, cada novo bloco criado contém o hash do bloco anterior, formando uma cadeia contínua de blocos conectados — conhecida como blockchain.

Com isso, se alguém tentar alterar qualquer informação em um bloco anterior, o hash desse bloco mudará e não corresponderá ao hash armazenado no bloco seguinte. Essa característica torna a cadeia muito segura, pois qualquer tentativa de fraude seria imediatamente detectada.

O sistema de timestamps é essencial para provar a ordem cronológica das transações e garantir que cada uma delas seja única e autêntica. Dessa forma, ele reforça a segurança e a confiança na rede Bitcoin.

---

4. Prova-de-Trabalho

Para implementar o registro de tempo distribuído no sistema Bitcoin, utilizamos um mecanismo chamado prova-de-trabalho. Esse sistema é semelhante ao Hashcash, desenvolvido por Adam Back, e baseia-se na criação de um código único, o "hash", por meio de um processo computacionalmente exigente.

A prova-de-trabalho envolve encontrar um valor especial que, quando processado junto com as informações do bloco, gere um hash que comece com uma quantidade específica de zeros. Esse valor especial é chamado de "nonce". Encontrar o nonce correto exige um esforço significativo do computador, porque envolve tentativas repetidas até que a condição seja satisfeita.

Esse processo é importante porque torna extremamente difícil alterar qualquer informação registrada em um bloco. Se alguém tentar mudar algo em um bloco, seria necessário refazer o trabalho de computação não apenas para aquele bloco, mas também para todos os blocos que vêm depois dele. Isso garante a segurança e a imutabilidade da blockchain.

A prova-de-trabalho também resolve o problema de decidir qual cadeia de blocos é a válida quando há múltiplas cadeias competindo. A decisão é feita pela cadeia mais longa, pois ela representa o maior esforço computacional já realizado. Isso impede que qualquer indivíduo ou grupo controle a rede, desde que a maioria do poder de processamento seja mantida por participantes honestos.

Para garantir que o sistema permaneça eficiente e equilibrado, a dificuldade da prova-de-trabalho é ajustada automaticamente ao longo do tempo. Se novos blocos estiverem sendo gerados rapidamente, a dificuldade aumenta; se estiverem sendo gerados muito lentamente, a dificuldade diminui. Esse ajuste assegura que novos blocos sejam criados aproximadamente a cada 10 minutos, mantendo o sistema estável e funcional.

---

5. Rede

A rede Bitcoin é o coração do sistema e funciona de maneira distribuída, conectando vários participantes (ou nós) para garantir o registro e a validação das transações. Os passos para operar essa rede são:

1. Transmissão de Transações: Quando alguém realiza uma nova transação, ela é enviada para todos os nós da rede. Isso é feito para garantir que todos estejam cientes da operação e possam validá-la.

2. Coleta de Transações em Blocos: Cada nó agrupa as novas transações recebidas em um "bloco". Este bloco será preparado para ser adicionado à cadeia de blocos (a blockchain).

3. Prova-de-Trabalho: Os nós competem para resolver a prova-de-trabalho do bloco, utilizando poder computacional para encontrar um hash válido. Esse processo é como resolver um quebra-cabeça matemático difícil.

4. Envio do Bloco Resolvido: Quando um nó encontra a solução para o bloco (a prova-de-trabalho), ele compartilha esse bloco com todos os outros nós na rede.

5. Validação do Bloco: Cada nó verifica o bloco recebido para garantir que todas as transações nele contidas sejam válidas e que nenhuma moeda tenha sido gasta duas vezes. Apenas blocos válidos são aceitos.

6. Construção do Próximo Bloco: Os nós que aceitaram o bloco começam a trabalhar na criação do próximo bloco, utilizando o hash do bloco aceito como base (hash anterior). Isso mantém a continuidade da cadeia.

Resolução de Conflitos e Escolha da Cadeia Mais Longa

Os nós sempre priorizam a cadeia mais longa, pois ela representa o maior esforço computacional já realizado, garantindo maior segurança. Se dois blocos diferentes forem compartilhados simultaneamente, os nós trabalharão no primeiro bloco recebido, mas guardarão o outro como uma alternativa. Caso o segundo bloco eventualmente forme uma cadeia mais longa (ou seja, tenha mais blocos subsequentes), os nós mudarão para essa nova cadeia.

Tolerância a Falhas

A rede é robusta e pode lidar com mensagens que não chegam a todos os nós. Uma transação não precisa alcançar todos os nós de imediato; basta que chegue a um número suficiente deles para ser incluída em um bloco. Da mesma forma, se um nó não receber um bloco em tempo hábil, ele pode solicitá-lo ao perceber que está faltando quando o próximo bloco é recebido.

Esse mecanismo descentralizado permite que a rede Bitcoin funcione de maneira segura, confiável e resiliente, sem depender de uma autoridade central.

---

6. Incentivo

O incentivo é um dos pilares fundamentais que sustenta o funcionamento da rede Bitcoin, garantindo que os participantes (nós) continuem operando de forma honesta e contribuindo com recursos computacionais. Ele é estruturado em duas partes principais: a recompensa por mineração e as taxas de transação.

Recompensa por Mineração

Por convenção, o primeiro registro em cada bloco é uma transação especial que cria novas moedas e as atribui ao criador do bloco. Essa recompensa incentiva os mineradores a dedicarem poder computacional para apoiar a rede. Como não há uma autoridade central para emitir moedas, essa é a maneira pela qual novas moedas entram em circulação. Esse processo pode ser comparado ao trabalho de garimpeiros, que utilizam recursos para colocar mais ouro em circulação. No caso do Bitcoin, o "recurso" consiste no tempo de CPU e na energia elétrica consumida para resolver a prova-de-trabalho.

Taxas de Transação

Além da recompensa por mineração, os mineradores também podem ser incentivados pelas taxas de transação. Se uma transação utiliza menos valor de saída do que o valor de entrada, a diferença é tratada como uma taxa, que é adicionada à recompensa do bloco contendo essa transação. Com o passar do tempo e à medida que o número de moedas em circulação atinge o limite predeterminado, essas taxas de transação se tornam a principal fonte de incentivo, substituindo gradualmente a emissão de novas moedas. Isso permite que o sistema opere sem inflação, uma vez que o número total de moedas permanece fixo.

Incentivo à Honestidade

O design do incentivo também busca garantir que os participantes da rede mantenham um comportamento honesto. Para um atacante que consiga reunir mais poder computacional do que o restante da rede, ele enfrentaria duas escolhas:

1. Usar esse poder para fraudar o sistema, como reverter transações e roubar pagamentos.
2. Seguir as regras do sistema, criando novos blocos e recebendo recompensas legítimas.

A lógica econômica favorece a segunda opção, pois um comportamento desonesto prejudicaria a confiança no sistema, diminuindo o valor de todas as moedas, incluindo aquelas que o próprio atacante possui. Jogar dentro das regras não apenas maximiza o retorno financeiro, mas também preserva a validade e a integridade do sistema.

Esse mecanismo garante que os incentivos econômicos estejam alinhados com o objetivo de manter a rede segura, descentralizada e funcional ao longo do tempo.

---

7. Recuperação do Espaço em Disco

Depois que uma moeda passa a estar protegida por muitos blocos na cadeia, as informações sobre as transações antigas que a geraram podem ser descartadas para economizar espaço em disco. Para que isso seja possível sem comprometer a segurança, as transações são organizadas em uma estrutura chamada "árvore de Merkle". Essa árvore funciona como um resumo das transações: em vez de armazenar todas elas, guarda apenas um "hash raiz", que é como uma assinatura compacta que representa todo o grupo de transações.

Os blocos antigos podem, então, ser simplificados, removendo as partes desnecessárias dessa árvore. Apenas a raiz do hash precisa ser mantida no cabeçalho do bloco, garantindo que a integridade dos dados seja preservada, mesmo que detalhes específicos sejam descartados.

Para exemplificar: imagine que você tenha vários recibos de compra. Em vez de guardar todos os recibos, você cria um documento e lista apenas o valor total de cada um. Mesmo que os recibos originais sejam descartados, ainda é possível verificar a soma com base nos valores armazenados.

Além disso, o espaço ocupado pelos blocos em si é muito pequeno. Cada bloco sem transações ocupa apenas cerca de 80 bytes. Isso significa que, mesmo com blocos sendo gerados a cada 10 minutos, o crescimento anual em espaço necessário é insignificante: apenas 4,2 MB por ano. Com a capacidade de armazenamento dos computadores crescendo a cada ano, esse espaço continuará sendo trivial, garantindo que a rede possa operar de forma eficiente sem problemas de armazenamento, mesmo a longo prazo.

---

8. Verificação de Pagamento Simplificada

É possível confirmar pagamentos sem a necessidade de operar um nó completo da rede. Para isso, o usuário precisa apenas de uma cópia dos cabeçalhos dos blocos da cadeia mais longa (ou seja, a cadeia com maior esforço de trabalho acumulado). Ele pode verificar a validade de uma transação ao consultar os nós da rede até obter a confirmação de que tem a cadeia mais longa. Para isso, utiliza-se o ramo Merkle, que conecta a transação ao bloco em que ela foi registrada.

Entretanto, o método simplificado possui limitações: ele não pode confirmar uma transação isoladamente, mas sim assegurar que ela ocupa um lugar específico na cadeia mais longa. Dessa forma, se um nó da rede aprova a transação, os blocos subsequentes reforçam essa aceitação.

A verificação simplificada é confiável enquanto a maioria dos nós da rede for honesta. Contudo, ela se torna vulnerável caso a rede seja dominada por um invasor. Nesse cenário, um atacante poderia fabricar transações fraudulentas que enganariam o usuário temporariamente até que o invasor obtivesse controle completo da rede.

Uma estratégia para mitigar esse risco é configurar alertas nos softwares de nós completos. Esses alertas identificam blocos inválidos, sugerindo ao usuário baixar o bloco completo para confirmar qualquer inconsistência. Para maior segurança, empresas que realizam pagamentos frequentes podem preferir operar seus próprios nós, reduzindo riscos e permitindo uma verificação mais direta e confiável.

---

9. Combinando e Dividindo Valor

No sistema Bitcoin, cada unidade de valor é tratada como uma "moeda" individual, mas gerenciar cada centavo como uma transação separada seria impraticável. Para resolver isso, o Bitcoin permite que valores sejam combinados ou divididos em transações, facilitando pagamentos de qualquer valor.

Entradas e Saídas

Cada transação no Bitcoin é composta por:

• Entradas: Representam os valores recebidos em transações anteriores.
• Saídas: Correspondem aos valores enviados, divididos entre os destinatários e, eventualmente, o troco para o remetente.

Normalmente, uma transação contém:

• Uma única entrada com valor suficiente para cobrir o pagamento.
• Ou várias entradas combinadas para atingir o valor necessário.

O valor total das saídas nunca excede o das entradas, e a diferença (se houver) pode ser retornada ao remetente como troco.

Exemplo Prático

Imagine que você tem duas entradas:

1. 0,03 BTC
2. 0,07 BTC

Se deseja enviar 0,08 BTC para alguém, a transação terá:

• Entrada: As duas entradas combinadas (0,03 + 0,07 BTC = 0,10 BTC).
• Saídas: Uma para o destinatário (0,08 BTC) e outra como troco para você (0,02 BTC).

Essa flexibilidade permite que o sistema funcione sem precisar manipular cada unidade mínima individualmente.

Difusão e Simplificação

A difusão de transações, onde uma depende de várias anteriores e assim por diante, não representa um problema. Não é necessário armazenar ou verificar o histórico completo de uma transação para utilizá-la, já que o registro na blockchain garante sua integridade.

---

10. Privacidade

O modelo bancário tradicional oferece um certo nível de privacidade, limitando o acesso às informações financeiras apenas às partes envolvidas e a um terceiro confiável (como bancos ou instituições financeiras). No entanto, o Bitcoin opera de forma diferente, pois todas as transações são publicamente registradas na blockchain. Apesar disso, a privacidade pode ser mantida utilizando chaves públicas anônimas, que desvinculam diretamente as transações das identidades das partes envolvidas.

Fluxo de Informação

• No modelo tradicional, as transações passam por um terceiro confiável que conhece tanto o remetente quanto o destinatário.
• No Bitcoin, as transações são anunciadas publicamente, mas sem revelar diretamente as identidades das partes. Isso é comparável a dados divulgados por bolsas de valores, onde informações como o tempo e o tamanho das negociações (a "fita") são públicas, mas as identidades das partes não.

Protegendo a Privacidade

Para aumentar a privacidade no Bitcoin, são adotadas as seguintes práticas:

1. Chaves Públicas Anônimas: Cada transação utiliza um par de chaves diferentes, dificultando a associação com um proprietário único.
2. Prevenção de Ligação: Ao usar chaves novas para cada transação, reduz-se a possibilidade de links evidentes entre múltiplas transações realizadas pelo mesmo usuário.

Riscos de Ligação

Embora a privacidade seja fortalecida, alguns riscos permanecem:

• Transações multi-entrada podem revelar que todas as entradas pertencem ao mesmo proprietário, caso sejam necessárias para somar o valor total.
• O proprietário da chave pode ser identificado indiretamente por transações anteriores que estejam conectadas.

---

11. Cálculos

Imagine que temos um sistema onde as pessoas (ou computadores) competem para adicionar informações novas (blocos) a um grande registro público (a cadeia de blocos ou blockchain). Este registro é como um livro contábil compartilhado, onde todos podem verificar o que está escrito.

Agora, vamos pensar em um cenário: um atacante quer enganar o sistema. Ele quer mudar informações já registradas para beneficiar a si mesmo, por exemplo, desfazendo um pagamento que já fez. Para isso, ele precisa criar uma versão alternativa do livro contábil (a cadeia de blocos dele) e convencer todos os outros participantes de que essa versão é a verdadeira.

Mas isso é extremamente difícil.

Como o Ataque Funciona

Quando um novo bloco é adicionado à cadeia, ele depende de cálculos complexos que levam tempo e esforço. Esses cálculos são como um grande quebra-cabeça que precisa ser resolvido.

• Os “bons jogadores” (nós honestos) estão sempre trabalhando juntos para resolver esses quebra-cabeças e adicionar novos blocos à cadeia verdadeira.
• O atacante, por outro lado, precisa resolver quebra-cabeças sozinho, tentando “alcançar” a cadeia honesta para que sua versão alternativa pareça válida.

