-
@ b799e60f:07815677
2025-05-18 03:38:11
I see where you're coming from — it's true that Bitcoin's base layer has strict limits on throughput, and Lightning was developed in response to that. But isn't that kind of the point? The base layer prioritizes decentralization and security, while layer 2 solutions like LN aim to handle speed and scalability — much like how the internet is built in layers.
When you say it's a "band-aid" for "chronic problems," do you mean you’d prefer Bitcoin to scale directly on-chain? Or are you pointing to something deeper, like mining centralization or usability barriers?
Genuinely curious about your view — always interesting to hear different takes on whether LN complements or compromises Bitcoin’s vision.