-
@ rewolf
2025-05-24 09:30:04
If a non custodial money transmitter is responsible for a few of their users using it for criminal purposes, that same ruling should surely apply to mobile phone service providers when users make calls or send each other messages for criminal purooses, or to ISPs if any of their users do criminal activities using their internet service. Why is it just money? What about ATMs or banks that give money to people who then do crime?
It sets such a ridiculous precedent
https://fountain.fm/episode/oYedbajUiCvb9U5hb5TF