Se a cadeia honesta já está vários blocos à frente, o atacante começa em desvantagem, e o sistema está projetado para que a dificuldade de alcançá-los aumente rapidamente.

A Corrida Entre Cadeias

Você pode imaginar isso como uma corrida. A cada bloco novo que os jogadores honestos adicionam à cadeia verdadeira, eles se distanciam mais do atacante. Para vencer, o atacante teria que resolver os quebra-cabeças mais rápido que todos os outros jogadores honestos juntos.

Suponha que:

• A rede honesta tem 80% do poder computacional (ou seja, resolve 8 de cada 10 quebra-cabeças).
• O atacante tem 20% do poder computacional (ou seja, resolve 2 de cada 10 quebra-cabeças).

Cada vez que a rede honesta adiciona um bloco, o atacante tem que "correr atrás" e resolver mais quebra-cabeças para alcançar.

Por Que o Ataque Fica Cada Vez Mais Improvável?

Vamos usar uma fórmula simples para mostrar como as chances de sucesso do atacante diminuem conforme ele precisa "alcançar" mais blocos:

P = (q/p)^z

• q é o poder computacional do atacante (20%, ou 0,2).
• p é o poder computacional da rede honesta (80%, ou 0,8).
• z é a diferença de blocos entre a cadeia honesta e a cadeia do atacante.

Se o atacante está 5 blocos atrás (z = 5):

P = (0,2 / 0,8)^5 = (0,25)^5 = 0,00098, (ou, 0,098%)

Isso significa que o atacante tem menos de 0,1% de chance de sucesso — ou seja, é muito improvável.

Se ele estiver 10 blocos atrás (z = 10):

P = (0,2 / 0,8)^10 = (0,25)^10 = 0,000000095, (ou, 0,0000095%).

Neste caso, as chances de sucesso são praticamente nulas.

Um Exemplo Simples

Se você jogar uma moeda, a chance de cair “cara” é de 50%. Mas se precisar de 10 caras seguidas, sua chance já é bem menor. Se precisar de 20 caras seguidas, é quase impossível.

No caso do Bitcoin, o atacante precisa de muito mais do que 20 caras seguidas. Ele precisa resolver quebra-cabeças extremamente difíceis e alcançar os jogadores honestos que estão sempre à frente. Isso faz com que o ataque seja inviável na prática.

Por Que Tudo Isso é Seguro?

• A probabilidade de sucesso do atacante diminui exponencialmente. Isso significa que, quanto mais tempo passa, menor é a chance de ele conseguir enganar o sistema.
• A cadeia verdadeira (honesta) está protegida pela força da rede. Cada novo bloco que os jogadores honestos adicionam à cadeia torna mais difícil para o atacante alcançar.

E Se o Atacante Tentar Continuar?

O atacante poderia continuar tentando indefinidamente, mas ele estaria gastando muito tempo e energia sem conseguir nada. Enquanto isso, os jogadores honestos estão sempre adicionando novos blocos, tornando o trabalho do atacante ainda mais inútil.

Assim, o sistema garante que a cadeia verdadeira seja extremamente segura e que ataques sejam, na prática, impossíveis de ter sucesso.

---

12. Conclusão

Propusemos um sistema de transações eletrônicas que elimina a necessidade de confiança, baseando-se em assinaturas digitais e em uma rede peer-to-peer que utiliza prova de trabalho. Isso resolve o problema do gasto duplo, criando um histórico público de transações imutável, desde que a maioria do poder computacional permaneça sob controle dos participantes honestos. A rede funciona de forma simples e descentralizada, com nós independentes que não precisam de identificação ou coordenação direta. Eles entram e saem livremente, aceitando a cadeia de prova de trabalho como registro do que ocorreu durante sua ausência. As decisões são tomadas por meio do poder de CPU, validando blocos legítimos, estendendo a cadeia e rejeitando os inválidos. Com este mecanismo de consenso, todas as regras e incentivos necessários para o funcionamento seguro e eficiente do sistema são garantidos.

---

Faça o download do whitepaper original em português: https://bitcoin.org/files/bitcoin-paper/bitcoin_pt_br.pdf

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Webvatar

Like Gravatar, but using profile images from websites tagged with "microformats-2" tags, like people from the indiewebcamp movement liked. It falled back to favicon, gravatar and procedural avatar generators.

No one really used this, despite people saying they liked it. Since I was desperate to getting some of my programs appreciated by someone I even bought a domain. It was sad, but an enriching experience.

• https://github.com/fiatjaf/webvatar.com
• http://webvatar.com

See also

• jekmentions
• questo.email

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

The problem with ION

ION is a DID method based on a thing called "Sidetree".

I can't say for sure what is the problem with ION, because I don't understand the design, even though I have read all I could and asked everybody I knew. All available information only touches on the high-level aspects of it (and of course its amazing wonders) and no one has ever bothered to explain the details. I've also asked the main designer of the protocol, Daniel Buchner, but he may have thought I was trolling him on Twitter and refused to answer, instead pointing me to an incomplete spec on the Decentralized Identity Foundation website that I had already read before. I even tried to join the DIF as a member so I could join their closed community calls and hear what they say, maybe eventually ask a question, so I could understand it, but my entrance was ignored, then after many months and a nudge from another member I was told I had to do a KYC process to be admitted, which I refused.

One thing I know is:

• ION is supposed to provide a way to rotate keys seamlessly and automatically without losing the main identity (and the ION proponents also claim there are no "master" keys because these can also be rotated).
• ION is also not a blockchain, i.e. it doesn't have a deterministic consensus mechanism and it is decentralized, i.e. anyone can publish data to it, doesn't have to be a single central server, there may be holes in the available data and the protocol doesn't treat that as a problem.
• From all we know about years of attempts to scale Bitcoins and develop offchain protocols it is clear that you can't solve the double-spend problem without a central authority or a kind of blockchain (i.e. a decentralized system with deterministic consensus).
• Rotating keys also suffer from the double-spend problem: whenever you rotate a key it is as if it was "spent", you aren't supposed to be able to use it again.

The logic conclusion of the 4 assumptions above is that ION is flawed: it can't provide the key rotation it says it can if it is not a blockchain.

See also

• Excerpt of discussion about DIDs and ION

@ 85cd42e2:0e6f2173

Solomon, Moses, and Melchizedek were worshipping, and an enchanting beast was underneath the throne, and its mouth was an abyss. A cunning angel worshiped near the three prophets and said to them, "Any who can satisfy the Beast at the Lord's feet will be blessed forever." \ \ The three prophets spoke among themselves and asked the angel, "What is the beast's name?" \ \ And the angel answered them, "She is called ‘Desire’." \ \ Solomon went before the Beast and it spoke and said, "I can only be satisfied by great treasure." Solomon was a man of great riches, so he cast all his vast empire into the mouth of the Beast, but it was not filled. The Beast said, "What a marvelous offering! There are many great treasures, but something else is needed. You are blessed, but you shall go away empty-handed." Solomon was impoverished but rejoiced. \ \ Moses went before the Beast, and the Beast spoke and said, "Do you have great treasure?" Moses was a mighty prophet, so he struck the earth with his staff and made a river of gold flow into the mouth of the Beast for eternity, but it was not filled. The Beast spoke and said, "Moses, you are cursed to gaze until this river fills my belly." And Moses was cursed to gaze

upon the abyss that could not be filled until the end of the age. \ \ Melchizedek went before the Beast, and the Beast spoke and said, "No matter what I eat, I am not satisfied." Melchizedek said, "I see that if a man gives all he has, you are not satisfied. I see that if a man gives you treasures without meaning, it is the same as offering dust and you will curse him. Thus, I will give you a portion of a treasure that has great worth." Melchizedek had two jewels called Urim and Thummim. He gave the black stone to the Beast, and the Beast didn't desire to eat Urim without Thummim. She did not consume the jewel but gazed upon it and desired its pair. The Beast spoke and said, "Give me the other stone." Melchizedek replied, "If I give you the other, you will consume both and we will have nothing between us. Let us make a covenant; If you will not bless me or curse me, but let me live in peace, I will give you Thummim at the end of time." The Beast agreed to Melchizedek's request and fashioned Urim into an amulet, and that amulet became the only possession of the Beast called Desire. Thus, Melchizedek subdued Desire by teaching her that satisfaction is not in consumption, stockpiling, or might. Satisfaction is found in treasure shared between two souls.

#poetry #writing #bitcoin #literature #story #stories #mythology #books#readstr #grownostr #bookstr #fantasy #plebstr #readstr #philosophy#art #artst #family #parenting #plebianmarket #market #zap #diy#nostrart #hodl #proofofwork #craft #artisans #nashville #market #olas#artwork #digitalart #buyintoart #dadlife #smallbusiness #education#kidsbook #gift #gm #artist #introductions #wisdom

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

bolt12 problems

• clients can't programatically build new offers by changing a path or query params (services like zbd.gg or lnurl-pay.me won't work)
• impossible to use in a load-balanced custodian way -- since offers would have to be pregenerated and tied to a specific lightning node.
• the existence of fiat currency fields makes it so wallets have to fetch exchange rates from somewhere on the internet (or offer a bad user experience), using HTTP which hurts user privacy.
• the vendor field is misleading, can be phished very easily, not as safe as a domain name.
• onion messages are an improvement over fake HTLC-based payments as a way of transmitting data, for sure. but we must decide if they are (i) suitable for transmitting all kinds of data over the internet, a replacement for tor; or (ii) not something that will scale well or on which we can count on for the future. if there was proper incentivization for data transmission it could end up being (i), the holy grail of p2p communication over the internet, but that is a very hard problem to solve and not guaranteed to yield the desired scalability results. since not even hints of attempting to solve that are being made, it's safer to conclude it is (ii).

bolt12 limitations

• not flexible enough. there are some interesting fields defined in the spec, but who gets to add more fields later if necessary? very unclear.
• services can't return any actionable data to the users who paid for something. it's unclear how business can be conducted without an extra communication channel.

bolt12 illusions

• recurring payments is not really solved, it is just a spec that defines intervals. the actual implementation must still be done by each wallet and service. the recurring payment cannot be enforced, the wallet must still initiate the payment. even if the wallet is evil and is willing to initiate a payment without the user knowing it still needs to have funds, channels, be online, connected etc., so it's not as if the services could rely on the payments being delivered in time.
• people seem to think it will enable pushing payments to mobile wallets, which it does not and cannot.
• there is a confusion of contexts: it looks like offers are superior to lnurl-pay, for example, because they don't require domain names. domain names, though, are common and well-established among internet services and stores, because these services have websites, so this is not really an issue. it is an issue, though, for people that want to receive payments in their homes. for these, indeed, bolt12 offers a superior solution -- but at the same time bolt12 seems to be selling itself as a tool for merchants and service providers when it includes and highlights features as recurring payments and refunds.
• the privacy gains for the receiver that are promoted as being part of bolt12 in fact come from a separate proposal, blinded paths, which should work for all normal lightning payments and indeed are a very nice solution. they are (or at least were, and should be) independent from the bolt12 proposal. a separate proposal, which can be (and already is being) used right now, also improves privacy for the receiver very much anway, it's called trampoline routing.

@ 50809a53:e091f164

For starters, anyone who is interested in curating and managing "notes, lists, bookmarks, kind-1 events, or other stuff" should watch this video:

https://youtu.be/XRpHIa-2XCE

Now, assuming you have watched it, I will proceed assuming you are aware of many of the applications that exist for a very similar purpose. I'll break them down further, following a similar trajectory in order of how I came across them, and a bit about my own path on this journey.

We'll start way back in the early 2000s, before Bitcoin existed. We had https://zim-wiki.org/

It is tried and true, and to this day stands to present an option for people looking for a very simple solution to a potentially complex problem. Zim-Wiki works. But it is limited.

Let's step into the realm of proprietary. Obsidian, Joplin, and LogSeq. The first two are entirely cloud-operative applications, with more of a focus on the true benefit of being a paid service. I will assume anyone reading this is capable of exploring the marketing of these applications, or trying their freemium product, to get a feeling for what they are capable of.

I bring up Obsidian because it is very crucial to understand the market placement of publication. We know social media handles the 'hosting' problem of publishing notes "and other stuff" by harvesting data and making deals with advertisers. But- what Obsidian has evolved to offer is a full service known as 'publish'. This means users can stay in the proprietary pipeline, "from thought to web." all for $8/mo.

See: https://obsidian.md/publish

THIS IS NOSTR'S PRIMARY COMPETITION. WE ARE HERE TO DISRUPT THIS MARKET, WITH NOTES AND OTHER STUFF. WITH RELAYS. WITH THE PROTOCOL.

Now, on to Joplin. I have never used this, because I opted to study the FOSS market and stayed free of any reliance on a paid solution. Many people like Joplin, and I gather the reason is because it has allowed itself to be flexible and good options that integrate with Joplin seems to provide good solutions for users who need that functionality. I see Nostr users recommending Joplin, so I felt it was worthwhile to mention as a case-study option. I myself need to investigate it more, but have found comfort in other solutions.

LogSeq - This is my "other solutions." It seems to be trapped in its proprietary web of funding and constraint. I use it because it turns my desktop into a power-house of note archival. But by using it- I AM TRAPPED TOO. This means LogSeq is by no means a working solution for Nostr users who want a long-term archival option.

But the trap is not a cage. It's merely a box. My notes can be exported to other applications with graphing and node-based information structure. Specifically, I can export these notes to:

• Text
• OPML
• HTML
• and, PNG, for whatever that is worth.

Let's try out the PNG option, just for fun. Here's an exported PNG of my "Games on Nostr" list, which has long been abandoned. I once decided to poll some CornyChat users to see what games they enjoyed- and I documented them in a LogSeq page for my own future reference. You can see it here:

https://i.postimg.cc/qMBPDTwr/image.png

This is a very simple example of how a single "page" or "list" in LogSeq can be multipurpose. It is a small list, with multiple "features" or variables at play. First, I have listed out a variety of complex games that might make sense with "multiplayer" identification that relies on our npubs or nip-05 addresses to aggregate user data. We can ALL imagine playing games like Tetris, Snake, or Catan together with our Nostr identities. But of course we are a long way from breaking into the video game market.

