-
@ btcttombola
2025-05-03 13:24:45
nostr:nprofile1qyjhwumn8ghj7cn40faxymm594ex2mrp0yhxyatvd35hx6rzda6kuare9e3k7mgprfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuum4v3hkxctjd3hhxtnrdaksqgxfax7upvpuyx7nx7sjmn6mgc75nld0azz25y4mj5xpst57fklfhqy6fmt5 and nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshsqg9tvep3k80m46uqtf4aysm9cgzxc73zdr0xgw7sdy9yjn9qg2mstsmg2qrx
aren't integrated to clients.
For survey it could be enough.
For rating, you are true, perhaps a new NIP if is does not ever exist ?
The feature adoption by usage make it a norm.
Which client will include it first ?
And another question, does this rate compatible with free speech ?
For example Palestinian could bad rate Israeli notes, and the opposite too.
And It doesn't mean their note are bad for everyone.
It is the same with Russian and Ukrainian. Or just every people that are against other.
So this rate could be useful to know interesting notes, but not to exclude and make invisible others.
Perhaps likes/zaps are enough finally because they are only "positive" rate ? You can't unzap or unlike a note. Just make best notes come over others (if it is the filter you use as reader that matter).
For profile rating it is a little different, because it could be used as a "trust" rate.
And if it is not automatically used by client and relay to exclude npub from the network, it could be useful has an information profile to help people trust each other and find the ones they want to follow.
#asknostr #nostridea