-
@ LiโฟฮสLiรธฮท ๐ดaยณ
2025-05-13 20:58:30
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฆ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต: ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผโ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐จ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฒ
It might be science fiction, but how could a Technocratic government attack the privacy of Monero?
1984 was supposed to be a work of fiction and not a paper for the techno bureaucrats.
We must be prepared, because I believe this will happen sooner rather than later ๐๐ป
If GPUs embed covert telemetry that logs memory operations and transmits them to central servers, Moneroโs privacy model is effectively compromised at the silicon level.
Even though Monero uses ring signatures, stealth addresses, and bulletproofs, these protections are irrelevant if the hardware leaks pre-encryption data or execution patterns.
This isn't a theoretical riskโif mining operations, transaction processing, or memory access patterns are traceable by design, then global deanonymization becomes technically feasible.
Adversaries could map mining nodes, correlate wallets, and retroactively trace โanonymousโ activity.
This amounts to a hardware-level backdoor that bypasses cryptographic guarantees.
Privacy becomes a myth if the GPU is a snitch.