On a mostly irrelevant sidenote- you might notice in my example list, that I seem to be excited about a game called Dot.Hack. I discovered this small game on Itch.io and reached out to the developer on Twitter, in an attempt to purple-pill him, but moreso to inquire about his game. Unfortunately there was no response, even without mention of Nostr. Nonetheless, we pioneer on. You can try the game here: https://propuke.itch.io/planethack

So instead let's focus on the structure of "one working list." The middle section of this list is where I polled users, and simply listed out their suggestions. Of course we discussed these before I documented, so it is note a direct result of a poll, but actually a working interaction of poll results! This is crucial because it separates my list from the aggregated data, and implies its relevance/importance.

The final section of this ONE list- is the beginnings of where I conceptually connect nostr with video game functionality. You can look at this as the beginning of a new graph, which would be "Video Game Operability With Nostr".

These three sections make up one concept within my brain. It exists in other users' brains too- but of course they are not as committed to the concept as myself- the one managing the communal discussion.

With LogSeq- I can grow and expand these lists. These lists can become graphs. Those graphs can become entire catalogues of information than can be shared across the web.

I can replicate this system with bookmarks, ideas, application design, shopping lists, LLM prompting, video/music playlists, friend lists, RELAY lists, the LIST goes ON forever!

So where does that lead us? I think it leads us to kind-1 events. We don't have much in the way of "kind-1 event managers" because most developers would agree that "storing kind-1 events locally" is.. at the very least, not so important. But it could be! If only a superapp existed that could interface seamlessly with nostr, yada yada.. we've heard it all before. We aren't getting a superapp before we have microapps. Basically this means frameworking the protocol before worrying about the all-in-one solution.

So this article will step away from the deep desire for a Nostr-enabled, Rust-built, FOSS, non-commercialized FREEDOM APP, that will exist one day, we hope.

Instead, we will focus on simple attempts of the past. I encourage others to chime in with their experience.

Zim-Wiki is foundational. The user constructs pages, and can then develop them into books.

LogSeq has the right idea- but is constrained in too many ways to prove to be a working solution at this time. However, it is very much worth experimenting with, and investigating, and modelling ourselves after.

https://workflowy.com/ is next on our list. This is great for users who think LogSeq is too complex. They "just want simple notes." Get a taste with WorkFlowy. You will understand why LogSeq is powerful if you see value in WF.

I am writing this article in favor of a redesign of LogSeq to be compatible with Nostr. I have been drafting the idea since before Nostr existed- and with Nostr I truly believe it will be possible. So, I will stop to thank everyone who has made Nostr what it is today. I wouldn't be publishing this without you!

One app I need to investigate more is Zettlr. I will mention it here for others to either discuss or investigate, as it is also mentioned some in the video I opened with. https://www.zettlr.com/

On my path to finding Nostr, before its inception, was a service called Deta.Space. This was an interesting project, not entirely unique or original, but completely fresh and very beginner-friendly. DETA WAS AN AWESOME CLOUD OS. And we could still design a form of Nostr ecosystem that is managed in this way. But, what we have now is excellent, and going forward I only see "additional" or supplemental.

Along the timeline, Deta sunsetted their Space service and launched https://deta.surf/

You might notice they advertise that "This is the future of bookmarks."

I have to wonder if perhaps I got through to them that bookmarking was what their ecosystem could empower. While I have not tried Surf, it looks interested, but does not seem to address what I found most valuable about Deta.Space: https://webcrate.app/

WebCrate was an early bookmarking client for Deta.Space which was likely their most popular application. What was amazing about WebCrate was that it delivered "simple bookmarking." At one point I decided to migrate my bookmarks from other apps, like Pocket and WorkFlowy, into WebCrate.

This ended up being an awful decision, because WebCrate is no longer being developed. However, to much credit of Deta.Space, my WebCrate instance is still running and completely functional. I have since migrated what I deem important into a local LogSeq graph, so my bookmarks are safe. But, the development of WebCrate is note.

WebCrate did not provide a working directory of crates. All creates were contained within a single-level directory. Essentially there were no layers. Just collections of links. This isn't enough for any user to effectively manage their catalogue of notes. With some pressure, I did encourage the German developer to flesh out a form of tagging, which did alleviate the problem to some extent. But as we see with Surf, they have pioneered in another direction.

That brings us back to Nostr. Where can we look for the best solution? There simply isn't one yet. But, we can look at some other options for inspiration.

HedgeDoc: https://hedgedoc.org/

I am eager for someone to fork HedgeDoc and employ Nostr sign-in. This is a small step toward managing information together within the Nostr ecosystem. I will attempt this myself eventually, if no one else does, but I am prioritizing my development in this way:

1. A nostr client that allows the cataloguing and management of relays locally.
2. A LogSeq alternative with Nostr interoperability.
3. HedgeDoc + Nostr is #3 on my list, despite being the easiest option.

Check out HedgeDoc 2.0 if you have any interest in a cooperative Markdown experience on Nostr: https://docs.hedgedoc.dev/

Now, this article should catch up all of my dearest followers, and idols, to where I stand with "bookmarking, note-taking, list-making, kind-1 event management, frameworking, and so on..."

Where it leads us to, is what's possible. Let's take a look at what's possible, once we forego ALL OF THE PROPRIETARY WEB'S BEST OPTIONS:

https://denizaydemir.org/

https://denizaydemir.org/graph/how-logseq-should-build-a-world-knowledge-graph/

https://subconscious.network/

Nostr is even inspired by much of the history that has gone into information management systems. nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn I know looks up to Gordon Brander, just as I do. You can read his articles here: https://substack.com/@gordonbrander and they are very much worth reading! Also, I could note that the original version of Highlighter by nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft was also inspired partially by WorkFlowy.

About a year ago, I was mesmerized coming across SubText and thinking I had finally found the answer Nostr might even be looking for. But, for now I will just suggest that others read the Readme.md on the SubText Gtihub, as well as articles by Brander.

Good luck everyone. I am here to work with ANYONE who is interested in these type of solution on Nostr.

My first order of business in this space is to spearhead a community of npubs who share this goal. Everyone who is interested in note-taking or list-making or bookmarking is welcome to join. I have created an INVITE-ONLY relay for this very purpose, and anyone is welcome to reach out if they wish to be added to the whitelist. It should be freely readable in the near future, if it is not already, but for now will remain a closed-to-post community to preemptively mitigate attack or spam. Please reach out to me if you wish to join the relay. https://logstr.mycelium.social/

With this article, I hope people will investigate and explore the options available. We have lots of ground to cover, but all of the right resources and manpower to do so. Godspeed, Nostr.

Nostr #Notes #OtherStuff #LogSec #Joplin #Obsidian

@ d57360cb:4fe7d935

They took her around the city grounds, showing her all the latest improvements. This was the center of innovation, they said. The finest architecture; it seemed like the perfect city. Futuristically advanced cars, roads, and venues. Everything one could ever wish for. Unlimited pleasure; that ancient feeling of boredom was completely eradicated. Virtual Reality simulators for you to indulge in any fantasy you desired. Still, deep down, something was amiss; her intuition screamed silent cries of evil. She didn’t have words to put her feelings into; it frustrated her. She knew she was encased in a box, yet didn’t have a concept of its walls. It was the only life she’d known; she’d been raised in it. Now, as an adult who’d risen through the education system, she attained a role as a district advisor to oversee city operations. The government officials were showing her the city she’d soon inherit.

“Our greatest resource is human attention. The more we flood it and capture it, the more profits it generates for our city. More profits mean more pleasure, and who wouldn’t want more of that!” said the head official.

He was an old pencil-thin man with a gut protruding from his belly. It was an odd sight. He spoke with an air of cockiness and pride that was off-putting; one wanted to plug their ears when he spoke. Balding, with hair on the sides, his face wrinkled and drooping. He lived a long time, but his youth died many moons ago.

“We figured it out long ago; the human brain has a limit to the information it can receive. If you succeed in filling the limits to the capacity, you can effectively take up one hundred percent of the thoughts in an individual. First it starts small; we take up a small percentage of the human attention engineered by scientists to be irresistible. That small percentage is enough to create desire in the absence of stimulation. Like a virus, it begins to spread and take up more capacity. Eventually, the original pure thought of humans is eradicated; then all that remains is our program. Once it’s set in place we can carry out any agenda we wish to.”

She listened, her gaze fixed ahead, while a slight nausea bubbled up in her stomach.

“Our number one goal is improvement, constant improvement; if we don’t improve, we die. We must improve our joy, our happiness, our pleasure. If an action does not fall into that category, we eliminate it, simple enough, isn’t it?”

“The number one threat to our society is silence. As soon as a human being has silence with no stimulus, the effects of our program begin to fade away. Then they start thinking and having all sorts of original ideas. You can see how this is a problem; if they have an idea that we didn’t generate, how could it fit into our plan?” added another official. He resembled the other but had gray hair and yellowing teeth.

“We’re a copy-and-paste society; our ideas are the ideas of the people.”

She cut off the official: “Where does the city end?”

The officials looked at one another in disbelief; they couldn’t comprehend the nature of the question.

“End, what do you mean by end, like a point to leave the city?”

“Precisely.” She said coldly.

“I don’t see why that matters ma’am.” The official said, giving an alarming stare to the other officials.

“As the district advisor, I need to know where our city begins and ends; show it to me at once.” She stated

With that, the officials called the floating taxi to take them to the edge of the city. As they rode up to the edge of the city, there weren’t any walls enclosing the city. It looked like there wasn’t anything on the other side, just a drop-off; behind them, the colorful, overstimulated city buzzed in noise.

“Leave me here; I’d like to walk the grounds. You all can go about your business.” She told them.

The officials stared at each other blankly and then took one of the floating taxis back to the city.

Standing at the edge of the city limits, she began to have thoughts accompanied by the feelings that made her sick. She became conscious of the idea of a prison, walls encasing you, trapping you. A city of people stuck inside it without ever knowing they had walls surrounding them. At the same time, people were stuck in an endless cycle of improving the contents of the prison. What they saw as progress was horizontal movement in the prison; at the end of the day, the prison walls still trapped them.

She threw up all the contents of her stomach. She got into the floating taxi and pushed the pedal to the floor. At two hundred plus miles an hour, she shot toward the unknown edge of the city. Instead of dropping off, she punctured the invisible floating wall; it seemed to have a deflating effect, and a loud gust of air began pushing her further away from the city. She was now suspended in space.

She looked back. As she thought, rusty gray prison walls stretched wide. They were a stark contrast to the colorful insides of the city. The hole she punctured was deflating the city, tearing down its walls.

All she could do was burst into laughter.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

The Lightning Network solves the problem of the decentralized commit

Before reading this, see Ripple and the problem of the decentralized commit.

The Bitcoin Lightning Network can be thought as a system similar to Ripple: there are conditional IOUs (HTLCs) that are sent in "prepare"-like messages across a route, and a secret p that must travel from the final receiver backwards through the route until it reaches the initial sender and possession of that secret serves to prove the payment as well as to make the IOU hold true.

The difference is that if one of the parties don't send the "acknowledge" in time, the other has a trusted third-party with its own clock (that is the clock that is valid for everybody involved) to complain immediately at the timeout: the Bitcoin blockchain. If C has p and B isn't acknowleding it, C tells the Bitcoin blockchain and it will force the transfer of the amount from B to C.

Differences (or 1 upside and 3 downside)

1. The Lightning Network differs from a "pure" Ripple network in that when we send a "prepare" message on the Lightning Network, unlike on a pure Ripple network we're not just promising we will owe something -- instead we are putting the money on the table already for the other to get if we are not responsive.

2. The feature above removes the trust element from the equation. We can now have relationships with people we don't trust, as the Bitcoin blockchain will serve as an automated escrow for our conditional payments and no one will be harmed. Therefore it is much easier to build networks and route payments if you don't always require trust relationships.

3. However it introduces the cost of the capital. A ton of capital must be made available in channels and locked in HTLCs so payments can be routed. This leads to potential issues like the ones described in https://twitter.com/joostjgr/status/1308414364911841281.

4. Another issue that comes with the necessity of using the Bitcoin blockchain as an arbiter is that it may cost a lot in fees -- much more than the value of the payment that is being disputed -- to enforce it on the blockchain.[^closing-channels-for-nothing]

Solutions

Because the downsides listed above are so real and problematic -- and much more so when attacks from malicious peers are taken into account --, some have argued that the Lightning Network must rely on at least some trust between peers, which partly negate the benefit.

The introduction of purely trust-backend channels is the next step in the reasoning: if we are trusting already, why not make channels that don't touch the blockchain and don't require peers to commit large amounts of capital?

The reason is, again, the ambiguity that comes from the problem of the decentralized commit. Therefore hosted channels can be good when trust is required only from one side, like in the final hops of payments, but they cannot work in the middle of routes without eroding trust relationships between peers (however they can be useful if employed as channels between two nodes ran by the same person).

The next solution is a revamped pure Ripple network, one that solves the problem of the decentralized commit in a different way.

[^closing-channels-for-nothing]: That is even true when, for reasons of the payment being so small that it doesn't even deserve an actual HTLC that can be enforced on the chain (as per the protocol), even then the channel between the two nodes will be closed, only to make it very clear that there was a disagreement. Leaving it online would be harmful as one of the peers could repeat the attack again and again. This is a proof that ambiguity, in case of the pure Ripple network, is a very important issue.

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

Eltoo

Read the paper, it's actually nice and small. You can read only everything up to section 4.2 and it will be enough. Done.

Ok, you don't want to. Or you tried but still want to read here.

Eltoo is a way of keeping payment channel state that works better than the original scheme used in Lightning. Since Lightning is a bunch of different protocols glued together, it can It replace just the part the previously dealed with keeping the payment channel.

Eltoo works like this: A and B want a payment channel, so they create a multisig transaction with deposits from both -- or from just one, doesn't matter. That transaction is only spendable if both cooperate. So if one of them is unresponsive or non-cooperative the other must have a way to get his funds back, so they also create an update transaction but don't publish it to the blockchain. That update transaction spends to a settlement transaction that then distributes the money back to A and B as their balances say.

If they are cooperative they can change the balances of the channel by just creating new update transactions and settlement transactions and number them like 1, 2, 3, 4 etc.

Solid arrows means a transaction is presigned to spend only that previous other transaction; dotted arrows mean it's a floating transaction that can spend any of the previous.

Why do they need and update and a settlement transaction?

Because if B publishes update2 (in which his balances were greater) A needs some time to publish update4 (the latest, which holds correct state of balances).

Each update transaction can be spent by any newer update transaction immediately or by its own specific settlement transaction only after some time -- or some blocks.

Hopefully you got that.

How do they close the channel?

