-
@ David
2025-06-13 16:15:20
in my opinion, anyway, drone technology is superior to nuclear weapons. which funny enough nobody aside from a few documented cases have ever been used, and the ones dropped on japan were not plutonium based explosives, they were based on actual hydrogen, thus they called them "H-Bombs" and hydrogen, when ignited, with sufficient oxygen to initiate combustion - the ratio is very tolerant and will initiate with very low levels of oxygen, and this creates a flame that reaches upwards of 3000 degrees C, that is extremely impulsive, think like a petrol bomb, but make it the size of a car and under extremely high pressure, it is sufficient to emit so much light and infrared radiation, especially, that it effectively can flatten a whole city. but it's not plutonium. and all the other cases are specious in that they are hidden under all kinds of classification and it is entirely plausible that the claimed detonations were in fact staged propaganda and the technology, like HAARP and others, is in fact a fraud mainly to make a lot of money for owners of weapons manufacturers.
drones, on the other hand, are very much real, very effective, and are essentially like bullets that move a lot slower and have a potential to carry a much bigger bomb not just a fast moving ballistic object. they can enable striking specific people, there is devices that identify people by ethnicity and race, there is remote controlled ones but also fully autonomous ones, they are really the successor to the missile technology, which uses low altitude and small size instead of ever increasing altitude and speed.