-
@ Garrettstr 🌸
2025-05-04 18:51:11
LLMs are the best, here’s the context for those that liked this message and need it:
What is this saying?
This piece is a Bitcoin advocacy rant, stylized with humor and cultural commentary, aimed at critiquing consumerist habits—embodied by “Temu joggers”—while emphasizing a serious concern: Bitcoin’s viability as a store of value is threatened if it fails to become a medium of exchange.
Let’s break it down:
⸻
Who or what are “Temu joggers”?
“Temu joggers” are a metaphor for:
• Hyper-consumerist behavior, especially cheap, disposable purchases made via platforms like Temu.
• People who prioritize comfort, convenience, and consumption over principles like decentralization or monetary sovereignty.
• A stand-in for the masses who say Bitcoin can’t be “real money” because you can’t use it to buy “real things”—like joggers (pants).
They aren’t just hypothetical critics—they’re painted as the overwhelming majority of society: people who just want cheap stuff fast, and will adopt whatever payment system (fiat, stablecoins, CBDCs) makes that easier.
⸻
What is the main message?
1. Bitcoin’s store-of-value use case is not enough
While Bitcoiners often say “just HODL” (hold long term as a savings technology), the piece warns that this won’t be sustainable if it’s not also used for spending. If no one buys goods with Bitcoin, critics will eventually be right when they claim it’s useless.
2. Medium of exchange is a battleground
The threat is clear: if Bitcoin isn’t being spent, and stablecoins/digital dollars dominate transactions, Bitcoin becomes irrelevant in everyday life, making it easier for skeptics (joggers) to mock or ignore it.
3. Consumer behavior matters
Every time someone chooses to buy more cheap crap in fiat instead of supporting a Bitcoin-native business, they empower the fiat system and delay Bitcoin adoption.
4. The call to action:
Start the “flywheel” of Bitcoin circular economies. Buy something with sats. Support Bitcoin-native companies. Be the change—literally. Otherwise, the consumerism army wins by default.
⸻
Why is this emotionally charged?
• It’s urgent, using strong language and sarcasm to shake the reader out of complacency.
• It portrays Bitcoiners as having a mission—to build an alternative economy—and failure as a moral and existential defeat.
• It satirizes how the world chose “easier pants” (joggers) over real change, yet asks Bitcoiners to lead by example—even if it starts with buying soap.