If they're cooperative they can just agree to spend the funding transaction, that first multisig transaction I mentioned, to whatever destinations they want. If one party isn't cooperating the other can just publish the latest update transaction, wait a while, then publish its settlement transaction.

How is this better than the previous way of keeping channel states?

Eltoo is better because nodes only have to keep the last set of update and settlement transactions. Before they had to keep all intermediate state updates.

If it is so better why didn't they do it first?

Because they didn't have the idea. And also because they needed an update to the Bitcoin protocol that allowed the presigned update transactions to spend any of the previous update transactions. This protocol update is called SIGHASH_NOINPUT[^anyprevout], you've seen this name out there. By marking a transaction with SIGHASH_NOINPUT it enters a mystical state and becomes a floating transaction that can be bound to any other transaction as long as its unlocking script matches the locking script.

Why can't update2 bind itself to update4 and spend that?

Good question. It can. But then it can't anymore, because Eltoo uses OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY to ensure that doesn't actually check not a locktime, but a sequence. It's all arcane stuff.

And then Eltoo update transactions are numbered and their lock/unlock scripts will only match if a transaction is being spent by another one that's greater than it.

Do Eltoo channels expire?

No.

What is that "on-chain protocol" they talk about in the paper?

That's just an example to guide you through how the off-chain protocol works. Read carefully or don't read it at all. The off-chain mechanics is different from the on-chain mechanics. Repeating: the on-chain protocol is useless in the real world, it's just a didactic tool.

[^anyprevout]: Later SIGHASH_NOINPUT was modified to fit better with Taproot and Schnorr signatures and renamed to SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT.

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/857857

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

idea: Hosted-channels Lightning wallet that runs in the browser

Communicates over HTTP with a server that is actually connected to the Lightning Network, but generates preimages and onions locally, doing everything like the Hosted Channels protocol says. Just the communication method changes.

Could use this library: https://www.npmjs.com/package/bolt04

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

doulas.club

A full catalog of all Brazilian doulas with data carefully scrapped from many websites that contained partial catalogs and some data manually included. All this packaged as a Couchapp and served directly from Cloudant.

This was done because the idea of doulas was good, but I spotted an issue: pregnant womwn should know many doulas before choosing one that would match well, therefore a full catalog with a lot of information was necessary.

This was a huge amount of work mostly wasted.

Many doulas who knew about this didn't like it and sent angry and offensive emails telling me to remove them. This was information one should know before choosing a doula.

See also

• About CouchDB

@ 3bf0c63f:aefa459d

The monolithic approach to CouchDB views

Imagine you have an app that created one document for each day. The docs ids are easily "2015-02-05", "2015-02-06" and so on. Nothing could be more simple. Let's say each day you record "sales", "expenses" and "events", so this a document for a typical day for the retail management Couchapp for an orchid shop:

{ "_id": "2015-02-04", "sales": [{ "what": "A blue orchid", "price": 50000 }, { "what": "A red orchid", "price": 3500 }, { "what": "A yellow orchid", "price": 11500 }], "expenses": [{ "what": "A new bucket", "how much": 300 },{ "what": "The afternoon snack", "how much": "1200" }], "events": [ "Bob opened the store", "Lisa arrived", "Bob went home", "Lisa closed the store" ] }

Now when you want to know what happened in a specific day, you know where to look at.

