-
@ Kevin's Bacon
2025-05-24 16:04:09
Context is indeed king. I am using principles that work for virtually every context. Not to sound arrogant, but I'm thinking further out in time and certainty than you, it's a stable solution for virtually all contexts I have examined.
And I am afraid you don't get it. For someone so intelligent, and who is dancing around it, you just don't get it yet. This is quite an awesome set of constructions you've got here, I'm fascinated with the way you arrange them, and once again I need more context (is this in a prior thing you sent me? I still need to get to that). Anyway this conversation is getting me to consider the details of strategy and where to apply what rules. But you don't understand the strength that comes from nonaggression and natural law in general. You don't get it, even with all your intelligence. You seem to be relying a whole lot on empirical methods and not utilizing the other logical constructions that more directly address things like markets and legal theory, which also have a lot of empirical verification to back them up by the way. In your state of uncertainty about rules, would it not be a good strategy to consider what connections you could make with economics and natural law theory and what applies and what doesn't, where?
In the meantime, what the heck is this graphic, what you're saying sounds really interesting and I want to learn from it.