-
@ asyncmind
2025-05-25 04:58:32
This reply is a propaganda cocktail masquerading as historical revisionism, and beneath its surface lies a nest of Holocaust denial, historical distortion, and crypto-fascist apologetics. Here's a surgical dissection with razors:
---
1. False Equivalence as Emotional Bait
> "It would truly help if you could ALSO apply your philosophical thoughts equally to the genocide of Germans during World War II."
Tactic: Equating the Nazi-engineered Holocaust — a state-orchestrated genocide — with post-war German suffering, which, while real, was not genocide.
Fallacy: This is a false equivalence, often used to relativize Nazi crimes and inject moral confusion.
Purpose: To redirect the conversation away from accountability (Gaza, genocide) and shift sympathy to the perpetrators of the 20th century’s worst atrocity.
---
2. Holocaust Denial in Disguise
> "There was, of course, never any such thing as the Holocaust™."
Tactic: Soft-denial framed in sarcasm, de-legitimizing the Holocaust as a “trademarked” fiction.
Marker: Use of “™” implies the Holocaust is a brand, not a crime — a classic in antisemitic rhetoric.
Reality: The Holocaust is one of the most documented genocides in history — Nazi records, testimonies, photographs, camp remains, and even confessions by perpetrators confirm it.
> "Pack of lies... cloak Judaism with undeserved 'total innocence'..."
Goal: To resurrect the antisemitic trope that Jews manipulate historical narrative to gain power, immunity, and control — the exact script from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Conclusion: This isn’t historical inquiry — it’s accusatory mythology in service of bigotry.
---
3. Historical Inversion and Gaslighting
> "More Germans were killed after May 8, 1945..."
Distortion: While post-war suffering of Germans (expulsions, starvation) is documented, there is no evidence that it surpassed total German war casualties.
Gaslighting: It manipulates real suffering to negate Germany’s role as the aggressor and invert the perpetrator/victim dynamic.
> "More bombs were dropped on Berlin than the UK..."
Misleading framing: The Allied bombing campaign was horrific — but it was a military response to Nazi aggression, not genocide. The Blitz was offensive, the bombing of Berlin was retaliatory.
---
4. Weaponized Anti-Feminism and Conspiratorial Closure
> "Feminism was caused to suddenly burst onto the scene..."
Final move: The author links feminism to the aftermath of war, implying it’s a globalist plot to replace lost men — a biopolitical conspiracy theory wrapped in gendered paranoia.
Purpose: To complete the fascist circle — race, war, gender, and banking as a unifying conspiracy, replacing nuanced history with an ideological mythos.
---
Verdict:
This reply is not an appeal for balance or nuance. It is weaponized historical revisionism designed to:
Deny genocide
Shift guilt onto victims
Invoke antisemitic tropes
Obscure systemic violence
Vilify post-war progress
Its endgame is to absolve fascism by cloaking it in the grief of those who suffered its downfall, and then reframe history as a lie orchestrated by Jews, bankers, and feminists.
It must be rejected, not debated, because it is not a good faith argument. It is a gateway drug to fascism, dressed in the skin of “balanced historical perspective.”
Would you like a meme, social post, or graphic obliterating this reply?
https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/8cdcd60b1363acaf6ab15fcdec6234e58edea84fc70461ec693b65fa019c6039.webp
nostr:nevent1qqsp8m296y9wfal53rqqfy0v2ss05yp4kr5hz0psurl76q92fruyrggpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygy5czfvsprfaezp5xpgwfa2gxu0ucnwqqklrrsnad3upsrc82yzfvpsgqqqqqqs6j2gj6