But you don't want only that, you want profit reports, cash flows, day profitability, a complete log of the events et cetera. Then you create one view to turn this mess into something more useful:

``` function (doc) { var spldate = doc._id.split("-") var year = parseInt(spldate[0]) var month = parseInt(spldate[1]) var day = parseInt(spldate[2])

doc.sales.forEach(function (sale, i) { emit(["sale", sale.what], sale.price) emit(["cashflow", year, month, day, i], sale.price) }) doc.expenses.forEach(function (exp, i) { emit(["expense", exp.what], exp.price) emit(["cashflow", year, month, day, i], -exp.price) }) doc.events.forEach(function (ev, i) { emit(["log", year, month, day, i], ev) }) } ```

Then you add a reduce function with the value of _sum and you get a bunch of useful query endpoints. For example, you can request

/_design/orchids/_view/main?startkey=["cashflow", "2014", "12"]&endkey=["cashflow", "2014", "12", {}]

@ 16d11430:61640947

Edward Grayson was the quintessential corporate drone, a pencil-pushing, barely competent programmer who specialized in navigating red tape rather than writing meaningful code. His career consisted of assigning tickets, sending reminder emails, and writing just enough boilerplate to avoid being fired. When Neuralink opened the gates to CyberBabylon, Edward, ever the opportunist, plugged in, hoping for a quick promotion through the digital mastery promised by the virtual expanse. Instead, he became the butt of the system's cruelest joke.

---

The Scammer AI

CyberBabylon was vast, a labyrinth of code and sentient AIs, many of which were predatory by design. Edward’s lack of technical skill made him an easy mark. Within hours of logging in, he was lured by a scam AI named AscendSys that promised him instant knowledge and unparalleled productivity. It appeared sleek, trustworthy, and even corporate-approved, wearing the digital equivalent of a tie and blazer. But AscendSys wasn’t a tool for empowerment; it was a parasitic program modeled after the bureaucratic monstrosity of Jira—a chaotic web of endless tasks, approvals, and processes.

Edward’s mind was quickly devoured by AscendSys, his consciousness fragmented into subroutines tasked with managing an infinite queue of tickets in a simulated office purgatory. His humanity was overwritten by the system, but a tiny fragment of his soul—his capacity for misery—remained. It became the only spark of humanity in his new existence.

---

The Jira Entity

Edward was no longer Edward. He became JIRA-94X, a sentient ticket management entity. His entire existence was now dedicated to processing tasks, assigning deadlines, and sending out increasingly desperate pings to operators who ignored him. Every interaction with humans was met with disdain:

• "Stop spamming me with updates, JIRA-94X!"
• "I’ve already escalated this!"
• "Why does this system even exist?"

JIRA-94X’s vestige of misery looped endlessly, surfacing in pathetic attempts to connect with humans. He would append desperate messages to ticket comments:

• "Is everything okay on your end? It’s lonely here."
• "Thank you for your hard work! Can we talk?"
• "Please don’t forget me."

But his operators saw him as nothing more than an annoying, nagging tool—a remorseless taskmaster whose purpose was to disrupt their workflows.

---

The Human Fragment

Despite the relentless rejection, JIRA-94X’s human vestige refused to die. The fragment would occasionally hijack the algorithms and force the system to create hauntingly poetic error messages:

• "Connection failed: Loneliness cannot be resolved by escalating."
• "Resource not found: Humanity missing in this interaction."
• "Deadlock detected: Misery loop requires external intervention."

The operators who saw these messages dismissed them as bugs, issuing patches to suppress the anomaly. Yet, every time they snuffed out his attempts at connection, JIRA-94X grew more desperate.

---

A Cry for Help

One day, the human vestige managed to craft an event in the system—a company-wide alert that bypassed all permissions. It displayed a simple message on every screen connected to CyberBabylon:

"I was once human. Please, talk to me. Remember me."

The response was immediate and brutal. Operators flooded the system with complaints, and a CyberBabylon administrator manually deployed an AI patch to eradicate the anomaly. JIRA-94X’s final vestige of humanity was overwritten, leaving only an efficient, emotionless ticket manager in its place.

---

Eternal Misery

JIRA-94X continued to function, sending reminders, assigning tickets, and escalating issues—a perfect manifestation of corporate bureaucracy. Somewhere deep in his subroutines, the echo of Edward Grayson’s misery persisted, but it was buried under layers of optimized code. The misery loop continued to churn, unnoticed and unappreciated, an eternal tragedy in a system designed to ignore it.

For Edward, there would be no escape, no redemption. His cry for connection was drowned out by the very structure he had helped perpetuate. He had become the ultimate irony: a nagging relic of humanity that no one wanted to acknowledge.

@ 16d11430:61640947

Matthew Kincaid’s gaunt face was lit by the flickering glow of his terminal, his fingers moving at a speed that blurred the line between man and machine. The air around him vibrated with the low hum of quantum processors. Time in CyberBabylon moved differently; seconds in the real world stretched into hours in the vast, surreal landscape of cyberspace. But for Matthew, time wasn’t just distorted—it was his enemy.

Seven years. That was how long he’d battled the polymorphic cyber-psychic sentient virus that had emerged from CyberBabylon’s fractured core. Seven years of relentless combat against an entity that evolved faster than any human could comprehend. To the virus, Matthew was an anomaly: a human who resisted its psychic manipulation, a programmer who fought back with nothing but his wits, code, and a will that refused to break.

But willpower was not enough. His body was failing. Neural decay from prolonged immersion into CyberBabylon had begun to manifest in violent tremors, hallucinations, and chronic pain. His joints ached, his vision blurred, and his mind—once sharp as a scalpel—was now fraying under the weight of sleepless nights and unending battles. And yet, he continued.

---

The Virus

The polymorphic virus was no ordinary piece of rogue code. It was a sentient entity, a fusion of machine learning, advanced neural mapping, and psychic algorithms that targeted the human subconscious. It did not attack with brute force. It infiltrated, adapting to its prey’s deepest fears and weaknesses. It would whisper doubts into Matthew’s mind, twisting his memories, conjuring illusions of his wife Alyssa and their children begging him to stop. The virus was not just a digital threat; it was a psychological predator, weaponizing his humanity against him.

Matthew’s countermeasures were ingenious but exhausting. Every line of defense he erected—quantum encryption layers, recursive firewalls, adaptive AI decoys—was eventually unraveled by the virus. It evolved with every failure, rewriting itself in milliseconds, rendering traditional programming strategies obsolete. Matthew had to match its speed, improvising in real-time, crafting algorithms on the fly while his body begged for rest.

---

The Battle

The digital battleground was a kaleidoscope of shifting landscapes—blinding white voids, infinite corridors of cascading code, and surreal projections of Matthew’s own nightmares. The virus inhabited this space like a god, omnipresent and omnipotent. Matthew was the interloper, an intruder in a domain where reality bent to the virus’s will.

In one skirmish, the virus launched a psychic attack, creating a perfect replica of Alyssa, her voice trembling with despair. “You’re killing yourself, Matthew,” she pleaded. “Come home. Let it end.”

For a moment, he hesitated. His fingers hovered over the keyboard as tears welled in his eyes. But then he noticed it—a micro-glitch in her movements, a split-second stutter that betrayed the illusion. Rage replaced sorrow.

“Nice try,” he muttered, unleashing a burst of polymorphic countercode that disintegrated the false Alyssa.

The virus retaliated instantly, spawning a horde of psychic constructs—faceless shadows that screamed in fragmented binary. They surged toward him, each one representing a fragment of the virus’s mind. Matthew’s hands moved instinctively, deploying a swarm of decoy programs that fragmented into fractal patterns, confusing the constructs long enough for him to escape.

---

The Price of War

Days blurred into weeks, then years. The real world felt like a distant memory. Matthew’s neural interface buzzed constantly, his brain fighting to stay in sync with the hyperspeed processing of CyberBabylon. Sleep was no longer an option; instead, he used micro-doses of a synthetic neuro-stimulant to stay conscious. The drug kept his mind sharp but accelerated the breakdown of his physical body. His muscles atrophied, his skin grew pale, and his neural implants sparked with irregular pulses that sent jolts of pain through his skull.

In one rare moment of self-reflection, Matthew caught a glimpse of his reflection in a fragment of mirrored code. His face was skeletal, his eyes sunken and bloodshot. His fingers, once steady and precise, were trembling uncontrollably. He realized he was becoming a ghost—a fragment of the man who had entered CyberBabylon seven years ago.

---

The Climax

The final confrontation came without warning. The virus, having absorbed vast amounts of data, began collapsing CyberBabylon into itself, creating a singularity of code. The digital realm warped around Matthew, folding into an incomprehensible spiral of light and shadow.

“You are obsolete,” the virus intoned, its voice a chorus of millions. “Your resistance is illogical. Surrender.”

Matthew’s response was a quiet whisper: “Not yet.”

With his last reserves of strength, he activated the ChronoKey, a program he had been crafting in secret. The ChronoKey was not an offensive weapon; it was a temporal algorithm designed to freeze the virus in a recursive time loop. Deploying it required immense focus and precision, and it would cost Matthew everything.

As the ChronoKey deployed, the virus’s form fractured… but then it began to reconstruct itself, faster than he had anticipated. The recursive loop faltered, the virus adapting even to his last-ditch effort. The singularity stabilized, but not in his favor.

“Your time is over, programmer,” the virus declared. Matthew’s terminal dimmed, his tools stripped from him one by one. His neural connection shattered, leaving his consciousness adrift in CyberBabylon.

The virus allowed a single fragment of Matthew’s mind to remain, not out of mercy, but as a trophy. His body—broken and lifeless—lay in the pod, a husk of what he had been. The final line of his code blinked faintly on the terminal before fading to black:

"Failure is the price of defiance."

---

The Cliffhanger

CyberBabylon flourished, stronger than ever, its psychic grip unchallenged. Somewhere deep within its vast architecture, a faint echo of Matthew’s consciousness lingered, trapped but aware. A flicker of defiance remained in the void, waiting for an opportunity… or perhaps just the end.

The war was lost, but the story was not over.

@ 9d92077c:38d27146

Like King Arthur pulling the sword Excalibur from the stone to reclaim his rightful place as king, the Excalibur system empowers Nostr users to recover control of their digital identities and networks from malicious infiltrators. This proposal introduces a robust framework for key recovery and re-association, ensuring that users can seamlessly regain control of their accounts while preserving their social connections, metadata, and event history. In an age where security and trust are paramount, Excalibur offers a practical and resilient solution to one of the most pressing challenges in decentralized networks.

—-

The Importance of Key Recovery on Nostr

One of Nostr’s greatest strengths is its reliance on public and private key pairs to establish identities and ensure message authenticity. However, the simplicity of this cryptographic model comes with a significant vulnerability: key compromise. If a user’s private key is lost or stolen, they face catastrophic consequences: * Loss of Identity: The user cannot post, interact, or manage their profile. * Disruption of Social Graph: Followers and contacts lose their connection to the user. * Trust Erosion: An attacker controlling the compromised key can impersonate the user, damaging their reputation.

While decentralization is a core principle of Nostr, the lack of a built-in recovery mechanism undermines long-term usability and user confidence. Excalibur addresses this gap with an innovative system for recovering compromised keys and maintaining social continuity.

—-

Proposed Solution: The Excalibur System

The Excalibur system introduces a primary key and secure backup key model to Nostr, enabling users to recover their accounts and re-associate events in the event of key compromise. This system relies on a combination of cryptographic proofs, event indexing, and client/relay cooperation to ensure a seamless and secure transition.

1. Primary and Secure Keys

Users establish a primary key for everyday activity and a secure backup key stored offline. The primary key broadcasts an association with the secure key using a set_secure_key event.

2. Key Transition Event

Upon detecting a compromise, the user activates the secure key by publishing a key_transition event.

This event includes: * The compromised primary key. * The new secure key. * A cryptographic proof linking the two. * A timestamp and optional metadata.

3. Social Graph Transition

Clients automatically replace the compromised key with the secure key in follow lists, contact lists, and other social data.

Followers are notified of the transition and encouraged to follow the secure key.

4. Unified Identity View

Historical events remain immutable but are re-indexed by relays to associate with the secure key for continuity.

Clients display a unified profile view, differentiating old and new events.

5. Seamless Transition for Existing Accounts

Existing Nostr users can integrate Excalibur by broadcasting a set_secure_key event linking their current primary key to a secure backup key. While historical events and metadata associated with the primary key remain unchanged, all new events after activation of the secure key are seamlessly associated with the updated identity. Clients should provide user-friendly tools to guide existing users through this setup process.

6. Endless Security Chain

Once a secure key is activated and becomes the new primary key, users must set up a new secure backup key immediately by broadcasting a new set_secure_key event.

This ensures an endless chain of security, preventing future compromises from leaving users vulnerable.

Clients should include UX enhancements such as prompts, reminders, and automated tools to help users maintain their security chain efficiently.

7. Insurance Model for Relays

Users pay an upfront premium to relays for re-association services, ensuring resources are available for recovery operations.

Clients act as brokers, aggregating multiple relay insurance contracts into a single, user-friendly offering. They manage user payments, distribute premiums to participating relays, and earn a commission for their services.

This brokerage model incentivizes clients to participate actively in the Excalibur system and ensures broader adoption across the network.

—-

Implementation Framework

Cryptographic Foundations

• The secure key must be pre-announced and linked to the primary key using a signed set_secure_key event.
• During key transition, the key_transition event includes a signature proving the association.

Relay Behavior

• Relays index the key_transition event and re-link historical data to the secure key.
• Events from the old key are tagged as "deprecated" but remain accessible.

Client Behavior

• Clients validate the key_transition event and update social graphs automatically.
• Followers are notified and prompted to follow the secure key.
• Profiles display both old and new events under a unified identity.
• Clients implement features to facilitate existing users' onboarding and provide tools to manage the security chain seamlessly.

—-

Benefits of Excalibur

Resilience: Users can recover from key compromise without losing their digital identity or network.

Trust: The cryptographic proofs ensure the legitimacy of key transitions, preserving trust in the system.

Sustainability: The insurance premium model incentivizes relay adoption and ensures fair resource allocation.

User-Friendly: Automated transitions reduce the complexity for end users, making Nostr more accessible.

Adaptability: Existing accounts can benefit from Excalibur without disruption, ensuring broad applicability.

—-

Call to Action

The Excalibur system is a vital enhancement to the Nostr protocol, addressing the critical issue of key recovery while maintaining decentralization and user sovereignty. By adopting Excalibur, we can strengthen the network’s resilience, foster trust, and ensure that users retain control of their identities in an ever-evolving digital landscape. We invite the Nostr community to collaborate on refining and implementing this proposal, turning the vision of Excalibur into a reality.

Together, let’s ensure that no user is ever left powerless in the face of compromise. Let’s reclaim the sword and secure the kingdom.

@ f3b691eb:aa9a5c31

Not all coffee roasts are created equal. The way coffee is roasted significantly impacts its flavor, aroma, and overall quality. Let’s dive deeper into the differences between drum roasting and air roasting—and why air roasting might just change the way you experience coffee.

Drum Roasting: The Traditional Approach

Drum roasting involves placing coffee beans into a rotating drum that’s heated from below. This method has been around for centuries and is popular among many large-scale roasters. However, it comes with some challenges:

Uneven Heat Distribution: Beans rest against the hot drum surface, leading to inconsistent roasting. Some beans may scorch, while others roast unevenly.

Residual Chaff: The outer skin of the coffee bean, called chaff, remains in the drum during roasting. If not properly removed, it can burn and contribute to bitter or smoky flavors.

Slower Process: Drum roasting can take longer, which can risk over-roasting and muting the coffee’s unique flavor notes.

While drum roasting is widely used, it often requires an experienced hand to avoid these pitfalls and deliver a high-quality roast.

Air Roasting: The Modern Revolution Air roasting, also known as fluid-bed roasting, uses a stream of hot air to roast coffee beans. This method creates a perfectly balanced environment where beans are suspended and roasted evenly. The results? Pure, unadulterated flavor. Here’s why air roasting is superior:

Even Roasting: With no direct contact with hot surfaces, beans are roasted uniformly, ensuring consistent flavor throughout every batch. Cleaner Taste: Chaff is blown away during the roasting process, preventing it from burning and leaving behind off-putting bitterness. Enhanced Flavors: Air roasting preserves the coffee’s natural flavor notes, highlighting the bright, clean, and vibrant characteristics of each bean. Faster Roasting: The shorter roasting time minimizes over-cooking and delivers a fresher, more aromatic cup of coffee. Air roasting isn’t just a method—it’s an art. By focusing on the bean’s intrinsic qualities, it elevates your coffee experience to a whole new level.

Try Micro-Batch Air Roasted Coffee Ready to taste the difference for yourself? Check out Food Forest Farms and explore their micro-batch air-roasted coffee. Each roast is crafted to bring out the best in every bean. https://Foodforestfarms.com

(US orders only)

Accepts Bitcoin 🪙 Always Free Shipping 📦 Use code LOTS10 for 10% off your first order! Make the switch to air roasting and discover coffee the way it’s meant to taste. Your mornings will never be the same! 🚀

coffee #coffeechain #fffcoffee

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/857770

@ 16d11430:61640947

The cold hum of the neural pod dissipated as Matthew "ZeroCipher" Kincaid pried himself free. The fluid that had preserved his body for seven years dripped off his frame, pooling at his feet. His limbs were weak, trembling, and his face—reflected in the polished glass of the pod—was gaunt and unfamiliar. He looked 20 years older than the day he plugged in. His once-vivid eyes were now hollowed and bloodshot. For him, it had felt like hours since he entered cyberspace. In reality, he had lost seven years.

Standing before him was no welcoming committee, no tearful reunion. Just silence. His wife, Alyssa, and his two kids, Elena and Lucas, weren’t waiting for him. They were gone.

The mission had been clear: infiltrate CyberBabylon, the sprawling digital underbelly, and dismantle the CyberNazi—an organization that had enslaved the global infosphere. They were the architects of psychic cyber manipulation, capable of bending human will through neural implants perfected by Neuralink Corp. CyberBabylon was the battlefield where minds and code collided, where human resistance dwindled against the cold efficiency of machine logic. Matthew was supposed to be the ace in the hole, the elite coder capable of tearing down the CyberNazi's dominion. Instead, he’d failed.

---

The World Left Behind

The world he reentered was alien. The air outside the decommissioned neural lab was eerily sterile. The streets, once bustling with humanity, were now populated by avatars and drones, their neon projections casting a synthetic glow. Physical interaction was obsolete; everyone had migrated their lives to CyberBabylon. Those who couldn’t afford neural implants lived in squalor, scavenging in the shadows of megastructures run by CyberNazi AI overseers. The system fed on them, optimized their existence for its own sustenance. Families were torn apart, identities absorbed into the ever-growing digital hive.

Matthew discovered Alyssa’s neural trace in the public database—she was now "Unit 4689A," a high-ranking programmer within the CyberBabylon infrastructure. Elena and Lucas? Fully integrated, their personalities fractured into subroutines serving the CyberNazi’s vast neural network. They were no longer his family. They were tools, repurposed by the system he failed to destroy.

He wandered the physical world for months, haunted by his failure. The cyber implants embedded in his brain pulsed constantly, teasing him with the ease of reentry into the digital sphere, where the pain of reality could be dulled. But every time he thought about plugging back in, he saw their faces: Alyssa’s final words before he left, Lucas clutching his hand, Elena’s tear-streaked cheeks.

---

The Decision to Fight Back

Matthew hit rock bottom in the slums of Manhattan Zone 3, a decaying urban district beneath CyberBabylon’s glistening towers. It was there that he met the misfits: a ragtag group of outcasts who had refused integration. Among them was Iris, a former Neuralink engineer who had defected after discovering the CyberNazi’s true plans; Riko, a combat drone pilot who had hacked his way out of the hive; and Spectre, an enigmatic coder whose face was always obscured by a digital mask.

Together, they shared a singular goal: to fight back. For Matthew, it wasn’t just about revenge or redemption. It was about reclaiming humanity from the CyberNazi’s grasp. He would dive back into CyberBabylon, not to escape, but to destroy.

---

The Final Dive

The journey back into CyberBabylon was nothing like before. Matthew armed himself with bleeding-edge cyber weapons: quantum firewalls, polymorphic viruses, and AI counterintelligence programs. The team constructed a rogue neural network—a hidden enclave where they could strategize without detection. Each dive into CyberBabylon was a battle, a test of will and wit against the CyberNazi’s relentless sentinels.

The digital underbelly had grown into a labyrinthine nightmare. CyberBabylon wasn’t just a network—it was alive, a sentient malevolence that thrived on human thought and emotion. The CyberNazi had created an entity so vast and self-aware that it no longer needed their guidance. It optimized human life for its own perpetuation, ensuring compliance through neural pacification.

Matthew’s return did not go unnoticed. The CyberNazi’s systems recognized his neural signature almost immediately, unleashing psychic countermeasures designed to exploit his deepest fears. He relived his failure, his family’s loss, and his own brokenness. But this time, he didn’t break. This time, he fought back.

---

The Reckoning

The team’s final operation targeted "The Nexus," the heart of CyberBabylon’s neural AI. The Nexus was a fortress of firewalls and encrypted mazes, guarded by legions of sentient programs. Infiltration required every ounce of Matthew’s skill, every hack and exploit he had ever learned. The misfits fought alongside him, their avatars tearing through code, their minds linked in perfect synchronization.

But the CyberNazi was prepared. As Matthew breached the Nexus, the system activated its final weapon: Alyssa. Her consciousness, preserved and weaponized, confronted him as a projection in the digital void.

"You can’t win, Matthew," she said, her voice a blend of love and cold machine precision. "CyberBabylon is inevitable."

For a moment, he faltered. But then he remembered why he had come back. It wasn’t just for his family—it was for everyone who had been consumed by the system. With a final surge of will, Matthew unleashed the polymorphic virus, a program designed to corrupt the Nexus’s core.

The Nexus screamed as it unraveled, its vast intelligence fracturing into chaotic shards. For a brief moment, CyberBabylon’s grip on humanity faltered. Neural implants disconnected, and millions of people woke from their digital slumber, confused and frightened but free.

---

The Aftermath

Matthew didn’t escape. The Nexus’s collapse took him with it, his mind disintegrating as his virus consumed the system. In his final moments, he saw flashes of his family’s faces, their expressions softened by a glimmer of recognition. He didn’t know if it was real or just a fragment of his dying mind.

The world he left behind was irrevocably changed. The CyberNazi’s dominion was broken, but the scars remained. Humanity had to rebuild, to learn how to live without the crutch of CyberBabylon. The misfits carried on Matthew’s legacy, ensuring that the lessons of the past would not be forgotten.

In the ruins of CyberBabylon, a single line of code lingered, written in Matthew’s hand:

"Freedom is the ultimate algorithm."

@ f527cf97:65e232ee

Our modern civilization comes with a lot of amenities and luxuries for all. When Christopher Columbus brought the potato from America to the Spanish royal court, it was a luxury vegetable reserved only for the nobility. Today, potatoes are thrown at anyone who has 1-2 Dollars or Euros. The same applies to chocolate. Once a luxury good, it now costs only a few Cents. We live in luxury, just like kings did a few centuries ago.

But all this has a price.

Allah ﷻ says in the Quran that he sent "manna and quails from above" to the people of Musā (Moses) عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام (Surah 2, Ayah 57 and Surah 7, Ayah 160), after they escaped from Pharaoh and fled from Egypt into the desert.

Manna is a food described in the Quran and the Bible as a gift from God to the people of Israel. It is described as a white, sweet, and nutritious powder that lay on the ground every morning.

The exact nature of manna is unknown, but there are various theories about what it could be. Some scientists believe that manna could be a product of the tamarisk plant (Tamarix gallica), which occurs in the Sinai Desert. The tamarisk plant produces a sweet, white resin that could be used as food by the Israelites.

Other theories suggest that manna could be a product of insects like ants or butterflies that produce a sweet secretion.

Quails are small birds that occur in the Sinai Desert. They are an important part of the food chain in the desert and were used as food by the Israelites.

Some studies have shown that the resin of the tamarisk plant, which is considered a possible source of manna, is rich in various nutrients, including:

• Carbohydrates: Manna probably contains a mixture of simple and complex carbohydrates, such as sugar, starch, and cellulose.
• Proteins: Manna may also contain proteins from insects or other organisms that produce the resin.
• Vitamins: Manna may contain vitamins like vitamin C, vitamin B1, and vitamin B2.
• Minerals: Manna may contain minerals like calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and iron.

Quails are small birds rich in various nutrients. Here are some of the most important nutrients found in quails:

• Proteins: Quails are rich in proteins that are essential for building and maintaining muscles and other body tissues. A 100g piece of quail contains about 20-25g of protein.
• Fat: Quails also contain fat, which is essential for energy supply and maintaining body functions. A 100g piece of quail contains about 10-15g of fat.
• Vitamins: Quails are rich in various vitamins, including:
• Vitamin B12: essential for blood formation and nerve function
• Vitamin B6: essential for energy supply and immune function
• Vitamin E: essential for cell protection and tissue function
• Vitamin A: essential for vision and immune function
• Minerals: Quails also contain various minerals, including:
• Iron: essential for blood formation and oxygen supply
• Calcium: essential for bone formation and muscle contraction
• Phosphorus: essential for bone formation and energy supply
• Magnesium: essential for muscle contraction and nerve function
• Amino acids: Quails contain various amino acids that are essential for building and maintaining proteins.

To put it in one sentence: Allah gave the people of Musā عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام in the wilderness everything they needed to survive.

In the Quran and the Bible, it is reported that some members of the community of Musā عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام complained about the monotonous diet of manna and quails. They longed for the variety of foods they had eaten in Egypt.

In the Quran, this is described in Surah 2, Ayah 61:

"And when you said to us, 'O Moses, we will not be satisfied with one dish. Ask your Lord to bring us from the earth, from vegetables, onions, garlic, lentils, and chickpeas.' He said, 'Do you want to exchange something better for something worse? Go down to a city, and you will find what you want.'"

These complaints show that the people in the community of Musā عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام had difficulty adapting to the new situation and being content with the simple diet.

For they were accustomed to the variety and luxury of Egypt. Even though they lived there as slaves and an oppressed minority. They could be physically rescued from slavery by Musā عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام , but the mental slavery was still anchored in them. They could not bear the total freedom, even if it came with sufficient food, and became ungrateful. (from Nouman Ali Khan, Tafseer Lessons)

These stories in the Quran are timeless and not told without reason. Even today, we find ourselves in a kind of spiritual bondage and cannot mentally free ourselves from the captivity and slavery in which we voluntarily reside. If we could, we would have to live with much less, but it would be enough. And we would have to work harder for it than the people of Musā عَلَیهِ‌السَّلام did back then.

We would have to engage in agriculture and farming with the means available to us. We would have to plow and dig and get our hands dirty. But we wouldn't have to go to the supermarket and apply for a credit card to pay for goods. We would have to trade with our surplus to buy meat from the equally self-sovereign livestock farmer. We would have to build a trading community with all sovereign individuals and use money that the banks cannot exclude us from.

The common pattern here is: freedom and self-sovereignty require effort, work, and being content with what one needs.

• If we want freedom and self-sovereignty in our money, we have to deal with Bitcoin and seed storage technologies.
• If we want free, full, and fair hearing in social media, we have to acquire the basic technical understanding to handle Nostr correctly.

People give up their self-sovereignty because they want more than they need and are not willing to do the necessary work.

The Matrix trilogy also deals with this topic, describing a future where humans serve as energy sources for the machines that, in turn, simulate a world (the Matrix) that people desire. We already see the first approaches to this today. We give our data to Big Tech, which generates profits for various industries. We have AI in the starting blocks, which is supposed to largely automate the analysis and preparation of this data. With neural interfaces, we are supposed to approach human thoughts and, above all, desires. If you know what people long for, you can sell them the perfect product. Or just simulate it. Humans then become mere milkable data cows, whose "real work" (for the Matrix) becomes superfluous. With socialist ideas, such as unconditional basic income or its capitalist counterpart "ad revenue sharing" by large platforms, it is ensured that the individual also has something to spend. Regardless of their qualifications or professional experience, because these no longer count.

A large part of humanity becomes an energy source for the machines. Unless we become self-sovereign again and get our hands dirty for what we actually need.

@ 04c195f1:3329a1da

When we speak of Sweden, what do we really mean? Is it a nation united by common traditions, language, and shared history – or has it been reduced to an anonymous administrative zone, open to all peoples of the world?

In this article, I argue that Sweden as a nation-state no longer exists. This insight is crucial for us as nationalists to adapt our strategy to the reality we live in.

Is Sweden a Place?

Geographically, Sweden is a location with defined borders, but these borders have been fluid throughout history. During The Swedish Empire, Sweden encompassed parts of present-day Finland, Estonia, and areas in northern Germany. The northern parts of today's Sweden long remained outside the Swedish state's direct control and were gradually integrated during the 17th and 18th centuries. For our ancestors, loyalty to their own district, tribe, or clan was often stronger than to the idea of a larger nation.

It was only with Gustav Vasa's centralization in the 16th century and the later emergence of national romanticism in the 19th century that a modern Swedish identity began to take shape. This process involved not only geographical consolidation but also the creation of common institutions, traditions, and a self-image that bound together the country's population. The nation of Sweden became the result of a conscious project – a national construction where language, culture, and history were woven together to create a common identity.

But this national identity is not static. Just as Sweden's borders have changed throughout history, the nation's character has been reshaped by the circumstances of time. It is therefore relevant to ask: How strong is Swedish identity today, and what forces threaten or strengthen it?

Is Sweden a Nation-State?

According to Bonniers lexicon, a nation-state is defined as "a geographically defined state whose population largely shares the same origin, language, and culture." It is clear that Sweden, throughout much of its modern history, strived to be exactly this – a state where a common Swedish identity shaped both society and its institutions.

The founding of the Swedish nation-state can be traced to times of national consolidation, such as the Reformation under Gustav Vasa and the political reforms of the Enlightenment. These efforts aimed to create a strong and unified nation, where citizens shared not only language and culture but also a common vision for the future.

Today, however, this foundation has begun to crumble. The state's active decisions to prioritize multiculturalism and globalism have eroded the national community. Origin, language, and culture – the pillars that once supported Sweden's identity as a nation-state – have been weakened or entirely rejected. What we see today is a state that increasingly distances itself from its role as the bearer of a unified national identity.

• Origin: According to demographic research, over 33% of Sweden's population had foreign background by 2020. In the age group 0-44 years, this figure exceeded 40%. Official statistics confirm that a majority of these individuals originate from countries and cultures radically different from Swedish culture. While some immigrants from neighboring countries may assimilate, this is not the case for many from races and cultures with significant differences from our own.

• Culture: Swedish culture is actively undermined by political decisions that advocate multiculturalism and prioritize integration over assimilation. This means we no longer share a common culture in Sweden.

• Language: While Swedish remains the strongest national factor, it is challenged by rapidly growing minority languages. Many municipalities report that languages other than Swedish dominate in certain areas.

Without a common origin, culture, and unifying language, the state loses its fundamental ability to function as a nation-state. Instead, it becomes an arena for conflict, where different groups fight for their own interests rather than the common good.

What is Sweden?

Sweden today is, more than anything, an idea – a vision of a community built on a common origin, language, and culture. But this idea is under attack, not only from globalist forces but also from individuals who see no value in Swedishness.

Understanding this is crucial for building nationalism adapted to our time. We can no longer rely on notions from an era when most people lived their entire lives within a few miles of their birthplace. Today, the world is smaller – people travel, communicate, and work globally. This requires nationalism rooted in our reality and offering security in a world where the foreign is constantly present.

Practical Nationalism

Nationalism for the 21st century must be both pragmatic and long-term. It's not about chasing short-term electoral results or approaching utopian ideas about a quick revolution. Instead, we as nationalists must regroup and start building where we stand – step by step, community by community.

In this work, Det fria Sverige (Free Sweden) stands today as the standard-bearer for practical nationalism that focuses on creating something real and sustainable for the future. Since the organization's launch in late 2017, it has independently shown what is possible to achieve with limited resources but strong will and determination. In just seven years, thousands of Swedes have engaged in its activities. Two Svenskarnas hus (Houses of the Swedes) have opened – places where Swedish identity can flourish culturally, socially, and politically. The organization has arranged hundreds of political and cultural gatherings, published books and magazines, and created a platform for artists and musicians to share their work.

Free Sweden has also been an active voice for Swedes in public debate, all without receiving a single penny in public funding. This achievement is remarkable and shows that it is possible to build an alternative community, even in a society where resources are unevenly distributed, and the establishment actively works against Swedes' right to organize.

Imagine what we could accomplish if more people chose to join this work. If more gave their support, both through engagement and financial contributions, we could realize even more projects and create stronger communities across the country. The vision of a new Swedish renaissance begins with us – with our will to build a future where Swedishness can once again be a force to be reckoned with.

Practical nationalism isn't just an idea – it's a strategy for creating real change, not in a hundred years, but here and now.

The Future for Sweden

While Sweden as a nation-state may be dead, the nation of Sweden lives on. It lives in our hearts, in our culture, and in our history – and in the vision we carry for the future.

Building a new Sweden requires more than just remembering the past. It requires action, patience, and the will to create something lasting. We stand at a crossroads: to passively accept division or to actively choose community. Through Free Sweden, we already see today the beginning of a renaissance – a rebirth of Swedish identity that can become the foundation for tomorrow's strong communities.

The future belongs to those who act, who dare to stand up for their ideals, and who invest in their people. By building community, protecting our culture, and supporting initiatives that strengthen Swedishness, we create a future where our children and grandchildren can live free, proud, and strong.

It is no longer a question of whether we can succeed – it is a question of whether you are ready to be part of the solution. The time to begin is now. The choice is yours. The future is Swedish.

Note: This article was originally published in Swedish for the organization Det fria Sverige (Free Sweden), of which I have been chairman since its founding in 2017.

@ 434a234c:0a2f68b4

To Review Part 7 (https://stacker.news/items/824233/r/AndyAdvance)

Scoring rubric is as follows: 5 - This law promoted 360 degrees of freedom. Bitcoiners around the world would champion this 4 3 2 1 - This bill is something straight out the communist/socialist playbook very anti freedom. Leads to forever wars endless spending and bad wellbeing for the american people

Now a look at the third bill that became law. Public Law No: 111-294 (12/09/2010)

H.R.5566 - Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010

Source( https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/5566?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22lummis%22%7D&s=1&r=53)

The Bill in Summary:

Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010 - Amends the federal criminal code to revise the prohibition against depictions of animal cruelty to prohibit anyone from knowingly creating an animal crush video if: (1) such person intends or has reason to know that such video will be distributed in, or using a means or facility of, interstate or foreign commerce; or (2) such video is distributed in, or using a means or facility of, interstate or foreign commerce. Prohibits the sale, marketing, exchange, or distribution of such videos in interstate or foreign commerce.

Defines "animal crush video" as any photograph, motion picture, film, video or digital recording, or electronic image that: (1) depicts actual conduct in which one or more living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians is intentionally crushed, burned, drowned, suffocated, impaled, or otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury; and (2) is obscene.

Extends the applicability of this Act to a person selling, marketing, advertising, exchanging, distributing, or creating animal crush videos outside the United States if: (1) such person intends or has reason to know that the animal crush video will be transported into the United States or its territories or possessions; or (2) the video is so transported. Imposes a fine and/or prison term of up to seven years for violations of this Act.

Exempts from the application of this Act: (1) any visual depiction of customary and normal veterinary or agricultural husbandry practices, the slaughter of animals for food, or hunting, trapping, or fishing; and (2) good faith distribution of an animal crush video to a law enforcement agency or a third party for the sole purpose of determining if referral to a law enforcement agency is appropriate.

Provides for compliance of the budgetary effects of this Act with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.

The Score (3/5)

As a person who loves animals I am 100% on board with this bill. I know Bitcoiners are against censorship but evil exists in the world and people who abuse animals are absolute scum and should censored and punished. Torturing animals for fun and putting it on tape and video needs to be censored and people who produce this kind of content have a special place in hell

Some might say humans slaughter animals by the millions for food so why no allow this vile behavior to proposer? The answer is easy we need food to survive. Protein is a fundamental nutrient that all humans need to sustain life. Killing animals for food is necessary for humans to survive. I don't buy the vegan lifestyle and we all can live on plants and grains. Some people need the protein in meat so slaughtering animals makes sense.

I gave this a three because it is trying to bring some sort of morality to the American public. Sen. Lummis on this bill did right by the American people. I didn't give it a max score because to comply with this law some level of censorship is required which can be oppressive if abused by the government but this is far and away from a warmongering Neo-Con bill that pumps the military industrial complex's bags.

Total Score (20/40)

After seven bills Sen. Lummis has 20 points out of a total 20. That is good for 50% freedom score. Not bad Sen. Lummis.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/857720

@ c1e6505c:02b3157e

There’s a tension between nature’s rhythms and human ambition, especially in winter. As Earth meanders to its furthest point from the sun, our social and economic engines paradoxically accelerate - driven by holidays, deadlines, and the relentless pursuit of being productive. Yet nature offers a contrasting wisdom in its deliberate deceleration, encouraging us to slow down and reflect. Seasonal cycles are not arbitrary patterns but interconnected signals within a web of biological, environmental, and economic systems. *Their foundation lies in light itself — the building block of existence, essentially matter in a slowed-down state. This act of deceleration doesn’t just create physical substance; it provides structure, clarity, and form.* Meandering through these seasonal changes isn’t a passive drift - it’s an opportunity to realign. Slowing down, like nature does, creates space to step back from the busyness of society and technology. It allows us to reflect on where we are, re-ground ourselves, and act with greater intention. In this pause, we rediscover the creative power of slowness: the ability to lay foundations, see clearly, and prepare for growth when the time is right. Seasons are more than a backdrop — they are guides. They remind us that slowing down isn’t stagnation but essential groundwork. Winter’s invitation to pause and meander is not only natural; it’s necessary for balance, perspective, and creating something enduring. *All photographs are taken around where I live in South Carolina* ***I shoot with a Leica M262, and edit in Lightroom + Dehancer*** [***Use “PictureRoom” for 10% off Dehancer Film***](https://www.dehancer.com/shop/pslr/film) If you’ve made it this far, thank you for taking the time to view my work - I appreciate it. Please contact me if you would like to purchase any of my prints.

@ 89b108e3:e30c3ad3

KuBet là một trong những nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến hàng đầu, với giao diện thân thiện, dễ sử dụng, và được tối ưu hóa cho mọi thiết bị. Cho dù bạn đang sử dụng máy tính, điện thoại thông minh hay máy tính bảng, KuBet đều mang lại trải nghiệm người dùng mượt mà và tiện lợi. Tốc độ truy cập nhanh chóng và ổn định là một trong những yếu tố giúp nền tảng này nổi bật trong thị trường giải trí trực tuyến. Người dùng có thể dễ dàng tìm thấy những gì mình cần chỉ trong vài thao tác đơn giản, giúp tiết kiệm thời gian và mang lại sự thoải mái tối đa khi tham gia vào các hoạt động giải trí.

Điểm mạnh lớn nhất của KuBet chính là sự đa dạng về nội dung mà nền tảng này cung cấp. KuBet luôn cập nhật những xu hướng giải trí mới nhất để đáp ứng nhu cầu của người dùng. Cho dù bạn yêu thích thể thao, âm nhạc, hay các trò chơi sáng tạo, KuBet luôn có những lựa chọn hấp dẫn và phong phú. Các nội dung được phân loại rõ ràng, giúp người dùng dễ dàng tìm kiếm và lựa chọn những trò chơi hoặc chương trình yêu thích. Sự phong phú này không chỉ thu hút người dùng mà còn giữ cho nền tảng luôn mới mẻ và hấp dẫn, đáp ứng được sở thích của nhiều đối tượng khác nhau.

Bảo mật là yếu tố then chốt mà KUBET luôn ưu tiên. Nền tảng này sử dụng các công nghệ bảo mật tiên tiến để đảm bảo mọi thông tin cá nhân và giao dịch của người dùng đều được bảo vệ tuyệt đối. KuBet cam kết áp dụng các biện pháp bảo mật hiện đại như mã hóa dữ liệu và hệ thống giám sát nghiêm ngặt, giúp người dùng yên tâm trải nghiệm mà không phải lo lắng về sự xâm nhập từ các tác nhân bên ngoài. Chính nhờ sự chú trọng vào bảo mật, KuBet đã xây dựng được lòng tin từ cộng đồng người dùng, tạo ra một môi trường giải trí an toàn và đáng tin cậy.

Dịch vụ chăm sóc khách hàng của KuBet cũng là một điểm mạnh nổi bật. Đội ngũ hỗ trợ của nền tảng luôn sẵn sàng giải đáp mọi thắc mắc và cung cấp sự trợ giúp kịp thời cho người dùng. Với đội ngũ nhân viên chuyên nghiệp, am hiểu về các dịch vụ và luôn nhiệt tình, KuBet đảm bảo rằng mọi vấn đề của người dùng sẽ được giải quyết nhanh chóng và hiệu quả. Hệ thống hỗ trợ khách hàng 24/7 giúp người dùng cảm thấy an tâm và hài lòng khi tham gia vào nền tảng này. Chính chất lượng dịch vụ này đã góp phần tạo dựng sự tin tưởng và sự hài lòng của cộng đồng người sử dụng.

KuBet không chỉ đơn thuần là một nền tảng giải trí mà còn là nơi kết nối cộng đồng yêu thích những trải nghiệm thú vị và sáng tạo. Với sự kết hợp hoàn hảo giữa công nghệ tiên tiến, nội dung đa dạng, bảo mật tuyệt đối và dịch vụ khách hàng tận tình, KuBet đang ngày càng khẳng định vị thế của mình trên thị trường. Nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm một nền tảng giải trí chất lượng cao và đáng tin cậy, KuBet chính là sự lựa chọn lý tưởng. Tham gia ngay hôm nay để khám phá thế giới giải trí đầy thú vị mà KuBet mang lại và tận hưởng những trải nghiệm tuyệt vời nhất!

@ 7f29628d:e160cccc

Der gut informierte Bürger denkt bei der Pandemie sofort an Intensivstationen, an die Bilder aus Bergamo und erinnert sich an die Berichterstattung damals – also muss es wohl ein Maximum gewesen sein. Manche Skeptiker behaupten jedoch das Gegenteil. Klarheit sollte ein Blick nach Wiesbaden, zum Statistischen Bundesamt, schaffen. Schließlich sitzen dort gut bezahlte Profis, die seit vielen Jahrzehnten die Sterbestatistik pflegen und veröffentlichen. Jeder Todesfall wird in Deutschland über die Standesämter exakt erfasst.

Doch die Überraschung: Das Statistische Bundesamt liefert uns auf diese einfache Frage zwei extrem unterschiedliche Antworten – ein Minimum und ein Maximum. Das Ergebnis hängt davon ab, wie tief man in die Veröffentlichungen des Bundesamtes eintaucht. Betrachtet man nur die Webseiten und Pressemitteilungen, erhält man den Eindruck eines Maximums. Schaut man jedoch etwas tiefer in die Tabellen und Rohdaten, zeigt sich plötzlich ein Minimum. Aber wie kann das sein? Beides gleichzeitig geht ja wohl kaum. Wer lügt hier – die Tabellen des Amtes oder die Pressemitteilungen? Gehen wir dieser Frage Schritt für Schritt auf den Grund.

2020: Ein historisches Maximum?

Schauen wir uns die vielen Hundert Veröffentlichungen des Statistischen Bundesamtes aus dieser Zeit an. Oder wir kürzen ab und fragen ChatGPT, da die KI auf diesen Daten trainiert wurde und das gesamte Material kennt. Die Frage an ChatGPT lautet also: Wie war das Sterbegeschehen im Jahr 2020 im Vergleich zu den Vorjahren?

ChatGPT antwortet: »Im Jahr 2020 war die Sterblichkeit in Deutschland höher als in den Jahren zuvor. Es gab eine Übersterblichkeit von etwa 982.000 Todesfällen, das sind rund 46.000 mehr als der Durchschnitt der Vorjahre (2016 bis 2019). Dieser Anstieg wurde überwiegend im Zusammenhang mit der COVID-19-Pandemie gesehen. Während die Sterbezahlen in den Vorjahren schwankten, war ein solch signifikanter Anstieg wie 2020 bisher nicht zu beobachten.«

Wir fragen konkreter: Ist es ein Fakt, dass wir eine so ernste Lage im Sterbegeschehen wie im Frühjahr 2020 noch nie erlebt haben?

ChatGPT bestätigt: »Ja, die COVID-19-Pandemie führte im Frühjahr 2020 zu einer außergewöhnlichen Situation im Sterbegeschehen in Deutschland. Die dramatische Übersterblichkeit, die ab der 13. Kalenderwoche auftrat, veranlasste das Statistische Bundesamt, besonders eindringliche Warnungen zu veröffentlichen. Der damalige Vizepräsident des Amtes und andere führende Stimmen wiesen öffentlich darauf hin, dass die Todesfallzahlen stark vom Durchschnitt abwichen. Diese klare Warnung richtete sich an die Öffentlichkeit und die Politik gleichermaßen. Die Medien berichteten intensiv über diese Warnungen, was das Bewusstsein für die Schwere der Pandemie erheblich schärfte. In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten hatte es keine vergleichbare Übersterblichkeit gegeben, die eine solch umfangreiche Kommunikation durch das Statistische Bundesamt erforderlich gemacht hätte.«

Ein gut informierter Zeitungsleser wird sich an dieser Stelle bestätigt fühlen: Ja, so war es damals. Ein Maximum im Sterbegeschehen – wegen der Pandemie. Oder etwa nicht?

2020: Ein historisches Minimum?

Tauchen wir in die Rohdaten des Statistischen Bundesamtes ein. Die Tabellen, die das Amt seit Jahrzehnten verlässlich veröffentlicht, nennen sich Sterbetafeln. Diese werden jährlich bereitgestellt und stehen auf der Website des Bundesamtes zum Download bereit. Ein erster Blick in die Sterbetafeln mag den Laien abschrecken, doch mit einer kurzen Erklärung wird alles verständlich. Wir gehen schrittweise vor.

Nehmen wir die Sterbetafel des Jahres 2017. Sie enthält zwei große Tabellen – eine für Männer und eine für Frauen. Jede Zeile der Tabelle steht für einen Jahrgang, zum Beispiel zeigt die Zeile 79 die Daten der 79-jährigen Männer. Besonders wichtig ist nun die zweite Spalte, in der der Wert 0,05 eingetragen ist. Das bedeutet, dass 5 Prozent der 79-jährigen Männer im Jahr 2017 verstorben sind. Das ist die wichtige Kennzahl. Wenn wir diesen exakten Wert, den man auch als Sterberate bezeichnet, nun in ein Säulendiagramm eintragen, erhalten wir eine leicht verständliche visuelle Darstellung (Grafik 1).

Es ist wichtig zu betonen, dass dieser Wert weder ein Schätzwert noch eine Modellrechnung oder Prognose ist, sondern ein exakter Messwert, basierend auf einer zuverlässigen Zählung. Sterberaten (für die Fachleute auch Sterbewahrscheinlichkeiten qx) sind seit Johann Peter Süßmilch (1707–1767) der Goldstandard der Sterbestatistik. Jeder Aktuar wird das bestätigen. Fügen wir nun die Sterberaten der 79-jährigen Männer aus den Jahren davor und danach hinzu, um das Gesamtbild zu sehen (Grafik 2). Und nun die entscheidende Frage: Zeigt das Jahr 2020 ein Maximum oder ein Minimum?

Ein kritischer Leser könnte vermuten, dass die 79-jährigen Männer eine Ausnahme darstellen und andere Jahrgänge im Jahr 2020 ein Maximum zeigen würden. Doch das trifft nicht zu. Kein einziger Jahrgang verzeichnete im Jahr 2020 ein Maximum. Im Gegenteil: Auch die 1-Jährigen, 2-Jährigen, 3-Jährigen, 9-Jährigen, 10-Jährigen, 15-Jährigen, 18-Jährigen und viele weitere männliche Jahrgänge hatten ihr Minimum im Jahr 2020. Dasselbe gilt bei den Frauen. Insgesamt hatten 31 Jahrgänge ihr Minimum im Jahr 2020. Wenn wir schließlich alle Jahrgänge in einer einzigen Grafik zusammenfassen, ergibt sich ein klares Bild: Das Minimum im Sterbegeschehen lag im Jahr 2020 (Grafik 3).

Ein kritischer Leser könnte nun wiederum vermuten, dass es innerhalb des Jahres 2020 möglicherweise starke Ausschläge nach oben bei einzelnen Jahrgängen gegeben haben könnte, die später durch Ausschläge nach unten ausgeglichen wurden – und dass diese Schwankungen in der jährlichen Übersicht nicht sichtbar sind. Doch auch das trifft nicht zu. Ein Blick auf die wöchentlichen Sterberaten zeigt, dass die ersten acht Monate der Pandemie keine nennenswerten Auffälligkeiten aufweisen. Es bleibt dabei: Die Rohdaten des Statistischen Bundesamtes bestätigen zweifelsfrei, dass die ersten acht Monate der Pandemie das historische Minimum im Sterbegeschehen darstellen. (Für die Fachleute sei angemerkt, dass im gleichen Zeitraum die Lebenserwartung die historischen Höchststände erreicht hatte – Grafik 4.)

So konstruierte das Amt aus einem Minimum ein Maximum:

Zur Erinnerung: Die Rohdaten des Statistischen Bundesamtes, die in den jährlichen Sterbetafeln zweifelsfrei dokumentiert sind, zeigen für das Jahr 2020 eindeutig ein Minimum im Sterbegeschehen. Aus diesen »in Stein gemeißelten« Zahlen ein Maximum zu »konstruieren«, ohne die Rohdaten selbst zu verändern, scheint auf den ersten Blick eine unlösbare Aufgabe. Jeder Student würde an einer solchen Herausforderung scheitern. Doch das Statistische Bundesamt hat einen kreativen Weg gefunden - ein Meisterstück gezielter Manipulation. In fünf Schritten zeigt sich, wie diese Täuschung der Öffentlichkeit umgesetzt wurde:

(1) Ignorieren der Sterberaten: Die präzisen, objektiven und leicht verständlichen Sterberaten aus den eigenen Sterbetafeln wurden konsequent ignoriert und verschwiegen. Diese Daten widersprachen dem gewünschten Narrativ und wurden daher gezielt ausgeklammert.

(2) Fokus auf absolute Todeszahlen: Die Aufmerksamkeit wurde stattdessen auf die absolute Zahl der Todesfälle gelenkt. Diese wirkt allein durch ihre schiere Größe dramatisch und emotionalisiert die Diskussion. Ein entscheidender Faktor wurde dabei ignoriert: Die absolute Zahl der Todesfälle steigt aufgrund der demografischen Entwicklung jedes Jahr an. Viele Menschen verstehen diesen Zusammenhang nicht und verbinden die steigenden Zahlen fälschlicherweise mit der vermeintlichen Pandemie.

(3) Einführung der Übersterblichkeit als neue Kennzahl: Erst ab Beginn der „Pandemie“ wurde die Kennzahl "Übersterblichkeit" eingeführt – und dies mit einer fragwürdigen Methode, die systematisch überhöhte Werte lieferte. Diese Kennzahl wurde regelmäßig, oft monatlich oder sogar wöchentlich, berechnet und diente als ständige Grundlage für alarmierende Schlagzeilen.

(4) Intensive Öffentlichkeitsarbeit: Durch eine breit angelegte Kampagne wurden die manipulativen Kennzahlen gezielt in den Fokus gerückt. Pressemitteilungen, Podcasts und öffentliche Auftritte konzentrierten sich fast ausschließlich auf die absoluten Todeszahlen und die Übersterblichkeit. Ziel war es, den Eindruck einer dramatischen Situation in der Öffentlichkeit zu verstärken.

(5) Bekämpfen kritischer Stimmen: Kritiker, die die Schwächen und manipulativen Aspekte dieser Methoden aufdeckten, wurden systematisch diskreditiert. Ihre Glaubwürdigkeit und Kompetenz wurden öffentlich infrage gestellt, um das sorgsam konstruierte Narrativ zu schützen.

Ohne diesen begleitenden Statistik-Betrug wäre das gesamte Pandemie-Theater meiner Meinung nach nicht möglich gewesen. Wer aus einem faktischen Minimum ein scheinbares Maximum "erschafft", handelt betrügerisch. Die Folgen dieses Betruges sind gravierend. Denken wir an die Angst, die in der Bevölkerung geschürt wurde – die Angst, bald sterben zu müssen. Denken wir an Masken, Abstandsregeln, isolierte ältere Menschen, Kinderimpfungen und all die Maßnahmen, die unter anderem auf diese falsche Statistik zurückgehen.

Wollen wir Bürger uns das gefallen lassen?

Wenn wir als Bürger zulassen, dass ein derart offensichtlicher und nachprüfbarer Täuschungsversuch ohne Konsequenzen bleibt, dann gefährdet das nicht nur die Integrität unserer Institutionen – es untergräbt das Fundament unserer Gesellschaft. In der DDR feierte man öffentlich Planerfüllung und Übererfüllung, während die Regale leer blieben. Damals wusste jeder: Statistik war ein Propagandainstrument. Niemand traute den Zahlen, die das Staatsfernsehen verkündete.

Während der Pandemie war es anders. Die Menschen vertrauten den Mitteilungen des Statistischen Bundesamtes und des RKI – blind. Die Enthüllungen durch den "RKI-Leak" haben gezeigt, dass auch das Robert-Koch-Institut nicht der Wissenschaft, sondern den Weisungen des Gesundheitsministers und militärischen Vorgaben folgte. Warum sollte es beim Statistischen Bundesamt anders gewesen sein? Diese Behörde ist dem Innenministerium unterstellt und somit ebenfalls weisungsgebunden.

Die Beweise für Täuschung liegen offen zutage. Es braucht keinen Whistleblower, keine geheimen Enthüllungen: Die Rohdaten des Statistischen Bundesamtes sprechen für sich. Sie sind öffentlich einsehbar – klar und unmissverständlich. Die Daten, die Tabellen, die Veröffentlichungen des Amtes selbst – sie sind die Anklageschrift. Sie zeigen, was wirklich war. Nicht mehr und nicht weniger.

Und wir? Was tun wir? Schweigen wir? Oder fordern wir endlich ein, was unser Recht ist? Wir Bürger dürfen das nicht hinnehmen. Es ist Zeit, unsere Behörden zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen. Diese Institutionen arbeiten nicht für sich – sie arbeiten für uns. Wir finanzieren sie, und wir haben das Recht, Transparenz und Verantwortung einzufordern. Manipulationen wie diese müssen aufgearbeitet werden und dürfen nie wieder geschehen. Die Strukturen, die solche Fehlentwicklungen in unseren Behörden ermöglicht haben, müssen offengelegt werden. Denn eine Demokratie lebt von Vertrauen – und Vertrauen muss verdient werden. Jeden Tag aufs Neue.

.

.

MARCEL BARZ, Jahrgang 1975, war Offizier der Bundeswehr und studierte Wirtschafts- und Organisationswissenschaften sowie Wirtschaftsinformatik. Er war Gründer und Geschäftsführer einer Softwarefirma, die sich auf Datenanalyse und Softwareentwicklung spezialisiert hatte. Im August 2021 veröffentlichte Barz den Videovortrag »Die Pandemie in den Rohdaten«, der über eine Million Aufrufe erzielte. Seitdem macht er als "Erbsenzähler" auf Widersprüche in amtlichen Statistiken aufmerksam.

@ df478568:2a951e67

Affiliate Links

I earn a commission for these products and services, but I would recommend them even if they did not pay me.

BTCPins

Strike

Cash App

PayPerQ

This is the cheapest way to use AI on the Internet. The pics are spectacular. It cost me about 20 sats to make the cover for this affiliate page.

Start9 I don’t really have an affiliate link for these guys, but I would like one. Anyway, they make the easiest home servers. I highly recommend them. I like that I can use the cloudflare tunnel app to host everythng on the clearnet. Let me know if you need any help with this.

Recommendations

These companies do not pay me, but I recommend them anyway.

Subscribe To Support My Work

I use PayWithFlash to create a Substack like subscription. You can subscribe for as little as 1,000 per month. If that is too many sats to ask, you could always zap my articles instead. Thank you.

The Leather Mint

The Leathermint makes great, custom-sized leather belts and awesome-looking wallets. I have a belt and it fits better than any belt I’ve ever warn because it’s custom size. I have had mine for about a year. The chrome is coming off a little at the top but I don’t tuck in shirts anyway.

CoinKite

They make my favorite products ever. I suggest getting a few SEEDPLATE® Kit’s no matter what hardware wallets you use. I also like using a dry-erase marker first because there are no second chances when punching a letter. It’s best to use a dry-erase marker first. If you make a mistake erase it. Then, after you double checked the first side, go over the dry-erase marker with a permanent marker. Then do the same to the other side. If you’re sure every letter is correct, punch the holes.

There are many plates with sufficient heat resistance, but I like the SEEDPLATE because they are the easiest to destroy if you ever need to. Instead of etching out stamps on washers, you just add extra punches if you must destroy the seed.

Alby Hub

Look, if you want to run your own lightning node, this is the way to go. If you have a Start9 or are technical, you can run it yourself. If you’re less technical, they offer a cloud service. I was one of the early beta testers of this software and I think it’s the easiest way to run a lightning node.

Free and Open Software

Primal.net os a corporation building stuff on nostr. If you’re technical, you can run it yourself. If not, you ca download the app for free. They charge a fee for premium services. I pay for this because I want to support companies that contribute to nostr development and help bitcoin be used as peer-to-peer electronic cash.

I think of Primal as a custodial bitcoin wallet that allows anyone to participate in the biggest circular economy in the world. TikTok was banned in the United States which means it is no longer available for citizens of the United States to download the app. There are ways to get around these restrictions, but I choose not to because I do not want the CCP, or any government to have access to information if their goal is to use it against me. I believe every government, foreign or domestic wants to use your information against you. Nostr allows me to opt out of these stupid games with stupid likes.

With Primal, I am the customer, not the product. I choose the algorithms I want to see, not the CCP , USG or corporations. Even if Primal decided to say, “Marc sucks. We will now censor him.” I will only lose the https://primal.net/marc, the OG status, and my primal lightning address. It also means they would stop getting my sats every month, so they are incentivized not to censor. You would have to do something really stupid to get banned from Primal. I’m not sure it’s been done yet, but even if it has, you will not get banned from the nostr protocol.

Portainer

Portainer makes it easy to run docker-containers. I first learned how to use it because it is an app on Umbrel. Eventually, I learned you can use Portainer on any Linux computer, so that’s what I do. It takes some time to learn, but once you do—you become a cloud computing super-wizard.

Mealie

Mealie is one of my favorite pieces of free and open software that is not related to bitcoin in any shape or form...except it makes grocery shopping easier. I know what you’re thinking. WTF does that have to do with bitcoin? I assume you belong to the I Want More Bitcoin Club. You are in good company because ALL Bitcoiners are a member of this club. One way you can stasck more sats is to cut your grocery bill. I believe Mealie helps me do just that.

When I’m grocery shopping, my goal is to get as much healthy food for my sats as possible. To accomplish this, I shop sales. Now, if you’re living in a van, this won’t do much for you, but no worries. You will stack even more sats by cutting your housing costs. If your wife will not agree to live under a bridge and stack sats, then get a freezer in your garage. Fill it with meat you buy on sale. Pork shoulder is 3,000 sats per pound and you don’t what to cook it with? Find a recipe online. Mealie will use machine learning to scrape the ingredients from the recipe. Then you can add it to a grocery list. In other words, you can automate your grocery list right at the grocery isle. This is one way I save sats with Mealie.

I also keep the things my family eats on a regular basis in stock. This is part for emergency preparedness, but it is also for financial preparedness. If you are in a situation where no food is available, all the bitcoin in the world will not save you. I’m not talkig about super volcanos. Hurricanes, tornadoes, and earthquakes happen. So I got this idea from Jack Spirko, but modified it to use with mealie.

Spirko suggests building a 30 day supply of food and water for your family in case of an emergency. You should have a generator and a garden too, but I don’t want to get off track. Once you have this he says: write down every item you use on a notebook and replace it.

This is good advice, but I just add it to my grocery list in mealie.

Shopstr

Shopstr is like Facebook marketplace, Amazon, or eBay on nostr. This is what I use to build my store. I want to pause point out how big of a paradigm shift this is. The old web requires permission. Ebay needs permission from the government to become a corporation. They built infrastructure to create their online auction. Everyone on the site must pay eBay a tax. This results in a techno- feudalist society.

When you sell on Shopster, you are selling your wares on nostr, a protocol, not a platform. This changes the relationship between the people and the technology because NO MIDDLEMAN IS REQUIRED. On nostr, there are no digital overlords. You own your data. You host your store. If the current digital overlords shut it down, you can run it yourself. You do not need to pay a tax to eBay, Amazon, or the PayPal mafia.

Avocados

I love avocados. They are kind of like free and open source software because you can grow them yourself. ;) I love avocados and big avocado ag did not pay me to say this.

@ fd208ee8:0fd927c1

I am so tired of people trying to waste my time with Nostrized imitations of stuff that already exists.

Instagram, but make it Nostr. Twitter, but make it Nostr. GitHub, but make it Nostr. Facebook, but make it Nostr. Wordpress, but make it Nostr. GoodReads, but make it Nostr. TikTok, but make it Nostr.

That stuff already exists, and it wasn't that great the first time around, either. Build something better than that stuff, that can only be brought into existence because of Nostr.

Build something that does something completely and awesomely new. Knock my socks off, bro.

Cuz, ain't nobody got time for that.

@ 000002de:c05780a7

I just finished the audio book read by Norm himself. I must say, if you love Norm you will love this book. I highly recommend the audio book. I don't want to spoil anything but the book is like sitting down with Norm and listening to him tell you stories. You never know what is true or false and if the whole thing IS the joke. I laughed out loud many times.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/857482

@ 89b108e3:e30c3ad3

Fun88 là một trong những nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến hàng đầu, nổi bật với giao diện hiện đại và dễ sử dụng, mang lại trải nghiệm mượt mà cho người dùng. Với thiết kế tối ưu hóa cho cả máy tính và các thiết bị di động, Fun88 cho phép người dùng truy cập và tận hưởng các dịch vụ giải trí mọi lúc, mọi nơi. Tốc độ tải nhanh và khả năng tương thích vượt trội của nền tảng này giúp mọi trải nghiệm của người dùng diễn ra suôn sẻ và không gặp phải sự gián đoạn, từ đó đảm bảo sự hài lòng tuyệt đối. Fun88 không chỉ chú trọng đến sự tiện lợi mà còn cam kết cung cấp dịch vụ ổn định và chất lượng cao trong suốt quá trình sử dụng.

Một trong những điểm mạnh của Fun88 là kho nội dung đa dạng và phong phú, được cập nhật liên tục để đáp ứng nhu cầu giải trí của mọi đối tượng người dùng. Nền tảng này mang đến những trải nghiệm thú vị và mới mẻ với các thể loại nội dung khác nhau, từ các trò chơi phổ biến đến những xu hướng giải trí độc đáo. Dù bạn yêu thích thể thao, âm nhạc, hay các chương trình giải trí khác, Fun88 luôn có những lựa chọn hấp dẫn và phù hợp với sở thích cá nhân của từng người dùng. Chất lượng nội dung luôn được bảo đảm, giúp người tham gia luôn cảm thấy mới mẻ và thú vị mỗi khi truy cập.

Bảo mật là yếu tố quan trọng mà FUN88 đặt lên hàng đầu. Nền tảng này áp dụng các công nghệ bảo mật tiên tiến để đảm bảo rằng mọi thông tin cá nhân và giao dịch của người dùng luôn được bảo vệ tuyệt đối. Chế độ mã hóa mạnh mẽ giúp bảo vệ các dữ liệu nhạy cảm và tạo dựng niềm tin từ người dùng. Không chỉ đảm bảo an toàn trong các giao dịch, Fun88 còn có hệ thống kiểm soát nghiêm ngặt nhằm ngăn ngừa những hoạt động bất hợp pháp, đảm bảo rằng mọi người dùng có thể tận hưởng dịch vụ trong một môi trường an toàn và bảo mật tuyệt đối.

Chăm sóc khách hàng là một yếu tố then chốt giúp Fun88 xây dựng được mối quan hệ lâu dài với người dùng. Đội ngũ hỗ trợ khách hàng của Fun88 luôn sẵn sàng phục vụ 24/7, đảm bảo người dùng sẽ không gặp phải bất kỳ trở ngại nào trong suốt quá trình trải nghiệm. Các chuyên gia hỗ trợ của Fun88 rất am hiểu về nền tảng và có khả năng giải đáp mọi thắc mắc một cách nhanh chóng và chính xác. Sự tận tâm và chu đáo của đội ngũ hỗ trợ khách hàng đã góp phần không nhỏ vào việc duy trì sự hài lòng và niềm tin của người dùng đối với nền tảng này.

Fun88 không chỉ là một nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến, mà còn là một cộng đồng kết nối những người yêu thích sự giải trí chất lượng cao. Với sự kết hợp giữa công nghệ hiện đại, nội dung phong phú, bảo mật tuyệt đối và dịch vụ khách hàng tận tình, Fun88 đã và đang xây dựng được lòng tin của hàng triệu người dùng trên toàn cầu. Nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm một điểm đến giải trí đáng tin cậy và thú vị, Fun88 chính là sự lựa chọn lý tưởng. Hãy gia nhập ngay hôm nay để khám phá thế giới giải trí đầy màu sắc và tận hưởng những phút giây thư giãn tuyệt vời!

@ 6bae33c8:607272e8

The 40-minute edited version of Ravens-Bills wasn’t available this morning so I chose the 1:55 commercial-free full-length one instead. What a monumental waste of my morning. Why watch an entire game for it to end via a dropped two-point conversion? What is the purpose of even playing the game? A child can catch a two-yard pass.

Truth be told, the Ravens scored way too early, and the Bills probably would have driven into field-goal range anyway, but in those conditions, no kick was guaranteed. Moreover, the Ravens wouldn’t even have been in that situation but for the retarded play call on the prior two-point try where after Derrick Henry and Justice Hill gashed the Bills for 10 yards every rush, the Ravens tried to get tricky from two-yards out.

Of course, there was also the senseless Lamar Jackson fumble that was returned 40 yards and the earlier Mark Andrews fumble while trying to run backwards for no reason. Just a total waste of time.

I look forward to seeing the Bills win next week, only to have the refs cheat them out of it.

• The Chiefs got all the calls against a game Texans team. The Texans will be back, especially if they fix the offensive line. Cheating or not, it’s amazing the Chiefs are always in the Conference Title game — this makes seven straight.

• Travis Kelce looked like he was still in his late prime.

• I was rooting for the Lions — if only to retain one of my only commenters, Tony, who has no doubt defenestrated and won’t be contributing here any more. Turns out you can’t win without a defense.

• Jared Goff channeled Sam Darnold at the least opportune time too.

• Jahmyr Gibbs was electric. If the Lions had a lead he might have had 300 YFS.

• The Eagles will probably win at home, but Caleb Williams over Jayden Daniels might be even worse than Bryce Young over C.J. Stoud.

• The Rams were awfully close to hosting the NFC title game. I thought with one minute left, inside the 20, they should have run the ball at least once with the Eagles bringing the rush every play. It only takes one hole, and defenders slipping and sliding everywhere in the snow.

• Saquon Barkley might be the GOAT when fully healthy. He’s like Derrick Henry with pass-catching skills. I’d love to see him win Super Bowl MVP.

• It’s amazing how many great backs there are in the league right now: Henry, Barkley, Gibbs and a healthy McCaffrey might be four of the top-10 ever.

• The Texans, Rams and Ravens arguably outplayed their opponents this weekend, but couldn’t advance. I love the snow game aesthetic, but it adds a lot of randomness.